Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIII (B) Public Hearings: Ordinance No 95-01, adopting amendments to the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan in Case Nos CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 AGENDA 1-26-95 Item III B "CENTERORANGE" MAYOR• LOMMDottm OF GOOD LIVING-PRIDE OF WEST NenS.SCOTT VANDERGRIFT 4 Ocoee � � COMMISSIONERS ► jupq ' CITY OF OCOEE RUSTY JOHNSON PAUL W.FOSTER O 150 N.LAKESHORE DRIVE SCOTT A.GLASS 4,. O OCOEE,FLORIDA 34761-2258 JIM GLEASON J,'j • (407)656-2322 CITY MANAGER Of GOOD ELLIS SHAPIRO SRP-470 STAFF REPORT DATE: January 20 , 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Russ Wagner, Director of Planning SUBJ: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-1-9-93 Lake Lotta Mall CPA-2-9-93 Lake Lotta Center Ordinance No. 95-01 ISSUE: Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners adopt Ordinance No. 95-01 amending the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan in connection with Case No . CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 and authorize the staff to transmit them to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for Compliance Determinations? BACKGROUND: On May 26 , 1994 , the City Commission held an advertised public hearing on the proposed amendments in Case No . CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 and voted to transmit the subject Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for their review and comment . These proposed Future Land Use Map changes are directly related to the Lake Lotta Mall DRI and Lake Lotta Center DRI and are therefore exempt from the usual twice-a-year restriction on Comprehensive Plan Amendment transmittals . These proposed Amendments must , however, be approved at the same meeting at which the proposed DRI projects are considered. CPA-1-9-93 solely involves a Future Land Use Map Amendment changing 60 . 4 acres of High Density Residential , 37 . 3 acres of Medium Density Residential and 20 . 4 acres of Low Density Residential to 118 . 1 acres of Commercial . Upon approval of CPA-1-9-93 , the proposed Lake Lotta Mall DRI will be consistent with the Ccoee Comprehensive Plan. CPA-2-9-93 solely involves a Future Land Use Map Amendment changing 20 acres of High Density Residential and 15 acres of Low Density Residential to 35 acres of Commercial . Upon approval of CPA-2-993 , the proposed Lake Liv( �N� Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments January 20 , 1995 Page 2 Lotta Center DRI will be consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. On August 15 , 1994, the attached Objections, Recommendations , and Comments (ORC) Report was received from DCA in response to the City's transmittal . For the most part , DCA requested further information to verify that the City could provide adequate public facilities to support the two DRI projects . DISCUSSION: The attached response to the DCA ORC Report was prepared by the developers ' consultants to assure that the proposed Land Use changes were consistent with City, regional and state goals and policies affecting transportation facilities , aquifer recharge and open space, wetland wildlife habitat, the Wekiva River basin, solid waste, sewer and water facilities and drainage. This additional analysis confirms that area roadways can accommodate the final reduced development program proposed for the combined projects , since the maximum development potential of each site was previously evaluated and it was demonstrated that traffic impacts could be mitigated when proper transportation improvements are provided. The response indicates that appropriate safeguards are in place to assure that impacts associated with drainage will be properly mitigated by following local and state regulatory standards . These provisions will also ensure adequate aquifer recharge, protect the Wekiva River basin and preserve wetland wildlife habitat . Additionally, provisions to ensure adequate public facilities for solid waste, water and sewer have been made fully documented in the response. The entire response package was carefully evaluated by Staff to verify that the Future Land Use Map change would be consistent with regional and state goals and policies as well as the goals and policies set forth in the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. The developers ' consultants also had DCA Staff informally review the response to ensure that all of their concerns were adequately addressed . Ordinance No . 95-01 (attached) sets forth the findings , purpose and intent of the proposed amendments and provides for the adoption of the proposed Future Land Use Map changes . It is necessary for the City Commission to adopt Ordinance No . 95-01 in order to make findings that the proposed Lake Lotta Mall DRI and Lake Lotta Center DRI are consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. In accordance with Florida Statutes , this Ordinance becomes effective only upon a Compliance Determination by DCA which is typically completed within 45 days of receipt of the adoption ordinance. Also, the Ordinance only becomes effective if the City Commission subsequently approves development orders for the Lake Lotta Mall DRI and Lake Lotta Center DRI . Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments January 20 , 1995 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that Ordinance No . 95-01 be approved and authorize execution thereof by the Mayor and City Clerk; that the response dated January 18 , 1995 to the Objections , Recommendations and Comments Report be approved; and that the Director of Planning be authorized to transmit to DCA the following: 1) the attached response dated January 18 , 1995 to the Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report; 2) a copy of Ordinance No. 95-01 which adopts the proposed Comprehensi a Plan Amendments; and 3) a letter outlining all information as specified by Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code required for he adoption of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment . RBW/emk Attachment Page 1 RESPONSE TO DCA OBJECTIONS,RECOMMENDATIONS,AND COMMENTS FOR THE CITY OF OCOEE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 94D1 LAKE LOTTA MALL AND LAKE LOTTA CENTER L Listed below are the DCA objections, recommendations, and responses for both Amendments CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93,which propose to amend the Future Land Use Map. A. The amendment did not provide an analysis of the character and magnitude of the existing vacant and/or undeveloped land in order to determine its suitability for use, including impact on the Wekiva River Basin,wetland wildlife habitats, and aquifer recharge areas. The proposed amendment sites are located in an area with high potential for groundwater recharge with an estimated absorption rate of 20 inches annually. In addition, the analysis did not include a review of the proposed amendment's consistency with the Plan's Goals, Objectives, and Policies. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J-5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rule 9J-5.006(2)(b), 9J-5.011(1)(g) and (h), 9J- 5.011(2)(b)5, 9J-5.011(2)(c)4, 9J-5.013(1)(a), 9J-5.013(2)(b)2, 9J-5.013(2)(c)1, and 9J-11.006(3),F.A.C.). Recommendation Include an analysis that addresses the character and magnitude of the existing vacant and/or undeveloped land and that determines the site suitability for the proposed use. This analysis must consider impacts to the Wekiva River Basin,wetland wildlife habitat, and aquifer recharge areas with the maximum development potential of each amendment site. In addition, the analysis must include a cumulative effect of all approved development on the Wekiva River Basin and the recharge areas. Further, the analysis must include a review of the proposed amendments consistency with the Plan's Goals, Objectives, and Policies. Revise the amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 2 Response As of 1990, there existed 310.9 acres of commercial land use within the City of Ocoee. There were also 539.2 acres of land designated for commercial land use, but not developed for commercial land use. Much of this vacant land does not have approvals in place and has not requested approvals to proceed with any commercial development. The projected need for commercial land use in the City is 1,179.9 acres in the year 2010. The projects included in these amendments (Lake Lotta Center and Lake Lotta Mall) account for 35 and 118.1 acres, respectively, of new commercial land use. The acreages involved for the two projects (153.1 acres), when added to areas currently designated for commercial use (850.1 acres), equals 1,003.2 acres, which is within the projected need of 1,179.9 acres. The two projects contain a total of 165 acres of commercial use with 11.9 acres already designated as commercial on the Future Land Use Map, leaving 153.1 acres for inclusion in this amendment. It should be noted that the projected commercial need of 1,179.9 acres did not anticipate regional needs. The 130 acres for the mall is in addition to the acreage needed for local commercial and does not compete with local commercial. The sites are capable of being developed in such a way as to preclude adverse impacts to the Wekiva River Basin, wetland wildlife habitat and recharge areas, and sufficient regulations are in place to ensure that adequate protection does occur. The City of Ocoee's Land Development Code Section 6-7 regulates Surface Water Management to provide for pollution abatement, recharge, and protection from flooding. The projects will be required to meet those requirements as well as the requirements of the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). Specific design criteria for the projects include: 1. Providing water quality treatment for on-line systems in the amount of 1- inch of runoff or the total runoff from 1.25 inches over the impervious plus 0.50-inch from the total site. 2. Providing "recharge" retention volume of 3 inches of runoff from directly connected impervious areas. 3. Providing on-site retention of the pre-development vs post-development runoff volume for the 25-year/96-hour storm. 4. Providing detention of the 100-year/24-hour storm. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations, and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 3 The projects' stormwater management systems will not degrade recharge capabilities or effectiveness. Please note that the projects are in the high recharge area of the Wekiva River Basin, but are not in the Wekiva River Protection Area as defined in 369.303(a), F.S. These sites recently underwent DRI review. The appropriate inventories and evaluations were conducted. Gopher tortoises were found on-site and an acceptable mitigation plan must be approved prior to development. No actions may be taken which will result in the harming, pursuit, or harassment of wildlife species classified as endangered, threatened, or a species of special concern. Regulated wetlands, i.e., those around Lake Lotta, will be preserved without impact. The projects are consistent with the City's level of service standards and the related policies of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the cited objective of the Conservation Element: Policy 1.4 The City of Ocoee will maintain a level of service standard for water quality based upon the following minimum design standards: Facility Design Stormwater • Provide retention of the first 1/2-inch of runoff, or quality ponds • Provide retention with filtration of the first 1/2-inch of runoff. • Provide retention for water quality purpose consistent with new and innovative techniques. Policy 2.7 In new developments a detention system shall be provided which is capable of providing sufficient storage to limit peak discharge rate of the post-development site to the peak discharge of the pre-development site consistent with the regulations of the SJRWMD. Policy 2.8 All stormwater management systems within a subdivision shall be designed and installed in order to provide adequate flood protection for all structures and to protect the structural integrity of all roadways. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 4 Policy 2.15 Retention/detention areas shall be designed and located so as to not adversely reduce the existing flood storage of the floodplain. Policy 4.4 The City of Ocoee shall maintain a level of service standard "C" based on the following minimum design standards: Design Storm(Minimum) Facility Design Storm Bridges >= 50-Year Canals, ditches, or culverts for drainage 25-Year external to the development Crossdrains, storm sewers 10-Year Roadside swales for drainage internal to 25-Year the development Detention basins 25-Year Retention basins (no positive outfall) 100-Year Recharge areas 25-Year Require the rate of stormwater discharge from new development to be equal to, or less than, the rate of discharge that exists prior to development, based on a 25-year frequency, 24-hour duration storm event. Objective 4 (Conservation Element) Through the planning period, the City's wetlands shall be conserved and protected from physical and hydrologic alterations, through the implementation of the policies which follow. (Chapter 187.201, 8(b)2, 4, 8, 10 and 14, 10(a), 10(b)1, 2, 6, 7 and 10;ECFRPC Regional Issue 37,Policies 37.4 and 37.12, Regional Issue 38, Policies 38.2 and 38.5,Regional Issue 43, Policies 43.1 and 43.8, and Regional Issue 60, Policy 60.30.) Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 5 B. The amendment did not provide an analysis of the availability of transportation facilities and the maximum development potential of both amendments and their cumulative effect on the adopted level of service. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J-5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rules 9J- 5.006(2)(b), 9J-5.006(3)(b)1,7, 9J-5.007(2)(b), 9J-5.007(3)(b)1 and 2, 9J- 5.019(3)(0, J5.019(3)(f), and 9J-11.006(3),F.A.C.). Recommendation Include an analysis of the availability of transportation facilities and their maximum development potential of both amendments and the effect on the adopted level of service. This analysis should include a cumulative analysis of all approved and potential development on the existing transportation facilities. Revise the amendment as necessary, to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response The development programs originally analyzed for the two projects represented the maximum development potential of the sites as allowed by the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDR). The projects as evaluated contained a total of 2,175,000 gross square feet(gsf) of commercial space on 165 commercial acres for a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of.30. The actual proposed program has been reduced to 1,851,431 gsf, so the actual traffic impacts will be less than those analyzed. Attachment A, incorporated herein, presents a summary of the final revised traffic analysis for the two projects. The impacts of the initial phase of the projects were found to be acceptable and consistent with the City's adopted LOS "D" for roads. Monitoring and modeling will be required before subsequent phases can be undertaken. Policy 1.11 of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan limits commercial development to a maximum FAR of.30; therefore, the development program analyzed in the traffic studies will not be exceeded. Any proposal to exceed the maximum F.A.R. of.30 would require an additional amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Also, Section 4-5 of the LDR provides standards for Planned Unit Developments. Based on the requirements for stormwater management, open space, parking, setbacks, landscaping and maximum impervious surface ratio, the development programs analyzed in the traffic studies will not be able to be exceeded. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 • Page 6 The additional control of the City's Concurrency Management System is also in place to monitor and regulate development. C. The amendment did not provide an analysis of the availability of sanitary sewer facilities to serve the proposed amendment site and the amendment's effect on the adopted level of service for the sanitary sewer facilities. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J- 5 J5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rules 9J-5,006(2)(b), 9J-5.011(1)(f), and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.). Recommendation Include an analysis of the availability of sanitary sewer facilities to serve the proposed amendment site. This analysis should include a cumulative analysis considering the demands attributable to all approved and planned development on the sanitary sewer facilities. Revise the amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response The Lake Lotta Mall and Lake Lotta Center projects will be served by the City of Ocoee Wastewater Treatment Facility located on A.D. Mims Road. The plant capacity is currently 3.00 MGD. The DEP construction permit allows the City to treat up to 1.5 million gallons per day. This figure represents the current permitted effluent disposal capacity of the ponds at the plant site and at the golf course. The City is continuing to work with DEP to further increase the permitted disposal capacity. During the 1994-95 fiscal year, the ponds at the plant site will be reconfigured to increase the amount of effluent disposal capacity. The City will also focus on reuse programs over the next several years to increase the DEP effluent disposal capacity in order to maximize use of the plant. The current wastewater flow is approximately 0.82 MGD (August 1993-July 1994); therefore, before expansion, approximately 2.17 MGD of capacity is available. The Lake Lotta Center project will generate approximately±0.213 MGD at buildout and the Lake Lotta Mall project will generate approximately±0.08 MGD at buildout, for a total of±0.293 MGD for the two projects. Therefore, sufficient capacity is available for the two projects, with an additional 1.88 MGD still available for new future development. The property has guaranteed, reserved capacity, so the demand was previously accounted for in the system. The Developer, its successors and assigns, have certain rights to water and sewer service capacity as set forth in and pursuant to the terms and conditions of(1)the City of Ocoee, Florida-Water Plant No. 4 Potable Water Supply Agreement dated January 24, 1994 (the "1984 Water Supply Agreement"), (2) certain Wastewater Developer's Agreements dated December 30, 1987, having Contract Numbers OWW-87-2, OWW-87-3, OWW- Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 • Page 7 87-4, OWW-87-5, OWW-87-8, OWW-87-10, OWW-87-11, and OWW-87-12 (the "New Agreements"), (3)that Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 3, 1987, as amended (the "1987 Sale Agreement"), (4)those Stipulations for Settlement dated December 21, 1987, in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court(Case No. CI 87-2462) and the United State District Court, Middle District(Case No. 87-387-CIV-ORL-19) and that City Resolution No. 87-23, dated December 29, 1987 authorizing certification of the Stipulations (the "Stipulations"), (5)that Developer's Agreement dated November 22, 1988 by and between the City and Developer(the "November 22, 1988 Developers' Agreement for Water Service"), and(6) that Amendment to City of Ocoee Wastewater Developers' Agreements Nos. OWW-87-2, OWW-87-3, OWW-87-4, OWW-87-5, OWW-87-8, OWW-87- 10, OWW-87-11, and OWW-87-12 dated October 1, 1992 (the "October 1, 1992 Agreement"). These six items are hereby collectively referred to as the "Water and Sewer Agreements." D. The amendment did not provide an analysis of the availability of the solid waste facility to serve the proposed amendment site and the amendment's effect on the adopted level of service for the solid waste facility. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J-5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy with Rule 9J-5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rules 9J-5.006(2)(b), 9J-5.006(3)(b)1, 9J-5.011(1)(f), 9J-5.011(2)(b)2, and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.). Recommendation Include an analysis of the availability of the solid waste facility to serve the proposed amendment site. This analysis should include a cumulative analysis of all approved development on the solid waste facility. Revise the amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response All the solid waste generated by the residents and businesses in the City of Ocoee are sent to the Orange County Landfill. Based upon the County's Comprehensive Policy Plan, the landfill has an estimated remaining capacity of 3.5 million tons. The County has purchased an additional 3,300 acres next to the existing landfill that will extend capacity of the landfill for at least an additional 20 years. The entire development program for the Lake Lotta Center will generate approximately 8.32 tons/day of solid waste. The Lake Lotta Mall project is estimated to generate 18.76 tons/day for a total of 27.08 tons/day for the two projects. Therefore, sufficient capacity is available to service the two projects. A letter from Orange County verifying available capacity is attached to and incorporated in this response as Attachment B. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 8 E. The amendment did not provide an analysis of the availability of drainage facilities to serve the proposed amendment site and the amendment's effect on both the Wekiva River Basin and the adopted level of service for the drainage facilities. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J-5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rules 9J-5.006(2)(b), 9J-5.006(3)(b)1, 9J-5.011(1)(h) and (g), 9J-5.011(2)(b)2, and 9J-11.006(3),F.A.C.). Recommendation Include an analysis of the availability of drainage facilities to serve the proposed amendment site and the impact on the Wekiva River Drainage Basin. This analysis should include a cumulative analysis of all approved development on drainage facilities. Revise the amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response The master surface water management system for the two projects will be designed to meet or exceed the standards established by the SJRWMD and the City of Ocoee. Specific design criteria for the projects include: 1. Providing water quality treatment for on-line systems in the amount of 1- inch of runoff or the total runoff from 1.25 inches over the impervious 0.5- inch from the total site. 2. Providing "recharge" retention volume of 3 inches of runoff from directly connected impervious areas. 3. Providing on-site retention of the pre-development vs. post-development runoff volume for the 25-year/96-hour storm. 4. Providing detention of the 100-year/24-hour storm. The water flow pattern will remain essentially unchanged since both pre- development and post-development surface water discharge are ultimately to Lake Lotta. Changes in the routing to Lake Lotta are inconsequential, since the stormwater system will retain the 100-year design storm. This will result in a reduced discharge rate to Lake Lotta during the storm event. The timing of discharge will be altered such that peak rates of discharge are lowered and such that the discharge of stored volume (bleeding down for system recovery)will occur after the design storm event. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 9 Consistent with best management practices for water quality and quantity, and the requirements of the SJRWMD and the City of Ocoee, the proposed stormwater management system is expected to consist of a combination of wet and dry bottom stormwater management ponds, exfiltration trenches, and underground storage vaults(as optional systems); with volume recovery provided by natural percolation, underdrains, bleeders and/or the exfiltration trenches. Storage in the parking areas may be utilized. Skimmers will be used as needed to minimize discharge of floatables. Because the SJRWMD's aquifer recharge criteria require a minimum retention of 3-inch over the impervious area, discharge from storms of less than 3 inches will range from none to minimal. Since this represents the overwhelming majority of all rainfall events, no degradation of water quality in adjacent waterbodies is anticipated. The retention and filtration of the 100-year, 24-hour storm runoff volume, as discussed above, with only bleeder recovery of the system, will minimize impacts on receiving bodies from any increase in site runoff volume. A comparison of pre-development and post-development volumes for the 100- year, 24-hour design storm is provided in the table below: PRE-DEVELOPMENT VS. POST-DEVELOPMENT VOLUME COMPARISON 100-YEAR, 24-HOUR DESIGN STORM Runoff Volume Discharge Volume Condition (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) Existing 36.52 18.28 Proposed 93.47 0* • Does not include bleed-down volume. The projects are consistent with the City's level of service standards and the related policies of the Comprehensive Plan as noted under item IA of this response. F. The amendment did not provide an analysis of the availability of potable water facilities to serve the proposed amendment site and the amendment's effect on the adopted level of service for the potable water facilities. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J- 5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rules 9J-5.006(2)(b), Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations, and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 10 9J-5.006(3)(b)1, 9J-5.011(1)(h), 9J-5.011(2)(b)1 and 2, and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.). Recommendation Include an analysis of the availability of potable water facilities to serve the proposed amendment site. This analysis should include a cumulative analysis of all approved development on potable water facilities. Revise the amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response At present, the City of Ocoee's water system is permitted for up to 2.88 MGD. Actual usage per day over the last 12 months has been approximately 2.61 MGD. Based on the development program for Lake Lotta Center, approximately 0.236 MGD is the anticipated need for buildout. Another 0.094 MGD is estimated to be needed for the Lake Lotta Mall project for the a total of 0.330 MGD for the two projects. This year, the City is schedule to have two new wells in service which will increase the number of gallons the City is permitted to pump. This increase in the consumptive use permit is expected to meet the needs of the system for anticipated growth in the City for the next several years. The demand for the projects has already been accounted for in the system, as the property has guaranteed, reserved capacity. The Developer, its successors and assigns, have certain rights to water and sewer service capacity as set forth in and pursuant to the terms and conditions of(1)the City of Ocoee, Florida-Water Plant No. 4 Potable Water Supply Agreement dated January 24, 1994 (the "1984 Water Supply Agreement"), (2) certain Wastewater Developer's Agreements dated December 30, 1987, having Contract Numbers OWW-87-2, OWW-87-3, OWW- 87-4, OWW-87-5, OWW-87-8, OWW-87-10, OWW-87-11, and OWW-87-12 (the "New Agreements"), (3)that Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 3, 1987, as amended (the "1987 Sale Agreement"), (4) those Stipulations for Settlement dated December 21, 1987, in the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court (Case No. CI 87-2462) and the United State District Court, Middle District (Case No. 87-387-CIV-ORL-19) and that City Reolution No. 87-23, dated December 29, 1987 authorizing certification of the Stipulations(the "Stipulations"), (5)that Developer's Agreement dated November 22, 1988 by and between the City and Developer(the "November 22, 1988 Developers'Agreement for Water Service"), and (6)that Amendment to City of Ocoee Wastewater Developers' Agreements Nos. OWW-87-2, OWW-87-3, OWW-87-4, OWW-87-5, OWW-87-8, OWW-87- 10, OWW-87-11, and OWW-87-12 dated October 1, 1992 (the "October 1, 1992 Agreement"). These six items are hereby collectively referred to as the "Water and Sewer Agreements." Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations, and Comments January 18, 1995 • Page 11 G. The amendment did not provide a cumulative analysis of the impact of the proposed land use amendments on Open Space which effects the existing aquifer recharge areas. Absent this analysis the amendment has not demonstrated consistency with Rule 9J-5 and the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan (Rule 9J-5.014(2)(b), 9J-5.014(3)(b)4, 9J-5.014(3)(c)2, and 9J-11.006(3),F.A.C.). Recommendation Include a cumulative analysis of the impact of the proposed land use change on Open Space which affects the existing aquifer recharge areas. This analysis should include the standards the City will utilize to protect the Open Space and aquifer recharge areas and the corresponding goals, objectives, and policies. Revise the amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by this data and analysis. Response The projects are located in a designated area of"Most Effective Recharge" by the SJRWMD. To conform with criteria of the SJRWMD, policies of the ECFRPC and regulations of the City of Ocoee, the stormwater management system will be designed to provide retention of 3 inches of runoff from directly connected impervious areas. Please refer to item E. for additional information regarding the stormwater management system. Section 4-5 of the City's Land Development Regulations limits impervious surfaces to 70 percent of a site and at least 20 percent of a site must be preserved as open space. The requirements of the SJRWMD, the ECFRPC, and the City of Ocoee provide adequate protection of the recharge capabilities of the project sites. The projects are consistent with the City's level of service standards and the related policies of the Comprehensive Plan as noted under item IA of this response. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Page 12 IL CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendments are not consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan, including the following goals and policies (Rules 9J-5.021(1) and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.. a. Goal 8 (Water Resources),Policies 2, 5, 9, 10 and 12; b. Goal 10 (Natural Resources),Policies 1, 3, 11 and 13; c. Goal 16 (Land Use),Policies 1,3, 6; d. Goal 18 (Public Facilities),Policies 1, 2, 3, 8 and 10; e. Goal 20 (Transportation),Policies 3, 9, and 15. Recommendation Revise the amendment to be consistent with, and further, the State Comprehensive Plan including the above-referenced goals and policies. The revisions provided in response to the recommendations for the items in Section I provide the necessary information to establish consistency with the above-referenced goals and policies. Adequate measures are provided to protect the areas of concern identified. III. CONSISTENCY WITH THE REGIONAL POLICY PLAN The proposed amendment is not consistent with the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan, including the following goals and policies (Rules 9J-5.021(1) and 9J- 11.006(3),F.A.C.): a. Goal 37 (Water Supply),Policies 37.4 and 37.5; b. Goal 38 (Water Resources),Policies 38.2 and 38.15; c. Goal 43 (Natural Resources),Policies 43.2, 43.3, 43.9, 43.11 and 43.13; d. Goal 46 (Parks and Recommendation),Policies 46.1 and 46.6; _ e. Goal 51 (Wastewater),Policy 51.1; f. Goal 57 (Development),Policies 57.1, 57.2, 57.3 and 57.6; g. Goal 63 (Transportation),Policies 63.3 and 63.8. Recommendation Revise the amendment to be consistent with, and further, the East Central Florida Regional Policy Plan including the above-referenced goals and policies. The revisions provided in response to the recommendations for the items in Section I provide the necessary information to establish consistency with the above-referenced goals and policies. Adequate measures are provided to protect the areas of concern identified. Response to DCA Objections,Recommendations,and Comments January 18, 1995 Attachment A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Page 1 Attachment A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS LAKE LOTTA PROJECT January 2, 1995 INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIS) is a revision of the Traffic Impact Study(TIS) contained in the Second Sufficiency Response to the Lake Lotta Mall Development of Regional Impact (DRI) dated February 4, 1994. The revisions contained in this report reflect the change to the Lake Lotta Center DRI development program. The revised development program and phasing schedule is shown in Table 1. This revised analysis was conducted based on the methodology approved for use in the original traffic study presented in the Application for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact (ADA/DRI). The application of this methodology was adjusted to incorporate the following: • Revised Development Program • Revised Access Plan (no connection to Good Homes Road) • Revised Roadway Network(no extension of Clarke Road) The analysis was done for Phase 1 (Year 1997) for roadway segments only, because Phase 2 will be subject to monitoring and modeling. Since the estimate number of trips with one end in the Lake Lotta Project(revised program) are approximately 13 percent less than those reported in the ADA, no additional analysis was conducted for intersections. The assumption was that 13 percent less project traffic would not result in any changes to intersection LOS or significance. Following is a summary of the methodology used in this revised traffic analysis. Trip Generation Estimates of trip generation for the revised development program, based on ITE, are summarized in Table 2(Year 1997) and Table 3 (Year 2000). The methodology for estimating internal capture was the same as used in the ADA/DRI. A summary of PM peak-hour internal capture is presented in Table 4. Pass-by trips were estimated using the formulas contained in the ITE Trip Generation Report. These estimates were adjusted down so as not to exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic volumes (non-site traffic)based on the ECFRPC policy. Traffic Analysis Lake Lotta Project January 2, 1995 Page 2 Table 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Lake Lotta Mall Project Phase 1 Phase 2 DRI Land Use 1997 2000 Total Lake Lotta Mall DRI Regional Mall 1,100,000 GLA 150,000 GLA 1,250,000 GLA Retail 100,000 GLA 150,000 GLA 250,000 GLA Lake Lotta Center DRI Retail -- 275,000 GLA 275,000 GLA Multifamily 200 DU -- 200 DU Single-Family 151 DU -- 151 DU GLA-Gross Leasable Area(Square Feet) DU-Dwelling Unit Source: Glatting Jackson Karcher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,Inc. Traffic Analysis Lake Lotta Project January 2,1995 a 0000 00 cin ein O^ ON h e%ry Z ^cn O .-- t N .4 v E" C le 'O e h N en en C d Z Li C. ul en O O ^ N at O 'C r. N N x F 4 INOs re a ON X 1 a op �p W�+ L Cl V % 0 * o O ,p r. � . en -. w„ is o e+1 •rr e7 G F g 00 V O N V'. _. W ', a F W O � o a � 0 es 40 g N eu '�O 0 0 O 0 coM 5 el 2j U 00 00 N N E °I © p:1 a ce I ti 00 gl g OM FMI O 0 0 OA A tiN k" «: o o N a .. ; p o o ce 00 '" Sr I cn 11 1 AA 6. p N p ,..q R; A AO V eq • QQQ �_ to M 'V M 4 en - N r. V1 eri. e4 D C C Zt h h h h F-, eN'1 1.) 114 4 00 4 00 11 N 0% ;3 In — � !h d cN.1 v ccef ? N ... -Il N 1 o © 4 N $ vii vii h h vii °PD 1.2 a 00 '.O 0 %0 0 .-. en lit 0 N N1 oo 'NG ONO I 0000 I .N-• 00 m VVI N iM 1C 1n r g 040 'C O N 0 1441 — h .-. e 0. .. .-. .-. K eA '►. W 9 2 oft 1 4 e� e?% 00 eT .. • A O Ea N a °\N .d Ta N U 040 000 000 ON0 ONO N N F 1 r 11 w 1 X W CD CI g g g "Ws A A 1 p d tri d .. E , 2 ..._ d gi Imi in ao VI r4 VI cr 1 A A D � 1 X111111E1 8 5v A o 4 c H w Page 5 Table 4 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK-HOUR INTERNAL CAPTURE Lake Lotta Mall Project Phase 1 From/To Mall Retail Multifamily Total Mall 0 0 5 5 Retail 0 0 0 0 Multifamily 5 0 0 5 Total 5 0 _ 5 10 Phases 1 and 2 From/To Mall Retail Multifamily Total Mall 156 82 0 238 Retail 82 0 0 82 Multifamily 0 0 0 0 Total 238 82 0 320 Source: Glatting Jackson Karcher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,Inc. Traffic Analysis Lake Lona Project January 2,1995 Page 6 Adjustments to Systems Forecasts DRI trips were adjusted following the methodology used in the ADA/DRI. This adjustment re- assigned DRI traffic on the four roadway segments surrounding the site(Clarke Road, White Road, Good Homes Road and SR 50). This re-assignment used in this study assumed no connection to Good Homes Road. These adjustments were made to better reflect how (route) and where (site access)vehicles would access the individual development parcels within the Lake Lotta Project(see Exhibit 1). The re-assignment took into account those comments reviewed in the first and second requests for additional information. An example of this procedure is detailed in Attachment C. Total daily forecasts were converted to peak-hour directional volumes based on the "K" and "D" factors used in the ADA/DRI. The resulting peak-hour directional volumes were used to determine the operational level of service. Phase 1 (1997)total peak-hour directional volumes were compared to existing peak-hour directional volumes and,in cases where existing volumes were higher than the forecasted 1997 volumes (Table 5),the 1997 forecasted volumes were replaced by the existing volumes increased by a factor of 1.06. DRI daily forecasts(as adjusted)were converted to peak-hour directional volumes using the ITE "K" and"D" factors. The resulting peak-hour directional volumes were used to determine significance of project traffic. Evaluation The level of service analysis for roadway segments was conducted using a staged approach. Stage 1 compared the total volumes to the service volumes reported in the FDOT Generalized Level of Service Guidelines. If the Stage 1 analysis produced a level of service below the acceptable minimum, a Stage 2 analysis was performed using service volumes estimated from the ART_TAB software program(Exhibit 2). A summary of PM peak-hour directional volumes, service volumes, levels of service and project traffic as a percent of LOS "C" are presented in Table 6(1997). Projected improvement needs are summarized in Revised Table 7(1997). Traffic Analysis Lake Lotta Project January 2, 1995 Page 7 EiCHIBIT 1 The projected daily trips with one end in the Lake Lotta Project were assigned from the roadway segments adjacent to the site to the various project entrances based on proximity and intensity of development within the site. The site was divided into four major parcels: 1)the Lake Lotta Center retail west of Clarke Road, 2) the mall, 3)the multi-family parcel, and 4)the single-family parcels. A percentage of total trip generation was calculated for each of the five parcels. For each parcel, this percentage was applied to the DRI volumes projected for each adjacent segment and the resulting volume was assigned to the most reasonable path to access the parcel. For example, the Lake Lotta Mall represents 79 percent of the total trip generation for Phase 1. The modeled forecast for SR 50 west of Clarke Road is 5,380. Of the seventy-nine percent of 5,023 (4,250), 2,125 was assigned east on SR 50 to Clarke Road, then north to the Lake Lotta Mall, and 2125 was assigned east on SR 50 to the mall entrance on SR 50. This procedure was followed for each adjacent roadway segment volume(DRI volume), for each of the five development parcels for each phase. The only other adjustment was the re-assignment of DRI trip ends which the model assigned from the East-West Expressway(westbound)to Kirkman Road(northbound)to SR 50 (westbound)to the site. The adjustment kept 60% (750 ends) on the East-West Expressway to Clarke Road to access the site. This adjustment was made for Phase 1 only. These adjustments were discussed at the meetings held with the ECFRPC and the City of Ocoee staff on July 14, 1993, at the City of Ocoee and on July 21, 1993, at the ECFRPC. Traffic Analysis Lake Lotta Project January 2, 1995 Table 5 SUMMARY OF 1993 AND 1997 PM PEAK-HOUR/PEAK-DIRECTION VOLUMES Lake Latta Project . r i \ r''. �'^^• '`''''''''"%4X'1 aat.at,k `." cl \\i. „Nerd r oL= 1. ,. -''s k.n,-.. :. tir 1997.:.I \�-� �,r `Z'•!1 'wi;e,"1.4 ,-'-'t'•,•'"?''' t p _ �+-� 7 S%0.\ y rte c i',-,=i-4---,- r,... r �;;;.a.----,..4',:', --;*r} ,y„ t 2,".v 77. �'., L8II•• -s t.:.,8 ,,-- `T aSA • .-, . ••CCw .O w\Pe�$t -Reek •oa.ora . � .; :Sezmeat• "n" Y., ?Class :' • 1:." L' .:., ��'"fl'A/PDI:`. ._FOS: 'D Dir:....„.,Dir...:., CR 535 Tilden-SR 50 2 Col 560 E 1 760 I 508 I 447 j Main St. SR SO-Story 2 COL 560 E 7601 231 31.11 Story-W.Plant 2 COL 560 E 7601 241 1 Dillard(SR 537) SR 50-Story 4 ART(B) 1650 D 17701 480 275 Story-W.Plant 4 ART(B11 1650 D 1770 1 674 260 j IMarshall Farms Rd. 'SR 50-Maguire 2 COL 560 D 1 690 I 377 1 aguire Rd Roberson-SR 50 2 COL 560 D 690 I 445 5591 SR 50-Kissimmee 2 ART(A) 850 D 10301 265 Masuire-Story 2 ART(A)L 850 D 1030 I 636 Kissimmee Ave. Story-Ocoee-Apopka 2 ART(A)I 850 D 10301 497 ; Ocoee-Apopka -Franklin 2 ART(A)1 850 D 10301 171 'Ocoee-Apopka Rd. Franklin-Silver Star 2 ART(A)1 850 D 10301 814 Silver Star-Fuller's Cross 2 ART(A)I 850 D 1 10301 463 I Bluford Ave. SR 50-Story 2 COL I 560 I D 6901 547 4111 Story-White 2 COL E 5601 D 6901 560 536 White -Sliver Star 2 COL 5601 D 6901 597 j 2S7 1 Clarke Rd. SR 50-S.Site Enc. 4 COL I 12301 D 1 1520 I 5451 662- 1S.Site Ent.-MId Site Entrance 4 COL 1 12301 D 1 15201 5451 671 Mid Site Ent.-Multi-Family Eat. 4 COL 1 1230 I D I 15201 545 I 8-0 Multi-Family Ear.-White 4 COL 1 12301 D 1 1520 5451 856 I White -Silver Star 4 COL 1 12301 D 1520 5551 1,1171 Silver Star-Wurst 4 CCL 1 12301 D 1520 337 I 531 1Wurst-Clarcona-Ocoee 4 COL 1 1230 D r 1520 1 4941 tApopka-Vineland Rd. Conroy Windermere-Gotha 2 COL 1 560 E 760 1 6541 Gotha -Old Winter Garden 2 COL 1 560 E 760 431 I 465 ' Good Homes Rd. Old Winter Garden-E,W Xway [ 2 COL 1 560 E 7601 414 I 3241 E/W Xway-SR 50 2 COL r 560 E 760 513 I 291 SR 50-Site Entrance 2 COL 1 560 E 760 I 5231 5781 Site Entrance-Balboa 2 COL 1 560 E 7601 523 6231 Balboa-White 2 CCL 1 560 E 760 I 469 660 White -Silver Star - 2 COL 1 560 E 7601 487 3111 Apopka-Vineland Rd. Silver Star-A.D.Mims 2 COL 1 560 E 1 760 946 574 A.D.Minis -Clarcona-Ocoee 2 COL 1560 E 760 239 Hiawassee Rd. 'Conroy Windermere -Metro West 4 ART(A)r 1900 E 2600 719 Metro West-Old Winter Garden 4 ART(A)1 1900 E 2600 1.423 1,557 Old Winter Garden-ENV Xway 4 ART(A)1 1900 E 2600 1.580 1,733 E/W Xway-SR 50 4 ART(A)1 1900 E 2600 1,438 1,919 SR 50-Balboa 4 ART(A)1 19001 E 2600 1,934 1,813 Balboa -Silver Star 4 ART(A)1 1900 E 2600 1,940 1,736 Silver Star-Clarcona-Ocoee 4 ART(A)1 1900 E 2600 1,741 1.538 Powers Dr. Old Winter Garden-SR 50 • 2 COL _ 5601 E 760 606 5.5. SR 50-Silver Star 2 COL 5601 E 760 619 382 Silver Star-Clarcona-Ocoee 2 COL 560 I E 760 822 468 Florida's Turnpike I—1-E/W Xwav 4 F(2) 2780 I C 2780 1.140 1,609 E/W Xway-SR 50 4 F(2) 2780 I C 2780 1,182 2,210 SR 50-East 4 F(2) 2780 C 2780 816 2.043• Old Winter Garden Rd. Kirkman-Powers 4 COL 1230 E 1650 1,220 1,345 Powers -Hiawassee 4 COL 12301 E 1650 1,214 953 Hiawassee -Apopka-Vineland 2 COL 5601 E 760 797 894 Apcoka-Vineland -Good Homes 2 COL 5601 E 760 741 621 Good Homes-Citrus Oaks 2 COL 5601 E 760 505 330'. ,Citrus Oaks -SR 50 , 2 COL 5601 E 760 529 521 Note:Service volumes for SR 50 and Old Winter Garden Road are based on ART_PLAN(from Orange County Comprehensive Plan,modified to include proposed traffic signals) Source:Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,Inc. Table S(Continued) SUMMARY OF 1993 AND 1997 PM PEAK-HOUR/PEAK-DIRECTION VOLUMES Lake Latta Project p2 n "�" Y r '!.,",,.,y `F!;:::v. .:tNi 41:,. '.7.:67,--w��. rWo�o `R -r? 4,.......' °Li;`;.19 3;,-; 7'7:j rr a"'-. 1/...r .... fra:,,..��.�-c--s' a n LOS �C,,a.::Ac e k . aS FCaIc` talo' '''''':::^ -'-'s •oa.a -;..u.� �'. :Sezmenr '. r ,..,Class x"(PHMPD) LO.4 a(PH/PD1. :^''D'".� 41:311,7 .:- East-West f East-West Expressway Kirkman-Hiawassee 4 F(2) 1 27801 C 2780 I 6321 851 Hiawassee -Good Homes 4 F(2) 27801 C 27801 468 1 1.262 Good Homes -SR 50 4 F(2) 2780 I C 2780 I 4121 1,177 SR 50 -Florida's Turnpike 4 F(2) 2780 I C 2780 I 3551 601 ,SR 50 John Youne Parkway-Pine Hills 6 ART(B) 1730 D 2400 I 2.2791 2.314 Pine Hills-Kirkman 6 ART(B) 1730 D 24001 2.'_541 2.173 Kirkman-Powers 4 ART(B) 1020 D 1840 I 1,764 I 1,611. + Powers-Hiawassee 4 ART(B) 1020 D 18401 1,5591 1,420 Hiawassee-Good Homes 4 ART(B) D 1 1,2011 1.783 IGood Homes-Mall Entrance 4 ART(B) D I 8951 1.578. Mall Ent.-Retail Entrance 4 ART(B) D I 8951 1.400 Retail Eat.-Citrus Oaks 4 ART(B) D I 8951 1.400 1 Citrus Oaks -Clarke 4 ART(B) D I 1,036 I 1.324 I Clarke -Old Winter Garden 14 ART(B) 16501 D 1770! 1.269 1 1.695 I Old Winter Garden-Maeuire �4 ART(B) 1650 1 D 1 17701 1,2311 1.661 I IMacruire -Marshall Farms 4 ART(B) 1650 1 D I 1770; 1.489 1 1.456 i 'Marshall Farms -Dillard 4 ART(A) 1900 1 D 2210' 1.489 I 1.612 'Dillard -Main 14 ART(A) 1900 i D 2210 i 1.458 1 1,237 i 'Main- CR 545 4 ART(A) 1900 i D I 2210 1 1.573 I 1.333 I Balboa Dr. Powers -Hiawassee 2 COL 560 I E 690 1 394 394 Hiawassee-Good Homes 2 COL 5601 E 760 1 402 554. Geneva St. 1Bluford-Kissimmee 2 COL 5601 E 760 I 513 Story Rd. Kissimmee -Woffcrd I 2 COL 560 1 D 690 I 310 382 Wofford -Dillard I 2 COL 560 I E 760 I 310 347 'Dillard -Main I 2 COL 5601 E 760 I 569 'Main-W.Plant 2 COL 560 I E 7601 207 I White Rd. 'Good Homes-Multi-Family Ent. 2.00L 560 I D 1 690 I 433 408 Multi-Family Ent.-Clarke 1 2 COL 560 I D 690 1 483 408 Clarke Multi-Family Ent. 2 COL 560 1 D 690 1 265 423' Multi-Family Ent. -Bluford 2 COL 560 I D 690 265 429 Franklin St. [Ocoee-Apopka -Crown Point 2 ART(A) 8501 D 1030 587 I 280 Silver Star Rd.(SR 438) Powers -Hiawassee 6 ART(A) 2860 I E 1 3890 945 1.315 lHiawassee -Acepka-Vineland 12 ART(A) 850 I E 1280 1,173 1.234 'Apopka-Vineland -Good Homes 2 ART(A) 8501 E 1230 739 837. Good Homes-Johio Shores 2 ART(A) 850 1 D 1030 903 650' Johio Shores-Clarke 2 ART(A) 8501 D 1030 943 592. Clarke -Bluford 2 ART(A) 8501 D 1030 535 7441 Bluford-Ocoee Apopka 2 ART(A)_ 850 D 1030 575 383', 'W.Plant St.(SR 438) Crown Point-Dillard 2 ART(A) 850 D 1030 812 772 Dillard -Main 2 ART(A) 850 D 1030 423 'Main-Story 1,2 ART(A)1 850 D 1030 488 417 Story-SR 50 2 ART(A) 850 D 1030 271 448 A.D.Mims Rd. Apopka-Vineland -Johio Shores 2 Local 560 D 690 347 355 Johio Shores -Clarke 1 2 Local 560 D 6901 296 298 Wurst Rd. Clarke -Clarcona-Ogee 2 Local 560 D 6901 312 273' Clarcona-Ocoee -Ocoee-Apopka 2 Local 560 D 6901 272 I 119 Note:Service volumes for SR 50 and Old Winter Garden Road are based on ART_PLAN(from Orange County Comprehensive Plan,modified to include proposed traffic signals) Source:Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,Inc. • REPORT F;R 27-1e--i4 EXHIBIT 2 • ' I, , " , . Florida Oeparttent of Transportation , Arterial Level of Service Tables ' , Eased on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ; 8 ART TAE Version 1.1 ; Date: 12-14-91 ' Developed by: E.Shenk, 0.McLeod, W.McShane, and a.9rown ; I I DESCRIPTION PEAK HOUR, PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME ROAD NAME: WEST COLONIAL ;FIVE (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn _ones) ;PEAK )))))))))) PEAK DIRECTION: WE ; 1.48148I Intersections par rile l Study Tim Period: PM PEAK Level of Service 8 Analysis Date: 1991/1992 . A g C 0 •c 1 Nuaber of Lanes: 4 ; LANES 8 AAOT: 26933 8 n ' 1 N/A 610 850 530 960 , 1 User Notes: Hiawassee to East/pest ; ;22 N/A 1,350 1,760 1,500 1,42: File Naga =WCOL TA2.34 , ;3 N/A 2,070 2,650 2.:70 2,830 ;TR3RFIC CHARACTERISTICS ,: 4 N/A 2,300 3,580 3. 10 1:,d30 ,. - --=an;a---- .. PEAK HOUR VCL"rE E0TH OIREC :1NS K FACTOR: 0.081 (0.06 - 0.20i ., (Includes ,:es , � „ vena le in ex .0 ... turn ones) „ 0 FACTOR: 0.552 (0.50 - 1.00) ; ;; 1.481481 Interser_ians per r,i1e - 'PHF: 0.325 (0.70 - 1.00) Level of Service ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (1400 - 2000) ; A C E % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 17 (0 - 100) ; LANES AO AY CHARACTERISTICS2 N/A 1,140 1,540 1,:50 :.740 ;;RO W ; 4 N/A 4v: 3,110 ..440 ..47C II RANSITIONING, OF ; N/A 5,080 6,45C 6.=:1 x,350 RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R ): U ; t ' ARTERIAL CLASS: 1 (1, 2, or 3) AVERAGEANNUALDAILY TRAFFIC (AA-' FREE FLOW SPEED ($Fh): 45 (45, 40, or 35) ' (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn :ane.) ' 1.481481 Intersections per Rile ;For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flow speed of: ; Level of Service Rural SS, S0, 45, 40 or 35 ; A 8 C 0 Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 ; LANES Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 ; 2 N/A 14,100 19,000 20,200 21,400 Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 4 N/A 30,100 39,300 42,400 42,500 ; Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 ; ; 6 NIA 46,400 60,100 64,200 6=.300 • 8 N/A 62,700 80,100 85,700 85,700 TOTAL LENGTH 0.F ARTERIAL (7i): 2.7 MEDIANS (Y/N): T ; ; N/A leans the level of service is not achieve le LEFT TURN SAYS (YIN): Y ; ;SIGHALIZATION CHARACTERISTIC ; ; Peak hour peak direction thru!right VC ratir4 for ._._ Level of Service ; NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 ; LANES A _ C 0 = ,; ARRIVAL TYFr, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1, 2, 3, 4,cr 5) ,; ; t N/A 1.66 0.39 ..57 71.00 TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 (1, 2, or 3) ; ; 2 )UA 0.70 0.92 0.95 1.00 (1:Actuated, 2:Pretised, 3:Sesiactuated) ; ; 3 N/A 0.72 0.53 1.00 1.00 SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sac): 115 (60 - 180) . ; 4 NIA 0.73 0.53 1.00 1.00 ; WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT 'VC: 0.43 (0.20 - 0.80) ; 1 ; REPORT FOR 01-OK-9Z EXHIBIT 2 t • .t Florida Department of Transportation . Arterial Level of Service Tables Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ART TAa Version 1.1 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.AcLaod, V.)<cShane, and Gamin DESCRIPTION N~ PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VCLiiE RCAO NAME: WEST COLONIAL DRIVE (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) PEAK aa»a» PEAK DIRECTION: WS 3.478260 Intersections per aile Std Time Period: P14 PEAK Level of Service Analysis Date: 1991/1992 A B C 0 E Number of Lanes: 4 LANES - AADT: 42964 1 M/A N/A 500 880 1,030 User Motes: Kirkman to Hiarassee 2 N/A N/A 1,020 1,840 '2,100 File Name ■ WOOL TAa.33 3 N/A N/A 1,520 2,830 3,210 --- 4 N/A N/A 2,070 3,810 4,280 TRAFFIC CAARACTEZIs7ICS ----Rance---- PEAK HOUR VOLUME (80TH DIRECTIONS) K FACTOR: 0.075 (0.06 - 0.20) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 0 FACTOR: 0.556 (0.50 - 1.00) 3.478260 Intersections per mile PHF: 0.925 (0.70 - 1.00) Level of Service ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (1400 - 2000) A B C D E X TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 24 CO - 100) LANES it 2 N/A N/A 890 1,580 1,850 ( DADVAT CHARACTERISTICS 4 N/A N/A 1,830 3,310 3,770 it 6 N/A N/A 2,740 5,080 5,77D URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR 8 N/A N/A 3,730 6,850 7,690 RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTERIAL CLASS: 1 (1, 2, or 3) AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC CAADT) FREE FLOW SPED (aph): 45 (45, 40, or 35) (Includes Vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3.478260 Intersections per mile For Arterial Type and Class: Use Free'Florr speed of: Level of Service Rural . 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 A B C 0 E Transitioning, Class 1 • 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 SES Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 2 M/A N/A 12,000 21,200 24,800 - -• Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 4 N/A N/A 24,500 44,500 50,600 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 6 N/A N/A 36,800 68,200 77,400 8 N/A N/A 50,100 92,000 103,200 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 1.15 IMAMS MN): Y N/A means the level of service is not achievable LEFT TURN BAYS MN): Y SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full he • Level of Service NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4 LANES A B -C D E ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) 1 N/A N/A 0.43 0.77 0.90 TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 Cl, 2, or 3) 2 N/A N/A 0.44 0.80 0.92 C1=Actuated, 2=Pretined, 3=Semiactuated) 3 N/A N/A 0.44 0.82 _ 0.93 SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 140 (60 - 180) 4 N/A N/A 0.45 0.83 0.93 t WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.47 (0.20 - 0.80) ___-__ --- __---__-__-- 1a'h -- - • REPORT FOR 25-Nov-97 • EXHIBIT 2 • I Florida Department of Transportation Arterial Level of Service Tables Based an the 1935 'Noway Capacity mammal ART TAB Version 1.1 Oats: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.ilcLeod, V.BcShane, and 0-3rern DESCRIPTION PEAK SOUR PEAK DIRECTIO! VOLUME ROAD MANE: WEST COLONIAL DRIVE (Includes vesicles in exclusive turn lanes) PEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: WB 2.605863 Intersections per ails Study Time Period: PM PEAK Level of Service Analysis Date: 1991/1992 A B C 0 E Nudger of Lanes: 6 LAMES AAOT: 49596 1 N/A N/A 550 750 340 • User Notes: Tama to Kirkman 2 N/A N/A 1,140 1,570 1,740 Fite Name i WCOL TA3.s2 3 N/A N/A 1,730 2,400 2,630 4 N/A N/A 2,300 3,244 3,510 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) K FACTOR: 0.074 (0.06 - 0.20) (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lams) O FACTOR: 0.547 (0.50 - 1.00) 2.605863 Intersecticrs per mile ' PHF: 0.925 (0.70 - 1.00) Levet of Service ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: '1,350 (1400 - 2000) A B C 0 E % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 13 CO - 100) LANES r- '"" a 2 N/A M/A 1,010 1,370 1,540 AMY CHARACTERISTICS 4 N/A N/A 2,070 2,370 3,17D 6 N/A N/A 3,160 4,390 4,310 MAX, TRANSITICNIMG, CR ' 3 N/A N/A 4,210 5,920 6,410 RURAL ARTERIAL (U/T/R): U ARTEERIAL CLASS: 1 (1, 2, or 3) AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) FREE FLOW SPEED (Lich): - 45 (45, 40, Cr 35) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 2.605863 Intersections per mite Far Arterial Type and Class: Use Free Flown speed of: Level of Service Rural r 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 A B C 0 E Transitioning, Class 1 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 LANES Urban, Class 1 45, 40 or 35 2 N/A N/A 13,600 18,500 20,300 - Urban or Transitioning, Class 2 40, 35, 30 or 25 4 N/A N/A 23,000 33,700 42,300 Urban, Class 3 35, 30 or 25 6 N/A N/A 42,600 59,300 64,300 3 N/A N/A 56,300 79,900 36,500 TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): • 3.07 MLEDIANS (Y/N): Y N/A means the level of service is not achievable LEFT TURN BATS (T/N): I SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS Peak hour peak direction thru/right V/C ratios for full h: Levet of Service N0. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 8 LANES A B C 0 E ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1, 2, 3, 4,or 5) 1 N/A 1N/A 0.61 0.33 0.93 TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: 3 Cl, 2, or 3) 2 N/A N/A 0.63 0.37 0.96 (1=Actcated, 2=Pretimed, 3=Sesiactuated) 3 M/A N/A 0.64 0.89 0.97 t SYSTEM CTCLE LENGTH (sec): 138 (60 - 180) 4 N/A N/A 0.64 0.90 0.97 WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C: 0.40 (0.20 - 0.80) =_________,================_________ I _-_ -- II --------- REPCRT FCR OD-Cot-92 EXHIBIT 2 • 1 Florida Department of Transportation Urban Two-Lane Uninterrupted Highway Level of Service Tables =ATM Version 1.0 Date: 12-14-91 Developed by: E.Shenk, D.XcLeod, V.X lane, and C-Brown DESCRIPTION ROAD MAKE: OLD WATER CARDEN ROAD Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: 1991/1992 • NAME: User Notes: Riawassee to State Road SO File Mame s O2G TA3.34 _a TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS PEAK. HOUR PEAR OIRECTICU VOLUKE ---Rarer--- LOS: A B C 0 E X FACTOR: 0.086 (0.06 - 0.20) 310 550 750 1,100 1,570 0 FACTOR: 0.594 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.925 (0.70 - 1.00) PEAR HOUR VCLUHE (BOTH DIRECTICHS) 011E-DIRECTION ADJUST LOS: A B C 0 E • SATURATICN FLOW RATE: 1,700 (1300 - 2000) 530 930 1,320 1,850 2,650 (. dDYAT CHARACTERISTICS AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) LOS: A B C 0 E Urbanized, Transitioning, or 6,200 10,800 15,400 21,500 30,800 Rural Developed Area: U (U, T or R) --------- POSTED --POSTED SPEED LIMIT (mph): 45 (55,50,45,40,35) MEDIANS (T/N): B LEFT TURN BAYS (Y/H): T i e * A '' gggMgN ,_ � � MOggrn ssg AiieCAase * * leFOO i * ** et m 0 ° r 0 4-4 e 0 Oo 000 0000 0 - � .4t * ni .6AgO 0ci 46ci40.8U •i g g g g $ g t $ C 44 4.1 $ $ $ 4 g$g r.. g ,t e- V g **g g 14 x f, e. .K K g g ti, f. f, g S n n e v n 3, : . 0 0 _ . 0 _ ... 0 _ _. o _ _ . .o w. 'w4 .4. °$ ,Q; d ,•: al r .., g, e>: .o 4 r a r ..: 0 o e•f 0 o nilH 1.1 N C, U u U o 0 u r.. U U U < U 0 C C C 0 0 0 U U U U C U U U U C U s. U n U U C = C C C I. r U U4 0r o _ o ., F1 ... mro _ mm : fdrrRva $ 22Sd ^ 29 _ F ^ 241m79 ^_ °22!M° o .•.IFc" aRI e C JI 1 a • N S y� • . 4, . > ` ! p `m .. ... o s " ., .t ... a r o' a s i StA .3 77 .°0i I A 8 9 11 a3 $ .2 S ' C R " F er. APS 7Q o A a a C.i r. ic, • Z ..• 2 ' ' - '- sZ . r y n9 7 3 F J 3 o b all a ' 7 n a5 $ e r7nr 3 a gi vr r K 2 = is _ r a. 7 N x -. r 4M • N i g A r. `^ XXX as^00000a0" aaR � R � I.��vRXXrrr `XX XX 3Sa_ ra3,c = a � rrrrr• • 0. = • 0 Q c - - e-e of r r nr .-r l e.— ; 6 a S i y a _ r N {Y Q u 1= 1= C C C C C C C C C C C - _ C C C C - '.. - =1 ,:; 4= u u ;: u; w c w =1 ;.. ,_ U 1 1 1'l , 7 I I I 1 I r I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 , I , ,- l ,' r-rr r r r r r f i l I .. .._� ...; = U U I ,' I , , EM " p I•w1 a 'IVs 3 cl ;.1 § � X AZf xr - r � : i 1 xx , § xx § g xg Fc § c iX1 . ` mIOmma - Ir .+ M o 8ry e r° gE 'R IOr - a O a = -.- e R o Q C F O ^ N C a. 7DOOn avn O — t R - 0 r e r a0 — 0 a FrJ e Cr r el' el el . J r = _ f4 'V r rF. d 0 a aQ cid = S'^ viRTFifaneeel k a = a CU cs s U U i x sYs x c.cU :C8CL L U c. U G U rc L 8 s s s i z z = L a ` - �. i y r- r r r < < , r < r < < < < r nryeeeee e r r r n r ry < < < < < < < r ry r ea e H H e• I - a Ca . sr a, > a, aa, aa. .i r r . a, aa L4 C c. r C' . Cv U U U U U U U U UaU U aU - U- ug. as U F, i c." d c acaac` acccooacccccco a L. I 6 tl 1 C a a.. a.. S L. — a w a a '4 f 2 N N 2 d a 11 gY 3 • s 9 .1 < 1 = ' 3R sg3R j _ j R e I 'e C tr C ,q • Z c; - Y 2 .� a - Y v, Y a w ." 2 r .a N 8 . . N w N H i e : t: .n 7 N u i �_ a y e i ? i. _ i S c 3 i � ya 7 r ! C R i N 4 S . ; N • ? . N — 5 r, N N v z ,s s . Y e 5 a 5 ` ` = 3 'V = .s 3 ;s - c? 3 5 Q c c 3 3 5 ` ` .n '11 V; N i. _ N 2 N H 3 N 3 S 8 a • N a n _ = h , = 3 e i •3 rn .. 3 = : ! N w . " -, 3 _,. r�_j � � N N , >•. N l.,3 � to • N � • �.R ° Rg a. 1 - o.g ati = „o 5 e 1R � = ,, °° - M 3R s moi i3 c ,, b : 1 ° 9 . 5 s s 5 Y ,l ° - , s Y c " 3 Y 3 , Y < 3 s' .1A N %1 N N N S N � N N N N N � Z 3 'l. 3 L �,.. N 3. Jf < 2 -' — N N N A — N I I ! i b ii ill Y e D as % x a a 1, c. I& =� y a < c Y v a x a Y 3 E. j - . 4. Y a > > :- N e . < < z 71 C r.-u 3 < e. < 7 C g _G .i z < 3 e: _ FrA gg : ggCg442. sc g . gKgag ,1e4 • tgggggdog � t � C4gt4gggggtggcggig . O n - w O M N . g _ P n . . OOOO _ _ - _ O Iua _ N . 11114 N � itgCmg1 $ $ $ ggg _ 4f, 1 $ ggrdgg4xggg ' gegg $$ % gg4Ag4egng ggt, _ _ oom s o o .i o 1"4 ea o r u: •11n N Ngr o Vi , •6 .. nc r _ OI ZF 1 ' ' N Q c c t,. c u v u < m < < u u _ c _ _ u u _ __ ' _ u u t u � u Q u n u t3c u cJu m ll, (Ja c u n m ' o = = � u uIc.: NmI m * n - = csS - _ = RV ,“ = = 9SzRiggIA7 = .. ss2V4 V .om o � p o of _ - 7 : I • y t IIA = _ 2 Se = Em _ _ F Yr AA ^ :3r2 S; mf'•. �t 42PI 1 = °RS eSSStd Q 'd' 02 NNoo' y� ool gm y 9 z e! ! . WERAiERE. § -,1. ,$, Vigii. FicI, RWRFAkiFIEfliWar,21E 3 4' 21 ;i , ' = = bl_ ' ' ` F ` ggg _ ZCg $ q 3 _ : "' ao 8 � 4g n t12 ^ " § � a Sr e dFmo — • , = m Z 1 ' 88888 �a I I I I I I I . I ) I I I I t I I I I I I l l I I r r r-I I ,§ gx :e A ^ rn R 'R $ ,1 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 ,o, o cic cI^;cl,iclolo o c o q18 8 R ^Z,rC'9 9 2 : R c 3 $ $ o c c o o 0101= R 9 xl7 Z . e O i � r r r r r r .a a _ _ _ _ _:r.l r .'7 ., r — r` a a b o . ev c. c c, q q c_ c o b b �{ 7 et e•f eY ni epi ni ^1 r e•i e•i e.i r b b'. ww. r 71 6 0 • y > ; Ugqu ::, . .., . m . uuuu ^ c ^ c i I cl_ nc _, ,, .. cc _ _ cy . — ^ ^ ^ ^ c Z < C I I ' I 4 In . I I I 1 1 1 1 7' i 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I'I I I? FRRR 81 ^ lr e- EI .. 3 > E61 ` ;� 12. a 4 s.--,— I 1DamN - 7 ' ; 2P. QQP, n1 n ! 6rig ^fFAR / I' gs R . rr _ = c Qnr . 0 Arr1w . vxo a ' _ d ' f ' a rC 1 « "grs C C ^ C C — — `e F= I I r : ^ ^ C C " C `F l= e- !` 'e- r C: L ;� I ++ ; . . uuuuc:: uZ''- YYYSYY �c�'Y ..cr « « , �, c1c .. , Luu cuY 'YYYS « « « S .,i i - - N M M M . . . . . < < < < < < < < < <1<I< < < < N N N N N N N N N MIN < < < < < < < < < < < < _ _ _ _1 3 ... .06. 64e. N N N N N N M N N N Ni y r e a . a :ti ar a.. a. _r ° ° ° 3 2 °0 3 'o °o 0 8 F F L. S. F F F F F F F I= F F F F > > g y u u F F �- F F F F 1... L.,.. F. F a iuuuuuuu919 ... xx ^ xlxx - xxxcuu g a a lig 'g gccccccRc - xg $ ' 1 g r r r r- t.c c c c c c . . . . . c c c Z . . rt 8 8 c c c c` c d ..! 3 3 3 i C I 1 b s _ G = . ' s = e � cn - _ :' a 1. 1 < e y V 5 ▪ t: 7, i .'! J 1 3 4 c;y i' °9 .e „ 3 'w 3 = : i a.—_' .a=.,_a 3 < e w • b L �a d y d 3 u e y n - i c c 1 c _ i I 1 31: m. S Y = ,u, 1c .u. S ;�II 5 4 z 1 $ > • _ 9 7 Z'Y > `3 G g ji i C o ? 5 .2t -.35111.71,- a1j - . ' . ? : J ; . 7 ? Y73r1 =i3S ; a ; 3 _ 0 _ = . 0 : C , 2 _ < miL:17. 51x1= l _ 32 . - < ; CC = <; C I2 6 .. In s, m^ i�� s 3 n - 3 Y A H 4 ! • - 9 1 ,a i .L • ne C j C Mc enF eY = s t z F. _ 3 .3 7. Z _ 3 _ Y r V1 N r"N M M N��� N ri= L'�D C 7 - "T V1 Q C 4 C C p MN,. a N+- a $ C c r Q L a L C. 7 v > on o n - < ak QQ7a�aQ iaaal<�d5QI<�.5 (� 1 ka„<< Ha Ci . ZtZZ� ��Z r���� � "rrrzrrrrr --J,, -trrrruii-irr` "i_ ...:. v y ,.7 .1.... L 1 N n -� V E 9. CCCCCC ^ ^ C C N V V V N V V'V u C C ? y ^ 3 C C V a) N N V V V V u V V Vi ,u I.) ON IIC icl� 0000ccocccccccCCCE�CCC0CCCCCCCCcccCl_ - � i ' 2zZ22222Z 2Z7ZZ Z czZ cZz,-, r: CA- C UU :�UCUVUdJ � �CC:000UUUC ` C UUCU �=J=UV � U�= UV Z P. t,z= .:I=I aow:� 3 C^Q G v Cl = , a oe aC�i C I= V V C Vi a C J - F C'.-.•-_I C 7T= 0 t+ xC Cly CI C > L.L. V Fn V 1n ii in Z _ Com_ _�'' TLv ril C a V cn m m `� =i, M E G >, ” •Q - E 7 T N U ,[n I 11 >.I L` =1 r y 4 > > � rnrn _i`I=v4 = c � j ` ei U ,-O - -zU -it u ' C t >^ Ecrcn , E c_ "r ..,,.-.,,,,iL1..-_, -2 C 3 R ' §! , G VI >UCj • Y .'1�V 4+.- 4-P1'C t'1 C •••I9...N n KT ^+C 7 4 N Y.' r1 •4'R,,. .•+ •G1 T.,, .C\C^.. .IG`r c c rt a a 4 a Ma .KJ 9 i 0 L C. .Q aa o d «< ««««I<I«I« - << • « <««< ««<, r..4 r.„...,..±..,r6.,r,.....„..r...r.„..r.r .„.rr, r.r„„r. . 1 y C C 'C L ca C1 y > C C C C C C C G C C V V :.t V at V a V C C C ^ C e� x.� ^..� a� V ^..� G C :7 o C o c c _ c ta� c c c c c c c cle ^1c a c�c c�^ c a c c c c cic ^ c c c ycic cic c c c: 4.1 L L c C f. .Z Z c Z Z Z Z rZ v Z Z v Z r�- M.. `" E 1 cil V1 $ _^. �tz .0L << U[ I CUUS UUUC:UVJ.0 `U .cL'LU�[=:VC U UI = c ...., z� 1 L =Z- V N y =I i . r L= C,., w `� �I L)�-' 3 .n .A 7� e� a� — ' C�-�'r1p Ji:i! _I• a "i -I� -I� ' ..:9nV ear C LL 3 3 �I c- , -c = 3 3G p 3L'- _;c cv 3 r _ c �>,r"' .� ' c ' `° r�- t ^�C` e7 , C 6i� ~ , V E.' , C ' J F.I: C J ,,F., cZ l/1.=I , = J^ c 0 y c 1= r.- C v T V^,I _ U , _ � c,.x`, a� c C � = � I�7-1 �` 1L �►. � ► u l` ►- ,u' c � IVVJ C� v� '_ CI `n '' -Hu 7 !f ' C,... C ` : -,I C f l^ ,L U ` CII , - , I ` -.—N vr` C , , 0 c " 3 ., ye3 � e , Y " 3 r- a :,-3c, � c � 3 N ° � c'c .u " cco 3i. _c � . _ :3 c r.....-Nd - = c !%r _1 :�I=�-r = 3 - ., c _ = c = r-'-'1 0 - '= arc= - cl L -c - C C)- ±"..7, cG=Vic..-,IC. =, UC MA ='=" r� a Coen en 0—QV .c, PUP' rnl :_ u _ Y Si a P1 3 - c2 c 3 _ = L,. v n u 34.1 r x e.) �,, e gi F s C r C C C ` .. U ,.7C j H L' , a ♦5 o L' - Lei n • C" ,—1 [": Y Ci en r+ Ci V Q ala c Q ✓ y Y _ a G 7 v • Z Z Z Z T: 7 as eN o ` Z Z Z Z ' • C L' >4 COI cn s U U U U L v ,.. i C 44444 ••••••'Ws ? 21 m 4; �, 4... 0 ....1L E y v• E' Q $ v� Y O t IA i co O a > o` U 'e Q = o 63 C E. :v a : g WQ ° U U iv a3 i 1s et▪ . 'Q $11 O s 0 :2 EIS -C r L ., V Q Page 19 Summary As shown in Table 7, there are no projected significant and adverse impacts on roadway segments within the study area for Year 1997 with development of Phase 1 of the Lake Lotta project. The analysis of intersections reported in the ADA/DRI traffic study projected that the SR 50/Hiawassee Road intersection would be significant and adverse. This intersection will require the addition of a northbound and southbound right turn lane. Traffic Analysis Lake Lotta Project January 2,1995 Attachment B LETTER RE: LANDFILL CAPACITY Orange N - nivision of rublic Utilities �— :'. -: Yom: L o1 1 nt 109 East Church Street,Suite 400 I *'`.' -y =; r7 V L.t J Reply To:Post Office Box 1393 I 4 � r '✓ Orlando,Florida 32802-1393 i ..,S - Telephone(1073 836-7200 k E September 16, 19933 1 S11 1.99 ; Mr. Michael Calleja O W' biller-Sellen Associates, Inc. ' 214 East Lucerne Circle Orlando, Florida 32801 . SUBJECT: Lake Lotta Center ADA/DRI E Dear Mr. Calleja: . Pursuant to the requirements of the County's Mandatory Garbage Program the . County can provide solid waste ' disposal service to the property as j outlined in your letter. The County's landfill site has an expected useful life of approximately 20 years, provided construction permits are obtained for additional disposal cells. The now call recently completed will ; provide capacity into the mid 1990's and another new cell is currently under design. i Our facility is a Class I Landfill, according to the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 17-7, and will accept for disposal those wastes consistent with descriptions contained therein. We will not accept {{ any hazardous wastes for storage or disposal. t Should you require any further information or assistance in this matter, l please contact this office. i Very `r•ly your , , \41/ (2. . St.nl J. eely, P.R. D-p y Di ctor - •• NGE C STY PUBLIC UTILITIES DIVISION JK/iv c: Alan B. Ispass, P.E., Director, Public Utilities Division Robert W. Badley, P.E., Chief Engineer, Utilities Engineering Dept. . Chris Kohl, Manager, Refuse Disposal Department File: 85-142-G/Lake Latta • AECYCLEo n 7 PAPE9 AGENDA 1-26-95 ITEM III B ORDINANCE NO. 95-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1991 BY ORDINANCE NO. 91-28, AS AMENDED, AS FOLLOWS: AMENDING FIGURE 2 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE LANDS WHICH ARE PART OF THE LAKE LOTTA MALL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; AMENDING FIGURE 2 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE LANDS WHICH ARE PART OF THE LAKE LOTTA CENTER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings, Purpose, and Intent. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Commission hereby makes, expresses, and incorporates the following findings, purposes, and intent: a. On September 18, 1991, the City Commission of the City of Ocoee ("City Commission") adopted a new comprehensive plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, by adopting Ordinance No. 91-28, which was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 94-19 adopted on June 21, 1994 ("the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan") . b. On or about August 31, 1993, Homart Development Co. , a Delaware corporation ("Homart") , submitted an Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact known as the Lake Lotta Mall DRI. c. The Lake Lotta Mall DRI requires an amendment to the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation of certain lands located within the corporate limits of the City totaling 118. 1 acres from Low Density Residential (20.4 acres) , Medium Density Residential (37. 3 acres) , and High Density Residential (60.4 acres) to Commercial ("Amendment No. CPA-1-9-93") . d. On or about September 21, 1993, Lake Lotta, Ltd. , a Florida limited partnership ("Lake Lotta") , submitted an Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact known as the Lake Lotta Center DRI. e. The Lake Lotta Center DRI requires an amendment to the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation of certain lands located within the corporate limits of the City totaling 35 acres from Low Density Residential (15 acres) and High Density Residential (20 acres) to Commercial ("Amendment No. CPA- 2-9-93") . f. As explained above, Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93, which are the subject of this Ordinance, are directly related to the Lake Lotta Mall DRI and Lake Lotta Center DRI, respectively. g. On May 12, 1994, the City of Ocoee Local Planning Agency ("LPA") held an advertised public hearing and recommended transmittal of Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 to the Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") . h. On May 26, 1994, the City Commission held an advertised public hearing and approved transmittal of Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 to the DCA. i. On August 15, 1994, the City received DCA's Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report (the "ORC Report") . j . On January 26, 1995, the City Commission held an advertised adoption public hearing with respect to Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 . k. The City has analyzed the comments set forth in the ORC Report and prepared a response to the ORC Report. At the above referenced public hearing held on January 26, 1995 the City Commission approved a response to the ORC Report and directed that such response be forwarded to the DCA. 1. All required public hearings have been held after due public notice in accordance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Chapter 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code, and Section 1-8 of Article I of the City of Ocoee Land Development Code. SECTION 2. Authority. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida, Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes, and Section 1-8 of Article I of the City of Ocoee Land Development Code. 3 SECTION 3. Amendment No. CPA-1-9-93. The Ocoee Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as follows: Figure 2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by changing the Future Land Use Designation from Low Density Residential (20.4 acres) , Medium Density Residential (37.3 acres) , and High Density Residential (60.4 acres) to Commercial for certain lands located within the corporate limits of the City as depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Exhibit "A" hereto identifies the current Future Land Use Designations of said lands as "City of Ocoee's Future Land Use Map (2010) " and the new Future Land Use Designation approved by this Ordinance as "Proposed Change to the Future Land Use Plan". SECTION 4. Amendment No. CPA-2-9-93. The Ocoee Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as follows: Figure 2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by changing the Future Land Use Designation from Low Density Residential (15 acres) and High Density Residential (20 acres) to Commercial for certain lands located within the corporate limits of the City as depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Exhibit "B" hereto identifies the current Future Land Use Designations of said lands as "City of Ocoee's Future Land Use Map (2010) " and the new Future Land Use Designation approved by this Ordinance as "Proposed Change to the Future Land Use Plan". 4 SECTION 5. Authority of City Planning Director to Amend Figure 2. The City Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to amend Figure 2 of the Future Land Use Element consistent with Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date that all of the following events have occurred: a) the Florida Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission has issued a final order finding Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 as set forth in this Ordinance to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163 . 3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier; b) the City Commission has approved a Development Order for the Lake Lotta Mall Development of Regional Impact; and c) the City Commission has approved a Development Order for the Lake Lotta Center Development of Regional Impact. No development order, development permits, or land uses dependent on these amendments may be issued or commence before the effective date of this Ordinance, except that such development orders or development permits approved concurrent with 5 Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 or CPA-2-9-93 (which amendments constitute Development of Regional Impact related comprehensive plan amendments) may be issued so long as such development orders or development permits state that they do not become effective or authorize development until the relevant comprehensive plan amendment becomes effective as defined in Section 163 .3189 (2) , Florida Statutes. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this Ordinance and Amendment Nos. CPA-1-9-93 and CPA-2-9-93 may nevertheless be made effective by adoption by the City Commission of a resolution affirming the effective status, a copy of which shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1995. APPROVED: ATTEST: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Jean Grafton, City Clerk S. Scott Vandergrift, Mayor (SEAL) FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY ADVERTISED JANUARY 19, 1995 THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA READ FIRST TIME AND ADOPTED APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY AT A SPECIAL MEETING HELD ON this day of January, 1995. , 1995 UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. FOLEY & LARDNER By: City Attorney A:\CPAORD.REVII/2W951LAKE LOTTA(DISK MHF)IPER:dP 6 • LAKE LOTTA MALL Case Number CPA-1-9-93 Exhibit A 1111 0 4:- Ili; 0 I. \\ • � ill iii � `\ \ � f4 .A.'7,'; /li � eB ill�, /j am :�` • ,` :, .,2‹,-/A ma //- 11111111kurgatd=Er lic II 111EK\w,\ 7 ite; 0 .."'"IPP-70" ,,$.-,W Ar kV; "Orliiiiirr7.: ,sx.,:,\V:k„,,Nti...- i lip ` Si EItPPL55MAYill \ --r010.1.111 - City of Ocoee's Future Land Use Map (2010) Proposed Change to the Future Land Use Map Legend LOW DENstrr RESIDENTIAL , NEAVF ma'am_( < •Du/ACRE) ...':C1,t AY. MEDIUM DEIISRY RESIDE/11wj INSnS11I10NLL/COSERSSEIO 0-0 Du/ICRC) // NCH DEFISRT RESIDEIAL% WATER BDdES (/-10 DU/ACRE) ..I MEMRROFLSSIOI41 SERVICE CONSERV..71011 MUS IMIE COMMERCIAL RECREAl1OII MEAS WI1 VIOLSIRULL O COMES DE INFLDEHCE I WATER WELLS) OCOEE CPI LMRS(1/01) PROPOSED ROADWAY —.—•••• • — ASSER WIDEN CRY LAMS()/01) iHMICYWICE AREAS/ AREA OF PROPOSED CHANGE ACIMTT CEIRERS LAKE LOTTA CENTER CASE NO: CPA-2-9-93 EXHIBIT B City of Ocoee's Proposed Change to the Future Land Use Map (2010) Future Land Use Map :;,,,,N . �_ \ 0 �' .,a IF 1 A ,r, ... , ,..„.., ...„,......:4 - ,7 vs.: M L*/. .ft.. \� Vg � \ �i \~ '•\ j '/\\ ; / \-, \ \\`\`\\\� j �7 \' \ � ` �\ � a% /: / „ ll,�� � ' . ./ ,',/ % iii.._ / -.. \� E%RES�UY `..\ RAY E/.G(.WFS7 P j�//,: \� Fl�_W� / Legend LOWDED/ACRE)DENf41 31:\\\� NEWT INDUSTRIAL < MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL jjjj/ INSRMIONAL/GOVERNMENT ., (4-8 DU/ACRE) Ni\\\� NIGH 6 NSITI RE)RESIDENTIAL ��������\\\\\\ WA7FR 80016 � jj PROFESSIONAL SERVICE //J � CONSERVATION AREAS 1/4a: \• (%//�� RECREATION AREAS \\ COMMERCIAL ' [�, \\ 0 CONE OF INT"'((,�\\ LIGHT INOIh1RNL (WATER WE115) -- - OCOEE CRY LIMOS(1/91) PROPOSED ROADWAY m•• ••••• •- WINTER GARDEN CITY LIMITS(1/91) • INTERCHANGE AREAS/ ACTVRY CENTERS