HomeMy WebLinkAboutVI (C) Discussion re: Proposed Transfer of Cable Television Franchise to Time Warner AGENDA 5-2-95
Item VI C
"CENTER OF GOOD LIVING -PRIDE OF WEST ORANGE"
Ocoee Vti�N�ZI.�1.11.
0 / COMMISSIONERS
RUSTY JOHNSON
V...._ ` CITY OF OCOEE PAUL W.FOSTER
rt: O 150 N.LAKESHORE DRIVESCOTT A.GLASS
4) OCOEE,FLORIDA 34761-2258JIM GLEASON
�� (407)656 2322 CITY MANAGER
�
Op GOO' ELLIS SHAPIRO
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND BOARD OF CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JANET G. RESNIK, CAPITAL PROJECTS/CONCURRENCY ANALYST
DATE: APRIL 26, 1995
SUBJECT: PROPOSED TRANSFER OF CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
TO TIME WARNER
ISSUE
Should the Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners enter
into negotiations with Time Warner to modify the existing cable
television franchise agreement in conjunction with the proposed
transfer of the franchise?
BACKGROUND
On March 30, 1995, the City received formal notification that
Cablevision Industries Corporation (CVI) had reached an agreement
to merge with Time Warner. Under the City' s current franchise
agreement, this transfer of the franchise must be approved or
denied by the City, and under the FCC Rules, approval or denial
must be issued within 120 days of the notice of intent to
transfer. (The 120 day timeframe expires July 28, 1995 . )
The formal transfer of a franchise grants an opportunity to
revisit the franchise agreement and negotiate any modifications
as the parties see fit .
DISCUSSION
The current franchise agreement was adopted in July 1984, well
before the 1992 Cable Act which strengthened franchising
authorities' abilities to protect subscribers . Much has changed
in the cable television industry -- and in Ocoee -- since 1984 .
Because of this, staff recommends that the City take advantage of
the proposed transfer to revisit the franchise agreement. The
City' s special cable television counsel will also be reviewing
the information provided by Time Warner to make sure everything
is in order before the City formally approves the transfer.
Page 2 - Cable Staff Report
There are several sections of the agreement which are important
to address :
- Requirements of the cable operator to serve newly-developed
areas of the City.
The language in the current franchise is somewhat vague as
to when service will be provided to new subdivisions, and
there are no enforcement mechanisms if service is not
provided as required. The City should set specific
requirements for service to new areas and specific penalties
that the cable operator will be subject to if service is not
provided as such.
- The ability of the City to collect, at our option, the
maximum franchise fee allowable by law.
The current franchise fee in Ocoee is 3 percent . The FCC
currently allows a maximum of 5 percent to be collected by
franchise authorities . The City should provide itself with
the ability to collect the maximum amount .
- Customer Service Standards.
The City has worked with CVI to build a much-improved
customer service system than was in place 5 years ago;
however, the 1992 Cable Act permits franchise authorities to
implement specific customer service standards and specific
enforcement mechanisms (fines and/or refunds) to ensure that
customer service standards are met . The City should
determine what customer service standards are imperative and
include those in the franchise along with specific penalties
if the standards are not met .
There are other, less critical areas of the agreement that, if
refined, would put the City in a better position to govern the
franchise . Several definitions need to be added or amended;
application fees for renewing or transferring the franchise need
to be included to help the City recover staff and legal costs
involved; the length of the franchise needs to be shortened; and
any additional needs for service or equipment for schools and
municipal buildings should be added to the agreement .
Many of these proposed modifications to the agreement could have
a financial impact to the people who subscribe to cable
television; the cable operator has the right to pass the costs of
many franchise requirements on to subscribers . The recommended
changes listed above would provide a basis for better service and
would not carry any great expense to the individual customer.
They would also help the City recover some of the costs
associated with administrating the franchise.
Page 3 - Cable Staff Report
Other, more expensive, things that the City could include as part
of the transfer approval are financial and technical audits . A
financial audit could be performed to ensure that CVI paid what
was due over the years it held the franchise and a technical
audit of the system could be performed to determine any capital
needs the new cable operator may need to achieve or maintain a
"state-of-the-art" system. Both of these audits would carry an
added expense to both the customers and the City. Staff believes
the costs would outweigh any benefits the City may derive from
either a financial or technical audit and does not recommend
pursuing them at this time; however the franchise agreement
should be revised to give the City the authority to perform these
audits at some time in the future if it elects to do so.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully recommends that the Honorable Mayor and Board
of City Commissioners direct staff and special counsel to work
with Time Warner representatives to prepare a draft revised
franchise agreement to bring to the City Commission for review in
conjunction with the formal review of the transfer.