Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 09 First Reading of Ordinance for Ocoee Village Center PUD Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan (PUD/LUP); Project No(s): CPA-2018-006 & RZ-18-06-09
\ I t � ocoee florida AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Meeting Date: April 16, 2019 Item # Reviewed By: Contact Name: Michael Rumer Department Director: Contact Number: Ext. 1018 City Manager: Subject: Ocoee Village Center PUD (Planned Unit Development) Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to PUD/Land Use Plan Project No(s): CPA-2018-006 & RZ-18-06-09 Commission District#1 — Larry Brinson Sr. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: General Location: The subject properties are located on the north side of Clarcona Ocoee Road and east of SR 429, south of Clarcona Ocoee Road, east of N. Lakewood Ave., and east of the intersection of Fullers Cross Road and N. Lakewood Avenue. The site is located within the SR 429 "Interchange Village Character Area. Parcel Identification Number(s): 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046, & 05-22-28-0000-00-004 Property Size: +/- 73.17 acres Actual land use, proposed land use and unique features of the subject property: The property is vacant/ undeveloped. The property has an agricultural exemption for the cultivation of planted pines. The future land use & requested initial zoning classification of the subject property: CURRENT PROPOSED Jurisdiction/Future Land City of Ocoee/ Low Density City of Ocoee/High Density Use-Joint Planning Area Residential Residential &Commercial Land Use Classification Jurisdiction/Zoning City of Ocoee/"R-1A" City of Ocoee/"PUD" Classification "Single-family Dwelling" "Planned Unit Development" The current future land use and zoning classifications of the surrounding properties: Direction Future Land use Zoning Classification Existing Land Use North SR 429 Expressway/Low- ROW/PUD (Townhomes) Vacant Density Residential East City of Ocoee"Recreation" City of Ocoee"A-1"/Orange Single-Family Dwellings /Low Density Residential County"A-1" South Low Density Residential Orange County"A-1" SR 429(Western Expressway) West Low Density Residential Orange County"A-1" Single-Family Dwellings /Agricultural ISSUE: Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners approve the Transmittal of the Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "City of Ocoee" Low-Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial, and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/ Land Use Plan) for Ocoee Village Center? DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing a Large-Scale Comprehensive Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (4 D.U./Acre) to High Density Residential (8-16 D.U./Acre) and Commercial. A rezoning to PUD for a mixed-use community that will include 150,000 S.F. of Commercial, 196 Unit Townhomes with 316 Unit Apartments Please See the Ocoee Village Center Comprehensive Plan Amendment document prepared June 28, 2018. The following table depicts the impacts the proposed development has on public facilities: Public Facility Existing Zoning Proposed Development Net Impact (R-1A) (PUD *292 SFR 316 Apartments / 196Townhomes and 150,000 SF of Commercial units and 120 Hotel) Water (300 ERU) 87,600 gpd Apartments 60,000 gpd 51,300 gpd (Orange County) Townhomes 72,600 gpd Retail 3,000 gpd Hotel 120 Room Sewer 270 ERU 78,840 • •d 56,000 • •d 47,880 • •d Oran•e Count Traffic ADT 261 1,472 1,211 additional tri•s Utilities: The site is located within the City of Ocoee's service area and is proposing to connect to public utilities for water and sewer. There is an existing 12" water main and force main on N. Lakewood Ave. and westerly on Fullers Cross Road. An extension is required for connection. Approval of the proposed water and sewer utility plan is required prior to the approval of the final subdivision/site plan. Sewer is available south of Fullers Cross Road, and an extension and lift station will be required. Transportation/Traffic: The proposed PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan) accesses N. Lakewood Avenue, and Clarcona Ocoee Road. Both roads are operating at an acceptable level of service. A plan is provided which indicates road sections to be vacated or transferred (See sheet C-4). Schools: The project will have to mitigate for the extra capacity of 78.525 elementary schools students and 9.665 middle school students (See School Capacity Determination Capacity Enhancement Letter). 2 Public Safety: The nearest fire department is Station 38 located on 313 West Road which is approximately 0.5 miles from the property. The estimated response time is less than 2 minutes. The Police Substation is located 0.5 miles from the subject property. The estimated response time is 3 minutes from within the enforcement zone. Drainage: The subject site is located within the Apopka Drainage Basin and therefore, must meet the requirements of Section 11.7 (a) SJRWMD Management and Storage of Surface Water Handbook and Wekiva Study Area BMP's. Design of the drainage system will be evaluated in more detail prior to final engineering approval. Recreation and Open Space: No impacts on recreation facilities are proposed. The applicant will be required to provide thirty-five (35) percent open space. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On January 29, 2019, the DRC met to determine if the proposed Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan) was consistent with the City's regulations and policies. When the discussion was finished, the DRC voted to recommend approval of the Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD/LUP for Ocoee Village Center. PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) met on April 09, 2019, to determine if the proposed Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD/LUP were consistent with the City's regulations and policies. An adjacent property owner spoke in regards to the opportunity of the development to use the renewable energy concept the Montessori School is utilizing and not have a gas station or bank as part of the plan. When the discussion was finished, the P&Z recommended approval of the transmittal of the Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "City of Ocoee" Low-Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial, and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff supports a decision by the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners to approve the Transmittal of the Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "City of Ocoee" Low-Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial, and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan) for Ocoee Village Center, subject to the comments made from staff. Attachments: Location Map; Future Land Use Map; Proposed Future Land Use Map; Surrounding Zoning Map; Aerial Map; Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance; PUD Land Use Plan; Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package; Rezoning Ordinance; Traffic Study; OCE-18-005 Ocoee Village denial letter.pdf. 3 Financial Impact: None Type of Item: (please mark with an "x") X Public Hearing For Clerk's Dept Use: X Ordinance First Reading Consent Agenda Ordinance Second Reading Public Hearing Resolution Regular Agenda X Commission Approval X Discussion & Direction Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution Reviewed by City Attorney N/A Reviewed by Finance Dept. N/A Reviewed by 0 N/A 4 Ocoee Village Center PUD Location Map f W"'"""""'"IiE . 1111 r, , West West /' 1 1 oad X29 stste 7 .. . • • . . • - 3 = dv2nd 3rci I FursCross v, 5th a N 1111 0 Harris 0 3 as — a r cts _L_ -0 o ..., _ loth 1 mina - 0 . iint11 e"" I4v — _[ ii I/1 — iII . cP[[ I t puiD co .il a _ I 12 bow ill ii mi ll i ' ii , iiii, dt :: MIFTILlrETT/71111 o°p euo°�e�p a ,'a,, m L W Etlei P7 • ■1 Q -*Aid m o TRS P J j X11 �il ■■■■■q .�oen�y; IVv- 1717171014 �iii■r ii .1 - ' it — m III1I ) R3� rtAi■M�11111 i ER C _ ,. 1444.1 1 I �.= I 1 NIiIiI' l i. I I �' -0104-Wy s L511 in U_ — —F - --a — - - - — 11111 Q ... IV CI- _ x Janina_ MEM 2 � � ii ,_ cn ___,...i1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.4 4,... I _.,_ I I I p , ♦ - A _liL poonna4 l \di p 73 CD Ct J a 0 • AA p L N C= (1) Ill fr, ..i V 4-1 LL 0 V al'"''' 'O Cl,,,... 4 RR U) U aai L> _ � U N To Com\ 0 ;O e c)- C L' u) (o (s -O C Q' :+ N —' Uc 2, N O a) -.. -0 C N C .s. �0 o � LL z � m a) � -0 a 6 a 'u) m a) Q g CC 0 y aoo 7 H -v N 0 0 0 0 C 0 rn c >.-p -C a)ct > N N L -p in o L .2- Q .LT) C -CC 2 g g oc .0 d O Q 0 c c O 0 C (6 0 co c v m o a) E a) V) a) c m LL al (3) v ` N U O o . 0 a) E ..,.>, cOn a) .0 V) N U c � 3 '5 t w E t 'ea E o .n Y o (n D f6 J 2 2 d U J 2 U Q' ELJ 0 .ii . . 11111111 II N imi =!1 11iiiME 4-0 — a -.1 min mil Ma MIN n I Il1m MN 1■ a o2 d 73 ••..1•0 -- -� 0E � :: .. .. .= _ mill MIN NM ri . baa) , , , . : , W0 4a73 \ O G> > 0 `' ■ . —II G1 L „1 �;\ \\ U cti .0 = ill • UI o „:-,,, L \ AR S /V^ in N . „ „J \�, re Ile imil J0 co i NM UM II= ,....: ,r) IN Ell u) a) U E op ° Oo N a) U _N •� w o O r m C X C N Oc a) a) NIii 70 O 73 �' a Q) > fa w / O E a L N N N O O O 1- U _ s cv v, O c c a� O a a) > N c t O o O - � i O ca , = CO O c6 fn C c U L Fn o c c O ,_ .o ca rn Z Q CZ N a) d vi U) a) E a) v7 a) L CD cn 0 L a) j 0 = a N E — > gi .V 73 O ® 2 3 Q > 3 a .� Y— E -c c6) c o c0 c C J d -141( W Q' J 2 I a- 0 0) I U f W CC J D 0 C1 C J Deny __ 11.1 M'i - 111104 �� k kti ,� kti ::°_ . .. .,„. . k .�.... a 1 1 . I ) (0000r I . 2 ■ i -o MI .uepy • MICIA III r N —a1111 I Q i - 1. V i. al — Eli IN •r. 1 0. 2 .... \ A . , 6. :\ _. i. c cn �`'` 4 ilr !I a) E \ \ L_•.... p•onn- el U O \.. b O ,#1 N m C 'LJ a ZIIIIM :, � , Pg W €'• V U 6 I 12 MI }: to �...m w " Et;iii.:::::::::::;::::i.:;i:Iii.:;;.::::.::,i)))).....1:if::i:i:i?i _r • 0 " v. \() :::::::.:::::::::.:::::.):$:%‘-ck.,..IN::f: to :::•.•. ti:� �V 'k• tifiti ti� :: :ti r r:: ti \ \•\ ti ...: }fi tir : ti - co a. N d m / / Q o) M U 7 N U � E op ` � - CC CC a) 0) oin 0) — M a> 3a oN ON Q 0) 0) rn � 3 c .N � - o— `- N E :_ c c c c p = .> QD o E0 (N C N - - - = (1) cn a O — 0 o o o •n t0 O Q N N N 3 V 0 (13 . v p a 0 _ CO o f— • Y •3 3 3 3 L m — O ) D '`—' 0000 c�a > (n0 -0 E o c, E, 0_ 0- ao N o o m ao —, 4) w 7 .2 O N >, >, >, >, ur N 0 0 o E N c ( a a N a CO o „ N -6 0- 0 2 CO Q - : o E E (a 0 o : 75 �o - o o Q c o 0 0 0 = c _ U a o c D N CID ,-.: o � d O L � TT) jo LL LL LL LL N N U i (� N N o O m a� m ab • Q E m s c� m D .o al cn o (-) c o o c `� ai o 3 ami o> c Y co c c ca> _ _ _ a) o a> a> Cl) D ca O U) U) U) U) Cl) 0 2 2 a Z 0 C0 cC o C7 C.) J 2 I O_ D J 0 N 111111 1:... :. ,., Wili- 111 i:A.-1*- ' .,,, !ANA?ili ii-=1 0441411 t id 11F-4,....tilt-Ar-%tie . - - -- .0,•: , ;.7-: t a ! ,....1, pforregua. , insimarak i''' '' --- • ;1' ' ' 'szA • .4114j° 115".61 all"314'''%': .* '':4." _.. _ . . . . iv.. . , 1 — , . illt• I„. --1. • - ' -,.•'..' *cm fump ,a• gni Lamm !T. -... .,..' . . .r.a,..' '1..,, urn'. , -- -I =‘,..,..morA, *aim_ ,-i,-. • ,,,,..•fr Ask ' : ' 0 V ' , .4 •:-.•,' IV '.. , . ' ' 1 r.;- • . ' '... - . 1 ;...I f Abl• 6.- IuuPP.r i ''' :'' ' ' .' ''''-: '0. i 111"4" 7 6 ' I • r...e d LIM i-0 * ,- i ,,— s...0. 6.1 A 4. 1 s•-'' 11.41,-, 1 : 11 t •_ li •wr 1st alt • ..,. 4. . ,..,--- I . i ...., ' - .1 .. .: ./..,, , i - .• .,... ,.... ., ... , , millitr. •,% ; :. k - ; .11.11111111t. • ' \2: :',4/ '11-_-' .......- t ' ,kk. .,,,,ip ii • _.._ . _ ,, .10:. A ' . 1. k ' ', • ' \Ar. A -' - L ,.•.,. ,,, a , .... CD - . • 1 — -_ • .„ ..r, \ , .., . _ il ' • < =.•-,,-- '1 A4t. / ' ‘ - \ • it 1'0 .',' a :" \., ' •• . #. ,• , . -,.. ; . . I L t ) . 011,_ . .. i i'11/9.7:r-C • ' .r4 : ..',`, ''', -4''''''i 1 "-, '4....24 . ' , , -0 ct" i ri I . , .- - -. ' tp, 6 1). ii • (,. 0 -- . , ''':',' •- . <5;4 . CL' '' - — _ . ,, . .-jaw,„..'-7 ' • . 1..- '"' - . . :% . , '-.4 ?., - 'OW5 4..t.-4• 01.";:4111ir 4 ' I, f *flettlittl4 d)• ...,• -.^' ' ''''' ° . . :1!:3'itill3tOPR Z•OtAttit'%, ,• •. “A, ..?(4 .', ., . •!:::, I '4 .-: 4.Alt, . 1 •,,,, 'TS) , - 40tir.lb..4*%; . • 0 ..I .'',. am. ..:::: `‘,,r,---. 4•• --...- .1‘ .*, . ., . ,. ,;;.• : 1, 4k. : - ;.; , ..14•114",, al ' -. 0,. -* r "', , - l'\ \'' ' P( '‘' -X",- . . . , ,• _ . - --,•fttil . . ' . i . iP7''.7.giff-7 • . ' ' ... : "i. 4- ----;--,- •-' :. . ---iii )(-1'•r:41't-...''''t - ' . , -..tv,-.,1. - .. , . ' • 1 -v - t, - : ',...',:;4',..:",' 'lirr 0% •''... *:., ,,. 11 . '4?4:';'-'; ',;7.*'h: ' ' 4 ' P ',-0 , . ORDINANCE NO. 2019-010 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance for Ocoee Village Center PUD) TAX PARCEL ID: 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046, & 05-22-28-0000-00-004 CASE NO. CPA-2018-006: Ocoee Village Center PUD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL" FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 73.17 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, EAST SIDE OF SR 429 EXPRESSWAY, NORTH/SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE, AND AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL; AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Ocoee (City) has adopted the City's Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, the Growth Policy Act (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, sets forth procedures and requirements for a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan and amendments to the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3174(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the City's Local Planning Agency (LPA) conducted a public hearing on April 9, 2019, to consider the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3184(11), Florida Statutes, on April 16, 2019, the City Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the transmittal of the amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and, after consideration of public comments, authorized its transmittal pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and confirmed as true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. Section 3. Amendments to Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by approval of a Large Scale Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Future Land Use Map designation for the property described in "Exhibit A" from "Low Density Residential" to "High Density Residential and Commercial". Exhibit A" is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Section 4. Transmittal; Revision of the Official City Land Use Map. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to transmit the required copies of the amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan to the parties as required pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Following transmittal the ordinance will be considered for final adoption. Following final adoption, the City Planner is authorized to revise the Official Future Land Use Map of the City of Ocoee in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective following adoption and in accordance with the provisions stated in Section 163.3184(3)(c), Florida Statutes. PASSED and APPROVED on this day of , 2019. APPROVED: ATTEST: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Rusty Johnson, Mayor (SEAL) ADVERTISED AND FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY READ FIRST TIME 2019. THEREAD SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY 2019, UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. this day of , 2019. SHUFFIELD, LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. By: City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED APRIL 17, 1998 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5461, PAGE 2341 AND IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS: PARCEL 4 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-004: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2930.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 89°44'04" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 89°44'04" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6450-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 00°53'06" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1111.47 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 58°53'01" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 72.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 514.27 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°49'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 660.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 00°17'43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1409.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE OF RUN SOUTH 00°34'54" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 231 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°44'04"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1286.39 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°11'35" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.77 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 40 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-040: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88°07'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1252.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 88°07'15" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 00°17'43" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1351.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT- OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN NORTH 89°13'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1262.21 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 69°30'11" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 851.79 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°2623" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 868.85 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49°49'55" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36°19'17"WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49°49'02" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 429, WESTERN BELTWAY, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF- WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-5460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 54°40'57" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1377.66 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 46 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-046: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1465.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN NORTH 00°49'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 71°13'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST ROAD, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320- 6460-602/603; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 776.19 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 00°25'09" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 180.72 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°22'14" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.13 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE RUN NORTH 06°15'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 131.33 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 19°42'11" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044 PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 49°49'02" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.92 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1385.18 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 56°21'45" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 316.40 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°06'58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 317.09 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°49'52" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.70 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 89°10'08"WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.12 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" Location Map f AIIMMININEmmomm= * 45 E E West WeEst r . Wet oaa X29 state I �y - Clarcona Onnpe I� 2nd 3rd 4th - 1 ca Full rs Cross g 5th, z A- c 1 1 o Harri 0 L le ,ai El 10th I 74-, 0 • , !!!! - - I1tl f AIII 2 A 1 ' • ' i — l C Ocoee Village Center - Site Data Tabuations Printed On- Marrh 19 9019 PROJECT TEAM APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: KENNETH W BUCHMAN, OWNERS REP 2718 LAUREL OAK DRIVE WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 PHONE: 813-754-5018 KENBUCHMAN(s'i-)GMAIL.COM CIVIL ENGINEER: WOHLFARTH CONSULTING GROUP, LLC CONTACT: RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, P.E. 246 N. WESTMONTE DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 407-750-3123 RWOHLFARTH@WCGROUP.CO SURVEYOR: ALLEN & COMPANY INC CONTACT: WILSON E. WAY, PSM 15 E PLANT ST WINTER GARDEN FL 34787 CONTACT: ED JOHNSON, PSM 407-654-5355 OFFICE ED(a)-ALLEN-COMPANY.COM UTILITIES POTABLE WATER NON -POTABLE WATER WASTEWATER POWER TELECOMMUNICATIONS GAS CITY OF OCOEE CITY OF OCOEE CITY OF OCOEE DUKE ENERGY SPECTRUM TECO N r LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS N0. 32108 MASTERD V OPM N PLAN for OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Y' N ��°'�'y�r Paradise FIL?!gt-Its W�FlrCtu'r�LRu 7ucL'ttmlt�Fd PROJECT LOCATION 9 r,.lnrc Forest Lake.Galf Club ® alxAnmY V•man R4 u ? r'vlluv 4w» aU ' il14 �0.nq A,- i µ0 rp z x 3 a>P a �1 n OCOee ass W mttr Garde" a 4'15 cam. Ern -an rn n'.• Whrlr Fid wlwi. R21 4-i E 5'rsry Rd S'��'1 Rd ail d38 � J Da: iy"'rmr. yo4;aand Ea NDrrda'sTurnPite Flo ds s Turnpike St7�s3atdL'. Tildenvllle s sly Gama Ga ogle My Maps LOCATION MAP N.T.S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0 �J I' r ....... yr`rr . -4 - D AERIAL MAP N.T.S. I THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED APRIL 17, 1998 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5461, PAGE 2341 AND IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS: PARCEL 4 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-004: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2930.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 89°44'04" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 89044104" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6450-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 00053'06" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1111.47 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST FORA DISTANCE OF 265.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 58053'01" EAST FORA DISTANCE OF 72.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010'08" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 514.27 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010108" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 660.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 00°17'43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1409.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE OF RUN SOUTH 00034154" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 FORA DISTANCE OF 231.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 231 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN SOUTH 89044'04" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FORA DISTANCE OF 1286.39 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°11'35" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.77 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 40 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-040: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88107'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1252.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 88007'15" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 00017143" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1351.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN NORTH 89013'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1262.21 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 69°30'11" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 851.79 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39026123" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 868.85 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049155" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36019'17" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049'02" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 429, WESTERN BELTWAY, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-5460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 54040157" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1377.66 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 46 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-046: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1465.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FORA DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 71013'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST ROAD, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FORA DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 776.19 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 00025'09" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 180.72 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13022'14" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.13 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE RUN NORTH 06015'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 131.33 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 19°42'11" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044 PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 49°49'02" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.92 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1385.18 FEET A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 56-21145" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 316.40 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13006'58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 317.09 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°49'52" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.70 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 89°10'08" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FORA DISTANCE OF 432.12 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. WOHLFARTH CONSULTING GROUP LLC ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 246 N. WESTMONTE DRIVE AL TAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32774 (407) 750-3123 � PERMITS REQUIRED � AGENCY PERMIT TYPE I DATE APPROVED APPROVAL NO. EXPIRATION DATE REV. DATE 91ZT."ANT/10[0110191 C-1 COVER SHEET C-2 OVERALL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN C-3 OVERALL AERIAL PLAN C-4 RIGHT OF WAY EXCHANGE PLAN C-5 MASTER INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN C-7 APARTMENT HOMES PLAN C-7.1 TOWNHOUSE PLAN C-8.0 OCOEE-CLARCONA ROADWAY PLANS C-8.1 OCOEE-CLARCONA ROADWAY PLANS C-9.0 TOWNHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS C-9.1 ENTRANCE WALL DETAIL DESCRIPTION •„r'° 114 0 TE TAX I.D. PARCEL NUMBERS: 05-22-28-000-00-004 05-22-28-0000-00-040 05-22-28-0000-00-046 U nsnine8�� NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED REV. WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 PARCEL USE UNITS ROOMS COMMERCIA LSQUARE ERU FOOTAGE Height AREA (so AREA (ac) NOT S (NR1) Apartments 316 5 -story Bldgs. 648,554 14.89 Luxury Apartments Bldg. Plate 12,000sf (NC1) N.W. Parcell Commercial - Hotel 140 92,000 5 -story Bldgs. 196,095 4.50 Hotel Plate (+/-) 22,000sf Commercial - Bank 5,000 35ft Bank (NC2) N.E. Parcel 1 C -Store 3,500 35ft 158,169 3.63 QSR-1 3,000 35ft QSR-2 3,000 35ft (NC3) S.W. Parcel 1 Flex retail 1 7,000 35ft 329,282 7.56 Flex Retail 5,600 35ft Flex Retail 8,000 35ft Flex Retail 5,320 35ft Grocery 28,200 35ft (NC4) S.E. Parcel 1 C -Store (Race Tract) 5,411 35ft 205,359 4.71 Child Care 10,000 35ft Grocery 22,435 35ft (SR1) Townhouse Residential 196 35ft 964,786 30.00 (GRN1) Operlspace - Water Mara . 237,876 5.46 GRN2 Public Park 104,138 2.39 2,844,259 70.76 Totals 512 140 1198,466 PROJECT TEAM APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: KENNETH W BUCHMAN, OWNERS REP 2718 LAUREL OAK DRIVE WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 PHONE: 813-754-5018 KENBUCHMAN(s'i-)GMAIL.COM CIVIL ENGINEER: WOHLFARTH CONSULTING GROUP, LLC CONTACT: RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, P.E. 246 N. WESTMONTE DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 407-750-3123 RWOHLFARTH@WCGROUP.CO SURVEYOR: ALLEN & COMPANY INC CONTACT: WILSON E. WAY, PSM 15 E PLANT ST WINTER GARDEN FL 34787 CONTACT: ED JOHNSON, PSM 407-654-5355 OFFICE ED(a)-ALLEN-COMPANY.COM UTILITIES POTABLE WATER NON -POTABLE WATER WASTEWATER POWER TELECOMMUNICATIONS GAS CITY OF OCOEE CITY OF OCOEE CITY OF OCOEE DUKE ENERGY SPECTRUM TECO N r LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS N0. 32108 MASTERD V OPM N PLAN for OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Y' N ��°'�'y�r Paradise FIL?!gt-Its W�FlrCtu'r�LRu 7ucL'ttmlt�Fd PROJECT LOCATION 9 r,.lnrc Forest Lake.Galf Club ® alxAnmY V•man R4 u ? r'vlluv 4w» aU ' il14 �0.nq A,- i µ0 rp z x 3 a>P a �1 n OCOee ass W mttr Garde" a 4'15 cam. Ern -an rn n'.• Whrlr Fid wlwi. R21 4-i E 5'rsry Rd S'��'1 Rd ail d38 � J Da: iy"'rmr. yo4;aand Ea NDrrda'sTurnPite Flo ds s Turnpike St7�s3atdL'. Tildenvllle s sly Gama Ga ogle My Maps LOCATION MAP N.T.S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0 �J I' r ....... yr`rr . -4 - D AERIAL MAP N.T.S. I THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED APRIL 17, 1998 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5461, PAGE 2341 AND IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS: PARCEL 4 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-004: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2930.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 89°44'04" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 89044104" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6450-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 00053'06" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1111.47 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST FORA DISTANCE OF 265.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 58053'01" EAST FORA DISTANCE OF 72.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010'08" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 514.27 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010108" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 660.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 00°17'43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1409.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE OF RUN SOUTH 00034154" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 FORA DISTANCE OF 231.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 231 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN SOUTH 89044'04" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FORA DISTANCE OF 1286.39 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°11'35" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.77 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 40 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-040: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88107'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1252.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 88007'15" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 00017143" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1351.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN NORTH 89013'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1262.21 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 69°30'11" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 851.79 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39026123" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 868.85 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049155" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36019'17" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049'02" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 429, WESTERN BELTWAY, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-5460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 54040157" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1377.66 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 46 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-046: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1465.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FORA DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 71013'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST ROAD, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FORA DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 776.19 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 00025'09" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 180.72 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13022'14" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.13 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE RUN NORTH 06015'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 131.33 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 19°42'11" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044 PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 49°49'02" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.92 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1385.18 FEET A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 56-21145" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 316.40 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13006'58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 317.09 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°49'52" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.70 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 89°10'08" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FORA DISTANCE OF 432.12 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. WOHLFARTH CONSULTING GROUP LLC ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 246 N. WESTMONTE DRIVE AL TAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32774 (407) 750-3123 � PERMITS REQUIRED � AGENCY PERMIT TYPE I DATE APPROVED APPROVAL NO. EXPIRATION DATE REV. DATE 91ZT."ANT/10[0110191 C-1 COVER SHEET C-2 OVERALL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN C-3 OVERALL AERIAL PLAN C-4 RIGHT OF WAY EXCHANGE PLAN C-5 MASTER INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN C-7 APARTMENT HOMES PLAN C-7.1 TOWNHOUSE PLAN C-8.0 OCOEE-CLARCONA ROADWAY PLANS C-8.1 OCOEE-CLARCONA ROADWAY PLANS C-9.0 TOWNHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS C-9.1 ENTRANCE WALL DETAIL DESCRIPTION •„r'° 114 0 TE TAX I.D. PARCEL NUMBERS: 05-22-28-000-00-004 05-22-28-0000-00-040 05-22-28-0000-00-046 U nsnine8�� NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED REV. WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 c c T 0] O) O) 3 c 0 a c O E a 0 0 0 � � 1 U) O U J a 1 CLI Ll I I I n !;� i i i i i i i i i � i i i i i i i i i n i i i i i i i i -i -f -aa 6 6 6 6 6 6 A 6 /1— �6 � 0 Z s w Z OJ sem, Lu LL U CN Lu � 6' o6- Q 0� � PLO s a / i moi% rr 7 o1--- 0 o o a r QLd J a- Z � O d r M Q J Z J Z yyu O > J= O r > J O r Q r LLI > J O r T J w m O J O J m U 0 O J m U O Q cL O z N Z O z a0 N O O O 13381S 13dWO $� I I I 4 I I� lanoo 3oalaals3MokpAmw —44W_ - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -_ -- --- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- r J 7 1 ' / �•' IF I I 1 a ti F + U C,_ OJ L OM W� H � W W O (-7MW Q rn Ja-Z Q W 1. U> r _j Z) r �1 O waw O OJ w m O 0 J Jm Q �O QaIF Z Lo uj p1 I coI 0 � r I o J � - 71- I I W M IoJ r c`�i( i '�I � s � 7000 3JOIa81S3M __ - - - 1"VOOOM3w O0OM3AVl 'N '3Ad OOOM�iV9 Sl �, — l- r� - - - - - 00 Ll -- — -- —-- -- �r� — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ —`-* o I I 0LLJ I (3) � IN U w ' U D W - •q J C w 0 w M w I U 0 00m U I = O OW sr+ a r N I I I W _ 4f LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS NO. 32108 Ab �M 5� GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. 3/12119 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P . #20044 � 0 Z 4 w Z OJ Lu LL U CN Lu � � O Q � PLO J 0 J J U Q Lu V Q Oz 0 r r c`�i( i '�I � s � 7000 3JOIa81S3M __ - - - 1"VOOOM3w O0OM3AVl 'N '3Ad OOOM�iV9 Sl �, — l- r� - - - - - 00 Ll -- — -- —-- -- �r� — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ —`-* o I I 0LLJ I (3) � IN U w ' U D W - •q J C w 0 w M w I U 0 00m U I = O OW sr+ a r N I I I W _ 4f LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS NO. 32108 Ab �M 5� GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. 3/12119 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P . #20044 � 0 Z 4 w Z OJ Lu LL U Q Lu � � Q Z Q J J 0 J J U Q Lu V w Oz 0 O0� r c`�i( i '�I � s � 7000 3JOIa81S3M __ - - - 1"VOOOM3w O0OM3AVl 'N '3Ad OOOM�iV9 Sl �, — l- r� - - - - - 00 Ll -- — -- —-- -- �r� — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ —`-* o I I 0LLJ I (3) � IN U w ' U D W - •q J C w 0 w M w I U 0 00m U I = O OW sr+ a r N I I I W _ 4f LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS NO. 32108 Ab �M 5� GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. 3/12119 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P . #20044 0) U U jo� Paradise Heights 7 y [7 d�4 Fores n s� X Wural Rd b Avg C LOCATION MAP U POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 1 S88007'1 5"E - - - - - _ 122.87' GOLF COURSE W N a x 0 Lu � O� O o �a —j LL LUU 75 w> Boz L �o Qz v NQ z >v J Q a x 0 N Cn Z D Z Y 0:� Q (/) W W = Q ~ O W 0 O w I w u II 0 00 U) ~ � N LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES E BUSINESS N0. 32108 S GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 ( IN FEET) 3/14/19 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATI 1 inch = 50 ft. WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOILFARTI, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 Lu � J � O Lu —j LL LUU 75 w> O = Qz JO z >v w 75 W LLI CD ry O\ 0- O O N Cn Z D Z Y 0:� Q (/) W W = Q ~ O W 0 O w I w u II 0 00 U) ~ � N LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES E BUSINESS N0. 32108 S GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 ( IN FEET) 3/14/19 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATI 1 inch = 50 ft. WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOILFARTI, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 N Paradise Heights 1► McCornI Ck Fid Me Cormick Rd 7 y a JS a gForest Lake Coli Club a Hacxmey P?w.w Rd C%ti LOCATION MAP U PROJECT LOCATION ' a Cyr FULLERS CROSS RD I� N I PA 3 91 r�,wkonn 1 1 91_ O I OAK LEVEL HEIGHTS O P. B. L, PG. 31 C/') ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA \ \ I LOT 12 LOT 13 r\ \��. — 4 — — — 25' J� — — L ® •-- —_ ND AYE) AVE //nnnnnw �i I !�In - LOT 11 LOT 10 / \ a \ j OAK LEVEL HEIGHTS P. B. L, PG. 31 \ \ 25' 25' GRAN E COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 ;SII y-44 U4 y-- POINT OF BEGINNING PA CEL 3 25' II N NOT PLATTED 89°44'04"W NOT PLATTED LOT 12 LOT 13 L— — �RD AVED AVE I Ln O m O I LOT 11 LOT 10 I I OAK LEVEL HEIGHTS P.B. L, PG. 31 ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA LOT 12 I LOT 13 I I I I 0 v 4THI AV& AVE / I LOT 11 LOT 10 o of0 — \ \ I OAK LEVEL HEIGHTS \ P.B. L, PG. 31 \ I ORANGE COUNTY, F�ORIDA \ \ \ \ I LOT 12 LOT 13 \ I o` I L — I I 5TH AV& AVE ,S 100 F —I -- I� LOT 10 LOT 9 OAK LEVEL HEIGHTS P. B. L, PG. 31 i ORANGE COUNTY, rLORIDA W aLn �t- LOT 11 LOT 12 I o o Cn 6TH A\EH AVE _ m N 286.39' NOT PLATTED W m a x 0 LL Z N O Z0 L� Zzo �aQ- r O W 5 U) Z Q v 0 NQ > J Q a x 0 LLJ LLJ D' W = Q r\ ~ O w O w l w II 0 00 ~ O U N LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES E BUSINESS NO. 32108 S GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 40 80 160 ( IN FEET) 3/14/19 r NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATI 1 inch = 80 ! t. WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 LL LU Z Z0 Q LU W >— U) Z Q !� 0 J0 > U z � w( O 0z 0� 0 LLJ LLJ D' W = Q r\ ~ O w O w l w II 0 00 ~ O U N LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES E BUSINESS NO. 32108 S GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 40 80 160 ( IN FEET) 3/14/19 r NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATI 1 inch = 80 ! t. WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 0) N,1 0 N O a L MY - E m � ZI .T � I / /// ////// it i/iii/// I I F'/'/,A OR 0 I o i IIA I11 I/:II ►19 - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - I I I i W � � s J 0 z iLLJ O 1 I 0 � � �\ SAKE i \, LAKE \ \. 8 BIKEWAY SAKE I _ ---- — — — — - —= nO - - - - N LAK 'WOOD AVE UE N LAKEWOOD AVENUE \ ob -- --�,-- © --e - �_�—� _- _- -- -- j-- -- -- -- -- -- I O 0 a 0 N 0 O a, 3 3 w �aCl- J I � I o LL - IJ o o I I L t 0 3 v Y U Q' i NQ 0 a a 0 0 T O J Q 7 C C N a� a� N U W a GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 40 80 160 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 80 ft. z 0 U Y) W W Q 0 W a x 0 z O oQ p Q U � � �- zo Qo w U LL z 2i w> Ove z � Q J � Q 3: �O U� > U Q Lu (Dw Oz OLJ OOC/) O O O 0 N CO o o o U U w Q Vn w Of w = Q C��j 0 ~O w O w I w o U � N LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS N0. 32108 3/14/19 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATI WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 V Z N O L� azo �aCl- \W v NQ J Q a x 0 z O oQ p Q U � � �- zo Qo w U LL z 2i w> Ove z � Q J � Q 3: �O U� > U Q Lu (Dw Oz OLJ OOC/) O O O 0 N CO o o o U U w Q Vn w Of w = Q C��j 0 ~O w O w I w o U � N LAND DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING SERVICES BUSINESS N0. 32108 3/14/19 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATI WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 N C C N U m 02 O N N_ M U N U O U 3 'O vi C O IL T O 3 0 0 U I 0 04 0 a U r m z 0 m U W H Q :._ � �+T•F� ALL— tea.._ -_•_ �"� -_._ �a��._ ��— rtaf� �+._— �aa�� ��._ �a+� __ _ _ _ ____ _•___��`— _-_ . ..:rti� r _�� _� a -r _:7� _:. �r _— �... ^. _— _— .iT-rte• -��. r�� _— _- _ �_ _ i� ..��� _ s�� �-__�}k Of aJ 1� f0 � � M N W ter- �� � - - �� r :-� -:� -� � -:� - � � � � •� �� ��� � �� � - � jp L Q rte❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑1❑I^�I❑❑❑I ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ I o A 1:1 E11:1 F-1 EIEI El E]EITIE]EI E❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ DDDEDDEIE -I F-1 F] [-I F-1 F] F-1 7 E El F F7.[:] F1 Ll F-1 E] I EIF�FILI=ILIL: TOWNHOUSE EUITSz z O Q �o � � ��w W0 J J W U LL CD W � Z Q Z J J_ O � m U W W (D � Oz O C-) �• _ - ,--r. .�� .--r. ,--rte .�- T. �- - - - - ,�—_ .�. .� -- --- ..r -� -_—POOL, y �' a— � - � � ar � � —� _� _� � ar � _� _ --- _r --i- at �� _—� �a�� � � •� _� --_ •�- ar --. a .� �- � it _ - _� ar ._- _ -� Ti � .- ��� � �T��T _--� - -�� ��� ����� ����� ��� �� stir- ���-� ��T--- �.r������+���� _�� ter- �� �r-r����� ��- �M� stir rt�-���T�r��� -+�� T�� -•�.�� �� T� '����� '.}�5 ��� -- .�. a-_ �.s— �..�-_ ���_ � �- �. �- ---•� ---• --�..� ��.. _�.r _-�..� _�. �. -�. _�� _ _ - a _. ,tom_ �....- a�a- � �-_ �.-. _�. � _-� � -� _-�� —�..•. -�� -� _-a,� _-�-. �- �.- �..�-_ �-- =ate-. t. «. - .••' _���� � �� -.. ��- _�_-�_ -��_ v �_ - � �� - �__-�_- :__--�.� �< «• �_�- -�� - _ .rte - � ,--_--�� � �_ - � �� tom_ ��; - _--_� �+� «�� «�� :_�- . �_-�-_--_� :_ -�_ �_-__--_� �--_-rte :k, O • � - t� � ..rte �� :..^� ,-._ � �� �� ..-.� � T� �� _ _ _ .... _ ..— — --- -- — — - -- ... - - - - � � �� T.. � ,� �� .-rte � ,...�,--�--.-rte � ��. - - - - - — — — — — — - — — — -- - -- �� ,� ,--,� �����...��...� �� .--.� �t ��� �.. p h �L_LJ ® I ■ I ■ I < Q GE� U U in W W = W � Q W • k. Of U -- -— -- - �r;'�III I 4 O N L-J❑lam❑❑ ❑❑ ❑1❑�❑ ' L -j ❑�M❑ ❑ ❑ M❑71❑❑�. I I f❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑ .' ❑❑❑_❑❑❑❑ E]EILIE10-:1E]_I❑ :❑ E101 -❑i❑❑❑_❑ �_i❑❑❑❑I❑i❑ EIDE]EIE]EIE ILI❑❑❑❑. -' oD=o❑❑ ❑I I ❑= ❑❑❑ - ❑= ❑❑LJ- I'_ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ I_�❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑�1. EANDDERVELOPMENT .I INGSEVICE ENGINEERING SERVICES TOWNHOUSE ELEVATION 6 UNITS BUSINESS N0.32108 3/21/19 NOT TO BE FILED FOR RECORD UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED WITH THE ORIGINAL SEAL OF RICHARD C. WOHLFARTH, FLORIDA P.E. #20044 c T m U c T m U WORK IN PROGRESS REVISED 3D RENDERINGS 18th March 2019 40tw V ocoet, —willillo� 11,411W rCOIV4 OAD -, Lo:— v/ Yl /V Co SABLE RUNWAY IMF < - .�F AWL F Ir P. %0 Alk 01 �Jkjo V.y��-:�i'ir Yom► lmkp- � OD AVE �� N.LAKEWO NUE MAL �_ 711; off low L6--� - �xf. C,- 7Z,, -OW �„ 'F JL jpdh --rr* Y 711 - Pr.mit -0000 k- -: IMF Wit olleft%c -At I WIN" iamb ago hhh�,-ql� �m qLAdkwL zp. I Por 1p Ir qL le 40' dp '61 A JL 4_ dL Por 1p Ir f - le 40' dp T .0 A I ISI � "k` NMI - i 4 -- w . tw k.- . � . � . \ . -- . % �I 2 �- �` ,IL - sk � _ - � _ . :. 1.7 dkil f ,diem +rm i :iTAri i ir tir saw L h. l O I O � ��► � FF � coq RO OOID Al_. '.- Ocoee - CIARCO/V Rn, - Lt•vt Ae M A4m d1w WIN" PL 07 pip", 7'. ,L% AV iL ftp 4j. = O _ lw" - �- JL �-mp- } a� _ i■ - r.- ! Ilk . y Y; 'gyp �'• ,j■=' ' oodP We y} �1 •�Kti iS S P- VFT VF4FFPFW I AF f ON dW-- v.64 6w -•' y� sow Awl� V t op -q 'l ' y _ww�- MW r " t rai.' — � - �},r,'"�, � t v -J •I:. .� � ..SVT.` . - ..�' �. ' �5�t . St — .i'�' �.a. - l w ' Pf -•+�' � ..h' • � p aar k �` �e �;. � x� ; - _ - ��-� M �. r RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2018 O C O E E VILLAGE CENTER clTr �. "< COEE CITY OF OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for City of Ocoee by Wohlfarth Consulting Group, LLC WCG Project 2018-017 246 N. Westmonte Drive I Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 1 407-750-3123 (0) 1 407-350-9090 (C) i RWohlfarth@WCGroup.co A AkIN Z/� 0 C 0 e ce Florida REZONING APPLICATION Development Services — Planning Division 150 N. Lakeshore Drive I Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone: 407.905.3157 1 Fax: 407.905.3158 PROJECT NUMBER: RZ lA-O(a' - DATE RECD: PROJECT NAME: Ocoee Village Center RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2018 CITY OF OCOEE Received Date — Office Use Only ACTION REQUESTED: Land Use Amendment to HieDensity Residential and h Commercial ACREAGE: 73.41 #OF LOTS: 360 Apartments, 140 Townhouses together with 150,000 SF of Commercial ZONING REQUESTED: P.U.D. LAND USE REQUESTED H.D. Residential and Commercial APPLICANT'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman, owner representative APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive, 'Pin 0 F1 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 813-754-5018 and 407-350-9090 E-MAILADDRESS: kenbuctMAq@gmail.com and Rwoh1farth@wcgroup.co- OWNER OF RECORD: See Attached List OWNER'S ADDRESS: See Attached List PHONE NUMBER: See Attached List 0 INVOICES WILL BE SENT TO:[] OWNER OR [X ]APPLICANT PROPERTY LOCATION: Clarcona-Ocoee Road east of SR 429, 10711 N.Lakewood Avenue PROPERTY TAX ID. NO(S): 05-22-28-0000-00-040.05-22-28-0000-00-046 05-22-28-0000-00-004 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL APPLICATIONS FOR SUBDIVISION OR SITE PLAN REVIEW MUST PROVIDE THREE (3) EXECUTED, CERTIFIED AND SEALED BOUNDARY SURVEYS FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE A METES -AND -BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ATTACH SURVEY WITH FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS EXHIBIT. Form 18 REZONING APPLICATION /UN �� yD1R PRESENTZON|NG: PRESENT DESIGNATION ON[�COEEFUTURE LAND USEMAP: DEVELOPMENT HISTORY/OTHER INFORMATION: Vacant, Timber Lands NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND EXISTING LAND USE OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL: N/A, Property is Vacant and is a planted pine forest (silviculture) HOW WILL THE FOLLOWING ESSENTIAL SERVICES BEPROVIDED? A. POTABLE WATER: _CitV of Ocoee B. WASTEWATER TREATMENT: City of Ocoee C. STORMWAT RMA0AGEMENT: Private D. RECREATION: City of Ocoee Prairie Lake Elementary, Ocoee Middle, Ocoee High School 2Z6Total E. SCHOOLS AND PROJECTED NUMBER OFSCHOOL AGE CHILDREN: APPLICATION MADE TO OCPS? -Yes TRANSPORT/TION: (Atraffic study may berequired.) UnForm 18 derstood REZONING APPLICATION • APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A CITY OF OCOEE OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT WITH APPLICATION. • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE DEEMED INSUFFICIENT AND MAY BE REJECTED WITHOUT REFUND OF THE APPLICATION FEE. THE CITY MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IF IN THE CITY'S SOLE DISCRETION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRAFFIC STUDIES) IS NEEDED IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE APPLICATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. Form 18 3 REZONING APPLICATION (W Form 18 APPLICANT SHALL PAY SUCH ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 1, SECTION 1-12 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. "REVIEW COSTS' SHALL MEAN AND REFER TO THE COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE REVIEW AND PROCESSING OF AN APPLICATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITY ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS AND LEGAL, CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING FEES AND COSTS, AND ALL ADVERTISING COSTS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT REVIEW COSTS SHALL NOT, INCLUDE (I) THE COST OF CITY STAFF FROM TIME DEDICATED TO THE REVIEW AND PROCESSING AN APPLICATION, AND (II) CITYATTORNEY, LEGAL, CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING FEES AND COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY IN REVIEWING AND PROCESSING AN APPLICATION WHICH ARE EXPRESSLY INCLUDED WITHIN THE FLAT FEE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1-12.C.2 HEREOF. I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION: ,MfrLl%-MIVI 3Il9iYFlIUKt DATE CITY OF OCOEE 2 REZONING APPLICATION OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH Before me, the undersigned personally appeared Kenneth W Buchman who being first duly swornon oath, depose(s) and say(s): 1. That they/she/he/is the fee -simple owner(s) of the property legally described in this application and that the attached ownership list is made a part of the affidavit and contains the legal description(s) for the real property, and the names and mailing addresses of all owners having an interest in said land. 2. That they/she/he desire(s) comprehensive elan and rezoning (specify action sought) for said property. 3. That they/she/he/ have/has appointed himself (specify himself or agent) to act as the Owner's Authorized Agent to represent the Owner in connection with the proposed action and the real property described in this application. 4. That they/she/he agree to be bound by the actions of the Owner's Authorized Agent designated in Paragraph 3 above and the Ocoee Land Development Code. 5. That they/she/he affirm(s), certif(y)(ies) and will complywith all ordinances, regulations and provisions of the City Code of the City of Ocoee, and that all statements and diagrams submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of their/his/her knowledge and belief and further, that this application and attachments shall become part of the official records of the City of Ocoee, and are not returnable. 6. That the accompanying adjacent property owners list is, to the best of their/her/his knowledge, a complete and accurate list of the owner's names and mailing addresses for all property lyingwithin three hundred (300) feet of the perimeter of the subject parcel, as recorded on the latest official Orange County Tax Rolls. 7. That prior to the public hearing, if applicable, signs will be prominently posted on the subject parcel not less than seven (7) days before the application will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Board or the Board of Adjustment, and will remain posted until final determination after which time the notices are to be removed and destroyed. Owner's Signature Print Name: Sworn to and subscribed before me this ZL of ,. , tom'. /3`" hAt4 "' L Y d. t . 20�, by_ �,� who is personally know to me orwho produced as identification, and who took an oath. Notary Public Print Name: yy� l �2_f�r._ IUNJLt'L *Y�(y�.LINDA MvOuNt�Notary Public • State of Flor,oa My commission expires: J Cornn►ission GG 082080 My COMM Expires Feb 28, 2021 w.,. 9endtrrltMOuyh National Notary Assn. Form 18 5 REZONING APPLICATION Form 18 REZONING APPLICATION OWNERSHIP LIST PARCEL ONE: OWNER'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman, Elise Della Rocca, Tom and Carol Cole, Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young, Beryle Buchman, Miles Buchman, Robert Solomon OWNERSHIP INTEREST: Fee Simple MAILING ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive. Plant City Fl, 33566 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey PARCEL TWO: OWNER'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman , Elise Della Rocca, Tom and Carol Cole, Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young. Beryle Buchman, Miles Buchman, Robert Solomon OWNERSHIP INTEREST: Fee Simple MAILING ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive. Plant City Fl, 33566 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey Form 18 REZONING APPLICATION PARCEL THREE: OWNER'S NAME: Kevin Young, BeKyle Buchman Miles Buchman, Robert Solomon OWNERSHIP INTEREST: Fee Simple MAILING ADDRESS: - 2718 Laurel Oak Drive. Plant Citv FI, 33566 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey * NOTE: ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS |FMORE THAN THREE PARCELS. REZONING APPLICATION CITY OF OCOEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT VERIFIED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FORM The following legal description has been prepared by and submitted to the City Planning Division for verification. Signature Date APPLICATION REQUEST (OFFICE USE ONLY): FILE NO: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (TO BE TYPED BY APPLICANT): Form 18 Property Owner's Information/ Owners of Record Owner's Name: ■ Kenneth Buchman ■ Elise Della Rocca • Tom and Carol Cole ■ Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young ■ Beryle Buchman • Miles Buchman • Robert Solomon Owner's Address: ■ 2718 Laurel Oak Drive Plant City, Florida 33566-6740 Owner's Telephone Number: ■ 813-754-5018 Owners within 306ft CA 919107514 FID Parcel Num Ownerl Owner2 Addressl 16 282028012401040 ACHERMAN PIETHEIN A ALMEIDA SILVIA R $50 E H ST APT 95 48282027000000084 AGARWALMANIU AGARWAL ROHITAS 3902 KILMARNOCK DR 58 282028000000061 ARENDT GEORGE T JR 327124889 APOPKA 65 282028000000039 ARREDONDO JESUS ARREDONDO IRENE 19 E LESTER RD 6412 SANSON DR 47 282028012400040 SAE SUNG OK FL 327718122 31 282028012400180 SHIM YATEE R SHIM SAVITRI 32 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 27 282028012400240 CAI ZURONG 01 YU 244 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 34 282028000000019 CHILDERS WILLIAM FL 330 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 18 282028012400130 CHRISTMAN DANIEL P CHRISTMAN RACHEL L 2208 ROCK SPRINGS RD 8601 BEAR HAVEN CT 64 282028000000017 CITY OF APOPKA APOPKA FL 30 282028012400190 COLIN RIGUAD COLIN ROSA M N 120 E MAIN ST 250 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 49 282028012401050 CONFIDENTIAL 327124873 TAMPA 63 282028000000042 CONFIDENTIAL ORLANDO CONFIDENTIAL 52 282028012400020 CRUMP PENNY A FL CONFIDENTIAL 9 282028012401140 DESAMOURJUNIAS DESAMOUR MARIE 20 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 4 282028012401090 DORMAN CECIL DORMAN HUGUETTE 340 MAPLEVIEW CT 143 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 26282028012400150 EARLJERRYM EARL NORA PALACIOS 22SALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 46 282027000000061 EDGELL L LC 327124871 OCOEE 3 282028012400560 ESPOSITO DOLORES F WILLIS KATHLEEN M 2451 WALNUT HEIGHTS RD 2317 TOPAZ ISLE LN 40 282028012401080 GOONEWARDENA SHAMANDRA GOONEWARDENA RUTH 209 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 22282028012400090 GOWDA YESHWANTH FL 7708 TUSCANY WOODS DR 43 282028000000037 GREGORY CHARLES D 327124867 APOPKA 13 282028012401180 HAN AN HO JANG MI RAN PO BOX 780717 6 282028012401110 HERRING PETER W HERRING R ELAINE 21 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 131 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 21 282028012400100 JONES ELROY JONES KEISHA 136 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 25 282028012400050 JONES ISAAC STE8NER•JONES ANITRA LYNAE 106 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 8 282028012401130 JONES MAY C FL 327124869 5 282028012401100 KECHEJIAN JOHN KECHEIIAN SIRANUSH 119 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 137 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 19 282028012400120 KENNINGTON KENNETH P KENNINGTON LORI LEIGH 1405 CHARLEON CT 35 282028000000052 KNIGHT CAROLYN SUE SMALLWOOD PATSY DIANE 2144 ROCK SPRINGS RD 20 282028012400110 LE VAN HIEN LE CHRIS DAVIS 142 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 12 282028012401170 LITTLE ROBERT L JR LITTLE RETHA M 27 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 41 282028012400570 LUCAS DAWN LUCAS GARY 2311 TOPAZ ISLE LN 59 282028000000094 LUCCIONI JOSE 328146405 25 E LESTER RD 23 282028012400080 MOCK JOHN C MOCK GERALDINE N 124 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 10 282028012401150 NARAINE SHANTA FL 327125728 24 282028012400070 NEWSURN RICHARD A 327124865 107 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 2 282028012400950 NGUYEN ETHAN NGUYEN KATIE 118 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 32 282028012400170 NGUYEN TUAN ANH NGUYEN NGOC VAN 2314 POND COVE WAY 238 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 45 282028012400030 NGUYEN TUNG DOAN THUY HANH XUAN 26 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 14 282028012400930 NOISETTE WILNER NOISETTE MARIE 2307 EMERALD ROSE WAY 11 282028012401160 ORTEGA LOURDES D FL 33 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 67 282028000000043 OWENS LARRY P 1R OWENS PEGGY A PO BOX 2324 7 282028012401120 PARK GRACIE MAE LONGWOOD 142 DOROTHY DR APT 2A 56 282028000000084 PUMPHREY CURTIS R PUMPHREY KAREN R 28030 SHIRLEY SHORES RD 28 282028012400210 RAMLAL DAMIEN RAMLAL LISA 312 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 62 282028000000040 RAULERSON ADELSERT D 16 N HIGHLAND AVE 60 282028000000087 RAULERSON ADELBERT D 1R 859 ERROL PKWY 38 282027000000065 RED LANDS LAND TRUST C/O FLTR LLC TRUSTEE 50 282028012401030 RIVA NORMA ROSA 51 282028012400220 RIZO CARLOS A RIZO MARTHA C 2309 POND COVE WAY 68 282028000000041 ROCK SPRINGS ACADEMY INC 318 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 39 282028012401020 ROUSE BARBARA R LIFE ESTATE REM: STANLEY L ROUSE 2226 ROCK SPRINGS RD 2315 POND COVE WAY 57 282028000000074 RSPI MHC LLC 42 282028012400230 SHAW DOMINICK A SHAW DIANA R PO BOX 4918 324 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 44 282028012400060 STEEL£ VERNITA STEELE DELROY 112 ALEXANDRIA PLACE OR 15 282028012400940 STENZEL MICHAEL STENZEL SUSAN 2308 POND COVE WAY SS 282028000000058 TAAFEVANESSAA TAAFE ALFRED 4111 CALEDONIA AVE 17 282028012400140 TAGHADOSS M MEHDI 301 N ATLANTIC AVE APT 204 29282028012400200 THEODORE CLEANNE J THEODORE PIERRE 306 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 33 282028012400160 THEODOREJEAN THEODORE URVINE 232 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 37 282028000000018 VBRO ENTERPRISES INC 320 W SABAL PALM PL STE 300 36 282028022000050 VBRO ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 915201 Addressl Address3 Address4 City State Zip CHULA VISTA CA 919107514 APOPKA FL 327124783 APOPKA FL 327122266 APOPKA FL 327125224 APOPKA FL 327124869 APOPKA FL 327124889 APOPKA FL 327124875 APOPKA FL 327125728 SANFORD FL 327718122 APOPKA FL 327035346 APOPKA FL 327124889 APOPKA FL 327124869 LAKE MARY FL 327464026 APOPKA FL 327124871 APOPKA FL 327124872 APOPKA FL 327034854 APOPKA FL 327124867 APOPKA FL 327124873 TAMPA FL 336475108 ORLANDO FL 328780717 APOPKA FL 327124868 APOPKA FL 327124871 APOPKA FL 327124870 APOPKA FL 327124870 APOPKA FL 327124871 APOPKA FL 327124871 OCOEE FL 347612566 APOPKA FL 327125728 APOPKA FL 327124870 APOPKA FL 327124868 APOPKA FL 327124867 APOPKA FL 327122266 APOPKA FL 327124870 APOPKA FL 327124871 APOPKA FL 327124870 APOPKA FL 327124864 APOPKA FL 327124889 APOPKA FL 327124869 APOPKA FL 327124863 APOPKA FL 327124868 APOPKA FL 327042324 ELIZABETHTOWN KY 427014845 TAVARES FL 327789686 APOPKA FL 327124875 APOPKA FL 327034374 APOPKA FL 327122601 4767 NEW ORLANDO FL 328146405 APOPKA FL 327124865 APOPKA FL 327124875 APOPKA FL 327125728 APOPKA FL 327124865 SKOKIE tL 600764918 APOPKA FL 327124875 APOPKA FL 327124870 APOPKA FL 327124864 APOPKA FL 327126048 COCOA BEACH FL 329312956 APOPKA FL 327124875 APOPKA FL 327124889 LONGWOOD FL 327793621 LONGWOOD FL 327915201 4WGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: The Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South Range 28 East, LESS the South 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right—of—way, AND LESS that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 lying Northwesterly of State Road 429. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—way taken as parcel 62-161, "Limited Access Right—Of—Way" and Parcel 62-161, "Right—Of—Way A" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 5461, Page 2341. PARCEL B: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the North 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right—of—way. AND The North 7 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the West 30 feet for road right—of—way. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—way taken as Parcel 62-161, "Right—Of—Way B" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 5461, page 2341. LESS AND EXCEPT: ditional right—of—way taken as Parcel 1044, "Right—Of—Way" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 6, page 8120, ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL 1 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 88'07'15" East along the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 1252.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said North line run South 88'07'15 East for a distance of 122.87 feet to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5; thence departing said North line run South 00`17'43" West along the East line of said Northwest 1/4 for a distance of 1351.26 feet to a point on the Northerly line of Right—of—Way Taking, Parcel No. 1044, per Official Records Book 9816, Page 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence departing said East line run North 89'13'22" West along said Northerly right—of—way tine for a distance of 154.59 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 1262.21 feet, a chord bearing of North 69'30'11" West and a chord length of 851.79 feet; thence run Northwesterly along said Northerly right—of—way line and said curve through a central angle of 39'26'23" for an arc distance of 868.85 feet; thence run North 49'49'55" West for a distance of 151.44 feet; thence run North 36'19'17" West for a distance of 51.42 feet; thence run North 49'49'02" West for a distance of 184.99 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of County Road 429, Western Beltway, a limited access right—of—way, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence departing aforesaid Northerly right—of—way line run North 54'40'57" East along said Southerly right—of—way line for a distance of 1377.66 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 23.76 acres more or less. AND A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00~53^06^ East along the waot line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 for o distance of 1405.41 feet to the Southwest corner ,�'oor 'er ,of the Northwest mfhw � tl/4 of the Southwest of aforesaid Section 5; thence departing sold West line run South O8�O'O~'Eoot along the "" " t hline of said Northwest 1/4 o/ the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for o distance of 14512 feat thence departing said North line North UO�8'52-Epot for o distance of 50.00 feet to o point on the Northerly right-of-way |�a of Ocoee -C|umonp Roadpor Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-wayControl Survey Project No. 75320-0460602/603. also being thepQ|NT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 71�J.2O'Weo^ along said Northerly '/yhc-o'-wy line o «/ouonce o/ 20.59 feet to op»i»t on the Easterly right-of-way line of West Ruod'o limited o::euaright-of-way, Per Orlando or«»go County Expressway right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-802/003; thence run North 07'06'16" East along said Easterlyright_nf_woy line for o distance mvv.uv feet to o point of curvature of o curve concave Westerly and having o radius of770.1S foot o chord bearing of "r"' 0025^09.Eont and o chord length of 180.72 feet; thence run Northerly along saidEasterly right-of-way line and said curve through o central angle of 13^22'14'for on oro distance o/ 181'13 foot to o point oftongenoy, thence run North 0675'58^Weat for o distance of 131.33 feet; thence run North 19'42'11^ West fux odistance of25.32 feet to o point on the Southerly line of Right -of -Way Taking, Por -e| No. 1044 per Official Records Book 9816, Page of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence departing said Easterly right-of-way line run South +v`4vu2' East along said Southerly right -of -Way line for a distance of 265.92 feet to a point on a non tangent curve concave Northeooter|y and having o radius of 1385.18 f=et, o chord bearing of South ^D`21'45^East and o chord length of 31640foot thence run Southeasterly along said Southerly right-of-way line o-noidcurwe through o nont,o| angle of 13'06'58" for an arc distance of 317.03 feet; thence run South 00'49'52" West for oUiatonue of 6070 feet to o point onaforesaid Northerly right-of-way line of Ocoee - C|oroono Road per Or|o-u Orange County Expressway Authority rightof-°ux ControlSurvey Project No. 75320-8460-602/603; thence departing said Southerly right-of-wayline run North 89/0'08West alongaoid Northerly right-of-way line /or o distance of 432.12 fart aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. to Contains 2.13 acres more or less. (W CEL 3 A parcel of land comprising o portion of Sections 5 and 8. Township 22 Snuth, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE otthe Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4ofaforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00*53'06-East along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of said SooUnn 5 for n distance of '2Q-3'0�''O3`—feet to the Southwest corner of 8`e"Southwest1/4 of Section 5; thence departing said West line run North 89'44'04" East along the South line of said Southwest 1/4 for odistance of 30.00 feet to o point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Ocoee - C|orcono Rood; thence continuing along saidSouth line run North 89~44'04~Eoat for o distance of 40.00 feat to o point on the Easterly right-of-way|ine of Ocoee -C|oroono Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control 3u'»nyp'»�ut No. 75320-6450-602/60,3; departing said South line run North 00'53'00'West along said Easterly '=h' o' ^~/ |i'^ '~ ~ ~is^'^= of ''''.4' feet;thenco run North 07'06'16" East for q distance of 20587 feet; thence run norm 58��'01^Eost for o distance of 72.13 feetto o point on the Southerly right-of-way line of Ocoee - C|o'uo o m»no per »r/onun oro»go County Expressway Authorityright-of-way Control Sum�ypro}o t No. 75320-6460-602/803; thence run South 89'10'08" East along said Southor|ydght_o' o|ine for o"'"tunco of 514.27 feet; thence run worth 00^43'52'Eoat for o distance of 2000 feet' thence runSouth 89'10'08"Eout for o distance of 660-17 feet to o point on the East ||me of the Southwest Y4 »f the Southwest Y4 ofofor000id Section 5; thence deporting said Southerly right-of-way line ,3-h OO'''4~ '`~^ n|»nv said E""` '= for "diotonoo of 1409'05 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest Y4 of the Southwest X of said Section 5, also being theNortheast corner of the Northwest % of the Northwest X of aforesaid Section 8; thence deporting said East line of run 3outhUO^34^54,Eost along the East ono of un said Northwest % o/ the Northwest Y4 of Section O for o distance of 231 .78 feet to o Northwest on the South line of the North 231 feet of the N�hummt l4 ' of the Northwest � of aforesaid Section O� thence departing said line run South 89*4404" West along said South line for o distance of 1286.38 foot to o point on aforesaid Easterly line of Ocoee - C|orcono Rood; thence run North 00'11'35" West along said Easterly right-of-^|ina for o distance of 231.77 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. ""x Contains 47.50 acres more or less. 21 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION Development Services – Planning Division 150 N. Lakeshore Drive I Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone: 407.905.3157 1 Fax: 407.905.3158 A. Applicant Information CPA. 9018 -00(v 1. Applicant's Name: Kenneth W. Buchman. owner Wresenative 2. Applicant's Address: 271. Laurel Oak Drive 3. Applicant's Telephone Number: 811-754-5018 and 407-350-9090 4. Applicant's Facsimile Number: B. Property Owner's Information 1. Property Owner's Name: See Attached List 2 Property Owner's Address: See Attached List 3. Property Owner's Telephone Number: See Attached List 4. Property Owner's Facsimile Number: C. Subject Property Information 1tECEiVED JUN 2 8 2018 TY OF OCOEE 19'&e"'" Office Use On 1. Location: Clarcona-Ocoee Road cast of SR 429, 10711 N.Lakewood Avenue 2. Acreage of Property: 7.3.41 3. Current Use: Residential 4. Proposed Use: HD Residential and Commercial 5. Existing Zoning: R -1A 6. Proposed Zoning: LDR 7. Existing Future Land Use Designation: LDR 8. Proposed Future Land Use Designation: H.D. Residential and Commercial 9. Does the Property Owner hold title to other property in the vicinity? Yes—If so, where? Remainder property on the other side of 429 10. Has an amendment for the adjacent property been processed within the past two years? One was started a few years back, not sure of the exact date of submittal or status. It is assumed that (W the application is not current- AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CL Surrounding Property Information 1. Zoning: North: East: South: West: `RJA Z. Future Land Use: North: Recreation and East: Low Dqng�y Open Space Residential/ Recreation South: Low Density West: -Low Densit 1es!geIDla/ Residential E. Required Submittals l_�__[ornp|etedApplication Form 2.X Flat fee and review deposit 3.X completed Owner's Affidavit 4. X Completed, Annexation and Initial Zoning Hold Harmless Agreement 5.X Completed Applicant's Acknowledgment 6.X Location Map 7.X Legal description and boundary survey ofthe property 8. X Title certification complying with 177'041, FS.z Q.X Alist ofsurrounding property owners within 3OO'ofthe subiec1proper�Kexcluding right- of'vvaysand lakes. - IO. X Supplemental information as may be required from time to time to process the application. F. Available Facilities I Water Service - a Nearest water main: North Lakewood Avenue b. Anticipated water demand: 240,.644 Gallons.Per Day c Water capacity available: 2 Sewer Service ' a Nearest sewer main: 12, inch Gravity Main located on North Lakewood Avenue and Wurst Avenue b. Anticipated sewer demand:. 197,068 Gallons Per Day c Sewer capacity available: 90�1 I � a Nearest roadway access: Clarcona — Ocoee Road and SR 429 This review does not guarantee capacity availability for public facilities or roads for the project. The applicant may reserve capacity for all public facilities and roads by obtaining a Capacity Reservation AM ENDM ENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN b Anticipatedtrips per day: __ C Roadway capacity available: 4 Fire Service - a Location ofnearest fire hydrant: b Fire district: c. Estimated fire response time: d Will any hazardous materials bestored here? 5 Police Service - a Police service district: b. Estimated police response time: 6 Storm water Service: a Location ofstormvvaterretention pond: b Existing stonmvvaterpond tobeused: c New stornnvvatersystem tobebuilt: -An on-site Storm Water Pgrid will he constructed on site. ci Stor/nvvaterwill behandled during DRC Review: 7 Solid Waste - a Nearest solid waste dump: b Disposal capacity available: c How will any hazardous waste be disposed: 8. Recreation - a Anticipated recreation impact: b Nearest parkfaci|ity:________ c Recreation capacity available: AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN G. Owner's Affidavit STATE OF: Florida COUNTY OF: Hillsborough Before me, the undersigned personally appeared who being first duly sworn on oath, depose(s) and say(s): 1 That theylshelhe arelis the fee -simple cwner(s)of the property |- '�|�describedinthis application. 2- That theylshelhe desire(s) to apply for a small scale comprehensive plan amendment for said property. l That thev/shp/hehave/has appointed himself to act as the Owner's Authorized Agent to represent the Owner in connection with the proposed action and the real property described in this application. 4 That they/she/he agrees to be hound by the action(s) of the Owner's Authorized Agent designated inparagraph 3above and the Ocoee Land Development Code. ` 5, That theylshelhe affirm(s) and will comply with all ordinances, regulations, and provisions of the City Code of the City of and that all statements and 'diarn ~ s submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of the/nhen1�� knowledge and sU --ef and furthe�that th�appUattachments part ofthe official records of the City returnable. 6. That the accompanying adjacent property owners list is, to the best of - knowledge, acornp|e1eand accurate list ofthe ovvne�snamnesand nnaiUngaddresses -`�—'-- property king within three hundred feet LlOO'> of the perimeter of the subject parcel, as recorded in the latest official Orange County Tax Rolls. 7 That prior to the public hearing, ifapp|icable' swiUbeprominen'�posted onthe subject parcel not less than twelve /12\ days before the application will be considered b' -^ ~^-e Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board ofAdjustment, willan� w�remain posted until final determination (City Commission adopted or denial), after which time the noticesar- beremnoved and destroyed. - '- AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Sworn to and subscribed before me this,&tday of Ounc. o?af8 , by Le-Anct{► lc1 �c� � who isersonal€y kna nwnW tom or who produced as identification, and who took an oath. a, Notary Public f Print Name: r My Commission Expires: �Y Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of who is personally known to me or who produced oath. Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: LINDA M. YOUNG Notary Public - State of Florida COmiflliaion # GG 062080 [NOTARIAL SE;^, My Comm. Expires Feb 28, 202 �. °A ���•'���, Bonded thmughNational Notary Ass+ Owner's Signature . by as identification, and who took an [NOTARIAL SEAL] Owner's Signature Sworn to and subscribed before me this_ day of by who is personally known to me or who produced as identification, and who took an oath. Notary Public Property Owner's Information/ Owners of Record Owner's Name: • Kenneth Buchman • Elise Della Rocca • Tom and Carol Cole ■ Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young • Beryle Buchman • Miles Buchman ■ Robert Solomon Owner's Address: ■ 2718 Laurel Oak Drive Plant City, Florida 33566-6740 Owner's Telephone Number: ■ 8I3-754-5018 )-754-5018 A SUPPLEMENTAL DATA LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT (LUPA) AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (ZMA) OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER CITY OF OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA JUNE 2018 Prepared for City of Ocoee by Wohlfarth Consulting Group, LLC WCG Project 2018-017 �A OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... ......................................... 1 2. PROPERTY AERIAL MAP ............................. .................................................................... 1 3. MASTER SITE PLAN ................................................................ .................. ............... 3 4. LAND USE AND ZONING .................. ......................... ...................................................... 5 5. LEVEL OF SERVICE .......................................... __ ............. __ ................. _ ........................ 8 6. SERVICES .............................................................. ........................................................... 8 6.1 POTABLE WATER SERVICE ....................................... __,_ ........................................ 8 6.3.1 WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES ................................................ 9 7. CONCURENCY ................................................................................................................ 10 8. SCHOOLS .............................................................. ................................. 11 9. IMPACT FEES .................................................................................................................. 12 10. UTILITIES / SERVICES ............. ................... ............................................................... 13 11. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................ 13 12. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................... 13 13. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ...................................................... 13 14. HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY .............................................................. 14 15. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 14 16. WATER MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................... 14 17. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW ........ ...................... _ ................... ...................................... 15 17.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE MAY 19, 2005 REPORT ................................... 15 18. OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER TITLE CERTIFICATION ................................................... 16 19. PROJECT SCHEDULE ......................................................... ........................................ 16 20. GENERAL INFORMATION .......... ........................................................... ..................... 17 JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE i OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER TABLE 1 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROJECT PROGRAM .............................................. 4 TABLE 2 PROJECT SITE AND LAND USE DATA .................................... ..................... ..... 7 TABLE 2 PROJECT LOS AND PROJECT IMPACT .............................................................. 8 TABLE4 SUMMARY OF LOS ..................... ......... ............................................................. 11 TABLE 5 STUDENT GENERATION RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS ....................... 11 TABLE 6 PROJECT AREA SCHOOLS / RATING ................... ..................... __ .................. 12 TABLE 7 CITY OF OCOEE AND ORANGE COUNTY IMPACT FEES* .............................. 12 TABLE 8 PROJECT AREA UTILITY/SERVICES COMPANIES .................... ................. _.. 13 TABLE 9 PROJECT MILESTONES ..................................................................................... 16 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................... 1 FIGURE2 PROJECT AERIAL ......................................................................... ..................... 1 FIGURE 3 HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL MAP .......................................................................... 2 FIGURE 4 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER SITE PLAN ............................................................. 3 FIGURE 5 EXISTING LAND USE MAP ................................................................................. 5 FIGURE 6 PROPOSED LAND USE MAP ................ _ .......................................................... 5 FIGURE 7 EXISTING ZONING MAP FIGURE 8 PROPOSED ZONING MAP ...................... 6 FIGURE 9 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROPERTY FEMA MAP ...................................... 14 JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE ii OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT B OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER AERIAL MAP EXHIBIT C OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT D OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT E OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER EXISTING ZONING MAP EXHIBIT F OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROPOSED ZONING MAP EXHIBIT G OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER SITE PLAN EXHIBIT H OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER LAND USE TABLES AND ANALYSIS OF LEVEL OF SERVICE EXHIBIT I OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER UPDATED SURVEY EXHIBIT J TITLE COMMITMENT (2015) EXHIBIT K PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION (MAY 2005 BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING) EXHIBIT L PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION 2005 (RELIANCE LETTER - JUNE 2018 BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING) EXHIBIT M PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (APRIL 2005 BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING) EXHIBIT N OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (JUNE 2018, BIO -TECH) EXHIBIT O OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCPA PARCEL MAPS EXHIBIT P OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCPA PARCEL INFORMATION EXHIBIT Q OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER QUAD MAP EXHIBIT R OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER FEMA MAP EXHIBIT S OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCPS CAPACITY LETTER EXHIBIT T OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER POA DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT U OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROJECT SCHEDULE EXHIBIT V SOIL ANALYSIS FOR WEKIVA EXHIBIT W CITY OF OCOEE IMPACT FEES (FEB 2018) EXHIBIT X OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL MAP EXHIBIT Y OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE TIME MAP EXHIBIT Z OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER EXISTING UTILITY PLAN JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE iii OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 1. INTRODUCTION The Ocoee Village Center Project is located in the City of Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. The property location is shown on Figure 1 and Exhibit A. A Boundary Survey is shown in Exhibit I. Per the Orange County Property Appraiser (OCPA) the proposed property consists of three parcels (Exhibit O): 10711 N Lakewood Avenue 28-22-05-0000-00-004 (47.28 acres) Clarcona Ocoee Road 28-22-05000000040 (23.76 acres) Westbridge Court 282205000000046 (2.13 acres) All three properties are located in: Section 5 -Township 22 -Range 28. Pe.�ene ` Necan,e Paradise Heights Za a s ' a o GY Pvt nr.... r�ii�., wa,Y Rw r wF o- nL n r ��o oc000 Figure 1 Project Location Per the OCPA the property is owned by Beryle S Buchman; Carol A Cole Trust No 1-, Thomas E Cole Trust No 1; Elise A Solomon-, Robert B Solomon; Kenneth W Buchman; J Miles Buchman, - Alissa R Barrett and Kevin M Young (Exhibit P). The contact for the property is Mr. Beryle S Buchman, whose address is 2718 Oak Drive, Plant City, Florida 33566-6740. The site is more specifically located south of Clarcona Ocoee Road, and east of N Lakewood Avenue. The majority of the property is treed areas for silviculture. Details of the property are included in the Environmental Assessment conducted by Bio -Tech (Exhibit N) and summarized in this report. The property has convenient access to State Route 429, located directly to the west. 2. PROPERTY AERIAL MAP Figure 2 and Exhibit B show a recent aerial map of the properties and surrounding area. The site is outlined in yellow. N Lakewood Avenue is a two- lane road west of the property. To the north is State Route 429 and Clarcona-Ocoee Road bisects the property. East of the property is Carpet Street-, and east and south of the property are single-family '111ftr housing neighborhoods. Figure 2 Project Aerial JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 1 L� OCOEE IV, LLC The following schools are located in close proximity to the property: Ocoee Elementary School is located four miles south of the property on S Lakewood Avenue-, Ocoee Middle School is located four miles south of the property on S Bluford Avenue-, and Ocoee High School is located 1.9 miles west of the property on Ocoee High School, 1925 Ocoee Crown Point Parkway. CAMC Health Central is located 6.6 miles south of the property, and a Publix anchored shopping center is also located .7 miles to the west on West Road. Also located in the area are several charter schools. Figure 3 and Exhibit X show hospital and school map. Also included is a Drive Time Map (Exhibit Y) for area location and distance references. JUNE 2018 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Figure 3 Hospital and School Map DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 2 Legend IY QF DNIlhN41 ELw a MIO RORNM REREARr: •. W 1(Rmc n'. " n.nr ® Schools SEDUCAYIpNCENTER ©• Hospitals J. p -Property ODtlma Jap',yA b O m O Cdy Boundary Li rk m 0 F m 4 0 Beach Are Nil, Dr v vrmn b NOrvtiv C Pok Paradise E Heights Para ms¢ E o` ,_ Nelg his McCornlck RdW J❑ v © a L Wa'.k¢r tdOr tJa yr.I �r mi� Tr°U' Lak¢ Ceuley RH E TOO Lake Rd r�I•� o Erol eo.aomv GRRCE 0 We.lyn 8� ti LAAa Cr LFARMNG.i 6lvh _ Sans _ !'ENTER/ j E\ Ma.•ta Dr • i cAamy 0 ACAOEMYFAS' as + G„reena 0,,n. A r Cr°.. eD t t,sdl, Oaks Cy Map'a Rd �a ym .Ave - C sarrm1118 p rvd A NAISSANCF GNAR-PRAT Fullers �osYRdRDVJN Pow' Lake 3 + a • AY4a0Gn AA PIWPoE DIRE Of.OFF hIGM anYO ELEMENTARY � SCIKMI 4 Ur 0 t n a GLAD T,OINGS m O q Q^F e :DADEMY m Llcerie t ba P+Dine o�4 � a` Nicole 61ve m iake b �l.n , o y 6th Ave � U NOPE CNARTER LEWCV NMJI r v�pn¢.ta.'N MarloNv Dry Q � ° R } C A -AIT °a3 bER 4 r • C e p E Fwlers c se Rd V ( O Q= c JJi'RING IARE 0 YAF T DAa9 E ; ELEMFNTARv 00•,1:.^ Ad Mims Re CAOLM• p1 CEDWD e�'I_T W-1 Re • _`4 RI Point IV., Der y0A7^i.d y 2AfADEM 9 m • e \Q ^ i99 snai A P e ".kh Cl J b CDEMY 4• L.—riA- G` \oil A ndre or i c"Ah�sflfwellinBAve 4 p 2 b L.K6 Burnt Tree Ct O Mohllw in m a sT 3 Q a Palm D, L e St µry\s • Canter St " r' NyY 4W O < V P i QCO@B n Star, Srrrl�e FSI Rr Rd Av< La Lu NqH R LL a1y OCO@0 Starke laky FranAIIR St ao .EGACYOE JOSH ACADGNv lGreywall De D!YA114 Tr LEa>SANORDUNCS LF -W. CPNTFR • Blvd t 'A S 15 MPS ACADEMY u Ocv T.seD `� iaka `AMMAN O Lake v Fforen te. An..FC eM1h Jt MP NING'4 ANlia?YY ru OCOFLTBeODI.E Olyinp" •`¢.. • OCDLS m < ELE At Pr 'neer U Oak SI v r ROY St E RCir oHoma 'ORA+N-OE+TEc--H�N'GrA.g 044 4AaplaSt\Eanit - v' Enterprise St_y Orlando Ave' 'ea Wh:1e Rd. evallo Dr f Hidet CAMPUS 5 Snr',7` Dt hry+reO.S. "ALLMM 3 MAAEY "Pd.,C alB a Q R oee O. L Sun.prrte. Cl ELEMLW: Slor Rd Goners SI [ Y E a E e ,10 Oal60A Oana P o w O <o MI A 8yarly; O MninR 4q St pe Sh0 N NonolU u¢�f - Uf+RC It>014 u d, rla Sl HEALTH PIKE of oeuum CENTRAL W colom.v ur so 5 W C°I°niel Dr q . g „ mHOSPITAL ,Dos coNuuwriake a' = (CE4'RAL f.ORIDA COLLEGE CHART,&. 1-1RA1 F1-4 Lafy CNAISTMMACADEMY c _ 4" WW 0 PREPAPC1,00L Oil SCI+DOL ACADFM 9i . AGADEMVo ���- _ �,. a 3 ewlnf •lane n _ ,q RoRoRSM Re!Qao_[We da'e jpR o'Oare°0'k O -.. 5, Figure 3 Hospital and School Map DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 2 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 3. MASTER SITE PLAN The proposed Master Development Plan is shown below (Figure 4), and attached as Exhibit G. The plan is a mixed-use with residential and commercial uses. 4 I I I x zt > _XZ It;0 V IN ENTER WOULFAWTH C OCOEE VILLAGE C ONSULTM 7 OGOEE• FLORIDA GROUP� 1t� Figure 4 Ocoee Village Center Site Plan JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 3 OCOEE IV, LLC Table Ocoee Village Center Project Program OCOBVILLAGE CENTER Parcel use Area IDU/Acre (NR1) Multi -Family Residential 350 Units 14.9 23.6 (NC1) Commercial — Hotel 140 Rooms 2.6 (NC2) Commercial — Bank 10,000 SF 1.5 (NC3) Mixed -Use Commercial 16,000 SF 1.6 (NC4) Mixed -Use Commercial 15,000 SF 1.5 (SR1) Townhouse Residential 140 Units 26.6 5.3 (SC1) Commercial Grocery/Health 75,000 SF 6.7 (SC2) Commercial — Gas Station 6,000 SF 1.5 (SC3) Commercial — QSR 4,500 SF 1.5 (SC4) Commercial — QSR 4,500 SF 1.5 (GRN1) Open Space Water Management 7.9 (GRN2) Public Park 0.2 Parcel Area ROW Area 5.6 67.81 While some of the uses in the table above are specific, the commercial parcels may vary as the development and approval stages progress. The following list of commercial uses are permitted on commercialproperties. Uses: Hotels Orive-ThnoughRaatounonta Restaurants Offices Banks with Drive -Through Grocery Stores Child Care Centers Convenience Stores Automotive Service Stations Car Washes Pharmacies with Drive 'Through Health Clubs Dental and Medical Clinics Urgent Cares Veterinary Clinics Dry Cleaners Shopping Centers Jums2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE E-11 09 OCOEE IV, LLC 4. LAND USE AND ZONING The existing land use for the property is residential low intensity. The land use allows up to four (4) dwelling units per acre. Based on the gross acreage, there are 73.41 acres. Based on four DU/Acres the allowable density is 293 units. As can be seen from the Future Land Use (FLU) Map shown in Figure 5 and Exhibit C, the property is surrounded by low density residential land to the west, north, south and southeast. A small portion of the property backs up to recreation or open space to the northeast. The proposed Land Use Amendment is to modify the land use to high density residential (HDR) and commercial (C). Based on the amendment the area of HDR and C is: HDR 41.5 Acres 16 DU/Acre 664 Units C 31.9 Acres d C Figure 6 Proposed Land Use Map JUNE 2018 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Figure 5 Existing Land Use Map The residential area will be limited to the PUD zoning which will limit the number of residential units to 490 units or a density of 11.8 DU/Acres. A copy of the Proposed Future Land Use Map is shown in Figure 6 and Exhibit D. DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 5 Figure 6 Proposed Land Use Map JUNE 2018 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Figure 5 Existing Land Use Map The residential area will be limited to the PUD zoning which will limit the number of residential units to 490 units or a density of 11.8 DU/Acres. A copy of the Proposed Future Land Use Map is shown in Figure 6 and Exhibit D. DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 5 N OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER The existing zoning for the property is R1 -A. The density of the property is regulated by the land use designation of low density residential of 4 DU/Acre or a maximum of 293 units. The existing Zoning Map is shown in Figure 7 and Exhibit E. The proposed PUD plan increases the use to 490 units and commercial uses. The Description of R1 -A by the City of Ocoee is as follows: R -1-A and R-1 single-family dwelling districts. The areas included in R -1-A and R-1 single-family dwelling districts are of the same general character as R -1 -AAA and R -1 -AA, but with smaller minimum lots and yards, and a corresponding increase in population density. This district is primarily intended for areas shown on the Future Land Use Map as "Low Density Residential". The proposed rezoning will change the zoning to PUD (Residential) and PUD (Commercial). The PDP/FDP plan shown in the schematic in Figure 7 and Exhibit E. A copy of the Proposed Zoning Map is shown in Figure 8 and Exhibit F. Figure 7 Existing Zoning Map Figure 8 Proposed Zoning Map JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 6 OCOEE IV, LLC Table 2 Project Site and Land Use Data OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Description Data Acreage Gross 73.41 acres Uplands 73.41 Acres Wetland/Surface Waters 0 acres Number of Residential Units 490 Commercial Area 135,000 SF plus 140 Hotel Rooms Existing Site Conditions Vacant property, consisting of approximately 73.41 acres of uplands. Existing Land Use Low Density Residential Existing Zoning R -1-A Existing Zoning (North) Right -of -Way SIR 429 Existing Zoning (East) Southeast A-1 (County) and Northeast Recreation (City) Existing Zoning (South) A-1 (County) Existing Zoning (West) A-1 (County) Proposed Zoning PUD (Residential) and PUD (High Density Residential) Potential Phasing TBD Setback for Lots (Townhouses) Front 20 Feet Rear 15 Feet Side 0 Feet Side (Corner) 10 Feet Building Height Shall Not Exceed 60 Feet (5 Stories) Impervious Surface Ratio Maximum 60% Density Maximum 8.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre Maximum Building Coverage 60% of Gross Minimum Living Area 850 Square Feet Apartments and 1,250 Square Feet for Townhouses Building Separation Minimum of 20 Feet APARTMENTS; Minimum 15 Feet Townhouses Proposed Use 350 Apartments and 140 Townhouses; 110,000 SF Commercial plus 140 Hotel Units Gross Density (Based on Total Residential Property) 490/41.5 = 11.86 DU/Acres Population 490 X 3.1 = 1,519 Parking Provided Apartments 2 per unit X 350 units = 700 spaces Townhouses 2 per unit X 140 units = 280 spaces (w JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 7 OCOEE IV, LLC 5. LEVEL OF SERVICE OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Table 3 shows the project's established Level of Service (LOS) for the City of Ocoee and the impact of the Ocoee Village Center development. Table 3 Project LOS and Project Impact Description LOS Project Impact Residential Units Apartments (North) 350 Units Residential Units Townhouses (South) 140 Units Commercial 135,000 SF Hotel 140 Rooms People per Unit Residential) 3.1 P/Unit 1,519 People Water Demand 300 GPD/ERU 52,200 GPD Wastewater Generation 270 GPD/ERU 52,200 GPD Solid Waste 6 # per P/Day 1,879 # Schools Elementary .137 Students per Unit-- 67 Students Middle .057 Students per Unit 28 Students High .065 Students per Unit 32 Students The water demand and wastewater generation are based on City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. People Based on Residential Uses Only 6.1 POTABLE WATER SERVICE The potable water service is provided by the City of Ocoee. Based on review of the as -built drawings provided by the City of Ocoee there is a 12" water main just south of the property. This is shown on the Conceptual Engineering Plan. The design of the water distribution system is based on utilizing a 1.5 over a 16 -hour period or 2.25 times ADF for max -day plus fire flow (1000 GPM) and 2.5 times max day, or a factor of 5.625 for peak hour flow. The analysis is detailed below. Average Daily Flow equals the combination of demand for the residential and commercial areas. The City of Ocoee has established, through its Comprehensive Plan, that 300 GPD is an Equivalent Residential Unit. The City has also established values for generation rates for various residential and commercial uses. Based on those values and adjusted per experience, the following have been used in determining the demand for potable water: (W JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 8 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Residential Townhouses, assume to be primarily 3 Bedroom ERC per unit Apartments, assume to be an average of 2 BR Commercial Gas Service Station Full Service Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant (QSR) Hotel Retail Grocery 1 ERC/Unit 83 ERC per unit 3.0 ERU/Station 5.5 ERU/Per Restaurant 3.0 ERU/Restaurant .5 ERU/Room .2 GPD/SF or 1 ERU/1,500 SF .2 GPD/SF or 1 ERU/1,500 SF Based on the analysis of the Level of Service for the project the site will require 182,900 Gallons Per Day (ADF) or a total of 610 ERC's. The maximum demand for the project is equal to the maximum daily flow plus fire flow and is 1,318 GPM. A copy of the analysis is attached to the supporting data report. 6.2 NON -POTABLE WATER SERVICE The non -potable water service is available. Irrigation will be provided by reuse water. A reuse system will be installed on the site. The details of the site are not finalized at this time. To determine the approximate quantity of the reuse water required it has been assumed that 40% of the property will be irrigated with 1'/z inches per week. Based on the above approximately 6,000 gallons per day per acre will be required. With 73.41 acres X 40% X 6,000 GPD/acre or 176,184 gallons per day will be required for Irrigation. The reuse water is located east of the property. The reuse line will be extended to the site as part of the land development process. 6.3 WASTEWATER SERVICE The wastewater system will consist of a gravity collection system connected to a proposed pumping station located on the property. The pumping station will pump to a 12" gravity main along N. Lakewood Avenue at Wurst Road. The locations are shown on the existing utility plan, Exhibit Z. 6.11 WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES Potable water, non -potable water, and wastewater service are provided by the City of Ocoee. A water capital charge has been established as follows: • Water $2,083.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit • Sewer $6,178.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit • Total $8,251.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 9 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER This is based on the attached impact fee schedule effective as of February 1, 2018. There are (W annual adjustments of fees. In addition, meter set charges and deposits are required to be paid at the time the meter is set. There is a total of 610 ERU's based on the total $5,033,110.00. 7. CONCURENCY In Florida, concurrency refers to a system of providing new public facilities/services to accommodate growth. These facilities and services must be provided at the time of new development. A new development cannot cause a facility to exceed an adopted level -of -service (LOS). The City of Ocoee and Orange County has defined concurrency facilities that include: • Roadways ■ Potable Water Facilities ■ Sanitary Sewer Facilities ■ Solid Waste Facilities ■ Recreation and Open Space Facilities ■ Drainage Facilities ■ Schools A request for a Development Order and permits are conditional on the availability of concurrency Facilities that meet adopted LOS are identified in Table 4. Letters of Capacity Reservation will be issued on a first-come, first-served basis by the Administrative Official. Letters of Capacity Reservation will be valid only for the specific land uses, densities, intensities, construction and improvement schedules contained in the application. Letters of Capacity Reservation run with the land and are transferable to a successor in ownership. Reservation of capacity for concurrency shall expire if the underlying development order or development agreement expires or is revoked. The letters of capacity are issued with the Final Development Plan approval. City of Ocoee Staff will identify the current status in their review. Upon the conclusion of the concurrency review, the Administrative Official shall prepare a written set of findings concerning the proposed development. These findings shall include, but are not limited to: ■ The anticipated public facility impacts of the proposed development; ■ The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the adopted level of service standards, ■ Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the completion of the proposed development; ■ The facility(ies) improvement or additions necessary to accommodate the impact of the proposed development at the adopted level(s) of service standard(s) and the entity(s) responsible for the design and installation of all required facility improvements or additions; and ■ The date such facility(ies) improvement or additions will need to be completed to be concurrent with the impacts on such facility(ies) created by the proposed development. JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 10 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Based on the City's internal review and conversations with their staff, the project would currently (W meet or exceed the required level of services. There appears to be adequate capacity to process and approve the proposed LUPA and ZMA. Table 4 shows a summary of the Level of Services (LOS) or design criteria, if higher: Table 4 Summary of LOS Item. LOS Population 3.1 People/Unit (Single Family) Potable Water 350 GPD/Unit Fire Flow Residential 500 GPM/20 PSI, Commercia11,000 GPM/20 PSI Sanitary Sewer 300 GPD/Unit Solid Waste 6.0 Pounds/Capital/Day Recreation Parks: 6 Acres/1000 People Drainage Retention/Detention with no Positive Outfall 25 Yr, 96 Hr Public Schools 100% to 125% of FISH of Capacity Roadways I Meeting Traffic Analysis Requirements 8. SCHOOLS The Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) system is responsible for the public schools servicing the proposed project. In addition to the public system, charter schools and private (W schools are available in the area. The OCPS has a procedure. An application will be submitted to OCPS for concurrency review as part of the due diligence process. The finding of school capacity also identifies the School Impact Fees for the project. The fee for Townhouses is $6,930.00 per unit and the fee for Apartments is $5,919.00 per unit. Based on the impact fees the cost for schools is: Apartments 350 Units $5919.00 $2,083,488.00 Townhouses 140 Units $6,930.00 $970,200.00 The fees are to be paid as follows: Individually at the time of building permits are issued; and a Capacity Enhancement will be submitted as part of the review process. Table 5 Student Generation Rates for Single -Family Units SchoW *U001100per' Unfit Elementary School .152 per unit Middle School .074 per unit High School .102 per unit TOTAL .328 per unit JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 11 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Table 6 lists the schools in the project area and their ratings. Table 6 Project Area Schools I Rating Sohooll Address Phone ftIt Ocoee Elementary School 400 S. Lakewood Avenue 407-877-5027 C+ Fire Protection (Non -Residential) Ocoee, FL 34761 Recreation $1,560.00 Ocoee Middle School 300 S. Bluford Avenue 407-877-5035 B Road (Commercial) ITE 850 Ocoee, FL 34761 Road ITE 220 Apartments $2,655.21 Ocoee High School 1925 Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy. 407 -905-3000 C+ School (Multi -Family) Ocoee, FL 34761 Ocoee, School (Townhouse) $6,930.001 -zulbil t Kating 9. IMPACT FEES Development projects in the City of Ocoee, Orange County are subject to impact fees for the following: • Police Services • Fire Protection • Recreation • Road • Library • School Impact fees are based on City of Ocoee Impact Fee Schedule. Table 7 shows the fees as of February 1, 2018. Fees are subject to change. Table 7 City of Ocoee and Orange County Impact Fees* Entity Fm Police Services (Residential) $501.04/Unit Police Services (Non -Residential) $.33/SF Fire Protection(Residential) $636.00/Unit Fire Protection (Non -Residential) $.47/SF Recreation $1,560.00 Road (Commercial) 310 Hotel/Motel $2667.56 Road (Commercial) ITE 820 Varies, $4,847.30 Road (Commercial) ITE 850 $15,791.28 Road ITE 220 Apartments $2,655.21 Road ITE 220 Townhouse $2,319.70 Library $0.00 School (Multi -Family) $5,919.00 School (Townhouse) $6,930.001 * All fees payable prior to Building Permit JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 12 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 10. UTILITIES /SERVICES The following table lists the utilities/services companies and contact information for the project area. Table 8 Proliect Area Utility/Services Comnanias 11. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS There are major off-site improvements required for the development of the property. They are: 0 Re -alignment of the existing southbound road from Clarcona-Ocoee Road. 0 Turn Lanes on Clarcona-Ocoee Road. • Connection to the 12" watermain on N. Lakewood Avenue south of Fullers Cross Road. • Construction of a 12" gravity main along N. Lakewood Avenue at Wurst Road. The locations are shown on the Existing Utility Plan (Exhibit Z). 12. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The existing site is a planted pine forest that is part of a silviculture program. As part of the development the pine trees will be removed during the clearing process. The entire site is designated as vegetative community. An Environmental Assessment was prepared by Bio -Tech Consultants and is included in Exhibit N. 13. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT A Phase I Environmental Study was conducted by Universal Engineering Services and a report issued on April 2005 (Exhibit M). The project number is 13318-004-01. The assessment identified no evidence of unresolved recognized environmental conditions. The assessment concluded that according to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the property, and that if no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. Based on the Analysis no JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 13 Actdreas Phone/Internet/ Bright House Customer Statewide 855-222-0102 Cable TV Spectrum Service Potable Water City of Ocoee Customer 150 N Lakeshore Dr., 407-905-8191 Service Ocoee, FL 34761 Wastewater City of Ocoee Customer 1800 AD Mims Road, 407-905-3159 Service Ocoee, FL 34761 Re -Use Water City of Ocoee Customer 1800 AD Mims Road, 407-905-3159 Service Ocoee, FL 34761 Electric Duke Energy Customer Orlando area 407-629-1010 Service Gas Lake Apopka Customer 1320 Winter Garden 407-656-2734 Natural Gas Service Vineland Rd, Winter Garden, FL 34787 11. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS There are major off-site improvements required for the development of the property. They are: 0 Re -alignment of the existing southbound road from Clarcona-Ocoee Road. 0 Turn Lanes on Clarcona-Ocoee Road. • Connection to the 12" watermain on N. Lakewood Avenue south of Fullers Cross Road. • Construction of a 12" gravity main along N. Lakewood Avenue at Wurst Road. The locations are shown on the Existing Utility Plan (Exhibit Z). 12. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The existing site is a planted pine forest that is part of a silviculture program. As part of the development the pine trees will be removed during the clearing process. The entire site is designated as vegetative community. An Environmental Assessment was prepared by Bio -Tech Consultants and is included in Exhibit N. 13. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT A Phase I Environmental Study was conducted by Universal Engineering Services and a report issued on April 2005 (Exhibit M). The project number is 13318-004-01. The assessment identified no evidence of unresolved recognized environmental conditions. The assessment concluded that according to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the property, and that if no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. Based on the Analysis no JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 13 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER additional assessments were warranted at that time. Due to the amount of time since the study 4W was ordered an updated has been prepared and attached as Exhibit L. The updated study has the same conclusions and no additional assessments are warranted at this time. 14. HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY A Historical and Archaeological Study has not been performed at this time. 15. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A Traffic Impact Analysis is currently being prepared by Traffic Planning and Design (TPD) and will be submitted under separate cover. 16. WATER MANAGEMENT The property is located within Zone X. The FIRM for the area is Map number 12095CO21OF dated September 25, 2009. A copy of a portion of that map is shown in Figure 9 and Exhibit R. Based on the proposed development there will be no impact to the 100 -year flood plain. The property is within the jurisdiction of the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). The property is.under the Wekiva Rule and certain conditions must be meet for the development of the site. As soon as the Master development plan has been finalized, a pre - application meeting and submittal of the permit will be made. Figure 9 Ocoee Village Center Property FEMA Map To maximize the property, approximately four acres of off-site water management storage has 4W been proposed on the adjacent golf course. JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 14 OCOEE IV. LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER A detailed analysis has been conducted to determine the impact of the Wekiva Study Area to the development of the property. Based on that analysis (Exhibit V), it was concluded that there are no development restrictions required. A Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration was done on May 19, 2005.The report was done by Universal Engineering Sciences (Exhibit K). The report was updated on June 15, 2018. The later report is attached (Exhibit Q. The recommendations for the 2005 report are included below. During the design portion of the project, additional geotechnical studies will be conducted. Those studies, as well as the May 19, 2005 and the recent 2018 studies, will be utilized in the development of the project. 17.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE MAY 19, 2005 REPORT The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the soil data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. The recommendations made are of a preliminary nature and cannot be used for design. A comprehensive geotechnical investigation is recommended and the preliminary recommendations will be revised and amended as necessary on completion of the comprehensive exploration. We have not been provided with site development plans or structural loads for the likely development. Against this background, we present our preliminary assessment of site development constraints relating to foundation design, groundwater control, and construction related services. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, we anticipate that relatively lightly loaded structures may be founded on conventional, shallow spread footings, post- tensioned slabs, or on reinforced monolithic slabs with conventional site preparation. The actual design of the foundation will most likely be governed by, building structure type, wall and column loads, and the allowable settlement for the structures. We estimate that the actual foundation design pressures will be in the range of 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per square foot. Since the proposed development will include the addition of impervious areas from the buildings and pavements, the increase in stormwater nun -off rate and volumes will likely be attenuated a through stormwater management pond on-site. Based on the subsurface conditions and groundwater levels encountered, and depending upon fined site layout, we believe that a wet retention pond system should be considered. We recommend that at this preliminary stage, a seasonal high-water table at a depth of within 3 feet of current grade be assumed. Detailed design of the retention pond system should take into aocount variations in elevation between boring locations, proximity to the adjacent wetlands, etc. With improvement, the surficial soils appear suitable to support typical light duty pavement sections. We recommend using a flexible pavement section for the design of light and moderate duty parking lots and driveways. Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and cost-effective combination of available materials. For preliminary pavement designs, we recommend using a three -layer pavement section consisting of stabilized subgrade, base course, and surface course. A stabilized subgrade may be required due to the relatively dean nature of the surficial sands, since these sands may not provide the necessary stability during the compaction operations. The three -layer pavement may be placed on existing, prepared subgrade or compacted embankment fill. One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in Central Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. Many roadways and parking areas have been destroyed as a result of deterioration of the base and the basetsurface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected and based on our past experience with groundwater problems in this area, we recommend that the seasonal high groundwater and the bottom of the base course be separated by at least 12 inches. In summary, although we have identified the preceding potential constraints due to subsurface conditions, we believe these issues can be managed through proper Panning and design and should not significantly affect the feasibility of developing this site. A comprehensive geotechnical exploration should be carried out once development proposals are known. JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 15 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 18. OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER TITLE CERTIFICATION A Title Certificate was issued on October 16, 2015 (Exhibit J). An updated Title Report dated March 2018 is also attached. In review of the Title certificate and the Boundary Survey there are no encumbrances that will impact the development of the site. 19. PROJECT SCHEDULE The development of the Ocoee Village Center will require a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment (LUPA), a Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA), Preliminary and Final Development Plan (P/FDP), and Subdividing (platting), of the property, a water management permit, and permits from the City of Ocoee and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The project was initiated in February of 2018. The project should have all its entitlements and approvals in January/February of 2019. Table 9 shows the project milestones starting with the execution of the LOI and concluding with the issuance of all the required permits to construct the project. Table 9 Project Milestones Date February 28, 2018 Signed Contract and Effective Date June 13, 2018 Submit LUPA/ZMA July 21, 2018 Due Diligence Period Over August 14, 2018 Submit PDP/FDP to City August 28, 2018 Submit SJRWMD/ALOE Permit Application November 27, 2018 LUPA/FDP Approved December 18, 2018 PDP/FDP Approved March 15, 2019 FDP Approved March 15, 2019 SJRWMD Permit Approved March 15, 2019 All Permits Issued March 25, 2019 FDEP Permit Approved March 25, 2019 Closing It is anticipated that the project will have all permits by March 2019. A more detailed schedule is included in Exhibit U. Below is a list of the approvals needed for the project's development: ■ Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) ■ Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) ■ Preliminary and Final Development Plan (P/FDP) Approval ■ Orange County Public Schools Concurrency Approval ■ Final Plat Approval ■ Concurrency Review and Approval ■ SJRWMD Permit Approval ■ FDEP Water and Sewer Permits JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 16 OCOEE IV, LLC 20. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant Ocoee IV, LLC c/o Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 407-750-3123 Office 407-350-9090 Cell Rwohlfarth@wpgroup.co Planner Ocoee Development fl, LLC c/o Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 407-750-3123 Office 407-350-9090 Cell Rwoh1farth@wpgroup.co Civil Engineer t Wohlfarth Consulting Group, LLC C/o Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 407-750-3123 Office 407-350-9090 Cell Rwohlfarth@wpgroup.co Surveyor Allen and Company Donald Allen, RJR 16 E Plant Street Winter Garden, Florida 34787 407-654-5955 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Environmental Consultant Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc. C/o John Miklos and Danny Gough 2002 East Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32803 407-894-5969 Office 407-894-5970 FAX 407-963-2751 Cell Geotechnical Universal Engineering Sciences c/o Thomas E. Whitney, P.E. 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 407-423-0504 Office Phase 1 Environmental Study Universal Engineering Sciences c/o Mary H. Bruno 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 407-423-0504 Office Transportation Traffic Planning and Design c/o Turgut Dervish 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407-628-9955 JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 17 OCOEE IV, LLC City of Ocoee, 150 N Lakeshore Drive Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3100 www.ocoee.org • • Building Official Dean Hall DHali@ocoee.org 407-554-7088 Plans Examiner Ryan Morgan rmorgan@ocoee.org 407-554-7089 Plans ExaminerlBuilding Code Inspector Doug Hammon dhammon@ocoee.org 407-554-7087 Building Code Inspectors Rick Howell ricky.howell@ci.ocoee.fl.us 407-554-7089 Bob Farris rfarris@ocoee.org 407-554-7091 Building/Permitting Supervisor Laureen Cooper Icooper@ocoee.org 407-905-3104 Building Division City Planner Michael Rumer MRumer@ci.ocoee.fl.us 407-905-3100 ext. 1018 manl� �1: Development Services 407-905-3157 Assistant City ManagerlDevelopment Services Director Craig Shadrix Parks and Recreation 407-877-5803 Director Jeffrey Hayes Public Works 301 Maguire Road Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3170 Director Steve Krug Police Department 646 Ocoee Commerce Parkway Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3160 Police Chief Charles J. Brown Fire Department 563 S. Bluford Ave. Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3140 Fire Chief John Miller JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 18 R OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Orange County School Board 445 W. Amelia St. Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 317-3236 Superintendent Barbara Jenkins Supt@ocps. net Chairman William Sublette William.Sublette@ocps.net I•I I•1 11•j S' .11 0 0 Facilities Planning 6501 Magic Way, Building 200 Orlando, Florida 32809 (407) 317-3974 (407) 317-3263 Fax Senior Administrator Tyrone K Smith tyrone.smith@ocps.net (407) 317-3700 x2022898 District 1 Planning Relations Joie Cadle Vitonni Jenkins joie.cadle@ocps.net vitonni.jenkins@ocps. net District 2 (407) 317-3700 x2022395 Daryl Flynn daryi.flynn@ocps.net District 3 Linda Kobert, Vice Chair Linda.Kobert@ocps.net District 4 Pam Gould pamela.gould@ocps.net District 5 Kat Gordon kathleen.gordon@ocps.net District 6 Nancy Robbinson nancy.robbinson@ocps.net District 7 Christine Moore christine.moore2@ocps.net JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 19 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Exhibit A Ocoee Village Center Location Map Exhibit B Ocoee Village Center Aerial Map Exhibit C Ocoee Village Center Existing Future Land Use Map Exhibit D Ocoee Village Center Proposed Future Land Use Map Exhibit E Ocoee Village Center Existing Zoning Map Exhibit F Ocoee Village Center Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit G Ocoee Village Center Site Plan Exhibit H Ocoee Village Center Land Use Tables and Analysis of Level of Service Exhibit / Ocoee Village Center Updated Survey Exhibit J Title Commitment (2015) Exhibit K Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration (May 2005 by Universal Engineering) Exhibit L Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration 2005 (Reliance Letter - June 2018 by Universal Engineering) Exhibit M Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (April 2005 by Universal Engineering) Exhibit N Ocoee Village Center Environmental Assessment (June 2018, Bio -Tech) Exhibit 0 Ocoee Village Center OCPA Parcel Maps Exhibit P Ocoee Village Center OCPA Parcel Information Exhibit Q Ocoee Village Center Quad Map Exhibit R Ocoee Village Center FEMA Map Exhibit S Ocoee Village Center OCPS Capacity Letter Exhibit T Ocoee Village Center POA Documents Exhibit U Ocoee Village Center Project Schedule Exhibit V Soil Analysis for Wekiva Exhibit W Ocoee Village Center Existing Utility Map Exhibit W City of Ocoee Impact Fees (Feb 2018) Exhibit X Ocoee Village Center Hospital and School Map Exhibit Y Ocoee Village Center Drive Time Map Exhibit Z Ocoee Village Center Existing Utility Plan JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 20 Paradf Heigh Par He Fullers V I howl Lake Luke A,1,2,, Cj D' Lake V -d - onto L,k. Wad. - o < Prairie ro ake Crown g R,dg- r 0 0 ng R;' ing L., CI.— Pont CI." Rd ollik— St C = Ocoee OC 0 e e Legend to Property Outline City Boundary E S, 00"'d. 6 H 0 U P Buckman Property 0 0.25 0.5 1 A Location Map Miles N at howl Lake Luke A,1,2,, Cj D' Lake V -d - onto L,k. Wad. - o < Prairie ro ake Crown g R,dg- r 0 0 ng R;' ing L., CI.— Pont CI." Rd ollik— St C = Ocoee OC 0 e e Legend to Property Outline City Boundary E S, 00"'d. 6 H 0 U P Buckman Property 0 0.25 0.5 1 A Location Map Miles N Buckman Property o iso soo soo \ Aerial Map Fee} N I%W �G fl 0 U P Ocoee Village Center o ,so 300 600 \ Existing Future Land Use �J Feet A n 09 G fl 0 0 P Ocoee Village Center o 150 soo soo Proposed Future Land Use Feet A I `J w�G II Q U I Ocoee Village Center o ,so soo soo \ Existing Zoning Map Feet A i Ocoee Village Center 0 150 300 600 Proposed Zoning Map ^j Feet A 1 A A A OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCOEE, FLORIDA WOHLFAWFH CONSUIXING GROUP LLC r r r Ocoee Village Center - Site Data Tabuations ON. 2018.06.09 PARCEL USE ROW UNITS ROOMS SQUARE FOOTAGE ERU Height AREA (so AREA ac NOTES (NRI) Multi -Family Residential 350 5 -Story Bid s. 646.817 14.85 Luxury Apartments Bldg. Plate J±L)_12,000sf (NCI) Commercial - Hotel 140 111,012 2.55 Hotel Plate 22,000sf (NC2) Commercial - Bank 10,000 64,221 1.50 Bank (NC3) Mixed -Use Commercial 16,000 70,773 .1.60 (NC4) Mixed Use Commercial 15,000 65,183 11.50 I (SRI) Townhouse Residential 140 35ft 1,437,717 3100 (SC1) Commercial - Grocery/Health 75,000 290,516 670 (SC2) Commercial - Gas Station 6,000 65,047 1.50 (SC3) Commercial - QSR 4,500 65,235 1.50 (SC4) Commercial - QSR 4,500 65,365 .1,50 1 (GRN1) Openspace - Water Manag. 62,706 1-40 (GRN2) Public Park 10,481 0.24 490 140 131,000 1PARCEL AREA 623 1 2,955,073 67.84 ROW AREA 241,795 5,55 TOTAL SITE AREA 3,196,888 73.39 �d • L EH COMPANY 77 . , - -""A AN It 00*1 - r r r r r ,HEU 4 OF 4 F I. 2E -ET OF I ,OCU' -r� ,HEU 4 OF 4 Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY St 4MC ,*Schedule A First American Title Insurance Company 5011612 - 2037-3448515 Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Effective Date: October 16, 2015 @ 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Amount of Insurance: a. Owner's ' Policy ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) $TBD (with Florida modifications) Proposed Insured: To Be Determined b. Loan Policy ALTA Loan Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) $TBD (with Florida modifications) C. Proposed Insured: To Be Determined, its successors and/or assigns as their interests may appear as defined in the Conditions of this policy. Proposed Insured: Val-1mr,aw.] 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Alfred F. Barrett; Beryle S. Buchman; Elise A. Solomon; Robert B. Solomon; J. Miles Buchman; Kenneth W. Buchman; Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co - Trustees of the Carol A. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002; and Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co -Trustees of the Thomas E. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002, as their interests may appear, by virtue of Book 4536, Page 1047; Book 4619, Page 407; Book 5286, Page 975; Book 9602, Page 3926; Book 10992, Page 6757; and Book 10992, Page 6759. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof Swann Hadley Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 1 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Authorized Countersignature for Swann Hadley Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A. (This Schedule A valid only when Schedule B is attached.) Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 2 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) •.*1 ►a1►K,r Exhibit A Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company The land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Orange, State of Florida, and is described as follows: THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 3 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) V.• a * t 'I , , 14 + RrstAmej Schedule BI Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 The following requirements must be met: Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company 5011612 - 2037-3448515 1. Pay and/or disburse the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. 2. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 3. Pay all taxes and/or assessments, levied and assessed against the land, which are due and payable. 4. The following documents, satisfactory to us, creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded: Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 4 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) a. Warranty Deed conveying the land executed by Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, individually and as Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co -Trustees of the Carol A. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002, and by all beneficiaries of the Trust, to To Be Determined. In conjunction therewith, obtain and record with the deed in the Public Records, either: 1) The aforementioned Trust Agreement and any amendments thereto (the 'Trust Agreement"), together with an incumbency affidavit from the acting trustee, which describes the land, and: a) Confirms that the Trust Agreement remains in full force and effect; b) that the Trustee still remains vested with all the powers enumerated in the Trust Agreement; and c) that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) noted herein; 2) As an alternative to recording the Trust Agreement in its entirety, obtain and retain in the agent's file an affidavit from the acting trustee, with a copy of the Trust Agreement attached, and asserting that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) attached thereto, and obtain and record in the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, an affidavit of the acting trustee referring to lands to be insured setting forth excerpts of the pertinent sections of the Trust Agreement, as follows: a) the names of the trustee or trustees and excerpts which establish the succession of trustees; b) affirmative statement that the trustee has full power and authority to sell the trust property and excerpts describing such authority; c) affirmation that no contrary powers or restrictions appear in the Trust Agreement; and d) affirmation that the Trust has been in full force and effect during the period of ownership of the lands to be insured. Note: If the terms of the Trust Agreement reveal that it is an active trust and contains a power of sale in the Trustee(s), a deed from all beneficiaries will not be required. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 5 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) b. Warranty Deed conveying the land executed by Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, individually and as Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co -Trustees of the Thomas E. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002, and by all beneficiaries of the Trust, to To Be Determined. In conjunction therewith, obtain and record with the deed in the Public Records, either: 1) The aforementioned Trust Agreement and any amendments thereto (the 'Trust Agreement"), together with an incumbency affidavit from the acting trustee, which describes the land, and: a) Confirms that the Trust Agreement remains in full force and effect; b) that the Trustee still remains vested with all the powers enumerated in the Trust Agreement; and c) that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) noted herein; 2) As an alternative to recording the Trust Agreement in its entirety, obtain and retain in the agent's file an affidavit from the acting trustee, with a copy of the Trust Agreement attached, and asserting that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) attached thereto, and obtain and record in the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, an affidavit of the acting trustee referring to lands to be insured setting forth excerpts of the pertinent sections of the Trust Agreement, as follows: a) the names of the trustee or trustees and excerpts which establish the succession of trustees; b) affirmative statement that the trustee has full power and authority to sell the trust property and excerpts describing such authority; c) affirmation that no contrary powers or restrictions appear in the Trust Agreement; and d) affirmation that the Trust has been in full force and effect during the period of ownership of the lands to be insured. Note: If the terms of the Trust Agreement reveal that it is an active trust and contains a power of sale in the Trustee(s), a deed from all beneficiaries will not be required. C. Warranty Deed from Alfred F. Barrett; Beryle S. Buchman; Elise A. Solomon; Robert B. Solomon; J. Miles Buchman; and Kenneth W. Buchman, as a single person or persons, and joined by spouse (or their respective spouses), if married, to To Be Determined, conveying the property described in Schedule "A". In the event that the property being conveyed is not the homestead of the grantor(s), the following statement should be set forth on said deed in lieu of a spouse's signature: The land described herein is not the homestead of the grantor(s), and neither the grantor(s) nor the grantor(s) spouse, nor anyone for whose support the grantor(s) is responsible, resides on or adjacent to said land. d. Mortgage from To Be Determined to To Be Determined, encumbering property described in Schedule "A" in the principal amount of $TBD. 5. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $162.97 for Tax Identification No. 05- 22-28-0000-00041. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 6 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) 6. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $3,034.15 for Tax Identification No. 05-22-28-0000-00040. 7. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $6,037.41 for Tax Identification No. 05-22-28-0000-00004. 8. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $272.35 for Tax Identification No. 05- 22-28-0000-00046. 9. Furnish Company a Survey prepared by a Florida registered land surveyor; dated no more than 90 days prior to closing date of subject transaction; certified to the proposed insured(s), First American Title Insurance Company and all other parties in interest; and, meeting the Florida Minimum Technical Standards for all land surveys. Upon receipt and review of such survey, the Company reserves the right to make such additional requirements and/or to modify the legal description set forth on Schedule A as it may deem necessary. 10. If the amount of insurance to be issued exceeds the authority of the agent under the existing Agency Agreement with the Company, the Company requires that the agent obtain specific underwriting approval from First American. 11. The Company is to be advised as to the identity and nature of the proposed insured under the owner's policy/mortgagor under the mortgage policy, and reserves the right to make such additional requirements as it may deem necessary. 12. Execution at time of closing of the Seller/Owner's Affidavit by owners herein disclosing all facts relative to mechanics', laborers' and materialmens' liens and all facts relevant to parties in possession of the premises to be insured at time of closing. The Company reserves the right to 4W make additional requirements in relation thereto. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 7 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) HrstAmej Schedule BII Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company 5011612-2037-3448515 PART H Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 2. Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the land. 4. Any lien, for services, labor, or materials in connection with improvements, repairs or renovations provided before, on, or after Date of Policy, not shown by the public records. 5. Any dispute as to the boundaries caused by a change in the location of any water body within or adjacent to the land prior to Date of Policy, and any adverse claim to all or part of the land that is, at Date of Policy, or was previously under water. 6. Taxes or special assessments not shown as liens in the public records or in the records of the local tax collecting authority, at Date of Policy. 7. Any minerals or mineral rights leased, granted or retained by current or prior owners. 8. Taxes and assessments for the year 2015 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. NOTES FOR STANDARD EXCEPTIONS: Standard Exceptions for parties in possession, for mechanics liens, and for taxes or special assessments not shown as liens in the public records shall be deleted upon receipt of an acceptable Non -Lien and Possession Affidavit establishing who is in possession of the lands, that there are no liens or encumbrances upon the lands other than as set forth in the Commitment, that no improvements to the lands have been made within the past 90 days or are contemplated to be made before closing that will not be paid in full, and that there are no unrecorded taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens in the public records. Any Policies issued hereunder may be subject to a Special Exception for matters disclosed by said affidavit. Standard Exception(s) for questions of survey may be deleted upon receipt and review of a properly certified Survey meeting the Florida Minimum Technical Standards for all land surveys dated no more than 90 days prior to closing or such other proof as may be acceptable to the Company. Any Policies issued hereunder may be subject to a Special Exception for matters disclosed by said survey or proof. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 8 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) 9. Ordinance No. 92-42 of the City of Ocoee, Florida Annexing into the Corporate Limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida recorded December 28, 1992 in Book 4504, Page 4173. 10. Ordinance No. 92-44 of the City of Ocoee, Florida Annexing into the Corporate Limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida recorded December 28, 1992 in Book 4504, Page 4195. 11. Annexation Agreement recorded December 29, 1992 in Book 4506, Page 352. 12. Annexation Agreement recorded December 29, 1992 in Book 4506, Page 377. 13. Drainage easement in favor of Orange County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida contained within that certain Stipulated Order of Taking recorded January 16, 2009 in Book 9816, Page 8120. 14. Terms and conditions of any existing unrecorded lease(s), and all rights of lessee(s) and any parties claiming through the lessee(s) under the lease(s). Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 9 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Note: All of the recording information contained herein refers to the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, unless otherwise indicated. Any reference herein to a Book and Page is a reference to the Official Record Books of said county, unless indicated to the contrary. Notices - Where Sent All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to the Company, Attention: Claims Department, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707. Service, Quality and Availability First American Title Insurance Company cares about its customers and their ability to obtain information and service on a convenient, timely and accurate basis. A qualified staff of service representatives is dedicated to serving you. A toll-free number is available for your convenience in obtaining information about coverage and to provide assistance in resolving complaints at 1-800-854-3643. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. through 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 10 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) 10/15/2015 Re: Customer Reference Number: First American File Number: Property Address: , FL Ocoee Parcels 2037-3448515 Swann Hadley Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A. 1031 W Morse Blvd Ste 350 Winter Park, FL 32789 Phn - (407)647-2777 Fax - (407)647-2157 YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A REDUCED PREMIUM FOR TITLE INSURANCE IF THIS OFFICE IS PROVIDED WITH A PRIOR OWNER'S POLICY INSURING THE SELLER OR MORTGAGOR IN THE CURRENT TRANSACTION. An order has been placed with this company for a title insurance policy. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with important information regarding the title insurance premium that has been or will be charged in connection with this transaction. Eligibility for a discounted title insurance premium will depend on : REFINANCE TRANSACTIONS: To qualify for a reduced premium for title insurance you must provide our office with a copy of your prior owner's policy of title insurance insuring your title to the above -referenced property. SALES TRANSACTIONS: To qualify for a reduced premium for title insurance you must provide our office with a copy of your (or your seller's) prior owner's policy of title insurance insuring your title to the above - 4W property. The effective date of the prior owner's policy must be less than three years old or the property insured by the policy must be unimproved (except roads, bridges, drainage facilities and utilities are not considered improvements for this purpose). To qualify for the reduced rate, you or your representative may hand deliver, mail or fax a copy of the prior owner's policy of title insurance to the above address or fax number prior to closing, although we will accept the prior policy up to 5 working days after the closing date of your transaction. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 11 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) '`y ♦YRt�C FimtAmm*-an Title Privacy Information We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial Information. We agree that you have a right to know tow we will utilize the personal Information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether In writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, Including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title Insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and Investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial Institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our Crest efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your Information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal informatiorn. Information Obtained Through our Web Site First American Financial Corporation is sensitive to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it is important you know how we treat the information about you we receive on the Internet. In general, you can visit First American or its affiliates' Web sites on the World Wide Web without telling us who you are or revealing any information about yourself. Our Web servers collect the domain names, not the e-mail addresses, of visitors. This Information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the site, pages viewed and similar information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our site and to develop Ideas to improve the content of our site. There are times, however, when we may need information from you, such as your name and email address. When information Is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at the time of collection how we will use the personal Information. Usually, the personal Information we collect Is used only by us to respond to your Inquiry, process an order or allow you to access specific account/profile information. If you choose to share any personal information with us, we will only use it In accordance with the policies outlined above. Business Relationships First American Financial Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect for privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites. Cookies Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive. EirstAm GQm uses stored cookies. The goal of this technology is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to productive Web site experience. Provide you with a more meaningful and Fair Information Values Fairness We consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits and consumer privacy. Public Record We believe that an open public record curates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open public record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy. Use We believe we should behave responsibly when we use information about a consumer In our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of data. Accuracy We will take reasonable steps to help assure the accuracy of the data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct Inaccurate Information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct Inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers in Identifying the source of the erroneous data so that the consumer can secure the required corrections. Education We endeavor to educate the users of our products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our employees on our fair information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our Industry to collect and use information in a responsible manner. Security We will maintain appropriate facilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain. Form 50 -PRIVACY (9/1/10) Page 1 of 1 Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation) UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION 76 ACRES SITE CORNER OF SR 429 AND CLARCONA-OCOEE OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROJECT NO. 13318-004-02 REPORT NO. 402758 Prepared For. RMC Property Group 1745 West Fletcher Avenue Tampa, Fl- 33612 Prepared By: Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 {407} 423-0504 May 19, 2005 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engine ft • Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspections Offices in: Orlando • Gainesville • Riviera Beach • Rockledge • Daytona Beach • Punta Gorda • St Augustine • Jacksonville • Ocala • Tampa UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES 4W Consultants In. Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental sciences Construction Materiels Testing • Threshold Inspection Private Provider Inspection May 19, 2005 RMC Property Group 1745 West Fletcher Avenue Tampa, Florida 33612 Attention: Mr. Barry Tillman Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration 76 Acres Site SEC SR 429 & Clarcona-Ocoee Road Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Project No. 13318-004-02 Report No. 402758 Dear Mr. Tillman: OFFICES IN: • Clermont • Daytona Beach • DeBary • Fort Myers • Gainesville • Hollywood • Jacksonville • Ocala • Orlando • Palm Coast • Rockledge • Sarasota • St. Augustine • Tampa • West Palm Beach Universal Engineering Sciences (UES) is pleased to submit our preliminary geotechnical engineering review for this scheme. 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is an approximately 76 -acre site consisting of pine groves. The subject property is located on the southeast comer of SR 429 and Clarcona-Ocoee Road and also the southeast comer of West Road and Clarcona-Ocoee Road within Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. The subject property is located within Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East as referenced in the "Winter Garden, Florida" United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map. Development proposals are not known, but we have been advised that the site is intended to be developed for mixed use retail and residential. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES We have carried out an initial assessment of the site based upon a review of published information and the findings of a total of thirty-five (35) hand auger soil borings taken to a depth of approximately 7 feet. Our exploration makes no allowance for surveying services or an environmental assessment of the property. We have not been provided with proposed development plans for the schemes. 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION The subsurface conditions were investigated with a total of thirty-five (35) hand auger soil borings taken to a depth of approximately 7 feet. We performed the auger soil borings by manually advancing a bucket auger into the soils. We evaluated the soil type by visually inspecting the soil cuttings recovered from the auger bucket. The bore hole locations have not been surveyed, however the approximate as -drilled locations are presented in the Appendix B-1: Boring Hole Location Plan. 3532 Maggie Blvd. * Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423.0504 * Fax (407) 423-3106 M UES Project No. 1331M0402 UES Report No. 402158 4.0 SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is currently developed as a pine grove. The USGS topographic quadrangle map titled "Winter Garden, Florida" was referenced as a source for obtaining information regarding the physical setting of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. The subject property is located at an elevation of approximately 160 feet above sea level. The topography in the vicinity undulates and, overall, slopes gently to the east, towards Lake Apopka. The general geology of Orange County is characterized by 30 to 50 feet of undifferentiated fine to medium grained sands and clayey sands of Holocene age overlying the Miocene age Hawthorn Group. The Hawthorn is approximately 100 feet thick and is comprised of interbedded layers of clay, clayey sand, sandy clay, and phosphatic carbonates. The underlying Tertiary age carbonates gently dip east under an increasing thickness of younger sediments. According to the Soil Conservation Service, Orange County Soil Survey, sufficial soils at the subject property are classified as Immokaleig fine sands, Seffner fine sands and Tavares fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes. Immokalee fine sands are nearly level and poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 10 inches of the surface for one month to three months, and it recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than six months. The permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and it is moderate in the subsoil. Seffner fine sands are nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months and between depths of 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to 2 weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is rapid throughout. Tavares fine sand. This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, and it recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout. The available water capacity is very low. 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The classifications and descriptions of the soils encountered are shown on the auger boring logs attached. The soil descriptions are based upon visual characterizations of the recovered soil samples. The borings generally encountered light brown to dark brown, light grey to dark grey fine sands with, slit and traces of silt. A few locations encountered very small layers of cemented sand (hardpan) approximately 3.5 to 5 feet below the existing grade. At the time of our preliminary investigation, the groundwater table was encountered at depths ranging from 3.75 to greater than 7 feet below existing grades at the test boring locations. Stabilized groundwater levels have not been determined. ETES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the soil data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. The recommendations made are of a preliminary nature and cannot be used for design. A comprehensive geotechnical investigation is recommended and the preliminary recommendations will be revised and amended as necessary on completion of the comprehensive exploration. We have not been provided with site development plans or structural loads for the likely development. Against this background, we present our preliminary assessment of site development constraints relating to foundation design, groundwater control, and construction related services. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, we anticipate that relatively lightly loaded structures may be founded on conventional, shallow spread footings, post - tensioned slabs, or on reinforced monolithic slabs with conventional site preparation. The actual design of the foundation will most likely be governed by, building structure type, wall and column loads, and the allowable settlement for the structures. We estimate that the actual foundation design pressures will be in the range of 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per square foot. (W Since the proposed development will include the addition of impervious areas from the buildings and pavements, the increase in stormwater run-off rate and volumes will likely be attenuated a through stormwater management pond on-site. Based on the subsurface conditions and groundwater levels encountered, and depending upon final site layout, we believe that a wet retention pond system should be considered. We recommend that at this preliminary stage, a seasonal high water table at a depth of within 3 feet of current grade be assumed. Detailed design of the retention pond system should take into account variations in elevation between boring locations, proximity to the adjacent wetlands, etc. With improvement, the surficial soils appear suitable to support typical light duty pavement sections. We recommend using a flexible pavement section for the design of light and moderate duty parking lots and driveways. Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and cost effective combination of available materials. For preliminary pavement designs, we recommend using a three -layer pavement section consisting of stabilized subgrade, base course, and surface course. A stabilized subgrade may be required due to the relatively clean nature of the surficial sands, since these sands may not provide the necessary stability during the compaction operations. The three -layer pavement may be placed on existing, prepared subgrade or compacted embankment fill. One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in Central Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. Many roadways and parking areas have been destroyed as a result of deterioration of the base and the base/surface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected and based on our past experience with groundwater problems in this area, we recommend that the seasonal high groundwater and the bottom of the base course be separated by at least 12 Inches. LIES Project No. 13318-004-02 LIES Report No. 402758 In summary, although we have identified the preceding potential constraints due to subsurface conditions, we believe these issues can be managed through proper planning and design and should not significantly affect the feasibility of developing this site. A comprehensive geotechnical exploration should be carded out once development proposals are known. Should you have any questions concerning this information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 549 P= Thomas E. Whitney, P Assistant Branch Mani -I. ck, P . k: I 0062 Senior Vice President Signature date: STATE OF FLORIDA Registered Professional Engineer No. 327711 M;d a __o I .1 IIEW D i At t r�r Y J'�"Nn�' f b ( i ,,rr t �) S) i.iy//,. :•Da.--,k"?uu��r'i t�" "1 �'i roj��'`o �, tiv. v: ew -}',� t /a3 F•"�y.., ` ` _._ ..� � � � tw.r' t fi• �° IY 1 i j �CIR ' 1 �r �I�� yew >;`lt �rv.?rt �Ilr r c �� .��r111�1� �� � D' � 4�1i}'�_�..,•"X' C•���a1 a� �4ryt +1 an�s ' 22, 1 ff ,� of r ;7� p >rr I ' �.i' {� z � �., `�i-�•,. s�_� ��f��S c '}� I N c P9,�/ f F h t t ! r rr. :wT T i A, 4Y 4 ? S ,.. Iy 'E YI A t. .i i"'<a r'•'I.s.��`�rF 1"'r"'' -. X�r /Y i & } �� • .�e4 +. +.�� dam§ '£� � ) ;APP /'/ r ',.�'J s � 1-. �'A 1M�f,,:� � _ t t • , fi�,Y �44'R-t w r,z �rL �l'"J•'+�"'.. ...,P Y y, Y} "�.� f i � tr Pf�aVd 9a h•.t hd a# -F Cs ti. 0- °��tT Y.X"� �` va 4/�� ei B �I 't- a :.. J t',- � �• ',?�,P Fn e't-.TA` . �+ � � b +. ��r ., �I t a� t l yy 4 a VYl 11m3 # . � w `- � �. �. _ G a .�*. • h.. ta,=�ki��c�',r?� i6 .. IO it .�. ,.7� ' 108 � � . t � 3 �, ` Z r • �:,� t '11.4.:1 a 1 �....' „z.`".. � , • iD- "' 7��. # '+�71 f, i��F��Zyk r�i� � � waa ea I ° Gvle o. 'AS' r2`•^"t D .Q {,z\,4\ -i'4: v c>•. t t i : ef4e, OD / 1 y�.i.. >� 4I tl�i. r�oy `4 fir 1 � i `� � � �. ' . t llrt�r5to J a hS% � � '�• w �._•.• >. - DgA7c 1� se t x a ytt 5# y ;. • P3�C6'�ai .int•'_!`. ^, � `-hi, kT >;,,:. ;. ,lf t�Y 7 I t ti•� D • ,Y''i • ..a '��11 •..i• • �Cr IS 1 j.Jl 1 x. r 1� _+ ,. s.l-aa t''�a t s -.a '/p r � ��n ' -t •• ,'r * � V'4y,, . f ,. x4D � � u 5r ,t , nM •. ♦ S e �Y y, ! �,�) re $ f ���.,�,. rid ••e � . �. ♦. " i t. �. et+ til t� �; t � ' � { �D � ` tq4 9 ii„ � � + ri e5 �. •�tII e, ; • l }'-.. tl Y '� IQ/ r a' r i 5 'n •p (�a:.* a�atala sa di r `�—' w u e 1 �`..,.P» �' 'P`.. az aha ..ww^:.o- ems. "�' ,`'"•I ,\ 14 11A ... .. �: t� ;. i i9y, 4t � kTl qe/�.q 116&�)�C. �aP"�i: t • �� il('�. �}, • -..v ; ''� `,� • y1 N9.nf �r�£+�-t'. F -. ��4L �!—I,`��r, N � I .! � i 72fir Park 0 2000 BASE MAP. "WINTER GARDEN, FLA.", U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP SCALE, FEET r _ PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION 76 ACRES CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD SITE OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA UNIVERSAL U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ENGINEERING SCIENCES DRAWN BY: R.K.S. DATE: 5 3 05 CHECKED BY: DATE: S IiQ 05 SCALE: AS SHOWN PROJECT NO: 01-0013318-004-02 1 REPORT NO: PAGE N0: A—i om q i j�r�! I r+tl ��r� h it II � 1 ' � J f �.�.� ff, QYr�} 3 ..{C I•�'?..pi� "1 . � f ' i' \\\ �, i 1 }. ` .. yr � !• u r•��.•' ✓r ,. f ' I 1'i � � t f7". -h °�. • l it � 111' •,. + ��'• �.:•t•�`'°n r r r'^�' -;,�"t J -'i j i ~� % f l' � k�l 1 �'< 1 ' G r 1 .f } �. 27 yF �iw+_a� ®18 IT - 28 19010 .' :.✓ ° j'tif:'1 u Iii Il{ 02 0 20 ®29 ,Jr6r j1E 1 6 'e 11 012021 m304_�isl I 03 , d.r 0�q 013 022 031.. c ri "I CATION OR., r BORf2OVV OR SIN 1 (n I_ JL — l �) �, 1h117H Si'L'EP rjt I'ti • 5 014 SIDES >3 WA7ERI� 0231 ®32 r, FULL OF-bEpfAIS,&G��1 FALLEN 7R�ES � � ( t �' . .._.;_ ... ...-. �=.: ...... �j•, �c1 �,IE �1��� Wiz. !•d Y PP �. •) I° ®� r 'I 1.1. .. r � I I I I! 0 1.r o 2 0 33.. ,I rJ is 1F I E+ 1 I [ e fIIIIfs > IIF ' _� �.. d s,_ 07 025 034 J; _ 161 1u .1 _� E jEf' _ r l .f ( f I,�, I � r��l {,y1 t I - � t �y 1 I�f ��� 4.a.. L� f• '�1. I _I ,..' i -'•_•11 0[l: --- 011 026sJ5 .�'I �J I±. L• ,I� +`f' r-I''�� { illy ;��i sir.: I: • 1. „ _ 11911 5r 1 !i b 111,,:=11 C: i I 1 I - 7 it �� I f 1111 r „ , ....� 4 ' r • l UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AUGER BORING LOGS AB -1 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-1.5 Grey brown fine sand 1.5-3.5 Very light brown (to grey mottled) fine sand 3.5-7 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.0 feet 0-1.0 1.0-1.5 1.5-3.75 3.75-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AB -3 Depth (ft). 0-1.0 1.0-3.5 3.5-4.25 4.25-6.0 6.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth I Soil Profile Brown grey fine sand With trace silt Very light brown grey fine sand Very light brown (to grey mottled) fine sand Dark brown silty fine sand 6.0 feet 2.5 feet Soll.Profile Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt Very light brown grey (mottled) fine sand Very dark brown silty fine sand Brown to dark brown (mottled) sand with silt Dark brown silty sand 5.8 feet 2.5 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB -4 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-0.5 Grey brown fine sand 0.5-1.5 Light grey brown fine sand 1.5-2.75 Brown to light brown fine sand with trace of silt 2.75-4.0 Light brown to brown (mottled) fine sand 4.0 _'6.5 Dark brown Silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 3.75 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 1.0 feet AB -5 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-1.25 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.25-1.5 Light brown to grey (mottled) fine sand 1.5-2.5 Dark brown to grey silty fine sand 2.5-3.0 Brown to light brown (mottled) fine sand 3.0-4.25 Light brown to brown (mottled) fine sand 4.25-6.0 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.3 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 1.5 feet AB -6 Depth (ft)PI_ Sol, rofile 0-1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0-1.75 Light brown to grey fine sand 1.75-3.25 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.25-5.0 Very light brown to brown (mottled) fine sand 5.0-6.5 Dark brown silty sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.1 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.5 feet LIES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 A13-7 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0-3.25 Light brown to brown fine sand 3.25-4.0 Very light brown fine sand 4.0-5.75 Light to very light brown (mottled) fine sand 5.75-6.5 Brown (mottled) fine sand 6.5-7.0 Dark brown silty sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Not encountered (estimated to be 7.5 to 8.5 feet) Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 4.0 feet AB -8 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0-3.25 Light brown to brown fine sand 3.25-4.0 Very light brown fine sand 4.0-6.0 Light brown (mottled) One sand 6.0-7.0 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.5 feet AB -9 Depth (ft) So' il-P'roflle''- 0-3.0 Brown fine sand 3.0-5.0 Light brown fine sand 5.0-7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet t3.0 Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth feet 29 UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AS -10 Depth (ft) 0-3.0 3.0-4.5 4.5-6.0 6.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWF' Depth AB -11 Depth (ft) 0-3.5 3.5-4.5 4.5-6.0 6.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AS -12 Depth (ft) 0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-6.0 6.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimatedt Seasonal High GWi" Depth Soil Profile Light brown fine sand Brown fine sand Light brown fine sand Brown fine sand 5.9 feet 3.0 feet Soil profile Light grey to grey fine sand Dark brown fine sand Light brown fine sand Brown fine sand 5.6 feet 2.5 feet Soil Profile Light grey to grey fine sand Dark brown fine sand Light brown fine sand Brown tine sand 5.8 feet 3.3 feet ,Depthz(��: _Soil Profile 0-0.5 Grey fine sand 0.5-3.0 Brown fine sand 3.0-6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0-7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWi' Depth 3.3 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AS -14 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-1.0 Light grey to grey fine sand 1.0-3.0 Brown fine sand 3.0-7.0 Light brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet AS -15 Depth (ft) Sol[ Profile 0-4.0 Light brown fine sand 4.0-6.0 Light brown to brown fine sand 6.0-7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet AB -16 (W Depth (ft) 0-4.0 Light brown fine sand 4.0-7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.5 feet Estimated Seasonal High GIJVT Depth 3.0 feet AS -17 Depth {ft) 0-6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0-7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet Soil Profile 29 A UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 ABA 8 Depth (ft) 1.5-3.75 3.75-4.5 4.5-6.75 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AB -19 Depth (ft) 0-1.5 1.5-3.5 3.5-4.5 4.5-6.8 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AS -20 Depth (ft) 0-0.5 0.5-6.0 6.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth -Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth Soil Profile Brown grey fine sand Light brown to brown fine sand Light brown to brown (mottled) fine. sand Brown silty sand Not encountered 4.0 feet Soil Profile Grey brown fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown sand with hardpan Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 5.7 feet 3.0 feet Poll Profile Grey fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 6.6 feet 3.5 feet 19 A UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AS -21 Depth (ft) 0-0.5 0.5-1.5 1.5-5.5 5.5-6.5 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AS -22 Depth (ft) 0-2.5 2.5-5.0 5.0-6.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth Soil Profile Grey fine sand Orange to brown fine sand Brown fine sand, Dark brown fine sand With trace of silt 5.9 feet 3.5 feet Soil Profile Grey brown fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown fine sand With trace of silt 4.8 feet 2.3 feet AB -23 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-2.5 Grey brown fine sand 2.5-5.0 Brown fine sand 5.0-6.0 Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.2 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.5 feet AB -24 Depth '(ft)' 'S il,Pfofille,: 0 0-1.5 Grey brown fine sand 1.5-5.5 Very fine brown sand 5.5-7.0 Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.0 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet LIES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB -26 Depth (ft) 0-110 1.0-3.5 3.5-6.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AB -26 Depth (ft) 0-1.0 1.0-5.5 5.5-6.8 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AS -27 Depth (ft) 0-1.0 1.0-3.5 3.5-5.0 5.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth Soil Profile Grey brown fine sand Browne fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 4.9 feet 2.5 feet Soil Profile Grey brown fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 5.4 feet 3.0 feet -S611 Profilli Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Brown fine sand with sift and hardpan Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.8 feet 3.3 feet AB -28 Depth (ft)Sail Profile 0-1.75 Grey brown to brown fine sand With trace of silt 1.75-4.0 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 4.0-7.0 Dark brown to brown fine sand With silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.2 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet M UES Project No. 13318.004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AS -29 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-2.0 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 2.0-3.5 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.5-4.5 Brown fine sand with silt, wood, and roots 4.5 — end Could not penetrate — boring terninated Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 4.5 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.0 feet AB -30 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0-1.75 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 1.75-3.5 Light brown to gray fine sand with trace of silt 3.5-5.0 E Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt and hardpan 5.0-7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Ddpth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.5 feet AB -31 Depth (ft) Soil. Profile 0-1.5 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 1.5-3.5 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.5-7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet AB -32 ;Depth (ft) 0-1.0 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 1.0-3.5 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt - 3.5-5.5 Brown to orange brown fine sand with trace of silt and hardpan 6.5-7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 LIES Report No. 402758 AS -33 Depth (ft) 0-1.25 1.25-6.0 6.0-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AS -34 Depth (ft) 0-1.0 1.0-5.5 5.5-7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth .AB -35 Depth (ft) 0-1.0 1.0-3.75 3.75-5.5 5-5- — 7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth I Soil Profile Grey brown to brown fine send With trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.9 feet 3.4 feet Soil Profile Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.7 feet 3.2 feet Soil Profile Dark brown to grey fine sand with trace of silt Light brown fine sand With trace of silt Brown to orange fine sand with silt Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.7 feet 3.2 feet UNIVERSAL. U1ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration June 20, 2018 Ocoee Development IV, LLC 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 Attn: Mr. Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. Reference: Reliance Letter -Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration 76 Acre Site SEC of SR 429 & Clarcona-Ocoee Road Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Project No. 0130.1800271.0000 UES Correspondence No. 1579955 Dear Mr. Wohlfarth: LOCATIONS: • Atlanta • Daytona Beach • Fort Myers • Fort Pierce • Gainesville ■ Jacksonville • Miami • Ocala • Orlando (Headquarters) • Palm Coast • Panama City Pensacola • Rockledge • Sarasota • St. Petersburg • Tampa • Tifton • West Palm Beach At your request and authorization, we are providing this letter of authorization so that the following, Ocoee Development IV, LLC may rely upon our report submitted for the subject property referenced above. The specific report is identified as follows: • Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration - UES Project No. 13318-004-02, UES Report No. 402758 dated May 19, 2005 Specific design recommendations were formulated based upon site development plans, proposed geometry and 4W layout configurations, and site grading conditions at the time of our evaluations. If any of these items have changed since the time of our evaluations, our recommendations may not be valid and Ocoee Development IV, LLC should not rely on our conclusions or recommendations presented within this report without having UES review the changes and evaluating the possible affect on the previously provided recommendations. This authorization is granted with the explicit understanding that the limitations expressed in the report continue to apply and that you accept the Universal Engineering Sciences' General Contract Conditions (enclosed) as a condition of your reliance on our report. Please indicate your acceptance in the signature space provided below and return an original of this letter within ten (10) business days if you wish to rely upon our report. Respectfully submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. 1,1. A*Ak-- Zachary W. Adams, P.E. Geotechnical Project Manager Attachment: General Conditions Acceptance: Signature 4W Title 3532 Maggie Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32811 •407-423-0504 •407-423-3106 www.UniversalEngineering.com Universal Engineering Sciences, inc. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1: RESPONSIBILtT1ES 1.1 Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc., CUES', has the responsibility for providing the services described under the Scope of Services section. The work is to be performed according to accepted standards of care and is to be completed in a timely manner. The term "UES" as used herein includes all of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc's agents, employees, professional staff, and subcontractors. 1.2 The Client or a duly authorized representative is responsible for providing UES with a clear understanding of the project nature and scope. The Client shall supply LIES with sufficient and adequate Information, including, but not limited to, maps, site plans, reports, surveys and designs, to allow UES to properly complete the specified services. The Client shall also communicate changes in the nature and scope of the project as soon as possible during performance of the work so that the changes can be incorporated into the work product. 1.3 The Client acknowledges that UES's responsibilities in providing the services described under the Scope of Services section is limited to those services described therein, and the Client hereby assumes any collateral or affiliated duties necessitated by or for those services. Such duties may include, but are not limited to, reporting requirements imposed by any third party such as federal, state, or local entities, the provision of any required notices to any third party, or the securing of necessary permits or permissions from any third parties required for UES's provision of the services so described, unless otherwise agreed upon by both parties. 1.4 Universal will not be responsible for scheduling our services and will not be responsible for tests or inspections that are not performed due to a failure to schedule our services on the project or any resulting damages. 1.5 PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES §668.0035, ANY INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF UES MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE. SECTION 2: STANDARD OF CARE 2.1 Services performed by UES under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of UES's profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in the locality of the project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. 2.2 The Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those observed at locations where borings, surveys, or other explorations are made, and that site conditions may change with time. Data, interpretations, and recommendations by UES will be based solely on information available to LIES at the time of service. UES is responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but will not be responsible for other parties' interpretations or use of the information developed. 2.3 Execution of this document by UES is not a representation that LIES has visited the site, become generally familiar with local conditions under which the services are to be performed, or correlated personal observations with the requirements of the Scope of Services. it is the Clients responsibility to provide UES with all information necessary for UES to provide the services described under the Scope of Services, and the Client assumes all liability for information not provided to UES that may affect the quality or sufficiency of the services so described. 2.4 Should UES be retained to provide threshold inspection services under Florida Statutes §553.79, Client acknowledges that UES's services thereunder do not constitute a guarantee that the construction in question has been properly designed or constructed, and UES's services do not replace any of the obligations or liabilities associated with any architect, contractor, or structural engineer. Therefore it is explicitly agreed that the Client will not hold UES responsible for the proper performance of service by any architect, contractor, structural engineer or any other entity associated with the project. �SECTION 3: SITE ACCESS AND SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 _61—ient will grant or obtain free access to the site for all equipment and personnel necessary for UES to perform the work set forth in this Agreement. The Client Will notify any and all possessors of the project site that Client has granted UES free access to the site. UES will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the site, but it is understood by Client that, in the normal course of work, some damage may occur, and the correction of such damage is not part of this Agreement unless so specified in the Proposal. 12 The Client is responsible for the accuracy of locations for all subterranean structures and utilities. UES will take reasonable precautions to avoid known subterranean structures, and the Client waives any claim against UES, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold UES harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss, including costs of defense, arising from damage done to subterranean structures and utilities not identified or accurately located. In addition, Client agrees to compensate UES for any time spent or expenses incurred by UES in defense of any such claim with compensation to be based upon UES's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. SECTION 4: SAMPLE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL 4.1 Soil or water samples obtained from the project during performance of the work shall remain the property of the Client. 4.2 UES will dispose of or return to Client all remaining soils and rock samples 60 days after submission of report covering those samples. Further storage or transfer of samples can be made at Client's expense upon Clients prior written request. 4,3 Samples which are contaminated by petroleum products or other chemical waste will be returned to Client for treatment or disposal, consistent with all appropriate federal, state, or local regulations. SECTIONS: BILLING AND PAYMENT 5.1 UES will submit invoices to Client monthly or upon completion of services. Invoices will show charges for different personnel and expense classifications. 5.2 Payment is due 30 days after presentation of invoice and is past due 31 days from invoice date. Client agrees to pay a finance charge of one and one-half percent (1 Y2 %) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, on past due accounts. 5.3 If UES incurs any expenses to collect overdue billings on invoices, the sums paid by LIES for reasonable aftomeys'fees, court costs, UES's time, UES's expenses, and interest will be due and owing by the Client. SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 6.1 All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by UES, as instruments of service, shall remain the property of LIES. 6.2 Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which are not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose. 6.3 UES will retain all pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of five years following submission of the report, during which period the records will be made available to the Client at all reasonable times. 6.4 All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by UES, are prepared for the sole and exclusive use of Client, and may not be given to any other party or used or relied upon by any such party without the express written consent of UES. SECTIOr`UI 7: DISCOVERY OF UNANTICIPATEd HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 7.1 Clien#warrants that a reasonable effort has been made to inform UES of known or suspected hazardous materials on or near the project site. 7.2 Under this agreement, the term hazardous materials Include hazardous materials (40 CFR 172.01), hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.2), hazardous substances (40 CFR 300.6), petroleum products, polychlorinated biphenyls, and asbestos. 7.3 Hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. UES and Client agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work. UES and Client also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for UES to take immediate measures to protect health and safety. Client agrees to compensate UES for any equipment decontamination or other costs incident to the discovery of unanticipated hazardous waste. 7.4 UES agrees to notify Client when unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials are encountered. Client agrees to make any disclosures required by law to the appropriate governing agencies. Client also agrees to hold UES harmless for any and all consequences of disclosures made by UES which are required by governing law. In the event the project site is not owned by Client, Client recognizes that it is the Client's responsibility to inform the property owner of the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. 7.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, Client waives any claim against UES, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, agrees to defend, indemnify, and save UES harmless from any claim, liability, and/or defense costs for injury or loss arising from UES's discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials including any costs created by delay of the project and any cost associated with possible reduction of the property's value. Client will be responsible for ultimate disposal of any samples secured by UES which are found to be contaminated. SECTION & RISK ALLOCATION 8.1 Client agrees that UES's liability for any damage on account of any breach of contract, error, omission or other professional negligence will be limited to a sum not to exceed $50,000 or UES's fee, whichever is greater. If Client prefers to have higher limits on contractual or professional liability, UES agrees to increase the limits up to a maximum of $1,000,000.00 upon Client's written request at the time of accepting our proposal provided that Client agrees to pay an additional consideration of four percent of the total fee, or $400.00, whichever is greater. The additional charge for the higher liability limits is because of the greater risk assumed and is not strictly a charge for additional professional liability insurance. SECTION 9: INSURANCE 9.1 UES represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed by it, is and are protected by worker's compensation insurance and that UES has such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance policies which UES deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon request in writing. Within the limits and conditions of such insurance, UES agrees to indemnify and save Client harmless from and against loss, damage, or liability arising from negligent acts by UES, its agents, staff, and consultants employed by it. UES shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance or the limits described in Section 8, whichever is less. The Client agrees to defend, indemnify and save UES harmless for loss, damage or liability arising from acts by Client, Client's agent, staff, and other UESs employed by Client. SECTION 10: DISPUTE RESOLUTION 10.1 All claims, disputes, and other matters in controversy between UES and Client arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement will be submitted to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as mediation or arbitration, before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law, including the commencement of litigation. 10.2 If a dispute arises related to the services provided under this Agreement and that dispute requires litigation instead of ADR as provided above, then: (a) the claim will be brought and tried in judicial jurisdiction of the court of the county where UES's principal place of business is located and Client waives the right to remove the action to any other county or judicial jurisdiction, and (b) The prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees, and other claim related expenses. SECTION 11: TERMINATION 11.1 This agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. In the event of termination. UES shall be paid for services performed to the termination notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. 11.2 In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three (3) months, prior to completion of all reports contemplated by the Agreement, UES may complete such analyses and records as are necessary to complete its files and may also complete a report on the services performed to the date of notice of termination or suspension. The expense of termination or suspension shall include all direct costs of UES in completing such analyses, records -and reports. SECTION 12: ASSIGNS 12.1 Neither the Client nor UES may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer their duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. SECTION 13 GOVERNING LAW ANd SURVIVAL 13.1 The laws of the State of Florida will govern the validity of these Terms, their interpretation and performance. 13.2 If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be impaired. Limitations of liability and indemnities will survive termination of this Agreement for any cause. SECTION 14. INTEGRATION CLAUSE 14.1 This Agreement represents and contains the entire and only agreement and understanding among the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous oral and written agreements, understandings, representations, inducements, promises, warranties, and conditions among the parties. No agreement, understanding, representation, inducement, promise, warranty, or condition of any kind with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement shall be relied upon by the parties unless expressly incorporated herein. 14.2 This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by an agreement in writing signed by the party against whom the enforcement of any modification or amendment is sought. Rev. 06/10/2015 Bio -Foch !Consulting Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services June 19, 2018 Richard Wohlfarth W.C. Group, LLC 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamnte Springs, FL 32714 inffo@bio-techconsulting.com www.bio-techconsulting.com Proj: Ocoee Village Center Site — Orange County, Florida Sections 5 & 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East BTC File #654-18 Re: Environmental Assessment Dear Mr. Wohlfarth: During June 2018, Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an environmental assessment of the three (3) separate parcels that comprise the approximately 73.4 -acre Ocoee Village Center Site. This site is located north and south of Clarcona-Ocoee Road, just southeast of State Road 429 within Sections 5 & 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, in Orange County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 & 3). The environmental assessment included the following: • review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries, • evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; and, • field review for protected plant and animal species. SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), four (4) soil types occur within the property boundaries (Figure 4). These soil types include the following: Orlando Vero Beach Jacksonville Tampa Key West Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 2 of 8 • Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#2) * Immokalee fine sand (#20) • Seffner fine sand (#43) • Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#46) The following presents a brief description of each of the soil mapped for the subject property: Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#2) is a nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soil found on low ridges and knolls on the flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of dark gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 42 to 60 inches for about 6 months and recedes to a depth of 60 to 80 inches for the rest of the year. It is at a depth of 24 to 40 inches for about 1 month to 4 months during wet periods. Permeability of this soil type is very rapid throughout. Immokalee fine sand (#20) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. In most years the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 3 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate in the subsoil. Seffner fine sand (#43) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soil found on rims of depressions and on broad, low ridges on the flatwoods. The upper part of the surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months and between depths of 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to 2 weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is rapid throughout. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#46) is a nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soil found on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of very dark gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, and recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is very rapid throughout. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) does not consider the main components of any of the above referenced soils to be hydric. However the FAESS does consider inclusions present in Immokalee fine sand (420) and Seffner fine sand (#43) to be hydric. This information can be found in The Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, third edition, March 2000. 1 0 Bio -Tech Gnnsuiting Inc. EnNirocirclental and Pcrrnittiri„ Scm-ices Richard Woh1farth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 3 of 8 LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The land use types and vegetative communities within the boundaries of the Ocoee Village Center Site were evaluated and classified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 1999). The three (3) parcels that comprise the project site support one (1) land use type/vegetative community within its boundaries. The entire subject property is considered uplands and consists of Pine Plantation (441). No wetland/surface water land use types/vegetative communities were identified on the subject property. The following provides a brief description of the land use type/vegetative community identified on the site Uplands: 441 Pine Plantation The entirety of the subject property is classified as Pine Plantation (441), per the FLUCFCS. This area is dominated by slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Other vegetation identified within this community consists of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), Spanish needles (Bidens alba), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia), goldenrod (Solidago fistulosa), American pokeweed, (Phytolacca americana), muscadine (Vitus rotundifolia), Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), dog fennel (Eupatorium cappilifolium), hairy indigo (Indifogera hirsute), caesarweed (TJrena lobata) and a few scattered Carolina cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), camphor (Cinnamomum camphora), and common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana).. PROTECTED SPECIES Using methodologies outlined in the Florida's Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); Wildlife Methodology Guidelines (1988); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (revised April 2013); an assessment for "listed" floral and faunal species was conducted at the site in June 2018. This assessment, which covered approximately 100% of the subject site, included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and birdcalls that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are "listed" by the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (January 2013) that have the potential to occur in Orange County. Blo-Tech Consulting Inc. Environmcntal and Permitting Scrviccs Richard Wohdfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 4 of 8 Reptiles and Amphibians brown anole (Anolis sagrei) gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) six -lined racerunner (Cnemidophorus sexlineatus sexlineatus) Birds American Crow (Corvus brachyrhychos) Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Red -shouldered Hawk (Buten lineatus) Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) Mammals nine -banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) raccoon (Procyon lotor) Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) One (1) of the above wildlife species, the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), is identified in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (May 2017). The following provides a brief description of the species as they relate to the development of the project site. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) State Listed as "Threatened" by FFWCC Currently the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is classified as a "Category 2 Candidate Species" by USFWS, and as of September 2007 is now classified as "Threatened" by FFWCC, and as "Threatened" by FCREPA. The basis of the "Threatened" classification by the FFWCC for the gopher tortoise is due to habitat loss and destruction of burrows. Gopher tortoises are commonly found in areas with well -drained soils associated with the pine flatwoods, pastures and abandoned orange groves. Several other protected species known to occur in Orange County have a possibility of occurring in this area, as they are gopher tortoise commensal species. These species include the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Florida mouse (Podomys floridanus) and the gopher frog (Rana capito). However, none of these species were observed during the survey conducted. The subject property was surveyed for the existence of gopher tortoises through the use of pedestrian and ATV Transects. 1 Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Pcrraitting Sen, -ice, Richard Wohffiarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 5 of 8 The FFWCC provides three (3) options for developers that have gopher tortoises on their property. These options include: 1) avoidance (i.e., 25 -foot buffer around burrow), 2) preservation of habitat, and 3) off-site relocation. Based on the expected use of the property, off- site relocation of the entire gopher tortoise population is recommended. A Gopher Tortoise Conservation Permit application will be submittted to the FFWCC for the relocation of the entire on-site population of gopher tortoises to an approved recipient site. The relocation will be conducted by a certified FFWCC Agent to capture using bucket traps, hand shovel or backhoe excavation to remove and relocate the onsite population by non -harmful means. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucoceph alus) State protected by F.A. C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FFWCC's imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FFWCC's Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A- 16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leuchocephalus). In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. Under FFWCC's new management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. A FFWCC Eagle permit is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the 660 -foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest during the nesting season, October I through May 15 or when eagles are present at the nest. In addition to the on-site review for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review of the FFWCC's recorded Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest sites on or in the vicinity of the subject property. This review revealed that three (3) nests, through the 2016 nesting season, exist within one (1.0) mile of the subject site. These nests are designated as OR -061, OR -045 & OR -005 and are located approximately 2,670 feet, 3,425 feet and 5,010 feet, respectively. The project site is located outside of the nests' 660 -foot protection zone. (W / Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Environrncntal and Permitting services Richard Wohlfarth, W C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 6 of 8 USFWS CONSULTATION AREAS The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has established "consultation areas" for certain listed species (Figure 8). Generally, these consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually associated with permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The reader should be aware that species presence and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the final determination. Consultation areas are typically very regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the species in question are known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed species to occur and that additional review might be necessary. Such review might include the need for species-specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS. The following paragraphs include a list of the USFWS Consultation Areas associated with the subject property. Also included, is a brief description of the respective species habitat and potential for additional review: Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) Federally Listed as "Endangered" by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Everglade Snail Kite. Currently the Everglade Snail Kite is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Everglade Snail Kites are similar in size to Red -shouldered Hawks. All Everglade Snail Kites have deep red eyes and a white rump patch. Males are slate gray, and females and juveniles vary in amounts of white, light brown, and dark brown, but the females always have white on their chin. Everglade Snail Kites vocalize mainly during courtship and nesting. They may occur in nearly all of the wetlands of central and southern Florida. They regularly occur in lake shallows along the shores and islands of many major lakes, including Lakes Okeechobee, Kissimmee, Tohopekaliga (Toho) and East Toho. They also regularly occur in the expansive marshes of southern Florida such as Water Conservation Areas 1, 2, and 3, Everglades National Park, the upper St. John's River marshes and Grassy Waters Preserve. No Everglade Snail Kites were observed within the subject property during the survey conducted by BTC. The subject site does not contain habitat for the Everglade Snail Kites. Florida Scrub -Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) Federally Listed as "Threatened" by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Florida Scrub -Jay. Currently the Florida Scrub -Jay is listed as threatened by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are largely Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services Richard Wohlfarth, W C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 7 of 8 restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak, scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a, Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands. Optimal Scrub -Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks from 1 to 3 m (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50% to 90 % of the area; bare ground or sparse vegetation less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10% to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than 20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). No Florida Scrub -Jays were observed on the subject site or nearby during the survey conducted by BTC and no habitat exists within the property boundaries. Sand Skink (Neoseps reynoldsi) Federally Listed as "Threatened" by USFWS The subject property falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Sand Skink. The sand skink is listed as "Threatened" by the USFWS. The sand skink exists in areas vegetated with sand pine (Pinus clausa) - rosemary (Ceratiola ericoides) scrub or a long leaf pine (Pinus palustris) - turkey oak (Quercus laevis) association. Habitat destruction is the primary threat to this species' survival. Citrus groves, residential, commercial and recreational facilities have depleted the xeric upland habitat of the sand skink. All properties within the limits of this consultation area that are located at elevations greater than 80' and contain suitable (moderate - to -well drained soils) soils are believed by USFWS to be areas of potential sand skink habitat. The subject property does not contain suitable habitat for the sand skink. A sign -off from United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) sand skink monitoring requirements has been submitted. Once correspondence is received from the USFWS it will be forwarded. Bio -Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Permitting scrvices Richard Wohlfarth, W C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #659-18) Page 8 of 8 The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894-5969. Thank you. Sincerely, Dc. & 4 Daniel Gough Project Manager John Miklos President attachments f Rlo-Tech Consulting Inc. Environmcntal and Permitting Services H sn' 01"m L-1 IN pi C. 0, I Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village CenterN F— 4,400 1 Feet Orange County, Florida <� F= Project #: 654-18 Figure 1 S Produced By: DBG Location Map Date: 6/19/2018 ViK, Rd S H sn' 01"m L-1 IN pi C. 0, I Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village CenterN F— 4,400 1 Feet Orange County, Florida <� F= Project #: 654-18 Figure 1 S Produced By: DBG Location Map Date: 6/19/2018 BIB Tach consulting Inc. I Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center Orange County, Florida Figure 2 2018 Aerial Photograph � 450 " r ---1 Feet w Project #: 654-18 Produced By: DBG S Date: 6/19/2018 coulsindfing Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com A. I EIAN Tr -1. Ocoee Village Center Orange County, Florida Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map 890 "---I Feet E Project #: 654-18 Produced By: DBG S Date: 6/19/2018 11 Iti I coulsindfing Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com A. I EIAN Tr -1. Ocoee Village Center Orange County, Florida Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map 890 "---I Feet E Project #: 654-18 Produced By: DBG S Date: 6/19/2018 Soils Legend 2 - Archbold fine sand,'0 to 5 percent slopes 20 - Immokalee fine sand 43 - Seffner fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes; 46 - Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 'f Environmental and Permitfing Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center "1 450 Feet Orange County, Florida w E Project #: 654-18 Figure 4 S Produced By: DBG USDA-NRCS Soils Map Date: 6/19/2018 V Blemi-Te-ch Consulting Inc. iEnvironmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center Orange County, Florida Figure 5 FLUCFCS Map 380 N I Feet WQ j E Project #: 654-18 Vu Produced By: DBG S Date: 6/19/2018 Table 1 • Potentially Occuring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Orange County, Florida. Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status State Status County Occurrence Status FISH: -7, ' . Cyprinodon vartegatus hubbsi Lake Eustis pupfish N LS C AMPHIBIANS,:w Lithobates capito gopher frog S C REPTILES ... Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A) LS C Drymarchon corals cou eri eastern indigo snake LT LT C Go herus Polyphemus gopher tortoise N LT C Neose s re noldsi sand skink LT LT C Pituophis melanoleucus mu itus Florida pine snake N LS P Stilosoma extenuatum short -tailed snake N LT C BIRDS ,x� xxu Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub -jay LT LT C Aramus guarauna lim kin N LS C Athene cunicularia burrowing owl N LS P Egretta caerulea little blue heron N LS C Egretta thula snowy eget N LS C &gretta tricolor tricolored heron N LS C Eudocimus albus white ibis N LS C Falco sparverius paulus southeastern American kestrel N LT P Grus canadensis ratensis Florida sandhiil crane N LT C Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle MC * C M cteria americana wood stork LE LE C Pandion haliaetus osprey N LS** P Picoides borealis red -cockaded woodpecker LE LE C Platalea a'a'a roseate spoonbill N LS P Sterna antillarum least tern N LT _4P Podom s floridanus Florida mouse N LS C Sciurus ni er shermaniSherman's fox squirrel N LS C A Sorex longirostris southeastern shrew N N P ry1oni(r1'o'ystris']'�] INVERTEBRATES `" a t , , � •." r { , v � � §"S'y'N'� M 9nr R 'ry� 1r i t haostracon mons Wekiwa h drobe N N C Cincinnatia wekiwae Wekiwa siltsnail N N C Procambarus acheroniis Orlando cave crayfish N N C Troglocambarus sp 1 Orlando spider cave crayfish N N C VASCULAR PLANTS Ascle ias curtissii Curtiss' milkweed N LE C Bonamia graWora Florida bonamia LT LE C Calamintha ashei Ashe's savory N LT R Cheiro lossa palmata hand fern N LE C Clitoria a raps pigeon -wing LT LE C Conradina grandiora large -flowered rosemary N LE R Deeringothamnus ulchellus beautiful pawpaw LE LE C Eriogonum longifolium var gnaphalifolium scrub buckwheat LT LE C Glandularia tam ensis Tampa vervain N LE C Illicium parviflorum star anise N LE C Lechea cernua nodding inweed N LT C Lindera subcoriacea bog s icebush N LE R Lupinus westianus var aridorum scrub lupine LE LE C Matelea 17oridana Florida spiny -pod N LE C Monotra a hypopithys pinesap N LE C Nemaytylis floridany fall -flowering ixia N LE C Nolina ato ocar a Florida beargrass N LT C Nolina brittoniana Britton's bear ass LE LE C Paronychia chartacea ssp chartacea paper -like nailwort LT LE C Pe eromia humilis terrestrial peperomia N LE R Platanthera intqgra yellow fringeless orchid N LE C Polygala lewtonii Lewton's polygala LE LE C Polygonella myriophylla Small's jointweed LE LE C Prunus geniculata scrub plum LE LE C Pteroglossaspis ecristata wild Coco N LT C Salix oridana Florida willow N LE C Stylisma abdita scrub stylisma N LE C Warea amplexi olia clasping warea LE LE C Zephyranthes simpsonii rain lily N LT C FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS LE -Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. LT -Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. E(S/A)-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. T(S/A)-Threatened due to similarity of appearance (see above). PE -Proposed for listing as Endangered species. PT -Proposed for listing as Threatened species. C -Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN-Non-essential experimental population. MC -Not currently listed, but of management concern to USFWS. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS LE -Endangered: species, subspecies, or isolated population so few or depleted in number or so restricted in range that it is in imminent danger of extinction, LT -Threatened: species, subspecies, or isolated population facing a very high risk of extinction in the future. LS -Species of Special Concern is a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is facing a moderate risk of extinction in the future. PE -Proposed for listing as Endangered, PT -Proposed for listing as Threatened. PS -Proposed for listing as Species of Special Concern. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS LE -Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely ifthe causes of a decline in the number of plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act. LT -Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. PE -Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT -Proposed for listing as Threatened. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. * State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) COUNTY OCCURRENCE STATUS Vertebrates and Invertebrates: C = Confirmed P = Potential N = Nesting Plants: C = Confirmed R = Reported 6119/2018 Prird Bald Eagle Nest Data This report was generated using the bald eagle nest locator at https://public-myfwc.com/FWRI/EagieNests/nestiocator.aspx on 6/19/2018 9,45:07 AM. Search Entered: Within 5 miles of pat's lane ocoee fl (latitude 28.5992555 and longitude -81.5432896); All Search (W Results 8 record(s) were found; 8 record(s) are shown Said Eagle Nest Map: L Paradise Heights Lockhar Hiawassee Ocoee,' Winter Garden Oakland Pine Hills AW6 f-)ot,da's Turnpko Orlovista Gotha A% T R ej 0 Q e Map &RePb0MWa0,eiTqte Bald Eagle Nest Data Search Results: Results per page: All Nest ID County Latitude Town- Ran- Sec- Longitude ship ge tion Gaz Last Page Known Active Last Act Sur- 13 eyed1 Act 14 AAct 15 16 Act 17 I Dist. (Mi) 1 6R005 Orange 28 36.79 81 32.99 21S 28E 31 79 2014 2014 Y IM 1.04 OR034 Orange 28 35.40181 —F- 29.70 22S 28E 10 80 1998 2014 1 * 3.001 0 039 Orange 28 T2,59 81 34.31 22S 27E 25 79 2014 2014 Y * 4.24 OR04510range 28 35.22 81 32.92 22S 28E 07 79 2008 2014 0.91 OR0521 Orange ,28 32.63181 35.74 22S 27E 27 79 2011 2014 4.97 CIR05510rangeJ28 35.44181 30.30 22S 28E 10 79 2014 2014 Y * 2.40 OR0611 Orange J28 36.11181 33.04 22S 28E 06 79 2014 2014 Y * 0.48 [OR0661 Orange J28 34.32181 33.62 1 22S I 27E 1 13 1 79 1 2014 2014 1 Y I * 1 15 "Y" denotes an active nest "U" denotes a nest that was visited but status was undetermined "N" denotes an inactive nest denotes a nest that was not surveyed denotes an unobserved nest https://publicterrp.nijhAc.com/FMUEag[eNests/PrintData.aspx 1/1 APOPKA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 20, 28187:0$PM APOPKA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. City Council regular meeting June 6, 2018. AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENT; STAFF RECOGNITION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Public Comment Period: The Public Comment Period is forissues that may or may not be on today's Agenda. U you are here form matter that requires apublic hearing, please wait for that item tocome uponthe agenda. |fyou wish bmaddress the Counci|youmum1�out on Intent buSpeak form and pno�de|thuthe C�yClerk p�orxothe �a�ofthe moebng.|fyou v�uhtospeak duhngthe Public Comment Period, please fill out green -colored Intent -to -Speak form. If you wish to speak on a matter that hearing, please fill out a white -colored Intent -to -Speak form. Speaker fbrms may be completed up to 48 hours in advance of the Council meeting. Each speaker will have four minutes to give remarks, regardless of the number of items addressed. Please refer to Resolution No. 2016-16 for further information regarding our Public Participation Policy & Procedures for addressing the City Council. Presentations: 1. Presentation onForm Base Code. James Hitt (W 2. ApupkeCityCenter—Hi|honGardon|nnPresontaUnn James Hitt CONSENT (Action Item) 1. Authorize the disposal ofsurplus equipmanUpnoperty. 2. Approve renewalofLease 3. School CapacityE h -Bakery, ' Approve the purchase "' two p`/utility carts from Cruise Ca, Inc. a. Award acontract for the construction ofeReclaim Water SystemExmmoinnunGuldenGomRood. 6. Award ocontract for the construction & deepening ufMount Plymouth Lakes Water Production VVe'�No 1&Nn 4 7. Approve anagmem���processing �brthan��[�ond ofcu�sidenapydaWes c�|o�odbytheC--Sanitation Division.� �' BUSINESS (Action Item) 1. Event Production & Management Services Edward Bass for Special Events atthe Apopka Amphitheater. 2. Reject ITB 2V18'O5Construction ofKit Land Nelson Park Fitness Trails. Edward Bass 3. Final Development P1 Wekiva Riverwalk Shopping Center Bobby Howell Project: VVoo|bhghtVVokiva—Location: 2121 East 8emnrmnBoulevard PUBLIC MEARkNG8/OR0UNANCES/RESCLUJ7ON(Action Item) 1, Ordinance No. 2W56—Second Reading - Change of Zoning/Master Plan/Development A-reememt David Moon Project: AH|H]'1D.LLC —Location: West ofPlymouth-Sorrento Road; east ofSR429 approximately 1/2 mile north of the intersection of Kelly Park Road and Plymouth -Sorrento Road. 2. Preliminary Development Plan — Bridle Path Subdivision Bobby Howell Project: AHIFO-18, LLC — Location: West of Plymouth -Sorrento Road and east of SR 429, approximately one-half mile north of the intersection of Kelly Park Road and Plymouth -Sorrento Road 3. Ordinance No. 2654 First Reading Change of Zoni Phil Martinez Project: JTDLand agRogers Road, LLC —Location: 1455VV.Lester Road. 4. Ordinance No. 2659 — First Reading - Comp Plan — Large Scale — Reserve at Kelly Park Phil Martinez Project: Min Sun Cho, Hong Sik and Deok Hwa Kim — Location: 4068, 4046, & 4022 Plymouth Sorrento Road 5. Ordinance No. 2661 — First Reading - Comp Plan — Small Scale Project: 3255 Clarcona Road LLC (aka Randall Mechanical) — Location: 3307 Clarcona Road Phil Martinez 6. Ordinance No. 2662 — First Reading - Change of Zoning Project: 3255 Clarcona Road LLC (aka Randall Mechanical) — Location: 3307 Clarcona Road Phil Martinez 7. Ordinance No. 2663 — First Reading — Change of Zoning Project: SunTrust Bank — Location: 936 East Semoran Boulevard Phil Martinez 8. Ordinance No. 2664 — First Reading — Annexation — Cycle 3 - Stormwater Pond Project: Ci of Pam Richmond Project: City Apopka —Location: 16$0 South Lake Pleasant Road 9. Ordinance No. 2665 — First Reading — Annexation — Cycle 3 — Road Right -of -Ways Pam Richmond Project: Orange County — Locations: Carnation Court; East Laurel Street; East Myrtle Street; West Myrtle Street; North Washington Avenue; North Central Avenue; and North Lake Avenue (North and South of West Myrtle Avenue) 10. Resolution No. 2018-09 - Execute a contract for a Capital Improvement Revenue Note. Edward Bass CITY COUNCIL.. REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT 1. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Bear Cart Grant. 2. Interlocal Agreement with Orange County Fire Department. ADJOURNMENT AACCTI►IAi+ x i1w ..www.......-..-..-� Individuals with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk at least two (2) working days in advance of the meeting date and time at (407) 703-1704. F.S. 286.0105 If a person decides to appeal any decision or recommendation made by Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he will need record of the proceedings, and that for such purposes he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Any opening invocation that is offered before the official start of the Council meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private person, to and for the benefit of the Council. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the City Council or the city staff, and the City is not allowed by law to endorse the religious or non -religious beliefs or views of such speaker. Persons in attendance at the City Council meeting are invited to stand during the opening ceremony. However, such invitation shall not be construed as a demand, order, or any other type of command. No person in attendance at the meeting shall be required to participate in any opening invocation that is offered or to participate in the Pledge of Allegiance. You may remain seated within the City Council Chambers or exit the City Council Chambers and return upon completion of the opening invocation and/or Pledge of Allegiance if you do not wish to participate in or witness the opening invocation and/or the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 76 -ACRE UNDEVELOPED PARCEL CLARCONA-OCOEE ROAD OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA UES Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 Date: April 2005 Prepared For: Clarcona-Ocoee, LLC 1745 West Fletcher Avenue Tampa, Florida 33612 Prepared By: Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 (407} 423-0504 www.uesorl.com COA #00000549 Prepared By: vr&.,c6 4'j -w.. F� Mary H. Bruno Project Manager Reviewed by: Michael J. Geden, P. G. Senior Geologist Florida License No. 0000408 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold inspections Offices in: Orlando • Gainesville • Riviera Beach • Rockledge • Daytona Beach + Punta' Gorda 9 St Augustine • Jacksonville • Ocala • Tampa Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 PURPOSE 2 2.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 2.3 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 2 2.4 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS .................................. 3 2.5 USER RELIANCE 3 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 3.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ................................ 3 3.2 PROPERTY AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS ......................... 3 3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY .......................... 3 3.4 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND/OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 4 3.5 CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PARCELS ............................. 4 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4 4.1 TITLE RECORDS...: ; :: ; : ; 4 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS ............ 4 4.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE 5 4.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................ 5 4.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION ......... 5 4.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I ESA ............................. 5 4.7 OTHER 5 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 5 5.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ...................... 5 5.1.1 FLORIDA STATE AND ORANGE COUNTY RECORDS REVIEW ........ 7 5.1.2 FEDERAL RECORDS REVIEW .................................. 7 5.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ............................. 7 5.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES ...................................... 8 5.3.1 TOPOGRAPHY................... . ................. 8 5.3.2 SOILS/GEOLOGY 8 5.3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY 9 5.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE PROPERTY ................... 9 5.4.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW ................................ 9 5.4.2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP RECORDS ............................ 11 5.4.3 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAP REVIEW ...................... 11 5.4.4 CITY DIRECTORY REVIEW .................................... 11 5.4.5 LAND USE RECORDS ........................................ 11 5.4.6 OTHER HISTORICAL SOURCES ................................ 11 5.5 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON ADJOINING PARCELS .............. 12 Project No. 13318-004-01 (W Report No. 399772 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued ... ) 6.0 INFORMATION -FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE ............................. 12 6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ......................... 12 6.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING .......................................... 12 6.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ........................................ 12 6.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ........................................ 13 7.0 INTERVIEWS 13 7.1 INTERVIEW WITH OWNER ......................................... 13 7.2 INTERVIEW WITH SITE MANAGER .................................. 13 7.3 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS .................. 13 7.4 INTERVIEWS WITH OTHERS ....................................... 13 8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .......................... ... ............. 14 9.0 DEVIATIONS ..........................................................14 10.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ................................................ 14 11.0 REFERENCES........................................................14 12.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ...................... 14 13.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ................... 14 7 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 SITE LOCATION MAP ............................................... A-1 SITE PLAN/2003 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ............................... A-2 APPENDIX B GENERAL CONDITIONS B APPENDIX C ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S INFORMATION ............... C APPENDIX D FIRSTSEARCH RADIUS MAP REPORT D APPENDIX E ENVIRONMENTAL MAPS E APPENDIX F SITE PHOTOGRAPHS F (W APPENDIX G INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION G APPENDIX H REFERENCES H APPENDIX I QUALIFICATIONS Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 1.0 SUMMARY The subject property evaluated as part of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) consists of an approximately 76 -acre undeveloped parcel, located at the southeast comer of the intersection of West Road and State Road 429, in Orlando, Orange County, Florida. Please refer to the Site Location Map presented in Appendix A-1 and the 2003 Aerial Photograph/Site Plan presented in Appendix A-2 for additional information. Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA conducted in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) format E1527-00, we conclude the following: 1. We found no evidence of recognized environmental conditions with respect to past uses of the subject property or adjoining parcels based on our field observations, historical research, and public records review. 2. We found no evidence of petroleum product or hazardous materials storage or use at the subject property. 3. We found no evidence indicating the presence of underground storage tanks (USTs), aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), drums, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), drinking water wells, seeps, illegal dumping, unusual odors, or stressed vegetation on the subject property oron adjoining parcels based on ourfield observations, interviews, and historical and public records review. 4. We found evidence indicating the presence of one facility that contained leaking USTs within the ASTM minimum search distance based on our regulatory agency contact and field observations. Becky's Country Store is located approximately 600 feet east of the subject property and addressed at 10600 Clarcona Ocoee Road. Based on a review of the regulatory files reported extent of contamination and/or distance between sites, the potential for this leaking UST facilities to have adversely impacted the subject property appears low. 5. No evidence exists indicating the presence of facilities within the ASTM minimum search distances that formerly or currently generate(d) hazardous waste or use(d) hazardous materials based on our regulatory agency contact and field observations. Based on the conclusions of the Phase I ESA conducted at the referenced property, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) finds no evidence of recognized environmental conditions which would warrant further assessment at this time. According to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the subject property. If no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. Page 1 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 2.1 PURPOSE The primary purpose of this assessment was to conduct an evaluation of the subject property and surrounding properties to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with the past or present uses of the subject property and neighboring properties. The term "recognized environmental conditions" means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release, or a material threat of a release that could impact the property. This environmental assessment was conducted following the ASTM E1527-00 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. This assessment was also intended to identify potential off-site contaminant sources within the distances set forth in ASTM E1527-00 guidelines. Methodology followed good commercial and customary practice with a goal to identify recognized environmental conditions that would be subject to an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate government agencies. 2.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of work does not include an evaluation of asbestos containing building materials, lead based paint, lead in drinking water, regulatory compliance', cultural and historical resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, indoor air quality, radon, JW site geotechnics (soils, foundations, site retention, etc.), wetlands, endangered species, or construction materials testing. UES can provide these additional services, if necessary. The contracted scope of services consists of the preparation of a Phase I ESA of the subject property in accordance with the requirements set forth in ASTM E1527-00. The accuracy, correctness and completeness of this Phase I ESA is provided with knowledge of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) as set forth in 42 United States Code Section 9601 et seq., as amended. 2.3 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The findings of this report represent our professional judgement; no warranty is expressed or implied. These findings are relevant to the dates of our site work and the information cited herein. This report should not be relied upon to represent property conditions on other dates or at locations other than those specifically cited within the report. Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. can accept no responsibility for interpretations of these data made by other parties. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. Page 2 of 14 Pages A Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 2.4 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS This report, and the information contained herein, shall be the sole property of UES until payment of any unpaid balance is made in full. The client agrees that until payment is made in full, the client shall not have a proprietary interest in this report or the information contained herein. UES shall have the absolute right to request the return of any and all copies of this report submitted to other parties, public or private, on behalf of the client in the event of nonpayment of outstanding fees by the client pursuant to UES's General Conditions (Appendix B). 2.5 USER RELIANCE This report is intended for the sole use of Clarcona Ocoee, LLC: and RMC Retail Property Group. Its contents may not be relied upon by other parties without the explicit written consent of UES. This is not a statement of suitability of the property for any use or purpose. In accepting this report, all parties herein mentioned agree to the General Conditions of the Agreement between UES and Clarcona Ocoee, LLC, dated April 5, 2005. A copy of the General Conditions is contained in Appendix B. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is an approximately 76 -acre undeveloped parcel, located at the southeast comer of the intersection of West Road and State Road 429 in Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. The site is located within Section 05, Township 22 South, Range 28 East as referenced in the "Winter Garden, Florida" United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map presented in Appendix A-1 (Site Location Map). Please also refer to the Site Plan/2003 Aerial Photograph in Appendix A-2, and to the legal description of the property in Appendix C. The legal description of the subject property was obtained from the Orange County Property Appraiser's website. 3.2 PROPERTY AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS Atthe time of our evaluation, the subject property consisted of unimproved land populated with pine trees comprising approximately 76 acres. Clarcona-Ocoee Road traverses the central portion of the subject property in a west -east direction. The property vicinity is characterized by undeveloped property and residential development. State Road 429, a former abandoned railroad easement, adjoins the northern boundary of the subject property. Please refer to the Site Location Map in Appendix A-1 and the Site Plan/2003 Aerial Photograph in Appendix A-2 for additional details. 3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY At the time of the site reconnaissance, the subject property was unimproved. None of the current uses of the subject property appear likely to involve the use, treatment, storage, disposal, or generation of hazardous substances or petroleum products. Page 3 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 3.4 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND/OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY At the time of our evaluation, the subject property was unimproved land populated with pine trees. Clarcona-Ocoee Road traverses the central portion of the subject property in a west -east direction. No sources of potable water, sewer services or electricity were observed. Residences in the area are served by the City of Ocoee for water and sanitary sewer and by Progress Energy for electricity. One former irrigation well is located on the southern portion of the subject property. 3.5 CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PARCELS Currently, the parcels adjoining the subject property are used as follows: Table 1 Description of Adjoining Parcels Direction From Subject Property Description of Current Use North State Road 429 adjoins the subject property to the north. East Forest Lake Golf Course and residential properties adjoin the subject Propertv to the east. South Residential properties adjoin the subject property to the south. West Clarcona-Ocoee Road and West Road adjoin the subject property to the west. None of the current uses of the adjoining properties appear likely to indicate the presence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4.1 TITLE RECORDS A copy of the historical property ownership chain -of -title report was not provided to UES as part of this Phase I ESA. 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS No information was provided to UES with respect to any environmental liens or activity and use limitations on the subject property. Page 4 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 4.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE The client did not provide information to UES with respect to any specialized knowledge or experience that may pertain to recognized environmental conditions in connection to the subject property. 4.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES The client did not provide UES with information pertaining to the value of the purchase price in relation to the purchase price of comparable parcels located within the subject area. Information pertaining to the assessed value of the subject property is included in the Orange County Property Appraisers Information presented in Appendix C. 4.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION The current owner of the subject property is Beryle S. Buchman and Florence A. Barrett, Etal. The subject property is unoccupied. 4.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I ESA UES was contracted to perform this Phase I ESA in conjunction with a real estate transaction 4W in order for the prospective owner to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to CERCLA liability. 4.7 OTHER No other information was provided in preparation of this Phase I ESA 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 5.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES As a part of this assessment, we reviewed information sources to obtain existing information pertaining to a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products on or near the subject property. UES obtained an ASTM site search report through FirstSearch Technology Corporation (FirstSearch). A copy of the FirstSearch report is contained in Appendix D. UES also reviewed other available standard environmental record sources at the FDEP and OCEPD, as needed. The following state and federal sources were consulted during this record review: Page 5 of 14 Pages IM Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 State and County Database Review (FDEP and 0CEPD) • FDEP, Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) • FDEP, Registered Underground Storage Tanks (UST) • FDEP, Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) • FDEP, State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) • FDEP, Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites (SWF/LS) Federal Database Review [United States Environmental Protection Aaencv (EPM • EPA, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Index (CERCLIS) • EPA, Toxic Release inventory System (TRIS) • EPA, Facilities Index System List (FINDS) • EPA, Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Index System List (RCRIS) • EPA, Emergency Response Notification System List (ERNS) • EPA, RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) • EPA, National Priorities List (NPL) Table 2 lists the minimum search distances used during this assessment as set forth in ASTM E1527-00. TABLE Minimum Search Distances - ASTM E1527-00 SOURCE SEARCH DISTANCE Federal NPL Site List (National Priorities List) 1.0 mile Federal CERCLIS List (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980) 0.5 mile Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List Subject property and adjoining parcels Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1.0 mile Federal RCRA Non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities 0.5 mile Federal RCRA Generators Lists Subject property and adjoining parcels Federal ERNS List (Emergency Response Notification System) Property only States Lists of Hazardous Waste Sites 1.0 mile State Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists 0.5 mile State Leaking UST List (Underground Storage Tanks) 0.5 mile State Registered UST List Subject. property and adjoining parct1s Page 6 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 5.1.1 FLORIDA STATEANDORANGE COUNTY RECORDS REVIEW According to information provided by FirstSearch, the subject property is not listed on the state or county databases. One leaking UST site is in the vicinity of the subject property and is listed within the minimum search distances as specified by ASTM. Becky's Country Store is located approximately 600 feet east of the subject property and addressed at 10600 Clarcona Ocoee Road. Based on a recent file review conducted at the OCEPD, a petroleum discharge was discovered during the removal of two 1,000 -gallon USTs and completion of a Tank Closure Assessment report. A Contamination Assessment Report completed in 1991 indicated that soil and groundwater contamination was contained within site boundaries. No work had been conducted at the facility between 1991 and 2004, at which time, S&ME, Inc. was designated as the contractor to complete site assessment and rehabilitation activities. Based on a review of the regulatory files reported extent of contamination and/or distance between sites, the potential for this leaking UST facilities to have adversely impacted the subject property appears low. Please refer to the FirstSearch report in Appendix D for details. In addition to reviewing the FirstSearch report, UES performed reconnaissance of the property vicinity to identify any sites not mapped by FirstSearch due to inadequate or inaccurate address information and to look for unregistered facilities. No petroleum fueling or storage facilities were observed within a half mile of the subject property during field reconnaissance performed by UES. 5.1.2 FEDERAL RECORDS REVIEW The FirstSearch report indicates no EPA listed sites located in the vicinity of the property within the minimum search distance specified by ASTM. No facilities suspected of generating hazardous wastes were observed by UES during reconnaissance of the property vicinity. 5.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS UES reviewed ethylene dibromide (EDB) Application Zone Delineation Maps of Florida prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Based on review of the EDB maps, no EDB impact to groundwater within the geographic section of the subject property has been identified. EDB was formerly used in citrus grove applications as a fumigant against nematodes. UES reviewed the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) 2004 Florida Radon Protection Map for New Single Family Homes and Duplexes. Fewerthan 5% of all new homes in Orange County are expected to have elevated radon levels, so no additional radon resistant construction techniques are recommended by the Florida Department of Health to prevent radon problems. Please refer to Appendix E for a copy of the radon map. According to the U. S Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), the subject property does not fie within the a flood hazard area. A FEMA Flood Hazard Map is provided in Appendix E. Page 7 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Ar Report No. 399772 %W UES reviewed the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory Map providing coverage of the subject property. According to the map, wetlands have not been delineated on the subject property. Please refer to Appendix E for a copy of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map. 5.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES The "Winter Garden, Florida"USGS topographic quadrangle map, Orange County Soil Survey, and regulatory files available regarding properties of environmental concern in the property vicinity were reviewed as sources for obtaining information regarding the physical setting of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. Based on our site reconnaissance, review of USGS maps, aerial photographs, location of the subject property, and the present environmental related conditions of adjacent and nearby properties, the potential for migration of petroleum product or hazardous waste contamination from off-site sources appears low. 5.3.1 TOPOGRAPHY The USGS topographic quadrangle map titled "Winter Garden, Florida" was referenced as a source for obtaining information regarding the physical setting of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. The subject property is located approximately 150 to 155 feet above sea level. The on-site topography slopes to the west, towards Lake Apopka located approximately 1.6 miles from the subject property, A copy of the USGS Quadrangle Map is provided as Appendix A-1 (Site Location Map). 5.3.2 SOILS/GEOLOGY The general geology of Orange County is characterized by 30 to 50 feet of undifferentiated fine to medium grained sands and clayey sands of Holocene age overlying the Miocene age Hawthorn Group. The Hawthorn is approximately 100 feet thick and is comprised of interbedded layers of clay, clayey sand, sandy clay, and phosphatic carbonates. The underlying Tertiary age carbonates gently dip east under an increasing thickness of younger sediments. According to the Soil Conservation Service, Orange County Soil Survey, surficial soils at the subject property are classified as Immokalee fine sand, Seffner fine sand, and Tavares fine sand (0 to 5 percent slopes). Immokalee fine sand are nearly level and poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 10 inches of the surface for one month to three months, and it recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than six months. The permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and it is moderate in the subsoil. Page 8 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 Seffner fine sand are nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months and between depths of 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to 2 weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is rapid throughout. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, are nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, and it recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout. The available water capacity is very low. 5.3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY The general hydrogeology of Orange County includes an unconfined surf icial aquifer separated from the Floridan aquifer by the Hawthorn Group. The surf icial aquifer is recharged by rainfall and can yield small to moderate amounts of water to small diameter wells. The Floridan aquifer may reach 2,000 feet in thickness and is the primary source of the public water supply. According to the Florida Department of Natural Resources, Areas of Natural Recharge to the Floridan Aquifer in Florida Map, the subject property is located in an area of high recharge. The direction of shallow groundwater flow is generally toward surface water bodies. The direction of shallow groundwater flow, based solely on the USGS Topographic Map, is most likely to the west, towards Lake Apopka. 5.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE PROPERTY Based on the review of aerial photographs, the northern portion of the subject property was undeveloped from 1947 (the earliest aerial photograph available) through the present day. The southern portion of the subject property was developed with two small shed -type structures, circa 1958 until about 1984, at which time these structures were removed. None of the past uses of the subject property appear to present unresolved recognized environmental concerns. 5.4.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW To evaluate the previous land uses of the subject property and surrounding area, a series of aerial photographs was reviewed. The aerial photographs provide a progressive overview of parcels pertaining to this assessment. UES reviewed aerial photographs from 1947 to 2003, available at the Orange County Public Works Department. Please refer to Appendix A-2 for a copy of the 2003 Aerial Photograph, which was available on-line at the Orange County GIs website. Descriptions of UES' observations are outlined in Table 3. Page 9 of 14 Pages M Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 Page 10 of 14 Pages TABLE Summa of W Photograph Observations Photograph Photograph Date Scale Quality Remarks 1947 1" = 800' Poor The subject property is unimproved land developed with orange trees. Clarcona-Ocoee Road and a Railroad easement are visible adjoining the subject property to the east and north, respectively. The adjoining properties to the north, south, and west appear as undeveloped land. Residential development is visible to the east of the subject property, across undeveloped land. 1958 1 440' Poor Two small shed -type structures and a small pond are visible on the southern portion of the subject property. No significant changes were observed on the adjoining properties since the 1947 aerial photograph. 1963 I"= 440' Poor No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1958 aerial photograph. 1965 1 440' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1963 aerial photograph. 1967 1 440' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1965 aerial photograph. 1969 1 660' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1967 aerial photograph. 1971 1" = 660' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties- since the 1969 aerial photograph. 1975 1' = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1971 aerial photograph. 1978 V = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1975 aerial photograph. 1981 1"= 300' Good The northeast comer and the western portion of the subject property has been cleared. A commercial property has been developed across the railroad easement. 1984 1"= 300' Good The entire subject property has been cleared of the citrus trees. Also, the two small bam-type structures are no longer visible on the southern portion of the subject property. State Road 429 appears developed in place of the former railroad easement. 1987 1 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1984 aerial photograph. Page 10 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 TABLE Summa ry of Aerial Photograph Observations Photograph Photograph Date Scale Quality Remarks 1994 1"=300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property since the 1994 aerial photograph. The existing Forest Lake golf course is visible on the adjoining property to the east of the subject property. 1997 1 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1994 aerial photograph. 2000 1 300' Good State Road 429 Toll Booth and entrance/exit ramps are developed on an adjoining property to the north. The commercial property previously located across the railroad I — ------ - easement is no longer visible. 2003 1 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 2000 aerial photograph. 5.4.2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP- RECORDS A chain -of -title was not provided by the client for our review. According to the Orange County Property Appraiser's Information, the current owner of the subject property is Beryle S. 4W Buchman and Florence A. Barrett, Etal. 5.4.3 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE _MAP REVIEW Sanborn fire insurance maps providing coverage of the subject area were not available, likely due to the historically rural nature of the property vicinity. 5.4.4 CITY DIRECTORY .REVIEW Historical street directories listing the former businesses at the street addresses of the subject property and adjoining properties were not reviewed by UES since the subject property and adjoining properties have not been developed or used for any purpose, with the exception of the two small shed -type structures present during the operation as a citrus groves. 5.4.5 LAND USE RECORDS A According to the Orange County Property Appraiser's Report, the subject property is zoned R- 1 A, single family dwelling. 5.4.6 OTHER HISTORICAL SOURCES No historical sources were reviewed during this assessment. Page 11 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 5.5 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON ADJOINING PARCELS Based on the earliest aerial photograph available (1947), the adjoining parcels were undeveloped. Clarcona-Ocoee Road and railroad easement (existing State Road 429) were constructed to the west and north of the subject property, respectively, circa the 1940's. Adjoining properties to the east and south were developed with residential properties, circa the 1940's. Adjoining properties to the north, across State Road 429, were developed with commercial structures, circa the 1980's until about 2000, at which time, the structures were removed and the property remained undeveloped, State Road 429 was improved over the abandoned railroad easement, circa the 1990's. None of the past uses of the adjoining properties appear to present recognized environmental concerns. 6.0 INFORMATION FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS On April 15, 2005, a walkover evaluation of the subject property was completed by Mary H. Bruno, The purpose of the site visit was to assess the current conditions of the subject property I j and to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. The evaluation included walking the accessible portions of the interior of the subject property and walking the accessible portions of the site perimeter. This visual assessment of the property focused primarily on its surface features. Property use and significant features are indicated on the Site Plan/2003 Aerial Photograph presented in Appendix A-2. Site photographs are included in Appendix F. The majority of the subject property was covered with tall pine trees. palmettos, tall vegetation, which obstructed our view of the site. There were no other constraints that impeded our evaluation of the property or obstructed our view the day of our site reconnaissance. 6.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING The subject property is located within a residential and agricultural area to the east of Lake Apopka. The property vicinity is characterized by residential properties, agricultural land and undeveloped property. The on-site topography slopes gently to the west, toward Lake Apopka. 6.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS During our site reconnaissance, the accessible portions of the periphery and interior of the subject property were viewed. Clarcona-Ocoee Road traverses the central portion of the subject property in a east -west direction and also adjoins the southern portion of the subject property to the west. State Road 429 adjoins the subject property to the north. One irrigation well is located on the southern portion of the subject property. The subject property appeared covered with thick patches of palmettos, pine trees, and dense tall vegetation, making some portions of the site inaccessible the day of our reconnaissance. Page 12 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 (W We observed no evidence of petroleum product or hazardous materials storage or use at the subject property. We found no evidence indicating the presence of obvious surface discharges such as stained soil or pavement, USTs, ASTs, septic systems, drinking water wells, seeps, unusual odors, pits, ponds, lagoons, or stressed vegetation. No unresolved recognized environmental concerns were identified at the subject property the day of our site reconnaissance. 6.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS No structures were observed at the subject property the day of our site reconnaissance. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 INTERVIEW WITH OWNER LIES interviewed Mr. Ken Buchman, co-owner of the subject property. Mr. Buchman stated that the subject property was previously an orange grove and cleared during a freeze during the mid-1980s. He also stated that no residential or commercials have been developed on the subject property to the best of his knowledge. Mr. Buchman stated that he was not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. He also stated that he was not aware of any pending, threatened or past litigation or administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property. Also, he was not aware of any government notices regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products at the subject property. Mr. Buchman stated that water, sewer and electricity is not provided to the subject property. However, there is one irrigation well, which has not been in operation for a few years, located on the southern portion of the subject property. Interview documentation is included in Appendix 1. 7.2 INTERVIEW WITH SITE MANAGER There is no designated site manager for the subject property. 7.3 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS LIES interviewed Lucy Albrecht of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Hazardous Waste Section, to obtain information regarding her knowledge of recognized environmental concerns in connection with the subject property. She stated that there are no files regarding hazardous waste for the subject property. UES attempted to contact Sue Mela of the Ocoee Fire Department, to obtain information regarding her knowledge of recognized environmental concerns in connection with the subject property. No response was given by the time of report completion. 7.4 INTERVIEWS WITH OTHERS No other interviews were conducted in preparation of this Phase I ESA. Page 13 of 14 Pages A Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 8.0 FWDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS We have performed this Phase I ESA in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-00 for the approximately 76 -acre undeveloped parcel, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Road and State Road 429 in Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 of this report. Based on the conclusions of the Phase I ESA conducted at the referenced property, UES finds no evidence of unresolved recognized environmental conditions and no further assessment is warranted at this time. According to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the subject property. If no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. 9.0 DEVIATIONS UES prepared this Phase I ESA in accordance with ASTM E1527-00. 10.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Under the terms of the agreement between Clarcona-Ocoee, LLC and UES, no additional services were provided in association with the Phase I ESA. 11.0 REFERENCES References reviewed during the Phase I ESA are documented in Appendix H. 12.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Please refer to the title page for signatures of the environmental professionals who prepared and reviewed this Phase I ESA. 13.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS This assessment was completed by Mary H. Bruno, Project Manager, and reviewed by Michael J. Geden, Senior Professional Geologist, both employees of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Qualifications of personnel participating in this assessment are provided in Appendix 1. Page 14 of 14 Pages APPENDIX A .I�; 'ate• f '` ��` •'Pay' , • � I I it !j/� "' �!_' J ,= • ` 4 `. It 1r �J / r�~1` .Ji \ l -'�- ��: -) � �l� ��133 '1••^�~'.� i _y�f_�?r�r"cv_�. �5\ � i• � 1 / ✓/bc`�andpit '\ al\..Sr /` '; 1: T 2'1 fs22 '� �a9 fl, m� .I BM 01 ~I {`t ~ ".•✓I 'J (r sir: ,n AeAOo� =�JL 777' / S1113J �' (,r/ � ` cul ers � i � •. ` � � R�' �=�- - 1 _ ).DE� ' �, u• � � % . ^1�Y 7gb .d � e __._ter.•` '�� "I' � CE �`� �� L-.-k-� , • is 1 . iii '�"�'��k+ 1 a�t�� \` l nVIt 4 J, '1.1 it 170A` �7,���Yl,t ,�� SII �. 1 u „! • I �' a� -In1 k t 't t ' •f I Peaah La i� i\q"•-T �. QR /IrJ /�~,..`�-r wt�� sj' zl'` `{np .':adA y Il tx i ��"P •f . vim, ✓ �-� .�i � I, �J�f"I tiKJ 1 7 s d'` � `� .,y.:.� rh .+ � _ ,1 �•lir�s4$^ 4 '! 7c S�• r<S+�L�1, I+X� �' r� ° t^ � � �. s. "� J 1 1 �_ lPyrk . .-.'I .-, ._(�..�'��J6r •I,L:, � .,: �. 0 2000 BASE MAP: "WINTER GARDEN, FLA.", U.S.G. S. QUADRANGLE MAP SCALE, FEET PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 76 ACRES CLARCONA-OCOEE ROAD SITE OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA UNIVERSAL U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 0 o ENGINEERING SCIENCES DRAWN 8Y: M LP OATS: 4/22/05 CHECKED BY: $ DATE: 4 - o - C -5 - SCALE: AS SHOWN PROJECT NO:01-0013318-004-01 IREPORT NO --54q AGE N0: A-1 4ixk 4 .��Y` l�i4d l 1 I�a�� � 111 �I G t.'. ' lel �l I t > r 1 i 1 I.'•• :, �,�. �+a ,': i JI ;, �R L� i�Y� �m,� ,� n ;' � YF �}. C3. 4��f'Ih i.. r � r 7�c IIihI ��' III r.i l!' I I �I� I�^' �='„I♦�tl I�1 �.��`." 1 +' t 4 r fid+ 6 CT fl1� �1:�i I • 1�� I I�{ r r( fl';'," j 1 ��: �C �t. �a.- � � s- a. � YN , t � �, -, �1�, � 1 •.eq t .f � F• wMl � je'� � h � SUBJECT t' �;� ' � �',,.`,' , , f� v?'s,� ;I,y a1rr', PROPERTY (I �Ii�,�,;� r3" ai i� S" �lcl�:���''J!`�" =i r I „ L ��fit ; l'i)7'l rl I ' 1 I �` � ,�L� •� � � ti r ,r.�Y�l ��r ��n a ,� �zi ( "•-ter , tj }� ice) -'t i I�', ill 1 I �` _ ��t� fl� ��t—�;9 r 11 ? � � � , , ���. Vr „ I 1 I � I � � _� � P ,. rrt t! J { Il�r }• .{ s rt.: i R� i �- 1 i! 17 �,. I 1 � ! € rL y '-- I i 7 i I a •' 12.JI�� .._. g!7 t �. I r� , r r ° ifr `' I• t 1i l lr i 'I r�.r i � , t � - 1 ~ ( F � ' � t � iy � Y�` 1��,�'VY �= �� .-1 .-� � r.,.._�' Irl r _ J ' ✓o �� { ',. � _ y� 6M1117 , a t �: A UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC, GENERAL COMMONS SECTION 1: RESPONS113f MES 1.1 Universal Engineering Sciences, inn., heretofore referred to as the 'Consultant.* has the responsibility for providing the services described under the'Scope of Services" section, The work is to be performed according to accepted standards of care and is to be completed in a time) 1.2 The "Client" or a duly authorized representative. Is responsible for providing the Consultant with a clear understanding f the project nature scope' The Client shall supply the Consultant with sufficient and adequate information, including,d surveys and designs, 10 allow the Consultant toProperty complete the s heClient butnotlimso OD pedto,maps,siteplans,reports, and scope at the project as soon as possible during perfonnana of then wont so that the dhanges can tobeincorporated ical limo the work produce ECTI N 2: T ARD F CAR,s 2.1 Services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement are expected by the Client to be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of Care and skin ordinarily exercised by members of the Consultant's profession practicing cpntemppraneously under similar conditions in the locality of the project. No other warranty. expressed or implied, Is made. 2.2 The Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those observed at locations where borings, surveys. made. and that site conditions may change with time. Osla. interpretations. and recommendations D the information available to the Consultant at the time of service, The Consutlarhtis its � or other explorations are but will not to be responsible for other parties, interpretations ar use of the information developedt data. rots tatians and etant vvIll to cbased ornmendatio an SECTION 3, SITE ACCESS AND cry CONDITteLue 3.1 Client will grant or obtain free access b the site for all equipment Client and personnel necessary for the Consultant to perforin the work set forth in this Consultant will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage t tsors Of the he site, tite it understoodat �n� Consultant tree access b the site. The damage may occur. and the correction of such damage is not part of this by Client That. in the normal Course of work, some Agreement unless sa spec+fied in the, Proposal 3.2 TheCtientisresponsiblefortheaccuracyotlocatfonsforatlsubterraneans to avoid known subterranean structures, and the Client wctures and utilities. The Consultant will take reasonable precautions harmless from any claim or liability for" waives any claim against Consultant, and agrees to defend, Indemnify and hold Consultant not identified or accurately located. in addition Client including ts of defense, arising from da agrees to compensate Consultant for any�timee spent or expenses I structures and utilities in defense of any such claim with compensation b be based upon Consultant's prevailing tee schedule and xpenses incurred by Consultant (ACTION < SAMPLE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL expense reimbursement policy. W 4.1 Salt or water samples obtained from the project during performance of the work shall remain the property of the Client. 4.2 The Consultant will dispose of or return to Client all remaining soils and rock samples SO days after submission of Further storage or transfer of samples can to be made at Glen`s expense upon CGenl's prior written request report covering those samples. 4.3 Samples which are contaminated by petroleum with all appropriate federal, state, or local cations. S ct other chemical waste will to be returned to Client for treaIn) t or disposal, consistent regulations. SECnON S: 13tLLiNG AND PAYMENT S• 1 Consultant will submit invoices 10 Client monthly or upon completion of services, Invoices will, show cha classifications. rges /or different ersonn ! P e and expense 5.2 Payment is due 30 days after presentation of invoice and is past due 31 days from invoice date Client a rens to and onahaif percent (1- % %) per month, or the maximum rale allowed by faw, on past due acmurtts. g I?aY a finance change of 5,3 If the Consultant Incurs any expenses b coifed overdue costs, Consultants time, Consultants a billings inwices,due he sums paid by the Consultant for r+easorraDlt attorneys' fees, court :q�tnses, and interest will to be due and owing by the Client, . �ECTiON 6: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6.1 AN reports. boring logs, field data. field notes, laboratory test dao, cal inslrurltents of service, shall remain the property of the CrSiisutiant:culations, estimates, and other documents prepared by the Consultant as ," " 6.2�.,. Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which is not paid tor, will to be returned upon'dethind'ani will not to be used by the Client for any purpose. 6.3 The Consultant will retain an pertinent records relating to the services performed for a . which period the records will t be made period of five years following submission of the report dtiring ava�bie to the Client at all reasonable times. lON 7: Df COVERY OF UN+4NTtCIP TED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS _ « 1 ire.CHewarrants that a reasonable made b inform has been Consultant of known or suspected hazardous materials on or near the project,. 7.2 Under this agreement the term hazardous nWeriels includes hazardous materials (40 CFR 177-01), hazardous was substances (40 CFR 300.6), petroleum products, poiychlatinated biphonyls, and asbestos. tes (40 CFR 2612), hazardous 7.3 Hazardous materials may "at at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. Consultand and Client agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work Consultant : and Client also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for Consultant to take immediate measures " r eta u protect health and safety. Client agrees to compensate Consultant for any equipment decontamination or other costs incident to the Ursa of unanticipated hazardous waste. 7.4 Consultant agrees to notify Client when unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials are encountered, Client agneas to make any disclosures required by law to the appropriate governing agencies. Client also agrees to hold Consultant harmless for consequences of disclosures made by Consultant which are required by governing law. In the event the ro any and all ted recognizes that lt is the Chant's responsibility to inform the property owner of the discovery d unanticipated site mater or Client, J~ hazardous materials. 7.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the AgroomoM„ Client waives any claim against Consultant, and to the maximum extent agrees to defend, indemnify, and save Consultant harmless from permitted by law, Consultant's discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or sue claim, liability, and defense costs for injury or loss arising from and any cost associated with possible reduction of the ro suspected hazardous materials including any costs created by delay of the project by the Consultant which are found to be contaminatedP PeriY's value. Client will be responsible for ultimata disposal of any samples secured SECiiDN & FlfSK ALLOCATION &I Client agrees that Consultant's liability for any damage on account of any error, omission or other professional negligence will be limited to a sum not to exceed $50,000 or Consulteas tae. whichever is greater. If Client prefers 10 have higher limits on professional liability, Consultant agrees to increase the limits up to a maximum of $1,000,000 upon Client's whiten request at the time ofecceptlrrg our Pprovided that roP� Client agrees to pay an additional consideration of four percent of the total fee, or $400.00, whichever is greaten The additional charge for the higher liability limits is because of the greater risk assumed and is not strictly a charge for additional professional liability insurance, sect" 9.- 9.1 : 9.1 The Consultant represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and Consultants employed by it, is and ase protected by worker's compensation Insurance and that Consultant has such coverage under public liability and property damage Insurance policies ad the Consultant deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shelf be provided to Client upon request in writing. WltlnIn the Jim and conditions of such Insurance, Consultant agrees to Indemnify and Sava Client harmless from and againat foss, damage, or Ilabliity arising from negligent acts by Consultant, its agents. staff, and consultants employed by ft The Consultant shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability The Client agrees to defend beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance or the limits deacrified in Section 8, whichever is lose. and save consultant harmless for lose, damage or liability arising from acts by clientclient's ant, staff" and other consultants mployed by Client , agent SECi1ON 10: DISPUTE R M- OLUiKtN 10.1 AD claims, disputes, and other matters in controversy between Consultant and Client arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement will be submitted to 'alternative dispute resolution* (ADM such as mediation and/or arbitration, before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law. 10.2 If a dispute at law arises related to the services provided under this Agreement and that dis above, then: pute requires litigation iinstead of ADR as -Provided the claim will be brought and tried in judicial jurisdiction of the court of the county where Consultant's principal piece M businesails.tooeted'" and Client waives the right to remove the action to any other county or judicial jurisdiction, and (b) the prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, ttomey'a,feea; and other claim related expenses• court ousts, a SEGTIDNi 11: 113VW NATION 11.1 This agreement may be terminated bY'GMW, ply u pen seven (7j done written native in the event of substantial fatiure by the other party to ' Perform In accordance with the terms hereof Such termination shall not be effective N that substantialjanlureA has been romediad� before expiration of the period specified in the,wrilten notice.- M the event of'temwtetiOn, Consultant shall'.tae,paid``for,sorvices..perforrnsd to the termination notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. p 11.2 In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three (3) months, prior to completion of all repohi eontein sated b this .. - J, Consultant may complete such analyses and records as are n to cpm P Y Agreement ecessaµy.., , 1> h�s,tiias end<may�alaa;cornptote a;repod on tiffs a` ccs " performed to the date of notice of termination ocsuapension. "The expense of ts,rmiiiat,on'oI suapension,shailrincluda.sA direct costs-01-t,oiisuNant Woo such analyses, records and reports. SECGION 12: ASSIGNS 12,1 Neither otherClient nor the Consultand may n of the delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent g 9 party. SEI. N 13: f3txftWNG JAW MID SURVIVAL 3.1 The laws of the State of Florida will govern the validity of these Terms, their.interpratation,and,performance.. L. 13.2 if any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be impaired, limitations of liability and indemnities will survive termination of this Agreement for any cause. ,J OCPA Property Data (05-22-28-0000-00-004) Pagel of BILL DONEGAN, CFA �;Orange County Property AppraiserW9"r Property Line Inquiry System Assessed values shown are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem tax purposes N Previous Parcel Next Parcel * What's this' Parcel Data for 05 -22 -2R -0000 -0A -AAA Show Map Parcel Id View ftyLokjs Year 05-22-28-0000- 00-004 1 Mm Notice Address V —tet'-W&R1QPgM Taxes 10711 CLARCONA OCOEERD Find Neigh -�prhqod Schools Property Use Code 5400 Lcity Codite][OCO - Ocoee Mill Codeage JE5 - Reflects Tax Rates Tax Year -11 2005 Value Sununary Estimate mate Taxes I , I eta . i! (If this property were to sell) Value Method Number of Bldgs. Depreciated Bldg. Value Depreciated XFOB Value Land Value (Market) Land Value AG Just MarketValue) Assessed Value (SOH} Exempt Value Taxable Value Market 0 $0 $350 $1,182,000 $18,912 $1,182,350 $19,262 $19,2621 Owner Information SWI/4 OF SWIA OF SEC 05-22-28 (LESS W 30 FT FOR RD R/W) & (LESS PT TAKEN ON N & W FOR R/W PER OR 546112341 C198- 1671) N 7 ACRES (231 FT) OF NWI/4 OF NWI/4 SEC 08-22-28 (LESS W 30 FT FOR R/W) 3202/290 3286/834 & 3768/320 & 4319/953 4619/407 4830/433 435 437 439 & 4415286/975 & 5286/972 (DC) 2004 Tax Savings Due to SOH* htq)://www.ocpafl.org/pls/Webappl(get_parcel—master?pid=282205000000004&query data.. 4/6/2005 DCPA Property Data (05-22-28-0000-00-004) Sales Information 7r----- 1 0 OR Book/Page Sale Date (Deeds) 4536/1047 11 02/18/1993 Sale ]L Deed JVac/Imp AmountType Code $100�F FM - 7.jZmproved Page 2 of 3 Qualification 11 Q/U Reason Unqualified I LH- LESS $100 4319/0953 J11/07/1990 $100 MM------- 3768/0320 03/01/1986; Improved Unqualified $100 Improved Unqualified Misp-by-Sim ftar-S-ales i� Subdivision Information Model : Ty I (Click to PC Year Gross Int Ext Est. Beds Baths :Firs Living Bldg Code Code Wall Wall 1] Cos. 1191 11 Value view Built* SIT SF Value sketches) Code Code Nem *Actual year built - does not reflect subsequent building improvements. Shaw R_ujMiqg_Eub Axa Land Information Item Land Use Code Zoning* Frontage D th Land Units Unit Price Land Value J 5400 R -l -A f1 47.28 ACRE(S) $25,000.00 $1,182,000 *Please contact Your local Zoning Agency for the latest zoning information. Extra Feature Information Item Description Units Unit Price XFOB Value 1SHED a $100.00 $100 http://www.ocpafl.orglpls/webappI/get_parcel-master?pid=282205000000004&query data.. 4/6/2005 DCPA Property Data(05-22-28-0000-00-004) ���[13LDG I L 250.00 nis Data Printed on 04/06/2005 15 -34. -ID md ed on 04106r,1005 03:00:03 [Home] [Ahout O -UA] [ 9-eneral nfo t3ecord —I—..] ]Meet 8it1 T7nnpa�w] [earchesj [Map„Searches] [Contact OCPA] [Departments] [Otler site ... - . _ es _ _] [Products) Wfia Ha [Important aticesl ... _ Copyright CD 1996 Orange County Property Appraiser. All rights reserved. This page last modified on: 02/25/00 Page 3 of 3 http://www.ocpafl,orglpIslwebappUget_arcel master9pid=282205000000004&auery data... 4/6/20(}S DCPA Property Line Page 1 of 1 Bill Benegan orange county (W r. Proper A00falser POND LCss PONCE' r'r . s' POND- i C.,2aou, x PaND �� ; M, i!3 11 1► s Parcel ID: 052228000000040 This MaP is for reference onlv and ie nm. 0 xwm� 236 ft http://paims.ocpafl.orgtwebmap/printmap. asp?pin=282205000000040&condo=&mapurl=h... 4/18/2005 UUP» Property Line Bill Benevan I "f` :«} w. ,. Orange 8000ty } I MPOV Appralser POND - t F ra�^n an SIrL�aiE rfll�i Parcel ID: 052228000000004 Page 1 of 1 (W http://paims.ocpafl.orgtwebmap/printmap.asp?pin=282205000000004&condo=&ma url=h... 4/18/20 P 05 7 N FirstSearch Technology Corporation Environmental FirstSearchTM Report 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE 'ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 Job Number: 01-0013318 PREPARED FOR: Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Sciences 04-06-05 �Eavtruwuenw ?-'V' Tel: (407) 265-8900 Fax: (407) 265-8904 Environmental FirstSearch is a registered tradernark of Firs(Search Technology Corporation. All rights reserved. Environmental Firsdearch Search Summary Report Target Site: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 FirstSearch Summar Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS NPL Y 02-14-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 01-18-05 0.50 0 0 0 0 _ 0 NFRAP Y 06-23-04 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 0 RCRA TSD Y 02-14-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 RCRA COR Y 02-14-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA GEN Y 02-14-05 0.25 0 0 0 0 ERNS Y 12-31-04 0.25 0 0 0 - - 4 2 4 State Sites Y 03-10-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Spills -1990 Y 01-06-05 0.25 0 1 0 0 SWL Y 02-14-05 0.50 0 0 0 0 _ 1 1 2 Other Y 01-06-05 0.25 0 0 0 - - 2 0 REG UST/AST Y 01-06-05 0.25 0 2 0 2 Leaking UST Y 03-15-05 0.50 0 1 0 _ _ 7 9 I - 1 3 - TOTALS - 0 4 0 1 0 17 22 i Nut,tce oz Disclaimer Due to the limitations, constraints, inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in FirstScarch Technology Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the tiles residing at the agency responsible Cor such information. Waiver of Liability Although FirstSearch 'technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp, does not and can not warrant the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an understanding of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations. Environmental Firstsearch Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCnmA r)rrlvv nn AD OCOEE FL 34761 u JOB: 01-0013318 TOTAL: 22 GEOCODED: 5 NON GEOCODED: 17 SELECTED: 0 _ge Na. ID DBT a Site �NameljD/Status Address Dist/Dir IVM12 11D SPILLS FIN RVIEW Lo' A*"l RVI ' CLARCONA-OCOEE RD 12760��',SED JA VkL'ln-% .05 SW 4885 D��Cf 7254 ORLANDO FL, 32811 1 tq 2 3 UST FINA- RVIEW 0� 4 J'0 Gr 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD 15 1� 27, S 488512760, SED Vrq �Lg 1,1 ORLANDO FL 32818 0.05 SW 4 4 LUST BECKYS CNTRY STORE 489045638/CLOSED 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD 0.08 NE 3 APOPKA FL 32703 5 2 UST BECKYS CNTRY STORE 10600 CLARCONA, OCOEE RD 489045638/CLOSED APOPKA Fl. 32703 0.08 NE 3 6 5 LUST RIGHT FUEL & FOOD 1399 N LAKEWOOD AVE 488513383/OPEN OCOEE FL 34761 0.49 SE 2 1-1=p rL;I;K ZYJ00 -C� > I2. KIWI Environmental Firstsearch R Sites Summary Report (W TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 JOB: 01-0013318 TOTAL: 22 GEOCODED: 5 NON GEOCODED: 17 SELECTED: 0 Pa2e No. in nn T— Site.Name/ID/Status Address MAIM Ma N/A 11 ERNS NP ,C-537609/MOBILE VULCAN RD APOPKA FL 32703 NON GC N/A 10 ERNS COW GAS 18915/UNKNOWN SE OF FLORAL NURSERY/SHILER NON CC APOPKA FL 32703 N/A 22 LUST MEDLOCK PROPERTY 2320EAST AVE 039800127/CLOSED PANAMA CITY FL 34761 NONGC N/A 14 OTHER 327031CATTLE VATS APOPKA FL 32703 NON GC N/A 13 OTHER 34761/CATTLE VATS OCOEE FL 34761 NON OC NIA 9 RCRAGN BP #79395 FLR000I 10767/SGN 2115 ORANGE BLOSSOM TRL NON GC APOPKA FL 32703 NIA 8 RCRAGN ALBERTSONS 94471 300 W LAKE MARY BLVD FLR000i 10742/SONNON SANFORD FL 32703 GC N/A 7 RCRAGN QUALITY PRODUCTS OF ORLANDO HWY 437 N PO BOX 470 FLD981857394/SGN OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC (w N/A 6 RCRAGN BP #14149 1650E SILVER STAR FLR000111161/SGN OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 12 SPILLS MINUTE MAID CO (FORMERLY COCA COLA HWY 437 N 489803347/CLOSED OF BELTWAY -FULLER OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 15 UST SOS TRUCKLINE INC 12743 GILLARD RD 489805438/CLOSED WINTER GARDEN FL 34761 NON CC N/A 16 UST GIBBS & REGISTER 340 8 STORY RD 4898065091OPEN OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 17 UST MINUTE MAID CO (FORMERLY COCA COLA HWY 437 N 4898033471CLOSED OF BELTWAY -FULLER OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 18 UST OCOEE CITY KISSIMMEE AVE WATER PLA WASHINGTON AVE 489901874/CLOSEDNON OCOEE Fl, 34761 CC N/A 19 UST TURKEY LAKE SERVICE PLAZA (VEHICL FLORIDA TURNPIKE MP 263 489805693JCLOSED OCOEE Fl, 34761 NON GC N/A 20 UST USE #9803244 4898030071DELETED 3710 S MAGUIRE RD NON CC OCOEE FL 34761 N/A 21 UST MACGEORGE, STEVE RT I APOPKA BLVD 4891032561CLOSEDNON APOPKA FL 32703 OC R Environmental FirstSearcl, Normalized Sites Summary Report �w TAP -GET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 TOTAL: 22 GEOCODED: 5 NON GEOCODED: 17 SELECTED: 0 Site Name Address Dist/Dir Ma ID Total Sites FINA-CLEARVIEW 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD 0.05 SW L 1 2 NP CE F ORLANDO FL 32818 - kT RQ RQ ER a SP LF OT ja LS 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 BECKYS CNTRY STORE 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD 0.08 NE 3 2 APOPKA Fl. 32703 NE � NF RT RC RG ER 5—T 5P � OT Pj Ls 0 0 0 1 RIGHT FUEL & FOOD 1399 N LAKEWOOD AVE 0.49 SE 2 1 NP CE NF RT RC RG ER ST SP LF OT OCOEE FL 34761 lu LS 0 0 0 0 0 n n n A 0 0 0 1 r4 I I (W 80: Spills 80 AC: ACEC AQ: Aquifers CE: CERCLIS ER: ERNS Database Legend FL: FN: Fed Land Use FINDS HM: LF: HMIRS Landfill NP: NPL PE: Permits RN: RCRA NLR ST.- State FP: Floodplain LS: Lust NS: NU: NPOES Nuclear Permits PW; RC: Pub Water Supply RP: Receptors TO: Towers FW: Fed Wells NC: NCDB OT: Other RE: RCRA COR Releases RT: RCRA TSD TR. TRIS HS: Historic NF: NFRAP PA: Pads RG: RCRA GEN SP: SO: Spills 90 SOILS US: WE: Ust Wetlands e Q 1 t Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD B: 01.0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 STATE SPILLS SI' 'E SEARCH ID: 1 DISTIDIR: 0.05 SW MAP ID: i NAME: FINA-CLEARVIEW ADDRESS: 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD REV: 116105 ORLANDO FL 32811 IDI: 488512760 ORANGE ID2: 8512760 CONTACT: MARK G. KUBALSKI STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: .SITE INFORMATIO OPERATOR: NAME UPDATED: ADDR UPDATED: HAD ADDR INDICATOR: CLEAN UP STATUS: CLEANUP STATUS DATE: RANK: RP ID: RP ROLE: RP BEGIN: NAME: II PHONE: DISCHARGE INFORMATION CLEANUP REQUIRED: WORK STATUS: INFO SOURCE: OTHERSOURCE: SITE MANAGER: MANAGER END DATE: TANK OFFICE: TRENTIS DURDEN N DNR - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION RECEIVED 06-16-2004 2800 ACCOUNT OWNER 07-01-1985 BROWDER, DURDEN, KUBALSKI PO BOX 491 CLARCONA FL 32710 491 (305) 295-9684 INACTNE D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION Site Details Page -1 Environmental F'irstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FSEARCH ID: 3 DISTIDIR: 0.05 SW MAP ID: 1 NAME: FINA-CLEARVIEW ADDRESS: 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD ORLANDO FL 32811 ORANGE CONTACT: MARK G. KUBALSKI SITJi INPORMA7"ION TOTAL NUMBER OF TANKS: FACILITY TYPE: DEP CO: TANK INFORMATION TANK ID: TVI: INSTALLED: TK STAT: 'CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI: INSTALLED: TK STAT: CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI: INSTALLED: TK STAT: CAPACI'i Y(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI: -NSTALLED: 5 A - RETAIL STATION N I TANK 01-JUL-1978 B -REMOVED 2000 B - UNLEADED GAS UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 2 TANK 01-JUL-1978 B -REMOVED 2000 B - UNLEADED GAS UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 3. TANK 01-JUL-2978 B -REMOVED 4000 B - UNLEADED GAS UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 4 TANK 01-JUL-1978 REV: 116105 IDI: 488512760 ID2: 8512760.00 STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: (305) 295-9684 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31 -OCT -1993 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 3I -OCT -1993 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31 -OCT -1993 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31 -OCT -i993 - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 2 I 0 0 vironmeatal Firstsearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 4 DIST/DIR: - 0.08 NE ID: 3 NAME: BECKYS CNTRY STORE ADDRESS: 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD REV: 3115105 APOPKA FL 32703 IDI: 489045638 ORANGE ID2: 9045638 CONTACT: STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: (407) 877-6137 L!rEr INFOR1dA770 OPERATOR: NAME UPDATED: BECKYS COUNTRY STORE ADDR UPDATED: 03-27-2003 BAD ADDR INDICATOR; y CLEAN UP STATUS: CLEANUP STATUS DATE: RA - RA ONGOING RANK; 07-22-2004 2742 RP ID: RP ROLE: 2503 RP BEGIN: ACCOUNT OWNER NAME: 05-20-1994 BOWERS, CLIFTON 642 S DILLARD ST WINTER GARDEN FL 34787 3903 PHONE: (407) 656-1813 DI39HAR2INFORMATIO CLEANUP REQUIRED: WORK STATUS: INFO SOURCE: OTHER SOURCE: SITE MANAGER: MANAGER END DATE: TANK OFFICE; DISCHARGE DATE: POLLUTANT: COMBINED: SCORE: SCORE DATE: GAL DISCHARGED: DRINK WELLS AFFECTED: MONITORING WELLS: SOIL AFFECTED: S WATER AFFECTED: G WATER AFFECTED: CLEANUP ELIG: US?'_INFOI�IpN R - CLEANUP REQUIRED ACTIVE A - ABANDONED TANK RESTORATION TAYLOR DT PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY 11-01-1989 B - UNLEADED GAS S5 07-22-2003 0 Y Y N N E - ELIGIBLE Site Details Page - 4 I Ica -'vironmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 JOB: 01-0013318 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DjR: 0.08 NE MAP ID: 3 NAME: BECKYS CNTRY STORE ADDRESS, 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD REY: 116105 APOPKA FL 32703 IDI; 489045638 ORANGE ID2: 9045638.00 CONTACT' CLIFTON BOWERS STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: (407) 656-1813 "- INFORMATION TOTAL NUMBER OF TANKS; FACILITY TYPE: DEP CO: TANK INFORMATION TANK 11D, TVI: INSTALLED: TK STAT. CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE, TANK ID: TVI: INSTALLED: TK STAT; CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT. PLACE: TYPE: 2 A - RETAIL STATION N I TANK STATUS: CLOSED DEP Co. N STAT DATE; 31 -DEC -1989 B - REMOVED 1000 Y'UNKNOWNINOT REPORTED UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 2 STATUS: TANK CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE. 31 -DEC -1989 B -REMOVED 1000 Y - UNKNOWN/NOT REPORTED UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION Site Details Page - 5 9 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 JOB: 01-0013318 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DrR: 0.49 SE MAP ID: 2 NAME: RIGHT FUEL& FOOD ADDRESS: 1399 N LAKEWOOD AVE REV: 3115105 OCOEE FL 32761 IDI; 488513383 CONTACT: ID2: 8513383 STATUS: OPEN [ONE: (407) 468-1673 .vfrj7 INFO RmA177 OPERATOR: NAME UPDATED: ADDR UPDATED: BAD ADDR INDICATOR: CLEAN UP STATUS, CLEANUP STATUS DATE: RANK: RP ID, RP ROLE: RP BEGIN.. NAME: DISCHARGE INFO 9HATION DISCHARGE: DATE: POLLUTANT: COMBINED: SCORE: SCORE DATE: GAL DISCHARGED: DRINK WELLS AFFECTED: MONITORING WELLS: SOIL AFFECTED. S WATER AFFECTED: G WATJER AFFECTED: CLEANUP ELIG, CLEANUP REQUIRED: WORK STATUS: INFO SOURCE: OTHER SOURCE: SITE MANAGER, MANAGER END DATE: TANK OFFICE: UST MMRM—ATUION NEIL KAPPADIA 10-07.2002 10.07-2002 N RA - RA ONGOING 09-17-2002 1380 52351 ACCOUNT OWNER 10-07-2002 PANITA FOOD INC 2018 S CHICKASAW TRL ORLANDO FL 32825 (407)468-1673 03-30-199S B - UNLEADED GAS 70 11-20-1998 A Y E - ELIGIBLE R - CLEANUP REQUIRED ACTIVE D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION VAZQUEZ E PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY Site Delafis Page - 6 Environmental FirstSearch Federal Database Descriptions (Wl ASTM Databases: CERCLIS- Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability -Tn-'70-_'mati0n System. The EPA's database Of current and potential Superfund siProtectiontes currentAgency.ly or previously under investigation. Source: Environmental Updated quarterly. CERCLIS-NFRAp {Archive): Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Xnfo=at10n System Archived Sites. The Archive designation means that, to the best Of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Updated quarterly. ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System. The EPA's database of emergency response actions. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Data since January, 2001, has been received from the National Response Center as the EPA no longer maintains this data. Updated quarterly. (W FINDS: The Facility Index System- The EPA's Index of identification numbers associated with a property or facility which the EPA has investigated or has been made aware of in conjunction with various regulatory programs. Each record indicates the EPA office that may have files on the site or facility. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. NPL: National Priority List:. The EPA's list Of confirmed or Proposed Superfund sites. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly. RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. The EPA's database of registered hazardous waste generators and treatment, storage and disposal facilities. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List). Source: Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA TSD: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Treatment, Storage, and -Disposal Facilities. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites which treat, store, dispose, or incinerate hazardous waste. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. q ASTM Database Descripti -------- �Ons {continued}; RCRA COR: -Resource Conservation and Recovery Xnformation System Corrective Action Sites. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites with 4W reported corrective action. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. RCRA GEN: Resource Conservation and Recovery 1:nformat .Large,Quantit argee Small, and Vez7 Small ion System of RCRIS sites that create hazardous Generators. The EPA's database zardous waste or meet other RCRA requirements. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List). RCRA NM: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System sites No Longer Regulated. FirstSearch's proprietary database of Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's that the EPA cannot categorize. All RCRA databases are Updated quarterly R Environmental FirstSearch Federal Database Descriptions Non—ASTM Databases: HMRS: Hazardous Materials Incident Response System. This database contains information from the US Department of Transportation regarding materials, packaging, and a description of events for tracked incidents. Updated quarterly. NCDB. Nationa7 compliance Database. The National Compliance Data Base System (NCDB) tracks regional compliance and enforcement activity and manages the Pesticides and Toxic Substances Compliance and Enforcement program at a national level. The system tracks all compliance monitoring and enforcement activities from the time an inspector conducts and inspection until the time the inspector closes or the case settles the enforcement action. NCDB is the national repository of the 10 regional and Headquarters FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS). Data collected in the regional FITS is transferred to NCDB to support the need for monitoring national performance of regional programs. Updated quarterly NIDES: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The EPA's database of all permitted facilities receiving and discharging effluents. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. NRDB: National Radon Database. The NRDB was created by the EPA to taw distribute information regarding the EPA/State Residential Radon Surveys and the National Residential Radon Survey. The data is presented by zipcode in Environmental FirstSearch Reports. Source: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Updated Periodically Nuclear: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) list nuclear facilities, of permitted Updated Periodically PADS: PCB Activity Database System The EPA's database PCB handlers (generators, transporters, Storers and/or disposers) that are required to notify the EPA, the rules being similar to RCRA. This database indicates the type of handler and registration number. Also included is the PCB Transformer Registration Database. Updated semi-annually. Receptors: 1995 TIGER census listing of schools and hospitals that may house individuals deemed sensitive to environmental discharges due to their fragile immune systems. i Updated Periodically 4W M A Ron -ASTM Database Desc .E�rltions (Continued) RELEASES: Air and Surface Water Releases database which have impacted only air or Updated semi-annually. . A subset of the EPA's ERNS surface water. Soils: This database includes the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data for the conterminous United States from the United States Geographical Survey (USGS),. It contains information regarding soil characteristics such as water capacity, percent clay, organic material, permeability, thickness of layers, hydrological characteristics, quality of draina surface, slope, liquid limit, and the annual frequency of flooding.ge, National Resources Conservation Services Soil Survey Geographic(SSURGO) database, and the USGS Digital Data Series bedrock data. Updated annually TRIS: Toxic Release Inventory System. The EPA's database of all facilities that have had or may be prone to toxic material releases. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. Federal Wells: The United State Geographic Survey(USGS) Groundwater Inventory Sites Updated annually Envirofimental FirstSearch Florida Database Descriptions Three Florida Department of Environmental Protection databases are included under the Florida Sites list heading. They include... 1. Florida Sites List - identifies facilities and/or locations that the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation has recognized with Potential Or existing environmental contamination. This database has not been updated since 1989 2. Superfund Hazardous waste Sites - This database correlates to the NPL database and includes active, delisted, and Federal sites. Based on information provided by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 3. State Funded Action Sites - This database includes sites Prioritized by the State Of Florida for clean-up by the state or by potentially responsible parties. The List Status field includes SS, SFAS and SHAS. SS means site is on the Original State Sites. SFAS means site is on the State Funded Action Sites list. SHAS means site is on the State Hazardous Waste Sites list. jLID WASTE FACILITIES (SWF) The Solid Waste Facilities List is concerned with the handling Of solid waste and includes locations identified with solid waste landfilling or associated activities involving the handling Of solid waste. The Presence of a site on this list does not necessarily indicate existing environmental contamination but rather the potential. LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (LUST) The LUST database is concerned with petroleum storage tank systems and includes facilities and/or locations that have reported the possible release of contaminants. Included within this list are sites that are in the Florida Early Detection Incentive (EDI) Program, the Abandoned Tank Restoration Program (ATRP) and the Petroleum Liability Insurance Restoration Program (PLIRP). These programs support remedial action or reimbursement for those sites with environmental problems due to leaking fuel storage tanks. Some sites listed in the report have not yet been accepted in these programs. Environmental FirstSearch Florida Databases and Sources(continued) The FDEP assigns scores to the sites based on the threat to human health and the environment. The Rank is determined by the site's Score and reflects the state's Priority for remedial action on that site. Typically, the lower the Rank value, the greater the priority for remedial from the state. action UNDERGROUND STORAGE TAX" (UST) The Florida Administrative Code requires registration of underground and aboveground stationary storage tanks that contain petroleum products or hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA. Inclusion on this list indicates the Presence of stationary storage tanks and therefore the Potential for environmental problems. It does not necessarily indicate existing problems. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY (PWS) The Florida Department of Environmental Protection Potable water System Wells 13ROWNFIELDS 4 -he Florida- Department of Environmental Protection's Voluntary Cleanup —jites WUpdated quaterly PERMITS: BROWARD county Department of Natural Resources Protection (DNRP) Databases EARLY DETECTION INCENTIVE (EDI) • Includes leaking tank sites that fall under the following categories: Early Detection Incentive (EDI) • Petroleum Liability Insurance Reimbursement (PLIRP) • Abandoned Tank Restoration (ATRP) Env±rnnmg:or,4-.i assessment And remediation(EA) ol—:5 that have been issued licenses (by DNRP) to ensure that proper assessment and remediation are applied. mmuxs,mumn "KTnvn.,ft___D and ABMVrr-'Of%TTL1n STORAGE TANKS (ST) 1—r— -s inventory of Underground and Abov Broward County. 79rOund 'Storage Tanks in Environmental FirstSearch Florida Databases and Sources(continued) Hazardous MATERIALS(KH) This database includes sites that are involved in some way in the handling of hazardous substances or wastes. Due to the activities relating to the handling of hazardous substances or waste, these sites Possess the potential for environmental contamination. DADE county Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM) Databases ENFORCEMENT CASES(ENF) Includes sites that have been notified and/or investigated by Dade County to determine if any cleanup activity is necessary. Leaking Underground Storage tanks make up the bulk of this database, but other types Of sites include: unauthorized air emissions, unauth- orized storage facilities, and site specific spills. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (UT) DERM 's inventory of Underground Storage Tanks in Dade County. FUEL SPILL CASES (FSpILL) DERM 's listing of spill cases in Dade County. It consists mainly of underground tanks. INDUSTRIAL Waste (IW) IW2 - Facilities with reclaim systems or holding tanks. IW3 - Facilities with pretreatment or treatment systems that discharge to sewers less then 25,000 gal. per day. IW4 - Facilities that operate treatment systems that discharge to open ground. (Permits are no longer issued to facilities that discharge to open ground.) INDUSTRIAL waste(Iws) This database consists of Industrial Waste type 5. It is similar to the USEPA 's RCRA database (RCRIS) and includes sites that are involved in some way in the handling of hazardous and/or non -hazardous waste. Due to the activities relating to the handling of hazardous substances or waste, these sites Possess the Potential for environmental contamination. Hazardous Waste(HW) Sites with confirmed soil or groundwater contamination. Environmental FirstSearch Federal Database Sources CERCLIS: The EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System database. Updated quarterly CERCLIS NFRAP: The EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System archived sites. Updated quarterly ERNS: The EPA's Emergency Response Notification System. quarterly Updated FEDRThe EPA's Section Seven Tracking System. Updated Quarterly FINDS: The EPA's Facility Index System. Updated as new data becomes available RMIRS: The EPA's hazardous Materials Incident Response System Updated quarterly NCDB: The EPA's National Compliance Database. Updated quarterly NPDES: The EPA's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Tp -dated quarterly NPL: The EPA's list of confirmed or proposed Superfund Sites Updated quarterly NRDB-. The National Technical Information Service' abase s National Radon (W -elated as new data becomes available NUCLEAR: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's list of permitted nuclear facilities. Updated periodically PADS, The EPA's PCB handlers database. Updated quarterly RCRA COR: The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's corrective Action Sites. Updated quarterly RCRA GEN: The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's Generators and Transporters. Updated quarterly RCRA NLR: FirstSearch's Proprietary database of Resource Conservation and.Recovery Information System's that the EPA cannot categorize. Updated quarterly RCRA SD: The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's Treatment, rm Storage, and Disposal facilities. Updated quarterly RECEPTORS: The 2002 Census listing of schools and hospitals Updatedasnew data becomes available RELEASES: The EPA's ERNS air and surface water releases. quarterly Updated The EPA's Toxic Release Inventory system. Updated quarterly Environmental FirstSearch 4W Florida Database Sources BROWNFIELDS (13F) The Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Voluntary Cleanup Sites Updated quaterly LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (LUST) The Florida DEP Tank �Facility Discharge Information Updated quarterly OTHER (OT) The Florida DEP Dry Cleaning Facilities/Priority Ranking List and Cattle Dipping Vats. The Florida Geographic Data Library sink Holes of Florida Updated Quarterly PERMITS (PE) Broward County and Dade County DERM enforcement cases, storage tanks, industrial waste, fuel spill cases and hazardous waste permits Updated quarterly RELEASES (RL) Not available 90 SPILLS (SP) The Florida DEP Contamination and Cleanup Reports Updated quarterly 80 SPILLS (80) The FloridaP Contamination and Cleanup Reports bpdated quarterly STATE SITES (ST) The Florida DEP Florida Sites lists of Superfund Hazardous Waste Sites and State Funded Action Sites. Updated quarterly. SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS (SWL) The Florida DEP Solid Waste Facilities List Updated annually UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (UST) The Florida DEP Storage Tank and Petroleum Contamination/Cleanup Monitoring Updated quarterly GIS Sources AREAS OF CRITICAT. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (ACEC) Not available AQUIFERS (AQ) Not avail -able STATE WELLS (PETS) The Florida DEP Potable Water System Wells � Updated annually I IN Environmental Firsdearch Street Name Report for Streets within .25 Mile(s) of Target property TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE Fl, 34761 JOB: 01-0013318 Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name DistlDir 10th Ave 0.22 SE 2nd Ave U4 NE 3rd Ave 0.03 NE 4th Ave 0.04 NE 5th Ave 0.04 NE 6th Ave 0.05 SE Angola St 0.15 NE Butler Ln 0.23 SE Carpet St 0.03 NE Clarcona Ocoee Rd 0.00 -- Fullers Cross Rd 0,00 -- Harris Rd 0.12 SE Northern Durango Ave 0.24 SE Peters Ave 0.24 SE West Rd 0.01 SW I IN Environmental FirstSearch I We Radius from Area Single Map: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, OCOEE FL 34761 En exw FIRSTS Source: 2001 U.S. Ceww TIGER File$ AmPolygon ...... . .. .............................. . . . ................. ified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor---..... .......... NPL, BrOwnfield, Solid Waste L40drill (SWL) or Ha=rdous Waste ............ LRailroads . ................ . ..................................... . . . .... . ........ .. . ... . ... . ..... Black Rings Represent 114 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents 50o ft...Radius Environmental FirstSearch I Mile Radius from Area ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD$ OCOEE FL 34761 FIRST,, I ISOurce: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER File$ Asea Polygon .„...».„.»..,, . .. . .................. dfied Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor.„ ................. i NPL, Brownfield. Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hannfous Waste Railroads... ....... ......................... ... . . ....... . ... L Black Rings Represent 114 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents Soo (k. Radius Environmental FirstSearch .5 Mile Radius from Area ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, OCOEE FL 34761 Source: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER File, AreaPolygon.._..._ ............................. .. ..... . .............. .. ED tilied Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor........ .................... a 0 4 NPL- Sm-ficid, Solid Waste Landflill (SWL) at Hazardous Waste Railroads..............................................»............ . . .. . . . .... . ... Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Rcprcsc=soDfk. Radius Environmental FirstSearch .25 Mile Radius from Area ASTM MW RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, OCOEE FL 34761 Source: 2001 U.S Census TIGER Files AreaPolygon ..... . ............................. . ........ ................ F ltfied Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ................». ......... I Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Railroads...»..._....._.......................................... Black Rings —P—CUt 1/4 Mile Radii, Red Ring RcPrcscilts 50011 Radius Pmj CA, Environmental FirstSearch 31 .25 Mile Radius from Area Nan ASTM map: spuis go 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, OCOEE FL 34761 K3 Source: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER Files AreaPolygon ....».... ............ . ........... ... . ... ................... tified Site. Multiple Sit=, Receptor ...... ........ a 0 1w NPL. BrQ-fjgld. Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazudous Waste .......«„.M9 (W National Historic Sites and Landmark Sims .............„...._»..»_» ................. III MI SoilSites ..................................... . ...... ... . ....... ........... ..... . . . .. .. . Railroads ............ ............................. Blick Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents 500 fL Radius m APPENDIX E 3 14 map Uenterpoint: -81.54045, 28.60129 Map Produced: Thu Apr 2105:33:00 2005 ESRI/FEMA Project Impact Hazard information and Awareness Site http://Www.esri-com/hazards http://mapserver2.esri.comlcgi-binlhazard.adol?s=O&cd=x&p--l&c-81.540445,28.60l29... 4/21/2()o5 76 -Acre Clarcona Ocoee Ah cotruscitrss tApoweraa CW sUSGg WeW�ndOats �d Ir1atlX CCppl� =: � �4a�tld4 (SIIYiI 1e0KU3 Staten 4% e kbntlare r>ab coitus We rwnd PEM1A Polygons PAWrtr PikIA ad rNr1114 a.pwow ®iM W4»nnnd ` r' Y4Ytl'"dNr oeoard"w"` 1 �^ � FFo iFel« �ddliiu�ub 0m9tl - FnsrnrtldrPard Lake r ® Oartlr IQ RAnrins ED This m� is a user generated stat,_ output from an 1nIemat mapping aIle and is for general referenatl only, Data layers that appear on thls map may or may not be accurate, current, Or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. NrP C tlf'2Z'24,tl1' W, N Map Scale Unavailable (unprojected r data) Jackson Levy Iachua I F Marion DCA Radon Protection Maps for New Single Family Homes cnrus and Duplexes H mond, Counties with areas where the addition of radon resistant construction features 111sb01 are recommended to prevent radon P roblems (AfIore th 5% f Polk p an o new homes Manatee Hardee are expected to have annual average radon levels above the EPA action level Sas DeSoto In the Identified areas.) harl°tti E Fewer than 5% of new homes In theses counties are expected to have elevated radon levels, so no additional radon resistant construction techniques are recommended to prevent radon problems. Osceola http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/graphics/dcaresmp.gif 4/21/2005 Jackson Taylor St: �. ilchrl Dixie Alachua Putnam Levy Marion QGA Radon Protection Iiia s carus� I� for Large Buildings H mandc Counties with areas where the addition , Pasco of radon resistant construction features msbor are recommended to prevent radon PI lie 11 problems. (More than 5% of new large I buildings are expected to have annual Menai average radon levels above the EPA action level in the identified areas.) ® f=ewer than 5% of all new large buildings in these counties are expected to have elevated radon levels, so no additional radon resistant construction techniques are recommended to prevent radon problems. Osceola Polk Hardee DeSoto _ Ighland LSt. L e Martin Palm Beach Broward http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/graphics/dcalrgmp.gif 4/21/2005 I APPENDIX F 1' y I 1 y4 t It qq 13 ,... _. .�T:.r.... _.,yam; �...,.M... i I 1 S I 07 P 1� + c4 �. . � f\. to ••y'r4iwr 14�y �t� • f�l�%If,�; � W ?; 1 _ 1 ` Ir it 2t j �ftl � * _ •�'. ..q J PHOTOGRAPH 4. View of Forest Lake golf course located on adjoining property to the east, north of Clarcona Ocoee Road. APPENDIX G C1 Inter Relationship to INTERVIEW RECORD Tompn w ontgs' Have you owned the suFj—ect prape f fiiiz-a'r-dGu'-s Mval'euri'ajtsaa?ttVe"'suteA CT proI's pe or4e-r storagie or use ofpetroleum�products or 3. Are ou awar fpny environmental concerns associated with the subject o adjoinixg prope ies. property or 4. Arun ware f a Rpstpendin 0 War US c en releva War US% is or pe (W, Are You are of an govergent i 9a-zardous s2stances - A r petro earn p FTWT17- 6. (Client? Who would you like to be listed in the reliance section of the report? ---- or�admigistratyge zc?roceedh*n or from t e su le prooe vq re ding viol itions liabilities relating to aPKesubjecPprope Y$ �caw many copies of the report do you desire? To whom should they Client) Can youprovidea site plan and/or a legal interviewer 9. Are there any locked improvements/strlictures at the subject property? -- ho provides water e r to th I I I L_ . ,subject 11. Has tli-er—e- been a previous Environmenta 12. Can you provide a chain of title? 13. Who is the current owner of the subject property? How long? 14. Who is the Property manager? 15 What is the intended use of the subject property? lof ki 0 4W -NZ5 - 10. Are there any liens against the subject property? -- 17. - YOU Provide a copy's Do you have any knowledge of any other environmental concerns not mentioned? .18. Is the sale price comparable to similar properties in the area? I I I Cli Inter Relationship to F Commantc- INTERVIEW RECORD Interviewer � r r REFERENCES American Society of Testing and Materials, May 2000, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation E 1527-00, 27 p. Florida Department of Community Affairs Radon Protection Map. 2004. Available on-line at: hftp:/ANww.doh.state.fl.us/enVironmentifacility/radon/ Florida Department of Environmental Protection, GIS Section, Orange County Ethylene Dibromide Delineation Map. February 1995. Florida Department of Natural Resources, Areas of Natural Recharge to the Floridan Aquifer in Florida, Map by J. W. Stewart, Tallahassee, Florida, 1980. Federal Emergency Management Agency and Environmental Research Systems Institute, Inc. Flood Hazard Map. Available on-line at hft2:Z*ww.esri.com/hazards/makemaD'html OCULUS Database, FDEP Regulatory Files Review, available on-line. Orange County Public Works Department, Aerial Photograph Collection, photographs dated, 1939, 1947, 1958, 1963, 1967, 1971, 1975, 1981, 1984, 1987, 1990, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2003. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Issued August 1989, Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida. 4W United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey, "Winter Garden, Florida" Quadrangle Map, 7.5 Minute Series. Expertise Academic Background Certifications/ Training General Experience Work Experience '00grulfull mammals I-Osting * Geophysical Services Environmental Sciences * Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data MARY H. BRUNO Environmental Project Manager findustrial Hygienist Industrial Hygiene Services, Environmental Sciences B.S., 1998, Environmental Science, University of Houston at Clear Lake Welland Delineator and Management Certification Global Positioning Systems Surveying and Mapping Practical Surveying with Global Positioning System Opacity Reading — Visible Emissions Evaluation Asbestos/Lead-Based Paint Inspector (inactive License) Comprehensive Industrial Hygiene Review Course, 2003 Ms. Bruno has worked In the environmental consulting industry for over ten (10) years. Ms. Bruno has conducted hundreds of industrial hygiene related projects, which include mold/bacteria investigation and management indoor air quality studies, noise surveys, health and safety plan development, heat stress studies, water quailty studies, chemic and storage analysis, regulatory compliance, and Naturally 0 allrivento ry Occurring Radioactive Materials surveys. Typical properties/clients have included metal extruding facilities, fat refining facilities, office/warehouse facilities, retail centers, high-rise buildings, medical facilities, financial Institutions, and residential dwellings. Ms. Bruno has performed hundreds of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESA) throughout the United States utilizing ASTM E 1527 and ASTM E 1528 as guidance as well as client provided Phase I ESA protocols. Typical properties/clients have included industrial warehouse, light -industrial facilities, high-rise buildings, commercial properties, retail shopping centers, multi -family residential housing, and undeveloped land. Project responsibilities Include a review of any existing environmental reports, a visual assessment of the property, a review of selected public records concerning the property and adjacent properties, and final report presentation with conclusions and recommendations. Phase 11 ESAs have included remediation design and Health and Safety Planning for similar client types. Ms. Bruno has conducted hundreds of asbestos and lead-based paint Surveys. Typical properties/clients have included public and private schools, medical facilities, high-rise buildings, commercial properties, retail shopping centers, and multi -family residential housing. Project responsibility included the visual inspection for suspect -asbestos containing building material, collection of bulk samples, analyses of laboratory results, and report findings. In addition to building inspections, under the supervision of a licensed individual consultant, Ms. Bruno has prepared and/or coordinated recommendations, cost estimate for removal, abatement specifications, final abatement clearance reports, and operations and maintenance programs, Ms. Bruno was Staff Environmental Scientist for an international environmental firm. Her duties included project administration, field investigations, project coordination, proposal preparation, client contact, and project budgeting. She also worked for a substantial engineering and environmental sciences firm with responsibilities similar to the aforementioned. Ms. Bruno was an Environmental Professional (Technical and Logistics Manager) providing independent consulting services for a large, comprehensive lead-based *Committed to Service - •• .• .•—rr materrats testing • Geophysical Services Environmental Sciences • Geotechnlca l Engineering Biographical Data paint survey of over seventy (70) school campuses. Her services included providing litigation support for a large school district. Ms. Bruno also served as industrial Hygiene Program Related Leader/Manager for an environmental consulting firm. Projects Industrial Hygiene Services, Personal and Area Sampling, Various Hughes Supply Sampling for Metals, Total VOCs and limited Mold at the referenced properFacilities, Orlando, Florida. Ms. Bruno provide Industrial Hygiene Services Services with Air ties. included a walkthrough building assessment of the subject property for the purpose of preparing a sampling plan; Conducting full (8 -hour) personal breathing zone air sampling for a panel of eight (8) metals associated with soldering operations on one (1) client -selected employee; Conducting area sampling for a panel of eight (8) metals associated with soldering operations in two (2) areas; Conducting area sampling for total volatile organic compounds (VOC) associated with the plastics operation in two (2) areas; Collecting up to two (2) samples for laboratory analysis including air samples, culture plate samples, bulk samples, tape -lift samples, and/or swab samples. • Preliminary Indoor Air Quality Assessment, industrial Park Area, Orange County, Florida. Ms. Bruno provided preliminary Indoor Air Quality assessment services at the referenced site location. The subject building is approximately 10,000 square feet. The study was limited to the office area of the building, Ms. Bruno assessed the current conditions within selected locations within the facility for potential problems that may result in poor indoor air quality, mold proliferation, and/or specific conditions which may result in (W moisture intrusion. The final report included recommendations for improvements and/or remedlation if warranted, as well as recommendations for additional study, if warranted, and a rationale for those recommendations. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), Sadler Road Site, Intersection of Sadler Road and U.S. Highway 441, Orange County, Florida. Ms. Bruno conducted an environmental site assessment of the subject property. The purpose of the proposed site s assessment was to evaluate current potential toxic or hazardous chemical expoures associated with the property. The Phase I ESA followed ASTM E 1527 -aa and included: (1) a review of environmental records to assess past uses and the potential for past on-site hazardous waste disposal; (2) a site reconnaissance to evaluate existing site conditions; (3) review of historical aerial photographs and land uses; and (4) a written report that documents work performed, the results of the assessment, and conclusions and recommendations. Universal Office Orlando, Florida Years with Universal 0 (2005) Years with Other Firms 10 `COMMI ted to Service- ■��� . - 41101ffrram r esting • Geophysical Services Environmental Sciences • Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data MICHAEL J. GEDEN, P.G. Project Engineer Expertise Environmental Project Management, Feasibility Studies, Site Remedial Actions Academic Background B.S., Earth Science, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois Registrations Professional Geologist, Florida No. (PG408), (1988) Professional Geologist, Indiana (1985) Professional Geologist, Arkansas (1988) Professional Geologist, North Carolina (1987) Certifications Employee Development Course in Hazardous Materials and Site investigations Trained in Hazardous Waste Cleanup and Disposal Techniques, 1983 Short Course, Ground Water Modeling, NWWA, 1985 Short Course, RCRA Rules and Regulations, Government Institutes, 1991 Experience Mr. Geden has over twenty-four (24) years of professional experience in conducting and managing multiple groundwater investigations, site assessments, risk assessments, feasibility studies and site remedial actions. Project components have included literature and record searches, design and implementation of field assessment programs including installation and sampling of soil borings and groundwater monitor wells, geophysical investigations, single and multiple well aquifer testing, groundwater modeling and report preparation. Sites involved include those on the National Priorities List (NPL), RCRA, industrial, residential and open land. Clients have included the federal government, state, Related county and municipal governments and private industrial concerns. Projects PETROLEUM SITES Managed Assessment and Remedial Actions, Former Defense Fuels Supply Point, Lynn Haven, Florida. This facility formerly provided bulk fuels to Tyndell Air Force Base, but is currently being decommissioned. Site activities have included removal of bulk fuel storage tanks and the railroad network, delineation of petroleum contamination within the soils and groundwater and the installation of groundwater and soil remediation systems. Active remediation at the site includes dual-phase groundwater recovery, standard recovery wells, and air sparging. Soils at the site are also undergoing enhanced bto-remediation. Recovered groundwater is treated in an on-site stripper and is then returned via infiltration galleries and spray fields. idianaged Assessment and Remedial Actions, Defense Fuels Supply pointy MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Florida. This operational facility provides bulk fuels to the Air Force Base. Site activities have included delineation of petroleum contamination within the soils and groundwater and the installation of groundwater remediation systems. Refurbishing of the bulk storage tanks by the Air Force allowed for the installation of an air sparging system under the tanks which are currently operational. Contaminated soils in the basins and at the Pumping facility are being addressed as the refurbishing of the facility continues, product recovery has been completed at two locations and the installation of additional groundwater remedial systems are progressing. Commiffed to Service" --8 Frowler"c"s nGchal Services EnvironmenrarScienceseo emc�egneenng Biographical Data tlAZ4RDOUS WASTE SITE ADMIN/STRATTON/ASSESSMENTS/REMEDIATION NPL Site, Operations and Management (O&M), DeLand, Florida. Mr. Geden is currently Providing complete site management services ata local NPL site including re -instrumentation of operating remediation system, installation of telemetry system to eventative maintenance allow remote monitoring of system operation, weekly, monthly and quarterly O&M and pr operations, preparation and implementation of a new O&M manual, all monitoring points and regulatory reporting. semi-annual sampling of Supplemental Field investigation, NPL Cleanup Site, DeLand, Florida. Mr. Geden is currently managing this project EPA requested the collection of additional data to better define extent of contamination. Responsibilities include collection of groundwater data utilizing the GeoProbe Membrane interface Probe and Electron Capture Detector, completion of multi -aquifer pumping test, installation of deep aquifer monitoring oints and the clection of discrete depth groundwater samples utilizing dispersion samplig equipment. Second phase of effort requires installation of FLUTe sampling technology to determine location of DNAPL within the interbedded sands, silts and clays of the confining layer. Information Management for Ongoing NPL Assessment, Alabama Army Ammunition Plant, Childersburg, Alabama. Mr. Geden is currently providing CERCLA Oversight, Community Relations, Closure Report Preparation, Administrative Records, Site Management Plan, DOD Property Transfer for this project. Mr. Geden has been involved in assessment activities at the installation since 1981 and have participated in the prepara#ion of Remedial Investigation Reports, Feasibility Studies and Risk Assessments. Current tasks involve the review of the Community Relations Plan and maintaining the Community Outreach Program. Mr. Geden is also assisting in the preparation of the site -wide Record of Decision, and the maintenance of the Site Management Plan and Adm inistrative Records for the site. Mr. Geden coordinates partnering meetings with each of the project stakeholders which include EPA, ADEM, AEC, USACE, IOC, AMC, CHPPM, the local community, and the Prime contractors. • Remedial Action Operations and Maintenance, Sherwood Medical Industries NPL Site, Deland, Florida. Mr. Geden is responsible for total operation of all selected remedies at the Sherwood Medical NPL site in accordance with two approved Records of Decision (ROD). As Project Manager, Mr. Geden represents the interests of the client directly to the EPA in operational matters. Additionally, Mr. Geden is responsible for the bi-annual collection and analysis of groundwater samples from all site monitoring wells inthe surficial and the Floridan aquifer and from residential wells surrounding the site. Water elevations are measured in all wells and potentiometrfc and contaminant isopleth maps are developed. All data is compiled into semi-annual reports which are submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV. Publications Denahan, S. A., Gregory, R. G., and Geden, M. J. The Slug Test A Ground Water Quality Management Tool. National Water Works Association, Conservation and Regulation of Ground Water Resources Conference, 1983. Isaac, R. B., Sparlosu, D., Samson, C., Gray, K. F., Cox, C. H., Geden, M. J. A Partnering Effort that Expedited the Remedial Action Process at the Alabama Army AmmunitionPlant National Defense Preparedness Association, 22nd Environmental Symposium and Exhibition, 1996. "Committed to Service" I est/ng' Geophysical services Environmental Sciences - Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data Geden, M. J. Partial Defisfing of the Alabama Army Ammunition Plant. National Defense Industrial Association, 24th Environmental Symposium and Exhibition, 1998. Geden, M. J. Alabama ArmyAmmunition Plant - Area A, A CERCLA Case Study. Executive Enterprises Environmental Regulation Course, 1998. Geden, M.J., Nadolishny, A. Application of the Toolbox Approach and a Dynamic Workplan Universal for Expedited Delineation of a Solvent Plume. Florida Remediation Conference, 2002. Office Orlando, Florida Years with Universal 1(2005) Years with Other Firms 24 Committed to Service - Parcel Number 05-22-28-0000-00-004 DCPA Web Map Major Roads -- — PropGaed Ras Otock LMS mora ;—� Cornutio Institutional t J ei o Gedi Caur5o Ponca tumpl" Public Reade " Bftick Road Lot Line &,aver I el LA Irtetltulionat 15roste LandRlvate LaY.ee anc 41IRC interstale a Galed Roade Rall Road RseMentul Cdrnl; � IRdLbtne!trfa County .. �.1 Boundary 8UI!dICp W9c:ant Lana Toll Road e. Roaandairuuncdtle�rn Propneed gn�ultureu>Ralt Agnoulturai Parke ©Ho! ital curtllage Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser !i �rrfgal+ f anrdq i �br,rt rnr :, tit, A.. 0A Lrw0 .1 Created: Tue Mar 06 2018 10:44:20 GMT -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) This map is for reference only and is not a SUrve i Parcel Number 05-22-28-0000-00-046 OCPA Web Ma Map MajcrRo3da -- --• Proposed Ra? Block LMe i Commetcrau lnat)tullonal Hydro Goff Course Rano 3 tumplNs PUNIC Reads OffCk Rcad La! Lint uorel nn•.ent.atr institutional, 1�lasta Lend i Lakes and a #ll Pr, Rivers Intere+91e a Ga/ad Roads Rall RoadRealdenti3l r---' Commewsh, In'duatrI91`. County Bul:dlrp .. _._ u Vacant Land BaunOarl - Toll Road e: Road Under Con?tructl"n proposed iunRall Agncurtural Psr►.a ® Hospital Curtilage 4 1 4 Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser A t.. 0 Gw 11;--- C404 Yl- 'xc l'rots Int N Laksw*W Av..- .;.. 0 ,*x k ,'I'. +k :. +$ Created: Tue Mar 06 2018 10:47:12 GMT -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) This map is for reference only and is not 'A' a 4 1 4 A A k A t l .;.. 0 ,*x k ,'I'. +k :. +$ Created: Tue Mar 06 2018 10:47:12 GMT -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) This map is for reference only and is not 'A' Parcel Number 05-22-28-0000-00-040 OCPA Web Map MajcrRe.3de atateed Rea — F' aleck Line __ ___. cornntercrau Institutional '-- HxiCrc GC it Course Flcnua 1� iumpim Public Road Brsck R.ad Lot Line c.araroin dn(yrt Institutldnav �_ W33te Land Lakee anti tiller Rivers interstate a Gated Roads Rall Road i Reeldeotral CIndueMaro iltrIPrsl! County BUIrstlrva � Bdunosrj Vacant Land Toil Road r. , Road Under onetructivn Proposed -- SrzrRall Agri UR x Agnsulturai n Pane � tio_sp ttal cur -nage Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser V YT` Cl awn Pia nt Art. -(As, t"tmil Wxy w)Lwns West Llbd Reflais4ance c. *y M11, K.enats6311r / Otaitai 3thod Chwtar at CIO*" Pant ChCC4 at xoarn Pcgnt „ trn N"t,, I , F#catda A Ito ext �;rP.X'I",,.y11 . . : VP" Vol" • twi11r19;�ty n �CI''_•LxG 9tlt �. M " N t4rs! 1�x4�i+r Created: Tue Mar 06 2018 10:41:00 GMT -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) map is for reference only and is not a ., uwvc, RICK SINGH, ffA - ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER d0 Searches I 51 Sales Search Property Record Card 4 My Favorites Sign up for e -Notify... 10711 N Lakewood Ave < 05-22-28-0000-00-004 > Nvt (5) Buchman Beryle S 90/500 int Carol A Cole Trust No 162.5/500 Int Thomas E Cole Trust No 162.5/500 Salomon Elise A 40/500 Int Solomon Robert B 40/500 Int 4 More... P,q—ty Name N/A. Click information icon to contribute. Mailing Add,,,, Or; File 2124 65Th Ave Greeley, CO 80634-7907 Incorrect Mailing Address? View 2017 Property Record Card Physical Street Add,LS 10711 N Lakewood Ave Postal City and Zipcode Ocoee, FI 34761 Pmj,mity Use 5420 - Timberland Planted M-topality Ocoee Property FeaturesValues, Exemptions and Taxes �Sales Analysis11 Location Info11 Market Stats ° Update Information Historical Value and Tax Benefits , Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2017 Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $1,460,952 + $0 + SO = $1,460,952 (12%) $1,442,040 = $18,912 (o%) 2016 ®® $1,300,200 + $0 + $0 = $1,300,200 otim - $1,281,288 = $18,912 (0%) 2015 Orange County (General) $11182,000 + $o + $0 = $1,182,000 (674) - $1,163,088 = $18,912 (o%) 2014 a ® $709,200 + $0 + $0 = $709,200 $690,288 = $18,912 (-2.99%) Tax Year Benefits Library -Operating Budget $18,912 $0 Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2017 Moo $7.092% St Johns Water Management District $18,912 $1,442,040 $26,254 2016 a ® Kis 1 % t $1,281,288 $24,009 2015 Moo $344.33 $1,163,088 $22,378 2014 ® - ® $690,288 $13,279 2017 Taxable Value and Certified Taxes TAX YEAR 1 2017 , 2016 , 2015 • 2014 Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value MlBage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $18,912 $0 $18,912 4.2220 {-7.47x) $79.85 23% Public Schools: By Local Board $18,912 $0 $18,912 3.2480 (oem) $61.43 18% Orange County (General) $18,912 $0 $18,912 4.4347 (o.00%) $83.87 24% City Of Ocoee $18,912 $0 $18,912 5.6546 (-2.99%) $106.94 31% Library -Operating Budget $18,912 $0 $18,912 0.3748 gw%) $7.092% St Johns Water Management District $18,912 $0 $18,912 0.2724 (•s.s8%) Kis 1 % 18.206S $344.33 2017 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEEOCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3170 5673,60 E1.00 $5,673.60 $5,673.60 2017 Gross Tax Total: $6,017.93 2017 Tax Savings Tax Savings Your property taxes without exemptions would be: $26,598.82 Your ad -valorem property tax with exemptions is: - $344.33 Providing You A Savings Of: _ $26,254.49 This Data Printed on 03/06/2018 and System Data Last Refreshed on 03/05/2018 View 2017 Property Record Card Property Features Values, Exemptions and Taxes Sales Analysis11 Location Info 11 Market Stats r' Update Information Historical Value and Tax Benefits 2017 Tax Breakdown Tax Year Values RICK 81N6H, (TA - ORANGE CKM PROPERTY APPRAISER Building(s) party R,ac,,� $My Favorites Sign up for e -Notify... i Searches 9 Sales Search WeStbridge Ct <05-22-28-0000-00-046> N;,mE(,) Phy,iwl Str dt Add,,, Buchman Beryle S 90/500 Int Westbridge Ct Carol A Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Int Poscd City and Lpcod, Thomas E Cole Trust No 162.5/500 Apopka, FI 32703 Solomon Elise A 40/500 Int PMp,,rty U'P Solomon Robert B 40/50D Int 5420 - Timberland Planted 4 More... IMAGE UPIOAO Municipality Property Name Ocoee N/A. Click information icon to contribute. - $31,098 Mailing Addra s bn PIIr 2014 ® ® 2124 65Th Ave + $0 Greeley, CO 80634-7907 $31,950 Incorrect Mailing Address? = $852 View 2017 Property Record Card Property Features Values, Exemptions and Taxes Sales Analysis11 Location Info 11 Market Stats r' Update Information Historical Value and Tax Benefits 2017 Tax Breakdown Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2017 ®® $54,848 + $0 + $0 = $54,848 (3.0%) $53,996 = $852 (o%) 2016 ®® $53,250 + $0 + $0 = $53,250 (67%) - $52,398 = $852 (a%) 2015 ®® $31,950 + $0 + $0 = $31,950 (o%) - $31,098 = SSS2 (o%) 2014 ® ® $31,950 + $0 + $0 = $31,950 $31,098 = $852 Tax Year Benefits $0 $852 0.3748 pm%) Ag Beneflts Tax Savings 2017 ® $0 $852 0.2724 (-5ss%) $53,996 $983 2016 ®- ® 18.2065 $52,398 $982 2015 ® ® $31,098 $598 2014 ® ® $31,098 $598 2017 Taxable Value and Certified Taxes TAX YEAR 12017 - 2016 • 2015 • 2014 Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value MLBage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $852 $0 $852 4.2220 (-7A7%) $3.60 23% Public Schools: By Local Board $852 $0 $852 3.2480 gow) $2.77 18% Orange County (General) $852 $0 $852 4.4347 (o.00%) $3.78 24% City Of Ocoee $852 $0 $852 5.6546 (-2.99%) $4.82 31% Library -Operating Budget $852 $0 $852 0.3748 pm%) $0.322% St Johns Water Management District $852 $0 $852 0.2724 (-5ss%) $0.23 1 % 18.2065 $15.52 2017 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments evying Authority Assessment Description units Rate Assessmen :ITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)90S-3170 255.96 $1.00 $2SS.94 $255.91 2017 Gross Tax Total: $271.48 2017 Tax Savings Tax Savings Your property taxes without exemptions would be: $998.59 Your ad-vatorem property tax with exemptions is: - $15.52 Providing You A Savings Of. _ $983.07 This Data Printed on 03/06/2018 and System Data Last Refreshed on 03/05/2018 RICK SIN611, CFA - ORAWE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER i Searches Sales Search Property Record Card 1 4 My Favorites Sign up for e'Notify.,. Clarcona Ocoee Rd < 05-22-28-0000-00-040 > Na-(') Physical Stwo Address Buchman Beryle S 90/500 Int Clarcona Ocoee Rd Carol A Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Int Postal City „d zit ode Thomas E Cole Trust No 162.5/500 Apopka, FI 32703 Solomon Elise A 40/500 Int P"' ty Use Salomon Robert 8 40/500 Int 5420 - Timberland Planted 4 More... IMAGE UPLOAD + $0 = $59000 (67%) Mnni pAly Prc•r _,Iy Nnme Ocoee N/A. Click information icon to contribute. + $0 Mailing Address On rile $346,896 = $9,504 2124 65Th Ave $9,504 Greeley, CO 80634-7907 (-2.99%) Incorrect Mailing Address? 2017 View 2017 Property Record Card ^� �� �� ��� r1 Update Information Propertypeatures Values, Exemptions and Taxes Sates Analysts Location Info Market Stats Historical Value and Tax Benefits Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2017 ®® $673,002 + So + $0=$673,002 no%) $663,498 = $9,504 (o%) 2016 ® CM $653,400 + $0 + $0 = $653,400 (1ox) - $643,896 = $9,504 ON 2015 ®® $594,000 + $0 + $0 = $59000 (67%) $584,496 = $9,504 (o%) 2014 0 CM $356,400 + $0 + $0 = $356,400 $346,896 = $9,504 Tax Year Benefits $9,504 5.6546 (-2.99%) Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2017 ® - ® $0 $9,504 0.3748 $663,498 $12,080 2016 ® . ® $9,504 $0 $9,504 $643,896 $12,065 2015 ® ® $584,496 $11,246 2014 ® - ® $173.04 $346,896 $6,673 2017 Taxable Value and Certified Taxes TAX YEAR 12017 - 2016 . 2015 . 2014 Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $9,504 $0 $9,504 4.2220 (-7.47%) $40.13 23% Public Schools: By Local Board $9,504 $0 $9,504 3.2480 (a00%) $30.87 18% Orange County (General) $9,504 $0 $9,504 4.4347 (o.00%) $42.15 24% City Of Ocoee $9,504 $0 $9,504 5.6546 (-2.99%) $53.74 31% Library - Operating Budget $9,504 $0 $9,504 0.3748 (o.00%) $3.56 2% St Johns Water Management District $9,504 $0 $9,504 0.2724 (-ssa%) $2.59 1 % 18.2065 $173.04 2017 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments 2017 Tax Breakdown x� r Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment :ITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3170 2851.32 $1.00 S2,8S1.32 $2,851.32 2017 Gross Tax Total: $3,024.36 2017 Tax Savings Tax Savings Your property taxes without exemptions would be: $12,253.01 Your ad -valorem property tax with exemptions is: - $173.04 Providing You A Savings Of: _ $12079.97 This Data Printed on 03/06/2018 and System Data Last Refreshed on 03/05/2018 �1►20185 ' ���.'��� NO 4 P 0 I SCALE V= 1000' S00 1,000 1,500 2,000 FEET+�eC PANEL 021OF FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS KEY LIME PANEL 210 OF 750 �. sr (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) p 'CA ;- • CONTAINS: Clty of Ocoee 3RD AVEr a L RIA DR - Z COMMUNITY UMBE PANEL SUFFIX "SS N R P ' #� Wd.. y OCOEE. CITY OF 120185 0210 F - S1g1 � 4TH -AVE � SATIN ORANGECCUNTY 20 79 0210 F LEAF CIR WINTER GARDEN, CITY OF 120187 0270 F y FULLERS CROSS RD- _ — 5TH NICOLE 6TH AVE w rU }.. \\zoN E A — _ - .. a 2 Notice to User The Map Number shown below should be use d when placing map orders: the Community Nmbm shown above HARRIS RD W N U should be used w insurance applications for the subject Q... _ community „ a MAP NUMBER �c4Rty 12095CO21OF .' F Q 1 MARLENE ,.���f"i ZONE'. X '10TH SAVE a NORTHERN � DURANGO AVE ' 1':TH AVE MEAD Oti1b ��gmnst�°P MAP REVISED SWEETCT *' ZONE, :� LLJ FOR s:• SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 t _ ; 12TH AVE z COLI=INS'CT Federal Emergency \IanagenientAgency a o '`ITT E Orang --- - "& 13TH v ASPEN CT _ : L' This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It , o AVE _..__* U.n i n C �� rp -as extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does rot reflect changes .,,•�" , # x or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the 8 c title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance 'r b,,; ..-s= -_ Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mse.fema.gov APPLICATION FOR CAPACITY DETERMINATION AND CONCURRENCY RECOMMENDATION DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES PLANNING 6501 MAGIC WAY, BUILDING 200, ORLANDO, FL 32809 TEL: 407-317-39741 FAX: 407-317-32831 WEBSITE: http://plannlng.ocps.net Proposed Development Profile TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAFF (Check All That Apply) PROJECT NAME Ocoee Village Center Existing FLU: Low Density _ Max, Density permitted: 4 dulac FV� Future Land Use [FLU] Map Amendment Proposed FLU: HighDensityMax. Density permitted: 16 du/ac (Capacity Enhancement) Type:[3SF_ ZMF 350 OTH 140 E3MH_ VestedlUnvested: 2 488 Existing Zoning: R -1A Max. Density permitted: du/ac Rezoning Proposed Zoning: PUD (Residential). Max. Density permitted: _ du/ac (capacity Enhancement) Type: 1771 SF EIMF 350 STH 140 OMH VestedlUnvested: 2 488 Total Unit Type: Fj Site Plan/ Preliminary Plat/ Development Plan EJSF nMF_ EITH_ EIMH (Concurrency) CITY APPLICANTS ONLY If school concurrency vested rWhts apply, please Submit documentation to plannino.ocps,not Local Government Information Case #: Planner Assigned: City of Ocoee Phone # Email: W1 Comp Plan fv,z- Target date and type of Local Government public hearing Pf 7 Rezoning D PlattSite Plan Approval Form must contain original signature of local government representative: Local Government Reviewer Name (print) 10=16 Local Govemme7"evIer Signature / b / Dati Facilities Planning 6501 Magic Way, Building 200, Orlando, FL 32809 TEL: (407) 317-3947 if FAX: (407) 317-3263 1, (PRINT PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME) Kenneth W. Buchman AS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW, HEREBY GIVE PERMISSION FOR (PRINT AGENT'S NAME) Alchard C. Wohlfarth TO ACT AS MY AGENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPLYING FOR CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT if CONCURRENCY FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY. Legal Description(s) or Parcel Identification Number(s) are required: PARCEL ID NUMBER(S): 05-22-28-0000-00-040 ; 05-22-28-0000-00-046; 05-22-28-0000-00-004 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description Signature of the Property Owner Date STATE OF l) A COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of )u)' 20." by as an individual/officer/agent, on behalf of himself/herself a corporation/partnership. He/She is ersonan 11 known to me or has produced as identification and did/di not e an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of "7 L,LAhe- - 20& Notary Public Signature: e nal I kn wn rso 0 0 id did �nan My Commission Expires: LINDA M. -YOUNG DUNG NOWY Public - Stilts of Flown C8111111111111011 0 GG 162000 MY COMM, Expires Feb 28, 2021 lko* AWIN v afficivyAsio. (W LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: The Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South Range 28 East, LESS the South 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right—of—way, AND LESS that port of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest i/4 of said Section 5 lying Northwesterly of State Road 429. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—woy token as parcel 62-161, "Limited Access Right—Of—Way" and Parcel 62-161, "Right—Of—Way A" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official records Book 5461, Page 2341. PARCEL B: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the North 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right--of—way. AND The North 7 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the West 30 feet for road right—of—way. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—way taken as Parcel 62-161, "Right--Of—Way B" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 5461, page 2341. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—woy token as Parcel 1044, "Right--Of—Way'' in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 9816, page 8120, ALSO BEiNG DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL 1 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 88'07'15" East along the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 1252.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along sold North line run South 88'07'15"' East for a distance of 122.87 feet to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5: thence departing said North line run South 00'17'43" West along the East line of said Northwest 1/4 for a distance of 1351.26 feet to a point on the Northerly line of Right—of—Woy Taking, Parcel No. 1044, per Official Records Book 9816. Page 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence deporting said East line run North 89'13'22'" West along sold Northerly right—of—woy line for a distance of 154.59 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 1262.21 feet, a chord bearing of North 69`30'11" West and a chord length of 8.51.79 feet; thence run Northwesterly along sold Northerly right—of—way line and said curve through a central angle of 39'26'23" for an arc distance of 868.85 feet; thence run North 49'49'55" West for a distance of 151.44 feet; thence run North 36'19'17" West for a distance of 51.42 feet: thence run North 49'49`02" West for a distance of 184.99 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—woy line of County Road 429, Western Beltway, a limited access right—of--way, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—woy Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence departing aforesaid Northerly right—of—way line run North 54'40'57" East along sold Southerly right—of—way line for a distance of 1377.66 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 23.76 acres more or less. AND A PARCEL 2 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00'53'06" East along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 for a distance of 1465.41 feet to the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence departing said West line run South 89'10'08" East along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 145.12 feet; thence departing said North line run North 00'49'52" East for a distance of 50.00 feet to a point on the Northerly right—of—way line of Ocoee — Clorcono Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right--of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603, also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 71'13'20" West along said Northerly right—of—way line for a distance of 20.59 feet to a point on the Easterly right—of—way line of West Road, a limited access right—of—woy, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence run North 07'06'16" East along said Easterly right—of—way line for a distance of 60.00 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 776.19 feet, a chord bearing of North 00'25'09" East and a chord length of 180.72 feet; thence run Northerly along sold Easterly right—of—woy line and said curve through a central angle of 13 22'14" for on arc distance of 181.13 feet to a point of tongency, thence run North 06'15'58" West for a distance of 131.33 feet; thence run North 19'42'11" West for a distance of 25.32 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Right—of—Woy Taking, Parcel No. 1044 per Official Records Book 9816, Page 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence departing said Easterly right—of—way line run South 49'49'02" East along said Southerly right—of—Woy line for a distance of 265.92 feet to a point on a non tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 1385.18 feet, a chord bearing of South 56'21'45" East and a chord length of 316.40 feet; thence run Southeasterly along said Southerly right—of—way line and said curve through a central angle of 13'06'58" for an arc distance of 317.09 feet; thence run South 00'49'52" West for a distance of 60.70 feet to a point on aforesaid Northerly right—of--way line of Ocoee — Ciorcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-64.60-602/603; thence departing said Southerly right—of—way line run North 89'10'08" West along said Northerly right--of—woy line for a distance of 432,12 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 2.13 acres more or less. (Mom PARCEL 3 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00'53'06" East along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 for a distance of 2930.83 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5; thence deporting said West line run North 89"44'04" East along the South line of said Southwest 1/4 for s distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right--of—woy line of Ocoee — Clorcono Rood; thence continuing along said South line run North 89'44'04" East for a distance of 40.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right—of—way line of Ocoee — Clorcono Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6450-602/603; thence deporting said South line run North 00'53'06" West along said Easterly right—of—way line for a distance of 1111.47 feet; thence run North 07"06'16" East for a distance of 265.87 feet; thence run North 5853'01" East for a distance of 72.13 feet to o point on the Southerly right—of—way line of Ocoee — Clarcono Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence run South 89'10'08" East along said Southerly right—of—way tine for a distance of 514.27 feet; thence run North 00'49'52" East for a distance of 20.00 feet; thence run South 89'10'08" East for a distance of 660.17 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest X of the Southwest 34 of aforesaid Section 5; thence departing said Southerly right—of—way line run South 00'17'43" West along said East line for a distance of 1409.65 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest 34 of the Southwest 34 of said Section 5, also being the Northeast corner of the Northwest X of the Northwest of aforesaid Section 8; thence departing said East line of run South 00'34'54" East along the East line of said Northwest of the Northwest )J of Section 8 for a distance of 231.78 feet to a point on the South line of the North 231 feet of the Northwest 34 of the Northwest �/ of aforesaid Section 8; thence departing said East line run South 89'44'04" West along said South line for a distance of 1286.39 feet to a point on aforesaid Easterly right—of—woy line of Ocoee — Clorcono Rood; thence run North 00'11'35" West along said Easterly right—of—way line for a distance of 231.77 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 47.50 acres more or less. 01 1 s OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 a _ H1 H2 1 Real Estate Contract 288 days Mon 1/8118 Wed 2/13/19 2 Prepare and Submit LOI 5 days Mon 1/8/18 Fri 1/12/18 3 Review 5 days Mon 1/15/18 Fri 1/19/18 4 Meeting to discuss 0 days Fri 1/19/18 Fri 1/19/18 5 Revise and submit LOI 2 days Mon 1/22/18 Tue 1/23/18 6 Review 20 days Wed 1/24/18 Tue 2/20/18 7 LOI executed 0 days Tue 2/20/18 Tue 2/20/18 ♦2/20 8 Prepare Contract 2 days Wed 2/21/18 Thu 2/22/18 F 9 Review 2 days Fri 2/23/18 Mon 2/26/18 H 10 ® Execute contract 2 days Tue 2/27/18 Wed 2/28/18 F 11 Effective Date 0 days Wed 2/28/18 Wed 2/28/18 X2/28 12 Deposit 5 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 3/7/18 13 Due Diligence Period 103 days Thu 3/1/18 Mon 7/23/18 14 End of Due Diligence 0 days Mon 7/23/18 Mon 7/23/18 4;7/23 15 Awaiting Closing 190 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 11/21/18 16 Closing (Earliest) 0 days Wed 11/21/18 Wed 11/21/18 17 1st Extension 20 days Thu 11/22/18 Wed 12/19/18 18 Closing 2 0 days Wed 12/19/18 Wed 12/19/18 ♦12/19 19 2nd Extension 20 days Thu 12/20/18 Wed 1/16/19 20 Closing 3 0 days Wed 1/16/19 Wed 1/16/19 1116 21 i 3rd Extension 20 days Thu 1/17/19 Wed 2/13/19 22 Closing 4 0 days Wed 2/13/19 Wed 2/13/19 ♦ 2113 23 BUILDER CONTRACT 180 days Wed 2/28/18 Wed 11/7!18 24 ® Start Process 0 days Wed 2/28/18 Wed 2/28/18 2128 25 Review Options 10 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 3/14/18 26 Prepare LOI 25 days Thu 3/15/18 Wed 4/18/18 27 Agreement to LOI and Execution 0 days Wed 4/18/18 Wed 4/18/18 4/181 28 Finalize Agreements 5 days Thu 4/19/18 Wed 4/25/18 29 Contracts Executed 0 days y Wed 4/25/18 Wed 4/25/18 4/2 30 Review Period 40 days Thu 4/26/18 Wed 6/20/18 31 End of Due Diligence Period 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 ♦6120 Task Inactive Milestone - Finish -only Split ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Inactive Summary External Tasks <� Milestone ♦ Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary Duration -only ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Progress Project Summary W Manual Summary Rollup ♦ Deadline External Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone ♦ Start -only Page 1 V J J OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 e -- — , ---- - --H 1 - -- — --- ---HZ --- H1 - -- 32 - - - Contract Time 100 days Thu 6/21/18 Wed 11/7/18 33 Closing Date 0 days Wed 11/7/18 Wed 11/7/18 11/7 34 Geotechnical and Phase 1 27 days Thu 5/31/18 Fri 7/6/18 35 Request Proposals 5 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6/6/18 �- 36 Prepare Proposal 5 days Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6/13/18 37 Proposals Submitted 0 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 6/13 38 Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/14/18 Wed 6/20/18 t 39 Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 6/20 40 Phase 1 Update 12 days Thu 6/21/18 Fri 7/6/18 41 Complete 0 days Fri 7/6/18 Fri 7/6/18 ! ♦ 7/6 42 Field Work for Geotechnical 5 days Thu 6/21/18 Wed 6/27/18 i 43 Prepare Report 5 days Thu 6/28/18 Wed 7/4/18 IT 44 Report Issued 0 days Wed 7/4/18 Wed 7/4/18 ;7/4 45 Biological 30 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 7/11118 46 ® Request Proposals 5 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6/6/18 47 Prepare Proposal 10 days Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6/20/18 48 Proposal Submitted 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 j 6/20 49 ® Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/21/18 Wed 6/27/18 50 Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 6/27/18 Wed 6/27/18 ♦6/27 51 ® Endanger Species Study. Archeological Letter 10 days Thu 6/28/18 Wed 7/11/18 i 52 ® Report Issued 0 days Wed 7/11/18 Wed 7/11/18 7/11 53 Boundary and Topographic Survey 20 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6127/18 54 ® Request Proposals 3 days Thu 5/31/18 Mon 6/4/18 55 Prepare Proposal 2 days Tue 6/5/18 Wed 6/6/18 F 56 ® Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6/13/18' I 57 ® Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 6/13 58 ® Update Survey, stake borings and wetland 10 days Thu 6/14/18 Wed 6/27/18 flags 59 ® Survey Updated 0 days Wed 6/27/18 Wed 6/27/18 ♦6/27 60 Traffic Study 25 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 7/4/18 61 Request Proposals 5 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6/6/18 Task Inactive Milestone Finish -only Split „.,,,, ..... Inactive Summary „ , ,. „„ ... External Tasks Milestone ♦ Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary Duration -only ,,,, Progress Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup ♦ Deadline External Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone ♦ Start -only Page 2 V J J O� I C. OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID O Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 H1 H2 H1 62 Prepare Proposal 5 days . Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6/13/18 _ _.�_ --—— IT 63 Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/14/18 Wed 6/20/18 ir 64 Prepare Traffic Study 10 days Thu 6/21/18 Wed 7/4/18 65 Traffic Study Complete 0 days Wed 7/4/18 Wed 7/4/18 ;7/4 66 City of Ocoee 214 days Thu 3/1/18 Tue 12/25/18 67 LUPA and ZMA Application 214 days Thu 3/1/18 Tue 12/25/18 68 Prepare LUPA and ZMA Application 69 days Thu 3/1/18 Tue 6/5/18 69 ® Submit to the City 0 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 6113 70 Review 11 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/27/18, 71 DRC Meeting 0 days Wed 6/27/18 Wed 6/27/18 6/27 72 Comments issued 2 days Thu 6/28/18 Fri 6/29/18 f+ 73 Revise Submittal 6 days Mon 7/2/18 Mon 7/9/18 74 Submit to City 0 days Mon 7/9/18 Mon 7/9/18 75 Review 12 days Tue 7/10/18 Wed 7/25/18 76 Submit to City 0 days Wed 7/25/18 Wed 7/25/18 77 Schedule for Planning Commission 19 days Thu 7/26/18 Tue 8/21/18' 78 Planning Commission (2nd Tuesday of the 0 days Tue 8/21/18 Tue 8/21/18 ♦8 21 month) TRANSMITTAL 79 Schedule for City Commission Meeting 15 days Wed 8/22/18 Tue 9/11/18' 80 City Commission Meeting (1st and 3rd 0 days Tue 9/11/18 Tue 9/11/18 9/11 Tuesday of the month)TRANSMITTAL 81 Review 12 days Wed 9/12/18 Thu 9/27/18 82 DRC Meeting 0 days Thu 9/27/18 Thu 9/27/18 X9/27 83 LUPA Transmittal Approved 0 days Thu 9/27/18 Thu 9/27/18 ♦ 9/27 84 Prepare Transmittal to DEO 5 days Fri 9/28/18 Thu 10/4/18 85 Transmittal to DEO 0 days Thu 10/4/18 Thu 10/4/18 10/4 86 Review by DEO 20 days Fri 10/5/18 Thu 11/1/18 87 Schedule City Commission Adoption 18 days Fri 11/2/18 Tue 11/27/18 88 City Commission Meeting 1st Reading (1st 0 days Tue 11/27/18 Tue 11/27/18 11/27 - and 3rd Tuesday of the month) 89 LUPA and ZMA Approved 0 days Tue 11/27/18 Tue 11/27/18 ♦ 11/27 901 PDP/FDP APPLICATION 121 days Tue 7/10/18 Tue 12/25/18 Task Inactive Milestone = Finish -only Split ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Inactive Summary External Tasks Milestone ♦ Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary Duration -only Progress Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup ♦ Deadline External Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone ♦ Start -only Page 3 V J V OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 H2 H1 91 ® Prepare FDP/PDP Application 31 days Tue 7/10/18 Tue 8/21/18 92 ® Submit to the City 0 days Tue 8/21/18 Tue 8/21/18 8/21 93 ® Review 18 days Wed 8/22/18 Fri 9/14/18 94 ® Comments issued 10 days Mon 9/17/18 Fri 9/28/18 95 DRC Meeting 0 days Fri 9/28/18 Fri 9/28/18 9/28 96 ® Revise Submittal 6 days Mon 10/1/18 Mon 10/8/18 Y 97 ® Submit to City 0 days Mon 10/8/18 Mon 10/8/18 ♦�10/8 98 ® Review 14 days Tue 10/9/18 Fri 10/26/18 99 ® DRC Meeting 0 days Fri 10/26/18 Fri 10/26/18 10/26 100 ® Schedule for Planning Commission 32 days Mon 10/29/18 Tue 12/11/18 - 101 Planning Commission Meeting (2nd 0 days Tue 12/11/18 Tue 12/11/18 12!11 Tuesday of the month) 102 Schedule for City Council 10 days Wed 12/12/18 Tue 12/25/18 103 City Council Meeting (1st and 3rd 0 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 12/25/18 12/25 Wednesday of the month) 104 FDEP Water Distribution Permit 10 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 1/8/19 105 ® Submit to FDEP 0 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 12/25/18 12/25 106 Process 10 days Wed 12/26/18 Tue 1/8/19 107 Permit Issued 0 days Tue 1/8/19 Tue 1/8/19 X1/8 108 FDEP Wastewater Collection Permit 10 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 1/8/19 109 Submit to FDEP 0 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 12/25/18 1 /25 110 ® Process 10 days Wed 12/26/18 Tue 1/8/19 111 ® Permit Issued 0 days Tue 1/8/19 Tue 1/8/19- 1/8 112 St. Johns River Water Management District 62 days Wed 8/15118 Thu 11/8/18 � (SJRWMD) _ 113 Prepare Analysis and Permit Application 5 days Wed 8/15/18 Tue 8/21/18 114 Request Pre -Application Meeting 0 days Tue 8/21/18 Tue 8/21/18 8/21 115 Waiting for Meeting 5 days Wed 8/22/18 Tue 8/28/18 116 Pre -Application Meeting 0 days Tue 8/28/18 Tue 8/28/18 ♦8/28 117 Prepare Submittal Package and Wetland 7 days Wed 8/29/18 Thu 9/6/18 *r Analysis 118 Submit application to SJRWMD 0 days Thu 9/6/18 Thu 9/6/18 4)9/6 Task Inactive Milestone Finish -only Split ... ..... .... Inactive Summary .......... ..... External Tasks Milestone ♦ Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary W Duration -only ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,, Progress Project Summary W Manual Summary Rollup ♦ Deadline -. External Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone ♦ Start -only Page 4 V J V OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID O Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 - H1_ H2 H1 119 Review 20 days _ Fri 9/7/18 Thu 10/4/18 120 Comments Letter Issued 0 days Thu 10/4/18 Thu 10/4/18 10/4 121 Revise Application 5 days Fri 10/5/18 Thu 10/11/18 X 122 Submit to SJRWMD 0 days Thu 10/11/18 Thu 10/11/18 10/11 123 123 Review 20 days Fri 10/12/18 Thu 11/8/18 124 Intent to Issue letter is issued 0 days Thu 11/8/18 Thu 11/8/18 ♦11/8 125 ® permit issued 0 days Thu 11/8/18 Thu 11/8/181118 126 Construction 218 days Wed 1/9/19 Fri 11/8/19 127 Property Closing 5 days Wed 1/9/19 Tue 1/15/19 128 Construction 213 days Wed 1/16/19 Fri 11/8/19 129 ® Mobilization 5 days Wed 1/16/19 Tue 1/22/19 130 ® Clearing and Grubbing 25 days Wed 1/23/19 Tue 2/26/19 131 ® Earthwork 30 days Wed 2/27/19 Tue 4/9/19 132 ® Sewer 39 days Mon 4/8/19 Thu 5/30/19-, 133 ® Drainage 34 days Fri 5/24/19 Wed 7/10/19 ETEE 134 ® Water 17 days Thu 7/4/19 Fri 7/26/19 135 ® Sub grade/Base 26 days Mon 7/22/19 Mon 8/26/19 136 ® Asphalt 5 days Tue 8/27/19 Mon 9/2/19 137 ® Landscape 10 days Tue 8127/19 Mon 9/9/19 138 ® Electric 21 days Tue 8/27/19 Tue 9/24/19 139 ® Gas 17 days Wed 9125/19 Thu 10/17/19 140 ® Telecommunications 16 days Fri 10/18/19 Fri 11/8/19 141 ® Testing for Wastewater System 15 days Tue 8/27/19 Mon 9/16/19 142 ® Testing for Water System 14 days Tue 8/27119 Fri 9/13/19 143 ® Certifications to FDEP 18 days Tue 9/17/19 Thu 10/10/19 Task Inactive Milestone - Finish -only Split Inactive Summary ,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, External Tasks Milestone ♦ Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary Duration -only ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Progress Project Summary W Manual Summary Rollup ♦ Deadline �1 External Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone ♦ Start -only Page 5 '_ 100 East Pine Street 0 0 Suite 605 At I engineering RenviArojkental solutions Orlando, FL 32801 a Phone: 407.649.5475 %W Fax: 407,649.6582 hsagoiden.com July 15, 2011 VIA UPS Mr. Ken Buchman, Trustee 1012 Redbud Circle Plant City, Florida 3 )3 ) 563 .Re: Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Orange County Parcel ID's 05-22-28-0000-00-004, 05-22-28-0000-00-040, and 05-22-28-0000-00-046 Ocoee, Orange County, Florida HSA Golden Project No. 11-628.001 Dear Mr. Buchman: HSA Golden has conducted a recharge area soils analysis in relation to development constraints 4W placed upon the above -referenced parcels (hereafter referred to as site or subject property) by the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan policy 1.2.1 a.). This policy states that an analysis of soils to determine the presence and location of most effective recharge area, as defined by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Type "A" Hydrologic Soils Group, be conducted for future land development. Type "A" Hydrologic Soils have a high infiltration rate when thoroughly wet and have low runoff potential. They are mainly deep, well drained, and sandy or gravelly. Soils located in the most effective recharge area would have very rapid penneabilities (greater than 20 inches/hour). The site location and parcel designations are shown on Figures I and 2. This investigation included a desktop review of the Wekiva Study Area (WSA) reports, Soil Conservation Service's (SCS) Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, and the completion of soil borings and collection of soil samples for permeability analysis. The permeability analysis was performed to confirm or refute that Type "A" soils exist on the subject property. The results of our findings are summarized in the sections below. According to the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, soils on the subject property are classified as Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, Immokalee fine sand, Seffner fine sand, and Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (see Figure 3). 1.1 Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (2) Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained, located on low ridges and knolls on flatwoods.' Typically, this soil has a surface layer of AFT'k K_ J-1 Environmental and Engineering Consultants Since 1989 Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Page 2 dark gray fine sand about two inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of about 80 inches consists of white fine sand. In most years, a seasonal high water table (SHWT) is present at a depth of 42 to 60 inches for about six months, and it recedes to a depth of 60 to 80 inches for the rest of the year. The SHWT is at a depth of 24 to 40 inches for about one to four months during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout, while the available water capacity is very low. This soil is suited to dwellings without basements, small commercial buildings, and local roads and streets. No corrective measures are needed. This soil has severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields and for recreational uses. Water control measures should be used for septic tank absorption fields. When installing a septic tank absorption field on this soil, the proximity to a stream or a canal should be considered to prevent lateral seepage and groundwater pollution. If the density of housing is moderate to high, a community sewage system can help prevent contamination of the water supplies. The soil has severe limitations for sewage lagoons, trench sanitary landfills, and shallow excavations. The sealing or lining of a sewage lagoon or trench sanitary landfill with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes is classified by the SCS as a Type "A" soil. This soil reportedly has permeabilities greater than 20 inches/hour and available water capacities of 0.02 to 0.05 inches/inches, from 0 to 80 inches below land surface (bls). This soil is located on approximately 1.5% of the subject property. 1.2 Immokalee Fine Sand (20) This soil is nearly level and poorly drained, located on broad flatwoods. The slopes are smooth and range from zero to two percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about five inches thick. The upper part of the subsurface layer, to a depth of about 18 inches, consists of a grayish brown fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 35 inches, consists of light gray fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 41 inches, consists of a black fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 67 inches, consists of a brown fine sand. The substratum to a depth of 80 inches consists of a light brownish gray fine sand. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 10 inches of the surface for one to three months, and it recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than six months. The permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and it is moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is very low in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and is medium in the subsoil. This soil has severe limitations for sanitary facilities, building site development, and recreational uses. Water control measures should be used to minimize the excessive wetness limitation. The sealing or lining of a sewage lagoon or trench sanitary landfill with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. Septic tank absorption fields may need to be enlarged because of wetness. The proximity to a stream or aquifer recharge area should be considered in the placement of sanitary facilities to prevent contamination of water supplies. Fill material is needed for local roads and streets, small commercial buildings, and playgrounds. The sidewalls of excavations should be shored and Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Page 3 water control measures should be used. The sandy surface layer should be stabilized for recreational uses. Immokalee Fine Sand is classified as a Type "B/D" soil. Immokalee fine sand has permeabilities ranging from 0.6 to 20 inches per hour and available water capacities of 0.02 to 0.25 inches/inches, depending on depth. This soil is located on approximately 27% of the subject property. 1.3 Seffner fine sand (43) This soil is nearly level and somewhat poorly drained, located on the rims of depressions and on broad low ridges on flatwoods. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer consists of black fine sand about six inches thick. The lower part, to a depth of 19 inches, consists of very dark grayish brown fine sand. The upper part of the underlying material, to a depth of about 36 inches, consists of grayish brown fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 52 inches, consists of a light gray fine sand that has common brown mottles. In most years, a SHWT is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for two to four months and between 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to two weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is rapid throughout and the available water capacity is medium in the surface layer and low to very low in the underlying material. This soil has severe limitations for sanitary facilities, shallow excavations, and recreational uses. It has moderate limitations for dwellings without basements, small commercial buildings, and local roads and streets. Water control measures should be used to minimize the excessive wetness limitation. Septic tank adsorption fields may need to be enlarged because of wetness. The rapid permeability of this soil can cause groundwater pollution in areas of septic tank absorption fields. If the density of housing is moderate to high, a community sewage system can help prevent contamination of water supplies. The sidewalls for shallow excavations should be shored. The sealing or lining of a sewage lagoon or trench sanitary landfill with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. The sandy surface layer should be stabilized for recreational uses. Droughtiness is a problem during extended dry periods. Seffner fine Sand is classified as a Type "C" soil. Seffner fine sand has permeabilities ranging from six to 20 inches per hour and available water capacities of 0.04 to 0.12 inches/inches, depending on depth. This soil is located on approximately 17% of the subject property. 1.4 Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (46) This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained and is located on low ridges and knolls on the uplands throughout the country. Typically, this soil has a surface Iayer of very dark gray fine sand about six inches thick. The upper part of the underlying material, to a depth of about 16 inches, consists of brown fine sand. The lower part to a depth of 80 inches consists of white fine sand. In most years, a SHWT is located at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Page 4 more than six months and it recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout. The available water capacity is very low. This soil is well suited to dwellings without basements, small commercial buildings, and local roads and streets. No corrective measures are needed. The soil has moderate limitations for septic tank absorption fields, and water control measures should be used. When installing a septic tank absorption field on this soil, the proximity to a stream or canal should be considered to prevent lateral seepage and groundwater pollution. If the density of housing is moderate to high, a community sewage system can help prevent contamination of the water supplies. This soil has severe limitations for sewage lagoons, sanitary landfills, shallow excavations, and recreational uses. The sidewalls of shallow excavations should be shored. The sealing or lining of a trench sanitary landfill or sewage lagoon with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. Water control measures should be used for trench sanitary landfills. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes is classified as a Type "A" soil. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, has permeabilities greater than six inches per hour and available water capacities of 0.02 to 0.10 inches/inches, depending on depth. This soil is located on approximately 54% of the subject property. 2.0 TYPE 'W SOILS ANALYSIS On June 20, 2011, HSA Golden installed a total of six soil borings on the subject property, three on each portion of the site where Type "A" soils were identified by the soil survey (Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes [2] and Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes [46]). Soil boring Iocations are presented on Figure 3. Soil borings were designated as SB -A through SB -F and were installed to a maximum depth of six feet below land surface (bls). Subsurface soils generally consisted of gray/brown fine sand or light brown very fine sand. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the soil borings installed. Two soil samples were collected and transported to Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES, Orlando, Florida) for constant head permeability analysis. Sample #1 was collected from SB -A (Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes; 5' bls) and Sample #2 was collected from SB -D (Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes; 3' bls). Soil permeability of Sample #1 was reported by UES to be 16.9 feet/day (8.45 inches/hour) and the permeability of Sample #2 was reported to be 14.4 feet/day (7.2 inches/hour). According to the Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment (WAVA), soil permeabilities exceeding 13.1 inches/hour (26.08 feet/day) are strongly correlated with aquifer vulnerability (most effective recharge), whereas values less than 13.1 inches/hour (26.08 feet/day) are considered less significant (see attached). Although the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan refers to Type "A" soils, the WSA's WAVA basis report recommended protecting soils with permeability more than 13.1 inches/hour. Both of the onsite soil permeability tests are below this soil protection level. Since site specific data gathered suggests that Type "A" soil permeabilities on the subject property are considered less significant in terms of aquifer vulnerability, the City of Ocoee's Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road page 5 generalized Comprehensive Plan restrictions on site development for Type "A" soils does not apply. The permeability reported in Sample #1 (Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes) was below the generalized permeability listed in the SCS Survey for this type of soil (greater than 20 inches/hour). The permeability reported in Sample #2 (Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes) correlated with the lower limit permeability listed in the SCS Survey for this type of soil (greater than six inches/hour). Site specific data was not found to suggest that very rapid soil permeabilities (greater than 20 inches per hour) exist on the subject property. 3.0 CONCLUSIONS Based upon the findings of our investigations, a total of four different types of soil were identified on the subject property. Of these four soil types, two were identified as being in the Type "A" soils group: Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes and Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes. Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes accounts for approximately 1.5% of the subject property, while Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes accounts for approximately 54% of the subject property. A soil sample was collected from each Type "A" soil type and analyzed for constant head permeability. The analyses indicated that soil permeability in Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes was below the generalized soil type value of greater than 20 inches/hour indicating that the onsite Archbold soils are not as permeable as a Type "A" soil. Permeability in the Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes correlated with the generalized soil type value of greater than six inches/hour, but well below 13.1 inches/hour soil protection, or most effective recahrge level stated in the WAVA. It should be noted that constant head permeability analyses from the two soil samples collected onsite indicated that permeability values were less than 13.1 inches/hour (26.08 feet/day), indicating that the risk of high recharge in these soils is less significant. Based on these findings along with the fact that very rapid or "most effective" permeabilities (greater than 20 inches/hour) are not present on the subject property, we conclude that no development restrictions should be placed on the subject property by the City of Ocoee with regard to Type "A" soils on this site. 4.0 REFERENCES Chicon, James R., Baker, Alan E., Wood, Alex R., and Arthur, Jonathan D., 2005, Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment: Florida Geological Survey Report of Investigation 104. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, August 1989. Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act, Chapter 369, Part 1I1, Florida Statutes, 2010. Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road sage 6 We trust that the contents of this report are sufficient for your needs. If you require explanation or clarification of any of the preceding, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 109 r1illiam Jacobs Jaim 8. olden, F.G. Project Manager Pyj 'pal Hydrogeologist/Vice President Attachments cc: Jim. Hall, VHB . <<> F 11 t j\ /�ƒ � DATE: June 2011 k4i t `-i�, � f ti � ell 1 ! ! all B� N5 J 1, ANVIYfIA A '5' PROJECTO --LOCATION PROJECT t LOCATION PROJECT' a .....,LOCATION am a 0 • pro' B m am - 51 A. a 00 a 1� a a 6 a" Akvi —a* k pm Jt 4 its or 0 op 0 j %JQ 1 %.Jf-u%.-'3mtAr-rllU MRVZ), VVIN I ti -I UAR N, t-LURIDA N I 0 500 1000 DISTANCE IN FEET 0 0 _j LLJ C5 FIGURE 1 u C7 0 n 21 u - 11.628.001-PARCEL.d DATE: Jm.2011 '^ r Y r tit 05 -22 -28 -0000 -VIN 00-040 _t o :7s'�,��.. �,�:. a k, r,__�► 05-22-28-0000-00-046 Lu fifi ° •.. :1` try — w 0 Q k. R • !� O O U c0 yLSAL ` O O N Tr app ` P Z Li •: O w o r U O z o w aievL i 1% O y; ! 05-22-28-0000-00-004 + p M • A � ,. �J AERIAL SOURCE: ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE, 2010 p J_ U d N =r' FIGURE 0 250 500 DISTANCE IN FEET 2 E 11-628.001-SOIL.d DATE: June 2011 aOecS PROJECT 'w LOCATION ` C 20 PROJECT a LOCATION w a V LU coPROJECT p " a ui 20 ' LOCATION M U w o 0 G v O o � V Y "x'11 ,Y„,f�• , -� �A' {;.`,M ^ d SB-D/SAMPLE #2 SB -13 SB -C 43 ter+ jr SB-A/SAMPLE #1 wR d AERIAL SOURCE: ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE, 2010 SOIL SOURCE: Natural Resources Conservation Service, to Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey —i O ID SOIL TYPES 2 Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 20 Immokalee fine sand 43 Seffner fine sand N 46 Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes SB-A/SAMPLE #1 1 �?- SOIL BORING /SAMPLE LOCATION SB -B FIGURE • SOIL BORING LOCATION 0 250 500 DISTANCE IN FEET 3 Im r 166 TABLE 14. --PHYSICAL ANA CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS Soil SuNe [The symbol < means less than; > means more than. Entries under "Erosion factors --T" apply to the entire Profile. Entries under "Mind erodibility group" and "Organic matter" apply on] -y to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not available or were not estimated) Map symbol and DeptbIClay I I 1 Moist I IPermea- I lAvailablel I Soil Ireacti.onl ISalinitylshrink-sweill OS ion factorslerodi-lOr I---lbilityl n soil name I { bulk i densityI bility water lCa 1 1 l potential ( l gf ,al I Ii acit T on I°{ Pct G/cc i n r l n I os cmi I I l Imm i Arents. 2"""`-` Archbald 1 0-801 0-1 11.50-1.601 >2O 10,02-0.051 3.6-6.51 <2 ILow---------IO.iol 5 1 1 1 5. 3--------------- - Basinger I a-7 1 7-321 132-471 i 0`4 0-4 1 1 ao-1 s5 (1.40-1.551 11.40-1 I 6 0-2o 6.0-20 1! a 05`0,10 10.05-0 101 10.10-0.15) a,5-5 5 4.5-5.51 ( <2 <2 1 Low ---------10.101 (I.ow --------- 10.101 1 5 ! I 2 I I l 1. 1 47-801 1-3 1-3 [ 651 11.50-1.701 I 6.0-20 6,0-20 I 10.05-0.101 I 4,5-5.51 4.5-5.51 1 <2 <2 I lLow---------10.101 ILow- ---10.10{ I '''-' 1 I 1 I 4----------------1 Candler 0-5 1 5-741 1 <3 <3 11.35-1,551 1150-1651 11:50-1:651 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.04-0.081 10.02-0.061 4.5-6.01 4.5-6.0) <2 <2 ILov--------- 1Low--------- I 10.101 10 101 I 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 .5, 1 174-801 I 3-8 I I 6.0-20 I 10.05-0,081 I 4,5-6.01 I <2 I ILow--------- I 10 101 I I 1 1 1 1 5----------------1 Candler 0-4 1 4-611 161-801 I 1 <3 <3 3-8 1 11,35-1.551 11.50-2 651 11.50-1 651 I 6.0-20 6.0-20 6.0-20 I 10 04-0.081 10,02-0.061 10.05-0.081 1 4,5-6.0 4.5-6.011 4.5-6.01 i <2 <2 <2 I {Low --------- 1LOw---------10 11,ow---------lo'lol I 10.101 101 I 5 I 1 2 1 I 1 .5. 1 I Candler ---------1 0-6 ( 6-691 169-801 l <3 <3 11.35-1.551 11,50-1,651 11-50-1 6,0-20 6.0-20 10.04-0.081 10.02-0,061 4,5-6,01 4.5-6.01 <2 <2 1Low--------- 1Low--------- 10.101 la 101 5 I 1 2 1 i 1 I 3-8 i 651 I 6.0-20 I I0.05-0.081 I 4.5-6.01 I <2 I {Low---------lo'lol I I I Apopka ----------1 0-691 169-80118-3711.55-1.75) I <3 1 11,45-1 601 l 6.0-20 0,6-2.010.12-0.171 1 10.03-0.051 I 4,5-6.01 4,5-6.01 ( I <2 <2 ILow--------- 1Low---------10+241 I I 10 101 I 5 I 1 2 1 I 1 C 1 7: Candler --------1 0-4 1 4-671 167-801 1 <3 <3 11.50-1 11.35-1.551 651 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.02-0.061 10,04-0,081 4.5-6.01 4.5-5.•01 <2 <2 1Low-------- Low --------- I l0 101 I 5 I 1 2 1 1 1 5, 1 3-8 11.50-1651 6,0-20 10.05-0 081 4.5-6 01 <2 ILow --------- 10:101 1 1 Urban Land. I• I I ! ]Candler ---------1 1 0-5 5-521 1 <3 11.35-1.551 <3 11.50-1 651 6.0-20 10.04-0.081 6.0-20 10.02-0.061 4.5-6.01 4.5-5 01 <2 )Low <2 1Low-------- ------ ---10101 J0'101 5 1 l 2 1 1 .5, 152-801 I I 3-8 11.50-1.651 I I 6.0-20 10.05-0.081 I 4 4.5-6_01I <2 ILow I --------- 10 101 1 1 Urban land. 1----------------1 Canova 1 116-22115-3411.50-1.701 0-6 1 6-161 10.20-0.401 1-6 11.35-1 501 6.0-20 10 6.0-20 10.02-0.051 10-0.201 5,6-6.51 6.1-8.41 <2 1Low <2 ILow --------- 10.101 --- -----_10.10) 5 1 I 2 1 I 35 122-80115-2511.60-1.701 0,6-6,010.10-0.15) 0.6-6.010.10-0.151 5.6-8.41 7.4-8.41 <2 !Low <2 {Low ---------10 ---------10 281 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I - I I 1 I I' 281 I I 1 LO ---------------1 Chobee 1 0-7 1 7-50120-3511.55-1.751 7-2011.45-1.501 2.0-6:010,10-0.151 <0»2 10.12-0 171 6 1-7.31 7.4-8,41 <2 1LOW <2 1Moderate --------- 10.151 ---- 10.321 5 1 1 3 1 1 2- 1150-801 7-20 1.60-1.7511 6.0-20 10.06-0.10 7.4-8.4 <2 `Low --------- 1 1 Ll: 1 Floridana ------- 1 I 0-141 I 3-1011.40-1.501 1-7 (1.50-1 I 601 I 6.0-20 10.10-0.201 6.0-20 10.05-0.101 1 ► 5.6-7.81 5,5-7.61 I <2 'Low <2 ILOw---------10 10.101 --------- 10.101 lol 5 1 1 2 I i 6• 1114-281 28-80115-30111.60-1.70 <0.2 10.10-0.2011 5.6-7.81 <2 'Low --------- 10.241 1 1 Chobee---------- 1 112-56120-3511.55-1.751 0-121 7-2011.45-1.501 2.0-6.010.10-0.151 <0.2 10.12-0 171 6,1-7.31 7.4-$.41 <2 1 <2 1Moderate----10.361 Low --------- 10.151 5 1 I 3 1 I 2• 156-$O1 I l 7-2011,60-1.751 I i 0.2-6.010,06-0.10) I i 7.4-8.41 I <2 (Low ---------10 201 1 1 I I I I 1 1 Laic .ter .1 .g .2 •2 .2 2 •2 .2 •75 .7 -15 .7 11 C Grange County, Florida TABLE 14. --PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS --Continued 169 Map symbol and soil name i IDepthlClay I I I I I Moist I bulk densityca { IPermea- I bility I IAvailab]ei I water acit I I Soil ISalinitylShrink-swelll IreactionI I I potential rosloo ffactorsI __ilerodipl0rgani� I ( K T win Ibilit ou 1 I matte, in { 1 Pct I cc I n r in/in1I pH os cm1 1 I I 1 c Imm 39s St. Lucie -------1 { 0-801 I I 0-1 1 I 11.50-1• 601 I f >20 1 I 10.02-0 051 I I 3.6-7.31 I { <2 f! { ILow--------- I 10 101 i I 5 1 I 1 1 ( I 1 o -I 1 Urban land. I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 { I I I I I I 40---------------1 Samsula 140-801 { 0-401 I --- 1-1411.35-1.551 I 10.25-1 501 6.0-20 6«0-20 I 10.20-0.251 (0.02-0,051 I 4.5-5. 51 3.6-5.51 i <2 <2 I Low ILov--------- 1 I --- 10 171 1 ' I 1-__I I I 2 1 I I 1 >20 1 I 41: Samsula--------- 1 134-801 0-341 --- 1-1411.35-1.551 10.25-0.501 6.0-20 6.0-20 (0.02-0»051 1 10.20-0.251 4.5-5.51 3.6-5.51 1 <2 <2 1 1Low--------- ILow--------- 1 I ------I 10 171 1' 1 2 1 1 1 >20 1 pontoon ---------1 { 0-801 --- 10.20-0.401 6.0-20 10.30-0 501 4.5-5.51 <2 1 1 ILow--------- I ---I---1 { 1 2 1 1 1 75-85 1 Basinger --------1 1 125-351 0-6 1 6-251 0-4 11.40-1.551 0-4 11.40-1.551 6,0-20 10.05-0.101 6.0-20 10.05-0,101 4.5-5.51 4.5-5.51 <2 1Low------ <2 ---10 ILov---------10'101 101 5 1 2 1 1 1-8 1 135-801 I 1-3 1-3 I 1140-1.651 11:50-2 701 I 6.0-20 10.10-0.151 6,0-20 I 10.05-0.101 I 4.5-5.51 4.5-5.51 I <2 <2 ILov I I ILov--------- --------- 10+101 10 101 I I 1 1 1 1 1 42---------------1 Sanibel 111-151 0-111 --- 11,40-1.601 10.30-0.551 6.0-20 110.10-0.151 10.20-0.501 3.6-7.31 <2 'Low I ---------0.101 110 4 1 2 1 1 1 20-50 1 115-801 I 2-6 2-6 I 11.50-1 651 I 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.03-0.101 I I 3.6-7.31 3.6-7,31 I <2 <2 ILov---------10 I I Low --------- 101 101 1 1 43---------------1 Seffner 113-191 119-801 0-131 1-8 1-8 11.35-1.451 11.50-1 I1«35-1.451 6.0-20 10.07-0.121 6.0-20 10.07-0 121 4.5-7.31 4.5-7.31 <2 ILow <2 ILov I --------- --------- 10 I 10.101 101 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1-5 1-8 601 6.0-20 (0.04-0 081 4.5-7.31 <2 ILov --------- 10.101 I 1 1 44---------------1 Smyrna 117-271 127-801 0-171 1-6 11.35-1.451 3-8 11.35-1 11.50-1 451 6.0-20 10.03-0.071 0.6-6.010,10-0.201 3.6-6.01 3.6-5.51 <2 'Low <2 I --------- Low --------- 10 10 101 151 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 1-5 1 { 1-6 I 651 I ' I 6.0-20 10,03-0.071 I 4.5-5.51 I <2 ILow I I --------- 10:101 1' f I 1 1 I 45: I Smyrna ----------1 118-281 0-181 128-801 f I 1-6 11.35-1 3-8 11.50-1 451 11.35-1.451 I 6.0-20 10.03-0.071 0.6-6. 010.1.0-0.201 I I 3.6-6.01 3.6-5.51 f I <2 ILow---------10.101 <2 ILov---------10 I 1 151 5 1 1 I I 2 1 1 1-5 I 1-6 f I 651 6.0-20 I 10.03-0 071 I ' 4.5-5.51 I <2 ILov---------10:101 I I i I 1 1 I 1 Urban land. 1 1 I I I I I f { I I I 46---------------I Tavares 0-6 1 1 6-801 I 0-4 11.25-1.601 0-4 I 11.40-1 701 f >6.0 1005-0 >60 II 101 10:02-0:051 5 3,6-6.01 3.6-6.01 I <2 'Low <2 ILov I f --- ------10 --------- 101 10 101 I I 5 1 1 2 1 1 I I ,5-2 47 - 7:Tavares--------- Tavares --------- 0-6 1 6-801 I 1 0-4 0-4 I 11.25-3 601 11.40-1 701 I >6.0 >6.0 I 10.05-0 101 10.02-0+051 I 3.6-6.01 3.6-6.01 I {2 ILifw <2 I --------- ILov--------- I 10 1p1 10+101 I 5 I 1 I 2 I .5-2 1 Millhopper ------ 1 0-641 164-761 176-80112-2811.80-1.9010.06-2.010.08-0.151 2-8 8-1411.60-1.801 11.50-1.671 6.0-20 2,0-6.010.08-0.121 10.05-0.101 4.5-6.51 4.5-6.01 <2 <2 ILov--------- How ---------10 10 101 151 5 I 1 2 1 I 1 5-2 1 ' 1 I I I i 4.5-6.01 l <2 I ILow--------- I 10`281 I{ 1 { 1 1 4s: Tavares--- -----1 I 0-6 I 1 0-4 I 11.25-1.60 ! >6.0 I 0.05-0.101 I 3.6-6.01 1 <2 I ILOW --------- I 10 101 ! 5 I 1 2 I 1 1 6-801 0-4 11.40-1.70 >6.0 0.02-O.051 3.6-6.01 <2 How --------- 10.10) 1 .5-2 1 Urban land. I I I I I I I I I I I I 49---------------1 0-741 --- 10.15-0.351 6.0-20 10.30-0.501 4.5-8.41 <2 ;Law ---------I ---1---1 2 1 60-90 Terra Cela 1 1 I I ! I I ! I 1 I I 50. Urban land. I { I I 1 I I { f ( I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I � FLOReA WEKIVA AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF INVESTIGATION 104 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Soil Permeability Soil permeability values were obtained from the soils statewide grid layer developed for FAVA (Arthur et al.. 2005, in preparation), which was compiled from the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service - Soil Service Geographic (SSURGO) data set. This database was mapped at a scale of 1:24,000 and contains the most detailed soil permeability data. However, different permeability values can exist along some county boundaries due to the different mapping techniques used by different soil scientists. The development of this layer included the calculation of average soil permeability values for each soil horizon layer. Then, based on soil horizon thicknesses, weighted -average permeability values were calculated for the entire soil column. This allowed the generation of a data coverage of soils containing a single permeability value per soil polygon. This data coverage is displayed in Figure 3. Missing -data areas on the figure represent urban land, pits and water features. Soil permeability is a measure of the rate at which water travels through the vadose (unsaturated) zone. Areas with high soil permeability values are normally associated with higher aquifer vulnerability. Weights were calculated for soil permeability using the cumulative descending method (refer to Weights of Eviclence Glossary) of the WofE model technique. The highest contrast of any class was calculated at. 13.1 in/hr (9.2 x 10'7' cm/sec) as displayed in Figure 4. Based on the calculated weights, the most appropriate break in the soil permeability evidential theme was at 13.1 in/hr (9.2 x 10*3 cm/sec), creating a binary generalized theme for input into the WAVA model. This contrast break indicated that values exceeding 13.1 in/hr (9.2 x 10.3 cm/sec) were strongly correlated with aquifer vulnerability as defined by the training point data, whereas values less than 13.1 in/hr (9.2 x 10'3 cm/sec) were less significant. The generalized theme is displayed in Figure 5. Buffered Effective Karst Features To represent karst features (i.e., sinkholes) affecting vulnerability in the WAVA model study area, an effective karst GIS grid was generated based on a combination of closed topographic depressions identified in USGS 7.5 -minute quadrangle maps and thickness of overburden on FAS (Figure 6). Closed topographic depressions (considered an estimation of karst feature distribution) are represented on USGS 7.5 -minute maps as enclosed hachured contour lines: The effective karst feature evidential theme was developed by evaluating which of these closed topographic depressions were more likely to be hydrologically connected to the underlying FAS. This was accomplished by filtering out depressions underlain by more than 100 feet (30.5 m) of FAS overburden thickness. The 100 -ft (30.5 m) threshold of overburden thickness has been used to identify karst-prone areas by Cichon et al. (2004) and Wright (1974). Though the location of training points was not used to select this filter threshold, the lack. of their occurrence in areas underlain by more than 100 feet (30.5 m) of FAS overburden thickness ]ends support to the use of this filter. Areas nearer to an effective karst feature are normally associated with higher aquifer vulnerability due to tl;e increased chance of overland flow and the infiltration into the depression. Therefore, buffer zones of 3.600-m (i 1,811 ft) divided into 30-m (98.4 ft) intervals were generated around each karst feature, and weights were calculated for the effective karst feature evidential theme using the cumulative ascending method. The highest contrast of any class was calculated at a distance of 60 m (196.9 ft) from a depression creating a binary generalized theme for input into the WAVA model. In other words, the analysis indicated that this threshold of proximity to karst features maximized the spatial association between the map pattern and the training point pattern. The generalized theme is displayed in Figure 7. UNIVERSAL NI E RS p jr Project No.: ENGINEERING SCIENCES _ Date Typed: Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Construction Materials Testing • Threshold inspection Private Provider Inspection (W Field and Laboratory Report Cover Page Client: HSA Golden Attn: Jim Golden 100 East Pine Street, Suite 605 Orlando, Florida 32801 0110,1100352.0000, Task 01 June 28, 2011 Project: City of Ocoee, 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road, Orange County, Florida - Project #11-628.001 As requested, a representative of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) was at the referenced project to provide construction materials testing services. Scope of Work Report No. Type of Report 905158 Constant Head Permeability The results of the observations and or tests are summarized on the attached sheets. We hope this information is sufficient „ror your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. cc: Client (Email & Mail -2) jgolden@hsagolden.com Attachments (1) kn Reviewed By, Universal Engi5eeZig Sciences, Inc. C.O.A. Non004 5 ST. No. 38818 3532 Maggie Blvd. + Orlando, FI 32811 1/ (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com roject No.; 0110.1100352.0000, Task 01 Report No.: 905158.1 UNIVERSAL P ENGINEERING SCIENCES Date: June 28, 2011 ED Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental sciences Construction Materials Testing.- Threshold Inspection * Private Provider Inspection Maggie Boulevard - Orlando, FL 32811 - I 423-0604 - (407) 423-3106 REPORT ON CONSTANT HEAD PERMEABILITY (ASTM D-24341AASHTO T-215) Client: HSA Golden Attn: Jim Golden 100 East Pine Street, Suite 605 Orlando, Florida 32801 Project: City of Ocoee, 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road, Orange County, Florida - Project #11-628.001 Date Tested: 6/21/11 Date Sampled: 6120/11 Tested By: 1 57 Sampled By: I D. Caffery TEST RESULTS Location Soil Description Permeability ft/day 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Brown Tan Sand 16.9 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Tan Brown Sand 14.4 'All information pertinent to sampling of soil was prepared by the client or contractor. Universal Engineering Sciences is only responsible for the laboratory testing. For informational use only. a mutual protection of Universal's clients, the genera! public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the conridentfalpmperty of our clients. Accordingly, wization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. dkn (WO# N/S) 1� .G fl 0 U P Ocoee Village Center 0 500 1,000 2,000 Utilities 2� Feet N xar Ocoee florldo IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES — EFFECTIVE February 1, 2018 Development projects in the City of Ocoee are subject to: 1) Police, 2) Fire, 3) Recreation, 4) School, and 5) Transportation/Road impact fees. However, only residential projects are subject to recreation and school impact fees. This information packet provides the multipliers used to calculate impact fees. It is a summary of the impact fee information in the Code of the City of Ocoee, Chapter 87 Impact Fees. In addition, water and sewer capital charges and deposits are included at the back of this packet. It is a summary of Chapter 173 Water and Sewers. Sections from the Code are referenced below. The fees imposed for residential and nonresidential construction are a result of the City's fee calculation study that was designed to ensure that the impact fees imposed are rationally related to the benefit received by the applicant. In the event that an applicant believes the impact of the construction will be less than that set forth below, the applicant may, at his or her option, submit evidence to the City Commission in support of an alternative assessment based upon convincing and competent evidence, the City Commission may adjust the impact fee as appropriate for the particular property. The Building Division coordinates the Final Impact Fee Assessment at the time of Building Permit review. All impact fees must be paid before permits may be issued. If you need additional information to estimate impact fees for your project, please contact the applicable City offices listed below: Police, Fire, School and Recreation Impact Fees - Transportation Impact Fees - Water and Sewer Deposits & Capital Charges plus Irrigation Charges - Section 87-43. Definitions. Building Department/Development Services (407) 905-3100 ext. 1000 Planning Department/Development Services (407) 905-3100 ext. 1018 Engineering / Public Works (407) 905-3100 ext. 1504 NON-RESIDENTIAL DWELLING - Any structure which fully encloses space for the occupancy by persons or their activities other than residential dwellings, including but not limited to professional buildings, commercial buildings, public assembly buildings or institutional buildings. RESIDENTIAL DWELLING - Each single-family dwelling in each unit of a condominium, duplex, triplex, mobile home, modular housing, manufactured home, apartment or multiple -dwelling structure designated as a separate dwelling for one (1) or more persons, whether temporarily or permanently (W utilized or designed or intended to be utilized for human habitation. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 1 of 13 1) POLICE IMPACT FEE Section 87-42. Police Fee Schedule. The following police impact fees are hereby assessed by the City and shall be collected by the City prior to the issuance of the building permit or any other development permit for the construction of any structure to be used for a residential or nonresidential dwelling in each district: Residential: $501.04 Nonresidential: $0.33 (thirty-three cents) per square foot 2) FIRE IMPACT FEE Section 87-30. Fire Fee Schedule. The following fire impact fees are hereby assessed by the City and shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of a building permit or any other development permit for the construction of any structure to be used for a residential or nonresidential dwelling. Residential: $636.00 Nonresidential: $0.47 (forty-seven cents) per square foot 3) RECREATION IMPACT FEE (Not applicable to Commercial, Office, or Industrial projects.) Section 87-18. Recreational Park Fee. A recreational park impact fee in the amount of $1,560.00 per residential dwelling unit is hereby assessed by the City. 4) SCHOOL IMPACT FEE (Not applicable to Commercial, Office, or Industrial projects.) The City of Ocoee is required to collect School Impact Fees for Orange County Public Schools. The required impact fee must be paid before the residential building permit can be issued. Single-family detached house: $8,784.00 per dwelling unit Multi -family dwelling unit: $5,919.00 per dwelling unit Townhouse: $6,930 per dwelling unit Mobile home: $6,088.00 per dwelling unit For your information, a copy of the Orange County Public School Impact Fee Ordinance is available at the City of Ocoee Building Division. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 2 of 13 IM TRANSPORTATION/ROAD IMPACT FEE 6) Publicly owned and operated buildings(government, public schools, Ubnyrhao community are exempt from paying road impact fees. Single-family residential additions are also exempt. Section 87-14. Schedule of Road Impact Fees. Land Use Unit of Measure ITE Code Net Impact Fee Port and Terminal Intermodal Truck Terminal 1,000 sf 030 $3,529.99 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 110 $2,496.72 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 140 $1,366.71 Warehousing 1,000 sf 150 $1,776.32 Mini -warehouse 1,000 sf 151 $895.36 Residential Single Family Dwelling Unit 210 $3,943.71 Apartment Dwelling Unit 220 $2,655.21 Condom in i u mrrown house Dwelling Unit 230 $2,319.70 Mobile Home Dwelling Unit 240 $1,827.77 Congregate Care Facility Occupied DU 253 $792.44 Lodginq Hotel/Motel Occupied Room 310 $2,667.56 Recreational Goff Course Per Hole 430 $16,174.12 Multipurpose Recreational Facility 1,000 sf 435 $1,385.24 Multiplex Movie Theatre 1,000 sf 445 $7,226.69 Institutional Place of Worship 1,000 sf 560 $3,229.48 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 565 $8,323.76 Medical Hospital 1,000 sf 610 $4,400.64 Nursing Home 1,000 sf 620 $584.55 Office Updated February 1.2018 Page 3 of 13 Less than 100,000 1,000 sf 710 $4,752.62 100,000 to 200,000 1,000 sf 710 $3,657.59 Greater than 200,000 1,000 sf 710 $3,241.82 Medical/Dental Office 1,000 sf 720 $11,493.54 Business Park 1,000 sf 770 $3,814.03 Retail Shopping Center: Less than 50,000 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,942.65 Shopping Center: 50,000 to 99,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $4,598.24 Shopping Center: 100,000 to 199,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $4,847.30 Shopping Center: 200,000 to 299,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $5,429.79 Shopping Center: 300,000 to 399,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $5,530.65 Shopping Center: 400,000 to 499,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $5,503.90 Shopping Center: 500,000 to 999,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,026.70 Shopping Center: 1,000,000 to 1,250,000 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,255.17 Shopping Center: Greater than 1,250,000 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,026.70 Automobile Sales 1,000 sf 841 $7,963.57 Supermarket 1,000 sf 850 $15,791.28 Convenience Store (open 24 hours) 1,000 sf 851 $34,762.63 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/drive-thru window 1,000 sf 881 $8,700.43 Services Drive-in Bank 1,000 sf 912 $9,608.15 Restaurant, Quality 1,000 sf 931 $14,027.32 Restaurant, High Turnover (sit-down) 1,000 sf 932 $15,978.59 Restaurant, Fast Food 1,000 sf 934 $23,155.88 Automobile Care Center 1,000 sf 942 $3,480.58 Gasoline Station (8 VFP) Fueling position 944 $7,521.03 Gasoline Station w/Convenience Market and Car Wash (12 VFP) Fueling position 946 $14,685.97 Self -Service Car Wash Per Stall 947 $4,308.02 Section 87-5. Road I moact Fee - Alternative fee calculation. A. In the event that an applicant believes the impact of his new building on the roadway network will be less than that derived utilizing the Schedule of Fees in § 87-14, the applicant may submit an Updated February 1, 2018 Page 4 of 13 alternative road impact fee calculation to the Development Review Committee. The Development Review Committee shall review the data, information and assumptions used by the applicant as part of the alternative road impact fee calculation methodology to determine whether the requirements of this section are satisfied, if the Development Review Committee finds that the requirements of this section are satisfied, it shall review the results of the study and determine the applicant's alternative road impact fee for recommendation to the City Commission. If the Development Review Committee finds the requirements of this section are not satisfied, it shall recommend to the City Commission the Road Impact Fee Schedule set forth in § 87-14 for the applicant. The decision of the City Commission as to the use of an alternative road impact fee or the Road Impact Fee Schedule shall be final and binding on the applicant. B. The alternative road impact fee calculations shall be based on data, information or assumptions contained in the City of Ocoee Transportation Impact Fee Update, dated November 1998 and shall be compatible with assumptions used for development of a standards -driven impact fee calculation, provided that: (1) The independent source is an accepted standard source of transportation engineering or planning data; (2) The independent source is a local study carried out by a qualified traffic planner possessing membership in the American Institute of Certified Planners or a professional engineer licensed by the State of Florida pursuant to an accepted methodology of transportation planning or engineering; or (3) If a prior applicant submitted during a prior approval process a traffic impact study consistent with the criteria required by this section and if that study is determined by the Development Review Committee to still be valid, the traffic impacts of the new building shall be presumed 4W to be as described in such prior study. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a traffic impact study which is more than two years old is invalid. C. The trip length, diversion and capture factor used in the alternative road impact fee calculation shall be based on actual surveys conducted In the City of Ocoee or Orange County or based on professional studies, including commonly used references. For the purposes of the alternative road impact fee calculation, the diversion and capture factor shall be the percentage of average daily trips that a proposed use will generate that constitute new or additional trips added to roadways identified within the Ocoee Transportation Master Plan. Those trips that do not represent additional trip ends shall not be counted as new or additional trips. D. The new building shall be presumed to generate the maximum number of average daily trips to be generated by the most intensive use permitted under the applicable land development regulations, such as the Comprehensive Plan or zoning regulations, or under applicable deed or plat restrictions. E. The cost of the city review of the alternative road impact fee calculation shall be paid by the applicant. Upon submittal of the alternative road impact fee calculation by the applicant, the city shall collect a flat fee of $500 and a review deposit of $1,000 from the applicant. Section 1-12 of Article I of the Land Development Code (Chapter 180 of the Code of Ordinances of the City), as it may from time to time be amended, shall be followed when collecting review fees and deposits under this section. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 5 of 13 WATER & SEWER CAPITAL CHARGES & DEPOSITS Section 173-11. Water Capital Charges. A water capital charge is hereby established at $2,083.00 (two thousand, eighty-three dollars) per equivalent residential unit (ERU). Those persons, corporations or entities who or which have entered into an agreement with the city providing credits against the water connection fee shall be exempt from paying this water capital charge. For the purpose of calculating and imposing the water capital charge, the ERU factor for any particular connection shall be calculated and imposed in the manner provided as follows: ESTABLISHMENT Unit ERU Factor RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Duplex (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Duplex (3 or more Bedrooms) Per Unit 1.000 Mobile Home (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.667 Mobile Home (3 or more bedrooms) Per Unit 0,833 Multifamily, Efficiency (Less than 500 sf) Per Unit 0.500 Multifamily (1 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.583 Multifamily (2 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily (3 or more bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 1.000 Single Family Residence Per Unit 1.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Animal Kennels Per Kennel Run 0.160 Auditorium Per Seat 0.017 Automotive Repair & Maintenance Per Repair Bay 0.250 Bar/Cocktail Lounge Per Seat 0.067 Barber/Beauty Shop Per Operator Station 0.300 Bowling Alley Per Lane 0.330 Church Per Seat 0.017 Convenience Store (No Gas Pumps) By FU See FU Table Below Dentist Office Per Dentist 0.833 Extended Care Facilities Per Efficiency 0.500 Hospital Per Bed 0.833 Hotel / Motel (See Note 1) Per Room 0.500 Hotel / Motel Suites, 1 Bedroom (See Note 1) Per Unit 0.583 Hotel / Motel Suites, 2 Bedrooms (See Note 1) Per Unit 0.833 Hotel / Motel Suites, 3 or more Bedrooms (See Note 1) Per Unit 1.000 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) with showers Per Employee 0,117 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) without showers Per Employee 0.050 Landscape Irrigation Per 1,000 SF 0.125 Laundry, Self Service Per Machine 1.333 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 6 of 13 IM Medical Office (formerly: Doctors Office) Per Doctor 0.833 ESTABLISHMENT Unit ERU Factor Meeting & Banquet Rooms Per Seat 0.017 Nursing Home Per Bed 0.417 Office Building (See Note 3) Per 1,000 SF, gross 0.334 Restaurant (Cafeteria), Full Service Per Seat 0.100 Restaurant, 24 hour Per Seat 0.167 Restaurant, Fast Food Per Seat 0.050 Retail Spaces By FU See FU Table Below Schools, Elementary & Nursery Per Student 0.025 Schools, Middle & High Per Student 0.067 Self Service Gas Station (See Note 5) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Service Bay 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Wash Bay 3.200 Theater Per Seat 0.010 Theater (Dinner) Per Seat 0.067 Trailer Park (overnight) Per Space 0.333 Warehouse Space (See Note 4) By FU See FU Table Below NOTES 1 . Hotels and motels: add food service, banquet & meeting rooms, and self service laundries. 2. Add food service; does not include industrial waste flows which are calculated on Fixture Unit (FU) basis. 3. Office buildings: add food service and retail space. 4. Warehouses: add office space, food service, and retail space. 5. Self service gas stations: add Fixture Units (FU). 6. Service (gasoline) Stations: add the total of ERU factors for all service bays, wash bays (not recycled) and toilet rooms. Automatically recycled vehicle washing systems require a professional engineer's signed and sealed estimate of capacity usage. 7. See Fixture Unit (FU) calculations on FU Table below. 8. Ocoee requires a minimum of 1.000 ERU per each separate commercial establishment. 9. Multi -family projects based on units only; no additional capital charges for laundries, pool, or management Updated February 1.2018 Page 7 of 13 FIXTURE UNITS (FU) TABLE Type of Fixture FU ERU Factor NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Drains, condensate 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1 -1/4 -inch trap 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1 -1/2 -inch trap 2.0 0.167 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 2 -inch trap 3.0 0.250 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed 2 -1/2 -inch trap 4.0 0.333 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: I 3 -inch trap 5.0 0.417 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: I 4 -inch trap 6.0 0.500 Updated February 1.2018 Page 7 of 13 Drinking Fountain 0.5 0.042 FIXTURE UNITS (FU) TABLE Type of Fixture FU ERU Factor Laundry Tray 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, large drain (greater than 1 -1/4 -inch trap) 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, small drain (1 -1/4 -inch trap) 1.0 0.083 Showers (per head) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (food service) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (garbage grinder) 4.0 0.333 Sink, compartmented (2) 3.0 0.250 Sink, compartmented (3) 4.0 0.333 Sink, flushing rim 8.0 0.667 Sink, service (mop/janitor) 3.0 0.250 Sink, service ("p" trap) (Hand) 2.0 0.167 Sink, (pot, scullery, etc.) 4.0 0.333 Urinal 4.0 0.333 Washing Machine (Non coin laundry) by drain size above Varies Varies Water Closet, public 6.0 0.500 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS (requiring larger than 5/8" meter) Bathroom Group (water closet, lavatory, bathtub/shower) 6.0 0.500 Bath, Half 4.0 0.333 Dishwasher 2.0 0.167 Drains (by drain size above) Varies Varies Lavatory 4.0 0.333 Shower Stall 3.0 0.250 Sink, kitchen 2.0 0.167 Sink, kitchen (garbage grinder/dishwasher) 3.0 0.250 Sink, laundry 2.0 0.167 Washer, clothes (by drain size, above) Varies Varies NOTES 1. Continuous and semi -continuous flows (pumps, air conditioning systems, etc.) are 2.0 FU per gallon per minute (gpm) of flow. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 8 of 13 IM Section 173-28. Sewer Capital Chartres. A sewer capital charge is hereby established at $6,178.00 (six thousand, one hundred seventy-eight dollars) per ERU. Those persons, corporations or entities who or which have previously prepaid the existing sewer capacity charges or who prepaid sewer capacity charges to Prima Vista Utility Company, Inc. (PVU), which were transferred from PVU to the city pursuant to the agreement between PVU and the city dated December 3, 1987, shall be exempt from paying this sewer capital charge. For the purpose of calculating and imposing the sewer capital charge, the ERU factor for any particular connection shall be calculated and imposed in the manner provided as follows: ESTABLISHMENT Unit Factor RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Duplex (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Duplex (3 or more Bedrooms) Per Unit 1.000 Mobile Home (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.667 Mobile Home (3 or more bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily, Efficiency (Less than 500 sf) Per Unit 0.500 Multifamily (1 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.583 Multifamily (2 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily (3 or more bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 1.000 Single Family Residence Per Unit 1.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Animal Kennels Per Kennel Run 0.160 Auditorium Per Seat 0.017 Automotive Repair & Maintenance Per Repair Bay 0.250 Bar/ Cocktail Lounge _ Per Seat 0.067 Barber/Beauty Shop Per Operator Station 0.300 Bowling Alley Per Lane 0.330 Church Per Seat 0.017 Convenience Store (No Gas Pumps) By FU See FU Table Below Dentist Office Per Dentist 0.833 Extended Care Facilities Per Efficiency 0.500 Hospital Per Bed 0.833 Hotel/Motel (See Note 1) Per Room 0.500 Hotel/Motel Suites, 1 Bedroom (See Note 1) Per Unit 0.583 Hotel/Motel Suites, 2 Bedrooms(See Note 1) Per Unit 0.833 Hotel/Motel Suites, 3 or more Bedrooms (See Note 1) Per Unit 1.000 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) with showers Per Employee 0.117 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) without showers Per Employee 0.050 Landscape Irrigation Per 1,000 SF 0.125 Laundry, Self Service Per Machine 1.333 Medical Office (formerly: Doctor's Office) Per Doctor 0.833 Meeting & Banquet Rooms Per Seat 0.017 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 9 of 13 Nursing Home Per Bed 0.417 ESTABLISHMENT Unit Factor Office Building (See Note 3) Per 1,000 SF, gross 0.334 Restaurant (Cafeteria), Full Service Per Seat 0.100 Restaurant, 24 hour Per Seat 0.167 Restaurant, Fast Food Per Seat 0.050 Retail Spaces By FU See FU Table Below Schools, Elementary & Nursery Per Student 0.025 Schools, Middle & High Per Student 0.067 Self Service Gas Station (See Note 5) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Service Bay 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Wash Bay 3.200 Theater Per Seat 0.010 Theater (Dinner) Per Seat 0.067 Trailer Park (overnight) Per Space 0.333 Warehouse Space (See Note 4) BY FU See FU Table Below NOTES 1. Hotels and motels: add food service, banquet & meeting rooms, and self-service laundries. 2. Add food service; does not include industrial waste flows which are calculated on Fixture Unit (FU) basis. 3. Office buildings: add food service and retail space._ 4. Warehouses: add office space, food service, and retail space. 5. Self-service gas stations: add Fixture Units (FU). 6. Service (gasoline) Stations: add the total of ERU factors for all service bays, wash bays (not recycled) and toilet rooms. Automatically recycled vehicle washing systems require a professional engineer's signed and sealed estimate of capacity usage. 7. See Fixture Unit (FU) calculations on FU Table below. 8. Ocoee requires a minimum of 1.000 ERU per each separate commercial establishment. 9. Multi -family projects based upon units only; no additional capital charges for laundries, pool, or management offices. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 10 of 13 IM Capacity Demand Based Upon f=ixture Units (FU) Type of Fixture FU ERU Factor NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Drains, condensate 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1 -1/4 -inch trap 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1 Y2 -inch trap 2.0 0.167 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 2 -inch trap 3.0 0.250 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed 2 Y2 -inch trap 4.0 0.333 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 3 -inch trap 5.0 0.417 Drains, floor &fixtures not listed: 4 -inch trap 6.0 0.500 Drinking Fountain 0.5 0.042 Laundry Tray 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, large drain (greater than 1 -1/4 -inch trap) 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, small drain (1 -1/4 -inch trap) 1.0 0.083 Showers (per head) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (food service) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (garbage grinder) 4.0 0.333 Sink, compartmented (2) 3.0 0.250 Sink, compartmented (3) 4.0 0.333 Sink, flushing rim 8.0 0.667 Sink, service (mopranitor) 3.0 0.250 Sink, service ("p" trap) (Hand) 2.0 0.167 Sink, (pot, scullery, etc.) 4.0 0.333 Urinal 4.0 0.333 Washing Machine (Non coin laundry) by drain size above Varies Varies Water Closet, public 6.0 0.500 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS (requiring larger than 5/8" meter) Bathroom Group 6.0 0.500 (water closet, lavatory, bathtub/shower) Bath, Half 4.0 0.333 Dishwasher 2.0 0.167 Drains (by drain size above) Varies Varies Lavatory 4.0 0.333 Shower Stall 3.0 0.250 rt Sink, kitchen 2.0 0.167 Sink, kitchen (garbage grinder/dishwasher) 3.0 0.250 Sink, laundry 2.0 0.167 Washer, clothes (by drain size, above) Varies Varies NOTES 1. Continuous and semi -continuous flows (pumps, air conditioning systems, etc.) are 2.0 FU per gallon per minute (gpm) of flow. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 11 of 13 Section 173-3. Water and Sewers Account Deposit. (1) Residential Meter Type Water Deposit Sewer Deposit %-inch $120.00 $120.00 Owner of residence $ 60.00 $ 60.00 Renter of residence $ 80.00 $ 80.00 1 -inch $140.00 $140.00 (2) Non -Residential Meter Type Water Deposit Sewer Deposit %-inch $120.00 $120.00 1 -inch $300.00 $300.00 1'/z -inch $450.00 $450.00 2 -inch $520.00 $520.00 3 -inch and larger To be determined by Director 173-4. (1)(a) Water charges and billing. Base facility charge (zero consumption), effective for all bills issued on or after October 1, 2003, without regard to the date of the meter reading: Meter Type Charge 1/44nch $ 7.64 1 -inch $ 19.10 1'/ --inch $ 38.20 2 -inch $ 61.12 3 -inch $ 122.24 4 -inch $ 191.00 6 -inch $ 382.00 8 -inch $ 611.00 10 -inch $ 878.60 12 -inch $1,642.60 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 12 of 13 21 173-4. (2)(a) Sewer charges and billing. Base facility charge (zero consumption), effective for all bills issued on or after October 1, 2003, without regard to the date of the meter reading: Meter Type ...__ .............__.._ _.__ Charge %-inch $ 14.22 1 -inch $ 35.56 1'l -inch $ 71.12 2 -inch $ 113.79 3 -inch $ 227.58 4 -inch $ 355.60 6 -inch $ 393.46 8 -inch $1,137.94 10 -inch $1,635.79 12 -inch $3,058.22 Resolution No. 2003-17. Reclaimed Water System Rates. Base facility charge (zero consumption), effective for all bills issued on or after October 1, 2003, without regard to the date of the meter reading. Meter Type Charge %-inch $ 5.90 1 -inch $ 14.75 1Y2 -inch $ 29.50 2 -inch $ 47.21 3 -inch $ 94.43 4 -inch $ 147.54 6 -inch $ 295.09 8 -inch $ 471.99 10 -inch $ 678.71 12 -inch $1,268.90 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 13 of 13 Un Legend Schools © Hospitals Property Outline City Boundary ` HOPE CHAT :J "E Fullers"Ctass n m 0 Crown ``y RI Point way y � j z r E - E o = v a Z K s" ST LILLIE V �; HIGH SCHOOL til St THE KING'S ALVI V;MY t<a Bay St E 1 i ORANGE TECHN ICm IMaple3SOEsT.L., CAMPUS WILLIAM S MAXEY UNIVERSI MID-FLO 8 EDUCAI 0 'p M.iynolia u i:k ti "k Beach Ave // Hill Dr Paradise Heights Paradise Heights Walker 0 I der Dr I Cau/ey Rd Westyi' Hi Blva �/ � 3 3/ o ov a N A � RENAISSANCE CHARTER AT Fullers �/West:Rd ROWN POINT OCOEE HIGH HIGH R r or GLAD TIDINGS ACADEMY 0 Lee FMI S.T.E. M. ACADEMY 437: t T��I ry�S t m N Q i N \ E \�\ E n Enterprise St c , g - m F m s v g a 0 Cla: tens Norse C 3ili E E o .____McCormick-Rd=W---._,.-----:-.__. ,Os m o a D 0 ew, 3 ,r Cnnni� 77,Cake au, .plartona e/ glossonoF . Cir LEAH^.II. CENTF.hj EMarra Dr 0 4 GLAD TIDINGS •01� ACADEMY-EAT 1� 3 Cross C�'G Sawnill o a brant Lake Rd a Lake a Sims Ra=/jam G�ge.cona:.Ocoee- \ �j k,rden Oaks Dr l� .eaole Lake II Meadow II A., ij e.nt D SCHI F Dr 0 Capitol,, �`-� 9\ Q O o °i p Oa0 _ _—Balboa=Dr ll A o < Licaria Prairie> o 00 = a i m Nicole Blvd Lake n r 'y' 6th Ave - X11 a J > n - Marlee D, < j �� t �'- 'II COLLEGE CHAR (: LNIRALFLORIDA Etta a PREPARATORY DEEP OT CENTRAL FLORIDA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 4 ---o-Dt L ACA a SCHOO jatle \ p - ¢ SPRING LAKE n u WEST OAKS S v p ELEMENTAR, L• ACADEMY -P1 cHRISEUd `—WursY-Rd�._:�. n L g7 '.. �\ 2 ACAORY DEMY h\�v �IS � Y' �yalch Ct Sze\\� Cira Andre C" Dr Lowman Ave >. -' vail vedS D° o e c ,��fVav ` a ✓�✓ Spring Burns Tree Ct � plewelliny Ave Lake Mobile Lrr h D A y c m %cot Dr = A o take _ r >� ___ center St- d > J I lCc ' 1 438 H c y n O Sf rlio,'. z U ny J "li Lake CDei' �,_,, E Sitver_Sta Rd __� GD� wall Ave Lucy dee Starke Lake O LEGACY OF JOSHACADEMY v CITRt15 CI ELE1'a6PgC/ �/ \\Y,ake< IEAPSANDDOUNDS EARFIRSTNNO • Na • Se7 STE STNTERIEPS 'T'Q Ot Lak / oc N l Lake I` Florence I OCOE?4PIDDLE Olympia m D ;i • ocotss Banc vrC va ELEMEflPARv O yr i rOak St aHom°y u o o� a o ¢�' _ v O y � Silvers Orlando Ave "A -- White Rd veno Dr Hal Ct a o y'h Sn ..fire DI re Rose Dr Capitol,, �`-� 9\ Q SunsprvteCt --Sty=Rd_= """111 — Geneva St E or °i p Oa0 _ _—Balboa=Dr ll a m o 00 = a I gyerly3 ��� Maine 9 Sl J, �tv' U nD 6� � ErY\ �°iia GOOD HOMES HOn pf454 Dr PRESCHOOL r 'y' St `� OFORLANDO X11 HEALTH CENTRAL J _ - -' W Colonial Dr 5050 v r- w HOSPITAL Ilr KIDS COMMUNIT{ake _ 5o � F �� t �'- 'II COLLEGE CHAR (: LNIRALFLORIDA Etta a PREPARATORY DEEP OT CENTRAL FLORIDA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ---o-Dt L ACA a SCHOO jatle \ n Lde,_ Seminole St �X.G fl 0 P Buckman Property 0 0.25 0.5 , / aRr•R.nr Hospital and School Map Miles A 1 L Tavares Mt Dora Tavares Mt Dora S Tangerine Tangerine Jones Ave ro ZO Sorrento ae Sorrento Mt Plymouth Mt Plymouth a' S 6 K'oILRark Rd W OchRdE Wek�ka s, in .. c m wss Ry i Seminole V) w Y .v'Rd E"' x = .4 2 a Apopka � Apopka a36 city n v�A 414 d�ae Paradise"d Paradise Heights Heights r - Mon[verde n _ - Fairview 1 Montverde o - Shores �_ , irview res a tioee, 2 old, I Winter Garden Ocoee ¢ rt �Qgtb,,zst -� z �Oc 9ryway 50 Oakland Winter Garden '- �'� e oe, 7ildenville s Pine Hills z0akland Tildenville Hills_-' axa ja s — E _ o n ®d— 50 SR -50 E �.ru Lake n Orlo Vista — I 1 S food Marsh Rd� nraok - F v a ry '135 i Tii env � Down � . - "'^�� Holden rc Windermere E S Heights indermere c ,rny Wird ,e,r q„ ��� Holden Height m Bay Hill Oak Ridge a Bay Hill w� Oak Ridge Doctor Tangelo Park Tang e o Park z Phillips Doctor Legend .,.r PhilliPgj Cee Big Sand 1 Rcl Meb 1 < Sh Lake Site c N "fir m o Bay 5 Minutes Lake Williamsburg Williamsburg 10 Minutes 15 Minutes F City Boundary w c' La gym. q Bue Vista Nil fl U U P Buckman Property o 1 z 4 / 5, 10 , 15 Minute Drive Time Map Miles N ORDINANCE NO. 2019-011 (Rezoning Ordinance for Ocoee Village Center PUD) TAX PARCEL ID: 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046, & 05-22-28-0000-00-004 CASE NO. RZ-18-06-09: Ocoee Village Center PUD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM OCOEE R-1A TO OCOEE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY +/-73.17 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF SR 429 EXPRESSWAY, AND EAST SIDE OF N LAKEWOOD BLVD, PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER; FINDING SUCH ZONING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner (the "Applicant") of certain real property located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, as hereinafter described, has submitted an application to the City Commission of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Commission") to rezone said real property (the "Rezoning"); and WHEREAS, the Applicant seeks to rezone certain real property containing approximately +/-73.17 acres, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, from Ocoee R-1A to Ocoee PUD (Planned Unit Development); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5-9(B) of Chapter 180 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Code"), the City Development Services Director has reviewed said Rezoning application and determined that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant is consistent with the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Ordinance No. 91-28, adopted September 18, 1991, as amended (the "Ocoee Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, said Rezoning application was scheduled for study and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Planning and Zoning Commission"); and WHEREAS, on April 9, 2019, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed said Rezoning application for consistency with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and determined that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of the City, and recommended to the Ocoee City Commission that the zoning classification of said real property be rezoned as requested by the Applicant, and that the Ocoee City Commission find that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on , 2019, the Ocoee City Commission held a de novo advertised public hearing with respect to the proposed Rezoning of said real property and determined that the Rezoning is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been considered by the Ocoee City Commission in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 166.041(3)(a), Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. The Ocoee City Commission has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida and qhapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. SECTION 2. REZONING. The zoning classification, as defined in the Ocoee City Code, of the Property described in Exhibit "A" containing approximately +/-73.17 acres located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, is hereby changed from Ocoee R-1A to Ocoee PUD (Planned Unit Development). A map of said land herein described which clearly shows the area of the Rezoning is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference is made a part hereof. SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The City Commission hereby finds the Rezoning of the lands described in this Ordinance to be consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 4. ZONING MAP. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to revise the Official Zoning Map of the City of Ocoee in order to incorporate the Rezoning enacted by this Ordinance and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said revised Official Zoning Map in accordance with the provisions of Section 5-1(G) of Article V of Chapter 180 of the Ocoee City Code. SECTION 5. CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2019. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Rusty Johnson, Mayor (SEAL) ADVERTISED , READ FIRST TIME , 2019. READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED 2019. Under Agenda Item No. FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this day of , 2019. SHUFFIELD LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. By: City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED APRIL 17, 1998 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5461, PAGE 2341 AND IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS: PARCEL 4 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-004: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2930.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 89°44'04" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 89°44'04" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6450-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 00°53'06" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1111.47 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 58°53'01" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 72.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 514.27 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°49'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 660.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 00°1T43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1409.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE OF RUN SOUTH 00°34'54" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 231 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°44'04" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1286.39 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°11'35"WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.77 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 40 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-040: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88°0T15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1252.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 88°07'15" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER QF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 00°1T43"WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1351.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN NORTH 89°13'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1262.21 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 69°30'11" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 851.79 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°26'23" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 868.85 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49°49'55"WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36°19'17" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49°49'02" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 429, WESTERN BELTWAY, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT- OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-5460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 54°40'57" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1377.66 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 46 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-046: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1465.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN NORTH 00°49'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 71°13'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST ROAD, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320- 6460-602/603; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 776.19 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 00°25'09" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 180.72 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°22'14" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.13 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE RUN NORTH 06°15'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 131.33 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 19°42'11" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044 PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 49°49'02" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.92 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1385.18 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 56°21'45" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 316.40 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°06'58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 317.09 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°49'52" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.70 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 89°10'08" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.12 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING EXHIBIT "B" Location Map * 4West West r Wet oadh H1Tfld rd co Full s Cross 5t6 l I�� N o Harri O .a boom1 • ck vee Er "ri 11 I SII It ilii ii i � � � - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OCOEEVILKAGE CENTER CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Prepared for: WC Group 246North VVeStrnOnhgDrive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 Prepared by: Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407'828-8855 October 2018 TPD NQ 5095 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic Planning & Design, Inc., a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, EB -3702, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: LOCATION: CLIENT: Ocoee Village Center City of Ocoee, Florida WC Group I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. NAME: Turgut lilt P.E. No.: DATE: 2040W EN Octd'ber ,2016 SIGNATURE. F ORI �xs l NA% - 1111110, TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 STUDYAREA............................................................................................................................... 4 EXISTINGCONDITIONS ANALYSIS...................................................................................... 6 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION.................................................11 Trip Generation Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS..................................................................................14 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis Turn Lane Analysis STUDYCONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................... 24 APPENDICES............................................................................................................................. 26 A Methodology Memorandum and Correspondence B CMS Database C Intersection Volumes/FDOT Factors and Signal Timings D Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets E Trends Analysis Worksheets F Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis.............................................................. 7 Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis................................................................. 10 Table 3 Trip Generation Summary ......................................................................................... 12 Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis.................................................................... 15 Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis................................................................ 21 Table 6 Projected Site Access Capacity Analysis............................................................... 21 Table 7 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis (with Improvements) .......................... 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map............................................................................ ..................... Figure2 Proposed Site Plan..................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Study Intersections...................................................................................................... 5 Figure 4 (a) Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ..................................... 8 Figure 4 (b) Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ..................................... 9 Figure 5 Project Trip Distribution........................................................................................... 13 Figure 6(a) Projected A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes............................................16 Figure 6(b) Projected A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes............................................17 Figure 7(a) Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 18 Figure 7(b) Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes............................................19 Figure 7(c) Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 20 This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact ofthe proposed Ocoee Village Center development in the City of Ocoee, Florida. The site is located OD Lakewood AveOUe/C|arcone- OooeaRoad immediately tothe east of8R42S. Figure 1depicts the project's aite|ooaUonand its one -mile impact area. Access fothe site will be provided via access driveways VO both Lakewood Avenue and C|oroona-Ocoee Rood. Figure 2 is a conceptual site plan of the development which consists of: * North OfC|arcoD@-OcoeeRoad 350 MF Residential Units 140 Room Hotel 20,000 Sq FtRetail Commercial * South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 240 Townhome Units 115,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial Prior to the conduct of the ana|ysis, a methodology me00[8ndU[D was SUbnnU±ed to the City identifying an impact area along with the CMS roadway segments and intersections to be included in the analysis. Additionally, the project's trip gene[aton and distribution characteristics were documented and graphically illustrated. The methodology rnennonandum, correspondence from the City and the responses are included iDAppendix A. Data used in this analysis consists of site plan/development information provided by the Project EnQineers.A.K8./z.W1. peak hour traffic counts obtained bvTraffic Planning and Design, Inc. (TPD) and roadway segment data obtained from the City of Ocoee's Concurrency Management System (CMS). Ocoee Village Center Project Ne5095 Pege1 6papka Dr ru Ps zs i R 429) f7 Fn o 6t 2'- atk, e,_ P ve 3rd Ave diW 4th )kve pmme;L*e Nice tit L LL -k Rd Ave Vignetfi P r 1 -Mile -t i_Ay_Q.i Ave ens eCi 45 177� 77,07 Ocoee Village Center N Project NQ 5095 Project Location Map Figure 1 Ms A The City's Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Outline requires that the extent of the impact area include all road segments that fall within one -mile of the project site and all roadways with a trip generation of more than 5% of the maximum service volume outside of the one -mile radius. A significance test was conducted, and impacted roadway segments and intersections were identified in the study methodology. The methodology was reviewed by the City and the study roadway segments and intersections, shown in Figure 3, were identified for use in the analysis as follows: Roadway Segments: • Clarcona-Ocoee Road * Lakewood Avenue • Ocoee -Apopka Road * Wurst Road • A.D. Mims Road: * West Road: • Adair Street: * Fuller's Cross Road • Ingram Road: Study Intersections: SR 429 to N. Lakewood Avenue N. Lakewood Avenue to Ingram Road SR 438 to Rewis Street Rewis Street to Wurst Road Wurst Road to Fuller's Cross Road Fuller's Cross Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road Demastus Lane to Fuller's Cross Road Fuller's Cross Road to West Road West Road to McCormick Road Lakewood Avenue to Adair Street Adair Street to A.D. Mims Road Wurst Road to Clarke Road Ocoee- Apopka Road to SR 429 Wurst Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road Ocoee -Apopka Road to Lakewood Avenue McCormick Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road • Ocoee -Apopka Road to West Road • West Road & SR 429 SB Ramps * West Road & SR 429 NB Ramps • Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue * Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Adair Street • Ocoee -Apopka Road & Fuller's Cross Road • Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road • Lakewood Avenue & Wurst Road • Project Entrances =- Ocoee Village Center Project N2 5095 IN Page 4 f tA 4A 0 —M A AVE ab L. 0 ui 3- 00RE EN AVE Et pC)pKA OCOEE wm !DR , PDXFIR�:D*`f3Z LOG cm 0 'eb LA % 0 —ADAIR-ST -`5 L� Lu z > uj 3AVi S8343d,w�-.- < BUTLER--AVf X P , u-, iL > Lj, Lu 0 f tA 4A 0 ab L. 0 ui 3- Et pC)pKA OCOEE !DR , LOG cm 0 'eb LA % 0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS Anexisting conditions analysis was conducted for the CMS roadway segments and their major intersections utilizing existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry to establish their cVnerd operating conditions. The roadways were analyzed for daily traffic conditions and the intersections for P.M. peak hour conditions. Additionally, two of the study |DtenSeCtiOOB DD Lakewood Avenue were analyzed for A.W1.peak hour conditions due toarea school traffic. Roadway Segment Analysis The study roadway segments were analyzed bvcomparing their existing daily traffic volumes with the corresponding capacities at the adopted LOS standard. Roadway segments were obtained from the City's CW18 database and Updated as per the City's request. Daily traffic coUDbg were obtained from the most recent AADT information obtained from Orange County and from FDOT count stations, and from turning Dl0VaOlGOt COVOte where FD[>T7C)range County traffic CDuDtS were not available with the use of a K factor of 0.09. The CMS traffic volumes and capacities by roadway segment are included inAppendix B. Asummary ofthe daily roadway capacity analysis is presented in Table 1. The existing conditions analysis reveals that the study segments currently operate satisfactorily within their adopted capacities. Intersection Analysis The study intersections were analyzed in accordance with the procedures of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) using the latest version of the Highway Capacity Gnfwona (HCS). The capacity analysis at each intersection was performed using the eXGUUQ intersection geometry, traffic volumes during the P.M. peak hour for all intersections and theA.K4. peak hour at the directly impacted intersections as requested by the City and signal timing/phasing data. The counts were adjusted based on F[}OT`o amoeona| factors corresponding to the week the when the counts were taken. Figures 4(a) and 4(d) depict the adjusted existing peak hOU[ traffic volumes. Existing turning movement counts along with FD(}T's Peak Season Category Report and the intersection signal timing sheets obtained from the City of Ocoee are included in Appendix C. Ocoee Village Center Project Nu5V95 Table 1 Existina Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment Data Source No. of Lanes LOS Std Daily Capacity Existing AADT Capacity Available? Clarcona-Ocoee Road SR 429 to N. Lakewood Ave OC 454.9 4 E 39 800 17,757 Yes N. Lakewood Ave to Ingram Rd OC 70.0 4 E 39,800 13,621 Yes Lakewood Avenue SR 438 to Rewis St MOT 8056** 2 E 17,700 8,900 Yes Rewis St to Wurst Rd OC 33.2 2 E 17,700 3,727 Yes Wurst Rd to Fuller's Cross Rd TMC* 2 E 17,700 5,233 Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd OC 66.1 2 E 17,700 5,903 Yes Ocoee -Apopka Road Demastus Ln to Fuller's Cross Rd OC 73.0 2 E 17,700 9,463 Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd TMC* 2 E 17,700 16,367 Yes West Rd to McCormick Rd OC 71.0 2 E 17,700 12,413 Yes Wurst Road Lakewood Ave to Adair St OC 7130.0 2 D 14,800 5,379 Yes Adair St to A.D. Mims Rd FDOT 8059** 2 D 14,800 5500 Yes— A.D. Mims Road Wurst Rd to Clarke Rd FDOT 8166 -- 2 E 15,600 6000 Yes West Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to SIR 429 OC 2024 4 D 32,400 ------ 9,230 Yes Adair Street Wurst Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd F OC 8161 2 D 14,800 4,006 Yes Fuller's Cross Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Lakewood Ave TMC* 2 E 17,700 6,667 Yes Ingram Road McCormick Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd F OC 8162 2 D 14,800 2,892 Yes * Counts obtained from turning movement counts collected by Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. — FDOT count stations were used where Orange County counts were not available Ocoee Village Center Project N2 6095 Page 7 IT (2) 0 E. 0 S LqJ cr) 00 00(0 1,- Ln CIJ N CI) 172 181 582 206 J L 312 wase Ra 524 45 124 96 0 � I F 39 LO CI) LO LO E M z (952)715 (268) 290 73 685 (1) 4 47 (1) 7 (981)747 411 )p (186) 108 fl- Ln Legend: (000) 000 Peak Hour D= P.M. A.M. Peak Hour N Ocoee Village Center Project Ng 5095 Existing Traffic Volumes. Figure 4(a) CL O0 U M LO CI) U') icor 12 CON 29 754 232 CJI L 51 J L 50 Clarcona-gcoce Rd �� Fuller's Cress Rd 6 313 147 14 F F 157----1 00 co N 6 "r 1- co Q0 N LO Kb� T (0N M (.0 04 ,It LO (0 LO 70 3 (Fullees Cross Rd) L 00 Worst Rd (98)189 7 (87)81 r � 0) cc LO Legend: (000) 000 P.M. Peak Hour LI= A.M. Peak Hour N Ocoee Village Center Project No 5095 Existing Traffic Volumes Figure 4(b) NTS The intersection capacity analysis results are summarized in Table 2 which shows that the study intersections operate @tsatisfactory Levels of Service except for the eastbound approach 0fthe STOP -controlled intersection ofLakewood Avenue and Fullers {}noaa Roed, which currently Operates at Level of Service "F during the A.M. peak hour. Detailed HCS worksheets; are included in Appendix D. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Int # Intersection Control rime EB WB NB SB Overall Period Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd Signal PM. 67.8 E 66.7 E 49,0 D 52,8 D 57.2 E 7 Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd STOP Ocoee Village Center Project No5O95 Page 10 .111 �l ' i _ ► _;_G. • ► The proposed development will consist of the following: • North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 350 MF Residential Units 140 Room Hotel 20,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial • South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 240 Townhome Units 115,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial To determine the impact of this development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics was conducted. This included the determination of the trips to be generated as well as their distribution to the area roadways. Trip Generation Trip generation rates were obtained from the 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. As a mixed-use development, the project will generate internal trips estimated with the use of the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. Furthermore, the retail commercial uses will generate a portion of their trips from the existing traffic stream on adjacent roadways as pass -by trips. The pass -by trips were estimated with the use of data from the 3rd Edition of the ITE Handbook. Subtracting the internal and pass -by trips results in new net trips to be added to the area roadways. The trip generation, internal capture and pass -by worksheets are included in Appendix A within the study methodology. Table 3 provides a summary of the trip generation for the proposed development. As can be seen the project is expected to generate 9,326 new net daily trips, 478 A.M. peak hour trips and 744 new net P.M. peak hour trips to be added to the area roadways Ocoee Village Center Project Ne 5095 Page 11 Table 3 Trip Generation Summary ITE Code Land Use Size* Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Ra Rate Enter Exit Total Rate Enter E — - -_ it FTOQ North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Multi -Family 350 DU 7.44 2,605 0.45 36 121 157 0 51 F1 13 67 180 310 Hotel 140 Rms 8.24 1,154 0.46 38 27 65 0.656 40 39 79 820 Retail Commercial 20 KSF 100.60 2,012 8.10 100 62 162 79 86 165 Total Trips 5,771 174 210 �E384 232 192 424 Internal Trips (18%) 1,039 31 38 69 42 35 77 Retail Pass -by Trips (34%) 561 28 17 45 22 24 46 New Net Trips 4,171 115 155 3 301 South of Clarcona-0coee Road 220 Multi -Family 240 DU .39 1,774 25 85 110 81 48 129 820 Retail Commercial 115 KSF 57.49 6,611 129 80 209 289 314 603 Total Trips 8,385 154 165 319 370 362 732 Internal Trips (16%) 1,342 25 J 26 51 59 58 117 Retail Pass -by Trips (34%) 1,888 37 23 50 83 89 172 New Net Trips 5,155 92 116 208 228 215 443 Total New Net Trips 9,326 207 271 478 396 348 744 ~ DU= Dwelling units, nme Roomsxap=1.000equare-feet Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment A trip distribution pattern was estimated using the currently adopted Central Florida Regional Planning k8Vde| (CFRpK8). A Select Zone Analysis (SZ8) was conducted by modifying the 2020 interim year model network to include a Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) representing the proposed project and the model's socio-economic data updated toreflect the proposed project bui|douL The model -generated distribution is included in Appendix A within the study methodology. This distribution was reviewed for reasonableness and an adjustment was made based upon the site's access configuration and |o:m} traffic patterns. The model assigned orather high 22%ofthe project tripohnmC|ancono-O000eRoad togosouth onAdair Street and then east bxWurstRoad and A.D. Mims Road. Twelve percent nfthe project trips were re -assigned from Adair Street to Lakewood Avenue to go south and then east via VVurst Road and Silver Star Rood. The modified distribution is illustrated in Figure 5. Utilizing this distribution, the project tripsmiUbeasai0nedtothemtudyanearVedvvove/interaectionn. Ocoee popka we Dr ary pa Pari) D � 1; c C r i R W m 429 3 a r,1'9r uIII P lers e Pt �e Gt8 z pp 3rd ve t v 4th ve F Rdis e 1 P�akieL*e. r d % I Ave ly o *1 Vigneit P r t of o - lii i P � Cr rvn P irrt I * r 1 -Mile 4�5 St w lU�t , SFS g �fi1 n P nt Cr 's Rd Aiaeie LakE aClr�ens Ci St+tta�ey, • ri ,r __6 11 � �� � arc.. (� � �;'A Circle � e r -"�, ' i lr`I Legend: —:It rPercent Distribution LL 439� T' n nt-,G[ Iden � x F L 8kE ="� Gre n Ocoee Village Project NQ 5095 Figure 5 ■® I N Project Trip Distribution * PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for the study roadway segments and intersections based on projected traffic conditions k}assess the effect nfthe proposed development omthe surrounding transportation network otthe build -out 'ofthe project in2U21.Thap joutedtraffinvo|unneauaed iOthe analysis consist Ufbackground traffic volumes combined with project irips.Atrends analysis of the historical traffic volumes on the area roadways revealed annual growth rates ranging from -0.3696 to 10.6396. An average growth Rate Of596was used in the background traffic estimation. The trends analysis charts are included inAppendix E. Roadway Segment Analysis A roadway segment analysis was performed for the study roadway segments bvcomparing tha projected daily segment volumes with the respective capacities at the adopted LOS standard. The daily analysis is summarized in Table 4. The table shows the existing roadway segments along with their existing daily volumes combined with background traffic volumes and projectUipG to obtain total segment volumes. The results of the analysis show that the study roadway segments will continue LDoperate atsatisfactory LOS iDthe projected coDditinns.exceptfo[the segment of Ocoee -Apopka Road which is projected to operate at Level of Service ^F^ due to background traffic growth. The project ui||gddzerD(U)thpstDthiSSeg[OeOt. Intersection Analysis Toassess the projected operating conditions atthe study intersanUons, intersection oouocit/ analyses were conducted using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). Total peak hour traffic volumes were determined by combining existing traffic volumes with background traffic and new project trips. Figunes S(a)" (b) and Figures 7(a). (b), (c) show the projected A.M. and P.M. peak hour intersection turning movements, respectively, for the study intersections and the site access dhveVYays. Table 6 SU0On@riI8s the projected intersection Levels of Gen/ice and Table 6 summarizes the projected Levels nfService for the site access driveways. Ocoee Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes LOS Std Daily Capacity Projected Traffic Capacity Available? Backg'd' % Dist Project Trips Total Trips LOS Clarcona-Ocoee Road SR 429 to N. Lakewood Ave 4 E 39,800 20,421 27% 2,518 22,939 C Yes N. Lakewood Ave to Ingram Rd 4 E 39,800 15,664 32% 2,984 18,648 C Yes Lakewood Avenue SR 438 to Rewis St 2 E 17,700 10,235 14% 1,306 11,541 C Yes Reavis St to Wurst Rd 2 E 17,700 4,286 14% 1,306 5,592 C Yes Wurst Rd to Fuller's Cross Rd 2 E 17,700 6,018 21% 1,958 7,977 C Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 E 17,700 6,788 41% 3,824 10,612 C Yes Ocoee -Apopka Road Demastus Ln to Fuller's Cross Rd 2 E 17,700 10,882 7% 653 11,535 C Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd 2 E 17,700 18,822 0% 0 18,822 F No West Rd to McCormick Rd 2 E 17,700 14,275 8% 746 15,021 C Yes Wurst Road Lakewood Ave to Adair St 2 D 14,800 6,186 7% 653 6,839 C Yes Adair St to A.D. Mims Rd 2 D 14,800 6,325 13% 1,212 7,537 D Yes A.D. Mims Road Wurst Rd to Clarke Rd 2 E 15,600 6,900 10% 933 7,833 D Yes West Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to SR 429 4 D 32,400 10,615 12% 1,119 11,734 C Yes Adair Street Wurst Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 D 14,800 4,607 10% 933 5,540 C Yes Fuller's Cross Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Lakewood Ave 2 E 17,700 7,667 20% 1,865 9,532 C Yes Ingram Road McCormick Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 D 14,800 3,326 2% 187 3,512 C Yes ' Background traffic= Existing X 1.15 Ocoee Village Center Project N2 5095 Page 15 Ocoee Village Center N Project Na 5095 Projected A.M. Peak Hour_ _� Figure 6(a) Traffic Volumes s 00 t-0 122+(20)=142 Access 5 LO o rn O O o 400+(62)=462 Access 6 0) co C"I N co + S - 0+ O + LO It uD LO co C"I rY d - t --CI) P< M N C0 0 0 (14) [Fuiiers cross Rd] 113+(37)=150 Access 7 0+(4)=4 100----i N C\4 iI C, 0 0 M Legend: 000 +[000] + (000) =aaa -J Total Traffic Project Trips Pass -by Trips Background Traffic N 10 Ocoee Village Center Projected A.M. Peak Hour* Project NQ 5095 Traffic Volumes Figure 6(b) h x n h � II < (t m N o m U O + vi u>ui mm UD ce) 198+(28)=226 �-- 2208+(14)=222 .E— 669+(42)=711 37 359+(45)=404 "'III West Ra 603+(48)=651 wase Ra � � � 110+(16)=1 52 143 45� M N V K N � ` 00 14 L84+(7)=91 J )=954 � 59 •E— 788+(87)=875 Clarwna-0eoee Rd —ItD Clarcona-0eoea Rd 547 473+(56)=529 $84+(77)=961 h N 181+(35)=216 It h co N M Nin II N_ U H + CD O v N 7 a b O a 0 Q h b O 00 1100 C 4 rn I� Y °b + O �)! V � 33 t° 81+(28)=109 E-- 267+(42)=309 3 58+(28)=86 115 +FulleYs Cross Rd i Wurst Rd 360 � r 8 169+(48)=217 — --0 I 3 —> 7� corN 7� hNif3 rno cc Is N I4 N t + O h m L€arend: *Refer to Figure 8b 000 +[000] + (000) = 000 c for intersectionsnA anda ��_ Total Traffic Project Trips Pass-t>y Tnps Background Traffic N Ocoee Village Center Projected P.M. Peak Hour, .r Project NL) 5095 Traffic Volumes ._ __ Figure 7(a) a Q a ¢ a u a 0 d O tta ¢ tlIf i� + N: h (30) co [5]+(34)-39 JL4+50]+(93=477 I 0 822-[50]+(23)=795 3 [ u [10]+(14)=24 r4 919-[3]+(86)=1,002 I► 1,161-[10]+(113)=1,264 (Clercona-Ocoee Rd 991-[16]+(86)=1,061 --0 [16]+(21)=37_-4,, r 8+[2]+(33)=43' 859-[9][7]++(50(3j-9 )-4400 —> 1,146-[12]+(5)+(84)=1,223-0 [12]+(17)=29 F 1,146-[5]+(98)=1,239 —"—� [5]+(5)=10 C. t` 124+(18)=142 _ N^ co + W Q + C + N V 9 ° Y N M co N + c) of ori V a J ¢ Legend: 000 +[0010] + (000) = 000 E Total Traffic i Project Trips . I Pass -by Trips Background Traffic IL-0 (26) Access 5 m N t� CCr N o L� 411+(100)=511 0 1 Access 6 ti M M M O H U M �+ {�r CI) N C''} to N It3 G4 C4 } } N � O 0 (8) Fuller's cross Rd 217+(66)=283 !I Access 7 (14)-� 93----j �rN �j 00 c`v'n tl W � a 0 ' LO r 0 mLegend: O 000 +[000] + (OOD) = 00� Total Traffic Project Trips Pass -by Trips - Background Traffic N Ocoee village Center Projected P.M. Peak Hour* Project NQ 5095 Traffic Volumes T. Figure 7(c) Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Int# Intersection Control Time Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & West Rd Signal PM 72.2 E 65.1 E 25.6 C 20.6 C 39.7 D 2 West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signal PM 11.7 B 5.9 A - - 41.1 D 10.8 B 3 West Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signal PM 13.9 B 26.7 C 44.3 D - - 29.3 C 4 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave Signal AM 28.3 C 23.0 C 68.4 E 78.4 E 31.9 C PM 38.6 D 29.5 C 62.6 E 79.4 E 39.8 D 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd & Adair St STOP PM 8.6 A 7.6 A 38.4 D 27.7 C 11.0 B 6 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd Signal PM 102.2 F 25.4 C 66.7 E 70.1 E 68.9 E 7 Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd STOP AM ** F 174.2 F 7.9 A - - PM - PM ** F 29.9 D 3.8 A - Full AM - 8 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd AWSC PM 9.2 A 11.6 B 13.7 B 12.2 B 12.6 B ** Delay exceeds 300s Table 6 Projected Site Access Capacity Analysis Intersection Access Type Time Period EB WB NB SB Delay LOS Delay LOS Dela LOS Delay LOS Access 1 @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out RiRi AM - - - - - - 14.3 B PM - - - - - - 12.7 B Access 2 @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right iNOut AM - - - ., 16.0 C - - PM - - - - 14.8 B _ - Access 3 @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right IRIn/Out AM - - - - 15.2 C - - PM - - - 15.1 C Access 4A @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right IRiRiOut AM - - - - 15.2 C -- -C PM -- -- -- -- 14.7 B Access 4B @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out R_ AM -- - -- - -- -- 18.1 C PM - - - - - __ 16.6 C Access 5 @ Lakewood Ave Full AM - - 11.0 B - - - - PM - - 9.4 A - - - - Access 6 @ Lakewood Ave Full AM - - 41.7 E - - - - PM - - 36.0 E - - - - Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 21 Table Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis (with Improvements) Int # Intersection Control Time EB WB NB Sa Overall Period - Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signal P.M. 73.5 E 26.6 C 667 E 70.1 E 62.3 E The analysis shows that all intersections will operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service when ° Eastbound approach at [} pka Road/Fuller's Cross Road intersection —This approach ioprojected 0000arobaotLeva/of5arvimaFduebzhaavyeas1bound|efttumna and heavy southbound right turns. The project is adding zero (0) traffic to these movements. p Eastbound (\.yW./P.K8] and vv9StbOuDd (A.M.) approaches at the Lakewood Avenue/ FuUer'aCroaaRoadinbarsection—Theintansacbonoppnoouhaaapap jentadb7operote at Level OfService "F"due h}high expected background volumes aswell aSthe addition of project trips. According to the Cdv. improvements are funded at the (] oka Rood and Fuller's Cross Road intersection. The improvements consist of adding h0h[ and left turn lanes on all fou[ approaches ofthe intersection. These improvements are tobeimplemented within the next year. |Dorder tomitigate this Level ofService dEfioiencygtthe Lakewood Avenue and Fuller's Cross Rood intersection it is recommended that the intersection be improved with an All -Way Stop Control and the addition of southbound right turn lane. These improvements are expected to address the existing deficiencies as well as deficiencies expected as a result of adding project trips, Reanalyzing this intersection with these improvement resultsinsatisfactory Levels of Sen/oe, as shows in Table 7. Detailed printouts of each intersection capacity analysis are included inAppendix F. Ocoee Village Center Project Ng 5095 Turn Lane Analysis The site will beserved by five right in/out driveways nnC Road in addition to the full access utthe signalized intersection opposite Lakewood Avenue. OnLakewood Avenue, the site will be served bytwo full access driveways in addition to the full access opposite Fuller's Cross Road. A right turn lane is required and should be provided at the eastbound approach of the C|aroono- Ocoee Road/Lakewood Avenue intersection. The length of the right turn lane is recommended to be 395 feet based on deceleration distance dictated by FDOT Index 301 plus queue length from the HCS analysis. The length of the existing left tum lanes at the Avenue signalized intersection vveroevo|uatedtucheoktheiradequooytoeorvetheprojuctthpsadp 'ecL buildout as follows: Total Turn Lane Length Required = Vehicular Deceleration Distance + Queue Length Deceleration Distance: 185 ft (Based on FDOT Index 301 and 45 mph speed limit) Queue Length: Based onHCS output Total TLLength (EBU=185'+3�veh* 25 fUveh=282.5' The length of existing eastbound and westbound left turn lanes at this intersection are 285 ft and 315 ft, respectively. Tharefore, the existing eastbound left turn lane length is adequate toserve the proposed project thpsendwi||notnmmjtnbeextendod.Thevwestbound|eftturn|une|enDth will need toboextended toserve the project trips. Ocoee Village Center Project N9 5095 STUDY CONCLUSIONS This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact ofthe proposed Ocoee Village Center development in the City ofOcoee, Florida. The project is located on Lakewood AvenuaKC|armono' OcoeeRoodimmediate|ytotheeostofSR42Q.Themropomeddeveopmentcmneidsof35Omu|b- fami|yrooidonUo|unito.14Oroomhnte|und2O.O0Oaquare-#aotofrotaUnnthonorthsidonfC|anoona' OuoeeRoed.und24Otowmhomeunitaond1i5.00Oequare4eetofrebai|onthesoutheideofC|mmmno- OooeeRoud. Access to the site will be provided via access driveways on both Lakewood Avenue and Clarcona-Ocoee Road. The results of the study as documented herein are summarized below: ° The proposed development will generate adaily traffic volume of 9,326 new net daily trips of which ° The study roadway segments currently operate atsatisfactory Levels nfService. These roadway segments will continue to operate adsatisfactory Levels ofService in the projected conditions, except for the segment Ocoee -Apopka Road from Fuller's Cross Road to West Road. The daily capacity of this segment will be exceeded duo to background traffic growth. The project will not boadding any trips tuthis segment. ° The study intersections are currently operating at satisfactory Levels of Service except for the eastbound approach of the STOP -controlled intersection of Lakewood Avenue and Fuller's Cross Road, which currently operates at Level ofService ^�during the A.M.peak hour. ° The study intersections are projected to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service at the project buildout (2021) except for the eastbound approach at Ocoee -Apopka Road/Fuller's Cross Road intersection and the eastbound (A.M./P.M.) and westbound (A.M.) approaches at the Lakewood Avenue/Fuller's Cross Road Intersection. Re -analyzing these intersections with funded/ frecommendodimprovements yield satisfactory Levels ofService. These improvements include (a) implementing the funded right0efttum |unoo at Ocoee-Apopka/Fuller's Cnnoo Road and (b) converting the Two -Way Stop Control intersection of Lakewood Avenue/Fuller's Cross Road to an All -Way Stop Control and adding a southbound right turn lane and (b) adding an eastbound left turn lane at the Ocoee -Apopka Road/F|ler'uCross Road intersection. Ocoee Village Center Project Ne 5095 • At the Glarcona-Ocoee Road/Lakewood Avenue intersection, the length of the existing westbound left turn lane should be increased and an eastbound separate right turn lane added as documented herein. Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 44 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Methodology Memorandum and Correspondence RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF OCOEE'S COMMENTS 111;7190[ON 16I9_[01&1rill gym oriI*isLwl-9161 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER The following is our response to the City's review comments dated 08-28-18 concerning the Traffic Impact Study for the above -referenced project. The comment is listed in bold followed by the response. Trip Generation Please update Table 1 — Trip Generation Summary in the forthcoming TIA as follows: 1. Include an AM peak hour trip generation summary. 2. Verify the trips shown for the Multi -Family north of Clarcona-Ocoee. The rates appear consistent with latest ITE procedure, but the trips shown do not correspond with the rates shown. Update internal capture spreadsheet accordingly. Response: The A.M. peak hour analysis was included in the traffic study. Table 1 — Trip Generation Summary appear to have the number of units of the Multi -Family mistyped. The correct proposed number of multi- family units north of Clarcona-Ocoee is 350 dwelling units. The trip generation summary corresponds to the correct number of unit and therefore doesn't need to be revised. The internal capture worksheet also contains the correct proposed number of multi -family units. The typo in Table 1 will be addressed within the traffic study. Study Area Please update Table 1 — Significance Analysis in the forthcoming TIA as follows: 3. Due to recent roadway network improvements in the project area, some oof the roadway segmentation in the City's Concurrency Management System (CMS) spreadsheet should be updated in the TIA, as follows: • Update Clarcona-Ocoee Road (Fuller's Cross Road to West Road) to Clarcona-Ocoee Road (SR 429 to N. Lakewood Avenue). Refer to Orange County Station 454.9 for count data. • Update Clarcona-Ocoee Road (West Road to Ingram Road) to Clarcona-Ocoee Road (N. Lakewood Avenue to Ingram Road). Refer to Orange County Station 70.0 for count data. • Update Clarcona-Ocoee Road (Fuller's Cross Road to West Road) to Lakewood Avenue (Fuller's Cross Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road). Refer to Orange County Station 66.1 for count data. • Update West Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road) to West Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to SR 429). Refer to Orange County Station 2024 for count data. TPD# 5095 October 21, 2018 Response to Traffic Study Methodology Review Comments October 21, 2018 Ocoee Village Center TPD 5095 • Update Fuller's Cross Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road) to Fuller's Cross Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to Lakewood Avenue). Derive daily volumes from turning movement counts at the intersection of Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road and a standard K -factor. • Verify the number of lanes on each segment analyzed in the table. For example, West Road is a 4 -lane roadway. Update capacities accordingly. Response: The roadway segments were updated as per the comment and included in the traffic study. The number of lanes on the study roadway segments were verified and capacities were adjusted were applicable. 4. The following intersections should be included in the TIA for PM peak hour analysis: • Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Adair Street • Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue • SR 429 & West Road Ramps • West Road & Ocoee -Apopka Road • Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road • Lakewood Avenue & Wurst Road • Ocoee -Apopka Road & Fuller's Cross Road • Project Accesses Response: The intersections above were included in the traffic study PM peak hour intersection analysis. 5. The following intersections should be included in the TIA for AM peak hour analysis due to area school traffic: • Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue • Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road • Project Accesses Response: The intersections above were included in the traffic study AM peak hour intersection analysis. 6. A map depicting the study area segments and intersections should be included in the TIA. Consider numbering the intersections for easy reference between figures, tables, and Synchro/HCS outputs. Please provide figures showing turning movements volumes in the TIA to reduce review time. Response: The comment was addressed in the traffic study. Response 0oTraffic Study Methodology Review Comments October 21.2O18 Ocoee Village Center TPD 5095 Study Procedures l For any deficiencies identified inthe ThA.identify mitigation strategies that would provide adequate service volumes capacity on study area noodvvmym, intersections, and access points at Future Buildout of the project. Provide analysis showing these strategies one effective. Include proportionate share calculations for identified strategies if currently unfunded. Response: The comment was addressed inthe traffic study. / ( TO: Michae1RU0er, MPA City ofOcoee, FL FROM: TUFgUtDervish, P.E. DATE: August 21.2O1O RE: TbAMethodology: Ocoee Village Center TPD NQ 5095 The following information on tripgeneration/distribution and study ons is provided for your review and approval prior to the submittal of the 1nsffio study for the above - referenced ( �Propose Development The proposed development consists ofamixed-use project consisting ofresidential, hotel and retail connnnancia| uses. The site is located on Lakewood Avanue/C|oruona-Ocoee Road immediately to the 8QSt of SIR 429. Figure 1 depicts the project's Site |oCBtiOD and its one -mile impact area. Access to the site will be provided via acmaao dhvavvoya on both Lakewood Avenue and C|8rcoD@-[)CO8e Road. Figure 2 is a conceptual site plan of the development which consists of: * North ofC|aroona-DcoeeRoad 35OyWFResidential Units 14ORoom Hotel 20,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial ° South ofQarcona'OcomeRoad 24OToVvOhOrneUnits 115,000 Sq Ft Retail Cnnnnneroia| Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. Ocoee Village N Project Ns 5095 Project Location Map Figure 1 yrs N Ocoee Village Site Pla Project NQ 5095 n Figure 2 NTS Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology August 21, 2018 TPD No. 5095 Page 4 Trip Generation Utilizing data from the 1011' Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the project's trip generation was calculated as summarized in Table 1. As a mixed-use development, the project will generate internal trips estimated with the use of the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. Furthermore, the retail commercial uses will generate a portion of their trips from the existing traffic stream on adjacent roadways as pass -by trips. Subtracting the internal and pass -by trips results in new net trips to be added to the area roadways. The project is expected to generate 9,326 new net daily trips and 744 new net P.M. peak hour trips to be added to the area roadways. The trip generation, internal capture and pass -by worksheets are included in Attachment A. Table I Trip Generation Summary ITE Cod7el Land Use Size I Daily Generation P.M. Peak Hour Generation FR_a_te_T Trips Rate Enter Exit Total North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Multi -Family 330 Units 7.44 2,605 0.51 113 67 180 310 Hotel 140 Rms 8.24 1,154 0.56 40 39 79 820 Retail Commercial 20 KSF* 100.62 2,012 8.25 79 86 165 Total Trips 5,771 ----- 232 192 424 Internal Trips (18%) 1,039 ----- 42 35 77 Pass -by Trips (34%) 561 ----- 22 24 j 46 New Net Trips 4,171 168 133 301 South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Town Homes 240 Units 7.39 1,774 0.54 81 48 129 820 Retail Commercial 115 KSF* 57.49 6,611 5.24 289 314 603 Total Trips 2,385 ---- 370 362 732 Internal Trips (16%) 1,342 ---- 59 58 117 Pass -by Trips (34%) 1,888 ---- 83 89 172 New Net Trips 5,155 --- 228 215 413 Total New Net Trips 9,326 396 348 744 *KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology / August 21.2O18 i TPD No. 5O95 Page Trip Distribution Atho distribution pattern was estimated using the CUrr8DUx adopted OBOtna| Florida R8okJOa| Planning Model kCFFlPK8\. ASelect Zone Analysis (SZA) was conducted bvmodifying the 2O20 interim year model network to include o Traffic Analysis Zona (TAZ) representing the proposed project and the 0Odg|'S socio-economic data updated to reflect the pn]pOSSd project bUi|dOUL The nm distribution is included in Attachment B. This distribution was reviewed for n88SoOab|eDeSs and an adjustment was made based UpOD the site's 8CCeSS CODfigU[@tOD and local traffic patterns. The modal assigned o rather high 2296 of the project trips from C|arcVna-Ocoee Road tDQOsouth onAdair Street and then east h]VVVnGtRoad and AOMims Road. Tvve|m* percent of the project trips were re -assigned from Adair Street to Lakewood Avenue to go south and then east via Wurst Road and Silver Star Road. The modified distribution is illustrated in Figure ]. Utilizing this dimtribuUon. the projecttrips will be assigned to the study area roadways/intersections. /Study Area Roadway Segments ' The City's current TIA methodology guidelines require that the extent of the impact area include all road eoQnlento that fall within onm'n1||a of the project site and all noodvvava with a trip generation of more than 5% of the maximum service volume outside of the one -mile radius. To determine the traffic impact area for this project, o significance test was conducted as summarized in Table 2. Based upon the significance test, the highlighted segments shown in the table will be evaluated as part of the study. Those segments include those within one rn||e and those outside of one mile where project trips consume more than 596 of the segment's Intersections The following intersections are proposed bJbeincluded iDthe analysis: ° Clarcono-OcoeeRoad and West Road * GR428and West Road Ramps * West Road and Ocoee -Apopka Road � , * Lakewood Avenue and VVursdRoad a Project Entrances �popka Ave iff Q Pat !d' E 429 b Clarcons OU r I Legend: (m Percent Distribution I J�- I Ocoee Village N W,M Project NQ 5095 Trip Distribution Figure 3 Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology August 21, 2018 TPD No. 5095 Page 7 Table 2 Significance Analysis Roadway Segment Lns Adopted Daily LOS Daily Project Trips Project Trip as % of Capacity Significant at 5% Level? LOS Capacity Trip Distribution* Volume Clarcona-Ocoee Road Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd 2 E 17,700 41% 3,824 --- - ---- -- - 21.60% Yes West Rd to Ingram Rd 2 E 17,700 32% 2,974 16.86% Yes Ingram Rd to Clarke Rd 4 E 39,800 16% 1,492 315% No Lakewood Avenue SR 438 to Rewis St 2 E 17,700 14% 1,306 7.38% No Rewis St to Wurst Rd 2 A2 E 17,700 14% 1-306 7,38% No Wurst Rd to Fuller's Cross Rd E 17,700 21% 1,958 11.06% No Ocoee -Apopka Road SR 438 to Demastus Ln 2 E 17,700 7% 653 3.69% No Demastus Ln to Fuller's Cross Rd 2 E 17,700 7% 653 3.69% No Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd 2 E 17,700 0% 0 0.00% No West Rd to McCormick Rd 2 E 17,700 8% 746 4.21% No Wurst Road Lakewood Ave to Adair St 2 D 14,800 7% 653 4.41% No Adair St to A.D. Mims Rd 2 D 14,800 13% 1,212 819% Yes A.D. Mims Road Wurst Rd to Clarke Rd 2 E 15,600 10% 933 5.98% Yes Clarke Rd to Apopka -Vineland Rd 2 E 15,600 8% 746 4.78% No West Road Ocoee -Apopka to Clarcona-Ocoee 2 D 14,800 27% 2,518 17.01% Yes Adair Street Wurst Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 D 14,800 10% 93=3- 6.30% Yes SR 438ISilver Star Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Bluford Ave 2 E 17,700 2% 187 1.06% No Bluford Ave to Ocoee -Hills Rd 2 E 17,700 8% 746 4.21% No Ocoee -Hills Rd to Clarke Rd 2 E 17,700 8% 746 421% No Fuller's Cross Road Ocoee -Apopka to Clarcona-Ocoee 2 E 17,700 20% 1,865 10.54% Yes Ingram Road McCormick Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 D 14,800 2% 186 1,26% No -Hignest uistribution on the Segment Ocoee Village Center Tk\K88thDdO|Dgy ' August 21.2O18 < TPD No. 5095 Page Study Procedures The procedures contained in the City's Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Outline will be followed in the preparation of the traffic study which will involve: °Roadway Segment Analysis — The study roadways will be analyzed for existing and projected conditions by comparing the daily traffic volumes on the segments with the corresponding capacities at the adopted LOS. * |O[e[S8CtOO Analysis — The intersections will be 8D8|VZed for existing and projected conditions during the P.M. peak hour utilizing HCS and/or Synchro Software. �Existing doily traffic volumes will be obtained from the Citv. County and FOOT as available. EXSUDg P.M. p88h hour volumes will be DDU8Ctgd in the field during the 4-6 P.M. peak hour and adjusted as per FDOT seasonal factors. Projected traffic volumes will bedetermined bvcombining background traffic with project trips. Background traffic will be estimated by applying growth factors determined from historical trends analysis of daily traffic volumes on the study roadways. 0 Access Driveway Analysis — The proposed driveway will be evaluated with respect to overall geometry, turn lanes and traffic controls. 0 Traffic Report — A traffic report will be prepared summarizing the study procedures, analyses and results. ATTACHMENT Trip Generation Sheets Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 29 Avg. Num, of Dwelling Units: 168 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle i rip Generation per DweJung unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.32 4.45-10.97 1.31 Data Plot and Equation 5,000 4,00 Lu 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 x x x x x x x x XX 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site - Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 R'= 0.96 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition 0 Institute of Transportation Engineers Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 50 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 187 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle I rip Generation per Dweinng unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.56 0.18-1.25 0.16 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 WE: .2 1` 300 11 F- 200 100 x X X on X X xx _'x x XX X" X X X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site - Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - 0.02 R1= 0.86 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Hotel (310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 6 Avg. Num. of Rooms: 146 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting venicle i rip Generation per Koom Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.36 5.31 -9.53 1.86 Data Plot and Equation 2,500 2,000 1,000 500 O1 C 50 100 150 X = Number of Rooms X Study Site - Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 11.29(X) - 426.97 200 250 300 - - - - Average Rate W-- 0.92 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition * Institute of Transportation Engineers Hotel (310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 28 Avg. Num. of Rooms: 183 Directional Distribution: 51 % entering, 49% exiting Venicie i rip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.60 0.26 - 1.06 0.22 Data Plot and Equation 400 X 300 U) W -X X X. 200 X X 100 x x x xx X X X 00 100 200 300 400 Soo X = Number of Rooms X Study Site - Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.75(X) - 26.02 R1= 0.80 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 100OSq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 147 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 453 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.75 7.42 - 207.98 16.41 Data Plot and Equation 60,OOC 40,000 w 1 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 x xx X x X x X x x Ix X X x X I xx x I x I x '- X x xx XX X X XX X>< XX x x XN X�xx I xx XYX >w x ,x x >&, I " x XX x 0 500 1,000 1,500 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site - Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 R2= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition e Institute of Transportation Engineers Shopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 261 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 327 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.81 0.74-18.69 2.04 Data Plot and Equation 8,0( 6,0( 2,00 0 x 0 x x x X x O x Xx x x x x x X X,e X x X$x e x x x x X0 x x x x x xx x x x 0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site - Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) + 2.89 R= 0.82 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation—Tool Project Name: Ocoee Village/North Part Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Organization: TPD Project Location: Orange County Performed By: TPD Scenario Description: Full Buildout Date: 8/3/2018 Analysis Year: Projected Checked By: TPD Analysis Period: P.M. Street Peak Hour Date: 8/3/2018 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Table I -P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Land Use Development Data (For lnfbrma6on Only) ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Office A!l Person -Trips Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 235 Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Residential Retail 820 20 KSF 165 79 86 Restaurant 0 Office Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 Residential 220 3501 DU 179 113 66 Hotel 310 140 Rooms -6see 84 43 41 All Other Land 0 22 4 428 235 193 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Veh. OCC.4 % Transit % Non -Motorized Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Exiting Trips Veh. OCC.4 % Transit % Non -Motorized Office A!l Person -Trips Retail 235 Restaurant Internal Capture Percentage Cinema/Entertainment 16% Residential Retail Hotel Cinema/Entertainment All Other Land Uses2 Hotel Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Zn, Retail Restaurant iCinema/Entertainment lResidential lHotel W11IN—W" maw, Table 5-P: Computations Summary Land Use Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Total Entering Origin (From) A!l Person -Trips 428 235 Destination (To) Internal Capture Percentage 18% 16% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 197 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 00 0 0 0 22 4 Restaurant 0 0 f 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 8 0 0 2 Hotel 0 2 0 T -o Table 5-P: Computations Summary Land Use I Total Entering Exiting A!l Person -Trips 428 235 193 Internal Capture Percentage 18% 16% 20% N/A N/A Residential 19% External Vehicle -Tri ss MLLF 197 155 JExtemal Trans" Trips6 0 0 0 lExtemal Non -Motorized Tri s6 0 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages byLandUse Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office N/A N/A Retail 13% 30% Restaurant N/A N/A Cinema[Entertainment N/A N/A Residential 19% 15% Hotel 14% 5% 'Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 'Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator- 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non -motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual), 'Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table I -P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be 'Vehicle -trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P. 6Person-Trips *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Toot Project Name: Ocoee Village/South Part Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix` Organization: TPD Project Location: Orange County Performed By: TPD Scenario Description: Full Buildout Date: 8/21/2018 Analysis Year: Projected Checked By: TPD Analysis Period: P.M. Street Peak Hour Date: 8121/2018 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Table 1-P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix` Land Use Development Data (For Information Only) ITE LUCs' Quantity Units Office All Person -Trips Estimated Vehicle -Trips' 371 Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Residential Retail 820 115 KSF 603 289 314 Restaurant 0 Officey';i')a."'•; Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 Residential 220 240 DU 130 82 48 Hotel 0 0 All Other Land Uses? 0 38 0 733 371 362 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Veh.000.4 %Transit %Non -Motorized Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix` Exiting Trips Veh.000.4 %Transit %Non -Motorized Office All Person -Trips Retail 371 Restaurant Internal Capture Percentage Cinema/Entertainment 16% Residential Retail Hotel Cinema/Entertainment All Other Land Uses? Hotel Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (Pram) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant CinematEntertainment Residential Hotel Officeiu 3 u Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment ResidentialHotel qw; mss. Table 5-P: Computations Summary Land Use Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix` Total Entering Origin (From) All Person -Trips 733 371 Destination (To) Internal Capture Percentage 16% 16% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Officey';i')a."'•; 313 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 0 0 0 38 0 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 F r T: 0 0 Residential 0 20 0 0 „ 1, ” 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 K71,7777----:'' Table 5-P: Computations Summary Land Use Entering Trips Total Entering Exiting All Person -Trips 733 371 362 Internal Capture Percentage 16% 16% 16% N/A N/A Residential 46% External Vehicle -Tri ss 617 313 304 Extemai Transit -Tri se �± 0 0 0 External Non -Motorized Tri sfi 0 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office N/A NIA Retail 7% 12% Restaurant N/A N/A Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A Residential 46% 42% Hotel N/A N/A 'Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. ?Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 'Enter trips assuming no transit or non -motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual). "Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be Vehicle -tri s computed using the modes lit and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P. 6Person-Trips 'indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 a a � Trip Distribution 5095 Ocoee Village Trip C'--,ution 0 2 0 C1 U) 0 0 1 1 0 Ck 0 0 12 15 13 cb 16 16 o Y CD Co 0 0 -44 43 19 N CD C:I .12 1 20 808 1 CD C 0 3 5 0 %D 3 aC) 0 C� ti 2 ri 0 120 17 0 13\ 13 15 -IS !L6CD C. 0 0 CD, o Q, 3 3 x 0 k C) 0 0 'Ir W 0 0 C) z --o 0 '0 Q) 0 5 5 5 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 0 0 3 30 0 C) C) 0 3 3, 0 0 0 0 r,j 5 'y 0 0 0 0 C:\FSUTMS\D5\CFRPMV61-Daily\Base\CF-2020\P5095\Output\HWYLOAD-C20.NE-F Csookp CFRPM 2020 Model Year (Licensed to Traffic Planning and Design) ♦ > • CMS Database TABLE 1 OCOEE ROAD CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Traffic Volumes and Capacities by Road Segments Overall Summary Last Updated: 4126/2013 Roadway Segment Llmite Atloptetl No. of Jurisdiction Dally Volumes (VPD) FDOT LOS Ca sallies Segment (From -To) LOS Lanes Existing Vested Combined 2012 Numerical Capacity (VPb} 2012 Counts LOS Adj Minus Minus %Used %Available %Used %Available LOS Threshold Existln Combinad ExfsUng Existing Combinad Combfisd A.D. Mims Rd Work Rd/Clarkee- E 2 Orange Co. 6,900 557 7,457 Clarke Rd/A o ka-Vineland Rd E 2 2 2 Orange Co. Ocoee Ocoee 6,900 2,189 557 7,457 2,189 15,600 15,60D 14,800 15% 15% 15% 13,260 13,260 12,580 6,360 6,360 10,381 5,803 5,803 10,391 52% S2% 77% 48% A8% 83% 56% 56% 17% 44% 44% 83% Adair St Wurst Rd/Clarcona-Ocoee Rd D Apopka -Vineland Rd A.D. Mims Rd/Hack- -Prairie Rd E Hack- -Prairie Rd/Clercona-Ocoee Rd E 2 4 Ocoee Ocoee 12,900 12,900 444 - 13,344 12,900 17,700 17,700 15% 15% 15,045 15,045 2,745 2,145 1,701 2,145 86% 86% 14% 14% e9% 88% 17% 14% Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. to SR 50 D SR SD to Mont oma Ave O 2 2 Ocoee Oran a Co. 8,800 3175 6,886 104 8,904 3175 32,400 74800 10% i5% 29,180 12,680 20,380 9,466 20,256 0,466 30% 25% 70% 75% 31% 25% 69% 76% eluicra Ava Ofd Winter Garden Rd, to SR 50 O S.R. 50/Geneva St D 2 FDO7 382 7,487 74,800 15% 12 589 6 895 5,573 53% 47% 56% 4q% Geneva S1/Orlando Rd D 2 Ocoee 8806 439 Q345 14,800 16% 12,580 3,674 3,235 71% 29% 74% 26% Orlando Rd 2;K,, St D 2 Ocoee 8,906 351 9,257 14 800 15% 12,580 3,674 3 323 71% 24% 74% McKe SUS. R. 438 D 2 8,806 642 9,548 14,800 15% 12,580 3,674 3,032 71% 29% 76% Bowness Rd Kissknmee Ave/S. R. 438 D Ocoee 8,906 532 9,438 14,80D 15% 12,580 3,674 3,142 71% 29% 75% 12� Citrus OaksAve Old Winter Garden Rd. to SR 50 D 2 2 2 Ocoee Ocoee Oren 11,280 2,993 1,102 - 12,382 2993 14,800 14,800 15% 15% 12,580 12,580 1,300 9,587 198 9,587 40% 24% 10% 78% 98% 24% 7% Clercona-Ocoee Rd FUBar,i Cross Rd/ West Rd E West Rd/In ram Rd E 2 eCo. Ocoee 4,515 3,500 8,015 17,700 15% 15,045 10,530 7,030 30% 7D% 53% 47% 47% In ram it/ Clarke Rd E 6,500 3,500 L0000 17,700 15% 15,045 8,545 5,045 q3% 67% 66% Clarke Rd/A,Whi Rd/Apopka-Vineland Rd E R 4 FDOT Ocoee Oran eCo. 8500 8 082 21,268 2,713 3 869 9,213 71 951 39,800 39 800 15% 15% 338 30 33 830 27330 25 748 24,617 21,879 t9% 24% 8t% 76% 27% 35% 73% 85% Clarke Rd S.R. SPM/hite Rd D White Rd/S.R. A38 D _q 4 Oran Co. 2,482 23744 398W 10% 35820 14562 12,080 59% 47% 66% 34% Mims Rd D 4 a 26,003 2,610 28,613 39,800 10% 35,820 9,817 7,207 73% 27% 80% 20% A.D. Mims Rd/Hack- -Prairie Rd D 2 Orange Co. 13,671 4,117 17,788 39,800 10% 35,820 22,149 18,D32 38% 62% 50% 50% Hackne -Phil- Rd/Ch rcons-Ocoee Rd D 2 Orange Co. 8,619 6,207 14,826 17,700 15% 15,045 6,426 219 57% 43% 99% 1% East Croom Point Rd SR 4381 Palm Or O 2 2 2 4 Orange Co. FDOT Ocoee Ocoee Oran a Co. 8,619 5,521 6,500 8,687 20 874 5,638 1,311 174 14,157 5,521 7817 81751 17,7DD 14 1300 17,700 14,800 15% 15% 15% 10% 15,045 12,580 15,045 13,320 6,426 7,059 8,545 4,733 888 7,059 7,234 4,559 57% 44% 43% 64% d3% 56% 57% 38% 84% 44% 52% 66% 6% 56% 48% 34% Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka/Clercona-Ocoee E Gonave St Rd/Blulord Rd D Good Homes Rd Oitl Willer Garden RdlEast-Wast Ex E Old East-West Ex /S.R. 50 E A Orn eCo. 20874 B9 -20063 39,800 10% 35 820 14 946 14 867 58% 42% 59% 41% S,R. 5016alboe Dr. E 2 Orn eCo. 12794 194 40 27089 39,800 10% 35,820 14,946 14,752 58% 42% 59% 47% Balboa DrANhhe Rd E 2 Oran Co. 12,794 12834 17,700 10% 15,930 3,138 3,096 80% 20% 81% 19% Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarke Rd/A o ka-Vlneiarrd Rd D 2 2 a Ocoee Ocoee 1,059 7,059 40 641 12 834 1,700 17 700 14,800 15% 15% 15,045 12,580 2,251 11,521 2,211 10,880 85% 8% /5% 92% 85% 14% 15% 86% Hempls Ave Gotha Rd/Old Winter Garden Rd E Ingrain Rd McCormick Rd/Clercona Ocoee Rd d 2 2 2 Ocoee Ocoee Oran eCo. 1,452 815 2,200 - - 7,059 8150 1,452V177700 14,804 0 15% 15% 15% 12,580 12,580 12,580 5 521 11,128 11,765 5 527 11,128 11,765 56% t2% 6% 44% 88% ed% 56% 12% 6% q4% 88% 94% Shares Rtl S.R. 438/A.O. Mims Rd O KisJohsi Kissimmee Ave Bowness Rd/McKe St D Lakewood Ave S.R. 438/Revgs St E 2 FOOT 322 2,5220 15% 12,580 10,380 10,058 17% 83% 20% 80% Rewis StANurst Rd E 2 FDO7 6 319 436 6,755 15% 16,045 8,726 8,290 42% 58% 45% 55% Wurst RrllFuller's Cross Rd E 2 2 Dec.. Oran eCo. 5 592 3,588 70 003 296 864 5,807 4,462 16% 15% 16,045 16,045 9,453 11 457 9,758 10,593 3T% 24% 83% 76% 30% 30% 61% 70% Maguire Rd Gotha Rd/Roberson Rd p Roberson Rd/1'om nRd O A OrangeCo. 237 10,2400 10% 15 939 _ 5 927 5,690 63% 37% 64% 36% Tom n Rd/Old Wnter Garden Road D 4 Oran 27,280 4,417 31,7070 10% 35,820 8530 4,113 76% 24% 89% 11% Oltl Winter Garden RoadtS.R. 50 D 4 a Co. 27,290 6,017 33,307 10% 35,820 8,530 2,513 76% 24% 93% 7% S.R. 501Marsha11 Farms Rd D 4 Oran eCo. 27,280 4,246 31,536, 10% 35,820 8,530 4,284 78% 24% 88% 12% Marshall Farms Rd/Stly Rd/StRd D Orange Co. 12,148 7,881 14,029 39,800 10% 35,820 23,672 21,791 34% 66% 39% 61% Sto Rd/ Kissimmee Ave D 2 2 2 2 Change Co. Orange Co. FDOT Ocoee 12,148 12,148 3,943 3 367 2,151 1,401 313 14,299 13,549 4 56 17,700 17,700 14 800 15% 15% 15% 15,045 15,045 12,580 2,897 2,897 8,637 746 1,496 8 324 81% 81% 31% 19% 19%= 88% 95% 90% 34% 5% 74% 66% Marshall Farms Rd S.R. 501Ma uira Rd O McCormick Rd Ocoee o ka Rd/ In rin Rd O In rm Rd/ Apopka -Vineland Rd D 2 Ocoee 273 S,B60 14,860 16% 12,580 9 193 8 920 27% 73% 29% 71% McKey Sl Kissimmee Ave/Bluford Ave E 2 Ocoee 3,087 273 3,354 14 000 16% 12,680 9 499 9,226 24 % 78% 27% 73% Montgomery Rd Blackwood Ave/While Rd D 2 8,800 10 8,810 14,800 16% 12,580 3,780 3,770 70% 30% 70% 30% Moore Rd Ma uira Rd/ 7th Ave D Ocoee 2,407 - 2,407 14800 t6% 72,580 10,173 16,173 1986 81% 19% 81% Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 438lFlewellin St D 2 2 Ocoee FDOT 6,769 264 7,433 14,800 15% 12,580 5,811 5,547 54%M28%70% % 44% Ocoee -Apopka Rd S.R. 438! Demaslus Ln E 2 Orn eCo. 2,680 10,975 2,680 14,800 16% 12,580 9,900 9,900 21% 79%-21% 79% Demaslus Ln/Fullers Cross Rd E 2 Orn eCo. 10,975 2,555 2,967 13,530 13,942 17,700 15% 15,045 4,070 1,515 73%% 10% Fullers Cross Rd/ West Rd E 2 Orn a Co. 10,975 3,838 14,813 17,700 17,700 15% 15,045 4,070 1,103 73%% 7% West Rill McCarmiok Rd E 2 4 Ocoee Ocoee 8,476 2D 847 3,836 12,314 17704 15% 15% 15,045 75,045 4,070 6,569 232 2,731 73%% 56% 2% 7B% Old Winter Garden Rd Ma uira Rd/ Blufard Ave E BlutoM Ale/ Blackwood Ave E 4 Ocoee 12,740 33,587 398 00 70% 35 820 14,973 2 233 SB% 8% Ave/Hem la Ave E 4 Ocoee 2567A 23,442 2,598 2,829 28273 26,271 39,800 39.800 10% 35820 10,746 7,547 72%% 27%Blackwood ".I .,,., a vim- oan� sc%L_ 73%1 27%1 Community Development Department Planning Division 1/2 TABLE, 1 OCOEE ROAD CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Traffic Volumes and Capacities by Road Segments Overall Summary Last Updated: 412512013 Roadway Segment Limits Adopted No.of Jurisdiction Dally Volumes (VPD) FOOT LOS Capaaitlea Segment (From -To) LOS Lanes Exkting Vested Combined 2072 Numerics) Minus Capacity (VAD) -AV Hem is Ave/CIVUs Oaks AveE 2012 Counts LOS AdJ LOS Threshold Existing Minus Combined %Used Existing Existing F% Used Comblhad % ailsble Combined Citrus Oaks Ave/Good Hamas Rd E 4 4 2 Ocoee FOOT Orange Co. FDOT 22,693 23,078 4,405 259 52 22,952 23,078 4,457 39,800 10% 39,800 10% 14,800 10% 35,820 35,820 13,320 13 127 12,742 8,915 12,888 12,742 8,863 63% 64% 33% 37% 36% 67% 64% 64% 33% 36% 36% 67% Orlando Ave Bluford Ave to Mont oma Ave Reavis St Lakewood Ave/Fl-Ifing St D Roberson Rd Windarmare Rd/Ma uire Rd D 2 2 Orange Co. FOOT 1,071 11,640 21 1,180 1,092 12,820 14,600 10% 17,700 10% 13,320 15,930 12,249 4,290 12,228 3,110 8% 73% 92% 27% 8% 80% 92% 20% Russell Dr Fleweiimn StW,llow Creak Rd D S.R. 438 {Sllverstar Road) E. Cmwn Point Rd/ SR 429 E 2 FOOT 1,131 1,137 14,800 70% 13,320 72,189 12,189 8% 92% 8% 92% SR 4291 Bowness Rd E 2 FDOT 15,700 12700 1,414 17114 17,700 5% 16,815 1,115 299 B3% 7% 702% -2% Rawness Rd/Ocoee-A o ka Rd E 2 FDOT 12700 1,414 2,140 14,N4 17,744 6% 16815 4,115 2701 76% 24% 84% 16% Ocoee -A o ka Rd/BWfam Ave E 2 FDOT 14,000 2,548 14,840 17,700 5% 16,815 4,115 1975 78% 24% 86% 12% Blutord Ave/Ocoee-Hilts Rd E 2 FDOT 16,500 712 10,548 17,212 17,700 5% 16 a15 2,815 267 83% 77% 98% 2% Ocoee -Hills Rd/Clarke Rd E 2 FOOT 16,500 344 17,700 5% 16,816 315 (397 98% 2% 102% -2% Clarke Rd/Johio Shores Rd E 4 FDOT 21,500 16,844 17,700 5% 16,8(5 315 29 98% 2% 102% 0% Johio Shares Rd/Good Homes Rd E 4 4 FDOT FDOT 25,500 153 398 21,653 25,898 39,800 0% 39,800 0% 39,800 39,800 18,300 14,300 18,147 13,802 54% 6+1% 46% 36% 54% 65% 46% 35% .R. 50 (West Colonial Dr. 9th S11 SR 429 D SR 429! Mar Marshall Farms Rd D 4 FOOT 44,D00 982 44,982 49,900 art len 49,900 5,900 4,918 88% t2% 9D% 10% Marshall Farms Rd/Ma uue Rd O 4 FDOT 44,000 2,941 46,941 49,BD0 artiplan 48,800 5,800 2,959 88% 12% 94% 6% Ma uire Rdl Blufom Ave D 4 FDOT 32,500 32,500 3,181 1936 35,681 49,900 art Ian 49,900 17400 14219 88% 35% 72% 26% Word Ave/Blackwood Ave Q 4 FDOT 34,000 1,794 34,436 49,906 ad kn 49,800 17400 15464 65% 3S% 69% 31% Blackwood Rd D 4 FDOT 34,000 35,194 54300 art Isn 54,300 20,300 19,106 63% 37% 65% 35% Clarke ftd/Good Homos Rd .odHome D FDOT 1,274 35,274 54,300 ad Ian 54,300 20,300 19,026 63% 37% 65% 35% Good Homes Rd/ A o ka-Vineland Rd D _4 4 2 FOOT Ocoee 27,500 27,000 622 186 28,122 27,186 54,300 adpism 54,300 artlen 54,300 54,300 26,800 27,300 26,178 27,114 51% 50% 49% 50% 52% 50% 481 50% Story Rd 91h Stf SR 429 E SR 4291 Kissimmee Ave E 2 2 2 Ocoee Ocoee FDOT 9,770 9,770 8,8D0 5,610 194 206 121 9,964 9,976 8,921 17,700 10% 17,700 10% 14,800 10% 15,930 15,830 13,320 8 ,160 6,160 4,520 5,966 5,954 4,388 61% 61 % 66% 39% 39% 34% 63 63% % 67% 37% 37% 339 Taylor St Franklin SUMcke St D Tomyn Blvd Robarstan Rd/ Warrior Rd D Warrior Rd/Ma Maguire Rd D 2 2 2 FDOT Omn a Co. Oran Co, 5,403 3 941 80 449 5,690 5,852 3,947 17,700 1p% 17,770 10% 14 800 iD% 15,830 15,883 13 320 70,320 10,590 9 379 10240 10141 9 379 36% 34% 30% 65% 66% 7Q% 36% 37% 30% 64% 63% 70% West Rd Ocoee -A o ke Rtl/ Ciarcana-Ocoee Rd D Whits Rd (Orlando Ave.) Mont oma Rd/ Clarke Rd D Clarks Rd/Good Homos Rd D 2 a Oran Co. 6.602 7 6,609 14,800 10% 13,320 6 718 6,717 50% 50% 50% 50% Worst Rd Lakewood Ave/Adair St D 2 a Oran Orange 0,734 4 6,736 14,800 10% 13,320 6,580 6,502 51 % 49% 57% 49% Adair St/A.D. Mims Rd D 2 Co. 0-g.Co. 5,147 10,975 10 472 5,157 11,447 14,800 10% 14,804 10% 13,320 73,320 8,173 2,345 8,163 1,873 39% 82% 01%' 18% 39% 86% 61% 14% Community Development Department Planning Division 212 MEM Intersection Vo)unlem/F[}OTFactors and Signal Timings 1.5 MINUTE TURNIN 'OVEMENTCOUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 ......... ..... Ocoee Apopka Rd .................. ...... .................... . .. . . ......................... i L ........................ Ocoee Apopka Rd ... ..................... . ... . ....................... ...................... West Rd West Rd TIME BEGIN L NORTHBOUND fll SOUTHBOUND NIS ...... ............................ EASTBOUND . .................. w - . . . .................. . ... ESTBOUND . . ...................... E/W IGRAND T I R -turnj TU— TOTAL L I T I R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L T I R 11 -turn TOTA�L L I T I R U-turnFTO—TALITOTALI,,TOTAL 04:00 PM 22 ---- 63 5 0 _�O 29 125 —12-2 19 0 173 -- 263 30 37 29 5 101 5 25 20 0 04:15 PM 19 58 m 0 87 j5— — 2-0 —0—i67 —i54 il— 4-5 35 6 11-7 7 32 50 1 51 —�83 414 04:30 PM 2 6 65 10 0 —0 101 32 142 22 0 196 297 3 2 42 29 10 113 10 27 0 437 04:45 PM 40 -iO7 91 7 -- 13-8 —j-57-- — 30 0 -- --iO7 — 345 — 34 _ 46 - 0— —6 — — 32 20 0 —0 62 —io- 175 472 TOTAL 77 —�2 416 106 546 91 0 743 1,159 127 170 123 27 116 447 6 22 186 531 28 131 89 0 248 695 1,854 05:00 Pm —6-5 33 80 5 0 118 19 -�5 143 31 0 193 311 63 46 34 5 148 7 40 9 -.15 P M —65 3-4 87 3 0 i24 —ilS —T 62 31 0 2 8 218 342 342 —37 35 32 10 14 15 36 0 56 204 --i—gg— 515 —�3-0- 30 PM i5 —13— 66 14 0 —11 —0 --T36 7 il 0 1 84 18 299 299 X81,257 ---- 24 35 42 6 — 107 12 1 J234 34 0 7-4 — 05:45 PM 6-8 --�0-1— —13 11-2 —T 3-6 — 132 ---- 25 —0 1 93 193 305 305 37 ---- 38 40 12 127 14 1 44 6-9 — 176 — 475 TOTAL 135 - 0 —9 6 —To— 7 —T— 73 —To -8 —0 7 88 1 5 161 — 0 !�0-3 5 2,023 PM Peak Peak Hour 04:45 P M to 05:45 P1 MF 142T-3 0 495 91 598 E 1173 T( 802 1,297 158 52 i�2:[ F �77( 269 754 2,051 PM 1 113 598 91 0 ............................ ........... Ll ............. PM W ....... 152 West Rd le 40 27 ... ....................... ..................... ... ........... ........ . . ......................... . . ....................... C� 0 West Rd ....... ilk ............ Pm77 ----------------------- 714:2 0 324 29 PM 15 MIN.UTE TURNIP JOVEMENTCOUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Ocoee Apopka Rd .......... ......... . ................. --- .................... .. . .. . ...... . ................. L .................... Ocoee Apopka Rd _7 ..................... -- . . ................. . .................. West Rd West Rd TIMENORTHBOUND 1 9 SOUTHBOU ND N/S .................... ......................... EASTBOUND ..... . ....... ............ I --- . . .................. .... . ................ . .. WESTBOUND ................... EfW BEGIN L T � R U-turn OTAL I T L L T I R u—t-u-rn-T—ToTAL I TOTALI L I T R !U-�tur:n �TOTA L I L T R JU-turn7TOTAL TOTAL IGRAND TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 2 1 0 3 —0 0 0 0 1 1 — 0 1 4 1 b - 0 04:15 PM 1 1 0 2 —0 1 ---- 0 0 1 3 1 —1 —1 —0 —0 —0- --2-- —0 64 3 —OP M —1 —1 —1 —0 3 0 1 1 0 2 5 —0-1 —2 —0 —0 04:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 TOTAL 3 5 2 0 10 0 -0 0 4 14 2 3 2 —TI Lu 0 7 0 3 1 0 4— 25 05:00 PM --05�15PM 0 1 0 b 1 —1 —0 1 0 0 0 1 - 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 —1 —0 —2 4 0 —0 —0 —0 7 30 PM —0-0 —1 —0 2 —0 —0 —2 —3 0 0 05:45 PM 0 o 0 —D —o--- 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 TOTAL - 3 0 0 4 2 3 1 0 6 10 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 6 16 PM Peak 04:45 PM to 05.45 RIM 0 5 - 1 LEL9=20� +h IAL I.S.. MINUTE TURNIf JOVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: SR 429 SB Ramp & West Rd COUNTY: Orange Countv LONGITUDE: 0 .................... . . . ...... ............. . . ............ ...... . .. . . . ..................... L . .. ................ SR 429 SB Ramp . ..................... . . ................... - ......................... ........ West Rd ................. . ............................. : West Rd TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHIMND N/S EASTBOUND . ...................... .......... ............. . . . . ................... . . ... . ...................... WESTBOUND . .......... .............. . .. [-E/W GRANDI BEGIN L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L --F T R U-turn TOTAL L T I R U-turn TOTAL'TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 E, 0 20 20_ 0 90 24 0 114 71 118 0 0 189 3 - 03 323 04:15 PM 0 0 E 0 0 0 13 0 1 2 12 0 25 iS _ 0 93 27 0 -j--- 20 �7 134 0 —0 331 iS —6 04:30 PM -EO 0 0 0 0 01 17 0 0 10 10 0 27 27 0 81 27 0 108 83 —i35 0 0 --�i—jg 326 353 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 -] 13 0 15 0 28 28 0 114 27 0 141 78 142 0 0 220 361 389 TOTAL - 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 43 0 100 100 0 378 105 0 483 309 529 0 0 838 1,321- -1,421 05:00 PM - -�Sl 0 0 0 —0-0 0 0 —0 14 0 —0 17 0 31 31 0 137 26 0 163 67 149 0 0 216 379 410 5 PM 0 0 1-4 9 19 0 33 33 0 121 34 0 -5— --�—q -T3 —4 —0 —0 -8 --i6 213 i0i 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 20 0 35 5 E35 0 137 33 0 170 79 140 0 0 219 389 424 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 5 5 0 18 18 1 18 0 100 31 0 131 53 154 0 0 207 338 356 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 61 0 117 0 495 124 0 619 278 577 0 0 855 1,474 1,591 PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: L K. '-�l�,4971�,624 5.958 v "o 04'.45 PM to 05:45 303 565 0 �0 868 Southbound INUI LF) -- il PM 71 0 56 0 5� + ........................... le 14, Ll 0 565 West Rd ............. . ............... ...... . . . ................. ... . . ............ .......... .......................... ..................... C; 303 0 0 t�l West Rd rk 0 509 ............ PM ......................... D 0 0 T7 0 PM North ound DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) LOCATION: SR 429 SB Ramp & West Rd ................ ..... ................. . . ... I TIME NORTHBOUND _aIGIN L T R U-turn] TOTAL11 L 15 MINUTE TURNI DVEIVIENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY: Apopka COUNTY: Orange County SIR 429 S13 Ramp West Rd .... . ............. I ......... . ....... SOUTHBOUN�D N/S EASTBOUND I I T I R I U_t7,11 �TOTAL TOTALI L I T U-turnITOTAL11 LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 West Rd ............ . ........................... . . ........................... ....... ...... WESTBOUND L I T I R I U-turnTT7O7TAdL E/W TOTAL SRANDI ITOTALl 04:00 PM —64 0 —0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 —0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 8 9 15 PM — 0 0 0 �0 0 jo 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 5 3 ;52 0 T7 0 8 10 2 04:30 PM— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJE 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 — 5 0 — 0 — 7 —�-- 1 -- 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 4 2 ' 0 u 0 6 10 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 9 3 0 12 20 —i7: 0 27 39 43 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 5 8 9 05:15 PM --- 0 0 —0 0 0 1 0 flo 0 0 ---H— 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 *1 —3 0 0 0 —3 7 7 65 �30PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7T 0 0 0 0 ��o — 1 1 0 '10 — 6 —0- —0 —0— 0 1 05AS PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 0 - 1 0 - 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 3 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0) 1 2 2 0 1 - —5 --3-� —() :::8:] 7 3 0 0 10 18 20 . PM Peak 04:45 P M to 05:45 PM 0 0 i F26T728 �' 3 v 15 MINUTE TURNIK i.OVEMENT.COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: SR 429 NB Ramp & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 SR 429 NB Ramp ............... .......................... . .......... . . . .................. ..... . . . .................... . . . ............................................ . West Rd West Rd TIMENORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND N/S . .......................... - . . ................ EASTBOUND .......... -- ........................ - . .................... . . .. ........................ ....... BEGIN L T R I U- ALI L I T I �R�uturn TOTALITOTAL L T WESTBOUNI: 04:00 PM 31 1 0 74 0 — 1 R R -T47'15 —PM 53 4 89 0 105 —f4 —6 0 —0 0 —0 0 0 0 —0 0 —0 10*5 10 95 — 0 LOO 0 105 -iO6 0 154 9 0 163 268 373 -�430 PM 45 1 los 0 —1 —0 —0 1 4Ar6 1 0 0 0 -T6-0 1-6 —0 --ig-2 — -0�4S PM 47 0 88 —0 --i 3 —5 —0 —0 51 0 9-9 —0 17-2 —72 —8 —0 -i—go _j7_9 430 TOTAL 176 1 5 356 —0 13E 5 0 0 127 0 1-3 — 0 --jS—S —3�1-2- 447 - -.38 399 1 0 0 43-7 - --- --- — - 1,678 05:00 PM -6�-�15PM ' 103 0 153 -i-3-7 0 —0 0 —0 0 0 0 153 11 9 5E0 0 106 0 --6-S- 46 2 89 0 0 0 —0 —f3-7 —13 —0 167 21 0 188 294 447 30—PM �1— 0 9-5 — 0 136 0 0 — 0 - 100 0 —0 —i-8— 0 167 17 0 194 297 434 05:45 PM- — 55 0 —18 —0 17-3 —0 —o —0 0 —0 0 —0 136 10 88 0 —0 0 177 0 194 292 428 TOTAL 791 —3, 0 599 — 17-3 — ---A 12 116 0 0 170 298 471 — —2 —0() 0 0 59 46 399 - 0 - 0 736 1,181 1,780 PM Peak 05:00 PM to Peak Hour Factor: r 0.94s 06:00 Pl. �0� 0 0 �445 �0 �665� 71 0 736 1,1181 1,780 go Southbou-n-7- J'JL)l Lr PM 0 0 0 0 + .................... ...... Ll ----- - ............ PM - - ---------- 665 WeSt Rd 0 0 . .................. .................... . ......... .......... . . . ....................... ..................... . ............. C� --- b- 46 vvesr HT 399 0 ------------- PMca -77=1 IT, ------- - --------------- 0 191 3 405 1 PM 15 MINUTE TURNIK AOVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: SR 429 NB Ramp & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 ............... S.R .. 42 . 9 N.. B R . a ..m.p ... .... ....... ... ... ... . . . . .................... I . .............. . . . . ................... . . . ................... ...... . ................ . ......... . . ....................... West Rd West Rd TIME NORTHBOUND -- 0 SOUTHBOUND - I N/S . . . . ................. . ..... EASTBOUND ........................ .......... .............. T— .. . . ..................... - . . . .................... -- WESTBOUND ................... GRANDI BEGIN L T R U -tum I TOTAL I L I T I R U-turn I TOTAN TOTAL I L I T L R I U-turn I TOTAL11 L I T I R I --T-- U-t—urn TOTAL] TOTAL] TOTAL 04:00 PM —64.15 0 0 4 0 4 —0 —3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 ---- ----- 6 0 0 PM 1 0 4 —0 —0 —9 —0 —9-0 0 0 —0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 �6 8 --12- 64 30 PM 0 7() 0 —0 —9 —0 —0 —0 —1 —0 —8 —0 101 0 8 9 18 04:45 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 — 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 7 11 14 TOTAL 2 0 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 8 0 0 8 0 25 2 0 35 55 05:00 PM --�5,15 5 i o 0 6 5 0 -0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 3 0 5 0 PM 4 0 3 �j 0 0 2 0 t- 0 2 0 — 1 — 2 —4 -- 8- 05:30 Pm o 0 3 0 0 0 10 E00 0 0 W04 a 3 0 —2-0 0 E 2 0 1 1 3 6 05:45 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 —0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 TOTAL 2 0 13 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 1 .5 E321 PM Peak 05:00 Pm to 06:00 L2LEEJ 17T132 P. im ,,I 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: September 20, 2018 (Fhursday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION. Lakewood Av & Clarcona Ocoee Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd TIME NORTHI -L--7[---T SOUTHHOUND -�—R N/S EASTBOUND TBO D U�U-lu,. E/W GRAND -BEGIN L T R U-turn TOTAL I U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL L I T I R I U-turn I TOTAL 11 L I T I -R I TOTAL TOTAL TOTALI 07:00 AM 18 0 47 0 65 0 1 0 1 0 7-0 1 0 65 0 1 247 1 30 1 0 F277 —1147 1 ?q�; --- I n - I n I zai I Ai2 - 683 07:15AM 13 0 3 E 1 237t, 11 1 I 0 M 514 560 07:30 AM 1 20 0 3 2 0 0 -10 0 225 �8 1 274 61�1 1�9 - 0 1 1 258 '32 582 07:45 AM 1 9 0 1 25 1 0 1 34 60 60 0 ---T 0 3-4 0#208 08 1 " I " 11 5 1 3,� 1 - -nT 69 —zg2 s 9 603 TOTAL 1 60 0 1 135 0 0 o 0 0 195 0 1 917 174 1 1,092 250 890 n -d-2i,233 2,428 08:00 AM 44 0 35 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 190 80 0 270 1 1 1 0 '9 3 463 �42 542 08:15 AM 43 0 46 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 8-9- 0 1 22 7 2 197 1�g i 6L2 0 1 ;07 08:30 AM 27 0 44 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 113 9 1 123 49 1 121 0 0 ;64 08:45 AM 7 0 24 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 8 0 117 �14 TOTAL 121 0 1 49 5 i3 7 0 0 0 __i_ 7. �111.9 2 727 81 0 145 21 2 0 181 349 430 79 0 168 ;-0 n I 1AR �;O IAQ n2 Ica 387 66 04:30 PM 17 0 53 0 0 0 70 0 169 22 1 192 51 1 163 1 0 1 0 J-214 406 476 04:45 PM 16 0 50 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 185 19 0 29L] 40 1 1- 0 0 1 207 411 477 TOTAL 81 0 215 0 1 296 52 JH81 1 620 0 o 801 1,553 1,849 05:00 PM 18 0 66 0 1 84 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 179 17 1 1 1 197 11 IF; I 17n 1 0 1 n 1 779 1 A.)q r r n7 05:15 PM -5 —OP 16 0 62 78 0 0 1 190 74 172 0 2 248 438 516 3 M 19 0 55 0 74 1 0 0 0 0 74 0 159 24 2 185 71 175 0 248 433 so 05:45 PM 19 0 46 0 65 200 31 234 A7 70 151 0 ---LO- n 221 1 455 A 520 TOTAL 72 0 229 0 301 0 0 0 0 0 301 0 691 101 271 668 0 - 4 9 43 2,050 — AM 'eo k Peak Facto -r. 0.889 I -GAMW M -W Ah 1 6. 1 1 135 195 0 19-1 917 174 1 1,092 250 0 1 1 -Hour 1 1,141 1 1..233T-2,42.] PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0386 1 05:90 PM to 06:00 PM 806 271 F,. SoUthbound �Wl L., M P- 0 0 0 + AM 1 0 a 0 0 ----------------------- C ------ --------- K 0 ------ 1(- 890 668 ClOrMa OCOee Rd ld 250 4 7 CL 917 4 101 174 N PM AW ------- 41 - ------------------------ IK 1. 135 7- AM 0 72 0 Z79 PM OrIlh ound DATE. September 20, 2018 (Thursday) LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Lakewood Av 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY.- Apopka COUNTY: Orange County Clarcona Ocoee Rd LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 Clarcona Ocoee Rd TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S TOTALI EASTBOUND WESTBou—N—D------j E/W TOTAL GPAN TOTAL L T I R U4urn TOTAL L T R FU-t-ur-,FT-0-T-AjL L I T I R I U-turn I TOTAL 11 L I T I R I U-turn I TOTAL[ 07:00 AM 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 Q 1 10 1 0 1 b 1 100 1112 1 0 1 0 1 3 23 26 07:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 is 5 16 07:30 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 8 9 07:45 AM 0 ��3 0 0 0 2, 0 2, o 0 21 21 TOTAL 2 0 5 67 72 08:00 AM 1 1 0 1 0 2 Q 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 f -2 F-0 1 7 11 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 3 10 12 08:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 1 1 11 ff 0 0 12 18 18 N ZIN 1 0 1 2 0 0 2. 20 0 30 2. 4 2 6 6 #1:1K2# 0 0 4 10 12 A fM� 6 6 6 02 0 0 G 0 6 0 1 0 6 0 2 1�3 19 19 TOTAL 2 0 1 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 20 1 5 1 0 25 1 2 1 30 1 0 0 57 61 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 4 9 9 04:15 PM 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 D 0 4 0 1 o o 1 2 5 b o 7 12 04:30 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 6 0 3 0 -1-0-F —3 9 11 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 2 10 10 TOTAL 1 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 20 0 0 20 2 14 0 1 0 16 36 42 05:00 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 5 0515 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 5 7 — E 3 —OP M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 2 3 0 0 5 t4 10 10 A7 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 11 0 0 0 3 3 TOTAL 1 0 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 0 13 2 8 0 0 10 2313 2, —A --k M A:1. WMAMI 3 I 0 2 I I 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 37 1 1 29 0 1 0 30 67 72 PM Peak 05,00 PM W 06.00 PM —F,—T —, I o I - I - 1 23 1 17 f �„ Ao -> - - - - [�o § g 4- ---------------------------- L; 15 MINUTE TURNIN iOVEMENT COUNTS PM 732 Ln Clarcona Ocoee Rd (Cars and Trucks) It 49 6 ........... ... ................... ...................... . ............. . . ........ ....... ................... ...................... ............. C� 0 -- tz :3 14 71 DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) 777corl, Dcoee PET' 747 CITY: Apopka •- LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Adair St/West St & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - — - — - — - — IT' 71 - — - — - — - — - — - COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 .1 ...................................... Adair St . . ............................ . .... .................. __I_..................................................._. I West St .................................................. Clarcona Ocoee coee R Clarcona Ocoee Rd TIME BEGIN L T NORTHBOUND -7 7 I R U-turn TOTAL L SOUTHBOUND I T I R -- turn TOTAL N/S TOTAL L EASTBOUND . .................... T R U-turn . ............ I TOTAL .......... .. - . L .................. WESTBOUND .. .. ....................... T R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL ANE TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM TOTAL 14 27 32 232 96 2 0 2 4 4 0 4 5 — 7 21 0 0 0 0 0 18 34 37 32 121 1 4 3 1 9 1 0 2 0 3 1 4 6 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 11 2 24 21 42 48 34 145 1 2 2 12 163 25 -- 3— 49 4 174 36 183 25 669-- 120 1- -- 0-1-90 2 0 3 190 --21 4 210 804 10 1-3 7 9 --- 379 152 -- 784 188 193 717 4 —2 0 0 6 —0 0 0 0 166 356 -199 389 195 409 202 412 762 566 T -- 377 431 457 446 1,711 05:00 PM 65.15 PM 65.io Pm 05:45 PM TOTAL 27 3 8 28 0 30 t4 20 105 0 2 2: 0 6 13 1-0 8 10 41 0 —0 0 0 0 40 40 42 30 152 0 1 2 4 7 0 0 11 0 0 E 2 2 4 2 2 7 7 0 0 0 —0 0 —0 —0 5 3 3 9 9 6 6 23TI75 45 43 -�3 51 51 36 3. 3 1 5 14 -- 206 41 3 34 187 43 91 34 7747 �52 1 -- 1 -- 1 6 251 203 _j3 4— 231 919 16 196 1 0 213 464 509 12 8-7 1 —0---iO3 1 87 200 —5 — El -�i46 65 6 1 5 6 0 —76 --F6 461 184 4 184 4 0 204 435 471 49 732 2 0 793 1,712 1,887 PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: :00 Pm to --- 06'.00 PM 105 6 L41 T L�0�152����o ........... 7 3 49 732 0.927 12 0 793 1,712 �1887 out oun iwi Li i PM 13 3 7 0 + ---------------------------- L; PM 732 Ln Clarcona Ocoee Rd It 49 6 ........... ... ................... ...................... . ............. . . ........ ....... ................... ...................... ............. C� 0 -- tz :3 14 71 777corl, Dcoee PET' 747 •- — - — PM— - — - — - — - — IT' 71 - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — .1 0 105 6 41 1 PM 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT&OUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Adair St/West St & Clarcona Ocoee Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 ........... Adair St .. . ................... ........... ................. . . ........................ . ........................ West St . ...................... . . .................. .... . .... . ................... ......... Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND L T SOUTHBOUND N/S . . . ....................... EASTBOUND L ............ . . . .................. WESTBOUND . . .. . . . .. ... . .................. E/W RAND I R U-turn TOTAL ----- - — L I T I R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL TOTALI L I T R I U-turn �TOTALJ L I T_ EF64 TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 —0 —0 —0 —0 —0 0 —0 0 6 —0 —(�— 0 —0 3 —4--6-- 0 0 3 —4 5 04:30 FM 1 0 0 0 1 —0 0 0 0 0 —0 —0 6 —0-8 1-0 10 04:45 PM 0 0 ;E20 —2 —0 —0 —0 —0 —0— 1 4 4 0 12 13 TOTAL 1 0 2 0 3 0 10 12 37 40 05:00 Pm —6515 0 0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 - 0 0 — 0 -- 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 PM 0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0 0 0 4 —0— 2 0 0 2 3 3 6530 k4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 —0 1 0 0 1 s s 05:45 PM 0 1 0 —0 0 —0 —0 0 0 — 0 0 7 C 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 —4— TOTAL 0 J- —0 —1 0 —1, 0 0 0 0 —1 0 3 0 0 3 4 1 0 13 1 0 0 13 —.0 1 6 0 0 6 19 20 PM Peak 05:00 Pm to 06:00 Phi �13 �0 6 19 20 15 MINUTE TU,RNIN OVIMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd LATITUDE: 0 PM 2i------- z$„-.-... + TIME BEGIN Ocoee Apopka Rd i ...................... . ..................... . ..................... . .... — ............. .................... NORTHBOUND L T R U-turn TOTAL L Ocoee Apopka Rd ..... . .-................... . . . ................ ..................... SOUTHBOUND I T I R I U-turn . FT0--TA-Lj N/S TOTAL I L 04:00 PM 1 96 20 0 117 3 63 44 -- 0 106 223 60 04:15 PM 04:30 —PM 04:45 —PM 0 --08 --i —3-1-15- 23 0 99 1-2 --6 1-3 —0 — 131 113 131 6 —4 —7 5-5 5-8 6-0 71 6-6 -57- —0 -6---i-2-8--i4-1-67 —01-24 132 263 25-5 _72- —86 TOTAL 6 418 0 --2 Z920 8 1-4 _948 — 7 38 — 236 --2— 34 — 0 — 490 — 982 — 28 34 5 0 111-- 31 2 0 100 33 1 0 120 129 10 0 424 , -665 05:00 PM- 2 122 15 0 —0 139 7 56 - 89 0 152 291 87 05;15 PM 1 134 2-4 -T3 159 —2 6-1 7-4 —0 -1-3-7 -2-96 —71 05730 PM 65�45 —PM —1 3 24 11-9 3-0 —0— _73- —0 16-0 150 2 3 67 —8-9 64 7-7 —o —0 -1-46- — 156 --3-06- --jo-6 - _79- — 67 TOTAL 7 508 - 608 -- 17- ---24-8 32-9 0 591 1,199 304 Pm to 7 1 508 � 93 --F4 329 F248 -T— --T——T 06:00 PM I I o T 6o8 1T o59,T,,,,)93 o4 PM 329 -------------------------- Fuller's Cross Rd *D It :3 304 71 CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 PM 2i------- z$„-.-... + COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 a 49 49 Fuller's Cross Rd ............... .. . ...................... .... ............ .............. . ......................... Fuller's Cross Rd . . 0 EASTBOUND R U-turn TOTAL L . ............................................. WESTBOUND T I R U-turn . ..... -� I -TO-TAL E/W TOTAL IGRANE TOTAL I 31 2 0 93 K . . . . . . . . . . 71 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 8 1-4 _948 — 7 38 51 31 — 44 174 5 —7 5 1-2 29 0 —0 0 — 0 0 64 —52 62 - 241 157 1-63- 162 - 1 8-3- 380 426 —3 40 438 1,647 34 5 0 111-- 31 2 0 100 33 1 0 120 129 10 0 424 -665 43 0 0 42 0 0 28 2 0 30 4 0 -- -- 143 6 0 130 -8 113 1Q9 101 i5-3 17 ---10 14 -:�9 48 6-1 6-38 53 i2-5- -7-8- 7 4 — 9 0 —0 0 0 —0-70-2 63 8-2 81 6 193 195 190 177 7S5 484 491 496 483 1,954 --F Peak Hour Factor: 0.989- T— 0 53T49 22S T 28 To 302 F1.9S4143T-6] 248 14 0 ------------- ---- PM 2i------- z$„-.-... + F 225 a 49 49 ................ .................... .......... ...................... 0 . . . ............... ..... . .. ............ MlWr5 LrOSS HO K . . . . . . . . . . 71 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 I.._._......._._..._.._.._....._._.._ 0 7 508 17 93 PM 15 MINUTE TURNIN ..QVEMENT..COUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Ocoee Apopka Rd ..................... ...................... -.1- ................... . .. . ........................ . ...................... Ocoee Apopka Rd I., ..... . ................. -- . ...................... I- .................... ........... . ........................... Fuller's Cross Rd Fuller's Cross Rd TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S . .................. . .. . .. . . ............... EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND - ...... . ........ .......... . I . . . ..................... . .. . . ................. .... . .................... ...... E/W GRAND _I L T TOTAL L I T I R I U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL L I T I R U-turn -- TOTAL L I T R U-turn -- TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM -T471 0 2 1 0 3 —1 0 1 1 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 5 P M 0 0 0 0 2 1 —0 —3 1 —0 0 o —1 —1 —0-0 —0 —1 —6 04:30 PM —0 —0 —b-- —0 —0 —0 —0--- —0 —0 —0 —0 —0 F44 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 —0 — 0 —0 —0 —0 —0 45 PM -- 0 0 1 —0— 0 —1 1 0 0 —0 0 0 0 1 0 TOTAL 0 1 2 2 0 4 0 4 2 - 0 6 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 J7 21 2 7 05:00 PM- 0 0 0 0 0 —0 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 6515 PM 0 2 0 —0 0 —0 —1 —0 —1 3 —1 —2 0 —0-3— —1 0 1 3 _7 05:30 PM —2 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 05:45 PM 0 2 0 0 —2 —0 —o----— 1 0 3 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 5 0 0 50 2 4 o 6 11 3 0 0 0 — 5 0 0 8 2 0 o 0 2 10 21 PM Peak 05:00 PM to 06:00 PM f 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: September 20, 2018 (Thursday) CITY. Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Fuller's Cross Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av i Lakewood Av Fuller's Cross Rd TIME I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND -- I N/S EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E/w GRANDI BEGIN L T R U-turn I I TOTAL IJ L I T I R T. TU--,.TTOTAL TOTAL L I T R U-turnTOTALL I T I R U-turnTOTALTOTAL TOTAL 07:00 AM 27 26 0 0 53 11 0 1 31 1 51 1 0 1 82 1 135 1 42 1 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 48 1&13 07:15 AM 20 16 0 0 36 0 22 54 --12-7 -6 4 0 36 0 1 0 1 0 - 0 0 36 148 07:30 AM 25 24 0 0 49 9 - 0 67 Q 176 -T5 - 0 12 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 37 213 W7445 07 45 AM 21 16 0 —0 0 37 37 0 63 68 0 131 -TI-6 168 18 0 15 0 0 33 4 I� 0 0 0 a 33 201 TOTAL 93 82 0 175J 0 176 240 0 591 1 117 0 37 0 154 . - I - - 54 _ 08:00 Am 57 61 0 0 118 0 98 46 0 144 1 262 1 21 1 0 1 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 53 315 08:15 Am 61 63 1 0 0 124 0 IPO 99 99 44 D �1462 6 7 2' 1 28 1 0 1 22 �j �05 0 0 0 0 0 so 317 08:30 Am T 39 T 0 0 78 14�4 1 0 sq 5, 134A 1 3S 1 0 1 A 11 1 A n — 0 ---i3— 176 08:45 Am 11 14 0 0 25 0 1 17 1 32 0 49 74 18 1 0 14 0 32:1 0 0 0 0 0 32 106 TOTAL �8 177 0 0 345 0 2213 163 0 391 736 102 0 76 0 178 1 0 0 0 0 0 178 914 4�211 9 11 0 51 0 245 36 0 61 �O71 13 0 61 2, 0 0 6' 173 64- 13 �I�M 18 36 0 0 48 6 i 42 119 49 n f 5�) n 06 68 187 04:30 PM 18 28 0 0 46 49 0 72 18 1 118 38 38 0 0 60 45 163 04:45 P 14 33 0 1 0 47 JF-� 0 1 22 37 '59 il 06 37 1 0 12 0 0 0 49 - l5�5 TOTAL 72 120 0 1 0 192 0 1 99 164 0 263 455 - - 223 0 0 0 D 0 223 678 05:00 PM 21 28 0 f 0 49 0 1 22 51 0 73 M 53 0 14 D 67 0 0 0 0 0 67 189 05:15 PM 21 32 0 1 0 1531[0-- 43 63 0 106 159 49 0 23 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 1 72 231 05:30 PM 20 38 0 0 58 0 1 43 51 - 94 152 36 0 18 4 14 0 1 1 0 1 54 211 05:45 PM 26 27 0 0 53 0 1 43 F—TOTAL 88 1 125 0 AM Peak Peak Hour Factor. 0.825 CT.30 AM . . 09� A . 1 164 a a 328 0 320 225 545 873 92 .1 0 173 0 0 0 I - 173 I I iiml PM Peak Peak Hour Factor. 0.907 1 05:00 PM W 06.00 P 88 125 0 0 213 0 151 221 0 372 S 1 0 0 7S 3 839 Soumbound NUT Ul PM I 221 151 0 0 + AM I 225 320 0 0 jj ._._._._._._._._._._._-_ IC S1 I------- AM -------- PM K 0 0 ------- E 0 0 o Fuller's Cross Rd ic 0 0 0 Z. 177 92 71 L 0 0 -3 7681 N PMAW ------- ------------------------ I F� 111 AM 125 0 'M North Pound DATE: September 20, 2018 (Thursday) LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Fuller's Cross Rd Lakewood Av TIME NORTHBOUND BEGIN L -] _T _R U-turnTOTALL I 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY: Apopka COUNTY: -Orange County Lakewood Av Fuller's Cross Rd SOUTHBOUND N/S EASTBOUND T I R T_U-turn _TOTAL JTOTAL j L I T I RTOTAL LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 WESTBOUND E/W GRAND IJ L I T I R JU-turn iTOTAL ITOTAL TOTALI 07:00 AM 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 o 11 o 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 11 01 0 1 a I 1 11 n I n I n I n I I 2 07:15 Am 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 " 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 07:30 Am 0 1 0 0 1 —0 0 0 —0, 0 —0 0 0 1 0 0 -7— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1' _T_ 07:45 Am 0 0 6-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E, 0 Eli] 0 0 0 60 0 0 TOTAL 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 1 o 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 0 Em 0 a 0 i 08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 _0 —0 a— 6 6-0 0 1 0 0 2 08:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 _0 243 0 0 1 0 0 0 F0_TAL 1 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 3 6 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 1 04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 o 1 2 2 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 04:30 PM 1 2 0 0 3 a_ 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 5 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o n n 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 6 5 D 0 D 5 0 D p 0 0 5 11 05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 05:15 PM -65-30 _PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 o 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 _—PM 0 0 0 0 a 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —0 0 0 00 1 45:45 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 AM Peak 08:W A. 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 PM Peak --F-o 05:00 Pm,. �.,mF 06:00 P 3 1 0 1 4 — 0 1 S 4- 15 MINUTE TURNI QVIEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Wurst Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 .................... Lakewood Av - . .................. ... .................................. ............... ...................... Lakewood Av .................... - . . .. . ................ ..... ........................ ....... Wurst Rd Wurst Rd TIME BEGIN L NORTHBOUND --- -FU-turnjTOTAL� SOUTHBOUND N/S EASTBOUND . ..... I ........ . .................... .... .. .... ... ... ... WESTBOUND . . . . . .... ..................... E/W GRAND T R L T I R I U-turn TOTAL I TOTAL L T R U-turn I TOTAL 11 L I T R 7 U-turn TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 28 31 0 —0 59 9 15 1 0 25 84 2 1 1 0 4 28 3 -T 0 04.15 PM —0 2 26 37 6-5 14 13 2 —0 29 —1 —1 — 15 46 so 134 21 9 0 30 33 127 0 .3 4,,iO PM 0 19 -6-- —66 1-3 2-3 —3- —o —9,9— —0 —1 —1-0 —2— 04: 45 PM 0 39 18 0 77 15 22 1 0 —18 — — 3 1 14 - 0 35 — 37 - 136 TOTAL — 2 112 147 0 261 51 73 7 0 131 115 392 4 7 1 0 0 5 25 17 _�l 4� 0 40 45 160 92 7 52 -- 0 151 165 557 4 3 0 14 05:00 Pm 1 25 - 33 0 59 21 5 0 40 99 2 1 0 4 19 0 - 0 39 43 142 05:15 Pm —65 3 26 41 0 70 19 —i — 1 3 0 5-3 — 12i 0 —0— —0 — 20 — 29 2 0 47 47 - 8 171 30 PM —1-30 3— —0 7-4 12 3-0 6 —0 —4 -- 8 ---j— 22 — 3 -- 0 —L 1 24 1 17 0 42 49 171 05:45 PM 1 35 56 0 92 ---- 9 25 1 0 35 —127 — 4 0 7 3 TOTAL — 6 — 116 173 0 295 54 107 15 -- 0 1 76 — 0 0 4 25 -- 0 15 -68 0 40 0 AW 171 0 168 --184 655 471 7 3 6 0 16 97 3 PM Peak 1 — - a Peak Hour Factor: 05:00 Pm to 06:00 Pm 6 116 173 0 295 54 107 15 0 176 471 7 3 6 0 76 97 3 68 0.958 0 168 184 655 Southbound Lrl PM 15 107 54 0 + -------------------------- le ------- Pm -6i ------- 3 Wurst Rd 97 ........... ... . ................. . . .. .................... .... ............... .. . ................. ... . ......................... . ........... 0 WUrst Rd :3 7 CL 3 'A &------------- Pm------- --------- 0 6 17173 PM 15 MINUTE TURNI ..OVEMENT COUNT (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Wurst Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av ......................... - .................. ... - ................. .... .. -- . ................... . i Lakewood Av Wurst Rd i Wurst Rd TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NIS .. . . ..... .. ... .. .. EASTBOUND . . .. _ . . ..................... . ......... . ......... I - . . . ................... W . EST . B .. 0 . U . N . D .. ....................... E/W, GRAND BEGIN L T R I U-turn TOTAL I L U-turn TOTAL TOTAL ------- L T I R 1U U-turn TOTAL I L I T R I U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 —1 --6— —3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM —PM 0 2 —0 —1 —1 —0 0 —0 —0 0 0 —3 _0 —o-0 — —0 —0- —o —6 —1 —1 64730 2 0 1 0 0 1 T1 —0 —0-6— —0 —0 —0 —0- 4 04:45 PM 0 0 1 0 —1 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 -- 0 3 3 3 6 —2 TOTAL 0 3 4 —0 —7 0 1 071 8 -- —0 —0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 5 13 05:00 Pm 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 05:15 PM —PM 0 1 0 0 1 —0—o —0-0--- 0 0 o f —0 0 1 0 0 —0 —0 —0 —0 0 65-30 0 — 1 0 E o 0 1 EE 0 �E 0 0 0 o— o— —i o 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o— 0 o— 0 o— — I 1 2 TOTAL 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 PM Peak :00 Pm to0 06:00 PIA 2 5 C:nnsultant Tim= (ft) tance (ft) ec) L 43 128 -1.8% 4S 164 1.7% 24 7 3045tance 110 2.4% 82 24 92 -1.8% 82 24 COORDINATION PLANS Coordination Pattern Cycle Split 1 1/1/1 80 15 2/1/1 65 15 3/1/1 80 15 Day Time Pattern FREE 2/1/1 Split 2 45 35 45 FREE Split 3 FREE Split 4 20 15 20 %18:15 1/1/1 Split 5 2/1/1 Split 6 60 SO 60 3/1/1 Split 7 2/1/1Split S FREE Offset 10 35 63 7 0:00 FREE Lagging Phases Source Day 0/0/0/0 Equate 1 0/0/0/0 Equate 2 1/0/0/0 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 7 8:00 20:00 2/1/1 FREE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green 5. Alternate Sequence 1: Reverse Phases 1 & 2 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination - ►e, ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Intersection: Clarcona-Ocoee Road & N. Lakewood Avenue Equipment: Eagle Node: Date: 643 Port: 09/25/18 Address: BASIC TIMING Phase 2 4 5 6 Direction WB NB WBL EB Min Green (sec) 10 5 5 10 Vehicle Gap (sec) 3.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 Max Green 1 (sec) 41 30 20 41 Max Green 2 (sec) 41 30 20 41 Yellow (sec) 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Walk (sec) 7 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 23 29 Recall/Memory MIN/LK NL LK MIN/LK Detector Delay (sec) CD10 Detector Switching Dual Entry Y Y Overlap Flash Y R 5 -SECTION Y Speed (mph) Veh Crossing Distance (ft) Grade Ped Crossing Distance (ft) Ped Clearance (sec) 45 140 -0.4% 35 103 0.6% 78 23 45 110 -0.4% 45 93 0.5% 101 29 COORDINATION PLANS Coordination Pattern 1/1/1 2/1/1 3/1/1 Day Time Pattern Cycle 80 130 80 1 0:00 FREE Split 1 1 9:30 2/1/1 Split 2 65 110 65 1 19:30 FREE Split 3 2 0:00 FREE Split 4 15 20 15 2 6:00 1/1/1 Split 5 15 20 15 2 9:30 2/1/1 Split 6 50 90 50 2 15:00 3/1/1 Split 7 2 18:15 2/1/1 Split 8 2 20:00 FREE Offset 13 102 32 7 0:00 FREE Lagging Phases 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 7 8:00 2/1/1 Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 20:00 FREE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Hazem EI-AssarP.E. , Intersection: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Equipment: Eagle CDI: j j CDO: Node: 335 Date: 7123118 BASIC TIMING. Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Direction EB/WB NB/SB Min Green sec 5 15 Vehicle Ga sec 3.0 3.5 Max Green 1 sec 55 65 Max Green 2 sec 60 55 Yellow sec 4.8 4.8 All -Red sec 2.0 2.0 Walk sec 7 Flash Don't Walk sec 17 Recall/Memo NL SF/LK Dela (sec) CD10 Detector Switching Dual Entry Overlap Flash R Y Speed (mph) Veh Distance (ft) Grade (%) Ped Distance (ft) Ped Clearence (sec) 45 78 -0.5 45 63 -0.6 59 17 COORDINATION PLANS. A Coordination Pattern Day Time Pattern Cycle MAX II Split 1 1 0:01 FREE Split 2 2 0:01 FREE Split 3 2 16:00 PH 1, 2 Split 4 2 19:00 FREE Split 5 Split 6 Split 7 Split 8 Offset Lagging Phases Source Da _Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 E uate 5 1 7 2 3 4 5 6 Notes: Basic Ring Structure R1 1 2 R2 +-I cP! _ .11.E -.L-r:....,, ' ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Intersection: Ocoee Crown Point Parkway/West Rd at Ocoee -Apopka Rd Equipment: Eagle Node: Date: 402 Port:, 05/10/18 Address: BASIC TIMING. Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Direction SBL NB EBL WB NBL SB WBL EB Min Green (sec) 5 15 5 5 5 15 5 5 Vehicle Gap (sec) 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 Max Green 1 (sec) 25 60 25 35 25 60 25 35 Max Green 2 (sec) 35 50 25 20 20 50 25 35 Yellow (sec) 4.8 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.1 Walk (sec) 7 7 7 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 31 16 28 23 Recall/Memory NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK Detector Delay (sec) Detector Switching Dual Entry Y Y Y Y Overlap Flash 5 -SECTION Y 5 -SECTION R 5 -SECTION Y 5 -SECTION R Speed (mph) Veh Crossing Distance (ft) Grade Ped Crossing Distance (ft) Ped Clearance (sec) 45 114 -0.3% 45 144 0.4% 107 31 25 128 0.7% 45 118 -0.5% 55 16 45 94 0.4% 45 161 -0.3% 98 28 45 150 -0.5% 25 105 0.7% 79 23 COORDINATION PLANS, Coordination Pattern 1/1/1 2/1/1 3/1/1 Day Time Pattern Cycle 160 130 160 1 0:01 FREE Split 1 35 20 20 2 0:01 FREE Split 2 58 51 70 2 12:45 2/1/1 Split 3 20 20 15 2 15:00 3/1/1 Split 4 47 39 55 2 18:15 FREE Split 5 31 20 20 7 0:01 FREE Split 6 62 51 1 70 Split 7 28 20 30 Split 8 39 39 40 W _ Offset 49 65 102 _ Lagging Phases 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green - Phases 4 & 8 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination Consultant Timing Gu; ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING. Intersection: West Road/Clarcona-Ocoee Road & SR 429 SIR Ramps Equipment: Eagle Node: Date: 403 04/26/18 Port: Address: BASIC TIMING Phase 2 S 6 8 Direction WB WBL EB SB Min Green (sec) 15 5 15 5 Vehicle Gap (sec) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Max Green 1(sec) 45 20 45 20 Max Green 2 (sec) 45 20 45 20 Yellow (sec) 4.8 4.8 4,8 3.7 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Walk (sec) 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 16 Recall/Memory SF/LK NL SF/LK NL Detector Delay (sec) Detector Switching Dual Entry Y Y Overlap Flash Y 5 -SECTION Y R Speed (mph) Veh Crossing Distance (ft) Grade Ped Crossing Distance (ft) Ped Clearance (sec) 45 75 2.0% 56 16 45 94 2.0% 45 109 2.1% 30 110 1.4% COORDINATION PLANS, Coordination Pattern 1/1/1 2/1/1 3/1/1 Day Time Pattern Cycle 80 65 80 1 0:00 FREE Split 1 1 9:30 2/1/1 Split 2 65 50 65 1 19:30 FREE Split 3 2 0:00 FREE Split 4 2 6:00 1/1/1 Split 5 20 15 20 2 9:30 2/1/1 Split 6 45 35 45 2 15:00 3/1/1 Split 7 2 18:15 2/1/1 Split 8 15 15 15 2 20:00 FREE Offset 12 41 63 7 0:00 FREE Lagging Phases 0/0/5/0 0/0/5/0 0/0/0/0 7 8:00 2/1/1 Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 20:00 FREE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination S. Alternate Sequence 4: Reverse Phases 5 & 6 2017 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 7500 ORANGE COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.98 WEEK DATES SF PSCF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 01/01/2017 - 01/07/2017 1.01 1.03 2 01/08/2017 - 01/14/2017 1.03 1.05 3 01/15/2017 - 01/21/2017 1.04 1.06 4 01/22/2017 - 01/28/2017 1.03 1.05 5 01/29/2017 - 02/04/2017 1.02 1.04 6 02/05/2017 - 02/11/2017 1.00 1.02 7 02/12/2017 - 02/18/2017 0.99 1.01 8 02/19/2017 - 02/25/2017 0.99 1.01 * 9 02/26/2017 - 03/04/2017 0.98 1.00 *10 03/05/2017 - 03/11/2017 0.98 1.00 *11 03/12/2017 - 03/18/2017 0.97 0.99 *12 03/19/2017 - 03/25/2017 0.97 0.99 *13 03/26/2017 - 04/01/2017 0.97 0.99 *14 04/02/2017 - 04/08/2017 0.97 0.99 *15 04/09/2017 - 04/15/2017 0.97 0.99 *16 04/16/2017 - 04/22/2017 0.97 0.99 *17 04/23/2017 - 04/29/2017 0.97 0.99 *18 04/30/2017 - 05/06/2017 0.98 1.00 *19 05/07/2017 - 05/13/2017 0.98 1.00 *20 05/14/2017 - 05/20/2017 0.98 1.00 *21 05/21/2017 - 05/27/2017 0.99 1.01 22 05/28/2017 - 06/03/2017 1.00 1.02 23 06/04/2017 - 06/10/2017 1.00 1.02 24 06/11/2017 - 06/17/2017 1.01 1.03 25 06/18/2017 - 06/24/2017 1.01 1.03 26 06/25/2017 - 07/01/2017 1.01 1.03 27 07/02/2017 - 07/08/2017 1.01 1.03 28 07/09/2017 - 07/15/2017 1.02 1.04 29 07/16/2017 - 07/22/2017 1.01 1.03 30 07/23/2017 - 07/29/2017 1.00 1.02 31 07/30/2017 - 08/05/2017 1.00 1.02 32 08/06/2017 - 08/12/2017 0.99 1.01 33 08/13/2017 - 08/19/2017 0.99 1.01 4 08/20/2017 - 08/26/2017 1.01 1.03 -)5 08/27/2017 - 09/02/2017 1.04 1.06 36 09/03/2017 - 09/09/2017 1.06 1.08 37 09/10/2017 - 09/16/2017 1.09 1.11 38 09/17/2017 - 09/23/2017 1.07 1.09 39 09/24/2017 - 09/30/2017 1.05 1.07 40 10/01/2017 - 10/07/2017 1.03 1.05 41 10/08/2017 - 10/14/2017 1.01 1.03 42 10/15/2017 - 10/21/2017 0.99 1.01 43 10/22/2017 - 10/28/2017 0.99 1.01 44 10/29/2017 - 11/04/2017 0.99 1.01 45 11/05/2017 - 11/11/2017 1.00 1.02 46 11/12/2017 - 11/18/2017 1.00 1.02 47 11/19/2017 - 11/25/2017 1.00 1.02 48 11/26/2017 - 12/02/2017 1.01 1.03 49 12/03/2017 - 12/09/2017 1.01 1.03 50 12/10/2017 - 12/16/2017 1.01 1.03 51 12/17/2017 - 12/23/2017 1.02 1.04 52 12/24/2017 - 12/30/2017 1.03 1.05 53 12/31/2017 - 12/31/2017 1.04 1.06 * PEAK SEASON 02 -MAR -2018 15:35:06 830UPD 5 7500 PKSEASON.TXT Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information nency TPD, Inc. alyst MJA Analysis Date Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd Analysis Year Intersection West Rd/Ocoee Crown... File Name Project Description (1) PM Peak Hour - Existing Intersection Information'*'` Duration, h 0.25 Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other PM Peak Hour PHF 0.97 2018 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 1- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd - Existing... 4 J A -s Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand (v ), veh/h 45 96 39 206 181 172 95 593 75 126 378 22 Signal Information Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green 5.4 Yellow 4.8 Red 12.0 1.2 0.0 10..0 y R 97.1 5.2 4.8 3.4 2.0 3.1 8.0 4.8 2.0 8.3 4.8 3.1 5 6 7 8 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 11.7 16.2 26.5 31.0 12.2 103.9 13.4 105.1 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.5 7.9 6.8 1 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 3.0 4.1 3.0 4.1 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 5.9 6.3 19.6 19.2 5.3 6.4 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 1.9 0.1 1.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 ase Call Probability 0.87 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 max Out Probability 1.00 1 0.00 0.55 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 46 99 40 212 187 177 98 611 77 130 412 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1781 1781 1585 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1852 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 3.9 4.3 3.9 17.6 7.6 17.2 3.3 30.5 3.2 4.4 17.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 3.9 4.3 3.9 17.6 7.6 17.2 3.3 30.5 3.2 4.4 17.7 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.64 1 0.61 0.61 0.65 0.61 Capacity ( c), veh/h 164 184 82 297 515 229 584 1135 962 456 1138 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.282 0.538 0.491 0.716 0.363 0.774 0.168 0.539 0.080 0.285 0.362 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 81.6 92.6 77.4 328.7 156.5 295.7 59 487 53.6 77.9 304.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 3.2 3.6 3.0 12.9 6.2 11.6 2.3 19.2 2.1 3.1 12.0 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 68.9 74.0 73.8 60.1 61.8 65.9 12.1 18.4 13.0 14.2 15.3 Incremental Delay ( d2), s/veh 0.3 2.4 4.5 4.8 0.4 5.5 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( of), s/veh 69.3 76.4 78.3 64.9 62.2 71.4 12.2 20.2 13.2 14.3 16.2 Level of Service (LOS) E E E E E E B C I B B I B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 75.0 E 66.1 E 18.5 B 15.7 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 35.9 D Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB --destrian LOS Score / LOS 2.16 B 1.96 B 2.41 B 2.41 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.64 1 A 0.96 A 1.79 B 1.38 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 10:55:26 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Informationialxi"f4 J C $ 4 � r AM tyl'Ir "gency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 -alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.96 Urban Street West Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Intersection SR 429 SB Ramps File Name 2- 5095 - West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps - Existing... Project Description (2) PM Peak Hour- Existing Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T I R Demand ( v), veh/h 524 124 312 582 58 73 Signal Information JCycle, 80.0 Reference Phase3 0 Reference Point End inated No Simult. Gap E/W On Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green 7.9 Yellow 4.8 Red 2.0 47.2 5.6 4.8 3.7 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ode 0.0 0.0 s 6 4 e Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 8 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 54.0 14.7 68.7 11.3 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 7.2 5.7 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 ase Call Probability 1.00 0.95 max Out Probability 0.04 1 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 6 16 5 2 3 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 348 327 325 606 60 76 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1870 1746 1767 1795 1781 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 9.5 1 7.6 5.2 3.7 2.6 1 3.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 9.5 7.6 5.2 3.7 2.6 3.7 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.59 0.59 0.71 0.77 0.07 0.07 Capacity ( c), veh/h 1103 1030 622 2779 124 111 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.315 0.317 0.522 0.218 0.488 0.684 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 119.2 111.4 56.2 1 27.2 1 54.9 73.7 Back of Queue ( Q), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 4.7 4.5 2.2 1.1 2.2 2.9 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 8.3 8.3 5.4 2.5 1 35.8 36.4 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.2 3.0 7.2 Initial Queue Delay ( of 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 9.0 9.1 6.1 2.6 38.8 43.6 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 9.0 A 3.9 A 0.0 41.5 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.8 A Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.36 A 1 1.60 B 2.31 B 2.14 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.04 A 1.26 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10124/2018 11:02:19 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information i b b' i bnency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 3lyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.95 Urban Street West Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection SR 429 NB Ramps File Name 3- 5095 - West Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps - Existing... Project Description (3) PM Peak Hour- Existing Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 47 411 685 73 197 417 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red 3.3 5.0 2.0 33.1 23.9 5.0 3.7 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 2 5 6 ] 7 Y B Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 1 6 2 4 Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0 Phase Duration, s 10.3 50.4 40.1 29.6 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 3.2 23.7 Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ase Call Probability 0.67 1.00 max Out Probability 0.02 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 2 12 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 49 433 721 77 207 439 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1810 1781 1795 1572 1795 1572 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.2 5.1 1 11.8 2.4 7.3 1 21.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 1.2 5.1 11.8 2.4 7.3 21.7 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.48 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.30 0.30 Capacity ( c), veh/h 363 1933 1485 651 536 469 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.136 0.224 0.486 0.118 0.387 0.936 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 18.5 77.2 201.1 38.3 133.9 417.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.7 3.0 8.0 1.5 5.3 16.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 12.4 9.5 17.2 14.5 22.3 27.3 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.4 0.2 25.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 12.4 9.8 18.3 14.8 22.4 52.6 Level of Service (LOS) B A B B C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 10.1 B 18.0 B 43.0 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 24.4 C Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB _Jestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.66 B 1.39 A 2.31 B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.89 1 A 1.15 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS11 Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:07:39 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information ".iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 .alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Lakewood Ave File Name 4.1- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... Prniart Ilocrrintinn I/d1 ANA Pcok 1-Ini it - Pvictinn Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS11 Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:05:23 AM Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 1 981 186 269 952 64 144 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green 6.8 Yellow 14.8 Red 12.0 •• r 44.6 4.8 2.0 ' 9.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 s e e Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 4 Case Number 6.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 51.4 13.6 65.0 15.0 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.7 9.1 Green Extension Time ( g e), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 ase Call Probability 1.00 0.99 wax Out Probability 1.001.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 1 606 573 272 962 65 145 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 593 1841 1738 1810 1766 1739 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s), s 0.1 17.4 1 17.4 4.7 8.2 2.7 1 7.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c), s 0.1 17.4 17.4 4.7 8.2 2.7 7.1 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.67 0.73 0.11 0.11 Capacity ( c), veh/h 421 1026 968 408 2570 196 180 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.002 0.590 0.592 0.665 0.374 0.330 0.809 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.3 272 1253.7 72.3 83.8 53.1 170.2 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.0 10.5 10.1 2.9 3.3 2.0 6.8 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d r ), s/veh 7.9 11.7 11.7 10.6 4.1 32.7 34.7 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.0 2.5 2.7 3.4 0.4 0.4 22.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 7.9 14.2 14.4 14.0 4.5 33.1 56.6 Level of Service (LOS) A B B B A C E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.3 B 6.6 A 49.4 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.5 B Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.88 B 1.32 A 2.31 B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.46 A 1.51 B F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS11 Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:05:23 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information • "-iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Lakewood AveFile Name 4.2- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... T R L T R r. .. , ". y _...__.... Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T I R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 7 747 108 294 715 77 245 Signal Information j80.0 Reference Phase 2r 0 Reference Point EndGreen d No Simult. Gap E/W On Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 8.2 Yellow 4.8 Red 2.0 38.2 4.8 2.0 14.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 6 s Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 4 Case Number 6.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 45.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 8.3 14.1 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 Ivlax Out Probability 1.00 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 7 442 422 297 722 78 247 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 731 1870 1787 1795 1795 1795 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.4 12.9 12.9 6.3 6.8 3.0 12.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (g c), s 0.4 12.9 12.9 6.3 6.8 3.0 12.1 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.61 0.66 0.18 0.18 Capacity ( c), veh/h 439 893 853 478 2387 314 280 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.016 0.494 0.495 0.621 0.303 0.248 0.885 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 3 225.2 1214.7 98 1 84.5 56.7 1268.4 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/in ( 95 th percentile) 0.1 8.9 8.6 3.9 3.4 2.2 10.6 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 11.0 14.3 14.3 10.1 5.6 28.5 32.2 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 2.0 2.0 2.5 0.3 0.2 26.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 11.1 16.2 16.3 12.5 1 5.9 28.6 58.2 Level of Service (LOS) B 1 B B B A C E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 16.3 B 7.9 A 51.2 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 17.5 B Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB ddestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.89 B 1.34 A 2.31 B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.21 A 1.33 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:18:15 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information Aiency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 _ .alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.93 Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Adair St File Name 5- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Adair St - Existin... o n--- ir-% onn m --i. u,.... L T Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:06:59 AM Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach MovementL T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 20 769 157 51 754 12 108 6 42 7 3 13 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On r; r a.. Green 58.2 9.0 Yellow 4.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 6 7 j 8 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 2 4 8 Case Number 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 65.0 65.0 15.0 15.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 1 6.8 6.8 6.0 1 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.2 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 11.0 3.0 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ase Call Probability 0.99 0.99 max Out Probability 1.00 1.00 Movement Group Results ti EB WB NB SB Approach Movement T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 22 513 483 55 413 411 168 25 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 675 1870 1760 575 1885 1875 1463 1711 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.9 8.2 1 8.2 3.2 1 6.1 6.1 8.0 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 7.0 8.2 8.2 11.4 6.1 6.1 9.0 1.0 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.11 0.11 Capacity ( c), veh/h 530 1361 1280 449 1371 1364 241 251 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.041 0.377 0.377 0.122 0.301 10.301 0.697 0.098 Back of Queue ( Q), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 5.2 94.6 1 89 16.2 69.6 70.9 165.6 18.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.2 3.7 3.6 0.6 2.8 2.8 6.5 0.8 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 5.0 4.1 4.1 6.2 1 3.8 3.8 35.6 32.0 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 7.2 0.1 Initial Queue Delay ( d s ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 5.2 4.9 .4.9 6.8 4.4 4.4 42.8 32.0 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A A A D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 4.9 A 4.5 A 42.8 D 32.0 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.1 A Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB idestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.62 B 1 1.62 B 2.30 B 2.29 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.33 A 1.21 A 0.76 A 0.53 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:06:59 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Agency TPD, Inc. alyst MJA Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd Intersection Fuller's Cross Rd Project Description (6) PM Peak Hour - Existing Intersection Information Duration, h 0.25 Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 File Name 6- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd -... 41-kf �t t. ti r Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 313 147 6 50 232 29 7 523 96 14 255 339 Signal Information Cycle, s 145.5 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap EM On ;,, Green 57.0 Yellow 4.8 27.5 4.8 40.6 0.0 4.8 0.0 z a 0.0 0.0 s 1 iCAI 6 J ; e 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 12.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 8 4 2 6 Case Number 12.0 12.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 47.4 34.3 63.8 63.8 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 6.8 1 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 39.0 26.4 48.6 51.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.5 1.1 6.2 5.7 ase Call Probability 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 max Out Probability 1 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.39 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 471 314 632 614 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1806 1840 1831 1711 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 37.0 1 1 24.4 0.0 2.6 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 37.0 24.4 1 46.6 49.3 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.28 0.19 0.39 0.39 Capacity ( c), veh/h 504 347 743 696 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.933 0.905 0.851 0.882 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 652.91 1443.8 746.6 754.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 25.7 17.6 29.6 29.9 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d i ), s/veh 51.2 57.8 41.1 41.9 Incremental Delay ( d2), s/veh 16.6 8.9 7.9 10.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 67.8 66.7 49.0 52.8 Level of Service (LOS) E E D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 67.8 E 66.7 E 49.0 D 52.8 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 57.2 E Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB .;destrian LOS Score / LOS 1 1.7 41.72 B 1.70 B 1.70 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.26 A 1.01I A 1.53 B 1.50 B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:15:10 AM General Information Two -Way •• • • Report Site Information nalyst MJA Intersection (7)Lakewd Av & Fullers Cr gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/22/2018 East/West Street Fuller's Cross Rd Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.83 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes V V 1 - Magor Street North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L I T R U L T R ",iority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 .tuber of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h) 98 87 175 175 342 241 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked _47 Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.40 6.20 4.10 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.50 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 223 211 Capacity, c (veh/h) 232 904 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.23 95% Queue Length, Qss (veh) 8.6 0.9 Control Delay (s/veh) 94.7 10.2 Level of Service (LOS) F B oroach Delay (s/veh) 94.7 6.4 i Hpproach LOS F Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:17:21 AM 7.1- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Existing AM.xtw Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS1" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:18:20 AM 7.2- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Existing PM.xtw General Information Two -Way •• • • Report Site Information -talyst MJA Intersection (7)Lakewd Av & Fullers Cr ,gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/22/2018 East/West Street Fuller's Cross Rd Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.91 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes 11,fi �_'f'Y Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R '-iority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 mber of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h) 189 81 94 134 162 236 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.41 6.20 4.10 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.51 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 297 103 Capacity, c (veh/h) 450 1133 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.09 95% Queue Length, Qss (veh) 4.7 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.1 8.5 Level of Service (LOS) D A oroach Delay (s/veh) 27.1 4.0 Approach LOS D - Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS1" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:18:20 AM 7.2- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Existing PM.xtw Copyright Q 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:24:14 AM 8- 5095 - Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd - Existing PM.xaw General Information All -Way Site Information "nalyst MJA Intersection (8) Lakewd Ave & Wurst Rd i .gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/23/2018 East/West Street Wurst Rd Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Existing Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes -► 4- I + y t t - Vehicle Volume and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R ume 7 3 6 100 3 70 6 119 178 56 110 15 % Thrus in Shared Lane Lane L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 17 180 316 189 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 2 Departure Headway and Service Time Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.015 0.160 0.281 0.168 Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 5.20 4.96 4.30 4.82 Final Degree of Utilization, x 0.024 0.248 0.377 0.252 Move -Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time, is (s) 3.20 2.96 2.30 2.82 Capacity, Delay and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 17 180 316 189 Capacity 692 725 836 747 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 1.0 1.8 1.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 9.6 9.9 9.4 Level of Service, LOS A A A A proach Delay (s/veh) 8.3 9.6 9.9 9.4 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 9.7 A Copyright Q 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:24:14 AM 8- 5095 - Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd - Existing PM.xaw APPENDIX E Trends Analysis Worksheets Traffic Trends - V3.0 LAKEWOOD AVENUE -- Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd FIN# 11= Location County: Orange (75) Station #: 66.1 Highway: LAKEWOOD AVENUE 14000 4201 bserved Count 92.45%, Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: [=FittedCurve Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 12000 Printed: 22 -Oct -18'. 4400 4400 2015 4700 4800 2016 10000 5200 2017 a� 5700 2022 Opening Year Trend 2022 1 N/A 1 7800 2027 Mid -Year Trend 2027 N/A >_ 8000 2032 Design YearTrend 2032 1 N/A 1 12000 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends L F— 6000 0 4000 L Q 2000 0 2013 C g 2023 2028 2033 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: 4201 Trend R -squared: 92.45%, Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 10.63% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 7.37%', Printed: 22 -Oct -18'. Traffic (ADT/AADT) Year Count* Trend** 2013 4100 4000 2014 4400 4400 2015 4700 4800 2016 5000 5200 2017 5900 5700 2022 Opening Year Trend 2022 1 N/A 1 7800 2027 Mid -Year Trend 2027 N/A 9900 2032 Design YearTrend 2032 1 N/A 1 12000 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends Traffic Trends - V3.0 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD -- Fuller's Cross Rd to Clarke Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 30000 25000 T RS 20000 .0 N U 15000 CU LL 0 10000 m Cn �a L Q 5000 0 2015 County: Orange (75) Station #: 70.0 Highway: CLARCONA-OCOEE RD ** Annual Trend Increase: 650 Trend R -squared: 98.26% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 5.24% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 4.72% Printed: 22 -Oct -18 2015 12300 12400 1 • 13100 13000 2017 13600 13700 2022 Opening Year Trend 2027 Mid -Year Trend 2032 Design Year Trend � •11 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends Emm Traffic Trends - V3.0 OCOEE-APOPKA RD -- Binion Rd to West Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 20000 ® Observed Count 18000 Fitted Curve 16000 0 14000 d 12000 im 10000 H 8000 0 m 6000 rn ca Q 4000 2000 0 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: 320 Trend R -squared: 80.96% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 2.99% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 2.60% Printed: 22 -Oct -18 County: Traffic (ADT/AADT) Orange (75) Station #: Year 71.0 Highway: 10700 OCOEE-APOPKA RD Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** Year 2012 11100 10700 2013 10700 11000 2014 11000 11300 2015 11500 11600 2016 12100 11900 2017 12400 12300 2022 Opening Year Trend 2022 1 N/A 1 13900 Mid-Year2027 - . 2027 1 N/A 1 15500 2032 Design Year Trend 2032 1 N/A 1 17100 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends Traffic Trends - V3.0 OCOEE-APOPKA RD -- West Rd to Silver Star Rd FIN# 1234 Loc t' I 1 12000 oObserved Count —Fitted Curve 10000 8000 s m m 6000 ❑ 4000 a� m a 2000 0 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: 89 Trend R -squared: 46.54% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 1.14% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 0.93% Printed: 22 -Oct -18 County: Orange (75) Station #: 73.0 Highway: OCOEE-APOPKA RD 2612 ::11 880 2013 • 11 :911 2014 9111 9111 2015 :911 • II 2016 9111 • 00 2017 • 1/ • 00 2022 Opening Year Trend 2027 Mid -Year Trend 2032 Design Year Trend I' 1.11 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends Traffic Trends - V3.0 West Road -- Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 25000 ®Observed Count 20000 ca ❑ m U cD 15000 LL r :1 10000 N L Q 5000 0 - LL 2012 County: Traffic (ADT/AADT) Orange (75) Station #: Trend** 2024 Highway: 6300 West Road ** Annual Trend Increase: 637 Trend R -squared: 93.62% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 10.16% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 6.74% Printed: 22 -Oct -18 Traffic (ADT/AADT) Year Count* Trend** 2012 6400 6300 2013 6800 7000 2014 7300 7600 2015 8700 8200 2016 9100 8900 2017 9200 9500 2022 Opening Year Trend 2022 N/A 12700 2027 Mid -Year Trend 2027 1 N/A j 15900 2032 Design YearTrend 2032 1 N/A 1 19100 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends Traffic Trends - V3.0 WURST ROAD --A.D. Mims Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd FIN# I,= Location 6000 Observed Count —Fitted Curve 5000 0 N CD 4000 m ca 3000 > 0 2000 m rn L d Q 1000 - 0 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: -26 Trend R -squared: 6.61% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: -0.36% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): -0.49% Printed: 22 -Oct -18 County: Traffic (ADT/AADT) Orange (75) Station #: Year 7130 Highway: 5500 WURST ROAD Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** Year 2012 5700 5500 2013 5200 5500 2014 5600 5500 2015 5300 5400 2016 5500 5400 2017 5400 5400 2022 Opening Year Trend 2022 1 N/A 1 5300 2027 Mid -Year Trend 2027 1 N/A 1 5100 2032 Design YearTrend 2032 1 N/A 1 5000 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends /_\»=1►197E�9 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary EM General Information Intersection Information -iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 jalyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.97 Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Intersection West Rd/Ocoee Crown... File Name 1- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd - Projecte... Project Description (1) PM Peak Hour - Projected ....................._.. 141). h'1 61S J t a + i Wr ti r:¢, r r,_r Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 52 126 45 237 222 226 109 682 86 177 435 25 Signal Information Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green 16.4 Yellow 4.8 Red 12.0 12.8 0.0 10.0 cy R 89.5 5.9 4.8 3.4 12.0 3.1 9.6 4.8 2.0 z i 10.9 1 4.8 3.1 5 6 a e Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 12.4 18.8 28.8 35.2 13.2 96.3 16.1 99.2 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 6.5 1 7.9 6.8 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 3.0 4.1 3.0 4.1 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.4 7.6 21.9 24.9 6.3 9.0 _Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 2.5 0.1 2.5 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 ase Call Probability 0.91 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 Max Out Probability 1.00 1 0.00 1 1.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 1244 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 54 130 46 229 233 1 112 703 89 182 474 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1781 1781 1585 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1852 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 4.4 5.6 1 4.5 19.9 1 9.1 22.9 4.3 42.4 1 4.2 7.0 23.3 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 4.4 5.6 4.5 19.9 9.1 22.9 4.3 42.4 4.2 7.0 1 23.3 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.22 0.17 0.17 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.62 0.58 Capacity ( c), veh/h 189 243 108 331 608 271 502 1047 887 367 1069 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio ( X) 0.284 0.534 0.428 0.738 0.376 0.860 0.224 0.672 0.100 0.497 0.443 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 92.2 119.4 86.3 367.7 187.7 375.6 78.3 665.6 71.2 126.5 389.1 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 3.6 4.7 3.4 14.5 7.4 14.8 3.1 26.2 2.8 5.0 15.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( of i ), s/veh 66.1 72.1 71.5 56.9 58.8 64.5 15.5 24.9 16.4 20.5 19.2 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 1.8 2.7 6.7 0.4 7.9 0.1 3.4 0.2 0.4 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( of), s/veh 66.4 73.9 74.2 63.6 59.2 72.4 15.5 28.3 16.7 20.9 E25 Level of Service (LOS) E E E E E E B C B C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 72.2 E 65.1 E 25.6 C 20.6C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.7 D Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB adestrian LOS Score / LOS 2.16 B 1.96 B 2.42 B 2.42 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.68 A 1.07 A 1.98 B 1.57 B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:25:54 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information -iency TPD, Inc. ,alyst MJA Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Analysis Date Time Period Intersection Information Duration, h 0.25 Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other PM Peak Hour PHF 0.96 J Urban Street West Rd Analysis Year Intersection ISR 429 SB Ramps File Name Project Description (2) PM Peak Hour - Projected 2021 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Y ti 2- 5095 - West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps - Project... 1 )1 r. Y pi r Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 651 143 404 711 75 84 Signal Information Cycle, S 80.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Green Yellow r 1 2 0 4 110.3 44.2 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 14.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 12.0 12.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 8 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 51.0 17.1 68.0 12.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 9.4 6.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 ase Call Probability 1.00 0.97 Max Out Probability 0.28 ME "1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 6 16 5 2 3 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 427 400 421 741 78 88 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1870 1753 1767 1795 1781 1598 Queue Service Time (g s ), s 12.2 1 10.6 7.4 1 4.9 3.4 4.3 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c), s 12.2 10.6 7.4 4.9 3.4 4.3 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.55 0.55 0.71 0.77 0.08 0.08 Capacity ( c), veh/h 1033 968 579 2748 139 125 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.413 0.414 0.727 0.270 0.561 0.701 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 178 165.5L93.2 71.1 83.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 7.0 6.6 2.8 3.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 10.4 10.48 35.5 36.0 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 1.2 1.3 3.5 6.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Control Delay ( d), s/veh 11.6 11.70 39.1 42.9Level of Service (LOS) B B D DApproach Delay, s/veh / LOS 11.7 B A 0.0 41.1 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 10.8 B Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB . destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.3 1.60 B 2.31 B 2.14 I B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.17 1 A 1.45 A F Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 6:57:57 PM Demand Information WB NB SB Approach Movement R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 4529 875 91 227 532 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap EMOn Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red 13.627.4 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 29.3 0.0 3.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 2 e 3 �J' ` 4 7 8 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 1 6 2 4 Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0 Phase Duration, s 10.6 45.0 34.4 35.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 3.5 30.0 Green Extension Time ( g e), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ise Call Probability 0.72 1.00 1 Max Out Probability 0.09 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 2 12 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 57 557 921 96 239 560 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1810 1781 1795 1572 1795 1572 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.5 7.8 18.2 3.4 7.8 28.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c), s 1.5 7.8 18.2 3.4 7.8 28.0 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.41 0.48 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.37 Capacity ( c), veh/h 242 1692 1230 539 658 576 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.234 0.329 0.749 0.178 0.363 0.972 Back of Queue ( Q ), fl/In ( 95 th percentile) 25.6 127.6 304.2 56.7 138 527.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 1.0 5.0 12.1 2.2 5.5 20.6 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 17.1 13.1 23.2 18.4 18.5 25.0 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.2 0.5 4.2 0.7 0.1 30.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 17.2 13.6 27.5 19.1 18.7 55.3 Level of Service (LOS) B B C B 1 B I I E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.9 B 26.7 C 44.3 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh /,LOS 29.3 C ltimodal Results EB WB NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.67 B1.39 A 2.31 B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.99 Al 1.33 A F Copyright© 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:29:04 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results General Information Intersection Information - -- -- _ .AencV TPr1 Inr ` n,,..,�:., w 'n �c 1. Analyst MJA Analysis Date_ Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF f0.99 - _ Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 Intersection Lakewood Ave File Name 4.1- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... Project Description (4) AM Peak Hour - Projected Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 49 1134 220 390 1091 126 34 189 40 50 27 Signal Information Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 "� r" I_� Vr- Offset, s 0 Reference Point End 11.1 82.3 - -- 24.2 6.4 -- ------ 0.0 - Green 4,4 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap ENV On Yellow 4.0 0.0 0.0 5 5 L' 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Timer Results EBL I EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 1 6 5 2 ._ _.8_ _. Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 10.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 10.4 89.1 28.4 107.0 30.2 12.4 Change Period, ( Y+R o ), s 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway( MAH), s 3.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 3 2 3.1 Queue Clearance Time (g s), s 4.1 20.0 23.5 6.2 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.2 lase Call Probability 0.89 1.00 1 1.00 0.99 `Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T' R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 49 1145 222 394 1102 127 225 40 51 27 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1810 1752 1610 1810 1766 1739 1649 1781 1900 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 2.1 37.8 12.5 18.0 27.1 10.7 21.5 3.6 4.2 2.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (g c), s 2.1 37.8 12.5 18.0 27.1 10.7 21.5 3.6 4.2 2.7 Green Ratio (g/C) 0.54 0.51 0.51 10.922 0.66 0.63 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.04 Capacity ( c), veh/h 326 1799 827 427 2213 263 249 71 76 63 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0,152 0.637 0.269 0.498 0.484 0.904 0.571 0.669 0.430 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 38.8 575.9 211.1 342.9 411.3 218 359.9 77.2 95.9 51.1 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 1.6 22.3 8.4 13.7 16.1 8.4 14.4 3.0 ' 3.8 2.0 Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (95 th per , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 D 00 !' 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d , ), s/veh 17.7 28.1 22.0 30.9 16.2 62.2 66.8 75.5 75.8 75.0 Incremental Delay ( d2), s/veh 0.1 1.7 0.8 8.7 0.8 0.5 4.9 2.7 3.8- 1.7 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 17.8 29.9 22.8 3.945 17.0 62.7 71.7 78.2 79.5 76.7 Level of Service (LOS) B I C C_ D B E E E E E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.3 C 23_.0 C 68.4 E 78.4 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.9 C Multimodal Results EB WB NB I SB j destrian LOS Score / LOS -� 1.92 L _.,cycle LOS Score / LOS 1.66 B 2.09 B 2.33 B 2.49 B 1.72 B 1.07 A 0.68 HCS Street; Ve,sii,n 7 6 Gener Ifl rd 11/92018 1056 43 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information -iency TPD, Inc. alyst MJA Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Intersection Information'{'�'+'i'S Duration, h 0.25 Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 J t $ Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Lakewood Ave File Name 4.2- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... Project Description (4) PM Peak Hour- Projected tii-r;Y• ir. Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T I R L I T I R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 87 900 142 504 795 191 55 295 30 35 15 Signal Information Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Green Yellow Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 Z s 6 1 4 1 a Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 1 6 5 2 4 8 Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 10.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 12.6 70.2 39.1 96.7 39.8 10.9 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Extension Time ( g e), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ise Call Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Service Time (g s ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.62 0.56 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.03 0.03 Capacity ( c), veh/h 389 1427 645 529 2019 379 349 55 59 49 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.226 0.637 0.222 0.963 0.398 0.509 0.926 0.551 0.602 0.307 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 90.2 527.3 169.8 496.8 331.3 284.1 481.5 58.5 67.5 28.5 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 3.5 20.8 6.8 19.7 13.1 11.3 19.3 2.3 2.7 1.1 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 26.2 38.6 31.5 32.6 19.7 55.8 61.9 76.4 76.6 75.9 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 2.2 0.8 11.3 0.6 0.4 4.6 3.2 3.7 1.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 26.4 40.8 32.3 43.9 20.3 56.2 66.5 79.6 80.2 77.1 Level of Service (LOS) C D C D C E E E F E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 38.6 D 29.5 C 62.6 E 79.4 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.8 D Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.98 B 2.10 B 2.33 B 2.49 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.43 A 1.57 B 1.34 A 0.62 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 2:59:03 PM Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 7:14:29 PM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information •' {' iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other b Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.93 Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Y l Intersection Adair St File Name _ 5- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Adair St - Project... Prnior4 flocnrintinn /C,\ DAA Dr�.oL 4.Init D�..f.�..M.� a .a: Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 7:14:29 PM Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 23 9 61 21 6 59 954 14 164 7 48 8 3 15 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap ENV On a F 53. Green 2 Yellow 4.8 - 14.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 s 6 1 ,C�l a 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 2 4 8 Case Number 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 60.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c), s 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 14.8 3.1 Green Extension Time ( g e), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 ase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 1.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 25 652 614 63 522 519 235 28 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s), veh/h/In 551 1870 1751 445 1885 1875 1447 1691 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.7 14.3 1 14.5 6.9 10.3 10.3 11.7 1 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 12.0 14.3 14.5 21.3 10.3 10.3 12.8 1.1 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.18 0.18 Capacity ( c), veh/h 386 1244 1164 305 1254 1247 332 355 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.064 0.524 0.527 0.208 0.416 0.416 0.710 0.079 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 9.4 201.2 190.9 32.1 143.7 145.3 213.7 19.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.4 7.9 7.6 1.3 5.7 5.7 8.4 0.8 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d 1 ), s/veh 9.0 6.9 6.9 12.4 6.2 6.2 32.5 27.7 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 5.9 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 9.3 8.5 8.6 13.9 7.2 7.2 38.4 1 27.7 Level of Service (LOS) A A A B A A D I I C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.6 A 7.6 A 38.4 D 1 27.7 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 11.0 B Itimodal Results EB WB NB I SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.63 B 1 1.63 B 2.29 B 2.29 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.55 B 1.40 A 0.88 A 0.53 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 7:14:29 PM General Information 'll -Way Stop Control Report Site Information �alyst MJA Intersection (8) Lakewd Ave & Wurst Rd ,gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/23/2018 East/West Street Wurst Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes W, L 4 r II+Y1 t.r Vehicle Volume and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R lume 8 3 7 115 3 109 7 192 205 88 176 17 % Thrus in Shared Lane Lane 1_1 L2 L3 1_1 1_2 1_3 L1 L2 1_3 L1 L2 1_3 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 19 236 421 293 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 2 Departure Headway and Service Time Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.017 0.210 0.374 0.260 Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 6.05 5.53 4.78 5.28 Final Degree of Utilization, x 0.031 0.363 0.559 0.429 Move -Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time, is (s) 4.05 3.53 2.78 3.28 Capacity, Delay and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 19 236 421 293 Capacity 595 651 753 682 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.1 1.7 3.5 2.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 11.6 13.7 12.2 Level of Service, LOS A B B B proach Delay (s/veh) 9.2 11.6 13.7 12.2 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 12.6 B Copyright Q 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 7:23:54 PM 8- 5095 - Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd - Projected PM.xaw General Information Westbound R T U L T 3 4U 4 5 0 0 0 2 T 1238 Site Information Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) I-lyst MJA Intersection al.l ,yency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 1 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) _ _t:J _ Lanes v/c Ratio Major Street' East -west Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U L T 'ity 1U 1 2 ,ber of Lanes 0 0 0 Configuration Volume (veh/h) Westbound R T U L T 3 4U 4 5 0 0 0 2 T 1238 R U 6 1 R 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) _ _t:J _ v/c Ratio 95% Queue Length, Qss (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service (LOS) oath Delay (s/veh) 'p,,, oath LOS Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 a.L1- Access 1 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw 6.9 6.96 3.3 3.33 9 395 0.02 0.1 14.3 8 14.3 I B Generated: 10/26/2018 8:49:52 AM Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:51:49 AM a.1.2 - Access 1 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Ist M1A Intersection a1.2 .,yency/Co, TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 1 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes _ I&1&46 ! 4kAk1I Major Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ity 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .oer of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration �^ TT T R R Volume (veh/h) 1002 39 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) Y 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and' level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 14 Capacity, c (veh/h) 480 v/c Ratio 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q's (veh) 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.7 Level of Service (LOS) B oach Delay (s/veh) 12.7 Approach LOS B Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:51:49 AM a.1.2 - Access 1 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information st MJA Intersection a.2.1 Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 2 Time Analyzed �~ AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes � t —4 r IItyt 11r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ` �- U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ity —_ 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ roer of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1382 17 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) - 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized _ No - Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 _ Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3,3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 18 Capacity, c (veh/h)-_ -� 346 v/c Ratio 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q9s (veh) 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.0 Level of Service (LOS) C oath Delay (s/veh) 16.0 Approach LOS C Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/7/2018 10:27:00 PM a.2.1- Access 2 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw General Information ! Site Information yst M1A Intersection a.2.2 Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 2 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period�_(Ch,,T)J 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes J4 1 4-1.4 -rt r- � c 1*TIlYt Y r rt ,o Sv ea: ru; W=;t Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R •ity 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. ber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1061 X37 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked y Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 76 Capacity, c (veh/h) 444 v/c Ratio 0.17 95% Queue Length, Q93 (veh) 0.6 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.8 Level of Service (LOS) B oath Delay (s/veh) 14.8 Approach LOS B i Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS' TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/201.8 8:5501 AM a.2.2 - Access 2 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw Lupyrignt V 2U18 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 12:10:53 PM a.3.1- Access 3 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw HCS7 5eneral Information Two -Way Stop -Control Report Site Information Analyst MJA Intersection a.3.1 Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 3 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes � .d, L. t A- c ' ityt Fr Major Street East- West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R °riority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4umber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 a. 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1350 11 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) p Right Tum Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 8 Capacity, c (veh/h) 357 v/c Ratio 0.02 95% Queue Length, Q9s (veh) 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.3 Level of Service (LOS) C Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.3 :)proach LOS C Lupyrignt V 2U18 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 12:10:53 PM a.3.1- Access 3 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw General Information Two -Way •• • Report Site Information Analyst MJA Intersection a.3.2 Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 3 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes 4 tYt 11f Major Street East West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dumber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1223 1 29 128 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Tum Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 30 Capacity, c (veh/h) _ 391 v/c Ratio 0.08 95% Queue Length, Q,s (veh) 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.0 Level of Service (LOS) B Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.0 pproach LOS B L�pyright m 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" IWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 12:14:08 PM a.3.2 - Access 3 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Prcjected.xtw 'general Information Two-Way • • • Report Site Information Analyst MJA _ Intersection 4 A Northbound Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Ciarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes J x 'iIttyt 11r Major Street. East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R 'riority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,umber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1348 1 7 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Tum Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6,9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 5 Capacity, c (veh/h) 359 v/c Ratio 0.02 95% Queue Length, Qes (veh) 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.2 Level of Service (LOS) C E± Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.2 )proach LOS C Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/20113 1:55:21 PM a.4.1 North - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw ,eneral Information Two -Way • • •Report Site Information analyst MJA Intersection 4 A Northbound Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes -R' 1 1 J d ,A.+ J� y L t 'i Ittyt 1k,r Major Sheet: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R °riority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,umber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1239 10 118 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Tum Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 20 Capacity, c (veh/h) 392 v/c Ratio 0.05 95% Queue Length, Qqs (veh) 0,2 Control Delay (s/veh) 1 14.7 Level of Service (LOS) g Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.7 ,proach LOS B Copyright m 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:57:50 PM a.4.2 North - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw ,eneral Information Two -Way • Report Site Information Analyst MJA Intersection 4 B Southbound Agency/Co. TPD, Inc Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor T 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes 1 y t � ii— G II+Yt11r Major Street East West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R 'riority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 :umber of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1439 30 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Tum Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 51 Capacity, c (veh/h) 327 v/c Ratio 0.16 95% Queue Length, Qqs (veh) 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh) 18.1 Level of Service (LOS) C Approach Delay (s/veh) 18.1 )proach LOS C Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:56:37 PM a.4.1 South - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw HCS7 ^eneral Information Two -Way Stop -Control Report Site Information .analyst M1A Intersection 4 B Southbound Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes 1 H � L � t Cr 1 1+ y t' P r Major We L East West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R 'riority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .umber of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1 1 1264 24 1 1 65 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) _++ 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Leh + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6,9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 71 Capacity, c (veh/h) 379 v/c Ratio 0.19 95% Queue Length, Qvs (veh) 0,7 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.6 Level of Service (LOS) C Approach Delay (s/veh) 16.6 )proach LOS C Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:59:03 PM a.4.2 South - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved, HCS" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:06:46 PM a.5.1- Access 5 & Lakewood Ave - AM Prcjected.xtw General Information Site Information `lyst MJA Intersection a.5.1 .yancy/Co, TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Access 5 Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Intersection Orientation North-South Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.92 025 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes J-1 1 -1 1.u L A- n���Yt Yr Major street North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R °r -Irity 10 j 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 l fiber of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h) 142 0 50 19 0 148 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) v 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 154 0 Capacity, c (veh/h) 756 1518 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.00 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 0.8 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.0 7.4 Level of Service (LOS) B A oath Delay (s/veh) 11.0 0.0 ,;,,,,roach LOS B Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved, HCS" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:06:46 PM a.5.1- Access 5 & Lakewood Ave - AM Prcjected.xtw Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/7/2018 10:3535 PM a.5.2 - Access 5 & Lakewood Ave - PM Projected.xtw ,.. ,Vi=a, . • - r General Information Site Information -Alyst MJA Intersection n 5.2 .,anty/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction I City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street ......... Access s _..__.... Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 1 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Lanes iL iL -1 A -4, 41,1 U L Wr Major Street North South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L ! T R U L T R U L T R U L T R °r'nrity 10 t 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 ber of Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR TR LT Volume (veh/h) 26 0 37 33 0 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 28 Capacity, c (veh/h) _ 845 v/c Ratio 0.03 95% Queue Length, Q,5 (veh) 0.1 MT� Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 0.0 Level of Service (LOS) A -oath Delay (s/veh) 9.4 r rroach LOS A_._. - Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/7/2018 10:3535 PM a.5.2 - Access 5 & Lakewood Ave - PM Projected.xtw HCS7 Two General Information Site Information 'yst MJA Intersection a.6.1 .'. ncy/Co, TPD, Inc. _ Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Access 6 Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes J It 4 ,d.4- J" 4 It 1 ti 4 •- y A 'i *4 + Y t 11 1" Major Street North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L I T R U L T R U L T R p'`-rlty 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 .bar of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L R TR LT Volume (veh/h) 462 0 69 322 0 290 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ~� Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 502 0 0 Capacity, c (veh/h) �- - - 568 786 1129 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.0 95% Queue Length, Qos (veh) 10.2 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 41.7 9.6 8.2 A Level of Service (LOS) E A oath Delay (s/veh) 41.7 0.0 A ,Nroach LOS E Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSTM TWSC Version 7.6 Generated. 11/2/2018 12 07:57 PM a.6.1 - Access 6 & Lakewood Ave - AM Projected.xtw General Information Site Information e Ilyst MJA — — Intersection a.6.2 :nty/Co TPD, Inc.. lunsdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Access 6 Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes J 4 1 ,A.4- 1. 1. U AII+Yi 11r Major STr"t: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach i Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 ber of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L R TR LT Volume (veh/h) 511 0 70 436 0 72 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.43 6.23 4.13 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 2,23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 555 0 0 Capacity, c (veh/h) 642 725 1015 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.00 0.00 95% Queue Length, Qas (veh) 10.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 36.0 10.0 8.5 Level of Service (LOS) E A A -oach Delay (s/veh) 36.0 0.0 oach LOS E_� Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:08:31 PM a.6.2 - Access 6 & Lakewood Ave - PM Prcjected.xtw General Information A -- Jurisdiction Urban Street Intersection Prniar+ n ... rin#inn HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary TPD, Inc. MJA City of Ocoee Ocoee -Apopka Rd Fuller's Cross Rd /R\ DRA D -L- l -J -- Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2021 File Name 6- 5095 - Ocoee Intersection Information_ Duration, h 0.25 Area Type Other PHF 0.99 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 opka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd - Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS'" Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/28/2018 10:57:47 AM Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v), veh/h 360 217 7 86 309 33 8 601 142 16 293 390 Signal Information Cycle, s 143.6 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W On Green Yellow „, 1 2 J 4 60.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J ,(�l s 6 7 e 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 8 4 2 6 Case Number 6.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 76.8 76.8 66.8 66.8 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH), s 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.6 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 72.0 29.7 62.0 62.0 Green Extension Time (g e), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 ase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 max Out Probability 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T 1 R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h364 226 432 759 706 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1043 1860 1626 1811 1664 Queue Service Time ( g s), s 42.3 10.2 17.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c), s 70.0 10.2 27.7 60.0 60.0 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.42 0.42 Capacity ( c), veh/h 357 907 823 782 721 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 1.018 0.250 0.526 0.970 0.979 Back of Queue ( Q ), Win ( 95 th percentile) 641.5 198.8 389.9 1013. 9 974.7 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 25.5 7.8 15.5 40.2 38.7 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d i ), s/veh 53.6 21.5 26.0 41.8 41.8 Incremental Delay ( d2), s/veh 52.1 0.1 0.6 25.0 28.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 105.8 21.6 26.6 66.7 70.1 Level of Service (LOS) F C C E LT- E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 73.5 E 26.6 C 77F6-7 70.1 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 62.3 E Itimodal Results E4B WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.69 B 1.69 B 1.70 B 1.93 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.46 A 1.20 A 1.74 B 1 1.65 B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS'" Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/28/2018 10:57:47 AM HCS7 General Information All -Way Stop Control Report Site Information Inalyst MJA Intersection 7.1 .gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/28/2018 East/West Street Fuller's Cross Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Project Description 5095 Ocoee Village Center Lanes ; I +'Y t Vehicle Volume and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R lume 150 4 100 15 14 0 201 241 4 0 435 317 �o Thrus in Shared Lane Lane L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 1_3 1_1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LT R Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 276 32 485 473 345 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 Departure Headway and Service Time Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.245 0.028 0.431 0.420 0.306 Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 6.84 8.13 6.27 6.48 5.76 Final Degree of Utilization, x 0.525 0.071 0.845 0.851 0.551 Move -Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.3 Service Time, is (s) 4.84 6.13 4.27 4.18 3.46 Capacity, Delay and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 276 32 48S 473 345 Capacity 526 443 574 556 625 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 3.0 0.2 9.0 9.1 3.4 Control Delay (s/veh) 17.1 11.8 34.4 35.6 15.3 Level of Service, LOS C B D E C xoach Delay (s/veh) 17.1 11.8 34.4 27.1 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 27.3 D Copyright O 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:10:17 PM 7.1- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Projected AM - AWSC.xaw HCS7 General Information All -Way Stop Control Report Site Information Analyst MJA Intersection 7.2 gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/28/2018 East/West Street Fuller's Cross Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Project Description 5095 Ocoee Village Center Lanes -4 4 ,s r- Ir I+Y1 tmr Vehicle Volume and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R lume 283 14 93 8 8 0 108 223 15 0 251 333 `Yo Thrus in Shared Lane Lane L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 L1 1_2 L3 1_1 L2 L3 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LT R Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 424 17 376 273 362 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 Departure Headway and Service Time Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.377 0.015 0.334 0.243 0.322 Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 6.51 8.11 6.61 6.87 6.16 Final Degree of Utilization, x 0.767 0.039 0.691 0.521 0.619 Move -Up Time, m (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.3 Service Time, is (s) 4.51 6.11 4.61 4.57 3.86 Capacity, Delay and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 424 17 376 273 362 Capacity 553 444 545 524 585 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 6.9 0.1 5.3 3.0 4.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.7 11.4 23.1 16.8 18.3 Level of Service, LOS D B C C C oroach Delay (s/veh) 27.7 11.4 23.1 17.7 Approach LOS D B C C Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 21.9 C Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'" AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:10:55 PM 7.2- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Projected PM - AWSC.xaw Orange County Public Schools 6501 Magic Way - Building 200 - Orlando, Florida 32809 - (407) 317-3700 - www.ocps.net SCHOOL CAPACITY DETERMINATION CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT DENIAL LETTER - 2ND REVISION March 15, 2019 VIA E-MAIL: rwohIfarth(ZDwc;QrouD.co Mr. Richard Wohlfarth Wohlfarth Consulting Group, LLC 246 N. Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 ACTION: RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL for Application OCE -18-005 This letter serves as the official determination by Orange County Public Schools that school capacity for the following development is not available: Type of Development Application FLUM Rezoning ❑ Amendment or Extension Local Government Application #: CPA -2018-006, RZ-18-06-09 Project Name: Ocoee Village Center OCPS Completed Application Date: August 30, 2018 Parcel #(s): 05-22-28-0000-00-040; -046; -004 Requested New Units (#): SF: 0 MF: 315 TH: 195 Vested Unit(s): SF: 0 MF: 1 TH: 1 Total Project Units: 512 School Board District: # 7 Detailed Capacity Analysis: Attachment A Upon review of the above-named application for School Capacity Determination, the Department of Facilities Planning of Orange County Public Schools finds the application is denied based on insufficient school capacity at Prairie Lake Elementary School and Ocoee Middle School to support the development of 510 new multi -family and townhome residential units. A Capacity Enhancement Agreement (CEA) will be required. To determine if this project can be approved through mitigation, the Applicant must contact the Department of Facilities Planning within fourteen (14) days of this letter. The fee to process a CEA for 510 New Units is $6,000.00, and the process takes approximately sixty (60) days from the date OCPS deems the application sufficient. Please refer to Attachment B for additional instructions on how to proceed with "The Orange County School Board is an equal opportunity agency.- Page 2ux4 OCE -18-005 Capacity Enhancement Denial Letter entering into mCEA. |fyou intend homitigate, the next step inthe application process will baareview by the School Development Review Committee (SDRC). This determination expires on September 11, 2019. |nthe event this project does not possess ofuUy executed CEA by the expiration date but mdiU intends to move forward in the development procesu, the applicant must resubmit the application and application fee to be reevaluated by OCPS. |naddition, should the scope of the project change (e.g., modification of unit count and/or unit type), a new determination will be required. OCPS is not required to extend the expiration date of this determination letter. If this project obtains o CEA, the project will odi|| be required to submit for concurrency review and, if necessary, enter into aConcurrency Mitigation Agreement. This determination is governed by the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency, the provisions of the municipality's adopted Comprehensive Plan, and the Orange County Charter. Please contact mnmmt(4O7)317'37OOext. 20223B1ore-mail meat 6amie.diluzioboergerAocos. net with any questions. Jamie Boerger, AICP.LEEDAP Administrator Facilities Planning Deportment Orange County Public Schools Attachments—Attanhment A: Detailed Capacity Analysis Attachment B: CEA Submittal Requirements and Information DC: Michael Rmner,City uOcoee (viae-mail) Thomas Moore, OCPG(via e'maU) Project File --he Orange County School Board is an equal opportunity agency" O0 Facilities Planning L© Orange County Public Schools School Capacity Determination User ID #: 109591 March 15, 2019 11:18:51 Project ID: CEA —OCE —18 —005 Valid Until: September 11, 2019 ProjectOCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Single Family Units: 0 Single Family Units: 0 U nvested Units Multi Family Units: 315 Vested Units Multi Family Units: 1 Town Homes Units: 195 Town Homes Units: 1 PRAIRIE LAKE ES OCOEE MS OCOEE HS School Level Elementary Middle High CSA: CC School: PRAIRIE LAKE ES OCOEE MS OCOEE HS Analysis of Existing Conditions } School Capacity (2018-2019) 885 1,424 2,777 Enrollment (2018-2019) 877 1,356 2,577 E Utilization (2018-2019) 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% U LOS Standard 110.0% 100.0% 100.0% Available Seats 97 68 200 Analysis of Reserved Capacity L J School Level Elementary Middle 4 Encumbered Capacity 111 43 76 'U Reserved Capacity 0 0 25 Q Adjusted Utilization 111.6% 98.2% 96.4% U Adjusted Available Seats 0 25 99 Analysis of Proposed Development Students Generated 78.525 34.665 39.990 Adjusted Utilization PASS/FAIL 120.5% 100.7% FAIL FAIL 97.9% PASS Number of Seats to Mitigate 1 78.525 9.665 0.000 PRAIRIE LAKE ES OCOEE MS OCOEE HS Q� Facilities Planning ©© Orange County Public Schools Capital Contribution Calculation March 15, 2019 11:20:30 Impact Fee Calculator E c c c Impact Fee Rate Total Estimated Impact Fee E c c E c ( c CE�OCE-18-005 �O E0 o02 M0 c �O o0 m �O c �O o0 m OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER m ami 42-0 " mi a LL °' " a2 � H `�° rn� m in S in �> w r w N �> 3 w �> 0) �> N �> _ o ~ > > i�> �> UJ W� W� �� �� �� _� 2� _ � Status FAIL FAIL PASS Generation Rate 0.191 0.149 0.162 0.095 0.063 0.076 0.131 0.070 0.092 Housing Units Proposed (Non -Exempt) 0 315 195 510 0 315 195 510 0 315 195 510 0 Net Development Impact 78.525 9.665 0 0 Total Cost per Student Station for Failing Schools $ 27,053 $ 27.053 $ 27,053 Net Impact Cost per Student for Passing Schools $ 21,065 $ 21,065 S 21,065 Capital Contribution per Student S 5.988 $ 5,988 S Capital Contribution Due $ 470,208 $ 57,874 $ 0 �78 Impact Fee Calculator Single Family Multi Family Townhomes Total Housing Units Proposed 0 315 195 Impact Fee Rate Total Estimated Impact Fee $ 8,784 $ 5,919 $ 6,930 Total Fiscal Impact $ 3,743,917 Page *of* OCE -1 8-005 Capacity Enhancement Denial Letter CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AGREEMENT (CEA) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION Toproceed with entering into aCEA with OCP5 please provide the Department ofFacilities Planning with the following, and initial each item to acknowledge: ___1. Written confirmation that Applicant would like to proceed with the CEA. Written confirmation can be provided via U.S. Mail or via E -Mail. __3. Check made out to Orange County Public Schools for mitigation agreement fee: CEA Mitigation Agreement Fee 1io5Ounits: $1,500l0 S11o2OOunits: $3,00000 2O1toSDDunits: $4000.00 5D1to1OOOunits: $6,000.00 1001+ units: $7,000.00 Additional Fee for DRI Review: $3,000.00 CEA Extension/Amendment Fee 1toB]units: $1I00.00 51to2DOunits: $1'500.00 2U1tnSOOunits: 53,DOO.00 5O1to1OOOunits: $4,000.00 1OO1+units: $S,OOO.DO Additional Fee for DRI Review: $2'000.00 _3. Ifthe Property isunder contract, please provide the name and address of the contract ___4. Facilities Planning will provide Applicant with a draft mitigation agreement following the School Development Review Committee's (SDRC)recommended approval ofthe draft agreement terms. Please review and provide comments within ofreceipt ofthe draft mitigation agreement from Facilities Planning. �5. After reviewing the draft, Applicant will return to Facilities Planning at least two weeks prior to the School Board hearing date. G. Acheck made out tothe Orange County Comptroller tocover the recording ofthe Agreement in the Public Records, must be provided to Facilities Planning prior to the School Board hearing date. $10.00 for the first page and $8.50 for each additional page. Indexing - first four (4)names free and acharge of$1.0Oper additional name. 7. CEAs are required to appear on one (1) of the School Board meeting agenda. Staff is required tosubmit materials, including asigned agreement, at least two (2) weeks prior to the meeting date. The 2019 School Board meeting schedule is as follows: December 11.2U1@ April 9, 2019 *July 9, 2019 October 8, 2019 January D.2O1O 8ph|23.2018 ~Uu|y30.2O1S October 22.2O1S January 22.2019 May 14.%O19 August O.2V18 November 12'2V1( February 12.2O1B May 28.2O18 August 20.2U19 (Reorganization) February 28.2O1g June 11.2O1Q "September 1O.2O1Q March 12.2019 June 25.2O19 September 24.2O19 °Ten(mVva»Optioma|school board meeting -ifneeded "Budget Public Hearing The School Board's 2020 meeting schedule will be available after the November 12, 2019 meeting COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT 19L960f (A Iti "�'+" -J.'1]L_. 1 L'II'III N IIS,u LILT CI Cd .� $1 M, '_ zip^ ilgt 1'°I I l l lr VAI _ O_ ,_;C] a) v T S u t4 _ Vim) N 5 -- ala '1 Ai maim— `vO O a \ _:G: g t 1.-. c4 cn E 1- rW .faralY - = Esv .n, a' c g ``f - C:�m _ mo _ If um nnn_ ZMY el Ait4V � O o ro ° s 1 , V � v.C$ 4, c � s r W0O o¢ " ��, � o ° -,,,,.,111111 I.JOa U. J 4 � °aOJ o � E � ;_ z >- - o �'� A a VI s� o p. •.. W w a, ai y .� pq 0 W — ce _. a.. . ¢ q w�zHoo¢ CP o E a) vp vN W No o0 vx y+ az¢�WO v o a.� o W V W alp d o o=azA3W co to o a, '. � \ z � Op A� AUFWc�x.7H y > 0 ,4., Oyln O Z O � �O � •°U U W•x Ozx�dAd ,� 1c .E - 4 a• Ig O W H O c� a'O O . ¢ZAZw'aZA 04 CI E NcE y v °p I` �� E., a ZAZwxdw 0 °-. o n •� ,00 J 2 a�� o Za�0a"›. 0 V c °a E o"v W a a V I g ovnU ° o aWA�zcj v /� b a n d o ,,, L: z p.I H [�W '' V .v, 'd .o o y o l' Z ~ Z O O y -7 di >v)�UEZwW o .o a, 0 o0 0 ,▪ °'. : 'Al LU CC a Z Z a, -�s � o v�Zo1-4 o Z � a, ct - E W W J W a N ° o wxAco')--,- 3 Z = ,0 C i .. .5 OQa � Ja odo'd �, � o 04 az�Ow o ', � .40 � . ;Y ° lis .... —W N Q a � ¢ o o g.oxo°f�v�7 w m ro .°c t- 0 ta. . C W S. a'"i � �.• v Z OV� M `"wA o 0) 'C c� n ', co o OW h a, oAo. o 0 0 > f.._...306.Vkik. Q U. Z =.1 'dao . on a, W Uwo �¢�0�. v ° o a) 7:$ b ° Y ° d OO Z o o C • U w w E"y, U w> >~ o v y, � d .n t , V W W o , o v d Z WO;aaLvz�,V'x0 c, a v °; w � a. . rl V Q m ,--I �"' NQ �"• Z OO F-Iami,a Wp. O u O y 0 0 v v o HOW - 2 •3 acv o o a owz SOH o ;> >. 0 o ° c . MEI V F" 0 Z a,lnCL) CA a ° •o 0 =-r=lk win- zo� "0 Yq o a o -oaoo W Z W O do a.u) Hwn0Nwv�ca o a. v onLd � 3 v .� r. V � W � Z � oaS ° zap ax">g a'9 � = o 0.,rz.,. Z_ ca0 >. W �UoO d A¢ ¢wz � , . N0. q ,o rn ' C 0 4 vo° onU ww�ZOcz4 ,-.w v j ,0 a 0 od v o a O O N a O`" � �OwZAwcDp d v V voU A7''nE-. V cd E v o .'2 Z V V ono v x A d F zZ'� 0 a) '0 a) x ▪ a.,4 .,_ ire = W J LU Hai o VU Q¢aO�Wxwc4z cu ¢, o o � 3V cLe O. J W �" '~ 00 � x 4V -c "0Q .174 78 5 -. o o m a W W vN v t'�., F- ¢WE"O 3 v 6. 4) v vb v 5 0 m V O Usn a. -d •.. uSDaW• a da s~ o J O o o p-d wwoa.wx�a o v oo °o' v s = N V — V oa'n r. 0 G! OWZOWF -o a, � � o bA5 'U ~ W O Z Ods v C.)=0;ii;! v cc cd v � b a, o w LL " v0 Z�" oZzz a "0 v o on O O o 00 (:) .�3 yAc? C� d G V v '� v.0Z fa. 6' a w a y v0-0 c% bp E•"zWzcJWga alio " G b m W J 000 �' � ' �wA��zFo > o Q ° ° , ea V ~ � N ° � x wa674 U�Oz a � c ° � ° � ° '; o M ~ V �4 I ;.. � E, A�Uw¢wF. a, � v " . 0 3 d a w ` oN 0 -`2 wwAc4pZV v o a0 o 1. o ., V ti w O W 7) CD U OZdOwWOAw d a ct 4 v `' 'd LD AG •o�M• F — U W.4 a" Q• Hoc.) -0 o o d o.c •� ° c° o 0 c Z x v �. Vg ddg,. = gU VO v 'v o 0 g . •- g 0- a,' W ZdF.,a�ar' Z v 0 ac v a' ao r" vi a, d � ;14 711 w ...a al a. a. , ..• :� W W d o d O .2 cAW V)Fx.,�d on `' Dan cu CDC 3 4 U^Cz 'y� U O°'w "Arrwpw � � 0 Rs o cd ... op a, a. '"" a a o O '� Z I O Z O> a v a, .4 'o .o a'd .o c '� O d a4 v 1.a. ¢ZHc.)dZda o > '� d e Z d a; co H O 5 w ° a .4 a