Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 18 Second Reading of Ordinance for Ocoee Village Center PUD Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan (PUD/LUP) with Approval of the Development Agreement; Project No(s) CPA-2018-006 & RZ-18-06-09
Contact Name: Contact Number: 1440 W/ Ocoee norlda. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Meeting Date: June 18, 2019 Item # 16 Michael Runner Ext. 1018 Reviewed By. Department Director: City Manager: Subject: Ocoee Village Center PUD (Planned Unit Development) ' Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to PUD/Land Use Plan Project No(s): CPA-2018-006 & RZ-18-06-09 Commission District #1 — Larry Brinson, Sr. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: General Location: The subject properties are located on the north side of Clarcona Ocoee Road and east of SR 429, south of Clarcona Ocoee Road, east of N. Lakewood Ave., and east of the intersection of Fullers Cross Road and N. Lakewood Avenue. The site is located within the SR 429 "Interchange Village Character Area. Parcel Identification Number(s): 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046, & 05-22-28-0000-00-004 Property Size: +/- 73.17 acres The property is vacant/ The property has an agricultural exemption for the cultivation of planted pines. The future land use & requested initial zoning classification of the subiect property: CURRENT PROPOSED Jurisdiction/Future Land City of Ocoee / Low Density City of Ocoee / High Density Use -Joint Planning Area Residential Residential & Commercial Land Use Classification Jurisdiction/Zoning City of Ocoee / "R-1A" City of Ocoee / "PUD" Classification "Single-family Dwelling" "Planned Unit Development' The current future land use and zoning classifications of the surrounding properties: Direction Future Land use Zoning Classification Existing Land Use North SR 429 Expressway / Low- ROW/PUD (Townhomes) Vacant Density Residential East City of Ocoee "Recreation" City of Ocoee "A-1" / Orange Single -Family Dwellings / Low Density Residential Count "A-1" South Low Density Residential Orange County "A-1" SR 429 (Western Expressway) West Low Density Residential Orange County "A-1" Single -Family Dwellings Agricultural ISSUE: Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners approve the adoption of the ordinances for Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "City of Ocoee" Low -Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial, and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/ Land Use Plan) for Ocoee Village Center? DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing a Large -Scale Comprehensive Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (4 D.U./Acre) to High Density Residential (8-16 D.U./Acre) and Commercial. A rezoning to PUD for a mixed -use community that will include 150,000 S.F. of Commercial, 196 Unit Townhomes with 316 Unit Apartments Please See the Ocoee Village Center Comprehensive Plan Amendment document prepared June 28 2018. The following table depicts the impacts the proposed development has on public facilities: Public Facility Existing Zoning Proposed Development Net Impact (R-1A) (PUD *292 SFR 316 Apartments / 196Townhomes and 150,000 SF of Commercial units and 120 Hotel Water (300 ERU) 87,600 gpd Apartments 60,000 gpd 51,300 gpd Townhomes 72,600 gpd Retail 3,000 gpd Hotel 120 Room Sewer 270 ERU 78,840 gpd 56,000 gpd 47,880 gpd Traffic ADT 261 1,472 1,211 additional trips Utilities: The site is located within the City of Ocoee's service area and is proposing to connect to public utilities for water and sewer. There is an existing 12" water main and force main on N. Lakewood Ave. and westerly on Fullers Cross Road. An extension is required for connection. Approval of the proposed water and sewer utility plan is required prior to the approval of the final subdivision/site plan. Sewer is available south of Fullers Cross Road, and an extension and lift station will be required. Transportation / Traffic: The proposed PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan) accesses N. Lakewood Avenue, and Clarcona Ocoee Road. Both roads are operating at an acceptable level of service. A plan is provided which indicates road sections to be vacated or transferred (See sheet C-4). Schools: The project will have to mitigate for the extra capacity of 78.525 elementary school students and 9.665 middle school students (See School Capacity Determination Capacity Enhancement Letter). Public Safety: The nearest fire department is Station 38 located on 313 West Road which is approximately 0.5 miles from the property. The estimated response time is less than 2 minutes. The Police Substation is located 0.5 miles from the subject property. The estimated response time is 3 minutes from within the enforcement zone. Drainage: The subject site is located within the Apopka Drainage Basin and therefore, must meet the requirements of Section 11.7 (a) SJRWMD Management and Storage of Surface Water Handbook and Wekiva Study Area BMP's. Design of the drainage system will be evaluated in more detail prior to final engineering approval. Recreation and Open Space: No impacts on recreation facilities are proposed. The applicant will be required to provide thirty-five (35) percent open space. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On January 29, 2019, the DRC met to determine if the proposed Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan) was consistent with the City's regulations and policies. When the discussion was finished, the DRC voted to recommend approval of the Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD/LUP for Ocoee Village Center. PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) met on April 09, 2019, to determine if the proposed Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD/LUP were consistent with the City's regulations and policies. An adjacent property owner spoke in regards to the opportunity of the development to use the renewable energy concept the Montessori School is utilizing and not have a gas station or bank as part of the plan. When the discussion was finished, the P&Z recommended approval of the transmittal of the Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "City of Ocoee" Low -Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial, and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan). DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY (DEO), STATE & SURROUNDING AGENCY REVIEW: The proposed amendments were sent to DEO, State, and surrounding agencies per the statutory Expedited Review process. The expedited review from DEO came back with no objections, recommendations, or conditions. Also, no comments were received from other State or surrounding agencies. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff supports a decision by the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners to approve the Transmittal of the Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "City of Ocoee" Low -Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial, and rezoning to PUD/LUP (Planned Unit Development/Land Use Plan) for Ocoee Village Center, subject to the comments made from staff. Attachments: Location Map; Future Land Use Map; Proposed Future Land Use Map; Surrounding Zoning Map; Aerial Map; Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance; PUD Land Use Plan; Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package; Rezoning Ordinance; Traffic Study; OCE-18-005 Ocoee Village denial letter.pdf. Development Agreement Financial Impact: None Type of Item: (please mark with an "x') X Public Hearing Ordinance First Reading X Ordinance Second Reading Resolution X_ Commission Approval X Discussion & Direction Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution Reviewed by City Attorney Reviewed by Finance Dept. Reviewed by () For Clerk's Dept Use: Consent Agenda Public Hearing Regular Agenda N/A N/A N/A E N ... Ocoee florida Ocoee Community Development Department Printed: March 2019 end Lakes and Water Bodies Parcels Low Density Residential After Proposed Annexation Expressways ROW's Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential �. High Density Residential Professional Offices and Services Commercial Light Industrial - Heavy Industrial - Conservation/Floodplains Recreation and Open Space - Public Facilities/Institutional Road Right -of -Way Lakes --Natural Water Bodies Unincorporated Territory Ocoee Village Center PUD Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposed Future Land Use Map JM_jj=L LI Wet I H D R �e boa �� REC COMM I11111111V 0 COMM HDR F Ocoee Village Center PUD Surrounding Zoning Map Ocoee Community Development Department 1 inch = 813.560627 feet 280140 0 280 560 840 Feet Printed: January 2019 QSubject Property Unincorporated Territory ® and Other Municipalties Zoning Classification: General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban (A-2) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices & Services (P-S) ® Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) Community Commercial (C-2) General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (1-1) General Industrial (1-2) Commercial (PUD) Low Density (PUD) Medium Density (PUD) High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) Unclassified Lakes and Water Bodies .eL,airWCI I � � !yY 4r ti it °i "k''- .^���, � • • • � � ':.: � gar ,����r � • � • a 14^�r�� iCIM 14 �:,.> r ��. a `.a .o•s"�k +.'. •. -�, ir� '�iiti �:�� all WIXI K* ,� '' - � w�w�r .�....�,.. W •nit � �. rr ` tk �VIII M V pIr ORDINANCE NO. 2019-010 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance for Ocoee Village Center PUD) TAX PARCEL ID: 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046 & 05-22-28-0000-00-004 CASE NO. CPA-2018-006: Ocoee Village Center PUD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL" FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 73.17 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, EAST SIDE OF SR 429 EXPRESSWAY, NORTH/SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE, AND AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL; AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Ocoee (City) has adopted the City's Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, the Growth Policy Act (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, sets forth procedures and requirements for a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan and amendments to the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3174(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the City's Local Planning Agency (LPA) conducted a public hearing on April 9, 2019, to consider the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the LPA recommended the proposed amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan that is set forth herein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3184(11), Florida Statutes, on April 16, 2019, the City Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the transmittal of the 1 amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and, after consideration of public comments, authorized its transmittal pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and confirmed as true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. Section 3. Amendments to Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by approval of a Large Scale Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Future Land Use Map designation for the property described in "Exhibit A" from "Low Density Residential" to "High Density Residential and Commercial." Exhibit A" is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Section 4. Transmittal; Revision of the Official City Land Use Map. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to transmit the required copies of the amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan to the parties as required pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Following transmittal the ordinance will be considered for final adoption. Following final adoption, the City Planner is authorized to revise the Official Future Land Use Map of the City of Ocoee in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective following adoption and in accordance with the provisions stated in Section 163.3184(3)(c), Florida Statutes. PASSED and APPROVED on this day of , 2019. [Signatures on Following Page] 2 ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Rusty Johnson, Mayor (SEAL) FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this day of , 2019. SHUFFIELD, LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. mm City Attorney ADVERTISED AND READ FIRST TIME , 2019. READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED , 2019, UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED APRIL 17, 1998 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5461, PAGE 2341 AND IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS: PARCEL 4 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-004: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2930.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 89044'04" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 89044'04" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6450-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 00053'06" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1111.47 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 07'06'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 58053'01" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 72.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 514.27 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00049,52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010'08" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 660.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 00017'43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1409.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE OF RUN SOUTH 00034'54" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 231 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN SOUTH 89044'04" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1286.39 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE RUN NORTH 00011'35" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.77 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 40 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-040: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88007'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1252.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 88007'15" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 00017'43" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1351.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT- OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN NORTH 8901322" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1262.21 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 69030'11" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 851.79 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39026'23" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 868.85 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049'55" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36019'17" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049,021, WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 429, WESTERN BELTWAY, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF- WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-5460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 54040'57" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY 61 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1377.66 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 46 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-046: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00053'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1465.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN SOUTH 89°10'08" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 71013'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST ROAD, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320- 6460-602/603; THENCE RUN NORTH 07°06'16" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 776.19 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 00025'09" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 180.72 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13022'14" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.13 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE RUN NORTH 06015'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 131.33 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 19042" 1" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044 PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 49049'02" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.92 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1385.18 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 56021'45" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 316.40 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13006'58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 317.09 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00049,521, WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.70 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 89010'08" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.12 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. 1.1 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-011 (Rezoning Ordinance for Ocoee Village Center PUD) TAX PARCEL ID: 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046 & 05-22-28-0000-00-004 CASE NO. RZ-18-06-09: Ocoee Village Center PUD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM OCOEE R-1A TO OCOEE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY +/-73.17 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, EAST SIDE OF SR 429 EXPRESSWAY, NORTH/SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE, AND AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE; PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER; FINDING SUCH ZONING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner (the "Applicant") of certain real property located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, as hereinafter described, has submitted an application to the City Commission of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Commission") to rezone said real property (the "Rezoning"); and WHEREAS, the Applicant seeks to rezone certain real property containing approximately +/-73.17 acres, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, from Ocoee R-1A to Ocoee PUD (Planned Unit Development); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5-9(B) of Chapter 180 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Code"), the City Development Services Director has reviewed said Rezoning application and determined that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant is consistent with the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Ordinance No. 91-28, adopted September 18, 1991, as amended (the "Ocoee Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, said Rezoning application was scheduled for study and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Planning and Zoning Commission"); and WHEREAS, on April 9, 2019, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed said Rezoning application for consistency with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and determined that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of the City, and recommended to the Ocoee City Commission that the zoning classification of said real property be rezoned as requested by the Applicant, and that the Ocoee City Commission find that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on 2019, the Ocoee City Commission held a de novo advertised public hearing with respect to the proposed Rezoning of said real property and determined that the Rezoning is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been considered by the Ocoee City Commission in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 166.041(3)(a), Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. The Ocoee City Commission has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article Vill of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. SECTION 2. REZONING. The zoning classification, as defined in the Ocoee City Code, of the Property described in Exhibit "A" containing approximately +/-73.17 acres located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, is hereby changed from Ocoee R-1A to Ocoee PUD (Planned Unit Development). A map of said land herein described which clearly shows the area of the Rezoning is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference is made a part hereof. SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The City Commission hereby finds the Rezoning of the lands described in this Ordinance to be consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 4. ZONING MAP. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to revise the Official Zoning Map of the City of Ocoee in order to incorporate the Rezoning enacted by this Ordinance and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said revised Official Zoning Map in accordance with the provisions of Section 5-1(G) of Article V of Chapter 180 of the Ocoee City Code. SECTION 5. CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk (SEAL) FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this day of , 2019. SHUFFIELD LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. Aa- City Attorney day of , 2019. APPROVED: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Rusty Johnson, Mayor ADVERTISED , READ FIRST TIME , 2019. READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED 2019. Under Agenda Item No. FXI-IIRIT "A" Legal Description of Property THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED APRIL 17, 1998 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5461, PAGE 2341 AND IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE FOLLOWING THREE PARCELS: PARCEL 4 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-004 A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2930.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 89044'04" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 89044'04" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6450-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE RUN NORTH 0005306" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1111.47 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 07'06'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.87 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 58°53'01" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 72.13 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010'08" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 514.27 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89010'08" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 660.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 00017'43" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1409.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE OF RUN SOUTH 00034'54" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 231 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 8; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN SOUTH 89044'04" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1286.39 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD; THENCE RUN NORTH 00011'35" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 231.77 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 40 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-040: A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88007'15" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1252.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 88007'15" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 00017'43" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1351.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044, PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE RUN NORTH 89013'22" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1262.21 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 69030" 1" WEST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 851.79 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39026'23" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 868.85 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49°49'55" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 36019'17" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 49049'02" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 429, WESTERN BELTWAY, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT- OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-5460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 54040'57" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1377.66 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 46 PARCEL ID NO. 05-22-28-0000-00-04& A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISING A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°53'06" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 1465.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF AFORESAID SECTION 5; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE RUN SOUTH 89010,08" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 FOR A DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE RUN NORTH 00049'52" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 71013'20" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST ROAD, A LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY, PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320- 6460-602/603; THENCE RUN NORTH 07006'16" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 776.19 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 00025'09" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 180.72 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13022'14" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.13 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE RUN NORTH 06015'58" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 131.33 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 19042'11" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKING, PARCEL NO. 1044 PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN SOUTH 49049'02" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 265.92 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1385.18 FEET, A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 56021'45" EAST AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 316.40 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13006'58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 317.09 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00049'52" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.70 FEET TO A POINT ON AFORESAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OCOEE - CLARCONA ROAD PER ORLANDO ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTROL SURVEY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN NORTH 89010'08" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.12 FEET TO AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING EXHIBIT "B" Location Map 'Il11�iG�E� ■11�� OCOEE OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER I CITY OF ORCOUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for City of Ocoee by Woh/farth Consulting Group, LLC WCG Project 2018-017 246 N. Westmonte Drive I Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 1 407-750-3123 (0) f 407-350-9090 (C) RWohlfarth@WCGroup.co I(" c ���. 2, 1 Development Services — Planning Division 150 N. Lakeshore Drive I Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone:407.905.3157 I Fax:407.905.3158 Received Date — Office Use Only PROJECT NAME: Ocoee Village Center ACTION REQUESTED: Land Use Amendment to High Density Residential and Commercial ACREAGE: 73.41 # OF LOTS: 360 Apartments, 140 Townhouses together with 150,000 SF of Commercial ZONING REQUESTED: P.U.D. LAND USE REQUESTED H.D. Residential and Commercial APPLICANT'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman owner representative _ APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oal< Drive TELEPHONE NUMBER: 813-754-5018 and 407-350-9090 E-MAILADDRESS: _kenhuchman Rmail.com and Rwohlfarth wcroup co OWNER OF RECORD: See Attached List OWNER'S ADDRESS: See Attached List PHONE NUMBER: See Attached List 0 INVOICES WILL BE SENT TO:[] OWNER OR [X ] APPLICANT PROPERTY LOCATION: Clarcona-Ocoee Road east of SR 429 10711 N.Lakewood Avenue PROPERTY TAX ID. NO(S): 05-22-28-0000-00-040. 05-22-28-0000-00-046 05-22-28-0000-00-004 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ALL APPLICATIONS FOR SUBDIVISION OR SITE PLAN REVIEW MUST PROVIDE THREE (3) EXECUTED, CERTIFIED AND SEALED BOUNDARY SURVEYS FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE A METES -AND -BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ATTACH SURVEY WITH FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS EXHIBIT. Form 18 REZONING APPLICATION PRESENT ZONING: R- PRESENT DESIGNATION ON OCOEE FUTURE LAND USEMAP: LDR DEVELOPMENT HISTORY/OTHER INFORMATION: Vacant, Timber Lands NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND EXISTING LAND USE OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL: N/A, Property is Vacant and is a planted pine forest (silviculture) HOW WILL THE FOLLOWING ESSENTIAL SERVICES BE PROVIDED? A. POTABLE WATER: City of Ocoee B. WASTEWATER TREATMENT: City of Ocoee C. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Priva D. RECREATION: City of Ocoee Prairie Lake Elementary, Ocoee Middle, Ocoee High School 226 Total E. SCHOOLS AND PROJECTED NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN: Units Type lernenta Middle High Total 140 TH 0.162 0.076 0.092 0.330 360 MF 0.149 0.063 0.07 0.282 TH 23 11 13 46 MF 54 23 25 102 76 33 38 148 APPLICATION MADE TO OCPS? F. TRANSPORTATION: (A traffic study may be required.) Understood Form 18 2 REZONING APPLICATION m APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A CITY OF OCOEE OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT WITH APPLICATION. o INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE DEEMED INSUFFICIENT AND MAY BE REJECTED WITHOUT REFUND OF THE APPLICATION FEE. THE CITY MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IF IN THE CITY'S SOLE DISCRETION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRAFFIC STUDIES) IS NEEDED IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE APPLICATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. Farm 18 3 REZONING APPLICATION o .APPLICANT SHALL PAY SUCH ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BV ARTICLE I, SECTION 1-12 OF HE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. "REVIEW COSTS" SHALL MEAN AND REFER TO THE COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE REVIEW AND PROCESSING OF AN APPLICATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITYATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS AND LEGAL, CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING FEES AND COSTS, AND ALL ADVERTISING COSTS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT REVIEW COSTS SHALL NOT, INCLUDE (1) THE COST OF CITY STAFF FROM TIME DEDICATED TO THE REVIEW AND PROCESSING AN APPLICATION, AND (11) CITYATTORNEY, LEGAL, CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING FEES AND COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY IN REVIEWING AND PROCESSING AN APPLICATION WHICH ARE EXPRESSLY INCLUDED WITHIN THE FLAT FEE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1-12.C.2 HEREOF. 0 1 CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION: Form 18 /-xrrLiI,HN I NL3IVA I UKt DATE CITY OF OCOEE 10 REZONING APPLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH Before me, the undersigned personally appeared Kenneth W. Buchman who being first duly swornon oath, depose(s) and say(s): 1. That they/she/he/is the fee -simple owner(s) of the property legally described in this application and that the attached ownership list is made a part of the affidavit and contains the legal description(s) for the real property, and the names and mailing addresses of all owners having an interest in said land. 2. That they/she/he desire(s) comprehensive plan and rezoning (specify action sought) for said property. 3. That they/she/he/ have/has appointed himself (specify himself or agent) to act as the Owner's Authorized Agent to represent the Owner in connection with the proposed action and the real property described in this application. 4. That they/she/he agree to be bound by the actions of the Owner's Authorized Agent designated in Paragraph 3 above and the Ocoee Land Development Code. S. That they/she/he affirm(s), certif(y)(ies) and will complywith all ordinances, regulations and provisions of the City Code of the City of Ocoee, and that all statements and diagrams submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of their/his/her knowledge and belief and further, that this application and attachments shall become part of the official records of the City of Ocoee, and are not returnable. 6. That the accompanying adjacent property owners list is, to the best of their/her/his knowledge, a complete and accurate list of the owner's names and mailing addresses for all property lying within three hundred (300) feet of the perimeter of the subject parcel, as recorded on the latest official Orange County Tax Rolls, 7. That prior to the public hearing, if applicable, signs will be prominently posted on the subject parcel not less than seven (7) days before the application will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Board or the Board of Adjustment, and will remain posted until final determination after which time the notices are to be removed and destroyed. �Z_ ;',; Owner's Signature Print Name: Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of ;?%%,�,.t=� , 20 by } e y; L"who is personal know to me orwho produced as identification, and who took an oath. Notary Public// Print Name: Z),t, My commission expires:.!// Form 18 "RY P, LINDA M Yt)U�U z Notary Public • State of Flontla o °e Commission # GG 062080 m- y COmM. Expires Feb 28, 2021 0ondedthrou g'n National Notary Assn, N REZONING APPLICATION Form 18 REZONING APPLICATION OWNERSHIP LIST PARCEL ONE: OWNER'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman Elise Della Rocca Tom and Carol Cole Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young Bervle Buchman Miles Buchman Robert Solomon OWNERSHIP INTEREST: Fee Simple MAILING ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive. Plant City FI 33566 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey OWNER'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman Elise Della Rocca Tom and Carol Cole Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young, Bervle Buchman Miles Buchman Robert Solomon OWNERSHIP INTEREST: Fee Simple MAILING ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive. Plant City FI 33566 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey Form 18 REZONING APPLICATION Form 18 I'' ��a I•. t 1 I I': OWNER'S NAME: Kenneth W. Buchman Elise Della Rocca Tom and Carol Cole Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young Beryle Buchman Miles Buchman Robert Solomon OWNERSHIP INTEREST: Fee Simple MAILING ADDRESS: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive. Plant City FI 33566 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey * NOTE: ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF MORE THAN THREE PARCELS. 0 REZONING APPLICATION CITY OF OCOEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT VERIFIED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FORM The following legal description has been prepared by and submitted to the City Planning Division for verification. Signature Date APPLICATION REQUEST (OFFICE USE ONLY): FILE NO: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (TO BE TYPED BY APPLICANT): Form 18 Property Owner's Information/ Owners of Record Owner's Name: 13 Kenneth Buchman 93 Elise Della Rocca 13 Tom and Carol Cole ® Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young ® Beryle Buchman ® Miles Buchman 12 Robert Solomon Owner's Address: 13 2718 Laurel Oak Drive Plant City, Florida 33566-6740 Owner's Telephone Number: 13 813-754-5018 Owners within 30DR FID Parcel Num Ownerl Owner2 Addressl Address2 Address3 Address4 City State Zip 16 282028012401D40 ACHERMAN PIETHEIN A ALMEIDA SILVIA R 550 E H ST APT95 48 282027000000084 AGARWAL MANJU AGARWAL ROHITAS 3902 KILMARNOCK DR CHULA VISTA CA 919107514 58 282028000000061 ARENDT GEORGE TJR 19 E LESTER RD APOPKA FL 327124783 65282028000000039 ARREDONDO JESUS ARREDONDO IRENE 6412 SANSON DR APOPKA FL 327122266 47 282028012400040 BAE SUNG OK APOPKA FL 327125224 31 282028012400180 BHIM YATEE R BHIM SAVITRI 32 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124869 27 282028012400240 CAI ZURONG QI YU 244 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124889 34 282028000000019 CHILDERS WILLIAM 330 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124875 18 282028012400130 CHRISTMAN DANIEL P CHRISTMAN RACHEL L 2208 ROCK SPRINGS RD 8601 BEAR HAVEN CT APOPKA FL 327125728 64 282028000000017 CITY OF APOPKA SANFORD FL 327718122 30 282028012400190 COLIN RIGUAD COLIN ROSA M N 120 E MAIN ST APOPKA FL 327035346 49 282028012401050 CONFIDENTIAL 250 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124889 63 282028000000042 CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 52282028012400020 CRUMP PENNY 20 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 9 282028012401140 DESAMOUR JUNTAS DESAMOUR MARIE 340 MAPLEVIEW CT APOPKA FL 327124869 4 282028012401090 DORMAN CECIL DORMAN HUGUETTE 143 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR LAKE MARY FL 327464026 26 282028012400150 EARL1ERRY M EARL NORA PALACIOS 226 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124871 46282027000000061 EDGELLL LC APOPKA FL 327124872 3 282028012400560 ESPOSITO DOLORES F WILLIS KATHLEEN M 2451 WALNUT HEIGHTS RD 2317 TOPAZ ISLE LN APOPKA FL 327034854 40 282028012401080 GOONEWARDENA SHAMANDRA GOONEWARDENA RUTH 209 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 827124867 22 282028012400090 GOWDA YESHWANTH 7708 TUSCANY WOODS DR APOPKA FL 327124873 43282028000000037 GREGORY CHARLES D PO BOX 780717 TAMPA FL 336475108 13 282028012401180 HAN AN HO 1ANG MI RAN 21 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR ORLANDO FL 328780717 6 282028012401110 HERRING PETER W HERRING R ELAINE 131 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124868 21 282028012400100 JONES ELROY JONES KEISHA 136ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124871 25282028012400050 JONES 15AACA STEBNER-JONES ANITRA LYNAE 106 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124870 8 282028012401130 JONES MAY C APOPKA FL 327124870 5 282028012401100 KECHEIIAN JOHN KECHEIIAN SIRANUSH 119 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124871 19 282028012400120 KENNINGTON KENNETH P KENNINGTON LORI LEIGH 137 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR 1405 CHARLEON CT APOPKA FL 327124871 35 282028000000052 KNIGHT CAROLYN SUE SMALLWOOD PATSY DIANE 2144 ROCK SPRINGS RD OCOEE FL 347612566 20 282028012400110 LE VAN HIEN LE CHRIS DAVIS 142 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327125728 12 282028012401170 LITTLE ROBERT LJR LITTLE RETHA M 27 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124870 41 282028012400570 LUCAS DAWN LUCAS GARY 2311 TOPAZ ISLE LN APOPKA FL 327124868 59 282028000000094 LUCCIONI JOSE 25ELESTER RD APOPKA FL 327124867 23 282028012400080 MOCK JOHN C MOCK GERALDINE N 124 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327122266 10282028012401150 NARAINE SHANTA APOPKA FL 327124870 24 282028012400070 NEWBURN RICHARD A 107 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124871 2 282028012400950 NGUYEN ETHAN NGUYEN KATIE 118 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124870 32 282028012400170 NGUYEN TUAN AN NGUYEN NGOC VAN 2314 POND COVE WAY 238 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124864 45 282028012400030 NGUYEN TUNG DOAN THUY HANH XUAN 26 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124889 14 282028012400930 NOISETTE WILNER NOISETTE MARIE 2307 EMERALD ROSE WAY APOPKA FL 327124869 11 282028012401160 ORTEGA LOURDES D 33 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124863 67282028000000043 OWENS LARRY PJR OWENS PEGGYA PO BOX 2324 APOPKA FL 327124868 7282028012401120 PARK GRACIE MAE 142 DOROTHY DR APT 2A APOPKA FL 327042324 56282028000000084 PUMPHREY CURTIS R PUMPHREY KARENR 28030 SHIRLEY SHORES RD ELIZABETHTOWN KY 427014845 28 282028012400210 RAMLAL DAMIEN RAM LAL LISA 312 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR TAVARES FL 327789686 62 282028000000040 RAULERSON ADELBERT D 16 N HIGHLAND AVE APOPKA FL 327124875 60 282028000000087 RAULERSON ADELBERT D JR 859 ERROL PKWY APOPKA FL 327034374 38 282027000000065 RED LANDS LAND TRUST C/O FLTR LLC TRUSTEE APOPKA 4767 NEW FL 327122601 50 282028012401030 RIVA NORMA ROSA ORLANDO FL 328146405 51 282028012400220 RIZO CARLOS A RIZO MARTHA C 2309 POND COVE WAY APOPKA FL 327124865 68 282028000000041 ROCK SPRINGS ACADEMY INC 318 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124875 39 282028012401020 ROUSE BARBARA R LIFE ESTATE REM: STANLEY L ROUSE 2226 ROCK SPRINGS RD 2315 POND COVE WAY APOPKA FL 327125728 57 282028000000074 RSPI MHC LLC APOPKA FL 327124865 42 282028012400230 SHAW DOMINICK A SHAW DIANA R PO BOX 4918 324 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR SKOKIE IL 000764918 44 282028012400060 STEELE VERNITA STEELE DELROY 112 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124875 IS 282028012400940 STENZEL MICHAEL STENZEL SUSAN 2308 POND COVE WAY APOPKA FL 327124870 55 282028000000058 TAAFE VANESSAA TAAFE ALFREDJ 4111 CALEDONIA AVE APOPKA FL 327124864 17 282028012400140 TAGHADOSS M MEHDI 301 N ATLANTIC AVE APT 204 APOPKA FL 327126048 29 282028012400200 THEODORE CLEANNE J THEODORE PIERRE 306 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR COCOA BEACH FL 329312956 33 282028012400160 THEODOREJEAN THEODORE URVINE 232 ALEXANDRIA PLACE DR APOPKA FL 327124875 37 282028000000018 VERO ENTERPRISES INC 320 W SABAL PALM PL STE 300 APOPKA FL 327124889 36 282028022000050 VBRO ENTERPRISES LLC LONGWOOD FL 327793621 PO BOX 915201 LONGWOOD FL 327915201 `GAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: The Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South Range 28 East, LESS the South 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right—of—way, AND LESS that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 lying Northwesterly of State Road 429. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—way taken as parcel 62-161, "Limited Access Right —Of —Way" and Parcel 62-161, "Right —Of —Way A" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 5461, Page 2341. PARCEL B: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the North 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right—of—way. AND The North 7 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the West 30 feet for road right—of—way. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right—of—way taken as Parcel 62-161, "Right —Of —Way B" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 5461, page 2341, LESS AND EXCEPT: 'ditional right—of—way taken as Parcel 1044, "Right —Of —Way' in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 16, page 8120, ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL 1 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 88'07'15" East along the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 1252.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said North line run South 88'07'15" East for a distance of 122.87 feet to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5; thence departing said North line run South 00'17'43" West along the East line of said Northwest 1/4 for a distance of 1351.26 feet to a point on the Northerly line of Right —of —Way Taking, Parcel No. 1044, per Official Records Book 9816, Page 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence departing said East line run North 89'13'22" West along said Northerly right—of—way line for a distance of 154.59 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 1262.21 feet, a chord bearing of North 69'30'11 " West and a chord length of 851.79 feet; thence run Northwesterly along said Northerly right—of—way line and said curve through a central angle of 39'26'23" for an arc distance of 868.85 feet; thence run North 49'49'55" West for a distance of 151.44 feet; thence run North 3619'17" West for a distance of 51.42 feet; thence run North 49'49'02" West for a distance of 184.99 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of County Road 429, Western Beltway, a limited access right—of—way, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence departing aforesaid Northerly right—of—way line run North 54'40'57" East along said Southerly right—of—way line for a distance of 1377.66 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 23.76 acres more or less. AND .,�CEL 2 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00'53'06" East along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 for a distance of 1465.41 feet to the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence departing said West line run South 89'10'08" East along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 145.12 feet; thence departing said North line run North 00°49'52" East for a distance of 50.00 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603, also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 71'13'20" West along said Northerly right-of-way line for a distance of 20.59 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of West Road, a limited access right-of-way, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence run North 07'06'16" East along said Easterly right-of-way line for a distance of 60.00 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 776.19 feet, a chord bearing of North 00'25'09" East and a chord length of 180.72 feet; thence run Northerly along said Easterly right-of-way line and said curve through a central angle of 13'22'14" for an arc distance of 181.13 feet to a point of tangency; thence run North 06'15'58" West for a distance of 131.33 feet; thence run North 19'42'11" West for a distance of 25.32 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Right -of -Way Taking, Parcel No. 1044 per Official Records Book 9816, Page 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence departing said Easterly right-of-way line run South 49'49'02" East along said Southerly right -of -Way line for a distance of 265.92 feet to a point on a non tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 1385.18 feet, a chord bearing of South 56'21'45" East and a chord length of 316.40 feet; thence run Southeasterly along said Southerly right-of-way line and said curve through a central angle of 13'06'58" for an arc distance of 317.09 feet; thence run South 00'49'52" West for a distance of 60.70 feet to a point on aforesaid Northerly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence departing said Southerly right-of-way line run North 89'10'08" West along said Northerly right-of-way line for a distance of 432.12 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 2.13 acres more or less. AND CEL 3 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00'53'06" East along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 for a distance of 2930.83 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5; thence departing said West line run North 89'44'04" East along the South line of said Southwest 1/4 for a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road; thence continuing along said South line run North 89'44'04" East for a distance of 40.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6450-602/603; thence departing said South line run North 00'53'06" West along said Easterly right-of-way line for a distance of 1111.47 feet; thence run North 07'06'16" East for a distance of 265.87 feet; thence run North 58'53'01" East for a distance of 72.13 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460-602/603; thence run South 89'10'08" East along said Southerly right-of-way line for a distance of 514.27 feet; thence run North 00`49'52" East for a distance of 20.00 feet; thence run South 89'10'08" East for a distance of 660.17 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest �/a of the Southwest % of aforesaid Section 5; thence departing said Southerly right-of-way line run South 00'17'43" West along said East line for a distance of 1409.65 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest % of the Southwest �/ of said Section 5, also being the Northeast corner of the Northwest Y4 of the Northwest % of aforesaid Section 8; thence departing said East line of run South 00'34'54" East along the East line of said Northwest �/ of the Northwest % of Section 8 for a distance of 231.78 feet to a point on the South line of the North 231 feet of the Northwest 1/ of the Northwest �/a of aforesaid Section 8; thence departing said East line run South 89'44'04" West along said South line for a distance of 1286.39 feet to a point on aforesaid Easterly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road; thence run North 00'11'35" West along said Easterly right-of-way line for a distance of 231.77 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 47.50 acres more or less. flcridr AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION Development Services — Planning Division 150 N. Lakeshore Drive 9 Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone:407.905.3157 9 Fax:407.905.3158 A. Applicant Information CpA- 01)01IB - 1. Applicant's Name: Kenneth W. Buchman, owner represenative 2. Applicant's Address: 2718 Laurel Oal: Drive 3. Applicant's Telephone Number: 813-754-5018 and 407-350-9090 4. Applicant's Facsimile Number: B. Property Owner's Information 1. Property Owner's Name: See Attached List 2. Property Owner's Address: See Attached List 3. Property Owner's Telephone Number: See Attached List 4. Property Owner's Facsimile Number: C. Subject Property Information r ,_ .> - cece Use On y 1. Location: Clarcona-Ocoee Road east of SR 429, 10711 N_Lakewood Avenue 2. Acreage of Property: 73.41 3. Current Use: Reside 4. Proposed Use: HD Residential and Commercial 5. Existing Zoning: R- 6. Proposed Zoning: 7. Existing Future Land Use Designation: 8. Proposed Future Land Use Designation: H.D. Residential and Commercial 9. Does the Property Owner hold title to other property in the vicinity? Yes_lf so, where? Remainder property on the other side of 429 10. Has an amendment for the adjacent property been processed within the past twoyears? One was started a few years back, not sure of the exact date of submittal or status. It is assumed that the application is not current. AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN D. Surrounding Property Information 1. Zoning: North: A-1 East: A-1 R-1 South: R-1 West: R-1A 2. Future Land Use: North: Recreation and East: Low Density Open Space Residential) Recreation South: Low Density West: Low Density Residential Residential E. Required Submittals 1. X Completed Application Form 2. X Flat fee and review deposit 3. X Completed Owner's Affidavit 4. X Completed. Annexation and Initial Zoning Hold Harmless Agreement 5. X Completed Applicant's Acknowledgment 6. X Location Map 7. X Legal description and boundary survey of the property 8. X Title certification complying with 177.041, FS.1 9. X A list of surrounding property owners within 300' of the subject property, excluding right- of-ways and lakes. 10. X Supplemental information as may be required from time to time to process the application. F. Available Facilities 1. Water Service - a Nearest water main: 12 inch water main at the corner of North Fullers Cross Road and North Lakewood Avenue b. Anticipated water demand: 240,644 Gallons Per Day c Water capacity available: 2 Sewer Service - a Nearest sewer main: 12 inch Gravity Main located on North Lakewood Avenue and Wurst Avenue b. Anticipated sewer demand: 197,068 Gallons Per Day c Sewer capacity available: 3. Roads - a Nearest roadway access: Clarcona —Ocoee Road and SR 429 1 This review does not guarantee capacity availability for public facilities or roads for the project. The applicant may reserve capacity for all public facilities and roads by obtaining a Capacity Reservation Certificate. AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN b. Anticipated trips per day:_ c Roadway capacity available: 4. Fire Service - a Location of nearest fire hydrant: b. Fire district: c Estimated fire response time: d. Will any hazardous materials be stored here? S. Police Service - a Police service district: b. Estimated police response time: 6. Storm water Service: a Location of stormwater retention pond: b. Existing stormwater pond to be used: NIA c New stormwater system to be built: An on -site Storm Water Pond will be constructed on site. d. Stormwater will be handled during DRC Review: 7. Solid Waste - a Nearest solid waste dump: b. Disposal capacity available: c How will any hazardous waste be disposed: 8. Recreation - a Anticipated recreation impact: b. Nearest park facility: c. Recreation capacity available: AMENDMENTTO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN G. Owner's Affidavit STATE OF: Flori COUNTY OF: Hillsborough Before me, the undersigned personally appeared Kenneth W. Buchman who being first duly sworn on oath, depose(s) and say(s): 1. That they/she/he are/is the fee -simple owner(s) of the property legally described in this application. 2. That they/she/he desire(s) to apply for a small scale comprehensive plan amendment for said property. 3. That they/she/he have/has appointed himself to act as the Owner's Authorized Agent to represent the Owner in connection with the proposed action and the real property described in this application. 4. That they/she/he agrees to be bound by the action(s) of the Owner's Authorized Agent designated in paragraph 3 above and the Ocoee Land Development Code. 5. That they/she/he affirm(s), certif(y)(ies) and will comply with all ordinances, regulations, and provisions of the City Code of the City of Ocoee, and that all statements and diagrams submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of their/her/his knowledge and belief, and further, that this application and attachments shall become part of the official records of the City of Ocoee, and are not returnable. 6. That the accompanying adjacent property owners list is, to the best of their/her/his knowledge, a complete and accurate list of the owner's names and mailing addresses for all property lying within three hundred feet (300') of the perimeter of the subject parcel, as recorded in the latest official Orange County Tax Rolls. 7. That prior to the public hearing, if applicable, signs will be prominently posted on the subject parcel not less than twelve (12) days before the application will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment, and will remain posted until final determination (City Commission adopted or denial), after which time the notices are to be removed and destroyed. AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Owner's Sidmature Sworn to and subscribed before me thisday of U—U-iic. w' i by Lc, --L— 1 " who isersanally known to moJdF(tiR or who produced as identification, and who took an oath. 1; Notary Public J Print Name: bil{ a U",??"e My Commission Expires:f .J�d` r� P Sworn to and subscribed before me this_ day of who is personally known to me or who produced oath. Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: Sworn to and subscribed before me this_ day of who is personally known to me or who produced oath. Notary Public Wotwv Public • s9a@o of Florida Commienien o GG 062000 [NOTARIAL SEAS s,9a 4e P79,Comm Enpiros Feb 26, 202 Bonded t0troni�National No¢aryAssi vim- e Owner's Signature by as identification, and who took an [NOTARIAL SEAL] Owner's Signature by , as identification, and who took an Property Owner's Information/ Owners of Record Owner's Name: • Kenneth Buchman • Elise Della Rocca Torn and Carol Cole ® Alissa Barrett and Kevin Young Beryle Buchman Miles Buchman 13 Robert Solomon Owner's Address: 2718 Laurel Oak Drive Plant City, Florida 33566-6740 Owner's Telephone Number: 813-754-5018 v -2 -1- k U r r LAND USE, PLAN AMENDMENT fLUPA�� MA P "ten MIV'Pi N. lof`m#1`11 -' OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER CITY OF OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for City of Ocoee by Wohifarth Consulting Group, LLC WCG Project 2018-017 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 2. PROPERTY AERIAL MAP.................................................................................................. 1 3. MASTER SITE PLAN.......................................................................................................... 3 4. LAND USE AND ZONING................................................................................................... 5 5. LEVEL OF SERVICE.......................................................................................................... 8 6. SERVICES..........................................................................................................................8 6.1 POTABLE WATER SERVICE...................................................................................... 8 6.3.1 WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES ................................................ 9 7. CONCURENCY................................................................................................................ 10 8. SCHOOLS........................................................................................................................ 11 9. IMPACT FEES.................................................................................................................. 12 10. UTILITIES / SERVICES................................................................................................. 13 11. OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................................ 13 12. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS....................................................................................... 13 13. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT...................................................... 13 14. HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY.............................................................. 14 15. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS....................................................................................... 14 16. WATER MANAGEMENT............................................................................................... 14 17. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW........................................................................................... 15 17.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE MAY 19, 2005 REPORT ................................... 15 18. OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER TITLE CERTIFICATION................................................... 16 19. PROJECT SCHEDULE.................................................................................................. 16 20. GENERAL INFORMATION............................................................................................ 17 JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE i OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER TABLE 1 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROJECT PROGRAM .............................................. 4 TABLE 2 PROJECT SITE AND LAND USE DATA................................................................ 7 TABLE 2 PROJECT LOS AND PROJECT IMPACT.............................................................. 8 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF LOS............................................................................................. 11 TABLE 5 STUDENT GENERATION RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS ....................... 11 TABLE 6 PROJECT AREA SCHOOLS / RATING............................................................... 12 TABLE 7 CITY OF OCOEE AND ORANGE COUNTY IMPACT FEES* .............................. 12 TABLE 8 PROJECT AREA UTILITY/SERVICES COMPANIES ........................................... 13 TABLE 9 PROJECT MILESTONES..................................................................................... 16 FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION......................................................................................... 1 FIGURE 2 PROJECT AERIAL............................................................................................... 1 FIGURE 3 HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL MAP.......................................................................... 2 FIGURE 4 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER SITE PLAN............................................................. 3 FIGURE 5 EXISTING LAND USE MAP................................................................................. 5 FIGURE 6 PROPOSED LAND USE MAP............................................................................. 5 FIGURE 7 EXISTING ZONING MAP FIGURE 8 PROPOSED ZONING MAP ...................... 6 FIGURE 9 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROPERTY FEMA MAP ...................................... 14 JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE II OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER a EXHIBIT A OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT B OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER AERIAL MAP EXHIBIT C OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT D OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT E OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER EXISTING ZONING MAP EXHIBIT F OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROPOSED ZONING MAP EXHIBIT G OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER SITE PLAN EXHIBIT H OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER LAND USE TABLES AND ANALYSIS OF LEVEL OF SERVICE EXHIBIT I OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER UPDATED SURVEY EXHIBIT J TITLE COMMITMENT (2015) EXHIBIT K PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION (MAY 2005 BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING) EXHIBIT L PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION 2005 (RELIANCE LETTER - JUNE 2018 BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING) EXHIBIT M PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (APRIL 2005 BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING) EXHIBIT N OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (JUNE 2018, BIO-TECH) EXHIBIT O OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCPA PARCEL MAPS EXHIBIT P OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCPA PARCEL INFORMATION EXHIBIT Q OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER QUAD MAP EXHIBIT R OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER FEMA MAP EXHIBIT S OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCPS CAPACITY LETTER EXHIBIT T OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER POA DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT U OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER PROJECT SCHEDULE EXHIBIT V SOIL ANALYSIS FOR WEKIVA EXHIBIT W CITY OF OCOEE IMPACT FEES (FEB 2018) EXHIBIT X OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL MAP EXHIBIT Y OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE TIME MAP EXHIBIT Z OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER EXISTING UTILITY PLAN JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE iii OCOEE IV. LLC 1 ► : �7�1L��T�7,, The Ocoee Village Center Project is located in the City of Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. The property location is shown on Figure 1 and Exhibit A. A Boundary Survey is shown in Exhibit I. Per the Orange County Property Appraiser (OCPA) the proposed property consists of three parcels (Exhibit O): 10711 N Lakewood Avenue Clarcona Ocoee Road • ,0 0000 4 • acres', Westbridge Court All three properties are located in: Section 5-Township 22-Range 28. Figure 2 and Exhibit B show a recent aerial map of the properties and surrounding area. The site is outlined in yellow. N Lakewood Avenue is a two- lane road west of the property. To the north is State Route 429 and Clarcona-Ocoee Road bisects the property. East of the property is Carpet Street; and east and south of the property are single-family housing neighborhoods. OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER fi. P adrza -," H ighti } Paratll$a Hel9 hts a 1-:�er a vA,AM TAp 01 Full Ave q n w oiviao a b is x �E b arorlh 1a ;'rl uo. slerftu.� Figure 1 Project Location Figure 2 Project Aerial JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 1 OCOEE IV, LLC The following schools are located in close proximity to the property: Ocoee Elementary School is located four miles south of the property on S Lakewood Avenue; Ocoee Middle School is located four miles south of the property on S Bluford Avenue; and Ocoee High School is located 1.9 miles west of the property on Ocoee High School, 1925 Ocoee Crown Point Parkway. CAMC Health Central is located 6.6 miles south of the property, and a Publix anchored shopping center is also located .7 miles to the west on West Road. Also located in the area are several charter schools. Figure 3 and Exhibit X show hospital and school map. Also included is a Drive Time Map (Exhibit Y) for area location and distance references. aaradlse ' Heights D, YRd OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 0 a,a E D ��lol Diossom� �.�� ccreim �. �t tAorry Dh: �Y Av Uala Dl d z 0 a r o 6Sh n� x 0 c IfOa'E GHA0.iC7' �LCGACY MIEN 9 ors Cr ss Rd G ARTER Sa � R q ` i O S RIVC LAI4E 0.. oaxs AFF. o I ELE ENTARt s PCMY ( f Ad Mires ftA Nil 4('n ¢ 41]G IY a' �Q w'lillt ww( [ Ad , 2h al 6 . .— it Y o ZACAUnv t m' ,IaRs�wn yqa, �alencl a l j y5AC'AOEI.ii Ciro Andre G� p� Lowman Aver r �o�i C. s IDor T,A. Ol �� tl xelimg Ave .fr Z. m. fi 'M ti 4qt `t �t a, n m a 5� �I� o! y Dr q a d c+ L.o St. .'A center 5t ,"ho b ax Day 0111NW LAMA G9ftPU; Figure 3 Hospital and School Map aHom� � q d' SilYor A Suusp a D E 4tr Oand4-,I S Ir Bye V d1�fi��J4P H9"E4: Vj 1 ErytC. P'iLSGIiQ'JL. ❑R AryCO: ALrH NTRA Dnlama D( !SPITAi KU�Gbrtm'Gi�ilik `nE .E'dSCWLpCON➢ WLEldlw £GIARi4(Fz CE'0 W4I C(iP,ISilht P'IVYRRk OFi O £P:rt �GT SCk Ut)L RCAIY't5Y o inrnv Da q. ni0� . n JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 2 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 3. MASTER The proposed Master Development Plan is shown below (Figure 4), and attached as Exhibit G. The plan is a mixed -use with residential and commercial uses. L OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER OCOEE, FLORIDA W0HL64RTH CONSULTING i GROUP LT.0 Figure 4 Ocoee Village Center Site Plan JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 3 OCOEE IV, LLC Table '-I.le OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Parcel (NR1) Use Multi -Family Residential 350 Units AreaDU/Acre 14.9 23.6 (NC1) Commercial — Hotel 140 Rooms 2.6 (NC2) Commercial — Bank 10,000 SF 1.5 (NC3) Mixed -Use Commercial 16,000 SF 1.6 (NC4) Mixed -Use Commercial 15,000 SF 1.5 (SR1) Townhouse Residential 140 Units 26.6 5.3 (SC1) Commercial Grocery/Health 75,000 SF 6.7 (SC2) Commercial — Gas Station 6,000 SF 1.5 (SC3) Commercial — QSR 4,500 SF 1.5 (SC4) Commercial — QSR 4,500 SF 1.5 (GRN1) Open Space Water Management 7.9 (GRN2) Public Park 0.2 Parcel Area ROW Area 5.6 67.8 While some of the uses in the table above are specific, the commercial parcels may vary as the development and approval stages progress. The following list of commercial uses are permitted on commercial properties. Uses: Hotels Drive - Through Restaurants Restaurants Offices Banks with Drive -Through Grocery Stores Child Care Centers Convenience Stores Automotive Service Stations Car Washes Pharmacies with Drive - Through Health Clubs Dental and Medical Clinics Urgent Cares Veterinary Clinics Dry Cleaners Shopping Centers JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 4 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER The existing land use for the property is residential low intensity. The land use allows up to four (4) dwelling units per acre. Based on the gross acreage, there are 73.41 acres. Based on four DU/Acres the allowable density is 293 units. As can be seen from the Future Land Use (FLU) Map shown in Figure 5 and Exhibit C, the property is surrounded by low density residential land to the west, north, south and southeast. A small portion of the property backs up to recreation or open space to the northeast. The proposed Land Use Amendment is to modify the land use to high density residential (HDR) and commercial (C). Based on the amendment the area of HDR and C is: HDR 41.5 Acres 16 DU/Acre 664 Units C 31.9 Acres Figure 5 Existing Land Use Map The residential area will be limited to the PUD zoning which will limit the number of residential units to 490 units or a density of 11.8 DU/Acres. A copy of the Proposed Future Land Use Map is shown in Figure 6 and Exhibit D. Figure 6 Proposed Land Use Map JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 5 OCOEE IV. LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER The existing zoning for the property is RI -A. The density of the property is regulated by the land use designation of low density residential of 4 DU/Acre or a maximum of 293 units. The existing Zoning Map is shown in Figure 7 and Exhibit E. The proposed PUD plan increases the use to 490 units and commercial uses. The Description of R1-A by the City of Ocoee is as follows: R-1-A and R-1 single-family dwelling districts. The areas included in R-1-A and R-1 single-family dwelling districts are of the same general character as R-1-AAA and R-1-AA, but with smaller minimum lots and yards, and a corresponding increase in population density. This district is primarily intended for areas shown on the Future Land Use Map as "Low Density Residential'. The proposed rezoning will change the zoning to PUD (Residential) and PUD (Commercial). The PDP/FDP plan shown in the schematic in Figure 7 and Exhibit E. A copy of the Proposed Zoning Map is shown in Figure 8 and Exhibit F. Figure 7 Existing Zoning Map Figure 8 Proposed Zoning Map JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 6 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Description Acreage Gross Data 73.41 acres Uplands 73.41 Acres Wetland/Surface Waters 0 acres Number of Residential Units 490 Commercial Area 135,000 SF plus 140 Hotel Rooms Existing Site Conditions Vacant property, consisting of approximately 73.41 acres of uplands. Existing Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Zoning (North) Existing Zoning (East) Low Density Residential R-1-A Right -of -Way SR 429 Southeast A-1 (County) and Northeast Recreation (City) Existing Zoning (South) A-1 (County) Existing Zoning (West) A-1 (County) Proposed Zoning PUD (Residential) and PUD (High Density Residential) Potential Phasing TBD Setback for Lots (Townhouses) Front 20 Feet Rear Side Side (Corner) 15 Feet 0 Feet 10 Feet Building Height Shall Not Exceed 60 Feet (5 Stories) Impervious Surface Ratio Maximum 60% Density Maximum 8.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre Maximum Building Coverage 60% of Gross Minimum Living Area 850 Square Feet Apartments and 1,250 Square Feet for Townhouses Building Separation Minimum of 20 Feet APARTMENTS; Minimum 15 Feet Townhouses Proposed Use 350 Apartments and 140 Townhouses; 110,000 SF Commercial plus 140 Hotel Units Gross Density (Based on Total Residential Property) 490/41.5 = 11.86 DU/Acres Population 490 X 3.1 = 1,519 Parking Provided Apartments 2 per unit X 350 units = 700 spaces Townhouses 2 per unit X 140 units = 280 spaces JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 7 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Table 3 shDVVS the pje{t'8 established Level Of Service (L{)S) for the City of {}COee and the impact of the Ocoee Village Center development. Description LOS Project Impact Residential Units Apartments 350 Units Residential Units Townhouses (South) 140 Units Commercial 135,000 SF Hotel 140 Rooms People per Unit Residential) 3.1 P/Unit 1,519 People Schools Elementary .137 Students per Unit 67 Students Middle .057 Students per Unit 28 Students High .065 Students per Unit 32 Students The water demand and wastewater generation are based on City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan The potable water service is provided by the City of Ocoee. Based on review of the as -built drawings provided by the City of Ocoee there is a 12" water main just south of the property. This is shown on the Conceptual Engineering Plan. The design of the water distribution system is based on utilizing a 1.5 over a 16-hour period or 2.25 times ADF for max -day plus fire flow (1000 GPM) and 2.5 times max day, or a factor of 5.625 for peak hour flow. The analysis is detailed The City of Ocoee has established, through its Comprehensive Plan, that 300 GPD is an Equivalent Residential Unit. The City has also established values for generation rates for various residential and commercial uses, Based on those values and adjusted per experience, the following have been used in determining the demand for potable water: JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 8 OCOEE IV, LLC Residential Townhouses, assume to be primarily 3 Bedroom ERC per unit Apartments, assume to be an average of 2 BR Commercial Gas Service Station Full Service Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant (QSR) Hotel Retail Grocery OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER 1 ERC/Unit 83 ERC per unit 3.0 ERU/Station 5.5 ERU/Per Restaurant 3.0 ERU/Restaurant .5 ERU/Room .2 GPD/SF or 1 ERU/1,500 SF .2 GPD/SF or 1 ERU/1,500 SF Based on the analysis of the Level of Service for the project the site will require 182,900 Gallons Per Day (ADF) or a total of 610 ERC's. The maximum demand for the project is equal to the maximum daily flow plus fire flow and is 1,318 GPM. A copy of the analysis is attached to the supporting data report. The non -potable water service is available. Irrigation will be provided by reuse water. A reuse system will be installed on the site. The details of the site are not finalized at this time. To determine the approximate quantity of the reuse water required it has been assumed that 40% of the property will be irrigated with 1 Y inches per week. Based on the above approximately 6,000 gallons per day per acre will be required. With 73.41 acres X 40% X 6,000 GPD/acre or 176,184 gallons per day will be required for Irrigation. The reuse water is located east of the property. The reuse line will be extended to the site as part of the land development process. 6.3 WASTEWATER SERVICE The wastewater system will consist of a gravity collection system connected to a proposed pumping station located on the property. The pumping station will pump to a 12" gravity main along N. Lakewood Avenue at Wurst Road. The locations are shown on the existing utility plan, Exhibit Z. 6.3.1 WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES Potable water, non -potable water, and wastewater service are provided by the City of Ocoee. A water capital charge has been established as follows: Water $2,083.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit Sewer $6,178.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit Total $8,251.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 9 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER This is based on the attached impact fee schedule effective as of February 1, 2018. There are annual adjustments of fees. In addition, meter set charges and deposits are required to be paid at the time the meter is set. There is a total of 610 ERU's based on the total $5,033,110.00. In Florida, concurrency refers to a system of providing new public facilities/services to accommodate growth. These facilities and services must be provided at the time of new development. A new development cannot cause a facility to exceed an adopted level -of -service (LOS). The City of Ocoee and Orange County has defined concurrency facilities that include: Roadways Potable Water Facilities Sanitary Sewer Facilities Solid Waste Facilities Recreation and Open Space Facilities Drainage Facilities Schools A request for a Development Order and permits are conditional on the availability of concurrency. Facilities that meet adopted LOS are identified in Table 4. Letters of Capacity Reservation will be issued on a first -come, first -served basis by the Administrative Official. Letters of Capacity Reservation will be valid only for the specific land uses, densities, intensities, construction and improvement schedules contained in the application. Letters of Capacity Reservation run with the land and are transferable to a successor in ownership. Reservation of capacity for concurrency shall expire if the underlying development order or development agreement expires or is revoked. The letters of capacity are issued with the Final Development Plan approval. City of Ocoee Staff will identify the current status in their review. Upon the conclusion of the concurrency review, the Administrative Official shall prepare a written set of findings concerning the proposed development. These findings shall include, but are not limited to: The anticipated public facility impacts of the proposed development; The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the adopted level of service standards; Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the completion of the proposed development; The facility(ies) improvement or additions necessary to accommodate the impact of the proposed development at the adopted level(s) of service standard(s) and the entity(s) responsible for the design and installation of all required facility improvements or additions; and The date such facility(ies) improvement or additions will need to be completed to be concurrent with the impacts on such facility(ies) created by the proposed development. JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 10 OCOEE IV. LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Based on the City's internal review and conversations with their staff, the project would currently meet or exceed the required level of services. There appears to be adequate capacity to process and approve the proposed LUPA and ZMA. Table 4 shows a summary of the Level of Services (LOS) or design criteria, if higher: Table 4 Summary of LOS Item LOS Population 3.1 People/Unit (Single Family) Potable Water 350 GPD/Unit Fire Flow Residential 500 GPM/20 PSI, Commerciall ,000 GPM/20 PSI Sanitary Sewer 300 GPD/Unit Solid Waste 6.0 Pounds/Capital/Day Recreation Parks: 6 Acres/1000 People Drainage Retention/Detention with no Positive Outfall 25 Yr, 96 Hr Public Schools 100% to 125% of FISH of Capacity Roadways Meeting Traffic Analysis Requirements The Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) system is responsible for the public schools servicing the proposed project. In addition to the public system, charter schools and private schools are available in the area. The OCPS has a procedure. An application will be submitted to OCPS for concurrency review as part of the due diligence process. The finding of school capacity also identifies the School Impact Fees for the project. The fee for Townhouses is $6,930.00 per unit and the fee for Apartments is $5,919.00 per unit. Based on the impact fees the cost for schools is: Apartments 350 Units $5919.00 $2,083,488.00 Townhouses 140 Units $6,930.00 $970,200.00 The fees are to be paid as follows: Individually at the time of building permits are issued; and a Capacity Enhancement will be submitted as part of the review process. Table 5 Student Generation Rates for Single -Family Units School Students per Unit Elementary School .152 per unit Middle School .074 per unit High School .102 per unit TOTAL .328 per unit JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 11 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Table 6 lists the schools in the project area and their ratings. Table 6 Project Area Schools / Rating School " Address Phone Rating* Ocoee Elementary School 400 S. Lakewood Avenue 407-877-5027 C+ Ocoee, FL 34761 Ocoee Middle School 300 S. Bluford Avenue 407-877-5035 B Ocoee, FL 34761 Ocoee High School 1925 Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy. 407-905-3000 C+ Ocoee, FL 34761 *2016117 Rating ��I►Ti17_Tor:14 Development projects in the City of Ocoee, Orange County are subject to impact fees for the following: 111 Police Services 11 Fire Protection Is Recreation IN Road Library School Impact fees are based on City of Ocoee Impact Fee Schedule. Table 7 shows the fees as of February 1, 2018. Fees are subject to change. Table 7 City of Ocoee and Orange County Impact Fees* Entity Fee Police Services (Residential) $501.04/Unit Police Services (Non -Residential) $.33/SF Fire Protection (Residential) $636.00/Unit Fire Protection (Non -Residential) $.47/SF Recreation $1,560.00 Road (Commercial) 310 Hotel/Motel $2667.56 Road (Commercial) ITE 820 Varies, $4,847.30 Road (Commercial) ITE 850 $15,791.28 Road ITE 220 Apartments $2,655.21 Road ITE 220 Townhouse $2,319.70 Library $0.00 School (Multi -Family) $5,919.00 School (Townhouse) $6,930.00 *All fees payable prior to Building Permit JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 12 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER The following table lists the utilities/services companies and contact information for the project area. Table 8 Project Area Utility/Services Companies Utility / Service Company Contact Address Phone Phone/Internet/ Bright House Customer Statewide 855-222-0102 Cable TV Spectrum Service Potable Water City of Ocoee Customer 150 N Lakeshore Dr., 407-905-8191 Service Ocoee, FL 34761 Wastewater City of Ocoee Customer 1800 AD Mims Road, 407-905-3159 Service Ocoee, FL 34761 Re -Use Water City of Ocoee Customer 1800 AD Mims Road, 407-905-3159 Service Ocoee, FL 34761 Electric Duke Energy Customer Orlando area 407-629-1010 Service Gas Lake Apopka Customer 1320 Winter Garden 407-656-2734 Natural Gas Service Vineland Rd, Winter Garden, FL 34787 There are major off -site improvements required for the development of the property. They are: Re -alignment of the existing southbound road from Clarcona-Ocoee Road. FA Turn Lanes on Clarcona-Ocoee Road. Connection to the 12" watermain on N. Lakewood Avenue south of Fullers Cross Road. FA Construction of a 12" gravity main along N. Lakewood Avenue at Wurst Road. The locations are shown on the Existing Utility Plan (Exhibit Z). The existing site is a planted pine forest that is part of a silviculture program. As part of the development the pine trees will be removed during the clearing process. The entire site is designated as vegetative community. An Environmental Assessment was prepared by Bio-Tech Consultants and is included in Exhibit N. A Phase I Environmental Study was conducted by Universal Engineering Services and a report issued on April 2005 (Exhibit M). The project number is 13318-004-01. The assessment identified no evidence of unresolved recognized environmental conditions. The assessment concluded that according to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the property, and that if no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. Based on the Analysis no JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 13 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER additional assessments were warranted at that time. Due to the amount of time since the study was ordered an updated has been prepared and attached as Exhibit L. The updated study has the same conclusions and no additional assessments are warranted at this time. 14. HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY A Historical and Archaeological Study has not been performed at this time. 1. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A Traffic Impact Analysis is currently being prepared by Traffic Planning and Design (TPD) and will be submitted under separate cover. 16. WATERMANAGEMENT The property is located within Zone X. The FIRM for the area is Map number 12095CO21OF dated September 25, 2009. A copy of a portion of that map is shown in Figure 9 and Exhibit R. Based on the proposed development there will be no impact to the 100-year flood plain. The property is within the jurisdiction of the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). The property is.under the Wekiva Rule and certain conditions must be meet for the development of the site. As soon as the Master development plan has been finalized, a pre - application meeting and submittal of the permit will be made. SCALE 1" - 1000' PANEL 0210F tl\l\1'. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 210 OF 750 (ate.-.0 WAG ifIC£%f GF FipIA PrtiCL IAVOUT) C CltSN11E. CC<{Y_gp_�f11= =-1. 17" nrmM s MAP NUMBER 120950021OF i MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25,2009 FtJa�al N ierq�nr,\fue8r+ne,1 ,\&,�,r), Figure 9 Ocoee Village Center Property FEMA Map To maximize the property, approximately four acres of off -site water management storage has been proposed on the adjacent golf course. JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 14 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER A detailed analysis has been conducted to determine the impact of the Wekiva Study Area to the development of the property. Based on that analysis (Exhibit V), it was concluded that there are no development restrictions required. 17. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW A Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration was done on May 19, 2005.The report was done by Universal Engineering Sciences (Exhibit K). The report was updated on June 15, 2018. The later report is attached (Exhibit L). The recommendations for the 2005 report are included below. During the design portion of the project, additional geotechnical studies will be conducted. Those studies, as well as the May 19, 2005 and the recent 2018 studies, will be utilized in the development of the project. `IFA111111111111111Nxxi IT,I Ttl=1kil7_r1C07 tIS7elIT, a9M1AJ,F_V 1 It 74767.-A'III The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the soil data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. The recommendations made are of a preliminary nature and cannot be used for design. A comprehensive geotechnical investigation is recommended and the preliminary recommendations will be revised and amended as necessary on completion of the comprehensive exploration. We have not been provided with site development plans or structural loads for the likely development. Against this background, we present our preliminary assessment of site development constraints relating to foundation design, groundwater control, and construction related services. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, we anticipate that relatively lightly loaded structures may be founded on conventional, shallow spread footings, post- tensioned slabs, or on reinforced monolithic slabs with conventional site preparation. The actual design of the foundation will most likely be governed by, building structure type, wall and column loads, and the allowable settlement for the structures. We estimate that the actual foundation design pressures will be in the range of 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per square foot. Since the proposed development will include the addition of impervious areas from the buildings and pavements, the increase in stormwater run-off rate and volumes will likely be attenuated a through stormwater management pond on -site. Based on the subsurface conditions and groundwater levels encountered, and depending upon final site layout, we believe that a wet retention pond system should be considered. We recommend that at this preliminary stage, a seasonal high-water table at a depth of within 3 feet of current grade be assumed. Detailed design of the retention pond system should take into account variations in elevation between boring locations, proximity to the adjacent wetlands, etc. With improvement, the surficial soils appear suitable to support typical light duty pavement sections. We recommend using a flexible pavement section for the design of light and moderate duty parking lots and driveways. Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and cost-effective combination of available materials, For preliminary pavement designs, we recommend using a three -layer pavement section consisting of stabilized subgrade, base course, and surface course. A stabilized subgrade may be required due to the relatively clean nature of the surficial sands, since these sands may not provide the necessary stability during the compaction operations. The three -layer pavement may be placed on existing, prepared subgrade or compacted embankment fill. One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in Central Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. Many roadways and parking areas have been destroyed as a result of deterioration of the base and the base/surface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected and based on our past experience with groundwater problems in this area, we recommend that the seasonal high groundwater and the bottom of the base course be separated by at least 12 inches. In summary, although we have identified the preceding potential constraints due to subsurface conditions, we believe these issues can be managed through proper planning and design and should not significantly affect the feasibility of developing this site. A comprehensive geotechnical exploration should be carried out once development proposals are known. JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 15 OCOEE IV. LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER A Title Certificate was issued on October 16, 2015 (Exhibit J). An updated Title Report dated March 2018 is also attached. In review of the Title certificate and the Boundary Survey there are no encumbrances that will impact the development of the site. The development of the Ocoee Village Center will require a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment (LUPA), a Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA), Preliminary and Final Development Plan (P/FDP), and Subdividing (platting), of the property, a water management permit, and permits from the City of Ocoee and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The project was initiated in February of 2018. The project should have all its entitlements and approvals in January/February of 2019. Table 9 shows the project milestones starting with the execution of the LOI and concluding with the issuance of all the required permits to construct the project. Table 9 Project Milestones Date Milestone February 28, 2018 Signed Contract and Effective Date June 13, 2018 Submit LUPA/ZMA July 21, 2018 Due Diligence Period Over August 14, 2018 Submit PDP/FDP to City August 28, 2018 Submit SJRWMD/ACOE Permit Application November 27, 2018 LUPA/FDP Approved December 18, 2018 PDP/FDP Approved March 15, 2019 FDP Approved March 15, 2019 SJRWMD Permit Approved March 15, 2019 All Permits Issued March 25, 2019 FDEP Permit Approved March 25, 2019 Closing It is anticipated that the project will have all permits by March 2019. A more detailed schedule is included in Exhibit U. Below is a list of the approvals needed for the project's development: Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) rM Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) Preliminary and Final Development Plan (P/FDP) Approval III Orange County Public Schools Concurrency Approval Final Plat Approval Concurrency Review and Approval SJRWMD Permit Approval IN FDEP Water and Sewer Permits JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 16 OCOEE IV, LLC Applicant Ocoee IV, LLC c/o Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 407-750-3123 Office 407-350-9090 Cell Rwohlfarth@wpgroup.co Planner Ocoee Development Il, LLC c/o Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 407-750-3123 Office 407-350-9090 Cell Rwohlfarth@wpgroup.co Civil Engineer Wohlfarth Consulting Group, LLC c/o Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 407-750-3123 Office 407-350-9090 Cell Rwohlfarth@wpgroup.co Surveyor Allen and Company Donald Allen, RJR 16 E Plant Street Winter Garden, Florida 34787 407-654-5955 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Environmental Consultant Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. c/o John Miklos and Danny Gough 2002 East Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32803 407-894-5969 Office 407-894-5970 FAX 407-963-2751 Cell Geotechnical Universal Engineering Sciences c/o Thomas E. Whitney, P.E. 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 407-423-0504 Office Phase 1 Environmental Study Universal Engineering Sciences c/o Mary H. Bruno 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 407-423-0504 Office Transportation Traffic Planning and Design c/o Turgut Dervish 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407-628-9955 JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 17 OCOEE IV, LLC OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER City of Ocoee, 150 N Lakeshore Drive Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3100 MOMSE92M L--M=MM= Building Official Dean Hall DHall@ocoee.org 407-554-7088 Plans Examiner Ryan Morgan rmorgan@ocoee.org 407-554-7089 Plans Examiner/Building Code Inspector Doug Hammon dhammon@ocoee.org 407-554-7087 Building Code Inspectors Rick Howell ricky. howell@ci.ocoee.fl. us 407-554-7089 Bob Farris rfarris@ocoee.org 407-554-7091 Building/Permitting Supervisor Laureen Cooper Icooper@ocoee.org 407-905-3104 Building Division City Planner Michael Rumer MRumer@ci.ocoee.fl.us 407-905-3100 ext. 1018 Development Services 407-905-3157 Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Craig Shadrix Parks and Recreation 407-877-5803 Director Jeffrey Hayes Public Works 301 Maguire Road Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3170 Director Steve Krug Police Department 646 Ocoee Commerce Parkway Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3160 Police Chief Charles J. Brown Fire Department 563 S. Bluford Ave. Ocoee, FL 34761 407-905-3140 Fire Chief John Miller JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 18 OCOEE IV, LLC Orange County School Board 445 W. Amelia St. Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 317-3236 Superintendent Barbara Jenkins Supt@ocps.net Chairman William Sublette William.Sublette@ocps.net OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Orange County Public Schools Facilities Planning 6501 Magic Way, Building 200 Orlando, Florida 32809 (407) 317-3974 (407) 317-3263 Fax Senior Administrator Tyrone K. Smith tyrone.smith@ocps.net (407) 317-3700 x2022898 District 1 Planning Relations Joie Cadle Vitonni Jenkins joie.cadle@ocps.net vitonni.jenkins@ocps.net District 2 (407) 317-3700 x2022395 Daryl Flynn daryl.flynn@ocps.net District 3 Linda Kobert, Vice Chair Linda.Kobert@ocps.net District 4 Pam Gould pamela.gould@ocps. net District 5 Kat Gordon kathleen.gordon@ocps.net District 6 Nancy Robbinson nancy. robbinson@ocps. net District 7 Christine Moore christine. moore2@ocps. net JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 19 OCOEE IV, LLC Exhibit A Ocoee Village Center Location Map Exhibit 8 Ocoee Village Center Aerial Map Exhibit C Ocoee Village Center Existing Future Land Use Map Exhibit D Ocoee Village Center Proposed Future Land Use Map Exhibit E Ocoee Village Center Existing Zoning Map Exhibit F Ocoee Village Center Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit G Ocoee Village Center Site Plan OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Exhibit H Ocoee Village Center Land Use Tables and Analysis of Level of Service Exhibit I Ocoee Village Center Updated Survey Exhibit J Title Commitment (2015) Exhibit K Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration (May 2005 by Universal Engineering) Exhibit L Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration 2005 (Reliance Letter - June 2018 by Universal Engineering) Exhibit M Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (April 2005 by Universal Engineering) Exhibit N Ocoee Village Center Environmental Assessment (June 2018, Bio-Tech) Exhibit O Ocoee Village Center OCPA Parcel Maps Exhibit P Ocoee Village Center OCPA Parcel Information Exhibit Q Ocoee Village Center Quad Map Exhibit R Ocoee Village Center FEMA Map Exhibit S Ocoee Village Center OCPS Capacity Letter Exhibit T Ocoee Village Center POA Documents Exhibit U Ocoee Village Center Project Schedule Exhibit V Soil Analysis for Wekiva Exhibit W Ocoee Village Center Existing Utility Map Exhibit W City of Ocoee Impact Fees (Feb 2018) Exhibit X Ocoee Village Center Hospital and School Map Exhibit Y Ocoee Village Center Drive Time Map Exhibit Z Ocoee Village Center Existing Utility Plan JUNE 2018 DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PAGE 20 fl,-4 irn htl S,bu n R,� ri pa, ja f1r D, ch Arc I{ Ii fl 71 Paradise.' - Heights' � Paradise Heights L, �dva i- c,ut", Rd t 7r ur t al., itd.: O i' r; D, Fullers tv D13 L'u - �J V�Yi fi,h Av,fccic 6lvd In_n , CION/n �i t ` Paint 0:61,s< t P,i tl� st 4, :e .rt. � . ,c DI 7r ,t G—I, Pal" t G, Rd k • !A n r/ v�� �r as '].. G—L ci o,v „ si C ya; Ocoee st It, ;t Si Ocoee n c r Y\apF N DO Legend `�' t E chi ono. 3t rt, ci Property Outline 7 _ C s city Boundary . Ei,t �n Inc SE 439 0,t,ndu Avg. IVhj, N' ( ' Q BLlckman Property o o.ze 0.5 Location Map Miles h 1 G H 0 0 P Buckman Property o ,so 300 600 11°_��`-, Aerial Map Feet GB 0 P Ocoee Village Center o 150 soo soo Existing Future Land Use Feet Legend O FLU PInP—d 01M,, 1-- 0-11, R-id-1,] Wdim. 0eaAy Re,-,Whl Milli D,.",y R—d-1,M PW—I—,I OMaas -d .—I... C...—!al LI,M M-dll H—, Ind-d.j R--mn v,W Op,. Sp - Nhhc F—W—A,.-n—1 Road Rigi—f-Way Ocoee Village Center 0 150 300 600 Proposed Future Land Use Feet G U U U P Ocoee Village Center o 150 soo soo / Existing Zoning Map Feet N IC ® ° s y d f , 7 v r ryryr s g° } Legend Zoning: -Subject-to change during review - Gone ralAgrioultural(A-1) 19uburban (A-2) <, Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) . Singlo-Famlly Dwelling (RAAA) 'Single-Famlly. Dwelling (R-IA)( - ISingleFamil Dwelling (R•1) �',• eOna- 8 Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) } : Multiple-Famlly Dwelling (R-3).. ' F `Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-i) -. Professional Office. _ e - x - Neighborhood Shopping (C.1) " Community Commemlal(C-2). General commercial (C3) J'Restdctad Manufacturing & warehousing (1.1). General Induskiai (I-2) Commercial (PUD) Low Density (PUD) F,4 Medlum Density (PUD) High Density (PUD),," .. ; r Public Use (PUD) ( ,y -. # Industrial (PUD) ` Unclassified delete arse ,1G 8 0 U P Ocoee Village Center 0 150 300 600 .� GIM1KIIA-11 2A arvai Proposed Zoning Map Feet A 1 �J / ,, 7 ,z J -'Y� fl llc� FF0.Kc OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER WOHLFARTH CONSULTING — OCOEE, FLORIDA GROUP LLC — TJ5 yit �vi5N0.YlE,G .LL —Pv1E Sf.+:'K5, Fl 1 J1111 — -- Ocoee Village Center - Site Data Tabuations ON. 2018.06.09 PARCEL USE ROW UNITS ROOMS SQUARE FOOTAGE ERU Height AREA (sf) AaR) A NOTES (NR1) Multi -Family Residential 350 5-Story Bldgs. 646817 , 14.85 Luxury Apartments Bldg. Plate +/_ 12,000sf (NCI) Commercial - Hotel 140 111,012 2.55 Hotel Plate +/_) 22,000sf NC2 Commercial - Bank 10,000 64,221 1.50 Bank NC3 Mixed -Use Commercial 16,000 70,773 1.60 NC4) Mixed Use Commercial 15,000 65,183 1.50 (SR1) Townhouse Residential 140 135ft 1,437,717 133.00 (SC1) Commercial - Grocery/Health 75,000 290,516 6.70 (SC2) Commercial - Gas Station 6,000 65,047 1.50 SC3) Commercial - QSR 4,500 65,235 1.50 (SC4) Commercial - QSR 4,500 65,365 1.50 (GRN 1) Openspace - Water Manag. 62,706 1.40 (GRN2) Public Park 10,481 0.24 490 140 131,000 PARCEL AREA 623 2,955,073 67.84 ROW AREA 241,795 5.55 TOTAL SITE AREA 3,196,868 73.39 114 -1 t11 1-1-1 of srn.a a, llo 22 S-11. 1-11 11 8121, A— Z'CIL 1111,11"IE . ..... ... �.1!1.1111 ... .... ... (41A 111111111-� 111111 11;11111b1_111 lh, I M 60,�N "t, 'VALLEr? COMPANY T �l a ;; E scamp —N. 11 11 I'll ",IT Z, IV 11 IN TI�M''l ll.— � .E —.T'. t7l "I I— INI I I 11T I pUbtic "I EECExp Ill -IS LEIAL 1111N I— — CE 111 11 11 G l.. S1,11- 1, T-11 22 1.11 11 I'll D o z w 0, D 0 0 0 Ca I V_111�1%1_111�11_11 Denotes ...... . Ih- 1 29 1 , C 111111T 111111TI. SLIIICI 12 fi, D:l 11 1 1-,:,- 111Et' 11217 LLr l� zl� _Z 17 W11 x. l. P., 11-1 ..6j, -------- -- -- -------- ANI I AAPHIC S ALL; ®®tea ®��® pLLEnt COMPANY SHEET 2 OF 4 ®tea ®®® COMPANY" ,HEET 3 OF 4 ®®®® o®®® I SEE SHEET Z OF < ®Pa®® — j ALLEN e�®® — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — l' COMPANY... 6 I �r ,K I e al I �_ zip sw.n olio. mnrze aem� °so->„r o ^ I 1 l � (m,7 rksse%Hmirsr.;ar. — aAaIEE �- r VALANi \'lODDED LPNO 1 n � Q � a Q w I w o o 0- m iI 1 I \No : TME P DN DF "I R PERN F "•' " `� DECTIDN e-z_-zI Is Noi E GN i E � ^ + �. _ �.....r.� I—E TON AS T AvvEARs ON ENTITLE CDI.3 IMENT " Y � I,SUEU 9T FRNT AMFR CqN FILE NO, ?U]) 35iB5i5� - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ n SHEET I OF 4 Commitment for Title Insurance First Amei Schedule A Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 ISSUED BY 1 1. Effective Date: October 16, 2015 @ 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Amount of Insurance: a. Owner's Policy ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) $TBD (with Florida modifications) Proposed Insured: To Be Determined b. Loan Policy ALTA Loan Policy of Title Insurance (6-17-06) $TBD (with Florida modifications) Proposed Insured: To Be Determined, its successors and/or assigns as their interests may appear as defined in the Conditions of this policy. C. $ Proposed Insured: Premium: $ 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Alfred F. Barrett; Beryle S. Buchman; Elise A. Solomon; Robert B. Solomon; J. Miles Buchman; Kenneth W. Buchman; Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co - Trustees of the Carol A. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002; and Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co -Trustees of the Thomas E. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002, as their interests may appear, by virtue of Book 4536, Page 1047; Book 4619, Page 407; Book 5286, Page 975; Book 9602, Page 3926; Book 10992, Page 6757; and Book 10992, Page 6759. S. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof Swann Hadley Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 1 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY Exhibit A i First American Title Insurance Company 5011612 - 2037-3448515 Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 The land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Orange, State of Florida, and is described as follows: THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1971 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2062, PAGE 843, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN CORRECTED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2001 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6397, PAGE 247, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9816, PAGE 8120, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 3 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Commitment for Title Insurance First Am Schedule BI Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 The following requirements must be met: ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company REQUIREMENTS 1. Pay and/or disburse the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. 2. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 3. Pay all taxes and/or assessments, levied and assessed against the land, which are due and payable. 4. The following documents, satisfactory to us, creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded: Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 4 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) a. Warranty Deed conveying the land executed by Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, individually and as Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co -Trustees of the Carol A. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002, and by all beneficiaries of the Trust, to To Be Determined. In conjunction therewith, obtain and record with the deed in the Public Records, either: 1) The aforementioned Trust Agreement and any amendments thereto (the "Trust Agreement"), together with an incumbency affidavit from the acting trustee, which describes the land, and: a) Confirms that the Trust Agreement remains in full force and effect; b) that the Trustee still remains vested with all the powers enumerated in the Trust Agreement; and c) that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) noted herein; 2) As an alternative to recording the Trust Agreement in its entirety, obtain and retain in the agent's file an affidavit from the acting trustee, with a copy of the Trust Agreement attached, and asserting that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) attached thereto, and obtain and record in the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, an affidavit of the acting trustee referring to lands to be insured setting forth excerpts of the pertinent sections of the Trust Agreement, as follows: a) the names of the trustee or trustees and excerpts which establish the succession of trustees; b) affirmative statement that the trustee has full power and authority to sell the trust property and excerpts describing such authority; c) affirmation that no contrary powers or restrictions appear in the Trust Agreement; and d) affirmation that the Trust has been in full force and effect during the period of ownership of the lands to be insured. Note: If the terms of the Trust Agreement reveal that it is an active trust and contains a power of sale in the Trustee(s), a deed from all beneficiaries will not be required. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 5 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) b. Warranty Deed conveying the land executed by Carol A. Cole and Thomas E. Cole, individually and as Co -Trustees, or successors, as Co -Trustees of the Thomas E. Cole Trust No. 1, dated August 8, 2002, and by all beneficiaries of the Trust, to To Be Determined. In conjunction therewith, obtain and record with the deed in the Public Records, either: 1) The aforementioned Trust Agreement and any amendments thereto (the "Trust Agreement"), together with an incumbency affidavit from the acting trustee, which describes the land, and: a) Confirms that the Trust Agreement remains in full force and effect; b) that the Trustee still remains vested with all the powers enumerated in the Trust Agreement; and c) that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) noted herein; 2) As an alternative to recording the Trust Agreement in its entirety, obtain and retain in the agent's file an affidavit from the acting trustee, with a copy of the Trust Agreement attached, and asserting that there have not been any amendments or modifications to the Trust Agreement other than the amendment(s) attached thereto, and obtain and record in the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, an affidavit of the acting trustee referring to lands to be insured setting forth excerpts of the pertinent sections of the Trust Agreement, as follows: a) the names of the trustee or trustees and excerpts which establish the succession of trustees; b) affirmative statement that the trustee has full power and authority to sell the trust property and excerpts describing such authority; c) affirmation that no contrary powers or restrictions appear in the Trust Agreement; and d) affirmation that the Trust has been in full force and effect during the period of ownership of the lands to be insured. Note: If the terms of the Trust Agreement reveal that it is an active trust and contains a power of sale in the Trustee(s), a deed from all beneficiaries will not be required. C. Warranty Deed from Alfred F. Barrett; Beryle S. Buchman; Elise A. Solomon; Robert B. Solomon; J. Miles Buchman; and Kenneth W. Buchman, as a single person or persons, and joined by spouse (or their respective spouses), if married, to To Be Determined, conveying the property described in Schedule "A". In the event that the property being conveyed is not the homestead of the grantor(s), the following statement should be set forth on said deed in lieu of a spouse's signature: The land described herein is not the homestead of the grantor(s), and neither the grantor(s) nor the grantor(s) spouse, nor anyone for whose support the grantor(s) is responsible, resides on or adjacent to said land. d. Mortgage from To Be Determined to To Be Determined, encumbering property described in Schedule "A" in the principal amount of $TBD. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $162.97 for Tax Identification No. 05- 22-28-0000-00041. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 6 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) 6. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $3,034.15 for Tax Identification No. 05-22-28-0000-00040. 7. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $6,037.41 for Tax Identification No. 05-22-28-0000-00004. 8. Note: The following is for informational purposes only and is given without assurance or guarantee: 2014 taxes show PAID in the gross amount of $272.35 for Tax Identification No. 05- 22-28-0000-00046. 9. Furnish Company a Survey prepared by a Florida registered land surveyor; dated no more than 90 days prior to closing date of subject transaction; certified to the proposed insured(s), First American Title Insurance Company and all other parties in interest; and, meeting the Florida Minimum Technical Standards for all land surveys. Upon receipt and review of such survey, the Company reserves the right to make such additional requirements and/or to modify the legal description set forth on Schedule A as it may deem necessary. 10. If the amount of insurance to be issued exceeds the authority of the agent under the existing Agency Agreement with the Company, the Company requires that the agent obtain specific underwriting approval from First American. 11. The Company is to be advised as to the identity and nature of the proposed insured under the owner's policy/mortgagor under the mortgage policy, and reserves the right to make such additional requirements as it may deem necessary. 12. Execution at time of closing of the Seller/Owner's Affidavit by owners herein disclosing all facts relative to mechanics', laborers' and materialmens' liens and all facts relevant to parties in possession of the premises to be insured at time of closing. The Company reserves the right to make additional requirements in relation thereto. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 7 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company 5011612 - 2037-3448515 PART II Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 2. Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the land. 4. Any lien, for services, labor, or materials in connection with improvements, repairs or renovations provided before, on, or after Date of Policy, not shown by the public records. 5. Any dispute as to the boundaries caused by a change in the location of any water body within or adjacent to the land prior to Date of Policy, and any adverse claim to all or part of the land that is, at Date of Policy, or was previously under water. 6. Taxes or special assessments not shown as liens in the public records or in the records of the local tax collecting authority, at Date of Policy. 7. Any minerals or mineral rights leased, granted or retained by current or prior owners. 8. Taxes and assessments for the year 2015 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. NOTES FOR STANDARD EXCEPTIONS: Standard Exceptions for parties in possession, for mechanics liens, and for taxes or special assessments not shown as liens in the public records shall be deleted upon receipt of an acceptable Non -Lien and Possession Affidavit establishing who is in possession of the lands, that there are no liens or encumbrances upon the lands other than as set forth in the Commitment, that no improvements to the lands have been made within the past 90 days or are contemplated to be made before closing that will not be paid in full, and that there are no unrecorded taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens in the public records. Any Policies issued hereunder may be subject to a Special Exception for matters disclosed by said affidavit. Standard Exception(s) for questions of survey may be deleted upon receipt and review of a properly certified Survey meeting the Florida Minimum Technical Standards for all land surveys dated no more than 90 days prior to closing or such other proof as may be acceptable to the Company. Any Policies issued hereunder may be subject to a Special Exception for matters disclosed by said survey or proof. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 8 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) 9. Ordinance No. 92-42 of the City of Ocoee, Florida Annexing into the Corporate Limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida recorded December 28, 1992 in Book 4504, Page 4173. 10. Ordinance No. 92-44 of the City of Ocoee, Florida Annexing into the Corporate Limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida recorded December 28, 1992 in Book 4504, Page 4195. 11. Annexation Agreement recorded December 29, 1992 in Book 4506, Page 352. 12. Annexation Agreement recorded December 29, 1992 in Book 4506, Page 377. 13. Drainage easement in favor of Orange County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida contained within that certain Stipulated Order of Taking recorded January 16, 2009 in Book 9816, Page 8120. 14. Terms and conditions of any existing unrecorded lease(s), and all rights of lessee(s) and any parties claiming through the lessee(s) under the lease(s). Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 9 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Note: All of the recording information contained herein refers to the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, unless otherwise indicated. Any reference herein to a Book and Page is a reference to the Official Record Books of said county, unless indicated to the contrary. Notices - Where Sent All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to the Company, Attention: Claims Department, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707. Service, Quality and Availability First American Title Insurance Company cares about its customers and their ability to obtain information and service on a convenient, timely and accurate basis. A qualified staff of service representatives is dedicated to serving you. A toll -free number is available for your convenience in obtaining information about coverage and to provide assistance in resolving complaints at 1-800-854-3643. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. through 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 10 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) Swann Hadley Stump, Dietrich & Spears, P.A. 1031 W Morse Blvd Ste 350 Winter Park, FL 32789 Phn-(407)647-2777 Fax - (407)647-2157 10/15/2015 Re: Customer Reference Number: Ocoee Parcels First American File Number: 2037-3448515 Property Address: , FL YOU • TO A REDUCED PREMIUM FOR TITLE INSURANCE IF THIS OFFICE PROVIDED WITH A PRIOR POLICY INSURING THE SELLER OR •, O, IN TRANSACTION.THE CURRENT An order has been placed with this company for a title insurance policy. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with important information regarding the title insurance premium that has been or will be charged in connection with this transaction. Eligibility for a discounted title insurance premium will depend on : REFINANCE TRANSACTIONS: To qualify for a reduced premium for title insurance you must provide our office with a copy of your prior owner's policy of title insurance insuring your title to the above -referenced property. SALES TRANSACTIONS: To qualify for a reduced premium for title insurance you must provide our office with a copy of your (or your seller's) prior owner's policy of title insurance insuring your title to the above - referenced property. The effective date of the prior owner's policy must be less than three years old or the property insured by the policy must be unimproved (except roads, bridges, drainage facilities and utilities are not considered improvements for this purpose). To qualify for the reduced rate, you or your representative may hand deliver, mail or fax a copy of the prior owner's policy of title insurance to the above address or fax number prior to closing, although we will accept the prior policy up to 5 working days after the closing date of your transaction. Form 5011612 (2-1-11) Page 11 of 12 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) (with Florida modifications) ASS PMf R/C� y I First American Title Privacy Information We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain Information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal Information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect Include: Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; ® Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and ® Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your Information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Information Obtained Through Our Web Site First American Financial Corporation is sensitive to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it is important you know how we treat the information about you we receive on the Internet. In general, you can visit First American or its affiliates' Web sites on the World Wide Web without telling us who you are or revealing any information about yourself. Our Web servers collect the domain names, not the e-mail addresses, of visitors. This information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the site, pages viewed and similar information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our site and to develop ideas to improve the content of our site. There are times, however, when we may need information from you, such as your name and email address. When information is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at the time of collection how we will use the personal information. Usually, the personal Information we collect is used only by us to respond to your inquiry, process an order or allow you to access specific account/profile information. If you choose to share any personal information with us, we will only use it in accordance with the policies outlined above. Business Relationships First American Financial Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect for privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites. Cookies Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive. Firs-Am.c_3 uses stored cookies. The goal of this technology is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with a more meaningful and productive Web site experience. Fair Information Values Fairness We consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits and consumer privacy. Public Record We believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open public record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy. Use We believe we should behave responsibly when we use information about a consumer in our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of data. Accuracy We will take reasonable steps to help assure the accuracy of the data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct inaccurate information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers in identifying the source of the erroneous data so that the consumer can secure the required corrections. Education We endeavor to educate the users of our products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our employees on our fair information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others In our industry to collect and use information in a responsible manner. Security We will maintain appropriate facilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain. Form 50-PRIVACY (9/1/10) Page 1 of 1 Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation) 76 ACRES SITE •- .r •: •�. • •; PROJECT NO.13318-004-02 REPORT NO.402758 Prepared For: RMC Property Group 1745 West Fletcher Avenue Tampa, FL 33612 Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 (407) 423-0504 May 19, 2005 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering ® Environmental Sciences ® Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspections Offices in: Orlando ® Gainesville m Riviera Beach ® Rockledge a Daytona Beach ® Punta Gorda o St. Augustine ® Jacksonville u Ocala a Tampa Attention: Mr. Barry Tillman Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration 76 Acres Site SEC SR 429 & Clarcona-Ocoee Road Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Project No. 13318-004-02 Report No. 402758 Dear Mr. Tillman: OFFICES IN; • Clermont • Daytona Beach • DeBary • Fort Myers Gainesville Hollywood • Jacksonville • Ocala • Orlando • Palm Coast • Rockledge • Sarasota • St. Augustine • Tampa • West Palm Beach Universal Engineering Sciences (UES) is pleased to submit our preliminary geotechnical engineering review for this scheme. 6 I The subject property is an approximately 76-acre site consisting of pine groves. The subject property is located on the southeast comer of SR 429 and Clarcona-Ocoee Road and also the southeast corner of West Road and Clarcona-Ocoee Road within Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. The subject property is located within Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East as referenced in the 'Winter Garden, Florida" United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map. Development proposals are not known, but we have been advised that the site is intended to be developed for mixed use retail and residential. We have carried out an initial assessment of the site based upon a review of published information and the findings of a total of thirty-five (35) hand auger soil borings taken to a depth of approximately 7 feet. Our exploration makes no allowance for surveying services or an environmental assessment of the property. We have not been provided with proposed development plans for the schemes. The subsurface conditions were investigated with a total of thirty-five (35) hand auger soil borings taken to a depth of approximately 7 feet. We performed the auger soil borings by manually advancing a bucket auger into the soils. We evaluated the soil type by visually inspecting the soil cuttings recovered from the auger bucket. The bore hole locations have not been surveyed, however the approximate as -drilled locations are presented in the Appendix B-1: Boring Hole Location Plan. 3532 Maggie Blvd. ® Orlando, FI 32811 ® (407) 423-0504 ® Fax (407) 423-3106 UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402158 The site is currently developed as a pine grove. The USGS topographic quadrangle map titled "Winter Garden, Florida" was referenced as a source for obtaining information regarding the physical setting of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. The subject property is located at an elevation of approximately 160 feet above sea level. The topography in the vicinity undulates and, overall, slopes gently to the east, towards Lake Apopka. The general geology of Orange County is characterized by 30 to 50 feet of undifferentiated fine to medium grained sands and clayey sands of Holocene age overlying the Miocene age Hawthorn Group. The Hawthorn is approximately 100 feet thick and is comprised of interbedded layers of clay, clayey sand, sandy clay, and phosphatic carbonates. The underlying Tertiary age carbonates gently dip east under an increasing thickness of younger sediments. According to the Soil Conservation Service, Orange County Soil Survey, surficial soils at the subject property are classified as Immokaled fine sands, Seffner fine sands and Tavares fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes. Immokalee fine sands are nearly level and poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 10 inches of the surface for one month to three months, and it recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than six months. The permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and it is moderate in the subsoil. Seffner fine sands are nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months and between depths of 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to 2 weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is rapid throughout. Tavares fine sand. This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, and it recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout. The available water capacity is very low. The classifications and descriptions of the soils encountered are shown on the auger boring logs attached. The soil descriptions are based upon visual characterizations of the recovered soil samples. The borings generally encountered light brown to dark brown, light grey to dark grey fine sands with, silt and traces of silt. A few locations encountered very small layers of cemented sand (hardpan) approximately 3.5 to 5 feet � below the existing grade. 't At the time of our preliminary investigation, the groundwater table was encountered at depths ranging from 3.75 to greater than 7 feet below existing grades at the test boring locations. Stabilized groundwater levels have not been determined. UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the soil data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. The recommendations made are of a preliminary nature and cannot be used for design. A comprehensive geotechnical investigation is recommended and the preliminary recommendations will be revised and amended as necessary on completion of the comprehensive exploration. We have not been provided with site development plans or structural loads for the likely development. Against this background, we present our preliminary assessment of site development constraints relating to foundation design, groundwater control, and construction related services. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, we anticipate that relatively lightly loaded structures may be founded on conventional, shallow spread footings, post - tensioned slabs, or on reinforced monolithic slabs with conventional site preparation. The actual design of the foundation will most likely be governed by, building structure type, wall and column loads, and the allowable settlement for the structures. We estimate that the actual foundation design pressures will be in the range of 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per square foot. Since the proposed development will include the addition of impervious areas from the buildings and pavements, the increase in stormwater run-off rate and volumes will likely be attenuated a through stormwater management pond on -site. Based on the subsurface conditions and groundwater levels encountered, and depending upon final site layout, we believe that a wet retention pond system should be considered. We recommend that at this preliminary stage, a seasonal high water table at a depth of within 3 feet of current grade be assumed. Detailed design of the retention pond system should take into account variations in elevation between boring locations, proximity to the adjacent wetlands, etc. With improvement, the surficial soils appear suitable to support typical light duty pavement sections. We recommend using a flexible pavement section for the design of light and moderate duty parking lots and driveways. Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and cost effective combination of available materials. For preliminary pavement designs, we recommend using a three -layer pavement section consisting of stabilized subgrade, base course, and surface course. A stabilized subgrade may be required due to the relatively clean nature of the surfcial sands, since these sands may not provide the necessary stability during the compaction operations. The three -layer pavement may be placed on existing, prepared subgrade or compacted embankment fill. One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in Central Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. Many roadways and parking areas have been destroyed as a result of deterioration of the base and the base/surface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected and based on our past experience with groundwater problems in this area, we recommend that the seasonal high groundwater and the bottom of the base course be separated by at least 12 inches. UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 In summary, although we have identified the preceding potential constraints due to subsurface conditions, we believe these issues can be managed through proper planning and design and should not significantly affect the feasibility of developing this site. A comprehensive geotechnical exploration should be carried out once development proposals are known. Should you have any questions concerning this information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 549 rF Thomas E. Whitney, P Assistant Branch Maw: Oden-n e ick, P.F. Senior Vice President Signature date: STATE OF FLORIDA Registered Professional Engineer No. 3771 1 � �~ © � ©« - _ 7 � � �� /�� \� � 3� �a ��� < - : � d6 �� � ; G \ \ � © � �� .� a � � , a. .� . � � , � � a : � � . . y « � - - - � � « - a � � � - -� - a-77�. �� 9� PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION 76 ACRES CLARCONA-OCOEE ROAD SITE 91 OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA UNIVERSAL U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - ENGINEERING SCIENCES DRAWN BY; R.K.S. DATE- 5/13/05 1 CHECKED BY: LN -1-6ATE. s Vik SCALE, AS SHOWN PROJECT NO: 01 -0013318-004-02 1 REPORT NO: i PAGE NO: A-! FORM UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB-1 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 — 1.5 Grev brown fine Land Very light brown (to grey mottled) fine sand 3.5 — 7 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.0 feet AB-2 Depth (ft) Soll Profile " 0 —1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace silt 1.0 —1.5 Very light brown grey fine sand 1.5 — 3.75 Very light brown (to grey mottled) fine sand 3.75 — 7.0 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.0 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.5 feet AB-3 Depth (ft) Soil.Profil® Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0 — 3.5 Very light brown grey (mottled) fine sand 3.5 — 4.25 Very dark brown silty fine sand 4,25 — 6.0 Brown to dark brown (mottled) sand with silt 6.0 — 7.0 Dark brown silty sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.5 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB-4 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 - 0.5 Grey brown fine sand 0.5 -1.5 Light grey brown fine sand 1.5 - 2.75 Brown to light brown fine sand with trace of slit 2,75 - 4.0 Light brown to brown (mottled) fine sand 4.0 -- 6.5 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 3.75 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 1,0 feet AB-5 Depth (ft) Soilpr®fle 0 -1.25 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.25 -1.5 Light brown to grey (mottled) fine sand 1.5 - 2.5 Dark brown to grey silty fine sand 2.5 - 3.0 Brown to light brown (mottled) fine sand 3.0 - 4.25 Light brown to brown (mottled) fine sand 4.25 - 6.0 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.3 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 1.5 feet AB-6 Depth (ft) Soil'Profile 0 -1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0 -1.75 Light brown to grey fine sand 1.75 - 3.25 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.25 - 5.0 Very light brown to brown (mottled) fine sand 5.0 - 6.5 Dark brown silty sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.1 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.5 feet LIES Project No. 13318-004-02 LIES Report No, 402758 AB-7 - - Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 -1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0 - 3.25 Light brown to brown fine sand 3.25 - 4.0 Very light brown fine sand 4.0 - 5.75 Light to very light hmwn /mniflaril sn. --4 5.75 - 6.5 Brown (mottled) fine sand 6.5 - 7.0 Dark brown silty sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Not encountered (estimated to be 7.5 to 8.5 feet) Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 4.0 feet AB-8 Depth (ft) ;oil Profile 0 -1.0 Brown grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0 - 3.25 Light brown to brown fine sand 3.25 - 4.0 Very light brown fine sand 4.0 - 6.0 Light brown (mottled) Fine sand 6.0 - 7.0 Dark brown silty fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.5 feet A9 - . Depth (ft) - foil Profile . 0 - 3.0 Brown fine sand 3.0 - 5.0 Light brown fine sand 5.0 - 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet LIES Project No. 13318-004-02 LIES Report No. 402758 AB-10 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 - 3.0 Light brown fine sand 3,0 - 4.5 Brown fine sand 4.5 - 6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0 - 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet ABA I Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 - 3.5 Light grey to grey fine sand 3.5 - 4.5 Dark brown fine sand 4.5 - 6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0 - 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.6 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.5 feet AS-12 -- Depth (fft) Soil Profile 0 - 3.0 Light grey to grey fine sand 3.0 - 4.0 Dark brown fine sand 4.0 - 6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0 - 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated -,,Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet !_At3 13 file 0 - 0.5 Grey fine sand 0.5 - 3.0 Brown fine sand 3.0 - 6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0 - 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet LIES Project No. 13318-004-02 LIES Report No. 402758 AB-1 a Depth (ft) soil Profile 0 —1.0 Light grey to grey fine sand 1.0 — 3.0 Brown fine sand 3.0 — 7.0 Light brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet AS-15 Depth (ft) 'Soil Profile 0 — 4.0 Light brown fine sand 4.0 — 6.0 Light brown to brown fine sand 6.0 — 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet AB-16 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 — 4.0 Light brown fine sand 4.0 — 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.5 feet Estimated Seasonal High GAIT Depth 3.0 feet ALB-17 Dept (ft) Soil Profile 0 — 6.0 Light brown fine sand 6.0 — 7.0 Brown fine sand Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 — 1.5 Brown grey fine sand 1.5 — 3.75 Light brown to brown fine sand 3.75 — 4.5 Light brown to brown (mottled) fine. sand 4.5 — 6.75 1 Brown siltv sand Encountered Groundwater TaqDeptht encountered Estimated Seasonal High GW0 feet AB-19 Depth (ft) Sail Profile 0 — 1.5 Grey brown fine sand 1.5 — 3.5 Brown fine sand 3.5 — 4.5 Dark brown sand with hardpan 4.5 — 6.8 Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet AB-20 Depth (ft) Soil;Profil® 0 — 0.5 Grey fine sand 0.5 — 6.0 Brown fine sand 6.0 — 7.0 Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.6 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.5 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB-21 Depth (ft) 0 — 0.5 0.5 —1.5 1.5 — 5.5 5.5 — 6.5 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AS-22 Depth (ft) 0 — 2.5 2.5 — 5.0 5.0 — 6.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth Soil Profile Grey fine sand Orange to brown fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 5.9 feet 3.5 feet Soil Profile Grey brown fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 4.8 feet 2.3 feet AB-23 Depth (ft) Soll Profile 0 — 2.5 Grey brown fine sand 2.5 — 5.0 Brown fine sand 5.0 — 6.0 Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.2 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.5 feet Depth `6ft) Se.. Profile 0 —1.5 Grey brown fine sand Very fine brown sand 5.5 — 7.0 Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 6.0 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.0 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB-25 Depth (ft) 0 — 1.0 1.0 — 3.5 3.5 — 6.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AB-26 ., Depth (ft) 0-1.0 1.0 — 5.5 5.5 — 6.8 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth AB-27 Depth (ft) 0 — 1.0 1.0 — 3.5 3.5 — 5.0 5.0 -- 7.0 Encountered Groundwater 'fable Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth =AB-283 13optp (i ) 0 —1.75 1.75 — 4.0 4.0 — 7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth Soil Profile Grey brown fine sand Browne fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 4.9 feet 2.5 feet Soil Profile " Grey brown fine sand Brown fine sand Dark brown fine sand with trace of silt 5.4 feet 3.0 feet Soil Profile Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Brown fine sand with silt and hardpan Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.8 feet 3.3 feet Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Dark brown to brown fine sand with silt 5.2 feet 3.0 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AS-29 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 - 2.0 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 2.0 - 3.5 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.5 - 4.5 Brown fine sand with silt, wood, and roots 4.5 - end Could not penetrate - boring teminated Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 4.5 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 2.0 feet AS-30 uepin tri) 0 -1.75 1.75 - 3.5 3.5 - 5.0 5.0 - 7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Ddpth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth Soil profile Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to grey fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt and hardpan Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.9 feet 3.5 feet AS-31 Depth (ft) Soil:Profile Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 1.5 - 3.5 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.5 - 7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.8 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.3 feet Pep .� ) 0 -1.0 1.0 - 3.5 3.5 - 5.5 5.5 - 7.0 Encountered Groundwater Table Depth Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth ,} Soli Profll® Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt Brown to orange brown fine sand with trace of silt and hardpan Dark brown fine sand with silt 5.8 feet 3.3 feet UES Project No. 13318-004-02 UES Report No. 402758 AB-33 — - Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 —1.25 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 1.25 — 6,0 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 6.0 — 7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.9 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.4 feet AD-34 Dept (ft) Soil Profile 0 — 1.0 Grey brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 1.0 — 5.5 Light brown to brown fine sand with trace of silt 5.5 — 7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.2 feet AD-35 Depth (ft) Soil Profile 0 —1.0 Dark brown to grey fine sand with trace of silt 1.0 - 3.75 Light brown fine sand with trace of silt 3.75 — 5.5 Brown to orange fine sand with silt 5.5 — 7.0 Dark brown fine sand with silt Encountered Groundwater Table Depth 5.7 feet Estimated Seasonal High GWT Depth 3.2 feet UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysiczl Services a Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Inspection m Plan Review ® Building Code Administration June 20, 2018 Ocoee Development IV, LLC 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 Attn: Mr. Richard C. Wohlfarth, P.E. Reference: Reliance Letter -Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration 76 Acre Site SEC of SR 429 & Clarcona-Ocoee Road Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Project No. 0130.1800271.0000 UES Correspondence No. 1579955 Dear Mr. Wohlfarth: LOCATIONS: • Atlanta ® Daytona Beach ® Fort Myers ® Fort Pierce ® Gainesville ® Jacksonville ® Miami ® Ocala ® Orlando (Headquarters) ® Palm Coast ® Panama City ® Pensacola ® Rockledge ® Sarasota ® St. Petersburg © Tampa ® Tifton ® West Palm Beach At your request and authorization, we are providing this letter of authorization so that the following, Ocoee Development IV, LLC may rely upon our report submitted for the subject property referenced above. The specific report is identified as follows: Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration - UES Project No. 13318-004-02, UES Report No. 402758 dated May 19, 2005. Specific design recommendations were formulated based upon site development plans, proposed geometry and layout configurations, and site grading conditions at the time of our evaluations. If any of these items have changed since the time of our evaluations, our recommendations may not be valid and Ocoee Development IV, LLC should not rely on our conclusions or recommendations presented within this report without having UES review the changes and evaluating the possible affect on the previously provided recommendations. This authorization is granted with the explicit understanding that the limitations expressed in the report continue to apply and that you accept the Universal Engineering Sciences' General Contract Conditions (enclosed) as a condition of your reliance on our report. Please indicate your acceptance in the signature space provided below and return an original of this letter within ten (10) business days if you wish to rely upon our report. Respectfully submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. If " a Zachary W. Adams, P.E. Geotechnical Project Manager Attachment: General Conditions Acceptance: Signature Title 3532 Maggie Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32811 ® 407-423-0504 ® 407-423-3106 www.UniversalEngineering.com Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1: RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc., ("UES'), has the responsibility for providing the services described under the Scope of Services section. The work is to be performed according to accepted standards of care and is to be completed in a timely manner. The term "UES" as used herein includes all of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc s agents, employees, professional staff, and subcontractors. 1.2 The Client or a duly authorized representative is responsible for providing UES with a clear understanding of the project nature and scope. The Client shall supply UES with sufficient and adequate information, including, but not limited to, maps, site plans, reports, surveys and designs, to allow UES to properly complete the specified services. The Client shall also communicate changes in the nature and scope of the project as soon as possible during performance of the work so that the changes can be incorporated into the work product. 1.3 The Client acknowledges that UES's responsibilities in providing the services described under the Scope of Services section is limited to those services described therein, and the Client hereby assumes any collateral or affiliated duties necessitated by or for those services. Such duties may include, but are not limited to, reporting requirements imposed by any third party such as federal, state, or local entities, the provision of any required notices to any third party, or the securing of necessary permits or permissions from any third parties required for UES's provision of the services so described, unless otherwise agreed upon by both parties. 1.4 Universal will not be responsible for scheduling our services and will not be responsible for tests or inspections that are not performed due to a failure to schedule our services on the project or any resulting damages. 1.5 PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE §658.00 5, ANY INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT UES MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE. SECTION 2: STANDARD OF CARE 2.1 Services performed by UES under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of UES's profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in the locality of the project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. 2.2 The Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those observed at locations where borings, surveys, or other explorations are made, and that site conditions may change with time. Data, interpretations, and recommendations by UES will be based solely on information available to UES at the time of service. UES is responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but will not be responsible for other parties' interpretations or use of the information developed. 2.3 Execution of this document by UES is not a representation that UES has visited the site, become generally familiar with local conditions under which the services are to be performed, or correlated personal observations with the requirements of the Scope of Services. It is the Client's responsibility to provide UES with all information necessary for UES to provide the services described under the Scope of Services, and the Client assumes all liability for information not provided to UES that may affect the quality or sufficiency of the services so described. 2.4 Should UES be retained to provide threshold inspection services under Florida Statutes §553.79, Client acknowledges that UES's services thereunder do not constitute a guarantee that the construction in question has been properly designed or constructed, and UES's services do not replace any of the obligations or liabilities associated with any architect, contractor, or structural engineer. Therefore it is explicitly agreed that the Client will not hold UES responsible for the proper performance of service by any architect, contractor, structural engineer or any other entity associated with the project. SECTION 3: SITE ACCESS AND SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Client will grant or obtain free access to the site for all equipment and personnel necessary for UES to perform the work set forth in this Agreement. The Client will notify any and all possessors of the project site that Client has granted UES free access to the site. UES will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the site, but it is understood by Client that, in the normal course of work, some damage may occur, and the correction of such damage is not part of this Agreement unless so specified in the Proposal. 3.2 The Client is responsible for the accuracy of locations for all subterranean structures and utilities. UES will take reasonable precautions to avoid known subterranean structures, and the Client waives any claim against UES, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold UES harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss, including costs of defense, arising from damage done to subterranean structures and utilities not identified or accurately located. in addition, Client agrees to compensate UES for any time spent or expenses incurred by UES in defense of any such claim with compensation to be based upon UES's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. SECTION 4: SAMPLE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL 4.1 Soil or water samples obtained from the project during performance of the work shall remain the property of the Client. 4.2 UES will dispose of or return to Client all remaining soils and rock samples 60 days after submission of report covering those samples. Further storage or transfer of samples can be made at Client's expense upon Client's prior written request. 4.3 Samples which are contaminated by petroleum products or other chemical waste will be returned to Client for treatment or disposal, consistent with all appropriate federal, state, or local regulations. SECTION S. BILLING AND PAYMENT 5.1 UES will submit invoices to Client monthly or upon completion of services. Invoices will show charges for different personnel and expense classifications. 5.2 Payment is due 30 days after presentation of invoice and is past due 31 days from invoice date. Client agrees to pay a finance charge of one and one-half percent (1 Y2 %) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, on past due accounts. 5.3 If UES incurs any expenses to collect overdue billings on invoices, the sums paid by UES for reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, UES's time, UES's expenses, and interest will be due and owing by the Client. SECTION 6: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 6.1 All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by UES, as instruments of service, shall remain the property of UES. 6.2 Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which are not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose. 6.3 UES will retain all pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of five years following submission of the report, during which period the records will be made available to the Client at all reasonable times. 6A All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by UES, are prepared for the sole and exclusive use of Client, and may not be given to any other party or used or relied upon by any such party without the express written consent of UES. SECTIO'�1 7: DISCOVERY OF UNANTICIPATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 7.1 Client warrants that a reasonable effort has been made to inform UES of known or suspected hazardous materials on or near the project site. 7.2 Under this agreement, the term hazardous materials include hazardous materials (40 CFR 172.01), hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.2), hazardous substances (40 CFR 300.6), petroleum products, polychlorinated biphenyls, and asbestos. 7.3 Hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. UES and Client agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work. UES and Client also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for UES to take immediate measures to protect health and safety. Client agrees to compensate UES for any equipment decontamination or other costs incident to the discovery of unanticipated hazardous waste. 7A UES agrees to notify Client when unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials are encountered. Client agrees to make any disclosures required by law to the appropriate governing agencies. Client also agrees to hold UES harmless for any and all consequences of disclosures made by UES which are required by governing law. In the event the project site is not owned by Client, Client recognizes that it is the Client's responsibility to inform the property owner of the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. 7.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, Client waives any claim against UES, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, agrees to defend, indemnify, and save UES harmless from any claim, liability, and/or defense costs for injury or loss arising from UES's discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials including any costs created by delay of the project and any cost associated with possible reduction of the property's value. Client will be responsible for ultimate disposal of any samples secured by UES which are found to be contaminated. SECTION 8: RISK ALLOCATION 8.1 Client agrees that UES's liability for any damage on account of any breach of contract, error, omission or other professional negligence will be limited to a sum not to exceed $50,000 or UES's fee, whichever is greater. If Client prefers to have higher limits on contractual or professional liability, UES agrees to increase the limits up to a maximum of $1,000,000.00 upon Client's written request at the time of accepting our proposal provided that Client agrees to pay an additional consideration of four percent of the total fee, or $400.00, whichever is greater. The additional charge for the higher liability limits is because of the greater risk assumed and is not strictly a charge for additional professional liability insurance. SECTION 9: INSURANCE 9.1 UES represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed by it, is and are protected by worker's compensation insurance and that UES has such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance policies which UES deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon request in writing. Within the limits and conditions of such insurance, UES agrees to indemnify and save Client harmless from and against loss, damage, or liability arising from negligent acts by UES, its agents, staff, and consultants employed by it. UES shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance or the limits described in Section 8, whichever is less. The Client agrees to defend, indemnify and save UES harmless for loss, damage or liability arising from acts by Client, Client's agent, staff, and other UESs employed by Client. SECTION 10: DISPUTE RESOLUTION 10.1 All claims, disputes, and other matters in controversy between UES and Client arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement will be submitted to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as mediation or arbitration, before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law, including the commencement of litigation. 10.2 If a dispute arises related to the services provided under this Agreement and that dispute requires litigation instead of ADR as provided above, then: (a) the claim will be brought and tried in judicial jurisdiction of the court of the county where UES's principal place of business is located and Client waives the right to remove the action to any other county or judicial jurisdiction, and (b) The prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees, and other claim related expenses. SECTION 11: TERMINATION 11.1 This agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. In the event of termination, UES shall be paid for services performed to the termination notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. 11.2 In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three (3) months, prior to completion of all reports contemplated by the Agreement, UES may complete such analyses and records as are necessary to complete its files and may also complete a report on the services performed to the date of notice of termination or suspension. The expense of termination or suspension shall include all direct costs of UES in completing such analyses, records and reports. SECTION 12: ASSIGNS 12.1 Neither the Client nor UES may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer their duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. SECTION 13. GOVERNING LAW AND SURVIVAL 13.1 The laws of the State of Florida will govern the validity of these Terms, their interpretation and performance. 13.2 If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be impaired. Limitations of liability and indemnities will survive termination of this Agreement for any cause. SECTION 14. INTEGRATION CLAUSE 14.1 This Agreement represents and contains the entire and only agreement and understanding among the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous oral and written agreements, understandings, representations, inducements, promises, warranties, and conditions among the parties. No agreement, understanding, representation, inducement, promise, warranty, or condition of any kind with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement shall be relied upon by the parties unless expressly incorporated herein. 14.2 This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by an agreement in writing signed by the party against whom the enforcement of any modification or amendment is sought. Rev. 0611012015 Environmental and Permitting Services June 19, 2018 Richard Wohlfarth W.C. Group, LLC 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamnte Springs, FL 32714 info@)bio-techconsulting.com www i o-techconsulting.com Frog: Ocoee Village Center Site — Orange County, Florida. Sections 5 & 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East BTC File #654-18 Re: Environmental Assessment Dear Mr. Wohlfarth: During June 2018, Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an environmental assessment of the three (3) separate parcels that comprise the approximately 73.4-acre Ocoee Village Center Site. This site is located north and south of Clarcona-Ocoee Road, just southeast of State Road 429 within Sections 5 & 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, in Orange County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 & 3). The environmental assessment included the following: ® review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries; ® evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; and, ® field review for protected plant and animal species. According to the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS), four (4) soil types occur within the property boundaries (Figure 4). These soil types include the following: Orlando Vero Beach Jacksonville Tampa key West Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 2 of 8 ® Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#2) ® fmmokalee fine sand (920) ® Seffner fine sand (#43) ® Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#46) The following presents a brief description of each of the soil mapped for the subject property: Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#2) is a nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soil found on low ridges and knolls on the flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of dark gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 42 to 60 inches for about 6 months and recedes to a depth of 60 to 80 inches for the rest of the year. It is at a depth of 24 to 40 inches for about 1 month to 4 months during wet periods. Permeability of this soil type is very rapid throughout. fmmokalee fine sand (#20) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. In most years the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 3 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate in the subsoil. Seffner fine sand (#43) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soil found on rims of depressions and on broad, low ridges on the flatwoods. The upper part of the surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black, fine sand about 6 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months and between depths of 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to 2 weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is rapid throughout. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#46) is a nearly level to gently sloping, moderately well drained soil found on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of very dark gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, and recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is very rapid throughout. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) does not consider the main components of any of the above referenced soils to be hydric. However the FAESS does consider inclusions present in Immokalee fine sand (#20) and Seffner fine sand (#43) to be hydric. This information can be found in The Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, third edition, March 2000. r^ kE TnviTonmcntal and Permittin;, Scrviccs Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 3 of 8 LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The land use types and vegetative communities within the boundaries of the Ocoee Village Center Site were evaluated and classified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 1999). The three (3) parcels that comprise the project site support one (1) land use type/vegetative community within its boundaries. The entire subject property is considered uplands and consists of Pine Plantation (441). No wetland/surface water land use types/vegetative communities were identified on the subject property. The following provides a brief description of the land use type/vegetative community identified on the site Uplands: The entirety of the subject property is classified as Pine Plantation (441), per the FLUCFCS. This area is dominated by slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Other vegetation identified within this community consists of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), Spanish needles (Bidens alba), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia), goldenrod (Solidago fistulosa), American pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), muscadine (Vitus rotundifolia), Mexican clover (Richardia brasiliensis), dog fennel (Eupatorium cappilifolium), hairy indigo (Indifogera hirsute), caesarweed (Urena lobata) and a few scattered Carolina cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), camphor (Cinnamomum camphora), and common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana).. Using methodologies outlined in the Florida's Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); Wildlife Methodology Guidelines (1988); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (revised April 2013); an assessment for "listed" floral and faunal species was conducted at the site in June 2018. This assessment, which covered approximately 100% of the subject site, included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and birdcalls that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are "listed" by the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (January 2013) that have the potential to occur in Orange County. 9 fi �'rn�i.rozizxzrzxtal and &'crnitii:zg sczviccs Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 4 of 8 Reptiles and A ml2hibians brown anole (Anolis sagrei) gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) six -lined racerunner (Cnemidophorus sexlineatus sexlineatus) .Birds American Crow (Corvus brachyrhychos) Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Red -shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus) Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) Mammals nine -banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) raccoon (Procyon lotor) Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) One (1) of the above wildlife species, the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), is identified in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (May 2017). The following provides a brief description of the species as they relate to the development of the project site. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) State Listed as "Threatened" by FFWCC Currently the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is classified as a "Category 2 Candidate Species" by USFWS, and as of September 2007 is now classified as "Threatened" by FFWCC, and as "Threatened" by FCREPA. The basis of the "Threatened" classification by the FFWCC for the gopher tortoise is due to habitat loss and destruction of burrows. Gopher tortoises are commonly found in areas with well -drained soils associated with the pine flatwoods, pastures and abandoned orange groves. Several other protected species known to occur in Orange County have a possibility of occurring in this area, as they are gopher tortoise commensal species. These species include the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Florida mouse (Podomys floridanus) and the gopher frog (Rana capito). However, none of these species were observed during the survey conducted. The subject property was surveyed for the existence of gopher tortoises through the use of pedestrian and ATV Transects. l Environmental and Permitting, Services Richard Wohlfarth, W. C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File 9654-18) Page 5 of 8 The FFWCC provides three (3) options for developers that have gopher tortoises on their property. These options include: 1) avoidance (i.e., 25-foot buffer around burrow), 2) preservation of habitat, and 3) off -site relocation. Based on the expected use of the property, off - site relocation of the entire gopher tortoise population is recommended. A Gopher Tortoise Conservation Permit application will be submittted to the FFWCC for the relocation of the entire on -site population of gopher tortoises to an approved recipient site. The relocation will be conducted by a certified FFWCC Agent to capture using bucket traps, hand shovel or backhoe excavation to remove and relocate the onsite population by non -harmful means. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FFWCC's imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FFWCC's Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A-16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leuchocephalus). In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. Under FFWCC's new management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. A FFWCC Eagle permit is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the 660-foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest during the nesting season, October I through May 15 or when eagles are present at the nest. In addition to the on -site review for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review of the FFWCC's recorded Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest sites on or in the vicinity of the subject property. This review revealed that three (3) nests, through the 2016 nesting season, exist within one (1.0) mile of the subject site. These nests are designated as OR-061, OR-045 & OR-005 and are located approximately 2,670 feet, 3,425 feet and 5,010 feet, respectively. The project site is located outside of the nests' 660-foot protection zone. 9 3 icl ER u - --iAre 0 _Fa", 5, E',nvironixacntal and Permitting Scrviccs Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 6 of 8 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has established "consultation areas" for certain listed species (Figure 8). Generally, these consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually associated with permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The reader should be aware that species presence and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the final determination. Consultation areas are typically very regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the species in question are known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed species to occur and that additional review might be necessary. Such review might include the need for species -specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS. The following paragraphs include a list of the USFWS Consultation Areas associated with the subject property. Also included, is a brief description of the respective species habitat and potential for additional review: Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) Federally Listed as "Endangered" by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Everglade Snail Kite. Currently the Everglade Snail Kite is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Everglade Snail Kites are similar in size to Red -shouldered Hawks. All Everglade Snail Kites have deep red eyes and a white rump patch. Males are slate gray, and females and juveniles vary in amounts of white, light brown, and dark brown, but the females always have white on their chin. Everglade Snail Kites vocalize mainly during courtship and nesting. They may occur in nearly all of the wetlands of central and southern Florida. They regularly occur in lake shallows along the shores and islands of many major lakes, including Lakes Okeechobee, Kissimmee, Tohopekaliga (Toho) and East Toho. They also regularly occur in the expansive marshes of southern Florida such as Water Conservation Areas 1, 2, and 3, Everglades National Park, the upper St. John's River marshes and Grassy Waters Preserve. No Everglade Snail Kites were observed within the subject property during the survey conducted by BTC. The subject site does not contain habitat for the Everglade Snail Kites. Florida Scrub -Jay (4phelocoma coerulescens) Federally Listed as "Threatened" by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Florida Scrub -Jay. Currently the Florida Scrub -Jay is listed as threatened by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are largely ivah r', Erzviranz-nenud and Peraiitcing services Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 7 of 8 restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak, scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a, Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands. Optimal Scrub -Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks from 1 to 3 m (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50% to 90 % of the area; bare ground or sparse vegetation less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10% to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than 20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). No Florida Scrub -Jays were observed on the subject site or nearby during the survey conducted by BTC and no habitat exists within the property boundaries. Sand Skink (Neoseps reynoldsz) Federally Listed as "Threatened" by USFWS The subject property falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Sand Skink. The sand skink is listed as "Threatened" by the USFWS. The sand skink exists in areas vegetated with sand pine (Pinus clausa) - rosemary (Ceratiola ericoides) scrub or a long leaf pine (Pinus palustris) - turkey oak. (Quercus laevis) association. Habitat destruction is the primary threat to this species' survival. Citrus groves, residential, commercial and recreational facilities have depleted the xeric upland habitat of the sand skink. All properties within the limits of this consultation area that are located at elevations greater than 80' and contain suitable (moderate - to -well drained soils) soils are believed by USFWS to be areas of potential sand skink habitat. The subject property does not contain suitable habitat for the sand skink. A sign -off from United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) sand skink monitoring requirements has been submitted. Once correspondence is received from the USFWS it will be forwarded. n nvironixtcntal and Permitting Services Richard Wohlfarth, W.C. Group, LLC Ocoee Village Center Site (BTC File #654-18) Page 8 of 8 The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on -site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on -site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through on -site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894-5969. Thank you. Sincerely, D t Daniel Gough Project Manager John Miklos President attachments e .ad 'Environnxental and Permitting Services C_ -Wk., !-"' NJ WinterGarden L; $1 E 7, ( 4 18__11T a"M ' lrhl o' f, Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee si;1 sIx Rd 'F'-mk!m 5t 31 Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan , Esc Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kopb), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, 'qpenStreetMap contributors, and$e GIS.Us Community ornmunity Ocoee Village Center N 1 4,400 Feet Orange County, Florida W—<�' E Project #: 654-18 Figure I s Produced By: DBG Location Map Date: 6/19/2018 i g - f ig Nine.. Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center N \ 450 Orange County, Florida Feet W E Project #: 654-18 Figure 2 Produced By: DBG 2018 Aerial Photograph S Date: 6/19/2018 L Fnvironmentai and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center Orange County, Florida Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map 890 " Feet w E Project #: 654-18 Produced By: DBG S Date:6/19/2018 Soils Legend 2 - Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 20 - Immokalee fine sand 43 SefFner fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 46 - Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes _ Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center 450 " Feet w E Orange County, Florida Project #: 654-18 Figure 4 S Produced By: DBG USDA-NRCS Soils Map Date: 6/19/2018 Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 www.bio-techconsulting.com Ocoee Village Center N 380 Orange County, Florida Feet g ty� w E Project #: 654-18 Figure 5 Produced By: DBG S FLUCFCS Map Date: 6/19/2018 Table 1: Potentially ®ccuring Fisted Wildlife and Plant Species in ®range County, Florida. Scientific Name Common Name Federal State County Status Status Occurrence Status Sorex longirostris lon irostris southeastern shrewT N I N P INVERTEBRATES A haostracon monas Wekiwa h drobe N N C Cincinnatia ivekiwae Wekiwa siltsnail N N C Procambarus acherontis Orlando cave crayfish N N C Troglocambarus sp I Orlando spider cave crayfish N N C VASCULAR PLANTS Ascle ias curtissii Curtiss' milkweed N LE C Bonamia grandfflora Florida bonamia LT LE C Calamintha ashei Ashe's savory N LT R Cheiro lossa palmata hand fern N LE C Clitoria frazrans pigeon -wing LT LE C Conradina grandiora large -flowered rosemary N LE R Deeringothamnus ulchelhis beautiful pawpaw LE LE C Eriogonum longifolium var gnaphalifolium scrub buckwheat LT LE C Glandularia tam ensis Tampa vervain N LE C Illicium parvifloruin star anise N LE C Lechea cernua nodding inweed N LT C Lindera subcoriacea bog s icebush N LE R Lupinus westianus var aridorum scrub lupine LE LE C Matelea oridana Florida spiny -pod N LE C Monotro a hypopithys pinesap N LE C Neinastylis floridana fall -flowering ixia N LE C Molina ato ocar a Florida bear ass N LT C Nolina brittoniana Britton's bear ass LE LE C Paronychia chartacea ssp chartacea paper -like nailwort LT LE C Pe eromia humilis terrestrial peperomia N LE R Platanthera inte ra yellow fringeless orchid N LE C Polygala lewtonii Lewton's polygala LE LE C Polygonella myriophylla Small's jointweed LE LE C Prunus geniculata scrub plum LE LE C Pteroglossaspis ecristata wild Coco N LT C Salix floridana Florida willow N LE C Stylisma abdita scrub stylisma N LE C Warea am lexi olia clasping warea LE LE C Zephyranthes simpsonii rain lily N LT C FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS LE -Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. LT -Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. E(S/A)-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. T(S/A)-Threatened due to similarity of appearance (see above). PE -Proposed for listing as Endangered species. PT -Proposed for listing as Threatened species. C-Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN-Non-essential experimental population. MC -Not currently listed, but of management concern to USFWS. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS LE -Endangered: species, subspecies, or isolated population so few or depleted in number or so restricted in range that it is in imminent danger of extinction. LT -Threatened: species, subspecies, or isolated population facing a very high risk of extinction in the future. LS-Species of Special Concern is a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is facing a moderate risk of extinction in the future. PE -Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT -Proposed for listing as Threatened. PS -Proposed for listing as Species of Special Concern. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS LE -Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act. LT -Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. PE -Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT -Proposed for listing as Threatened. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. * State protected by EA. C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) COUNTY OCCURRENCE STATUS Vertebrates and Invertebrates: C = Confirmed P = Potential N = Nesting Plants: C = Confirmed R = Reported 6/19/2018 Print Bald Eagle Nest Data This report was generated using the bald eagle nest locator at https://public.myffwc.corn/EWRI/EagieNests/nestiocator.aspx on 6/19/2O18 9:45:07 Aid. Search Entered: Within 5 miles of pat's lane ocoee fl (latitude 28.5992555 and longitude-81.5432896); All Search Results 8 record(s) were found; 8 record(s) are shown Bald Eagle NestMap: i.tai'E ,y C-E) Paradise He o coee C421 Hf r �3 lalro QZY? 010 s t 3 tl. P " Map &Re0rNT ai3 erroi'e is a f d Eagle Nest Data i ..; Search '" s^ g . Results per page: All YJ I Nest f �® County I Latitude Longitude Town- ship Ran- ge Sec- flan Gaz Page Last Known Active Last Sur- veyed Act 13 Act 14 Act 15 _ Act 16 Act 17 Dist. Nil) I I OR005 Orange 28 36.79 81 32.99 21S 28E 31 79 2014 2014 * * Y * I * 1,04 OR034 Orange128 35.40 81 29.70 22S 28E 1 10 80 1998 2014 * ; * - * 1 * 13.001 OR039 Orange 28 32.59 81 34.31 22S 27E 25 79 2014 2014 * * Y I * I * 14,241 OR045 Orange128 35.22 81 32.92 22S 28E 07 79 1 2008 2014 1 * * - I * I * 10.911 OR052 Orange 28 32.63 81 35.74 22S 27E 27 79 2011 2014 * * - * I * 14.971 OR05510range128 35.441 81 30.30 22S 28E 10 79 2014 1 2014 * 1 *I Y I * I * 12.401 OR061 Orange 28 36.11 81 33.04 22S 28E 06 79 2014 1 2014 * * I Y I * 1OR06610range128 34.321 81 33.621 22S 1 27E 1 13 1 79 1 2014 1 2014 1 * I * 1 Y 1 * 1 * 12.151 "Y" denotes an active nest "U" denotes a nest that was visited but status was undetermined "N" denotes an inactive nest "*" denotes a nest that was not surveyed -" denotes an unobserved nest https:Hpubl ictemp.myfwc.corfVF WRI/Eag leNests/PrintData.aspx 1/1 J CITY OP h, APOPKA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 20, 2018 7:00 PM APOPKA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. City Council regular meeting June 6, 2018. AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENT; STAFF RECOGNITION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Public Comment Period: The Public Comment Period is for City -related issues that may or may not be on today's Agenda. If you are here for a matter that requires a public hearing, please wait for that item to come up on the agenda. If you wish to address the Council, you must fill out an Intent to Speak form and provide it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. If you wish to speak during the Public Comment Period, please fill out a green -colored Intent -to -Speak form. If you wish to speak on a matter that requires a public hearing, please fill out a white -colored Intent -to -Speak form. Speaker forms may be completed up to 48 hours in advance of the Council meeting. Each speaker will have four minutes to give remarks, regardless of the number of items addressed. Please refer to Resolution No. 2016-16 for further information regarding our Public Participation Policy & Procedures for addressing the City Council. Presentations: I. Presentation on Form Base Code. 2. Apopka City Center— Hilton Garden Inn Presentation James Hitt James Hitt CONSENT (Action Item) 1. Authorize the disposal of surplus equipment/property. 2. Approve renewal of Lease Agreement, Aunt Gingibread's Bakery, LLC. 3. Approve a School Capacity Enhancement Agreement with San Sebastian Reserve. 4. Approve the purchase of two (2) utility carts from Cruise Car, Inc. 5. Award a contract for the construction of a Reclaim Water System Extension on Golden Gem Road. 6. Award a contract for the construction & deepening of Mount Plymouth Lakes Water Production Wells No. 1 & No. 4. 7. Approve an agreement for the receipt and processing of curbside recyclables collected by the City's Sanitation Division. BUSINESS (Action Item) 1. Reject RFP#2018-01 Event Production & Management Services Edward Bass for Special Events at the Apopka Amphitheater. 2. Reject ITB 2018-05 Construction of Kit Land Nelson Park Fitness Trails, Edward Bass 3. Final Development Plan — Wekiva Riverwalk Shopping Center Bobby Howell Project: Woolbright Wekiva — Location: 2121 East Semoran Boulevard PUBLIC HEARINGS/ORDINANCES/RESOLUTION (Action Item) 1. Ordinance No. 2656— Second Reading - Change of Zoning/Master Plan/Development Agreement David Moon Project: AHIFO-18, LLC — Location: West of Plymouth -Sorrento Road; east of SR 429 approximately'/Z mile north of the intersection of Kelly Park Road and Plymouth -Sorrento Road. 2. Preliminary Development Plan — Bridle Path Subdivision Bobby Howell Project: AHIFO-18, LLC — Location: West of Plymouth -Sorrento Road and east of SR 429, approximately one-half mile north of the intersection of Kelly Park Road and Plymouth -Sorrento Road 3. Ordinance No. 2654 — First Reading - Change of Zoning Phil Martinez Project: JTD Land at Rogers Road, LLC — Location: 1455 W. Lester Road. 4. Ordinance No. 2659 — First Reading - Comp Plan — Large Scale — Reserve at Kelly Park Phil Martinez Project: Min Sun Cho, Hong Sik and Deok Hwa Kim — Location: 4068, 4046, & 4022 Plymouth Sorrento Road 5. Ordinance No. 2661 — First Reading - Comp Plan — Small Scale Project: 3255 Clarcona Road LLC (aka Randall Mechanical) — Location: 3307 Clarcona Road Phil Martinez 6. Ordinance No. 2662 — First Reading - Change of Zoning Project: 3255 Clarcona Road LLC (aka Randall Mechanical) — Location: 3307 Clarcona Road Phil Martinez 7. Ordinance No. 2663 — First Reading — Change of Zoning Phil Martinez Project: SunTrust Bank — Location: 936 East Semoran Boulevard 8. Ordinance No. 2664 — First Reading — Annexation — Cycle 3 - Stormwater Pond Pam Richmond Project: City of Apopka — Location: 1680 South Lake Pleasant Road 9. Ordinance No. 2665 — First Reading — Annexation — Cycle 3 — Road Right -of -Ways Pam Richmond Project: Orange County — Locations: Carnation Court; East Laurel Street; East Myrtle Street; West Myrtle Street; North Washington Avenue; North Central Avenue; and North Lake Avenue (North and South of West Myrtle Avenue) 10. Resolution No. 2018-09 -Execute a contract for a Capital Improvement Revenue Note. Edward Bass CITY COUNCIL REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT 1. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Bear Cart Grant. 2. Interlocal Agreement with Orange County Fire Department. Rfi=F'TIAir_C A him 1 emn^... — ___ Individuals with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk at least two (2) working days in advance of the meeting date and time at (407) 703-1704, F.S. 286.0105 If a person decides to appeal any decision or recommendation made by Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he will need record of the proceedings, and that for such purposes he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Any opening invocation that is offered before the official start of the Council meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private person, to and for the benefit of the Council. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the City Council or the city staff, and the City is not allowed by law to endorse the religious or non -religious beliefs or views of such speaker. Persons in attendance at the City Council meeting are invited to stand during the opening ceremony. However, such invitation shall not be construed as a demand, order, or any other type of command. No person in attendance at the meeting shall be required to participate in any opening invocation that is offered or to participate in the Pledge of Allegiance. You may remain seated within the City Council Chambers or exit the City Council Chambers and return upon completion of the opening invocation and/or Pledge of Allegiance if you do not wish to participate in or witness the opening invocation and/or the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. UES Project No. 13318.004-01 Report No. 399772 Date: April 2005 Prepared For: Clarcona-Ocoee, LLC 1745 West Fletcher Avenue Tampa, Florida 33612 Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 (407) 423-0504 www.uesorl.com COA #00000549 vra'-CLA Mary H. Bruno Project Manager Reviewed by: Michael J. Geden, P. G. Senior, Geologist Florida License Nb. 0000408 Consultants in. Geotechnical Engineering e Environmental Sciences a Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspections Offices in: Orlando - Gainesville - Riviera Beach - Rockledge - Daytona Beach * Punta' Gorda - St. Augustine - Jacksonville * Ocala a Tampa Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 1.0 SUMMARY............................................................ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 2 2.1 PURPOSE .. ................................................ 2 2.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................ .. . . 2 2.3 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS ............................... . . . . 2 2.4 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS .................................. 3 2.5 USER RELIANCE .................................................. 3 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .......................... 3 3.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION . 3 3.2 PROPERTY AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS ......................... 3 3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY .......................... 3 3.4 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND/OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 4 3.5 CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PARCELS ............................. 4 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................. 4 4.1 TITLE RECORDS .................................................. 4 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS ............ 4 4.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE ................................ 5 4.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................ 5 4.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION ......... 5 4.6 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I ESA ............................. 5 4.7 OTHER.......................................................... 5 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW ........................................... 5 5.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ...................... 5.1.1 FLORIDA STATE AND ORANGE COUNTY RECORDS REVIEW ........ 5 7 5.1.2 FEDERAL RECORDS REVIEW .................................. 7 5.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ............................. 5.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES 7 ...................................... 5.3.1 TOPOGRAPHY 8 ............................................... 8 5.3.2 SOILS/GEOLOGY............................................. 8 5.3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY .................... 9 5.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE PROPERTY ................... 9 5.4.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW ................................ 9 5.4.2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP RECORDS ............................ 11 5.4.3 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAP REVIEW ...................... 11 5.4.4 CITY DIRECTORY REVIEW .................................... 11 5.4.5 LAND USE RECORDS ........................................ 5.4.6 OTHER HISTORICAL SOURCES ................................ 11 11 5.5 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON ADJOINING PARCELS .............. 12 Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 013409 a. •: 6.0 INFORMATION FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE ............................. 12 6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ......................... 12 6.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING .......................................... 12 6.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ........................................ 12 6.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ........................................ 13 7.0 INTERVIEWS.........................................................13 7.1 INTERVIEW WITH OWNER ......................................... 13 7.2 INTERVIEW WITH SITE MANAGER .................................. 13 7.3 INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS .................. 13 7.4 INTERVIEWS WITH OTHERS ....................................... 13 8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .......................................... 14 9.0 DEVIATIONS.......................................................... 14 10.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ................................................ 14 11.0 REFERENCES........................................................ 14 12.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ...................... 14 13.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ................... 14 Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 SITE LOCATION MAP ............................................... A-1 SITE PLAN/2003 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ............................... A-2 GENERAL CONDITIONS .............................................. B APPENDIX C ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S INFORMATION ............... C APPENDIX D FIRSTSEARCH RADIUS MAP REPORT .................................. D APPENDIX E ENVIRONMENTAL MAPS .............................................. E APPENDIX F SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ................................................ F APPENDIX G INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION ........................................ G APPENDIX H REFERENCES...................................................... H APPENDIX I QUALIFICATIONS 1 Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 1.0 allMMARY The subject property evaluated as part of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) consists of an approximately 76-acre undeveloped parcel, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Road and State Road 429, in Orlando, Orange County, Florida. Please refer to the Site Location Map presented in Appendix A-1 and the 2003 Aerial Photograph/Site Plan presented in Appendix A-2 for additional information. Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA conducted in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) format E1527-00, we conclude the following: We found no evidence of recognized environmental conditions with respect to past uses of the subject property or adjoining parcels based on our field observations, historical research, and public records review. 2. We found no evidence of petroleum product or hazardous materials storage or use at the subject property. 3. We found no evidence indicating the presence of underground storage tanks (USTs), aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), drums, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), drinking water wells, seeps, illegal dumping, unusual odors, or stressed vegetation on the subject property or on adjoining parcels based on our field observations, interviews, and historical and public records review. 4. We found evidence indicating the presence of one facility that contained leaking USTs within the ASTM minimum search distance based on our regulatory agency contact and field observations. Becky's Country Store is located approximately 600 feet east of the subject property and addressed at 10600 Clarcona Ocoee Road. Based on a review of the regulatory files reported extent of contamination and/or distance between sites, the potential for this leaking UST facilities to have adversely impacted the subject property appears low. 5. No evidence exists indicating the presence of facilities within the ASTM minimum search distances that formerly or currently generate(d) hazardous waste or use(d) hazardous materials based on our regulatory agency contact and field observations. Based on the conclusions of the Phase I ESA conducted at the referenced property, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) finds no evidence of recognized environmental conditions which would warrant further assessment at this time. According to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the subject property. If no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. Page 1 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 2.0 INTRODUCTION The primary purpose of this assessment was to conduct an evaluation of the subject property and surrounding properties to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with the past or present uses of the subject property and neighboring properties. The term "recognized environmental conditions" means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release, or a material threat of a release that could impact the property. This environmental assessment was conducted following the ASTM E1527-00 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. This assessment was also intended to identify potential off -site contaminant sources within the distances set forth in ASTM E1527-00 guidelines. Methodology followed good commercial and customary practice with a goal to identify recognized environmental conditions that would be subject to an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate government agencies. The scope of work does not include an evaluation of asbestos containing building materials, lead based paint, lead in drinking water, regulatory compliance, cultural and historical resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, indoor air quality, radon, site geotechnics (soils, foundations, site retention, etc.), wetlands, endangered species, or construction materials testing. UES can provide these additional services, if necessary. The contracted scope of services consists of the preparation of a Phase I ESA of the subject property in accordance with the requirements set forth in ASTM E1527-00. The accuracy, correctness and completeness of this Phase 1 ESA is provided with knowledge of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and liability Act (CERCLA) as set forth in 42 United States Code Section 9601 et seq., as amended. The findings of this report represent our professional judgement; no warranty is expressed or implied. These findings are relevant to the dates of our site work and the information cited herein. This report should not be relied upon to represent property conditions on other dates or at locations other than those specifically cited within the report. Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. can accept no responsibility for interpretations of these data made by other parties. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. Page 2 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 This report, and the information contained herein, shall be the sole property of UES until payment of any unpaid balance is made in full. The client agrees that until payment is made in full, the client shall not have a proprietary interest in this report or the information contained herein. UES shall have the absolute right to request the return of any and all copies of this report submitted to other parties, public or private, on behalf of the client in the event of nonpayment of outstanding fees by the client pursuant to UES's General Conditions (Appendix B). This report is intended for the sole use of Clarcona Ocoee, LLC and RMC Retail Property Group. Its contents may not be relied upon by other parties without the explicit written consent of UES. This is not a statement of suitability of the property for any use or purpose. In accepting this report, all parties herein mentioned agree to the General Conditions of the Agreement between UES and Clarcona Ocoee, LLC, dated April 5, 2005. A copy of the General Conditions is contained in Appendix B. The subject property is an approximately 76-acre undeveloped parcel, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Road and State Road 429 in Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. The site is located within Section 05, Township 22 South, Range 28 East as referenced in the "Winter Garden, Florida" United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map presented in Appendix A-1 (Site Location Map). Please also refer to the Site Plan/2003 Aerial Photograph in Appendix A-2, and to the legal description of the property in Appendix C. The legal description of the subject property was obtained from the Orange County Property Appraiser's website. Atthe time of our evaluation, the subject property consisted of unimproved land populated with pine trees comprising approximately 76 acres. Clarcona-Ocoee Road traverses the central portion of the subject property in a west -east direction. The property vicinity is characterized by undeveloped property and residential development. State Road 429, a former abandoned railroad easement, adjoins the northern boundary of the subject property. Please refer to the Site Location Map in Appendix A-1 and the Site Plan/2003 Aerial Photograph in Appendix A-2 for additional details. 3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY At the time of the site reconnaissance, the subject property was unimproved. None of the current uses of the subject property appear likely to involve the use, treatment, storage, disposal, or generation of hazardous substances or petroleum products. Page 3 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 3.4 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND/OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SUBJECI PROPERTY At the time of our evaluation, the subject property was unimproved land populated with pine trees. Clarcona-Ocoee Road traverses the central portion of the subject property in a west -east direction. No sources of potable water, sewer services or electricity were observed. Residences in the area are served by the City of Ocoee for water and sanitary sewer and by Progress Energy for electricity. One former irrigation well is located on the southern portion of the subject property. Currently, the parcels adjoining the subject property are used as follows: Table 1 Description of Adjoining Parcels Direction From Subject Property Description of Current Use North State Road 429 adjoins the subject property to the north. East Forest Lake Golf Course and residential properties adjoin the subject propertV to the east. South Residential properties adjoin the subject property to the south. West Clarcona-Ocoee Road and West Road adjoin the subject property to the west. None of the current uses of the adjoining properties appear likely to indicate the presence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. A copy of the historical property ownership chain -of -title report was not provided to UES as part of this Phase I ESA. No information was provided to UES with respect to any environmental liens or activity and use limitations on the subject property. Page 4 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 The client did not provide information to LIES with respect to any specialized knowledge or experience that may pertain to recognized environmental conditions in connection to the subject property. The client did not provide UES with information pertaining to the value of the purchase price in relation to the purchase price of comparable parcels located within the subject area. Information pertaining to the assessed value of the subject property is included in the Orange County Property Appraiser's Information presented in Appendix C. 4.5 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION The current owner of the subject property is Beryle S. Buchman and Florence A. Barrett, Etal. The subject property is unoccupied. UES was contracted to perform this Phase I ESA in conjunction with a real estate transaction in order for the prospective owner to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to CERCLA liability. No other information was provided in preparation of this Phase 1 ESA. As a part of this assessment, we reviewed information sources to obtain existing information pertaining to a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products on or near the subject property. UES obtained an ASTM site search report through FirstSearch Technology Corporation (FirstSearch). A copy of the FirstSearch report is contained in Appendix D. UES also reviewed other available standard environmental record sources at the FDEP and OCEPD, as needed. The following state and federal sources were consulted during this record review: Page 5 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 State and County Database Review (FDEP and OCEPD) FDEP, Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) FDEP, Registered Underground Storage Tanks (UST) FDEP, Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) FDEP, State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) FDEP, Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites (SWF/LS) Federal Database Review [United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)I EPA, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Index (CERCLIS) EPA, Toxic Release Inventory System (TRIS) EPA, Facilities Index System List (FINDS) EPA, Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Index System List (RCRIS) ® EPA, Emergency Response Notification System List (ERNS) EPA, RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) EPA, National Priorities List (NPL) Table 2 lists the minimum search distances used during this assessment as set forth in ASTM E1527-00. TABLE 2 Minimum Search Distances - ASTM E1527-00 SOURCE Federal NPL Site List National Priorities List SEARCH DISTANCE 1.0 mile Federal CERCLIS List (Comprehensive Environmental .Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980) 0.5 mile Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List Sub'ect property and adjoining parcels Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) 1.0 mile Federal RCRA Non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities 0.5 mile Federal RCRA Generators Lists Subject and adjoin,ing parcels Federal ERNS List (Emergency Response Notification S stem _property Property only States Lists of Hazardous Waste Sites 1.0 mile State Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists 0.5 mile State Leaking UST List Under round Storage Tanks 0.5 mile State Registered UST List Subject roe and adjoiningparcels Page 6 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 5.1.1 FLORIDA STATE AND ORANGE COUNTY RECORDS REVIEW According to information provided by FirstSearch, the subject property is not listed on the state or county databases. One leaking UST site is in the vicinity of the subject property and is listed within the minimum search distances as specified by ASTM. Becky's Country Store is located approximately 600 feet east of the subject property and addressed at 10600 Clarcona Ocoee Road. Based on a recent file review conducted at the OCEPD, a petroleum discharge was discovered during the removal of two 1,000-gallon USTs and completion of a Tank Closure Assessment report. A Contamination Assessment Reportcompleted in 1991 indicatedthat soil and groundwater contamination was contained within site boundaries. No work had been conducted at the facility between 1991 and 2004, at which time, S&ME, Inc. was designated as the contractor to complete site assessment and rehabilitation activities. Based on a review of the regulatory files reported extent of contamination and/or distance between sites, the potential for this leaking UST facilities to have adversely impacted the subject property appears low. Please refer to the FirstSearch report in Appendix D for details. In addition to reviewing the FirstSearch report, UES performed reconnaissance of the property vicinity to identify any sites not mapped by FirstSearch due to inadequate or inaccurate address information and to look for unregistered facilities. No petroleum fueling or storage facilities were observed within a half mile of the subject property during field reconnaissance performed by UES. 5.1.2 FEDERAL RECORDS REVIEW The FirstSearch report indicates no EPA listed sites located in the vicinity of the property within the minimum search distance specified by ASTM. No facilities suspected of generating hazardous wastes were observed by UES during reconnaissance of the property vicinity. UES reviewed ethylene dibromide (EDB) Application Zone Delineation Maps of Florida prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Based on review of the EDB maps, no EDB impact to groundwater within the geographic section of the subject property has been identified. EDB was formerly used in citrus grove applications as a fumigant against nematodes. UES reviewed the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) 2004 Florida Radon Protection Map for New Single Family Homes and Duplexes. Fewer than 5% of all new homes in Orange County are expected to have elevated radon levels, so no additional radon resistant construction techniques are recommended by the Florida Department of Health to prevent radon problems. Please refer to Appendix E for a copy of the radon map. According to the U. S Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), the subject property does not lie within the a flood hazard area. A FEMA Flood Hazard Map is provided in Appendix E. Page 7 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 LIES reviewed the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory Map providing coverage of the subject property. According to the map, wetlands have not been delineated on the subject property. Please refer to Appendix E for a copy of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map. The "Winter Garden, Florida" USGS topographic quadrangle map, Orange County Soil Survey, and regulatory files available regarding properties of environmental concern in the property vicinity were reviewed as sources for obtaining information regarding the physical setting of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. Based on our site reconnaissance, review of USGS maps, aerial photographs, location of the subject property, and the present environmental related conditions of adjacent and nearby properties, the potential for migration of petroleum product or hazardous waste contamination from off -site sources appears low. 5.3.1 TOPOGRAPHY The USGS topographic quadrangle map titled "Winter Garden, Florida" was referenced as a source for obtaining information regarding the physical setting of the subject property and surrounding vicinity. The subject property is located approximately 150 to 155 feet above sea level. The on -site topography slopes to the west, towards Lake Apopka located approximately 1.6 miles from the subject property. A copy of the USGS Quadrangle Map is provided as Appendix A-1 (Site Location Map). 5.3.2 SOILS/GEOLOGY The general geology of Orange County is characterized by 30 to 50 feet of undifferentiated fine to medium grained sands and clayey sands of Holocene age overlying the Miocene age Hawthorn Group. The Hawthorn is approximately 100 feet thick and is comprised of interbedded layers of clay, clayey sand, sandy clay, and phosphatic carbonates. The underlying Tertiary age carbonates gently dip east under an increasing thickness of younger sediments. According to the Soil Conservation Service, Orange County Soil Survey, surficial soils at the subject property are classified as Immokalee fine sand, Seffner fine sand, and Tavares fine sand (0 to 5 percent slopes). Immokalee fine sand are nearly level and poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 10 inches of the surface for one month to three months, and it recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than six months. The permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and it is moderate in the subsoil. Page 8 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 Seffner fine sand are nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for 2 to 4 months and between depths of 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to 2 weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is rapid throughout. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, are nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, and it recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout. The available water capacity is very low. 5.3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY The general hydrogeology of Orange County includes an unconfined surficial aquifer separated from the Floridan aquifer by the Hawthorn Group. The surficial aquifer is recharged by rainfall and can yield small to moderate amounts of water to small diameterwells. The Floridan aquifer may reach 2,000 feet in thickness and is the primary source of the public water supply. According to the Florida Department of Natural Resources, Areas of Natural Recharge to the Floridan Aquifer in Florida Map, the subject property is located in an area of high recharge. The direction of shallow groundwater flow is generally toward surface water bodies. The direction of shallow groundwater flow, based solely on the USGS Topographic Map, is most likely to the west, towards Lake Apopka. 5.4 HISTORICAL O!. i O`. ON THE PROPERTY Based on the review of aerial photographs, the northern portion of the subject property was undeveloped from 1947 (the earliest aerial photograph available) through the present day. The southern portion of the subject property was developed with two small shed -type structures, circa 1958 until about 1984, at which time these structures were removed. None of the past uses of the subject property appear to present unresolved recognized environmental concerns. 5.4.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW To evaluate the previous land uses of the subject property and surrounding area, a series of aerial photographs was reviewed. The aerial photographs provide a progressive overview of parcels pertaining to this assessment. UES reviewed aerial photographs from 1947 to 2003, available at the Orange County Public Works Department. Please refer to Appendix A-2 for a copy of the 2003 Aerial Photograph, which was available on-line at the Orange County GIS website. Descriptions of UES' observations are outlined in Table 3. Page 9 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 TABLE 3 Surnmary of Aerial Photograph Observations Photograph Photograph Date Scale Quality Remarks 1947 1" = 800' Poor The subject property is unimproved land developed with orange trees. Clarcona-Ocoee Road and a Railroad easement are visible adjoining the subject property to the east and north, respectively. The adjoining properties to the north, south, and west appear as undeveloped land. Residential development is visible to the east of the subject property, across undeveloped land. 1958 1 "= 440' Poor Two small shed -type structures and a small pond are visible on the southern portion of the subject property. No significant changes were observed on the adjoining properties since the 1947 aerial photograph. 1963 1" = 440' Poor No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1958 aerial photograph. 1965 1" = 440' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1963 aerial photograph: 1967 1" = 440' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1965 aerial photograph. 1969 1" = 660' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1967 aerial photograph. 1971 1" = 660' Fair No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1969 aerial photograph. 1975 1" = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1971 aerial photograph. 1978 1" = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1975 aerial photograph. 1981 1 "= 300' Good The northeast corner and the western portion of the subject property has been cleared. A commercial property has been developed across the railroad easement. 1984 1" = 300' Good The entire subject property has been cleared of the citrus trees. Also, the two small barn -type structures are no longer visible on the southern portion of the subject property. State Road 429 appears developed in place of the former railroad easement. 1987 1" = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1984 aerial photograph. Page 10 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 TABLE 3 Summary of Aerial Photograph Observations Photograph photograph Date Scale Quality Remarks 1994 1 "=300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property since the 1994 aerial photograph. The existing Forest Lake golf course is visible on the adjoining property to the east of the subject property. 1997 1" = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 1994 aerial photograph. 2000 1" = 300' Good State Road 429 Toll Booth and entrance/exit ramps are developed on an adjoining property to the north. The commercial property previously located across the railroad easement is no longer visible. 2003 1" = 300' Good No significant changes were observed on the subject property or adjoining properties since the 2000 aerial photograph. 5.4.2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP RECORDS A chain -of -title was not provided by the client for our review. According to the Orange County Property Appraiser's Information, the current owner of the subject property is Beryle S. Buchman and Florence A. Barrett, Etal. 5.4.3 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAP REVIEW Sanborn fire insurance maps providing coverage of the subject area were not available, likely due to the historically rural nature of the property vicinity. 5.4.4 CITY DIRECTORY REVIEW Historical street directories listing the former businesses at the street addresses of the subject property and adjoining properties were not reviewed by UES since the subject property and adjoining properties have not been developed or used for any purpose, with the exception of the two small shed -type structures present during the operation as a citrus groves. 5.4.5 LAND USE RECORDS According to the Orange County Property Appraiser's Report, the subject property is zoned R- 1A, single family dwelling. 5.4.6 OTHER HISTORICAL SOURCES No historical sources were reviewed during this assessment. Page 11 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 Based on the earliest aerial photograph available (1947), the adjoining parcels were undeveloped. Clarcona-Ocoee Road and railroad easement (existing State Road 429) were constructed to the west and north of the subject property, respectively, circa the 1940's. Adjoining properties to the east and south were developed with residential properties, circa the 1940's. Adjoining properties to the north, across State Road 429, were developed with commercial structures, circa the 1980's until about 2000, at which time, the structures were removed and the property remained undeveloped. State Road 429 was improved over the abandoned railroad easement, circa the 1990's. None of the past uses of the adjoining properties appear to present recognized environmental concerns. 6.0 INFORMATION FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS On April 15, 2005, a walkover evaluation of the subject property was completed by Mary H. Bruno. The purpose of the site visit was to assess the current conditions of the subject property and to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. The evaluation included walking the accessible portions of the interior of the subject property and walking the accessible portions of the site perimeter. This visual assessment of the property focused primarily on its surface features. Property use and significant features are indicated on the Site Plan/2003 Aerial Photograph presented in Appendix A-2. Site photographs are included in Appendix F. The majority of the subject property was covered with tall pine trees. palmettos, tall vegetation, which obstructed our view of the site. There were no other constraints that impeded our evaluation of the property or obstructed our view the day of our site reconnaissance. 6.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING The subject property is located within a residential and agricultural area to the east of Lake Apopka. The property vicinity is characterized by residential properties, agricultural land and undeveloped property. The on -site topography slopes gently to the west, toward Lake Apopka. [wring our site reconnaissance, the accessible portions of the periphery and interior of the subject property were viewed. Clarcona-Ocoee Road traverses the central portion of the subject property in a east -west direction and also adjoins the southern portion of the subject property to the west. State Road 429 adjoins the subject property to the north. One irrigation well is located on the southern portion of the subject property. The subject property appeared covered with thick patches of palmettos, pine trees, and dense tall vegetation, making some portions of the site inaccessible the day of our reconnaissance. Page 12 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 We observed no evidence of petroleum product or hazardous materials storage or use at the subject property. We found no evidence indicating the presence of obvious surface discharges such as stained soil or pavement, USTs, ASTs, septic systems, drinking water wells, seeps, unusual odors, pits, ponds, lagoons, or stressed vegetation. No unresolved recognized environmental concerns were identified at the subject property the day of our site reconnaissance. 6.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS No structures were observed at the subject property the day of our site reconnaissance. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 INTERVIEW WITH OWNER UES interviewed Mr. Ken Buchman, co-owner of the subject property. Mr. Buchman stated that the subject property was previously an orange grove and cleared during a freeze during the mid-1980s. He also stated that no residential or commercials have been developed on the subject property to the best of his knowledge. Mr. Buchman stated that he was not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property. He also stated that he was not aware of any pending, threatened or past litigation or administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property. Also, he was not aware of any government notices regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products at the subject property. Mr. Buchman stated that water, sewer and electricity is not provided to the subject property. However, there is one irrigation well, which has not been in operation for a few years, located on the southern portion of the subject property. Interview documentation is included in Appendix I. There is no designated site manager for the subject property. UES interviewed Lucy Albrecht of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Hazardous Waste Section, to obtain information regarding her knowledge of recognized environmental concerns in connection with the subject property. She stated that there are no files regarding hazardous waste for the subject property. UES attempted to contact Sue Mela of the Ocoee Fire Department, to obtain information regarding her knowledge of recognized environmental concerns in connection with the subject property. No response was given by the time of report completion. No other interviews were conducted in preparation of this Phase I ESA. Page 13 of 14 Pages Project No. 13318-004-01 Report No. 399772 We have performed this Phase I ESA in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-00 for the approximately 76-acre undeveloped parcel, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Road and State Road 429 in Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 of this report. Based on the conclusions of the Phase I ESA conducted at the referenced property, UES finds no evidence of unresolved recognized environmental conditions and no further assessment is warranted at this time. According to the property owner, water wells may be located on the northeast portion of the subject property. If no intended use of the wells is anticipated, they should be abandoned in accordance with Orange County Health Department requirements and in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District rules. 9.0 DEVIATIONS UES prepared this Phase I ESA in accordance with ASTM E1527-00, 10.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Under the terms of the agreement between Clarcona-Ocoee, LLC and UES, no additional services were provided in association with the Phase I ESA. 11.0 REFERENCES References reviewed during the Phase I ESA are documented in Appendix H. 12.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Please refer to the title page for signatures of the environmental professionals who prepared and reviewed this Phase I ESA. 13.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS This assessment was completed by Mary H. Bruno, Project Manager, and reviewed by Michael J. Geden, Senior Professional Geologist, both employees of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Qualifications of personnel participating in this assessment are provided in Appendix 1. Page 14 of 14 Pages �� `' �• � �,� �a� 320 F q U9 _7W - V1 r IF, ii%r e l q andp t Z' s �7 Bm j 13 SD R R Fu• m . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z l.. 106" t6 Z -s" ! ( �T ' � GP ..e S �fy �� Itltlt ji +, it ama_ n�t.--v n� -�L� I' .t. C.,r ? ` , � .��� iL t �� I ,r 1...�,.,..:,-.-�:. "o, 8 R r�ijer PArk 'zi'll 0 20 i =To BASE MAP: "WINTER GARDEN, FLA.", U.S.G.S, QUADRANGLE MAP SCALE, FEET 76 ACRES CLARCONA-OCOEE ROAD SITE OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DRAWN BY: MLP j DATE: 4/2 :0 BY: ab - I DATE: 4,Aa_CL5- SCALE: AS SHOWN I PROJECT NO- 01 -00 13318-004-01 1 REPORT NO1519ftliPAGE NO: A- I �. � r. �.� UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. GENERAL CONDITIONS . SECTION 4: RESpONSII§ILBTIES 9.9 Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc., heretofore referred to as the *Consultant.' has the responsibility for providing the services described under the "Seope of Services' section, The work is to be performed according to accepted standards of care and is to be Completed in a timel yma 1.2 The "Clienror a duly authorized representative, is responsible for providing the Consultant with a clear understanding of the project naturenand scope. The Client shall supply the Consultant with sufficient and adequate information, including, but not limited to, maps, site plans, reports, surreys and designs, to allow the Consultant to properly complete the specified services. 'The Client shall also communicate changes in the nature and scope A the project as soon as possible during performance of the work so that the changes can to be incorporated into the work product. SECTIOh12: Si'AAIDq�D OF CARE , 2.9 Services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement are expected by the Client to be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the Consultant's profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in the locality Of the project. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. 2.2 The Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those observed at locations where borings, surveys, or other explorations are made, and that site conditions may change with time. Data, interpretations, and recommendations by the Consultant wili,to be based solely on information available to the Consultant at the timeofservice. The Consultant is responsible for those data,interpretations. and recommendations. but will not to be responsible for other panties' interpretations or use of the information developed. SECTION 3: SITE ACCESS D —M CONDIYt®NS 3.9 Client will grant or obtain free access to the site for all equipment and personnel necessary for the Consultant to perform the work set forth in this Agreement. The Client will notify any and all possessors of the project site that Client has granted Consultant free access to the site. The Consultant built take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the site, but i! is understood by Client That, in the normal course of wark, some damage may occur, and the correction of such damage is not part of this Agreemen@ unless so specified i t the Proposal. 3.2 The Client is responsible for the accuracy of locations for all subterranean structures and utilities. The Consultant will take reasonable precautions to avoid known subterranean structures, and the Clientwaives any claim against Consultant, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold Consultant harmless from any daim or liability for injury or loss, including costs of defense, arising from damage done to subterranean structures and utilities not identified or accurately located. In addition, Client agrees to compensate Consultant for any time spent or expenses incurred by, Consultant in defense of any such claim with compensation to be based upon Consultant's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy, xCTION 4• SAMPLE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL 4.9 Soil or water samples obtained from the project during Performance of the work shall remain the property of the Client 4.2 The Consultant will dispose of or return to Client all remaining soils and rock samples Eo days after submission of report covering those samples. Further storage or transfer of samples can to be made at Client's expense upon Client's prior written request. 4.3 Samples which are contaminated by petroleum products or otherchemical waste will4o be returned to Client for treatment or disposal, consistent with all appropriate federal, state, or local regulations. SECTlDI� S: SILLIMCa AfdD PAYMENT 5.1 Consultant wdll submit invoices to Client monthly or upon completion of services, Invoices will show charges fordilferent personnel and expense classifications. 5.2 Payment is due 30 days after presentation of invoice and is past due 39 days from invoice date. Client agrees to pay a finance change of one and one-half percent (I- % %) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by taw, on past due accounts. 5.3 if the Consultant incurs any expenses to collect ova billings on invoices, the sums paid by the Consultant for reasonableatlomeys',fees, court costs, Consultants time, Consultant's expenses, and interest will to be due and owing by the Client,' EC1TpN 6 OWNERSt9lP OE DOCURtENTS 6.1 All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by the Consultant as instruments of service, shall remain the properly of the Consultant, 6.2 Client agrees that all reports and other work fumished to the Client or his agents, which is not paid for, will to be returned upon.demand and Will to be used by the Client for any purpose. 18.E g P The h period the will retain all pertinent records lalatin to the i services a r rmed'for a period of five years following submission of the report, during` Which period the records will lobe made available to the Client at all reasonable times. _ 9ON 9: DISCOVERY OE UNANTICIPATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Client warrants that a reasonable effort has been made to inform Consulta site, nt of known or suspected hazardous materials on or near the project.. , 7.2 Linder this agreement, the term hazardous materials includes hazardous materials (40 CFR 172.01), hazardous wastes (40 CFR 251.2), hazardous substances (40 CFR 300.8), petroleum products, potychlorinated biphenyfs, and asbestos. 7.3 Hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. Consultant and Client agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work. Consultant '1 d Client also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for Consultant 4o take immediate measures ,10 protect health and safety. Client agrees to compensate Consultant for any equipment decontamination or other costs incident to the discovery `of unanticipated hazardous waste. 7.4 Consultant agrees to notify Client when unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials are encountered. Client agrees to make any disclosures required by law to the appropriate governing agencies. Client also agrees to hold Consultant harmless for any and all consequences of disclosures made by Consultant which are required by governing law. In the event the project site is not owned by Client, Client .- recognizes that it is the Client's responsibility to inform the property owner of the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials. 7.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, Client waives any claim against Consultant, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, agrees to defend, indemnify, and save Consultant harmless from any claim, liability, and/or defense costs for injury or loss arising from ConsultairiVe discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials Including any costs created by delay of the project d any cost associated with possible reduction of the property's value. Client will be responsible for ultimate disposal of any samples secured by the Consultant which are found to be contaminated. 3.1 Client agrees that Consultant's liability for any damage on account of any error, omission or other professional negligence will be limited to a sum not to exceed $50,000 or Consultant's fee, whichever is greater. If Client `prefers to have higher limits on professional liability, Consultant agrees to Increase the limits up to a maximum of $1,000,000 upon Client's written request at the time of accepting our proposal provided that Client agrees to pay an additional consideration of four percent of the total fee, or $400.00, whichever is greater. The additional charge for the higher liability limits is because of the greater risk assumed and is not strictly a charge for additional professional liability insurance. SECTIMI g: 9.1 The Consultant represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and Consultants employed by it, is and ate protected by worker's compensation Insurance and that Consultant has such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance,policies•which the, Consultant deeme to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon request in writing. Within the limits and conditions of such insurance, Consultant agrees to Indemnify and save Client harmless from and against loss, damage, or liability arising from negligent acts by Consultant, its agents, staff, and consultants employed by It. The Consultant shall .not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance or the limits described in Section 8, whichever fs less. The Client agrees to defend Indemnify and save consultant harmless for loss, damage or liability arising from acts by cliant, client's agent, staff, and other consultants mployed by Client. SECTDON 10: 10.1 All claims, disputes, and other matters in controversy between Consultant and Client arising .out of or in any way related to this Agreement will be submitted to 'alternative dispute resolution* (ADR) such as mediation and/or arbitration, before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law. 10.2 If a dispute at law arises related lathe services provided under this Agreement and that dispute, requires ling®Uon instead of ADR asprovided above, then: (a) the claim will be brought and tried in judicial jurisdiction of the court of the county where Consultant's principal place,_of, business is. located and Client waives the right to remove the action to any other county or judicial jurisdiction, and (b) the prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attomey'sfees, and other j claim related expenses. aggTom 11: 11.1 This agreement'may be terminated by either, party upon seven (n dare writtennotice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to, perform In accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be, effective, ifthat substantial failure, has been .remedial before, expiration of the period sped®d-in .the -written •notice. 1n the slant of termination; Consuttitn4'shall be,pauil4or_servic®s-padorrnad to the taemination notice date plus reasonable tormins4ion'oxpenses. " 11.2 In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three (3) months, prior to completion of all r®parts contemplated by this, Agreement Consultant may complete such analyses and records as are necessary 4o complete his, files and ;may ,also.complate,a-ropori bb- services performed to the date of notice of termination or'suspeMion:'`Th® irpens® of termination or suspension shall,include.aWdirectacstsrc@ ConsulanT ) iri complating such analyses, 4 records and reports. ; SECTMI 12 12.1 Neither the Client nor the Consultant may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his.duties or interest in this:Agre®man without the written consent of the other party. 13: GMEMING LAW 1.1 The laws of the State of Florida will govern the validity of these Terms,. their. interpratatiomand ,performance 13.2 If any of the provisions contained in y p � this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be impaired. Limitations of liability and indemnities will survive termination of this Agreement for any cause. � t = a � � � - � . m y � �\� �� \��� \^ � s� y. :±t � `2± ��\ ©^ x x�� :»« : . � . / ~.Q / yam:/� � � \�� ƒ. . OCPA Property Data (05-22-28-0000-00-004) Pagel of BILL DONEGAN, CFA Orange County Property Appraiser ORW Property Line Inquiry System Assessed values shown are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being flnalized for ad valorem tax purposes Previous Parcel Next Parcel * what's ;hJs,- Parcel Data for 05-22-28-0000-00-004 Show View Previous Mm -- Find Neighborhood i ghbQthgo—dAPyear Notice APWPrQ Propel s Schools .-l., Parcel 05-22-28-0000-Address 10711 CLARCONA Property UseId. 00-004 - OCOEERD Code 5400 ®de ----]1 OCO - Ocoee Millage 65 RTax Year 2005 I Code Reflects Tax Rates I Value SULM�n Esti , mateTaxes (If this property were to sell) Value Method Number of Bldgs. Depreciated Bldg. Value Depreciated X:F 07B Value [Land Value JX: :�:: (Market) ILaud Value :A:G just-Markeo, Value Assessed Value (SOH) Exempt Value Taxable Value Market 0 0 $ n 0 $350 $1,182,000 $18,912 $1,182,350 -4 =$19,262 $0 $19,262 2004 Tax Savings Due to SOH* Owner Information SW1/4 OF SWIA OF SEC 05-22-28 (LESS W 30 FT FOR RD RNO & (LESS PT TAKEN ON N & W FOR R/W PER OR 5461/ 2341 C198- 1167 1) N 7 ACRES (231 FT) OF NW I/4 OF NWI/4 SEC 08-22-28 (LESS W 30 FT FOR R/W) 3202/290 3286/834 & 3768/320 & 4319/953 4619/407 4830/433 435 437 439 & 4415286/975 & 5286/972 (DC) I http://www.ocpafl.orglplslwebappilget_parcel—master?pid=282205000000004&query data... 4/6/2005 OCPA. Property Data (05-22-28-0000-00-004) Page 2 of 3 Based on 2004 taxable value of $19,262 2004 Taxes without S®III $350 2004 Taxes with S®III DE 2004 Total Tax Savings $0 For details see Save Qur Homes (SOH). *Excludes Non -Ad Valorem Assessments. Sales Information =Book/Page Sate Date 4536/1047 02/18/1993 4319/0953 11/07/1990 376�/0320 03/01/1986 Building Information Sale �j Deed �I Vac/Imp Amount I Type Code $100 IL_F_M._ [_Improved $7F�.�I Improved $100 FS Improved I3isplay 51m_.12r Sa1gs in Subdivision ��r Unqualified LH- LESS $100 Unqualified Unqualified Bldg bosun 1dI®del Type (edict: to Beds Baths F 'Year Gross Livin g Int JExt Bldg Est. view Code Code Built* SF SF gait Wall Value Cos. sketches) L ------ i Code Code Nem Actual year burls - does not reflect subsequent building improvements. Sh�vv_(�uildig Swab Areas t Land Information Item Land Use Code .Zoning* Frontage Depth band Units Un=Pricesand Value F7,15400 R-1-A 47.25 ACRIE{S) 1'$25,000.0J0 $1,182,000 *Please contact your local Zoning Agency for the latest zoning information. Extra Feature Information Item Description SHED Units Unit Price $100.00 FOB Value $100 http://www.ocpafl.orglplslwebappIlget—parcel master?pid=282205000000004&query data... 4/6/2005 OCPA Property Data -(05-22-28-0000-00-004) Page 3 of 3 2 cc BLDG s250.00i $250 This Data Printed on 04/06/2005 15:34: 10 and was Last Epdatad on 04/0612005 03:00:03 0s. [Home] [About OCPAI [9949MLIW [Meet Bill Done an] [Record Searches) [Map. Searches) [Contact OCPA] [Depafinents] [Other_SitesJ [Products) [Whats Hot [Important Notices Copyright 0 1996 Orange County Property Appraiser. All rights reserved. This page last modified on: 02/25/00 http://www.ocpafl.orglplslwebappllget_parcel—master?vid=282205000000004&query data... 4/6/2005 ®CPA .Property Line Page 1 of 1 A t ill Donegan 012nue county d-. „.. .. ors G w PON LP POND. (k-', PONIjj Parcel ID: 052228000000040 http://paims. ocpafl. orglwebmaplprintmap. asp?pin=282205000000040&condo=&mapurl=h... 4/ 18/2005 U(,PA rroperty Line Page 1 of 1 .. �o -.w t. p�' r 'AOra 4 �IQ'Donegal nueCounty p WIV APPralser POND i 1 1 yi x I, �T ,pONO., 7 7 F- Parcel ID: 052228000000004 This map is for reference only and is not a survey. 0 MMM= 235 ft Co ri ht 2001. Oran a Count Pro MY A praiser. oennr, TREET ADDRESS: 5-22-28-0000.00-004 WNER NAMES : 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE RD AILING ADDRESS: BLICHMAN EERY-E S ETAL 1/2 tNT DDRESS2: 718 LAUREL OAK DR DRESS3: ITY,STATE, ZIP: LANT CITY, FL. 33566 OUNTRY: ITY CODE: O - OCOEE MILLAGE CODE: 5 RTY USE CODE: 00 ALUE MARKET: MARKET LAND CLASS VALUE: i8,912 , ND MKT VALUE: 1,182,000 BLDO VALUE: 0 FOB VALUE: 350 UST MKT VALUE: 1,182,350 SSESSED VALUE: 19,262 EMPT VALUE: 0 AXABLE VALUE: 19,262 T PLANE X-COORD: 82762.09 T PLANE Y-COORD: 1550209.93 FONT FACE='Axial' SIZE='-2 http://paims.ocpafl.org/webma / rintma .as ? in= — P p p P p 282205000000004&condo—&mapurl=h..- 4/18/2005 �� r TechnologyFirstSearch Environmental FirstSearch Tm Report i Job Number: 01-0013318 Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Sciences 04-06-05 FIRSTr Tel: (407) 265-8900 Fax: (407) 265-8904 Environmental FirstSearch is a registered trademark of FirstSearch Technology Corporation. All rights reserved. Environmental Firsdearch Search Summary .Report Target Site: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS NPL Y 02-14-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 01-18-05 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 NFRAP Y 06-23-04 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 RCRA TSD Y 02-14-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA COR Y 02-14-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA GEN Y 02-14-05 0.25 0 0 0 - - 4 4 ERNS Y 12-31-04 0.25 0 0 0 2 2 State Sites Y 03-10-05 1.00. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spills-1990 Y 01-06-05 0,25 0 1 0 - - 1 2 SWL Y 02-14-05 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 Other Y 01-06-05 0.25 0 0 0 - - 2 2 REG UST/AST Y 01-06-05 0.25 0 2 0 - _ 7 9 Leaking UST Y 03-15-05 0.50 0 1 0 1 - 1 3 - TOTALS - 0 4 0 1 0 17 22 Acitice of Disclaimer Due to the limitations, constraints, inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such information. Waiver of Liability Although FirstSearch Technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp. does not and can not warrant the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an understanding of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations. Environmental .F'irsdeareh Sites ,Summary Report TARGET SITE ° 10711 CLARCONA O • COEE ROAD ,IG1B; 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 TOTAL: 22 GEOCODED: 5 NON GEOCODED: 17 SELECTED; 0 Page No. ID . B Type Site Name/ID/Status ' , Address 1 I SPILLS FINA-C ARVIEW �`� �'� 488512760 SED t' k Lt n i ORL NDO FL 32811 EE RD ORLANDO FL 32811 2 3 UST F1NA- ARVIEW 0� �b ' • , , 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD 488512760 SED 7ro 1 (� ORLANDO FL 32818 4 4 LUST BECKYS CNTRY STORE u i u 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD 489045638/CLOSED APOPKA FL 32703 5 2 UST BECKYS CNTRY STORE 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD 489045638/CLOSED APOPKA FL 32703 6 5 LUST RIGHT FUEL & FOOD 1399 N LAKEWOOD AVE 488513383/OPEN OCOEE FL 34761 �ru yc ZY �v ..5-.�- > r 605 SW G s�Y 0.05 S W 1 0.08 NE 3 0.08 NE 3 0.49 SE 2 Environmental Firsdearch Sites Summary .Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 TOTAL: 22 GEOCODED: 5 NON GEOCODED: 17 SELECTED: 0 Page No. ID DE Type Site Name/ID/Status Af1d9'eSS Dist jr Map ID N/A I I ERNS VULCAN RD NRC-537609/MOBILE NON GC APOPKA FL 32703 N/A 10 ERNS COW GAS SE OF FLORAL NURSERY/SHILER NON GC 18915/UNKNOWN APOPKA FL 32703 N/A 22 LUST MEDLOCK PROPERTY 2320 EAST AVE 039800127/CLOSED PANAMA CITY FL 34761 NON GC N/A 14 OTHER 32703/CATTLE VATS APOPKA FL 32703 NON GC NIA 13 OTHER 34761/CATTLE VATS OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 9 RCRAGN $P #79395 2115 ORANGE BLOSSOM TRL FLR000110767/SGN NON GC APOPKA FL 32703 N/A 8 ! RCRAGN ALBERTSONS #4471 300 FLR000110742/SGN W LAKE MARY BLVD NON GC � SA SANFORA FL 32703 N/A 7 RCRAGN QUALITY PRODUCTS OF ORLANDO HWY 437 N PO BOX 470 } FLD981857394/ SGN OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC _ N/A 6 RCRAGN BP #14149 1650 E SILVER STAR FLR0001 l 1161/SGN NON GC OCOEE FL 34761 i N/A 12 SPILLS MINUTE MAID CO (FORMERLY COCA COLA HWY 437 N OF BELTWAY -FULLER 489803347/CLOSED OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 15 UST BOS TRUCKLINE INC GILLARD RD 1 48980 5438/CLOSED IN WINTER GARDEN FL 34761 NON GC j N/A 16 UST GIBBS & REGISTER 340 B STORY RD 489806509/OPEN OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 17 UST MINUTE MAID CO (FORMERLY COCA COLA HWY 437 N OF BELTWAY } -FULLER 489803347/CLOSED OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 18 UST OCOEE CITY KISSIMMEE AVE WATER PLA WASHINGTON AVE i 489801874/CLOSED OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC l N/A 19 UST TURKEY LAKE SERVICE PLAZA (VEHICL FLORIDA TURNPIKE MP 263 489805693/CLOSED OCOEE FL 34761 NON GC N/A 20 UST USE #9803244 3710 S MAGUIRE RD 489803007/DELETED NON GC .,1 OCOEE FL 34761 N/A 21 UST MACGEORGE, STEVE RT 1 APOPKA BLVD NON GC 489103256/CLOSED APOPKA FL 32703 I J Environmental FirstSearcli Normalized Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 TOTAL: 22 GEOCODED: 5 ICON GEOCODED: 17 SELECTED: 0 Site Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Total Sites FINA-CLEARVIEW 7254 CLARCONA.00OEE RD 0.05 SW 1 RT RC RG ER ST SP LF ORLANDO FL 32818 OT US LS 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 BECKYS CNTRY STORE 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD 0.08 NE 3 NP LE NF RT RC RG ER SS_T SP LF APOPKA FL 32703 QUS LS 2 0 0 ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 RIGHT FUEL & FOOD 1399 N LAKEWOOD AVE 0.49 SE 2 1 NP LE NF LT RC RG ER ST SP LF OCOEE FL 34761 OT US LS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 t 80: Spills 80 FL: Fed Land Use HM: HMIRS AC: ACEC FN: FINDS LF: Landfill AQ: Aquifers FP: Floodplains LS: Lust CE: CERCLIS FW: Fed Wells NC: NCDB ER: ERNS HS: Historic NF: NFRAP Database Legend NP: NPL PE: Permits RN: RCRA NLR ST. State NS: NPDES PW: Pub Water Supply RP: Receptors TO: Towers NU: Nuclear Permits RC: RCRA COR RT: RCRA TSD TR: TRIS OT: Other RE: Releases SP: Spills 90 US: Ust PA: Pads RG: RCRA GEN SO: SOILS WE: Wetlands Environmental Firstsearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 SEARCH ID: NAME: FrNA-CLEARVIEW ADDRESS: 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD ORLANDO FL 32811 ORANGE CONTACT. MARK G. KUBALSKI UTE IN "ORMA TION )PERATAD STATE SPILLS SITE DIST/DIR: 0.05 SW REV: 116105 IDI-, 488512760 ID2: 8512760 STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: NAME UPDATED., TRENTIS DURDEN sDDR UPDATED: 1AD ADDR INDICATOR: N 'LEAN UP STATUS: EANUP STATUS DATE: DNR - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION RECEIVED ANK: 06-16.2004 P ID: 2800 P ROLE: ACCOUNT OWNER P BEGIN: 07-01-1985 ANIE: PHONE: D'LC-HA RGE INFORMATION CLEANUP REQUIRED: WORK STATUS: INFO SOURCE: OTHER SOURCE: SITE MANAGER: MANAGER END DATE: TANK OFFICE: IL BROWDER, DURDEN, KUBALSKI PO BOX 491 CLARCONA FL 32710 491 (305)295-9684 INACTIVE D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION AIAP ID: I Site Details Page - I Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 3 DIST/DIR: 0.05 SW MAP ID: NAME: FINA-CLEARVIEW ADDRESS: 7254 CLARCONA-OCOEE RD REV: 116105 ORLANDO FL 32811 IDI: 488512760 ORANGE ID2: 8512760.00 CONTACT: MARK 0, KUBALSKI STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: (305) 295-9684 !jITE INFORAfA TION TOTAL NUMBER OF TANKS: 5 FACILITY TYPE: A - RETAIL STATION DEP CO: N TANK ➢NFORMATION TANK ➢D: TVI: INSTALLED: TIC STAT: CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: ➢'LACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI: INSTALLED: TKSTAT: CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI: INSTALLED: TIC STAT: CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI: -NSTALLED: I TANK 01-JUL-1978 B-REMOVED 2000 B - UNLEADED GAS UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 2 TANK 01-JUL-1978 B - REMOVED 2000 B - UNLEADED GAS UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 3. TANK 01-JUL-1978 B-REMOVED 4000 B - UNLEADED GAS UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 4 TANK 01-JUL-1978 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31-OCT-1993 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31-OCT-1993 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31-OCT-1993 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31-OCT-1993 - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 2 I Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL JOB: 01-00I3318 34761 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ------------ SEARCH ID: a DIST/DHR: 0.08 NE NAME: BECKYS CNTRY STORE ADDRESS: 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD APOPKA FL 32703 ORANGE CONTACT: ,SITE INFORMATION OPIERATOR' NAME UPDATED: BECKYS COUNTRY STORE ADDR UPDATED: 03-27-2003 DAD ADDR INDICATOR: y CLEAN UP STATUS: RA - RA ONGOING CLEANUP STATUS DATE: 07-22-2004 RANK: 2742 RP ID: 2501 RP ROLE: RP BEGIN: ACCOUNT OWNER NAME: 05-20-1994 BOWERS, CLIFTON 642 S DILLARD ST WINTER GARDEN FL 34787 3903 PHONE, (407) 656-1813 DISCHARGE INFORMATION CLEANUP REQUIRED: WORK STATUS: INFO SOURCE: OTHER SOURCE: SITE MANAGER: MANAGER END DATE: TANK OFFICE: DISCHARGE DATE. POLLUTANT: COMBINED, SCORE: SCORE DATE: GAL DISCHARGED: DRINK WELLS AFFECTED: MONITORING WELLS: SOIL AFFECTED: S WATER AFFECTED: G WATER AFFECTED: CLEANUP ELIG: UST INFORMATION R - CLEANUP REQUIRED ACTIVE A - ABANDONED TANK RESTORATION TAYLOR DT PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY 11-01-1989 13 - UNLEADED GAS 55 07-22-2003 0 Y y N N E - ELIGIBLE MAP ID: 3 REV: 3115105 IDI: 489045638 ID2.. 9045638 STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: (407) 877-6137 Site Details Page - 4 Environmental Firsdearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 JOB: 01-0013318 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS F-SCARCH ID, 2 DI<ST/DIR: 0.08 NE M.Al' 1fD: 3 NAME: BECKYS CNTRY STORE AIDDRIrSS: 10600 CLARCONA OCOEE RD APOPKA FL 32703 ORANGE CONTACT: CLIFTON BOWERS SITEI1V, ORA?ATION TOTAL NUMBER OF' TANKS: 2 FACILITY TYPE: A - RETAIL STATION DEP CO: N TANK IN -FORMATION TANK ID, TVI: INSTALLED: TK STAT: CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: TANK ID: TVI. INSTALLED: TK STAT: CAPACITY(GAL): CONTENT: PLACE: TYPE: 1 TANK REV: I16105 IDI: 489045638 ID2: 9045638.00 STATUS: CLOSED PHONE: (407) 656-1813 STATUS: CLOSED DEP CO: N STAT DATE: 31-DEC-1989 13 - REMOVED 1000 Y' UNKNOWNINOT REPORTED UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION 2 STATUS: TANK DEP CO: CLOSED N STAT DATE: 31-DEC-1989 B - REMOVED 1000 Y - UNKNOWN/NOT REPORTED UNDERGROUND A - RETAIL STATION Site Details Page - 5 Environmental. irstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD OCOEE FL 34761 JOB: 01-0013318 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FSE-___A.I.3CIIID'S DIST/DIR: 0.49 SE 14IAg' ID: 2 NAME: RIONT FUEL & FOOD ADDRESS: 1399 N LAKEWOOD AVE OCOEE FL 32761 CONTACT: SITE INFORMATION OPERATOR: NAME UPDATED: ADDR UPDATED: HAD ADDR INDICATOR: CLEAN UP STATUS: CLEANUPSTATUSDATE RANK: RP ID; RP ROLE: RP BEGIN: NAME: II PHONE; DISCIARGE INFORMATION DISCHARGE DATE: POLLUTANT: COMBINED: SCORE: SCORE DATE: GAL DISCHARGED: DRINK WELLS AFFECTED: MONITORING WELLS: SQIL AFFECTED: 3 WATER AFFECTED: WATER AFFECTED: 3LEANVP ELIG: :LEANVP REQUIRED: R'ORK STATUS: NFO SOURCE: DTHER SOURCE. ITE MANAGER: BANAGER LEND DATE: ANK OFFICE: 3T INFORMATION NEIL KAPPADIA 10-07-2002 10-07-2002 N RA - RA ONGOING 09-I 7-2002 1380 52351 ACCOUNT OWNER 10.07-2002 PANITA FOOD INC 2018 S CHICKASAW TRL ORLANDO FL 32825 (407)468-1673 03-30-1998 B - UNLEADED GAS 70 11-20-1998 Y Y E - ELIGIBLE R - CLEANUP REQUIRED ACTIVE D - DISCHARGE NOTIFICATION VAZQUEZ E PCLP48 - ORANGE COUNTY REV; 3/15/05 IDI; 4885I3383 ID2: 8513383 STATUS: OPEN PHONE: (407) 468-1673 Site Details Page - 6 Environmental Fi.rstSe:arch Federal Database Descriptions ASTM Databases: CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System. The EPA's database of current and potential Superfund sites currently or previously under investigation. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly. CERCLIS-NFRAp (Archive): Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System Archived Sites. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Updated quarterly. ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System, The EPA's database of emergency response actions. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Data since January, 2001, has been received from the National Response Center as the EPA no longer maintains this data. Updated quarterly. FINDS: The Facility Index System. The EPA's Index of identification numbers associated with a property or facility which the EPA has investigated or has been made aware of in conjunction with various regulatory programs. Each record indicates the EPA office that may have files on the site or facility. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. 1 NPL: National Priority List. The EPA's list of confirmed or proposed Superfund sites. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly, 1 RCRIS: .Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. The EPA's database of registered hazardous waste generators and treatment, storage and disposal facilities. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List). Source: Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA TSD: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System isposal Facilities. The EPA' Treatmdatabase of ent, Storage, treat, eDstore, dispose, or incinerates hazardous waste. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. ASTM Database Descriptions (continued) RCRA COR: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Corrective Action Sites. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites with reported corrective action. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. RCRA GEN: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Large, Small, and Very Small of RCRIS sites that create haQuantity Generators. The EPA's database zardous waste or meet other RCRA requirements. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List). RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Sites No Longer Regulated. FirstSearch's proprietary database of Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's that the EPA cannot categorize. All RCRA databases are Updated quarterly I Environmental FirstSearch Federal Database Descriptions Non-ASTM Databases HHIRS: Hazardous Materials Incident Response System. This database contains information from the US Department of Transportation regarding materials, packaging, and a description of events for tracked incidents. Updated quarterly. NCDB: National Compliance Database. The National Compliance Data Base System (NCDB) tracks regional compliance and enforcement activity and manages the Pesticides and Toxic Substances Compliance and Enforcement program at a national level. The system tracks all compliance monitoring and enforcement activities from the time an inspector conducts and inspection until the time the inspector closes or the case settles the enforcement action. NCDB is the national repository of the 10 regional and Headquarters FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS). Data collected in the regional FTTS is transferred to NCDB to support the need for monitoring national performance of regional programs. Updated quarterly NPDES: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The EPA's database of all permitted facilities receiving and discharging effluents. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. NRDB: National Radon Database. The NRDB was created by the EPA to distribute information regarding the EPA/State Residential Radon Surveys and the National Residential Radon Survey. The data is presented by zipcode in Environmental FirstSearch Reports. Source: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Updated Periodically Nuclear: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) list of permitted nuclear facilities. Updated Periodically PADS: PCB Activity Database System The EPA's database PCB handlers (generators, transporters, storers and/or disposers) that are required to notify the EPA, the rules being similar to RCRA. This database indicates the type of handler and registration number. Also included is the PCB Transformer Registration Database. Updated semi-annually. Receptors: 1995 TIGER census listing of schools and hospitals that may house individuals deemed sensitive to environmental discharges due to their fragile immune systems. Updated Periodically RELEASES: Air and Surface Suter Releases. A subset of the EPA's database which have impacted only air or surface water. ERNS Updated semi-annually. Soils: This database includes the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data for the conterminous United States from the United States Geographical Survey (USGS).. It contains information regarding soil characteristics such as water capacity, percent clay, organic material, permeability, thickness of layers, hydrological characteristics, quality of drainage, surface, slope, liquid limit, and the annual frequency of flooding. National Resources Conservation Services Soil Survey Geographic(SSURGO) database, and the USGS Digital Data Series bedrock data. Updated annually IRIS: Toxic Release Xnventory System. The EPA's database of all facilities that have had or may be prone to toxic material releases. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi-annually. Federal Wells: The United State Geographic Survey(USGS) Groundwater Inventory Sites Updated annually Enviro ' ental. F°irstSearch Florida Database Descriptions Three Florida Department of Environmental Protection databases are included under the Florida Sites list heading. They include... 1. Florida Sites List - identifies facilities and/or locations that the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation has recognized with potential or existing environmental contamination. This database has not been updated since 1989 2. Superfund Hazardous Waste Sites - This database correlates to the NPL database and includes active, delisted, and Federal sites. Based on information provided by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 3. State Funded Action Sites - This database includes sites prioritized by the State of Florida for clean-up by the state or by potentially responsible parties. The List Status field includes SS, SFAS and SHAS. SS means site is on the Original State Sites. SFAS means site is on the State Funded Action Sites list. SHAS means site is on the State Hazardous Waste Sites list. 1 __AID WASTE FACILITIES (SWF) The Solid Waste Facilities List is concerned with the handling of solid iwaste and includes locations identified with solid waste landfilling or associated activities involving the handling of solid waste. The presence of a site on this list does not necessarily indicate existing environmental contamination but rather the potential. i LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (LUST) The LUST database is concerned with petroleum storage tank systems and includes facilities and/or locations that have reported the possible release of contaminants. Included within this list are sites that are in the Florida Early Detection Incentive (EDI) Program, the Abandoned Tank Restoration Program (ATRP) and the Petroleum Liability Insurance Restoration Program (PLIRP). These programs support remedial action or reimbursement for those sites with environmental problems due to leaking fuel storage tanks. Some sites listed in the report have not yet been accepted in these programs. Environmental FirstSearch Florida Databases and Sources(continued) The FDEP assigns scores to the sites based on the threat to human health and the environment. The Rank is determined by the site's Score and reflects the state's priority for remedial action on that site. Typically, the lower the Rank value, the greater the priority for remedial action from the state. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (UST) The Florida Administrative Code requires registration of 1 underground and aboveground stationary storage tanks that contain petroleum products or hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA. Inclusion on this list indicates the presence of stationary storage tanks and therefore the potential for environmental problems. It does not necessarily indicate existing problems. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY (PWS) ! The Florida Department of Environmental Protection potable water System Wells BROWNFIELDS "he Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Voluntary Cleanup ._ jites Updated quaterly PERMITS: BROWARD county Department of Natural Resources Protection (DNRP) Databases EARLY DETECTION INCENTIVE (EDI) Includes leaking tank sites that fall under the following categories: Early Detection Incentive (EDI) Petroleum Liability Insurance Reimbursement (PLIRP) ® Abandoned Tank Restoration (ATRP) Environmental assessment And remediation(EA) Sites that have been issued licenses (by DNRP) to ensure that proper assessment and remediation are applied. REGISTERED UNDERGROUND and ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS (ST) DNRP 's inventory of Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks in Broward County. Envirorunental F'irstSearch FloridaDatabases and Sources (continued) Hazardous MATERIALS (1.53) This database includes sites that are involved in some way in the handling of hazardous substances or wastes. Due to the activities relating to the handling of hazardous substances or waste, these sites possess the potential for environmental contamination. .DADE county Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM) Databases ENFORCEMENT CASES (ENF) In sites that have been notified and/or investigated by Dade County to determine if any cleanup activity is necessary. Leaking Underground Storage tanks make up the bulk of this database, but other types of sites include: unauthorized air emissions, unauth- orized storage facilities, and site specific spills. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (UT) DERM 's inventory of Underground Storage Tanks in Dade County. FUEL SPILL CASES (FSPILL) DERM 's listing of spill cases in Dade County. It consists mainly of ( underground tanks. INDUSTRIAL, Waste (IW) IW2 - Facilities with reclaim systems or holding tanks. IW3 - Facilities with pretreatment or treatment systems that discharge to sewers less then 25,000 gal. per day. IW4 - Facilities that operate treatment systems that discharge to open ground. (Permits are no longer issued to facilities that discharge to open ground.) INDUSTRIAL Waste(IW5) This database consists of Industrial Waste type 5. It is similar to the USEPA 's RCRA database (RCRIS) and includes sites that are involved in some way in the handling of hazardous and/or non -hazardous waste. Due to the activities relating to the handling of hazardous substances or waste, these sites possess the potential for environmental contamination. Hazardous Waste(HW) Sites with confirmed soil or groundwater contamination. Environmental FirstSearch Federal Database Sources `CERCLIS: The EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System database. Updated quarterly CERCLIS NFRAP: The EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System archived sites. Updated quarterly ERNS: The EPA's Emergency Response Notification system. Updated quarterly FED OTHER: The EPA's Section Seven Tracking System. Updated Quarterly FINDS: The EPA's Facility Index System. Updated as new data becomes available j IRS: The EPA's hazardous Materials Incident Response System Updated quarterly i NCDB: The EPA's National Compliance Database. Updated quarterly NPDES: The EPA's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Updated quarterly NPL: The EPA's list of confirmed or proposed Superfund Sites Updated quarterly NRDB: The National Technical Information Service's National Radon .abase -,dated as new data becomes available NUCLEAR: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's list of permitted nuclear facilities. Updated periodically PADS: The EPA's PCB handlers database. Updated quarterly RCRA COR: The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's Corrective Action Sites. Updated quarterly RCRA GEN: The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's Generators and Transporters. Updated quarterly RCRA NLR: FirstSearch's proprietary database of Resource Conservation and..Recovery Information System's that the EPA cannot categorize. Updated quarterly RCRA TSD: The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System's Treatment, Storage, and Disposal facilities. Updated quarterly RECEPTORS: The 2002 Census listing of schools and hospitals Updated as new data becomes available f RELEASES: The EPA's ERNS air and surface water releases. Updated quarterly S: The EPA's Toxic Release Inventory System. Updated quarterly Envirormental F°i.rstSearch Florida Database Sources BROWNFIELDS (BF) The Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Voluntary Cleanup Sites Updated quaterly LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (LUST) The Florida DEP Tank Facility Discharge information Updated quarterly OTHER (OT) The Florida DEP Dry Cleaning Facilities/Priority Ranking List and Cattle Dipping Vats. The Florida Geographic Data Library sink Holes of Florida Updated Quarterly PERMITS (PE) Broward County and Dade County DERM enforcement cases, industrial waste, I storage tanks, fuel spill cases and hazardous waste permits Updated quarterly RELEASES (RL) j Not available 90 SPILLS (SP) The Florida DEP Contamination and Cleanup Reports I Updated quarterly 80 SPILLS (80) -` �Che Florida DEP Contamination and Cleanup Reports �bpdated quarterly STATE SITES (ST) The Florida DEP Florida Sites lists of Superfund Hazardous Waste Sites and State Funded Action Sites. Updated quarterly. SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS (SWL) The Florida DEP Solid Waste Facilities List Updated annually UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (UST) The Florida DEP Storage Tank and Petroleum Contamination/Cleanup Monitoring Updated quarterly GIS Sources AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (ACEC) Not available AQUIFERS (AQ) Not available STATE WELLS (PWS) The Florida REP Potable Water System Wells .Updated annually Environmental FirstSearch Street Name .Report for Streets within .25Mile(s) of Target .Property TARGET SITE: 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD JOB: 01-0013318 OCOEE FL 34761 10th Ave 2nd Ave 3rd Ave 4th Ave 5th Ave 6th Ave Angola St Butler Ln Carpet St Cl'Arcona Ocoee Rd Fullers Cross Rd Harris Rd Northern Durango Ave y Peters Ave j West Rd 0.22 SE 0.04 NE 0.03 NE 0.04 NE 0.04 NE 0.05 SE 0.15 NE 0.23 SE 0.03 NE 0.00 -- 0.00 -- 0.12 SE 0.24 SE 0.24 SE 0.01 SW Street Name Dist/Dir Environmental FirstSearch 01 "� 3 1 Mile Radius from Area Single Map: Source: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER Files Area Polygon .............................. ificd Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ............................ NPL, Brownfield Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste..... Railroads.................................................................................................... Black Rings Reptesent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents $00 6. Radius FIRSiSt� Environmental FirstSearch 1 Mile Radius from Area ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites t Source; 2001 U.S. Census TIGER Files Ama Polygon ............................... O dfed Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ............................ IN NPL. Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste ..... Railroads......................................................................... -- Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents 5oo 11. Radius EmAUrumnen FIRSTS - Environmental FirstSearch .5 Mile Radius from Area ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL 10711 CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, OCOEE FL 34761 Source: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER Files AreaPolygon ....... . ........................................................ tified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ............................ NPL. Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste............®, Railroads., ...................... Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Rb)gRcprcscnts500fl, Radius ma Environmental First earth .25 Mile Radius from Area ASTM Map: RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST Source: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER Files AreaPolygon .............................. .................................. itified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ............................ IN NPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste ............ Railroads Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring RLpresents 500 fl Radius Environmental First earth .25 Mile Radius from Area Non-ASTM Map: Spills 90 A } Source: 2001 U.S. Census TIGER Files li Area Polygon ..................................... Q . ............................ tified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ........................ NPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landrill (S WL) or Hazardous Waste ..... National Historic Sites and Landmark Sites ................ SoilSites.......................................................................................... Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents 500 ti. Radius lnvirunw®- Fii2.S�� 121 p Centerpoint:-81.54045, 28.60129 Map Produced: Thu Apr 2105:33:00 2005 ES E MA Project Impact Hazard Information and Awareness Site j http://www.esri.com/hazards 1 http://mapserver2.esri.comlegi-binlhazard.adol?s=O&cd=x&p=1 &c=-81.540445,28.60l29... 4/21/2005 PABIHs RA L"lfntnrGatden �n9a :.i 0 uy ly"f This map Is a usergenerated static output from an Internet mapping site and Is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. PRIA Lbp tbWec H4']F20.BY W, 2B' ]SS1.91' N A o CONUSCItles Laver48 CS W®end Data d kttftx 2 Wa Wadanda Data states Cj100K �tla Data Available _I CHUSa 9 t cwer 4a Wettand Polygorls Estuarine and Lino Da r ®E, Estaadna and Marine Wetland ® Ftaahwatar Emat..rt Wsdand Frasiwatar Fbmsbdishrub FraMwatari and Lake oiber Rlverina Map Scale Unavailable (unprojected data) Levy Alachua IF Marlon A J, Polk http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/graphics/dcaresmp.gif 4/21/2005 Jackson Taylor for Large Buildings H Counties h areas the addition Paso of radon resistant construction features ifisbor are i, e• to prevent radon Pi I problems. (More than 5% of new large buildings are expected to have annual levelaverage radon levels above the EPA action S 1981i ,_ Identified Fewer than If 3U o t new large buildings -dg,. these od to have elevated radon levels, so no additional radon resistant construction techniques are recommended to prevent radon problems. Osceola t Polk Hardee DeSoto _ lghland . St. L e MarUn mr... Palm Beach Broward ............... Dade http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/graphics/dcalrgmp.gif 4/21/2005 z� �, -- � , I PFB�T H Vied of `res�detial property located on an "adjoining'parceljio the east'and I� squth of Clarcona`OcoeejRoad PH®YOGFiAPH, 4 View of Forest Lake gojf course located on'adjoining property to the east, north-of.Clarcona; cove Road: I INTERVIEW RECORD owOnghave you own--edl e su3ject props y. Are ou awgre.o ar}y St , A�ST's or�tf�er stora a or use of petroleum products or i azard�ius ma eria s a the su jec prope y. 3. Areyou awar , ofpy environmental concerns associated with the subject property or adjoining properties . 4. Are ou ware of an ast, endin o threatened litigation or administrattive roceed'n relevant toiazardous ria�ter►a�s or pro�eum products m, on or from the subje proper�y j Are You a are of an over ment noCce re rdin viol tions o );abilities relating to azardous substances ��petro%um pro�uc s VMS subtecPproper{y, 6. (Client) Who would you like to be listed in the reliance section of the report? 1 7.lient) C�Iow many copies of the report do you desire? To whom should they be i ad�ressed . B. (Client) Can you provide a site plan and/or a legal description? 1 Interviewer 9. Are there any locked improvements/strictures at the subject property? _n M R 10. who provides water to the subject property? Sewer? ElKtrical 11. Has there been a previous Environmental Site As essment? Wan you provide a copy? 12. Can you provide a chain of title? 13. Who is the current owner of the subject property? How long? nr . /'\ n 14. Who is the property m pants? 1�S4What is the intended use of the subject property? 16. Are there any liens against the subject property? 4 17. Do you have any knowledge of any other environmental concerns not mentioned? t 18. Is the safe price comparable to similar properties in the area? Project Client No Date, Interviewee: Relationship to Project: Comments: INTERVIEW RECORD Interviewer w. �� � r �� REFERENCES American Society of Testing and Materials, May 2000, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation E 1527-00, 27 p. Florida Department of Community Affairs Radon Protection Map. 2004. Available on-line at: hftl2://www.doh.state.fl.uslenvironment/facility/radon/ Florida Department of Environmental Protection, GIS Section, Orange County Ethylene Dibromide Delineation Map. February 1995. Florida Department of Natural Resources, Areas of Natural Recharge to the Floridan Aquifer in Florida, Map by J. W. Stewart, Tallahassee, Florida, 1980. Federal Emergency` Management Agency and Environmental Research Systems Institute, Inc. Flood Hazard Map. Available on-line at hftp://www.esri.com/hazards/makemat)'.html OCULUS Database, FDEP Regulatory Files Review, available on-line. Orange County Public Works Department, Aerial Photograph Collection, photographs dated,1939, 1947, 1958, 1963, 1967, 1971, 1975, 1981, 1984, 1987, 1990, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2003 . United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Issued August 1989, Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida. United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey, "Winter Garden, Florida" Quadrangle Map, 7.5 Minute Series. �L� � �� -� � � � ���� Expertise General Experience Work Experience Ireshold/ Private Provider Inspection and Plan Review Construction Materials %sting* • Geophysical Services Environmental Sciences * Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data MARY Environmental Project Manager / Industrial Hygienist Industrial Hygiene Services, Environmental Sciences B.S., 1998, Environmental Science, University of Houston at Clear Lake Wetland Delineator and Management Certification Global Positioning Systems Surveying and Mapping Practical Surveying with Global Positioning System Opacity Reading — Visible Emissions Evaluation Asbestos/Lead-Based Paint Inspector (Inactive License) Comprehensive Industrial Hygiene Review Course, 2003 Ms. Bruno has worked in the environmental consulting industry for over ten (10) years. Ms. Bruno has conducted hundreds of industrial hygiene related projects, which include mold/bacteria investigation and management, indoorairqualitystudies, noise surreys, health and safety plan development, heat stress studies, water quatiiy studies, chemical inventory and storage analysis, regulatory compliance, and Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials surveys. Typical properties/clients have included metal extruding facilities, fat refining facilities, office/warehouse facilities, retail centers, high-rise buildings, medical facilities, financial institutions, and residential dwellings. Ms. Bruno has performed hundreds of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESA) throughout the United States utilizing ASTM E 1527 and ASTM E 1528 as guidance as well as client provided Phase I ESA protocols. Typical properties/clients have included industrial warehouse, light -industrial facilities, high-rise buildings, commercial properties, retail shopping centers, multi -family residential housing, and undeveloped land. Project responsibilities include a review of any existing environmental reports, a visual assessment of the property, a review of selected public records concerning the property and adjacent properties, and final report presentation with conclusions and recommendations. Phase 11 ESAs have included remediation design and Health and Safety Planning for similar client types. Ms. Bruno has conducted hundreds of asbestos and lead -based paint surveys. Typical properties/clients have included public and private schools, medical facilities, high-rise buildings, commercial properties, retail shopping centers, and multi -family residential housing. Project responsibility included the visual inspection for suspect -asbestos containing building material, collection of bulk samples, analyses of laboratory results, and report findings. In addition to building inspections, under the supervision of a licensed individual consultant, Ms. Bruno has prepared and/or coordinated recommendations, cost estimate for removal, abatement specifications, final abatement clearance reports, and operations and maintenance programs. Ms. Bruno was Staff Environmental Scientist for an international environmental firm. Her duties included project administration, field investigations, project coordination, proposal preparation, client contact, and project budgeting. She also worked for a substantial engineering and environmental sciences firm with responsibilities similar to the aforementioned. Ms. Bruno was an Environmental Professional (Technical and Logistics Manager) providing independent consulting services for a large, comprehensive lead -based "Committed to Service" 02Threshold / Private Provider Inspection and Plan Review Construction Materials Testing • Geophysical Services Environmental Sciences . Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data paint survey of over seventy (70) school campuses. Her services included providing litigation support for a large school district. Ms. Bruno also served as Industrial Hygiene Program Related Leader/Manager for an environmental consulting firm. Projects 4 Industrial hygiene Services, Personal and Area Sampling, Various Hughes Supply Facilities, Orlando, Florida. Ms. Bruno provide industrial Hygiene Services with Air Sampling for Metals, Total VOC's and Limited Mold at the referenced properties. Services included a walkthrough building assessment of the subject property for the purpose of preparing a sampling plan; Conducting full -shift (8-hour) personal breathing zone air sampling for a panel of eight (8) metals associated with soldering operations on one (1) client -selected employee; Conducting area sampling for a panel of eight (8) metals associated with soldering operations in two (2) areas; Conducting area sampling for total volatile organic compounds (VOC) associated with the plastics operation in two (2) areas; Collecting up to two (2) samples for laboratory analysis including air samples, culture plate samples, bull( samples, tape -lift samples, and/or swab samples. ® Preliminary Indoor Air Quality Assessment, Industrial Park Area, Orange County, Florida. Ms. Bruno provided preliminary Indoor Air Quality assessment services at the referenced site location. The subject building is approximately 10,000 square feet. The study was limited to the office area of the building. Ms. Bruno assessed the current conditions within selected locations within the facility for potential problems that may result in poor indoor air quality, mold proliferation, and/or specific conditions which may result in moisture intrusion. The final report included recommendations for improvements and/or remediation if warranted, as well as recommendations for additional study, if warranted, and a rationale for those recommendations. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), Sadler Road Site, Intersection of Sadler Road and U.S. highway 441, Orange County, Florida. Ms. Bruno conducted an environmental site assessment of the subject property. The purpose of the proposed site assessment was to evaluate current potential toxic or hazardous chemical exposures associated with the property. The Phase I ESA followed ASTM E 1527-00 and included; (1) a review of environmental records to assess past uses and the potential for past on -site hazardous waste disposal; (2) a site reconnaissance to evaluate existing site conditions; (3) review of historical aerial photographs and land uses; and (4) a written report that documents work performed, the results of the assessment, and conclusions and recommendations. Universal Office Orlando, Florida Years with Universal 0 (2005) Years with Other Firms 10 "Committed to Service" Expertise Environmental Project Management, Feasibility Studies, Site Remedial Actions Academic Background B.S., Earth Science, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois Registrations Professional Geologist, Florida No. (PG408), (1988) Professional Geologist, Indiana (1985) Professional Geologist, Arkansas (1988) Professional Geologist, North Carolina (1987) Certifications Employee Development Course in Hazardous Materials and Site Investigations Trained in Hazardous Waste Cleanup and Disposal Techniques, 1983 Short Course, Ground Water Modeling, NWWA, 1985 Short Course, RCRA Rules and Regulations, Government Institutes, 1991 Experience Mr. Geden has over twenty-four (24) years of professional experience in conducting and managing multiple groundwater investigations, site assessments, risk assessments, feasibility studies and site remedial actions. Project components have included literature and record searches, design and implementation of field assessment programs including installation and sampling of soil borings and groundwater monitor wells, geophysical investigations, single and multiple well aquifer testing, groundwater modeling and report preparation. Sites involved include those on the National Priorities List (NPL), RCRA, industrial, residential and open land. Clients have included the federal government, state, (Related county and municipal governments and private industrial concerns. Projects PETROLEUM SITES ® Managed Assessment and Remedial Actions, Former Defense Fuels Supply Point, I Lynn Haven, Florida. This facility former) y provided J ase, but is currently being decommissioned. Site activities havbe included reulk fuels to movall of bulk fuel Air Forcel storage tanks and the railroad network, delineation of petroleum contamination within the soils and groundwater and the installation of groundwater and soil remediation systems. Active j remediation at the site includes dual -phase groundwater recovery, standard recovery wells, and air sparging. Soils at the site are also undergoing enhanced bio-remediation. Recovered groundwater is treated in an on -site stripper and is then returned via infiltration galleries and spray fields. P Nara% ged "assssmen`t and Remedial Actions, v�f@n:a� a t3�ls Sidl3pt'y e�C)lBit, �°o�L6�icl Air Force Base, Tampa, Florida. This operational facility provides bulk fuels to the Air Force Base. Site activities have included delineation of petroleum contamination within the soils and groundwater and the installation of groundwater remediation systems. Refurbishing of the bulk storage tanks by the Air Force allowed for the installation of an air sparging system under the tanks which are currently operational. Contaminated soils in the basins and at the Pumping facility are being addressed as the refurbishing of the facility continues. Product recovery has been completed at two locations and the installation of additional groundwater remedial systems are progressing. "Committed to Service" rnreshold/Private Provide rInspection and Plan Review Construction Materials Testing • Geophysical Services Environmental Sciences • Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ADMINISTRATION/ASSESSMENTSIREME®1A TION NPL site, Operations and Management (O&M), Deland, Florida. Mr. Geden is currently Providing complete site management services at a local NPL site including re -instrumentation of operating remediation system, installation of telemetry system to allow remote monitoring Of system operation, weekly, monthly and quarterly O&M and preventative maintenance operations, preparation and implementation of a new O&M manual, semi-annual sampling of all monitoring points and regulatory reporting. Supplemental Field Investigation, NPL Cleanup Site, Deland, Florida. Mr. Geden is currently managing this project. EPA requested the collection of additional data to better define extent of contamination. Responsibilities include collection of groundwater data utilizing the GeoProbe Membrane Interface Probe and Electron Capture Detector, completion of multi -aquifer pumping test, installation of deep aquifer monitoring points and the collection of discrete depth groundwater samples utilizing dispersion sampling equipment. Second phase of effort requires installation of FLUTe sampling technology to determine location of DNAPL within the interbedded sands, slits and clays of the confining layer. Information Management for Ongoing NPL Assessment, Alabama Array Ammunition Plant, Childersburg, Alabama, Mr. Geden is currently providing CERCLA Oversight, Community Relations, Closure Report Preparation, Administrative Records, Site Management Plan, DOD Property Transfer for this project. Mr. Geden has been involved in assessment activities at the installation since 1981 and have participated in the preparation of Remedial Investigation Reports, Feasibility Studies and Risk Assessments. Current tasks involve the review of the Community Relations Plan and maintaining the Community Outreach Program. Mr. Geden is also assisting in the preparation of the site -wide Record of Decision, and the maintenance of the Site Management Plan and Administrative Records for the site. Mr. Geden coordinates partnering meetings with each of the project stakeholders which include EPA, ADEM, AEC, USACE, IOC, AMC, CHPPM, the local community, and the prime contractors. ® Remedial Action Operations and Maintenance, Sherwood Medical Industries NPL Site, Deland, Florida. Mr. Geden is responsible for total operation of all selected remedies at the Sherwood Medical NPL site in accordance with two approved Records of Decision (ROD). As Project Manager, Mr. Geden represents the interests of the client directly to the EPA in operational matters. Additionally, Mr. Geden is responsible for the bi-annual collection and analysis of groundwater samples from all site monitoring wells in the surficial and the Floridan aquifer and from residential wells surrounding the site. Water elevations are measured in all wells and potentiometric and contaminant isopleth maps are developed. All data is compiled into semi-annual reports which are submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV. Publications Denahan, S. A., Gregory, R. G., and Geden, M. J. The Slug Test —A Ground Water Quality Management Tool, National Water Works Association, Conservation and Regulation of Ground Water Resources Conference, 1983. Isaac, R, B., Spariosu, D., Samson, C., Gray, K. K. Cox, C. H., Geden, M. J. A Partnering Effort that Expedited the Remedial Action Process at the Alabama Army Ammunition Plant. National Defense Preparedness Association, 22nd Environmental Symposium and Exhibition, 1996. "Committed to Service" MMWM Construction Q9aterlals Testing a Geophysical services Environmental sciences o Geotechnical Engineering Biographical Data Geden, M. J. Partial Delisting of the Alabama Army Ammunition Plant. National Defense Industrial Association, 24th Environmental Symposium and Exhibition, 1998, Geden, M. J. Alabama ArmyAmmunition Plant -Area A, A CERCLA Case Study. Executive Enterprises Environmental Regulation Course, 1998. Geden, M.J., Nadolishny, A. Application of the Toolbox Approach and a Dynamic Workplan Universal Expedited Delineation of Solvent Plume. Florida Remediation Conference, 2002. Office Orlando, Florida Years with Universal 1 (2005) Years with Other Firms 24 "Committed to Service" Parcel Number 05-22-28-0000-00-004 1 i r,, .,j 47P1» rll i34u,�1117i11 f�+mr.IK� 7 II 11l A, !fit Created: Tue Mar 06 2018 10:44:20 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) This map is for reference only and is not a serve Parcel Number 05-22-28-0000-00-046 OCPA Web Map majuft9dg Proposfid Rog 13fwk LEna commerwau iRetItuilonal . ...... Caurss Ifflonda turnpMa Public nozag armit Roan tat Une IMSta Lond Lakes and Ao, Interaws, A Wad HOSAS RiilRoaa 1 Residental Commarctill Counl�' i3oundary 1 HU1111ra Vacent Land Toll Road Road Under Conatmettim proposed SUnRalf Agnaultyat A Parme flosAilml Parcel Number 05-22-28-0000-00-040 .., r .. � r N. , RI - ORANGE COUNTYPROPERTY APPRAISER Searches Sales Search Z Property Record Card My Favorites Sign up for e-Notif}.=... 10711 N Lakewood Ave .. 05-22-28-0000-00-004 > Narne(s) Physical Sheet Add — Buchman Beryle S 90/500 Int 10711 N Lakewood Ave Carol A Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Int Postal City and 2lpcode Thomas E Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Ocoee, FI 34761 Solomon Elise A 40/500 Int Prr,par yuse Solomon Robert B 40/500 Int 5420 - Timberland Planted More... Maridpaliq= Properly Name Ocoee N/A. Click information icon to contribute. Mailing Address On file 2124 65Th Ave Greeley, CO 80634-7907 lnccrrea:.` Mailing Address? View 2017 Property Record Card Property Features Market Stats Update Information Values, Exemptions and Taxes SalesAnalysis Location Info Historical Value and Tax Benefits 2017 Tax Breakdown Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Features) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 201 ra M $1,460,952 + $0 + $0 = $1,460,952 (12%) - $1,442,040 = $18,912 (MA) 2016 M M $1,300,200 + $0 + $0 = $1,300,200 (tom) - $1,281,288 = $18,912 (D%) 2015 a $1,182,000 + $0 + $0 = $1,182,000 (err.,) - $1,163,088 = $18,912 (o°i) 2014 La.=;;.y. $709,200 + $0 + $0 = $709,200 - $690,288 = $18,912 Tax Year Benefits AgBenefits Tax Savings 2017 M nM $1,442,040 $26,254 2016 Er $1,281,288 $24,009 2015 EM LIJ M $1,163,088 $22,378 2014 M $690,288 $13,279 2017 Taxable Value and Certified Taxes TAX YEAR 1 2017 . 2016 . 2015 • 2014 Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $18,912 $0 $18,912 4.2220 (a.47%) $79.85 23 % Public Schools: By Local Board $18,912 $0 $18,912 3.2480 (o.00%) $61.43 18 % Orange County (General) $18,912 $0 $18,912 4.4347 pmy.) $83.87 24 % City Of Ocoee $18,912 $0 $18,912 5.6546 (-2.99%) $106.94 31 % Library -Operating Budget $18,912 $0 $18,912 0.3748 (o.00%) $7.092% St Johns Water Management District $18,912 $0 $18,912 0.2724 (-5.58%) $5.15 1 % 18.2065 $344.33 2017 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments _evying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment :ITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3170 5673.60 $1.00 $5,673.60 $5,673.60 2017 Gross Tax Total: $6,017.93 2017 Tax Savings Tax Savings Your property taxes without exemptions would be: $26,598.82 Your ad -valorem property tax with exemptions is: - $344.33 Providing You A Savings Of: _ $26,2S4.49 This Data Printed on 03/06/2018 and System Data Last Refreshed on 03/05/2018 ',,, n aion ORANGE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER Searches Sales Search property Record Card My favorites Sign tap for e4loti4y 1 estbrl e Ct 05-22-28-0000-00-046 > N—e(s) Physical Street Address Buchman Beryle S 90/500 Int Westbridge Ct Carol A Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Int Postal City and zipeode Thomas E Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Apopka, FI 32703 Solomon Elise A 40/500 Int Property use Solomon Robert B 40/500 Int 5420 - Timberland Planted 4 Morc M:IDicipallly Property Name Ocoee N/A. Click information icon to contribute. Mailing Address Or, File 2124 65Th Ave Greeley, CO 80634-7907 lncorrect i 1, iA g Address? View 2017 Property Record Card Property Features Exemptions and Taxes �� Sales Analysis Location Info11 Market Stats ; update Ilrrormation Values, Historical Value and Tax Benefits 2017 Tax Breakdown Tax Year Values land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2017 $54,848 + $0 + $0 = $54,848 o.wx) - $53,996 = $852 (o°IA) 2016 $53,250 + $0 + $0 = $53,250 ((,7,,) - $52,398 = $852 (o°i) 2015 .,;: $31,950 + $0 + $0 = $31,950 (o%) - $31,098 = $852 (o%) 2014 :,;�.. $31,950 + $0 + $0 = $31,950 - $31,098 = $852 Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2017 ffa nM $53,996 $983 2016 Gffl [—$] $52,398 $982 2015 MI $31,098 $598 2014 �, EM $31,098 $598 2017 Taxable Value and Certified Taxes TAX YEAR 12017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $8S2 $0 $852 4.2220 (-7A7%) $3.60 23 % Public Schools: By Local Board $852 $0 $852 3.2480 (o.00%) $2.77 18 % Orange County (General) $852 $0 $852 4.4347 (o.00%) $3.78 24 % City Of Ocoee $852 $0 $852 5.6546 (-2.99%) $4.82 31 % Library - Operating Budget $852 $0 $852 0.3748 (omq $0.32 2 % St Johns Water Management District $852 $0 $852 0.2724 (-5.5s%) $0.23 1 % 18.2065 $15.52 2017 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments .evying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessmen :ITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3170 255.96 $1.00 $255.9( $255.9( 2017 Gross Tax Total: $271.48 2017 Tax Savings Tax Savings Your property taxes without exemptions would be: $998.59 Your ad -valorem property tax with exemptions is: - $15.52 Providing You A Savings Of: _ $983.07 This Data Printed on 03/06/2018 and System Data Last Refreshed on 03/05/2018 O Searches Sales Search11 property Record Card ,� My Favorites Sign up for e-Notify... Clarcona Ocoee Rd < 05-22-28-0000-00-040 > Name(,) Physkal tre t Address Buchman Beryle S 90/500 Int Clarcona Ocoee Rd Carol A Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Int P,a A City a d Zip -de jl�, Thomas E Cole Trust No 1 62.5/500 Apopka, FI 32703 Solomon Elise A 40/500 Int PruF,eily Use a� r Solomon Robert B 40/500 Int 5420 - Timberland Planted4 More.. GE UPLOAD ��-�- Pror-ty Name Ocoee N/A. Click information icon to contribute. Moiling Address On File 2124 65Th Ave Greeley, CO 80634-7907 ncorrext Nlaifina Address? View 2017 Property Record Card Property Features I Exemptions and Taxes Sales Analysis Location Info Market Stats Update Information Values, Ex Historical Value and Tax Benefits Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2017 IRA M $673,002 + $0 + $0 = $673,002 oo,,) - $663,498 = $9,504 (o°i) 2016 Ea $653,400 + $0 + $0 = $653,400 (1v) - $643,896 = $9,504 (0%) 2015 w„.a. $594,000 + $0 + $0 = $594,000 (e>°i) - $584,496 = $9,504 (ooi) 2014 "" $356,400 + $0 + $0 = $356,400 - $346,896 = $9,504 Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2017 >. ( $663,498 $12,080 2016 ,. U $643,896 $12,06S 2015 Ea U , $584,496 $11,246 2014 MEE $346,896 $6,673 2017 Taxable Value and Certified Taxes TAXYEAR i 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $9,504 $0 $9,504 4.2220 (aMN.) $40.13 23 % Public Schools: By Local Board $9,504 $0 $9,504 3.2480 pm%) $30.87 18 % Orange County (General) $9,504 $0 $9,504 4.4347 (a00%) $42.15 24 % City Of Ocoee $9,504 $0 $9,504 5.6546 (-2.99%) $53.74 31 % Library -Operating Budget $9,504 $0 $9,504 0.3748 (o.00%) $3.56 2% St Johns Water Management District $9,504 $0 $9,504 0.2724 (-5.58%) $2.59 1 % 18.2065 $173.04 2017 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments .evying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessmenl -ITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3170 2851.32 $1.00 $2,851.32 $2,851.32 2017 Gross Tax Total: $3,024.36 2017 Tax Savings Tax Savings Your property taxes without exemptions would be: $12,253.01 Your ad -valorem property tax with exemptions is: - $173.04 Providing You A Savings Of: _ $12,079.97 This Data Printed on 03/06/2018 and System Data Last Refreshed on 03/05/2018 SCALE V = 1000' 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 FEET PANEL 021OF FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ORANGE O' 11 PANEL 210 OF 750 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX OCOEE,CITYOF 120185 0210 F ORANGE COUNTY 1 201 79 0210 F WINTER GARDEN, CITY OF 120187 0210 F Notice to User. The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. MAP NUMBER Eo 6 12095CO21OF NIARLEN� ,,. �1m� n NORTFIERN �k D MANGO�AYE MEADeow MAP REVISED ND Sti SwEEi�l� �r ZONE a FORT�r �� r*, SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 COLLINSC,T, " s _ _ _ _ • k Federal Emergency blanagementAgency this is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at wvw✓.msc.fema.gc APPLICATION FOR CAPACITY DETERMINATION AND CONCURRENcYRECOMMENDATION DEPARTMENT OFFACILITIES PLANNING G601MAGIC WAY, BUILDING 20O.ORLANoO.FL328O8 Proposed Development Profile TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAFF (Check All That Apply) PROJECT NAME Ocoee Village Center Existing FLU: Low Density — Max, Density permitted: 4 du/ac Future Land Use [FLU] Map Amendment Proposed FLU: High Density Max. Density permitted: 16 du/ac Existing Zoning: R-iA Max, Density permitted: du/ac v,] Rezoning PUD (Residential). Proposed Zoning: Max. Density permitted: du/ac Total Unit Type: F� Site Plan/ Preliminary Plat/ CITY APPLICANTS ONLY If school concurrency vested rights apply, please submIt doowmentation to plannIng,ocps.net Case #: Planner Assigned: Local Government Information Citv of Ocoee Phone #(_) Email: Comp Plan Target date and type of Local Government public hearing '2— Z Rezoning El Plat/Site Plan Approval Form must contain original signature oflocal government representative: ~--`` —7 Ze- Local Government Reviewer Name (print) � -at ///.� Facilities Planning M1 TEL: (407) 317-39471 FAX: (407) 317-3263 8501 Magic Way, Building 200. Odundn, FL 32808 [ (PRINT PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME" Kenneth vxBuchman ASTHE PROPERTY OWNER QFTHE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW, HEREBY GIVE PERMISSION FOR (PRINT AGENT'S NAME) Richard o.wohifmm TOACT ASK0YAGENT FOR THE PURPOSE (lFAPPLYING FOR CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT /CONCURRENCYFOR THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY. Laoo orParcel Identification Number(s)are required: PARCEL ID NUMBER(S): � . -- ____ _--- -- - _ ' -- ____ --_. -- - _'.. ___~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description Signature of the Property Owner STATE OF COUNTYOF The as an individual/officer/agent, on behalf of himself/herself a corporation/partnership. Ile/She .personally I�jn to me or has produced as identification and did/did Take an oath. WITNESS my hand and official yaml in the County and State last aforesaid this nc day of Notary Public Signature: My Commission Expires: / / --- LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PARCEL A: The Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South Range 28 East, LESS the South 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right-of-way, AND LESS that port of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 lying Northwesterly of State Road 429, LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right-of-way taken (is parcol 62-161, "Limited Access Right -Of --Way' and Parcel 62-161, "Right-Of-WayA" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Hook 5461, Page 2341. PARCE[, B: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 Emd, LESS the North 30 feet and the West 30 feet for road right-of-way. AND 'fire North 7 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, LESS the West 30 foet for road right-of-way. LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right--of-way taken os Parcel 62-161, "Hight -Of -Way 0" in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Real< 5461, page 2.341, LESS AND EXCEPT: Additional right-of-way taken as Parcel 10411, "Right-Of--WoV' in that certain Order of Taking recorded in Official Records Book 9816, page 8120, ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL 1 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida. Being n-iore particularly described (is follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Sect -ion 5; thence run South 88-07'15" Lost along the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 1252,78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said North line run South 88'07'15" East for a distance of 122.87 feet to the Northeast corner of the Northwest 114 of said Southwest 1/4. of Section 5; thence departing said North line run South 00'17'43" West. along the 17o9i line of said Northwest- 1/1 for a distance of '1351.26 feet to a point on the Northerly line of Right -of -Way Taking, Parcel No. 1044, per Official Records Book 9816, Page 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence deporting said East line run North 89'13'22" West along said Northerly right-of-way lino for a distance of 154.59 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 1262.21 feet, a chard bearing of North 69*30'11" West and a chord length of 851.79 feet; thence run Northwesterly along said Northerly right-of-woy line and said curve through a central angle of 39'26'23" for an arc distance of 868.85 feet; thence run North 49'49'55" West for a distance of 151,44 feet; thence run North 36*19'17" West for a distance of 51.42 feet; thence run North 49*19,02" West for a distance of 184,99 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way fine of County Road 429, Western Beltway, a limited access right-of-way, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320--6460-602/603; thence departing aforesaid Northerly right-of-woy line run North 54*40'57" East along said Southerly right-of-way line for a distance of 1377.66 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 2336 acres more or less. AND PARCEL. 2 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Section 5, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida, COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00'53'06" East along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of said Section 5 for a distance of 1465.41 feet to the Southwest corner of the, Northwest 1/4. of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence deporting said West line run South 89'10'08" East along the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5 for a distance of 145.12 feet; thence departing said North line run North 00'49'S2' East for o distance of 50.00 feet to a point an the Northerly right--of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right--of--woy Control Survey Project No. 75320--6460-602/CO3, also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 71'13'20'West along said Northerly right-of-way line for o distance of 20.59 feet to a point on the Easterly right -of --way line of West Road, a limited access right-of-way, per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right-of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320---6460--602/603; thence run North 07'06'16" East along said Easterly right--of--way line for a distance of 60.00 feet to a point of curvature of a curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 776.19 feet, a chord bearing of North 00'25'09" East and a chord length of 180.72 feet; thence run Northerly along said Easterly right-of-way line and said curve through o central angle of 13'22'14" for on arc distance of 181.13 feet to a point of tangency; thence run North 06'15'58" West for a distance of 131.33 feet; thence run North 19'42'11" West for a distonce of 25,32 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Right--of-Way Taking, Parcel No. 1044 per Official Records Book 9816, Pogo 8120 of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida; thence departing said Easterly right-of-way line run South 49'49'02" East along said Southerly right -of -Way line for a distance of 265.92 feet to a point an a non tangent curve concave, Northeasterly and having a rodius of 1385.18 feet, a chord bearing of South 56'21'45" East and a chord length of 316.40 feet; thence run Southeasterly olong soid Southerly right--of-way Ihte and said curve through a central angle of 13'06'58" for an arc distance of 317.09 feet; thence run South 00'49'52" West for a distance of 60,70 feet to a point on aforosaid Northerly right -of --way line of Oc000 - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right--of-way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460--602/603; thence departing said Southerly right--of--way line run North 89'10'08" West along said Northerly right -of -way line for a distance of 432,12 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING, Contains2.13 ocres more or less. �Nl) PARCEL 3 A parcel of land comprising a portion of Sections 5 and 8, Township 22 South, Range 28 Enst, Orange County, Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of aforesaid Section 5; thence run South 00'53'06- East along the West line of said Southwest '1/4 of said Section 5 for a distance of 2930.83 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5; thence departing said West line run North 89'44'04" East along the South line of said Southwest 1/4 for c distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the Easterly right--of---way line of Ocoee - Clarcono Rood; thence continuing along said South line run North 89'44'04" East for a clistance of 40,00 feet to a point an the Easterly right-of-way line of Ocoee - Clarcona Road per Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority right -of --way Control Survey Project No. 7532.0--6450-602/603; thence departing said South line run North 00'53'06" West along said Easterly right-of-way line for a distance of 1111.47 feet; thence run North 07'06'16" East for a distance of 265.87 feet; thence run North 58'53'01" East for a distance of 72.13 feet to o point on the Southerly right--of—way line of Ocoee -- Clarcona Road per Orlando Change County Expressway Authority right—of—way Control Survey Project No. 75320-6460--602/603; thence run South 89'10'08" Fast along said Southerly right—of—way line for a distance of 514.27 feet; thence run North 00'49'52" East for a distance of 20.00 feet; thence run South 89'10'08" East for a distance of 660.17 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest Y4 of the Southwest % of aforesaid Section 5; thence deporting sold Southerly right -of --way line run South 00`17'43" West along said Cast tine for a distance of 1409.65 feet to the Southeast corner of the Southwest f/ of the Southwest % of said Section 5, also being the Northeast corner of the Northwest �/4 of the Northwest Yj of aforesaid Section 8; thence departing said East line of run South 00'34'54" East along the East line of said Northwest % of the Northwest % of Section 8 for a distance of 231.78 feet to a pointon the South line of the North 231 feet of the Northwest Y4 of the Northwest % of aforesaid Section 8; thence deporting said East line run South 89'44'04-" West along said South line for a distonee of 1286.39 feet to o point on aforesaid Easterly right--of-way line of Ocoee -- Clarcona Rood; thence run North 00'11'35" West along said Easterly right of- way line for n distance of 231.77 feet to aforesaid POINT OF BEGINNING, Contoins 47.50 acres more or less, OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID c Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 - — - - - - — ----- -- - -.— _. H1 H2 H1-. 1 Real Estate Contract _._ ---- 288 days Mon 1/8/18 Wed 2/13119 _ - - --- 2 Prepare and Submit LOI 5 days Mon 1/8/18 Fri 1/12/18' 3 Review 5 days Mon 1115/18 Fri 1/19/18 — 4 Meeting to discuss 0 days Fri 1/19/18 Fri 1/19/18 1/19 5 Revise and submit LOI 2 days Mon 1/22/18 Tue 1/23/18' 6 Review 20 days Wed 1/24/18 Tue 2/20/18 7 LOI executed 0 days Tue 2/20/18 Tue 2/20/18 �2120 8 Prepare Contract 2 days Wed 2/21/18 Thu 2/22/18' 9 Review 2 days Fri 2/23/18 Mon 2/26/18 10 Execute contract 2 days Tue 2/27/18 Wed 2/28118' 11 Effective Date 0 days Wed 2/28/18 Wed 2/28/182/28 12 Deposit 5 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 3/7/18 13 Due Diligence Period 103 days Thu 3/1/18 Mon 7/23/18 14 End of Due Diligence 0 days Mon 7/23/18 Mon 7/23/18 7/23 15 Awaiting Closing 190 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 11/21118' 16 Closing (Earliest) 0 days Wed 11/21/18 Wed 11/21/18' 17 1st Extension 20 days Thu 11/22/18 Wed 12/19/18' 18 Closing 2 0 days Wed 12/19/18 Wed 12/19/18 12119 19 2nd Extension 20 days Thu 12/20/18 Wed 1/16/19! 20 Closing 3 0 days Wed 1/16119 Wed 1/16/19 1116 21 3rd Extension 20 days Thu l/17/19 Wed 2/13/19' 22 Closing 4 0 days Wed 2/13/19 Wed 2/13/19' ;2/13 23 BUILDER CONTRACT 180 days Wed 2/28/18 Wed 11/7/18'MMMW 24 Start Process 0 days Wed 2/28/18 Wed 2/28/18' 2/28 25 Review Options 10 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 3/14/18' 26 Prepare LOI 25 days Thu 3/15/18 Wed 4/18/18' 27 Agreement to LOI and Execution 0 days Wed 4/18/18 Wed 4/18/18 4/18 28 Finalize Agreements 5 days Thu 4119118 Wed 4/25/18 29 Contracts Executed 0 days Wed 4125118 Wed 4/25/18 4/26 30 Review Period 40 days Thu 4/26/18 Wed 6/20/18 31 End of Due Diligence Period 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 6/20 Task Inactive Milestone Finish -only Split Inactive Summary External Tasks Milestone ® Manual Task External Milestone ! Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary Duration -only Progress Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup "S, Deadline v External Tasks �. Manual Summary External Milestone Start -only Page 1 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 - -- —- - ' ----- - H1 H2 ' H1 — - --- - - 32Contract Time 100 days y Thu 6121/18 Wed 11/7/18;- ----- - 33 Closing Date 0 days Wed 11/7/18 Wed 11/7/18 11/7 34 Geotechnicai and Phase 1 27 days Thu 5/31/18 Fri 7/6/18;, 35 Request Proposals 5 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6/6/18, 36 Prepare Proposal 5 days Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6/13/18' , 37 Proposals Submitted 0 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 �6/13 38 Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/14/18 Wed 6/20/18; -, 39 Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 6120 40 Phase 1 Update 12 days Thu 6/21/18 Fri 716/18' 41 Complete 0 days Fri 7/6/18 Fri 7/6/18', 7/6 42 Field Work for Geotechnical 5 days Thu 6/21/18 Wed 6/27/18' 43 Prepare Report 5 days Thu 6/28/18 Wed 7/4/18 44 Report Issued 0 days Wed 7/4/18 Wed 7/4/18 7/4 - 45 Bioiogical 30 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 7/11/18 46 Request Proposals 5 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6/6/18', 47 Prepare Proposal 10 days Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6/20/18I - 48 Proposal Submitted 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 6120 49 Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6121/18 Wed 6/27/18, 50 o Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 6/27/18 Wed 6/27/18 6127 51 j Endanger Species Study, Archeological Letter 10 days Thu 6/28118 Wed 7/11/18' 52 Report Issued 0 days Wed 7/11/18 Wed 7/11/18 7111 53 Boundary and Topographic Survey 20 days Thai 5131/13 Wed 6/27113 - 54 Request Proposals 3 days Thu 5131/18 Mon 6/4/18' }- 55 Prepare Proposal 2 days Tue 6/5/18 Wed 6/6/18', 56 Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/7/18 Wed 6113/18', 57 Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 6113 58 Update Survey, stake borings and wetland 10 days Thu 6/14/18 Wed 6/27/18 j flags 59 Survey Updated 0 days Wed 6/27/18 Wed 6/27/18 6127 60 Traffic Study 25 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 714/18'If 61 Request Proposals 5 days Thu 5/31/18 Wed 6/6/18 1 Task Inactive Milestone Finish -only Split Inactive Summary External Tasks Milestone ® Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat 6/16/18 Summary Duration -only Progress Project Summary -'�� Manual Summary Rollup ,� Deadline- External Tasks _?� ,tr ,__,.:; ,- Manual Summary External Milestone Start -only Page 2 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 62 Prepare Proposal -- - 5 days -- Thu 6/7/18 -Wed 6/13/18 - - H1 _ H2 _-._. —_ -- -- H1 63 Review Proposals 5 days Thu 6/14/18 Wed 6/20/18,ir 64 Prepare Traffic Study 10 days Thu 6/21/18 Wed 7/4/18' 65 - Traffic Study Complete 0 days Wed 7/4/18 Wed 7/4/18! 714 66 - City of Ocoee 214 days Thu 3/1/18 Tue 12/25/18. 67 LUPA and ZMA Application 214 days Thu 311118 Tue 12/25/18'MMMW 68 Prepare LUPA and ZMA Application 69 days Thu 3/1/18 Tue 615/18', 69 LE Submit to the City 0 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6/13/18 6/13 - 70 Review 11 days Wed 6/13/18 Wed 6127/18 71 DRC Meeting 0 days Wed 6/27118 Wed 6/27/18 6/27 72 Comments issued 2 days Thu 6128/18 Fri 6/29118' 73 Revise Submittal 6 days Mon 7/2/18 Mon 719118' 74 Submit to City 0 days Mon 719/18 Mon 7/9/18". 75 Review 12 days Tue 7/10/18 Wed 7/25/181is 76 Submit to City 0 days Wed 7/25/18 Wed 7/25/18' 77 Schedule for Planning Commission 19 days Thu 7/26/18 Tue 8/21/18, 78 Planning Commission (2nd Tuesday of the 0 days Tue 8121/18 Tue 8/21/18', 8121 month) TRANSMITTAL 79 Schedule for City Commission Meeting 15 days Wed 8/22/18 Tue 9/11118', 80 City Commission Meeting (1st and 3rd 0 days Tue 9/11/18 Tue 9/11/18 9111 Tuesday of the month)TRANSMITTAL 81 Review 12 days Wed 9/12/18 Thu 9/27/18' - 82 DRC Meeting 0 days Thu 9127/18 Thu 9/27/18' 9127 83 LUPA Transmittal Approved 0 days Thu 9/27118 Thu 9/27/18 9/27 84 Prepare Transmittal to DEO 5 days Fri 9/28/18 Thu 10/4/18, 85 Transmittal to DEO 0 days Thu 10/4/18 Thu 10/4/18 10/4 86 Review by DEO 20 days Fri 10/5118 Thu 11/1/18', 87 Schedule City Commission Adoption 18 days Fri 11/2118 Tue 11/27/18 88 City Commission Meeting 1st Reading (1st 0 days Tue 11/27/18 Tue 11/27/18 11/27 and 3rd Tuesday of the month) 89 LUPA and ZMA Approved 0 days Tue 11/27/18 Tue 11127/18 11/27 90 PDP/FDP APPLICATION 121 days Tue 7110118 Tue 12/25/18 Task Inactive Milestone —__-_ Finish -only Split Inactive Summary External Tasks Milestone ® Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat6/16/18 Summary Duration -only Progress Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup Deadline External Tasks �, _. ,, Manual Summary External Milestone Start -only Page 3 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID , Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 - - - --- -- - - -- - _ -- - -- - — - - H 1 H2 H 1 91 1 Prepare FDP/PDP Application 31 days Tue 7/10/18 Tue 8121/18' -- -- --- - -- - - --- - - 92 Submit to the City 0 days Tue 8/21/18 Tue 8/21/18 3/21 93 Review 18 days Wed 8122/18 Fri 9/14/18, 94 Comments issued 10 days Mon 9/17118 Fri 9/28/18' 95 DRC Meeting 0 days Fri 9/28118 Fri 9/28/18 9128 96 -J Revise Submittal 6 days Mon 10/1118 Mon 10/8/18' 97 Submit to City 0 days Mon 10/8/18 Mon 10/8/18 10/8 98 Review 14 days Tue 10/9/18 Fri 10/26/18 99 DRC Meeting 0 days Fri 10/26/18 Fri 10/26/18 IV 10126 100 Schedule for Planning Commission 32 days Mon 10/29/18 Tue 12/11/18' 101 Planning Commission Meeting (2nd 0 days Tue 12/11/18 Tue 12/11/18 12111 Tuesday of the month) 102 Schedule for City Council 10 days Wed 12/12/18 Tue 12/25118' 103 City Council Meeting (1st and 3rd 0 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 12/25/18i 12125 Wednesday of the month) 104 FDEP Water Distribution Permit 10 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 1/8119'Iry 105 Submit to FDEP 0 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 12125118' 12/25 106 Process 10 days Wed 12/26/18 Tue 1/8/19' 107 Permit Issued 0 days Tue 1/8/19 Tue 118119' 1/8 108 FDEP Wastewater Collection Permit 10 days 'Tue 12/25/13 Tue 1/8/19 109 ,2 Submit to FDEP 0 days Tue 12/25/18 Tue 12/25/18 112/25 110 6" Process 10 days Wed 12/26/18 Tue 1/8/19 111 Permit Issued 0 days Tue 1/8/19 Tue 1/8/19 1/8 112 St. Johns River Water Management District 62 days Wed 8115/18 Thu 11/8/18' (SJRWMD) 113 Prepare Analysis and Permit Application 5 days Wed 8/15/18 Tue 8/21/18 114 Request Pre -Application Meeting 0 days Tue 8/21118 Tue 8/21/18 8121 115 Waiting for Meeting 5 days Wed 8/22/18 Tue 8/28/18 116 Pre -Application Meeting 0 days Tue 8/28/18 Tue 8/28118 8128 117 Prepare Submittal Package and Wetland 7 days Wed 8/29/18 Thu 9/6/18' Analysis 118 - Submit application to SJRWMD - - 0 days Thu 9/6/18 Thu 9/6/18 — - --- 9/6 -- ®1-__------ Task Inactive Milestone Finish -only Split Inactive Summary External Tasks Milestone ® Manual Task External Milestone Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Date: Sat6/16/18 Summary Duration -only _. Progress Project Summary`" Manual Summary R011up AID Deadline External Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone ® Start -only Page 4 OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER Entitlement Process ID Ike Task Name Duration Start Finish 2018 2 119 ` Review 20 days H1 Fri 9/7/18 Thu 10/4/18 H2 H1 120 Comments Letter Issued 0 days Thu 10/4/18 Thu 10/4/18 �1014 121 Revise Application 5 days Fri 10/5/18 Thu 10/11/18', 122 Submit to SJRWMD 0 days Thu 10/11/18 Thu 10/11/18 10/11 123 Review 20 days Fri 10/12/18 Thu 11/8/18' 124 Intent to Issue letter is issued 0 days Thu 11/8/18 Thu 1118/18 11/8 125 permit issued 0 days Thu 11/8/18 Thu 11018, 126 Construction 218 days Wed 1/9119 Fri 1118119' 127 Property Closing 5 days Wed 1/9/19 Tue 1/15/19' 128 Construction 213 days Wed 1116/19 Fri 1118/19 129 2_1A Mobilization 5 days Wed 1/16119 Tue 1/22/19' 130 Clearing and Grubbing 25 days Wed 1/23/19 Tue 2/26/19' 131 Earthwork 30 days Wed 2127/19 Tue 4/9/19 13-2 Sewer 39 days Mon 4/8/19 Thu 5/30/19, 133 Drainage 34 days Fri 5/24/19 Wed 7110/19' 134 Water 17 days Thu 7/4/19 Fri 7/26/19' 135 n,":j Sub grade/Base 26 days Mon 7/22119 Mon 8/26/19' 136 Asphalt 5 days Tue 8/27/19 Mon 9/2/19' 137 _ia Landscape 10 days Tue 8/27/19 Mon 9/9/19 138 Electric 21 days Tue 8/27/19 Tue 9/24/19' 139 k Gas 17 days Wed 9/25/19 Thu 10/17/19 140 Telecommunications 16 days Fri 10/18/19 Fri 11/8/19' 141 Testing for Wastewater System 15 days Tue 8/27/19 Mon 9/16/19' 142 Testing for Water System 14 days Tue 8/27/19 Fri 9/13/19' 143 -mi Certifications to FDEP 18 days Tue 9/17/19 Thu 10/10/19 Task Inactive Milestone ____ - __;, Finish -only Split , Inactive Summary External Tasks- Project: Ocoee Village schedule 6-2-20 Milestone ® Manual Task External Milestone1. Date: Sat6/16/18 Summary Duration -only _,,,,., .,,, Progress Project Summary Manual Summary R011up Deadline External Tasks. Manual Summary External Milestone Start -only Page 5 0 0 0 engineering environrnenl( so�u�ions July 15, 2011 VIA. UPS Mr. Ken Buchman, Trustee 1012 Redbud Circle Plant City, Florida 33563 100 East Pine Street Suite 605 Orlando, EL 32801 Phone: 407.649.5475 Fax. 407,64.9.6582 hsagoldon.c in Re: Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Orange County Parcel ID's 05-22-28-0000-00-004, 05-22-28-0000-00-040, and 05-22-28-0000-00-046 Ocoee, Orange County, Florida HSA Golden Project No. 11-628.001 Dear Mr. Buchanan: HSA Golden has conducted a recharge area soils analysis in relation to development constraints placed upon the above -referenced parcels (hereafter referred to as site or subject property) by the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan policy 1.2.1 a.). This policy states that an analysis of soils to determine the presence and location of most effective recharge area, as defined by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Type "A'% Hydrologic Soils Group, be conducted for future land development. Type "A" Hydrologic Soils have a high infiltration rate -\N-hen thoroughly vet and have low runoff potential. They are plainly deep, well drained, and sandy or gravelly. Soils located in the most effective recharge area would have very rapid permeabilities (greater than 20 inches/hour). The site location and parcel designations are shown on Figures 1 and 2. This investigation included a desktop review of the Wekiva Study Area (AWSA) reports, Soil Conservation Service's (SCS) Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, and the completion of soil borings and collection of soil samples for permeability analysis. The permeability analysis was performed to confirm or refute that Type "A" soils exist on the subject property. The results of our findings are summarized in the sections below. According to the Soil Survey of Orange County,, Florida, soils on the subject property are classified as Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, Immokalee fine sand, Seffner fine sand, and Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (see Figure 3). 1.1 Archbold fine,sand, ! to 5 percent Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained, located on low ridges and knolls on flat -woods.' Typically, this soil has a surface layer of Environmental and Engineering Consultants Since 1989 Soil Analysis - Leiter of Findings 10711 Clar°cona Ocoee Road Page 2 dark gray fine sand about two inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of about 80 inches consists of white fine sand. In most years, a seasonal high water table (SHWT) is present at a depth of 42 to 60 inches for about six months, and it recedes to a depth of 60 to 80 inches for the rest of the year. The SHWT is at a depth of 24 to 40 inches for about one to four months during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout, while the available water capacity is very low. This soil is suited to dwellings without basements, small commercial buildings, and local roads and streets. No corrective measures are needed. This soil has severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields and for recreational uses. Water control measures should be used for septic tank absorption fields. When installing a septic tank absorption field on this soil, the proximity to a stream or a canal should be considered to prevent lateral seepage and groundwater pollution. If the density of housing is moderate to high, a community sewage system can help prevent contamination of the water supplies. The soil has severe limitations for sewage lagoons, trench sanitary landfills, and shallow excavations. The sealing or lining of a sewage lagoon or trench sanitary landfill with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes is classified by the SCS as a Type "A" soil. This soil reportedly has permeabilities greater than 20 inches/hour and available water capacities of 0.02 to 0.05 inches/inches, from 0 to 80 inches below land surface (bls). This soil is located on approximately 1.5% of the subject property. 1.2 9mmokofee Fine Sand (20) This soil is nearly level and poorly drained, located on broad flatwoods. The slopes are smooth and range from zero to two percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about five inches thick. The upper part of the subsurface layer, to a depth of about 18 inches, consists of a grayish brown fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 35 inches, consists of light gray fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 41 inches, consists of a black fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 67 inches, consists of a brown fine sand. The substratum to a depth of 80 inches consists of a light brownish gray fine sand. In most years, a seasonal high water table is within 10 inches of the surface for one to three months, and it recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than six months. The permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and it is moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is very low in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and is medium in the subsoil. This soil has severe limitations for sanitary facilities, building site development, and recreational uses. Water control measures should be used to minimize the excessive wetness limitation. The sealing or lining of a sewage lagoon or trench sanitary landfill with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. Septic tank absorption fields may need to be enlarged because of wetness. The proximity to a stream or aquifer recharge area should be considered in the placement of sanitary facilities to prevent contamination of water supplies. Fill material is needed for local roads and streets, small commercial buildings, and playgrounds. The sidewalis of excavations should be shored and Soil Analysis - fetter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Paze 3 water control measures should be used. The sandy surface layer should be stabilized for recreational uses. Immokalee Fine Sand is classified as a Type "B/D" soil. Immokalee fine sand has permeabilities ranging from 0.6 to 20 inches per hour and available water capacities of 0.02 to 0.25 inches/inches, depending on depth. This soil is located on approximately 27% of the subject property. 1.3 Seffner fine sand (43) This soil is nearly level and somewhat poorly drained, located on the rims of depressions and on broad low ridges on flatwoods. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer consists of black fine sand about six inches thick. The lower part, to a depth of 19 inches, consists of very dark grayish brown fine sand. The upper part of the underlying material, to a depth of about 36 inches, consists of grayish brown fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 52 inches, consists of a light gray fine sand that has common brown mottles. In most years, a SHWT is within 18 to 40 inches of the surface for two to four months and between 10 to 20 inches for periods of up to two weeks during wet periods. It recedes to a depth of less than 60 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is rapid throughout and the available water capacity is medium in the surface layer and low to very low in the underlying material. This soil has severe limitations for sanitary facilities, shallow excavations, and recreational uses. It has moderate limitations for dwellings without basements, small commercial buildings, and local roads and streets. Water control measures should be used to minimize the excessive wetness limitation. Septic tank adsorption fields may need to be enlarged because of wetness. The rapid permeability of this soil can cause groundwater pollution in areas of septic tank absorption fields. If the density of housing is moderate to high, a community sewage system can help prevent contamination of water supplies. The sidewalls for shallow excavations should be shored. The sealing or lining of a sewage lagoon or trench sanitary landfill with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. The sandy surface layer should be stabilized for recreational uses. Droughtiness is a problem during extended dry periods. Seffner fine Sand is classified as a Type "C" soil. Seffner fine sand has permeabilities ranging from six to 20 inches per hour and available water capacities of 0.04 to 0.12 inches/inches, depending on depth. This soil is located on approximately 17% of the subject property. 1.4. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (46) This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained and is located on low ridges and knolls on the uplands throughout the country. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of very dark gray fine sand about six inches thick. The upper part of the underlying material, to a depth of about 16 inches, consists of brown fine sand. The lower part to a depth of 80 inches consists of white fine sand. In most years, a SHWT is located at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Pare 4 more than six months and it recedes to a depth of more than 80 inches during extended dry periods. The permeability is very rapid throughout. The available water capacity is very low. This soil is well suited to dwellings without basements, small commercial buildings, and local roads and streets. No corrective measures are needed. The soil has moderate limitations for septic tank absorption fields, and water control measures should be used. When installing a septic tank absorption field on this soil, the proximity to a stream or canal should be considered to prevent lateral seepage and groundwater pollution. If the density of housing is moderate to high, a community sewage system can help prevent contamination of the water supplies. This soil has severe limitations for sewage lagoons, sanitary landfills, shallow excavations, and recreational uses. The sidewalls of shallow excavations should be shored. The sealing or lining of a trench sanitary landfill or sewage lagoon with impervious soil material can reduce excessive seepage. Water control measures should be used for trench sanitary landfills. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes is classified as a Type "A" soil. Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes, has permeabilities greater than six inches per hour and available water capacities of 0.02 to 0.10 inches/inches, depending on depth. This soil is located on approximately 54% of the subject property. On June 20, 2011, HSA Golden installed a total of six soil borings on the subject property, three on each portion of the site where Type "A" soils were identified by the soil survey (Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes [2] and Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes [46]). Soil boring locations are presented on Figure 3. Soil borings were designated as SB-A through SB-F and were installed to a maximum depth of six feet below land surface (bls). Subsurface soils generally consisted of gray/brown fine sand or light brown very fine sand. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the soil borings installed. Two soil samples were collected and transported to Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES, Orlando, Florida) for constant head permeability analysis. Sample 41 was collected from SB-A (Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes; 5' bls) and Sample #2 was collected from SB-D (Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes; 3' bls). Soil permeability of Sample #1 was reported by UES to be 16.9 feet/day (8.45 inches/hour) and the permeability of Sample #2 was reported to be 14.4 feet/day (7.2 inches/hour). According to the Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment (WAVA), soil permeabilities exceeding 13.1 inches/hour (26.08 feet/day) are strongly correlated with aquifer vulnerability (most effective recharge), whereas values less than 13.1 inches/hour (26.08 feet/day) are considered less significant (see attached). Although the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan refers to Type "A" soils, the WSA's WAVA basis report recommended protecting soils with permeability more than 13.1 inches/hour. Both of the onsite soil permeability tests are below this soil protection level. Since site specific data gathered suggests that Type "A" soil permeabilities on the subject property are considered less significant in terms of aquifer vulnerability, the City of Ocoee's Soil Analysis - Letter of Findings 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Page S generalized Comprehensive Plan restrictions on site development for Type "A" soils does not apply. The permeability reported in Sample 41 (Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes) was below the generalized permeability listed in the SCS Survey for this type of soil (greater than 20 inches/hour). The permeability reported in Sample #2 (Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes) correlated with the lower limit permeability listed in the SCS Survey for this type of soil (greater than six inches/hour). Site specific data was not found to suggest that very rapid soil permeabilities (greater than 20 inches per hour) exist on the subject property. Based upon the findings of our investigations, a total of four different types of soil were identified on the subject property. Of these four soil types, two were identified as being in the Type "A" soils group: Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes and Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes. Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes accounts for approximately 1.5% of the subject property, while Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes accounts for approximately 54% of the subject property. A soil sample was collected from each Type "A" soil type and analyzed for constant head permeability. The analyses indicated that soil permeability in Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes was below the generalized soil type value of greater than 20 inches/hour indicating that the onsite Archbold soils are not as permeable as a Type "A" soil. Permeability in the Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes correlated with the generalized soil type value of greater than six inches/hour, but well below 13.1 inches/hour soil protection, or most effective recahrge level stated in the WAVA. It should be noted that constant head permeability analyses from the two soil samples collected onsite indicated that permeability values were less than 13.1 inches/hour (26.08 feet/day), indicating that the risk of high recharge in these soils is less significant. Based on these findings along with the fact that very rapid or "most effective" permeabilities (greater than 20 inches/hour) are not present on the subject property, we conclude that no development restrictions should be placed on the subject property by the City of Ocoee with regard to Type "A" soils on this site. Chicon, James R., Baker, Alan E., Wood, Alex R., and Arthur, Jonathan D., 2005, Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment: Florida Geological Survey Report of Investigation 104. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, August 1989. Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act, Chapter 369, Part III, Florida Statutes, 2010. .Foil Aizac psis - Letter of Findingas IOill Clarcona Ocoee Road ti We trust that the contents of this report are sufficient for your needs. If you require explanation or clarification of any of the preceding, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, rJL'-!)4. ®LDEN ,; a V"illiam Jacobs James-] � /olden, P.G. pal Project Manager ix Hydrogeologist/Vice President: Attachments cc: Jim Hall; VHB im DATE: June 2011 40 1, �._ F,y47 Pam, `,•�� 't ,� - ; _-.,` , � ._ .�•�/�{ � � it `{j ;jlrA EI%61 ti rJJ — CATION PROJECT LO1+ �4 r r , PROJECT LOCATION .,. v j PROJECT` s- ®_°'LOCATION ' r- Bm 1 % 0 all 11 r •I I: OVUt' uc: UJl7J I UrUUNN-MIU MANS, WIN I -ER GARDEN, FLORIDA a o ':o 6 h u o .� hpLLno CD da�g W ��x U � y a 0 ce w LL, O O c Qo ow o U O O 0 FIGURE 1 DATE: June 2011 auur-%ur-: UrcHNVC UUUN I Y HNUI—EN I Y APPRAISER'S OFFICE, 2010 N —109 0 250 500 DISTANCE IN FEET J Q O W W Q QQ O0 O OW U o W U u0 CL Q J_ U ry Q d FIGURE 2 J PA DATE: June 2011 MMMIML Z)UUMUL: UNANUt UUUN I Y PRUPER fY APPRAISER'S OFFICE, 2010 SOIL SOURCE: Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey ID SOIL TYPES 2 20 43 46 SB-A/SAMPLE #1 S B-B Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Immokalee fine sand Seffner fine sand Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes SOIL BORING / SAMPLE LOCATION SOIL BORING LOCATION N 0 250 500 DISTANCE IN FEET 0 C4 W W O O Q o � o O Z U w O gU 2: a 0 FIGURE 3 Attachments 1 •E TABLE 14.--PHYSICAT, AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS Soil Surve (The symbol < means less than; > means more than. Entries under "Erosion factors--T" apply to the entire profile. Entries under "Hind erodibility group" and "Organic matter" apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not available or were not estimated] Map symbol and soil name 1Deptb1clay } I I I { Moist I bulk 1 densityI IPermea- I bility }Available} I water, Ica acit Soil Ireactionl 1 (SalinitylShrink-swell) 1_ potential Bros on factorslerodi-IOrq I-r--Ibilityl } K I T n I on na I c l cc I n r l n I L os cml { I I }- }mm 1 1. 1 I I { 1 I I I I I } Arents. Archbold I 1 0-801 I I 0-1 I 6 11.50-1.601 I I >20 I { 10.02-0.051 I I 3.6-6.51 I I <2 { I (Low---------10 I { 101 I I 5 I I 1 1 I I { 5 I' 3---------------- Basinger I 1 0-7 1 7-321 I 1 0-4 0-4 { 11.40-1.551 11.40-1 55) I 6.0-20 6.0-20 I 10.05-0.101 10,05-O,101 I 4,5-5.51 4.5-5.51 I <2 <2 I }Low--- ------ 1Low --------- I 10 101 10.101 I 5 I 1 2 1 I 1 1 1 132-471 `47-801 1-3 1-3 i 11.40-1*651 11 50-1:701 I 6.0-20 6 0-20 I 10.10-0 151 10 05-0.101 I 4.5-5 51 4.5-5.51 I <2 <2 I 1Lov--------- ILov--------- I 10'101 10'101 1 1 1 1 4---------------- Candler 1 0-5 0 5-741 1 <3 <3 11.35-1.551 11.50-1 651 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.04-0.08 10.02-0.061 1 4.5-6.01 <2 (Low --------- ILow I 10.101 10 I 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 .5 I r74-801 I 3-8 I 11 50-1:651 1 6.0-20 i 10,05-0.081 f 4.5-6.01 4.5-6.01 I <2 <2 I --------- ILov---------10.101 I 101 1 i 5----------------- Candler 1 0-4 1 4-611 1 <3 <3 11 35-1.551 11,50-1.651 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.04-0.081 10.02-0.061 4.5-6.01 4.5-6.01 <2 <2 1Lov---------10 ILow---------10 i 101 1 5 I 1 2 1 I 1 .5 1 161-801 I 3-8 { 11 50-1 651 I 6.0_20 I 10.05-0.081 I 4,5-6.01 I <2 I ILow--------- I 101 10'101 I I 1 } 1 } 5: Candler---------1 0-6 1 6-691 1 <3 <3 11.35-1.551 11.50-1.651 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.04-0.081 10.02-0.061 4.5-6.01 4,5-6.01 <2 ILow--------- ILov 10.201 10 5 1 2 1 1 .5 I 169-801 I 3-8 { 11.50-1 651 I 6.0-20 I 10.05-0 081 I 4.5-6,01 I <2 <2 I --------- 1Low--------- 101 10.201 1 1 Apopka ---------- 1 0-691 169-80118-3711 I <3 I 11.45-1.601 55-1.751 11 6.0-20 0.6-2.010.12-0.17 ID.03-0 051 I 4.5-6.01 4.5-6.01 � <2 <2 I I 1Low-- 'Low --------- I I 10'241 { I I I 1 I I 1 I Candler --------- 1 0-4 1 4-671 1 <3 <3 11,50-1651 11.35-1 551 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.02-0.061 10.04-0 081 4,5-6.01 4.5-6.01 <2 ILow ILow--------- 10.101 10 5 1 1 2 1 .5 1 167-801 I 3-8 11.50 I -1.651 !{ 6.0-20 10.05-0 I 081 I 4.5-6.01 1 <2 <2 ILOw 1 --------- --------- 10.101 i 201 1 1 Urban land. I 1 I } I 1 I 1 I I I I } I I } 1 I I } I I I I I } { Candler --------- 1 1 0-5 1 5-521 <3 11.35-1.551 <3 11.50-1 651 6,0-20 10.04-0.081 6.0-20 10.02-0.061 4.5-6.01 C 5-6.01 <2 'Low <2 ILow --------- 10.101 -------- -10 5 1 1 2 1 1 5 ' 152-801 I I 3-8 11.50-1:651 I 1 6.0-20 10.05-0.081 { 1 4.5-6.01 I <2 ILov-- i --------10'201 I{ 101 I 1 Urban land. I I I I I } o----------------1 Canova 1 116-22115-3411:60-1.701 0-6 1 6-161 __- 10.20-0 1-6 11.35-1:501 401 1 6.0-20 10 6.0-20 10.02-0+051 0.6-6.010:10-0.151 I 10-0 201 l 5.6-6,51 6.1-8.41 5,6-8.4I I <2 )Low <2 ILow---------10 <2 1Lor----- I --------- 10.101 ---- IO'281 I 101 I 5 I 1 1 l ? l 1 1 35 122.80115-2511.60-1.701 { 1 I i 0.6-6.010.10-0,151 I I 7.4-8.41 I <2 Low ---- ----- 10 281 1 1 .0--------------- 1 0-7 1 -5020-351.55-1.75 7-2011 2.0-6:0I10.10-0 <0.2 .151I 0.12-017 6.1-7.31I 74-84 I <21 <2 IModerate 1 Loow---------IIO 10.321 I 151 { 5 1 1 } 3 1 1150801 2Cbobee I I I45-1.501I 7-2011.60-1 751 6.0-20 10.D60.101 7.4-8 41 II <2 ILv ---- --------- 10'101 1 1 Floridana------- 1 114.281 0-141 3-101140-1.501 1-7 11:50_1 601 6.0-20 10 6.0-20 10.05-0'101 10-0 201 5.6-7.81 5,6-7.81 <2 1Low--- <2 ILov----------10 ------ 10.201 I I 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 6 12880115-3011.601.701 <0.2 10.10-0:201 5.6-7.81 <2 ILov --------- 10 201 241 ' 1 1 Chow----------1 112-56120-3-911,55-1.751 0-121 7-2011.45-1.501 2.0-6.010:10-0.151 <0.2 10.12-0 171 6.1-7.31 7.4-8.41 <2 1Low <2 'Moderate --------- 10.151 10.321 1 I 5 1 1 I 3 1 1 2 156-801 I 1 7-2011.60-1.751 l I 0.2-6.010.06-0.101 i I 7,4-8.41 I <2 ILov---------1p I ---- 201 1 I 1 I l able tier -1 -a -a -2 -2 2 -2 -2 -75 -7 -15 -7 Orange County, Florida TABLE 14.--PHYSICAL ARID C14EMICAL'PROPERTT£S OF THE SOTLS--Continued `�-I Map symbol and soil name I IDegthlClay I I I I i I Moist I bulk densit I IPerwea- I bi]ity I (Availab7el I water ca acit I I Soil Ixeactionl I ISalinitylShrink-swell) I I I potential IErosion I factorslerodiylOrgani� I { T Win I Ibilit ou I I matte: I n ct ccI I ❑ l n I PH l I I { I ct I I 39: St. Lucie ------- I I 1 0-801 I 1 I 0-1 i I I 11.50-1 601 I I I >20 I I I 10.02-0 051 ! I I 3.6-7.31 ( I I <2 I I { ILow--------- I I I 10.101 I I I 5 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 0-1 I Urban land. I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 40--------------- 1 0-401 140-801 --- 10.25-1.501 6.0-20 10.20-0.251 4.5-5.51 <2 (Low --------- I --- I --- 1 2 1 >20 Samsula I 1-1411.35-1.551 i I 6.0-20 i 10.02-0.051 I 3.6-5.51 I <2 I ILow--------- I 10' 171 I I 1 I 1 I Samsula--------- 1 0-341 --- 10 25-0 501 6.0-20 10.70-0 251 4.5-5.51 <2 ILow--------- I---1-�1 2 1 >20 134-801 1-1411.35-1.551 6.0-20 10.02-0:051 3.6-5.51 <2 ILow--------- 10 171 ' I 1 I 1 I Houtoon--------- ` 0-801 --- 10.20-0.40` 6.0-20 10.30-0.501 4.5-5.51 <2 +Low--------- i---i----1 2 1 75-85 Basinger -------- 1 0-6 1 6-251 1 0-4 0-4 11 40-1 551 11.40-1*551 6.0-20 10.05-0.101 10.05-0.101 4.5-5.51 4.5-5.51 <2 (Low--------- ILow---------10 10 101 5 1 2 1 1 1-8 1 125-351 135-801 1-3 (1.40-1:651 11.50-1.701 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.10-0.151 10.05-0.101 4.5-5.51 <2 <2 ILow--------- ILow 101 10'101 10.101 1 1 1 I I 1-3 I I 6.0-20 I I 4.5-5.51 I <2 I --------- I I I I I 12--------------- Sanibel 111-151 1 0-111 --- 10.30-0 551 11.40-1.601 6.0-20 ;0.20-0.501 °0.10-0.15i 3.6-7.31 <2 ILov--------- ILow 10.101 10 4 1 2 1 1 20-50 1 115-801 2-6 2-6 11 50-1 651 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.03-0.101 3.6-7.31 3.6-7.31 <2 <2 --------- ILow--------- 101 10'101 ' I 1 1 1 1 13--------------- 1 Seffner 113-191 0-131 1-8 1-8 11.35-1 451 11.35-1.451 6.0-20 6.0-20 10.07-0 121 10.07-0.121 4.5-7.31 4.5_7.31 <2 ILow <2 ILow---------10'1Q1 --------- 10 101 5 1 2 1 1 1-5 1 119-801 I I 1-8 11.50-1601 : I 6.0-20 I 10.04-0.081 I 4.5-7.31 I I <2 ILow I --------- ' 10101 ( I 1 I I I 14--------------- Smyrna 117-271 1 0-171 1-6 3-8 11 35-1 451 (1.35-1'451 6.0-20 0.6-6.010.10-0.201 10.03-0 071 3.6-6.01 3.6-5.51 <2 1Low--------- <2 1Low---------10°151 10 101 5 1 2 1 1 1-5 1 127-801 I I 1-6 11 50-1:651 1 I 6.0-20 10.03-0 071 I 4.5-5.51 I I <2 ILow---------10101 I " I I 1 I 1 I 15; Smyrna ----------I 118-281 128-801 0-181 1-6 11 3-8 35-1 451 11.35-1:451 6.0-20 10.03-0.071 0.6-6010.10-0.201 3.6-6.01 3.6-5.51 <2 ILow-=-------10 <2 ILow---------10:151 101 5 1 1 2 1 1 1-5 I I 1-6 11 I 50-1�651 I 6.0-26 10.03-0.071 I 4.5-5.51 l I <2 I I Low --------- 10 I 101 I 1 I 1 I Urban land. { I I I 1 l I I { i I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 16---------------I 0-6 1 0-4 11 25-1 601 >6.0 10.05-0 101 3.6-6.01 <2 'Low --------- 10 101 5 1 2 1 .5-2 Tavares 1 I 6-801 0-4 i 11.40-1.701 l >6.0 10.02-Oa051 I I 3.6-6.01 I I <2 [Low I --------- 10'101 I I 1 l 1 I 17s Tavares---------1 0-6 1 0-4 11 25-1 601 : >6.0 10.05-0 101 3.6-6.01 <2 ILow---- 1 I 6-801 0-4 I 11.40-1701 I >6.0 10.02-0:051 I I 3.6-6.01 I I <2 I How --------- 10'101 I I 1 I 1 I Millhopper------ 1 0-641 164-761 2-8 8-1411.60-1.801 11.50-1.671 6.0-20 2.0-6.010.08-0.121 10.05-0.101 4.5-6.51 4.5-6.01 <2 ILow <2 ILow --------- 10 --------- 10:151 101 5 1 1 2 1 .5-2 1 176-80112-2811 80-1.9010.66-2.010.08-0.151 4.5-6.01 <2 ILow --------- 10.281 1 1 1so _ -----1 I I 0-6 1 I 1 0-4 11.25-1.60 I I I I >60I I 0.05-0.101I ( I 3.fi-6.01I I <2 I1 1 I I O.lOI I 5 1I 1I { a- O i i .0Tavaresfi-S 0.02-0.05i 3.6-6.Oi <2 6Low--_-----±0i w---------10 1 1 2 1 .5-2 Urban land. I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 19--------------- 1 0-741 --- 10.15-0.351 6.0-20 10.30-0.501 4.5-8.41 <2 ILow --------- 1 ---+---i I 2 160-90 Terra Ceia I I P I I I I I I I I I Urban land. I I I I I 1 I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 01 ro, qwq, IFLOR16' FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Soil Permeability Soil permeability values were obtained from the soils statewide grid layer developed for FAVA (Arthur et al., 2005, in preparation), which was compiled from the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service - Soil Service Geographic (SSURGO) data set. This database was mapped at a scale of 1:24,000 and contains the most detailed soil permeability data.. However, different permeability values can exist along some county boundaries due to the different mapping techniques used by different soil scientists. The development of this layer included the calculation of average soil permeability values for each soil horizon layer. Then, based on soil horizon thicknesses, weighted -average permeability values were calculated for the entire soil column. This allowed the generation of a data coverage of soils containing a single permeability value per soil polygon. This data coverage is displaycd in Figure 3. Missing -data areas on the figure represent urban land, pits and water features. Soil permeability is a measure of the rate at which water travels through the vadose (unsaturated) zone. Areas with high soil permeability values are normally associated with higher aquifer vulnerability. Weights were calculated for soil permeability using the cumulative descending method (refer to Weights of Evidence Glossa,y) of the WofE model technique. The highest contrast of any class was calculated at 13.1 in/lir (9.2 x 10" cm/sec) as displayed in Figure 4, Based on the calculated weights, the most appropriate break in the soil permeability evidential theme was at 13.1 Mir (9.2 x 10-' cm/sec), creating a binary generalized theme for input into the WAVA model. This contrast break indicated that values exceeding 13.1 in/hr (9.2 x 10"3 cm/sec) were strongly correlated with aquifer vulnerability as defined by the training point data, whereas values less than 13.1 in/hr (9.2 x 10 cm/sec) were less significant. The generalized theme is displayed in Figure 5. Buffered Effective Karst Features To represent karst features (i.e., sinkholes) affecting vulnerability in the WAVA model study area, an effective karst GIS grid was generated based on a combination of closed topographic depressions identified in USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps and thickness of overburden on FAS (Figure 6). Closed topographic depressions (considered an estimation of karst feature distribution) are represented on USGS TS-minute maps as enclosed hachured contour lines: The effective karst feature evidential theme was developed by evaluating which of these closed topographic depressions were more likely to be hydrologically connected to the underlying FAS. This was accomplished by filtering out depressions underlain by more than 100 feet (30.5 m) of FAS overburden thickness. The 100-ft (30.5 m) threshold of overburden thickness has been used to identify karst-prone areas by Cichon et al. (2004) and Wright (1974). Though the location of training points was not used to select this filter threshold, the lack. of their occurrence in areas underlain by more than 100 feet (30.5 m) of PAS overburden thickness lends support to the use of this filter. Areas nearer to an effective karst feature are normally associated with higher aquifer vulnerability due to the increased chance of overland flow and the infiltration into the depression. Therefore, buffer zones of 3.600-m (11,811 ft) divided into 30-m (98.4 it) intervals were generated around each karst feature, and weights were calculated for tite effective karst feature evidential theme using the cumulative ascending method. The highest contrast of any class was calculated at a distance of 60 m (196.9 ft) from a depression creating a binary generalized theme for input into the WAVA model. In other words, the analysis indicated that this threshold of proximity to karst features maximized the spatial. association between the map pattern and the training point pattern. The generalized theme is displayed in Figure 7. Client: I-ISA Golden Attn: Jim Golden 100 East Pine Street, Suite 605 Orlando, Florida 32801 Project: City of Ocoee, 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road, Orange County, Florida - Project #11-628.001 As requested, a representative of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) was at the referenced project to provide construction materials testing services. Report No. Type of Report 905158 Constant Head Permeability The results of the observations and or tests are summarized on the attached sheets. We hope this information is sufficient or your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all orporticns of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Reviewed By, Universal Engi eri Sciences, Inc. cc: Client (Email & Mail-2) C.Q.A. No05 jgolden@hsagolden.com -�—� II (( �Wmm Svc ,� wc, l-%--VJ LIl1l;UU11.7Ci STA E F ORli Prof sio nginr No. 38818 Attachments (1) 'kn 3532 Maggie Blvd. 0 Orlando, FI 32811 @ (407) 423-0504 s (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com Project No.: 0110.1100352.0000, Task 01 Report No.: 905158.1 Date: June 28, 2011 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering * Environmental Sciences Construction Materials Testing., Threshold Inspection > Private Provider Inspection j32 Maggie Boulevard A Orlando, FL 32811 a (407) 423-0504 0 (407) 423-3106 REPORT ON CONSTANT HEAD PERMEABILITY (ASTM D-2434/AASHTO T-215) Client: HSA Golden Attn: Jim Golden 100 East Pine Street, Suite 605 Orlando, Florida 32801 Project: City of Ocoee, 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road, Orange County, Florida - Project ##11-628.001 Date Tested: 6/21/11 Date Sampled: 6/20/11 Tested By: L.F. Sampled By: ' D. Caffery TEST RESULTS Sample No. Location Soil Description Permeability ft/da 1 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Brown Tan Sand 16.9 2 10711 Clarcona Ocoee Road Tan Brown Sand 14.4 'Ail information pertinent to sampling of soil was prepared by the client or contractor. Universal Engineering Sciences is only responsible for the laboratory testing. For informational use only. a mutual protection of Universal's clients, the genera! public, and ourselves, ourreports are submitted as the confidential property ofourclients. Accordingly, irization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. dkn (WO# N/S) rG 8 0 0 P Ocoee Village Center o 500 1,000 2,002A 0 Utilities Feet A IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES — EFFECTIVE February 1, 2018 Development projects in the City of Ocoee are subject to: 1) Police, 2) Fire, 3) Recreation, 4) School, and 5) Transportation/Road impact fees. However, only residential projects are subject to recreation and school impact fees. This information packet provides the multipliers used to calculate impact fees. It is a summary of the impact fee information in the Code of the City of Ocoee, Chapter 87 Impact Fees. In addition, water and sewer capital charges and deposits are included at the back of this packet. It is a summary of Chapter 173 Water and Sewers. Sections from the Code are referenced below. The fees imposed for residential and nonresidential construction are a result of the City's fee calculation study that was designed to ensure that the impact fees imposed are rationally related to the benefit received by the applicant. In the event that an applicant believes the impact of the construction will be less than that set forth below, the applicant may, at his or her option, submit evidence to the City Commission in support of an alternative assessment based upon convincing and competent evidence, the City Commission may adjust the impact fee as appropriate for the particular property. The Building Division coordinates the Final Impact Fee Assessment at the time of Building Permit review. All impact fees must be paid before permits may be issued. If you need additional information to estimate impact fees for your project, please contact the applicable City offices listed below: Police, Fire, School and Recreation Impact Fees - Transportation Impact Fees - Water and Sewer Deposits & Capital Charges plus Irrigation Charges - Section 87-43. Definitions. Building Department/Development Services (407) 905-3100 ext. 1000 Planning Department/Development Services (407) 905-3100 ext. 1018 Engineering / Public Works (407) 905-3100 ext. 1504 NON-RESIDENTIAL DWELLING - Any structure which fully encloses space for the occupancy by persons or their activities other than residential dwellings, including but not limited to professional buildings, commercial buildings, public assembly buildings or institutional buildings. RESIDENTIAL DWELLING - Each single-family dwelling in each unit of a condominium, duplex, triplex, mobile home, modular housing, manufactured home, apartment or multiple -dwelling structure designated as a separate dwelling for one (1) or more persons, whether temporarily or permanently utilized or designed or intended to be utilized for human habitation. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 1 of 13 1) POLICE IMPACT FEE Section 87-42. Police Fee Schedule. The following police impact fees are hereby assessed by the City and shall be collected by the City prior to the issuance of the building permit or any other development permit for the construction of any structure to be used for a residential or nonresidential dwelling in each district: Residential: $501.04 Nonresidential: $0.33 (thirty-three cents) per square foot 2) FIRE IMPACT FEE Section 87-30. Fire Fee Schedule. The following fire impact fees are hereby assessed by the City and shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of a building permit or any other development permit for the construction of any structure to be used for a residential or nonresidential dwelling. Residential: $636.00 Nonresidential: $0.47 (forty-seven cents) per square foot 3) RECREATION IMPACT FEE (Not applicable to Commercial, Office, or Industrial projects.) Section 87-18. Recreational Park Fee. A recreational park impact fee in the amount of $1,560.00 per residential dwelling unit is hereby assessed by the City. 4) SCHOOL IMPACT FEE (Not applicable to Commercial, Office, or Industrial projects.) The City of Ocoee is required to collect School Impact Fees for Orange County Public Schools. The required impact fee must be paid before the residential building permit can be issued. Single-family detached house: $8,784.00 per dwelling unit Multi -family dwelling unit: $5,919.00 per dwelling unit Townhouse: $6,930 per dwelling unit Mobile home: $6,088.00 per dwelling unit For your information, a copy of the Orange County Public School Impact Fee Ordinance is available at the City of Ocoee Building Division. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 2 of 13 Publicly owned and operated buildings (government, public schools, libraries, community centers) are exempt from paying road impact fees. Single-family residential additions are also exempt. Section 87-14. Schedule of Road Impact Fees. Land Use Unit of Measure ITE Code Net Impact Fee Port and Terminal Intermodal Truck Terminal 1,000 sf 030 $3,529.99 Industrial General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 110 $2,496.72 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 140 $1,366.71 Warehousing 1,000 sf 150 $1,776.32 Mini -warehouse 1,000 sf 151 $895.36 Residential Single Family Dwelling Unit 210 $3,943.71 Apartment Dwelling Unit 220 $2,655.21 Condominium/Townhouse Dwelling Unit 230 $2,319.70 Mobile Home Dwelling Unit 240 $1,827.77 Congregate Care Facility Occupied DU 253 $792.44 Lod in Hotel/Motel Occupied Room 310 $2,667.56 Recreational Golf Course Per Hole 430 $16,174.12 Multipurpose Recreational Facility 1,000 sf 435 $1,385.24 Multiplex Movie Theatre 1,000 sf 445 $7,226.69 Institutional Place of Worship 1,000 sf 560 $3,229.48 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 565 $8,323.76 Medical Hospital 1,000 sf 610 $4,400.64 Nursing Home 1,000 sf 620 $584.55 Office Updated February 1, 2018 Page 3 of 13 Less than 100,000 1,000 sf 710 $4,752.62 100,000 to 200,000 1,000 sf 710 $3,657.59 Greater than 200,000 1,000 sf 710 $3,241.82 Medical/Dental Office 1,000 sf 720 $11,493.54 Business Park 1,000 sf 770 $3,814.03 Retail Shopping Center: Less than 50,000 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,942.65 Shopping Center: 50,000 to 99,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $4,598.24 Shopping Center: 100,000 to 199,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $4,847.30 Shopping Center: 200,000 to 299,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $5,429.79 Shopping Center: 300,000 to 399,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $5,530.65 Shopping Center: 400,000 to 499,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $5,503.90 Shopping Center: 500,000 to 999,999 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,026.70 Shopping Center: 1,000,000 to 1,250,000 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,255.17 Shopping Center: Greater than 1,250,000 1,000 sf GLA 820 $6,026.70 Automobile Sales 1,000 sf 841 $7,963.57 Supermarket 1,000 sf 850 $15,791.28 Convenience Store (open 24 hours) 1,000 sf 851 $34,762.63 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/drive-thru window 1,000 sf 881 $8,700.43 Services Drive-in Bank 1,000 sf 912 $9,608.15 Restaurant, Quality 1,000 sf 931 $14,027.32 Restaurant, High Turnover (sit-down) 1,000 sf 932 $15,978.59 Restaurant, Fast Food 1,000 sf 934 $23,155.88 Automobile Care Center 1,000 sf 942 $3,480.58 Gasoline Station (8 VFP) Fueling position 944 $7,521.03 Gasoline Station w/Convenience Market and Car Wash (12 VFP) Fueling position 946 $14,685.97 Self -Service Car Wash Per Stall 947 $4,308.02 Section 87-5. Road Impact Fee - Alternative fee calculation A. In the event that an applicant believes the impact of his new building on the roadway network will be less than that derived utilizing the Schedule of Fees in § 87-14, the applicant may submit an Updated February 1, 2018 Page 4 of 13 alternative road impact fee calculation to the Development Review Committee. The Development Review Committee shall review the data, information and assumptions used by the applicant as part of the alternative road impact fee calculation methodology to determine whether the requirements of this section are satisfied, if the Development Review Committee finds that the requirements of this section are satisfied, it shall review the results of the study and determine the applicant's alternative road impact fee for recommendation to the City Commission. If the Development Review Committee finds the requirements of this section are not satisfied, it shall recommend to the City Commission the Road Impact Fee Schedule set forth in § 87-14 for the applicant. The decision of the City Commission as to the use of an alternative road impact fee or the Road Impact Fee Schedule shall be final and binding on the applicant. B. The alternative road impact fee calculations shall be based on data, information or assumptions contained in the City of Ocoee Transportation Impact Fee Update, dated November 1998 and shall be compatible with assumptions used for development of a standards -driven impact fee calculation, provided that: (1) The independent source is an accepted standard source of transportation engineering or planning data; (2) The independent source is a local study carried out by a qualified traffic planner possessing membership in the American Institute of Certified Planners or a professional engineer licensed by the State of Florida pursuant to an accepted methodology of transportation planning or engineering; or (3) If a prior applicant submitted during a prior approval process a traffic impact study consistent with the criteria required by this section and if that study is determined by the Development Review Committee to still be valid, the traffic impacts of the new building shall be presumed to be as described in such prior study. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a traffic impact study which is more than two years old is invalid. C. The trip length, diversion and capture factor used in the alternative road impact fee calculation shall be based on actual surveys conducted In the City of Ocoee or Orange County or based on professional studies, including commonly used references. For the purposes of the alternative road impact fee calculation, the diversion and capture factor shall be the percentage of average daily trips that a proposed use will generate that constitute new or additional trips added to roadways identified within the Ocoee Transportation Master Plan. Those trips that do not represent additional trip ends shall not be counted as new or additional trips. D. The new building shall be presumed to generate the maximum number of average daily trips to be generated by the most intensive use permitted under the applicable land development regulations, such as the Comprehensive Plan or zoning regulations, or under applicable deed or plat restrictions. E. The cost of the city review of the alternative road impact fee calculation shall be paid by the applicant. Upon submittal of the alternative road impact fee calculation by the applicant, the city shall collect a flat fee of $500 and a review deposit of $1,000 from the applicant. Section 1-12 of Article I of the Land Development Code (Chapter 180 of the Code of Ordinances of the City), as it may from time to time be amended, shall be followed when collecting review fees and deposits under this section. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 5 of 13 WATER & SEWER CAPITAL CHARGES & DEPOSITS Section 173-11. Water Capital Charges. A water capital charge is hereby established at $2,083.00 (two thousand, eighty-three dollars) per equivalent residential unit (ERU). Those persons, corporations or entities who or which have entered into an agreement with the city providing credits against the water connection fee shall be exempt from paying this water capital charge. For the purpose of calculating and imposing the water capital charge, the ERU factor for any particular connection shall be calculated and imposed in the manner provided as follows: ESTABLISHMENT Unit ERU Factor RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Duplex (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Duplex (3 or more Bedrooms) Per Unit 1.000 Mobile Home (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.667 Mobile Home (3 or more bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily, Efficiency (Less than 500 sf) Per Unit 0.500 Multifamily (1 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.583 Multifamily (2 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily (3 or more bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 1.000 Single Family Residence Per Unit 1.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Animal Kennels Per Kennel Run 0.160 Auditorium Per Seat 0.017 Automotive Repair & Maintenance Per Repair Bay 0.250 Bar/Cocktail Lounge Per Seat 0.067 Barber/Beauty Shop Per Operator Station 0.300 Bowling Alley Per Lane 0.330 Church Per Seat 0.017 Convenience Store (No Gas Pumps) By FU See FU Table Below Dentist Office Per Dentist 0.833 Extended Care Facilities Per Efficiency 0.500 Hospital Per Bed 0.833 Hotel / Motel (See Note 1) Per Room 0.500 Hotel / Motel Suites, 1 Bedroom (See Note 1) Per Unit 0.583 Hotel / Motel Suites, 2 Bedrooms (See Note 1) Per Unit 0.833 Hotel / Motel Suites, 3 or more Bedrooms (See Note 1) Per Unit 1.000 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) with showers Per Employee 0.117 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) without showers Per Employee 0.050 Landscape Irrigation Per 1,000 SF 0.125 Laundry, Self Service Per Machine 1.333 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 6 of 13 Medical Office (formerly: Doctor's Office) Per Doctor 0.833 ESTABLISHMENT Unit ERU Factor Meeting & Banquet Rooms Per Seat 0.017 Nursing Home Per Bed 0.417 Office Building (See Note 3) Per 1,000 SF, gross 0.334 Restaurant (Cafeteria), Full Service Per Seat 0.100 Restaurant, 24 hour Per Seat 0.167 Restaurant, Fast Food Per Seat 0.050 Retail Spaces By FU See FU Table Below Schools, Elementary & Nursery Per Student 0.025 Schools, Middle & High Per Student 0.067 Self Service Gas Station (See Note 5) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Service Bay 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Wash Bay 3.200 Theater Per Seat 0.010 Theater (Dinner) Per Seat 0.067 Trailer Park (overnight) Per Space 0.333 Warehouse Space (See Note 4) By FU See FU Table Below NOTES 1. Hotels and motels: add food service, banquet & meeting rooms, and self service laundries. 2. Add food service; does not include industrial waste flows which are calculated on Fixture Unit (FU) basis. 3. Office buildings: add food service and retail space. 4. Warehouses: add office space, food service, and retail space. 5. Self service gas stations: add Fixture Units (FU). 6. Service (gasoline) Stations: add the total of ERU factors for all service bays, wash bays (not recycled) and toilet rooms. Automatically recycled vehicle washing systems require a professional engineer's signed and sealed estimate of capacity usage. 7. See Fixture Unit (FU) calculations on FU Table below. 8. Ocoee requires a minimum of 1.000 ERU per each separate commercial establishment. 9. Multi -family projects based on units only; no additional capital charges for laundries, pool, or management offices. FIXTURE UNITS (FU) TABLE Type of Fixture FU ERU Factor NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Drains, condensate 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1-1/4-inch trap 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1-1/2-inch trap 2.0 0.167 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 2-inch trap 3.0 0.250 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed 2-1/2-inch trap 4.0 0.333 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 3-inch trap 5.0 0.417 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 4-inch trap 6.0 0.500 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 7 of 13 Drinking Fountain 0.5 0.042 FIXTURE UNITS (FU) TABLE Type of Fixture FU ERU Factor Laundry Tray 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, large drain (greater than 1-1/4-inch trap) 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, small drain (1-1/4-inch trap) 1.0 0.083 Showers (per head) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (food service) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (garbage grinder) 4.0 0.333 Sink, compartmented (2) 3.0 0.250 Sink, compartmented (3) 4.0 0.333 Sink, flushing rim 8.0 0.667 Sink, service (mop/janitor) 3.0 0.250 Sink, service ("p" trap) (Hand) 2.0 0.167 Sink, (pot, scullery, etc.) 4.0 0.333 Urinal 4.0 0.333 Washing Machine (Non coin laundry) by drain size above Varies Varies Water Closet, public 6.0 0.500 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS (requiring larger than 5/8" meter) Bathroom Group (water closet, lavatory, bathtub/shower) 6.0 0.500 Bath, Half 4.0 0.333 Dishwasher 2.0 0.167 Drains (by drain size above) Varies Varies Lavatory 4.0 0.333 Shower Stall 3.0 0.250 Sink, kitchen 2.0 0.167 Sink, kitchen (garbage grinder/dishwasher) 3.0 0.250 Sink, laundry 2.0 0.167 Washer, clothes (by drain size, above) Varies Varies NOTES 1. Continuous and semi -continuous flows (pumps, air conditioning systems, etc.) are 2.0 FU per gallon per minute (gpm) of flow. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 8 of 13 Section 173-28. Sewer Capital Charges. A sewer capital charge is hereby established at $6,178.00 (six thousand, one hundred seventy-eight dollars) per ERU. Those persons, corporations or entities who or which have previously prepaid the existing sewer capacity charges or who prepaid sewer capacity charges to Prima Vista Utility Company, Inc. (PVU), which were transferred from PVU to the city pursuant to the agreement between PVU and the city dated December 3, 1987, shall be exempt from paying this sewer capital charge. For the purpose of calculating and imposing the sewer capital charge, the ERU factor for any particular connection shall be calculated and imposed in the manner provided as follows: ESTABLISHMENT Unit Factor RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Duplex (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Duplex (3 or more Bedrooms) Per Unit 1.000 Mobile Home (1-2 Bedrooms) Per Unit 0.667 Mobile Home (3 or more bedrooms) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily, Efficiency (Less than 500 sf) Per Unit 0.500 Multifamily (1 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.583 Multifamily (2 bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 0.833 Multifamily (3 or more bedroom units) (See Note 9) Per Unit 1.000 Single Family Residence Per Unit 1.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Animal Kennels Per Kennel Run 0.160 Auditorium Per Seat 0.017 Automotive Repair & Maintenance Per Repair Bay 0.250 Bar / Cocktail Lounge Per Seat 0.067 Barber/Beauty Shop Per Operator Station 0.300 Bowling Alley Per Lane 0.330 Church Per Seat 0.017 Convenience Store (No Gas Pumps) By FU See FU Table Below Dentist Office Per Dentist 0.833 Extended Care Facilities Per Efficiency 0.500 Hospital Per Bed 0.833 Hotel/Motel (See Note 1) Per Room 0.500 Hotel/Motel Suites, 1 Bedroom (See Note 1) Per Unit 0.583 Hotel/Motel Suites, 2 Bedrooms(See Note 1) Per Unit 0.833 Hotel/Motel Suites, 3 or more Bedrooms (See Note 1) Per Unit 1.000 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) with showers Per Employee 0.117 Industrial Buildings (See Note 2) without showers Per Employee 0.050 Landscape Irrigation Per 1,000 SF 0.125 Laundry, Self Service Per Machine 1.333 Medical Office (formerly: Doctor's Office) Per Doctor 0.833 Meeting & Banquet Rooms Per Seat 0.017 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 9 of 13 Nursing Home Per Bed 0.417 ESTABLISHMENT Unit Factor Office Building (See Note 3) Per 1,000 SF, gross 0.334 Restaurant (Cafeteria), Full Service Per Seat 0.100 Restaurant, 24 hour Per Seat 0.167 Restaurant, Fast Food Per Seat 0.050 Retail Spaces By FU See FU Table Below Schools, Elementary & Nursery Per Student 0.025 Schools, Middle & High Per Student 0.067 Self Service Gas Station (See Note 5) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Toilet Room 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Service Bay 1.000 Service Station (See Note 6) Per Wash Bay 3.200 Theater Per Seat 0.010 Theater (Dinner) Per Seat 0.067 Trailer Park (overnight) Per Space 0.333 Warehouse Space (See Note 4) BY FU See FU Table Below NOTES 1. Hotels and motels: add food service, banquet & meeting rooms, and self-service laundries. 2. Add food service; does not include industrial waste flows which are calculated on Fixture Unit (FU) basis. 3. Office buildings: add food service and retail space. 4. Warehouses: add office space, food service, and retail space. 5. Self-service gas stations: add Fixture Units (FU). 6. Service (gasoline) Stations: add the total of ERU factors for all service bays, wash bays (not recycled) and toilet rooms. Automatically recycled vehicle washing systems require a professional engineer's signed and sealed estimate of capacity usage. 7. See Fixture Unit (FU) calculations on FU Table below. 8. Ocoee requires a minimum of 1.000 ERU per each separate commercial establishment. 9. Multi -family projects based upon units only; no additional capital charges for laundries, pool, or management offices. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 10 of 13 Capacity Demand Based Upon Fixture Units (FU) Type of Fixture FU ERU Factor NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Drains, condensate 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1-1/4-inch trap 1.0 0.083 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 1 %2-inch trap 2.0 0.167 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 2-inch trap 3.0 0.250 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed 2 'h-inch trap 4.0 0.333 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 3-inch trap 5.0 0.417 Drains, floor & fixtures not listed: 4-inch trap 6.0 0.500 Drinking Fountain 0.5 0.042 Laundry Tray 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, large drain (greater than 1-1/4-inch trap) 2.0 0.167 Lavatory, small drain (1-1/4-inch trap) 1.0 0.083 Showers (per head) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (food service) 3.0 0.250 Sink, combination (garbage grinder) 4.0 0.333 Sink, compartmented (2) 3.0 0.250 Sink, compartmented (3) 4.0 0.333 Sink, flushing rim 8.0 0.667 Sink, service (mop/janitor) 3.0 0.250 Sink, service ("p" trap) (Hand) 2.0 0.167 Sink, (pot, scullery, etc.) 4.0 0.333 Urinal 4.0 0.333 Washing Machine (Non coin laundry) by drain size above Varies Varies Water Closet, public 6.0 0.500 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS (requiring larger than 5/8" meter) Bathroom Group 6.0 0.500 (water closet, lavatory, bathtub/shower) Bath, Half 4.0 0.333 Dishwasher 2.0 0.167 Drains (by drain size above) Varies Varies Lavatory 4.0 0.333 Shower Stall 3.0 0.250 Sink, kitchen 2.0 0.167 Sink, kitchen (garbage grinder/dishwasher) 3.0 0.250 Sink, laundry 2.0 0.167 Washer, clothes (by drain size, above) Varies Varies NOTES 1. Continuous and semi -continuous flows (pumps, air conditioning systems, etc.) are 2.0 FU per gallon per minute (gpm) of flow. Updated February 1, 2018 Page 11 of 13 Section 173-3. Water and Sewers Account Deposit. (1) Residential Meter Type Water Deposit Sewer Deposit '/-inch Owner of residence $ 60.00 $ 60.00 Renter of residence $ 80.00 $ 80.00 1-inch $140.00 $140.00 (2) Non -Residential Meter Type Water Deposit Sewer Deposit %-inch $120.00 $120.00 1-inch $300.00 $300.00 1 '/-inch $450.00 $450.00 2-inch $520.00 $520.00 3-inch and larger To be determined by Director 173-4. (1)(a) Water charges and billing. Base facility charge (zero consumption), effective for all bills issued on or after October 1, 2003, without regard to the date of the meter reading: Meter Type Charge %-inch $ 7.64 1-inch $ 19.10 I -inch $ 38.20 2-inch $ 61.12 3-inch $ 122.24 4-inch $ 191.00 6-inch $ 382.00 8-inch $ 611.00 10-inch $ 878.60 12-inch $1,642.60 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 12 of 13 173-4. (2)(a) Sewer charges and billing. Base facility charge (zero consumption), effective for all bills issued on or after October 1, 2003, without regard to the date of the meter reading: Meter Type Charge '/-inch $ 14.22 1-inch $ 35.56 1 %-inch $ 71.12 2-inch $ 113.79 3-inch $ 227.58 4-inch $ 355.60 6-inch $ 393.46 8-inch $1,137.94 10-inch $1,635.79 12-inch $3,058.22 Resolution No. 2003-17. Reclaimed Water System Rates. Base facility charge (zero consumption), effective for all bills issued on or after October 1, 2003, without regard to the date of the meter reading. Meter Type Charge %-inch $ 5.90 1-inch $ 14.75 V/2-inch $ 29.50 2-inch $ 47.21 3-inch $ 94.43 4-inch $ 147.54 6-inch $ 295.09 8-inch $ 471.99 10-inch $ 678.71 12-inch $1,268.90 Updated February 1, 2018 Page 13 of 13 Legend Schools Hospitals Property Outline City Boundary CAt1P US V, E xi t Page Dr', ' ' UNIVERSITY of FI ORIDA, -MID-FLORMA RESEARCH - '� = - W Keene -.Rd . E Keene Rd `, (4 EOIJCA7tONIGEP�fIER;� u l W o � a i o a ri< M as D }z` z3; B-1,Ave + Hill Dr tie ,e I< Paradise ;+ v E o Heights '�aradise -s E Valley Dr Heights a ._ _ Mccorm+dk Rd W o °mn 3. Walker eC,o aJo." yer or i r � +C a uley Rd L 7 a -E Traut Lake Rd u O 9) r' ona �. / Lo+ Q WestynQ t (� Cir LLA I Cr LLA121JINC, �.�. N _ C R� Marra Dr � GLAD TIIA CS ACADE[ Y-FAf k . o L,(>a t N F Ic na c¢ Gv p.rdeu Oaks Dr Maple Rdm ?d CY,Ave m a '. gaWiil '1_ 3 evd RENAISSA NC,E cHARTEIi AC Fu l l e rs West R ea, eTA,Praanalt�kt=. ,. z OCOCE HIGH f:�, �' Onto FLFIAH'ITF:RY a SCIIOUI a DA 1° GLAD TIDINGS O Q e+C c 'e ,ao FCADE(A l' Llcatia y > NmoleBivd Y 6th AV. LEGACY HIGH Mal lene Or HAD IENIA Q G ¢ RING LAKE �d WESr OAKS[' i n — y 2 s LtGtiT .t a Ef ENIA1Y Wurst Rd 1 fit' _r/� ACADEPAY Ad Mmu Rd bp�t ,C 4 r JCHRIGIUfN a I xi l ZACA➢ R1Y m e 2 \� �- 6.�.' h(.ADI t'1' "N.t Kaich Ct a� 'CIr� l « Jsz Andre G v Lowman AV. ad Dr,. `v0 e V �edS CO .DON : Paltn DI x Fill SJJ CAD LI' Burnt tree Cl � � Flewelling Ave ,Mobile Lp �,ol'�`: in > St tDr _ S vl�s Rc _ Center St a m w m 0 U eb, l� 438 '�D .' m coele�' �r r s e,l+e -E Silver Rd o eyYtail AY j:+�z JiDm g CAPS ADD DDUNDS LECAC ul O JOSH ACADEL v CITE U�, ELLS It'I CI% i P Iclo'P `y,ai<e �c EARNING CENTER NO !sseD d r n r IRST STEPS ACADWY t /f O U, e OCOEk0' ULL LLENEQ�ARY ncer oak St O Icir _ .41 ¢' Silvers" — l7 'aA welio Dr Hal Ct a 011ando Ave NhdeQRd- -.� �Lh. Snowfire Dt fe Rose Dr I' ¢ us A SunSprite Ct Geneva St E E rj p Oa - Balboa-0r 0 ,¢J p1 = nd`1 U o ,� c eye Maine St o Cjo riD a. Sergi PRECIIO`013 Hon— olpY4 Dt.- °'iia BI � '.OE OF2LANU0 HEALTH CENTRAL 50 - =W C Ion�ai-0r i"I C3.'a F'IT�AL 50 a 't l�JD CO 4 COLLEGE MUNilA E CNArF4jz Cf I.TRfL FIORiDA ,o (.I IJTI2AL LOf (UF Lal d h f 07 CIII:I4TI ANALADELAY p Y13Gf al,Pt ORY %o - 5C1{001 Me ALAI EI g:Olq - Waiter Ga�aentft d semi -le St Buckman Property 0 0.25 0.5 , Hospital and School Map Miles N �- Sorrento avares p\d U5-441 Mt DoraSorrento Tavares Mt Plymouth < gesbore pc Mt Mora ei Mt Plymouth O � S 4 Kelly Pari< Rd W- `e %Tangerine R.ya$ t Sadler Rd �'. 4angerine ""3 1 ��-�" t 4, + ...Jones A ` = , o ;Ponk n Rd W o.� r ' `syZellv✓Ood Il �, q W" Wvelch Rd E _ ¢ qa Sprin9 s1�V { m 1 m n � ry 434 `- -". .✓ '.""^�—' oa, SP)nut,*D'3'i"Ld"436 y w - Cit Foresft ty _. APopka 5outt Apopka ° o P 1 m ¢ w '. _ V�IC . "t a ..a;,. Paradise Padl,@e Heights LDckh6rt H e i hts, n .. �. ;. �rj r Lockha`ti r fiirview'�hores' �.- CiPQ�e..f' £r 439 _S Iv r St oRd M q O die h'vay Oekl n3?11tliw11(eWil�ter {$e11j ) s�0.s P: Pi he Hills P. � Aak' a Ttldenvrlle w c I �I o z _ tlls �s3 �,_....3��z6o #x=5a3�=v�Z`k.`�Yt.�v � .. .�""'" ✓ '''o vl`o-�t-. aka ^Z,. olrtW �,.w= ,`, G d Orlovis2eF "'� z 3- Rd e Orlovlsta }� t K •" Raleigh St er Ootha s R I {. �ood M 1, Rai " / Sf l k i6d �f �. ,. .� ` 0 435 S� N.`h'.,�.3 f Leod RdS LBHolden �l .Windermere':§ HelghtS f Windermere C e C Wide Rd ..�'m oy o' 01vd: Holden Heig- ht "� la aler�ro s r i u Bay Hill � � Oak Ridge y - ?< Bay Hill Oak Ridge m DoctorangeloFark Tango Park yo ? Phillips Doctor W,- Legend 'e c ae Phdhps� (( od bs t Site IVA t �aetam�T n Or a b Minutes at` ' FI Williamsburg wuliamsburg n ce6tral Q � Ftor 10 Minutes 15 Minutes Fps F + 1 ra o e' it City Boundary BuePVisja GBU�P Buckman Property o 1 z 4 ^r 5, 10, 15 Minute Drive Time Map Miles A 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Prepared for: WC Group 246 North Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 Prepared by: Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive Maitland, Florida 32751 407-628-9955 October 2018 TPD Ns 5095 r � • I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic Planning & Design, Inc., a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, EB-3702, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: • r Ocoee Village Center City of Ocoee, Florida WC Group I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. • y- ems, 1411 OctdeerWI 1 • of �� 0�.O R tY Page INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 STUDYAREA............................................................................................................................... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS...................................................................................... 6 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION .................................................11 Trip Generation Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment PROJECTEDTRAFFIC CONDITIONS..................................................................................14 Roadway Segment Analysis Intersection Analysis Turn Lane Analysis STUDYCONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................... 24 APPENDICES............................................................................................................................. 26 A Methodology Memorandum and Correspondence B CMS Database C Intersection Volumes/FDOT Factors and Signal Timings D Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets E Trends Analysis Worksheets F Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets 9109110 SIT -Me Page Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Capacity Analysis.............................................................. 7 Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis................................................................. 10 Table 3 Trip Generation Summary ......................................................................................... 12 Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis.................................................................... 15 Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis................................................................ 21 Table 6 Projected Site Access Capacity Analysis............................................................... 21 Table 7 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis (with Improvements) .......................... 22 LIST" OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map................................................................................................. 2 Figure2 Proposed Site Plan..................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3 Study Intersections...................................................................................................... 5 Figure 4 (a) Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ..................................... 8 Figure 4 (b) Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ..................................... 9 Figure 5 Project Trip Distribution........................................................................................... 13 Figure 6(a) Projected A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 16 Figure 6(b) Projected A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 17 Figure 7(a) Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 18 Figure 7(b) Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 19 Figure 7(c) Projected P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................................ 20 T,110•�W010,1 This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact of the proposed Ocoee Village Center development in the City of Ocoee, Florida. The site is located on Lakewood Avenue/Clarcona- Ocoee Road immediately to the east of SR 429. Figure 1 depicts the project's site location and its one -mile impact area. Access to the site will be provided via access driveways on both Lakewood Avenue and Clarcona-Ocoee Road. Figure 2 is a conceptual site plan of the development which consists of: ® North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 350 MF Residential Units 140 Room Hotel 20,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial ® South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 240 Townhome Units 115,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial Prior to the conduct of the analysis, a methodology memorandum was submitted to the City identifying an impact area along with the CMS roadway segments and intersections to be included in the analysis. Additionally, the project's trip generation and distribution characteristics were documented and graphically illustrated. The methodology memorandum, correspondence from the City and the responses are included in Appendix A. Data used in this analysis consists of site plan/development information provided by the Project Engineers, A.M./P.M. peak hourtraffic counts obtained by Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. (TPD) and roadway segment data obtained from the City of Ocoee's Concurrency Management System (CMS). Ocoee Village Center Project NQ 5095 Page 1 Ocoee Village Center N Project Ng 5095 Project Location Map Figure I Ms N Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Proposedits Plan Figure 2 The City's Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Outline requires that the extent of the impact area include all road segments that fall within one -mile of the project site and all roadways with a trip generation of more than 5% of the maximum service volume outside of the one -mile radius. A significance test was conducted, and impacted roadway segments and intersections were identified in the study methodology. The methodology was reviewed by the City and the study roadway segments and intersections, shown in Figure 3, were identified for use in the analysis as follows: Roadway Segments: ® Clarcona-Ocoee Road: SR 429 to N. Lakewood Avenue N. Lakewood Avenue to Ingram Road ® Lakewood Avenue: SR 438 to Rewis Street Rewis Street to Wurst Road Wurst Road to Fuller's Cross Road Fuller's Cross Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road ® Ocoee -Apopka Road: Demastus Lane to Fuller's Cross Road Fuller's Cross Road to West Road West Road to McCormick Road ® Wurst Road: Lakewood Avenue to Adair Street Adair Street to A.D. Mims Road ® A.D. Mims Road: Wurst Road to Clarke Road ® West Road: Ocoee- Apopka Road to SR 429 ® Adair Street: Wurst Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road ® Fuller's Cross Road: Ocoee -Apopka Road to Lakewood Avenue ® Ingram Road: McCormick Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road Study Intersections: ® Ocoee -Apopka Road to West Road ® West Road & SR 429 SB Ramps ® West Road & SR 429 NB Ramps ® Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue ® Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Adair Street ® Ocoee -Apopka Road & Fuller's Cross Road ® Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road ® Lakewood Avenue & Wurst Road ® Project Entrances Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 4 Ocoee Village Center " Project M 5095 Study Intersections r�s1 i1i Figure 3 NTS An existing conditions analysis was conducted for the CMS roadway segments and their major intersections utilizing existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry to establish their current operating conditions. The roadways were analyzed for daily traffic conditions and the intersections for P.M. peak hour conditions. Additionally, two of the study intersections on Lakewood Avenue were analyzed for A.M. peak hour conditions due to area school traffic. Roadway Segment Analysis The study roadway segments were analyzed by comparing their existing daily traffic volumes with the corresponding capacities at the adopted LOS standard. Roadway segments were obtained from the City's CMS database and updated as per the City's request. Daily traffic counts were obtained from the most recent AADT information obtained from Orange County and from FDOT count stations, and from turning movement counts where FDOT/Orange County traffic counts were not available with the use of a K factor of 0.09. The CMS traffic volumes and capacities by roadway segment are included in Appendix B. A summary of the daily roadway capacity analysis is presented in Table 1. The existing conditions analysis reveals that the study segments currently operate satisfactorily within their adopted capacities. Intersection Analysis The study intersections were analyzed in accordance with the procedures of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) using the latest version of the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The capacity analysis at each intersection was performed using the existing intersection geometry, traffic volumes during the P.M. peak hour for all intersections and the A.M. peak hour at the directly impacted intersections as requested by the City and signal timing/phasing data., The counts were adjusted based on FDOT's seasonal factors corresponding to the week the when the counts were taken. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) depict the adjusted existing peak hour traffic volumes. Existing turning movement counts along with FDOT's Peak Season Category Report and the intersection signal timing sheets obtained from the City of Ocoee are included in Village Center Project W 5095 Page 6 Table 1 Fxi-qtinrn n:;ily Rnndwav Canacity A,nalvsis Roadway Segment Data Source No. of Lanes LOS Std Daily Capacity Existing AADT Capacity Available. Clarcona-Ocoee Road SR 429 to N. Lakewood Ave OC 454.9 4 E 39,800 17,757 Yes N. Lakewood Ave to Ingram Rd OC 70.0 4 E 39,800 13,621 Yes Lakewood Avenue SR 438 to Rewis St FDOT 8056** 2 E 17,700 8,900 Yes Rewis St to Wurst Rd OC 33.2 2 E 17,700 3,727 Yes Wurst Rd to Fuller's Cross Rd TMC* 2 E 17,700 5,233 Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd OC 66.1 2 E 17,700 5,903 Yes Ocoee -Apopka Road Demastus Ln to Fuller's Cross Rd OC 73.0 2 E 17,700 9,463 Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd TMC* 2 E 17,700 16,367 Yes West Rd to McCormick Rd OC 71.0 2 E 17,700 12,413 Yes Wurst Road Lakewood Ave to Adair St OC 7130.0 2 D 14,800 5,379 Yes Adair St to A.D. Mims Rd FDOT 8059** 2 D 14,800 5500 Yes A.D. Mims Road Wurst Rd to Clarke Rd FDOT 8166 ** 2 E 15,600 6000 Yes West Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to SR 429 OC 2024 4 D 32,400 9,230 Yes Adair Street Wurst Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd OC 8161 2 D 14,800 4,006 Yes Fuller's Cross Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Lakewood Ave TMC* 2 E 17,7D0 6,667 Yes Ingram Road McCormick Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd OC 8162 2 D 14,800 2,892 Yes * Counts obtained from turning movement counts collected by Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. ** FDOT count stations were used where Orange County counts were not available Ocoee Village Center Project W 5095 Page 7 The intersection capacity analysis results are summarized in Table 2 which shows that the study intersections operate at satisfactory Levels of Service except for the eastbound approach of the STOP -controlled intersection of Lakewood Avenue and Fuller's Cross Road, which currently operates at Level of Service "F" during the A.M. peak hour. Detailed HCS worksheets are included in ,appendix D. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity ,analysis Int# Intersection Control Time Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & West Rd Signal P.M. 75.0 E 66.1 E 18.5 B 15.7 B 35.9 D 2 West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signal P.M. 9.0 A 3.9 A 41.5 D 8.8 A 3 West Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signal P.M. 10.1 B 18.0 B 43.0 D 24.4 C 4 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave Signal A.M. 14.3 B 6.6 A 49.4 D 13.5 B P.M. 16.3 B 7.9 A 51.2 D 17.5 B 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd & Adair St STOP P.M. 4.9 A 4.5 A 42.8 D 32.0 C 8.1 A 6 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd Signal P.M. 67.8 E 66.7 E 49.0 D 52.8 D 57.2 E 7 Lakewood Ave & Fullers Cross Rd STOP A.M. 94.7 F - - 6.4 A - P.M. 27.1 D - 8 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd STOP P.M. 8.3 A 9.6 A 9.9 A 9.4 A 9.7 A Ocoee Village Center Project Ne 5095 Page 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION The proposed development will consist of the following: ® North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 350 MF Residential Units 140 Room Hotel 20,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial ® South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 240 Townhome Units 115,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial To determine the impact of this development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics was conducted. This included the determination of the trips to be generated as well as their distribution to the area roadways. Trip Generation Trip generation rates were obtained from the loth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. As a mixed -use development, the project will generate internal trips estimated with the use of the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. Furthermore, the retail commercial uses will generate a portion of their trips from the existing traffic stream on adjacent roadways as pass -by trips. The pass -by trips were estimated with the use of data from the 31d Edition of the ITE Handbook. Subtracting the internal and pass -by trips results in new net trips to be added to the area roadways. The trip generation, internal capture and pass -by worksheets are included in Appendix A within the study methodology. Table 3 provides a summary of the trip generation for the proposed development. As can be seen the project is expected to generate 9,326 new net daily trips, 478 A.M. peak hour trips and 744 new net P.M. peak hour trips to be added to the area roadways Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 11 Table 3 Trip Generation Summary ITE Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Code Land Use Size Rate Trips Rate Enter Exit Total Rate Enter Exit Total North of Oarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Multi -Family 350 DU 7.44 2,605 0.45 36 121 157 0.51 113 67 180 310 Hotel 140 Rms 8.24 1,154 0.46 38 27 65 0.56 40 39 79 820 Retail Commercial 20 KSF 100.60 2,012 8.10 100 62 162 8.25 79 86 165 Total Trips 5,771 174 210 384 232 192 424 Internal Trips (18%) 1,039 31 38 69 42 35 77 Retail Pass -by Trips (34%) 561 28 17 45 22 24 46 New Net Trips 4.171 115 155 270 168 133 301< South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Multi -Family 240 DU 7.39 1,774 0.46 25 85 110 0.54 81 48 129 820 Retail Commercial 115 KSF 57.49 6,611 1.82 129 80 209 5.24 289 314 603 Total Trips 8,385U207 165 319 370 362 732 Internal Trips (16%) 1,34226 51 59 58 117 Retail Pass -by Trips (34%) 1,88823 60 83 89 172 New Net Trips 5,155116 208 228 215 443 Total New Net Trips 9,326271 478 396 348 744 . DU= Dwelling units, Rms=Rooms, KSF=1,000 square -feet Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment A trip distribution pattern was estimated using the currently adopted Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM). A Select Zone Analysis (SZA) was conducted by modifying the 2020 interim year model network to include a Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) representing the proposed project and the model's socio-economic data updated to reflect the proposed project buildout. The model -generated distribution is included in Appendix A within the study methodology. This distribution was reviewed for reasonableness and an adjustment was made based upon the site's access configuration and local traffic patterns. The model assigned a rather high 22% of the project trips from Clarcona-Ocoee Road to go south on Adair Street and then east to Wurst Road and A.D. Mims Road. Twelve percent of the project trips were re -assigned from Adair Street to Lakewood Avenue to go south and then east via Wurst Road and Silver Star Road. The modified distribution is illustrated in Figure 5. Utilizing this distribution, the project trips will be assigned to the study area roadways/intersections. Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 12 Ocoee Village N Project N!2 5095 Project Tripistr% t Figure 5 Ms A capacity analysis was performed for the study roadway segments and intersections based on projected traffic conditions to assess the effect of the proposed development on the surrounding transportation network at the build -out of the project in 2021. The projected traffic volumes used in the analysis consist of background traffic volumes combined with project trips. A trends analysis of the historical traffic volumes on the area roadways revealed annual growth rates ranging from -0.36% to 10.63%. An average growth rate of 5% was used in the background traffic estimation. The trends analysis charts are included in Appendix E. Roadway Segment Analysis A roadway segment analysis was performed for the study roadway segments by comparing the projected daily segment volumes with the respective capacities at the adopted LOS standard. The daily analysis is summarized in Table 4. The table shows the existing roadway segments along with their existing daily volumes combined with background traffic volumes and project trips to obtain total segment volumes. The results of the analysis show that the study roadway segments will continue to operate at satisfactory LOS in the projected conditions, except for the segment of Ocoee -Apopka Road which is projected to operate at Level of Service "F" due to background traffic growth. The project will add zero (0) trips to this segment. Intersection Analysis To assess the projected operating conditions at the study intersections, intersection capacity analyses were conducted using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). Total peak hour traffic volumes were determined by combining existing traffic volumes with background traffic and new project trips. Figures 6(a), (b) and Figures 7(a), (b), (c) show the projected A.M. and P.M. peak hour intersection turning movements, respectively, for the study intersections and the site access driveways. Table 5 summarizes the projected intersection Levels of Service and Table 6 summarizes the projected Levels of Service for the site access driveways. Ocoee Village Center Project N!? 5095 Page 14 Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment No. of Lanes LOS Std Daily Capacity Projected Traffic Capacity Available? Backg'd*% Dist Project Trips Total Trips LOS Clarcona-Ocoee Road SR 429 to N. Lakewood Ave 4 E 39,800 20,421 27 % 2,518 22,939 C Yes N.Lakewood Ave to Ingram Rd 4 E 39,800 15,664 32% 2,984 18,648 C Yes Lakewood Avenue SR 438 to Rewis St 2 E 17,700 10,235 14% 1,306 11,541 C Yes Rawls St to Wurst Rd 2 E 17,700 4,286 14 % 1,306 5,592 C Yes Wurst Rd to Fuller's Cross Rd 2 E 17,700 6,018 21 % 1,958 7,977 C Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 E 17,700 6,788 41 % 3,824 10,612 C Yes Ocoee -Apopka Road Demastus Ln to Fuller's Cross Rd 2 E 17,700 10,882 7% 653 11,535 C Yes Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd 2 E 17,700 18,822 0 % 0 18,822 F No West Rd to McCormick Rd 2 E 17,700 14,275 8 % 746 15,021 C Yes Wurst Road Lakewood Ave to Adair St 2 D 14,800 6,186 7 % 653 1 6,839 j C Yes Adair St to A.D. Mims Rd 2 D 14,800 6,325 13 % 1,212 7,537 1 D Yes A.D. Mims Road Wurst Rd to Clarke Rd 2 E 1 15,600 6,900 10 % 933 7,833 1 D Yes West Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to SR 429 4 D 32,400 10,615 12% 1,119 11,734 C Yes Adair Street Wurst Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 D 14,800 4,607 1 10 % 1 933 5,540 C Yes Fuller's Cross Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Lakewood Ave 2 E 17,700 7,667 20/ 1,865 9,532 C Yes Ingram Road McCormick Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2 F D T14,800 3,326 1 2 % 1 187 3,512 C Yes * Background traffic = Existing X 1.15 Ocoee Village Center Project Ne 5095 Page 15 Ocoee Village Center N Project Ns 5095 A.M.Projected a r .� _ _ Y �` Figure 6(a) Traffic Volumes Is 0 �o L122+(20)=142 0a-Of Access 5 L rn O rn N I I O N O N N o L 0 400+(62)=462 Access.,6 co N 11 1 t t � ' O dLD ' Il- tS7 m d I I I^ N O N d d' t + (0 N r7 0 'Ij` 0 (15) Fuller's Cross Rd 113+(37)=150 Access 7 0+(4)=4 =� 100 odd' t N N N` Q O d' + 0; 0 o N Legend: ooa +[000j + (000) = 000 LTotal Traffic Project Trips Pass -by Trips Background Traffic N Ocoee Village Center Projected A.M.Hour Projure 6�) ect Ns 5095 � Figb Traffic Volumes NT, CTI) h Y h o O Lo E III II a' m N o v to Lo N � � + co C°LO N a N 198+(28)=226 J L J 208+(14)=222 237 Rd 669+(42)=711 359+(45)=404 52 West 603+(48)=651 143 110+(16)=126 45 rncoco o cm m co a � z O O s N r M CO 14 867+(87)=954 59 84+(7)=91 �— 788+(87)=875 54 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd. � � 7 16 ' Clarcona-ocoeeRd: (� 473+(56)=529 —)> 884+(77)=961 h N 181+(35)=216 h co N � II N O � +� CD O m 9 a O O O h co °o o ^cov _ m N ° o 33 267+(42)=309 r ++ L 81+(28)=109 3 115 ILA 58+(28)=86 , Pullet's Cross Rd 8 r� Wurs[ Rd 360 7 7 ro r N co <t (o �— it h N 0 IIf N N t O � + I` * Refer to Figure 8b/c for intersectionsOandO Legend: 000 +[000) + (000) = 000 ��=To I. Triip Project Trips Pass -by Trips Background Traffic Ocoee Village Center N Projected P.M. Peak Hour. „ . Project NL) 5095 Traffic umes N .................. Figure 7(a) N d U U Q U U 0y, W U U C2 0: (O it rt N: a= h + �N + 00 (30) [5]+(34)=39 Jv L' �— 822-[50]+(23)=795 u 477 334][ [10]+ 14 -24 ( )- �— 919-[3]+(86)=1,002 `• r� 5+ + (15)(2) -*— 1,161-[10]+(113)=1,264 vw r� —� 991-[16]+(86)=1,061 —� [16]+(21)=37 I.. Q 8+[2]+(33)=43 C71+(37)_44 _—J 1,146-[12]+(5)+(84)=1,223—� I121+(17)=29 0 ti 124+(18)=142 _ � II C\J � t�ij N v I I 6 C2 c0 Qi, + N m 0 3 N m � m J co U Q �1,146-[5]+(98)=1,239—> [5]+(5)=10 �Tr 0 (V I I V � d � Legend: 000 +[000] + (000) = 000 Total Traffic Project Trips Pass -by Trips Background Traffic .- Ocoee Village Center N Project N2 5095 Projected a (, r d, J_ Figure 7(b) Traffic i S Ws It o L 0 (26) A' Access 5 cue � c� N I I CO N t CO V' O L 0 411+(100)=511 Access fi o co ti(Y) r� l^ co N I -O Ch cCi N 11 11 co c7 t co 00 N to (9 CO 00 N N 'r O 0 Fuller's Cross Rd 217+(66)=283 a' Access 7 (14) 93 m ro i O N f N LD 0 mLegend: O 000 +[000] + (000) = 000 L� Total Traffic Project Trips Pass -by Trips Background Traffic N Ocoee Village Center Projected P.M. (> r _ Project Ns 5095 Traffic VolumesN Figure 7(c) Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Int# Intersection Control Time Period EB WB NB SB Overall DelayLOS DelayLOS DelayLOS DelayLOS Delay L05 1 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & West Rd Signal PM 72.2 E 65.1 E 25.6 C 20.6 C 39.7 D 2 West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signal PM 11.7 B 5.9 A - - 41.1 D 10.8 B 3 West Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signal PM 13.9 B 26.7 C 44.3 D - - 29.3 C 4 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave Signal AM 28.3 C 23.0 C 68.4 E 78.4 E 31.9 C PM 38.6 D 29.5 C 62.6 E 79.4 E 39.8 D 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd & Adair St STOP PM 8.6 A 7.6 A 38.4 D 27.7 C 11.0 B 6 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd Signal PM 102.2 F 25.4 C 66.7 E 70.1 E 68.9 E 7 Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd STOP AM ** F 174.2 F 7.9 A - - - PM F 29.9 D 3.8 A - - - - 8 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd AWSC PM 9.2 A 11.6 B 13.7 B 12.2 B 12.6 B ** Delay exceeds 300s Table 6 Projected Site Access Capacity Analysis Intersection Access Type Time Period EB WB NB SB Delay LOS Dela LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Access 1 @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out AM - - - - - - 14.3 B PM _ _ _ _ _ _ 12.7 B Access 2 @Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out AM - - - - 16.0 C - - PM _ _ _ _ 14.8 B - - Access 3 @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out AM - - - - 15.2 C - - PM - _ _ _ 15.1 C - - Access 4A @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out AM - - - - 15.2 C -- --C PM -- -- -- -- 14.7 B -- -- Access 4B @ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Right In/Out AM -- -- -- -- -- -- 18.1 C PM _ _ _ _ __ __ 16.6 C Access 5 @ Lakewood Ave Full AM - - 11.0 B - - - - PM - - 9.4 A - - - - Access 6 @ Lakewood Ave Full AM - - 41.7 E - - - - PM - - 36.0 E - - - - Ocoee Village Center Project Ne 5095 Page 21 Table 7 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis (with Improvements) Int# Intersection Control Time Period EB WB NB SB Overall Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Ocoee -Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd Signal P.M. 73.5 E 26.6 C 66.7 E 70.1 E 62.3 E 7 Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd AWSC A.M. 17.1 C 11.8 B 34.4 D 27.1 D 27.3 D P.M. 27.7 D 11.4 B 23.1 C 17.7 C 21.9 C The analysis shows that all intersections will operate at satisfactory overall Levels of Service when project trips are added except for the following intersection approaches: ® Eastbound approach at Ocoee -Apopka Road/Fuller's Cross Road intersection — This approach is projected to operate at Level of Service F due to heavy eastbound left turns and heavy southbound right turns. The project is adding zero (0) traffic to these movements. ® Eastbound (A.M./P.M.) and westbound (A.M.) approaches at the Lakewood Avenue/ Fuller's Cross Road intersection — The intersection approaches are projected to operate at Level of Service "F" due to high expected background volumes as well as the addition of'project trips. According to the City, improvements are funded at the Ocoee -Apopka Road and Fuller's Cross Road intersection. The improvements consist of adding right and left turn lanes on all four approaches of the intersection. These improvements are to be implemented within the next year. In order to mitigate this Level of Service deficiency at the Lakewood Avenue and Fuller's Cross Road intersection it is recommended that the intersection be improved with an All -Way Stop Control and the addition of a southbound right turn lane. These improvements are expected to address the existing deficiencies as well as deficiencies expected as a result of adding project trips. Reanalyzing this intersection with these improvement results in satisfactory Levels of Service, as shows in Table 7. Detailed printouts of each intersection capacity analysis are included in Appendix F. Ocoee Village Center Project N2 5095 Page 22 Turn Lane Analysis The site will be served by five right in/out driveways on Clarcona-Ocoee Road in addition to the full access at the signalized intersection opposite Lakewood Avenue. On Lakewood Avenue, the site will be served by two full access driveways in addition to the full access opposite Fuller's Cross Road. A right turn lane is required and should be provided at the eastbound approach of the Clarcona- Ocoee Road/Lakewood Avenue intersection. The length of the right turn lane is recommended to be 395 feet based on deceleration distance dictated by FDOT Index 301 plus queue length from the HCS analysis. The length of the existing left turn lanes at the Clarcona-Ocoee Road/Lakewood Avenue signalized intersection were evaluated to check their adequacy to serve the project trips at project buildout as follows: Total Turn Lane Length Required = Vehicular Deceleration Distance + Queue Length Deceleration Distance: 185 ft (Based on FDOT Index 301 and 45 mph speed limit) Queue Length: Based on HCS output Total TL Length (EBL) = 185' + 3.9 veh* 25 fUveh = 282.5' Total TL Length (WBL) = 185' + 13.7 veh * 25 fUveh = 527.5' The length of existing eastbound and westbound left turn lanes at this intersection are 285 ft and 315 ft, respectively. Therefore, the existing eastbound left turn lane length is adequate to serve the proposed project trips and will not need to be extended. The westbound left turn lane length will need to be extended to serve the project trips. Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 23 This traffic analysis was performed to assess the impact of the proposed Ocoee Village Center development in the City of Ocoee, Florida. The project is located on Lakewood Avenue/Clarcona- Ocoee Road immediately to the east of SR 429. The proposed development consists of 350 multi- family residential units, 140 room hotel and 20,000 square -feet of retail on the north side of Clarcona- Ocoee Road, and 240 townhome units and 115,000 square -feet of retail on the south side of Clarcona- Ocoee Road. Access to the site will be provided via access driveways on both Lakewood Avenue and Clarcona-Ocoee Road. The results of the study as documented herein are summarized below: ® The proposed development will generate a daily traffic volume of 9,326 new net daily trips of which 478 will occur in during the A.M. peak hour and 744 will occur during the P.M. peak hour. ® The study roadway segments currently operate at satisfactory Levels of Service. These roadway segments will continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service in the projected conditions, except for the segment Ocoee -Apopka Road from Fuller's Cross Road to West Road. The daily capacity of this segment will be exceeded due to background traffic growth. The project will not be adding any trips to this segment. ® The study intersections are currently operating at satisfactory Levels of Service except for the eastbound approach of the STOP -controlled intersection of Lakewood Avenue and Fuller's Cross Road, which currently operates at Level of Service "F" during the A.M. peak hour. ® The study intersections are projected to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service at the project buildout (2021) except for the eastbound approach at Ocoee -Apopka Road/Fuller's Cross Road intersection and the eastbound (A.M./P.M.) and westbound (A.M.) approaches at the Lakewood Avenue/Fuller's Cross Road Intersection. Re -analyzing these intersections with funded/ frecommended improvements yield satisfactory Levels of Service. These improvements include (a) implementing the funded right/left turn lanes at Ocoee-Apopka/Fuller's Cross Road and (b) converting the Two -Way Stop Control intersection of Lakewood Avenue/Fuller's Cross Road to an All -Way Stop Control and adding a southbound right turn lane and (b) adding an eastbound left turn lane at the Ocoee -Apopka Road/Fuller's Cross Road intersection. ,y Ocoee Village Center Project Ns! 5095 Page 24 ® At the Clarcona-Ocoee Road/Lakewood Avenue intersection, the length of the existing westbound left turn lane should be increased and an eastbound separate right turn lane added as documented herein. Ocoee Village Center Project Ns 5095 Page 25 �- r Methodology Memorandum and Correspondence The following is our response to the City's review comments dated 08-28-18 concerning the Traffic Impact Study for the above -referenced project. The comment is listed in bold followed by the response. Trip Generation Please update Table 1 — Trip Generation Summary in the forthcoming TIA as follows: 1. Include an AM peak hour trip generation summary. 2. Verify the trips shown for the Multi -Family north of Clarcona-Ocoee. The rates appear consistent with latest ITE procedure, but the trips shown do not correspond with the rates shown. Update internal capture spreadsheet accordingly. Response: The A.M. peak hour analysis was included in the traffic study. Table 1 — Trip Generation Summary appearto have the number of units of the Multi -Family mistyped. The correct proposed number of multi- family units north of Clarcona-Ocoee is 350 dwelling units. The trip generation summary corresponds to the correct number of unit and therefore doesn't need to be revised. The internal capture worksheet also contains the correct proposed number of multi -family units. The typo in Table 1 will be addressed within the traffic study. Study Area Please update Table 1 — Significance Analysis in the forthcoming TIA as follows: 3. Due to recent roadway network improvements in the project area, some oof the roadway segmentation in the City's Concurrency Management System (CMS) spreadsheet should be updated in the TIA, as follows: • Update Clarcona-Ocoee Road (Fuller's Cross Road to West Road) to Clarcona-Ocoee Road (SR 429 to N. Lakewood Avenue). Refer to Orange County Station 454.9 for count data. • Update Clarcona-Ocoee Road (West Road to Ingram Road) to Clarcona-Ocoee Road (N. Lakewood Avenue to Ingram Road). Refer to Orange County Station 70.0 for count data. • Update Clarcona-Ocoee Road (Fuller's Cross Road to West Road) to Lakewood Avenue (Fuller's Cross Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road). Refer to Orange County Station 66.1 for count data. • Update West Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road) to West Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to SR 429). Refer to Orange County Station 2024 for count data. TPD# 5095 October 21, 2018 Response to Traffic Study Methodology Review Comments October21, 2018 Ocoee Village Center TPD 5095 ® Update Fuller's Cross Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to Clarcona-Ocoee Road) to Fuller's Cross Road (Ocoee -Apopka Road to Lakewood Avenue). Derive daily volumes from turning movement counts at the intersection of Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road and a standard K-factor. ® Verify the number of lanes on each segment analyzed in the table. For example, West Road is a 4-lane roadway. Update capacities accordingly. Response: The roadway segments were updated as per the comment and included in the traffic study. The number of lanes on the study roadway segments were verified and capacities were adjusted were applicable. 4. The following intersections should be included in the TIA for PM peak hour analysis: ® Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Adair Street ® Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue ® SR 429 & West Road Ramps ® West Road & Ocoee -Apopka Road ® Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road ® Lakewood Avenue & Wurst Road ® Ocoee -Apopka Road & Fuller's Cross Road ® Project Accesses Response: The intersections above were included in the traffic study PM peak hour intersection analysis. 5. The following intersections should be included in the TIA for AM peak hour analysis due to area school traffic: ® Clarcona-Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue ® Lakewood Avenue & Fuller's Cross Road ® Project Accesses Response: The intersections above were included in the traffic study AM peak hour intersection analysis. 6. A map depicting the study area segments and intersections should be included in the TIA. Consider numbering the intersections for easy reference between figures, tables, and Synchro/HCS outputs. Please provide figures showing turning movements volumes in the TIA to reduce review time. Response: The comment was addressed in the traffic study. Response to Traffic Study Methodology Review Comments October21, 2018 Ocoee Village Center TPD 5095 Study Procedures 7. For any deficiencies identified in the TIA, identify mitigation strategies that would provide adequate service volumes capacity on study area roadways, intersections, and access points at Future Buildout of the project. Provide analysis showing these strategies are effective. Include proportionate share calculations for identified strategies if currently unfunded. Response: The comment was addressed in the traffic study. TO: Michael Rumer, MPA City of Ocoee, FL r� FROM: Turgut Dervish, P.E. r DATE: August 21, 2018 RE: TIA Methodology: Ocoee Village Center TPD Nq 5095 The following information on trip generation/distribution and study roadways/intersections is provided for your review and approval prior to the submittal of the traffic study for the above - referenced project: Proposed Development The proposed development consists of a mixed -use project consisting of residential, hotel and retail commercial uses. The site is located on Lakewood Avenue/Clarcona-Ocoee Road immediately to the east of SR 429. Figure 1 depicts the project's site location and its one -mile impact area. Access to the site will be provided via access driveways on both Lakewood Avenue and Clarcona-Ocoee Road. Figure 2 is a conceptual site plan of the development which consists of: ® North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 350 MF Residential Units 140 Room Hotel 20,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial ® South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 240 Townhome Units 115,000 Sq Ft Retail Commercial Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. 535 Versailles Drive, Maitland, Florida 32751 ® Phone (407) 628-9955 ® Fax (407) 628-8850 a wvvw.tpdtraffic.com Ocoee Village N Project Ns 5095 Project Location Map� Figure 1 Nrs mow- f 1 .� UC,L(( nx f rf 1 Cm3 ° 1 eta N Ocoee Village Project Ne 5095 Site lan IV Figure 2 "rs Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology August 21, 2018 TPD No. 5095 Page 4 Trip Generation Utilizing data from the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the project's trip generation was calculated as summarized in Table 1. As a mixed -use development, the project will generate internal trips estimated with the use of the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. Furthermore, the retail commercial uses will generate a portion of their trips from the existing traffic stream on adjacent roadways as pass -by trips. Subtracting the internal and pass -by trips results in new net trips to be added to the area roadways. The project is expected to generate 9,326 new net daily trips and 744 new net P.M. peak hour trips to be added to the area roadways. The trip generation, internal capture and pass -by worksheets are included in Attachment A. Table 1 Trip Generation Summary ITE Code I Land Use Size Daily Generation P.M. Peak Hour Generation Rate I Trips Rate Enter Exit Total North of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Multi -Family 330 Units 7.44 2,605 0.51 113 67 180 310 Hotel 140 Rms 8.24 1,154 0.56 40 39 79 820 Retail Commercial 20 KSF* 100.62 2,012 8.25 79 86 165 Total Trips 5,771 ----- 232 192 424 Internal Trips (18%) 1,039 ----- 42 35 77 Pass -by Trips (34%) 561 ----- 22 24 46 New Net Trips 4,171 ----- 168 133 301 South of Clarcona-Ocoee Road 220 Town Homes 240 Units 7.39 1,774 0.54 81 48 129 820 Retail Commercial 115 KSF* 57.49 6,611 5.24 289 314 603 Total Trips 2,385 ---- 370 362 732 Internal Trips (16%) 1,342 ---- 59 58 117 Pass -by Trips (34%) 1,888 ---- 83 89 172 New Net Trips 5,155 ---- 228 215 413 Total New Net Trips i.9,326 ---- 396 348 744 *KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology August 21, 2018 TPD No. 5095 Page 5 Trip Distribution A trip distribution pattern was estimated using the currently adopted Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM). A Select Zone Analysis (SZA) was conducted by modifying the 2020 interim year model network to include a Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) representing the proposed project and the model's socio-economic data updated to reflect the proposed project buildout. The model -generated distribution is included in Attachment B. This distribution was reviewed for reasonableness and an adjustment was made based upon the site's access configuration and local traffic patterns. The model assigned a rather high 22% of the project trips from Clarcona-Ocoee Road to go south on Adair Street and then east to Wurst Road and A D Mims Road. Twelve percent of the project trips were re -assigned from Adair Street to Lakewood Avenue to go south and then east via Wurst Road and Silver Star Road. The modified distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. Utilizing this distribution, the project trips will be assigned to the study area roadways/intersections. Study Area Roadway Segments The City's current TIA methodology guidelines require that the extent of the impact area include all road segments that fall within one -mile of the project site and all roadways with a trip generation of more than 5% of the maximum service volume outside of the one -mile radius. To determine the traffic impact area for this project, a significance test was conducted as summarized in Table 2. Based upon the significance test, the highlighted segments shown in the table will be evaluated as part of the study. These segments include those within one mile and those outside of one mile where project trips consume more than 5% of the segment's capacity. Intersections The following intersections are proposed to be included in the analysis: • Clarcona-Ocoee Road and West Road ® SR 429 and West Road Ramps ® West Road and Ocoee -Apopka Road ® Lakewood Avenue and Wurst Road ® Project Entrances uO (1) M C))o cu LO = of Z M i N � � O.o � O a iL Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology August 21, 2018 TPD No. 5095 Page 7 Roadway Segment Clarcona-Ocoee Road _ Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd West Rd to Ingram Rd Ingram Rd to Clarke Rd Lakewood Avenue SR 438 to Rewis St Rewis St to Wurst Rd Wurst Rd to Fuller's Cross Rd Ocoee -Apopka Road SR 438 to Demastus Ln Demastus Ln to Fuller's Cross Rd Fuller's Cross Rd to West Rd West Rd to McCormick Rd Wurst Road Lakewood Ave to Adair St Adair St to A.D. Mims Rd A.D. Mims Road Wurst Rd to Clarke Rd Clarke Rd to Apopka -Vineland Rd West Road Ocoee -Apopka to Clarcona-Ocoee Adair Street Wurst Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR 438/Silver Star Road Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Bluford Ave Bluford Ave to Ocoee -Hills Rd Ocoee -Hills Rd to Clarke Rd Fuller's Cross Road Ocoee -Apopka to Clarcona-Ocoee Ingram Road McCormick Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Highest Distribution on the Segment Table 2 Significance Analysis Adopted Lns Daily LOS LOS Ca acit 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 4 E 39,800 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 E 17.700 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 D 14,800 2 D 14.800 2 E _ 15,600 2 E 15,600 2 D 14,800 2 D 14.800 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 E 17,700 2 D 14,800 Daily Project Trips Trip Distribution* Volume 41% 3,824 32% 2,974 16% 1,492 14% 1,306 14% 1,306 21% 1,958 7% 653 7% 653 0% 0 8% 746 7% 653 13% 1,212 10% 933 8% 746 27% 2,518 10% 933 2% 187 8% 746 8% 746 20% 1,865 2% 186 Project Trip as % of Capacity Significant at 5% Level? 21.60% Yes 16.86% Yes 3.75% No 7.38% No 7.38% No 11.06% No 3.69% No 3.69% No 0.00% No 4.21% No 4.41 % No 8.19% Yes 5.98% Yes 4.78% No 17.01% Yes 6.30% J Yes 1.06% No 4.21% No 4.21% No 10.54%7 Yes 1.26% No Ocoee Village Center TIA Methodology August 21, 2018 TPD No. 5095 Page 8 Study Procedures The procedures contained in the City's Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Outline will be followed in the preparation of the traffic study which will involve: ® Roadway Segment Analysis — The study roadways will be analyzed for existing and projected conditions by comparing the daily traffic volumes on the segments with the corresponding capacities at the adopted LOS. ® Intersection Analysis — The intersections will be analyzed for existing and projected conditions during the P.M. peak hour utilizing HCS and/or Synchro Software. ® Existing daily traffic volumes will be obtained from the City, County and FDOT as available. Existing P.M. peak hour volumes will be collected in the field during the 4-6 P.M. peak hour and adjusted as per FDOT seasonal factors. Projected traffic volumes will be determined by combining background traffic with project trips. Background traffic will be estimated by applying growth factors determined from historical trends analysis of daily traffic volumes on the study roadways. ® Access Driveway Analysis — The proposed driveway will be evaluated with respect to overall geometry, turn lanes and traffic controls. ® Traffic Report — A traffic report will be prepared summarizing the study procedures, analyses and results. ATTACHMENT A Trip Generation Sheets Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 29 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 168 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.32 4.45 - 10.97 1,31 Data Plot and Equation 5,000 X 4,000 X m X W 3,000 a F II 2,000 X X X X X 1,000 X XX 00 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 Rl= 0.96 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Multifamily Housing j Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. SettinglLocation: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 50 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 187 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle Trip Veneration per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.56 0.18 - 1.25 0.16 Data Plot and Equation 50 a w a 300 n F- 200 100 0 0 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - 0.02 R2= 0.86 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers cHotel (310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 6 Avg. Num. of Rooms: 146 Directional Distribution: 50% enterinq, 50% exiting /ehicle Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.36 5.31 - 9.53 1.86 2,500 2,000 a W ❑. 1,500 F-- 11 F- 1,000 500 00 X _ _. t.. r , I 1 I � I I X Xj- 100 150 X = Number of Rooms X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 11.29(X) - 426.97 50 2uu 2bU JUL - - - - Average Rate R2= 0.92 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 28 Avg. Num. of Rooms: 183 Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip veneration per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.60 0.26 - 1.06 0.22 Data Plot and Equation 400 X 300 -No c w X F X I I X �, 200 X X 100 X X X X X X X X 00 100 200 300 400 500 X = Number of Rooms X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.75(X) - 26.02 R1= 0.80 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Shopping Center (8 0) Vehicle 'Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 147 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 453 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting venicie t rip veneration per 1000 --)q. r-t. vt_K Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.75 7.42 - 207.98 16.41 60,OOC 50,000 w 40,000 a i I ~ 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 X 'X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X - X X X XX X X X X-' XXX A - X �f X X X X X XX X Xx X X X X }<CX X X x XX� X X X X X XX X 0 500 1,000 1,500 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 R2= 0.76 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers �, • • : •TR •0 Vehicle 'Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street 'Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 261 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 327 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle 'Trip Generation per 10 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.81 0.74 - 18.69 2.04 8,000 6,000 `o c W n. F- 4,000 2,000 0( X x X X 'X ' X XX , ' X X X X, X X X,X X X X X X XX X �`-X X X X %S X XX XX . XX ' X XX X X XX ..,,nn 1-nnn 1.500 2.000 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) +2.89 R2= 0.82 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers NCHRP 684Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool Project Name: Ocoee Village/North Part Organization: TPD Project Location: Orange County Performed By: TPD Scenario Description: Full Buildout Date: 8/3/2018 Analysis Year., Projected Checked By: TPD Analysis Period: P.M. Street Peak Hour Date: 8/3/2018 Table 1-P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only) Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 ITE LUCs' Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 820 20 KSF 165 79 86 Restaurant 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 220 350 DU 179 113 66 Hotel 310 140 Rooms 84 43 41 All Other Land Uses' 0 428 235 193 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Veh. Occ.4 % Transit %Non -Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non -Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses' Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 0 0 22 4 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 8 0 0 2 Hotel 0 2 0 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Total Entering Exiting All Person -Trips 428 235 193 Internal Capture Percentage 18% 16% 20% External Vehicle-TripsS 352 197 155 External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 External Non -Motorized Tri ss o 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office N/A N/A Retail 13 % 30% Restaurant N/A N/A Cinema/Entertainment N/A NIA Residential 19 % 15 Hotel 14 o 'Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 'Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non -motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual). 'Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed -use project, manual adjustments must be 5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P. 6Person-Trips *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 NCHRP 684Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool Project Name: Ocoee Village/South Part Organization: TPD Project Location: Orange County Performed By: TPD Scenario Description: Full Buildout Date: 8/21/2018 Analysis Year: Projected Checked By: TPD Analysis Period: P.M. Street Peak Hour Date: 8/21/2018 Table 1-P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only) Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 ITE LUCs' Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 820 115 KSF 603 289 314 Restaurant 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 220 240 DU 130 82 48 Hotel 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 733 371 362 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non -Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non -Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses2 Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Origin (From) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 0 0 38 0 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 20 0 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Total Entering Exiting All Person -Trips 1733 371 362 Internal Capture Percentage 16% 16% 16% External Vehicle-Trips5 617 313 304 External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 External Non -Motorized Tri s' 0 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office NIA N/A Retail 7% 12% Restaurant N/A N/A Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A Residential 46% 42% Hotel N/A N/A 'Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 'Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non -motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual). 'Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. if vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed -use project, manual adjustments must be SVehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P. 'Person -Trips *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 ATTACHMENT B Trip Distribution N `O ti n O Ln O 0 Ln � O � 0 Ln 0 9 0 g °� 0 0 � T 0 0 0 0 T J 0 0. U 1 T T T 1 0 0 0Ln rn 0 � 0 0 o �� m o 4-1 'U 0 0 0 o D c 0 00 0 0 u Q p a p C T O o 0 2 ° o 0 1 0 a 0 0 0 Om ° o N 10 1 U O 0 8T oD Z 0 o-m 3 3 0 Z o o x rc3 � � a 0 O T O C� M O O° O N 3 p Ln rn m o o aD m o £ 22--EL 19 0 y o i ai 2 0 0 0 J 3 Z 00T ° NI o u D \`� T 0 a c � CD Q o O O C\ \ N 2 N 0' g yD�1 `'Z 28 9H 9 4 o ti N o mIL 20 1-1• .n v G� N / � 0 8 0 ° °k / p > 2 o L o 70 7 7 6 LL o O o O o ON 0 £I Ln 0 13J o £T CLnL o L L U Ln O 0 o m 2 £ IC, Ln F' 0 0 0 �'0 o D m m 0 z 2 0 o � �- � C171�I[.9�f1�� TABLE 1 OCOEE ROAD CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Traffic Volumes and Capacities by Road Segments Overall Summary Last Updated: 4/2512013 tZoadway Segment Limits Adopted No. of Jurlsdictlon Daily Volumes (VPD) FDOT LOS Capacities Capacity (VPD) Segment (From -To) LOS Lanes Existing Vested Comhlned 2012 Numerical Minus Minus °/, Used %Available %Used /Available 20 12 Counts LOS Ad) LOSThreshold Existing Comhlned Existing Existing Combined Combined Community Development Department Planning Division 112 TABLE 1 OCOEE ROAD CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Traffic Volumes and Capacities by Road Segments Overall Summary Last Updated: 4/25/2013 Roadway Segment Limits Adopted No. of Jurisdiction Daily Volumes (VPD) FDOT LOS Capacities Capacity (VPD) Segment (From To) Los Lanes Existing Vested Combined 2012 NjTh Minus Minus %Used %Available %Used %Available 2012 Counts LOS Ad) LOS Existing Combined Existing Existing Combined Combined Hem le Ave/Citrus Oaks Ave E 4 Ocoee 22,683 259 22,952 39,800 10% 13127 12,868 53% 37% 64% 36Cihus Oaks Ave/Good Homes Rd E 4 FDOT 23,D78 - 23,078 39,800 10% 12,742 64% 36% 64% 36% Orlando Ave Bluford Ave to Mont ome Ave 4,405 52 4,457 14,50D 10% 5,915 5,863 33% 67% 33% 67.Rewis St Lakewood Ave/Flewellin St D 2 FDOT 1,071 21 1,092 14,800 10% 12,249 12,228 8% 92% 8% 92% Raher-Rd Windermere Rd/Ma uire Rd D 2 Omn eCo. 11,640 1,180 12,820 17,700 10% 4290 3,110 73% 27% 80% 20 Russell Dr Flewellin St�llow Creek Rd D 2 FDOT 1,131 - 1,131 14,800 10% 12,189 12.189 8A 92% 8% 92% S.R.438(Silverstar Road) E. Crown Point Rd/SR 429 E 2 FDOT 15,700 1,414 17,114 17,700 5% 16,815 1,115 299) 93% 7% 102% -2% SR 429/Bowness Rd E 2 FDOT 12,700 1,414 14,114 17,700 5% 16,e15 4,115 2,701 76% 24% 84% 16% Bowness Rd/Ocoee-A o ka Rd E 2 FDCT 12,700 2,140 --- 14,840 17,70D 5% 16,815 4,115 1,975 76% 24% 88% 12% Ocoee -A o ka Rd/Bluford Ave E 2 FDOT 14,000 16,548 17,70D 5% 16,815 2,815 267 83% 17% 95% 2% Bluford AvelOcoee-Hills Rd E 2 FDOT 16,500 712 17,212 17,700 5% 16,815 315 1397 95% 2% 102% -2% Ocoee -Hills Rd/Clarke Rd E 2 FDOT 16,500 344 16,844 17,700 5% 15,815 315 29 98% 2% 10D% 0% Clarke Rd/Johio Shores Rd E 4 FDOT 21,500 153 21,653 390800 0% 39,800 18,300 18,147 54% 46% 54% 46% Johio Shores RdlG_ood Homes Rd E 4 FDOT 25,500 398 25,BB8 39,800 0% 39,800 14,300 13,902 64% 36% 65% 35% .R. 50 (West Colonial Dr, 9th St/ SR 429 D 4 FDOT 44,000 952 44,962 49,900 art Ian 49,900 5,900 4,918 88% 12% 90% 10% SR 429/ Marshall Farms Rd D 4 FDOT 44,000 2,941 46.941 49,900 artlan 49,900 5,900 2,969 B8% 12% 94% 6% Marshall Farms Rd/Ma uire Rd D 4 FDOT 32,500 3,181 35,681 49.900 artlan 49,90D 17,400 14,219 65% 35% 72% 2fl% Ma uire Rd/Bluford Ave D 4 FDCT 32,500 1,936 34,436 49,900 artIan 49,900 17,400 15464 65% 35% 69% 31% Bluford Ave/Blackwood Ave D 4 FOOT 34,000 1,194 35,194 54,300 artIan 54,300 20,300 19,106 63% 37% 65% 35% Blackwood Ave/Clarke Rd D 4 FDOT 34,000 1,274 35,274 54,300 art Ian 54,300 20,300 19,026 63% 37% 65% 35% Clarke Rd/Good Homes Rd D 4 FDOT 27,500 622 28,122 54,30,0 art Ian 54,300 26,800 26,178 51% 49% 52% 48% Good Homes Rd/ A o ka-Vineland Rd D 4 FDOT 27000 186 27,186 54,300 art Ian 54,300 27,300 27,114 50% 50% 50% 501 Story Rd 9th SU SR 429 E 2 Ocoee 9,770 194 9,964 171700 10% 15,930 6,160 5,966 61% 39% 63% 37% SR 429/Kissimmee Ave E 2 Ocoee 9,770 206 9.976 17,700 10% 15.930 6,160 5,954 61% 39% 63% 37% Taylor St Franklin SUM.k.v St C 2 Ocoee 8,800 121 8,921 14,800 10% 13,320 4,520 4,389 66% 34% 67% 33% Tomyn Blvd Roberston Rd/Warrior Rd D 2 FDOT 5,610 80 5,690 17,700 10% 15,930 10,320 10,240 351/. 55% 36% 64% Warrior Rd/Ma uire Rd D 2 FDCT 5,403 449 5,852 17,770 10% 15,993 10,590 10,141 34% 66% 37% 63% West Rd Cccee-A o ka Rd/ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd D 2 Orange Co. 3,941 - 3,941 14,800 10% 13,320 9,379 9,379 30% 70% 30% White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Mont ome Rd/ Clarke 2 Oran e Co. 6,602 7 6,609 14,800 10% 13,320 6,718 6,711 50% 50% 5D%Clarke Rd/Good Homes !R�,�D 2 Oran e Co. 6,734 4 6738 14,800 10% 13,320 6,586 6,582 51 % 49% 51 % Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave/Adair St 2 Oran eCo. 5,147 10 5,15714,80010% 13,32D a,173 8, 163 39% 61% 39% 14.5 AdairSt/AD. Mims Rd 2 Oran eCo. 10,975 472 11,447 14,800 10% 13,320 2,345 1,873 82% 18A 85% Community Development Department Planning Division 212 1.._`rW I e Intersection Volumes/FDOT Factors and Signal Timings 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 .............. Ocoee Apopka Rd ............... .. .................. ........................................................................................................... Ocoee Apopka Rd ........................... West Rd West Rd TIME � NORTH SOUTHBOUND N/S ............... .................................................. EASTBOUND .................... - ................. ........................... ..................... WESTBOUND E/W GRAND BEGIN L . T R U-turn _I TOTAL L T R I U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L I T I R I turn TOTAL L I T R U-turn TOTAL TOTALI TOTAL 04:00 PM— 22 63 5 0 90 29 125 19 0 173 263 30 37 29 5 101 5 25 20 0 50 151 414 04:1 5 PM 19 58 10 0 87 25 1E 2-0 0 167 254 31 45 354 j29 117 7 32 27 0 66 183 437 04:30 PM 26 --40 65 10 0 101 32 --TS7 142 ----6 22 0 16 297 32 42 E6 10 113 10 32 20 0 62 175 472 04:45 PM 91 7 0 138 20 30 — ;'O� 17 345 34 — 46 0 30 6 116 6 42 22 0 70 186 531 TOTAL 107 277 32 0 416 106 546 91 0 743 1,159 127 170 123 27 447 28 131 89 0 248 695 1,854 05:00 PM 33 so 5 0 118 19 143 31 0 193 311 63 46 34 5 148 7 40 9 0 56 204 515 05:15 PM 34 87 3 0 124 25 162 31 0 218 342 37 35 32 10 114 15 36 23 0 74 198 530 05:30 PM 35 66 14 0 115 27 136 21 0 184 299 24 35 42 6 107 12 34 23 0 69 176 475 05:45 PM 33 68 11 0 112 36 132 25 0 193 305 37 38 40 12 127 14 44 13 0 71 198 S03 TOTAL 135 301 33 0 469 1 107 573 108 1 087 0 0 788 1,257 161 154 148 33 496 48 154 — 68 0 270 766 - --j - 2,023 PM Peak — -- — --- — Peak Hour Factor: 0.966 04:45 PM to .,F142 05:45 P 4T29 0 F495 T 91 F598 T 1137 1 112 1 1 1 i i 162 138 11 11, 485 40 152 0 269 F��T2,051 SouthbounR J\JUl Ll I PM 1 113 598 91 0 ........................... v y L-T 0 PM ..... 77.......... 152 West Rd v _ 0 4 Z9 ............... .......................... ..................... ............. .................... ............................. q 0 27 West Rd 158 71 162 138 ........... r7 7 71 ......................... t3 0 142 324 29 j PM 1 � North ound 15 MINUTE TURNIP IOVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd West Rd ............................... ....................... .... .. ....................... ............ ................... ................... .............. ............................ ................ ......... -- .............. -- ........... LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 West Rd .............................. .................. ............. ................... TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NIS TOTAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EIW TOTAL JGRAND TOTAL L T R U-turn ITOTAL IJ L I T I R FU-turn FTo—TAdL L T R U-turn TOTAL L I T R U-turn TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 04:15 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 04:30 PM 1 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 5 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 4 9 04:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 5 TOTAL 3 5 2 0 10 0 2 2 0 4 14-- 2 3 2 0 7 0 3 1 0 4 11 25 05:00 Pm 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 5 7 05:15 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 05:30 Pm 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 S 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 1 3 0 0 4 2 3 1 0 6 10 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 6 16 PM Peak 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM LLLI��� �6 2 1 2 I 1 I 0 5 I Fil Fl T- - 0 F Fo F 3TO --71 7 S 7 0 F 6T9 T20 15 MINUTE TURNIP .10VEIVIENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: SR 429 SB Ramp & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 ..................... ................... . ..................................... .......................... SR 429 SB R amp West Rd West Rd TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S ................ EASTBOUND ............ .... .. .. .. . ... ... ... . WESTBOUND E/W BEGIN L T I R U-turnITOTAL IJ L t_ T I R I U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL L I T I R I U-turn, TOTAL L T R U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL IGRAND TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 6 0 20 20 0 90 24 - 0 114 71 118 0 0 189 303 323 04:1 S PM 0 0 0 0 0-73 EO 0 12 0 25 25 0 9-3 —27— —0 12-0 7-7 13-4 0 -- 0 211 331 356 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 10 0 27 27 0 81 27 0 108 83 135 0 0 218 326 353 04:45 PM 0 13 0 28 28 0 114 27 0 141 78 142 0 0 220 361 38 9 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL S7 0 0 100 100 0 378 1 105 0 483 309 1 529 0 0 838 1,321 1,421 05:00 PM 0 0 0 14 0 31 31 137 26 0 163 67 149 0 0 216 379 410 05:1 s PM 0 0 N0O 14 0 33 33 34 0 155 79 134 0 0 — 213 368 401 D5:30 PM 0 —0 0 —0 10 L000 15 0 35 35 33 0 170 79 140 0 0 219 389 424 OSAS PM -- 13 0 18 18 31 0 131 — 53 1 154 0 0 207 338 356 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 117 117 D 495 124 0 619 78 5 577 0 0 855 1,474 1,591 PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.958 04:45 PM to — 05:45 PM.170 127 127 0 509 120 0 629 303 565 0 0 868 1,497 1,624 Southbound L11 PM 171 0 56 0 m 1i + .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. v ----------------- PM N -------- 0 <-- 20 West Rd 4 =S 0 ............................. ........................ ............... ................. ......................... o z 0 .......... ................ West Hd �Q 0 509 -------- 120 Fm7 ----------- .. ...................... 1 0 0 0 0 PM Northbound DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) LOCATION: SR 429 SB Ramp &West Rd ......................... ............. ............... . .............. .......... . .. ........................................................ 15 MINUTE TURNIN' OVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY: Apopka COUNTY: Orange County SR429 SB Ramp West Rd ..................... .... ....................... ............................... ............................ .... ....... .............. LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 West Rd ............... ....... . .......... ........................................... TIME _BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUND N/S TOTAL[ EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E/W IGRAND TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L I T I R U-turn TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 a 9 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 5 3 0 0 8 10 12 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 5 2 0 0 7 11 11 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 6 10 11 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 9 3 0 12 20 7 0 0 27 39 43 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 3 3 2 0 0 5 8 9 05:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 3 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 7 7 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 3 i TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 5 3 0 8 7 3 0 0 10 18 20 PM Pea 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 i T 0 2 2 0 1 9 —3 —To 1 12 11 10 4 0 0 14 1 26 28 s�' 3 15 MINUTE TURNIN MOVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: SR 429 NB Ramp & West Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 -SR 429 NB Ramp................. L`........._._.....:.....-............::.... ...................................... , ........................................................................................................._:........................................................................................................... West Rd West Rd TIME L,=�PT�HBOUN�D,,, SOUTHBOUND NIS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E/W GRANDBEGIN TOTALIJ L t T R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L I T I R IU-turn TOTAL 11 L T I R I U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM 31 0 74 0 105 0 0 0 0 105 10 95 0 0 105 0 154 9 0 163 268 373 04:15 PM 53 4 89 0 146 0 0 0 0 146 6 100 D 0 106 0 1 00 16 0176 282 42804:30 PM 45 1 105 0 151 0 0 0 0 E40 151 11 88 0 0 99 0 172 8 0 180 279 43004:45 PM 47 0 88 0 135 0 0 0 0 135 11 116 0 0 127 0 172 13 0 185 312 447 TOTAL 176 5 356 0 537 0 0 0 0 0 537 38 399 0 0 437 0 658 46 0 704 1,141 1,678 05:00 PM 49 1 103 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 153 11 95 0 0 106 0 167 21 0 188 294 447 05:15 PM 46 2 89 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 137 13 100 0 0 113 0 167 17 0 184 297 434 05:30 PM 41 0 95 0 136 0 D 0 0 0 136 10 88 0 0 98 0 177 17 0 194 292 428 0545 PM 55 0 118 0 173 0 0 0 0 0 173 12 116 0 0 128 0 154 16 0 170 298 471 TOTAL 191 3 405 0 599 0 0 0 0 0 599 46 399 0 0 445 0 665 71 0 736 1,181 0 1,780 PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.945 05:00 PM to 06:OD PM 191 3 405 0 599 0 0 0 0 0 599 46 399 0 0 445 0 665 F71 TO 736 1,181 1,780 Southbound PM I' 0 0 0 0 1 ` 1 71 ^� E 665 a a West Rd - '. 4 0 0 0 o 0 ,� ............................................................................................................................... est 0 46 7 399 ._. 0 �! .............._.I I-----._._._._._._._._._._ I 0 191 3 405 1 PM Northbound DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) LOCATION: SR429 NB Ramp &West Rd ........................._SR 429 ....... ...N......B......Ramp I ....................... ............. TIME NORTHBOUND BEGIN L T 1R I U-turn TOTAL L T 15 MINUTE TURNIN ,OVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY: Apopka COUNTY: Orange County West Rd....... SOUTHBOUND N/S EASTBOUND R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L T R turn TOTAL LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 West Rd ................ .... ............................................ WESTBOUND L T T R U-turn ............ ----r I TOTAL EA/V TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 —1 0 —0 4 —3 0 —0 4 —4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 04 15 PM 0 0 0 T 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 o —6 8 12 04:30 PM 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 8 9 18 04:45 PM 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 7 11 14 TOTAL 2 0 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 8 0 0 8 0 25 2 0 27 35 55 05:00 PM 1 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 31 0 5 1 0 1 6 9 15 05:1 S PM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 D5:30 PM 3 0 0 D 0 D 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 05:45 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 0 --.. 13 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 7 2 O 9_ 17 �3E2 PM Peak —I 05:00 PM to 06:00 P;F2 0 F13T0 7 1 32 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (cars and Trucks) DATE: September 20, 2018 (Thursday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Clarcona Ocoee Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av i Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd ... . .... ....._ _........... _........ _.._ ._._. _.._.__._......__._.... L__ TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E/W GRAND L T I R I U-turn I TOTAL IJ L T I R U-turn I TOTAL L T I R I U-turn I TOTAL L I T R U-turn I TOTAL BEGIN TOTAL I TOTAL TOTAL 07:00 AM 18 0 47 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 247 30 0 277 46 295 0 0 341 618 683 07:15 AMK60 0 33 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 237 27 0 264 60 190 0 0 250 514 560 0730 AM 0 30 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 225 48 1 274 68 189 0 1 256 532 582 07:45 AM0 25 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 208 69 0 277 76 216 0 0 292 569 603 TOTAL 0 135 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 I 195 D 917 174 1 1,092 250 S90 D 1 1,141 2,233 2,428 08:00 AM 44 0 35 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 190 80 0 270 71 121 0 1 193 463 542 08— 5 AM 43 0 46 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 122 73 2 197 58 162 0 1 221 418 507 08:30 AM 27 0 44 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 113 9 1 123 49 121 0 0 170 293 364 08:45 AM 7 0 24 0 31 0 0 0 0 D 31 0 109 8 0 117 37 128 0 1 166 283 314 TOTAL 121 0 149 0 270 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 534 170 3 707 215 532 0 3 750 1,457 1,727 04:00 PM 21 0 60 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 145 21 2 168 40 141 0 0 181 349 430 04:15 PM 27 0 52 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 168 20 0 188 50 149 0 0 199 387 466 0430 PM 17 D 53 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 169 22 1 192 51 163 0 0 214 406 476 04:45 PM 16 0 50 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 185 19 0 204 40 167 0 0 2D7 411 477 TOTAL 81 0 215 0 296 D 0 0 0 0 296 D fi67 82 3 752 181 620 0 0 801 1,553 1,849 05:00 PM 18 0 66 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 179 17 1 197 56 170 0 0 226 423 507 05:15 PM 16 0 62 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 160 29 1 190 74 172 0 2 248 438 516 05:30 PM 19 0 55 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 159 24 2 185 71 175 0 2 248 433 SD7 05:45 PM 19 0 46 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 200 31 3 234 70 151 0 0 221 455 520 TOTAL 72 0 229 0 301 0 0 0 0 0 301 0 698 101 7 806 271 668 0 4 943 1,749 2,050 AM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.889 07:00 AM V, 08:00 AM 60 0 135 0 19-1 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 917 174 1 1,092 250 890 0 1 1,141 2,233 2,428 PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.986 05:00 PM to 72 1 0 1 229 1 301 0 0 0 0 0 301 0 698 101 7 806 271 666 0 4 943 1,749 2,050 06:00 PM 5outhbound I PM i 0 0 0 0 I i I AM 1 0 0 0 0 IG y y tT AM PM ___—__ E 890 668 U a 14 250 271 Clarcona Ocoee Rd i 1 4 c 7 _..... ........ _........... _..... .......... _......:......................__...._.._._....__..._._._........_._._..._...._. _-.._ Clurcona Ucoee Rd m � 0 D 71 �y 698 917 -i 101 '174 ]I _.___.—____._.__—____._ — ._._._. PM _e__._. AM ._. a ¢ P G 71 I 0 v 0 60 0 135 1 AM i o 0 72 0 229 PM North ound 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: September 20, 2018 (Thursday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Clarcona Ocoee Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd ..... ---......_._._..._........................._............. _............ _.......... .—......_........_._._........_.-..._..._._._......._.__......... ___...._._.._......_....._._. .... ........_...... TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S I TOTAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EN/ GRAND TOTAL TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R I U-turn I TOTAL FL T R IU-turn I TOTAL 11 L I T I R U-turn TOTAL 07:00 AM 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 0 10 1 12 0 0 13 23 26 07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 11 0 4 0 0 4 15 16 07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 7 D 1 0 0 1 8 9 07:45 AM 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 12 0 0 12 21 21 TOTAL 3 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 37 0 0 37 1 29 0 0 30 67 72 08:OO AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 7 0 3 0 0 3 10 12 08:15 AM 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 1 11 O 0 12 18 18 08:30 AM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 0 6 0 4 0 0 4 10 12 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 1 12 0 0 13 19 19 TOTAL 2 0 2 0 4 0 D 0 D 0 4 0 20 5 D 25 2 30 0 0 32 57 61 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 D 5 0 4 0 0 4 9 9 04:15PM 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 0 0 7 8 12 04:30 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 D 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 6 0 3 0 O 3 9 11 04:45 PM 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 10 10 TOTAL 1 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 D 20 0 0 20 2 14 0 D 16 36 42 05:00 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 5 7 05:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 D 0 4 5 7 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 2 3 0 O 5 10 10 05:45 PM 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 3 D 0 3 0 0 0 D 0 3 3 TOTAL 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 0 13 2 8 0 0 10 23 27 AM Pto 1eak ,,:00 AM 08:00 AM 3 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 D 37 0 ❑ 37 1 29 0 0 30 67 72 PM Peak osAOPMt. 06:aa PM 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 0 13 2 8 0 0 10 23 27 0 11 15 MINUTE TURNIK iOVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucics) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Adair St/West St & Clarcona Ocoee Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 ............. .............. Adair St 1 .................................... ... .... -.1 ............... ............ West St ................. ......................... .... .............................. Clarcona Ocoee Rd ................. ............... ........................ .................. Clarcona Ocoee Rd ................ ............. ........................... TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ENV GRAND BEGIN TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL L T I R U-turn TOTAL L T I R U-turn TOTAL L T I R I U-turn ITOTAL 11 -- L T R I U-turn I TOTAL 04:00 PM 14 0 4 0 18 1 1 1 0 3 21 1 163 25 1 190 10 152 4 0 166 356 377 04:1 5 PM 27 2 5 0 34 4 0 4 0 8 42 7 149 34 0 190 13 184 2 0 199 389 431 04:3 0 PM 32 0 5 0 37 3 2 6 0 11 48 2 174 36 2 214 7 188 0 0 195 409 457 04:45 PM 23 2 7 0 32 1 0 1 0 2 34 2 183 25 0 210 9 193 0 0 202 412 446 TOTAL 96 4 21 0 121 9 3 12 0 24 145 12 669 120 3 804 39 717 6 0 762 1,566 1,711 05:00 PM 27 0 13 0 40 0 1 4 0 5 45 3 206 41 1 251 16 196 1 0 213 464 509 05:15 Pm 28 2 10 0 40 1 0 2 0 3 43 5 163 34 1 203 12 187 1 0 200 403 446 05:30 PM 30 4 8 D 42 2 0 7 0 9 51 1 187 43 3 234 5 165 6 0 176 410 461 05AS PM 20 0 10 0 30 4 2 0 0 6 36 5 191 34 1 231 16 184 4 0 204 435 471 TOTAL 105 6 41 0 152 7 3 13 0 23 175 14 747 152 6 919 49 732 12 0 793 1,712 1,887 r- PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.927 05:00 PM to 06:00 P FO 5 6 41 0 152 7 3 13 0 23 175 14 747 152 6 919 49 732 12j �O793 1,712 1'8 Southbound 1\101 Ll I PM 1 13 3 7 0 + .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. LT . . . . . . . Pm . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . 732 49 Clarcona Ocoee Ro' ............ .............................. ........................ .................................................................................... - C; 0 6 ID Clarcona coee Rcl 14 71 747 .. . 1 52 .....Irv.._._._... . . 71 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 105 6 41 1 PM Northbound DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) LOCATION: Adair St/West St & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Adair St ............................ I ........................ - ............................ ........................................................................................ TIME NORTHBOUND BEGIN L T R U-turn TOTAL L T 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY: Apopka COUNTY: Orange County West St Clarcona Ocoee Rd ....... ........................................................... ..................... -.: SOUTHBOUND N/S EASTBOUND I R U-turn TOTAL L I T R U-turn ITOTAL IJ LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 Clarcona Ocoee Rd ............... - ................ .............. .............. * —*** * WESTBOUND L I T- R U-turn I ................ TOTAL E/W TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 1 5 5 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 4410 10 04:30 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 8 0 — - 0:::� 8 12 13 04:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 — 6 0 -- 0 6 0 4 0 0 4 10 12 TOTAL 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 17 1 0 18 0 19 0 0 19 37 40 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 3 3 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 5 5 O5:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 —0 0 1 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —0 —0 —0- 1 —0 —0 —1 —0 —3 —0 —0 3 4 4 TOTAL 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 13 0 6 0 0 6 19 20 PM Peak r-00 PMto 06:OD PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE, October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 .......... Ocoee Apopka Rd ...................... ............. .................. .......... .................................................................................. Ocoee Apopka Rd ............ Fuller's Cross ................................................................................. Rd Fuller's Cross Rd TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHB D OU�U�-turnTOTAL N/S EASTBOUND ....................... ............................ . .............. --- .......... WESTBOUND ........... EIAWAJ GRAND L T I R U-turn I TOTAL IJ L I T I R 1 TOTAL L I T I R I U—t-ur7nTOTAL IJ L I T I R I U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL TOTALBEGIN 04:00 PM 1 —0 96 20 0 117 . 3 63 40 0 106 1 223 60 31 �5 0 93 8 51 5 0 64 157 380 04:15 PM 108 23 0 131 6 55 7-1 0 132 72 34 0 111 14 3-1 — 32 163 426 04:30 Pm 2 99 12 0 113 4 58 66 0 128 241 67 3-1 2� 191 100 —9 4-8 — 52 162 403 04AS PM 3 115 13 0 131 7 60 57 0 124 L2663 255 86 33 1 0 0 120 53 183 438 TOTAL 6 418 68 0 492 20 236 234 0 490 982 285 129 10 0 424 38 174 29241 665 1,647 05:00 Pm 2 122 15 0 139 7 56 89 0 152 291 87 43 0 0 130 8 48 7 0 63 193 484 05:15 Pm 1 134 24 0 159 2 61 74 0 137 296 71 42 0 0 113 -17 61 4 0 82 195 491 05:30 PM 3 133 24 0 160 2 67 77 0 146 306 79 28 2 0 109 10 63 —8 —0 8-1 19-0 496 05:45 PM 1 119 30 0 150 3 64 89 0 156 306 67 30 4 0 101 14 53 9 0 76 177 483 TOTAL 7 508 93 0 608 14 248 329 0 591 1,199 304 143 6 0 453 49 225 28 0 302 755 1,954 PM Peak - Peak Hour Factor: 0.985 05:00 Pm to L6--_011 P1, 7 SOB 93 0 608 14 2,1113 329 0 1 1 1,199 304 1 1 143-T 6 0 1 453- -f 49 225 28 —FO 302 1 755 Til 954 3ouf-FF5-u-nT-- 1'4UI Ll I PM 329 248 14 0 + ........................... v � y U o ...... PM ------- 28 225 0 R Fuller's Cross Rd ................ ...................................... ............... ............. ............... .............................. 49 0 304 21 ........... Tu7FeTr§ cross Ho' 143 6 ........ ............. Pm71 ------------------------- C) ¢ 0 77 SOB 93 I Pm North ound 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LOCATION: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd COUNTY: Orange County Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd Fuller's Cross Rd ................... .......... ....................................................... ........... ...... ..... -.-I.-I .. ........ ..... - ........... ....................... ....... ............................... . . . . ................... ........... ................. LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 : Fuller's Cross Rd ................. ................... ............ ......................... ........................ TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND -- SOUTHBOUND NIS TOTAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EIW JGRAND TOTAL TOTAL L T R I U-turn ITOTAL 11 L I T7 R U-turn TOTAL I L T R I U-turn ITOTAL 11 L I T I R I U-turn I TOTAL I 04:00 PM 0 2 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 S D 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 4 9 04:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 6 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 TOTAL 0 2 2 0 4 0 4- 2 0 6 10 1 1 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 5 7 17 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 3 5 05:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 4 7 05:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 05:45 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 TOTAL 0 5 0 0 5 0 2 4 0 6 11 -0 3 5 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 2 10 21 PM Peak 05:00 PM to 06:00 PM 0 0 0 1 2 10 21 Ci 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (cars and Trucks) DATE: September 20, 2018 (Thursday). CITY- Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Fuller's Cross Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 ......... ..__... Lakewood Av ....... _..... _............... .... _............. _.................. _..:.... i ........... _ Lakewood Av ............... _._...... -_._........... _._.__...... --................. _... ...................... Fuller's Cross Rd .......................... .................. ......__.......... _._._..... . TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NIS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EMI GRAND L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL BEGIN TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 07:00 AM 27 26 0 0 53 0 31 51 0 82 135 42 6 0 418 0 0 0 D 0 48 183 07:15 AM 20 16 0 0 36 0 0 76 112 32 4 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 36 148 07:30 AM 25 24 0 0 49 0 0 12 1176 25 do 12 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 37 213 07:45 AM 21 16 0 0 37 D 160467 0 131 168 18 15 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 33 201 TOTAL 93 82 0 0 175 0 0 416 591 117 37 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 154 745 08:00 AM 57 61 0 0 118 0 98 46 0 144 262 21 0 32 0 53M01 0 0 0 0 53 315 08:15 AM 61 63 0 0 124 D 99 44 0 143 267 28 0 22 0 5o 0 0 0 0 50 317 08:30 AM 39 39 0 0 78 0 14 41 0 55 133 35 0 8 0 43 0 0 D 0 43 176 08:45 AM 11 14 0 0 25 0 17 32 0 49 74 18 0 14 0 320 0 0 0 32 106 TOTAL 168 177 0 D 345 0 228 163 0 391 736 102 0 76 0 1780 1 0 0 0 178 914 04:00 PM 22 29 0 0 51 0 25 36 0 61 112 48 0 13 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 61 173 04:15 PM 18 30 0 0 48 0 29 42 0 71 119 48 0 20 0 68 0 0 D 0 0 68 1117 04:30 PM 18 28 0 D 46 0 23 49 0 72 118 38 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 163 04:45 PM 14 33 0 0 47 0 22 37 D 59 106 37 0 12 0 �49 00 0 0 49 155 TOTAL 72 120 0 0 192 0 99 164 0 263 455 171 D 52 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 223 678 05:00 PM 21 28 0 0 49 0 22 51 0 73 122 53 0 14 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 67V712 05:15 PM 21 32 0 0 53 0 43 63 0 106 159 49 0 23 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 7205:30 PM 20 38 D 0 58 0 43 51 0 94 152 36 0 18 0 54 0 0 D 0 0 5405:45 PM 26 27 D 0 53 0 43 56 0 99 152 39 0 21 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 60TOTAL 88 125 0 0 213 0 1512210 372 585 177 0 76 0 253 0 D 0 0 0 253 AM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.925 07:30 AM to N:R AM 164 164 0 0 328 0 320 2. 0 545 873 92 0 81 0 173 0 0 0 .7. 173 1 1,046 PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.907 os:oo PM to O6:o0 PM 88 125 0 0 213 0 151 221 0 372 585 177 0 76 0 2-0 0 0 0 0 253 838 our oun ; PM 221 151 0 0 vz 0 i l o l VV AM I 225 320 0 0 s 1 '---------------' ' v y N U tr AM PM E 0 0 a a 14 o n � - � a Fuller's Cross Rd .... ___..—.___._—. 0 0 0 0 0 ........ .... _...... __.......... —._.............__. ....... _.............. +.___...__._._....._.._._. y 3 777 92 71 a 0 0 i 76 81 ]I _._._._._._._._._..—._._._ PM AM I � 0 164 164 0 1 AM i e 0 88 725 0 PM North ound 15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS (7rucks Only) DATE: September 20, 2018 (Thursday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Fuller's Cross Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av ! Lakewood Av Fuller's Cross Rd j ........_._._......... _...... ....._._........_...-..._......... ................. _._._.... ............... ..._.._.__................._._....._..._..... ......__._........._......... ..._.-._........... _.... _...._... _........ _....................... ....__._. TIME BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N/S TOTALI EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E/W GRAND TOTAL TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL L I T I R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 01 07.30 AM D 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 r 1 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 08:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 TOTAL 1 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 6 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 8 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 D 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 04:30 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 3 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 6 5 D 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 11 05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 05:15 PM 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 0 3 0 0 3 D 1 0 D 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 AM Peak o1:31 AM" 08,30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 PM Peak 00 PM to F06:00 PM 0 1 3 0 0 3 IF 0 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 I 110 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT COUNTS (Cars and Trucks) DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) CITY: Apopka LATITUDE: 0 LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Wurst Rd COUNTY: Orange County LONGITUDE: 0 Lakewood Av ................ ................................................................................ L ............................. Lakewood Av ............................ ......................... ............. ........ .............. Wurst Rd .................................... - ................ ................ ................................. Wurst Rd ....................... ........................ TIME NORTHBOUND 7-- SOUTHBOU N/S EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I EMI GRAND BEGIN TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL L T R I U-turn TOTAL L T I R U-turn TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL ---- L I T R I U-turn TOTAL 04:00 PM 0 28 31 0 59 9 15 1 0 25 84 2 1 1 0 4 28 3 15 0 46 50 134 04:1 S PM 2 26 3 - 7 0 65 14 13 2 0 29 94 1 1 1 0 3 21 0 9 0 30 33 127 04:30 PM 0 19 41 0 60 13 23 3 0 39 99 0 1 1 0 2 18 3 14 0 35 37 136 04AS PM 0 319 38 0 77 15 22 1 0 TOTAL 2 1 2 147 0 264 Cl 737 05:00 Pm I 25 33 0 59 14 21 5 0 40 99 1 2 1 0 4 19 0 20 0 39 43 142 05:15 Pm 3 26 41 0 70 19 31 3 0 53 123 0 0 1 0 1 29 2 16 0 47 48 171 05:30 Pm 1 30 43 0 74 12 30 6 0 48 122 3 0 4 0 7 24 1 17 05:45 PM 1 35 56 0 92 9 25 1 0 35 127 L471 3 1 0 0 4 25 TOTAL 6 116 173 0 295 54 107 15 0 176 7 3 r n PM Peak Peak Hour Factor: 0.958 05:00 Pm to 06:00 PM 6 E 116�173�0 �295 54 107 15 a 176 471 7 3 6 0 16 97 3 68 0 �l 681-- 184 655 SouthbounV NU[ Ul PM 15 107 54 0 ------------------------- . . Pm ...... K .......... ...... 68 . a- 3 �7 Wurst Rd C; 0 o .............................. ..................... ................ Wurst Rd :3 7 CL 71 3 6..... ................ Pm CIS I 71 ------- 0 6 116 173 1 PM Noah ound DATE: October 2, 2018 (Tuesday) LOCATION: Lakewood Av & Wurst Rd Lakewood Av ............... .......... ............. TIME NORTHBOUND BEGIN L U-turn I T E7R7 urn TOTAL 11 L 15 MINUTE TURNIN OVEMENT COUNTS (Trucks Only) CITY: Apopka COUNTY: Orange County Lakewood Av Wurst Rd ...................................................................... .. ... ..... .. ... .. ... ... SOUTHBOUND NIS EASTBOUND ST B 0 U N D I I T I R � U-turn I TOTAL TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL LATITUDE: 0 LONGITUDE: 0 Wurst Rd ... ... ... ... WESTBOUND S T B 0 U N D L T I R U-turn ........... TOTAL E/W R , GRAND TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM —T471 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 PM 0 —0 1 —1 3 0 —0 0 —1 0 —0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 1 6430 PM -- 2 —0 —1 3 0 0 0 0 0 001 fl 0 E 0 E3 0. 04:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 —1 0 0 —0 0 — 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 3 4 7 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 5 5 13 05:00 Pm 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 Pm 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 -0 -0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak mto 05:00 P 06:00 PM 0 1 0 2 :E27F 5� Cycle -. - 80 -, -, - 65 -1 , _ 80 uay 1 i ime 0:00 Pattern FREE Split-1 Split 2 15 45 15 35 15 45 1 9:30 2/1/1 EE S}ili# 3 E Split 4 20 15 20 /1 Split 5 M18: /1 Split 6 60 50 60 1 Split 7 Split 8 2 20:00 1 FREE Offset 10 35 63 7 0.00 FREE Lagging Phases 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 1/0/0/0 7 8:00 2J1J1 Source Day; Equate 3 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 20:00 FREE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green S. Alternate Sequence 1: Reverse Phases 1 & 2 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Intersection: Clarcona-Ocoee Road & N. Lakewood Avenue Node: 643 Port: Equipment:. Eagle Date: 09/25/18 ' Address: BASIC TIMING Phase 2 4 '', 5 6 Direction WB NB WBL EB Min Green (sec) 10 5 5 10 Vehicle Gap (sec) 3.0 2.0 1.5 3.0 Max Green 1 (sec) 41 30 20 41 Max Green 2 (sec) 41 30 20 41 Yellow (sec) 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Walk (sec) 7 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 23 29 Recall/Memory MIN/LK NL LK MIN/LI< Detector Delay (sec) CD10 Detector Switching Dual Entry Y Y Overlap Flash Y R 5-SECTION Y Speed (mph) 45 35 45 45 Veh Crossing Distance (ft) 140 103 110 93 Grade -0.4% 0.6% -0.4% 0.5% Ped Crossing Distance (ft) 78 101 Ped Clearance (sec) 23 29 COORDINATION PLANS Coordination Pattern 1/1/1 2/1/1 3/1/1 Day Time Pattern Cycle 80 130 80 1 0:00 FREE Split 1 1 9:30 2/1/1 Split 2 65 110 65 1 19:30 FREE Split 3 2 0:00 FREE Split 4 15 20 15 2 6:00 1/1/1 Split 5 15 20 15 2 9:30 2/1/1 Split 6 50 90 50 2 15:00 3/1/1 Split 7 2 18:15 2/1/1 Split 8 2 20:00 FREE Offset 13 102 32 7 0:00 FREE Lagging Phases 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 7 8:00 2/1/1 Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 20:00 FREE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination Ff-4--- ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Hazemb-Assar,RE NF—-- l;tG—f—i6A:-'Ogee "A;opka Rd & fullers; Cross W" Node- 335 Equipment, Eagle CgL-ahliv ff cop: Date: 7123/18 BASIC TIMING, 1 2 3 4 Direction EB/WB NBISB Min Green (sec) 5 15. Vehicle Gap. (sec) 3.0 3.5 Max Green I (sec) 55 65 Max Green 2 (sec ) 60 1 55 Yellow secj 4.8 4.8 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 Walk (sec) 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 17 Recall/Memo ry NL SF/LK Delay (sec) CD10 Detector Switching Dual Entry Overlap Flash R Y Speed (mph) 45 45 Veh Distance (ft) 78 63 Grade (%) -0.5 -0.6 Ped Distance (ft) 59 Ped Clearence (sec) 17 COORDINATION PLANS. Day Tiffin, patf C)Nle MAX 11 Split 1 1 0:01 FREE Split 2 2 0:01 FREE Split 3 2 16:00 PH 1, 2 Split 4 2 19:00 FREE Split 5 solit 6 Split 7 - Split 8 Offset Law in Phases 5f66, Day Equate I Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 1 7 2 3 4 5 6 Notes: Basic Ring Structure Rl 1 2 R2 ,�% _ LL _ _ .L - r! b ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Intersection: Ocoee Crown Point Parleway/West Rd at.Ocoee-Apopka.kd Nader _ _ 402 Equipment: Eagle. Date: 05/10/18 Address: BASIC TIMING. Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Direction SBL NB EBL WB NBL SB WBL EB Min Green (sec) 5 15 5 5 5 15 5 5 Vehicle Gap (sec) 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 Max Green 1 (sec) 25 60 25 35 25 60 25 35 Max Green 2 (sec) 35 50 25 20 20 50 25 35 Yellow (sec) 4.8 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.1 Walk (sec) 7 7 7 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 31 16 28 23 Recall/Memory NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK Detector Delay (sec) Detector Switching Dual Entry Y Y Y Y Overlap Flash 5-SECTION Y 5-SECTION R 5-SECTION Y 5-SECTION R Speed (mph) 45 45 25 45 45 45 45 25 Veh Crossing Distance (ft) 114 144 128 118 94 161 150 105 Grade -0.3% 0.4% 0.7% -0.5% 0.4% -0.3% -0.5% 0.7% Ped Crossing Distance (ft) 107 55 98 79 Ped Clearance (sec) 31 16 28 23 COORDINATION PLANS. Coordination Pattern 1/1/1 2/1/1 3/1/1 Day Time Pattern Cycle 160 130 1 160 1 0:01 FREE Split 1 35 20 20 2 0:01 FREE Split 2 58 51 70 2 12:45 2/1/1 Split 3 20 20 15 2 15:00 3/1/1 Split 47 39 55 2 18:15 FREE Split 5 31 20 20 7 0:01 FREE Split 6 62 51 70 Split 7 28 20 30 Split 8 39 39 40 _ Offset 49 65 102 Lagging Phases 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1, Referenced to the Begin of Green - Phases 4 & 8 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination Consultant Timmy ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Intersection: Vilest Road/Clareona-Ocoee Road & SR 429 SB Ramps Node: 403 Pori: Equipment: Eagle Date: 04/26/18 Address: BASIC TIMING phase 2 5 6 8 Direction WB WBL EB SB Min Green (sec) 15 5 15: 5 Vehicle Gap (sec) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 Max Green 1(sec) 45 20 45 20 Max Green 2 (sec) 45 20 45 20 Yellow (Sec) 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 All -Red (sec) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Walk (sec) 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec) 16 Recall/Memory SF/LK NL SF/LK NL Detector Delay (sec) Detector Switching Dual Entry Y Y Overlap Flash Y S-SECTIDN Y R Speed (mph) 45 45 45 30 Veh Crossing Distance (ft) 75 94 109 110 Grade 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 1,4% Ped Crossing Distance (ft) 56 Ped Clearance (sec) 16 COORDINATION PLANS. Coordination Pattern 1/1/1 2/1/1 3/1/1 Day Time Pattern Cycle 80 65 1 80 1 0:00 FREE Split 1 1 1 9:30 2/1/1 Split 2 65 50 65 1 19:30 FREE Split 3 2 0:00 FREE Split 4 1 2 6:00 1/1/1 Split 5 20 15 20 2 9:30 2/1/1 Spilt 6 45 35 45 2 15:00 311/1 Split 7 2 18:15 2/1/1 Split 8 15 15 15 2 20:00 FREE Offset 12 41 63 7 0:00. FREE Lagging Phases 0/0/vo 0/0/5/0 010101U 7 8:00 Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 20:00 FREE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Notes: 1. Referenced to the Begin of Green 5. Alternate Sequence 4: Reverse Phases 5 & 6 2. Force Mode: Plan 3. Use Permissive Mode for coordination 4. Inhibit Max during coordination 2017 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 7500 ORANGE COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.98 WEEK DATES SF PSCF 1 01/01/2017 ------------------------------------------- - 01/07/2017 1.01 1.03 2 01/08/2017 - 01/14/2017 1.03 1.05 3 01/15/2017 - 01/21/2017 1.04 1.06 4 01/22/2017 - 01/28/2017 1.03 1.05 5 01/29/2017 - 02/04/2017 1.02 1.04 6 02/05/2017 - 02/11/2017 1.00 1.02 7 02/12/2017 - 02/18/2017 0.99 1.01 8 02/19/2017 - 02/25/2017 0.99 1.01 * 9 02/26/2017 - 03/04/2017 0.98 1.00 *10 03/05/2017 - 03/11/2017 0.98 1.00 *11 03/12/2017 - 03/18/2017 0.97 0.99 *12 03/19/2017 - 03/25/2017 0.97 0.99 *13 03/26/2017 - 04/01/2017 0.97 0.99 *14 04/02/2017 - 04/08/2017 0.97 0.99 *15 04/09/2017 - 04/15/2017 0.97 0.99 *16 04/16/2017 - 04/22/2017 0.97 0.99 *17 04/23/2017 - 04/29/2017 0.97 0.99 *18 04/30/2017 - 05/06/2017 0.98 1.00 *19 05/07/2017 - 05/13/2017 0.98 1.00 *20 05/14/2017 - 05/20/2017 0.98 1.00 *21 05/21/2017 - 05/27/2017 0.99 1.01 22 05/28/2017 - 06/03/2017 1.00 1.02 23 06/04/2017 - 06/10/2017 1.00 1.02 24 06/11/2017 - 06/17/2017 1.01 1.03 25 06/18/2017 - 06/24/2017 1.01 1.03 26 06/25/2017 - 07/01/2017 1.01 1.03 27 07/02/2017 - 07/08/2017 1.01 1.03 28 07/09/2017 - 07/15/2017 1.02 1.04 29 07/16/2017 - 07/22/2017 1.01 1.03 30 07/23/2017 - 07/29/2017 1.00 1.02 31 07/30/2017 - 08/05/2017 1.00 1.02 32 08/06/2017 - 08/12/2017 0.99 1.01 33 08/13/2017 - 08/19/2017 0.99 1.01 4 08/20/2017 - 08/26/2017 1.01 1.03 .55 08/27/2017 - 09/02/2017 1.04 1.06 36 09/03/2017 - 09/09/2017 1.06 1.08 37 09/10/2017 - 09/16/2017 1.09 1.11 38 09/17/2017 - 09/23/2017 1.07 1.09 39 09/24/2017 - 09/30/2017 1.05 1.07 40 10/01/2017 - 10/07/2017 1.03 1.05 41 10/08/2017 - 10/14/2017 1.01 1.03 42 10/15/2017 - 10/21/2017 0.99 1.01 43 10/22/2017 - 10/28/2017 0.99 1.01 44 10/29/2017 - 11/04/2017 0.99 1.01 45 11/05/2017 - 11/11/2017 1.00 1.02 46 11/12/2017 - 11/18/2017 1.00 1.02 47 11/19/2017 - 11/25/2017 1.00 1.02 48 11/26/2017 - 12/02/2017 1.01 1.03 49 12/03/2017 - 12/09/2017 1.01 1.03 50 12/10/2017 - 12/16/2017 1.01 1.03 51 12/17/2017 - 12/23/2017 1.02 1.04 52 12/24/2017 - 12/30/2017 1.03 1.05 53 12/31/2017 - 12/31/2017 1.04 1.06 * PEAK SEASON 02-MAR-2018 15:35:06 830UPD 5_7500_PKSEASON.TXT Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets HC7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Intersection Information �i General Information _ ,iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other - '- _ Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.97 4 Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Intersection West Rd/Ocoee Crown... File Name 1- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd - Existing... Project Description (1) PM Peak Hour- Existing '"r �" r Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 45 96 39 206 181 172 95 593 75 126 378 22 Signal Information Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 z 3 a' Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 5.4 1.2 97.1 5.2 8.0 8.3 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.8 0.0 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.1 2.0 3.1 s 6 a Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 11.7 16.2 26.5 31.0 12.2 103.9 13.4 105.1 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.5 7.9 6.8 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.0 4.1 3.0 4.1 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 5.9 6.3 19.6 19.2 5.3 6.4 Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 1.9 0.1 1.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 use Call Probability 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 max Out Probability 1.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 WB NB SB Movement Group Results EB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 46 99 40 212 187 177 98 611 77 130 412 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s), veh/h/In 1781 1781 1585 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1852 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 3.9 4.3 3.9 17.6 7.6 17.2 3.3 30.5 32 4.4 17.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (g c ), s 3.9 4.3 3.9 17.6 7.6 17.2 3.3 30.5 3.2 4.4 17.7 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.64 0.61 0.61 0.65 0.61 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 164 184 82 297 515 229 584 1135 962 456 1138 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.282 0.538 10.491 . 0.716 0.363 0.774 0.168 0.539 0.080 0.285 0.362 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 81.6 92.6 77.4 328.7 156.5 295.7 59 487 1 53.6 77.9 304.6 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 3.2 3.6 3.0 12.9 6.2 11.6 2.3 19.2 2.1 3.1 12.0 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 68.9 74.0 73.8 60.1 61.8 65.9 12.1 18.4 13.0 14.2 15.3 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 2.4 1 4.5 4.8 0.4 5.5 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 69.3 76.4 78.3 64.9 62.2 71.4 12.2 20.2 13.2 14.3 16.2 Level of Service (LOS) E E E E E E B C B B B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 75.0 E 66.1 E 18.5 B 15.7 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 35.9 D v EB w WB NB SB Itimodal Results ..destrian LOS Score / LOS 2.16 B 1.96 B 2.41 B 2.41 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.64 A 0.96 A 1.79 B 1.38 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/2412018 10:55:26 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Intersection Information General Information -^ gency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 J 3, , alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other - Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.96 Urban Street West Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Intersection SR 429 SB Ramps File Name 2- 5095 - West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps - Existing... Project Description (2) PM Peak Hour - Existing mmm Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 524 1124 F312 582 1 73 47 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 : Offset, s 0 Reference Point End [Green 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 3 A 7.9 47.2 5.6 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On llow 4.8 4.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On ed 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 s Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 8 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 54.0 1 14.7 68.7 11.3 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 1 7.2 5.7 Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 0.8 1 0.0 0.1 se Call Probability 1.00 0.95 roux Out Probability 0.04 1.00 EB WB NB SB Movement Group Results Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 6 16 5 2 3 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 348 327 325 606 60 76 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s), veh/h/In 1870 1746 1767 1795 1781 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s), s 9.5 7.6 5.2 3.7 2.6 3.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (g,;), s 9.5 7.6 5.2 3.7 2.6 3.7 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.59 0.59 0.71 0.77 0.07 0.07 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1103 1030 622 2779 124 111 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.315 0.317 0.522 0.218 0.488 0.684 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 119.2 111.4 56.2 27.2 54.9 73.7 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 4.7 4.5 2.2 1.1 2.2 2.9 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d r ), s/veh 8.3 8.3 5.4 2.5 35.8 36.4 Incremental Delay ( d2), s/veh 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.2 3.0 0 7.2 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 9.0 9.1 6.1 2.6 38.8 43.6 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 9.0 A 3.9 A 0.0 41.5 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.8 A Itimodal Results EB WB NB - SB destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.36 A 1.60 B 2.31 B 2.14 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.04 A 1.26 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:02:19 AM HC 7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Intersection Information General Information °ryency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 - alyst MJA Analysis Date lOct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee I Time Period IPM Peak Hour PHF 0.95 Urban Street West Rd fA4ysis Year 12018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection SR 429 NB Ramps File Name 3- 5095 - West Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps - Existing... Project Description (3) PM Peak Hour - Existing MEMO WB NB SB Demand Information EB Approach Movement L T R L T -r-R--F L F T I R 0 L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 47 411 685 73 197 417 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 4 4 1 1set, Offs 0 Reference Point End Green 3.3 33.1 23.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 5.0 5.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 6 7 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 1 6 2 4 Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 9.0 Phase Duration, s 10.3 50.4 40.1 29.6 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), sL3.2 0.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 23.7 Green Extension Time (g e )s 0.0 0.0 0.1 ise Call Probability 1.00 max Out Probability 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 2 12 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 49 433 721 77 207 439 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s ), veh/h/In 1810 1781 1795 1572 1795 1572 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.2 5.1 11.8 2.4 7.3 21.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 1.2 5.1 11.8 2.4 7.3 21.7 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.48 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.30 0.30 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 363 1933 1485 651 536 469 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) A 0.136 0.224 0.486 0.118 0.387 0.936 Back of Queue ( Q ), fUln ( 95 th percentile) 18.5 77.2 201.1 38.3 133.9 417.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.7 3.0 8.0 1.5 5.3 16.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 12.4 9.5 17.2 14.5 22.3 27.3 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.4 0.2 25.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 12.4 9.8 18.3 14.8 22.4 52.6 Level of Service (LOS) T B A B B C D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 10.1 B 18.0 B 43.0 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 24.4 C _. Itimodal Results EB WB^ NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS_ 1.66 B 1 1.39 A 2.31 B 2.31 B Bicycle -OS Score / LOS 0.89 A 1.15 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST1" Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/2612018 8:07:39 AM HC 7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Intersection Information General Information ^7ency �T TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type 10.99 Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period AM Peak Hour PHF Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Lakewood Ave File Name 4.1- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... Project Description (4) AM Peak Hour - Existing Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 981 186 269 952 64 144 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 z 3 4 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 6.8 44.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.8 4.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 6 7 B Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 4 Case Number 6.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 51.4 13.6 65.0 15.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 -1 4.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.7 9.1 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3se Call Probability 1.00 0.99 wax Out Probability 1.00 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 . 6 16 5 2 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 1 606 573 272 962 65 145 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 593 1841 1738 1810 1766 1739 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.1 17.4 17.4 4.7 1 8.2 2.7 1 7.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 0.1 17.4 17.4 4.7 8.2 2.7 7.1 11 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.67 0.73 0.11 0.11 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 421 1026 968 408 2570 196 180 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.002 0.590 0.592 0.665 0.374 0.330 0.809 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.3 272 253.7 72.3 83.8 53.1 170.2 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.0 10.5 10.1 2.9 3.3 2.0 6.8 _ Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 7.9 11.7 11.7 10.6 4.1 32.7 34.7 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.0 2.5 2.7 3.4 0.4 0.4 22.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 7.9 14.2 14.4 14.0 4.5 33.1 56.6 Level of Service (LOS) A I B B B A C E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.3 B 6.6 A 49.4 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.5 B r Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.88 B 1.32 A 773717T7 B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.46 A 1.51 B F Copyright© 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:05:23 AM HCS7 Signalized lntersection Results Summary MW General Information Intersection Information 1'i4 lJLJ4-1 1 14, "-iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 'alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 �s Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 12018 Analysis Period 11> 17:00 Y z Intersection Lakewood Ave File Name 4.2- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... Project Description (4) PM Peak Hour - Existing Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h U7747 108 294 715 77 245 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 , z 3 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 8.2 38.2 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.8 4.8 4.0 0.0 !0.,0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0 0.0 5 6 SBL SBT Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 4 Case Number 6.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 _ Phase Duration, s 45.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 14.1 Green Extension Time ( g e), s 0.0r8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 ase Call Probability .00 1.00 iviax Out Probability .00 1.00 Movement Group Results EB -LT WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 7 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 7 442 422 297 722 78 247 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 731 1870 1787 1795 1795 1795 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.4 12.9 12.9 6.3 6.8 3.0 12.1 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g e ), s 0.4 12.9 12.9 6.3 6.8 3.0 12.1 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.61 0.66 0.18 0.18 Capacity ( c ), veh/h i43J9E89 853 478 2387 314 280 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 4 0.495 0.621 0.303 0.248 0.885 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 3 225.2 214.7 98 84.5 56.7 268.4 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.1 8.9 8.6 3.9 3.4 2.2 10.6 . Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 11.0 14.3 14.3 10.1 5.6 28.5 32.2 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 2.0 2.0 2.5 0.3 0.2 26.0 Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 11.1 16.2 16.3 12.5 5.9 28.6 58.2 ,. Level of Service (LOS) B B B B A C E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 16.3 B 7.9 A 51.2 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 17.5 B rr Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB ddestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.89 B 1.34 A 2.31 1B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.21 A 1.33 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"^ Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:18:15 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection information'' ^,iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour 11 PHF 0.93 T Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Adair St I File Name 5- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Adair St - Existin... Project Description (5) PM Peak Hour- Existing h r +Y rr SHEMNEW Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L I T R L I T I R L I T I R Demand ( v ), veh/h 20 769 157 51 754 12 108 6 42 7 3 13 Signal information r, Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 9 " F. 1 V 31 Rt Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 58.2 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On lYellow 4.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 J Jeb Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On 11led 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 f EBL EB T WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Timer Results Assigned Phase 6 2 4 8 Case Number 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 65.0 65.0 15.0 15.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway (MAH), s 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.2 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 11.0 3.0 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ase Call Probability 0.99 0.99 max Out Probability 1.00 1.00 Movement Group Results WB NB SB EB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 22 513 483 55 413 411 168 25 _ Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s), veh/h/In 675 1870 1760 575 1885 1875 1463 1711 Queue Service Time ( g s), s 0.9 8.2 1 8.2 3.2 6.1 6.1 8.0 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (g c ), s 7.0 8.2 8.2 11.4 6.1 6.1 9.0 1.0 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.11 0.11 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 530 1361 1280 , 449 1371 1364 241 251 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.041 0.377 0.377 0.122 0.301 0.301 0.697 0.098 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 5.2 94.6 89 16.2 69.6 70.9 165.6 18.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.2 3.7 3.6 0.6 2.8 2.8 6.5 0.8 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 a00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d I ), s/veh 5.0 4.1 4.1 6.2 3.8 3.8 35.6 32.0 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 7.2 0.1 Initial Queue Delay ( d 3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 5.2 4.9 .4.9 6.8 4.4 4.4 42.8 0 32.0 Level of Service (LOS) A A A A A A D C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 4.9 A L�L5= A 42.8 D 32.0 ( C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.1 A �- Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB idestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.62 B 1.62 B 2.30 B 2.29 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.33 A _1.21 A 0.76 p A 0.53 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved, HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:06:59 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information A iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 1 t alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other - Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Fuller's Cross Rd File Name 6- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd -... Project Description (6) PM Peak Hour - Existing Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 313 147 6 50 232 29 7 523 96 14 �5339 MW Signallnformation ._& Cycle, s 145.5 Reference Phase 2 ".11 x 3 ¢ Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 57.0 27.5 40.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap ENV On Yellow. 4.8 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 $' EM SBL SBT Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT Assigned Phase 8 4 2 6 Case Number 12.0 12.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 47.4 34.3 63.8 63.8 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 39.0 26.4 48.6 51.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 1.5 1.1 6.2 5.7 ase Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 iviax Out Probability 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.39 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16Adjusted Flow Rate ( v), veh/h 471314 T87 632 614Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s )veh/h/In 18061840 1831 _ 1711 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 37.0 24.4 0.0 2.6 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 37.0 24.4 46.6 49.3 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.28 0,19 0.39 0.39 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 504t157.8 347 743 696 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.9330.905 0.851 0.882 Back of Queue (Q ), ft/ln (95 th percentile) 652.9443.8 746.E 754.E Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 25.717.6 29.6 29.9 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 51.2 41.1 41.9 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 16.6 8.9 7.9 10.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d s ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 67.8 66.7 9.0 49.0---[- 52.8 Level of Service (LOS) E JE E D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 67.8 66.7 E 49.0 D 52.8 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 57.2 E r Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.75 B 1.72 B 1.70 B 1.70 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.26 A 1.01 A 1.53 B 1.50 B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST"' Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:15:1DAM General Information Site Information -ialyst MJA Intersection (7)Lakewd Av & Fullers Cr . ,gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/22/2018 East/West Street Fuller's Cross Rd Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.83 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 Ocoee Village Center Lanes -s 11,14 T;� .1, U_ Major Street North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement "iority U L 10 T 11 R 12 U L 7 T 8 R 9 U lU L 1 T 2 R 3 U 4U L 4 T 5 R 6 ,mber of Lanes Configuration 0 1 LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 LT 1 0 0 0 1 0 TR Volume (veh/h) 98 87 175 175 342 241 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6.40 6.20 4.10 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.50 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 223 211 Capacity, c (veh/h) 232 904 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.23 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 8.6 0.9 Control Delay (s/veh) 94.7 10.2 Level of Service (LOS) F B oroach Delay (s/veh) 94.7 6.4 '. /Approach LOS F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved, HCS11 TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:17:21 AM 7.1- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Existing AM.xtw .w .. d-,.+...o- .-.a„.v .. ..�::v.. , .:h :...,.✓u _f :.m. y...:.F ,..w.. „.»s,�,y General Information 7alyst MJA .N. v.v" ,., .1,.. Site Information Intersection (7)Lakewd Av & Fullers Cr gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/22/2018 East/West Street Fuller's Cross Rd Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.91 Intersection Orientation North -South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: North -South Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R ^ iority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 ,tuber of Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LT TR Volume (veh/h) 189 81 94 134 162 236 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turnfflhannnelized����,Median Ty ndivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 6.2 4.1 Critical Headway (sec) 6A1 6.20 4.10 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.5 3.3 2.2 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.51 3.30 2.20 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 297 103 Capacity, c (veh/h) 450 1133 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.09 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) 4.7 03 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.1 8.5 Level of Service (LOS) D A -)roach Delay (s/veh) 27.1 4.0 Approach LOS D Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 11:18:20 AM 7.2- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Existing PM.xtw "nalyst MJA Intersection (8) Lakewd Ave & Wurst Rd .gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/23/2018 East/West Street Wurst Rd Analysis Year 2018 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Existing Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes Approach Movement fume %Thrus in Shared Lane Lane Configuration Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Departure Headway an Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) Initial Degree of Utilization, x Final Departure Headway, hd (s) Final Degree of Utilization, x Move -Up Time, m (s) Service Time, is (s) Capacity, Delay and Lei Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity 95% Queue Length, Qss (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS proach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Souhbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 7 3 6 100 3 70 6 119 178 56 110 15 Ll L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 L1 L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 LTR LTR LTR LTR 17 180 316 189 0 1 0 2 ice Time 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 0.015 5.20 0.160 4.96 0.281 4.30 0.168 4.82 0.024 0.248 0.377 0.252 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.20 2.96 2.30 2.82 ervice 17 180 316 189 692 725 836 747 0.1 1.0 1.8 1.0 8.3 9.6 9.9 9.4 A A A A 8.3 9.6 9.9 9.4 A A A A 9.7 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS'1 AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:24:14 A 8- 5095 - Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd - Existing PM.xaw Trends Analysis Worksheets Traffic Trends - V3.0 LAKEWOOD AVENUE -- Fuller's Gross Rd to West Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 County: Orange (75) Station #: 66.1 Highway: LAKEWOOD AVENUE 14000 oObserved Count Fitted e Cury 12000 10000 m v :c 8000 F- 6000 Z, 4000 CU 2000 0- LJ 1, 2013 2018 2023 2028 2033 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: 420 Trend R-squared: 92.45% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 10.63% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 7.37% Printed: 22-Oct-18 E 1 11 000 2014 4400 4400 2015 11 4800 2016 5000 5200 i 2017 i E i 5900 5700 I i i 2022 Opening Year i s r i Trend �,z �2027 Md„YearTrend.. , v,;a 2032$ign Des Year ,,,, , „ Trend ,.t. TRANPLAN'; ForecastslTrends s z 'Axle -Adjusted Traffic Trends - V3.0 CLARCOA-OCOEE RD -- Fuller's Cross Rd to Clarke Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 County: Orange (75) Station #: 70.0 Highway: CLARCONA-OCOEE RD 30000 oObserved Count Fitted Curve 25000 0 20000 :c U 15000 E- 0 10000 m cLa Q 5000 0 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Year **Annual Trend Increase: 650 Trend R-squared: 98.26% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 5.24% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 4.72% Printed: 22-Oct-18 2015 12300 12400 • 13100 13000 1 I i i i F i s t 2022°06ening Year 1 i i t Trend 2027;,.M6 YearTrend 2032 DesigriYear Trend TRANPLAN Forecasts/T,rends , 3, Axle -Adjusted Traffic Trends - V3.0 OCOEE-APOPKA RD -- Binion Rd to West Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 **Annual Trend Increase: 320 Trend R-squared: 80.96% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 2.99% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 2.60% Printed: 22-Oct-18 County: Orange (75) Station #: 71.0 Highway: OCOEE-APOPKA RD 2012 11100 10700 2013 i 10700 11000 2014 1100011 2015 1150060 1 • 12100 11900 2017 i i }2 ( 12400 12300 I I € 4 E i (Ij I E 2022 Opening Year t Trend a 2027, Mid -Year Trend ' s . 2032,Design Year;Trend TRAN P.LAN,,,1=orecasts/,Trends 11 j 'Axle -Adjusted Traffic Trends - V3.0 OCOEE-APOPKA RD -- West Rd to silver Star Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 "Annual Trend Increase: 89 Trend R-squared: 46.54% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 1.14% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 0.93% Printed: 22-Oct-I8 County: Orange (75) Station #: 73.0 Highway: OCOEE-APOPKA RD t Iff-1-11"IM-11,11 pill I 2012 8800M. 8800 2013 • 11 890 2015 :•11 • 0 I • •III 9200 2017 i 1 i 9500 • 11 4 E t t t p� C 2022 QpenrngyYear,Trend 2 q I {j 2027 Mid Year,, Trend I1 r 2032jDe'slgn Ye"ar;Trend TRANPLAN,ForecastslTre'nds,, k k A, , Traffic Trends - V3. West Road -- Ocoee -Apopka Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 ** Annual Trend Increase: 637 Trend R-squared: 93.62% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 10.16% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): 6.74% Printed: 22-Oct-I8 County: Orange (75) Station #: 2024 Highway: West Road f t 1 40 _I1 1 2013 6800 7000 2014 7300 7600j 2017 I • 11 • 11 6 i i k { i 1 '2022`O.penih�gYear f i Trend s 1 11 ,=20271d=Year Trend; °;2032;Design:Yearrrend ," -� •191011111111111 TRANPL/\`N"Forecasts/Trends ,} *Axle -Adjusted Traffic Trends - V3. 11RST ROAD --A.D. Mims Rd to Clarcona-Ocoee Rd FIN# 1234 Location 1 Annual Trend Increase: -26 Trend R-squared: 6.61 % Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: -0.36% Trend Growth Rate (2017 to Design Year): -0.49% Printed: 22-Oct-18 County: Orange (75) Station #: 7130 Highway: WURST ROAD IM f ti U11 I INVI oil WIT13 2012 5700 5500 p 2013 520011 2014 5600/1 2015 5300 5400 1 • 5500 5400 2017 5400 5400 i I i i 2022 Opening;Yepr i i i i i L-1 I Trend �� 11 � �.�'2027°Mid-YearTrend<: �« air i 2032 De ign Year,Trend x TRAMP I 'AN;Forecasts/Trends t _ f 'Axle -Adjusted Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets WCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 talyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.97 Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd I Analysis Year 12021 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Intersection West Rd/Ocoee Crown... I File Name 11- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd - Projecte... Project Description (1) PM Peak Hour - Projected Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 52 126 45 237 222 226 109 682 86 177 435 25 Signal Information .�A Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 6.4 2.8 89.5 5.9 9.6 10.9 Uncoordinated . No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.8 0.0 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 J4' J Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 10.0 2.0 3.1 2.0 13.1 z WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Timer Results EBL EBT Assigned Phase 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 Phase Duration, s 12A 18.8 28.8 35.2 13.2 96.3 16.1 99.2 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 6.5 7.9 6.8 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.0 4.1 3.0 4.1 3.0 0.0 3 00 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 6.4 7.6 21.9 24.9 6.3 9.0 Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 2.5 0.1 2.5 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 ase Call Probability 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Max Out Probability 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 mom NESESERNMEM Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 4 14 5 2 12F7. 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate (v ), veh/h 54 130 46 244 229 233 112 703 89 474 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1781 1781 1585 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1852 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 4.4 5.6 4.5 19.9 9.1 22.9 4.3 42.4 4.2 23.3 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 4A 5.6 4.5 19.9 9.1 22.9 4.3 42.4 4.2 . 23.3 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.22 0.17 0.17 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.62 0.58 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 189 243 108 331 608 271 502 1047 887 367 1069 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.284 0.534 0.428 0.738 0.376 0.860 0.224 0.672 0.100 0.497 0.443 Back of Queue (Q ), ft/In (95 th percentile) 92.2 119.4 86.3 367.7 187.7 375.6 78.3 665.6 71.2 126.5 389.1 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 3.6 4.7 3.4 14.5 7.4 14.8 3.1 26.2 2.8 5.0 15.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.V2..04 0.00 Uniform Delay (d ), s/veh 66.1 72.1 71.5 56.9 58.8 64.5 15.5 24.9 1 19.2 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 1.8 2.7 6.7 0.4 7.9 0.1 3.4 0 1.3 Initial Queue Delay( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 66.4 73.9 74.2 63.6 59.2 72.4 15.5 28.3 16 20.5 Level of Service (LOS) E E E E E E B C B C C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 72.2 E 65.1 E 25.6 C 20.6 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.7 D Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB destrian LOS Score / LOS 2.16 B 1.96 B 2.42 B �2.42 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.68 A 1.07 A 1.98 B B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:25:54 AM HC 7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary Intersection Information General Information -iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 J alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other - Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.96 Urban Street West Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 1> 16:45 Y Intersection SR 429 SB Ramps File Name 2- 5095 -West Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps - Project... Project Description (2) PM Peak Hour - Projected ):!w i r +� ri:r Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 651 143 404 711 75 84 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 z a Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 10.3 44.2 116.3 10.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.8 4.8 3.7 0.0 K0�0.Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 $ fi WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Timer Results EBL EBT Assigned Phase 6 5 2 8 Case Number 8.3 1.0 4.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 51.0 17.1 68.0 12.0 Change Period, ( Y+R c ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.3 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 9.4 6.3 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 ase Call Probability 1.00 0.97 Max Out Probability 0.28 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T7 R Assigned Movement 6 16 5 2 3 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 427 400 421 741 78 88 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1876 1753 1767 1795 1781 _ 1598 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 12.2 10.6 7.4 4.9 3.4 4.3 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 12.2 10.6 7.4 4.9 3.4 4.3 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.55 0.55 0.71 0.77 0.08 0.08 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 1033 968 579 2748 139 125 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.413 0.414 0.727 0.270 " 0.561 0.701 Back of Queue ( Q ), fUln ( 95 th percentile) 178 165.5 96.9 39.2 71.1 83.9 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 7.0 6.6 3.8 1.6 2.8 3.3 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 ^8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d T ), s/veh 10.4 10.4 2.8 35.5 36.0 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 1.2 1.3 2.9 0.2 IL _ 3.5 6.9 Initial Queue Delay ( d s ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 11.6 11.7 11.0 3.0 39.1 42.9 Level of Service (LOS) B B B A D D Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 11.7 B 5.9 A 0.0 41.1 D Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 10.8 B r,.ME Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB idestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.36 A 1.60 B 2.31 B 2.14 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.17 A A 1.45 A F Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST14 Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 6:57:57 PM HC7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information A V161I. 7ency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.95 j Urban Street West Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 z Intersection SR 429 NB Ramps I File Name 3- 5095 - West Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps - Project... Project Description (3) PM Peak Hour - Projected Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R FL TT R Demand ( v ), veh/h 54 529 875 91 227 532 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 z 3 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 3.6 27.4 29.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 5.0 5.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 s s SBT Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBLW30.0 Assigned Phase 1 6 2 Case Number 1.0 4.0 7.3 Phase Duration, s 10.6 45.0 34.4 Change Period, (Y+R o ), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 3.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Clearance Time (g s ), s 3.5 Green Extension Time ( g e), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 ase Call Probability 0.72 . Max Out Probability ii=- 0.09 1.00 NONE= INKNEM Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 2 14 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 57 557 921 560 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/In 1810 1781 1795 f47 1572 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 1.5 7.8 18.2 28.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g e ), s 1.5 7.8 18.2 28.0 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.41 0.48 0.34 0.37 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 242 1692 1230 539 658 576 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.329 0.749 0.178 0.363 0.972 Back of Queue (Q ), ft/In (95 th percentile) 127.E 304.2 56.7 138527.E Back of Queue ( Q), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) B25.6 5.0 12.1 2.2 5.5 20.6 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 .00 Uniform Delay ( d 1), s/veh 13.1 23.2 18.4 18.5 25.0 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.2 0.5 4.2 1 0.7 0.1 30.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d s ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( of), s/veh 17.2 13.6 27.5 19.1 18.7 55.3 Level of Service (LOS) _ B B C B B E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 13.9 B 26.7 C 44.3 D 0.0 Intersection Delay, s/veh /,LOS 29.3 C Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.67 B - 1.39 I �A^ 2.31 B 2.31 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 0.99 A 1.33 A F Copyright 9 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCSTM Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:29:04 AM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information +gency 'TPD, Inc. Duration, h 10.25 Analyst IMJA Analysis Date ;Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other 1 l Jurisdiction ?City of Ocoee Time Period '.AM Peak Hour PHF i0.99 Urban Street 1Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 1> 7:00 �. w �., Intersection iLakewood Ave File Name p4.1- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... rProject Description (4) AM Peak Hour Projected 00 Demand Information EB WB NB„ SB� Approach Movement L i T R_ L T R iy L T R L T R % Demand (v) veh/h 49 a 1134 390 1091 126 34 189 40 50 27 � �>�'-���""�w-�'�"''-���--.-. ';.. r. �,'�a :.. �. shy"'-�-;✓.��-�'e��."".` „",.-' ":a ' Signal Information Cycle s 4 i 160.0`!Reference Phase p 2 _ Offset, s 0 1 Reference Point End r Green 4.4 ill.182.3 24.2 ; 6.4 0 0 N Uncoordinated No Simult. Ga E/W h On �"le C ..p Yellowf4.04.8 �4.$ `D ;40 _ .0_0 Force Mode Fixed 5imult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 12.0 2 0 12.0 2.0 0.0 - Trmer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NB T SBL SBT Assigned Phase 1 N 6 5 r, 2 4 8 Gase Number z 1,1 I 3 0 1.1 4.0 "� 10.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 10.4 89.1 28.4 1 D7 0 30.2 12.4 . n Change Period ( Y+R c) s 6.0� 68 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway (N1AH ), s 3.0 0 0 4.0 0.0 3.2 3A �- --- Queue Clearance Time g s s 4.1 G 20.0 23.5 6.2 Green Extension Time (g e ), s- 0.1 j; 0.0 1.5 ° 0.0 �0.7 �� 0.2 f� lase Call Probability 0.89 G 1.00 1.00 ? 0.99 Out Probability D 00 u 0 DO 0 00 „ 6 0 00 [Max NO g, Movement Group Results 9 EB WB _ NB A ( SB Approach Movement L T R L T y� R L T E R %I L T R I Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 G 2 1_ l 7 4 j 14 VI 3 f 8 18 Ad usted Flow Rate v),veh/h 49 B 1145 222 394 110� 127 1225 �t 40 51 27 1 _ ( ) _ 9 _f.' _r Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 1 181 C 1752 N 1610 1810 766 1q,1739 11649 1781 1900 ' 1598 Queue Service Time (g s ), s 2.1 37.8 12 5 18 0 1 27 1 G 10 7 y 21.5 I� 3.6 4.2 2.7 Cycle Queue Clearance Time (g c ), s 2 1 37 8 1 5 18 0 1 27 1� 11 10 7 i 21.5 1 3.6 4 2 2.7 n.a _ t Green Ratio (gIC) 0 54 0.51 0.51 0.66 0 63 i 1 0_15 0 15 0.04 0 04 0.04 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) -� 0.152 0 637 0 269 0 922 0.498 ' 0 484 0.904 N 0 571 1 0 669 j 0 430 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 38.8 575.9 211.1 342.9 411.3 I__m. li._218 ( 359,9 ; 77.2 95.9 51.1- I Back of Queue (Q ), veh/In (95 th percentile) 1 1,6 22.3 " 8.4 13.7 116 1 3 8.4 14 4 3.0 3.8 2.0 I _ � e _ _ _ t ) 1 u _ � � _ Queue Storage Ratio (RQ) (95 th percentile) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 �� �' 0.00 O.OD ' 000 000 a 0 00 g,. - _ -w Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 17.7 l 28 1 22.0 30.9 16.2 162 2 r 66.8 a 75.5 75.8 75.0 Incremental Delay ((da)) slveh 1 0 1 1 7, D 8 i 8.7 0 8 0 5 1 4.9 �� 2.7 3 8 1.7 H _ r._ Initial Queue Delay( d s slveh D 0 1 0 0 jj 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d) s/veh C 17 8 { 29.9 93 22 8 3D5 ` 1 BO 6E7 k 7E7 7 2 '� 7E6 i 76.7 Level of Service (LOS) B C 1 C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 28.3 C f? 230 C 68.4 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 31.9 C Jd WA I�fultimodaI Results EB 1 WB J! NB SB destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.92 B 2.09 B h 2.33 B 2.49 B B,� j . L.cycle LOS Score / LOS ; 1.66 B 1.72 - ----- _.._1.07 ___-- -__ _ _ A 0.68 _ A (J HC7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information e'''a 7ency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 -- alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period PM Peak Hour PHF 0.99 Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Lakewood Ave File Name 4.2- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Ave... Project Description (4) PM Peak Hour- Projected Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 87 900 142 504 795 191 55 295 30 35 15 Signal Information Cycle, s 160.0 Reference Phase 2 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 6 7 WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Timer Results EBL EBT Assigned Phase 1 6 5 2 4 8 Case Number 1.1 3.0 1.1 4.0 10.0 9.0 Phase Duration, s 12.6 70.2 39.1 96.7 39.8 10.9 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway ( MAH ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 use Call Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MENIM Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01,379 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g � ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0f37 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Ratio (g/C) 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.62 0.56 0.21 0.03rO.03 0.03 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 389 1427 645 529 2019 349 55 59 49 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.226 0.637 0.222 0.963 0.398 .509 0.926 0.551 0.602 0.307 Back of Queue ( Q ), fUln ( 95 th percentile) 90.2 527.3 169.8 496.8 331.3 284.1 481.5 58.5 67.5 28.5 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 3.5 20.8 6.8 19.7 13.1 11.3 19.3 2.3 2.7 1.1 Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 26.2 38.6 31.5 32.6 19.7 55.8 61.9 76.4 76.6 75.9 Incremental Delay ( d2 ), s/veh 0.1 2.2 0.8 11.3 0.6 0.4 4.6 3.2 3.7 1.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d3 ), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 Control Delay ( d ), s/veh 26.4 40.8 32.3 43.9 20.3 66 79.6 80.2 77.1 Level of Service (LOS) C D C I D C E E E F E_ Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 38.6 D 29.5 C 62.6 E 79.4 I E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 39.8 D t itimodal Results EB WB NB SB destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.98 B 2.10 B 2.33 B 2.49 B bicycle LOS Score / LDS 1.43 A 1.57 B 1.34 A 0.62 A Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST11 Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 2:59:03 PM HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information Intersection Information iency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 - alyst MJA Analysis Date Oct 22, 2018 Area Type Other - Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time Period IPM Peak Hour PHF 0.93 Urban Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 Analysis Period 11> 17:00 Intersection Adair St File Name 5- 5095 - Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Adair St - Project... Project Description (5) PM Peak Hour - Projected ti:' J t-*y,H r; Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T f R-F L I T R I L I T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 23 961 216 59 954 14 164 7 48 8 3 15 Signal Information Cycle, s 80.0 Reference Phase 2 2 3 Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 53.2 I 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated No Simult. Gap E/W On Yellow 4.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S I On Red 2.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 s N s 7 Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 6 2 4 8 Case Number 6.0 6.0 &0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 60.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 Change Period, ( Y+R � ), s 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.0 Max Allow Headway (MAH ), s 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 Queue Clearance Time ( g s), s 14.8 3.1 Green Extension Time ( g e ), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 ise Call Probability 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 1.00 0.00 SB Movement Group Results EB WB NB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 25 652 614 63 522 519 235 28 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate ( s ), veh/h/In 551 1870 1751 445 1885 1875 1447 1691 Queue Service Time ( g s), s 1.7 14.3 14.5 6.9 10.3 10.3 11.7 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g,; ), s 12.0 14.3 14.5 21.3 10.3 10.3 12.8 1.1 Green Ratio ( g/C) 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.18 0.18 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 386 1244 1164 ' 305 1254 1247 . 332 355 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 0.064 0.524 0.416 0.416 ' 0.710 0.079 Back of Queue ( Q ), Win ( 95 th percentile) 9.4 201.2 143.7 145 33 13.7U27.7 Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 0.4 7.9 +�l 5.7 5.7 r8A Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 9.0 6.9 6.2 6.2 32.5 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 0.3 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.0 1.0 5.9 ( 0.0 Initial Queue Delay ( of 3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( d), s/veh 9.3 8.5 8.6 13.9 7.2 7.2 38.4 27.7 Level of Service (LOS) A A A B A A C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 8.6 A 7.6 A 38.4D D 27.7 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 11.0 B �Itimodal Results EB WB NB SB -destrian LOS Score / LOS 1.63 B 1.63 B 2.29 B 2.29 B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.55 B 1.40 A 0.88 A 0.53 A Copyright© 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST11 Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 7:14:29 PM nalyst MJA Intersection (8) Lakewd Ave & Worst Rd ,gency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/23/2018 East/West Street Wurst Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 Time Analyzed Project Description PM Peak Hour - Projected 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes Approach Movement fume %Thrus in Shared Lane Lane Configuration Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Departure Headway an Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) Initial Degree of Utilization, x Final Departure Headway, hd (s) Final Degree of Utilization, x Move -Up Time, m (s) Service Time, is (s) Capacity, Delay and Lei Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS proach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 8 3 7 115 3 109 7 192 205 88 176 17 Li L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 Ll 1_2 L3 LTR LTR LTR LTR 19 236 421 293 0 1 0 2 ice Time 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 0.017 6.05 0.210 5.53 0.374 4.78 0.260 5.28 0.031 0.363 0.559 0.429 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.05 3.53 2.78 3.28 ervice 19 236 421 293 595 651 753 682 0.1 1.7 3.5 2.2 9.2 11.6 13.7 12.2 A B B B 9.2 11.6 A B 12.6 13.7 12.2 B B B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS"° AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/24/2018 7:23:54 F 8- 5095 - Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd - Projected PM.xaw General Information ' Site Information lyst MJA ? Intersection f aLl .2ency/Co. I TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 G East/West Street Clarcona Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 t North/South Street Access 1 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation 6 East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) y 0.25 Project Description P 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach �� Eastbound F Movement U L _.1 T _ Ity lU � 2 ,ber of Lanes 0 0 0 Configuration Volume (veh/h) LLPercent Heavy Vehicles Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (90) Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Critical and Follow -tap Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) f I —Critical Headway (sec) i - r- Base Follow Up Headway (sec) Follow Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) I Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio i 95% Queue Length, Qss (veh) E Control Delay (s/veh) d Level of Service (LOS) oath Delay (s/veh)y i -,t,r,oach LOS Westbound Northbound Southbound R U .I L T R U L{ T E R a U j L a —T R T� 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 s 11 a 12 0 0 0 g 2) 1 0 0 C 0 j 0 0 1 j �_ _ h I 1238 38 L 7 _$ 3 0 I � ___ No p s No Left + Thru ( 1 6.9 &96 3.3 3.33 Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS " TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 10/26/2018 8:49:52 AM a.l.l - Access 1 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Proiected.xtw General Infor►nation ist „gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed�� Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes Intersection al.2 Jurisdiction City of Ocoee East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd North/South Street Access 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSI TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 101'2612018 8:51:49 AM a.1.2 - Access 1 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw General Information st i MJA Agency/Co, TPD,Inc, Date Performed 10/26/2018 Analysis Year 1 2021 Time Analyzed i AM Peak Hour - Projected Intersection Orientation East-West Project Description ' 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes Intersection a.2.1 Jurisdiction City of Ocoee East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd North/South Street Access 2 Peak Hour Factor ' 0.92 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Major Street East-West Westbound U L T R 4U _I 4 5 r 6 0 I D 4 0 f 0 Median Type I Storage Left + Thru Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow Up Headway (sec) i Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay. Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) I Capacity, c (veh/h) v/c Ratio 4 .._ _ . 95% Queue Length, Qss (veh) _ Control Delay (s/veh)E Level of Service (LOS) oach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS 1 U Northbound L i T . - b- 8 - 0 I 0 0 No G 16.0 ___ C 6.9 6,96 3.3 3.33 18 346 0.05 0.2 16.0 C 1 Southbound U L T R 710 P 11 12 0 0 0 Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved_ HC5'" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: il/7/2018 10:27:00 PM a.2.1- Access 2 iy Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.; tw Yst MJA J Intersection a.2.2 Agency/Co, TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 2 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected ---- ----- - Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation i East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center J Lanes Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach I Eastbound Westbound Movement U L I T R U 7 L T R U fty 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 - - r ..Ler o�i7anes 00 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration L- T TR J Volume (veh/h) - -_ 1061 - - ____ I -_ 37 __' - Percent Heavy Vehicles Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade Right Turn Channelized Median Type I Storage Left + Thru Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow Up Headway (sec) Follow -Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) Ratio 9S% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service (LOS) A -oath Delay (s/veh Approach LOS Northbound L T - 7 8 __ 0 0 0 No 14.8 R I U 9 I r 70 3 6.9 6.96 3.3 3,33 76 444 0.17 0.6 14.8 B 1 Southbound L J T R 10 11 12 0 0 Copyright (0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HICS" TWSC Version 1.6 Generated: 10/26/201-8 8:55:01 AM a.2.2 - Access 2 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projecled.xtw 5eneral Information e Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. MJA TPD, Inc, Intersection Jurisdiction a.3.1 City of Ocoee Date Performed Analysis Year 10/26/2018 2021 East/West Street North/South Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Access 3 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) D.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes yf III II'fyt f r M j°r Streit East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R °riority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 e rumber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9. - 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1350 11 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type IStorage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 8 Capacity, c (veh/h) 357 v/c Ratio 0.02 95 % Queue Length, Q,5 (veh) 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service (LOS) 15.3 C Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.3 )proach LOS C C vpyright KD 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 12:10:53 PM a.3.1 - Access 3 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw NEWS - General Information Site Information Analyst MJA Intersection a3.2 Agency/Co. TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 3 _T,_;Anaiyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected P�eakH�our Factor P u '6 ""' �(hr,) O�92 Intersection Orientation East-West �Analysis Ti..CPei.d lys:' 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes -4 4 + T- I I + Y t r Major straet: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound _U Southbound Movement T R �=L U L T L T R _ U L T R ___ — Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 10 11 12 �umber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1223 29 28 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) &9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 30 Capacity, c (veh/h) 391 v/c Ratio 0.08 95% Queue Length, Qqs (veh) 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.0 Level of Service (LOS) B Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.0 pproach LOS B �pyright 0 2018 University of Flodda. All Rights Reserved. HCS" rWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 12:14:08 PM a3.2 - Access 3 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected,xtw � '� %� ^''� v T..-n'd_�_Y��• `Fr'�� '�i �. �,4A e' UP "�—'� ��tr %R (� A� �� '*c ���[y � � �f' �„ ,, f �} may, r'�-- `� � ,-r / o- meneral Information Site Ynfor ation Analyst MJA Intersection 4 A Northbound Agency/Co TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour- Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 - Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes > Maj°r Street Eas[-Went Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R '6ority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4umber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1348 7 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage A Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)i � _ 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) I 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 5 Capacity, c (veh/h) 359 v/c Ratio 0.02 95% Queue Length, Qes (veh) 0.0 Control Delay (s/veh) 1S.2 Level of Service (LOS) — C� 1 Approach Delay (s/veh) 15.2 roach LOS C Copyright Q 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved, HCST" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:55:21 PM a.4.1 North - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projected.xtw r � *,jeneral Information Site Information analyst MJA� intersection 4 A Northbound ffi _ Agency/Co, TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Streetc�Qiw Access 4��� Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0,92 Intersection Orientation East-West �J Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0255 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lams J411L 41 r- 4— Major Street. East -Wert Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L7 T R r1riority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,umber of Lanes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 1 0 I 0 0 Configuration T TR R _ Volume (veh/h) 1239 10 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles (°b) 3 Proportion Time Blocked V Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)— 20 Capacity, c (veh/h)�I 392 We Ratio 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q9s (veh) 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.7 Level of Service (LOS) 8 Approach Delay (s/veh) 14.7 iproach LOS B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCST"' TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:57:50 PM a.4.2 North - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Prcjected.xtw d ,�,^ p� ci` Ty cy-!`'r"_-'>�� g '�- 4 ar''"`�",^' ^-'-r/rr-r---> •%� WE ,eneral Information Site Information Analyst MJA Intersection 4 B Southbound Agency/Co. TPD, Inc Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Date Performed 10/26/2018 East/West Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed AM Peak. Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) J 0.25 Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes 1. L iWW V. I V � 14 +Y I t,r Major Street: Easi-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R 'riority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 :umber of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 1 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1439 30 ( 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized I No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways -� - Base Critical Headway (sec) -� - - 6.9 Critical Headway (sec) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) I - - �- 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate v (veh/h) 51 Capacity, c (veh/h) � 327 ��_ - v/c Ratio 0.16 95% Queue Length, Q% (veh) 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh) 18.1 Level of Service (LOS) - - C Approach Delay (s/veh) ffi 181 )proach LOS C Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:56:37 PM a.4.1 South - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - AM Projectedxtw '-eneral Information Site Information analyst MJA Intersection 4 B Southbound Agency/Co. 1 TPD, Inc Jurisdiction TEast/West City of Ocoee y Date Performed I 10/26/2018 a Street Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Analysis Year 2021 North/South Street Access 4 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 425 Project Description 5095 -Ocoee Village Center Lanes -4 • - Major Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound @ Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T Iriority lU 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 4U 0 4 0 5 2 6 0 7 0 8 9 0 10 0 11 0 1 12 1 ,umber of Lanes 0 Configuration T TR R Volume (veh/h) 1264 24 65 Percent Heavy Vehicles M 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) Right Turn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Weadways Base Critical Headway (sec) 6.9 Critical Headway (set) 6.96 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.3 Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service) Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 71 Capacity, c (veh/h) 9 379 v/c Ratio 0.19 95 % Queue Length Qss (veh) 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service (LOS) _ - t 16.6 C 16 6 Approach Delay (s/veh) 3proach LOS C Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. a.42 South - Access 4 & Clarcona Ocoee Rd - PM Projected.xtw HCSTM TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/9/2018 1:59:03 PM lyst yency/Co. Date Performed +^vAnayysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes MJA TPD, Inc. 10/26/2018 2021 AM Peak Hour - Projected North -South 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Intersection a.5.1 Jurisdiction City of Ocoee East/West Street Access 5 North/South Street Lakewood Ave Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Copyright @ 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS11 TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2,/2018 12:06:46 PM a.51- Access 5 & Lakewood Ave - AM Prcjected.xtw 'lyst i MJA yency/Co. ..�.. ._..�....�....._. ._. _..... TPD, Inc. is Date Performed .. ,,.. __._ 10126/2018 Analysis Year s 2021 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour - Projected Intersection Orientation `, North -South Project Description 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Lanes ? Site Information I Intersection - — - __.__-___ a.5.2 Jurisdiction City of Ocoee East/West Street i Access 5 North/South Street Lakewood Ave s Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Major Street North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Movement U a L T I'II R P U P nrity 10 11 12 ber of Lanes 0 0 0 Configuration Volume (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) Proportion Time Blocked I) Percent Grade Right Turn Channelized C Median Type I Storage Left + Thru Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (set) 9 I Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) l Follow Up Headway (sec) S 9 b Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity, c (veh/h) 1 v/c Ratio i d I 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh) a Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service (LOS) p -oath Delay (s/veh) ;-,,,,roach LOS V Westbound Northbound Southbound L( T R U L T R U L T 7 8 9 lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 0 1 0 q 0 0 a 1 0 0 F D LR TR 9 LT Jl- 26 O s 37 _ p u 3' 0 l_ 46 3 3 ! 3 0 1 71 Q_62. i 41 6.43 6 23 ( 4.13 3.5 3.3 2..2_ 3.53 3.33 2.23 Copyright 0 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCS`- TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/7/2018 10:35:35 PM a.5.2 - Access S & Lakewood Ave - PM Projected.xtw General Information lyst ,oncy/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year nr� Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes MJA Intersection a.6.1 TPD, Inc. Jurisdiction City of Ocoee 10/26/2018 East/West Street Access 6 2021 North/South Street Lakewood Ave AM Peak Hour - Projected Peak Hour Factor 0.92 E..North-South d Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 5095 - Ocoee Village Center Major Street: North -South Westbound Northbound }! Southbound _ ._ _T L ., R .� - = a ,. U LT 6 �- R U L T 7 8 d 9 1U ? 1 2 3 4U 4 5 1J 0 1 e 0 0; l i 0 0 0 l I Q i �° L @ R TR t LT 462 0 69 312 0 290 �3 3 f, 0 No 1 71 6.2 { 4.1 - 64 � 623 � � � i 4.133 k I i r.� 35 33 a °° 2.2 _ g_ 3.53 R p_p 8 3.33 $ ¢ 2.23 R 6 0 Copyright Oc 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC5111 TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:07:57 PM a.6.1 - Access 6 & Lakewood Ave - AM Projected.rtw C�3 = • r t � �-17 3lyst -ncy/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes MJA ._ TPD, Inc. 10/26/2018 2021 PM Peak Hour -Projected North -South 5095 -Ocoee Village Center j Site Information Intersection i a.6.2 Jurisdiction City of Ocoee East/West Street Access 6 u ? North/South Street Lakewood Ave Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Major Street: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach ( Eastbound__'___T Westbound t Northbound f 5outhbound Movement U L T R U ��_�_� L U T R L ° T R U L T J_R Priority 10 ( 11 12 7 8 9 1U ° 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 ber of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 py 1 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L R TR LT d V Volume (veh/h) ( 511 0 70 436 6 6 A,- 0 l 72 7 _ gy Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 g Proportion Time Blocked f I y Percent Grade (%) 0 RightTurn Channelized No Median Type I Storage Left + Thru 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) # tv 6 ( 71 6.2 4 ?T J 41 Critical Headway (sec) � 6_ 43 6 23 )� 413 a i Base Follow Up Headway (sec) i 3 5 3.3 ) 8 ' 2,2 Follow Up Headway (sec) 3.53 3.33 g 2.23 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 555 I , ( 0 f D +- Capacity, c (vehlh) iy 642 725 ry j 6 1015 v/c Ratio 0.87 �p 0.00 ) 0.00 95%Queue Length Qes Neh)10.0 -- --- — _ i F 0.0 _ _ 0 0 - Control Delay (s/veh) i 36 0 10.0 8.5 Level of Service (LOS) J E 1 A t g A -oath Delay (s/veh) 36.D 0.0 .oach LOS E Copyright C 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS"" TWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:08:31 PM a.6.2 - Access 6 & Lakewood Ave - PM Projected.xtw HCS7 Signalized Intersection Results Summary �w General Information Intersection Information ^nency TPD, Inc. Duration, h 0.25 J alyst MJA Analysis Da41elct 22, 2018 Area Type Other Jurisdiction City of Ocoee Time PerioM PeakHour PHF 0.99 Urban Street Ocoee -Apopka Rd Analysis Year 12021 Analysis Period 1> 17:00 Intersection Fuller's Cross Rd I File Name 6- 5095 - Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fuller's Cross Rd -... Project Description (6) PM Peak Hour - Projected r+ir ri r, SB Demand Information EB WB NB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand ( v ), veh/h 360 217 7 86 309;33 8 601 142 16 293 390 the Signal Information ; Cycle, s 143.6 Reference Phase 2 z a Offset, s 0 Reference Point End Green 60.0 170.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated Yes Simult. Gap E/W 0 !A Yellow 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Force Mode Fixed Simult. Gap N/S On Red 2.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 s 6 7 e Timer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Assigned Phase 8 4 2 6 Case Number 6.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Phase Duration, s 76.8 76.8 66.8 66.8 Change Period, ( Y+R ), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Allow Headway (MAH ), s 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.6 Queue Clearance Time ( g s ), s 72.0 29.7 62.0 62.0 Green Extension Time (g e ), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 ise Call Probability 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Iv,bx Out Probability 1.00 1 0.00 H 1.00 1.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 3 8 18 7 4 14 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate ( v ), veh/h 364 226 432 759 706 Adjusted Saturation Flow Rate (s), veh/h/In 1043 1860 1626 1811 1664 Queue Service Time ( g s ), s 42.3 10.2 1 17.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time ( g c ), s 70.0 10.2 27.7 60,0 1 1 60.0 J Green Ratio (g/C) 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.42 0.42 Capacity ( c ), veh/h 357 907 823 782 721 Volume -to -Capacity Ratio (X) 1.018 0.250 0.526 0.970 0.979 Back of Queue ( Q ), ft/In ( 95 th percentile) 641.5 198.8 389.9 1013. 974.7 9 d Back of Queue ( Q ), veh/In ( 95 th percentile) 25.5 7.8 15.5 40.2 38.7 ^� Queue Storage Ratio ( RQ) ( 95 th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay ( d i ), s/veh 53.6 21.5 26.0 41.8 41.8 Incremental Delay ( d 2 ), s/veh 52.1 0.1 _ 0.6 25.0 28.3 Initial Queue Delay ( d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay ( of), s/veh 105.8 21.6 26.6 66.7 70.1 Level of Service (LOS) F C C E E Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 73.5 E 26.6 C 66.7 E 70.1 E Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 62.3 a E -= - -� -IN _u w w itimodal Results EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score / LOS 1.69 B H 1.69 J B 1.70 B 1.93J B Bicycle LOS Score / LOS 1.46 A 1.20 A 1.74 B 1.65 B Copyright © 2018 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved. HCST'^ Streets Version 7.6 Generated: 10/28/2018 10:57:47 AM ^nalyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Analysis Time Period (hrs) Time Analyzed Project Description MJA TPD, Inc. 10/28/2018 2021 0.25 AM Peak Hour - Projected 5095 Ocoee Village Center Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor 7.1 City of Ocoee Fuller's Cross Rd Lakewood Ave 0.92 Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R lume 150 4 100 15 14 0 201 241 4 0 435 317 Thrus in Shared Lane Lane Ll L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 1_1 L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 Configuration Flow Rate, v (veh/h) LTR 276 LTR 32 LTR 485 LT 473 R 345 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 Departure Headway and Service Time Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 Initial Degree of Utilization, x 0.245 0.028 0.431 0.420 0.306 Final Departure Headway, hd (s) 6.84 8.13 6.27 6.48 5.76 Final Degree of Utilization, x Move -Up Time, m (s) 0.525 2.0 0.071 2.0 0.845 2.0 0.851 2.3 0.551 2.3 Service Time, is (s) 4.84 6.13 4.27 4.18 3.46 Capacity, Delay and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 276 32 485 473 345 Capacity 526 443 574 556 625 95% Queue Length, Q15 (veh) 3.0 0.2 9.0 9.1 3.4 Control Delay (s/veh) 17.1 34.4 35.6±iS.3��Level of Service, LOS C tEVE1 D E broach Delay (s/veh) E171 1.8 E 34.4 27.1 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS 27.3 D Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS11 AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:10:17 F 7.1- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Projected AM - AWSC.xaw Analyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Analysis Time Period (hrs) Time Analyzed Project Description Lanes Approach Movement lume Thrus in Shared Lane Lane Configuration Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Departure Headway an Initial Departure Headway, hd (s) Initial Degree of Utilization, x Final Departure Headway, hd (s) Final Degree of Utilization, x Move -Up Time, m (s) Service Time, is (s) Capacity, Delay and Lei Flow Rate, v (veh/h) Capacity 9S% Queue Length, Q9s (veh) Control Delay (s/veh) Level of Service, LOS oroach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS Intersection Delay, s/veh I LOS MJA TPD, Inc. 10/28/2018 2021 0.25 PM Peak Hour - Projected 5095 Ocoee Village Center Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor 7.2 City of Ocoee Fuller's Cross Rd Lakewood Ave 0.92 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L 283 T 14 R 93 L 8 T 8 R 0 L 108 T 223 R 15 L 0 T 251 R 333 L1 L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 Ll L2 L3 LTR LTR LTR LT R 424 17 376 273 362 2 2 2 2 2 ice Time 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 0.377 0.015 0.334 0.243 0.322 6.51 8.11 6.61 6.87 6.16 0.767 0.039 0.691 0.521 0.619 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.3 4.51 6.11 4.61 4.57 3.86 ervice 424 17 376 273 362 553 444 545 524 585 6.9 0.1 5.3 3.0 4.2 27.7 11.4 23.1 16.8 18.3 D 1 C C C 27.7 11.4 D B 21.9 23.1 17.7 C C C Copyright © 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS11 AWSC Version 7.6 Generated: 11/2/2018 12:10:55 F 7.2- Lakewood Ave & Fuller's Cross Rd - Projected PM - AWSC.xaw MCE @ Orange County 00 Public Schools 6501 Magic Way • Building 200. Orlando, Florida 32809 • (407) 317-3700 • www.ocps.net SCHOOL CAPACITY DETERMINATION CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT DENIAL LETTER — 2"D REVISION March 15, 2019 VIA E-MAIL: rwohlfarth(d_)wcgroug.co Mr. Richard Wohlfarth Wohlfarth Consulting Group, LLC 246 N. Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 ACTION: RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL for Application OCE-18-005 This letter serves as the official determination by Orange County Public Schools that school capacity for the following development is not available: Type of Development Application ® FLUM ® Rezoning ❑ Amendment or Extension Local Government Application #: CPA-2018-006, RZ-18-06-09 Project Name: Ocoee Village Center OCPS Completed Application Date: August 30, 2018 Parcel #(s): 05-22-28-0000-00-040; -046; -004 Requested New Units (#): SF: 0 MF: 315 TH: 195 Vested Unit(s): SF: 0 MF: 1 TH: 1 Total Project Units: 512 School Board District: # 7 Detailed Capacity Analysis: Attachment A Upon review of the above -named application for School Capacity Determination, the Department of Facilities Planning of Orange County Public Schools finds the application is denied based on insufficient school capacity at Prairie Lake Elementary School and Ocoee Middle School to support the development of 510 new multi -family and townhome residential units. A Capacity Enhancement Agreement (CEA) will be required. To determine if this project can be approved through mitigation, the Applicant must contact the Department of Facilities Planning within fourteen (14) days of this letter. The fee to process a CEA for 510 New Units is $6,000.00, and the process takes approximately sixty (60) days from the date OCPS deems the application sufficient. Please refer to Attachment B for additional instructions on how to proceed with "The Orange County School Board is an equal opportunity agency" Page 2 of 4 OCE-18-005 Capacity Enhancement Denial Letter entering into a CEA. If you intend to mitigate, the next step in the application process will be a review by the School Development Review Committee (SDRC). This determination expires on September 11, 2019. In the event this project does not possess a fully executed CEA by the expiration date but still intends to move forward in the development process, the applicant must resubmit the application and application fee to be reevaluated by OCPS. In addition, should the scope of the project change (e.g., modification of unit count and/or unit type), a new determination will be required. OCPS is not required to extend the expiration date of this determination letter. If this project obtains a CEA, the project will still be required to submit for concurrency review and, if necessary, enter into a Concurrency Mitigation Agreement. This determination is governed by the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency, the provisions of the municipality's adopted Comprehensive Plan, and the Orange County Charter. Please contact me at (407) 317-3700 ext. 2022391 or e-mail me at lam ie.diluzioboerger(a-)-ocps.net with any questions. Sincerely, �1 Jamie Boerger, AICP, LEED AP Administrator Facilities Planning Department Orange County Public Schools VJ/jdb Attachments — Attachment A: Detailed Capacity Analysis Attachment B: CEA Submittal Requirements and Information CC: Michael Rumer, City of Ocoee (via e-mail) Thomas Moore, OCPS (via e-mail) Project File " i he Orange County School Board is an equal opportunity agency." O0 Facilities Planning ©© Orange County Public Schools School Capacity Determination User ID #: 109591 March 15, 2019 11:18:51 Project ID: CEA—OCE-18 —005 Valid Until: September 11, 2019 School Level Elementary Middle High CSA: CC School: PRAIRIE LAKE ES OCOEE MS OCOEE HS Analysis of Existing Conditions }, School Capacity (2018-2019) 885 1,424 2,777 Enrollment (2018-2019) 877 1,356 2,577 E Utilization (2018-2019) 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% v LOS Standard 110.0% 100.0% 100.0% Available Seats 1 97 1 68 1 200 t Analysis of Reserved Capacity I L School Level Elementary Middle Encumbered Capacity ill 43 76 v Reserved Capacity 0 0 25 Q Adjusted Utilization 111.6% 98.2% 96.4% U Adjusted Available Seats 0 25 99 Analysis of Proposed Development Students Generated 78.525 34.665 39.990 Adjusted Utilization -: F-1 I *,.N Wff = 120.5% 100.7% 97.9% FAIL FAIL PASS 1 78.525 9.665 0.000 Number of Seats to Mitigate PRAIRIE LAKE ES OCOEE MS OCOEE HS Facilities Planning © Orange County Public Schools Capital Contribution Calculation March 15, 2019 11:20:30 ET E c >. >. N �. T T E c T T y c E c c c CEA-OCE-18-005 LLO c EO c o0 m LLO c �O E o0 m LLO �O E o0 'aa OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER d aa) a a�i � a�i ; F � 2 m y " s y r a2i 3 N to- a) a, ;� w.2 c � 3 ;� - o N Cd N 2d y 0d ~c w Cd 2d oa) ~c Cd Zn �d �d ~c = H 05c tic �c �c U)c tnc UJ L1J- Lu 2� �� 27 =7 Status FAIL FAIL PASS Generation Rate 0.191 0.149 0 162 0.095 0 063 0 076 0 131 0.070 0.092 Housing Units Proposed (Non -Exempt) 0 315 195 510 0 315 195 510 0 315 195 510 0 Net Development Impact 76 525 s.ss5 r '• ': o 0 ,..kn .z;_ # : c p"y Total Cost Student Station for Failing Schools 9 per P Net Impact Cost per Student for Passing Schools .�+_ , # °' '�w�ta� W. Capital Contribution per Student k ? _ Capital Contribution Due' Impact Fee Calculator Single Family Multi Family Townhomes Total Housing Units Proposed 0 315 195 Impact Fee Rate Total Estimated Impact Fee $ 8,784 $ 5,919 $ 6,930 Total Fiscal Impact $ 3,743,917 Page 4 of 4 OCE-18-005 Capacity Enhancement Denial Letter Attachment B CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AGREEMENT (CEA) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION To proceed with entering into a CEA with OCPS, please provide the Department of Facilities Planning with the following, and initial each item to acknowledge: 1. Written confirmation that Applicant would like to proceed with the CEA. Written confirmation can be provided via U.S. Mail or via E-Mail. 2. Check made out to Orange County Public Schools for mitigation agreement fee: CEA Mitigation Agreement Fee 1 to SO units: $1,500.00 51 to 200 units: $2,000.00 201 to SOO units: $4,000.00 501 to 1000 units: $6,000.00 1001+ units: $7,000.00 Additional Fee for DRI Review: $3,000.00 CEA Extension/Amendment Fee 1 to 50 units: $1,000.00 51 to 200 units: $1,500.00 201 to 500 units: $3,000.00 501 to 1000 units: $4,000.00 1001+ units: $5,000.00 Additional Fee for DRI Review: $2,000.00 3. If the Property is under contract, please provide the name and address of the contract purchaser. _4. Facilities Planning will provide Applicant with a draft mitigation agreement following the School Development Review Committee's (SDRC) recommended approval of the draft agreement terms. Please review and provide comments within two (2) weeks of receipt of the draft mitigation agreement from Facilities Planning. 5. After reviewing the draft, Applicant will return three (3) signed originals to Facilities Planning at least two weeks prior to the School Board hearing date. _6. A check, made out to the Orange County Comptroller to cover the recording of the Agreement in the Public Records, must be provided to Facilities Planning prior to the School Board hearing date. $10.00 for the first page and $8.50 for each additional page. Indexing - first four (4) names free and a charge of $1.00 per additional name. 7. CEAs are required to appear on one (1) of the School Board meeting agenda. Staff is required to submit materials, including a signed agreement, at least two (2) weeks prior to the meeting date. The 2019 School Board meeting schedule is as follows: December 11, 2018 April 9, 2019 *July 9, 2019 October 8, 2019 January 8, 2019 April 23, 2019 **July 30, 2019 October 22, 2019 January 22, 2019 May 14, 2019 August 6, 2019 November 12, 2011 February 12, 2019 May 28, 2019 August 20, 2019 (Reorganization) February 26, 2019 June 11, 2019 **September 10, 2019 March 12, 2019 June 25, 2019 September 24, 2019 *Tentative/Optional school board meeting - if needed **Budget Public Hearing The School Board's 2020 meeting schedule will be available after the November 12, 2019 meeting THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: Dana Crosby -Collier, Esq. SHUFFIELD, LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. 1000 Legion Place, Suite 1700 Post Office Box 1010 Orlando, FL 32801 (407) 581-9800 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City Clerk CITY OF OCOEE 150 N. Lakeshore Drive Ocoee, FL 34761 (407) 656-2322 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER) For Recording Purposes Only THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2019, by and between CITY OF OCOEE, a Florida municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 150 N. Lakeshore Dr., Ocoee, Florida 34761, Attention: City Manager (the "City") and , whose mailing address is (the "Owner"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owners own fee simple title to certain lands located in Orange County, Florida, and within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, said lands being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the application of Owner on , the Ocoee City Commission approved Ordinance No. 2018- , rezoning the Property to PUD, under the Ocoee Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 4-10 of Article IV of the Ocoee Land Development Code requires that the Owner and the City enter into a development agreement incorporating all plans and conditions of approval by reference; and WHEREAS, the Owners and the City desire to execute this Agreement in order to fully comply with the provisions of the Ocoee Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable considerations exchanged between the parties hereto, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals; Definitions. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall be as defined or described on the Land Use Plan (as defined below), unless otherwise indicated. Section 2. Development of the Property. (A) The Property shall be developed in accordance with the Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. (B) The Property shall be developed in accordance with and is made subject to those certain Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Conditions of Approval"). Owners further agree to comply with all of the terms and provisions of the Conditions of Approval. The Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit "B" are the same as the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Land Use Plan. (C) The Property shall be developed in compliance with those Permitted and Prohibited Uses as stated in Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Permitted and Prohibited Uses"). (D) Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement and the Land Use Plan it is agreed that (1) the development of the Property shall comply with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City as set forth in the Ocoee Land Development Code, as it may from time to time be amended, and (2) all preliminary subdivision plans, final subdivision plans, and final site plans for the Property, or any portion(s) thereof, shall conform to the Ocoee Land Development Code requirements in effect at the time of approval of any such plans. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Ocoee Land Development Code, as it may from time to time be amended, and this Agreement, it is agreed that the provisions of this Agreement shall control. (E) Phasing. The Owner agrees that, prior to commencing construction beyond fifty percent (50%) of the residential units, no less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Commercial Use, as described below, shall be approved by the City and shall be under construction. Twenty-five percent (25%) Commercial Use shall be met by one or a combination of the following options: A hotel on any quadrant but preferably the NW. A grocery store on any quadrant but preferably the SW. A convenience store plus two other commercial uses on the SE quadrant. At least 10,000 square foot of retail shops on the NE quadrant plus one other use as described in this table. A convenience store on the SE quadrant plus at least 10,000 square feet of retail -2- shops on the NE quadrant. A combination of four different uses on the four quadrants as described in this table. (F) Design Criteria. Residential units shall be designed as follows: Apartments The Apartment Site shall be designed primarily as a four-story project with a mix of units in accordance with the following requirements: 1 Bedroom 50% 2 Bedroom 40% 3 Bedroom 10% Townhouses Townhome units shall have a mix of one (1) and two (2) car garages with the majority of townhome units having two (2) car garages. (G) Parking. Off -Street Parking requirements shall meet the following criteria: Parking spaces shall be 9' x 18' minimum. The depth of the parking space may be reduced if adjacent to 8' sidewalks. The required off-street parking shall be in accordance with Article VI, Section 6.4 (G), City of Ocoee Land Development Code, with the exception of the following: Multi -Family Units 1 BR 1.5 Spaces per Unit 2BR 1.75 Spaces Per Unit 3BR 2.0 Spaces Per Unit Section 3. Notice. Any notice delivered with respect to this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed to be delivered (whether or not actually received) when (i) hand delivered to the other party, or (ii) when sent by overnight courier service for next business day delivery (i.e., Federal Express), addressed to the party at the address set forth on the first page of this Agreement, or such other person or address as the parry shall have specified by written notice to the other party delivered in accordance herewith. Section 4. Covenant Running with the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and inure to and be for the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns and any person, firm, corporation, or entity who may become the successor in interest to the Property or any portion thereof. -3- Section 5. Recordation of Agreement. The parties hereto agree that an executed original of this Agreement shall be recorded by the City, at the Owners' expense, in the Public Records of Orange County, Florida. The City will, from time to time upon request of the Owners, execute and deliver letters affirming the status of this Agreement. Section 6. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the provisions contained herein shall be construed, controlled, and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Florida. Section 7. Time of the Essence. Time is hereby declared of the essence to the lawful performance of the duties and obligations contained in this Agreement. Section 8. Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes all previous discussions, understandings and agreements, with respect to the subject matter hereof; provided, however, that it is agreed that this Agreement is supplemental to the Land Use Plan and does not in any way rescind or modify any provisions of the Land Use Plan. Amendments to and waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be made by the parties only in writing by formal amendment. Section 9. Further Documentation. The parties agree that at any time following a request by the other party, each shall execute and deliver to the other party such further documents and instruments, in form and substance reasonably necessary to confirm and/or effectuate the obligations of either party hereunder. Section 10. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that either party finds it necessary to commence an action against the other party to enforce any provision of this Agreement or because of a breach by the other party of any terms hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorneys' fees, paralegal fees and costs incurred in connection therewith, at both trial and appellate levels, including bankruptcy proceedings, without regard to whether any legal proceedings are commenced or whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. Section 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 12. Captions. Captions of the Sections and Subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction, or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement. Section 13. Severability. If any word, sentence, phrase, paragraph, provision, or portion of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereof so long as the purpose and intent of this Agreement can still be achieved. ME Section 14. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the day this Agreement is last executed by a party hereto and such date shall be inserted on Page 1 of this Agreement. SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner and the City have caused this instrument to be executed by their duly authorized elected officials, partners, and/or officers as of the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered OWNER: in the presence of: By: Print Name: Its: Print N Print N STATE OF COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , as the of , who [] is personally known to me or produced as identification, and that he/she acknowledged executing the same on behalf of said company in the presence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and voluntarily, for the uses and purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of , 2019. Signature of Notary Name of Notary (Typed, Printed or Stamped) Commission Number (if not legible on seal): My Commission Expires (if not legible on seal): Im Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Print Name: Print Name FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA. Approved as to form and legality this day of , 2019. SHUFFIELD, LOWMAN AND WILSON, P.A. City Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA By: Rusty Johnson, Mayor Attest: Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED BY THE OCOEE CITY COMMISSION AT A MEETING HELD ON , 2019 UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared RUSTY JOHNSON and MELANIE SIBBITT, personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA and that they severally acknowledged executing the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and voluntarily under authority duly vested in them by said municipality. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of 52019. Signature of Notary Name of Notary (Typed, Printed or Stamped) Commission Number (if not legible on seal): My Commission Expires (if not legible on seal): -7- EXHIBIT "A" (The "Property") -8- EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Section A. General 1. The City of Ocoee, Florida (the "City") is subject to the terms, provisions and restrictions of Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, concerning moratoria on the issuance of building permits under certain circumstances. The City has no lawful authority to exempt any private entity or itself from the application of such state legislation and nothing herein shall be construed as such an exemption. 2. This project shall be developed in _ (1) phases. 3. Each phase of the project will stand on its own with respect to public services (sewer, water, stormwater management, access and other related services). 4. Except as specifically noted on this plan, development of the property shall be consistent with the requirements of the City of Ocoee Code of Ordinances (the "Code"), which Code includes Chapter 180, the City of Ocoee Land Development Code (the "Land Development Code"), that the development shall be consistent with the City of Ocoee Engineering Standards Manual along with the Code of Ordinances and the Land Development Code. 5. Nothing herein shall be construed to waive any provision of the Land Development Code except to the extent expressly set forth on a waiver table or explicitly set out on the plan. 6. Any damage caused to any public streets as a result of the construction activities related to the project shall be promptly repaired by the Owner to the applicable governmental standards at the Owner's sole cost and expense. 7. There shall be no access from the property to any public streets except at the approved locations shown on the approved Final Subdivision Plan/Final Site Plan. 8. All existing structures (including buildings, power lines, existing aerial and utility facilities) will be removed and/or terminated prior to or during construction of the development replacing those uses. 9. Development of this ro erty is subject to that certainDevelopment Agreement dated as recorded in Official Recor=dsBo%ok, Page -, Public Records of Orange County, Florida. 10. All legal instruments including, but not limited to (i) declarations of covenants, easements and restrictions for the property; (ii) articles of incorporation and bylaws of the property owners' association (the "Association"); and (iii) warranty deeds, easements and bill of sale documents to the Association, the City, the County and/or the St. Johns River Water Management District ("SJRWMD") shall be provided to the City for review and approval prior to platting all or a portion of the property. In 11. Parking for individual lots shall be provided in accordance with the Land Development Code. 12. Each fire hydrant shall be painted OSHA yellow in color and a blue reflective marker shall be affixed to the street in the center of the lane closest to each hydrant. 13. The Owner of each tract shall be responsible for installing reuse lines along with the other subdivision infrastructure. At such time as reuse water is available to the property, the Owner shall be responsible for connection to the reuse system lines. 14. Pursuant to the Land Development Code, all subdivision signage must be consistent with the legally assigned name of the subdivision. Any subsequent change to the name of the subdivision must be approved by the City Commission of the City. 15. To the extent the Land Use Plan and these Conditions of Approval conflict with the Land Development Code, the provisions of the land Use Plan and these Conditions of Approval shall control. 16. - To the extent any lift stations are required on the property they will be conveyed to the City at the time of platting. All such lift stations shall be designed in accordance with the City of Ocoee Engineering Standards Manual. To the extent any lift stations are required on the property they will be conveyed to the County at the time of platting. Lift station facilities shall be designed to accommodate a master pumping station consistent with the County's utility master plans. All such lift stations shall be fenced with black, vinyl chain -link fence, with posts and rails painted black, and shall be set back no less than 25' from any street. Such lift stations shall also be screened with hedge -type shrubbery, such as viburnum or ligustrum. Section B. Trees 1. Existing trees eight feet (8') or larger (other than citrus trees or "trash" trees) located along proposed locations of buffer walls or road right-of-way lines will be preserved if at all possible; the buffer walls and roads will be designed around those trees to incorporate them into required landscape buffers and as street trees 2. The existing grades on individual lots containing protected trees will be maintained as much as possible to preserve existing protected trees. For lots or tracts containing protected trees, there will be no grading or other construction on the same except as specified in the approved Final Subdivision Plan/Final Site Plan, until building permits are issued for those lots/tracts. 3. Removal of existing protected trees will be limited to clearing road right-of-way and retention areas as detailed in the Final Subdivision Plan/Final Site Plan. All existing protected trees on individual lots and tracts will be evaluated at the time of site plan review for that lot or tract, to determine whether or not each tree needs to be removed. -10- 4. In order to ensure that as many existing trees as possible will be preserved, all road rights -of -way and retention areas will be flagged for review by the City prior to any tree removal. No clearing permits will be issued for site work or building construction until the trees to be preserved have been clearly marked with tree protection barriers. 5. No person shall undertake land clearing or the removal of any protected trees without first obtaining a permit from the Building Department. The removal of protected trees shall be minimized to the maximum extent possible and no authorization shall be granted to remove a tree if the Owner has failed to take reasonable measures to preserve the trees on site. 6. The final grading plan will preserve existing grades on individual lots and tracts containing protected trees as much as possible. 7. All landscape areas will be irrigated and have an automatic rain sensor. Section C. Easements/Utilities 1. All cross access, utility and drainage easements shall be provided prior to or at the time of platting. 2. All utilities to be placed within the ten foot (10') easement along the front of each lot will be placed around existing protected trees to be preserved. 3. All utilities including electrical, cable, TV, and telephone and including on -site existing overhead wires shall be placed underground. 4. Unless otherwise noted, a five foot (5') utility and drainage easement will be platted along all side lot lines and ten foot (10') utility, drainage and sidewalk easement adjacent to the street right-of-ways. Sidewalks will only be placed in this easement if necessary to run them around existing protected trees to be preserved. 5. All drainage, utility and maintenance easements shall be for the benefit of the Association. The land burdened by such easements shall be owned by the individual lot or tract owners. 6. Drainage easements between lots and tracts are shown for location only. Final easement dimensions will be shown on the Final Subdivision Plan/Final Site Plan and will be sized to meet City requirements. 7. A perpetual, non-exclusive access easement over all internal roadways and other paved areas is hereby granted in favor of the City and other applicable authorities for law enforcement, fire and other emergency services. The City may require that the owner execute an easement in recordable form with respect to the foregoing. 8. An emergency access easement to the retention ponds and over all drainage easements shown hereon is hereby granted to the City for emergency maintenance -11- purposes. The emergency access easement will not impose any obligation, burden, responsibility of liability upon the City to enter upon the property it does not own or take any action to repair or maintain the drainage system on the property. Section D. Association 1. The Association shall own and maintain all common areas. 2. All declaration of covenants and restrictions affecting the property shall include the following provisions: i. Provision allowing the City to levy, collect, and enforce assessments for maintenance of common areas if the Association fails to do so or fails to maintain assessments at a level allowing for adequate maintenance. ii. Provision granting the City the right, but not the obligation, to maintain all common areas should the Association fail to do so after notice from the City. To the extent that the City undertakes such action, the City shall be entitled to reimbursement from the Association and shall be entitled to require the Association to levy assessments for the purposes of paying such reimbursement. iii. Provisions granting the City the right, but not the obligation, to maintain/repair the stormwater management system for the property (the "SWMS") and obtain reimbursement from the Association, or from the Owner if (a) turnover of control of the members has not occurred; or (b) if the Owner is still responsible for maintenance of the SWMS. iv. Provision providing that the SWMS will be transferred to a responsible operation/maintenance entity acceptable to the City in the event of dissolution and that if dissolution occurs without such approval then the City may continue to levy and collect assessments and impose liens with respect thereto notwithstanding the dissolution of the Association. V. Provision that the Association shall at all times be in good standing with the Florida Secretary of State. vi. Provision that at the time of turnover of control of the Association to the members, the declarant shall deliver to the new board of directors the maintenance plan for the SWMS accompanied by an engineer's certification that the SWMS is functioning in accordance with all approved plans and permits. To the extent that any such engineer's report indicates any corrective action is required, that declarant shall be required to diligently undertake such corrective action at the declarant's expense and to post a cash bond with the Association for the estimated costs of such corrective action. vii. Provision that no property owned by the City or any other governmental entity shall be subject to assessments levied by the Association. -12- viii. Provision that any amendment to any provision affecting the City or SWMS requires the consent of the City in an instrument recorded with the amendment. 3. All tracts that are to be owned and maintained by the Association shall be conveyed to the Association by warranty deed at the time of platting. A special warranty deed is permissible if accompanied by a title insurance policy to the Association. Section E. Streets 1. Final street naming will be coordinated through the City Support Services Department — Information System Division at the time of final plat submittal. All internal roads within the project will be dedicated to the public at the time of platting unless otherwise noted. Tract -, access road(s) through the property, is a private road which will be owned and maintained by the Association, with access and utility easements granted to the City. Such roads will be conveyed to the Association at the time of platting. blic j� Street lights, security lights and lighting for common areas meeting current Land Development Code requirements shall be installed by the Owner prior to Certificate of Completion at the Owner's expense. If upgraded street lights are installed, the Owner and the Association will be required to complete and execute a City of Ocoee Owners and Homeowners Association Agreement for Upgraded Street Lights with the Owner and the Association being responsible for operating costs for the difference between standard street lights and the upgraded street lights. Street lights, security lights and lighting for common areas meeting current Land Development Code requirements shall be installed by the Owner prior to Certificate of Completion at the Owner's expense. The Owner and the Association will be responsible for all operating costs relating to such lighting. In the event gates are installed on the private roads the gates and subdivision shall comply with Article VIII, Chapter 34 of the Orange County Code for gated communities as well as any amendments to that Article that may be enacted prior to approval of the Final Subdivision Plan. Further, in the event Orange County rescinds or ceases to have regulations for gated communities, then the regulations in effect at the time of Final Subdivision Plan approval shall control. All references in said County Code Chapter to the "County" shall be deemed to refer to the "City" for purposes of this requirement. Click to Enter and Knox Box technology shall be installed and operational at each gate. 5. The Owner shall construct appropriate curbs cuts to enable construction of ramps at all rights -of -way intersections (and other areas as reasonably required) in order to accommodate access to sidewalks and streets for persons who are in wheelchairs and other persons who are physically challenged. Sidewalks abutting each platted lot or tract -13- shall be constructed at the time of development of the lot or tract. When sidewalks are constructed on corner lots at certain locations, the sidewalks will be extended to the curb and the appropriate ramps will then be constructed. Sidewalks adjacent to common areas shall be constructed at the time of permanent construction of adjacent common areas. Section F. Stormwater Manaeement System 1. All retention ponds will be unfenced with maximum 5:1 side slopes into the pond. 2. The development of this project will incorporate the stormwater needs of all public roads within the project. 3. All building setbacks from all retention areas shall be fifteen feet (15') feet from the top of the bank. 4. Unless otherwise specifically provided for, the SWMS, including all pipes, inlets, manholes, structures and retention ponds, will be owned, operated and maintained by the Association. 5. Notwithstanding the conveyance of the retention ponds to the Association or any provision to the contrary contained in these Conditions of Approval, the Owner shall remain responsible for the maintenance of the SWMS, including all retention ponds, until such time as: i. the entire SWMS for the project is constructed and the appropriate Certificate of Completion is issued by both the City and the SJRWMD; ii. the retention ponds intended to be conveyed to the Association have in fact been conveyed to the Association; iii. the Association is designated as the maintenance entity on the records of the SJRWMD and all transfer records required by the SJRWMD have been executed and accepted by SJRWMD; iv. the City has been provided with a copy of the Owner's proposed maintenance plan with respect to the SWMS; and V. the City has been provided with a written statement from the Association acknowledging receipt of the Owner's proposed maintenance plan with respect to the SWMS and that the Association is responsible for the maintenance of the SWMS. 6. All common area improvements including entry features, walls, landscaping and sidewalks along all roads, as well as landscaping around the retention pond tracts and any lift station tract shall be completed prior to issuance of the Certificate of Completion for those corresponding phases. -14- Section G. Wetlands/100 Year Flood Plain 1. All finished floor elevations will exceed the 100-year flood plain by a minimum of two feet (2') and/or the 100-year flood event for the stormwater management system by two feet. 2. The Owner shall comply with all requirements of the City and other governmental entities with jurisdiction to protect the wetlands being preserved and to prevent any disturbance, siltation, or other construction below the natural wetland lines. Further, the areas below the natural wetland lines shall be fenced off (and silt fences shall be installed) during construction activities immediately adjacent to the wetlands, in order to minimize disturbances of the wetlands during construction. 3. Wetland and existing surface water impact for this property is regulated by SJRWMD and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. General or individual permits are required from these agencies prior to commencement of construction. 4, At the time of submittal of the first Preliminary Subdivision Plan or Site Plan review for the property, the Owner will map the jurisdictional wetland line on the site and establish a twenty-five foot (25') upland buffer from that line. Depending on the results, the City may also require a Conservation and Drainage Easement over any wetlands or adjoining conservation area. The usable area of the site will be reduced by this acreage and all development criteria will be reduced proportionately. Prior to or at the time of development of any portion of the property, if a Conservation and Drainage Easement is required, the Owner shall convey to the City the Conservation and Drainage Easement, the form of which shall be approved by the City prior to the conveyance. Section H. Commercial Projects 1. All commercial lots will be a minimum of one (1) acre in size. 2. All commercial lot uses shall conform to the Master Architectural, Signage, Lighting and Landscape Package Plans, which will be provided when the first commercial lot is developed and which will be subject to approval of the City. Section I. INTENTIONALLY DELETED. Section J. Townhome Projects 1. All multifamily residential buildings comprised of three (3) or more dwelling units, regardless of square footage or number of stories, will include automatic fire protection systems. 2. Open space between townhome units not part of an individual lot, shall be owned and maintained by the Association. -15- 3. The townhome portion of the project will comply with section 6-15 of the Land Development Code regarding multi -family development standards. 4. Street trees shall be provided by the Owner at a rate of one (1) tree per townhome unit prior to certificate of occupancy for each building. 5. All declaration of covenants and restrictions affecting the townhome portion of the property shall include the following provisions: i. Provision providing that short term rentals (rental term less than six (6) months) shall be prohibited and providing that this provision may be enforced by the City. ii. Provision requiring that garages must be used for parking cars and that parking will be prohibited on the private streets, except in designated off-street parking spaces. Provision prohibiting RV and boat parking within the subdivision. iv. Provision requiring that if trash cans are used at individual units, they shall be stored in the garage, but if they are stored outside the garage they shall be screened from view with a decorative fence and/or landscaping. V. Provision requiring a six foot (6') privacy fence on all three (3) sides of any lot with an accessory structure, per section 5-6b of the Land Development Code. vi. Provision requiring limitations on the size and placement of accessory structures and privacy fences in certain rear yards. vii. Provision requiring all lots with fencing to have a gated entrance along the rear lot line. viii. Provision providing that trash pickup will be provided for each individual unit and that no dumpsters shall be utilized for waste disposal. ix. Provision providing that individual owners of individual lots shall be wholly and exclusively responsible, to the extent necessary, for the periodic clean -out, maintenance, upkeep, repair and replacement of all elements of the sanitary sewer system located on their respective lot, from the inside of the home to the back of curb where the lot line ends. The elements of the sanitary sewer system shall include, but not be limited to, all piping, "laterals" and other components of the sanitary sewer system. Neither the Association nor the City nor any other third party shall have any responsibility for such clean -out, maintenance, upkeep, repair or replacement of any component of the sanitary sewer system located on a lot. Section K. Wekiva Study Area -16- 1. For development or redevelopment of property located outside the Ocoee Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) but within the Wekiva Study Area ("WSA") Boundary, and with the exception of a single-family home on an existing lot, those portions of properties that contain at least one (1) of the three (3) following resources: (i) most effective recharge areas, (ii) karst features, or (iii) sensitive natural habitats including Long Leaf Pine, Sand Hill, Xeric Oak Scrub, or Sand Pine Scrub vegetative communities, are be subject to a minimum thirty-five percent (35%) Wekiva Open Space requirement. 2. Open Space required to be preserved within the WSA boundary is defined as: any portion of a parcel or area of land that remains undeveloped, or minimally developed, such as trails and boardwalks as part of a natural resource preserve or recreation area, stormwater retention areas that follow Best Management Practices (BMPs), upland buffer retention swales (per policy 7.7.3), naturally vegetated areas, and tracts for pedestrian connections. Such designated open space excludes waterbodies, lots, street rights of way, parking lots, impervious surfaces and active recreation areas including golf courses. All Wekiva Open Space Areas shall be restricted to prohibit use of fertilizer and chemical applications, but may permit mechanical methods for routine maintenance. Rule 9J- 5.003(84), F.A.C. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] 3. Naturally vegetated swales are required to be placed within the upland buffers surrounding lakes or wetlands. The purpose of these swales is to improve the water quality of the stormwater runoff and ensure that the swale fills and exfiltrates into the soil so that there is no sheet flow into the lake or wetland. This method of water quality improvement shall mimic the absorption and pollutant removal abilities of a natural low spot in the topography and must follow accepted Best Management Practices (BMPs). Stormwater runoff from developed lands adjoining wetlands, lakes and/or floodplain areas shall be diverted towards swales, hold the runoff, and then allow it to slowly release into the soil column. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] Section L. West Orange Trail 1. A Public Trail Tract as depicted on the plan shall be dedicated to the City at the time of platting for connection through the property to the West Orange Trail. OR Access to the West Orange Trail, which will be provided by sidewalks from the project's access road that crosses the West Orange Trail. -17- EXHIBIT "C" PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED USES Permitted Uses: Permitted uses shall be those under the C-2 (Community Commercial) and the following: a.) Gasoline Service Stations Motor Vehicle repairs and maintenance are not allowed. Convenience retail uses are allowed within this use. The architectural details shall be coordinated with the service canopies. Service canopies shall not make up more than 50% of the primary road frontage and shall not block visibility at intersections of Right -Of -Ways or driveways. No outdoor storage shall be permitted. b.) Retail Centers — limited to a floor area ratio (FAR) of 3 c.) Grocery Store d.) Drug Store such as CVS, Walgreens etc. There shall be a limit of 2 drive thru windows. The Drive thru lanes shall not be located along Arterial Roadways. e.) Hotel — maximum of six (6) stories. £) Bank g.) Coffee Shop h.) Child Care / Pre K (Requires Special Exception) i.) Gym/ Yoga j.) Dry Cleaners k.) Florist 1.) Bakery m.) Paint or Hardware Stores n.) QSR (Fast Food), (2 Maximum), such as Chick-Fil-A, Arby, McDonalds etc., o.) Sit-down Restaurant such as Long Horn, Cheddars etc. p.) Car Wash; No outside vacuums unless shielded from all roads public and private q.) Auto Parts Store r.) Urgent Care s.) Dental and Medical Offices t.) Optometrist Office -18- Prohibited Uses: a.) Automobile Sales Retail or Wholesale b.) Banquet Room c.) Bait and Tackle Shops d.) Check Cashing Establishments e.) Mulching Facilities/Green Recycling of waste; f.) Recreation Vehicle Park; g.) Pawn Shop; h.) School; i.) Self -storage Facility j.) Equipment Sales; k.) Monument sales; 1.) New/used car sales; m.) Boat Sales and Service; n.) Automobile Repair; o.) Automobile Body Repair; p.) Nursing Home; q.) Medical Marijuana Dispensaries; r.) Medical Marijuana Cultivation; s.) Tobacco /Vaping Shops t.) Pet Sales, or adoption u.) Pharmacies; v.) Stand Alone ATM's. w.) Temporary Sales using a tent such as Fireworks, Christmas Trees, Valentine's Day x.) Tire store y.) Tobacco or Vape Store z.) All prohibited uses identified in accordance Article V, Section 5-8 (B), City of Ocoee Land Development Code. -19- COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT Date Published and Media Name 12 WEST ORANGE TIMES & OBSERVER I THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 2019 CITY OF OCOEE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM "CITY OF OCOEE"' LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO "CITY OF OCOEE" HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CASE NUMBER: CPA-2018-006 NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the OCOEE CITY COMMISSION will consider adoption of Ordinance No. 2019-010 thereby adopting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment related to the Ocoee Village Center Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The subject property consists of three (3) parcels identified as Parcel Number(s) 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046 & 05-22-28-0000-00-004. The Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment consists of classifying approximately 73.17 acres of the subject property from "City of Ocoee" Low Density Residential to "City of Ocoee" High Density Residential and Commercial. The OCOEE CITY COMMISSION will hold a public hearing on the proposed Large Scale Amendment on TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 2019, AT 6:15 PM or as soon thereafter as practical. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Commission Chambers located at 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee. ORDINANCE NO.2019-010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM "LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL" FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 73.17 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, EAST SIDE OF SR 429 EXPRESSWAY, NORTH/SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE, AND AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL; AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP, REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard with respect to the proposed actions above. The complete case file may be inspected at the Ocoee Development Services Department/ Planning Division located at 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. The City Commission may continue this public hearing to other dates and times, as it deems necessary. Any interested party shall be advised of the dates, times, and places of any continuation of these or continued public hearings shall be announced during the hearing and no further notices regarding these matters will be published. You are advised that any person who desires to appeal any decision made at the public hearings will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the. proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City Clerk's Office 48 hours in advance of the meeting at 407-905-3105. r COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT Date Published and Media Name Thursday June 6 2019 The West Oran -Re Times 58 Advertisement or Article FIRST INSERTION CITY OF OCOEE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OCOEE VILLAGE CENTER REZONING TO PUD CASE NUMBER RZ-18-06-09 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Sections 1-10 and 5-9, of the City of Ocoee Land Development Code, that on TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 2019, AT 6:15 P.M. or as soon thereafter as practical, the OCOEE CITY COMbHSSION will hold a PUBLIC HEARING at the City of Ocoee Commission Chambers,150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida, to consider the Rezoning to PUD for a mixed -use community that will include 150,000 S.F. of Commercial, 196 ni ideas ho s e and 316 Unit Apartments. The rezoning consists of three (3) p Parcel Number(s) 05-22-28-0000-00-040, 05-22-28-0000-00-046 & 05-22-28- 0000-00-004. The subject property is approximately 73.17 acres in size. The re- zoning would be from "City of Ocoee" R-1A (Single -Family) to "City of Ocoee" PUD (Planned Unit Development). ORDINANCE NO. 2019-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIEFICATION FROM OCOEE R-1A TO OCOEE UNIT PUD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ON CERTAIN REAL PROP- ERTY CONTAINING APPROXMATEI Y +/-73.17 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF CLARCONA OCOEE ROAD, EAST SIDE OF SR 429 EXPRESSWAY, NORTH/SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE, AND AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE; PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER, FINDING SUCH ZONING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABI LMM PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard that specsdescrto a om the proposed actions. The complete case file, including P De artment lion by metes and bounds, may be inspected at the Ocoee Planning P located at 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. The Ocoee City Commission may continue the public hearing to other dates and times, as it deems necessary. Any interested party shall be advised of the dates, times, and places of any continuation of these or continued public hearings shall be announced during the hearing and no further notices regarding these matters will be published. You are advised that any person who desires to appeal any decision made at the public hearings will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the nalis li based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, pe proceeding eter to rticipate in this shouling special ontact he City aClerk's Office tion or an e48rhours in advance of the meeting at (407)905-3105. 19-0238OW June 6, 2019