Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutII (A1) Turnpike District re: Various Interchange Alternatives in Ocoee/ West Orange Agenda 2-01-2000 Item IIA 1 Summary of the Ocoee/West Orange County Study Purpose of Study • Evaluate interchange modifications identified by the City of Ocoee in an effort to relieve congestion on SR 50. • Develop and evaluate feasible options for additional interchanges on the Turnpike between SR 50 and I-4. Background and Status ♦ Turnpike study started in the Summer of 1999 to evaluate City of Ocoee options • Modify Ocoee/Turnpike interchange and connector to SR 50, and extend to connect with Marshall Farms north of SR 50 and Windermere south of the Turnpike • Add the Western Extension ramps to and from south • Add Clarke Road ramps with the Western Extension (to and from the west), or add ramps to and from the west to OOCEA's Good Homes Road '/2 interchange • Turnpike added the study of additional Turnpike interchanges between SR 50 and I-4 • Avalon(CR 545) • Main(CR 535) • Apopka-Vineland • Hiawassee • Conroy • Kirkman • Conducted an environmental and engineering"fatal flaw"screening of all options ♦ Issue of the extension of the East—West Expressway to US 27 was added • Interim report produced in November 1999 on work to date • Report and analysis to be completed once decisions are made on the East—West Extension and need to coordinate recommendations with SOCTAS Options Still Under Consideration • City of Ocoee recommendations • Ocoee/Turnpike interchange — extend present connector to SR 50 south to Windermere Road • Western Extension ramps to and from the south — if another new interchange is implemented between the Western Extension and I-4 • Good Homes Road ramps to and from the west — if Western Extension ramps are implemented (these ramps are on OOCEA's East — West, and OOCEA must approve advancing the project) Other new Turnpike Interchanges • Avalon or Main between SR 50 and Ocoee Interchange • Hiawassee and/or Kirkman January 25,2000 RHANGE m ON Lake Apopka WI MINTE ODIFICCATION ; • cc W wi for E GARDEN WITH TURNPIKE ' O h _ NEW WESTBOUND ACCESS TO 3` .� Orlando A e S y� m - AND EASTBOUND EXIT FROM . OAKLAND ' : 'to Road m Q crj EXPRESSWAY 's<© ® , o PAVE HIL �.��� 1111.PAIN ,, lawassee _ ''Toll Plaza W Colonial Dr ve f/ • MP 270 1 �I-_ © g� 11'_rma!�O V • / 50 Existing 0 O 1) EXiStIfl9xtnPowIflier 266 arde Road Ili. PI IL JolTn 0 o cpi' NEW TO/FROM Lake > g. 4 °' ' WEST C Road © .e- ase(' MP 265 il„042.. ,.::. • 'reo Q• a� 0 � t-liawassee, m Western ^= '� o W NEW SOUTHBOUND ACCESS TO Q Road wo TURNPIKE AND EASTBOUND \ I ACCESS TO EAST-WEST EXPRESSWAY WCWa%M<icy. 5'.G%%: x�%iv-?:,:m:::,: :;. .:. :.�`d�.�i. . •L7 co Avalon Road -as r Til.-n Roa. \e a MP 263 Davenport Road oa 2'1 P21 Y Lake Butler c 0 PLOP IOAS CO TURNPIKE LEGEND WINDERMERE c Conro Road OProtential New Interchanges CD m O MP 26 1 °' � ' 262 - Proposed City of Ocoee Modifications o ry - Florida's Turnpike CD 2 Lake Butler (7.1 AKE CAIN Existin ar/ I '_ / HILLS ilk • • - Western Beltway(Future) c J 5 ® II Principal Arterial (1 p ik - Minor Arterial Major Collectior ` 11, / ,Other Road 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles quoNa sa,ti... Lake Tfbet — q Figure 1.2 ,ot Of noo FLORIDA'S A'S 'T Options to be Evaluated TURNPIKE a = Fladda s 19in � � l�4. �Q� West Orange/Ocoee Area Sleet iRND -- -- Source'.ETAK Inc.,Cop n•ht 1994;Florida Department of Transportation i. Li - i .-....----- - ' ' 1 . f I Welcome I 'TURNPiKEto . , , 1 , I ..., , , . • ; ... _ . , , . ,. _,........,, , ... . , I.I . .... ; ,,- ., ., ,.......,, , . • -,„....."."-., L / •"' , / - 4 '. --'-;.:.. '' .-- '-- • \ , 11 ' 4. ' ,ir,,',J. - 1—,- J.& 1 =.1,11-'11 -'4,..•-.-''...i.Vd•-•.,,,, ...,—,,,,g, 1r 1 Florida 's .r •••01.114.0:„;,.....„„ .. , 1 \I 44.I. . . Z. r ''''''''''' '''''''.4''''''...."7"'''''°'''''-'."'::"731':91:1'I II'ale,: .:44°-'1:"'" 1.''','''''''''Ilr'7L7‘;:S*415:1• :, .L., ...' ' ..7 ' . ' • .4'7..0," '' . &' ' ..,,, 4._ .L....., " ''''''''''''. :,I, ,,..1.,,,,,,,t%::''''''.....;47::;r4T.004j.',-.4.. ....' • '''' 444:::: L''".' A••4 , - - - _ • . , a _ .".0%. , ' ' 4 • • '.- •I ^4 ' ‘ ir": ,• '1. th, " • , , ....*.- ... U ' . A Pell . ; ...r/'•Ckt . '''''''$.'i '' ,"›.......;•.4,. •'A- ;.'''-‘ -: 3'• .. ' ......- ..,. . ., „,„ .. eg-r''' - ....."...:•:-:‘ ...77,•„,..• • : , „,.... ,.• :'4''',44.'7,,-, ,, , . : .' 1 4-"'r-%.1.;`"-Y.J '‘ •' :1. 1 ' , . ,,,„....•,, , 4',....-0,4„.' ' ' • ''`41" "•:'"''' , . ' - 1,...•" 'ie.,'P.4''''..4-` . ,. ,..' _ z , - • , „,.. . ...;, -•i'''. , '4' . 'n'' . ...........,444„, ' '` -I ,i. ' * * •"' . '';3'..' LtpV1-..A1t,,,,:ta • '': 6 ',,-; t I — -,'...."'Irr;' '".,-_-.1"--,,,f"4.4'._......"Nlii. 1 ) Mission -Statement • :_• . : . . . .. ..„ . . ••• . . • . • .• • • . • • • • • • - • • • FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE - • Florida's Main Street • The Mission; ofthe.:Turnpike is, to assist in meeting Florida's total tran portation ,needs by pursuing public and private sector partnerships to build Florida • Intrastate'Highway System_: projects :and improve . Turn ike access in: urban areas while p im �p rovin service g to-patrons any °prof ecting on o ers. Florida Department of Transportation SECRETARY Umn@p@rttiMed ComNAof General Counsel Inspector General Public Information Legislative Administrator Programs Administrator Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Transportation District Operations Finance and Policy Administration -District One •District Two Toll Operations •District Three •District Four •District Five •District Six •District Seven -.Turnpike District r . 3 - Florida7 s Turnpike District SEC-RE-TAR), TillFttstPlIKE DISTRICT Publik Admilintstrative 6.4 jelffralltelLsku ji-e) aet Enktmatioxit aiervkes eCtiftwasin P-4Antiiing PirfoduAtion Finacce ()aerations 131lanagft_mett Prrogyaurnmulingi and Rtarrketing Ottnelrfuglitut TratilEcp' EngjileirEng B4ainagietnen_t Consultant Consultant eelteral Consultant IllaitittenalincLe MW.349,entent ITS Consultant Ciaasmiltaint 4 i'` '- n -7 -,--- ---- --o :--- (,- ' r_ -, pi ,\_,--„L1-1----;, -.,- -.- 9 i : H1-1 --:Hic , ! : -•- ,, -----.L‘ .q. ,--tt‘ em 1 1 - - • L , ,i ,,_ILLH ;.__,.. !_ i_,, ,, -.; _t_t,-..„, ..-:. \.- -NI \\N • Mainline ( 1957- 1964) - ,_, > HEFT ( 1973- 1974) � Bee Line. West. (.1973.) � }� > Sawgrass Expressway i;, , (Opened 1986; Acquired 1990) • Seminole Expressway 1 ( 1994) > Veterans Expressway ( 1994) j ► Southern Connector Extension ( 1996) ;� i Polk Parkway ( 1999) Polk Parkway (2000) Suncoast Parkway 1 (2001 ) ty Seminole Expressway 2 (2003) 6 • _ _... . �� . -7---7 k Florida ' s 4~ . . . : .". ._ :., . . , _ .. . . TurnpikeT\ ,..:„., . . . . . . . . . . _ , . . . . . ,,,. . . . ,, \..... . . • .: ...L:. . .. ; ...,_: - , . : .. .,, - ....,..-... : . . . . . . . . . . . . . i, . . . . , . , . . . . . • . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . .. .... , . .. . , ... . . , .. . . . . . . . 1 . . to.• -1,.. ., - ' .' .. •• ., --: ' .. •, .: :.:. . ,, ..'.:::•• • .., , . - : . ','.. . . ...:., )°r%1 ' .. .. .,.. ■ .. DTI .... .. .. I. ,,.v p1.!..1l%1\1e1 l.b1f4f.W11"- IA �R p`` "4 _ -..` � :1,;_ ,4 1 Se m mole EIcp esswty ._t�._ _. _._ .. . ., 4, \VTestern ! s ,�♦ t Project 2 ; ilipill11111 Seminole s 4 , Beltway 4,I,* p ..Project 1 ,� ` a .. P• a , � / l O•Jrziq a AlC. . e • � Part —,, ' '11' '1 , may' ` + ' g — ;�' ° „o fl • as -- 1 Westerrn d, - .-•-• , _,.:;: . . ,,cam ' .,, 'il-1 FLORIDA ; Beltway A ,.a'e v'�•t g-�-; j q ^/////�� TURNPIKE P a rt d #a O. a n,d o .._. __• ,, �1° `1".•-•-•_•_•_•_•_-V A.,2!_-mile limited 5 0-.;. i .-MOro�Area©, °� •°� o �` 6 o e, Cl accessfacility e k \2 ® �.: . . aci ty a , T ns-T,urnpike' — • o�lland ° H from .In • r, Maui (ili �. East-West ® Osceola :County to a I, 0 � V ` -1 a �© �Q ' Expressway r �a� s �, /o i c v./< +. a b Florida's Turnpike ` ;�t.., Western a -� � Bee Line East in Orange County a bn•r' "` �;0 b APart• a, ° ��.� ine (Nest a Expressway ab • t 4 >> "ntral Florida ANN.", ry , - e ,} Q ; . ._...__. _._. ._©._..._..... _._ _._. . .�: ._._._._. OOCEA Section , r� : Southern, ` Connector erg a - "Turnpike Section I .. Extension fJ 8 S UN PA Sk S • • 1011.111 e. . ! • S r r • . . . . >South Florida Summer/Fall• 19.99 System Winter 2000 ,^ a. ' - ! • - F, >Ve terans Expressway Spring- 200:0 .;-Central Florida Fall 2000 • T >Pol.k Parkway Summer 2000 >Suncoast .Park Way 1 Upon: >Seminol.e Expressway 2 Upon_ Opening �- Seminole Exre s swa Project y 2 p y, VOLUSIA w e 42, 4 s SEM.INOLE s oQ49 , A6 mile limited access �aa facility from the northern W 1ST Street — — terminus of Seminole Semino e:Expressway Expressway Projec t 1 P o;ect z s . fy m 0 �` o to m S/ o / a, t co ry/ 1 Paola Road SAKFORD _ . , , t `� m• 0 a struction began:y. <e c) a .-.'...1.•`‘. 0 rn ept emberzi...... 1999 3 / Comp I et by• Lake Mary Boulevard U / \ January 2003 9�Go J� ss 0re co 0 o r V � �_ o oJ`O _ Sanford Avenue al 45 5 45 1 1.5 PAIe5 I di 10 Seminole Expressway, Project 2 Funding Analysis Dept. TFRTF 0.8M Local $39.4M • Dept. ROW Bonds per k Dept. ROW Bonds (to $100.8M $446M III District 5 Funds ■ SIB Loan $65.2M $10.2M Federal Funds $4.2M Total : $265 .2 Million I Florida ' s Turn ke =S stem • -, Toll Revenues. 1957=19.99 (Manion ) • • - $350 . • $300 .. °$250 $200 = . $150 • . . $100 :- $50. . .. . tS..k - .o : ti. . •6 t9 . �. is ,. 7 5- .` 0 :: tl . .. -;,t9 . *Includes S aw-grass Expressway . ., ' FY 1999 Expenditures ❑ Operating and Maintenance $92 M \� Expense $118 M n Debt Service Expense $125 M ❑ Renewal, Replacements, and Improvements * Per FY 1999 Audited Financial Statements Florida ' s y Turnpike S stem Existing System and Expansion Project Estimated Toll Revenues Toll Revenue (in Millions) $600 — $500 - $400 - Expansion Pro'ects $300 0 Mainline $200 - $100 - . . $0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 *Does not include Sawgrass Expressway or Concession Revenues Florida ' s Y Turnpike S stem Expansion Project Revenues Toll Revenue (in Millions) $140 $120 $100 1-11— $80 $60 $40 - mr_ $20 W O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1--+ M �t LO 00 O, O O O O O O O O O O O -- O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N ■ Seminole Expressway 1 Veterans Expressway • Southern Connector Extension Polk Parkway ■ Suncoast Parkway Seminole Expressway 2 Relocation of the Turnpike District Headquarters to Orange County ________ J,.., ' -.,- . - -------__________ 7 , .4,01.., i _ „Aim item 4,Nt*-1,12.:_z„,,_ ., . ._ „..,i---11:, �1 :if' r-- . . , I I 6. ---- ' . r a hi' d .� j ! 11 Ea t� A �.yy , ," • To better serve our patrons and reduce operating costs, the Turnpike District Headquarters will be relocated to Orange County in July 2000 16 FLORIDA ' S TURNPIKE ��P,�� OF Fie,, • 110. wPobT O = Q FLORIDA'S "it*, OF TURNPIKE Florida's Main Street Ocoee/West Orange County Interim Report BACKGROUND • West Orange County is one of the fastest growing areas in Central Florida with several large employers. • This study is one of several transportation studies in the region. 18 PURPOSE OF STUDY • To evaluate interchange modifications identified by the City of Ocoee in an effort to relieve congestion on SR 50 . • To develop and evaluate feasible options for additional interchanges on the Turnpike between SR 50 and I-4. 19 EXISITING CONDITIONS • SR 50 : Four-lane divided arterial with low Levels of Service (LOS) on many segments • Morning Peak Hours LOS • Park — Vineland F • Vineland — Dillard D ■ Dillard — 9th D ■ 9th — Beulah F • Beulah — Turnpike D • Turnpike — Maguire F • Maguire — Bluford F 20 EXISITING CONDITIONS • Turnpike : Four-lane divided expressway with relatively high LOS . • Morning Peak Hours LOS ■ US 27 — SR 50 A • SR 50 — Ocoee B • Ocoee — Western Extension C • E/W Expressway — I-4 B EXISITING CONDITIONS • Western Extension and East-West Expressway: Four-lane divided expressway with high LOS . • Morning Peak Hours LOS • Western Ext. — Clarke Road A • Clarke Road — Good Homes A • Western Beltway: New four-lane divided expressway from US 441 to Turnpike. PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION • Travel Demand Forecast: Utilized the Turnpike ' s Orlando 4 model. • Constructability: Footprint of improvement, design issues, proximity to other access points. • Environmental Feasibility: Fatal flaw analysis of wetlands, endangered species, hazardous materials, etc. IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE . .., •. .. ,.. • _ 777 .','''-:•-.. • ,r, . '' .,: .rM .,' i ire v ' ` y _!G I�w • ' -�• i a f • 0 1 aaiIIIMk �.. wY a .. rr r f ' " I �} R d `mil yi r � 4 Ptn••cep, .. ! "srpr,. l �' y s'..... ,iJ�, Mai r r*fir FO 'S4 1 a.,. 4, r t 4, !� ' 3,'r-air . •-Y yT.� • • i t a. w.... tri _T . y x • 4 ' "' } �. a� ,� i, r4f�. ram' - ICI. • ti ��p,.•y 1. -*. may` .r .i { 4 a 2t` �'f S ri • N r 24 IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE • Option A : Add ramps to/from the south at the Western Extension - i 7 -,-.�,.,a�.•-�*. _,•fit' .: ... , C _ ,,. t p� t� R I" _ E - s oslialicil`fit 0W 1 I. A f i '" r. L t L' i r d e ��, I 4- .4 .y : �. d Sri �`" ijAl J 11}1. # v� w.c , t 4 1 . i u •2 + t `i'.4, fit.► t c ,l. ".,:. t> •, q1 t '` F �• a IL} E ^ } + fi n • .... is ii -. •z • -.^ e, { pY .+`-� , d. ,. fir PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION A) • Travel Demand Forecast: No impacts to SR 50 traffic. Attracts minimal traffic. • Constructability: Recent developments make construction difficult. • Environmental Issues : Social and Physical impacts. 26 IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE • Option B : Add ramps to/from the west at the Clarke Road Interchange on the Western Ext. . .. .. i. ._... .„ _ . ,nr�mgn�I.„ _. ,,-,.. . . , . . . . ).. .. _,,„ , t ... , ,- ,:4 7'., ,j j,0:34147 _ FI ,, :: - .A. i it - • 1,'- , ,-'it ,1: .,11:: -.,,t,' ,.. !ill *4...soillr", rM� SM " CLARKE ROAD R ; ,C 2 is - — - �f.:J h ,. - � II yr ,. C z � PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION B) • Travel Demand Forecast: Minimal impacts to SR 50 traffic. • Constructability: Extremely difficult. • Environmental Feasibility: Significant Social and Physical impacts. • Dropped from further evaluation. 28 IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE • Option C : Add ramps to/from the west at the Good ..40., Homes Road Interchange on the E-W Expressway - 14-' ' it ; . t• ., •- J I•.. fit• ' ` ro1�w ro -y .. ,.. ,,,,,,,, , • _....rs{{P�'"'r. ,. R .F1 •: 1 '1 Rrorot^FY''+ '• 1M. �► t • till , �„ 4. ' ` elm r $c` GOOD HOMES RO• .., AD ,,,. ., " A_,..?Y r."''t r!.•' !i*,-", •''''7 {. !1 �, t.•1.' i!' • r 'M1 � •iROwsRR,W" 5, ' '� �� ��G IS �. • oft.+.• �t jt 1A15/q kly�eMt*}w 3'iit - „�,` e y " -ti R • • r ; se=+,.aMlleaMePl�MesFN�k f• ;'''• �� I.4I0 I. , ,► f � - . Tl. . 6 FLL 1 `,, _P 1 .4.1,,~ r a6'$.. to ," r /, PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION : OPTION C • Travel Demand Forecast: Minimal impacts to SR 50 traffic volumes • Constructability: Recent and planned development make construction more difficult. • Environmental Feasibility: Wetland impacts, no known fatal flaws. 30 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION : OPTIONS A AND C • Travel Demand Forecast: Decreases traffic volumes on SR 50 by 2-5% in year 2020 . Increases traffic on Western Extension. • Constructability: Recent and planned development make construction more difficult. • Environmental Feasibility: Wetland impacts, no known fatal flaws. IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE \ \ • O tion D : Modify the existing Ocoee/SR 50 Interchange .55 \ 1 Vt I / // / Pi -- / .° '- 11 ,..„....„_. .. / ---- _ - 1 At -�- ,==, 14'7 _,_- , '---- \ t f, , , __It_ iil _,/, 1 „, ? \ , , , \ , r PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION: OPTION D • Travel Demand Forecast: Decrease traffic volumes the Maguire and Beulah Roads. • Constructability: Operational issues need to be addressed. • Environmental Feasibility: No known fatal flaws. NEW ACCESS LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE TURNPIKE • Option E : Apopka-Vineland Road Interchange .. . --3-4,„ . . .3; -3-: ..,...,,,T: . -_,---74ptrago .: ,,. !.., ,,-. --. ,_. ; - . r.„,. . . .Mr.!. iiiisil ...__ .rim V. �, 104\ ip. .,.. ... asiat 34 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION E) • Travel Demand Forecast: Relatively low traffic volumes. • Constructability: Proximity to Turkey Lake Service Plaza, design issues on Apopka- Vineland Road. • Environmental Feasibility: No known fatal flaws. • Dropped from further evaluation. NEW ACCESS LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE TURNPIKE • Option F : Hiawassee Road Interchange ,._,.. . ....,._, IOW ..._ 4, , ' , . s r ,• " , • .ram ,, e t * f` t . % a44 �. 41 r., .1 lop d ""��' aR M��,7�'144 4ea�` .!1 Jf]k) yr S 4 _:� _ • F a'-e.,,C•,it-S 1 J1"-gy it ^ f - -. L • • y 71!'�t iR.„4 (-\:-= lc ,,,,i*_''..".' 'I ik"4 ,1_,\.,;.4.:eal,i2iik,'--- .., • ' . ' 'N.. litr _ 1 a psi ~ � ' j r 36 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION F) • Travel Demand Forecast: Reduced traffic on Old Winter Garden. Minimal traffic impact to SR 50. • Constructability: Design issues on Hiawassee Road. • Environmental Feasibility: Relocations, endangered plant identified. NEW ACCESS LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE TURNPIKE • Option G: Conroy I:oad Interchange ,. ... L.-, t,„ _ nRda r .. *. ad .Cooab ltr ,,,,,,,o, !,.,.... : 'lirci 4%. i litt ttri t r1 } .. ry4 .� t-` yt Kirkman Road 4 A A 'd t+ ...• •:•st" c, 'Lid oL • �` • 38 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION G) • Travel Demand Forecasts : Attract reasonable amount of traffic in 2020 . • Constructability: Extremely tight footprint • Environmental Feasibility: Impacts to wetlands, physical impacts. • Dropped from further evaluation. 39 NEW ACCESS LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE, TURNPIKE • Option H : Kirkman Road Interchange . .„. ?_:-,...,;,J ,, • -.. - ,,,,,,., ,... -,,-.. , • . . , , . ,. , , --, \ -- -,,-„,. IL- 4*- kto . ir,•,. , IIIIIIIIIIII yes ~� �. � \r '£4 '4 ^"�% � 1 . tt„\ ,,, i 0 . •,,,,=---, - -.'''N \\•. .'.. lft, .., . ,, ,. A0" 'IC J '.17,' .40 `-'Lie ...v -'.- I ''-'",- 1 1 40 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION H) • Travel Demand Forecast: Minimal traffic impacts to SR 50. Attracts the most traffic of any improvement. • Constructability: Extremely tight footprint, Need to evaluate traffic operations. • Environmental Feasibility: Impact to wetlands, no known fatal flaws. 41 illNEW ACCESS LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE TURNPIKE • Option I : CR 535 (Main Street) Interchange , . 4,...-1 . . - c, ..... .r _ . . „--... s._. -„,.. ., . .--. , ,.., „ . .., l 4 ..,". A ......-1 • 1 / ' *%'I . a I 4 i : t.:.-.41 1110 1 op OP [4.11 a • 1 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION I) • Travel Demand Forecast: Reduces traffic on SR 50 (Average 3 -5 % in year 2020). • Constructability: Drainage is an issue, realign Dillard Street • Environmental Feasibility: Wetland impacts. 43 NEW ACCESS LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE TURNPIKE • Option J: CR 545 (Avalon Road) Interchange . . _... __I N ' .1. ,* 4 b s i ',,, .—:. --w- i•••-',,'4.•• 4 s` r — I • 4 als —hill • .. .. r y_.. e jam.f I�r' '►._�. Id�C t i •1:11'I st 4. ;� , JM: �)1DittritglIV . 1 �# yy Fy 3 t Ste. tqitV a .. 3 IRa 44 PRELIMINARY SCREENING EVALUATION (OPTION J) • Travel Demand Forecast: Reduces traffic volumes on SR 50 more than any other improvements (Average 3 -7% in year 2020). • Constructability: Drainage is an issue. • Environmental Feasibility: Wetland impacts, relocations, community impacts. 45 • . , SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS • None of the improvement options located on the Turnpike substantially reduce traffic on SR 50, (i.e. more than 10%). • CR 545 (Avalon Road) reduces traffic on SR 50 more than any other option analyzed. • The Ocoee interchange modification will reduce traffic on north-south arterials including Maguire and Beulah. 46 • . • SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS • Completing the Good Homes Road and Western Extension/Turnpike interchanges will improve access to Ocoee area businesses. • Kirkman Road interchange attracts the most trips and would provide direct access to a major arterial. 47 NEXT STEPS • Revise draft Interim Report based on input from the City of Ocoee and others . • Coordinate report conclusions with other studies in the area. • Finalize Report in MarchlApril 2000 . 48 11, • i .0. OF FLO4 9 • v - z 1, m o 9 - Q F RIDA'S 1_ pe TURNPIKE 4r0 ANSI FTR Florida's Main Street 49