HomeMy WebLinkAboutVII(C) Discussion/ Action Re: Change Order #5 With Wharton-Smith For Forest Oaks And South Water Treatment Plant Project Agenda 4-7-98
� • • Item VIIC
r; 0 a
v
0.
of 000a JAMES W.SHIRA,P.E.
CITY ENGINEER/UTILITIES DIRECTOR
150 N.LAKESHORE DRIVE•OCOEE,FLORIDA 34761
PHONE(407)656-2322 EXT.142•FAX(407)656-7835
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 31, 1998
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners
FROM: David Wheeler, P.E.,e_9/Q /
Assistant City Engineer/Utilities Director
SUBJECT: Forest Oaks and South Water Treatment Plants
Well Pumps and Ground Storage Tanks Project
Bid No. B96-05
Change Order Request No. 5
Attached for your review is Change Order Request No. 5 on the Forest Oaks and South Water
Treatment Plants Well Pumps and Ground Storage Tanks Project, Bid No. B96-05 with
Wharton-Smith, Inc. This change order request was initiated by City staff because this work was
needed to eliminate operational problems associated with the feed pumps for disinfection of the
drinking water and additional costs associated with the construction of the buildings approved
under change order no. 4.
The items included in this change order are:
No. 5-A- Changes to the suction side piping for the NaOCI pumps
Since the sodium hypochlorite disinfection system was placed into operation in April of last year,
plant personnel have experienced numerous failures of the pump's diaphrams resulting in plant
shutdowns and temporary reinstallation of the gas chlorine system for disinfection to keep both
plants operational. Six of the eight pumps experienced at least one diaphram failure and some
had two or three failures. Upon analysis by representatives of Wallace &Teirnan, Inc.,the pump
manufacturers,PEC, Inc. and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.,the design team, Wharton-Smith, Inc.,the
contractor, and City staff, it was determined that the suction piping was to small in diameter to
allow the pumps to operate without drawing a vacuum and eventually rupturing the diaphrams.
The cost for the replacement/upsizing of the suction piping is $9,120.10, with no adjustment in
contract time.
Ott
THE PRIDE OF WEST ORANGE
This was a design flaw and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. has agreed to bear the expense of the upsizing
of the suction piping to the feed pumps. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. has proposed to offer additional
consulting services associated with the preparation of an Operation and Maintenance Manual for
the disinfection and monitoring process systems. Should a consultant be tasked with a similar
scope, the City would anticipate spending a comparable amount of money. This Operations and
Maintenance Manual will be helpful the operations staff, especially new operators employed in
the future, and should be used to for more efficient operations.
No. 5-B - Adjustment in Concrete Costs for Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings
The original plan for the Pre-Engineered metal buildings which Staff negotiated with Wharton-
Smith, Inc. was a typical design-build approach. All of the items,building, electrical and
lighting, doors and hardware, ventilation fans and foundation, were generally detailed with costs
estimated based upon discussions with manufacturers. In the interest of time to cover the
chemical feed pumps, Staff and Wharton-Smith detailed a foundation for the buildings and
included this cost in the overall cost in item 4-B of Change Order no. 4.
The project also included costs associated with a structural engineer designing the foundation.
The structural engineer did not start the design of the foundation until well after the building had
been released for fabrication; the foundation would not have any affect on the building design.
The structural engineer worked through two or three alternatives until Staff and Wharton-Smith
approved the design. His initial foundation design was grossly over designed and over budget.
Wharton-Smith installed the foundation realizing that the approved foundation required
significantly more formwork and workmanship than originally estimated. The "mass" amount of
concrete was less than we had initially detailed, but the structural engineer did not completely
follow our guidelines. With the need to permanently cover the chemical feed pumps, Staff
moved ahead prior to having the complete package. Wharton-Smith, Inc. is willing to split the
cost overrun with the City because they were a partner in the process. The City's share of the
cost associated with the additional foundation work would be $3,000.00, with no adjustment in
contract time.
The attachment is a copy of the change order. The total cost for this change order is $12,120.10
with no time extension on the contract time. The dollars for item 5-B of this change order will
come from the project's construction contingency. The reason for the delay in bring this final
change order before the Commission is that Staff wanted to keep the contract open in case there
were other problems with the chemical feed pumps which Wharton-Smith may be able to help
with in repairing. Wharton-Smith was not liable for any of the problems associated with the
chemical feed pumps.
The additional pages provide a cost accounting of the project for the City Commission's review.
The original contract cost was $2,304,000.00. There were five change orders that totaled
$459,910.60. Change Order No. 1 was an addition($261,086.33)to the project and was included
in Wharton-Smith's contract due to timing;this work could have been delayed and bid separately
with an additional cost to the City. PEC and Malcolm Pirnie contributed $23,120.10 towards the
project for design deficiencies included in Change Orders Nos. 2,3, and 5. The remaining costs
($175,704.17)were taken from the projects construction contingency of$230,400.00 or 7.62% of
the original construction cost. The City's share of the original project was $2,479,704.17
compared to a budget amount of$2,534,400.00.
I recommend that the City Commission approve Change Order No. 4 with Wharton-Smith, Inc.
by increasing the contract amount by $12,120.10,with no extension in contract time, and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Change Order No. 5.
Attachment
1) Change Order No. 5
Forest Oaks and South WTPs
Well Pumps and Ground Storage Tanks
Project Accounting
Construction City's PEC, Inc. Malcolm Pimie
Cost Share Share Share
Original Base Bid for 2,304,000.00 2,304,000.00
WTP Renovations
Change Order# 1 261,086.33 261,086.33
(additional high service
pumps and controls)
Change Order#2 37,811.32 28,811.32 9,000.00
(extension of building at
Forest Oaks WTP,
Forest Oaks pump
station, brine tank
renovations)
Change Order#3 8,036.00 3,036.00 5,000.00
(new well disinfection)
Change Order#4 140,856.85 140,856.85
(Metal Buildings, fourth
analyzer, South WTP
pump station&misc.
Electrical items)
Change Order#5 12,120.10 3,000.00 9,120.10
(new suction piping for
chemical feed pumps
and concrete adjustment
on metal buildings)
Project Totals $2,763,910.60 $2,740,790.50 $14,000.00 $9,120.10
Change Order No. 1: The items included were part of the proposed 1999 improvements which
were brought forward due to excessive demand by the service areas growth. Change Order no. 1
was paid for out of the 1997 Revenue Bond as a reimbursement item since the work was
accomplished prior to the sale of the bonds.
Change Order No. 2: The building extension was required because of space constraints in
working around the sodium hypochlorite generator. This was a misinterpretation by the design
team and therefore PEC, Inc. contributed a portion of the cost to offset any potential excesses not
realized through the competitive bid process.
Change Order No. 3: The pumping and disinfection of the two new wells was left out of the
construction project by mistake and therefore PEC, Inc. contributed a portion of the cost to offset
any potential excesses not realized through the competitive bid process.
Change Order No. 4: Although the chemical feed pumps had a simple cover included in the
design, Staff decided that a more aesthetically looking building for the sodium hypochlorite
system would be better for operations, maintenance and the public view. In the conceptual
design phase of the project, a similar building was proposed but deleted when overall project
dollars were brought into the review process. With money left in contingency to cover adding
the buildings after the fact, Staff proposed to construct a more permanent and functional cover
for the pumps and storage tanks. The other items were to improve operations.
Change Order No. 5: The upsizing of the suction piping was required to eliminate operational
problems. The design did not take into account the velocities of diaphram pumps and therefore
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. contributed to the cost. The concrete adjustment was required based upon
the design of the structural engineer.
The revenues for this project came from the following sources:
BUDGETED ACTUAL
Water Operating Fund:
Original Construction Cost $2,304,000.00 $2,304,000.00
Construction Contingency 230,400.00 175,704.17
1997 Revenue Bond Issue 261,086.33
PEC, Inc. Contributions 14,000.00
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 9,120.10
, * Adjustment as of Final Change Order No. 05
Change Order No._04
(Short title of Change Order)
CHANGE�,O�}R{gD�V�EYR FORM
CITCiCS7,SEi�\AW l�C���W7Ynti•
PROJECT: FRS' '>;1 ' < ' ''F ' E ,EM
CHANGE ORDER NO. 05
DATE: March 24, 1998 CONTRACTOR: Wharton-Smith, Inc.
OWNER: CITTVEZCOSETECRIVA AGREEMENT DATE: May 9, 1996
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
Original CONTRACT PRICE $2,304,000.00
Current CONTRACT PRICE ADJUSTED by previous CHANGE ORDER $2,751,790.50
Net Increase Resulting from this CHANGE ORDER $12,120.00
The current CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER $2,763,910.50
ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME: 270 Days Date February 3, 1997
Current CONTRACT TIME adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDERS` Date October 1, 1997
Net Increase Resulting from this CHANGE ORDER Days — 0
Current CONTRACT TIME Including this CHANGE ORDER Date October 1, 1997
CHANGES ORDERED:
I. GENERAL
This change order is necessary to cover changes in the work to be performed under this Contract. The
GENERAL CONDITIONS,SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS,SPECIFICATIONS and all parts of the
Project Manual listed in Article 1,Definitions,of the GENERAL CONDITIONS apply to and govern all
work under this change order.
Change Order No. 05
II. REQUIRED CHANGES
Items 5-A through 5-B
Item 5-A Remove 1"PVC intake piping and install 3"PVC intake piping to sodium hypochlorite
metering pumps at both the Forest Oaks and South WTPs. Intake distribution PVC
piping shall be removed/replaced/adjusted as required. Strainers will not be installed
in 3" PVC intake piping.
Item 5-B Reimbursement for additional concrete,rebar,labor and equipment for installation of
foundations for pre-engineered buildings.
III. JUSTIFICATION
Items 5-A through 5-B
Item 5-A PVC piping was removed/replaced/adjusted per manufacturer's recommendation.
Item 5-B Contractor requested reimbursement for over runs on structure concrete quantity
installed for Pre-engineered metal buildings.
IV. PAYMENT
Change Description Net Increase Unit Unit Price Net Increase Price
Order Item Quantity
No.
5-A Remove/Replace/Adjust PVC as required All IS $9,120.00 $9,120.00
per Manufacturer's recommendation
5-B Over run in structure concrete quantity All IS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
installed for foundation for Pre-Engineered
Metal Buildings •
Total Net Increase Change Order No.S $12,120.00
V. NARRATIVE OF NEGOTIATIONS
Item 5-A through 5-B _
Item 5-A RFP No.18 to remove/replace/adjust Sodium Hypochlorite Metering Pump(s)PVC piping
per Manufacturer' recommendation was issued on 822/97. CPS No. 18 was received from
the Contractor on 9/17/97 at a cost of$9,120.00. Same accepted by Owner on November
10, 1997 at a cost of$9,120.00.
Note: Request for Contract Time extension was verbally withdrawn by Contractor on
922/97.
Item 5-B CPC No. 6 was submitted on 11/05/'97 for reimbursement of over runs on the structure
concrete quantity installed for the foundation for Pre-engineered buildings at a cost of
$3,000.00. Same accepted by Owner on 11/10/97 at a cost of$3,000.00.
VI. APPROVAL AND CHANGE AUTHORIZATION
This proposed change to the Contract is to be approved by the Ocoee City Commission.
G:\CLER\CONSIIOE\OE-238\005N.CO 2
Acknowledgments:
The aforementioned change,and work affected thereby,is subject to all provisions of the original contract
not specifically changed by this Change Order; and,
It is expressly understood and agreed that the approval of the Change Order shall have no effect on the
original contract other than matters expressly provided herein.
CONTRACTOR acknowledges,by its execution and acceptance of this Change Order,that the adjustments
in Contract Price and Time shown hereon constitute full and complete compensation and satisfaction for
all costs and modifications of performance time incurred by the CONTRACTOR as a result of this Change
Order. No other claim for increased costs of performance or modifications of time will be granted by the
OWNER for the Work covered by this Change Order. The CONTRACTOR hereby waives and releases
any further claims for cost or time against the OWNER arising from or relating to the matters or Work
set forth or contemplated by this Change Order.
Change Order Request by: cffilgrOMORIM
Change(s) Ordered by: City of Ocoee
RECOMMENDED BY: ACCEPTED BY:
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS, INC. ��,,,e,P,v-J�j ,
Engineer Contract r
By: , ��� / •
/:gnat Signature
Date: 3/ 3//91 Date: ,�/7//�b'-
Title: (2nrf/14cton 41m-nirf-4fi Title: _C;e: / 4157A29 /T
APPROVED BY:
effiatiMEEZPIMIO
Owner
B
S. Scott Vandergrift, Mayor Date
Change Order No. 05
Attest:
Jean Grafton, City Clerk
FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY Proved by the Ocoee City Commission in
THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA a meeting held on , 1997
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY under Agenda Item No.
This day of . 1997
City Attorney
G:\CLER\CONSI1OE\OE-238\005N.00 3
1 . . . .
EOLA PARK CENTER,200 E.ROBINSON ST.,SUITE lbw,ORLw fucJ ru, ursivr+.xv �.o I . .. . ...rn 18
AFFILIATE FIRM:PECIW.K.Daugherty Consulting Engineers . SUMMAR d
engineers planners - surveyors NO.: - ��
44.2 3•�• -:a tis. s: ..jai r +... .: �.:t,, � '_ = _w.,: .. r.:-z.- :4§-i M-- 1;.,,.-:;.Y•`;;2 �< :w�
PROJECT'NAME: Forest Oaks&South Well Pumps&Ground Storage Tanks PROJECT NO.: 0E-238-3 0
L \TION: Ocoee, Florida - -7
OWNER: City of Ocoee,Jim Shira D- • IS EDC WAY M III
OTHER:. SPE .SECTION:•N/A
R E F E R E N C E: RFP NO.: 7 WORK DIRECTIVE NO.: FIELD ORDER NO.: I p. .4! lei-Wm.
DESCRIPTION: Forest Oaks and South WTP: Piping and Valve Modifications
WORK COPY tY N
ORIGINATOR I
ONE COPY& ROUTE TO:
..+�.ew��+.�.ten..,-��..vo..r«we. .•.%.5i✓!!.4[VrtSbY-Wt.��'Vn+W.;W.tN.IM�/�VW'JM'-i1'«� .. "-1 s •�NYWM'.yuati�'R�S.'�v[MY..MOI• ` Ate' ••� ��WWN '.lfrV�a.
PRICING INFORMATION 11, P ~'•' '-
• BRoe .
-
SKILL/TRADE MANHOURS FILE Rg.I iL"3-c,�,COST
Til - fir• .TOE s =t �." .s + \^ '%.,
1. DIRECT LABOR Laborer 48 MH $ 20.00 $ 960.00.1
1.A PRODUCT LABOR: 0 MH $ 35.00 $ -
0 MH $ 35.00 $ -
0 MH $ 20.00 $ -
1.Bn FOREMAN X SUPERINDENT Foierria ..% 0 MR $ 45.00 $ -
1.0 FIELD ENGINEERING: ?c jc r M4rafu-/Supenntender.if 48 MH $ 65.00 $ 3,120.00-a
1.D EXPENSES • e 01,,i. /,,c ) TRUCK 240.00,
Mafki/ war CO-S/Ye / r*-scA41*'1%‘,G 10.0.9e S'"' 1Z'Cri SUBTOTAL(1) $ -4,320.00;
2. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION QUANITY UNIT PRICE COST
_ . 2.A INCORPORATED IN WORK: MATERIALS 1 LS $ 3,546.00-
0 LS $ -
0 LS $ -
0 . LS $ -
0 LS $ -
' 0 LS $ -
• 0 LS $ -
0 LS $ -
2.B CONSUMED IN PERFORMANCE: FUEL, OIL, GREASE 1 LS $ 200.00.
2.0 EQUIPMENT: SMALL TOOLS 1 LS-- . $ 40.00-
2.D DIRECT COSTS: •
2.E BONDS,INSURANCE: :, `�=— -: •y � LS $ 185.00
SUBTOTAL(2) $ 3,971.00 •
3. SUBCONTRACTORS NAME DESCRIPTION OF WORK COST
3.A DIRECT: f$ -
$
3.B LOWER TIER:
J •
SUBTOTAL(3) $ -
'EC/FORM/CONST/00865
4. CONSULTANTS - [ NAME • DESCRIPTION OF WORK COST • •
+',mac at., • .,. '- - *:_• .:7•_.. - .. <. 't'o-�sy"i. ..� _ ..
•
A. Contractor •
1. Direct Labor. • " -
PIJBTOTAL(4) __
5. FEE STRUCTURE NAME I - COST l PERCENT (- FEE
1.Prime costs S 4,320.00 10 $ 4,752.00.°
2. Material and Equipment $ 3,971.00 10 $ 4,368.10-,
B. Subcontractors: S - 10 $
S - 10 $
$ - 10 $ -
SUBTOTAL(5) $ 9,120.10
TOTAL COST OF THIS CHANGE PROPOSAL (Au deductions shown at parentheses): TOTAL S 9,120.10
ti
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME:
As part of this Change Proposal,the Contractor requests an extension of Contract Time of ..-er days.
Justification:WORK TOOK THREE DAYS PER PLANT TO COMPLETE
OF BUILDINGS WILL TAKE FOUR TO SIX WEEKS AFTER APPROVAL OF BUILDING TYPE.
4!
eve#ros#,A- /Pe G er-f Ice- 44)i f-•,`Jn Cr vt4-n-,Fr -1", GU;tltd,•a.....r 4r ,
_'"s'te"�.���A-'`'S"`�°�o�c �. �r �'v'�:�� a'J��:`�._+."#a?..'�a.-�. a,a�i"'°�,c ��''��:!�.F"� �r.x• ��� :�4 �'-..• 's.' r..
RECORD DOCUMENTS: As part of this Change Proposal. a Contractor shaft provide applicable record drawing information affected
by this change.
Signed: 7/7.3Title: Proj Man Date:
Contractor. Wharton-Smith
s`e11-st'`-'. C`..4414a"+ ",' ,,4E.�i'�u` `4`<- sr -:'a .i
RECOMMEDATION by ENGINEER:(FowardtoOwnerforReview)
/- ?;rot- corfr - Pe O.wfrzct /fie.w-,,rs /SSG Mork /./S X 4132c, = IS'549a.o0
2. f'1,r?,7./ t„d F7k/e,«.,,i - Per C't,�1-art' Qocun,rrtFr f5 °t f1zrkin
f./5'x 397/ = 0,9564.t:3
rfJ a 9531.Ls
411,,Aded 117 L , Pa;irfE) ! •t T a..tr�t..'- - - -
Signature of Engineer: • f4/ Date: 05/97
•.;• ys.';:_,:"cis,...;:'.•.3•.�'u taz-^='o:. -`'sy :.�.::..i. ox ..T -3_--_ _r' 3="' 'x...-S _ :,,. •:S.J' s,.� 1.r
7.Y 1i:_ �. YP,� Y•.Yi _ v-..�L.; -r.`''C.�;..:45,�1`S.'t<.-Y .�C`L'.�.��"�'., ..lL< ..t.l.-. 'i-�=•^`
ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER: (return to engineer for processing) yw
Are e ic.d -f'(e)C..i.SS c S C,U, 'j.& —C c•' f;'44c.re:r r r s....,f �0,
Signature of Owners Authorized Representative: /1s/ ✓ - Date: /Yc✓ 7 /9 S 7
Engineer to prepare necessary change order Engineer to Re-negotiate change proposal as noted above Other as above
'
--OWNER:JAMES SHIRA,P.E.-CITY OF OCOEE CONTRACTOR:MURLIN JONES W-S PROJECT NO.
ENGINEER:GEOFF HANNESSY-PEC FIELD:DON TILTON-PEC 0E-238-3.0
ARCHITECT:DAVID WHEELER,P.E.-CITY OF OCOEE - CAM: ROBERT P.RUDD-PEC DATE - "
•G -`�,� :.`�:..,�: •^'�.:`�" :%sue`.';:'3 "'y',; -�:: S> -'v.,;:.:....:?' ..ref:-yr.- :^*•= %*• •.. ... ....
PEC FORMSCONST\00885.FRM F-00865-2
PE C/PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC
•
Project Name:
Ore.64. Ociki WTP'S Wei( Panirfs LI Gs 1 I 5
Project Number: 1,E - 38 - .3. 0 / 3 - 6. 1
Subject: • Tre- Mi
Recommendation by Engineer: (Forwarcho Owner for Review) •
.17)n irortot"IS / /prbpoS ) eajr•A r s A p rr-4 Sor),Jk A he-re, A- amcri.cd-pci‘r• .
Signature of Engineer: Date: P
Acceptance by Owner: (Return to Engineer FOr Process!ne
C • 404'1
A7 Signature of Owner's Authorized Representative: /-0-,1 e /k/1-1.,• Date:
0 Engineer to Prepare Necessary Change Order 0 Engineer to Re-negotiate Change Proposal as Noted Above
0 Other as Above
• CPC Wo. !�
• Wharton-Smith, Inc.
GENERAL&MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS
4‘1) •
•
•
November 5, 1997
•
Mr.David Wheeler,P.E. • •
•
City of Ocoee
150 N. Lakeshore Drive . . .
Ocoee,FL 34761
•
RE: CITY OF OCOEE FOREST OAKS AND SOUTH �WTP'S • •
•
Dear Mr.Wheeler: •
Item 4-B under Change Orde.No.4 was the Pre-Engineered Metal buildings to be constructed at both the
Forest Oaks and South water treatment plants. Because of the necessity in having these buildings up and
cover the chemical feed pumps as soon as possible, Wharton-Smith and the City basically agreed to this
portion of the project as a design-build process as opposed to having PEC, Inc. design the building,
foundation and appurtenances and Wharton-Smith to construct the buildings from those detailed design _.
drawings.
The costs associated with the change order were negotiated in good faith between the City and Wharton- • .
. Smith based upon our understanding of the scope of work required. With the help of PEC, Inc., we
estimated the quantities of material required t construct the entire building, including doors, lighting,
ventilation, etc., and their respective foundations. Because of the timing issue, the change order was : .
approved prior to completing the detailed design of the foundations.
The initial foundation design for the South building was for a 4" slab on grade with a step-down to 1 foot. •
thick at the.outer edge for wall support and four footer foundations for uplift support. The forest Oaks
building foundation included a gravity wall on the south side because of the difference in grade. These • .
two foundations were estimated to take approximately 16.5 CY for the South and 26.5 CY forth a Forest
Oaks foundations and cost$12,000 total. .
The actual designed foundations were different from the initial designs which we.generally.agreed to
when negotiating. the change order. If you remember, the first foundation design submitted was
significantly different and would have resulted in substantial difference I cost. After working with•the
foundation engineer the approved foundations included additional formwork and workmanship for the
concrete foundations at both sites.
The constructed foundations were 12" thick slabs with no footers for building column support and the
gravity wall for the Forest Oaks building extended along the west wall in addition to the south wall. The
design shifted the uplift support to the entire slab foundation as opposed to the massive footers. The
overall amount of concrete decreased approximately 7 CY but the material and labor costs increased from
• the initial average of$280 per CY to the constructed average of$500 per CY. The constructed cost of the
foundations was approximately$18,000. . .•
• 750 County Road 15•P.O.Box 471028•Lake Monroe,Florida 327-i7-1023 •407/321-8410•Orlando 407/830-3393•Fax 407/330-1092
CG CO32669 PC C048335 CM C035437 CU C056506
• •
Mr.David Wheeler,P.E.
. City of Ocoee '
November 5, 1997 .
Paget
Realizing that risks were taken by both parties in this design-build process, Wharton-Smith is proposing . -
to split the cost overturn with the City by absorbing one half of the cost and is requesting that the City.'. •.
consider approving an increase of$3,000 in the contract price for the buildings.
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this request further please call.
Sincerely, =
WHARTON-SMITH,INC. - .
Mur • es -- . -
•
Senior roject Manager • _
/rb - . . . .
pc: •Robert P.Rudd,P.E.-PEC ..
• 614/C-10. _
-•R/F -
(City110597.614)
•