HomeMy WebLinkAboutVII(B) Approval and Authorization for a Reduction of Fines and Release of Lien on Code Enforcement Board Case No. 99-074 & 99-075, Ruby Reeves
City Manager
Jim Gleason
Agenda 02-17 -2004
Item VII B
CommissivH\J~ "
Danny Howell, District 1
Scott Anderson, District 2
Rusty Johnson, District 3
Nancy J. Parker, District 4
Mavor
S. Scott Vandergrift
STAFF REPORT
FROM:
The Honorable May~r ~d City ~o/~s
James A. Phelps, BUIldmg Officlal15
February 10, 2004
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Request for Reduction of Fine and Release of Lien
Code Enforcement Case No. 99-074 & 99-075
ISSUE
Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commission consider a reduction of fmes and release of
lien on Code Enforcement Board Case 99-074 & 99-075, Ruby Reeves?
BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION
Ruby Reeves was found to be in violation of various city codes by the Code Enforcement Board
on March 23, 1999; an order was issued for compliance by March 30, 1999, or a fine in the
amount of $250.00 per day was to be assessed. On April 1, 1999, Edward Loeffler, Code
Enforcement Officer determined that certain violations continued. On April 27, 1999, an order
imposing the prescribed fine was issued and recorded in the official records of Orange County on
May 11, 1999.
The property is in compliance as of January 20, 2004, per affidavit of Edward Loeffler, Code
Enforcement Officer. Fines accrued to a total of $877,500.00 before the property was determined
to be in compliance. No cost was assessed as provided for in chapter 162.07 Florida Statutes and
no interest is added.
The violations occurred at 501 and 505 West Franklin Street. The property is owned by but is not
the residence of Ms. Ruby Reeves
RECOMMENDATION
It is my opinion that this case should not have continued for as long as it did without the city
proceeding to foreclosure; it does not appear to be homestead.
I support the action of the Code Enforcement Board who after rehearing certain facts of the case
and considering the circumstances surrounding the case recommend the fine be reduced to
$1,000.00 provided it is paid within 30 days of January 27, 2004. This amount should cover
actual costs incurred by the city to process the case. Further, upon payment of all monies due as
determined by the City Commission, the City process the order satisfying the lien for recording.