HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #07 - West SR 50 Development Wastewater Planthe tenter of Good Li,,
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Meeting Date: May 1, 2007
Item # q
Reviewed By.
Contact Name: David A. Wheeler, P.E. Department Director:
Contact Number: 407-905-3100, ext. 1504 City Manager:
Subject: West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan
Background Summary:
The study area is defined by the general limits of by the City of Winter Garden to the west, Economic/Consumer
Courts to the east, the Florida Turnpike to the south, and the Florida Auto Auction and Maguire Road to the
north. This area of Ocoee is mostly undeveloped and does not have any City provided central sanitary sewer
system to serve it. Any previous and/or current development handled wastewater treatment by septic tank and
was generally residential and/or small commercial establishments. The lack of a central sanitary collection
system has been the limiting factor in any large scale development in this area.
The City had been approached by potential developers in the past about various projects. Typically, the City did
not see a large number of developers at one time. Over the past two years, developers for almost every tract of
property in west Ocoee on SR 50 have approached the City either to talk about a potential development or have
submitted plans and are into or through the review process. The major drawback to any large scale development
of this area has been the lack of central sanitary sewer.
Typically, the City requires the first developer to design, construct, and pay for extensions and/or connections to
the City's water, sewer, and (now) reuse systems. None of these parcels and/or projects in this area have been
big enough to make this City policy work. Staff was asked by most of the developers and the City Manager to
propose another option that may be acceptable to the development community and the City.
Staff employed Reiss Environmental, Inc. to model and study the existing sanitary system and include the
proposed developments. The attached report details the analysis of the existing system and its excess capacity or
lack of capacity. The deficiencies exist today and will allow for development to continue, but the City needs to
be planning for the upgrades and improvements so that the system will never be overloaded. The study further
provides a plan to modify the City's wastewater collection and transmission systems in the SR 50 corridor to
alleviate existing deficiencies, provide for better operations, and allow for future growth.
The West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan also details the facilities needed to provide central sanitary
sewer service to the study area and facilities that each developer will needed to connect to the central system.
The study further provides a estimated flow per developable property that became the basis for a cost sharing or
refunding plan to allow the central system to be constructed by one of the developers and for that developer to be
reimbursed the cost based upon the established flows as each parcel is developed.
The acceptance of this Plan by the City Commission will become the basis for development of the wastewater
system in the west SR 50 corridor and the planned improvements to the City's existing system in the near term
and for the future. The Plan as proposed does not reverse the City's policy on connections to or extensions of
the City's utility systems for development, but provides for an alternative to that policy. Ideally, the City will
probably propose a similar plan for the northwest area where there is no central sanitary system.
Currently, the City's collection and transmission system for sanitary sewer takes the wastewater from the
Pioneer Key Park on Palm Drive and from the City Hall area and pumps it south down Maguire Road to the
gravity system on SR 50. The wastewater flow from the Colony Plaza and Old Time Pottery areas and from
south of the Florida's Turnpike also combine at the SR 50 gravity system and flow to a master lift station in the
northeast corner of Bluford Avenue and SR 50. From there the wastewater is then pumped all the way to the
A.D. Mims Wastewater Treatment Facility by going further east on SR 50 to Clarke Road and then north to the
plant. That force main has many other pump stations connecting to it along Clarke Road. This is a somewhat
circuitous route and is becoming more operationally intensive as more development is added to the system.
The Plan is to redirect the wastewater flow from the west SR 50 area and other adjacent areas north in the
Maguire Road force main to a new lift station to be located along Silver Star Road near Ocoee -Apopka Road.
This lift station would also collect wastewater from the surrounding area and pump north along Lakewood
Avenue and connect to the new force main coming from the northwest area. The combined force main would
probably run along Wurst Road to the wastewater plant. By taking flow off of the lift station at Bluford and SR
50, it will allow for some development of the surrounding property along Maine Street.
The different project costs were estimated for planning purposes because of the order of magnitude of the
projects. These projects are not easy and are not inexpensive and will take time to further plan, design, fund, and
construct. The cost estimates can also be used to develop a refunding agreement for the northwest area should
enough developers come together to make the central sanitary system viable.
Issue:
Acceptance of the West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan and authorization for staff to negotiate a
Wastewater Refunding Agreement for development of the west SR 50 area.
Recommendations
Staff recommends the acceptance of the West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan as presented by Reiss
Environmental, Inc. and to authorize staff to negotiate a refunding agreement with a developer for the central
sanitary system for the west SR 50 area.
Attachments:
1) West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan by Reiss Environmental, Inc.
Financial Impact:
There will be no financial impact for the acceptance of the Plan and the ability to negotiate a refunding
agreement with a developer for the west SR 50 area. Any funding of the other projects listed will be brought
back to the City Commission at a future date for funding options.
Type of Item: (please mark with an Y)
Public Hearing
For Clerk's Dept Use:
Ordinance First Reading
Consent Agenda
Ordinance Second Reading
Public Hearing
Resolution
Regular Agenda
Commission Approval
Discussion & Direction
2
Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk
Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution
Reviewed by City Attorney N/A
Reviewed by Finance Dept. N/A
Reviewed by Q N/A
REISS ENVIRONMENTAL
Q 1 200, RESEARCH PARKWAY, SUITE 228
Memorandum
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32826
(407) 679-5358 FAx: (407) 679-5003
TO: Charles Smith
David Wheeler
Steve Frey
FROM: Reiss Environmental, Inc.
DATE: April 23, 2007
RE: DRAFT — West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan
INTRODUCTION
Significant development is being planned in the City of Ocoee's service area around the intersection
of State Road 50 (SR 50) and SR 429 that will contribute additional raw sewage flows to the existing
wastewater collection system. The proposed West SR 50 Development area is along SR 50 from SR
429 to Economic Court, bounded to the south by the Turnpike and to the north by the Auto Auction.
The City has prepared a plan for sewer infrastructure to serve this corridor and assess the potential
impacts on its wastewater collection system. Reiss Environmental, Inc. (REI) was contracted to
assist the City with preparation of the West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan (Plan). The Plan
presented herein, includes a preliminary schematic of sewer infrastructure along SR 50 and an
assessment of the proposed development's impact on the City's existing wastewater collection
system to establish a range of cost. Potential impacts were assessed using the recently updated
wastewater system hydraulic model (Model).
The West SR 50 Development Wastewater Plan includes a hydraulic evaluation of the proposed
wastewater infrastructure and connection including gravity and force main size/routing, connection
location, existing gravity pipe available capacity, and lift station locations. The analysis will also
include identification of potential impacts to the existing system, inputting the proposed pumps and
piping and updating the City's hydraulic model. An estimate of probable cost of the required
infrastructure will be prepared and the developer cost pro rated. A schematic layout will be included
to identify the proposed infrastructure and tie-in locations. This memo summarizes assumptions and
results.
WASTEWATER FLOW ESTIMATES
Buildout wastewater flow estimates were prepared for the West SR 50 Development study area
outlined in Figure 1. Wastewater flow estimates were prepared using information provided by
developers if available, City of Ocoee unit equivalent residential unit (ERU) factors for development
type, a gross general commercial generation estimate for unspecified development type, and the City
of Ocoee's standard wastewater flow generation factor of 270 gallons per day per ERU. Wastewater
flow estimate inputs and assumptions are summarized in Attachment A. Wastewater flow estimates
were calculated using this input and assumptions as presented in Table 1. Due to differing collection
destinations, the "Ocoee West" properties were separated from the other developments (see Table 1).
a
d
O
L`
M
0000
V'
O O
00000000
IO
IO IO IO
O 00
00LO01.(o
Mol
L-
M
00
IO
C
Or9M
r V' O V'
IO
V
0
c
O
W)
01
LL
IO
IO
IO
IO r-
I
V
M
L- L- N
CO h
M
I
I
r
V'
)
N
L-
I
10)
V' V' CO
QQ
0000
C6 N
0000000
CO CO N
N
V:Lo0O0
M
(n0
aM- N
1�00NINO
V
M
e-
r
l D
H W
0
I
CV
fV
U)
I
�NNNti0�
I
I
cn
I
I
co
v N000r
IO
101?U
r
I
NNrr
IO
IOr
I
f�NOl�h
I
I
�•C
MMrM
LU
M
r
r
00
M
rn
r 0 0 0
0 0
co
O
r
co
M
0 0 0 0
..�..
N
7
7
<
LO
7
C
m
Q
f`6 m
t 7 7
f0
7
N
N
SC
N
VJ
E O O
O U U
N
Ul6
1-
E
Twy-
O
a 2 a
E O
2 a
O
W
E
42)
0")
U� 4E
�0
O
O
L
m
O L
L
0
LT h
Q N
d32
EE
aaN
20Inaa
00E
O
y
N O
yN
O yp
O
0
0N0
0
0
p
O
D N 9
O
0
c
O
a
c
O
.0
CC
N
co
m
CO
N
M
O
OD
M
d
c
O
'C
d
c
O
CAr
0 -
rIO
r-000
O V'
660
UO
I
N
N
o 0
00
0
O
O
N 0 0 0
IO IO UO
0 0
00 V'
=
N
r r>
N N r
r r
C
C
N N
3
C7
In
OONNN
D
0000
ON
MO<O
ON
t0M
M
00
02112
OM
V
U
N
N
¢
CV
M
�000OONr00
O
V'
In
V'IO0
N
r r
f`N0
00
r
01 N
MCO
V' N
NtOO
OMCO
OV
M
V'OM
00
0
M
O
0
NNNM
M
V'IO
r
9
fD
N
N(O 0m
NrrIO
0
6066660066
9
0
0
0 0
0
9
0 0
000
66666666666
0
0
0
0
0000
0090
6600
0
0009000090
0
0
0
00000000000
9999
0000000000
9099000000
00900000000
00000000000
0000
0000
0000000000
0900000009
1
00000000000
00000009000
1 I
1
1
0000
0900
1
N
d
aD
N
ao
N
ao
N
aD
N
w ao
N N
ao
N
aD
N
o ao
N N
ao w
N N
6
N
o
N
aD
N
6ao
N
N
6
N
o
N
ao
N
ao
N
ao o ao ao
N N N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N N
N
N
N
N
N N
N N
o
N N
N N
1 1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N
N
1
N N N N
N N N N
1 1 1 1
m
moommommoo
--
U
i
o
-
m
-
r
m i
-
r r
m
r
i
r
i
M M
00000000000
co M
M
co
co
M
M
co
M
M
M
0000
M M M M
Z_
U
Z
Z_
w
Y
Y
z
Q
C7
w
-j
ad
�-
J
�a
CO
��co
w
P:
0-
�
��
P?w'f'
O
U
co
c
3
O
F-
Z
Hwm
Q
w
CO m
O
}
Z_
0
of LL
O
�wdw
UwLLJ
w
JOwVww
Q
¢YO>UU
Jw
W
mm
ZF-
HOL
00
LL
LL
20m_j
00
LL
wU
¢¢awaaQw(L0-
LU
LLQO'Q
zwa
LLL
SF'JJ
aWJJ
Z2wZ=O��
aa00
wwv~ip00
Hmc~nv~i
M
OZZOUaa
mm��vWzn0.3��
�w��
iy—m000Wm��
N z
��QQ�
Q
-W
zLLILu
w
H
m
H
w
W
H H
Q Q
f~
O
O
w
-i
w w
fA
HN
Lu
==2Hf/)co
J
��0w<LUm
F=1=
JJ00
3LLM
W
��8N���
3:3:
o6Nw
00
a.co00
4)
c
cN
�
W
3:
U
E
0)
N
E
O
E
O
LQ
Q
N
N
N
N
O
Z
Z
N
276.S
N
N
N
N
2
0
U
W)
0
00�
Q
0)
c
0
E
o
N
v1
C
O
d
L
L
N
T
a
w
f°'
U
c
��
E
F4
a
a
0
a
�,
m°
`�
d
U
-
w
�3
d
y
r
ELL
f6w
SOL
¢v10
°
�Hwm
°�aHH
m
c
g
d
a
o
h
m
m
�
�
�=
E
O
�
�
�
ayi
$
�
o
�JUW
��
0)
3:
3:
LL
LLUION�L.LL
LL
3-O
v7
H
3
•c �
� 3
N
07
4
• c
or o
LU Q W
11
L`$
LU w
N
Applying a peak factor of 4.0 to the West SR 50 Development area average annual flow of —140,000
gallon per day (gpd) results in a peak flow of 558,000 gpd or 388 gallon per minute. This peak
flow was used to size proposed West SR 50 Development sewer infrastructure and assess impacts to
existing receiving infrastructure.
WASTEWATER COLLECTION LAYOUT
A series of alternatives were developed and evaluated for providing wastewater service to the West
SR 50 Development area. The alternatives involved various combinations of lift stations, gravity
mains, force mains and tie-in locations. Alternatives were discussed in a meeting with City Utilities
staff and a consensus alternative selected based on cost effectiveness, constructability and capacity
of existing City wastewater infrastructure. The proposed sewer infrastructure for the West SR 50
Development area is presented in Figure 1.
EXISTING SYSTEM IMPACTS
The capacity of the existing receiving wastewater collection system was estimated using the recently
updated wastewater collection hydraulic model and piping capacity values. The following existing
infrastructure was evaluated to determine available capacity to handle additional flows (refer to
Figure 2 for location):
• 8 -inch gravity mains on SR 50 feeding Lift Station (LS 8)
• LS 8 pump capacity and force main
• 12 -inch gravity main on northside of SR 50 from Maguire Road east
• 12 -inch gravity main on southside of SR 50 from Maguire Road east
• 15 -inch gravity main from SR 50 to LS 7
• LS 7 pump capacity and 12 -inch force main on SR 50
The results of the existing capacity analysis are presented in Table 2. The analysis indicates that the
8 -inch gravity main on SR 50 feeding LS 8 does not have enough available capacity to handle all the
West SR 50 Development area flow, although it can handle a portion (-80 gpm) of the peak flow.
LS 8 does have ample capacity, however the 12 and 15 -inch gravity mains feeding LS 7, as well as
LS 7 pump capacity and discharge force main do not have capacity to accept all the West SR 50
peak flow.
To relieve capacity in LS 7 and the 12 and 15 -inch gravity mains, an alternative routing was
developed by City utilities staff to reverse the flow in the Maguire Road force main (north of SR 50)
north up Lakewood Avenue to tie in to the proposed Wurst Road Force Main (serving the Eagle
Creek development) that routes directly into the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Due to the low
heads on the existing Maguire Road lift stations' pumps, a master lift station would be required, at
the proposed LS 22 upgrade site or the City's Lakewood Avenue site, to repump the Maguire Road
force main flows to the Treatment Facility. The new Lakewood Ave Force Main and master lift
station (LS 22 Upgrade or new Lakewood Ave LS) are shown in Figure 2.
The decision to reverse the Maguire Road force main flows north guided the proposed sewer
3 Im , r3;� ,.,2 �,. , f"C_v",I..
infrastructure presented in Figure 1. Based on this alternative, the "Ocoee West" properties'
wastewater flow was routed through LS 8 to LS 7, while the West SR 50 Development "non -Ocoee
West" properties' flow was routed north up Marshall Farms Road to discharge into the City's
Maguire Road force main. In the short term, prior to construction of the Lakewood Ave FM and
master lift station, the West SR 50 flows would all be routed through LS 7.
COST ESTIMATE AND SHARE
A magnitude of cost for proposed onsite and offsite West SR 50 Development wastewater
infrastructure is provided in Table 3. A cost share was calculated based on the following
assumptions:
• Developers construct and fund all local lift stations, gravity mains and force mains (see
Figure 1)
• West SR 50 Developments are divided into two groups for cost share purposes: "Ocoee
West" and "non -Ocoee West" as defined in Table 1.
• West SR 50 "non -Ocoee West" developers 100% cost share SR 50/Marshall Farms FM (see
Figure 1)
• West SR 50 "non -Ocoee West" and "Ocoee West" developers 100% cost share the LS 7
Phase 1 Upgrade and West SR 50 Planning/Legal efforts (see Table 3). For West SR 50
"non -Ocoee West" developers, this cost share is in lieu of cost sharing the Lakewood Ave
Force Main.
• West SR 50 "Ocoee West" developers cost share the LS 7 Force Main (16" from LS 7 to
Clarke Road)
A summary of the required cost share is provided in Table 4. Cost share values were divided by the
development ERUs to generate a unit cost share value ($/ERU) for the "Ocoee West" and "non -
Ocoee West" properties.
LIFT STATION DESIGN POINTS
Using the hydraulic model, design points for the proposed West SR 50 Development lift stations
were estimated for existing and future conditions. The proposed lift station design points are
summarized in Table 5.
4
8p �,pQg�� . .
,
\ � f
R! n�'
M W
>
� /® x \\ •oma r � � �
�uu
ZD
W
Z
ca: 5
�`
W
W 8
�
W
a
g
\ � f
R! n�'
M W
>
� /® x \\ •oma r � � �
W
a
D�RCONA OCOEE ROA•
/pY 5 A�•9
B� t�-----------
V
i A
NICOLE BLVD m
�g
LS109F 12' LS1 7
i
LS36 m _ Z ' LS32 ,
} a
> =' Treatment Facility
D Ls25 `MS ROAO
LS Lkwd Est O Wurst Road FM ; N m yo• M
CQI Future S" Fulura P 0 12' LS3 0" LS47
Y i aY
6i LL5
QI >= m
I Q a
L 46
U� C LS2 E LS27
e
O LS17 LS15
LS 106F '9.$107F
LS 22 g
Upgrade :LS2.
LS22. �1 LS43
LS21 e. E. SILVERSTAR RD 'S
4" LS13 8^ e"
4" g, L326 m
LS38
LS44 LS14 �LS41 LS2
LS50 L 3 LS16
a Q
O
K LS6 Y 4 LS23
LS9 g- Gj 4 'a�J
LS45 RL( LS4 ORLANDO A --N
LS10 12"_. 1�O LS48 6-
2' m LS40
I LS3
Fureut10• a LS29
0
z
f ? WEST O KS MALL
g. U 4- MAIN STREET Future 18"
m a Future 18^ 8" LS35 q
4• LS71 LS34 LS49
8• 12" iy
. COLONIAL DRIVE S.R. 50 LS8 12" ai 'w W COLONIAL DRIVE S.R. 50 19
--- 12" 12" 12^
4. 4. --T2:
LSH LSX
i � OCO WryyT
W
R LS30 D
LS11
LS51
LS39
m
0
g
LSI 2 'pIQ-acALe:r•laao•
p, H 10^ 9qr FORCE MAIN
LS26 AAL
FUTURE FORCE IMIN
L$33 ..Q ORAVRYMAIN MODEL
9i GRAVITY MIN'
AW&10'
LS123F
Ib uFr erAnoN
DISCHARGE TO ORAVRY
k• OWIETER. INCH
SERVICE SOUNDAW
CITY OCOEE
1-1-411 �ft- WASTEWATER COLLECTION HYDRAULIC MODEL (2/22/07) FIGURE 2
Table 2. Existing Wastewater Infrastructure Available Capacity Calculations
Calculated existing AAF
48
gpm
Calculated existing system peak flow
192
gpm
Modeled pump capacity
400
gpm
Available pump capacity
208
gpm
8 -inch gravity main capacity
272
gpm at minimum slope
Available gravity main capacity
80
gpm
12 -inch SR 50 gravity mains
12 -inch gravity main capacity
558
gpm at minimum slope
Northside
Modeled system peak flow
461
gpm
Available gravity main capacity
97
gpm
Southside
Modeled system peak flow
326
gpm
Available gravity main capacity
232
gpm
15 -inch LS 7 Gravity main
15 -inch gravity main capacity
874
gpm at minimum slope
Modeled system peak flow
794
gpm
Available gravity main capacity
80
gpm
Lift Station #7
Calculated existing AAF
500
gpm
Calculated existing system peak flow
2,000
gpm
Modeled pump capacity
878
gpm
Available pump capacity
-
gpm
12 -inch LS 7/SR 50 Force Main
12 -inch FM capacity (4 fps)
1,410
gpm
Modeled system peak flow
1,394
gpm
Available gravity main capacity
16
gpm
7 Ow
Table 3. West SR 50 Development Wastewater Infrastructure Cost Summary
SR 50/Marshall Farms Force Main
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization
1
LS
$50,000
$50,000
General requirements
1
LS
$80,000
$85,000
Traffic Maintenance
1
LS
$25,000
$25,000
Dewatering
1,000
LF
$12.0
$12,000
6" Force Main
3,250
LF
$55
$178,750
6" Force Main Directional Drill
600
LF
$165
$99,000
Wet tap
1
EA
$15,000
$15,000
Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
$30,000
SUBTOTAL
$494,750
Engineering & CEI (20%)
$98,950
Contingency 20%
$98,950
TOTAL
$692,650
Lakewood Ave FM & LS22 Upgrade
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization
1
LS
$100,000
$100,000
General requirements
1
LS
$160,000
$160,000
Traffic Maintenance
1
LS
$30,000
$30,000
Dewatering
2,000
LF
$12.0
$24,000
LS 22 Upgrade
1
EA
$325,000
$325,000
12" Force Main
7,500
LF
$95
$712,500
12" Force Main Directional Drill
300
LF
$220
$66,000
Restoration
1
EA
$80,000
$80,000
SUBTOTAL
$1,497,500'
Engineering & CEI (20%)
$299,500
Contin enc (20%)
$299,500
TOTAL
$2,096,500
Lift Station 7 Phase 1 Upgrade
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Pump & Electrical Upgrade
1
LS
$100,000
$100,000
LS 7 Force Main
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization
1
LS
$80,000
$80,000
General requirements
1
LS
$100,000
$100,000
Traffic Maintenance
1
LS
$15,000
$15,000
Dewatering
1,000
LF
$12.0
$12,000
16" Force Main
7,400
LF
$110
$814,000
16" Force Main Directional Drill
100
LF
$250
$25,000
Restoration
1
EA
$40,000
$40,000
SUBTOTAL
$1,086,000
Engineering & CEI (20%)
$217,200
Contingency (20%)
$217,200
TOTAL
$1,520,400
Plannin /Le al Service
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
West SR 50 Planning and Legal
1
LS
$30,000
$30,000
qI�
4) f6 O
�E.
Q M
W o=
II LL J
� II II
W LL CO
M
L
O
LO
N
N
O
LO
O
N
0
n
00
0
N ui
U
o
Cl)
1
0
0,O
I
N��
1
1
�MLOC-4C
MER
1
1
000'
0o
N
C
Ntfi
Vi
ER
M9
NCN
Efi
fR
fR
a Z
U
N
R m
a)
Na
I
o
0o
I
e
vv(
o
I
o
U)��
I
I
\\\\
OM�Nt`
o
l
i
0
M
0
eo
0
0
O
O
.�
C V
N
N
u i
0
0
0
N
N
O
O
Cy
•C
O
U o
�
C
O
v7
ma
L O
r-
O
M
0
I
NNS
O
1
aD
�N
�.
O
11
Cl)
O
a0
M
LU
W c
J
O
U
m
O
O
N
O
L
co
I
N
(n
O
O
ER
I
0
6A
0
69
0
64
1
O
61
O
ER
O
ER
1
1
O
ER
O
69
O
ER
O
69
O
ER
I
I
00
N
t
c
y
OU
04
O
U
�
V
yr
U
5
U
m
L
0
o
O
LL
.
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I,
w
000
000
00000
�
N
O
C
o
C
g
O
U o
U
m
o
-
o
U
E
E
o
N
O
C
1000
0
0
0
1
000
1
1
00000
00000
1
1
co
t`
0
N
U
W C
0
000
Ln
r
O
O
U
C
d_
L
LO
0o
co
O
ti
O
M
N
O
Z
U
N
n
0
coo
",
1
C
o
co
I
I
M
C
000
n
rn
v
11
0
0
69
t00
ci
0
(
EA
b4
M�N
LO
ER
I
N
b%
C6
6%
ER
N
�
:
ER
ER
ER
69
O
LL
cc
co
I
o
co
1
0
00�
0
0
10�v,
0 0
I
I
0
MvtnMOo
0
0
0
0
I
I
0
o
0
0
0
LL
Z5 0
O
N
000
fMMN
00000M
0
0
0
N
U a
m
c
o
w
LO
Eco
0
I
NCV
I
fV
N
0
i
i
M.
-CV
O
1
I
O
0
w
C
O
U
Vww
'JE
LL
�> C
c
rn>Q
LcLC
cI
NQ>
I
m WLL
I
I
m LL
>
I
N
0)
U
00
Ncc
co
c
m
OU
Ne•
O
0D
�Qa1
C
T
m
C
o
m
E
m
3
d
0
0
++
`d
E
m
0
5
Q
yC
N
0
o
c
O
.�O
Za
U,L
Q
�
m
o,sco
Q
O)
CO
p
>�
Z0
o
•s
3
J��m
LL
mUN
'
Ym
�°
IL
3fq
aNo
«E
w
M
a)
H
d
N
a)
LQvm
Tp
t
N
mHHvwE
m
N
2
E'00
E
o
00
1-
0
a)
v
4)00
w
O
H
O
H
3
m
J
U
W
3
I=
n
m
>
3
o
LL
0
LL
U-
I V
3
a
U.
Q
LL�
0
ate+
O
O
H
4) f6 O
�E.
Q M
W o=
II LL J
� II II
W LL CO
Table 5. West SR 50 Development Wastewater Lift Station Design Points
,Proposed Lift Station
Existing Conditions Future Conditions
Peak
Flow
gpm
Hydraulic Peak
Grade Flow
feet gpm
Hydraulic
Grade
feet
Lanham
7
126 7
160
West 50/Walia
174
128 174
164
Heichel/Just Brakes/WoodalVU-Haul
37
126 37
146
West Orange/Ralph Johnson/Self Storage
58
124 58
140
Notes:
-Hydraulic Grade = Static + dynamic head requirement from hydraulic model but does not
include minor lift station losses.
-Future results based on discharge to LS 22 at assumed 120' elevation.
10 Owf2r�iL u
ATTACHMENT A
FLOW ESTIMATE BACKUP
oftkris"', I "No'l-l- f,l
SANITARY LIFT STATION DESIGN CALCULATIONS
& PRO -RATIONAL SHARE
WEST 50 PROPERTIES, INC.
OCOEE, FLORIDA
PREPARED BY: Thomas H. Skelton, P.E. DATE: 4/19/2007
1.0 WASTEWATER DESIGN FLOWS
1.1 Flow based on:
Approximate uses proposed
Lot 1 Self Storage equivalent to 1 single family
residential @ 300 gpd = 300.0 gpd
Lot 2 Sit Down Restaurant 250 seats X
0.10 ERU/seat X 300 gpd/ERU = 7,500.0 gpd
Lot 3 Sit Down Restaurant 250 seats X
0.10 ERU/seat X 300 gpd/ERU = 7,500.0 gpd
Lot 4 150 room hotel
150 X 100 gpd/room = 15,000.0 gpd
Total for West 50 Commercial Subdivision = 30,300.0 gpd (57.7%)
Adjacent Parcel —180 room hotel + 140 seat restaurant
180 X 100 gpd/room = 18,000.0 gpd
140 X 0.10 ERU/seat X 300 gpd/ERU = 4,200.0 gpd
Total for Adjacent Parcel = 22,200.0 gpd (42.3%)
1.2 TOTAL DESIGN FLOW = 52,500 GPD
1.3 Peak Factor = 4.0
1.4 Peak Hourly Flow
52,500 gpd x 1/1440 x 4.0 = 145.8 GPM
General Code E -Code: City of Ocoee, FL
§ 173-9. (Reserved)
Page 9 of 39
§ 173-10. On-site facilities.
A. Each developer, owner or builder (hereinafter referred to as "developer") shall be responsible for the design,
installation, inspection and testing of the complete water system located in the streets or easements
adjoining or within the boundaries of the developer's property.
B. The term "complete water system" as used herein includes, but is not limited to all component parts of a
water distribution system, including pipes, valves, fittings, hydrants and all appurtenances as shown upon
the approved design of such water distribution system.
C. In the event the City requires the installation of oversized lines or facilities designed to provide service for
other properties, then the City shall pay for the cost of such oversizing by means of a direct cash payment
by the City to the developer or a credit against water capital charges otherwise to be paid by the developer.
The limited size of the developer's property for which service has been requested may indicate to the City
the desirability of having the City design and install the water distribution system. In such event, the City
reserves the right to compute the estimated cost of such extension and to require the developer to pay such
cost of construction in lieu of the developer's installation of the water distribution system.
§ 173-11. Water capital charges.
A. The intent of this section is to establish charges for the purpose of compensating the City for costs incurred
in providing water treatment facilities and in extending water distribution and transmission lines to a point of
reasonable availability for connection to the City water system. The charges shall be computed on the basis
of real property use, zoning and size in approximate proportion to the benefits received. The determination
of the point of reasonable availability for connection to the City water system shall be determined in
accordance with policies from time to time established by the City. As set forth in this chapter, the developer
may incur additional charges and expenses in order to obtain water service, which charges and expenses
are not defrayed by its payment of water capital charges. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be
construed to obligate the City to extend water services to any lands within its water service area.
B. A water capital charge is hereby established at $966 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). Those persons,
corporations or entities which have previously prepaid the existing water connection charge or who have
entered into an agreement with the City providing credits against the water connection charge shall be
exempt from paying this water capital charge. The amount of credit shall not exceed the amount prepaid or
the approved credit authorized in the developer's agreement.
C. For the purpose of calculating and imposing the water capital charge, the ERU factor for any particular
connection shall be calculated and imposed in the manner provided as follows:
Establishment
Unit
Factor
Residential Projects
Duplex (1 to 2 bedrooms)
Per unit
0.833
Duplex (3 or more bedrooms)
Per unit
1.000
Mobile home (1 to 2 bedrooms)
Per unit
0.667
Mobile home (3 or more bedrooms)
Per unit
0.833
Multifamily, efficiency (less than 500 square feet)
Per unit
0.500
Multifamily (1 -bedroom units) (See Note 9.)
Per unit
0.583
Multifamily (2 -bedroom units) (See Note 9.)
Per unit
0.833
Multifamily (3 -or -more bedroom units) (See Note 9.)
Per unit
1.000
Single-family residence
Per unit
1.000
Nonresidential Projects
Animal kennels
Per kennel run
0.160
Auditorium
Per seat
0.017
http://www.e-codes.generalcode.comisearchresults.asp?cmd=getdocTofC&index=1369 A&... 3/2/2007
General Code E -Code: City of Ocoee, FL
Page 10 of 39
Automotive repair and maintenance
Per repair bay
0.250
Bar/cocktail lounge
Per seat
0.067
Barber/beauty shop
Per operator station
0.300
Bowling alley
Per lane
0.330
Church
Per seat
0.017
Convenience store (no gas pumps)
By FU
See FU Table below.
Dentist office
Per dentist
0.833
Extended -care facilities
Per efficiency
0.500
Hospital
Per bed
0.833
Hotel/motel (See Note 1.)
Per room
0.500
Hotel/motel suites, 1 bedroom (See Note 1.)
Per unit
0.583
Hotel/motel suites, 2 bedrooms (See Note 1.)
Per unit
0.833
Hotel/motel suites, 3 or more bedrooms (See Note 1.)
Per unit
1.000
Industrial buildings (See Note 2.) with showers
Per employee
0.117
Industrial buildings (See Note 2.) without showers
Per employee
0.050
Landscape irrigation
Per 1,000 square feet
0.125
Laundry, self-service
Per machine
1.333
Medical office (formerly: doctor's office)
Per doctor
0.833
Meeting and banquet rooms
Per seat
0.017
Nursing home
Per bed
0.417
Office building (See Note 3.)
Per 1,000 square feet gross 0.334
Restaurant (cafeteria), full-service
Per seat
0.100
Restaurant, 24-hour
Per seat
0.167
Restaurant, fast-food
Per seat
0.050
Retail spaces
By FU
See FU Table below.
Schools, elementary and nursery
Per student
0.025
Schools, middle and high
Per student
0.067
Self-service gas station (See Note 5.)
Per toilet room
1.000
Service station (See Note 6.)
Per toilet room
1.000
Service station (See Note 6.)
Per service bay
1.000
Service station (See Note 6.)
Per wash bay
3.200
Theater
Per seat
0.010
Theater (dinner)
Per seat
0.067
Trailer park (overnight)
Per space
0.333
Warehouse space (See Note 4.)
By FU
See FU Table below.
NOTES:
1. Hotels and motels: add food service, banquet and meeting rooms, and self service laundries.
2. Add food service; does not include industrial waste flows which are calculated on fixture unit
(FU) basis.
3. Office buildings: add food service and retail space.
http://vvww.e-codes.generalcode.comisearchresults.asp?cmd=getdocTofC&index=1369 A&... 3/2/2007
General Code E -Code: City of Ocoee, FL
Page 11 of 39
4. Warehouses: add office space, food service, and retail space.
5. Self-service gas stations: add fixture units (FU).
6. Service (gasoline) stations: add the total of ERU factors for all service bays, wash bays (not
recycled) and toilet rooms. Automatically recycled vehicle washing systems require a
professional engineer's signed and sealed estimate of capacity usage.
7. See fixture unit (FU) calculations on FU Table below.
8. Ocoee requires a minimum of 1.000 ERU per each separate commercial establishment.
9. Multifamily projects based upon units only; no additional capital charges for laundries, pool, or
management offices.
Capacity Demand Based Upon Fixture Units (FU)
Type of Fixture
Fixture Units (FU) ERU Factor
Nonresidential Projects Drains, condensate
1.0
0.083
Drains, floor and fixtures not listed: 1 1/4 -inch trap
1.0
0.083
Drains, floor and fixtures not listed: 1 1/2 -inch trap
2.0
0.167
Drains, floor and fixtures not listed: 2 -inch trap
3.0
0.250
Drains, floor and fixtures not listed: 2 1/2 -inch trap
4.0
0.333
Drains, floor and fixtures not listed: 3 -inch trap
5.0
0.417
Drains, floor and fixtures not listed: 4 -inch trap
6.0
0.500
Drinking fountain
0.5
0.042
Laundry tray
2.0
0.167
Lavatory, large drain (greater than 1-1/4 inch trap)
2.0
0.167
Lavatory, small drain (1-1/4 inch trap)
1.0
0.083
Showers (per head)
3.0
0.250
Sink, combination (food service)
3.0
0.250
Sink, combination (garbage grinder)
4.0
0.333
Sink, compartmented (2)
3.0
0.250
Sink, compartmented (3)
4.0
0.333
Sink, flushing rim
8.0
0.667
Sink, service (mop/janitor)
3.0
0.250
Sink, service ("p" trap) (hand)
2.0
0.167
Sink, (pot, scullery, etc.)
4.0
0.333
Urinal
4.0
0.333
Washing machine (noncoin laundry) by drain size above Varies
Varies
Water closet public
6.0
0.500
Residential Projects (requiring larger than 5/8" meter)
Bathroom group (water closet, lavatory, bathtub/shower) 6.0
0.500
Bath, half
4.0
0.333
Dishwasher
2.0
0.167
Drains (by drain size above)
Varies
Varies
Lavatory
4.0
0.333
Shower stall
3.0
0.250
http://www.e-codes.generalcode.comisearchresults.asp?cmd=getdocTofC&index=1369 A&... 3/2/2007
General Code E -Code: City of Ocoee, FL Page 12 of 39
Sink, kitchen
2.0
0.167
Sink, kitchen (garbage grinder/ dishwasher)
3.0
0.250
Sink, laundry
2.0
0.167
Washer, clothes (by drain size, above)
Varies
Varies
NOTES:
1. Continuous and semicontinuous flows (pumps, air conditioning systems, etc.) are 2.0 FU per
gallon per minute (gpm) of flow.
D. One ERU shall have an assigned value of 1.00. One ERU is hereby established and determined to be equal
to a flow of 300 gallons per day (GPD), average annual basis. The water capital charge shall be determined
by multiplying the ERU factor listed in Subsection C above times $966, times the number of units.
E. For all establishments not listed in Subsection C above, the water capital charge shall be determined by
multiplying the number of fixture units, as published in the Standard Plumbing Code, by 25, times $966, and
dividing that numerator by 300 GPD/ERU; provided, however, all such establishments shall have a
minimum ERU value of 1.00.
F. The water capital charge shall be paid in accordance with a schedule agreed upon by the Director, but in no
event later than the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The Director may require that, prior to the
execution by the city of the FDEP construction application, a letter of credit in favor of the City be provided
to secure the obligations for payment of the water capital charges. (Amended 9-2-2003 by Ord. No. 2003-
351
G. Requested decreases and revised charges.
(1) An applicant may submit data and other information on actual usage, anticipated usage, peak load
requirements or a compination of the foregoing to the Director to support a requested decrease in the
total equivalent residential unit value. The Director may use this information to determine a revised
total ERU value, which may be less than or greater than that established by Subsection C above, and
which will be used to determine a revised water capital charge. In either case, the applicant shall pay
the revised water capital charge instead of the water capital charge established by Subsection C
above.
(2) Alternatively, an applicant may pay the water capital charge as established by Subsection C above
and, after one year of operation, submit one year's data on actual usage to the Director for review. The
Director may use this information to determine a total ERU value, which may be less than or greater
than that established by Subsection C above, and which will be used to determine a revised water
capital charge. If the applicant desires to use this alternative method of calculation, the applicant must
advise the Director of such determination prior to the payment of the water capital charge.
§ 173-12. Obligations of City.
A. The City shall maintain copies of this extension policy available for the inspection of any property owner,
developer, builder or prospective consumer desiring information regarding all elements of the cost of
connecting to the water facilities of the City. Such copies shall be maintained at the general office of the
Ocoee water system.
B. The City shall maintain as -built information on its water facilities in its office or in the office of its designated
representatives for the purpose of providing reasonable information concerning the location of its water
facilities.
C. The City shall install all meters upon the request of prospective consumers, provided that all fees and
charges as described herein and the established meter installation fees have been paid in accordance with
the provisions of the extension policy.
D. In instances where the City undertakes the installation of water distribution lines at the cost and expense of
the developer in lieu of the developer's installation of such facilities, the City will provide laterals for water
service to a developer's lot line ready for plumber's hookup and the installation of meters.
§ 173-13. Obligations of developer.
http://www:e-codes.generalcode.comisearchresults.asp?cmd=getdocTofC&index=1369 A&... 3/2/2007