Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-21-2020 Supporting DocumentsCitizens From: Vicki Mahoy <vmahoy@cfl.rr.com> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 7:20 PM To: Wilsen, Rosemary; Citizens Cc: Bill Holescher; Gemma Pascall; John H Thompson; Julie Kennedy, Mary Strickland Subject: Consent Agenda Item 2 (Roberts Rise HOA Neighborhood Grant Application) (Email #1) City Commissioners; Roberts Rise HOA is requesting a grant for the purpose of fencing off the dead end of Roberts Rise Dr., which stops at the subdivision line at the grove. The purpose for the fence is to stop people from cutting thru the grove and entering the neighborhood on foot, at all hours of the day and night. We have had issues with car break-ins where they run out thru the grove to the neighborhoods behind us. With the development of downtown Ocoee we feel this is the time to put a stop to unwanted foot traffic. Over 1 year ago I spoke with Commissioner Wilsen and she came out and looked at the street and we discussed applying for a grant to fence the street off and having the two houses at the end of the street extend their fences along the property line to meet up with that fence. We were trying to do our due diligence and obtain whatever was needed before the grant process began. The grants then were put on hold. I have been in contact and actually got put on the email list for notification when the grants were going to be available. Attached (in the second email) is an email from Commissioner Wilsen that she received from Michael Rumer advising what would be required from the Roberts Rise HOA, a Memo of Understanding stating that the city is not liable for the maintenance of the fence in the future. Once we were notified that the grants were back we started getting bids for the fence and one company advised that there would be problems with the two residents extending their fences to the street fence. I called Mike Rumer and was informed he was in a meeting and I received a call back (do not remember his name) from a young man who went over the issues with me. He stated he would speak to Mike and get back tome, however this did not happen and since we were close to the grant date, I went forward with completing and submitting the application. He did suggest that an administrative waiver from Mike may be possible on the residence fences coming forward of their back property line and being 6' in height. We were recommended in the review the grant for $2,000.00 for our 2nd project that we listed, which is a directory sign for $704.37 (50% = $352.19). But not the fence. The issue we have is we were not told any of these objections on the fence until now, had I known this earlier when we were gathering information, we could have listed some other items in the grant. Now the process is closed and we cannot apply for 2 years. If we are to be denied the fence, then I would request an extension to amend the application for some additional projects that we are looking at for the subdivision. We of course still feel the need to erect a fence at the dead end of the street. Thank you Vicki Mahoy, President RRHOA 407 376-5475 (I am sending 2 more emails that have a picture of the fence we are looking at and the email from Mike Rumer, my computer will not allow me to attach to this one) 0 _= Virus -free. www.avq.com CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or openattachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Citizens From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Vicki Mahoy <vmahoy@cfl.rr.com> Monday, April 20, 2020 7:23 PM Wilsen, Rosemary; Citizens Bill Holescher; Gemma Pascall; John H Thompson; Julie Kennedy; Mary Strickland Consent Agenda Item 2 Street Fence.pdf 0 _= Virus -free. www.avq.com CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 The Bufftech Advantage starts with details. Patented Construction Rotationally -molded allowing realistic granite - stone appearance and dramatic wood texture. Internal Reinforcement with galvanized steel to withstand significant impact or wind load without compromising aesthetics. Sound Barrier Blocks 98% of direct sound. 4 Color & Texture Bufftech fence products set the standard for the latest innovations in decorative privacy. From our proprietary manufacturing process to our vibrant colors, CertainTeed is the undisputed leader in color and texture. Our TrueTextureTM finish is molded from real wood and stone to deliver the most authentic look available today. Plus, Bufftech is virtually maintenance -free, and never needs staining or painting. For complete style and color specifications, see page 58. Colors throughout this brochure are simulated. Consult product color samples before making final selection. Vicki Mahoy From: Wilsen, Rosemary <rwilsen@ci.ocoee.fl.us> Sent. Tuesday, August 6, 2019 6:09 PM To: Vicki Mahoy Subject: Fwd: Roberts Rise Please see the below information from our city Planner. You will need to contact Mr. Rumer to discuss this issue. He can be reached at 407-905-3100 Ext.1018 Thanks Rosemary Hope this Is helpful. Rosemary Rosemary Wilsen Ocoee City Commissioner District 2 Cell407-948-2155 Florida has a very broad public records law (F.S.119). As a result, any written communication created or received by City of Ocoee officials and employees will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Additionally, under Florida Law email addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by hone or in writin Begin forwarded message: From: "Rumer, Michael' <MRumer@omee.ore> Date: August 6, 2019 at 11:09:09 AM EDT To: "Wilsen, Rosemary" <rwilsen@ci_ocoee.Us> Cc: "Frank, Robert" <RFrank( ocoee_o�>, "Shadrix, Craig" <Cr� Shaclrix@ocoee.oM> Subject: RE: Roberts Rise The public road dead ends at the grove which means the fence would have to be within the right-of- way. The City can give Roberts Rise HOA authorization to place a fence there and would probably need a Memo of Understanding stating the City is not liable for maintenance of the fence in the future. Sincerely, Michael Rumer Development Services Department Citizens From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: To whom it may concern: Eric Romano <ejr0485@gmail.com> Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:11 PM Citizens Oliver III, George Agenda Item #3 - Approval of Arden Park North I would like to have this email read as it pertsins to Amendment #3 - Aprroval of Arden Park North at tonight's meeting of the commission: Good evening Mayor and Commissioners, My wife and I and our 2 year old son recently bought a home within the Arden Park North Neighborhood in Ocoee. We signed contract on it around July 23rd, 2019 while it was still under construction. It was completed on November 18th, 2019 and we moved in on November 19th, 2019. When we initially went to their sales office, we were showed maps of phase 3 (the current phase that was being built at the time) as well as the projected lots for phase 4 which would begin sometime in the second quarter of 2020. We narrowed it down to 3 homes, ultimately deciding on the one at the far end of the phase which would become adjacent to the next phase. The land behind this lot we chose was empty tract with no homes as it butts up against wetlands. To the south, a neighboring home. To the north, what was presented to us as "green space" which was in phase 4. The maps being used showed this green space, the salesman pushed it as green space and that this was a premium lot. Ultimately, having a young son, we favored the increased privacy of only having one neighbor, so we bought lot #80 in Arden Park North. Fast forward to about a month after we moved in, it was brought to our attention by our neighbor that the lot to our north that was sold to us as "green space" was now going to have three houses built on it. We voiced our concern to Lennar Homes, who had their in house attorney take three weeks to tell us that per our contract, they were within their rights to change views, lots, and homesites. Being understandably frustrated by this answer, i reached out to Commissioner Oliver, the city commissioner for our district. A day later, Commissioner Oliver was at our house trying to get a better understanding of our situation. He spent an hour with my wife and I while we explained the circumstances of the situation. He invited me to the upcoming commission meeting which was coincidentally the next day. I attended this meeting where Commissioner Oliver made a statement to the commission on our issues with Lennar. After the meeting I met with Michael Rumer, who invited me to his office to go over a few public record items pertaining to Arden Park North. After pulling up documents, it was determined that Lennar Homes had approval from the City of Ocoee for those 3 lots adjacent to lot #80, which would eventually come to be our new home, around May 30th, 2019. This definitively proved that Lennar Homes knew 2 months before we signed our contract that those three homes would be built on the space that their sales team told us was "green space". Yet, when we were picking a lot, they were using maps that were knowingly not accurate and still pushing that lot as "premium". For reference, my neighbor to our south paid $10,000 for their lot. We paid $20,000. Because the lot was only to have one neighbor, thus making it premium. Yet they still took our money, lied to us, and frauded us into this lot knowing full well we would NEVER get what we just paid them over $400,000 for. In the months leading up to right now, Lennar has refused to rectify this situation even when faced with these facts. We are not alone. If you walked through our neighborhood and knocked on doors, you woupd hear one horror story after another about the treatment that customers have gotten from one of the biggest home builders in the country. We could have chosen another lot if they didn't intentionally deceive us. We had options. As a matter of fact, the identical house 5 lots down was $12,000 less because it didn't have the premium lot. We could have just saved that money and chose that one since the lots would essentially have been identical. They took those options away from us in the name of greed, and flat out refuse any semblance of responsibility for their actions. I come to the commission today to ask that you hold Lennar accountable for this terrible act that they perpetuated against our family. These kind of actions against your citizens cannot go unacknowledged. While doing what's popular is always easy, it's doing what's right that is difficult. But doing what's right for the citizens of the city should always be the top priority. I am asking the city to do what's right, and help us hold lennar accountable for their actions. Please, help our family. Thank you. Eric, Chelsea and Lucas Romano CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Citizens From: Mark McDonald <Mark.McDonald@Lennar.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 5:07 PM To: Rumer, Michael Cc: Citizens Subject: FW: Agenda Item #3 - Approval of Arden Park North Attachments: Arden Park North PH6 letter.pdf Mike, I'm not sure how the meeting format will work and if our item is pulled from consent to be discussed, it we'll be afforded the opportunity to speak. If not, I'd like the attached read into the record as Lennar's request for approval. Please let me know if this is the correct process in this situation. Thanks, LENNAM Mark McDonald Director of Land - Orlando Division Mark. McDonald(.alennar.com www.LennarOrlando.com Cell: 813-316-3349 Office: 407-586-4062 6750 Forum Drive, Suite 310 Orlando, FL 32821 D 9 Th.s e-mail is intended only for the use of the person to ,Ahern �- adruessed and conta ns rlf -rrat oFi , ,hn-h may )� ronfid�rral a privileged. If you are rot tfr_ person to iwhori In e-mail is addressed, or an agent aufhorced by sueh person to iecerve t rs e mad y,,u are hereby noon=d tha'_ a r; -am i natin r c.py n_ d sr bubon or other unauth ri:ed s- of this e-mai: is o chnited If yor received this e-mail in error, pease net`y rie immediately at thr e-•nail addrea referenced aho�.e From: Aaron Reid Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 1:35 PM To: Daniel La Rosa <Daniel.LaRosa@Lennar.com>; Mark McDonald <mark.mcdonald@lennar.com> Subject: FW: Agenda Item #3 - Approval of Arden Park North FYI: About the commission meeting tonight. See below from the home owner on Lot 80. Aaron Reid LENNAR' ORLANDO Land Project Manager Lennar Homes — Orlando Division Aaron. Reid@ Len nar.com Direct: 407-586-4069 1 407-931-6727 1 LENNAM April 21, 2020 Ocoee Citv Commission 150 N Lakeshore Dr. Ocoee. FL 34761 Re: Arden Park North PH6 PUD Amendment Dear Commission, Thank you for the consideration of the Non -Substantial Amendment to the Arden Park North PUD, changing the designation of Phase 6 to an approved use of residential. As stated in the staff report, recommending approval of this non -substantial amendment, this change request is being made in response to the Orange County Public School Board decision not to acquire this property for use as an elementary school. Lennar Homes is aware of the claim raised by the Romano's and are engaged with their attorney to resolve the matter. We take every resident claim seriously and although we dispute the facts as presented, we are working with their attorney on a resolution. Their claim is a private contractual matter that prevents Lennar Homes from public comment until resolved. Please consider this non -substantial amendment based on its conformance with the City of Ocoee land development code and the previously approved Land Use Plan. Sincerely, LENNAR HOMES Mark McDonald Director of Land Orlando Division Cc: Mike Rumer 6750 Forum Drive Suite #310 • Orlando, FL 32821 From: Sibbitt, Melanie To: Citv Clerk DL Subject: FW: Commission Meeting 4/21/20 - Lake Cleanup Date: Monday, April 20, 2020 8:15:58 AM Good Morning, I will need this printed out for the dais for tomorrow's meeting. From: Wilsen, Rosemary Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 8:06 AM To: Sibbitt, Melanie <msibbitt@ci.ocoee.fl.us> Subject: Fwd: Commission Meeting 4/21/20 - Lake Cleanup This is for the record for commission meeting Rosemary Wilsen Ocoee City Commissioner District 2 Cell 407-948-2155 Florida has a very broad public records law (F.S. 119). As a result, any written communication created or received by City of Ocoee officials and employees will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Additionally, under Florida Law email addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office b�j phone or in writing Begin forwarded message: From: "Wilsen, Rosemary" <rwilsengci.ocoee.fl.us> Date: April 18, 2020 at 1:11:52 PM EDT To: "Frank, Robert" <RFrank2ocoee.ora>, "Shadrix, Craig" <Craig.Shadrix(@ocoee.orp, "Krug, Stephen" <SKrug(@ci.ocoee.fl.us>, "Sibbitt, Melanie" <msibbitt-c@ci.ocoee.fl.us> Subject: Fwd: Commission Meeting 4/21/20 - Lake Cleanup Please see comments regarding consent agenda item . Rosemary Rosemary Wilsen Ocoee City Commissioner District 2 Cell 407-948-2155 Florida has a very broad public records law (F.S. 119). As a result, any written communication created or received by City of Ocoee officials and employees will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Additionally, under Florida Law email addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office b�j phone or in writing Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Smarrito <smarritom(@gmail.com> Date: April 16, 2020 at 9:48:50 PM EDT To: "Wilsen, Rosemary" <rwilsen9ci.ocoee.fl.us> Cc: Jim & Pat Wortham <iimpatwortham9cfl.rr.com>, dnachtsheim <dnachtsheim(@gmail.com>, SHHOA Estoppel <shhoadz(@gmail.com>, Jerry Odom <moierry1010hotmail.com>, "orlerifWhotmail.com" <orlgriff(@hotmail.com> Subject: Commission Meeting 4/21/20 - Lake Cleanup Good Evening Rosemary, My name is Mike Smarrito, and I am the recently elected new president of the Sleepy Harbor HOA. For the record, I have not spoken to those cc'd on this email prior to sending this email. I am speaking as a concerned citizen of this city and state that has lived in central Florida since 1970 and watched the water quality (both fresh and saltwater) degrade to a debilitating state. I am writing to you to express my concern regarding the initial plan to treat Lake Prima Vista (Deep Lake) and the adjoining lake, Starke Lake. I was informed by another HOA officer of the plan that will be discussed at the meeting next week and also to confirm that the public will be allowed to attend. Please advise. I want to inform you of the concerns that I have and they are based on past discussions that occurred at a commission meeting on or around January 15th, the minutes that were prepared after that meeting, and a follow up meeting at the condominiums when the engineering company spoke to the residents. Facts: At the 2019 January 15th commissioning meeting I presented evidence that the degradation of the lake started in 2010 and that the information was obtained from a website called lakewatch.org. I personally asked the city engineer what the main source was and he stated "it was agricultural." Ann Wittle a SHHOA resident stated that the West Blueberry Farm was established in 2010 The minutes that were prepared did not capture those comments. At the Sleepy Harbor Condo Association Meeting, I asked the engineering firm that if the Blueberry Farm was pumping nutrient rich water from Prima Vista Lake and distributing to his crops, would this in turn create an exponential increase in the nutrient level in the lake and the answer was yes. The City of Ocoee Engineer stated that Orange County was also aware of the issue and that they were willing to assist with funding. The engineering company stated that they did not know what the source of the pollutants were and I noted BS on my phone. The additional five notes I have on my phone that day are noted below: 1. Exfiltration systems (soil amendments) 2. Slurry Wall (buried clay)? 3. Treat Water Column (floculation) 4. Education 5. Clarification and Transparency As you can see there is nothing mentioning addressing the issue with the point source and that is the blueberry farm. I say point source because that is what the City Ocoee Engineer stated on January 15, 2019 when he mentioned that the source was "agricultural". I would like to be in attendance at the meeting to discuss the plan further because what is proposed is essentially number 3 above, floculation. This is what construction companies throw in the water to comply with state environmental requirements when their dirt flows over the silt fence and muddies the waters. For over $100K this is a waste of money and will likely only clear up the water for a month at the most. Please confirm that I can be in attendance as I am against this treatment plan. If you have any questions or comments I can be reached at 407-470- 7067. Thanks for keeping us informed INARST Schramm, Michele From: Sibbitt, Melanie Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 10:49 AM To: City Clerk DL Subject: FW: Ocoee Commission Mtg 4.21.20 Lake Watch Information Attachments: 4.20.20 Ocoee Commission Mtg Lake Watch Doc.pdf; ATT00001.htm Please print for dais. Follow-up response from resident. From: Wilsen, Rosemary Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 10:47 AM To: Frank, Robert <RFrank@ocoee.org>; Shadrix, Craig <Craig.Shadrix@ocoee.org>; Krug, Stephen <SKrug@ci.ocoee.fl.us>; Sibbitt, Melanie <msibbitt@ci.ocoee.fl.us> Subject: Fwd: Ocoee Commission Mtg 4.21.20 Lake Watch Information Please see below and for distribution regarding citizen comments Thanks Rosemary Rosemary Wilsen Ocoee City Commissioner District 2 Cell 407-948-2155 Florida has a very broad public records law (F.S. 119). As a result, any written communication created or received by City of Ocoee officials and employees will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Additionally, under Florida Law email addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records reauest. do not send electronic mail to this entitv. Instead, contact this office by hone or in writing. Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Smarrito <smarritom@gmail.com> Date: April 20, 2020 at 8:22:33 AM EDT To: "Wilsen, Rosemary" <rwilsen@ci.ocoee.fl.us> Subject: Ocoee Commission Mtg 4.21.20 Lake Watch Information Good Morning Rosemary, As we had discussed, I have attached a portion of the 2020 Lake Watch Lakes' Report for Orange County, specifically Lakes Apopka, Prima Vista, and Starke Lake. I also want to let you know that I conducted additional research on the internet and found a Technical Report based on a study on lakes in China, that confirm that focus should be more on removing Phosphorous than Nitrogen. I will be calling in as well to voice the message that we should stay diligent in the future after this initial treatment is conducted such that we can nurse both lakes to a healthier state. Thank you for your follow up. Take Care Mike CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Florida LAKEWATCH Report for Apopka in Orange County Using Data Downloaded 1/17/2020 Introduction for Lakes This report summarizes data collected on systems that have been part of the LAKEWATCH program. Data are from the period of record for individual systems. Part one allows the comparison of data with Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Numeric Nutrient Criteria. Part two allows a comparison of the long-term mean nutrient concentrations with nutrient zone concentrations published by LAKEWATCH staff (Bachmann et al. 2012; https:Hlakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/resources/bibliography/). Finally, this report examines data for long-term trends that may be occurring in individual systems but only for systems with five or more years of data. Step by step instructions on how to use the data tables are provided on page 4 of this report. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Nutrient Criteria for Lakes (Table 1) For lakes, the numeric interpretations of the nutrient criterion in paragraph 62-302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., based on chlorophyll a are shown in the Table 1. The applicable interpretations for TN and TP will vary on an annual basis, depending on the availability and concentration of chlorophyll a data for the lake. The numeric interpretations for TN, TP, and chlorophyll shall not be exceeded more than once in any consecutive three year period. a. If annual geometric mean chlorophyll a does not exceed the chlorophyll value for the lake classification in the table below, then the TN and TP numeric interpretations for that calendar year shall be the annual geometric means of the maximum calculated numeric interpretation in Table 1. b. If there are insufficient data to calculate the annual geometric mean chlorophyll for a given year or the annual geometric mean chlorophyll exceeds the values in the Table 1 for the correct lake classification, then the applicable numeric interpretations for TN and TP shall be the minimum values in the Table 1. Long -Term Data Summary for Lakes (Table 2): Definitions • Total Phosphorus (µg/L): The nutrient most often limiting growth of plant/algae. • Total Nitrogen (µg/L): Another nutrient needed for aquatic plant/algae growth but only limiting when nitrogen to phosphorus ratios are generally less than 10. • Chlorophyll -uncorrected (µg/L): Chlorophyll concentrations are used to measure relative abundances of open water algal population. • Secchi (ft), Secchi (m): Secchi measurements are estimates of water clarity. • Color (Pt -Co Units): LAKEWATCH measures true color, which is the color of the water after particles have been filtered out. • Specific Conductance (µS/cm@250C): Measurement of the ability of water to conduct electricity and can be used to estimate the amount of dissolved materials in water. • Lake Classification: The new numeric nutrient criteria for Florida require that lakes must first be classified into one of three group based on color and alkalinity or specific conductance; colored lakes (color greater than 40 Pt -Co units), clear soft water lakes (color less than or equal to 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity less than or equal to 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance less than or equal to 100 µs/cm @25 C), and clear hard water lakes (color less than 40 Pt -Co units and alkalinity greater than 20 mg/L as CaCO3 or specific conductance greater 100 µS/cm @ 25 Q. Table 1. Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Numeric Nutrient Criteria for lakes. Long Term Geometric Annual Minimum calculated Maximum calculated Mean Lake Color and Long- Geometric numeric interpretation numeric interpretation Annual Annual Annual Annual Term Geometric Mean Mean Color, Alkalinity and Chlorophyll- Geometric Geometric Geometric Geometric Specific Conductance corrected Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Mean Total Phosphorus Nitrogen Phosphorus Nitrogen > 40 Platinum Cobalt Units 20 µg/L 50 µg/L 1270 µg/L 160 µg/L1 2230 µg/L Colored Lakes < 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and > 20 mg/L CaCO3 20 µg/L 30 µg/L 1050 µg/L 90 µg/L 1910 µg/L or >100 µS/cm@25 C Clear Hard Water Lakes < 40 Platinum Cobalt Units and < 20 mg/L CaCO3 6 µg/L 10 µg/L 51 µg/L 30 µg/L 930 µg/L or < 100 µS/cm@25 C Clear Soft Water Lakes 1 For lakes with color > 40 PCU in the West Central Nutrient Watershed Region, the maximum TP limit shall be the 490 µg/L TP streams threshold for the region. For the purpose of subparagraph 62-302.531(2)(b)1., F.A.C., color shall be assessed as true color and shall be free from turbidity. Lake color and alkalinity shall be the long-term geometric mean, based on a minimum of ten data points over at least three years with at least one data point in each year. If insufficient alkalinity data are available, long-term geometric mean specific conductance values shall be used, with a value of <100 µS/cm@25 C used to estimate the mg/L CaCO3 alkalinity concentration until such time that alkalinity data are available. Table 2. Long-term trophic state data collected monthly by LAKEWATCH volunteers and classification variables color and specific conductance (collected quarterly). Values in bold can be used with Table 1 to evaluate compliance with nutrient criteria. Parameter Minimum and Maximum Annual Geometric Means Grand Geometric Mean (Sampling years) Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 57 - 114 81 8 Total Nitrogen (µg/L) 2654 - 4696 3524 (8) Chlorophyll- uncorrected (µg/L) 44 - 104 60 (8) Secchi (ft) 0.6 - 1.5 1.0(8) Secchi (m) 0.2 - 0.5 0.3(8) Color (Pt -Co Units) 18 - 29 23 (5) Specific Conductance (µS/cm 25 C) 324 - 467 376 (5) Lake Classification Clear Hardwater 2 Base File Data for Lakes: Definitions and Nutrient Zone Maps The long-term data summary will include the following parameters listed with a definition after each one: • County: Name of county in which the lake resides. • Name: Lake name that LAKEWATCH uses for the system. • GNIS Number: Number created by USGS's Geographic Names Information System. • Latitude and Longitude: Coordinates identifying the exact location of station 1 for each system. • Water Body Type: Four different types of systems; lakes, estuaries, river/streams and springs. • Surface Area (ha and acre): LAKEWATCH lists the surface area of a lake if it is available. • Mean Depth (m and ft): This mean depth is calculated from multiple depth finder transects across a lake that LAKEWATCH uses for estimating plant abundances. • Period of Record (year): Years a lake has been in the LAKEWATCH program. • TP Zone and TN Zone: Nutrient zones defined by Bachmann et al (2012). • Long -Term TP and TN Geometric Mean Concentration (µg/L: min and max): Grand Geometric Means of all annual geometric means (µg/L) with minimum and maximum annual geometric means. • Lake Trophic Status (CHL): Tropic state classification using the long-term chlorophyll average. Table 3. Base File Data, long-term nutrient grand geometric means and Nutrient Zone classification listing the 90te percentile concentrations in Figure 1. Values in bold can be used for Nutrient Zone comparisons. County Orange Name Apopka GNIS Number 293912 Latitude 28.6655 Longitude -81.6302 Water Body Type Lake Surface Area (ha and acre) 12518 ha or 30932.0 acre Period of Record (year) 2006 to 2019 Lake Trophic Status (CHL) Hypereutro hic TP Zone TP4 Grand TP Geometric Mean Concentration (µg/L, min. and max.) 81 57 to 114) TN Zone TN5 Grand TN Geometric Mean Concentration (µg/L, min. and max.) 3524 2654 to 4696) 4P TP criteria M& TP1 7 TP2 21 TP3 45 TP4 . 93 TP5 252 TP6 355 Total phosphorus zones 4110 , TN criteria pg/L TN1 450 TN2 642 TWO 1,067 TN4 1,369 TN5 ■ 2.701 ,-- Total nitrogen zones -I- 3 Figure 1. Maps showing Florida phosphorus and nitrogen zones and the nutrient concentrations of the upper 90% of lakes within each zone (Bachmann et al. 2012). Explanation on how to interpret the Nutrient Zones on page 4, below. Interpreting FDEP's Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC): These are instructions for using Table 1 and 2 to determine impairment status based on FDEP's NNC. 1. Identify your lake's Lake Classification in Table 2 (Colored, Clear Hard Water, or Clear Soft Water) (if no classification is listed then there is not enough data available to classify your lake). a. The Lake Classification tells you which row to use in Table 1. 2. Identify your waterbody's Grand Geometric Mean Chlorophyll -uncorrected in Table 2. a. Compare this number to the Annual Geometric Mean Chlorophyll -corrected (2°d column) in Table 1. b. If your lake's Chlorophyll -uncorrected concentration is greater than the Annual Geometric Mean Chlorophyll -corrected concentration use the Minimum calculated numeric interpretation columns. c. If your lake's Chlorophyll -uncorrected concentration is less than the Annual Geometric Mean Chlorophyll -corrected concentration use the Maximum calculated numeric interpretation columns. 3. Identify your lake's Total Phosphorus and Total Nitrogen Grand Geometric Mean concentration in Table 2 and compare them to the appropriate Annual Geometric Mean Total Phosphorus and Annual Geometric Mean Total Nitrogen values in Table 1. 4. If your lake's concentrations from Table 2 are greater than FDEP's NNC values from Table 1, your lake may be considered impaired. If they are below, it may be considered unimpaired. Nutrient Zones and "Natural Background" Administrative code definitions 62-302.200 (19): "Natural background" shall mean the condition of waters in the absence of man -induced alterations based on the best scientific information available to the Department. The establishment of natural background for an altered waterbody may be based upon a similar unaltered waterbody, historical pre -alteration data, paleolimnological examination of sediment cores, or examination of geology and soils. When determining natural background conditions for a lake, the lake's location and regional characteristics as described and depicted in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency document titled Lake Regions of Florida (EPA/R-97/127, dated 1997, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR) (http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-06267), which is incorporated by reference herein, shall also be considered. The lake regions in this document are grouped Nutrient Zones according to ambient total phosphorus and total nitrogen concentrations listed in Table 1 found in Bachmann, R. W., Bigham D. L., Hoyer M. V., Canfield D. E, Jr. 2012. A strategy for establishing numeric nutrient criteria for Florida lakes. Lake Reservoir Management. 28:84-92. Interpreting Florida LAKEWATCH's Nutrient Zones: These are instructions for using Table 3 and Figure 1 to determine nutrient status based on Nutrient Zones. 1. Identify your lake's TP Zone in Table 3. a. Locate this TP Zone (left map) and its corresponding nutrient concentration in Figure 1. 2. Locate your lake's Long -Term Grand Geometric Mean TP Concentration value in Table 3. 3. Compare your lake's Long -Term Grand Geometric Mean TP Concentration from Table 3 to the appropriate TP Zone nutrient concentration from Figure 1. a. If your lake's Long -Term Grand Geometric Mean TP Concentration number is higher than the TP zone nutrient concentration, your lake's nutrient concentration is above "Natural Background". b. If your lake's Long -Term Grand Geometric Mean TP Concentration number is lower than the TP zone nutrient concentration, your lake's nutrient concentration is within "Natural Background". 4. Repeat these same steps with the TN Zone and Long-term Grand Geometric Mean TN Concentration 0 Figure 1 and Figure 2. Trend plots of annual average total phosphorus and annual average total nitrogen versus year. The R2 value indicates the strength of the relations (ranges from 0.0 to 1.0; higher the R2 the stronger the relation) and the p value indicates if the relation is significant (p < 0.05 is significant). Trend Status are reported on plots. CD CD o cv U% T L 0 p Q � r 0 CD M 0 Q CD CD o c Q a� U-) 0, �r 0 _L Z CD uD CIO CD 0 CN Apopka (Grange) p=0.02,R2=024 Decreasing • • • 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year Apopka (Grange) p=O,R2=0.4 Decreasing • • • • • 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year 5 Figure 3 and Figure 4. Trend plots of annual average chlorophyll and annual average Secchi versus year. The R2 value indicates the strength of the relations (ranges from 0.0 to 1.0; higher the R2 the stronger the relations and the p value indicates if the relation is significant (p < 0.05 is significant). Trend status are reported on plots. CD J T �33 CD CD Q r 0 L D a E OD V, CD QD Q CD,;-}- V r- Nt U) 0 Apopka (Orange) p=0.06,R2=0.15 Na Trend • • • • • 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year Apopka (Grange) p=0,RZ=0-31 Increasing • • • • 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year A Figure 1 and Figure 2. Trend plots of annual average total phosphorus and annual average total nitrogen versus year. The R2 value indicates the strength of the relations (ranges from 0.0 to 1.0; higher the R2 the stronger the relation) and the p value indicates if the relation is significant (p < 0.05 is significant). Trend Status are reported on plots. CD J CD CD 0 CD Q Iq U) 0 CD CD N J 1 CD o a� CD Cq 0 Z CD © 0 `D C) Primavista (Grange) p=0,R2=0.15 Decreasing • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year Primavista (Orange) p=0.02,R2=0.07 Increasing • • • ••• ••• • • • • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year 314 Figure 3 and Figure 4. Trend plots of annual average chlorophyll and annual average Secchi versus year. The R2 value indicates the strength of the relations (ranges from 0.0 to 1.0; higher the R2 the stronger the relations and the p value indicates if the relation is significant (p < 0.05 is significant). Trend status are reported on plots. —I 0 0) In ZL >. CD Q Iq L O CD 0 CD ~ ~ F- i Primavista (Orange) P =0,R2=0-29 [decreasing • • i • i i • i i • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year Primavista (Orange) p=0.12,R2=0.03 Na jrend • i • i • i i i i i i i i i • i i • • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year 315 Figure 1 and Figure 2. Trend plots of annual average total phosphorus and annual average total nitrogen versus year. The R2 value indicates the strength of the relations (ranges from 0.0 to 1.0; higher the R2 the stronger the relation) and the p value indicates if the relation is significant (p < 0.05 is significant). Trend Status are reported on plots. CD CD cc, J r CD CD c CD a) �r 0) r O L O _ CD til Q © r CD C] Starke (Grange) p = 0, R2 = 0-36 Decreasing 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year Starke (Grange) p=0,R2=0_11 Increasing • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year 342 Figure 3 and Figure 4. Trend plots of annual average chlorophyll and annual average Secchi versus year. The R2 value indicates the strength of the relations (ranges from 0.0 to 1.0; higher the R2 the stronger the relations and the p value indicates if the relation is significant (p < 0.05 is significant). Trend status are reported on plots. CD _r_ Q Q Co 0 0 U Q 0 CD - Q aD 0 U a7 Co Co cv Starke (grange) p=0,R2=0.18 Decreasing • • • • • • . . • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year Starke (Orange) p = 0.09, R2 = 0.03 No Trend • 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year 343 CITY OF OCOEE 150 N. Lakeshore Drive Ocoee Ocoee, Florida 34761 (I o ri d a 407-905-3100 SPEAKING RESERVATION FORM NOTE: The public is allowed to comment on any items that are on the agenda but not part of a public hearing. Public hearing comments are to be heard during that portion of the meeting. Any comments you would like to make that are not part of the agenda will be heard under the citizens/public comments at the end of the meeting. sl DATE L1' [A(C 10� r �,/� NAME �r�, MG�Y:I� PHONE #1 �y ) 4160 0'024� ADDRESS CITY X Wf4 ZIP CODE E-MAI I want to address the Board about (PAse provide Item # and/or topic): Do you have a prepared statement, or other document(s) from which you will address the Board? No Yes if yes, please attach copy of same to this Reservation Form. All proceedings before the Commission shall be governed by the Civility Code — see back The following time limits to speak are in effect: Public Hearings: petitioner presentation - 15 minutes; citizen comments - 5 minutes per speaker; petitioner rebuttal - 5 minutes. Open to Public — Citizens Comments - 3 minutes per speaker, per meeting. ISJ CITY OF OCOEE M 150 N. Lakeshore Drive OCOee Ocoee, Florida 34761 florid. 407-905-3100 SPEAKING RESERVATION FORM NOTE: The public is allowed to comment on any items that are on the agenda but not part of a public hearing. Public hearing comments are to be heard during that portion of the meeting. Any comments you would like to make that are not part of the agenda will be heard under the citizens/public omments at the end of the meeting. DATE Z d ! L&M C NAME-� ^ 1. Q -3 y . �G_� PHONE # �7 �-3 3' ADDRESS E-MAIL I want to address the Board aboutWlease provide Item # and/or topic): ZIP CODE Do you have a prepared statement, or other document(s) from which you will address the Board? No Yes if yes, please attach copy of same to this Reservation Form. All proceedings before the Commission shall be governed by the Civility Code - see back The following time limits to speak are in effect: Public Hearings: petitioner presentation - 15 minutes; citizen comments - 5 minutes per speaker; petitioner rebuttal - 5 minutes. Open to Public — Citizens Comments - 3 minutes per speaker, per meeting. t J CITY OF OCOEE 150 N. Lakeshore Drive 0C0P_(? Ocoee, Florida 34761 florida 407-905-3100 SPEAKING RESERVATION FORM NOTE: The public is allowed to comment on any items that are on the agenda but not part of a public hearing. Public hearing comments are to be heard during that portion of the meeting. Any comments you would like to make that are not part, oftheagenda will be heard under the citizens/public comments at the end of the meeting. DATE ` 2.0 NAME PHONE # ADDRESS E-MAI I CITY ZIP CODE I want to address the Board wabout (Please provide Item # and/or topic): /� ■w� V r 44 `^ Do you have a prepared statement, or other document(s) from which you will address the Board? No Yes if yes, please attach copy of same to this Reservation Form. t Ory - All proceedings before the Commission shall be governed by the Civility Code - see back The following time limits to speak are in effect: Public Hearings: petitioner presentation - 15 minutes; citizen comments - 5 minutes per speaker; petitioner rebuttal - 5 minutes. Open to Public — Citizens Comments - 3 minutes per speaker, per meeting. FW: Sibbitt, Melanie Tue 4/21/2020 8:30 PM ToIandry, Amber <aland ry@ci.ocoee.fl.us>; From: Wilsen, Rosemary Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 8:03 PM To: Sibbitt, Melanie <msibbitt@ci.ocoee.fl.us> Subject: ■i V ri on LTE <0 7: 4 P Eel Maybe: Mike Smarrito Today 1P Call in number did not work any options 4%1 If no, please let Director Krug know than I read his email and appreciate his clear explanation and we are excited that the city is movingforward with treatment When they annex do they kick people out of their houses or were they abandoned? Watching on tv Subject 10) Text Message O'� Rosemary Wilsen Ocoee City Commissioner District 2 Cell 407-948-2155 Florida has a very broad public records law (F.S. 119). As a result, any written communication created or received by City of Ocoee officials and employees will be made available to the public and media, upon request, unless otherwise exempt. Additionally, under Florida Law email addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing, Citizens From: Amrita Budhu <amritabudhu@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 5:18 PM To: Citizens Cc: Oliver III, George Subject: 2175 Laurel Blossom Address Change Good afternoon, My name is Esardai Budhu. I live in the Forest Trails community in Ocoee. I am trying to change my house number. The address is 2175 Laurel Blossom Circle. The reason for wanting to change the house number is because for religious purposes. The numbers add up to be a very unlucky number. I am a single mother of 4 kids under the age of 17. 1 don't want to have to move from this community. My brother had a similar issue in Orange County and was able to change it without a fee. Jack Butler, Director of Support Services contacted me regarding the request for the address change. They will be able to accommodate the address change to 2177 Laurel Blossom Circle, Ocoee. Unfortunately, there is a fee of $750 to do all the address update in the City of Ocoee. At this time my financial situation is very limited for income. I am not sure what the industry will be in the next upcoming months with the Covidl9 Pandemic. I am asking if the City of Ocoee can do a better price or even waive the fees to do the address modifications. I understand that this is not a usual request, but your help is greatly appreciated. I can be reached at 407-520-8213. Thank you, Esardai Budhu CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.