HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 02 Approval of Resolution to Participate in Opioid Litigation Settlement _4
ocoee
florida
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET
Meeting Date: September 7, 2021
Item #
Reviewed By:
Contact Name: : Logan Opsahl Department Director:
Contact Number: 407-581-9800 City Manager: Robert Fran
Subject '.Resolution relating to'.Approval of Participation in Opioid`.Litigation'Settlement`' ' a
Background Summary:
The City Commission approved an Agreement with the Romano. Law Group to represent the City of
Ocoee in national litigation against the manufacturers of opioids (the "Opioid Litigation"). The State of
Florida and attorneys representing certain various local governments, including the Romano Law Group
on behalf of the City, have proposed a unified plan for the allocation and use of prospective settlement
compensation from the Opioid Litigation.
The attached Memorandum of Understanding outlines an agreement intended to govern the distribution
of proposed settlement proceeds obtained through the Opioid Litigation to be utilized for strategies,
programming and services: used to expand the availability of treatment for individuals impacted by
substance use disorders. The Memorandum of Understanding is the result of numerous meetings with
the State of Florida Attorney General's.Office and includes feedback and comments from many local
subdivisions. Based upon the status of the Opioid Litigation, the likely structure of any settlement, the
potential litigation risks in the absence of such settlement and the best interest of the City and its
citizens, City Staff recommends the Memorandum of Understanding be approved by Resolution.
Issue:
Should the City Commission approve a Resolution authorizing the City of Ocoee, Florida to join with
the State of Florida and other local governments as a participant in the Memorandum of Understanding
and formal agreements implementing a unified plan for the allocation and use of proposed Opioid
Litigation settlement proceeds; authorizing the City Attorney to execute the Memorandum of
Understanding and any associated formal agreements?
Recommendations:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve a Resolution authorizing the City of Ocoee, Florida
to join with the State of Florida and other local governments.as a participant in the Memorandum of
Understanding and formal agreements implementing a unified plan for the allocation and use of
proposed Opioid Litigation settlement proceeds; authorizing the City Attorney °to execute the
Memorandum of Understanding and any associated formal agreements.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution
2. Memorandum of Understanding
3. Spreadsheet showing proposals for allocation of funds
4. Letter from Attorney General's Office
Financial Impact:
N/A
Type of Item: (please mark with an "x')
Public Hearing Fo -Clerk's Dept.Use:
Ordinance First Reading Consent Agenda
Ordinance Second Reading 1 Public Hearing
X Resolution • Regular Agenda.
X Commission Approval
Discussion & Direction
Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk
Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution
Reviewed by City Attorney N/A
Reviewed by Finance Dept. N/A
Reviewed by N/A
2
4850:4823-1928,v. 1 •
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE A
UNIFIED PLAN FOR THE ALLOCATION AND USE OF
OPIOID SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS; AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF THE FLORIDA MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING AND FORMAL AGREEMENTS
IMPLEMENTING A UNIFIED PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Ocoee is a litigating public entity with claims pending in the
federal district court in In re:National Prescription Opiate Litigation,MDL No.2804 (N.D. Ohio);
and
WHEREAS,the attorneys representing the State of Florida and various local governments
involved in the litigation have proposed a unified plan for the allocation and use of prospective
settlement dollars from the multidistrict litigation; and
WHEREAS,the Florida Memorandum of Understanding("Florida Plan")sets forth a non-
binding general framework of a unified plan for the proposed allocation and use of opioid
settlement proceeds and it is anticipated that formal agreements implementing the Florida Plan
will be entered into at a future date; and
WHEREAS, participation in the Florida Plan by a large majority of Florida cities and
counties will materially increase the amount of funds to Florida and should improve Florida's
relative bargaining position during additional settlement negotiations, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Ocoee has determined that participation
in the Florida Plan is in the best interest of the City and its residents and citizens.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA:
1
4849-1970-5336,v. 1
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to the provisions of
the City of Ocoee Home Rule Charter;Article VIII, Section 2 of the Florida Constitution; Section
166.041, Florida Statutes; and other applicable provisions of law.
SECTION 2. UNIFIED PLAN. That the City Commission of the City of Ocoee hereby
acknowledges its support of a unified plan for the allocation and use of opioid settlement proceeds
as generally described in the Florida Memorandum of Understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" (the "Memorandum of Understanding").
SECTION 3. EXECUTION. That the City Attorney is hereby authorized to execute the
Memorandum of Understanding in substantially the form contained in the attached Exhibit "A"
and any other formal agreements implementing a unified plan for the allocation and use of opioid
settlement proceeds that is not substantially inconsistent with the Memorandum of Understanding
and this Resolution.
SECTION 4. RECORDATION. That the Clerk be and hereby is instructed to record
this Resolution in the appropriate record book upon its adoption.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any clause, section, or other part of this Resolution
shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
unconstitutional or invalid part shall be considered as eliminated and in no way affecting the
validity of other provisions of this Resolution.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its passage and adoption.
2
4849-1970-5336,v. 1
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021.
APPROVED:
ATTEST: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA
Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Rusty Johnson, Mayor
(SEAL)
FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY APPROVED BY THE OCOEE CITY
THE CITY OF OCOEE,FLORIDA; COMMISSION AT A MEETING HELD
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND ON ,2021,
LEGALITY THIS DAY OF UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO.
,2021.
SHUFFIELD,LOWMAN&WILSON,P.A.
By:
City Attorney
3
4849-1970-5336,v. 1
PROPOSAL
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Whereas, the people of the State of Florida and its communities have been harmed by
misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance committed by certain entities within the
Pharmaceutical Supply Chain;
Whereas, the State of Florida, through its Attorney General, and certain Local
Governments, through their elected representatives and counsel, are separately engaged in
litigation seeking to hold Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participants accountable for the damage
caused by their misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance;
Whereas, the State of Florida and its Local Governments share a common desire to abate
and alleviate the impacts of that misfeasance, nonfeasance and malfeasance throughout the State
of Florida;
Whereas, it is the intent of the State of Florida and its Local Governments to use the
proceeds from Settlements with Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participants to increase the amount
of funding presently spent on opioid and substance abuse education, treatment and other related
programs and services, such as those identified in Exhibits A and B, and to ensure that the funds
are expended in compliance with evolving evidence-based"best practices";
Whereas, the State of Florida and its Local Governments, subject to the completion of
formal documents that will effectuate the Parties' agreements, enter into this Memorandum of
Understanding("MOU")relating to the allocation and use of the proceeds of Settlements described
herein; and
Whereas, this MOU is a preliminary non-binding agreement between the Parties, is not
legally enforceable, and only provides a basis to draft formal documents which will effectuate the
Parties' agreements.
A. Definitions
As used in this MOU:
1. "Approved Purpose(s)" shall mean forward-looking strategies, programming and
services used to expand the availability of treatment for individuals impacted by substance use
disorders, to: (a) develop, promote, and provide evidence-based substance use prevention
strategies; (b) provide substance use avoidance and awareness education; (c) decrease the
oversupply of licit and illicit opioids;and(d)support recovery from addiction. Approved Purposes
shall include, but are not limited to, the opioid abatement strategies listed on Exhibits A and B
which are incorporated herein by reference.
2. "Local Governments" shall mean all counties, cities, towns and villages located
within the geographic boundaries of the State.
3. "Managing Entities" shall mean the corporations selected by and under contract
with the Florida Department of Children and Families or its successor ("DCF") to manage the
000003/01288125_1
daily operational delivery of behavioral health services through a coordinated system of care. The
singular"Managing Entity" shall refer to a singular of the Managing Entities.
4. "County" shall mean a political subdivision of the state established pursuant to s.
1,Art. VIII of the State Constitution.
5. "Municipalities" shall mean cities, towns, or villages of a County within the State
with a Population greater than 10,000 individuals and shall also include cities, towns or villages
within the State with a Population equal to or less than 10,000 individuals which filed a Complaint
in this litigation against Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participants. The singular "Municipality"
shall refer to a singular of the Municipalities.
6. "Negotiating Committee" shall mean a three-member group comprised by
representatives of the following: (1)the State; and (2) two representatives of Local Governments
of which one representative will be from a Municipality and one shall be from a County
(collectively,"Members")within the State. The State shall be represented by the Attorney General
or her designee.
7. "Negotiation Class Metrics"shall mean those county and city settlement allocations
which come from the official website of the Negotiation Class of counties and cities certified on
September 11, 2019 by the U.S. District for the Northern District of Ohio in In re National
Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804 (N.D. Ohio). The website is located at
https://allocationmap.iclaimsonline.com.
8. "Opioid Funds" shall mean monetary amounts obtained through a Settlement as
defined in this MOU.
9. "Opioid Related" shall have the same meaning and breadth as in the agreed Opioid
Abatement Strategies attached hereto as Exhibits A or B.
10. "Parties"shall mean the State and Local Governments. The singular word"Party"
shall mean either the State or Local Governments.
11. "PEC"shall mean the Plaintiffs'Executive Committee of the National Prescription
Opiate Multidistrict Litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District
of Ohio.
12. "Pharmaceutical Supply Chain"shall mean the process and channels through which
Controlled Substances are manufactured, marketed,promoted, distributed or dispensed.
13. "Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant" shall mean any entity that engages in,
or has engaged in the manufacture, marketing,promotion, distribution or dispensing of an opioid
analgesic.
14. "Population" shall refer to published U.S. Census Bureau population estimates as
of July 1, 2019, released March 2020, and shall remain unchanged during the term of this MOU.
These estimates can currently be found at https://www.census.gov
15. "Qualified County" shall mean a charter or non-chartered county within the State
that: has a Population of at least 300,000 individuals and (a)has an opioid taskforce of which it is
a member or operates in connection with its municipalities or others on a local or regional basis;
(b)has an abatement plan that has been either adopted or is being utilized to respond to the opioid
epidemic; (c) is currently either providing or is contracting with others to provide substance abuse
prevention,recovery, and treatment services to its citizens; and(d)has or enters into an agreement
with a majority of Municipalities (Majority is more than 50% of the Municipalities' total
population)related to the expenditure of Opioid Funds.The Opioid Funds to be paid to a Qualified
County will only include Opioid Funds for Municipalities whose claims are released by the
Municipality or Opioid Funds for Municipalities whose claims are otherwise barred.
16. "SAMHSA" shall mean the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services,
Substance.Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
17. "Settlement" shall mean the negotiated resolution of legal or equitable claims
against a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant when that resolution has been jointly entered
into by the State and Local Governments or a settlement class as described in (B)(1)below.
18. "State" shall mean the State of Florida.
B. Terms
1. Only Abatement- Other than funds used for the Administrative Costs and Expense
Fund as hereinafter described in paragraph 6 and paragraph 9, respectively), all Opioid Funds shall
be utilized for Approved Purposes. To accomplish this purpose,the State will either file a new action
with Local Governments as Parties or add Local Governments to its existing action, sever settling
defendants, and seek entry of a consent order or other order binding both the State, Local
Governments, and Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant(s) ("Order"). The Order may be part
of a class action settlement or similar device. The Order shall provide for continuing jurisdiction of
a state court to address non-performance by any party under the Order. Any Local Government that
objects to or refuses to be included under the Order or entry of documents necessary to effectuate a
Settlement shall not be entitled to any Opioid Funds and its portion of Opioid Funds shall be
distributed to, and for the benefit of, the other Local Governments.
2. Avoid Claw Back and Recoupment-Both the State and Local Governments wish
to maximize any Settlement and Opioid Funds. In addition to committing to only using funds for
the Expense Funds,Administrative Costs and Approved Purposes,both Parties will agree to utilize
a percentage of funds for the core strategies highlighted in Exhibit A. Exhibit A contains the
programs and strategies prioritized by the U.S. Department of Justice and/or the U.S. Department
of Health&Human Services ("Core Strategies"). The State is trying to obtain the United States'
agreement to limit or reduce the United States' ability to recover or recoup monies from the State
and Local Government in exchange for prioritization of funds to certain projects. If no agreement
is reached with the United States, then there will be no requirement that a percentage be utilized
for Core Strategies.
3. Distribution Scheme -All Opioid Funds will initially go to the State, and then be
distributed according to the following distribution scheme. The Opioid Funds will be divided into
three funds after deducting costs of the Expense Fund detailed in paragraph 9 below:
(a) City/County Fund- The city/county fund will receive 15% of all Opioid Funds to
directly benefit all Counties and Municipalities. The amounts to be distributed to
each County and Municipality shall be determined by the Negotiation Class Metrics
or other metrics agreed upon,in writing,by a County and a Municipality. For Local
Governments that are not within the definition of County or Municipality, those
Local Governments may receive that government's share of the City/County Fund
under the Negotiation Class Metrics, if that government executes a release as part
of a Settlement. Any Local Government that is not within the definition of County
or Municipality and that does not execute a release as part of a Settlement shall
have its share of the City/County Fund go to the County in which it is located.
(b) Regional Fund-The regional fund will be subdivided into two parts.
(i) The State will annually calculate the share of each County within the State
of the regional fund utilizing the sliding scale in section 4 of the allocation
contained in the Negotiation Class Metrics or other metrics that the Parties
agree upon.
(ii) For Qualified Counties, the Qualified County's share will be paid to the
Qualified County and expended on Approved Purposes, including the
Core Strategies identified in Exhibit A, if applicable.
(iii) For all other Counties,the regional share for each County will be paid to
the Managing Entities providing service for that County. The Managing
Entities will be required to expend the monies on Approved Purposes,
including the Core Strategies. The Managing Entities shall endeavor to
the greatest extent possible to expend these monies on counties within
the State that are non-Qualified Counties and to ensure that there are
services in every County.
(c) State Fund - The remainder of Opioid Funds after.deducting the costs of the
Expense Fund detailed in paragraph 9,the City/County Fund and the Regional Fund
will be expended by the State on Approved Purposes, including the provisions
related to Core Strategies, if applicable.
(d) To the extent that Opioid Funds are not appropriated and expended in a year by the
State, the State shall identify the investments where settlement funds will be
deposited. Any gains, profits, or interest accrued from the deposit of the Opioid
Funds to the extent that any funds are not appropriated and expended within a
calendar year, shall be the sole property of the Party that was entitled to the initial
deposit.
4. Regional Fund Sliding Scale- The Regional Fund shall be calculated by utilizing
the following sliding scale of the Opioid Funds available in any year:
A. Years 1-6: 40%
B. Years 7-9: 35%
C. Years 10-12: 34%
D. Years 13-15: 33%
E. Years 16-18: 30%
5. Opioid Abatement Taskforce or Council - The State will create an Opioid
Abatement Taskforce or Council (sometimes hereinafter "Taskforce" or"Council")to advise the
Governor, the Legislature, Florida's Department of Children and Families ("DCF"), and Local
Governments on the priorities that should be addressed as part of the opioid epidemic and to review
how monies have been spent and the results that have been achieved with Opioid Funds.
(a) Size-The Taskforce or Council shall have ten Members equally balanced between
the State and the Local Governments.
(b) Appointments Local Governments - Two Municipality representatives will be
appointed by or through Florida League of Cities. Two county representatives, one
from a Qualified County and one from a county within the State that is not a
Qualified County, will be appointed by or through the Florida Association of
Counties. The final representative will alternate every two years between being a
county representative (appointed by or through Florida Association of Counties) or
a Municipality representative (appointed by or through the Florida League of
Cities). One Municipality representative must be from a city of less than 50,000
people. One county representative must be from a county less than 200,000 people
and the other county representative must be from a county whose population
exceeds 200,000 people.
(c) Appointments State-
(i) The Governor shall appoint two Members.
(ii) The Speaker of the House shall appoint one Member.
(iii) The Senate President shall appoint one Member.
(iv) The Attorney General or her designee shall be a Member.
(d) Chair - The Attorney General or designee shall be the chair of the Taskforce or
Council.
(e) Term-Members will be appointed to serve a two-year term.
(f) Support-DCF shall support the Taskforce or Council and the Taskforce or Council
shall be administratively housed in DCF.
(g) Meetings - The Taskforce or Council shall meet quarterly in person or virtually
using communications media technology as defined in section 120.54(5)(b)(2),
Florida Statutes.
(h) Reporting - The Taskforce or Council shall provide and publish a report annually
no later than November 30th or the first business day after November 30th, if
November 30th falls on a weekend or is otherwise not a business day. The report
shall contain information on how monies were spent the previous fiscal year by the
State, each of the Qualified Counties, each of the Managing Entities, and each of
the Local Governments. It shall also contain recommendations to the Governor,
the Legislature, and Local Governments for priorities among the Approved
Purposes for how monies should be spent the coming fiscal year to respond to the
opioid epidemic.
(i) Accountability - Prior to July 1st of each year, the State and each of the Local
Governments shall provide information to DCF about how they intend to expend
Opioid Funds in the upcoming fiscal year. The State and each of the Local
Government shall report its expenditures to DCF no later than August 31st for the
previous fiscal year. The Taskforce or Council will set other data sets that need to
be reported to DCF to demonstrate the effectiveness of Approved Purposes. All
programs and expenditures shall be audited annually in a similar fashion to
SAMHSA programs. Local Governments shall respond and provide documents to
any reasonable requests from the State for data or information about programs
receiving Opioid Funds.
(j) Conflict of Interest-All Members shall adhere to the rules,regulations and laws of
Florida including, but not limited to, Florida Statute §112.311, concerning the
disclosure of conflicts of interest and recusal from discussions or votes on
conflicted matters.
6. Administrative Costs- The State may take no more than a 5% administrative fee
from the State Fund ("Administrative Costs") and any Regional Fund that it administers for
counties that are not Qualified Counties. Each Qualified County may take no more than a 5%
administrative fee from its share of the Regional Funds.
7. Negotiation of Non-Multistate Settlements -If the State begins negotiations with
a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant that is separate and apart from a multi-state negotiation,
the State shall include Local Governments that are a part of the Negotiating Committee in such
negotiations. No Settlement shall be recommended or accepted without the affirmative votes of
both the State and Local Government representatives of the Negotiating Committee.
8. Negotiation of Multistate or Local Government Settlements - To the extent
practicable and allowed by other parties to a negotiation, both Parties agree to communicate with
members of the Negotiation Committee regarding the terms of any other Pharmaceutical Supply
Chain Participant Settlement.
9. Expense Fund-The Parties agree that in any negotiation every effort shall be made
to cause Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participants to pay costs of litigation, including attorneys'
fees, in addition to any agreed to Opioid Funds in the Settlement. To the extent that a fund
sufficient to pay the entirety of all contingency fee contracts for Local Governments in the State
of Florida is not created as part of a Settlement by a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant,the
Parties agree that an additional expense fund for attorneys who represent Local Governments
(herein "Expense Fund") shall be created out of the City/County fund for the purpose of paying
the hard costs of a litigating Local Government and then paying attorneys' fees.
(a) The Source of Funds for the Expense Fund- Money for the Expense Fund shall be
sourced exclusively from the City/County Fund.
(b) The Amount of the Expense Fund- The State recognizes the value litigating Local
Governments bring to the State of Florida in connection with the Settlement
because their participation increases the amount Incentive Payments due from each
Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant. In recognition of that value,the amount
of funds that shall be deposited into the Expense fund shall be contingent upon on
the percentage of litigating Local Government participation in the Settlement,
according to the following table:
Litigating Local Government Amount that shall be paid
Participation in the into the Expense Fund
Settlement(by percentage of from (and as a percentage
the population) of)the City/County fund
96 to 100% 10%
91 to 95% 7.5%
86 to 90% 5%
85% 2.5%
Less than 85% 0%
If fewer than 85% percent of the litigating Local Governments (by population)
participate,then the Expense Fund shall not be funded,and this Section of the MOU
shall be null and void.
(c) The Timing of Payments into the Expense Fund- Although the amount of the
Expense Fund shall be calculated based on the entirety of payments due to the
City/County fund over a ten to eighteen year period, the Expense Fund shall be
funded entirely from payments made by Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participants
during the first two years of the Settlement. Accordingly, to offset the amounts
being paid from the City/County to the Expense Fund in the first two years,
Counties or Municipalities may borrow from the Regional Fund during the first two
years and pay the borrowed amounts back to the Regional Fund during years three,
four, and five.
For the avoidance of doubt, the following provides an illustrative example regarding the
calculation of payments and amounts that may be borrowed under the terms of this MOU,
consistent with the provisions of this Section:
Opioid Funds due to State of Florida and Local Governments (over 10 to 18 years): $1,000
Litigating Local Government Participation: 100%
City/County Fund (over 10 to 18 years): $150
Expense Fund (paid over 2 years): $15
Amount Paid to Expense Fund in 1st year: $7.5
Amount Paid to Expense Fund in 2nd year $7.5
Amount that may be borrowed from Regional Fund in 1st year: $7.5
Amount that may be borrowed from Regional Fund in 2nd year: $7.5
Amount that must be paid back to Regional Fund in 3rd year: $5
Amount that must be paid back to Regional Fund in 4th year: $5
Amount that must be paid back to Regional Fund in 5th year: $5
(d) Creation of and Jurisdiction over the Expense Fund- The Expense Fund shall be
established, consistent with the provisions of this Section of the MOU, by order of
the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pasco County, West Pasco
Division New Port Richey, Florida, in the matter of The State of Florida, Office of
the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al.,
Case No. 2018-CA-001438 (the "Court"). The Court shall have jurisdiction over
the Expense Fund, including authority to allocate and disburse amounts from the
Expense Fund and to resolve any disputes concerning the Expense Fund.
(e) Allocation of Payments to Counsel from the Expense Fund- As part of the order
establishing the Expense Fund, counsel for the litigating Local Governments shall
seek to have the Court appoint a third-neutral to serve as a special master for
purposes of allocating the Expense Fund. Within 30 days of entry of the order
appointing a special master for the Expense Fund, any counsel who intend to seek
an award from the Expense Fund shall provide the copies of their contingency fee
contracts to the special master. The special master shall then build a mathematical
model,which shall be based on each litigating Local Government's share under the
Negotiation Class Metrics and the rate set forth in their contingency contracts, to
calculate a proposed award for each litigating Local Government who timely
provided a copy of its contingency contract.
10. Dispute resolution-Any one or more of the Local Governments or the State may
object to an allocation or expenditure of Opioid Funds solely on the basis that the allocation or
expenditure at issue (a) is inconsistent with the Approved Purposes; (b) is inconsistent with the
distribution scheme as provided in paragraph 3, or(c)violates the limitations set forth herein with
respect to administrative costs or the Expense Fund. There shall be no other basis for bringing an
objection to the approval of an allocation or expenditure of Opioid Funds.
Schedule A
Core Strategies
States and Qualifying Block Grantees shall choose from among the abatement strategies listed in
Schedule B.However,priority shall be given to the following core abatement strategies ("Core
Strategies")[, such that a minimum of %of the [aggregate] state-level abatement distributions shall
be spent on [one or more of]them annually])
A.Naloxone or other FDA-approved drug to reverse opioid overdoses
1.Expand training for first responders, schools, community support groups and families; and
2. Increase distribution to individuals who are uninsured or whose insurance does not cover the needed
service.
B. Medication-Assisted Treatment("MAT")Distribution and other opioid-related treatment
1.Increase distribution of MAT to non-Medicaid eligible or uninsured individuals;
2.Provide education to school-based and youth-focused programs that discourage or prevent misuse;
3.Provide MAT education and awareness training to healthcare providers, EMTs, law enforcement,
and other first responders; and
4.Treatment and Recovery Support Services such as residential and inpatient treatment, intensive
outpatient treatment, outpatient therapy or counseling, and recovery housing that allow or integrate
medication with other support services.
C.Pregnant&Postpartum Women
1. Expand Screening,Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment("SBIRT") services to non-
Medicaid eligible or uninsured pregnant women;
2.Expand comprehensive evidence-based treatment and recovery services, including MAT, for women
with co-occurring Opioid Use Disorder("OUD") and other Substance Use Disorder("SUD")/Mental
Health disorders for uninsured individuals for up to 12 months postpartum; and
3. Provide comprehensive wrap-around services to individuals with Opioid Use Disorder(OUD)
including housing,transportation,job placement/training, and childcare.
D. Expanding Treatment for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
1.Expand comprehensive evidence-based and recovery support for NAS babies;
2.Expand services for better continuum of care with infant-need dyad; and
3.Expand long-term treatment and services for medical monitoring of NAS babies and their families.
As used in this Schedule A,words like"expand,""fund,""provide"or the like shall not indicate a preference for new or
existing programs. Priorities will be established through the mechanisms described in the Term Sheet.
1
E.Expansion of Warm Hand-off Programs and Recovery Services
1.Expand services such as navigators and on-call teams to begin MAT in hospital emergency
departments;
2.Expand warm hand-off services to transition to recovery services;
3.Broaden scope of recovery services to include co-occurring SUD or mental health conditions. ;
4.Provide comprehensive wrap-around services to individuals in recovery including housing,
transportation,job placement/training, and childcare; and
5. Hire additional social workers or other behavioral health workers to facilitate expansions above.
F.Treatment for Incarcerated Population
1.Provide evidence-based treatment and recovery support including MAT for persons with OUD and
co-occurring SUD/MH disorders within and transitioning out of the criminal justice system; and
2. Increase funding for jails to provide treatment to inmates with OUD.
G. Prevention Programs
1.Funding for media campaigns to prevent opioid use(similar to the FDA's"Real Cost"campaign to
prevent youth from misusing tobacco);
2.Funding for evidence-based prevention programs in schools.;
3.Funding for medical provider education and outreach regarding best prescribing practices for opioids
consistent with the 2016 CDC guidelines, including providers at hospitals (academic detailing);
4.Funding for community drug disposal programs; and
5.Funding and training for first responders to participate in pre-arrest diversion programs, post-
overdose response teams, or similar strategies that connect at-risk individuals to behavioral health
services and supports.
H. Expanding Syringe Service Programs
1.Provide comprehensive syringe services programs with more wrap-around services including linkage
to OUD treatment, access to sterile syringes, and linkage to care and treatment of infectious diseases.
I.Evidence-based data collection and research analyzing the effectiveness of the abatement strategies
within the State.
2
Schedule B
Approved Uses
PART ONE: TREATMENT
A. TREAT OPIOID USE DISORDER(OUD)
Support treatment of Opioid Use Disorder(OUD) and any co-occurring Substance Use Disorder or
Mental Health (SUD/MH) conditions through evidence-based or evidence-informed programs or
strategies that may include, but are not limited to, the following:2
1. Expand availability of treatment for OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions, including all
forms of Medication-Assisted Treatment(MAT) approved by the U.S.Food and Drug Administration.
2. Support and reimburse evidence-based services that adhere to the American Society of Addiction
Medicine(ASAM) continuum of care for OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions
3.Expand telehealth to increase access to treatment for OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH
conditions, including MAT, as well as counseling, psychiatric support, and other treatment and
recovery support services.
4. Improve oversight of Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs)to assure evidence-based or evidence-
informed practices such as adequate methadone dosing and low threshold approaches to treatment.
5. Support mobile intervention,treatment, and recovery services, offered by qualified professionals and
service providers, such as peer recovery coaches, for persons with OUD and any co-occurring
SUD/MH conditions and for persons who have experienced an opioid overdose.
6.Treatment of trauma for individuals with OUD (e.g.,violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or
adverse childhood experiences) and family members (e.g., surviving family members after an overdose
or overdose fatality), and training of health care personnel to identify and address such trauma.
7. Support evidence-based withdrawal management services for people with OUD and any co-
occurring mental health conditions.
8.Training on MAT for health care providers, first responders, students, or other supporting
professionals, such as peer recovery coaches or recovery outreach specialists, including telementoring
to assist community-based providers in rural or underserved areas.
9. Support workforce development for addiction professionals who work with persons with OUD and
any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
10.Fellowships for addiction medicine specialists for direct patient care, instructors, and clinical
research for treatments.
11. Scholarships and supports for behavioral health practitioners or workers involved in addressing
OUD and any co-occurring SUD or mental health conditions, including but not limited to training,
2 As used in this Schedule B,words like"expand,""fund,""provide"or the like shall not indicate a preference for new or
existing programs. Priorities will be established through the mechanisms described in the Term Sheet.
3
scholarships, fellowships, loan repayment programs, or other incentives for providers to work in rural
or underserved areas.
12. [Intentionally Blank—to be cleaned up later for numbering]
13. Provide funding and training for clinicians to obtain a waiver under the federal Drug Addiction
Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000)to prescribe MAT for OUD, and provide technical assistance and
professional support to clinicians who have obtained a DATA 2000 waiver.
14. Dissemination of web-based training curricula, such as the American Academy of Addiction
Psychiatry's Provider Clinical Support Service-Opioids web-based training curriculum and
motivational interviewing.
15. Development and dissemination of new curricula, such as the American Academy of Addiction
Psychiatry's Provider Clinical Support Service for Medication-Assisted Treatment.
B. SUPPORT PEOPLE IN TREATMENT AND RECOVERY
Support people in treatment for or recovery from OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions
through evidence-based or evidence-informed programs or strategies that may include, but are not
limited to,the following:
1. Provide comprehensive wrap-around services to individuals with OUD and any co-occurring
SUD/MH conditions, including housing,transportation, education,job placement,job training, or
childcare.
2. Provide the full continuum of care of treatment and recovery services for OUD and any co-occurring
SUD/MH conditions, including supportive housing,peer support services and counseling, community
navigators, case management, and connections to community-based services.
3. Provide counseling, peer-support, recovery case management and residential treatment with access to
medications for those who need it to persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
4. Provide access to housing for people with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions,
including supportive housing,recovery housing, housing assistance programs, training for housing
providers, or recovery housing programs that allow or integrate FDA-approved medication with other
support services.
5.Provide community support services, including social and legal services, to assist in
deinstitutionalizing persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
6. Support or expand peer-recovery centers, which may include support groups, social events, computer
access, or other services for persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
7. Provide or support transportation to treatment or recovery programs or services for persons with
OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
8.Provide employment training or educational services for persons in treatment for or recovery from
OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
4
9. Identify successful recovery programs such as physician, pilot, and college recovery programs, and
provide support and technical assistance to increase the number and capacity of high-quality programs
to help those in recovery.
10.Engage non-profits, faith-based communities, and community coalitions to support people in
treatment and recovery and to support family members in their efforts to support the person with OUD
in the family.
11. Training and development of procedures for government staff to appropriately interact and provide
social and other services to individuals with or in recovery from OUD, including reducing stigma.
12. Support stigma reduction efforts regarding treatment and support for persons with OUD, including
reducing the stigma on effective treatment.
13. Create or support culturally appropriate services and programs for persons with OUD and any co-
occurring SUD/MH conditions, including new Americans.
14. Create and/or support recovery high schools.
15.Hire or train behavioral health workers to provide or expand any of the services or supports listed
above.
C. CONNECT PEOPLE WHO NEED HELP TO THE HELP THEY NEED (CONNECTIONS
TO CARE)
Provide connections to care for people who have—or at risk of developing—OUD and any co-
occurring SUD/MH conditions through evidence-based or evidence-informed programs or strategies
that may include, but are not limited to,the following:
1.Ensure that health care providers are screening for OUD and other risk factors and know how to
appropriately counsel and treat(or refer if necessary) a patient for OUD treatment.
2. Fund Screening,Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment(SBIRT)programs to reduce the
transition from use to disorders, including SBIRT services to pregnant women who are uninsured or not
eligible for Medicaid.
3.Provide training and long-term implementation of SBIRT in key systems (health, schools, colleges,
criminal justice, and probation),with a focus on youth and young adults when transition from misuse to
opioid disorder is common.
4.Purchase automated versions of SBIRT and support ongoing costs of the technology.
5.Expand services such as navigators and on-call teams to begin MAT in hospital emergency
departments.
6.Training for emergency room personnel treating opioid overdose patients on post-discharge planning,
including community referrals for MAT, recovery case management or support services.
7. Support hospital programs that transition persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH
conditions, or persons who have experienced an opioid overdose, into clinically-appropriate follow-up
care through a bridge clinic or similar approach.
5
8. Support crisis stabilization centers that serve as an alternative to hospital emergency departments for
persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions or persons that have experienced an
opioid overdose.
9. Support the work of Emergency Medical Systems, including peer support specialists,to connect
individuals to treatment or other appropriate services following an opioid overdose or other opioid-
related adverse event.
10. Provide funding for peer support specialists or recovery coaches in emergency departments, detox
facilities, recovery centers, recovery housing, or similar settings; offer services, supports, or
connections to care to persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions or to persons who
have experienced an opioid overdose.
11. Expand warm hand-off services to transition to recovery services.
12. Create or support school-based contacts that parents can engage with to seek immediate treatment
services for their child; and support prevention, intervention, treatment, and recovery programs focused
on young people.
13. Develop and support best practices on addressing OUD in the workplace.
14. Support assistance programs for health care providers with OUD.
15. Engage non-profits and the faith community as a system to support outreach for treatment.
16. Support centralized call centers that provide information and connections to appropriate services
and supports for persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
D.ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF CRIMINAL-JUSTICE-INVOLVED PERSONS
Address the needs of persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions who are involved
in, are at risk of becoming involved in, or are transitioning out of the criminal justice system through
evidence-based or evidence-informed programs or strategies that may include, but are not limited to,
the following:
1. Support pre-arrest or pre-arraignment diversion and deflection strategies for persons with OUD and
any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions, including established strategies such as:
a. Self-referral strategies such as the Angel Programs or the Police Assisted Addiction Recovery
Initiative(PAARI);
b.Active outreach strategies such as the Drug Abuse Response Team (DART)model;
c. "Naloxone Plus" strategies,which work to ensure that individuals who have received
naloxone to reverse the effects of an overdose are then linked to treatment programs or other
appropriate services;
d. Officer prevention strategies, such as the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion(LEAD)
model;
e. Officer intervention strategies such as the Leon County,Florida Adult Civil Citation Network
or the Chicago Westside Narcotics Diversion to Treatment Initiative; or
6
f. Co-responder and/or alternative responder models to address OUD-related 911 calls with
greater SUD expertise
2. Support pre-trial services that connect individuals with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH
conditions to evidence-informed treatment, including MAT, and related services.
3. Support treatment and recovery courts that provide evidence-based options for persons with OUD
and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions
4.Provide evidence-informed treatment, including MAT,recovery support, harm reduction, or other
appropriate services to individuals with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions who are
incarcerated in jail or prison.
5.Provide evidence-informed treatment, including MAT,recovery support, harm reduction, or other
appropriate services to individuals with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions who are
leaving jail or prison have recently left jail or prison, are on probation or parole, are under community
corrections supervision, or are in re-entry programs or facilities.
6. Support critical time interventions (CTI), particularly for individuals living with dual-diagnosis
OUD/serious mental illness, and services for individuals who face immediate risks and service needs
and risks upon release from correctional settings.
7. Provide training on best practices for addressing the needs of criminal-justice-involved persons with
OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions to law enforcement, correctional, or judicial personnel
or to providers of treatment, recovery, harm reduction, case management, or other services offered in
connection with any of the strategies described in this section.
E. ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF PREGNANT OR PARENTING WOMEN AND THEIR
FAMILIES,INCLUDING BABIES WITH NEONATAL ABSTINENCE SYNDROME
Address the needs of pregnant or parenting women with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH
conditions, and the needs of their families, including babies with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS),
through evidence-based or evidence-informed programs or strategies that may include, but are not
limited to,the following:
1. Support evidence-based or evidence-informed treatment, including MAT,recovery services and
supports, and prevention services for pregnant women—or women who could become pregnant—who
have OUD and any co-occurring SUD/Mil conditions, and other measures to educate and provide
support to families affected by Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.
2.Expand comprehensive evidence-based treatment and recovery services, including MAT, for
uninsured women with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions for up to 12 months
postpartum.
3. Training for obstetricians or other healthcare personnel that work with pregnant women and their
families regarding treatment of OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
4.Expand comprehensive evidence-based treatment and recovery support for NAS babies; expand
services for better continuum of care with infant-need dyad; expand long-term treatment and services
for medical monitoring of NAS babies and their families.
7
5.Provide training to health care providers who work with pregnant or parenting women on best
practices for compliance with federal requirements that children born with Neonatal Abstinence
Syndrome get referred to appropriate services and receive a plan of safe care.
6. Child and family supports for parenting women with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH
conditions.
7. Enhanced family supports and child care services for parents with OUD and any co-occurring
SUD/MH conditions.
8.Provide enhanced support for children and family members suffering trauma as a result of addiction
in the family; and offer trauma-informed behavioral health treatment for adverse childhood events.
9. Offer home-based wrap-around services to persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH
conditions, including but not limited to parent skills training.
10. Support for Children's Services—Fund additional positions and services, including supportive
housing and other residential services, relating to children being removed from the home and/or placed
in foster care due to custodial opioid use.
PART TWO: PREVENTION
F.PREVENT OVER-PRESCRIBING AND ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRESCRIBING AND
DISPENSING OF OPIOIDS
Support efforts to prevent over-prescribing and ensure appropriate prescribing and dispensing of
opioids through evidence-based or evidence-informed programs or strategies that may include, but are
not limited to,the following:
1.Fund medical provider education and outreach regarding best prescribing practices for opioids
consistent with Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain from the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, including providers at hospitals (academic detailing).
2.Training for health care providers regarding safe and responsible opioid prescribing, dosing, and
tapering patients off opioids.
3. Continuing Medical Education (CME) on appropriate prescribing of opioids.
4. Support for non-opioid pain treatment alternatives, including training providers to offer or refer to
multi-modal, evidence-informed treatment of pain.
5. Support enhancements or improvements to Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs),
including but not limited to improvements that:
a. Increase the number of prescribers using PDMPs;
b. Improve point-of-care decision-making by increasing the quantity, quality, or format of data
available to prescribers using PDMPs, by improving the interface that prescribers use to access
PDMP data, or both; or
8
c. Enable states to use PDMP data in support of surveillance or intervention strategies, including
MAT referrals and follow-up for individuals identified within PDMP data as likely to
experience OUD in a manner that complies with all relevant privacy and security laws and rules.
6.Ensuring PDMPs incorporate available overdose/naloxone deployment data, including the United
States Depaitment of Transportation's Emergency Medical Technician overdose database in a manner
that complies with all relevant privacy and security laws and rules.
7. Increase electronic prescribing to prevent diversion or forgery.
8.Educate Dispensers on appropriate opioid dispensing.
G.PREVENT MISUSE OF OPIOIDS
Support efforts to discourage or prevent misuse of opioids through evidence-based or evidence-
informed programs or strategies that may include, but are not limited to,the following:
1. Fund media campaigns to prevent opioid misuse.
2. Corrective advertising or affirmative public education campaigns based on evidence.
3. Public education relating to drug disposal.
4. Drug take-back disposal or destruction programs.
5.Fund community anti-drug coalitions that engage in drug prevention efforts.
6. Support community coalitions in implementing evidence-informed prevention, such as reduced
social access and physical access, stigma reduction—including staffing, educational campaigns, support
for people in treatment or recovery, or training of coalitions in evidence-informed implementation,
including the Strategic Prevention Framework developed by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration(SAMHSA).
7. Engage non-profits and faith-based communities as systems to support prevention.
8. Fund evidence-based prevention programs in schools or evidence-informed school and community
education programs and campaigns for students, families, school employees, school athletic programs,
parent-teacher and student associations, and others.
9. School-based or youth-focused programs or strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in
preventing drug misuse and seem likely to be effective in preventing the uptake and use of opioids.
10. Create of support community-based education or intervention services for families,youth, and
adolescents at risk for OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
11. Support evidence-informed programs or curricula to address mental health needs of young people
who may be at risk of misusing opioids or other drugs, including emotional modulation and resilience
skills.
12. Support greater access to mental health services and supports for young people, including services
and supports provided by school nurses,behavioral health workers or other school staff,to address
9
mental health needs in young people that(when not properly addressed) increase the risk of opioid or
other drug misuse.
H. PREVENT OVERDOSE DEATHS AND OTHER HARMS (HARM REDUCTION)
Support efforts to prevent or reduce overdose deaths or other opioid-related harms through evidence-
based or evidence-informed programs or strategies that may include, but are not limited to,the
following:
1. Increase availability and distribution of naloxone and other drugs that treat overdoses for first
responders, overdose patients, individuals with OUD and their friends and family members, individuals
at high risk of overdose, schools, community navigators and outreach workers, persons being released
from jail or prison, or other members of the general public.
2.Public health entities provide free naloxone to anyone in the community
3.Training and education regarding naloxone and other drugs that treat overdoses for first responders,
overdose patients, patients taking opioids, families, schools, community support groups, and other
members of the general public.
4. Enable school nurses and other school staff to respond to opioid overdoses, and provide them with
naloxone,training, and support.
5.Expand, improve, or develop data tracking software and applications for overdoses/naloxone
revivals.
6. Public education relating to emergency responses to overdoses.
7. Public education relating to immunity and Good Samaritan laws.
8. Educate first responders regarding the existence and operation of immunity and Good Samaritan
laws.
9. Syringe service programs and other evidence-informed programs to reduce harms associated with
intravenous drug use, including supplies, staffing, space,peer support services, referrals to treatment,
fentanyl checking, connections to care, and the full range of harm reduction and treatment services
provided by these programs.
10. Expand access to testing and treatment for infectious diseases such as HIV and Hepatitis C resulting
from intravenous opioid use.
11. Support mobile units that offer or provide referrals to harm reduction services,treatment, recovery
supports,health care, or other appropriate services to persons that use opioids or persons with OUD and
any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
12.Provide training in harm reduction strategies to health care providers, students,peer recovery
coaches, recovery outreach specialists, or other professionals that provide care to persons who use
opioids or persons with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions.
13. Support screening for fentanyl in routine clinical toxicology testing.
10
PART THREE: OTHER STRATEGIES
I.FIRST RESPONDERS
In addition to items in sections C,D, and H relating to first responders, support the following:
1.Educate law enforcement or other first responders regarding appropriate practices and precautions
when dealing with fentanyl or other drugs.
2.Provision of wellness and support services for first responders and others who experience secondary
trauma associated with opioid-related emergency events.
J.LEADERSHIP,PLANNING AND COORDINATION
Support efforts to provide leadership, planning, coordination, facilitation,training and technical
assistance to abate the opioid epidemic through activities, programs, or strategies that may include, but
are not limited to, the following:
1. Statewide, regional, local, or community regional planning to identify root causes of addiction and
overdose, goals for reducing harms related to the opioid epidemic, and areas and populations with the
greatest needs for treatment intervention services;to support training and technical assistance; or to
support other strategies to abate the opioid epidemic described in this opioid abatement strategy list.
2.A dashboard to share reports, recommendations, or plans to spend opioid settlement funds;to show
how opioid settlement funds have been spent; to report program or strategy outcomes; or to track, share,
or visualize key opioid-related or health-related indicators and supports as identified through
collaborative statewide, regional, local, or community processes.
3. Invest in infrastructure or staffmg at government or not-for-profit agencies to support collaborative,
cross-system coordination with the purpose of preventing overprescribing, opioid misuse, or opioid
overdoses,treating those with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions, supporting them in
treatment or recovery, connecting them to care, or implementing other strategies to abate the opioid
epidemic described in this opioid abatement strategy list.
4. Provide resources to staff government oversight and management of opioid abatement programs.
K. TRAINING
In addition to the training referred to throughout this document, support training to abate the opioid
epidemic through activities, programs, or strategies that may include,but are not limited to,the
following:
1.Provide funding for staff training or networking programs and services to improve the capability of
government, community, and not-for-profit entities to abate the opioid crisis.
2. Support infrastructure and staffing for collaborative cross-system coordination to prevent opioid
misuse,prevent overdoses, and treat those with OUD and any co-occurring SUD/MH conditions, or
implement other strategies to abate the opioid epidemic described in this opioid abatement strategy list
(e.g.,health care,primary care, pharmacies,PDMPs, etc.).
L.RESEARCH
11
Support opioid abatement research that may include, but is not limited to,the following:
1.Monitoring, surveillance, data collection, and evaluation of programs and strategies described in this
opioid abatement strategy list.
2.Research non-opioid treatment of chronic pain.
3. Research on improved service delivery for modalities such as SBIRT that demonstrate promising but
mixed results in populations vulnerable to opioid use disorders.
4. Research on novel harm reduction and prevention efforts such as the provision of fentanyl test strips.
5.Research on innovative supply-side enforcement efforts such as improved detection of mail-based
delivery of synthetic opioids.
6.Expanded research on swift/certain/fair models to reduce and deter opioid misuse within criminal
justice populations that build upon promising approaches used to address other substances (e.g.Hawaii
HOPE and Dakota 24/7).
7. Epidemiological surveillance of OUD-related behaviors in critical populations including individuals
entering the criminal justice system, including but not limited to approaches modeled on the Arrestee
Drug Abuse Monitoring(ADAM) system.
8. Qualitative and quantitative research regarding public health risks and harm reduction opportunities
within illicit drug markets, including surveys of market participants who sell or distribute illicit opioids.
9. Geospatial analysis of access barriers to MAT and their association with treatment engagement and
treatment outcomes.
12
City/County Fund 15%
Regional Fund 35%
Scenario 1 $ 130,000,000.00
City/County Fund Scenario
1 $ 19,500,000.00 •
Regional Fund Secnorio I $ 45,500,000.00
Scenario 2 $ 100,000,000.00
City/County Fund Sccnarlo
2 $ 15,000,000.00
Regional Fund Scenario 2 $ 35,000,000.00
jScenario 3 $ 70,000,000.00
City/County Fund Scenario
3 $ 10,500,000.00
Regional Fund Scenario 3 $ 24,500,000.00
Scenorlo 1 Scenario 1'' Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 3-
'Count,/ 'Allocated Subdivisions 'Overall Total% I Allocated%by entity City/County Fund . Regional Fund' City/County Fund Regional Fund City/County Fund Regional Fund
Alachua 1.241060164449% $ .564,682.37 .5 434,371.06 5 304,059.74.
Alachua County 0.821689546303% $ .160,229.45 $ 123,253.43 • $ 86,277.40
Alachua 0.013113332457% $ 2,557.10 . . .. $ 1,967.00 _ . _ $ 1,376.90 ' '
Anther 0.000219705515% $ 42.84 • ' - $ 32.96 . $ 23.07 -e .
Gainesville 0.381597611347% $ 74,411.53 - - ' $ 57,239.64 $ 40,067.75 ' '
Hawthorne 0.000270546460% $ 52.76 $ 4058 ' $ 28.41
High Springs 0.011987568663% $ 2,337.58 . $ 1,798.14 • . $ 1,258.69 •
La Crosse 0.000975056706% $ 190.14 $ 146.26 $ 10238
Mieanopy 0.002113530737% 5 412.14 $ 317.03 ' $ 221.92
Newberry 0.006102729215% $ 1,190.03 ' • • $ 915.41 . $ 640.79
Waldo 0.002988721299% $ 582.80 $ 448.31 $ 313.82 -
Baker 0.19 3173 80413 0% $ '137,894.03 $ 67,610.83, $ 47,327.58
Baker County 0.169449240037% $ 33,042.60'. $ 25,417.39 ' $ 17,792.17 .
Glen St.Mary 0.000096234647% $. . 18.77 ' - $ 14.44 - $ 10.10 .. .
Macclenny 0.023628329446% $ 4,607.52 -- • $ 3,544.25 - $ 2,480.97 '
Bay 0.839656373312% .5 . 382,043.65. $ 293,879.73 3 .205,715.81-
Bay County 0.508772605155% $ 99,210.66 $ 76,315.89 S 53,421.12 '
Callaway 0.024953825527% $ 4,866.00 $ 3,743.07 $ 2,620.15
Lynn Haven 0.039205632015% 9. 7,645.10 $ 5,880.84 - $ 4,116.59
Meolno Beach 0.005614292988% $ 1,094.79 ' $ 842.14 $ 589.50 ..
Panama City 0.155153855596% $ 30,255.00 $ 23,273.08 $ 16,291.15
Panama City Beach 0.080897023117% $ 15,774.92 $ 12,134.55 $ 8,494.19 •
Parker 0.008704696178% $ - 1,697.42 _ _ $ 1,305.70 . . $ 913.99 ' - .
Springfield 0.016354442736% $ 3,189.12 - ,$ 2,453.17 - : $ 1,717.22 .
Bradford 0.189484204081% $ 86,215.31, .$ 66,319.47 $ ' ' 46,423.63
Bradford County 0.151424309090% $ 29,527.74 $ 22,713.65 : $ 15,899.55
Brooker 0.000424885045% $ 82.85 - $ 63.73 ' $ 44.61
Hampton 0.002839829959% $ 553.77 $ 425.97 - - $ 298.113
Lawtey 0.003400896108% $ 663.17 ... _ $ - 510.13 „ $ 357.09
Starke 0.031392468132% $ 6,121.53 - $ 4,708.87 5 3,296.21 . -
Brevard 3.878799180444% 'Sr. 1,764,853.63' $' - 1,357,579.71. $ 950,305.80
Brevard County 2323022668525% $ - 452,989.42 : ... ._ $ 348,453.40 .. $ 243,917.38 -Cape Canaveral 0.045560750209% $..- - .•- 8,884.35 - _ _ $
Cocoa 0.149245411423% $ 29,102.86 , ..
Cocoa Beach 0.084363286155% $. 16,450.84. - $ 12,654.49 - $ 8,858.15 .
Grant-Valkaria 0.000321387406% $ '62.67 . $ 48.21 ' $ 33.75 '
Indialantic 0.024136738902% $ 4,706.66 : •, $ 3,620.51 - $ 2,534.36 -
Indian Harbour Beach 0.02 10 89913 6 6 5% $ 4,112.53 - $ 3,163.49 - $ 2,214.44 ' _.
Malabar 0.002505732317% $ 488.62 $ 375.86 $ 263.10
Melbourne 0.3 83 1046 82 2 3 3% $ 74,705.41 $ - 57,465.70. $ 40,225.99 - '
Melbourne Beach 0.0120 910 6 6 3 02% $ 2,357.76 : ' . _. - $ 1,813.66 - - .- $ 1,269.56 : . ' '
Melbourne Village 0.003782203200% $ 737.53 $ 567.33 . $ 397.13 .
Palm Bay 0.404817397481% $ , 78,939.39 $ 60,722.61 .... $ 42,505.83 _ .
Palm Shores 0.000127102364% $ - 24.78 ' - $ 19.07 ' - $ 1335 .
Rockledge 0.096603243798% $ 18,837.63 - : $ 14,490.49 $ 10,14334 .
Satellite Beach 0.035975416224% $ 7,015.21 ' - $ 5,396.31 $ 3,777.42 - -
Titusville 0.240056418924% $ 46,811.00 .. . .. $ 36,008.46 . - - - $ 25,205.92 - •
West Melbourne 0.051997577066% $ 10,139.53 ' ' 5 7,799.64 $ 5,459.75
Broward 9.057962672578% $ 4,121,373,02' •5 3,170,286.94 $ • 2,219,200.85
Broward County 3.966403576878% $ 773,448.70 $ 594,960.54 $ 416,472.38 .
Coconut Creek 0.101131719448% $ 19,720.69 ' _ . . $ 15,169.76 ' $ 10,618.83 .--
CooperCity 0.073935445073% $ 14,417.41' $ 11,090.32 ' . I . _ $ 7,763.22
Coral Springs 0323406517664% $ 63,064.27 ' $ 48,510.98 $ 33,957.68 _ '
Dania Beach 0.017807041180% $ 3,472.37 . .. ' $ 2,671.06 $ 1,869.74 ,
Davie 0.266922227153% $ 52,049.83 3 40,038.33 : S 28,026.83 . '
Deerfield Beach 0.202423224725% $ 39,472.53 $ 30,363.48 • : $ 21,254.44 '
Fort Lauderdale 0.830581264531% $ 161,963.35 . $ 124,587.19 $ 87,211.03 ,
Hallandale Beach 0.154950491814% $ 30,215.35 , $ 23,242.57 $ 16,269.80 '
Hillsboro Beach 0.012407006463% $ 2,419.37 ' $ 1,861.05 $ 1,302.74 '
Hollywood 0.520164608456% $ - 301,432.10 -- $ 78,024.69 .. -. - $ 54,617.28 '
Lauderdale-By-The-Sea 0.02 2 8076113 2 5% $ ' 4,447.48 $ 3,421.14 $ 2,394.80 '
Lauderdale Lakes 0.062625150435% S 12,211.90 $ 9,393.77 $ 6,575.64
Lauderhill 0.144382838130% $ 28,154.65 5 21,657.43 $ 15,160.20
Lazy Lake 0.000021788977% $ 4.25 $ 3.27 $ 2.29
Llghthouso Point 0.029131861803% $ 5,680.71 $ 4,369.78 $ 3,058.85
Margate 0.143683775129% $ 28,018.34 $ 21,552.57 $ 15,086.80
Miramar 0.279280208419% $ 54,459.64 $ 41,892.03 $ 29,324.42
_ North Lauderdale 0066069524496% $ 12,883.58 $ 9,910.44 $ 6,937.31
Oakland Park 0.100430840699% $ 19,584.01 $ 15,064.63 $ 10,545.24 __
Ocean Breeze 0.005381877237% $ 1,049.47 $ 807.28 $ 565.10
Parkland 0.045804060448% $ 8,931.79 $ 6,870.61 5 4,809.43 ,
Pembroke Park 0.024597938908% $ 4,796.60 $ 3,689.69 S 2,582.78
Pembroke Pines 0.462832363603% $ 90,752.31 $ 69,424.85 $ 48,597.40
Plantation 0.213918725664% $ 41,714.15 $ 32,087.81 5 22,461.47
_ Pompano Beach 0.335472163493% $ 65,417.07 $ 50,320.82 5 35,224.58
Sea Ranch Lakes 0.005024174870% $ 979.71 $ 753.63 $ 527.54
Southwest Ranches 0025979723178% $ 5,066.05 $ 3,896.96 $ 2,727.87
Sunrise 0.28607110614696 $ 55,783.87 _ _ 5 42,910.67 6 30,037.47
Tamarac 0.134492458472% $ 26,226.03 $ 20,173.87 $ 14,121.71
Weston 0.13 8 63 78112 83% $ 27,034.37 $ 20,795.67 $ 14,556.97
West Park 0.029553115352% $ 5,762.B6 $ 4,432.97 $ 3,103.08
Wilton Manors 0.031630331127% $ 5,167.91 $ 4,744.55 5 3,321.18
Calhoun 0.047127740781% 5 21,443.12 $ 16,494.71 5 11,545.30
Calhoun County 0.038866087128% $ 7,578.89 5 5,829.91 $ 4,080.94
Altha 0.0003 6 6 7 81107% $ 71.52 $ 55.02 $ 38.51
Blountstown 0.007896688293% $ 1,539.85 $ 1,184.50 $ 829.15
Charlotte 0.737346233376%_ _ _ $ 335,492.54 $ 258,071.18 $ 180,649.83
Charlotte County 0.690225755587% $_ __ 134,594.02 $ 103,533.86 $ 72,473.70
Punta Gorda 0.047120477789% $ 9,188.49 $ 7,068.07 $ 4,947.65
Citrus 0.969645776606% _ $ _ 441,188.83 $ 339,76.02 $ 237,553.22
Citrus County 0.929715661117% $ 181,294.55 $ 139,457.35 5 97,620.14
_ Crystal River 0.021928789266% $ _ 4,276.11 _ $ 3,289.32 $ 2,302.52_
Inverness 0.018001326222% 5 3,510.26 $ 2,700.20 $ 1,890.14
Clay 1.193429461456% $ 543,010.40 $ 417,700.31 $ 292,390.22
Clay County 1.055764891131% $ 205,874.15 5 158,364.73 $ 110,855.31
Green Cove Springs 0.057762577142% $ 11,263.70 $ 8,664.39 $ 6,065.07
Keystone Heights 0.000753535443% $ 146.94 $ 113.03 $ 79.12
Orange Park 0.0785892073399L$ 15,324.90 $ 11,788.38 $ 8,251.87
Penney Farms 0.000561066149% $ 109.41 $ 84.16 5 58.91
Collier 1.551333376427% $ 705,856.69 $ 542,966.68 $ 380,076.6B
Collier County 1.35467333603096 $ 264,161.30 $ 203,201.00 5 142,240.70
Everglades 0.000148891341% $ 29.03 $ 22.33 5 15.63
Marco Island 0.062094952003% $ 12,108.52 $ 9,314.24 $ 6,519.97
Naples 0.134416197054% 5 26,211.16 $ 20,162.43 $ 14,113.70
Columbia 0.446781150792% $ 203.285.42 $ 156,373.40 $ 109,461.38
Columbia County 0.3 418 87 2013 73% 5 66,668.00 5 51,283.08 $ 35,898.16
Fort White 0.000236047247% $ 46.03 $ 35.41 $ 24.78
Lake City 0.104659717920%$ 20,408.64 $ 15,698.96 '$ 10,989.27
DeSoto 0.113 6 4040 7 802% 5 51,706.39 5 39,774.14 $ 27,841.90
DeSoto County 0.096884684746% $ 18,892.51 5 14,532.70 $ 10,172.89
Arcadia 0.01675 5 7 2 3 05 6% $ 3,267.37 $ 2,513.36 $ 1,759.35
Dixie 0.103744580900% 5 47,203.78 $ 36,310.60 $ 25,417.42
Dixie County 0.098822087921% $ 19,270.31 $ 14,823.31 $ 10,376.32
Cross City 0.004639236282% $ 904.65 5 695.89 5 487.12
Horseshoe Beach 0.000281440949% $ 54.88 $ 42.22 $ 29.55
Duval 5.434975156935% $ 2,472,913.70 $ 1,902,241.30 $ 1,331,568.91
Jacksonville 5.270570064997% $ 1,027,761.16 $ 790,585.51 $ 553,409.86
Atlantic Beach 0038891507601% $ 7,583.84 5 5,833.73 $ 4,083.61
Baldwin 0.002251527589% $ 439.05 $ 337.73 $ 236.41
Jacksonville Beach 0.100447182431% $ 19,587.20 $ 15,067.08 $ 10,546.95
Neptune Beach 0.022814874318% $ 4,448.90 $ 3,422.23 $ 2,395.56
Escambla 1.341634449244% $ 610,443.67 $ 469,572.06 $ 328,700.44
Escambla County 1.005860871574% $ 196,142.87 $ 150,879 13 5 105,615.39
Century 0.005136751249% $ 1,00157 $ 770.51 $ 539.36
Pensacola 0.330636826421% $ 64,474.18 $ 49,595.52 5 34.716.87
Flagler 0.389864712244% 5 177,388.44 $ 136,452.65 $ 95,516.85
Flagler[marry 0.279755934409% $ 54,552.41 5 41,963.39 $ 29,374.37
Beverly Beach 0.00015 43 3 8 5 85% $ 30.10 $ 23.15 $ 16.21
Bunnell 0.009501809575% $ 1,852.85 $ 1,425.27 $ 997.69
Flagler Beath 0.015482883669% $ 3,019.16 $ 2,322.43 $ 1,625.70
Marineland 0.000114392127% $ 22.31 $ 17.16 $ 12.01
Palm Coast 0.084857169626% $ 16,547.15 $ 12,728.58 $ 8,910.00
Franklin 0.049911282550% $ 22,709.63 $ 17,468.95 $ 12,228.26
Franklin County 0.046254365966% $ 9,019.60 $ 6,938.15 $ 4,85631
Apalachicola 0.001768538605% $ 344.87 $ 265.28 5 185.70
Carabelle 0001888377978% $ 368.23 $ 283.26 $ 198.28
Gadsden 0.123656074077% $ 56,263.51 $ 43,279.63 5 30,295.74
Gadsden County 0090211810642% $ 17,591.30 $ 13,531.77 $ 9,472.24
Chattahoochee 0.004181667772% $ 815.43 - - $ 627.25 $ 439.08
•
Greensboro 0.000492067723% $ 95.95 . . .. . $ . . 73.81 $ 51.67
Gretna 0.002240633101% $ 436.92 $ 336.09 $ 235.27
Havana 0.005459954403% $ 1,064.59 ' $ 818.99 $ 573.30
Midway 0.001202025213% $ 234.39 $ 180.30 $ 126.21
Quincy 0.019867915223% $ 3,874.24 5 2,980.19 $ 2,086.13 '
Gilchrist 0.0643337693559S $ 29,271.87 $ 22,516.82 $ 15,761.77
Gilchrist County 0.0612 7 42 3 3 8 81% $ 11,948.48 $ 9,191.14 $ 6,433.79
Bell 0.000099866143% $ 19.47 $ 14.98 $ 10.49 -
Fanning Springs 0.000388570084% $ 75.77 _ $ 58.29 $ 40.80 - '
Trenton 0.002571099247% $ 501.36 $ 385.66 $ 269.97
Glades 0.040612836758% $ 18,478.84" $ 14,214.49 $ 9,950.15
Glades County 0.040420367464% $ 7,881.97 ' $ 6,063.06 $ 4,244.14 .
Moore Haven 0.000192469294% $ 37.53 $ 28.87 $ 20.21
Gulf 0.059914238588% $ 27,260.98 $ 20,969.98' $ 14,678.99
Gulf County 0.054715751905% $ 10,669.57 $ 8,207.36 - . $ 5,745.15
Port St.Joe 0.004817179591% $ 939.35 $ 722.58 . $ 505.80
Wewahitchka 0.000381307092% $ 74.35 $ 57.20' $ 40.04
Hamilton 0.047941195910% $ - 21,813.24• $ 16,779.42 5'. -11,745.59
Hamilton County 0.038817061931% $ 7,569.33 . .. - $ 5,822.56 -. .. ' $ 4,075.79 - _
Jasper 0.004869836285% $ 949.62 ' $ 730.48 5 511.33
Jennings 0.002623755940% $ 511.63 ' $ 393.56 $ 275.49 -
White Springs 0.001630541754% $ 317.96 . - $ 244.58 $ 171.21
Hardee 0.067130048732% $ 30,535.07. $ 23;488.52 $ - 16,441.96
Hardee County 0.058100306280% $ 11,329.56 $ 8,715.05 $ 6,100.53 '
Bowling Green 0.001797590575% $ 350.53 ' $ 269.64 $ 188.75
Wauchula 0.005667426860% $ 1,300.15 . - $ 1,000.11 . $ 700.08
Zolfo Springs 0.000544724417% 5 106.22 $ 81.71 $ 57.20
Hendry 0.144460915297%, $ .. .. 65,729.72 $ 50,561.32 $ 35,392.92
Hendry County 0.122147187443% $ 23,818.70 $ 18,322.08 $ 12,825.45 .. .
Clewiston 0.017589151414% $ 3,429.88 $ 2,638,37 $ 1,846.86 .
LaBelle 0.004724576440% $ 921.29 ' • $ 708.69 $ 496.08
Hernando 1510075949110% '$ ' . .687,084.56 .$ 528,526.58 $ 369,958.61
Hernando County 1.447521612849% $ 282,266.71 $ 217,128.24 5 151,989.77
Brooksville 0.061319627583% $ 11,957.33 $ 9,197.94 $ 6,438.56
Weekl Wachee 0.001234708678% $ 240.77 $ 185.21 5 129.64
Highlands 0.357188510237% $ 162,520.77 $ 125,015.98 $ " 87,511.19
Highlands County 0.287621754986% $ 55,086.24 $ 43,143.26 $ 30,200.28
Avon Park 0.025829016090% $ 5,036.66 • - $ 3,874.35 - $ 2,712.05 .
Lake Placid 0.005565267790% $ 1,085.23 ' 5 834.79 $ 584.35
Sebring 0.038172471371% $ 7,443.63 - - $ 5,725.87 $ 4,0013.11
Hillsborough 8.710984113657% $ , 3,963,497.77 $ . 3,048,844.44 $.. 2,134,191.11
Hillsborough County 5.523111204400% $ 1,272,006.68 $ 978,466.68 ' $ 584,925.68
Plant City 0.104218491142% $ 20,322.61 ' $ 15,632.77 $ 10,942.94
Tampa 1.975671881253% $ 385,256.02 $ 296,350.78 $ 207,445.55 .
Temple Terrace 0.107980721113% $ 21,056.24 $ 16,197.11 5 11,337.98
Holmes 0.0816124271351% $ 37,133.65 5 213,564.35 $ 19,995.04
Holmes County 0.066805002459% $ 13,026.98 $ 10,020.75 $ 7,014.53
Bonifay 0.006898026863% 5 1,345.12 - $ 1,034.70 $ 724.29 '
Ssto 0.006269778036% $ 1,222.61 $ 940.47 $ 658.33
Noma 0.00127 82 86 63 1% $ 249.27 ... $ 191.74 .. $ 134.22 •
Ponce de Leon 0.000179759057% $ 35.05 5 26.96 $ 18.87
Westville 0.000179759057% $ 35.05 $ 26.96 $ 18.87
Indian River 0.753076058781% .$ 342,649.61 $ 263,576.62 $ 184,503.53
Indian River County 0.623 5 71460 217% $ 121,596.43 " . . $ 93,535.72. $ 65,475.0D .
Fellsmere 0.004917045734% $ 958.62 $ 737.56 $ 516.29
Indian River shores 0.025322422382% $ 4,937.87 $ 3,798.36 $ 2,658.85
Orchid 0.000306861421% $ 59.84 - , $ 46.03 _ $ 32.22 . .
Sebastian 0.0 3 8315915 467% $ 7,471.60 ' ' $ 5,747.39 $ 4,023.17 . , . '
Vero Beach 0.060642353558% $ 11,825.26 $ 9,096.35 $ 6,367.45
Jackson 0.158936058795% $ 72,315.91 $ 55,627.62 $ 38,939.33
Jackson County 0.075213731704% $ 14,666,68 $ 11,282.06 $ 7,897.44
Alford 0.000303229925% $ 59.13 - $ 45.48 $ 31.84 .
Bascom 0.0000 617 3 54 3 4% $ 12.04 . $ 9.26 $ 6.48 ..
Campbellton 0.001648699234% $ 321.50 $ 247.30 $ 173.11
Cottondale 0001093080329% $ 213.15 $ 163.96 $ 114.77
Graceville 0.002794436257% $ 544.92 $ 419.17 $ 293.42
Grandrldge 0.000030867717% $ 6.02 . $ 4.53 ' $ 3.24 '
Greenwood 0.001292812616% $ 252.10 • $ 193.92 $ 135.75 .
Jacob City 0.000481173235% $ 93.83 - $ 72.18 $ 50.52
Malone 0.000092603151% $ 18.06 $ 13.89 $ 9.72 . .
Marianna 0.073519638768% $ 14,335.33 $ 11,027.95 $ 7,719.56
Sneads 0.002404050426% $ 468.79 $ 360.61 $ 252.43
Jefferson 0.040821547784% •5 18,573.85 $ 14,287.58 $ 10,001.30
Jefferson County 0.037584169001% $ 7,328.91 $ 5,637.63 $ 3,946.34 '
Monticello 0.003237478783% $ 631.31 $ 485.62 $ 339.94 .
Lafayette 0.031911772076% i 5 .14,519.86. $ 11,169.12 $ 7,818.38
Lafayette County 0.031555885457% $ 6,153.40 $ 4,733.38 $ 3,313.37
Mayo 0.000355886619% $ 69.40 $ 53.38 $ 37.37
Lake 1.139211224519% $ 518,341.11. $ ' 398,723.93 $ 279,106.75
Lake County 0.757453827343% $ 147,703.50 - $ 113,618.07 $ 79,532.65
Astatula 0.002727253579% $ 531.81 $ 409.09 ' $ 286.36
Clermont 0.075909163709% $ 14,802.29 $ 11,386.37 $ 7,970.46
Eustis 0.041929254098% $ 8,176.20 $ 6,289.39 $ 4,402.57
Fruitland Park 0.0083 81493 02 4% $ 1,634.39 .. $ 1,25722 ., $ 880.06
Groveland 0.026154034992% $ 5,100.04 - $ 3,923.11 . $ 2,746.17
Hawey-In-The-HIlls 0.002981458307% $ 581.38 $ 447.22 ' $ 313.05
Lady Lake 0.025048244426% $ 4,884.41 5 3,757.24 $ 2,630.07
Leesburg 0.091339390185% $ 17,811.18 $ 13,700.91 $ 9,590.64
Mascotte 0.011415 60 8 025% $ 2,226.04 • $ 1,712.34 $ 1,198.64
Mlnneola 0.016058475803% $ 3,131.40 . .. $ 2,403.77 $ 1,686.14
Montverde 0.001347285057% $ 262.72 $ 202.09 $ 141.46
Mount Dora 0041021380070% $ 7,999.17 5 6,153.21 $ 4,307.24
Tavares 0.031820984673% 5 6,205.09 . $ 4,773.15 $ 3,341.20
Umatilla 0.005623371728% $ 1,096.56 $ 843,51 5 590.45
Lee 3.325371883359% $ 1,513,044.21 $ 1,163,880.16 $ . 814,716.11
Lee County 2.1152 6 840750 9% $ 412,477.34 ' $ 317,290,26 . $ 222,103.18
Bonita Springs 0.017374893143% $ 3,388.10 $ 2,606.23 $ 1,824.36
Cape Coral 0.714429677167% $ 139,313.79 • - - $ 107,164.45 $ 75,015.12
Estero 0.012080171813% $ 2,355.63 $ 1,812.03 $ 1,268.42
Fort Myers 0.431100350585% $ 84,064.57 $ 64,665.05 $ 45,265.54
Fort Myers Beach 0.000522935440% $ 101.97 $ 78.44 $ 54.91
Sanibel 0.034595447702% $ 6,746.11 ' - $ 5,189.32 $ 3,632.52
Leon 0.897199244939% $ 408,225.66 $ 314,019.74 $ 219,813.82
Leon County 0.471201146391% $ 91,884.22 $ 70,680.17 ' $ 49,476.12
Tallahassee 0.425998098549% $ 83,069.63 _ $ 63,899.71 $ 44,729.80
Levy 0.251192401748% $ ' 114,292.54 $ 87,917.34 $ , 61,542.14
Levy County 0.200131750679% $ 39,025.69 - $ 30,019.76 ' $ 21,013.83
Bronson 0.005701448894% $ 1,111.78 $ 855.22 5 598.65
Cedar Key 0.005180329202% $ 1,010.16 $ 777.05 $ 543.93
Chlefland 0.015326729337% $ 2,988.71 $ 2,299.01 $ 1,609.31
Fanning Springs 0.000808007885% $ 157.56 - $ 121.20 $ 84.84
Inglis 0.004976965420% $ 970.51 .. $ 746.54 $ 522.58
Otter Creek 0.000408543312% $ 79.67 $ 61.28 $ 42,90
Williston 0.017774357715% $ 3,466.00 $ 2,666.15 $ 1,866.31
Yankeetown 0.000884269303% $ 172.43 $ 132.64 $ 92.85 ,
Liberty 0019399452225% .$ 8,826.75 $ ' 6,789.81 $ 4,752.87
Liberty County 0,019303217578% $ 3,764.13 $ . 2,895.48 - $ 2,026.84
Bristol 0.000096234647% $ 18.77 5 14.44 $ 10.10
Madison 0.063540287455% 'S 28,910,83 $ 22,239.10 $ 15,567.37
Madison County 0.053145129837% $ 10,363.30 $ 7,971.77 $ 5,580.24
Greenville 0.000110760631% $ 21.60 $ 16.61 5 11.63
Lee 0.000019973229% $ 3.89 $ 3.00 $ 2.10
Madison 0.010264423758% $ 2,001.56 $ 1,539.66 $ 1,077.76
Manatee 2.721323346235% $' 1,238,202.12. $ 952,463.17 $. 666,724,22
Manatee County 2.201647174006% $ 429,321.20 $ 330,247.08 . $ 231,172.95
Anna Maria 0.009930326116% 5 1,936.41 $ 1,489.55 . $ 1,042.68
Bradenton 0.379930754632% $ 74,0116.50 ' $ 56,989.61 $ 39,892.73
Bradenton Beach 0,014012127744% $ 2,732.36 5 2,101.82 $ 1,471.27
Holmes Beach 0.028038781473% $ 5,467.56 $ 4,205.82 $ 2,944,07
Longboat Key 0.034895046131% $ 6,804.53 $ 5,234.26 . $ 3,663.98
Palmetto 0.052869136132% $ 10,309.48 $ 7,930.37 $ 5,551.26
Marlon 1.701176168960% $ 774,035.16 $ 595,411.66 $ 416,788.16
Marion County 1.303728892837% $ 254,227.13 - _ $ 195,559.33 $ 136,891,53
Belleview 0.009799592256% $ 1,910.92 .. $ 1,469.94 , - S 1,028.96
Dunnellon 0.018400790795% $ 3,588.15 $ 2,760.12 5 1,932.08
McIntosh 0.000145259844% $ 28.33 $ 21.79 . $ 15.25
Ocala 0.368994504094% $ 71,953.93 $ 55,349.18 $ 38,744.42
Reddlck 0.000107129135% $ 20.89 $ 16.07 $ 11.25
Martin 0.869487298116% $ . 395,616.72 $ 304,320.55 $ 213,024.39
Martin County 0.750762795758% $ 146,398,75 $ 112,614.42 $ 78,830.09
Jupiter Island 0.020873839646% $ 4,070,40 $ 3,131.08 $ 2,191.75
Ocean Breeze Park 0.008270732393% $ 1,612.79 $ 1,240.61 $ 868.43
Sewall's Point 0.008356072551% $ 1,629.43 - . $ 1,253.41 $ 877.39
Stuart 0.081223857767% $ 15,838.65 $ 12,183.58 $ 8,528.51
Miami-Dade 5.2 3 2119 7 8 4173% $ 2,380,614,50 $ 1,831,241.92 5• 1,281,869.35
Mlaml-Dade County 4.282797675552% $ 835,145.55 $ 642,419.65 $ 449,693.76
Aventura 0.024619727885% $ 4,800.85 . ' $ 3,692.96 $ 2,585.07
Bal Harbour 0.010041086747% $ 1,958.01 $ 1,506.16 $ 1,054.31
Bay Harbor Islands 0,004272455175% $ 833.13 . . $ 640.87 $ 448.61
Biscayne Park 0.001134842535% 5 221.29 $ 170.23 $ 119.16
Coral Gables 0.071780152131% $ 13,997.13 $ 10,767.02 $ 7,536.92
Cutler Bay 0.009414653668% $ 1,835.86 .. $ 1,412.20 . ' $ 988.54
Dora! 0.013977628531% $ 2,725.64 5 2,096.64 $ 1,467.65
El Portal 0.0009 2 42157 60% $ 180.22 . . .. ' $ 138.63 . $ 97.04
Florida City 0.003929278792% $ 766.21 $ 589.39 - $ 412.57 .
Golden Beach 0.002847092951% $ 555.18 $ 427.06 $ 298.94 '
Hialeah 0.098015895785% $ 19,113.10 • $ 14,702.38 , $ 10,291.67
Hialeah Gardens 0.005452691411% $ 1,063.27 $ 817.90 $ 572.53
Homestead 0.024935668046% $ 4,862.46 • $ 3,740.35 $ 2,618.25
Indian Creek 0.002543863026% $ 496.05 . $ 381.58 $ 267.11
Key Biscayne 0.013683477346% $ 2,668.28 _ - $ 2,052.52 $ 1,436.77
Medley 0.008748274131% $ 1,705.91 $ 1,312.24 ' $ 918.57
Miami 0.292793005448% $ .57,094.64 $ 43,918.95 . ._ $ 30,743.27 .
Miami Beach 0.181409572478% $ 35,374.87 $ 27,211.44 $ 19,048.01 _ .
-Miami Gardens 0.040683650932% $ 7,933.31 $ 6,102.55 $ 4,271.78 -
Miami Lakes 0.007836768608% $ 1,528.17 • $ 1,175.52 • $ 822.86
Miami Shores 0.006267935516% $ 1,226.15 - $ 943.19 $ 660.23
Miami Springs 0.006169911893% $ 1,203.13 $ 925.49 ' $ 647.84
North Bay Village 0005160355974% $ 1,006.27 $ 774.05 $ 541.84
North Miami 0.030379280717% $ 5,923.96 $ 4,556.89 $ 3,189.82
North Miami Beach 0.030391990953% $ 5,926.44 $ 4,558.80 $ 3,191.16 '
Opa-locks 0.007647663096% $ 1,530.29 $ 1,177.15 $ 824.00 _ . .
Palmetto Bay 0.007404620570% $ 1,443.90 . _ $ 1,110.69 $ 777.49
Pinecrest 0.008296152866% $ 1,617.75 $ 1,244.42 . $ 871.10
South Miami 0.007833137111% $ 1,527.4E -• " • $ 1,174.97 $ 822.48 .
Sunny Isles Beach 0.007693324511% $ 1,500.20 _ _ $ 1,154.00 $ 807.80
Surfside 0.004869836285% $ 949.62 $ 730.48 $ 511.33
Sweetwater 0.004116300842% $ 802.68 $ 617.45 $ 432.21
Virginia Gardens 0.001172973244% $ 228.73 $ 175.95 . $ 123.16
West Miami 0.002654623657% $ 517.65 $ 398.19 $ 278.74 .
Monroe 0.476388738585% $ 216,756.88 $ 166,736.06 $ 116,715.24
Monroe County 0.330124785469% $ 64374.33 _ $ 49,518.72 $ 34,663.10 .
Islamorada 0.022357305808% $ 4,359.67 $ 3,353.60 ' $ 2,347.52 .
Key Colony Beach 0.004751812661% $ 926.60 ' $ 712.77 ' $ 498.94 '
Key West 0 088087385417% $ 17,177.04 $ 13,213.11 . $ 9,249.18
Layton 0.000150707089% $ 29.39 $ 22,61 $ 15.82
Marathon 0.030916742141% $ 6,028.76 $ 4,637.51 $ 3,246.26
Nassau 0.476933463002% $ '217,004.73 $ 166,926.71. $ 116,1348.70
Nassau County 0.392706357951% $ 76,577.74 $ 58,905.95 ' $ 41,234.17
Callahan 0.000225152759% $ 43.90 $ 33.77 $ 23.64
Fernandina Beach 0.083159445195% $ 16,215.09 $ 12,473.92 $ 8,731.74
Hillard 0.000842507098% 5 164.29 • $ . 126.38 $ 88.46 ..
Okaloosa 0.819212865955% $ 372,741.85 $ ' ' 286,724.50 $ 200,707.15
Dkaloosa County 0.612059617545% S 119,351.63 $ 91,808.94 . . . $ 64,266.26
Clnco Bayou 0.000733562214% $ 143.04 $ 110.03 ' $ 77.02 ..
Crestview 0.070440130066% $ 13,735.83 $ 10,566.02 $ 7,396.21
Destln 0.014678507281% $ 2,862.31 ' $ 2,201.78 $ 1,541.24
Fort Walton Beach 0.077637487644% $ 15,178.31 _ $ 11,675.62 . $ 8,172.94
Laurel Hill 0.000079892914% $ 15.58 $ 11.98 $ 8.39
Mary Esther 0.009356549730% $ 1,824.53 $ 1,403.48 $ 982.44
Niceville 0.021745398713% $ 4,240.35 $ 3,261.81 $ 2,283.27
Shalimar 0.001824826796% $ ' 355.84 ' ' $ 273.72 $ 191.51 ' -
Valparaiso 0.010456893052% $ - 2,039.09 $ 1,568.53 ' $ 1,097.97
Okeechobee 0.353495278692% $ 160,840.35 $ 123,723.35 $ 86,606.34
Okeechobee County 0.314543851405% $ 61,336.05 $ 47,181.58 $ 33,027.10
Okeechobee 0.038951427287% $ 7,595.53 $ 5,842.71 $ 4,089.90
Orange 4.671028214546% $' 2,125,317,84 $ 1,634,859.88 $. 1,144,401.91
Orange County 3.063330386979% $ 597,349.43 $ 459,499.56 ' $ 321,649.69
Apopka 0.097215150892% $ 18,956.95 $ 14,582.27 $ 10,207.59
Bay Lake 0.023 5 6 65 94013% $ 4,595.49 . $ 3,534.99 $ 2,474.49 .
Belle Isle 0.010798253686% $ 2,105.66 -. . $ 1,619.74 - $ 1,133.82
Eatonville 0.008325204835% $ 1,623.41 ' $ 1,248.78 - $ 874.15 : •
Edgewaod 0.009716067845% $ 1,894.63 . ._ $ 1,457.41 - $ 1,020.19 .
Lake Buena Vista - 0.010355211161% $ 2,019.27 $ 1,553.28 $ 1,087.30
Maitland 0.046728276209% $ 9,112.01 $ 7,009.24. $ 4,906.47
Oakland 0.005429086686% $ 1,058.67 $ 814.3E $ 570.05
Ocoee 0.066599822928% $ 12,986.97 $ 9,989.97 $ 5,992.98
Orlando 1.160248481490% $ 226,248.45 $ 174,037.27 $ 121,826.09
Windemere 0.007548064667% $ 1,471.87 $ 1,132.21 $ 792.55
Winter Garden 0.056264584996% $ 10,971.59 $. 8,439.69 . ' $ 5,907.78
Winter Park 0.104903028159% $ 20,456.09 $ 15,735.45 - $ 11,014.82
Osceola 1.073452092940% $ 488,420.70 .$ 375,708.23 $ 262,995.7E
Osceola County 0.837248691390% $ 163,263.49 $ 125,587.30 ' $ 87,911.11
Kissimmee 0.162366006872% $ 31,661.37 $ 24,354.90 $ 17,048.43
St.Cloud 0.073837394678% $ 14,398.29 - $ 11,075.61 $ 7,752.93 •
Palm Beach 8.601594372053% $ 3,913,725.44 $ 3,010,558.03 $ 2,107,390.62
Palm Beach County 5.552548475026% $ 1,082,746.95 $ 832,882.27 $ 583,017.59
Atlantis 0.018751230169% $ 3,656.49 $ 2,812.68 $ 1,968.88
Belle Glade 0.020828445945% $ 4,061.55 - - $ 3,124.27 - $ 2,186.99 .
Borg Raton 0.472069073961% $ 92,053.47 . - $ 70,810.36 $ 49,567.25 ' .
Boynton Beach 0.306498271771% $ 59,767.16 - $ 45,974.74 $ 32,182.32
Briny Breezes 0.003257452012% $ 635.20 $ 488.62 $ 342.03
Cloud Lake 0.00018 8 8 3 77 9 8% $ 36.82 $ 28.33 $ 19.83
Delray Beach 0.351846579457% $ 68,610.08 $ 52,776.99 $ 36,943.89
Glen Ridge 0.000052656694% $ 10.27 l - $ 7.90 $ 5.53
Golf 0.004283349663% $ 835.25 $ 642.50 $ 449.75
Greenacres 0.076424835657% $ 14,902.84 $ 11,463.73 $ 8,024.61
Gulf Stream 0.010671151322% $ 2,080.87 $ 1,600.67 $ 1,120.47
Haverhill 0.001084001589% $ 211.3E - - $ 162.60 $ 113.82
�hland Beach 0.032510968934% $ 6,339.64 . - $ 4,876.65 $ 3,413.65_
Hypoluxo 0.00515 3 09 2 9 8 2% $ 1,004.85 $ 772.96 ' $ 541.07
Juno Beach 0.016757536804% $ 3,267.72 5 2,513.63 $ 1,759.54
Jupiter Island 0.125466374888% $ 24,465.94 . $ 18,819.96 ' $ 13,173.97
Jupiter Inlet Colony 0.005276563849% $ 1,028.93 $ 791.48 $ 554.04
Lake Clarke Shores 0.007560774903% $ 1,474.35 . $ 1,134.12 $ 793.88
Lake Park 0.029433275980% $ 5,739.49 $ 4,414.99 $ 3,090.49
Lake Worth 0.117146617298% $ 22,843.59 ' • $ 17,571.99 5 12,300.39
Lantana 0.024507151505% $ 4,776.89 .. .. $ 3,676.07 $ 2,573.25 .
Loxahatchee Groves 0.002531152789% $ 493.57 $ 379.67 $ 265.77
Manalapan 0.021632822333% $ 4,216.40 -. •
$ 3,244.92 - $ 2,271.45
Mangonia Park 0.010696571795% $ 2,085.83 . $ 1,604.49 $ 1,123.14
North Palm Beach 0,044349646256% $ 8,648.18 $ 6,652.45 S 4,656.71
Ocean Ridge 0.012786497807% $ 2,493.37 . $ 1,917.97 $ 1,342.58
Pahokee 0.004018250447% $ 783.56 $ 602.74 $ 421.92
Palm Beach 0.185476848123% $ 36,167.99 _ $ 27,821.53 . $ 19,475.07
Palm Beach Gardens 0.2336758802579S $ 45,566.80 $ 35,051.38 $ 24,535.97
Paler Beach Shores 0.014135598612% $ 2,756.44 $ 2,120.34 ' $ 1,484.24
Palm Springs 0.038021764282% $ 7,414.24 ' - - $ 5,703.26 $ 3,992.29
Riviera Beach 0.163617057282% $ 31,905.33 5 24,542.56 $ 17,179.79
Royal Paler Beach 0.049295743959% $ 9,612.67 ' $ 7,394.36 ' $ 5,176.05
South Bay 0.00183 02 7 4 040% $ 356.90 $ 274.54 ' $ 192.18
South Palm Beach 0.005 86 6 6 819 67% $ 1,144.00 $ 880.00 $ 616.00
Tequesta 0.031893614595% $ 6,219.25 $ 4,784.04 $ 3,348.83
Wellington 0.050183644758% $ 9,785.81 $ 7,527.55 $ 5,269.28
West Palm Beach 0.549265602541% $ 107,106.79 $ 82,389.84 $ 57,672.89
_Pasco 4.692087260494% $' 2,134,899.70 $ 1,642,230.54 $ 1,149,561.38
Pasco County 4.319205239813% $ 842,245.02 • $ 647,880.79 $ 453,516.55
Dade City 0.055819726723% $ 10,884.85 . $ 8,372.96 . $ 5,061.07
New Port Richey 0.149879107494% $ 29,226.43 $ 22,481.87 $ 15,737.31
Port Richey 0,049529975458% $ 9,658.35 $ 7,429.50 - $ 5,200.65
San Antonio 0002189792155% $ 427.01 $ 328.47 5 229.93
St.Leo 0 002790804761% $ 544.21 $ 418.62 $ 293.03
Zephyrhllis 0.112672614089% $ 21,971.16 $ 16,900.89 $ 11,830.62
Pinellas 7.934889816777% $ 3,610,374.87 $ 2,777,211.44 $ 1,944,048.01
Pinellas County 4.546593184553% $ 886,585.67 $ 681,988.98 $ 477,392.28
Belleair 0.018095745121% $ 3,528.67 • $ 2,714.36 - $ 1,900.05
Belleair Beach 0.0042 615 606 8 6% $ 831.00 $ 639.23 . 5 447.46
Belleair Bluffs 0.007502670965% $ 1,463.02 $ 1,125.40 $ 787.78
Belleair Shore 0.000439411029% $ 85.69 $ 65.91 $ 46.14
Clearwater 0.633863120196% 5 123,603.31 5 95,079.47 . $ 66,555.63
Dunedin 0.102 440873 7 9 6% $ 19,975.97 $ 15,366.13 5 10,756.29 '
Gulfport 0.047893986460% $ 9,339.33 $ 7,184.10 $ 5,028.87
Indian Rocks Beach 0.008953453662% $ 1,745.92 $ 1,343.02 . $ 940.11
Indian Shores 0.011323004874% $ 2,207.99 $ 1,698.45 $ 1,188.92
Kenneth City 0.017454786058% $ 3,403.68 5 2,618.22 $ 1,832.75
Largo 0.374192990777% $ 72,967.63 $ 56,128.95 $ 39,290.26
Madeira Beach 0,022616957779% $ 4,410.31 ' $ 3,392.54 $ 2,374.78
North Reddington Beach 0.003820333909% $ 744.97 $ 573.05 $ 401.14 '
Oldsmar 0.039421706033% $ 7,687.23 ' ' 5 5,913.26 $ 4,139.28
Pinellas Park 0.251666311991% $ 49,074.93 .. .. $ 37,749.95 $ 26,424.96
Redingtan Beach 0.003 61152 2 8 8 2% $ 704.25 5 541.73 $ 379.21
Redington Shores 0.006451352841% 5 1,258.01 • $ 967.70 $ 677.39
Safety Harbor 0.038061710740% $ 7,422.03 • ' ' $ 5,709.26 $ 3,996.48
Seminole 0.095248695748% $ 18,573.50 $ 14,287.30 . $ 10,001.11
South Pasadena 0.029968921656% $ 5,843 94 $ 4,495.34 $ 3,146.74
_ St.Pete Beach 0.071791046619% $ 13,999.25 $ 10,768.66 5 7,538.06_ _
St.Petersburg 1.456593090134% $ 284,035.65 $ 218,488.96 $ 152,942.27
Tarpon Springs 0.101970595050% $ 19,884.27 .. $ 15,295.59 $ 10,706.91
Treasure Island 0.040652783215% $ 7,927.29 - $ 6,097.92 $ 4,268.54
Polk 2.150483025298% $ 978,469.78 $ 752,669.06 $ 526,868.34
Polk County 1.558049828484% $ 303,819.72 $ 233,707.47 $ 163,595.23
Auburndale 0.028636162584% 5 5,584.05 • $ 4,295.42 $ 3,006.80
Bartow 0.043971970660% $ 8,574.53 . $ 6,595.80 $ 4,617.06
Davenport 0.005305615818% $ 1,034.60 • $ 795.84 $ 557.09
Dundee 0.005597951255% $ 1,091.60 $ 839.69 $ 587.78
Eagle Lake 0.002 5 8017 7 9 87% $ 503.13 - $ 387.03 $ 270.92
Fort Meade 0.007702403251% $ 1,501.97 $ 1,155.36 ' $ 808.75
Frostproof 0.005857603227% $ 1,142.23 • - $ 878.64 $ 615.05
Haines City 0.047984773863% $ 9,357.03 $ 7,197.72 $ 5,038.40 '
Highland Park 0.000063551182% $ 12.39 $ 9.53 $ 6.67
Hillcrest Heights 0.000005447244% $ 1.06 $ 0.82 $ 0.57
Lake Alfred 0.007489960729% $ 1,460.54 $ 1,123.49 $ 786.45 .
Lake Hamilton 0.002540231530% $ 495.35 ' $ 381.03 $ 266.72
Lakeland 0.2948756684E8% $ 57,500.76 $ 44,231.35 • $ 30,961.95
Lake Wales 0.03 6 2 9317213 4% $ 7,077.17 $ 5,443.98 $ 3,810.78
Mulberry 0.005414560702% $ - 1,055.84 - $ - 812.18 $ 568.53 ' - _
Polk City 0.001080370093% $ _ 210.67 $ 162.06 $ 113.44
Winter Haven 0.097033576087% $ 18,923.55 - $ 14,555.04 . - - $ 10,188.53 .. .
Putnam 0.384893194068% $ 175,126.40 $ 134,712,62 $ 94,298.83
Putnam County 0.329225990182% $ 64,199.07 $ 49,383.90 $ 34,568.73
Crescent City 0.005561636294% S 1,084.52 5 834.25 $ 583.97
Interlachen 0.001877483489% $ 366.11 $ 281.62 ' $ 197.14 '
Palatka 0.046955244716% S 9,156.27 $ 7,043.29 $ 4,930.30
Pomona Park 0.000379491344% $ 74.00 . $ 56.92 $ 39.85 .
Welaka 0.000893348043% $ 174.20 $ 134.00 $ 93.80
Santa Rosa 0.701267319513% $ 319,076.63 $ 245,443.56 $ 171,810.49
Santa Rosa County 0.592523984216% 5. 115,542.16 .. .._ _. $ 88,878.60 , $ 62,215.02 .
Gulf Breeze 0.061951507906% $ 12,080.54 $ 9,292.73 $ 6,504.91
Jay 0.000159785829% 5 31.16 $ 23.97 $ 16.78
Milton 0.046 6 3 2 0 415 62% $ 9,093.25 - $ 6,994.81 $ 4,896.36
Sarasota 2.805043857579% $ 1,276,294.96 $ 981,765135 $ 687,235.75
Sarasota County 1.924315263251% $ 375,241.48 $ 288,647.29 $ 202,053.10
Longboat Key 0.044489458856% $ 8,675.44 $ 6,673.42 $ 4,671.39
North Port 0.209611771277% $ 40,874.30 $ 31,441.77 $ 22,009.24
Sarasota 0.484279979635% $ 94,434.60 $ 72,642.00 $ 50,849.40
Venice 0.142 3 473 845 60% $ 27,757.74 $ 21,352.11 $ 14,946.48
Seminole 2.141148264544% $ 974,222.46 $ 749,401.89 $ 524,581.32
Seminole County 1.508694164839% $ 294,195.36 $ 226,304.12 $ 158,412.89
Altamonte Springs 0.081305566430% $ 15,854.59 $ 12,195.83 $ 8,537.08
Casselberry 0080034542791% $ 15,606.74 . ' $ 12,005.18 $ 8,403.63 .
Lake Mary 0.079767627827% $ 15,554.69 • $ 11,965.14 $ 8,375.60 '
__Longwood 0.061710013415% $ 12,033.45 $ 9,256.50 $ 6,479.55
_ Oviedo 0.103130858057% $ 20,110.52 $ 15,469.63 $ 10,828.74
Sanford 0.164243490362% $ 32,027.48 $ 24,636.52 , $ 17,245.57
Winter Springs 0.062262000824% $ 12,141.09 $ 9,339.30 . $ 6,537.51
St.Johns 0.710333349554% .5 .323,201.67_ $ 248,616.67. $ . 174,031.67
St.Johns County 0.656334818131% $ 127,985.29 $ 98,450.22 $ 68,915.16
Hastings 0.000010894488% $ 2.12 $ 1.63 $ 1.14 '.
Marineland 0.000000000000% $ - . . $ - $ - .
St.Augustine 0.046510386442% 5 9,069.53 $ 6,976.56 $ 4,883.59
St.Augustine Beach 0.007477250493% $ 1,458.06 $ 1,121.59 $ 785.11 '
St.Lucie 1.506627843552% $ 685,515.67 $ 527,319.75 $ 369,123.82
St.Ludo County 0.956156584302% $ 186,450.53 ' $ 143,423.49 $ 100,396.44
Fort Pierce 0.159535255654% $ 31,109.37 $ 23,930.29 $ 16,751.20
Port St.Lucie 0.390803453989% $ 76,206.67 . $ 58,620.52 . $ 41,034.36 . .
St.Lucie Village 0.000132549608% $ 25.85 $ 19.88 $ 13.92 .
Sumter 0.326398870459% $ 148,511.49 $ 114,239.60 $ ' 79,967.72
Sumter County 0.302273026046% $ 58,943.24 $ 45,340.95 . ' $ 31,738.67 .
Bushnell 0.006607507174% $ 1,288.46 $ 991.13 $ 693.79
Center Hill 0.001312785844% $ 255.99 $ 196.92 $ 137.84
Coleman 0.000748088199% $ 145.88 ' $ 112.21 $ 78.55
Webster 0.001423546476% $ 277.59 . $ 213.53 $ 149.47 '
Wildwood 0.014033916721% $ 2,736.61 $ 2,105.09 $ 1,473.56
Suwannee 0.191014879692% .$ 86,911.77 $ 66,855.21 $ 46,798.65
Suwannee County 0.161027800555% $ 31,400.42 $ 24,154.17 $ 16,907.92
Branford 0.000929663004% $ 181.28 $ 139.45 $ 97.61
Live Oak 0.029057416132% 5 5,666.20 - $ 4,358.61 5 3,051.03
Taylor 0.092181897282% $ 41,942.76 $ '32,263.66 $. 22,584.56
Taylor County 0.069969851319% $ 13,644.12 $ 10,495.48 $ 7,346.83
Perry 0.022212045963% $ 4,331.35 . $ 3,331.81 . $ 2,332.26
Union 0.065156303224% $ 29,646.12 $ 22,804.71 .$ 15,963.29
Union County 0.063629259109% $ 12,407.71 $ 9,544.39 . $ 6,681.07 __-
_
Lake Butler 0001398126003% $ • 272.63 • $ 209.72 $ 146.80
Raiford 0.000012710236% $ 2.48 $ 1.91 $ 1.33 .
Worthington Springs 0.000116207876% $ 22.66 $ 17.43 $ 12.20
Voluzla 3.130329674480% $ 1,424,300.00 $ 1,095,615.39 $ 766,930.77
Volusla County 1.708575342287% $ 333,172.19 . $ 256,286.30 . $ 179,400.41
Daytona Beach 0.447556475212% $ 87,273.51 $ 67,133.47 ' $ 46,993.43
Daytona Beach Shores 0.039743093439% $ 7,749.90 $ 5,961.46 $ 4,173.02
DeBary 0.03 52 8 3 616215% $ 6,880.31 $ 5,292.54 $ 3,704.78
DeLand 0.098983689498% $ 19,301.82 ' $ 14,847.55 $ 10,393.29
Deltana 0.199329190038% $ 38,869,19, $ 29,899.38 $ 20,929.56
Edgewater 0.058042202343% $ 11,318.23 $ 8,706.33 $ 6,094.43 .
Flagler Beach 0.000223337011% $ 43.55 $ 33.50 $ 23.45
Holly Hill 0.031615805143% $ 6,165.08 $ 4,742.37 $ 3,319.66
Lake Helen 0.004918861482% $ 959.16 $ 737.83 $ 516.48
New Smyrna Beach 0.104065968306% $ 20,292.86 $ 15,609.90 $ 10,926.93
Oak Hill 0.004820811087% $ 940.06 $ 723.12 $ 506.19
Orange City 0.033562287058% $ 6,544.65 $ 5,034.34 $ 3,524.04
Ormond Beach 0.114644516477% $ 22,355.68 $ 17,196.68 ' • $ 12,037.67
Pierson 0.002333236251% $ 454.98 .. . $ 349.99 $ 244.99
Ponce Inlet 0.023813535748% $ 4,643.64 $ 3,572.03 $ 2,500.42
Port Orange 0.177 5 9 65015 6 2% $ 34,631.32 ' $ 26,639.48 $ 18,647.63
South Daytona 0.045221205323% $ 8,818.14 $ 6,783.18 $ 4,748.23 '
Wakulla 0.115129321208% '$ .52,383.84 $ '40,295.26 $ 28,206.68
Wakulla County 0.1149 53 193 6 47% $ 22,415.87 $ 17,242.98 $ 12,070.09
Sopchoppy 0.000107129135% $ 20.89 $ 16.07 . $ 11.25
St.Marks 0.000068998426% $ 13.45 $ 10.35 $ 7.24
Walton 0.268558216151% $ 122,193.99 $ 93,995.38 $ 65,796.76
Walton County 0.224268489581% $ 43,732.36 $ 33,640.27 $ 23,548.19
DeFunlak Springs 0.017057137234% $ 3,326.14 $ 2,558.57 $ 1,791.00
Freeport 0.003290135477% $ 641.58 . $ 493.52 $ 345.46
Paxton 0.023942453860% $ 4,668.78 $ 3,591.37 $ 2,513.96
Washington 0.120124444109% $ 54,656.62 $ 42,043.56 $ 29,430.49
Washington County 0.104908475404% $ 20,457.15 $ 15,736.27 . $ 11,015.39
Caryuille 0.001401757499% $ 273.34 $ 210.26 $ 147.18
Chipley 0.012550450560% $ 2,447.34 $ 1,882.57 $ 1,317.80 '
Ebro 0.000221521263% $ 43.20 $ 33.23 $ 23.26
Vernon 0.000361333863% $ 70.46 $ 54.20 $ 37.94
Wausau 0.000680905521% $ 132.78 $ 102.14 $ 71.50
100.00% 100.00% $ 19,500,000.00 $ 45,500,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00 $ 35,000,000.00 $ 10,500,000.00 $ 24,500,000.00
o EY ge4. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
i-,,,,N
.4, it.1,,:,,
„,„._:,,:..„,,it •
• „,.., •
., , --„ , --.. :
4 Lex t Pe
114-OFF1-� PL-01 The Capitol
Tallahassee,FL 32399-1050
ASHLEY MOODY Phone(850)414-3300
ATTORNEY GENERAL Fax(850)487-0168
STATE OF FLORIDA hup://irww.myfloridalegal.cont
April 13, 2021
Mayor Rusty Johnson
City of Ocoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, FL 34761
rjohnson@ocoee.org
RE: Opioid Litigation
Dear Mayor Johnson:
My name is John Guard and I am the Chief Deputy Attorney General for the State of
Florida(the"State"). Since she took office, Attorney General Moody has been heavily involved
in leading both the State's ongoing opioid litigation and several different negotiations with
defendants in that litigation. Those negotiations have included litigation counsel representing
cities and counties.
As.part of those negotiations to enable Florida to achieve the maximum amount
recoverable for both the State and its subdivisions, the State has been negotiating for a lengthy
time with outside counsel for nearly all litigating political subdivisions.within the State. After
multiple Sessions and significant compromise by both sides, the attached memorandum of
understanding ("MOU") has been reached. We have offered and the lawyers for the litigating
subdivisions are recommending to their clients that the attached MOU_be accepted. This
proposal is the result of numerous meetings and includes feedback and comments from many
local subdivisions. Based on the status of this litigation, the likely structure of any resolution,
the potential litigation risks in the absence of such an agreement, the State believe that this
proposal reflects a reasonable compromise between the State and its political subdivisions: •
The purpose of this letter is to summarize the primary teens of the MOU and attempt to
anticipate questions that you,your commission, and your internal and/or other legal counsel may
have regarding this litigation and allocation proposal.
Page 1 of 7
What cases does this MOU apply?
This allocation agreement is intended to govern the distribution of settlement proceeds
obtained through the Purdue Pharma L.P. ("Purdue") bankruptcy, the Mallinckrodt PLC
("Mallinckrodt") bankruptcy, the distributor(Cardinal I-Iealth, Inc., McKesson Corp., and
AmerisourceBergen Corp. (collectively referred to as the "Distributors")) and Johnson &
Johnson ("J&J") potential deal, as well as any additional settlements obtained related to the
opioid litigation.
Why is an allocation agreement necessary and why now?
Almost 100 political subdivisions within the State of Florida, as well as the State of
Florida itself, have filed suit against numerous entities engaged in the manufacture, marketing,
promotion, distribution or dispensing of opioids. Another 30 political subdivisions within the
State of Florida have filed claims in the Purdue bankruptcy.
The State and the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee for the Opioid Litigation Multi-
District Litigation panel (the "PEC") are in ongoing negotiations with Purdue, Mallinckrodt, the
Distributors, and J&J with potential resolutions anticipated in the coming weeks.
Under the likely settlement structure for these cases, states and their political subdivisions are
strongly incentivized to reach a joint resolution of all State and political subdivision claims.
Under the Distributor and J&J deal, the State and its subdivisions receive a substantially larger
settlement amount the higher the number of subdivisions sign on to the deal. Therefore,'it is in
the best interest of all political subdivisions and the State of Florida to reach an allocation
agreement which will permit the joint resolution of all claims within the state.
The deals contemplate the need for relatively quick buy in by subdivisions in order to
maximize recovery. The pace of negotiations is accelerating, and Purdue has filed its plan of
reorganization. Given this accelerating pace, there is a greater sense of urgency among all
counsel to come to agreement and resolve how monies are going to be allocated, so that we can
move Purdue, Mallinckrodt, and other potential settlements toward finality. Given the Sunshine
law, the likely need for public notice and comment, and the complexity of the deals, we need to
agree to an allocation plan now to ensure that Florida maximizes recovery.
How can funds be utilized?
You will see as you review the MOU that the State and its subdivisions, who execute this
MOU, are agreeing that almost all the funds from any settlement will go to abatement activities.
In other words, funds must be utilized for strategies, programming and services used to expand
the availability of treatment for individuals impacted by Opioid Use Disorder or co-occurring
Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health disorders ("Approved Purposes"). A non-exclusive
list of potential abatement programs and uses are included in Exhibits A and B to the agreement.
The list was developed nationally consulting with public health officials in multiple states,
experts for the states and subdivisions, and officials within the United States Department of
Health and Human Services. These uses are intended to best serve the overall purpose and
Page 2 of 7
intention of this litigation,Which is to abate the continuing public health crisis of opioid
addiction within our communities.
While supported by the State, this requirement was imposed the defendants for tax arid
other reasons. It is also necessary to Militate against the United States seeking substantial
amounts of settlement funds from both the State and subdivisions as recoupment.
How are the funds allocated amongst the States?
While not part of the MOU,the States have been negotiating the national allocation for
almost two years with an agreement reached in late 2019. Florida's interstate allocation is
7.03%. That allocation is the second largest allocation in the nation ahead of Texas, which is the
second largest state. Florida is one of.a handful of States whose allocation is greater and,greater
by a significant percentage above its population (Florida has 6.54% of the United States'
population). The only states that have larger gains over their population are the opioid belt
States: West Virginia,Kentucky, etc. The interstate allocation is the product of two measures.
One calculated by the PEC and the other calculated by the States. The data-sets chosen are
slightly different(including different years and what measures were selected), but the main
difference is that some states demanded that population play a more significant factor in the state
allocation.and it is.not a factor in the PEC.calculation. Given how much Florida's allocation
percentage is above its population, the need in these settlements to maximize the number of
states settling, and the potential litigation risks in the absence Of such an agreement, it would be
our recommendation that cities and counties accept the interstate allocation.
How much money does the State expect for it and its subdivisions?
It depends. Each of the current or proposed settlements are for different lengths of time
and each contain different variability. In Purdue, payments are paid over a ten-year period and
vary with the performance of the ongoing business of the new company and payments from third
parties. In Mallinckrodt, payment amounts are still being negotiated, but Will be paid over-seven
years and will vary depending on the value of the emerging company seven years later as part of
the recovery is warrants in the re-emerged company. In the Distributor and J&J proposed deal,
the proposed deal is over eighteen year and the amount paid varies.depending on subdivision
participation and whether other subdivisions file opioid related litigation in the future. As part of
the MOU, the State is willing to seek judicial or legislative action to reduce the variability Of the
monies, especially in connection with the Distributor and J&J deal. Our current best guess based
on projections and assuming total participation is $120-140M a year for the first few.years, $90-
1101VI a year for the middle years, and then$60-70M a year for the later years of the deal for the
State audits subdivisions. Again,these numbers can and will vary and hopefully will increase if
additional settlements are reached.
How are the funds allocated amongst the State and its subdivisions?
This Proposal divides all settlement funds between three funds: (I) the City/County Fund;
(2) the Regional Fund; and (3) the State Fund.
Page 3 of 7
The City/County Fund consists of 15% of the total settlement amounts allocable to the
State of Florida. These funds arc distributed to all counties and qualifying municipalities in the
State of Florida.
The allocation of the City/County Fund between counties and municipalities is based on a
model referred to as the"Negotiation Class Metrics."This model was developed in the National
Prescription Opiate MDL by the PEC, and considers: (1) the amount of opioids shipped to the
county; (2) the number of opioid deaths that occurred in that county; and (3) the number of
people who suffer opioid use disorder in that county. Allocations between counties and
municipalities within each county use historical federal data showing how the specific county
and the cities within it have made opioids-rclated expenditures in the past.
We have attached a spreadsheet to this letter that provides you an estimated amount per
year for an amount within each range in the previous question.
The Regional Fund consists of a sliding scale between 30% and 40% of the total
settlement amounts allocable to the State of Florida, with the largest percentages occurring in the
immediate years after settlement and decreasing over time.
These funds are allocated to counties in accordance with the "Negotiating Class Metrics"
described above. In the case of counties with a population of over 300,000, and which satisfy
other criteria regarding abatement infrastructure, (termed "Qualified Counties") these funds are
provided directly to the county. For the remainder of counties within the State, these funds are
provided to the Managing Entity (the entity that the State has contracted with to provide
substance abuse treatment) for that county, to be spent on approved purposes within the region
that the county is a part.
For Counties with populations greater than 300,000: We encourage you to review the
definition of Qualified County in the MOU, so that you can understand the other
requirements that you will have to meet. Importantly, the definition of Qualified County
requires that you reach an agreement with at least some municipalities (at least 50% of
the population) within your county as to how these funds are spent. The requirements of
such agreements are subject to further discussion and negotiation.
We have attached a spreadsheet to this letter that provides you an estimated amount per
year for an amount within each range in the previous question. The amount will vary for
qualified counties depending on how many municipalities in that County: (l)join a
settlement; and (2) enter an agreement with a County.
For Counties with populations less than 300,000 or that do not qualify as a Oualifed
County: Currently, a majority of the monies being utilized to respond to the opioid
epidemic in the State flow through Managing Entities located regionally who provide
service in each community. When we traveled the state before COVID and had
discussions with many of you, most (outside a couple large counties) indicated that they
Page 4 of 7
had a good working relationship with their Managing Entity. Indeed, several indicated
that.they were already involved with their Managing Entity. The actual dollar amounts
annually paid to smaller counties under the contemplated settlement agreements are not
substantial enough to support standalone programs. Given that reality, but wanting to
maximize services locally, it made sense to have the monies flow through the existing
structure to expand services in each county. If there are issues or problems with
Managing Entities, we are happy to engage. We are also happy to try and help
communities get involved in br engage with their Managing Entity.
We.have attached a spreadsheet to this letter that.demonstrates the amounts attributable to
each county per year for an amount within each range in.the previous question.
The State Fund consists of the remaining 45%to 55%of the total settlement amounts
allocable to the State of Florida, depending on the amount of the Regional Fund above. As with
the City/County Fund and Regional Fund, these funds must be spent on Approved Purposes
Why should we agree to this allocation?
The proposed allocation in the MOU is better than the alternative that subdivisions will
receive if they do not enter an agreement with the State. Two of the defendants who we have
negotiated with, Purdue and Mallinckrodt are now in bankruptcy: In advance of and in
connection with those bankruptcies, the states, the PEC, and city and county representatives
negotiated a default intrastate allocation and agreed that it will apply unless a state and its cities
and counties agree to something else. A Deputy County Attorney for BroWard County,Florida,
was involved in the negotiations related to Purdue. Something like the Purdue default allocation
is currently in the draft connected to the Distributor and J&J deal:
The allocation above is superior for Florida's subdivisions than that default allocation.
Indeed, the State offered substantial improvements over those.terms from the beginning of the
negotiations that led to this MOU. We have attached a copy of the Purdue abatement term sheet
for your review. Under that default allocation,there is no city/county fund. Only subdivisions
with populations greater than 400,000 people are eligible to receive any monies directly. Almost
all the monies will flow through the Managing Entities who arc regionally supplying services.
The allocation percentages for the regional bucket are dollar based and decrease to half, far more
quickly than in the MOU. In other words, the allocation in this MOU allows a far greater
recovery directly to each Florida city and county than the alternative and greater recoveries
regionally for all subdivisions.
The allocation is also better than the cities and counties would achieve if damages were
proportionally allocated. In the Purdue bankruptcy, over one hundred twenty-five Florida
subdivisions filed proofs of claims. When the size of those claims is compared to that of the
State's claim, the State's claim was more than four, almost five times larger than all the
subdivisions' claims combined. Subdivisions are getting substantially more than what their
proportional share would be. The State is willing to agree to the larger because it frankly reflects
the reality of how ironies are currently being spent and is consistent with how the legislature has
been appropriating monies to combat this crisis.
Page 5 of 7
If individual subdivisions do not agree to a settlement,what will happen?
If there are hold outs or subdivisions that do not respond, the MOU contemplates that the
State will either file a new suit or sever its claims against settling defendants from its existing
opioid lawsuit and add political subdivisions and through either a class action mechanism or
declaratory relief seek to bar future subdivision claims. Such action is necessary to ensure that
the State and any subdivisions that agree to a settlement maximize their recoveries. This not a
novel position and there is a substantial body of Florida law that exists that the State may resolve
and release public claims including subdivision claims.' That being said, the State would prefer
that we reach agreement on the allocation under the proposed MOU and handle things
consensually. But, if there are holdouts, the State is prepared to litigate or seek legislation from
the legislature to ensure that cities and counties that agree to this MOU are protected and will
receive the recovery contemplated under the allocation.
What are the next steps and the timeline?
We would ask that you review the attached MOU and proposed model resolution
supporting an agreement on the MOU terms. We will be scheduling calls to answer questions
about the MOU. We would ask each subdivision to think about who is attending each session
and ensure that any of those discussions will not violate Florida's government-in-the-sunshine
law. If you will contact my administrator, Janna Barineau, by e-mail
(Janna.Barineau!u:mv11oridaleual.com), we will include you in those discussions. After those
discussions, we would then ask that you follow Florida law for approving such a resolution by
your commission and in due course, pass it, and return a copy to me at the address on the first
page of the letter. Potential settlements are anticipated in the coming weeks or months, but I
cannot tell you exactly when a settlement will be finalized. These proposed settlements are
'See Fla. Stat. §501.207(1)(c)(authorizing the Attorney General to bring "[a]n action on
behalf of one or more consumers or government entities for actual damages..." under Florida's
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act); e.g., Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246,
1258-62 (Fla. 2006); Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 46 So. 2d 26, 30 (Fla. 1950);
Castro v. Sun Bank of Bal Harbour, 370 So. 2d 392, 393 (Fla. 3d DCA1979); City of New Port
Richey v. State ex rel. O'Malley, 145 So. 903, 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); also State of Florida ex
rel. Shevin v. Exxon Corp., 526 F.2d 266, 275 (5`1' Cir. 1976) (holding that the Attorney General
could file suit seeking damages for injuries sustained by government entities who had not
specifically authorized the Attorney General to do so); Eggers v. City of Key West, 2007 WL
9702450, at*3 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 26, 2007) (concluding "[a]pplicable Florida law states that a
judgment in an action brought against a public entity that adjudicates matters of general interest
to the citizens of the jurisdiction is binding on all citizens of that jurisdiction.");Aerojet-General
Corp. v. Askew, 366 F. Supp. 901, 908-11 (N.D. Fla. 1973).
Page 6 of 7
anticipated to include provisions which establish time limits on agreements,between states and
political subdivisions. As a result, we would request that you pass a resolution in the next 60-90
days, if possible.
Si lcerely,
Jol . Guard,
C of Deputy Attorney General
cc: ScOtt Cookson
Shuffield, Lowman & Wilson, P.A.
1000 Legion Pl Ste 1700
Ocoee, FL 32801-1028
scookson@shuffieldlowman.com
Enc. Proposal with Ex. A and B
Recovery Spreadsheet
Purdue Abatement Term Sheet
Page 7 of 7