No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06 First Reading of Ordinance for Beltway 429 (aka Progress Commerce Park PUD) Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Annexation, Rezoning to PUD & Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan; Project Nos. CPA-2021-002, AX-01-21-01, RZ-21-02-01 & LS-2021WE %/ 0C.O(?P florida AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Meeting Date: October 19, 2021 Item #: Reviewed By: Michael Rumer, Contact Name: Development Services Department Director: Director Contact Number: 407-554-7083 City Manager: Robeg(ww If par, Subject: Beltway 429 AKA Progress Commercial Park PUD Annexation, Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, Rezoning to PUD / PUD Land Use Plan, and Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan Project No(s): AX-01-21-01, CPA-2021-002, RZ-21-02-01 & LS-2021-001 Commission District #1 — Larry Brinson Sr. Background Summary: Owners: Progress Commercial Park, LLC. Applicant: McCraney Property Company, Owner/Applicant Site Location: The proposed project is located on the west side of Ocoee Apopka Road, east of SR 429 and 2,900 feet south of Fullers Cross Road. The site is located within the "SR 429 Business Character Area Overlay" Parcel Identification Number(s): The project site consists of four (4) parcels: 07-22-28-0000-00-026, 07-22-28- 0000-00-096, 07-22-28-0000-00-024, and 07-22-28-0000-00-066. Property Size: +/- 39.96 acres Existing Future Land Use: Low -Density Residential (LDR) — Less than four dwelling units per acre Existing Zoning: Orange County A-1 (Citrus Rural District) and Unclassified. Actual land use proposed land use and unique features of the subject property: The property abutting Ocoee Apopka Road (PID 07-22-28-0000-00-026) has an agricultural exemption for the cultivation of blueberries. Parcel ID 07-22-28-0000-00-024 has a single-family residence, and the remaining parcels are wooded undeveloped land. The future land use and requested initial zoning classification of the subject property are as follows: CURRENT PROPOSED Jurisdiction/Zoning Classification City of Ocoee Low Density Residential (LDR) FLU Orange County / A-1 (Citrus Rural District) & Unclassified Zoning Classification City of Ocoee Light Industrial FLU & PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning The current future land use designations and zoning classifications of the surrounding properties are as follows: DIRECTION FUTURE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION EXISTING LAND USE North Low -Density Residential Orange County RCE (Rural Country Estates) One -Acre Subdivision East Low -Density Residential Orange County A-1 (Citrus Rural District) Single -Family Dwellings South Low -Density Residential City of Ocoee A-1 Vacant West SR 429 Toll Road SR 429 Toll Road SR 429 Toll Road The applicant is proposing an Annexation, Small -Scale Comprehensive Map Amendment from Low -Density Residential (4 D.U./Acre) to Light Industrial, rezoning to PUD and a Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan in order to develop 482,940 s.f. of Light Industrial/Warehouse use located within eight (8) buildings. The property is located within the SR 429 Business Character Area Overlay. Although the Business Character Area does not intend to facilitate this type of development in the subarea, the applicant and City Staff have worked diligently to develop a project size and layout that will meet the intent and desired outcomes of the overlay. Special conditions and criteria that make this project unique and beneficial will be used as new code requirements for the Ocoee Apopka Road Corridor and Business Character Area. The proposed Progress Commercial Park will provide the much -needed extension of Sewer Service to the area via its contribution towards a new public master lift station. Additionally, right-of-way dedication and a 12-foot trail will be provided along Ocoee Apopka Road. The applicants will improve Ocoee Apopka Road with right-of-way dedication, add turn lanes and construct a new east/west public roadway that will open new properties to development with the future extension of Pine Street. Please See the Progress Commercial Park Annexation Justification document, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Justification document, and Large -Scale Site Plan Justification document. The following table depicts the impacts the proposed development has on public facilities: Assumes 73.17 acres/4 DU Utilities: The site is located within the City of Ocoee's service area and is proposing to connect to public utilities for water and sewer. There is an existing 12" water main and force main on the east side of Ocoee Apopka Road; however, central sewer is currently not available and will need to be provided. 2 Transportation / Traffic: The proposed PUD accesses Ocoee Apopka Road and will create a new east/west public road that will eventually connect to the extension of Pine Street. Further comments will be made at the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. Schools: The Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial will eliminate use of the property for residential uses and reduce the potential for future student demands on the public -school capacity. Public Safety: The nearest Fire Department is Station 38, located on 313 West Road, approximately one-half mile from the project site. The estimated response time is less than two (2) minutes. The Police Sub Station is also located one-half from the subject property, with an estimated response time of three (3) minutes from within the enforcement zone. Drainage: The subject site is located within the Apopka Drainage Basin and, therefore, must meet the requirements of Section 11.7(a) SJRWMD Management and Storage of Surface Water Handbook and Wekiva Study Area Best Management Practices (BMP's). The design of the drainage system will be evaluated in more detail before final engineering approval. Recreation and Open Space: No impacts on recreation facilities are proposed. The applicant will be required to provide thirty-five (35) percent open space. Special Districts: The site is located within the Wekiva Study Area but does contain one of the protected features. Issue: Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commission approve ordinances for the Annexation, Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low -Density Residential to Light Industrial, rezoning to PUD (Planned Unii Development)/PUD Land Use Plan and Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan for Progress Commercial Park? Development Review Committee Recommendation: On June 21, 2021, the DRC met to determine if the proposed Annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning and Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan were consistent with the City's regulations and policies. When the discussion was finished, the DRC voted to recommend approval of the Annexation, Large -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial, rezoning from A-1 to PUD/Land Use Plan, and Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan for Progress Commercial Park subject to the following conditions: 1. Staff comments being finalized; 2. Review of the transportation study being completed and any traffic issues addressed, 3. Based on a recently completed Utilities Study, the project requires the construction of a master lift station to be dedicated to the City of Ocoee. The applicant is responsible for all applicable onsite improvements to serve this project and capital and connection fees for this project. The applicant shall participate in a pro rata cost share based on the study currently being performed by Reiss Engineering for sewer improvements, including a master lift station with connection to the 6" force main on Clinger Cover, which will require upsizing to accommodate additional flows, or the 20" force main on Lakewood Avenue. Point of connection shall be determined by the City. The project's gravity sewer shall provide connection to 3 adjacent parcels and also include construction of a manhole on Ocoee Apopka Road to accommodate future sewer connections. 4. Utilities shall be looped through Pine Street. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission met on July 13, 2021, and reviewed the proposed Annexation, Land Use Map Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Site plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission had discussions and differences of opinion on traffic and buffers. Each vote for the sperate motions passed on 3-2 votes except the annexation which was 4-1. A copy of the P&Z minutes is attached. Recommendations: Based on the above analysis and the subsequent DRC recommendation, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Annexation, Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low -Density Residential to Light Industrial, rezoning from A-1 to PUD (Planned Unit DevelopmentHPUD Land Use Plan and Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan for Progress Commercial Park, subject to the conditions recommended by Staff. Attachments: Ordinance block for Annexation; Ordinance block for Small Scale Land Use Amendment; Ordinance block for Rezoning to PUD; Location Map; Aerial Map; Future Land Use Map; Proposed Future Land Use Map; Surrounding Zoning Map; Progress Commercial Park PUD Land Use Plan; Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package; Traffic Study; Ocoee Apopka Road Exhibit; Natural Resource Assessment; Architectural Criteria Statement; Renderings; & Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commisison Meeting Financial Impact: Type of Item: (please mark with an `V) ❑ Public Hearing For Clerk's Dept Use: ® Ordinance First Reading ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ Ordinance Second Reading ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Resolution ❑ Regular Agenda ❑ Commission Approval ❑ Discussion & Direction ❑ Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk ❑ Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution Reviewed by City Attorney Reviewed by Finance Dept. Reviewed by 4 ORDINANCE NO.2021- (Annexation for Beltway 429) TAX PARCEL ID: 07-22-28-0000-00-026, 07-22-28-0000-00-096, 07-22-28-0000-00-024, and 07- 22-28-0000-00-066 CASE NO. AX-01-21-01: Beltway 429 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; ANNEXING INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 39.96 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OCOEE APOPKA ROAD, EAST OF SR 429 AND APPROXIMATELY 2,900 FEET SOUTH OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD, PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER; FINDING SAID ANNEXATION TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE OCOEE CITY CODE, AND THE JOINT PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE UPDATING OF OFFICIAL CITY MAPS; PROVIDING DIRECTION TO THE CITY CLERK; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.2021- (Small-Scale CPA — Beltway 429) TAX PARCEL ID: 07-22-28-0000-00-026, 07-22-28-0000-00-096, 07-22-28-0000-00-024, and 07-22-28-0000-00-066 CASE NO. CPA-2021-002: Beltway 429 Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED, TO CHANGE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 39.96 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OCOEE APOPKA ROAD, EAST OF SR 429 AND 2,900 FEET SOUTH OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI); AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.2021- (Rezoning for Beltway 429 PUD) TAX PARCEL ID: 07-22-28-0000-00-026, 07-22-28-0000-00-096, 07-22-28-0000-00-024, and 07-22-28-0000-00-066 CASE NO. RZ-21-02-01: BELTWAY 429 PUD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM ORANGE COUNTY A-1 TO OCOEE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 39.96 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OCOEEAPOPKA ROAD, EAST OF SR 429 AND 2,900 FEET SOUTH OF FULLERS CROSS ROAD, PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER; FINDING SUCH ZONING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. N Progress Commerce Park PUD Aerial Map E) 0 90 180 360 Feet N Progress Commerce Park PUD Surrounding Zoning Map 19 , \/ ocoee Ilorloo Development Services Department 0 255 510 1,020 Feet Created: February 2021 QSubject Property Zoning Classification: General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban (A-2) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) 111EProfessional Offices & Services (P-S) ■ Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) ■ Community Commercial (C-2) ■ General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (1-1) ■ General Industrial (1-2) Commercial (PUD) Low Density (PUD) Medium Density (PUD) High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) %/ Unclassified AL DESCRIPTION: OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER ME 50U THEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF ME NOR H6FET QUARTER (1/4) OF THE OF ME NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) GF THE SOUTHEAST WARTED (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TO'BHSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 2S EAST. ORANGE COUNTY, 11 GRIOA AL50 RECNNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE 50UTH,I-5T WAFTER (1/4) OF ME NORTHWEST WAFTER (1/4) OF THE NCR THEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE 5OUTHPE5T QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, I ANI A 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, RUN SOUTH 85 DEGREES 15 h,NUTES GO SECONDS Y,EST AOlC THE SOUTH LINE O ME SAID SOUTH WEST QUARTER D1/d) OF THE NORTHI'Esi QUARTER (1/a) G.- THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF ME SW F i F . R N' T O i NNES QUARTER 1 A OFT EEC. HE CE NGR H DEGREES 13 MNVVIES 00 SECONDS REST 338.42 FEET /) TO ME NORM LINE OF SAID SW MM1CST WAFTER (I/4) OF 114E NORTHEESi WARtE(1/4) OF ME NO�RMEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF ME SOUTHEEST QUARTER (1/4). MENCE NORill IFS6 DEGREES GREES 03 5r NlUTES 00 SECON05 EAST 40.CD FEET TO THE. NORTHEAST CORNER GF ME SAD 50UMYEST QUARTER (1/4) OF ME NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUMNEST QUARTER (1/4); THENCF SOUTH 1 DEGREE III ANNUTES 40 SECONDS REST 331 93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; TOGETHER KITH, THE NORTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST SUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF ME SCUL-EST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, MATNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, GRANGE COUNTY, FLOROA; AND THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUMYFEST W ORTER (1/4) AND THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST WARTER (1/4) CF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION! 7, MYMSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COON T'C FLO4I OA; 'IS THE SOUTH WAFTER (1/4) OF THE REST HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (i/4) GF ME SOUTHY EST QUARTER (1/4), LE55 THE YIEST 2 ACRES THEREOF, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, GRANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ALSO TOCETHER AI . ME NORM HALF (1/2) OF THE 5WTHYIE5T QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST WARIER (1/4) OF THE SOUTYI QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOYNSH,P 22 SOUTH, RANGE 20 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLCRIDA. SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF DAY FOR OCOEE-APOPKA ROAD (AKA STATE ROAD N0. 437) ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF ME PRCPERVL PARCEL B: A PORIO N OF MAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS ROOK 5140, PACE 1053, AND THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF L,DM DESCRIBED IN CFEC)AL RECORDS 80CIK 5140, PAGE 1505, PUBLIC RECORDS I ORANGE COUNTY, TLORIDA, LYING ;NO BEING IN ME 50UMI',EST QUARTER (I/4) OF SECTION 7, TORN5HIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLOReDA, BEING f.rORE PARTICULARLY OESCR HER AS FOLLGTE CQMM.ENCE AT THE NON -EST CORNER OF THE -WEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, MYKISMP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAD P T BEING A 6INCH BY 6 INCH CONCRETE NOOYENT; MENCE SOUTH CC DEGREES iB MINUTES 20 5ECONOS EAST, ALONG ME RE5T LINE OF THE EQLUHREST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7 FOR 1321.69 FEET TO ME NORM LINE OF ME SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUGHM ST QUARTER (1/4) OF 5A'O SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 01 SECOND EAST ALONG ME NORM UNE FOR 624. 53 FEET TO ME EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-IYAY UNE OF THE RESTERN BELLOAY, STATE ROAD N0. 429, ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSIYAY AUMD41TY PROTECT N0. 75320-6460-602/603 AID ME POINT CF REC'NNING: THENCE CCNNTNUE NORM 87 DEGREES 51 1111 ES 01 SEC(T`�O EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINNTED ACCE55 RIGHT-Cf--YIAY UNE FGR 10.00 FEET; MENCE NORM GI QEGREE 43 MINUTES 23 5ECONDS NEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY UVIITEO ACCESS RIGHT-OF-YIAY LINE FOR 520.02 FEET; THENCE NOOTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 02 SECOT DS EAST ALONG 5AtD EASTERLY UNITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-YIAY UNE FOR 290,85 FEET; MEICE NORM 01 DEGREE 43 NI;NOTES 28 SECONDS NEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY U!ETED ACCESS RIGHT-01-GAY UNE FOR 1273.C5 FEET TO ME EASTERLY LINE OF ME AFGGESA1D PARCEL OF LAND GESCRRED NI CEFICIAL RECORDS BOOR 5140. PAGE 1052: MENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE FOR 21.38 FEET; MENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 23 BIN, TES 10 SECCNDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE FOR 135,00 EEET; MENCE SOUTH OS DEGREES 11 EITIO TES ED SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 2-C. FEET; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES I6 MILD TES 38 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE FOR 172GO FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 26 MID TES i6 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 137- 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH OB DEGREES 41 NAND TES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 22CCD FEET; MENCE SOUTH 40 DEGREES 11 EIINU TES 22 SECODS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE FOR 395,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52 DEGREES 43 'IM1G TES Od SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE FCR 43.00 FEID THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 23 MND ITS 41 SECON'D$ ASST AL NO SAID EASTERLY LINE, ALSO BEING ME EAST LINE OF ME NORMREST CURRIER (1/4) OF ME 50UMYr:ST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7, FOR 610.07 FEET TO ME NORM LINE OF ME SOUMREST G4IAS- (1/4) OF THE SOUTHATE5T QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7; MENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 51 1/:MUTES 01 SECOND Y,EST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 626. GO FEET TO ME EAST LINE OF ME AFORESAO PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5140, PACE 15G5; THENCE SOUTH 00 DECREES 23 MINUTES 41 SECONDS NEST ALONG SAID EAST UNE FOR 32805 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 97 DEGREES 51 M NUT'S 01 SECCIND YIEST ALONG ME SOUTH UNE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOCK 5140. PAGE 1505 FOR 34 7 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EASTERLY UNITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF ME WESTER'N BELTYIAO THENCE NORM 01 DEGREE 43 MINUTES M SECONDS V'E5T ALGNG SAD EASTERLY UNITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE FOR 328,32 FEET TO ME PONT OF EEGNNNING. PARCEL C THE VYEST 2 ACRES OF ITE SOUTH 1/2 OF ME EGU WZST 1/4 CF THE NORIHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUMREST I/4 OF SECTION 7, TQYINSHIP 22 SCUM, RANGE 26 EAST, LE55 THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF ME NORM 150 FEET OF THE NE5T ISO FEET THEREOF, ORANGE COUNTY, RORrOA AND ME SOUTH 75 FEET OF ME NORM 150 FEET OF ME DIST 100 FEET OF THE NEST 2 ACRES OF ME SOUTH 1/2 OF THE 50UTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUMIYEST I/4 OF SECTOT 7. T011111HIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, ORANGE COUNPf, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIED PARCELS CONTAIN A TOTAL OF 39.965 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SOIL SURVEY DESIGNATIONS SOIL TYPE CONSTITUENTS 15-FELDA FINE SAND 0-2% SLOPES FINE SAND 20-IMNIOKALEE FINE SAND FINE SAND 44-SNIYRNA, NET, FINE SAND 0-2% SLOPES FINE SAND 46-TAVARES FINE SAND, 0-5% SLOPES FINE SAND 51- VIA BASSO FINE SAND, 0-2% SLOPES FINE SAND 54-ZOLFO FINE SAND, 0-2% SLOPES FINE SAND `l4 SOIL TYPE DESIGNATION ON PLAN ----- SOIL TYPE DELINEATION ON PLAN MATCHLINE A (THIS SHEET) I II PORTION OF PARCEL TO q.M111 VACANlT STATE ROAD 429 NIGHT OF WAY - NASOI PAGE -W-22-2N I WOO-CO-107 za+INc; A-1 N 87'50'-p5566 W_ 29U-bn I I / 9 / I----t600'-{- r STATE ROAD 42� R:G IT OF YIAY I 2 z L� N z 2S IT m m -•TI 0 2� Z 2L.0' {-� p_ 1 19 94.5' � SETBACK AM 1�_13MILF',Y Amm ASSOC,IA I F.S, va MATCHLINE A (THIS SHEET) S42'23'1 CIE 135.00' MC`.'.AS H RUTHEST- o7-2z-2B-1B43-QO-SZD S05'11'56"E 203.00' I aOUEST A HAR IIANN, JR 7- 22-28-,04}-00-530 ZONNO: R-CE ® PD11N N 87'50'55" 4V 626.00' PRIVATE DRIVE - AND USE 10 - RESIDENTIAL 200 - AGRICULTURAL 120 - UPLAND HARDWOOD FOREST RIO - DITCH i30 - VIETLAND FORESTED MIXED l IO VEG LAND USE DESIGNATION ON PLAN VEG LAND USE DELINEATION ON PLAN :31" 1 fit .' ; TOR P1i0GNLS`( COMNICN(J 1,Iwli, LLC 0000', 1 LORIDA PARKING DETAIL N. T. S. PROGRESS COMNIERCE PARK, LLC 2257 VISTA PARKWAY, STE 15 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33411 561-478-4300 SCARPEN TER CPMCCRANEYPROPER TY. COM PLANNER PLAN & DESIGN, LLC 823 N. OLIVE AVE. WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 561-797-4217 BRIANCSIPLANANDOESIGN.COM I 'III AMBIT 28-OD0DAB:E II 07-22-0-00-037 ZONING: A -I I IVIM I \, F-1LI 1117 D (THIS SHEET) 11.A'�T1,IZ SITE PLAN SMILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1928 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 2 JUPITER, FL 33458 561-747-8335 M SMILE YGSMILEY-ASSOCIA TES.COM SURVEYOR BISMAN SURVEYING P< MAPPING ARON D. BISMAN, PS)A 13610 GRANVILLE AVE. CLERMONT. FL 34711 407-905-8877 ARONET6ISH)AANSURVEYING.CO1.I ARCHITECT C4 ARCHITECTURE 135 VI. CENTRAL BLVD. ORLANDO, FI_ 32801 407-363-6136 CSTRANAHANCIC4ARCHITECTURE.COM FLOOD PLAIN PARTS OF SITE AITHIN FEMA FLOOD ZONE A/E. FEh1A PANE_ I2095C0110F ZONES DEPICTED ON SURVEY NOTE: SEE MSP2 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND INFORMATION A= 3'56'52" R=1884.86' L=129.87' 12' Yr.DE 1IUL1-U1E MAR. MATCHLINE B (THIS SHEET) =0 0"18'44" I - 28672.80' =156.24' I- b BEEN! PAVEMENT NIDENNNlS FOR AIRS LEFT TIRN LANE --------, 1 1 SCALE: 1"=100' 020 50 100 200 300 I � LOCATION MAP S7, T22 S, E28 E SITE DATA: PROJECT NAIJE EELTIVAY 429 IF- PROGRESS COMVERCE PARK) SITE LOCANON P CNs 1290 CCOEE APCPKA RD 07-22-28-0000-00-026 0>-22-28-0000-00-024 07-22-28-0000-OG-C66 07-22-28-0000-00-096 EXISTING LAND USE DESHGNAUDN GRANGE CTY LOU DENRTY TIES 140 DUS/AC PR OPQSED LAND USE DESTINATION CITY OF OCOEE H41T HDUSTRIAL (U) EXI5TRG ZORING DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT GRAM GE CTY AGROLI TIRAL A -I CITY OF OCOEE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUDI OVERLAYD) OCGEE/ORANGE CTY JOINT PLANNING AREA WINTER CARDED-OCOEE SR 429 LAND USE + ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STUDY h MASTER PLAN EXISTING USES AGRICULTURE/HESIDENTIAL/VACANT PROPOSE USES GRO55 STE AREA LIGHT IN'OUSMIAL (0-FlCE/IYAREHOUSE) Sf 1,7 ,I75 39.965 BV IL9I GG AREA DI NG 100 BU.DG, 200 (Hl. 39'-IO') (HT. 3T' UO`) 27.786 27,>E6 0.64 0.64 BUILDING 310 (HT. 39'-10') 27,7b6 0.6'1 BUILDING 400 (HT. 39'-10') 49,956 I.IS BVItDING 500 BUILSI 60O (HT. 39'-10') (HT, bfi'-10") 49,956 131, I 5 S I.IS 3,01 BUILDN:G 700 (HT. 42'-10) 95.100 2.IB SO :,I Eoo TOTAL BUILDING (Hr, az'-1o') AREA 76 zB7 401.813 - IIA5 PARKING REQUIRED ANCILLARY OFFICE (IPS/300 SF) (10G OF TOTAL BLDG SF) 162 SPACES YIAREHW SE (IPS/1000 SF) 437 SPACES TOTAL eEQUIREO SPACES 599 SPACES PARKING PROV.DED ANCILLARY OFFICE (IPS/MD SF) (107. OF TOTAL BLDG SF) 162 SPACES WASEHCUSE (IPS/I000 SF) 437 SPACES HAkG'CAPPED PARKING 28 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED SPACES (MO SPACES HANDICAPPED PARKING REQUIRED 27.. OF TOTAL 12 SPACES PROVIDEO 36 <PACES EGADI NG REQUIRED (5 LS/15T 29000O SF I ILS/EA. ADD 90,WO SF) 6 SPACES FROVIOEO 20N SPACES PROJECT PHASNG/VEHICLE TRIPS RESERVATION P.UILCING 100 BLDG IF N PRDI. PHASE 2J,J65 5.72f VEH. TRIPS 135 BUIL➢!NO 2. 27, 286 S.J2N I T BUILDING 300 27,786 5.72> 135 ITS* BU ED.`'D A. c R/W fi ED'NO 5W "L04G 11 49955 102d. I 49956 I0280 1 131156 ­.D11 248 24d 651 BU DING JW 9510E i957� 4]2 BUEDNG B00 TOTAL SF/YEHI CLE TRIPS 76'2flJ IS O. 485,813 100.00 3TA 2,4I1 51 BACKS REOD'.RED PRO4GEO PRIARY ST 5O 94.}' LC AL ST 25' 15.0' DONE) 46.0(DEtTA51U5) EXPIYY 75' 945' FRONT }5' 5.'.DE 10 RE 15' REAR ID' 129.7' BUFFER YARDS PR.1- ST 25' 25' EOCAE ST 15' SEWAGE FLOAS: TOTAL AVERAGE IS' DAILY FLOW = 12,047 GPO I, bltl LI I YPi? HHEI�J 1 OF IISIHOiY� 10u rf 0-00% PLAN & DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK On behalf of Progress Commerce Park, LLC (the "Applicant/Owner") we are pleased to submit for your consideration a request for a large-scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Applicant has purchased +/-39.965 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Ocoee Apopka Road and Demastus Lane within the municipal limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida. The land is comprised of 4 parcels that have a variety of current uses. A large portion of the eastern area of the land was utilized as a berry farm that has currently ceased operation. A second large portion to the west and adjacent to State Road 429 was historically used for citrus groves, but is currently fallow; and, a two -acre portion located to the south possesses a residential dwelling. A request to annex the property with initial rezoning to a City of Ocoee zoning designation has been requested concurrently with this application. The future land use of the property is Low Density Residential (LDR). The property is located within the Joint Planning Area of the City and within the Winter Garden -Ocoee SR 429 Land Use + Economic Development Study and Master Plan area which was created in 2014. More specifically, it exists within the 429 Business Center Character Area and is subject to the Business Center Design Plan regulations when it is to be developed. The Applicant intends to change the future land use from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Light Industrial (LI). The request to amend the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with numerous Objectives and Policies of the Plan as outlined below. Further, the aggregation of the subject properties and the request to change the future land use to Light Industrial will allow for the creation of a light industrial warehouse and logistics center at this location creating and encouraging economic development along the State Road 429 corridor. The request is consistent with the following Goal, Objectives and Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN XIII. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL: TO PROMOTE, PROTECT, AND IMPROVE THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, GENERAL WELFARE, AND AESTHETICS THROUGH THE PROVISION OF APPROPRIATE LAND USES BY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATE PATTERN OF LAND USE AND DIRECTING DEVELOPMENT ACCORDINGLY (9J-5.006 (3)(a), FAC). The request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the subject property will begin are -visioning of Northwest Ocoee in compliance with the standards of the 429 Business Center Character Area of the Winter Garden - Ocoee SR 429 Land Use + Economic Development Study and Master Plan (Master Plan). The Master Plan recognizes the need to locate lands and industrial / economic generator -type uses adjacent to the 429 Expressway consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Introducing light industrial uses in this location will create numerous direct and indirect employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding communities. Effective design will ensure surrounding properties are protected and public safety is enhanced, as well as the public's general welfare and overall aesthetics are achieved through superior site 823 N. OLIVE AVENUE WEST PALM BEACH, FL. 33401 T 561.797.4217 W IPLANANDDESIGN.COM E [PLANADMIN@IPLANANDDESIGN.COM PLAN & DESIGN plan programming. Light Industrial uses can be effectively buffered from adjacent properties and quality architecture and building orientation can create an aesthetically pleasing project. With parking and loading activities located at the back of buildings, noise, odors, vibrations can be effectively programmed away from neighboring residential properties. As a self-contained development, the site will also integrate open space into the site programming for the benefit of employees and visitors to the development and protect existing natural wetlands that exist on site. Objective 1: The development of land shall be regulated to ensure that newly developed property and redeveloped property is compatible (meaning, not in direct conflict with uses with regards to specific zoning categories, density and intensity) with adjacent uses and natural features and resources including topography, vegetation, and soil conditions (9J-5.006 (3)(b) (1), FAC). Additionally, the City recognizes the Wekiva Study Area and shall create policies to protect the most effective recharge areas, karst features, and sensitive natural habitats as depicted on the following maps as adopted in the Future Land Use Map Series: "Most Effective Recharge Areas/Soil Conservation Service Type "A" Soils, "Karst Features/Closed topographic depressions", and "Sensitive Natural Habitats". Within the Wekiva Study Area, properties with development entitlements shall be exempt. Amending the future land use to Light Industrial will allow for economic development within the Northwest area of the City that will benefit from new investment. The requested future land use is the least intense industrial designation and will create an employment center for the community, the City and the region. Aggregation of the lands from Ocoee Apopka Road (to the east) to SR 429 (to the west) will create a logical starting point for redevelopment and sufficient land area to create an appropriately scaled employment center in close proximity to the 429 expressway and the State Road 438 (Plant Street) interchange. A complete environmental report has been prepared and no recharge areas, karst features and/or sensitive natural habitats shall be impacted by the requested modification. Policy 1.2: The City shall regulate land development through the Land Development Code, to reduce, eliminate and/or prevent negative impacts related to noise, traffic, light, drainage, water and groundwater quality, toxic and hazardous materials, litter, dust, visibility, and other factors. This shall be accomplished by establishing and enforcing specific environmental performance standards, consistent with state and/or federal standards and with the City's technical enforcement capabilities. Standards shall be based on the measurement of the undesirable characteristics at the property line of the land on which the generating use or activity is located and shall be based on performance levels deemed to prevent nuisance to surrounding properties. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.) Modification of the future land use and subsequent development of the property as a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics Center will adhere to the regulations specified in the City's Land Development Code and also the Business Center Character Area Design guidelines as outlined in the June 2017 Business Center Design Plan. Enhanced site programming, landscape design and enhanced buffering shall prevent negative Page 2 of 15 FLAN & DESIGN off -site impacts related to noise, traffic, light, vibration, drainage, water and groundwater quality, toxic and hazardous materials, litter, dust and visibility. Ensuring appropriately scaled buildings engage adjacent rights -of -ways and parking and loading is placed at the sides and rear of buildings will create aesthetically pleasing architectural views into the property. Pedestrian sidewalks and multipurpose paths shall be integrated into the design to encourage walkability throughout the center to and from various uses and to and from on -site open spaces. Policy 1.3: The City shall mitigate impacts by using regulations related to landscaping, setbacks, walls/fences, on -site parking, on -site traffic flow, lighting, signs, pedestrian access, vehicular access and other factors which will mitigate offsite impacts and enhance the health, safety, welfare and appearance of the built environment while providing an effective buffer between uses (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(4), FAC). All future development on the subject property shall implement enhanced site -programming and site - related mitigation techniques to effectively minimize and/or eliminate any potential off -site impacts for neighboring properties. Buffering the proposed Light Industrial use and protecting/maintaining existing natural features (i.e. wetlands) will ensure that the health, safety, welfare and overall appearance of the built environment is enhanced and protected. Policy 1.4: The City shall allow mixed and multi -uses in the Special Overlay Areas (SOAs) which include the Downtown Redevelopment Area, Interchange Impact Areas, and Activity Centers, and shall use strict design criteria to provide an attractive appearance and to offset negative impacts, sprawling development patterns and the proliferation of strip commercial development (91- 5.006 (3)(c)(5), FAC). All future development on the subject site shall adhere to the City's Land Development Code and also the Business Center Character Area Design guidelines as outlined in the June 2017 Business Center Design Plan. The Business Center Design Plan outlines specific design criteria for all types of uses including Light Industrial projects. Policy 1.5: The City shall require that industrial parks develop with internal traffic circulation and buffering from adjacent roads and properties. Integration of a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics Center in this location will be executed carefully and thoughtfully to ensure it becomes a premier employment center that is self-contained; engages the adjacent rights -of -ways; and provides enhanced buffering to the neighboring properties. Any adjacent roadway modifications shall be completed to minimize impacts for neighbors and the general public and the project shall incorporate a network of internal roadways to connect all buildings within the development as well as connect exiting public rights -of -ways (New Lane extension to Ocoee -Apopka Road). Page 3 of 15 !PLAN & DESIGN Policy 1.7: The land development regulations shall promote innovative development in those cases where a public benefit can be realized and impact can be offset by the development, as follows: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT CPA 2002-1-1 1-36 • Utilize Planned Unit Development zoning to allow for mixed uses and unconventional development designs in those cases where the developer can demonstrate increased effectiveness of service delivery, improved living environments, or protection of natural resources such as the Flood plain/Conservation land use classification and the most effective aquifer recharge areas, karst features, and sensitive natural habitats as depicted in the Future Land Use Map series. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.]; and • Provide development standards that create useable open spaces in new developments (9J-5.006 (3) (c) (5), FAC). [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] It is the intent of the Applicant to modify the existing future land use designation and rezone the property to a consistent Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to effectively develop a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics Center. Direct public benefits of the development of such a facility in this area include: upgrading and enhancements to the adjacent public right-of-way (Ocoee -Apopka Road), the extension of sewer and water services to the area; the extension of Pine Street through to Ocoee -Apopka Road (via New Lane), and, economic opportunity to the Northwest area of the City. The project shall integrate useable open spaces throughout the development as well as a comprehensive sidewalk system to enhance the pedestrian environment. Policy 1.9: The City shall only establish new industrial development zoning along major corridors and shall review existing zoning along major corridors in order to minimize the impacts of the industrial zoning. Heavy industrial uses which are generally not aesthetically desirable shall be discouraged along arterial and collector streets or shall be required to provide berms and/or opaque screening or fencing so as to eliminate visibility of building or outside storage area from the street. Access to industrial areas shall be attractively landscaped and signed. Buffers shall be used as set forth in the City of Ocoee Land Development Code. The future land use amendment request is located on and has principal access from Ocoee Apopka Road, which is designated as a collector roadway. As indicated on Comprehensive Plan Map Roadway Improvement Master Plan 2020 exhibit, it is listed as a roadway that will be widened to the south to the Plant Street Interchange all the way north to McCormick Road. It is a significant north -south collector roadway. A traffic analysis of the proposed Comprehensive Plan change indicates that traffic impacts will not be significant for roadways up to 2.5 miles away from the subject site. Policy 1.10: The following density and intensity restrictions shall apply within the land use categories established on the Future Land Use Map. Page 4 of 15 PLAN & DESIGN • Light Industrial — FAR 3.0 max. The Applicant shall adhere to the maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 for the subsequent development of a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics Center. Objective 2: To provide adequate services and facilities to newly developed or redeveloped property and to protect the ability of those services and facilities to function properly. These services and facilities shall be provided in an economically feasible manner, as outlined in the Infrastructure Element Sub -elements, and shall be provided in a manner to discourage urban sprawl (9J-5.006 (3)(b)(8)&(9), FAC). Modification of the future land use will require the extension and enhancement of such services and facilities as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste and roadways. As the subject property is located within the City's municipal boundary; the Joint Planning Area (between Ocoee & Orange County, the City's utility service area, and is within a redevelopment overlay urban sprawl is not applicable nor shall it occur as a result of approval of such a request. Policy 2.3: The City shall require development to have adequate services and facilities available prior to or concurrent with the impacts of the development, consistent with adopted standards. Services and facilities include potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, roads, and parks. This policy shall be implemented through the Concurrency Management System as defined in the Capital Improvements Element (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(3), FAC). All adopted levels of service shall be met concurrent with any subsequent development with the extension of required services and facilities such as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste and roads. Policy 2.4: The City shall allow only land use patterns and development that can be efficiently provided with necessary public services. This shall be regulated through the Concurrency Management System as described in the Capital Improvements Element of this Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant shall identify all necessary enhancements to existing services and facilities to meet concurrency. Policy 2.5: The City shall consider requests for voluntary annexation into the City when those lands are logical extensions of the existing City limits, when services can be properly provided, and when proposed uses are compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the JPA Agreement, and the City's Annexation Policy. For the purpose of this Policy, an annexation shall be considered as a logical extension if it is within the limits of the JPA and meets the technical criteria of Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of the JPA are illustrated on the Future Land Use Map. Services will be considered as being properly provided if the existing or planned public facilities Page 5 of 15 !PLAN & DESIGN can support the land uses and densities proposed in the area to be annexed consistent with the level of service standards set forth in this plan (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(3), FAC). The subject property is located within the existing City boundary and within a designated Planning Overlay District (the SR 429 Character Area). The Applicant is proposing to voluntarily annex the property into the City of Ocoee, rezone the property and modify the future land use for the purpose of creating an employment center within one of the City's gateway districts and request a modification to the Joint Planning Area Agreement between the City of Ocoee and Orange County. The planned modifications/extension of/upgrading of public facilities will sufficiently serve the needs of the project. Coordination with the City and all applicable service providers will be conducted to ensure all services and facilities meet the adopted levels of service. Policy 2.7: The City shall require new developments to provide necessary services and facilities or to pay a fair share of the cost of those services and facilities. These services and facilities shall conform to the adopted level of service standards. The Applicant will extend/enhance/modify existing facilities where required and/or contribute a pro-rato share to any direct impacts caused by the subsequent development of the property as a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics use. Policy 2.8: The City shall encourage development when and where appropriate facilities and services to support it are available (based on the levels of services standards adopted concurrent with this Comprehensive Plan), thereby discouraging urban sprawl and ensuring that concurrency is met. The following policy statements demonstrate how compliance shall be implemented. • Development orders shall not be approved if mandated services are degraded below accepted LOS standards. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT CPA 2002-1-1 1-39 • The following public facilities and services shall be available for new development in all urban areas: schools; roadways; solid waste collection; stormwater management; fire and police protection; potable water, sanitary sewer or septic tanks if the soils are acceptable. • Through appropriate land development regulations and provision of effective urban services, the City shall promote infill development within the municipal boundaries. • The City shall assure that adequate facilities and services are available to support the new development as specified in the Concurrency Management System. • The land development regulations shall be enforced to reflect the policy of controlling control urban sprawl. Page 6 of 15 !PLAN & DESIGN The Applicant shall make any required service and facilities upgrades to ensure all services are available to the development and that it meets the adopted levels of service for each respective service, including but not limited to potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste and roads. Policy 2.12: The City shall continue to encourage the consolidation of lots or small, shallow parcels in order to encourage development into planned concentrations, as opposed to a linear, strip commercial configuration. The Applicant is consolidating up to 4 large and small parcels of land to create an employment center that shall satisfy the "supporting services" component of the City's adopted 429 Business Center Design Plan. That master plan envisions the integration of an "office and high-tech manufacturing area with supporting services like commercial and residential uses". In this specific instance, the development of a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistical Center would be considered a valuable support service to future Office, High Tech and Commercial uses both for local businesses and/or regional and national companies. The rezoning to o PUD will provide a well -planned, self-contained and concentrated facility that will protect neighboring properties and on -site natural features (existing wetlands). Objective 3: The City shall adopt and implement plans and programs for Interchange Impact Areas, the Downtown Redevelopment Area, and Activity Centers as determined by the City Commission to meet the criteria established by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes to encourage Planned Unit Developments and mixed and multi -use developments (9J-5.006 (3)(b)(2) and (10), FAC). The Applicant is proposing development within one of the recognized Interchange Impact Areas in the northwest area of the City. It is consistent with the 2006 Northwest Ocoee Sector Study. That study identified the importance of development in northwest Ocoee as an important gateway to the City due to the Western Expressway (SR 429) and the two interchanges that serve the City. Amendment of the 2019 Joint Planning Area Agreement will be carried out concurrent with these requests. As such the development of Light Industrial Office Warehouse and Logistics Center uses along SR 429 will help to pull investment to this area of the city and ensure that the needed public facilities to support all new development are planned, installed and operational. Policy 3.3: The City shall provide public services and facilities to all neighborhoods in an effective manner. The Applicant shall provide for the logical and timely extension of required facilities and services to the property in order to service the subject site and ensure adopted levels of service are fully met. Policy 3.4: The City shall develop mixed use zoning provisions within the Land Development Code which shall provide for the implementation of new "mixed/multi uses within a variety of higher Page 7 of 15 PLAN & DESIGN intensity land use categories where the overall impacts of development are determined to be no greater than those that would otherwise result from that permitted by underlying land uses. This ordinance shall provide for such items as internal circulation, compatibility of adjacent uses, functional relationship between mixed uses, provisions of open space and public amenities, and consistency with all requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(5), FAC. The integration of a self-contained, Light Industrial employment center use in a redevelopment area of the City, following the property development standards of the City's Zoning Code as well as the Design criteria of the SR 429 Business Center Design Plan will ensure compatibility with the existing surrounding residential, industrial and transportation (SR 429) uses adjacent to the subject property. Policy 4.2: Proposed commercial and industrial development requiring a change to the Future Land Use Map may be required to submit a market study indicating the economic feasibility of the development and the location advantage over existing commercial and industrial lands. The Applicant has provided a market analysis that outlines the need for Light Industrial uses within this market area and the vacancy rate as well as the amount of industrial needed to serve the marketplace. See attached analysis. Objective 5: The City shall enforce the Land Development Code to protect and properly utilize natural and historic resources in accordance with the Conservation Element and the following policies. The Applicant shall adhere to the applicable Land Development Standards and Conservation Elements of the City's Land Development Code and the Conservation Elements outlined in the following policies. Policy 5.1: The City shall protect areas of environmental concern including but not limited to the Flood plain/Conservation land use classification, and the most effective aquifer recharge areas, karst features, and sensitive natural habitats as depicted on the Future Land Use Map series, and areas of scenic and historic value, as identified in the Conservation Element, through development regulations and public programs, including, but not limited to environmental awareness programs at recreational facilities and in schools (9J-5.006 (3)(b)(4), FAC). [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] The Applicant has provided an Environmental Assessment of the subject property. An existing quality wetland has been identified on the site and is proposed to be maintained, enhanced and effectively buffered from any proposed future development. Subsequent development of the property shall ensure protection of this important natural feature. Further, the analysis found that no significant endangered or threatened species habitat exists on the property. Page 8 of 15 PLAN & DESIGN Policy 5.2: The City shall use development regulations to protect air and water quality, flood -prone areas, open space, karst features, natural wetland, sensitive natural habitats, wellhead protections areas and the most effective recharge areas for the Floridian and surficial aquifers. This shall be accomplished by such regulations as are described in Policy 5.3. In addition, the City shall cooperate with federal, state and regional environmental management agencies to identify and monitor unusual activities associated with non-residential uses and to refer observed violations to the appropriate enforcement authorities. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] The Applicant shall adhere to all City, County, State and Federal regulations governing the existing wetland on the subject property. Policy 5.3: The City shall enforce its Land Development Code to protect surface water quality including, but not limited to: restrictions in building setbacks, maximum impervious surface ratios, land use restrictions to ensure compatibility, development limitations in floodplains, and upland and wetland protection. Land development regulations shall include restrictions on development within areas designated as Conservation/Floodplains on the Future Land Use Map. Flood elevations shall not be adversely impacted and the water quality of the water body shall not be degraded. Land development regulations shall provide adequate protection for wetland areas and require central sewer for development within and adjacent to karst features, wetlands or 100-year floodplain areas (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(1), FAC). [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] The Applicant shall protect and enhance the existing on -site wetland that exists to the north and centrally within the subject property. A substantive wetland buffer shall be developed and maintained as part of programming the intended Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics Center use. A portion of an open ditch that exists to the south of the main wetland (with some wetland plants within it) shall be developed and mitigated. Policy 5.4: The City shall promote the use of upland and wetland corridors and buffer zones as natural reservations, as identified in the Recreation and Open Space Element. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] The Applicant shall create and maintain a significant wetland buffer around the main body of the on -site wetland and shall designate it as a preserve. Page 9 of 15 !PLAN & DESIGN Policy 5.5: The City shall, in coordination with developers, evaluate soil potential including but not limited to most effective aquifer recharge areas and karst features. This examination and testing will be done on a site -by -site basis. Specific characteristics and criteria under examination shall be as identified in the Land Development Code. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] Soil analysis on the subject property has revealed up to five (5) soil types that exist across the site and they include: Felda Fine Sand; Immokalee Fine Sand; Smyrna Fine Sand, Wabasso Fine Sand, and, Zolfo Fine Sand. The subject property is not included in the most effective aquifer recharge area nor does it possess karst features. Policy 5.6: The City shall require developers to delineate conservation and floodplain lands, most effective aquifer recharge areas, karst features, and sensitive natural habitats on a site -by -site basis as their development proposals are submitted. The criteria used for the delineation shall provide that development will be guided in a manner that optimizes open space and promotes a pattern of development that protects the recharge capabilities of the land, recognizes property rights and the differing circumstances and varying land use patterns within the Wekiva Study Area. The specific development criteria shall be addressed in the Land Development Code. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] The Applicant has prepared an environmental analysis of the subject property and has delineated the boundary of the on -site wetland. Enhancement, buffering and on -going maintenance of the wetland shall be carried out by the developer. Policy 5.7: The City shall enforce the Land Development Code to require development proposals to include the identification of and management plans for rare, endangered, and threatened flora and fauna species consistent with the criteria outlined in the Land Development Code and the Conservation Element of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy Series shall only be permitted in limited instances where development would be severely restricted. If there is no practical alternative, mitigation measures shall be undertaken, consistent with the Land Development Code. The Applicant has prepared an environmental analysis of the subject property and it has been determined that the property lies within the Federal Consultation Area for the eastern black rail, sand skink and Everglades snail kite. However, the Property does not contain suitable habitat or required soil types for any of these species...". No rare, endangered, and/or threatened flora or fauna species exist on the site. Policy 5.8: Proposed activities which would destroy or degrade the functions of wetlands or other environmentally sensitive natural habitats or karst features as defined by the Land Development Code or depicted in the Future Land Use Map Page 10 of 15 !PLAN & DESIGN The Applicant shall mitigate for any impacts to the open drainage ditch that exists adjacent to the on -site wetland. Policy 5.9: The City shall continuously plan for and only approve development that is consistent with natural drainage and water storage plans. This shall include special provisions in the Land Development Code pertaining to land -locked drainage basins where projects may be permitted on a case -by -case basis when unique site characteristics demand a more comprehensive stormwater management approach (9J-5.006(3)(c)(4), FAC). The aggregation of the four (4) parcels into a single property for the development of a Planned Unit Development shall comprehensively address natural drainage flows back to the on -site wetland and will also address all development -related stormwater drainage through a system of open on -site retention areas and pipes to achieve legal positive outfall. Policy 5.12: The City's wetlands shall be conserved and protected from physical and hydrologic alterations by regulating development activities to protect natural water -cleansing features and reduce or prevent discharges of contaminants from urban and agricultural land uses through the Land Development Code. The Land Development Code shall include provisions such as (but not limited to) the use of such natural features in the treatment of stormwater runoff, limitations on destruction of native vegetation and/or land clearing within such natural features, and maintenance of upland buffers and/or environmental swales within a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet surrounding such natural features. For the purposes of this policy, natural features shall include Florida Department of Environmental Protection jurisdictional wetlands (9J-5.013(2)(c)(3), FAC). The Applicant has prepared an environmental analysis of the subject property and has delineated the boundary of the on -site wetland. Enhancement, buffering and on -going maintenance of the wetland shall be carried out by the developer. Policy 5.13: The City shall protect and conserve the natural functions of wetlands by directing land uses incompatible with the protection and conservation of wetlands and wetland functions away from identified wetlands. The type, value, function, size, conditions and locations of wetlands will be factors used to consider land use changes where incompatible uses are allowed to occur, mitigation shall be considered and will be based on the regulations set forth in the Land Development Code (9J-5.013(3)(a)&(b), FAC). The Applicant has prepared an environmental analysis of the subject property and has delineated the boundary of the on -site wetland. Enhancement, buffering and on -going maintenance of the wetland shall be carried out by the developer. Page 11 of 15 PLAN & DESIGN Objective 7: The City shall enforce the Land Development Code to preserve existing and future neighborhoods. The subject property is located within a planning overlay district that envisions the development of a range of new uses in this important area of the City (the Northwest district) in close proximity to the 429 Expressway. Superior site planning and building programming combined with enhanced landscape buffering shall ensure existing neighborhoods remain unaffected by the future land use change request and subsequent development of the property as a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistics Center. Policy 7.1: The City shall enforce standards in the Land Development Code to promote compatibility of adjacent land uses by requiring buffer zones to protect new and established residential areas adjacent to new and established nonresidential, uses. Buffer zones shall be defined within the Land Development Code, based on the following guidelines: a) "Minor" buffers between low-rise (two stories or less) office or multi -family uses and single-family areas, consisting of a minimum of fifteen (15) feet of buffer area supplemented by walls, and/or fences, and landscaping. b) "Medium" buffers between retail commercial or high-rise (over two stories) office and any residential use, consisting of a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet of buffer area supplemented by walls, and/or fences, and landscaping. c) "Major" buffers between any industrial use and any residential use, consisting of a minimum of fifty (50) feet of buffer area supplemented by walls, and/or fences, and landscaping (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(2), FAC). The Applicant shall adhere to the 429 Business Center Character Area Design Criteria for Industrial buildings and sites. Policy 7.2: The City shall permit only low intensity office and low intensity commercial development adjacent to residential areas except where well buffered. The Applicant shall address buffering of the residential uses adjacent to the subject property to the north. The design criteria of the 429 Business Center Design Plan shall be adhered to. Enhanced buffering elements and landscaping shall be utilized to effectively minimize or eliminate off -site impacts to adjacent residential properties. The remaining surrounding properties are SR 429 and Light Industrial uses to the east and south of the subject property. Policy 7.5: To allow for greater open spaces to preserve the most effective recharge areas, karst features and sensitive habitats depicted in the Future Land Use Map series, density may be computed Page 12 of 15 PLAN & DESIGN in a defined development project by allowing clustering in certain areas. These clusters may be of greater density than allowable within the land use designations as long as the total project does not exceed maximum density as designated on the Future Land Use Map. Clustering, pursuant to the foregoing concept, may be controlled by density caps, PUD zoning or a restrictive covenant running with the land with power of enforcement in favor of the City. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] The Applicant shall request rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of creating a well -planned, comprehensive, and self-contained employment center to serve the surrounding community and greater city and region. The subject property is not located within an effective recharge area nor does it possess karst features. Policy 7.6: Land designated for industrial use should be adjacent to railways and/or major highways. Adequate buffering should be provided from adjacent residential land uses, and office or commercial uses should be encouraged between industrial and residential areas (9J-5.006 (3)(c)(2), FAC). The Applicant has aggregated these specific properties into a single unified property for the purpose of developing a Light Industrial Warehouse and Logistic Center due to its adjacency to the State Road 429 Expressway and the close proximity to the SR429 interchange to the south. A support service type use at this location shall encourage future Office, Commercial and Residential development within this overlay district. Policy 7.7: The Land Development Code shall provide for adequate open space within new developments and redevelopment projects. The minimum required open space within any project shall be five (5) percent of the total site. The Applicant shall adhere to the design standards of the 429 Business Center Character Area Design Plan. The required 5 percent open space minimum shall be achieved with future development of the site. 7.7.3: Upland Buffer Retention Swales: Naturally vegetated swales that are placed within the upland buffers surrounding lakes or wetlands. The purpose of these swales is to improve the water quality of the stormwater runoff and ensure that the swale fills and exfiltrates into the soil so that there is no sheet flow into the lake or wetland. This method of water quality improvement shall mimic the absorption and pollutant removal abilities of a natural low spot in the topography and must follow accepted Best Management Practices (BMPs). Stormwater runoff from developed lands adjoining wetlands, lakes and/or floodplain areas shall be diverted towards swales, hold the runoff, and then allow it to slowly release into the soil column. [Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act (WPPA): Ch. 369.321(3), F.S.] Page 13 of 15 !PLAN & DESIGN The Applicant shall develop on -site retention areas to hold stormwater runoff to achieve water quality on - site prior to release offsite to the point of legal positive outfall. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OFTHE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OFTHE OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ALSO: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, RUN SOUTH 88 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WESTALONG THE SOUTH LINE OFTHE SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) 31.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 336.42 FEETTO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4); THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST40.00 FEETTOTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4); THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 18 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 336.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; TOGETHER WITH: THE NORTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) AND THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) OF THE WEST HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4), LESS THE WEST 2 ACRES THEREOF, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ALSO TOGETHER WITH: THE NORTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF WAY FOR OCOEE-APOPKA ROAD (AKA STATE ROAD NO. 437) ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. PARCEL B: A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5140, PAGE 1053, AND THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5140, PAGE 1505, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE Page 14 of 15 PLAN & DESIGN COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING AND BEING IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE ATTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT BEING A 6 INCH BY 6 INCH CONCRETE MONUMENT; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7 FOR 1321.69 FEETTOTHE NORTH LINE OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 01 SECOND EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE FOR 624. 53 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE WESTERN BELTWAY, STATE ROAD NO. 429, ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY PROJECT NO. 75320-6460-602/603 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 01 SECOND EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 43 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 520.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 290.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 43 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 1273.05 FEETTO THE EASTERLY LINE OFTHE AFORESAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5140, PAGE 1052; THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 21.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 135.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 203.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 172.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 137. 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 220.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 395.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE FOR 43.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7, FOR 610.07 FEETTOTHE NORTH LINE OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 626.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE AFORESAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5140, PAGE 1505; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5140, PAGE 1505 FOR 34.27 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE WESTERN BELTWAY; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 43 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIMITED ACCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 328.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OFTHE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE NORTH 150 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE NORTH 150 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS CONTAIN A TOTAL OF 39.965 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Page 15 of 15 January 2021 PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Transportation Demand Analysis for a Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment luke transportation engineering consultants LTEC No 2 0-53 02 Luke Transportation EnQineerinj Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page I ii Luke Transportation EngrineerbU Consultants, Inc. PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Transportation Demand Analysis for a Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment Prepared for: McCraney Property Company 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1170 Orlando, FL 32801 Prepared by: Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 941556 Maitland, Florida 32794-1556 January 2021 Page I iii 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transyortation EnQineerink Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee IDA Page I iv Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose................................................................................................................................. I StudyMethodology............................................................................................................4 ProposedDevelopment.............................................................................................................. 9 TripGeneration...................................................................................................................9 TripDistribution.................................................................................................................9 Existing Traffic Conditions.....................................................................................................11 Roadway Level of Service Analysis...............................................................................11 Planned/Programmed Roadway Improvements.........................................................11 Projected Traffic Transportation Assessment.....................................................................19 Analysis of Projected Traffic Conditions.......................................................................19 Transit.................................................................................................................................42 Pedestrian...........................................................................................................................42 Park& Trails......................................................................................................................42 StudyConclusions.................................................................................................................... 43 StudyConclusions............................................................................................................43 APPENDICES............................................................................................................................ 45 Appendix A - 2025/2040 Project Trip Distribution Plots............................................47 Appendix B - Background Traffic Volumes Trend Analysis.....................................1 AppendixC - WOT Trail Map.........................................................................................57 Page I v 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation EngineeriU Consultants, Inc. FIGURES Figure1 - Site Location................................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 - Property Boundary Layout...................................................................................... 3 TABLES Table 1 - Property Land Use Comparison............................................................................... 1 Table 2 - Potential Study Impact Area Determination........................................................... 5 Table 3 - Estimated Trip Generation....................................................................................... 10 Table 4 - Study Roadway Parameters & LOS........................................................................12 Table 5 - 2025/2040 Study Roadway Parameters...................................................................16 Table 6 - 2025 & 2040 Background Traffic Calculation......................................................... 20 Table 7 - 2025 AFLU Maximum Density LOS........................................................................ 23 Table 8 - 2040 AFLU Maximum Density LOS........................................................................ 26 Table 9 - 2025 PFLU Maximum Density LOS........................................................................ 30 Table 10 - 2040 PFLU Maximum Density LOS...................................................................... 33 Table 11 - 2025 PFLU Proposed Density LOS........................................................................ 36 Table 12 - 2040 PFLU Proposed Density LOS........................................................................ 39 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page I vi Luke Transvortation Enzineerin4 Consultants, Inc. INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess a Comprehensive Policy Plan Transportation Amendment for adopted land use of a parcel located in Orange County, Florida into the City of Ocoee, Florida. The proposed development site is a ±39.965-acres parcel which will have access via Ocoee -Apopka Road (CR 437) and Pine Street. Figure 1 depicts the location of the development parcel and the adjacent roadway network. This analysis was undertaken to support an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan, changing the existing Orange County classification (Industrial with a FAR of 0.75) to the City of Ocoee classification (Industrial with a FAR of 3.0). Table 1 is a comparison showing the adopted future land use (AFLU) maximum density, the proposed future land use (PFLU) maximum density and the proposed future land use proposed density. Figure 2 shows the conceptual site plan. TABLE i PROPF.RTV LAND USE COMPARISON Land Use Development Density - 39.965 Acres 1 2025 1 2040 Adopted Future Land Use AFLU - Maximum Densi Industrial (1) 1,305,657 SF 1 1,305,657 SF Land Use Development Deno - 39.965 Acres 2025 1 2040 Proposed Future Land Use (PFLU) - Maximum Density Industrial (2) 5,222,626 SF 5,222,626 SF Land Use Development Density - 39.965 Acres 2025 1 2040 Proposed Future Land Use PFLU - Pmposed Densi Industrial I 48o,56o :SF= 480,560 SF (1) Orange County FAR o.75. (2) City of Ocoee FAR 3.0. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 A comparison between the Adopted Future Land Use (AFLU) maximum land use density, the Proposed Future Land Use (PFLU) maximum land use density and the proposed land use (PLU) density is also provided in Table 1. Under the AFLU maximum land use density the proposed industrial development parcel will allow a maximum density total of 1,305,657 square feet of industrial space. Under the PFLU maximum land use density the proposed industrial development parcel will allow a maximum density total of 5,222,626 square feet of industrial space. The proposed land use industrial density will consist of 480,560 square feet of industrial space. 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 1 a s Progress Yr.wtta ,a; Commerce _ «' �.,.y Park JI or x r T" '��11Ju,yf•• � �"�i-t� �- •f�i:,� •! sS�.n. .✓t'i •.� �' c. } X•I4.yiy,+�.� � � .. �-' �'�,,. �a 1 I x G Proposed b Full - e Access M LOCATION MAP S. Bze a anrlr,r7t b[TENTION MEA vI a DETENTION-� MEA I �-arnotl Proposed MATCHLINE _ _ — — H Full (THIS SHEET) - - - ._ - - w — °,-.o•u . ucx-a Access 1 Proposed 9iE - JH.985 ACNES 1 BLDGS - 48O.S60 SF Full MATCHLINE Access' (THIS SHEET) .may1 1PROGRS33 COYIMCS j''P 7�, a PARS IM Mall m -' l�oi/ CBlu�a PAM MC •,-• �� 000a Mao► a � .-.n 1-1 In (D luke w transportation engineering consultants PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK OCOEE, FLORIDA Industrial Land Use Conceptual Plan Figure 2 Luke Transvortation Eneineeriny Consultants, Inc. Study Methodology The methodology used for this study was developed to be consistent with the transportation methodology standards adopted as part of the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Policy Plan. Data utilized in the study consisted of land use data provided by Project planners, traffic volume data/level of service standards obtained from the City of Ocoee, Orange County, FDOT and planned improvement's information from the MPO. Based upon the study methodology assumptions, the impact area will consist of collector and arterial roadways within a 2.5 mile -radius impacted by Project trips that are equal to or greater than 3% of the adopted level of service (LOS) capacity of the study roadway. Table 2 was developed to show the Project impact area based on 3% of the adopted level of service (LOS) P.M. peak hour peak direction service volume threshold. Table 2 lists the City of Ocoee roadways, lists the number of lanes, the adopted LOS standard, adopted service volume, 3% threshold volume, Project trip distribution based on the CFRPM V6.1 2025/2040 Long Range Transportation Model assignment for the PFLU, maximum Project trip volume for each roadway segment and a determination of significance. Based on the minimum 3% criteria, 55 roadway segments are significantly impacted. Therefore, the roadways highlighted in blue and the other roadways within the 2.5-mile radius were evaluated as part of the Transportation Demand Analysis for a Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment. Page 1 4 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation EnkineerinQ Consultants, Inc. TABLE 2 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 5 Luke Transportation Enitineerinff Consultants, Inc. TABLE 2 (Continued) Vit-fnenee Stud.Pntentisl Rti,dvirnr>,art Area neterminatinn Roadwa Name Functional Class M Lanes Ado ted (1) 3% of Adopted LDS 2025 Project Tip Distribution 2025 2040 Project Trip Distribution 2040 s Project P.M. Peak DOS Cap. % of LOS Std 3% Si ? From o Tomyn Rd/Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D 35,820 1,074.E 3.9% 1,010 3.5% 7.5% 4.0% 907 1,347 i,g43 '2, 31 2.82% as iS 25"L. 3012% No es __ Yes Yes ;oJ _ ors .a arms , r5hall Fat m Rd/ Story Rd on Rd/Kissunmee Ave mar ena Minor rtertal Collector 2 D z D 35, 2 _ 15,050 S,oSo 1,07q. 451.5 451 5 I 1o.6% _ 175% z,202.2% z,7_46 4, 33 _--- - -- iss'n Ave/ S.R. 4_ k_lin Stree - - 2 - 17_2% r. Psh"4URd Rd Collector 2 D 12,580 377.4 0.1% 13 0.5% 130 1.03% No Ocoee Hills Rd St Collector Collector D 2 12,580 377.4 0.0% o 0.0% o O.oa % .47% Nn ' Yes r43ewelling t Silver StarRd/ Palm Dr ogress Commerce Prolert Ent Project Ent/ Demastus 1,n Fullers Cross Rd s Rd/ West Rd �Il cCormick Rd 'McConniek Rd/Bmion Rd -- -._ ....._.+ Collector Collector Collector T-(:ollertor ctor Collector Collector E z E 2 F, E 2 E 2 F z E 15,050 15,000 t5,o5o 15,050 15,050 15,050 15,050 451.g 45.0% 4515 z4z9b 45t-5 z4 7% 4515 f 304% 4515 14.2% _ 451.5 �, _ 13.3% 451.5 1 10-9% u657 h,z69' 6,398 7,875 3,678 3,445 21824 45 7 � 24.5% 25J% 30.9% 10 6% 9 5% 84% 11,838 j 6,34Et217% 6,5o2 S,o04 2,746 �2,461 2,176 78 66 ,, 43,20% 53.15% 24 44% 22.89% 1576% 1 Yes 1'esmmerce r Yesn/ Yes Yes Yes Y' s ion Rd/ Harmon Rd ICollector 2 j E 15,050 451.5 4.8% 1,243 1 4.0% 1,03fi 8.2E % Yes Maguire Rd/ Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 35,820 1,o74.6 2.6% 661 1.8% 466 1.85% No Blackwood Ave/ Hemple Ave Minor Arterial q E 35,8zo 1,074E 4.1% 1,o62 z.1% 531 2.96% No Orlando Ave BlufordAve/Montgomery Ave Collector z D 13,320 399E 0.9% z33 1.75% No 02230..9,% Re wis St Lakewood Ave/ Flewelling St Collector 2 D 13,320 399.6 1.2% 285 2.33% No Russell Or Flewelling St/ Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 13,320 1 399.6 0.4% 1 104 1 0.4% 104 0.78% No Page 1 6 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park - City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation EnQineerink Consultants, Inc. TABLE z (Continued) R:oadwa Name _ Functional Adopted (1) s 3% of 202 Adopted Project Trip zo25 zogo Project Trip zogo Project P.M. Peak %of 3% From o Class Lanes LOSCa LOS DistributionTrios Distribution Trips LOS Std Si ? it .'V111e School Rd 'Iden\ille School Rd/ Park Ace - - - ;ParkAce/Dillard 4t _ mor Afteh 2 -� i ;SoO 5550 S.oq z,njz 7.6 1,95E ',Dillard St/ 9thSt AfinorArt erial 4 E 39,8001 % 12,901 -- -- 10.1% �2,616 73,o Yes ;9m x/ h crown romt Ka minor 'Uteral 4 1 h 139,So0 1194a 1�i_4� 4,759 16.2% 4,19E 11 46% 1 le _-- E Crawo Point Rd/ SR 429 Timor Artettal 2 E �i6,820 504.6 _ .3/ 7;t5 3.0% 777 4,Q% ji Y,s SR 429/ Bowness Rd 1-in Arterial z l F 162820 504.E 6.1% _{-1,580 7.1% 1,839 10 93 /_ 1 S Bo1-ie s Rd/ Ocoee. Apopka Rd/Maguue Rd Min Arte ual 2 E 1682o 004.6 6.1% 1,580 7.1% 1 839 10 )9 k, Ys ocoee,Apopka Rd/Bluford Ave "Ttnor Arterial zL i6,3zo �o_-y_.6 17.8% �4,611 19.9% �5,14z 3057/ I Yes Info, ri Avr Rd ---_ kfi r A,tllia T 1 ,t, f, A,n _ n F A 'r -,!-- nee Hills Rd/Clarke Rd _ _ _. arke Rd Johio Shores Rd /_ Minor Arterkd Minor A enal e E �? E 116,82o - 39,800 anq.6 1,1940 1,35°% -- 9.3% 3.497 2,409 _ 1_5_.3 _ 9.7% _3_,9.6_3 1 2,500 -W,,6 628E Yes yes a pkneland Rd/ Hiawessee Rd _ Minor Arterial _ --' 6 E 59,900 1,797.0 4.7% 1,217 4.4% 1,127 2.03% No oest ColonialDrJ fIN 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 50,920 1527.E 0.4% 104 2% 3u 0.61% No SR 429/ Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 50,920 1,527.6 0.4% 104 1.3% 337 0.66% No Marshall Farms Rd/ Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 150,920 1,527.6 0.4% 104 0.1% 26 0.20% No Maguire Rd/ Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 150,920 1,527.6 1.5% 389 0.5% 130 0.76% No Bluford Ave/ Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 150,920 1,527.6 4.3% 1,114 1.8% 466 2.19% No Blackwood Ave/ Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 50,920 1,527.6 4.0% 1,036 1.7% 427 1 2.03 % No StoryRd A St/ SR 429 Collector 2 E 15,930 477.9 o.8% 207 1.5% 376 2.36% No SR 429/ Maguire Rd Collector 2 E 15,930 477.9 1 0.9% 233 1.5% 389 2.444E No Tom Blvd Roberston Rd/ Warrior Rd Collector 2 D 15,930 477.9 0.2% 39 0.1% 26 0.24% No Warrior Rd/ Maguire Rd Collector 2 D 15,930 477.9 0.5% 130 0.3% 78 1 0.82% No West Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/ L7arcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 13,320 399.6 o.8% 197 0.1% 26 1.48% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Montgomery Rd/ Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 13,320 399.6 0.9% 223 0.9% 233 1.754E No Clarke Rd/ Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 13,320 399.6 1.0% 1 259 1 1.3% 324 2.43% No Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave/ Adair & Collector 2 D 13,320 399.6 0.5% 130 0.2% 52 0.98% No Adair St/ AD. Mims Rd Collector 1 2 D 13,320 399.6 0.3% 1 78 0.3% 78 0.59°6 No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service VolumesJrom City of Ocoee. (2) Dail P-i-t 754s Ado ted LOS Luke 71ransportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park - City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 7 Luke Transbortation Eny-ineerinz Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 1 8 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Engineerinff Consultants, Inc. Proposed Development The existing Adopted Future Land Use for the property included in this study is Rural/Agricultural. The proposed land use for the property is Natural Resource / Utility. The existing and proposed land use densities are shown in Table 1. To determine the impact of this development scenario under the current AFLU and the PFLU, an estimate of the trip generation characteristics was determined. This included the determination of the site's trip generation and distribution/assignment of these trip generation characteristics to the study roadways. Trip Generation Based on the current (Wh Edition) ITE Trip Generation Report calculation methods, a comparison between the AFLU, the PFLU and the PLU is provided in Table 3. Two different comparison scenarios are provided. The first is the development parcel trip generation based on the Orange County (AFLU) maximum land use density (1,305,657 SF) and the City of Ocoee (PFLU) maximum land use density (5,222,626 SF) and the second is a comparison between the Orange County (AFLU) maximum land use density (1,773,328 SF) and the City of Ocoee (PFLU) proposed land use density (480,560 SF). As can be seen, when compared with the AFLU generated estimated traffic volumes, the PFLU maximum density results in an increase of 19,428 daily trip ends, an increase of 2,742 A.M. peak hour trip ends and an increase of 2,468 P.M. peak hour trips ends. However, under the second comparison scenario, when compared with the AFLU generated estimated traffic volumes, the City of Ocoee PFLU proposed density (480,560 SF) results in a decrease of 4,092 daily trip ends, a decrease of 578 A.M. peak hour trip ends and a decrease of 520 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Trip Distribution The distribution and assignment of project trips were based upon the CFRPM V6.1 2025 and 2040 Long Range Transportation Model assignments. The model network included all planned and programmed roadways and improvements within the impact area. The socioeconomic data used reflects the 2025 and 2040 model analysis years, which include a reasonable assessment of future development patterns. The socioeconomic data was updated to reflect the proposed development in a separate traffic zone. Subsequently, a selected zone assignment was performed to determine distribution of site trips in the impact area to the area roadways. Copies of the model 2025 and 2040 AFLU and PFLU development distribution plots are contained in Appendix A 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 9 Luke Transvortation EnkineerinQ Consultants, Inc. TABLE 3 Estimated Trin Generation (1) - AFLU Maximum Density Land Use Size ITE Code (2) Trip Generation Rates Traffic Volumes A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Dail I Total I Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Daily Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit AFLU (Orange Coui aximum DensiM. o.o8 o.63 I o.o8 0.55 6,476 914 804 110 822 107 715 Industrial 1 1,305,657 SF no R 4.96 1 o. o I o.62 AFLUMaximtan Density Total 6,476 914 804 110 822 107 715 Estimated Trin Generation (i) - PFLU Maximum Density Land Use Size ITE Code (2) Tri Generation Rates Traffic Volumes A M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Dail Total Enter I E dt Total Enter Exit Daily Total Enter I Exit Total Enter Exit PFLU Citv of Ocoee -FAR - .o -Maximum Densi : o.o8 o.63 o.o8 1 0.55 25,904 3,656 3,217 439 3,290 428 2,862 Industrial 15,222,626 SF iio R 1 4.9E 1 0.70 1 o.62 PFLUMaximum Density Total 25,904 3,656 3,217 439 3,290 428 1 2,862 Increase (Decrease) in Land Use Total trips (PFLUMax Densi-AFLUMax Densi ) 1 19,428 1 2,742 1 2,413 1 329 12,468 1 321 12,147 Estimated Trin Generation (i) - PFLU Proposed Density Land Use Size ITE Code (2) Trip Generation Rates Traffic Volumes 1 A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily Total Enter Exit I Total Enter Exit Dail Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit PF A A licant FAR - .2 - P e Densi : o.62 0.08 o.63 0.08 0.55 2,384 336 296 40 302 39 263 Industrial 480,56o SF uo R 6 o.7o Proposed Land Use Proposed Density Total I 2,384 336 296 40 302 39 263 Increase/ (Decrease) in Land Use Total trips (PFLUProposed Density-AFLUMax Density) (4,092) (578) (5a8) (70) (520) (68) (452) (i) Trip generation calculationsfrom loth Edition ofITE Dip Generation Report, 2017. (2) ITELand Use Code Number/ R= Average 71ipRate Luke Transportation Engineering Consultmits, Inc., 2021 Page 110 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. Existing Traffic Conditions The existing traffic operations near the site were evaluated for the study roadways within the 2.5-mile radius impact area. This included the study roadways which were analyzed for daily and P.M. peak hour conditions. Roadway Level of Service Analysis Table 4 is a summary of traffic parameters and existing level of service (LOS) for the study roadway segments to be impacted by the proposed land use change. This table lists the numbers of lanes, roadway functional classification, City adopted LOS standard and roadway service volume for each roadway segment. This table also shows the 2019 daily and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes as well as the peak hour peak direction LOS. As Table 4 shows, all but 10 study roadway segments currently operate within their level of service standards. The roadway segments which exceed the available roadway capacity for both the daily and P.M. peak hour are as follows: • Clark Road between A.D. Mins Road and Hackney -Prairie Road, • Clark Road between Hackney -Prairie Road and Clarcona-Ocoee Road, • Good Homes Road between SR 50 and Balboa Drive • Good Homes Road between Balboa Drive and White Road, • Maguire Road between Gotha Road and Roberson Road, • Maguire Road between Story Road and Kissimmee Avenue, • Maguire Road between Kissimmee Avenue and SR 438 (Franklin Street), • Old Winter Garden Road between Bluford Avenue and Blackwood Avenue, • SR 438 between East Crown Point Road and SR 429, and • West Road between Ocoee -Apopka Road and Clarcona-Ocoee Road. Planned/Programmed Roadway Improvements Programmed Roadway Improvements (funded within the next five years): • Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road - Intersection improvements. Planned Roadway Improvements (not yet funded): • Complete Streets Study for SR438 (Franklin Street)/Ocoee Apopka Road/SR 438 (Silver Star Road) - Multi -lane corridor improvement for SR 438 and segment of Ocoee Apopka Road by 2040 to include roundabout at SR 438 (Franklin Street) and Bowness Avenue. 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 11 Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. TABLE 4 Study Roadway Parameters and Existing Level of Service Ma Name Fo Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (i) LOS Capacity 20ig Traffic Volumes AADT P.M. Peak P.M. Volume LOS Direction Off -Peak (2) Peak Direction LOS Meets LOS Std? A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 68o 6,226 D 323 238 EB D Yes Clarke Rdl Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 E 68o 6,226 D 323 238 EB D Yes Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector z 1 D 640 4,272 C 201 194 SB C I Yes Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR o Collector D 1 80 C 97 394 SB C Yes SR So Montgomery Ave Collector z D 640 5,800 C 279 26o NB C Yes Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 2 D 6 0 7,458 D 456 349 NB D Yes SR o Geneva St Minor Arterial z D 640 7,763D 496 329 NB D Yes Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial z D 6 o 8,o68 D 535 3o8 NB D Yes Orlando Rd McKey St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 8,372 D 575 288 NB D Yes McKe St S.R 438 Minor Arterial 2 D 6 o 8,677 D 614 267 NB D I Yes S.R. 8 Rewis St Collector z E 68o 8,800 D 578 317 NB D Yes Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR 2 Lakewood Ave Collector 4 E I 1 0 23,127 C I 1o82 939 WB C Yes Lakewood Ave Rd Collector 4 E 17oo r8 o6 C 870 769 WB C Yes Ingrarn Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E 1, o0 14,685 C 657 598 WB C Yes Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 21,332 C 969 883 EB C Yes Apopka -Vineland Ltd Hiawassee Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 27,742 C 1,389 978 WB C Yes Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector 4 E 2,000 28,762 C 1,223 1,017 WB I C Yes Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 27,722 C ia87 971 WB C Yes Clarke Rd S.R. o White Rd Collector 4 D i,800 24,o85 C 1,270 749 NB C Yes White Rd S.R 438 Collector 4 D 1800 29,797 C 1,431 1,022 NB C Yes S.R 438 A.D. Mims Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 20,089 C 1,043 712 NB C Yes AD. Mims Rd/ Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 75o 15,169 824 561 NB F No Hackney -Prairie Rd/ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 750 i5,i6g 824 561 NB F No East Crown Point Rd SR 8 Palm Dr Collector z D 1 640 10,232 D 445 404SB D Yes Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E 750 7,458 C 440 j87 WB C Yes Geneva St Maguire Rd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 8,761 D 517 455 EB D Yes Good Homes Rd Expwy Old Winter Garden Rd East-West Collector E 1,80o 22,66o C 1,122 1,230 NB C Yes East-West S.R o Collector E 800 010 C 1,210 8 SB C Yes S.R. o Balboa Dr. Collector 2 E o ,089 F 1,264 628 NB F No Balboa Dr White Rd Collector z E o 18,002 F 8 2 NB F No Page 112 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park -City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. TABLE 4 (Continued) Studv Roadwav Parameters and Fxistin¢ Level of Service Roadwa Name Functional Class # Imes Ado ted (i) 20ig Traffic Volumes (2) Meets L.OS Std? L.OS Capacity AADT Volume ILOS JP.M.Peak Direction P.M. Off -Peak Peak Direction L.OS From/TO Ma ire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector 2 D 790 35,966 F 1,946 1,22 SB F No Roberson Rd/TomRd/Tomyn Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 34,326 D 1,761 1,224 NB D Yes Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D 1800 32,686 C 1,575 1,222 NB C Yes Old Winter Garden Road SR 50 Collector 4 D 1,8o0 31,o46 C 1�390 1,221 NB C Yes S.R. o Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 1 D 1 1,800 14,210 C 657 1 62 NB C Yes Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 750 iL4,884 D 719 551 NB D Yes Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 D 750 1.5,557 F 780 475 NB F - No Kissimmee Ave S.R 438 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 D 640 i5,800 F 648 482 NB E No Marshall Farms Rd S.R o Ma ire Rd Collector 2 D 6 0 3,000 C 150 92 NB C Yes McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd am Rd Collector 2 D 6o0 4,970 C 235 176 WB C Yes Ingram RdZ A ka-Vineland Rd Collector 2 1 D 6o0 4,515 C 1 213 1 16o WB C Yes McKe St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 680 4,85o E 22 172 EB C Yes Mont ome Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 2,970 C 149 91 WB C Yes Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 438Z Flewelling St Collector 2 D 6 o z 86o C 170 121 NB C Yes Ocoee -Apopka. Rd West SR 8 SR B Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 750 14,000 C 679 367NB C Yes SR S East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector 2 E 750 11,841 C 648 342 NB C Yes Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 75o 9,681 C 617 317NB C Yes Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector 2 E 750 9,681 C 617 317 NB C Yes Demastus in Fullers Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 10,959 C 652 384 NB C Yes Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 12,2,38 C 688 450 NB C Yes West Rd McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 13,516 C 723 517NB D Yes McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 880 12,194 C 611 453 NB C Yes Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector 2 E 880 10,871 C 499 389NB C Yes Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 880 11,684 C 1 518 423 NB C Yes Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E I 1800 28,741 C 1,597 936 WB C Yes Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 4800 33,165 C 1,850 11 WB F No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1800 32,384 C 1,792 1,097 WB D Yes Hem le Ave Citms Oaks Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 4800 31,6o3 C 4733 t,o6o WB D Yes Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 1800 30,822 C 1,675 1,023 WB C Yes Orlando Ave BlufordAve Montgomery Ave Collector 2 1 D 680 5,762 C 1 285 302 1 EB C I Yes Palm Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 6 0 0 o C 1 2 1 WB C Yes Fine St East Crown Point Rd Local 2 D 6 0 3,070 C 142 134 WB C Yes Pine Street Project Site Palm Dr Local 2 D 6 0 500 C 28 22 NB C Yes Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewellig St Collector 1 z 1D 68o 1950 C t31 72 NB C Yes Russell Dr Flewellin St Willow Creek Rd Collector 1 z 1 D I 68o 2,240 C 1 132 98 NB I C I Yes 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park - City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 13 Luke Transportation Enffineerinfr Consultants, Inc. TABLE 4 (Continued) Studv Roadwav Parameters and Existing Level of Service Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado led (1) 2019 Traffic Volumes (2) Meets LOS Std? LOS Canacitv AADT Volume LOS P.M. Peak Direction P.M. Off -Peak Peak Direction LOS FroMtro S-P- 438 Tubb St Tildenville School Rd Minor Arterial z E 880 8,248 C 424 398 EB C Yes Tildenville School Rd Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 6,8ig C 378 297 WE C Yes Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial 2 E 950 8,769 D 5o8 209 EB D Yes Dillard St 9th St Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 17,075 C 751 70 EB C Yes th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 19,700 C 933 1 840 EB I C Yes E. Crown Point Rd SR 429 Minor Arterial z E 84o 19,300 •' 955 492 EB F No SR z Bowness Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 14,000 C 784 315 EB C Yes Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 14,100 C 744 422 EB C Yes Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 840 14,200 C 704 528 EB C Yes Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 13,400 C 661 457 EB C Yes Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 0 15,748 C 726 710 WB C Yes Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 19,900 C 942 849 WB C Yes Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 22,053 C 978 884 WB C Yes Good Homes Rd A o ka-Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 24,205 C 1,014 q18 WB C Yes .Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 35,o96 C 1 26 1 81 EB C Yes S.R 5o(West Colonial Dr.) thSt SR 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 3,o2o 46,989 C 2,207 1,526 WB C Yes SR 29 Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,o2o 46,75o C 2,107 1,669 WB C Yes Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,o2o 46,510 C 2,007 1,812 WB C Yes Maguire RdZ Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 41,500 C 1 i,610 WB C Yes Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 47,000 C I i, 6o 1,777 WB C Yes Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 43,o62 C 1,796 1,628 WB C Yes Story Rd th St SR 2 Collector 2 E o 0 0 C 298 WB C Yes SR z Maguire Rd Collector 2 E 790 11654 C 588 567 EB C Yes Ta or St Franklin St Mckey St Collector 2 D 68a 1 3,400 C 16o 120 NB C Yes West Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd or Arterial z 1 D 68o 16,410 F 1 768 666 EB F No White Rd Orlando Ave. Montgomery Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 6 0 5,762 C 302 286 WB C Yes Clarke Rdj Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 8,632 D 427 381 WB D I Yes Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave/ Adair St Collector 2 D 680 5,867 C 303 235 EB C Yes Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Collector 2 D 68o 6,046 C 313 236 EB C Yes (i) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumes from City of Ocoee. (2) Existing traffw volumes from Orange County 2oig traffic count database and FDOT 2019 traffic count database. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 Page 1 14 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park - City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Enkineerin4 Consultants, Inc. Table 5 is a summary of the 2025 and 2040 traffic parameters for the study roadway segments to be impacted by the proposed land use change. This table lists the numbers of lanes, roadway functional classification, City adopted LOS standard and roadway service volume for each roadway segment. Table 5 also lists the K and D Factors that were utilized to convert the projected AADT model background traffic volumes to P.M. peak hour direction traffic volumes. 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 15 Luke Transportation EnirineerinQ Consultants, Inc. TABLE 5 2025 20 0 Stud Roadway Parameters Roadwa Name From o Demand Factors K D 2025 # Lanes 2025 Roadway Service Volumes Peak Hour / Peak Direction Ca acity Table (1) 2040 # Lanes logo Roadway Service Volumes Peak Hour / Peak Direction Capacity Table (1) A.D. Mims Rd A_ B E D E A B C D E Wurst Rd Clarke Rd 0.09 o. 8 z 0 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd o.og o. 8 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o Adair St A B C D E A B C D1 E Wurst RdZ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd o.og 0.51 2 o 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o Blackwood Ave A E E D E A B C D E Old Wmter Garden Rd. SR 5o o.og o. 6 4 o o 66o 1,47o i,53o 4 0 0 66o i,47o i,53o SR Sol Montgomery Ave 0.0 0.52 z 0 0 10 1 640 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o Bluford Ave _A B E D E A E E D E Old Winter Garden Rd SR 5o 0.11 0.57 1 2 1 0 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o S.R o Geneva St om o.6o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o Geneva St Orlando Rd 0.10 o.63 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o z o 0 310 64o 68o Orlando Rd McKey St o.10 o.67 2 0 0 310 6 o 680 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o McKe St S.R.438 0.10 0.70 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o S.R. 8 Rewis St o.10 o.65 2 0 0 310 6 o 68o 2 0 0 310 649 68o Clarcona-0coee Rd A B C D E A B E D E SR 2 Lakewood Ave 0.0 0-54 4 o I 0 1 1,620 1,700 1,700 4 0 0 1,620 11,700 1,700 IakewoodAve Ingram Rd 0.0 o.53 4 o o 162o 1 oo 1 o0 4 0 0 1,620 1,700 4700 Ingrain Rd Clarke Rd 0.09 0.52 4 0 0 162o 1 o0 47oo 4 o o 1620 1,700 1,700 Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd 0.09 0.52 4 0 0 462o 1 oo 1 o0 4 0 0 1620 1,700 4700 Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd 0.0 0-59 4 0 0 1,910 2,000 2,000 4 0 0 1,910 2,000 12,000 Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr 0.08 0 0 1,910 2,000 2,000 0 0 1,910 000 2,000 Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd 0.0 0 0 1,910 000 12,000 0 0 1,910 000 2,000 Clarke Rd _A B E D E A_ $ C D E_ S.R- o White Rd o.o8 jo.63 o o 1 o 1800 18o0 0 0 1 0 1800 1800 White Rd S.R 8 o.o8 0 0 1,720 i,800 r,800 0 0 1720 1800 4800 S.R q 8 AD. Mims Rd 0.0 o o 1,72o t,800 18o0 0 0 1 o 1800 1,800 AD. Mims Rd Hackne -Prairie Rd o.0 z 0 0 710 750 750 2 0 0 710 750 750 Hackney -Prairie Rd ClarconaOcoee Rd 0.09 0.59 2 1 0 0 710 750 750 2 0 0 710 0 750 East Crown Point Rd A B E D E A B C 12 E SR 8 Palm Dr o.o8 0.52 2 0 1 0 310 640 680 1 2 0 0 310 6 0 68o Fullers Cross Rd A B E D E A B E D E Ocoee -Apopka/ North lakewood Ave 0.11 0.53 2 0 0 1 710 750 750 2 0 0 710 750 750 Geneva St A B E D E _A B E D E Ma ire Rd Bluford Rd 0.11 0.53 2 0 0 330 68o 720 2 0 0 3 o 680 720 Good Homes Rd A B E D E A B C D E Expwy Hackne -Prairie Rd A R C D E A E -C Q E Clarke Rd A o ka-Vmeland Rd 0.11 0.53 2 0 0 10 640 680 2 0 0 10 640 680 In Rd A B E 12 E A B C D E McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd o.o o. 6 2 0 0 10 6 o 68o 2 0 0 10 6 o 68o Kissimmee Ave A_ B E D E _A B E D- E Ma ire Rd McKe St 0.10 0. 2 o 0 10 640 68o 2 0 0 10 6 o 68o Lakewood Ave A_ B E D E A_ E E D E Rewis St Wmst Rd 0.10 o.67 z o 0 710 750 750 2 0 0 0 750 750 Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd 0.11 0. 2 0 0 710 750 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd 0.11 0. 2 0 0 0 750 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Old Wmter Garden Rd East-West o.10 0. 8 0 0 1 20 1800 1,800 0 0 1 20 1800 1,800 East-West S.R o 0.07 0.67 0 0 1,720 1,800 1,Soo 0 0 1, 0 1,Soo 1,Soo S.R. So Balboa Dr. 0.08 0.67 2 0 0 0 0 790 2 0 0 7 0 790 790 Balboa Dr White Rd o.o 0.6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Page 116 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park -City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Enlrineeriniz Consultants, Inc. TABLE 5 (Continued) 2n2r/2ndn 3tudv Rnadwav ParameterR Roadwa Name Demand Factors 2025 # Tans 2025 Roadway Service Volumes Peak Hour / Peak Direction Ca aci Table (1) 2040 # Tans 204o Roadway Service Volumes Peak Hour / Peak Direction Ca aci Table (1) From/To K I D Maguire Rd A B C g E A B C D E Gotha Rd Roberson Rd o.og o.61 2 0 0 750 790 790 2 0 0 750 790 790 Roberson Rd/TomRd/Tomyn Rd 0.09 0.5 0 0 1,720 1,800 1800 4 0 0 1,720 1,800 i,800 Tom Rd Old Wmter Garden Road o.og o.56 40 0 1,72o 1,800 i,800 4 0 0 1,72o 1,800 1,800 Old Winter Garden Road S.R. So o.o8 o.53 4 0 0 1,72o 1,800 1,8o0 0 0 1,72o 1,800 1,800 S.R. o Marshall Farms Rd 0.0 0.51 0 o 1 o i,800 18o0 0 0 o 1,800 i,800 Marshall Farms Rd StoryRd 0.0 o. 2 0 0 710 0 o z 0 0 710 750 0 StoryRd Kissimmee Ave o.o8 o.62 2 0 0 710 750 750 2 0 0 710 750 750 Kiac;mmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) 0.07 0.57 1 2 1 0 1 0 310 64o 680 z o 0 310 64o 68o MarshallFarms Rd A B E D E _A B E D E S.R. 50Maguire Rd o.o8 o.62 2 0 0 310 640 68o 2 0 0 310 64o 68o McCormick Rd A B C D E_ A B E D E [Ocoee -Apopka Rd Ingram Rd o.o8 o.57 2 0 0 300 600 650 1 2 0 0 3oo boo 6 o In am Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd o.o8 o.57 2 0 0 300 600 650 2 0 0 1 300 600 6 o McKe St _A B E D E A B E D E Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave o.o8 o. 2 0 0 310 1 640 68o 2 0 0 310 64o 68o Mon ame Rd A II ]2 E A B D E Blackwood Ave/ White Rd o.o8 o.62 2 0 0 3io 64o 68o 2 0 0 310 64o 68o Ocoee Hills Rd C D E A_ B C D E S.R 8 Flewellin St 0.10 0. 8 2 10 640 68o z o 0 1a 64o 680 Ocoee- ka Rd E D E A B E D E West SR 8 SR 8 East Silver Star Rd 0.07 o.6 2 tAB 710 7 0 7 0 2 0 0 710 7 0 0 SR 8 ast Silver Star Rd Palm Dr o.o8 o.6 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Palm Dr Pro ss Commerce Project Ent 0.10 o.66 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ProCommerce Project Ent Demastus Ln o.lo o.66 2 0 0 0 2 0 O o 0 0 Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd 0.0 0.6 2 0750 750 2 0 0 710 1 750 750 Pullers Cross Rd West Rd 0.09 0.60 1 2 0 0 710 750 750 2 0 0 710 750 750 West Rd McCormick Rd 0.0 0.58 2 0 0 710 7 0 0 2 0 0 710 750 750 McCormick Rd Binion Rd 0.0 0.57 2 0 0 S o 880 I 88o 2 1 0 0 S o 88o 88o Binion Rd Harmon Rd o.o8 o. 6 2 0 0 8 o 88o 88o 2 0 0 S o 88o 88o Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd 0.08 0.55 2 0 o 830 88o 88o 2 0 0 I 8 o 88o 88o- Old Winter Garden Rd A B C I1 E A B E D E Mazuire Rd Bluford Ave o.og o.63 4 0 0 1,720 1800 1,800 4 0 0 1,720 1800 1,800 Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave o.og o.62 1 4 1 0 0 1,720 1,800 1,800 4 0 0 1,72o 1,800 1,800 Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave o.og o.62 4 0 0 1,720 1800 1,800 4 0 0 1,720 1800 i,800 Hem le Ave CStrusOaks Ave o.og o.62 4 0 0 1,72o 1,800 i,800 4 0 0 1,720 1800 1,800 Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd o.og o.62 4 0 0 1,720 1800 1 1,800 4 0 0 1 o i,800 1,800 OrbmdoAve A B C B E _A B E D E Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave o.10 0.49 2 0 0 1 33o 680 720 2 0 1 0 1 33o 68o 72o Palm Drive A_ B C D E A_ B_ E D E Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St 0.09 0.51 2 0 1 0 310 64o 68o 2 0 0 310 64o 680 Pine StZ East Crown Point Rd 0.0 0.51 2 0 1 0 310 64o 68o z o 0 10 64o 68o Pine Street A B C D E A B E D E Project Site Palm Dr oao 0.56 2 0 0 310 640 680 2 0 0 3to 64o 68o Rewis St A_ B C_ D E A B E D E IakewoodAve Flewelling St 0.10 o.65 2 0 0 330 680 720 2 0 0 33o 68o 720 Russell Dr A B O D E A B E D E Flewellin St/ Willow Creek Rd 0.10 0.572 0 0 330 68o 72o z 1 0 0 33o 68o 720 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park - City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 17 Luke Transvortation Eniineerinff Consultants, Inc. TABLE 5 (Continued) 202s/20ao Studv Roadwav Parameters RoadwayName Demand Factors 2025 # Lanes 2025 Roadway Service Volumes Peak Hour / Peak Direction Capacity Table (1) 2040 # Lanes 204o Roadway Service Volumes Peak Hour / Peak Direction Ca a ' Table (1) From o K I D S.R 8 A E C D E A B li D E Tubb St 151denville School Rd 0.10 0.52 2 o 0 830 88o 880 2 0 0 8 o 880 880 Tildenville School Rd Park Ave 0.10 o. 6 2 0 0 830 88o 88o 2 0 0 8 0 88o 88o Park Ave Dillard St 0.08 0.71 2 0 0 0 890 0 2 0 0 0 890 0 Dillard St 9th St O.O 0.52 O O 1,910 000 2,000 O O 1, 10 2,000 2,000 9th St E. Crown Point Rd 0.0 0. 0 0 1,910 000 2,000 0 0 1 10 2,000 2,000 E. Crown Point Rd SR 2 0.0 o.66 2 0 0 0 0 o z 0 0 90 840 0 SR 2 Bowness Rd o.o8 0.71 2 0 0 790 0 0 2 0 0 7 0 840 840 Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/MaguireRd/Maguire Rd o.o8 o.64 2 0 0 790 840 840 2 0 1 o 7 o 840 840 Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave 0.0 0 2 0 0 790 840 840 2 0 0 790 840 840 Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd 0.08 0.59 2 0 0 790 840 840 z 0 0 790 840 840 Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd 0.09 0.51 2 0 0 790 840 840 2 0 0 790 840 840 Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd 0.09 0.53 4 0 0 1,910 2,000 2,000 4 0 0 1,910 2,000 2,000 Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd 0.08 0.53 4 0 0 1,910 2,000 2,000 4 0 0 1,910 2,000 2,000 Good Homes Rd A o ka-Vmeland Rd 0.08 0.52 6 0 0 2,94 3,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 13,020 3,020 A o ka-Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd o.o8 o.51 1 6 0 0 1 2,940 3,020 3,020 6 1 0 0 2,940 13,020 3,020 S.R o (West Colonial Dr.) A E E D E A B r D E 9th St SR 429 o.o8 o.59 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 SR 42 Marshall Farms Rd o.o8 o. 6 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 Marshall Farms Rd Magwe Rd 0.08 0.53 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 Maguire Rd Bluford Ave 0.09 0.55 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave 0.08 0.52 6 0 0 2,940 1 3,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd 0.08 0.52 6 0 0 2,940 13,020 3,020 6 0 0 2,940 3,020 3,020 Story Rd A E E D E I A B I E D E 9th St/ SR 429 0.10 0.57 2 0 ' 0 750 790 790 2 0 0 750 790 790 SR 429/ Maguire Rd 0.10 0.51 1 2 0 0 750 790 790 2 0 0 750 790 790 Ta or St A B E D E A E E D E FYzoklin St Mcke St o.o8 0. 2 0 0 330 68o 720 2 0 0 33o 68o 72o West Rd A E E D E A B & D E Ocoee -A o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 0.0 0. 2 0 0 0 680 0 2 0 0 o 680 0 White Rd (Orlando Ave.) A A !� D E A E E D E Montgomery Rd Clarke Rd 0.10 0.51 2 0 0 20 6 o 68o 2 0 0 20 b o 68o Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd o.o o. 2 0 0 20 640 68o 0 20 6 o 68o Wurst Rd A B E D EB Mo C D E ve Adair St o.o o. 6 2 0 0 0 680 20 0 o 680 0 Adair St A.D. Mims Rd o.0 0. 2 0 0 0 680 0 0 0 680 0 (i) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumes from City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 Page 1 18 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park - City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transvortation Engineering Consultants, Inc. Projected Traffic Transportation Assessment Projected background traffic volumes were calculated three (3) different ways; existing daily traffic plus Ocoee vested trips, a 2% annual growth rate or the historic trend annual percentage based on five years of historical County or FDOT traffic counts (the FDOT Trends Analysis worksheet is in Appendix B). As documented in Table 6, the minimum annual growth rate for any roadway segment was at least 2%. The higher of the three values were used for the Background AADT traffic volumes which were then converted to P.M. peak hour peak direction traffic volumes via existing K and D factors. Table 6 presents the 2025 and 2040 background AADT calculations for both the AFLU and for the proposed PFLU. Analysis of Projected Traffic Conditions The analysis of projected traffic conditions for the existing AFLU maximum density (1,776,595 SF of Industrial space) was accomplished as shown in Table 7 for the 2025 short-range analysis and Table 8 for the 2040 long-range analysis. Under the 2025 analysis 30 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 36 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Fifteen of the Year 2025 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the existing AFLU maximum density land use density. Under the 2040 analysis 55 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 58 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service. All the remaining roadway segments in the 2040 analysis will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Fifteen of the Year 2040 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the existing AFLU maximum density land use density. 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 19 TABLE 6 2025 zo4o Bac ounct'lratttc Calculation Ocoee Existing 2%Annual FDOT 2025 Annual 2040 (7) 2040(4) 2040 2040 Roadwa Name Existing Vested Plus Background Trends Background Growth Background Background Background Annual From To Daily Trips (i) Vested (2) Growth () Growth () Trips (5) Rate (6) Growth Trips Trend Growth Trips (8) Rate (9) A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd 6,226 557 6,783 6,973 6,600 6,973 2.0% 9,o6o 8,019 9,o6o 2.2% Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd 6,226 557 6,783 6,973 6,600 6,973 2.0% 9,o6o 8,o19 9,o6o 2.2% Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 4,272 0 4,272 4,785 4,700 4,785 2.0% 6,220 6,005 6,220 2.2% Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 0 9,58o 104 9,684 10,730 10,155 10,730 2.0% 13,950 12,340 13,950 2.2% SR 50Montgomery Ave 5,800 0 5,800 6,496 6,148 6,496 2.0% 8,440 7,470 8,440 z.z% Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 50 7,458 382 7,8 0 8,353 7,300 8,353 2.0% 1o,860 7,852 1o,86o 2.2% S.R. 5o Geneva St 6439 8,202 1 8,694 11,033 11,033 7.0% 14,340 11,695 14,340 .0% Geneva St Orlando Rd 808 351 8, 19 9,o 6 6,800 9,036 2.0% 11,750 4,428 11,750 2.2% Orlando Rd McKey St 8,372 642 9,014 9,377 2,933 9,377 2.0% 12,190 1 (3,141) 12,190 2.2% McKe St S.R.438 8,677 532 9,209 9,718 8,300 9,718 2.0% 12,630 8,698 12,630 2.2% S.R.38 Rewis St 8,800 436 9,236 9,856 9,467 9,856 2.0% 12,810 11,778 12,810 2.2% Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR429 Lakewood Ave 23,127 3,500 26,627 25,902 1 31,43331,433 6.o% 4o,86o 59,723 59,723 7.5% Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd i8,906 3,500 22,4o6 21,175 18,100 22, o6 3.1% 29,130 35,514 35,514 •2% Ingram Rd/ Clarke Rd 14,685 17,398 16, 47 z9,66 29,667 1 .0% 38,570 58,592 58,592 1 .2% Clarke Rd A o ka-Vineland Rd 21,33225,201 23,892 36,000 36,000 11.5% 46,800 78,1z0 78,120 12.7% A o ka-Vmeland Rd Hiawassee Rd 27,7 227,7 2 31,0 1 29,900 31,0 1 z.0% 40,390 37,130 0,390 z.z% Hiawassee Rd/Powers Dr 28,76228,762 V2,713 2,213 35,200 5,200 3.7% 45,76o 54,736 54,736 4.3% Powers Dr/Pine Hills Rd 2 , 2227,72z 1,0 9 30,100 1,0 9 2.0% 40,36o 37,569 40,36o 2.2% Clarke Rd S.R 5o White Rd 24,085 ,4 26,567 1 26,975 28,300 28,300 2.9% 36,790 40,611 40,611 3. % White Rd S.R.38 29,797 2,610 32,407 3 32,500 33,373 2.0% 43,380 40,882 43,38o 2.2% S.R. 438 A.D. Mims Rd 20,o89 4,117 24,2o6 22,500 23,533 24,2o6 3.4% 31,470 34,736 34,736 3.5% A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd 1 ,169 6,207 21,376 16,989 17,400 21,376 6.8% 27,790 29,392 29,392 4.5% Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 1 169 5,538 20,707 16,989 17,400 20,707 6.1% 26,920 28,472 28;472 4.2% East Crown Point Rd SR 8 Palm Dr 10,232 0 10,232 11,46o 16,233 16,233 9.8% 21,100 40,o96 4o,o96 13.9% Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -Apopka/ North Lakewood Ave 7,458 1,311 8,769 8,353 13,400 13,400 13.3% 17,420 40,133 40,133 20.9% Geneva St Maguire Rd Bluford Rd 8,761 174 8,935 9,812 5,000 9,812 2.0% 12,76o 11,431 12,76o 2.2% r-A U.,- Rd Old Winter Garden Rd East-West ExPwv 22,66o 89 22, 9 25,379 35,300 00 9. % 890 43,243 ,890 % East-West S.R.5o 24,010 19 24,204 26,891 35,300 35,300 7.8% 45,890 43,243 45,890 4.3% S.R 5o Balboa Dr. 25,08 0 25,129 28,too 22,300 28,100 2.0% 36,530 33,58o 36,530 2.2% Balboa Dr White Rd 18,002 40 18,04z 20,162 20,000 20,162 2.096 26,210 34,981 34,981 % Ingram Rd McCormick Rd/ Clarcona Ocoee Rd 3,497 0 3,497 3,917 5,600 5,600 10.0% 7,280 14,588 14,588 15.1% Kissimmee Ave Ma wire Rd McKey St 2,700 1 322 1 3,022 1 3,024 1 2,967 1 3,024 2.0% 1 3,930 3,795 3,930 z.2% TABLE 6 (Continued) 202R/2oao Background Traffic Calculation Roadwa Name Existing Daily Ocoee Vested Trips (1) Existing Plus Vested (2) 2%Annual Background Growth () FDOT Trends Growth () 2025 Background Trips (5) Annual Growth Rate (6) 2040 (7) Background Growth Trips 2040 (4) Background Trend Growth 2040 Background Trips (8) 2040 Annual Rate (9) From o Lakewood Ave Rewis St Worst Rd 7,395 295 7,69o, 8,282 7,600 8,282 2.0% 10,770 8,903 10,770 2.2% Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd 7,456 864 8,320 8,351 13,400 13,400 13. % 17,420 40,133 40,133 20.9% Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd 7,456 864 8,320 8,351 13,400 00 13.3% 17,420 0, o, 20.9% Maguire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson lid 35,966 237 36,2030,282 13,033 40,282 2.0% 52,370 51,762 52,370 2.2% Roberson Rd/TomRd/Tomyn Rd 34,326 4,417 38,7438 21,400 38,743 2.1% 50,370 56,177 .56,177 3.0% Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road 32,686 6,oi7 38,703 36,6o8 29,400 38,7o3 3.1% 50,310 57,861 57,861 Old Winter Garden Road S.R.o 31,046 4,246 35,292 34,772 34,767 35,292 2. % 45,88o 45,880 45,880 2.3% S.R. So Marshall Farms Rd 14,210 1,881 16,ogi 15,915 17,200 17,200 3.5% 22,36o 26,230 26,23o 4.0% Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd 14,884 2,151 17,035 16,670 17,633 17,633 .1% 22,920 2.5,833 25,833 % Story Rd Kissimmee Ave 15,557 1,401 16,958 17,424 18,633 18,633 % 24,220 27,857 27,857 3.8% Kissimmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) 15,800 1,102 16,902 17,696 18,500 18,500 2.8% 24,050 26,548 26,548 3.2% Marshall Farms Rd S.R o Maguire Rd 3,000 313 3,313 3,36o 2,100 3,36o 2.0% 4,370 840 4,370 2.2% McCormick Rd Ocoee -Apo ka Rd Ingram Rd 4,970 273 5,243 5,566 5,000 5,566 2.0% 7,240 7,o6g 7,240 2.2% In am Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd 4,515 273 4,788 5,057 5,000 5,057 2.0% 6,570 6,422 6,570 2.2% McKe St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave 4,850 10 4,86o 5,432 3,900 5,432 2.0% 7,o6o Z,469 7,4692.6% Mon ome Rd od Ave BlackwoWhite Rd 2,970 0 2,970 3,326 3j48 3,326 2.0% 4,320 3,825 4,320 2.2% Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 8 Flewelli St 2,86o 0 2,86o 3,203 3,200 3,203 2.0% 4,16o 3,4 ,r6o 2.2% Ocoee -Apopka Rd West SR 438 SR 4 8 East Silver Star Rd 14,000 2,555 16,555 1 ,68o 15,267 16,555 3.0% 21,520 20,280 21,520 2.6% SR 8 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr 11,841 2,967 14,808 13,261 11,500 i4,8o8 4.2% 19,250 21,693 21,693 4.0% Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent 9,681 2,967 12,648 10,843 11,500 12,648 5.1% 16,440 18,529 18,529 4.4% Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus I.n 9,681 3,838 13,519 10,8 11,500 ,519 6.6% 17,570 i9,8o5 19,80 5.0% Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd 10,959 2,967 13,926 12,274 11,500 13,926 % 18,100 20,402 20,402 4.1% Fullers Cross Rd West Rd 12,238 3,838 16,076 13,7o6 13,900 16,0 6 5.2% 20,900 24,033 24,033.6% West Rd McCormick Rd 13,516 3,838 17,354 ,138 16, oo 17,354 % 22, 6o 26,985 26,985 4.7% McCormick Rd Binion Rd 12,194 0 12,194 13,657 18,300 18, oo 8. % 23,790 41,358 41,358 11. % Binion Rd Harmon Rd io,871 0 1o,871 12,176 21,400 21,400 16.1% 27,820 73,402 73,402 27.4% Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd 11,684 0 11,684 13,o86 18,900 18,9oo 10.3% 24,570 48,101 48,1ol 14.8% Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave 28,741 12,740 41,481 32,190 30,700 41,481 7.4% 53,930 48,3250 4.2% Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave 33,165 2,599 35,764 37,145 1 34,900 37,145 2.0% 48,290 42,i6o 48,290 2.2% Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave 32,384 2,829 35,213 6,2 0 34,700 36,270 2.0% 47,150 42,799 47,150 2.2% Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave 31,603 259 31,862 35,395 34,400 35,395 2.0% 46,oio 43,359 46,oio 2.2% Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd 30,822 0 3o,822 34,521 34,200 34,521 2.0% 44,88o 43,842 44,88o 2.2% Orlando Ave BlufordAve Mon ome Ave 5,762 52 5,814 6,453 6,800 6,800 3.0% 8,840 9,86o 9,86o 3. % Palm Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St 070 0 3,070 3,438 ,2 3, 38 2.0% o ,9 o 2.2% Pine St East Crown Point Rd ,0 0 0 ,070 3,438 2 , 8 2.0% o ,9 0 2.2% Pine Street Project Site Palm Dr 500 0 500 560 1 530 56o 2.0% 730 644 1 730 2.2% TABLE 6 (Continued) 2o2s/2oao Background Traffic Calculation Name Existing Dail Ocoee Vested Tri s (i) Existing Plus Vested (2) 2% Annual Background Growth (3) FDOT Trends Growth (4) 2025 Background Tri s (5) Annual Growth Rate (6) 2040(7) Background Growth Tri s z040 (4) Background Trend Growth 2040 Background Trips (8) 2040 Annual Rate (9) MRoadwa From o Rewis St lakewoodAve Flewelling St 11950 21 1,971 2,184 1,800 2,184 2.0% 2,8 o 1,66o 2,840 2.2% Russell Dr Flewellin St Willow Creek Rd 2,240 0 2,240 2,509 2,900 2,900 4.9% 3,770 5,032 5,032 % 3.R 438 Tubb St Tildenville School Rd 8,248 0 8,248 9,238 11,300 11,300 6.2% 1 ,690 21,809 21,8o9 7.8% T7ldenville School Rd Park Ave 6,8r9 0 6,8ig 7,6377,300 7,637 2.0% 9,930 9,012 9,930 2.2% Park Ave Dillard St 8,769 0 8,769 9,821 9,367 9,821 2.0% 12,770 11,441 12,770 2.2% Dillard St 9th St 17,075 0 17,075 19,124 18,200 19,124 2.0% 24,86o 22,279 24,86o 2.2% 9th St E. Crown Point Rd 19,700 0 19,700 22,o64 19,367 22,o64 2.0% 28,68o 21,071 2.2% E. Crown Point Rd SR 2 19,300 1, 20,714 21,616 20,800 21,616 2.0% 28,100 25,831 2.2% SR 2 Bowness Rd 14,000 1, 15,414 1 ,68o 16, oo 16, o0 .0% 21,450 23,925 % Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd ,100 2,140 16,24o 92 16, oo 16, oo 2.8% 21,450 ,92 N23,029 % Ocoee -Apopka RdBluford Ave ,200 2,548 16,748 15,904 16, oo 16,748 .0% 21,770 23,029 3.0% BlufordAve Ocoee -Hills Rd ,400 712 14,112 15,008 t,5,o67 i,5,o67 2.1% 19, 90 19,8 2.3% Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd 1 , 8 16,o z 1 6 8 00 1 6 8 2.0% 22930 12, 2.2% Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd 19,900 20,053 22,288 17,967 22,288 2.0% 28 0 1 20,616 28,970 2.2% Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd 22,0 398 22,451 ,69 21 6o0 ,6 2.0% 32,110 0 32,110 2.2% Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd 24,205 0 24,205 27,110 25,267 27,110 2.0% 35,240 29,957 35,240 2.2% 1.Apopka-Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd 35,096 1 0 35,096 39,308 36,267 39,308 2.0% 51,100 42,256 51,100 2.2% S.R. 50 (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St/ SR 429 46,989 982 47,971 2,628 52,900 52,900 2.1% 68,77o 69,564 69,564 2.3% SR 29 Marshall Farms Rd 46,750 2,941 49,691 52,359 51,500 52,359 2.0% 68,070 65,711 68,0 o 2.2% Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd 46,5io 3,181 49,691 52,091 48,500 52,091 2.0% 67,72o 57,561 67,720 2.2% Maguire Rd Bluford Ave 41ZOO 1,936 43,436 46,48o 42,100 46,48o 2.0% 60 20 47,874 6o, 20 2.2% BlufordAve Blackwood Ave 47,000 1,19 8,1 26 o 61, oo 61 oo 5.1% 79,690 io8j95 108,19 6.2% Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd 43,o62 1 1,274 44,336 48,229 50,700 50,700 3.0% 65,910 73,515 73,5153• % Sto Rd th St SR 429 7,090 19 ,28 7,941 7,300 7,941 2.0% 10,320 13,897 13,897 4.6% SR z ire Rd 11,554 2o6 11,76o 12,940 16, oo 16 oo 7.0% 21,320 33,6z0 33,620 9.1% Ta for St Franklin St Mckey St 3,400 121 3,521 3,808 3,900 3,900 z. % 5,070 5,363 5,363 2.7% West Rd Owee- o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 16, 10 0 16, 10 18,379 22,533 22,533 6.2% 29,290 43,489 43,489% White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Mon ome Rd Clarke Rd 5,762 7 5,769 6,453 6,800 6,800 3.0% 8,8 o 9,86o 9,860 % Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd 8,632 4 8,636 9,668 9,133 9,668 2.0% 12,570 11,118 12,570 2.2% Wurst Rd IakewoodAve Adair St 5,867 10 5,8776,571 ,16 6,2 2.0% 8 0 8 8, 40 2.2% Adair St A.D. Mims Rd 6,0 6 2 6, 18 6, 2 6 roo 6, 2.0% 7A83 8,800 2.2% 1. City of Ocoee Vested Daily trips, Feb, 25, 2019 2. Existing Daily plus Vested Daily 3.2o25 Background based on Minimum 2% annual growth rate (2o25-2o19 = 6 x o.o2 =12%) x Existing Daily. 4. FDOT Trends 2o25 Growth Projection based on,5 years of Historical traffic. 5. Background based on Maximum Existing + Vested, 2% Annual Growth or FDOT Trend Projection. 6.2o25 Background checked to ensure minimum 2% annual growth from 2019 to 2025. 7.2040 Background based on Minimum 2% annual growth rate (2o4o-2o25 =15 x 0.02 = 30%) x 2o25 Background. 8. FDOT Trends 204o Growth Projection based on 5 years of Historical traffic applied to 2o25 Background volume. 9.204o Background checked to ensure minimum 2% annual growth from 2019 to 2040. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 W v oq ro TABLE 202s Level of Service - Oran2e County AFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Adopted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS I Cap. Back Trips AFLU Trips Total Trips IAS Back Traffic AFLU Trips Total Trips IAS % of LOS Std. 3% Sig? From To A.D. Mims Rd Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.5% 6,973 32 7,005 D 362 4 366 D 0.59% No Rd A o ka-Vineland Rd nCl,k Collector 2 E 68o 0.2% 6,973 13 6,986 D 362 1 363 D 0.1 % No Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 o.6% 4,785 36 1 4,821 C 22 1 226 C o.16% No Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 50 Collector 4 D 1,470 0.1% 10,730 6 10,736 C 557 1 558 C 0.0% No SR 5ol Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 640 0.1% 6,496 6 6,502 D 312 0 312 D 0.00% No Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR So Collector 2 D 640 2.1% 8,353 136 8,489 D 511 2 513 D o. 1% No S.R.5o Geneva St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 5.4% 11,033 350 11,383 D 704 6 710 F o.9 % No Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 6 o 0.1% 9,036 6 9,042 D 599 0 599 D 0.00% No Orlando Rd McKey St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 1.6% 9,377 9,481 D 643 2 645 E o. 1% No McKe St S.R 438 Minor Arterial 2 D 640 0.4% 7189,744 D 688 0 688 F 0.00% No S.R. 438 Rewis St Collector 2 E 68o 0.8% 9,8569,9o8 D 647 1 648 E 0.15% No Clarcona-Ocoee Rd E68 SR 429 Lakewood Ave Collector E r, oo .0% 1, 31,62 C 1,471 1,474 C o.18% No Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd Collector E r, oo 10.0% 22,4o623,054 C 1,030 1 11 1,041 C o.6 % No Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 8.0% 29,667 518 30,185 C 1,327 9 1,336 C o. 3% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 6.9% 36,000 444 36,444 F 1,635 49 1,68 D 2.88% No Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 6.2% 31,071 398 31,469 C 1,556 7 1,563 C 0.35% No Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector 4 E 2,000 3.2% 35,200 207 35,407 C 1,497 3 1, 00 C 0.15% No Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 1 2,000 2.8% 31,049 178 31,227 1 C 1,553 3 1,556 C o.15% I No Clarke Rd S.R. o White Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 1. % 28,300 97 28,39 C 1, 92 2 1,494 C 0.11% No White Rd/S.R. 438 Collector 4 D 1,800 2.6% 33,373 168 33,541 C 1,603 3 1,6o6 C 0.17% No S.R. 438 A.D. Mims Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 0.7% 24,2o6 45 24,251 C 1,257 5 1,262 C 0.28% No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 750 0.1% 21,376 6 21,382 F `: 1,161 1 1,162 F 0.13% No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 75o 0.7% 20,707 45 20,752 F 1,125 5 1,13o F o.67% No East Crown Point Rd SR 438/ Palm Dr Collector 2 D 6 o 22.3% 16,233 1,444 17,677 F 7o6 159 865 F 2 .8 % Yes Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E 750 14.9% 13,400 965 14,365 D 791 16 807 F 2.13% No Geneva St Ma ire Rd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 6.o% 9,812 389 10,201 D 579 43 622 D 6. 2% Yes Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector z D 640 0.7% 2,761 45 2,8o6 C 163 5 168 C 0.78% No Ingram Rd McCormick Rd/ Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 o.6% 5,600 39 5,639 C 282 4 286 C o.6 % No Kissimmee Ave Ma ire Rd McKey St Collector 2 D 640 1.7% 3,024 107 3,131 C 161 2 163 C 0.31% No Lakewood Ave Rewis St Wurst Rd Collector 2 E 750 o.8% 8,282 2 8,334 C 39 1 540 C 0.1 % No Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 1. % 13,400 9 13,497 C 791 2 793 F 0.2 No Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 E 750 13.0% 13,400 842 14,z42 C 791 93 884 F 12.40% Yes TABLE 7 (Continued) 2025 Level of Service - OranEe County AFLU Maadmum Land Use Densitv Roadway Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' T From o Maguire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector 2 D 790 1.6% 40,282 104 40,386 F 2,18o a 2,191 F 1.39% No Roberson Rd/Tomyn Rd Collector 4 D 1,8o0 3.4% 38,743 220 38,963 F 1,987 4 1,991 F 0.22% No Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D 1,8o0 3.9% 38,703 253 38,956 F 1,865 4 1,869 F 0.22% No Old Winter Garden Road S.R. 5o Collector 4 D 1,800 6.6% 35,292 427 1 35, 19 D 1, 8o 7 1,587 C o. 9% No S.R.o Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 D 1,800 8. % 17,200 550 17,750 C 795 9 1 804 C 0.5o% No Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 750 io.6% 17,633 686 18,319 F 851 n 862 F 1.47% No Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 D 750 17.5% 18,633 1,133 19,766 F 934 19 953 F 2.53% No Kissimmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 D 1 640 17.2% 18,500 1,114 19,614 F 759 i8 777 F 2.81% No Marshall Farms Rd S.R. 5o Maguire Rd Collector 2 D 640 1 2.1% 3, 6o 136 3,496 C 168 2 170 C 0.31% No McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Ingram Rd Collector 2 D boo 1.9% 5,566 120 5,686 C 263 2 265 C 0.33% No Ingam Rd A o ka-Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 600 1.6% 5,057 104 5,161 C 239 a 241 C 0.33% No McKey St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 680 1. % 5,432 97 5,529 E 256 11 267 1.62% No Montgomery Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.1% 3,326 3 3,329 C 167 o 167 C 0.00% No Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 438 Flewelli St Collector 2 D 640 0.0% 3,203 0 3,203 C 190 0 190 C 0.00% No Ocoee -Apopka Rd West SR 38 SR 8 East Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 750 2 .0% 16,555 1,749 18,30 F' ' 803 1 29 832 F 3.8 Yes SR 38 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector 2 E 750 45.0% 1 ,8o8 2,gi4 17,722 F 810 48 858 F 6.40% Yes Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 750 24.2% 12,648 1,,567 14,215 C 8o6 26 832 F 3.47% Yes Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector 2 E 750 24.7% 13,519 1,600 15,119 F 862 177 1,039 F 23.6o% Yes Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 30.4% 13,926 1,969 15,895 F 829 217 1,046 F 28.93% Yes Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 14.2% 16,076 920 16,996 F 903 102 1,005 F 13.6o% Yes West Rd/McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 13.3% 17,354 861 18,215 F 928 95 1,023 F 12.6 Yes McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 880 10.9% 18,300 7o6 1 ,006 F 917 78 995 Yes Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector z E 880 4.8% 21 0o 311 21,711 F 982 i,o16 Yes Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 88o 4.4% 18,900 285 19,185 F 838 31 869 NFO-17% Yes Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 2.6% 41,481 165 41,646 F 2,305 3 2,308 Bluford Ave/ Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial E 1,8o0 % 37,145 291 37,436 F 2,072 5 2,077 . No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 4.1% 36,270 266 36,536 F 2,007 4 2,011 F 0.22% No Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,8o0 3.3% 35,395 214 35,6og D 1,941 4 1,945 F 0.22% No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E i,800 2.9% 34,521 188 34,709 D 1,876 3 1,879 F 0.17% No Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 68o 0.9% 6,800 56 D 6 6 342 D o.88% No Palm Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 6 o 21.3% 3, 8 1,3 9C 1 9 1 z 11 D z. % Yes Pine St East Crown Point Rd Local 2 D 640 23.6% 3,438 1,528 g85 C 1 25 18 C 3.91% Yes Pine StreetProject Site Palm Dr Local 2 D 640 44.9% 56o 2,9o8 C 31 48 9 C 0% Yes Rewis St Lakewood Ave/Flewellin St Collector 2 D 680 1.2% 2,184 78 2,262 C 14 9 1 6 C 1 1. 2% No a. NA TABLE 7 (Continued) 2o2n Level of Service - Oran¢e Countv AFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips AFLU Trips Total Trips LDS Back Traffic AFLU Trips Total Trips L.OS % of LDS Std. 3% S' ? Fro o Russell Dr F9ewellin St Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0.4% 2,900 26 2,926 C 171 3 174 C 0.44% No S.R. 438 Tubb St Tildenville School Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 5.9% 11,300 382 11,682 C 581 6 587 C o.68% No Tildenville School Rd Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 8.0% 7,637 518 8,155 C 423 57 480 C 6. 8% Yes Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial 2 E 950 8.o% 9,821 518 iLo,339 D 569 9 578 D 0.95% No Dillard St 9th St Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 11.2% 19,124 72s 19,849 C 841 12 1 853 C o.6o% No 9th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 18. % 22,o64 1,190 23,254 C 1,045 C 1.00% No E. Crown Point Rd SR 42 Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 2.8% 21,616 181 21,79 F 1,0701,073 F 0.36% No SR 429 Bowness Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 6.1% 16,500 395 16,8 5 F 968 F 5.24% Yes Bowness Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd M ire Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 6.1% 16,500 395 16,895 F 871915 R201,o65 F 5.24% Yes Ocoee -A o ka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 17.8% 16 8 1,153 1 ,901 F 8 095 F 15.12% Yes Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 1 % o6 1,017 16,o84 D 743855 F 13.33% Yes Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 13.5% 17,638 874 18,512 F 813 14 827 D 1.67% No Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9. % 22,288 602 1 22,890 C 1,055 10 1,q65 C 0.50% No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 8. % 24,699 6 25,262 C 1,095 1 9 1,10 C 0. % No Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 1 3,020 7.9% 27,110 512 27,622 C 1,136 8 1,144 C 0.26% No Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 4.7% 39,308 304 39,612 C 1,597 34 1,6311 C 1.13% No S.R o (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0.4% 52,900 26 52,926 C 2,485 3 2,488 C 0.10% No SR 429 Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0.4% 52,359 26 52,385 C 2,36o 3 2,363 C 0.10% No Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0.4% 52,091 26 52,117 C 2,248 3 2,251 C 0.10% No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.5% 46,480 97 46,577 C 2,194 2 2,196 C 0.07% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 4.3% 61,300 278 61,578 F 2,556 5 2,561 C 0.17% No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 4.0% 50,700 259 150,959 C 2,109 4 2,113 C 0.13% No Story Rd 9th St SR 429 Collector 2 E 790 o.8% 7,941 52 7,993 C 442 6 448 C 0.76% No SR 4291 Maguire Rd Collector z E 790 0.9% 16,400 58 16,458 V-.`: 835 1 836 F 0.13% No Ta for St Franklin St Mckey St Collector 2 D 68o 3.5% 3,900 22 ,1z C 18 188 C 0.59% No West Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 68o 0.8% 22,533 49 22,582 F 1,055 5 1,o6o F o.74% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Mon ome Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.9% 6,8o0 56 6,8 6 D 356 1 357 D o.16% No Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.0% 9,668 65 9,733 D 478 1 479 D o.16% No Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave Adair St Collector 2 D 68o 0.5% 6,571 32 6,6o3 D 339 D o. % No Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Collector 2 D 680 0.3% 6,772 1 19 1 6,791 1 D 351 2 353 D 0.29% No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Seruice Volumes from City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 TABLE 8 204o Level of Service - Orange County AFLU Maximum Land Use Density Roadwa Name Functional Class 0 Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Cap. Back s AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' 7 From o A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.3% 9,o6o 19 9,079 D 470 2 472 D 0.29% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.2% 9,o6o 13 9,073 D 470 1 471 D 0.15% No Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.0% 6,220 65 6,285 D 293 1 294 C o.16% No Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 50 Collector 4 D 1,470 0.1% 13,950 6 13,956 D 724 1 725 D 0.07% No SR 501 Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 640 0.0% 8,440 0 8,440 D 4o6 0 4o6 D 0.00% No Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 2 D 6 o 1. % ro,86o 97 10,957 D 664 2 666 E 0. 1% No S.R. 5o Geneva St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 4.1% 14,340 266 14,6o6 F 915 4 919 F o.6 % No Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 640 0.7% 11,750 45 11,795 D 779 1 78o F o.16% No Orlando Rd McKey St Minor Arterial 2 D 6 0 5.8% 12,190 376 12,566 D 836 6 842 F 0.94% No McKe St S.R. 438 Minor Arterial 2 D 6 o 2.8% 12,630 181 12,811 E 894 3 897 No S.R. 438 Rewis St Collector 2 E 68o 2.0% 12,810 130 12,940 E 841 2 843% No Clarcona-Ocoee Rd AD j-4% SR 429 Lakewood Ave Collector 4 E 1,700 5.9% 59,723 382 60,105 F 2,794 6 2,800% No Lakewood Ave I am Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 9M 35,514 641 36,155 F 1,633 11 1,6 4% No Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 8.2% 58,592 531 59,123 F 2,621 9 2,6300.58% No Clarke Rd A o ka-Vineland Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 6.3% 78,12o 4o5 78,525 F 3,549 45 3,594 F 2.6 % No Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 4.7% 40,390 304 40,694 F 2,022 5 2,027 F 0.25% No Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector 4 E 2,000 2.2% 54,736 142 54,878 F 2,327 2 2,329 F o.lo% No Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 1 2,000 2.2% 40,36o 139 4o,499 F 2,019 z 2,021 F 0.10% No Clarke Rd S.R. 50White Rd Collector 4 D i,800 2.6% 40,611 168 4o,779 F 2,141 3 .2,144 F 0.1 No White Rd S.R. 438 Collector 4 D 1,8o0 3.9% 43,380 249 43,629 F 2,083 4 12,087 F 0.22% No S.R. 438 A.D. Minis Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 1.2% 34,736 78 34,814 D 1,803 9 11,812 F 0. 0% No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 750 0. % 29,392 32 29,424 F 1,597 4 1 1,6o1 F o. % No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 750 1.0% 28,472 65 28,537 F 1,547 7 1,554 F 0.93% No East Crown Point Rd SR 438 Palm Dr Collector 2 D 640 20.3% 40,o96 1,311 41,407 F 1,744 145 1,889 F 22.66% Yes Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E 750 18.3% 40,133 1,182 41,315 F 2,368 20 2,388 F 2.67% No Geneva St Maguire Rd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 2.8% 12,76o 181 12,941 D 753 20 773 F 2.94% No Hackney- rairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.7% 3,590 45 3,635 C 212 5 217 C 0.78% No Ingram Rd McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.5% 14,588 97 14,685 F 734 11 745 F 1.72% No Kissimmee Ave Maguire Rd McKey St Collector 2 D 6 o 2.7% 3,930 172 4,102 C 210 3 213 C 0. No Lakewood Ave Rewis St Wurst Rd Collector 2 E 750 0.9% 10,770 58 10,828 C 701 1 702 C 0.13% No Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 1.8% 140,133 117 40,25o F 2,368 2 2,870 F o.27% No Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 E 750 15.8% 140,133 1,023 41,156 F 2,368 113 2,481 F I 15.o7•0 Yes w m m N V TABLE 8 (Continued) 204o Level of Service - Orange County AFLU Maximum Land Use Density Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Cap. Back Trips AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% _Si ? From To Maguire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector 2 D 790 1.2% 52,370 78 52,448 F q 2,834 9 2,843 F 1.14% No Roberson Rd/Tomyn Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 2. % 56,177 175 56,352 F 2,881 3 2,884 F 0.1 No Tom n Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D i,800 3.5% 57,861 22 8,o88 F 2,789 4 2,793 F 0.22% No Old Winter Garden Road S.R.o Collector 4 D 1,8o0 4.4% 45,880 285 46,165F 2,054 5 12,059 F 0.28% No S.R. 5o Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 D 1,800 5.2% 26,230 337 26,567 C 1,213 6 1,219 C 0.33% No Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial 2 o 7. % ,833 86 26,319 F 1,2 8 1,255 F 1.07% No StoryRd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 0 9.0% 27,85 8 28,440 F 1,397 10 1,407 F 1. % No Kissimmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 640 12.2% 26,548 790 27,338 F 1,089 13 1,102 F 2.03% No Marshall Farms Rd tD S.R. 0 Ma ire Rd Collector 2 6 o 2.1% 4,370 136 4,506 C 219 2 221 C 0. 1% No McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Ingram Rd Collector 2 D 600 0.9% 7,240 58 7,298 D 342 1 343 D 0.1 No Ingram Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector z D 600 1.3% 6,570 81 6,651 D 310 1 311 D 0.17% No McKe St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 68o 2.8% 7,469 181 7,6 o E 353 20 373 D 2.9 % No Montgomery Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 640 0. % 4,320 32 4,352 C 217 4 221 C o.63% No Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 438 Flewelling St Collector 2 D 640 0.0% 4,16o 0 4,16o C 247 0 247 C 0.00% No Ocoee -A o ka Rd West SR 438 SR 438 East Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 750 25.6% 21,520 1,658 23478 F 1,o44 27 1,071 F 3.6o% Yes SR 38 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector 2 E 750 45.7% 21,693 2,960 24,653 F 1,187 49 1,236 F 6. % Yes Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 750 24.5% 18,529 1,587 20,116 F 1,181 26 1,207 F 3.4 Yes Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector 2 E 750 25.1% 19,805 1,625 21,430 F 1,262 179 1,441 F 23.87% Yes Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd Collector z E 750 30.9% 120,402 2,001 22,403 F 1,2 221 11,435 F 29.4 Yes Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 1o.6% 124,033 686 24, 19 1 F 1,350 76 1, 26 F 10.13% Yes West Rd McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 9.5% 26,985 615 27,600 F 1,444 68 1,512 F 9.07% Yes McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 880 8.4% 41,358 544 41,902 F 2,072 6o 2,132 F 6.82% Yes Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector 2 E 88o 4.0% 73,402 259 73,661 F 3,369 29 3,398 F 3. o% Yes Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 88o 3.4% 48,101 220 48,321 F 1 2,132 24 2,156 F 2.7 % No Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 1.8% 53,930 117 54,047 F 2,997 2 2,999 F 0.11% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 3.2% 48,290 207 48,497 F 2,694 3 2,697 F 0.17% No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1800 2.1% 47,150 133 47,283F 2,6og 2 2,611 F o.i1% No Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 1. % 46,oio 84 46,o94F 2,524 1 2,525 F o.o6% No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 0.9% 44,880 58 144,938 F 2,439 1 2,440 F o.o6% No Orlando Ave BlufordAve Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 68o 0.9% 9,86o 58 9,918 D 488 6 494 D 0.88% No Palm Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 6 o 22. % 4,470 1,457 ,927 C 20 161 68 D 25.16% Yes Pine St East Crown Point Rd Local 2 D 6 o 21.2% 4,470 1,373 5,843 C 007 23 230 C 3.59% Yes Pine Street Pro'ectSite Palm Dr Local 2 D 640 43.7% 730 2,830 , 60 C 1 47 88 C 7. % Yes Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling St Collector 2 D I 68o 1.1% 2,840 1 71 1 2,911 1 C 1 191 1 8 1 199 C 1.18% No TABLE 8 (Continued) 2o4o Level of Service - Oranee County AFLU Ma7dmum Land Use Density Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Adopted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir TraflPic Project P.M. Peak LOS I Cap. Back 'his AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic AFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? From/To Russell Dr Flewellin St Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 68o o. % 5,032 26 5,058 C 296 3 299 C o. % No S.R 8 Tubb SV Tildenville School Rd Minor Arterial z E 88o 6. % 21809 421 22,230 F 1121 7 1128 V 0.80% No Tildenville School Rd Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 7.6% 9,930 489 10,419 C 550 54 60 C 6.14% Yes Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial 2 E 950 7.6% 12,770 489 13,259 D 740 8 748 D o.84% No Dillard St 9th St Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 10.1% 24,86o 654 25,514 C 1,093 11 1,10 C 0.55% No 9th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 16.2% 28,68o i,o 9 29,729 C 1,358 17 1,375 C 0.8 % No E. Crown Point Rd SR 429 Minor Arterial 2 E 840 3.0% 28,100 194 28,294 F 1,390 3 1,393 F 0.36% No SR 2 Bowness Rd Minor Arterial z E 840 7.1% 23,925 46o 24,385 F 1,340 51 1,391 F 6.o Yes Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 1 7.1% 23,925 46o 1 24,385 F 1 1,262 51 1,313 F 6.o Yes Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 840 19.9% 23,029 1,285 1 24,314 F 1,142 142 1,284 F 16.go% Yes Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 16.7% ig,813 1081 120,894 F 977 119 1,o96 F 14.1 Yes Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial z E 840 15.3% 22,930 991 23,921 F 1,057 1 16 1,073 F 1.90% No Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9.7% 28,97o 625 29,595 C 1,371 1 10 1,381 C 0.50% No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9.1% 32,110 586 32,696 C 1,424 10 1,434 C o. o% No Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 8.2% 35,240 531 35,771 C 1,476 9 11,485 C 0.30% No A o ka-Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 1 3,020 4.4% 51,100 282 51,382 C 2,076 31 12,107 C 1.03% No S.R. 5o (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.2% 69,564 78 69,642 F 1 3,267 9 3,276 F o. o% No SR 429 Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1. % 68,o7o 84 68,154 F 3,o68 9 3,077 F o. o% No Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0.1% 67,720 6 1 67,726 F 2,922 1 2,923 C 0.0 % No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0. % 6o, zo 32 6o,452 F 2,852 1 2,853 C 0.03% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.8% 108,195 117 108,312 F 4,512 2 1 4,514 F 0.07% No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 1 3,020 1.7% 73,515 107 73,622 F 3,058 2 3,o6o F 0.07% No Story Rd 9th St SR 429 Collector 2 E 790 1.5% 13,897 94 13,991 C 774 10 784 D 1.27% No SR 29 Maguire Rd Collector z E 790 1. % 33,620 97 33,717 F 1,711 2 1,713 F o. % No Taylor St Franklin St Mckey St Collector 2 D 68o 5.6% 5,363 363 5,726 C 252 6 258 C o.88% No West Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 68o 0.1% 43,489 6 43,495 F 2,035 1 2,036 F 0.15% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Mon ome Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.9% 9,860 8 9,918 D 1 1 18 D o.16% No Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.3% 12,570 81 12,651 D 622 1 623 D oa6% No Wurst Rd Ave Adair St Collector z D 680 0.2% 8,540 13 8,5 D 441 1 2 D o. % No [lakEewood St AD. is Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0.3% 8,800 19 8,819 D 456 2 58 D 0.29% No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumes from City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 Luke Transportation En2ineerinff Consultants, Inc. The analysis of projected traffic conditions for the PFLU maximum density (7,106,378 SF of Industrial space) was accomplished as shown in Table 9 for the 2025 short-range analysis and Table 10 for the 2040 long-range analysis. Under the 2025 analysis 36 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 40 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Twenty-four of the Year 2025 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. Under the 2040 analysis 56 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 60 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service. All the remaining roadway segments in the 2040 analysis will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Twenty-seven of the Year 2040 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. The analysis of projected traffic conditions for the PFLU proposed density (480,560 SF of Industrial space) change was accomplished as shown in Table 11 for the 2025 short-range analysis and Table 12 for the 2040 long-range analysis. Under the 2025 analysis 24 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 29 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. None of the Year 2025 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. Under the 2040 analysis 54 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 57 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service. All the remaining roadway segments in the 2040 analysis will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. None of the Year 2040 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 29 TABLE 9 202- Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (i) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Cap. Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? From To A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 680 0.5% 6,973 97 7,070 D 362 11 373 D 1.62% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.2% 6,973 39 7,012 D 362 4 366 D 0.59% No Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 o.6% 4,785 107 1 4,892 C 225 2 1 227 C 0. 1% No Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 4 D 1,470 0.1% 10,730 19 10,749 C 557 2 559 C o. % No SR 50Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 6 o 0.1% 6,496 19 6,515 D 312 0 312 D 0.00% No Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 2 D 640 2.1% 8,353 408 8,761 D 511 7 518 D 1.09% No S.R. o Geneva St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 5.4% 11,033 1,049 12,082 D 704 17 721 F 2.66% No Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial z D 6 o 0.1% 9,036 19 9,055 D 99 0 99 D o.00% No Orlando Rd McKe St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 1.6% ,377 311 9,688 D 6 5 648 E 0.78% No McKe St S.R 8 Minor Arterial 2 D 640 0. % 9,718 78 96 D 688 1 689 F o.16% No S.R. 438 Rewis St Collector 2 E 68o 0.8% 9,856 155 10,011 D 647 650 E o. 4% No Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR 29 Lakewood Ave Collector E 1, o0 0% 1, 8 2,016 C 1, 1 10 1,481 C o. 9% No Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd Collector 4 E 1 oo 10.0% 22,4o6 1,943 24,349 C 1,030 32 1,o62 C 1.88% No Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E 1,700 8.0% 29,667 11554 31,221 C 1,327 26 1,353 C 1.53% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 4 E i, oo 6.9% 36,000 1,331 37,331 L F 1,635 147 1,782 F 8.65% Yes Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Collector 4 E 1 2,000 6.2% 31,071 1,195 32,266 C 1,556 20 1 1,576 C 1.00% No Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector 4 E 2,000 3.2% 35,20o 622 35,822 C 1,497 10 1,507 C o. o% No Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 2.8% 31,049 534 31,583 C 1,553 9 1,562 C 1 o. 5% No Clarke Rd S.R. o White Rd Collector 4 D i,800 1. % 28,300 291 28,591 C 1,492 5 1,497 C 0.28% No White Rd S.R. 438 Collector 4 D i,800 2.6% 33,373 505 33,878 C 1,603 8 1,611 C o. 4% No S.R 4 8 A.D. Mims Rd Collector 4 D i,800 0.7% 24,2o6 136 24,342 C 1,257 15 1,272 C 0.83% No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 750 0.1% 21,376 19 21,395 F 1,161 2 1,163 F 0.2 No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 750 0. 20,707 136 20,843 F 1,125 15 1,140 F 2.00% No East Crown Point Rd SR 438 Palm Dr Collector 2 D 640 22.3% 16,233 4,332 20,565 F 706 479 1,185 F 8 % Yes Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E 750 14.9% 13,400 2,895 16,295 F 791 48 839 F 6.40% Yes Geneva St Ma ire ltd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 6.o% 9,81z 1,166 10,978 D 579 129 708 E 18.9 Yes_ Haekne -Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.7% 2,761 136 2,897 C 163 15 178 C 2.34% No Ingram Rd McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 o.6% 5,600 117 5,717 C 282 13 295 C 2.03% _ No Kissimmee Ave Ma ire Rd McKey St Collector 2 D 640 1.7% 3,024 321 3,345 C 161 5 166 C o. 8% No Lakewood Ave Rewis St Wurst Rd Collector 2 E o 0.8% 8,282 155 8, C 3 542 C o. o% No Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 1.5% 13,400 291 13,691 C 791 5 796 F o.67% No Fuller's Cross Rd/ Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 E 750 13.0% 1 13,400 12,526 1 15,926 F 791 1 279 1 1,070 F 1 37.20% Yes TABLE 9 (Continued) 2o2.q Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? From To Maguire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector 2 D 790 1.6% 40,282 311 40,593 F 2,180 34 2,214 F 4.30% Yes Roberson Rd/Tomyn Rd Collector 4 D i,800 3. % 38,743 661 39,404 F 1,987 11 1,998 F o.61% No Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector D i,800 1 3.9% 38,703 758 39,461 F 1,865 13 1,878 F o. 2% No Old Winter Garden Road S.R. so Collector 4 D 1,800 6.6% 35,292 11,282 36,574 F 1,580 21 1 i,6oi C 1.1 No S.R. o Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 D i,800 8. % 17,200 1,651 18,851 C Z95 27 822 C 1.50% No Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 75o 1o.6% 17,633 2,059 19,692 F 851 34 885 F 4.53% Yes Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 D 750 17.5% 18,633 3,400 22,033 F 934 56 990 F 7. Yes Kissimmee Ave S.R.38 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 D 640 17.2% 18,500 3,342 21,842 F 759 55 814 F 8. 9% Yes Marshall Farms Rd S.R. 5oZ Maguire Rd Collector 2 D 1 640 2.1% 1 3,36o 408 1 3,768 C 168 7 175 C 1.09% No McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Ingram Rd Collector 2 D 600 1.9% 5,566 359 5,925 C 263 6 269 C 1.00% No In am Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 600 1.6% 5,057 311 5,368 C 239 5 C 0.83% No McKey St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 68o 1.5% 5,432 291 5,723 E 256 32 288 C 4.71% Yes Montgomery Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.1% 3,326 10 3,336 C 167 1 168 C o.16% No Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 38 Flewel' St Collector 2 D 640 0.0% 3,203 0 3,203 C 190 0 190 C 0.00% No Ocoee -Apopka Rd West SR 8 SR 8 East Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 750 27.0% 16,555 5,246 21,8ol F 803 87 890 F 11.6o% Yes SR 438 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector 2 E 750 45.0% 14,8o8 8,743 23,551 F 810 144 954 F 19.20% Yes Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 1 750 24.2% 1 12,648 4,702 1 17,350 F 8o6 78 884 F 1o. o% Yes Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector 2 E 750 24.7% 13,519 4,799 18,318 F 862 530 1,392 F 7o.67% Yes Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 30.4% 13,926 5,go6 1 832 F 829 653 1,482 F 8 .o % Yes Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 14.2% 16,0 6 2,759 18,835 F 903 3051,208 F 4o.6 Yes West Rd/McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 13.3% 17,354 2,584 19,938 F 928 286 1,214 F 38.13% Yes McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 880 10.9% 18,300 2,118 20,418 F 917 234 1,151 F 26. 9% Yes Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector 2 E 88o 4.8% 21,400 933 22, 3 F 982 1o3 1,o851 F 11.7o% Yes Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 880 44% 18,9oo 855 19,755 F 838 94 932 F 1o.68% Yes Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 2.6% 41,481 495 41,976 F 2,305 8 2,313 F o.44% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 •5% 37,145 874 38,019 F 2,072 14 2,o86 F o. 8% No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial 4 E i,800 4.1% 36,270 797 37,o67 F 2,007 13 2,020 F 0.72% No Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,8o0 3.3% 35,395 641 36,036 F 1,941 11 1,952 F o.61% No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 2.9% 34,521 563 35,084 D 1,876 9 1,885 F 0.50% No Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 68o 0.9% 6,800 167 6,967 D 336 18 354 D 2.65% No Palm Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 6 o 21.3% 3,438 4,138 7,576 D 1 g 457 616 D 71.41% Yes Pine St East Crown Point Rd Local 2 D 640 23.6% 3,438 4,585 1 8,023 D 159 1 76 z3s C 11.88% Yes Pine Street Project Site Palm Dr Local 2 D 640 44 9% 56o 8,723 9,283 D 31 144 175 C 22. o% Yes Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling St Collector 2 D 68o 1.2% 2,184 z33 z,417 C 147 26 173 C 3.82% Yes s L TABLE 9 (Continued) 2o2s Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Roadway Name Functional Class # Lanes Adopted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir 1Y affic Project P.M. Peak LOS I Cap. Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? From o Russell Dr Flewelli St Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 68o o. % 2,900 78 2,978 C 171 9 180 C 1.32% No S.R 8 Tubb St TSldenville School Rd Minor Arterial z E 88o 5.9% 11,300 1,146 12,446 C 581 19 600 C 2.16% No Tildenville School Rd/Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 8.0% 7,637 1,554 9,191 C 423 172 595 C 19.55% Yes Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial 2 E 950 8.0% 9,821 1,554 11,375 D 569 26 595 D 2.74% No Dillard St 9th St Minor Arterial 4 1 E 1 2,000 11.2% 19,124 2,1 6 21, oo C 841 36 877 C 1.80% No 9th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 18.4% 22,o64 3,569 25,633 C 1,045 59 1,12 C 2.95% No E. Crown Point Rd SR 429 Minor Arterial 2 E 840 2.8% 21,616 544 22,16o F 1,070 9 1,079 F 1.0 No SR 29 Bowness Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 6.1% 16 oo 1,185 17,685 F 924 131 1,0 F 1 .6o% Yes Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Minor Arterial z E 840 6.1% 16,500 1185 17,685 F 871 131 1,002 F 15.6o% Yes Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 17.8% 16,748 3,458 20,2o6 F 830 382 1,212 F 5. 8% Yes Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial z E 8 0 .7% ,o6 3,050 18,117 F 837 i,08o F 40.12% Yes Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 . % 17,638 2,623 20,261 F 8 856 F 5.12% Yes Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial E 2,000 9.3% 22,288 1,80 ,o C 1,0 0 1,08 C 1. 0% No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial E 2,000 8. 699 i,6 o 26,389 C 1,0g 28 1,1 C 1 0% No Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E ,ozo .9% 27,110 1,5 28,6 C 1,136 1161 C o.8 % No Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 4.7% 39,3o8 913 40,221 C 1,597 1o1 1,698 C 3.34% Yes S.R 0 (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0. % 52,900 78 52,978 C 2,485 9 12,494 C 0.30% No SR 429 Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0.4% 52,359 78 52,437 C 2,36o 9 12,369 C 0.30% No Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 o. % 52,091 78 52,i6g C 2,248 9 2,2 C 0.30% No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.5% 46,480 291 46,771 C 2,194 2,199 C 0.1 No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020. 1 4.3% 61,300 835 62,135 2,556 14 2,570 C o. 6% No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 1 3,020 4.0% 50,700 777 51,477C 1 2,109 13 2,122 C 0.43% No Story Rd 9th St SR 429 Collector 2 E 790 0.8% 7,941 155 8,o96 C 442 17 459 C 2.1 % No SR 29Maguire Rd Collector 2 E 790 0.9% 16,400 175 16,575 F 835 3 838 F 0.38% No Ta for St Franklin St Mckey St Collector z D 680 3.5% 3,900 680 4,580 C 184 11 195 C 1.62% No West Rd Ocoee- o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 68o 0.8% 22,533 148 22,681 F 1,o55 16 1,o i 2.55% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Montgomery Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 640 0. % 6,800 167 6,967 D 356 3 359 D 0.47% No Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.0% 9,668 194 9,862 D 478 3 481 D 0.47% No Worst Rd Lakewood Ave Adair St Collector 2 D 6801 0.5% 6,571 97 6,668 D 339 11 350 D 1.62% No Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Collector 2 D 680 1 0.39% 6,772 58 6,83o D 351 6 357 D o.88% No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumes from City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 :1 crD TABLE 10 2oao Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily Tragic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir TYaffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS %of LOS Std. 3% Si ? From/To A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.3% 9,o6o 58 9,n8 D 470 6 476 D o.88% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 1 2 E 68o 0.2% 9,o6o 39 91099 D 470 4 474 D 0.59% No Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.0% 6,220 194 6, 1 D 293 3 296 C o. No Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 50 Collector 4 D i,47o 0.1% 13,950 19 13,969 D 724 2 726 D 0.1 % No SR o Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 6 o 0.0% 8,440 0 8,440 D 4o6 0 4o6 D 0.00% No Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 2 D 640 1.5% 1o,860 291 11,151 D 664 5 669 E 0.78% No S.R.o Geneva St Minor Arterial 2 D 6 0 4.1% 14,340 797 15,137 F 915 13 928 F 2.03% No Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 6 o 0. 11,750 136 11,886 D 779 z 781 F o. 1% No Orlando Rd McKey St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 5.8% 12,190 1,127 13,317 F 836 19 855 F 2. 7% No McKe St S.R. 438 Minor Arterial 2 D 6 o 2.8% 12,630 544 13,174 E 894 9 903 F 1. 1% No S.R. 38 Rewis St Collector 2 E 68o 2.0% 12,810 389 13,199 E 841 6 847 F 0.88% No Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR z Lakewood Ave Collector 4 E 1, oo 5.9% 59,723 1,146 6o,869 F 2,794 19 2,813 F 1.12% No Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd Collector 4 E 1, oo 9.9% 35,514 1,923 37,437 F 1,633 32 166 D 1.88% No Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E 1, oo 8.2% 58,592 1,593 6o,185 F 2,621 26 2,6 F 1.53% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 4 E 1, oo 6. % 78,120 1,2 9, F 3,549 134 3,683 F 7,88% Yes Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Collector E 2,000 4• 40,390 913 41,303 F 2,022 15 2,0 F o. 5% No Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector 4 E 2,000 2.2% 54,736 427 1 55,163 F 2,327 7 2,334 F o. % No Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 2.2% 40,36o 418 0,778 F 2,019 7 2,o26 F o. % No Clarke Rd S.R.o White Rd Collector 4 D i,800 2.6% 40,611 5o5 1,116 F 2,141 8 2,149 F o. % No White Rd S.R. 438 Collector 4 D 18o0 3.9% 43,38o, 748 128 F 2,083 12 2,095 F o.6 No S.R. 438 A.D. Mims Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 1.2% 34,736 233 34,969 D i,8o3 26 1,829 F 1.44% No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 750 0.5% 29,392 97 29,489 F 1,597 11 1,6o8 F 1. % No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 750 1.0% 28 72 194 28,666 F 1,547 21 1,568 F 2.80% No East Crown Point Rd SR 8 Palm Dr Collector 2 D 6 o 20. % 4o,o96 3,934 44,030 F 1,744 435 2,179 F 6 .9 Yes Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E o 18.3% 40,133 3,546 43,679 F 2, 68 9 2,427 F 7.87% Yes Geneva St Ma wire Rd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 2.8% 12,76o 544 1 13,304 D 753 6o 813 F 8.82% Yes Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarke RdJ Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.7% 3,590 136 3,726 C 212 15 227 C 2.34% No IngnMn Rd McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 1.5% 14,588 291 14,879 F 734 32 766 F 5.00% Yes Kissimmee Ave Ma ire Rd McKey St Collector 2 D 640 2.7% 3,930 515 4,445 C 210 9 219 C 1.41% No Lakewood Ave Rewis St/Wurst Rd Collector 2 E 750 0.9% 10,770 175 A10,945 I C 701 3 04 C 0.40% No Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd Collector 2 E o 1.8% 4o,i33o 14483 F 2,368 6 2,3741 $ J o.8o% No Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 E 750 15.8% 40,13 3,070_L43,2o3 F 2,368 339 2,707 F J 45.7o% Yes TABLE io (Continued) 2o4o Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Maximum Land Use Density Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic JPrcjectP.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips IDS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total I Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S" ? From/To Maguire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector 2 D 790 1.2% 52,370 233 52,603 F 2,834 26 2,86o F 3.29% Yes Roberson RdITomyn Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 2. 56,177 5 56,702 F 2,881 9 2,890 F 0.50% No Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D i,800 3.5% 57,861 680 58,541 F 2,789 11 2,80o F o.61% No Old Winter Garden Road S.R. so Collector 4 D 18o0 4.4% 45,88o 855 46,735 F 2,054 1 14 2,o68 F o. 8% No S.R. 501 Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 D 1,8o0 5.2% 26,230 1,010 27,240 C 1,213 17 1,230 C o. 4% No Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 750 7.5% 1 25,833 1,457 27,290 F 1,247 24 1 11271 F 3.20% Yes Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 D I 75o 9.0% 27,857 1,749 29,6o6 F 1,397 29 1,426 F 3.8 Yes Kissimmee Ave/ S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 D 640 12.2% 26,548 2,370 28,918 F i,o89 39 1,128 F 6.o9% Yes Marshall Farms Rd S.R. 50Maguire Rd Collector 2 D 640 2.1% 4,370 408 4,778 C 219 7 226 C 1.09% No McCormick Rd Ocoee -Apo ka Rd Ingram Rd Collector 2 D 600 0.9% 7,240 175 Z,415 D 342 3 345 D o. o% No In am Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 600 1. % 1 6,570 243 6,813 D 310 4 314 D o.6 No McKe St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 68o 2.8% 7,469 544 8,013 E 353 60 413 D 8.82% Yes Mont ome Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 6 0 0. % 4t320 97 4,417 C 217 11 228 C 1. z% No Ocoee Hills Rd S.R 8 Flewelli St Collector 2 D 6 o 0.0% 4,i6o o 4,i6o C 247 o 247 C 0.00% No Ocoee -Apopka Rd West SR 8 SR 8 East Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 750 2 .6% 21,520 4,974 26,494 F 1,044 82 1,126 F 10. 3% Yes SR 38 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector z E 750 45.7% 21,693 8,879 30,572 F 1,187 147 1,334 F 19.6o% Yes Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 750 24.5% 18,529 4,760 23,289 F 1,181 79 1,26o F 10. % Yes Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector 2 E 750 25.1% 19,805 4,876 24,681 F 1,262 539 1,801 F 71.87% Yes Demastus Ln Pullers Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 1 30.9% 20,402 6,oO3 26,4o5 F 1,214 663 1,877 F 88. o% Yes Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 1o.6% 24,033 2,059 126,092 F 1,350 228 1,578 F 30.40% Yes West Rd McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 9.5% 26,985 1,846 28,831 F 1,444 204 1,648 F 27.20% Yes McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 880 8.4% 41,358 1,632 42,990 F 2,072 180 2,252 F 20. 5% Yes Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector 2 E 88o 4.0% 73,402 777 74,179 F 3,36986 3,455 F 9. Yes Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 88o 3.4% 48,1o1 661 48,762 F 2,132 73 2,205 F 8. o% Yes Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E i,800 1.8% 53,930 350 F 2,99 6 3,003 F 0.33% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 3.2% 48,290 622 F 2,694 10 2,704 F o.56% No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial E 1,800 2.1% 47,150 98 F 2,6o9 2,616 F 0. 9% No Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Minor Arterial E 1,800 1.3% 6,o10 253 h46,263 F 2,5 2, 28 F 0.22% No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E i,800 0.9% ,88o 1 F 2,439 3 2,442 F 0.1 No Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 68o 0.9% 9,86o 175 io,035 D 488 19 507 D 2. 9% No Palm Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 640 22.5% 4,470 4,371 8,841 D 207 483 690 F 75.47% Yes Pine St East Crown Point Rd Local 2 D 640 21.2% 4,47o 4,ng 8,589 D 207 68 275 1 C I 1o.6 % Yes Pine Street Project Site Palm Dr Local z D 640 43.7% 730 8,490 99220 D 41 140 181 C 21.88% Yes Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling St Collector 2 1 D 68o 1.1% 2,840 214 3,054 C 191 24 215 C 3.53% Yes L w VI TABLE 10 (Continued) 2o4o Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Maximum Land Use Densitv Road wa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak L.OS I Cap. Back Trips PFLU Tri s Total Tri s LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips L.OS % of L.OS Std. 3% S' ? From To Russell Dr Flewelli St Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0. % 5,032 78 5,110 C 296 9 305C 1. 2% No S.R 438 Tubb St Tildenville School Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 6. % 21,809 1,263 23,072 F 1,121 21 1, 2 F 2.39% No Tildenville School Rd Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 7.6% 9,930 1,467 11,397 C 550 162 712 C 18.41% Yes Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial z E I 9 0 7.6% 12,770 1,467 ,2 7 D 740 24 764D 2.53% No Dillard St 9th St Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 10.1% 24,86o 1,962 26,822 C 1,093 32 1,125 C t.6o% No 9th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 16.2% 28,680 3,147 31,827 C 1,358 52 1,410 C 2.6o% No E. Crown Point Rd SR 429 Minor Arterial 2 E 8 0 3.0% 28,100 583 28,683 F 1,390 10 1,400 F 1.1 % No SR 29 Bowness Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 1 7.1% 23,925 1,379 25,304 F 1,340 152 1,492 F i8.1o% Yes Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Minor Arterial z E 8 0 1 7.1% 23,9251,379 25,304 F 1,262 152 1,414 F 18.1o% Yes Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 840 19.9% 23,029 3,856 26,885 F 1,142 426 1,568 F 50.71% Yes Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 84o 16.7% 19,813 13,244 23,057 F 977 1 359 1,336 F 42. % Yes Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 15.3% 22,930 12,972 25,902 F 1,o57 49 1,1o6 F 5.83% Yes Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9.7% 28,970 1,875 30,845 C 1,371 31 1,402 C 1.55% No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9.1% 32,110 1,758 33,868 C 1,424 29 1,453 C 1. % No Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 8.2% 35,240 1,593 36,833 C 1,476 26 11,502 C o.86% No Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 4.4% 51,100 845 51,945 C 2,076 93 2,169 C 1 3.08% Yes S.R. 5o (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.2% 69,564 233 69,797 F 1 3,26726 3,293 F o.86% No SR 2q Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 1 3,020 1. % 1 68 0 0 253 68,323 F 3,o68 28 3,o96 F 0.9 % No Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0.1% 67,720 19 67,739 F 2,922 2 2,924 C 0.07% No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 1 6 D 3,020 0. % 6o, 20 97 6o,517 F 2,8 2 2 2,854 C 0.0 No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.8% io8,i95 35o 1o8,545 F 4,512 1 6 4,518 1 F o.2o% I No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.7% 73,515 321 73,836 F 3,058 5 3,063 F o.17% No Story Rd 9th St SR 429 Collector 2 E 790 1.5% 13,897 282 14,179 C 774 31 805 F 3.92% Yes SR 422Z Maguire Rd Collector 2 E 1 790 1. % 33,620 291 33,911 F 1,711 5 1,716 F o.6 % No Ta or St Franklin St Mckey St Collector 2 D 680 5.6% 5,363 i,o88 6,451 C 252 18 2 o C 2.65% No West Rd Ocoee- o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 68o 0.1% 43,489 19 43,508 F 2,035 2 29037 F 0.29% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Montgomery Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.9% 9,86o 175 10,0 D 517 3 520 D 0. No Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.3% 12,570 243 12,813 D 622 4 626 D o.6 % No Wurst Rd IakewoodAve Adair St Collector 2 D 68o 0.2% 8,540 39 8,579 D 441 4 445 D 0.59% No Adair Stj A.D. Mims Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0.3% 8,800 58 8,858 D 456 6 462 1 D I o.88% No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumes from City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., zozl TABLE ii 2o2-q Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Prouosed Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily TY'affic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% I S' ? From To A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 68o o. % 6,973 (2o) 6,953 D 362 (2) 36o D -0.29% No Clarke Rdl Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.2% 6,973 (8) 6,965 D 362 (1) 361 D -0.1 % No Adair St Worst Rdl Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 6 o o.6% 4,785 (2) 4,762 C 225 0 225 1 C 0.00% No Blackwood Ave Old Wmter Garden Rd. SR 50 Collector 4 D 1,470 0.1% 10,730 () 10,726 C 557 o 557 C 0.00% No SR 5o Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 640 0.1% 6,496 () 6,492 D 312 0 312 D 0.00% No Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 2 D 64o 2.1% 8,353 (86) 8,267 D 511 (1) 510 D -o.16% No S.R. o Geneva St Minor Arterial 2 D 6 0 5.4% 11,0 (221) 10,812 D 7o4 () 7oo F -o.63% No Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 640 0.1% 9,036 () 1 9,032 D 599 o 599 D o.00% No Orlando Rd McKey St Minor Arterial 2 D 640 1.6% 9,377 (65) 9,312 D 643 (1) 642 E -o.16% No McKe St S.R. 438 Minor Arterial 2 D 640 0. % 9,718 (16) 9,702 D 688 0 688 F 0.00% No S.R. 438 Rewis St Collector 2 E 68o o.8% 9,856 (33) 9,823 D 647 (1) 646 E -0.15% No Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR 2 Lakewood Ave Collector 4 E 1,700 3.0% 31,433 (1 ) 31,310 C 1,471 (2) 1,469 C -0.12% No Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd Collector 4 E 1 oo 10.0% 22,4o6 0) 21,997 C 1,030 O 11,023 C -0. 1% No Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E 1,7oo 8.0% 29,667 1 (2) 129,340 C 1,327 (5) 1,322 C -0.29% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 4 E i, oo 6.9% 36,000 (28o)l 35,720 F 1,635 1 (31) 1,60 C -1.82% No Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Collector 4 1 E 2,000 6.2% 31,071 (252) 30,819 C 1,556 (4) 1,552 C -0.20% No Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector E 2,000 .2% ,200 ( 1) o69 C 1,497 (2) 1,495 C -0.10% No Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 2.8% 31,049 (11 ) 30,936 C 1,553 (2) 1,551 C -0.10% No Clarke Rd S.R. o White Rd Collector 4 D t,800 1. % 28,300 (61) 28,239 C 1,492 (1) 1,491 C -o.o6% No White Rd S.R. 438 Collector 4 D 1,800 2.6% 33,373 (1o6) 33,267 C 1,603 (2) 1,6oi C -o.11% No S.R. 438 A.D. Mims Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 0.7% 24,2o6 (29) 24,177 C 1,257 (3) 1,254 C -0.17% No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 750 0.1% 21,376 1 O 21,372 F 1,161 o 1,161 F 0.00% No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 750 o. 20,707 (29) 20,678 F 1,125 (3) 1,122 F -o. 0% No East Crown Point Rd SR438 Palm Dr Collector 2 D 640 22.3% 16,233 (913) 15,320 F 7o6 (1oi) 6o5 D -15.78% No Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E 7 o 14.9% 13,400 (61o) 12,790 C 791 (10) 781 F -1.33% No Geneva St Ma ire Rd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 6.o% 9,812 (6) 9,566 D 579 (z) 552 D - . % No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector z D 640 0.7% 2,761 (29) 2,732 C 163 (3) 16o C -o. No Ingram Rd McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 o.6% 5,600 (25) 5,575 C 282 (3) 279 C -0. No Kissimmee Ave M ire Rd McKey St Collector 2 D 640 1.7% 3,0 (68) 2,956 C 161 (1) 16o C -o.16% No Lakewood Ave Rewis St Worst Rd Collector 2 E o 0.8% 8,282 ) 8,249 C 539 (1) 538 C -o. % No Worst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 1.5% 1 13,400 1 (61) 1 13,339 C 791 (1) 790 F -0.13% No Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 E 75o 13.0% 1 13,400 1 (532) 1 12,868 C 791 (59) 732 D -7.87% No n TABLE ii (Continued) 2oz5 Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Proposed Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (i) Project Trip Distribution Dail y 1Y afiic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic I Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total 'his LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? Fro o Maguire Rd -Trips Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector z D 790 1.6% 40,282 (65) 40,217 F 2,180 (7) 2,173 P -o.89% No Roberson Rd/Tomyn Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 3• % 38,743 (139) 38,604 F 1,987 (2) 1,985 V -0.11% No Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D 1,800 3.9% 38,703 (16o) 38,543 F 1,86 (3) 11,862 # ." -0.1 % No Old Winter Garden Road S.R So Collector 4 D i,800 6.6% 35,292 (270) 35,022 D 1,580 (4) 1,576 C 1 -0.22% No S-F- 50Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 D 1,800 8.5% 17,200 (348) 16,8 2 C 795 (6) 789 C -0.3 % No Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial z D I 75o 1o.6% 17,633 () 17,199 F 851 (7) 844 F -0.9 % No Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 D 750 i .5% 18,633 (16) 17,917 F 93 (12) 922 F -1.6o% No Kissimmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 D 640 17.2% 18,500 (704) 17,796 1 F 759 (12) 747 F -1.88% No Marshall Farms Rd S.R. 50Maguire Rd Collector 2 D 640 2.1% 3,360 (86) 3,274 C 168 (1) 167 C -o.16% No McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Ingram Rd Collector 2 D 600 1.9% 5,566 (6) 5,490 C 26 (1) 262 C -0.1 No Ingram Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 600 1.6% 5,057 (65) 4,992 C 239 (1) 238 C -0.17% No McKe St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 68o 1.5% 5,432 (61) 5,371 E 256 (7) 249 C -1.03% No MontgomeryRd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 0.1% 3,326 (2) 3,324 C 167 0 167 C 0.00% No Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 8 Flewelling St Collector 2 D 640 0.0% 3,203 0 3,203 C 190 0 190 C 0.00% No Ocoee -Apopka Rd West SR 438 SR 438 East Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 750 27.0% 16,555 (1,105) 15,450 F 803 (18) 785 F -2.40% No SR 8 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector 2 E 750 1 45.0% 14,808 (1,841) 12,967 C 810 1) 779 F -4.1 % No Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 75o 24.2% 12,648 ( o) 11,658 C 8o6 (16) 790 F -2.13% No Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector z E 750 M.7% 13,519 1,011) 12, o8 C 862 (112) 750 D -1 % No Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 30.4% 13,926 (1,244) 12,682 C 829 (137) 692 C -18.27% No Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 14.2% 16,0 6 (581) 15,495 F 903 (6) 839 -8.53% No West Rd McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 13.3% 17,354 (544) 16,8io F 928 (6o) 868 -8.00% No McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 88o 10.9% 18,300 (446) 17,854 F 917 (49) 868 D -5. 7% No Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector z E 88o 4.8% 21,400 (196) 21,20 F 982 (22) 96o '" -2. 0% No Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 88o 4.4% 18,9oo (180) 18,720 F 838 20) 818 C -2.2 No Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 2.6% 41,481 (10) 41,377 F 2,305 (2) 2,303 F -0.11% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,8o0 % 37,145 (18) 36,961 F 2,0 () 2,069 F -0.17% No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 4.1% 36,270 (168) 36,102 F 2,007 (3) 2,004 F -0.17% No Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,8o0 3.3% 35,395 () 35,260 D 1,941 (2) 1,939 F -o.11% No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 2. % 34,521 (119) 3 , 02 D 1,876 (2) 1,87 F -o.11% No Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Collector z D 68o 0.9% 6,800 (35) 6,765 D 336 (4) 332 D -0.59% No Pahn Drive Ocoee -A o ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 6 o 21.3% 8 (8 z) 2,566 C (6) 6 C - .00% No Pine St East Crown Point Rd Local z D 640 z .6% 8 66 2,472 C (16) 143 C -z. o% No Pine Street Project Site Palm Dr Local 2 D 640 44.9% 56o (1,837) (1,277) A 31 1 (31) o A - .84% No Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling St Collector 2 D 68o 1.2% 2,184 (49) 1 2,135 C 1 147 1 (5) 142 C -0.74% No TABLE ii (Continued) 202s Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Pronosed Land Use Densitv Roadway Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project Trip Distribution Daily Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? From o Russell Dr Flewellin St Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0.4% 2,900 (16) 2,884 C 171 (2) 169 C -0.29% No S.R 8 Tubb St T ildenville School Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 880 5.9% 11 00 ( 1) 11,059 C 581 () 577 C -0. 5% No Tildenville School Rd/Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 8.o% 7,637 (z) 7,3io C 423 (6) 387 C -4.09% No Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial z E 9 o 8.0% 9,821 ( 2) 9,494 D 569 () 564 D -0. % No Dillard St 9th St Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 11.2% 19,124 (458) 18,666 C 841 (8) 833 C -0.40% No 9th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 18.4% 22,o6 (7 2) 21,312 C 10 (12) 1,03 C -o.6o% No E. Crown Point Rd SR 429 Minor Arterial 2 E 84o 2.8% 21,616 (115) 21,501 F 1,070 (2) 1,o68 F -o.24% No SR 29 Bowness Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 6.1% 16, oo (z o) 16,2,5o D 924 (28) 896 F -3.33% No Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Minor Arterial 1 2 E 1 840 6.1% 16, oo (2 0) 16,25o D 8 (28) 843 F 1 - . % No Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 840 17.8% 16,748 (728) 16,020 D 830 (80) 750 C -9.52% No Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 84o 15.7% r5,o67 (642) 14,425 C 743 1 (1) 672 C -8.45% No Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 13.5% 17,638 (2) 1 1 ,o86 F 81 (9) 804 D -1.0 No Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9.3% 22,288 (381) 21,907 C 1905 (6) 1,0 9 C -0.30% No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 8. % 24,699 (356) 24,.343 C 1,o9 (6) 1,o89 C -o. o% No Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 020 7.9% 27,110 (323) 26,787 C 1,136 ) 1,131 C -0.1 No A o ka-Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 1 3,020 4.7% 1 39,308 (192) 39,116 1 C 1,597 (21) 1 1,576 C -o. o% No S.R 5o (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0. % 52,900 (16) 52,884 C 2,485 (2) 2,483 C -0.07% No SR 29 Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0. % 52,359 (16) 52,343 C 2, 6o (2) 2,358 C -0.0 No Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 0. % 52,091 (16) 52,075 C 2,248 (2) 2, 6 C -0.07% No Maguire 441 Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.5% 46,480 (61) 1 46,4ig C 2,1 (1) 2,193 C -o.o % No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 1 D 3,020 4.3% 61,300 1 (1 6) 1 61,124 F 2,556 (3) 2,553 C -0.10% No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 4.0% 50,700 (164) 150,536 C 2,109 (3) 2,1o6 C -0.10% No Story Rd 9th St SR 429 Collector 2 E 790 o.8% 7,941 (33) 7,908 C 442 () 438 1 C -0.51% No SR 29 Maguire Rd Collector z E 790 0.9% 16, oo () 16,363 F 8 (1) 834 F -0.1 % No Ta or St Franklin S!J Mckey St Collector 2 D 68o 3.5% 3,900 ) 3,757 C 18 (2) 182 C -0.29% No West Rd Ocoee- o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 68o 0.8% 22,533 (1) 22,502 F 1,055 (3) 1,052 F -0.44% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Montgomery Rd Clarke Rd Collector z D 6 o 0.9% 6,800 (35) 6,765 D 356 (1) 355 D -o.16% No Clarke LdZ Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 1.0% 9,668 (1) 9,627 D 478 (1) 477 D -o.16% No Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave Adair St Collector 2 D 68o 0.5% 6,571 (2o) 6, 51 C 339 (2) 337 D -0.29% No Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0.3% 6,772 (12) 6,76o D 351 (1) 350 D -0.15% No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumes from City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 W s ii TABLE 12 2o4o Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Prouosed Land Use Densitv RoadwayName Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (1) Project 'hip Distribution Daily Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Ca Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' ? From o A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.3% 9,o6o (12) 9,048 D 470 (1) 469 D -0.15% No Clarke RdZ Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 E 68o 0.2% 9,o6o (8) 9,052 D 470 (1) 469 D -0. % No Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector z D 640 1.0% 1 6,220 ( 1) 6,i7g C 2 (1) 292 C -o.16% No Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 5o Collector 4 D 1,470 0.1% 13,950 (4) 13,946 D 724 0 724 D o.00% No SR o Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 640 0.0% 8,440 0 8,440 D 4o6 0 4o6 D 0.00% No Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd. SR 50 Collector 2 D 640 1.5% 1o,86o (61) 10,799 D 66 (1) 663 E -o.16% No S.R.5o Geneva St Minor Arterial 2 D 6 0 4.1% i4,34o (168) 14,172 F 91 () 912 F -o. % No Geneva St Orlando Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 640 1 0. 11,750 (29) 11,721 D 779 o 779 F 0.00% No Orlando Rd McKey St Minor Arterial 2 D 6 0 5.8% -,190 (2 7) 1 11,953 D 836 1 () 832 F -o.63% No McKe St S.R. 438 Minor Arterial 2 D 640 2.8% 12,630 (115) 12,515 D 894 (2) 892 F -0.31% No S.R. 38 Rewis St Collector 2 E 68o 2.0% 12,810 (82) 12,728 E 841 (1) 84o F -0.15% No Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR429 Lakewood Ave Collector 4 E 1, oo 5.9% 59,7 (1) 59,482 F 2,79 (4) 2,790 F -0.24% No Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd Collector 4 E 1, oo 9.9% 35, (o) 35,1o9 F 1,633 () 1,626 D -0. 1% No Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Collector 4 E I 1, oo 8.2% 1 58,592 ( 6) 58,256 F 2,621 (6) 2,615 F -0.35% No Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 4 E 1,7oo 6.3% 78,120 (256)1 77,864 F 3,549 (28) 3,521 F -1.65% No A o ka-Vmeland Rd Hiawassee Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 40,390 (192) 40,198 F 2,022 (3) 2,oi9 F -0.15% No Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr Collector 4 E 2,000 2.2% 54,736 (90) 54,646 F 2,327 (1) 2,326 F -o.o % No Powers Dr Pine Hills Rd Collector 4 E 2,000 2.2% 40,36o (88) 40,272 F 2,019 (1) 2,018 F -0.05% No Clarke Rd S.R. 50White Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 2.6% 40,611 (1o6) 40,505 F 2,141 (2) 2,139 F -0.11% No White Rd S.R. 438 Collector 4 D 1,800 3.9% 43,380 (8) 43,222 F 2,083 (3) 2,o8o F -0.1 No S.R 8 A.D. Mims Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 1.2% 34,736 (49) 34,687 D 1,80 (5) 1,798 D -0.28% No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney -Prairie Rd Collector 2 D 750 0.5% 29,392 (20) 29,372 F 1,597 (2) 1,595 F -0.27% No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 75o 1.0% 28,472 (1) 28,431 F 1,547 (5) 1,542 F -o.6 % No East Crown Point Rd SR 8 Palm Dr Collector 2 D 640 20. % 40,o96 (829) 39,267 F 1, (92) 1 1,652 F - .38% No Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka North Lakewood Ave Collector 2 E 750 18.3% 40,133 (747) 9,386 F 2,368 (12) 2,356 F -1.60% No Geneva St M ire Rd Bluford Rd Collector 2 D 68o 2.8% 12,76o (115) 12,645 D 753 (13) 74o F -1.91% No Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 640 0. % 3,590 (29) 3,561 C 212 () 209 C -0. No Ingram Rd McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 D 640 1.5% 14,588 (61) 14,527 ., F -. 7 (7) 72 F -1.09% No Kissimmee Ave Ma ire Rd McKey St Collector z D 640 2.7% 3,930 (108) 3,822 C 210 (2) 208 C -0.31% No Lakewood Ave Rewis St Wurst Rd Collector 2 E 75o o. % 10,770 10,733 C 701 (1) oo C -0.1 % No Wurst Rd Fuller's Cross Rd Collector 2 E 75o 1.8% 40,133 ±(647) 40,059 F 2,368 (1) 2,367 F -0.13% No Fuller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Collector 2 E 750 15.8% 40,133 39,486 F 2,368 (71) 2,297 F -9.47% No TABLE 12 (Continued) 2o4o Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Pronosed Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Adopted (1) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Cap. Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS Back Traffic TripsTrips LOS %of LOS Std. g% S' 7 Fro o M ire Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd Collector 2 D 790 1.2% 52,370 (49) 52,321 F 2,834 t(2)2,879 F -o.63% No Roberson Rd om n Rd Collector 4 D 1,800 2.7% 6,1 11o) 6,o67 F 2,881 F -0.11% No Tom Rd Old Winter Garden Road Collector 4 D 1,8o0 % ,861 (143) ,718 F 2, 89 F -0.11% No Old Winter Garden Road S.R. 50 Collector 4 D 1,800 4.4% 45,880 (180) 145,700 F 2,054 1 (3) 2,051 F -0.17% No S.R. 50Marshall Farms Rd Minor Arterial 4 D 1,8o0 5.2% 26,230 (213) 26,o17 C 1,213 (4) 1,209 C -0.22% No Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 75o 7.5% 25,833 (o) 25,526 F 1,247 ) 1,242 F I -o.6 No Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Collector 2 D 75o 9.0% z ,85 (68) 27,489 F 1,397 (6) 1,391 F -0.80% No Kissimmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) Collector 2 D 640 12.2% 26,548 (499) 26,049 1 F 1,089 (8) 1,o8r F -1. % No Marshall Farms Rd S.R o Maguire Rd Collector 2 D 640 2.1% 1 4,37o (86) 4,284 C 219 (1) 1 218 C -o.16% No McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd am Rd Collector 2 D 600 0.9% 7,240 () 7,203 D J!iVam Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Collector 2 D 60o 1.3% 6,570 (51) 6,519 D 310 (1) 309 D -o.i7% No- McKeySt Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Collector 2 E 68o 2.8% 7,469 (115) 7,354 E 353 (13) 340 D -1.91% No Montgomery Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd Collector 2 D 640 0.5% 4,320 (20) 4,300 C 217 (2) 215 C -0.31% No Ocoee Hills Rd S.R 8 Flewelli St Collector 2 D 6 o 0.0% 4,i6o 0 4,16o C 247 o 247 C o.00% No Ocoee o ka Rd West SR 38 SR 438 East Silver Star Rd Collector 2 E 7.5o 25.6% 21,520 (1,048) 20,472 F 1,0 (1) 1,027 F -2.2 No SR 38 East Silver Star Rd Palm Dr Collector 2 E 750 21,693 (1,870) 19,823 F 1,18 (1) 1,156 F - .13% No Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent Collector 2 E 750 24.5% 18,529 (100) 17,526 F 1 181 (1) 1,164 F -2.2 % No Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln Collector 2 E I 75o 25.1% 19,805 (1,02) 18,778 F 1,262 (113) i,149 F -1 .o % No Demastus Ln Fullers Cross Rd Collector 2 E 750 30.9% 20,402 (1,264) 19,138 F 1,2 ( o) r,o7 F -18.6 No Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Collector 2 E 750 1o.6% 24,03 (434) 1 23,599 F 1,350 (8) 1,302 F -6.40% No West Rd McCormick Rd Collector 2 E 750 9.5% 26,985 (389) 26,596 F 1, (3) 1,401 F - . % No McCormick Rd Binion Rd Collector 2 E 880 8.4% 41,358 (344) 41,0 F z,o 2 (8) 2,034 F - . 2% No Binion Rd Harmon Rd Collector 2 E 88o 4.0% 73,402 (164) 73,238 F 3,369 (18) 3,351 F -2.0 % No Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd Collector 2 E 88o 3.4% 48,101 (139) 47,962 F 2,132 (1 ) 2,11 F -1. 0% No Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 1.8% 53,930 (74) 53,856 F 2,99 (1) 2,996 F -o.o6% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,8o0 3.2% 48,290 (131) 48,159 F 2,694 (2) 2,692 F -0.11% No Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 2.1% 47,150 (8) 47,o66 F 2,6o (1) 2,6o8 F -o.o6% No Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Minor Arterial E 1,800 1. % 46,olo () 45,957 F 2, (1) 2,523 F -o.o6% No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 1,800 0.9% 44,880 (7) 144,843 F 2,439 (1) 2,438 F -o.o6% No Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Collector 2 D 68o 0.9% 9,86o (37) 9,823 D 488 (4) 484 D -0.5 % No Patin Drive Ocoee -Apo ka Rd Pine St Local 2 D 640 1 22. % 4,479 (921) 3,549 C 20 (102) 10 C -15.9 % No Pine StJ East Crown Point Rd Local 2 D 640 21.2% 4,470 (868) 3,602 C zo (14) 193 C -2.19% No Pine Street Project Site Palm Dr Local 2 D 6 0 43.7% 730 (1,788) (1,058) A 1 Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling St Collector 2 D 680 1.1% 2,840 (45) 2,795 C 191 (5) 186 1 C 1 -0.74% No TABLE 12 (Continued) 2o4o Level of Service - City Of Ocoee PFLU Prouosed Land Use Densitv Roadwa Name Functional Class # Lanes Ado ted (i) Project Trip Distribution Dail Traffic Volumes P.M. Pk Hr Pk Dir Traffic Project P.M. Peak LOS Cap. Back Trips PFLU Trips Total Trips IDS Back Traffic PFLU Trips Total Trips LOS % of LOS Std. 3% S' 7 From o Russell Dr [Flewelliij St Willow Creek Rd Collector 2 D 68o 0. % o z (16) ,o16 C 296 (2) 29 C -0.2 % No 3.R 8 Tubb St Tildenville School Rd Minor Arterial z E 880 6. % 21,80 (266) 21,543 F 1,121 O 1,117 F -0. 5% No Tildenville School Rd Park Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 88o 7.6% 9,930 (309) 9,621 C 550 (34) 1 516 C -3.86% No Park Ave Dillard St Minor Arterial 2 E 950 7.6% 12, 0 (09) 12,461 D 740 (5) 735 D -o. 3% No Dillard StJ 9th St Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 10.1% 24,86o ) 24,447 C 1,093 () 1,o86 C -0.35% No 9th St E. Crown Point Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 16.2% 28,68o (66) 28,01 C 1,358 (11) 1,347 C -0.5 % No E. Crown Point Rd SR 429 Minor Arterial z E 8 0 3.0% 28,100 (12) 27,977 F 1,390 (2) 1,388 F -0. % No SR 29 Bowness Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 7.1% 23,925 (291) 23,634 F 1,340 (2) 1,308 F - .81% No Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd]Maguire Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 7.1% 1 23,925 (291) 23,634 F 1,262 (32) 1,230 F -3.81% No Ocoee -Apopka Rd Bluford Ave Minor Arterial 2 E 840 19.9% 23,029 (812) 22,217 F 1 1,142 (90) 1,052 F -10.71% 1 No Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 8 o 16.7% 19,813 (683) 1 19,130 F 1 9 (75) 1 902 F -8.9 % No Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd Minor Arterial 2 E 840 15.3% 22,930 (626) 22,3o4 F 1,0 (10) 1,047 F -1.19% No Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 1 2,000 9.7% 28,970 (395) 28,575 C 1,371 () 1,364 C -0.35% No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd Minor Arterial 4 E 2,000 9.1% 32,110 (370) 31,740 C 1, (6) 1,418 C -0.30% No Good Homes Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 8.2% 35,240 (6) 34,904 C 1,476 (6) 1, 7o C -0.20% No A o ka-Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd Minor Arterial 6 E 3,020 4.4% 1,100 (178) 50,922 C 2,076 (20) 2,056 C I -o.66% No S.R. So (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 Principal Arterial 1 6 D 3,020 1.2% 69,564 (9) 69,515 1 It J 3,26 O 13,262 F -0.1 No SR 2 Marshall Farms Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1. % 68,0 o () 68,o17 3,o68 (6) 3,o62 F -0.20% No Marshall Farms Rd ire Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 1 3,020 0.1% 67,720 () 67,716 4922 o 2,922 C 0.00% No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Principal Arterial 6 D ,020 0. % 6o,420 (20) 6o, oo . _ 2,8 2 0 2,8 z C 0.00% No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.8% lo8,1 (7) 1o8,121VM 4,512 (1) 4,511 F -0.03% No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd Principal Arterial 6 D 3,020 1.7% 73,515 (68) 3,447 '` 3,058 (1) 3,057 F -0.03% No Story Rd 9th St SR 429 Collector 2 E 790 1. % 13,897 (9) 13,838 C 7 () 767 D -o.89% No SR 429Z Maguire Rd Collector 2 E 790 1. % 33,62o (61) 33,559 F 1,711 (1) 1,710 F -0. % No Ta Ior St Franklin Stj Mckey St Collector 2 D 68o 5.6% 5,363 (229) 5,134 C 252 (4) 248 C -0. 9% No West Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Minor Arterial 2 D 680 0.1% 489 (4) 43,485 F 2,035 0 2,o F 0.00% No White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Mon ome Rd Clarke Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 0.9% 9,86o ) 9,823 D 517 Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Collector 2 D 6 o 1.3% 12,570 ( 1) 12,519 D 622 (1) 621 D -oa6% No Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave Adair St Collector 2 D 68o 0.2% 8, o (8) 8 32 D 441 (1) 440 D -0.15% No Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Collector 2 D 68o o. % 8,800 (12) 8,788 D 456 1 (1) 455 1 D -0.15% No (1) Adopted LOS and Roadway Service Volumesfrom City of Ocoee. Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2021 Luke Transportation Enzineering Consultants, Inc. Transit Typically, the average walking distance to a transit stop is a quarter -mile to a half -mile. The closest transit route is Route 105 (West Colonial) with a stop on SR 50 (Colonial Drive) just east of Maguire Road approximately 2.64 miles from the proposed development parcel. Current weekday headway for transit Route 105 is 30-minutes. Pedestrian No sidewalks currently exist along Ocoee Apopka Road (CR 437A) adjacent to the proposed development site. The future on -site sidewalk system should be constructed to serve any pedestrians of this development and should be designed to connect to any future external Ocoee Apopka Road (CR 437A) sidewalk systems to facilitate and encourage alternative modes of transportation. The intent is to create a pedestrian - friendly project with ample sidewalks and crosswalks within the Project with connections to any future external sidewalk systems adjacent to the proposed development. Park & Trails The closest trail to the Progress Commerce Park is the West Orange Trail (WOT) which is located approximately 1.14 miles west via Pine Street south to Palm Drive west to the trail on the west side of West Crown Point Road. A copy of the trail map is included in Appendix C. Provisions to accommodate bicycle access should be incorporated into the site plan. Page 1 42 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transvortation Enzineerinz Consultants, Inc. Study Conclusions Study Conclusions This study was undertaken for a Comprehensive Policy Plan Transportation Amendment for the proposed Progress Commence Park development site which is located on the west side of Ocoee -Apopka Road (CR 437) on a ±39.965-acres parcel to be annexed into the City of Ocoee. The proposed land use will be industrial. This analysis was undertaken to support an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan, changing the existing AFLU designation from Orange County classification (Industrial with a FAR of 0.75) to the City of Ocoee PFLU classification (Industrial with a FAR of 3.0). The following is a summary of the results and recommendations. The results of the study as documented herein are summarized below: • The proposed Progress Commence Park development site is a ±39.965-acres parcel which will have access via Ocoee -Apopka Road (CR 437) and Pine Street. • As documented in this analysis, under the existing AFLU designation the maximum development density will be 1,305,657 square feet of industrial space. Under the proposed PFLU designation the maximum development density will be 5,222,626 square feet of industrial space. The proposed land use density under the PFLU will be 480,560 square feet of industrial space. • The Proposed land use (PFLU) proposed density will result in decrease of 4,092 two-way daily vehicle trip ends, a decrease of 578 A.M. peak hour trip ends and a decrease of 520 two-way P.M. peak hour vehicle trips ends, relative to the adopted AFLU maximum density. • As documented in this analysis, under the existing AFLU designation for the 2025 analysis 30 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 36 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Fifteen of the Year 2025 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the existing AFLU maximum density land use density. • As documented in this analysis, under the existing AFLU designation for the 2040 analysis 55 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 58 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service. All the remaining 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 43 Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. roadway segments in the 2040 analysis will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Fifteen of the Year 2040 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the existing AFLU maximum density land use density. • As documented in this analysis, under the PFLU designation for the 2025 analysis 36 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 40 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Twenty-four of the Year 2025 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. • As documented in this analysis, under the PFLU designation for the 2040 analysis 56 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 60 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service. All the remaining roadway segments in the 2040 analysis will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Twenty-seven of the Year 2040 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. • As documented in this analysis, under the PFLU designation proposed density for the 2025 analysis 24 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 29 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. None of the Year 2025 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. • As documented in this analysis, under the PFLU designation proposed density for the 2025 analysis 2040 analysis 54 of the roadway segments impacted by daily traffic volumes and 57 of the roadway segments impacted by P.M. peak hour traffic volumes are projected to operate at an adverse level of service (adverse roadway segments LOS are highlighted). All the remaining roadway segments will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. None of the Year 2040 adverse roadway segments are significantly impacted (i.e., 3%) by the PFLU maximum density land use density. • The proposed land use change should be considered for approval. Page 1 44 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. APPENDICES 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 45 Luke Transportation Enkineerinr Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 146 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation EnzineerinQ Consultants, Inc. Appendix A — 2025/2040 Project Trip Distribution Plots 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 47 Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 148 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA at A w (D E:\FSUTMS\DS\CFRPWAI..Dmty\Bm\CF 2025\MQraneylnd\OutW1\HWYLOAD_C25.NET 01/07/2021 20-5302 CrWflp PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK, OCOEE, FLORIDA (Licensed to Luke Transportation Engineering Consults) CFRPM V6.12025 Model Run - Industrial U, 0 5 E:\FSUTMS\D5\CFRPMV61 DNly\Base\CF2040\M[Cranry\OutpA\HWYLOAD_UO.NET 0110712021 20 5302 PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK, OCOEE, FLOR/OA o" [LJAI; (LiCenticd to Luke Transpm La Lion E,q.mvu, nj CunSuIL,,. CFRPM V6.12040 Model Run - Industrial Luke Transvortation Enffineerinfr Consultants, Inc. Appendix B — Background Traffic Volumes Trend Analysis 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 51 Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 152 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Historical Traffic Counts - FDOT Trend Analvsis Calculations Roadwa Name Station Number Dail Traffic Count (1) FDOT Trends Anal sis - V2.0 Linear Regression onential Growth Deca 'n Growth From o 201.5 2016 2017 2018 2019 RSO Sloe I Intercept RSO I Sloe Intercept RSQ I Sloe Intercept, A.D. Mims Rd Wurst Rd/ Clarke Rd 7107 0 6 o0 6 6 6,226 0.616 130.000 5,720.400 o.621 0.022 8.652 0.791 366.522 5,759456 Clarke Rd A o ka-Vineland Rd 7107 0 6 o0 6 6,259 6,226 0.616 130.000 5,720.400 o.621 0.022 8.652 0.791 366.522 5,759.456 Adair St Wurst MdJ Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 8161 1. .1 R 0 IA 0 7 4,006 4,io5 4,272 0.954 235.200 3,16o.400 0.945 o.o62 8.071 o.967 589.360 3,301.688 Blackwood Ave Old Winter Garden Rd./SR 5o 9,580 #DIV o! #DIV/o! #DIV/o! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! *DIV of #DIV/o! #DIV/o! SR So/Montgomery Ave 5,800 #DIV o! #DrVof #D1V/o! #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! #DIV of #DIV of #DLV o! Bluford Ave Old Winter Garden Rd./ SR 50 8080 7A36 7,4og 7,3oo 7,268 7,4s8 0.033 (9.700) 7,403.300 0.033 (0.001) 8.910 0.104 (3.175) 7,4155 0 S.R. So/ Geneva St 75-0261 gAoo 9,5oo 9,7oo 8 oo to Boo o.245 220.000 9,000.000 0.224 0.021 9.110 o.16o 442.toS 9,236.685 Geneva St/ Orlando Rd 8 Boo 8 o 6,350 7,600 8 o 0.073 (t85.000) 8,6o5.0oo o.o6o (0.022) 9.052 0.148 (657.957) 8,679.993 Orlando Rd McKey St 75-5092 8,200 8 o0 000 6 oo 6,300 0.185 (590.000) 8,210.000 o.o96 (0.082) 8.955 0.265 (t,758.o1q) 8,223.300 McKey St/ S.R. 438 109 8,836 8,8o4 6 8,589 8,677 0.288 (53.300) 8,831.900 0.282 (o.006) g.o86 0.408 (157.858) 8,823.148 S.R. 438/ Rewis St 75-8056 8 oo 8 oo 6 oo 9,loo 8 Boo 0.500 100.000 8,500.000 o.5o6 0.011 9.048 o.645 282.537 8,529472 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR429Lakewood Ave 454.9 11,152 11,972 17,757 18281 23,127 0.937 3,025.900 7,380.100 0.936 o.188 9.107 o.849 7467.584 9,594.850 Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd 70 12,297 1.9, Or, 2 13,621 14,028 14,685 0.991 575.200 11,811.000 o.987 0.043 9.383 o•969 1,415.254 12,181497 In am Rd/ Clarke Rd 69 12,916 22,709 19,474 zo 21,332 0.848 2,456.000 10,005.600 0.828 0.148 9.294 0.818 5,999.325 11,629.256 Clarke Rd/ Apopka -Vineland Rd 17,767 18 61 zz 2 22 24,537 o.899 1,824.900 15,972.600 o.891 0.087 9.704 0.893 4,525.012 17,ii4.6og Apopka -Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd 68 22,618 24,516 26,523 26,2o6 27,742 0.900 1,193.8oO 21,939.600 0.892 0.048 10.002 0.949 3,050.699 22,599.961 Hiawassee Rd Powers Dr 64 23,713 25,955 26,338 26,903 28,762 0.922 1,104.600 23,020.400 0.917 0.042 10.050 0.921 2,746.692 23,704.247 Powers Dr/Pine Hills Rd 7059 23,758 25,276 27,293 27,372 27,722 0.861 1,002.400 23,277.000 0.855 0.039 10.059 0.950 2,619.337 23,776.189 Clarke Rd S.R. 50/ White Rd 7138 21,356 21,263 0 6 zz 08 0.871 718.900 20,402.100 o.869 0.032 9.927 0.790 1,703.282 20,927.910 White Rd/ S.R. 438 7139 26,751 27,7os 3o,sii 3o,443 29,797 o.665 883.000 26,392.400 o.673 0.031 10.182 0.781 2,381.521 z6,761.o98 S.R. 438 A.D. Mims Rd 7140 18,242 18,558 20,811 20,448 20,089 0.583 558.400 17,954. 00 0.594 0.029 9.796 o.683 1,5o3.596 18,189.9og A.D. Mims Rd/ Hackney -Prairie Rd 7141 12,303 13,937 15,356 1 ,t6q o.647 715.100 12,359.100 o.653 0.052 9.424 o.81g 2,001.271 12,588.187 Hackney -Prairie Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 7141 12, 0 115,757 15,356 25,16g o.647 715.100 12,359-100 0.653 0.052 9.424 0.819 2,001.271 12,588.187 East Crown Point Rd SR 438/ Palm Dr 8184 6,200 8,5o4 6,487 10,159 10,232 o.633 971.900 5,400.700 o.6o8 0.118 8.650 o.586 2,326.otg 6,089.241 Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee -A o ka/ North Lakewood Ave 66.1 1 4,6970 6 5,9o3 5,8256 0.874 630.700 3,891-300 0.904 0.107 8.329 0.759 1,462.685 4,382.882 Geneva St Ma uire Rd/ Bluford Rd oo 00 00 00 00 o.796 110.000 4,230.000 0.797 0.0z4 8.351 o.870 286.170 4,285.993 Good Homes LtdOld Winter Garden Rd/ East-West E75-8286 0 28,526 31,417 29,883 32,370 o.785 1,529.100 24,932.500 0.780 0.053 10.130 0.874 4,014.982 25,675.461 East-West S.R50 0 28,526 31,417 29,883 32,370 0.785 1,529.100 24,932.500 0.780 0.053 10.130 0.874 4,014.982 25,675.461SR.o/Balboa Dr. 16,736 18,oz7 1g,658 19,434 2o,65o o.gu g2,3.s0o 16,1,3osoo 0.904 0.050 9.696 0.944 2,339.626 16,660.812 Balboa Dr White Rd 12,106 1 02 6 0 1 0 0.909 o u, o 0 0.908 0.0 0.8 8 1,91 . u,g61.906 Hackn -Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka -Vineland Rd 2,120 #DIV 01 #DIV 0I #DIV O! #NUMI #NUMI #NUM! #DIV oI #DIV oI #DIV o! Ingram Rd McCormick Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd 8162 2,540 2 6 2,892 11 0 o. 6 z .800 2,26 .000 o. 68 0.079 2 0.88 8 2,433.599 Kissimmee Ave M ire Rd McKe St 7 -7008 2,500 2, 00 2,900 2,800 2,700 0.080 0.000 2,670.000 0.092 0.012 .886 0. 129.826 2,635.692 Lakewood Ave Rewis St/ Wurst Rd 332 6,364 6,443 6,266 6,o89 7,392 0.278 170.20o 6,000.200 0.26o 0.024 8.7o6 0.159 320.375 6,204.042 Wurst Rd/ Fullers Cross Rd 66.1 4,697 5,036 5,903 5,825 7,456 o.874 630.700 3,891.300 0.904 0.107 8.329 0.759 1,462.685 4,382.882 Puller's Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd 66.1 4,697 5,036 5,9o3 5,825 7,456 0.874 630.700 1,891. 00 0. 0 0.107 8. 29 o.7 9 1,46z.685 4, 8z.8- Projected 20 2o25 Growth Factor Annual Growth Rate 6,600 1.o6 1.0% 6,600 t.o6 1.0% 4,700 1.10 1.7% 10,155 1.o6 1.0% 6,148 t.o6 1.0% 7300 0.98 -0.4% 11,033 1.02 0.4% 6,800 o.8o -3.4% 2,933 0.47 -8.9% 8,300 o.96 -o. 9,467 1.08 1.3% 31A33 1.36 6.o% 18,100 1.23 3.9% 29,667 1.39 6.5% 36,000 1.47 7.8% 29,9oo t.o8 1.3% 35,200 1.22 3.7% 30,100 1.09 1.4% 28,300 1.18 2.9% 32,500 1.09 1.5% ,533 1.17 2.9% 17,400 1.15 2.5% 17,400 1.15 2.5% 16,233 1.59 9.8% 13,400 t.8o 13.3% 5,000 1.o6 1.1% 35,300 1.09 1.5% 35,300 1.09 1.5% 22,300 1.08 1.3% 20,000 1.29 % 2,247 1.o6 1.0% ,600 1.64 10.7% 2,967 1 1.10 1.7% 1.03 o.s% ]7,6�oo 0 1.80 13.3% 0 1.80 13.3% A Hiwtnrieal Traffic Counts - FDOT Trend Analvwiw Caicnlatinnw Roadwa Name Station Number Dail Traffic Count (1) FDOTTrends Anal is - V2.o Linear Regression Exponential Growth Deca ' Growth From o 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 RSQ Sloe Intercept RSQ Sloe Intercept RSQ Sloe Intercept Maguire, Rd Gotha Rd Roberson Rd 128 11,389 11,819 11,956 12,826 u,690 0.222 16o.9oo 11,453-300 0.227 0.013 9.346 0.322 482.055 11,474.433 Roberson Rd/Tomyn Rd 16,287 16,24o 16,764 17,459 18,142 0.915 492•933 15,499.733 0.919 0.029 9.652 0.749 i,1o9.152 r5,9r6.522 Tom Rd/Old Winter Garden Road 21,185 20,661 21,573 22,093 24,594 0.726 824.967 19,546.167 0.734 0.037 9.888 0.520 1,736.249 20,358.61i Old Winter Garden Road S.R. 5o 6o80 26,083 25,082 26,381 26,726 31,046 0.628 1,157.000 23,592.600 o.634 0.041 10.080 0423 2,363.346 24,800.700 S.R. 5o/ Marshall Farms Rd 18 1 12,371 12,374 13,132 13,701 14,210 0.950 500.500 11,656.ioo o.95o 0.038 9.370 o.826 1,161.141 12,0 .810 Marshall Farms Rd/ Story Rd 13,044 13,686 15,544 14,617 14,884 0.541 46L000 12,971.900 o.56o 0.033 9.471 1 o.667 1,273.181 13,135.831 Story Rd/ Kissimmee Ave 333 13,717 14,998 117,956 15,533 15,557 0.188 421.500 14,287.700 0.218 0.029 9.562 0.328 1,385.222 14,225.852 Kissimmee Ave S.R. 438 (Franklin Street) -oo68 io,5oo 14,400 14,800 15,000 15,800 0.728 11,120.000 10, 0.000 1 o.695 o.o86 9.287 0.884 13,070-700 1 11,1 9.810 Marshall Farms Rd S.R. o Ma uire Rd -8o z ,6o0 oo ,000 000 ,000 o. o (190.000) 8 0.000 0.720 (0.057) 8. 0.6 8 ( 0.16) Io.181 McCormick Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Ingram Rd 3,986 3,828 4,076 4,098 4,515 o.679 132.800 3,702.200 o.679 0.032 8.222 0.477 276.925 3,835.445 In am Rdl Apopka -Vineland Rd Bo75 1 3,986 3,828 4,076 4,098 4,515 o.679 132.800 3,702.200 o.679 0.032 8.222 0.477 276.925 3,835 McKey St KissimmeeAve Bluford Ave 75-50 0 3,100 3,100 1 3,100 3,400 3AOO 0.750 0.000 1 2, 50.000 0.750 1 0.028 7.993 o.603 2oo.695 3,027.835 Mont ornery Rd Blackwood Ave White Rd 2,97o #DIV o! #DIV o! #DIV o! #NUM! #NUMI #NUM! #DIV/a! I #DIV o! #DIV o! Ocoee Hills Rd S.R. 8 Flewelli St 75-8055 2,900 ,000 ,100 too ,100 0.781 0.000 2,890.000 0. 0.017 .969 0.919 .90 2,91o.8 o Ocoee -A o ka Rd West SR 438/ SR 438 East Silver Star Rd 75-5094 13,100 14,800 13,900 14,600 14,000 0.143 160.000 13,600.000 0.155 0.012 9.516 0.276 553•042 13>550•463 SR 438 East Silver Star Rd/ Palm Dr 73 8,899 9,011 9,463 9,812 9,681 0.859 236.500 8,663.700 0.861 o.o25 g.o69 0.860 588.855 8,809.373 Palm Dr Progress Commerce Project Ent 3 8,899 9,011 9,463 9,812 9,681 o.859 236.5oo 8,663.700 o.861 o.o25 9.o6q o.86o 588.855 8,809.373 Progress Commerce Project Ent Demastus Ln 73 8,899 9,011 9,463 9,812 9,681 o.859 236.5o0 8,663.700 o.861 0.025U14 588.855 8,809.373 Demastus Ln/ Pullers Cross Rd 73 8,899 9,o11 9,463 9,812 9,681 o.859 236.5oo 8,663.700 o.861 0.0255 88.855 8,809.373 Fullers Cross Rd/ West Rd 10,183 10,548 10,938 11,422 11,599 o.986 370.550 9,826.15o 0.984 0.034906. 03 1o,o6g.921 West Rd McCormick Rd 71 11A67 12,o8q 1z,g13 13,o3z 1,3,516 0.994 504.600 10,988.600 o.gg3 0.04o1,223.951 EO.493 11,330.469 McCormick Rd/ Binion Rd 8,551 9,052 9,301 9,861 12,194 0.809 809.500 7,362.800 0.843 0.0801,801.395 8,o66467 Binion Rd/ Harmon Rd 2q 5,634 6,o19 6,188 6,689 ro,871 0.670 1,114.400 3,737.000 0.723 0.142 2,378840 4,802.465 Harmon Rd Bradshaw Rd 2 ,g 0 8, 8 9, 9 9,7 11,68 o.906 848.300 6,905.900 0.934 0.0881,962. 24 7, Old Winter Garden Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave 110.5 23,711 26,648 27,347 27,033 28,741 0.800 1,044.500 23,562.500 0.787 0.040 10.071 0.895 2,748.646 24,o64.176 Bluford Ave/Blackwood Ave 110 29,039 31,239 131,746 32,132 33,165 0.894 914.500 28,720.700 0.029 lo.268 o.964 2,362.499 29,202,111 Blackwood Ave Hem le Ave 27,176 30,003 31,085 31,017 32,384 0.8 1,143.o67 26,903.667 0.038 10.203 0.949 3,000.251 27,460.131 Hem le Ave Citrus Oaks Ave 25,312 28,767 30,423 29,902 31,603 o.816 1,371.633 25,o86.633 0.048 10.134 0.927 3,638.003 25,718.152 Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd 60 8 4q 27, 31 29,762 28, 8 o,82z o. 86 1,6002oo 2 ,269.600 F0-839 0.0 9 lo.o61 o.go6 ,z75.755 z ,976.172 Orlando Ave BlufordAve Mon ome Ave 16 2 2 8,081 ,g 9 62 o.01z 1. 00 6001.100 0.013 8.687 o.0 9 4o4.357 5,829.029 Pahn Drive Ocoee -A o kand Pine St 1 3,070 #DIV of #DIV o! #DIV of #NUMI #NUMI *NUM! #DN of #DIV of #DIV of Pine Stl East Crown Point Rd 3,o7o #DIV of #DIV 01 #DIV/of #NUMI #NUMI #NUM! #DIV oI #DN of #DIV of Pine Street Pro'ect Site Palm Dr 500 #DIV o! #DIV of #DIV o! -*NUM! #NUM! -*NUM! #DIV o! #DIV o! r #DIV o! Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewellin St 8091 2,204 2,026 2,005 1,955 1,991 o.652 (49.700) z,18 .300 0.657 (o.oz4) 7.690 0.840 (I40.305) 2,170.541 Russell Dr Flewellin St Willow Creek Rd 810 1,865 1,82 1, 6 2,Oz 2,240 0.8 0 .900 16 8. 00 0.8 0.0 9 0.6 zo8. 0 1, 8 . 23 Projected 2025 2025 Growth Factor Annual Growth Rate 13,033 1.12 1.9% 21,400 1.18 3.0% 29,400 1.20 3.3% 34,767 1.12 2.0% 17,200 1.21 3.5% 17,633 1.19 3.1% 18,633 1.20 3.3% 18,500 1.17 2. % 2,100 0.70 - .o% 5,000 1.11 1.8% ,000 1.11 1.8% ,900 1.15 2.5% 8 i.o6 1.0% ,200 1.03 0. % 15,267 1.09 1.5% 11,500 1.19 3.1% 11,500 1.19 3.1% 11,Soo 1.19 3.1% 11,500 1.19 3.1% 13,900 1.20 3.3% 16,5oo 1.22 3.7% 18,300 1.50 8.4% 21,400 1,97 16.2% 16 goo 1 1.62 10.3% 30,700 1.07 1.1% 34,900 1.05 0.9% 34,700 1.07 1.2% 34,400 1.09 1 1.5% 34,200 1.11 1.8% 6,800 1.18 .0% 3,2 i.o6 1.0% 3,254 1.o6 1.0% O 1.06 I 1.o% 1,800 0.90 -1.6% 2,900 1.30 4.9% Historical Traffic Counts - FDOT Trend Analvsis Calculations Roadwa Name Station Number Dail Traffic Count (1) FDOT Trends Anal ' - V2.o Linear Regression Exponential Growth Deca Growth From o 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 RSQ Sloe Intercept RSQ Sloe Intercept RSQ Sloe J Intercept, S.R. 438 Tubb St/ Tildenville School Rd 118 6,387 6,724 7,109 71198 8,248 0.893 41g.600 5,874.400 0.912 0.058 8.695 0.778 974.201 6,200.404 Tildenville School Rd Park Ave 114 5,844 6,195 6,498 6,706 6,8ig o.963 246.100 5,67 .too 0.955 0.039 8.648 0.993 621.957 5,816.877 Park Ave Dillard St 108 6,61g 6,225 5,994 6,069 8,769 0.318 414.400 5A92.000 0.289 0.054 8.643 0.160 731.537 6,034-754 Dillard St/ 9th St 107 14,782 15,485 16,918 16,384 17,075 0.789 5 8.500 83.300 0.791 0.035 9.583 0.857 1,422.114 14,767.128 9th St E. Crown Point Rd 75-5194 118,600 19,700 13,700 r9,600 19,700 0.016 210.000 17,630.000 0.012 0.011 9.770 0.001 101.322 t8,162.984 E. Crown Point Rd/ SR 429 70-0302 16,500 19,200 19,000 18,900 19,300 0.510 530.000 116,99o.000 0.510 1 0.030 9.739 0.699 1,543.544 17,102.059 SR429BownessRd 70-0662 12,300 14,200 14ZOO 14,400 14,000 0,397 360.000 112,800.000 0.404 0.027 9455 0.625 1 1,124.707 12,80 .095 Bowness Rd Ocoee -Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd 70-o662 12,300 14,200 14,500 14,400 14,000 0.397 360.000 112,800.000 0.404 0.027 9455 o.6z5 1 1,124.707 12,803.095 Ocoee -Apopka Rd/ Bluford Ave 70-5120 13,300 15,600 16,000 15,500 14,200 0.057 170.000 114,420.000 0.065 0.013 9.571 0.206 8o6.627 1 14,147.656 Bluford Ave Ocoee -Hills Rd 70-0089 11A00 14,400 14,400 12,700 13,400 0.083 230.000 12,570.000 0.102 0.020 9.429 0.216 923.313 12,375.929 Ocoee -Hills Rd Clarke Rd 89a 16,629 16,798 16,586 15,547 15,748 0.697 (301.300) 17,165.500 0.695 (0.019) 9.752 0.564 (674.136) 16,907.084 Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd 18,445 19,093 19,036 17,825 18667 0.099 (102433) 18,900.567 0.099 (0.006) 9.847 0.044 (16q.798) 18,755.848 Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd 20,261 21,389 21,486 20,103 21,386 0.050 96.433 20,635.633 0.049 0.005 9.934 0.097 334.541 20,604.611 Good Homes Rd/ Apopka -Vineland Rd 77 22,077 23,684 23,93E 22,381 24,205 0.236 295.300 22,370.700 0.234 0.013 10.015 0.307 838.879 22,453.375 A o ka-Vineland Rd Hiawassee Rd 78 34,21319 35,225 35,398 0 6 0.254 6 oo , 6. o0 0.257 0.00 10-451 0.451 . 6 6 .8z S.R. So (West Colonial Dr.) 9th St SR 429 7057 43,377 43,093 44,571 45,943 46,989 r 0.915 4007.400 41,772. 00 0.915 0.022 10.642 0.764 2,289.5o0 42,602.408 SR 429 Marshall Farms Rd 43,789 43,502 44,997 45,329 46,750 1 0.883 774.950 1 42,548-150 0.883 0.017 10.660 0.733 1 1,756.303 43,191.343 Marshall Fauns Rd/ Maguire Rd 7058 44,200 43,910 45,422 44,715 46,5u, r 0.676 542.500 43,323.900 0.676 0.012 10.677 0.555 r 1,223.106 43,780.279 Maguire Rd Bluford Ave 75-0018 36,000 37,000 31,500 35,500 41,500 0.176 950.000 33450.000 0.152 0.024 10.423 0.074 1,530.129 ,834.905 Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave 75-0304 37,500 38,500 39,500 41,000 47,000 0.821 2,150.000 34,250.000 0.843 0.052 io.456 0.654 4,773.842 36,129.055 Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd 304.1 127,230 38,220 39,215 40,26o 43,062 0. 1 0. o0 2 86.200 0.730 0.097 10.232 0.9070 6.1E z8 88 .6 Sto Rd 9th St SR4z9 112.1 4,657 4,765 5,233 S,ii,S 5,627 0.871 229.000 4,392.400 0.877 0.045 839E 0799 545.656 4,556.935 SR 4221 M ire Rd 112 8,953 9,6o8 10,0321 io,564 11,554 0.977 615.800 1§,224.800 o.984 o.o61 .039 0.892 '1,464.323 8,74o.114 Ta for Si.t FranklSt Mckey St 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,400 3,400 0.750 90.000 2,950.000 0.750 0.028 7.993 o.603 1 200.695 3,027.835 West Rd Ocoee -A o ka Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 2024 8,690 9,094 9,230 9,418 16,410 0. 79 1, 6. oo ,8 gzoo 0.607 0.131 8.842 0.407 ,28q.7 1 18. 8 White Rd (Orlando Ave.) Montgomery Rd/ Clarke Rd 7169.5 5,527 5,732 8,o8i 5,979 5,762 0.012 71.700 6,001.100 0.0 66 0.013 8.687 0.059 404-357 5,829.029 Clarke RdJ Good Homes Rd 7169 7,981 8,671 ,698 8, 8,632 0. 8 96.600 8,1 .600 0. 0.012 q.008 0.404 06. 98 Wurst Rd Lakewood Ave Adair St 70-8059 5,700 5,S00 ��l 5,500 .9,500 o.6t,3 (70.000) 5,810.000 o.616 (0.013) 8.668 0.567 (167.630)AdairSt A.D. Mims Rd 1 0 5,339 5,462 5,340 5,867 O. 3 9 00 ,19 .20o O. 0.m 8.558 0.313 1 6. 10 z89.o 1 (I) Traffic volumes from Orange Countg 2019 traffic count database and FDOT 2019 traffic count database. Luke D-ansportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., Saar Projected 2025 zo25 Growth Factor Annual Growth Rate 11,300 1.37 6.2% 7,300 1.07 1.2% 9,367 1.07 1.1% 18,200 1.07 1.1% 19,367 0.98 -0.3% 20,800 1.08 1.3% 16,500 1.18 3.0% 16,500 m8 3.0% 16,300 1.15 2.5% 15,067 1.12 2.1% 13,900 0.88 -2.0% 17,967 0.97 -0.5% 21,600 1.01 0.2% 25,267 1 1.04 0.7% 36,267 1.03 0. % 52,900 1.13 2.1% 51,500 1.10 1 1.7% 48,500 1.04 0.7% 42,100 1.01 0.2% 61,300 1.30 5.1% 50,700 1.18 3.0% 7,300 1.30 5.0% 16, o0 1.42 7.0% 00 1.15 2. % 22, 1-37 6.2% 6,800 1.18 3.0% 9,133 1.06 1.0% 5,167 0.94 -1.0% 6,100 1 1.0 O. Luke Transvortation Engineering Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 1 56 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation EnizineerinQ Consultants, Inc. Appendix C - WOT Trail Map 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Page 1 57 Luke Transportation Enkineeriny Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 1 58 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA y rD u, I Wall Oftwo Aml l4awmAA Ilat/ • $aalAtaae 1 Ale Mlmeofr Auarr flat/ 0 Alt SJatlm Q 8Aehlkak CCWIx HaaCA ►� klAr leas AAlMIJfY LArdeA n Core„lAA 0 14fleqrlar I AnkLM Q 1 u,&,V Pose Alloast/ (� Pan,w INAVOwma (� 14c.vc Area A LINT [� Port o le1 [j Puba ProAr ® Araw Pwlkoa xrmoome Suim >CCa A1AlAIM r/ Spmal l'malc a' 1n'nn1 p 11ly, © 1fAa O1ll:ae Q we. /=tmr. Q Watrr a9AAor © W�Crr. NrICCr ►::upNFY 0®0© D©iJ 11 1�i f 1w-rAPf%STA-5 -0®OD DO©© ©© eaM O DQ� TROtOY W ddlP" f j COVED unt FAAr OAKL a 041PUT ® ®®®DV vA«wuAeroa w e. Oakland MAHru lYfkaeA mil.. fit" Wtnler F «ae ? fi irarld {., W CamaGr t: /• ( feofila TVlpte•ERat ` 6 W«errn OG�©DOD 'sue �®OOD lent Tim soft ©O0� - W Ald;oAlittflG ®� � fhnNOtN�er . AaA lil O O©DO q sewswAd j 1 0 Ell Luke Transvortation Engineerin4 Consultants, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 1 60 20-5302 Progress Commerce Park — City of Ocoee TDA Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 3 204 --15 56 east pine street oriando florida 32801 [phone] 407 423 8055 [fax] 407 423 8022 R /ct `/ SiGR�A SECTION A —A SCALE: 1 "=5' R/W EX YIATER NA!N R/W R/41 QED3s.o' sl.o' LTT TED .T c R1cRT oFf rvar RiGMT PF cF rvar 12.0' %"2° 11.0' tt0' n.o' �20' Js' OPEN \1DiRASL X� OPEN -TRAOPEN EXlsr. Rill uNE TYPE F TYPE F L'URD sL. _ CORD 0-sroR+A Ex, WATER IAAiN� SECTION B—B SCALE: 1 "=5' STCR[I WffALL II AT EXIST. 01— I _ 12' YAOE 1 ( 2 0 )f ULri-U<E TRAIL 0'18'44" R=28672"80' �� Z W m L=156.24' �, DEoicareD R/W z STORlA PER P j CN P.IIGE Go1:rl,r \ H q "Im w sraaoaRs P' // DEG+PA—ENTPAENr STM LJ 8GD RIA GCE T STM y C11 NEW LEFT TURN- LPNE- -- _ OCOEE—APOPKA—RD� — �,�_ - I=— _ _....._-- -'- _ iAP[R--- --POPOSED EGr -__- __ nRflil LANEL--�--_---'� --' --_ aco' __—... — OCOEE APOPKA RD PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1 "=30' BPROGRESS �CCI,IIlERCE PARK 0RI SCALE: 1"=30' 0 6 15 30 60 90 j� cL OCATION MAI 7, T22 S, R28 E STORIA PER URAGE couNrr --� s 3 I F— ..... -s—n s-------__ t'- `— srrt_ —P , e S00'49'24"Y! 736.23' — sTQr.oaRos =118954��.8fi „ iI Z STPI,0AR05 2'.0' z' 1Y LE __ RULTI LIRE TRVL-\ _ 0 n J W SR ��` -- --— -- RANGE CIX1Ntr OEUICAIEO R/YI _ —_-- - (n _— � - - - _ - ..". - - - _�—�--- SPA -�_ Si / OCOEE—APOPKA RD _. RIGHT of r+Ar -- - — iRPNS i'U! CINl51RUCRP'l B OCOEE APOPKA RD PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1"=30' SMILEY & PROGRESS COMMERCE EX, Amm ASSOCIA`i S, PARK OCOEE APOPKA RD PRELIMINARY LAYOUT SHEET TYPE 19"le e0MIER1E LANE, SWTE 2, „uwr[R, 1.— 33asa PET DR T FOR DSG MS APRY DATE ESHEET i OF 1 HIM PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK, LLC D'"gs_3 CHK NiS OCOEE, FLORIDA ICADDWG PCP REVISION NOTES 1..11 1 TIAmC a 7 21 JOB # 20-007 OCOEE APOPKA LAND ASSEMBLAGE ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA r-- , V ECOLOGICAL DUE DILIGENCE November 2020 Prepared for: McCraney Property Company 7101 Presidents Drive, Suite 105 Orlando, FL 32809 Prepared by: Modica & Associates 302 Mohawk Road Clermont, FL 34715 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, DESIGN & PERMITTING, PHONE 352.394.2000 FAX 352.394.1159 302 MOHAWK ROAD, CLFRMONT. FLORIDA 34715 wN W.MOM&ANDASSOCt m.coM OCOEE APOPKA LAND ASSEMBLAGE ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ECOLOGICAL DUE DILIGENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS.................................................................................... 2 2.1 Soils............................................................................................................................2 2.2 Vegetative Communities............................................................................................ 3 2.3 Protected Species of Wildlife..................................................................................... 4 3.0 REGULATORY AGENCY PERMITTING.................................................................. 4 3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers................................................................................... 4 3.2 St. Johns River Water Management District.............................................................. 5 3.3 City of Ocoee............................................................................................................. 5 4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES OF WILDLIFE.................................................................. 7 4.1 Gopher Tortoise...................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Eastern Indigo Snake.......................................................................................... 7 4.3 American Bald Eagle.............................................................................................. 8 4.4 Wood Stork............................................................................................................. 8 4.5 Sand Skink.............................................................................................................. 9 5.0 SUMMARY...................................................................................................................9 5.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS.............................................................. 10 6.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................ 11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Aerial Map Figure 3 Soil Map Figure 4 Land Use Map Figure 5 Bald Eagle Nest Map Figure 6 Approximate Wetland Lines LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Google Earth Imagery —1990 Exhibit B USFWS IPaC Exhibit C Wood Stork Core Foraging Areas Map 1 OCOEE APOPKA LAND ASSEMBLAGE ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ECOLOGICAL DUE DILIGENCE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Modica & Associates conducted an Ecological Due Diligence of the 39.96t acre Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage ("Property") generally located west of Ocoee Apopka Road and south of N Fullers Cross Road in Ocoee, unincorporated Orange County, Florida (Figures 1 & 2). The Property is comprised of four parcels identified by the Orange County Property Appraiser with Parcel Identification Numbers: 07-22-28-0000-00-024 (1.47f acres), 07-22-28-0000-00-066 (0.54f acre), 07-22-28-0000-096 (13.01± acres), and 07-22-28-0000-00-026 (24.95t acres). Note that while the two parcels owned by Lawrence Levin are included on the maps, the likelihood of acquiring these parcels remains uncertain and therefore Modica & Associates did not enter these properties. Information regarding these two parcels are included for informational purposes only. The site review for the Ecological Due Diligence was completed on November 5 and 18, 2020. The property lies in unincorporated Orange County, but it is understood that McCraney Property Company intends to annex the property into the City of Ocoee. This report outlines the City's Land Development Codes (LDC's) relative to the ecological resources on the Property. If the Property remains in unincorporated Orange County, the regulations will be different. The intent of the due diligence assessment was to identify and delineate wetlands, evaluate potential listed species that could occur within the Property, and to identify other ecological constraints that could affect development and/or cost of acquisition of the Property. Potential listed species and/or constraints were determined through review of publicly available documents, including: • Current and historical Google Earth Imagery; • U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Orange County Florida; • Florida Natural Areas Inventory — Species Occurrence Tracking List, Orange County; • Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species; December 2018, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC); • USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac0; and • FWC, Eagle Nest Locator (https://www. arcgis.com/apes/webappviewer/index.html?id=253604118279431984e8 bc3ebflcc8e9). In addition to the above, a review was made of the Florida's Water Permitting Portal (httv://flwateEpermits.com/ag,wslO/ft)lperplo to determine if there are any permits or pending application documents that exist for the Property. 2.0 PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS The Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage was field reviewed by Modica & Associates on November 5 and 18, 2020. The following information summarizes the data collected during the in -office review and site inspections. 2.1 Soils According to the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resource Conservation Service, the Property is underlain by five (5) soil types (Figure 3). The following presents a brief description of the soil type mapped within the Property; these descriptions are excerpts from the Soil Survey. Felda fine sand, frequently flooded (#15) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on the floodplain of the Econlockhatchee River and other minor streams. This soil is flooded for very long periods following prolonged, intense rains. Typically, the surface layer of this soil type consists of very dark gray fine sand about 3 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 2 to 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and is moderate in the subsoil. Immokalee fine sand (#20) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. In most years the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 3 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate in the subsoil. Smyrna fine sand (#44) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 4 inches thick. The seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate to moderately rapid in the subsoil. Wabasso fine sand (#51) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 3 inches thick. The seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 5 months. It recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate in the sandy part of the subsoil and slow or very slow in the loamy part. Zolfo fine sand (#54) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soil found on broad, slightly higher positions adjacent to the flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of dark grayish brown fine sand about 5 inches thick. The seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 24 to 40 inches for 2 to 6 months. It is at a depth of 10 to 24 inches during periods of heavy rain. It recedes to a depth of about 60 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is moderate in the subsoil. 2.2 Vegetative Communities The Property five (5) land use cover types as described in the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FDOT, January 1999) (Figure 4). Modica & Associates delineated the jurisdictional wetland lines (Figure 6). Residential (110) The two parcels owned by Lawrence Levin include an existing single-family residence with associated secondary structures and a maintained yard. Agriculture (200) The eastern portion of the project site consists of an active blueberry farm. This area was historically in citrus production (Exhibit A). The field roads between the four quadrants of blueberry rows are vegetated with bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) and are mowed and maintained on a regular basis. Upland Hardwood Forest (420) The western portion of the Property consists of an upland forest vegetated with live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), camphor (Cinnamomum camphora), and earpod tree (Enterolobium cyclocarpum). The shrub and groundcover consists of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium) and various herbaceous forbs and grasses. This area was also historically comprised of a citrus grove (Exhibit A). Ditch (510) There is an open water canal that traverses the property in a north to south direction. This ditch was constructed prior to 1990 and appears to be periodically maintained. The spoil banks of the ditch are heavily vegetated with guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus), blackberry (Rubus sp.) and cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica). Vegetation present in the dich includes a cattails (Typha latifolia), primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), torpedo grass (Panicum repens) and other wetland vegetation. Wetland Forested Mixed (630) There is a forested wetland along the western limits of the ditch. This wetland contains a mixed canopy of swamp bay (Magnolia virginiana), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), camphor and water oak (Quercus nigra). The shrub layer consists of wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), elderberry (Sambucus nigra) and camphor. The groundcover contains cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomeum), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), Caesar weed (Urena lobata), blackberry, saw palmetto. Dense thickets of vines are present, including air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), grapevine, greenbrier (Smilax sp.) and bitter melon (Momordica charantia). 2.3 Protected Species of Wildlife A qualitative review of the Property was conducted to determine if any wildlife species using the property are listed as protected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or the FWC. The following is a list of those species that were observed using the Property during the evaluation. Mammals Nine -banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) Birds Mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) No protected species of wildlife were documented within the Property during the November 5 and 18, 2020 site inspections. 3.0 REGULATORY AGENCY PERMITTING Regulatory agencies with environmental jurisdiction over development, and jurisdiction over wetlands and surface waters on the Property include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the City of Ocoee. 3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The ACOE administers regulatory authority over any impacts to Waters of the United States ("WOTUS"). The new Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR) was enacted on June 22, 2020; this rule provides new guidance for wetlands and surface waters that are to be considered federally jurisdictional. Review of historical aerial photography indicates that the on -site wetland and drainage ditch were hydrologically connected to Lake Apopka. It appears that this hydrologic connection still exists in current condition. Accordingly, it is likely that the on -site wetland will be federally jurisdictional. The State of Florida is currently pursuing assumption of the "404 Program" which is the Clean Water Act implemented to regulate the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into WOTUS. It is anticipated that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) will assume responsibility of the 404 Program (federal wetland impact permitting) by December 1, 2020. Any proposed impacts to the ditch, including a crossing, and impacts to the on -site wetland will likely require authorization from the ACOE/FDEP. Because the program to be implemented by FDEP is new, the permitting timeframe is not known. It is estimated that permitting may take at least 9 months to complete. 3.2 St. Johns River Water Management District The SJRWMD administers regulatory authority for proposed developments through the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) program. Development of the Property will require an ERP application to be submitted to the SJRWMD for stormwater management and environmental regulatory review. The SJRWMD exerts regulatory jurisdiction over wetland and surface water areas. The drainage ditch and forested wetland are both jurisdictional to the SJRWMD. The SJRWMD will conduct a site inspection to review the limits of the jurisdictional wetland at the time of the ERP application. If direct impacts are proposed to the ditch and/or wetlands, these impacts will need to be quantified, and mitigation will be required for wetland impacts. No mitigation should be required to any impacts to the ditch. However, because the ditch was excavated in wetland soils and does contain some wetland plants, minimal mitigation may be required. It is assumed that there is a drainage easement over this ditch, although one has not been found. The wetland is of fair to low quality. It is estimated that every acre of impact may cost about $110,000.00 to mitigate, if purchasing credits from a mitigation bank. The Property is located within the Southern Ocklawaha River Drainage Basin. The Hammock Lake Mitigation Bank offers credits for mitigation within this basin. If no wetland impacts are proposed, a 15-foot minimum, 25-foot average upland buffer should be provided along the limits of the wetland, which will illustrate to the SJRWMD that no secondary impacts will occur to the wetland as a result of the development activities. If the minimum buffer cannot be provided, alternative methods to prevent secondary impacts can be proposed, such as fencing, placement of conservation area signage, etc. 3.3 City of Ocoee The Property lies within unincorporated Orange County. However, it is understood that McCraney Property Company intends to annex the Property into the City Limits of Ocoee, Florida. Accordingly, the Property would be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code (LDC). The City of Ocoee provides protection to natural resources including wetlands through Article VH Part 1 Provision 7-4 of the LDC. With regard to development in wetlands the code reads as follows: Wetlands. (1) No excavation or filling shall be undertaken within a wetland unless the City Commission finds, on the basis of reasonable evidence, that there are no practical alternatives to the filling. Examples of situations where such activities may be permitted include the need to provide access to property, to provide utilities, and to create a building site on an approved lot. Where any such disturbance of a wetland is permitted, it shall be the minimum disturbance necessary to meet the needs of the use. No excavation or other disturbance shall be permitted in a floodway. Except where specifically permitted by the City Commission, no native wetland vegetation shall be disturbed. (2) Where disturbance is permitted, new wetland areas shall be created at a minimum rate of two (2) times the area of wetlands destroyed. New wetland areas shall be in the vicinity of the areas destroyed and, at maturity, shall be functionally related (in terms of elevation, hydrology, and vegetation) to the remaining wetlands in the area. Where the City Commission finds that it is impractical to create such replacement wetlands, it may make alternative mitigation requirements. (3) A buffer area shall be retained in its natural state surrounding connected (i.e., FDER jurisdictional) wetlands. Such buffer shall be a minimum of seventy- five (75) feet in width except where the City Commission finds that it is impractical to maintain that width. Buffer areas shall not be disturbed except to provide for surface water management areas. (4) Modifications to wetlands shall ensure that predevelopment water flow (rate and quantity) is maintained to preserve wetland viability. (5) Wetlands management shall conform to standards included in the Comprehensive Plan (specifically including Conservation Element Policies 2.3 and 4.2). Note that the City only authorizes wetland impacts if no practicable alternative exists. If the proposed site plan is anticipated to result in wetland impacts, it is recommended that a pre -application meeting be held with the City to determine their opinion of proposed impacts. 4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES OF WILDLIFE The Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) species tracking list for Orange County was reviewed to determine the potential for listed species of wildlife that may occur within the habitat types present within the Property. The USFWS's Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) was also reviewed to determine the potential for federally listed species on the property (Exhibit B). State or Federal listed wildlife species with the potential to occur onsite based on geographic locale, habitat types present, and presence of suitable soils or vegetative cover include the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) and the Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon courais couperi). The Property lies within the federal Consultation Area for the eastern black rail, sand skink and Everglades snail kite. However, the Property does not contain suitable habitat or required soil types for any of these species and therefore the potential for these species are not discussed in detail below. Information regarding the gopher tortoise, Eastern indigo snake, American bald eagle and wood stork is provided below. This information is provided to detail development constraints and permitting requirements, as applicable, associated with species afforded protection by law occurring on the site or having the potential to occur adjacent to or onsite. 4.1 Gopher Tortoise The gopher tortoise is listed by the FWC as a Threatened species. Gopher tortoises are commonly found in areas occurring on well -drained sandy soils associated with xeric pine -oak hammock, scrub, pine flatwoods, pastures and citrus groves. No gopher tortoise burrows were documented during the November 5 and 18, 2020 site inspections of the Property. These site inspections were preliminary in nature and covered about 10% of suitable tortoise habitat. The FWC Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (FWC, April 2008, rev. July 2020) state that a gopher tortoise survey is valid for a period of 90-days. It is recommended that a comprehensive (100%) gopher tortoise survey be conducted 90-days prior to start of construction. If any tortoise burrows are documented, a permit from FWC will be required to authorize relocation to an approved, off -site recipient area. The permit process typically takes 45 to 90 days to complete. Relocation cannot commence until local government approval for land clearing or site development has been issued. 4.2 Eastern Indigo Snake The Eastern indigo snake is listed as "Threatened" by the USFWS. Indigo snakes are thick -bodied, glossy black snakes with iridescent blue highlights. Adult indigo snakes may be between 60 and 74 inches long (USFWS, 2016c). In northern areas, the indigo snakes most often use habitats such as pine flatwoods, scrubby flatwoods, floodplain edges, sand ridges, dry glades, tropical hammocks, edges of freshwater marshes, muckland fields, coastal dunes, and xeric sandhill communities; with highest population concentrations of eastern indigo snakes occurring in the sandhill, pinelands and agricultural lands with proximity to wetlands. No indigo snakes were observed during the inspections of the Property. Recent discussions with USFWS staff from the South Florida Ecological Services Office indicate that if a snake's presence on a property is "reasonably certain to occur", consultation will be required. The USFWS is defining "reasonably certain to occur" as recorded or known primary evidence of a snake's presence on or near a property (i.e. documented observation of an indigo snake, snake shed). Geographically, the Property is bordered on the east by Ocoee Apopka Road, residential development to the north, industrial and commercial uses to the east and south and State Road 429 along the western boundary. It is anticipated that the USFWS would determine that the presence of indigo snakes is not reasonably certain to occur. Consultation for the potential presence for this species is not anticipated. 4.3 American Bald Eagle The American bald eagle is no longer listed under the Endangered Species Act; however, it is still afforded protection by the USFWS under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. A review of the FWC's Bald Eagle Nest Locator website revealed the presence of eagle nest OR045 just to the east of the Property. The 660-foot management zone of bald eagle nest OR045 does not encroach into the Property (Figure 5). No coordination with USFWS is anticipated to be required for this species. 4.4 Wood Stork The wood stork (Mycteria americana) is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. The Property lies within the USFWS Consultation Area for wood stork, and lies within a "Core Foraging Area" for the wood stork (Exhibit Q. Wood storks nest in colonies and forage in freshwater wetlands (Ogden). Good feeding habitat for wood storks typically consists of calm waters that do not have dense thickets of vegetation. The primary food of a stork's diet is small fish between 1 and 8 inches in length (Ogden). Through consultation with the ACOE, the USFWS will evaluate potential impacts a project may have to Suitable Foraging Habitat (SFH) of the wood stork. SFH is defined as follows: "...wetlands that typically have shallow -open water areas that are relatively calm and have a permanent or seasonal water depth between 5 to 38cm (2 to 15 inches) deep. Other shallow non -wetland water bodies are also SFH. SFH supports and concentrates, or is capable of supporting and concentrating small fish, frogs, and other aquatic prey. Examples of SFH include, but are not limited to freshwater marshes, small ponds, shallow, seasonally flooded roadside or agricultural ditches, seasonallyfloodedpastures, narrow tidal creeks or shallow tidal pools, managed impoundments, and depressions in cypress heads and swamp sloughs. " (Souza, 2010). The Property does contain SFH for the wood stork. All proposed impacts to the drainage ditch will likely also be considered impact to wood stork SFH. Mitigation purchased to offset wetland impacts will also be sufficient to offset impact to wood stork SFH. No additional mitigation will be needed. 4.5 Sand Skink The sand skink is a state and federally "Threatened" species. The sand skink is a small nearly legless lizard that spends its entire lifecycle beneath the surface of the sandy soils that are characteristic of Central Florida's sandy ridges. Its presence on a property is detected by observing the sinusoidal tracks left in the sand due to the unique manner in which this species moves through the substrate. The Property lies within the Sand Skink Consultation Area and has elevations above 82- feet mean sea level (according to Google Earth). However, the Property does not contain soil types considered suitable for the presence of sand skinks. No coordination for this species will be required. 5.0 SUMMARY Modica & Associates conducted an Ecological Due Diligence of the 39.96± acre Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage on November 5 and 18, 2020, 2020. The Property is generally located west of Ocoee Apopka Road and south of N Fullers Cross Road in Ocoee, unincorporated Orange County, Florida. The two parcels within the project area owned by Lawrence Levin are included on the maps, but the likelihood of acquiring these parcels remains uncertain. Accordingly, Modica & Associates did not enter these properties. Information regarding these two parcels has been included for informational purposes only. The property contains a wetland and a drainage ditch, both of which are jurisdictional to the SRJWMD. Review of historical aerial photography indicates that the on -site wetland and drainage ditch were hydrologically connected to Lake Apopka. It appears that this hydrologic connection still exists in current condition. Accordingly, it is likely that the on -site wetland will also be federally jurisdictional. Any proposed impacts to the wetland or ditch will require a permit from SJRWMD and likely the ACOE. On December 1, 2020, the FDEP will assume regulatory authority of the Federal 404 program. Mitigation will be required for any proposed wetland impacts, and mitigation may also be required for impacts to the ditch, as it was excavated in wetland soils and does contain some wetland vegetation. It is estimated that every acre of impact may cost about $110,000.00 to mitigate, if purchasing credits from a mitigation bank. The Property lies in unincorporated Orange County, but it is understood that McCraney Property Company intends to annex the property into the City of Ocoee. Note that the City only authorizes wetland impacts if no practicable alternative exists. If the proposed site plan is anticipated to result in wetland impacts, it is recommended that a pre -application meeting be held with the City to determine their opinion of proposed impacts. If the Property remains in unincorporated Orange County, the regulations will be different. The Property lies within the federal Consultation Area for the eastern black rail, Everglades snail kite and sand skink. However, the Property does not contain suitable habitat or soil types for any of these species and therefore no coordination for these species is anticipated to be required. Bald eagle nest OR045 lies just east of the Property. The 660-foot management zone of this nest does not encroach into the Property. No coordination with USFWS is anticipated to be required for this species. No gopher tortoise burrows were documented during the November 5 and 18, 2020 site inspections of the Property. However, these site inspections only covered about 10% of the property. The FWC Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (FWC, April 2008, rev. July 2020) state that a gopher tortoise survey is valid for a period of 90-days. It is recommended that a comprehensive (100%) gopher tortoise survey be conducted 90-days prior to start of construction. If any tortoise burrows are documented, a permit from FWC will be required to authorize relocation to an approved, off -site recipient area. Geographically, the Property is bordered on the east by Ocoee Apopka Road, residential development to the north, industrial and commercial uses to the east and south and State Road 429 along the western boundary. It is anticipated that the USFWS would determine that the presence of eastern indigo snakes is not reasonably certain to occur. Consultation for the potential presence for this species is not anticipated. The Property lies within the USFWS Consultation Area for wood stork, and lies within a "Core Foraging Area" for the wood stork. All proposed impacts to the drainage ditch will likely also be considered impact to wood stork SFH. Mitigation purchased to offset wetland impacts will also be sufficient to offset impact to wood stork SFH. No additional mitigation will be needed. 5.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS No other environmental concerns were identified or expected for the Project Site. This ecological assessment does not constitute a Phase 1 Environmental Audit and this report makes no representation as to the presence or absence of hazardous materials. This report does not constitute a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) and makes no representation to the presence or potential presence of historic sites or artifacts, other than providing information from others. 6.0 REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Eagle Nest Locator: (ht!ps://www.arc2is.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=253604118279431984e8bc 3ebflcc8e9) Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2018. Florida's Threatened and Endangered Species. Tallahassee, FL. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tracking List. Osceola County, Florida. (httt)s://www.fhai.org/trackinizlist.cfin) Florida's Water Permitting Portal; http://webapub.sirwmd.com/aaws10/fpperpl/ United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1990. Soil Survey of Osceola County, Florida. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2016b. Quick Facts: Everglade snail kite. https://www.fws.gov/verobeachBirdsPDFs/EvergladesnailkiteFactSheet.i)df, accessed February 20, 2017. FIGURES Secbon Or a McCormick Rd W pK S O Trout late d:D! P.>tfr Or.rry* iml Pay Bivd Lair Srms Ctareafa t'X oea R u Moat 00 =r 3 s Ooa r Alden Oaks" K Syr,nAt BWtl West Rd o h4#ft4 g .k14os ..,-,sra Ibeh a6/� t;tar Go J H-k-y N aPr.— c 4 uk. v E Fullers Cross Rd Q ' N 'Z' M.P",Ptak 'o rr• •n r�L,re S1,z 1 a ++b> E Fullers Cross Rd n jd, Bach n_ O $ O Ra, Cf nor d '$ a Wu, at Rd Rd Z n\O Ap Altos O 0 8 v Ctipn Skrtbn U Sp,.g Lk. i a won Flawelllnp Ave os Cl o 9 i;b 'n r 4� � FS,Y -. Gres\Py, C e -�A!_t CeniH SS Jah. L5, c u „nte C„ a Owlalon St _ 471 OCON EBbaar8ta, Rd .-- e2' 3 ener 0� o _b SWtM Lakf \dt pp\aet9t 6. Oh wFas m j r,areme 0 4 3 Mddi. , yG ,y St Winter Garden Bay St E 4 50" Yt saa,.v 2 g Feb Orlando Ave E rihrte Rd � y AW. p = Tpx $ T Minor R ,ary Rd W v S E s Story Rd E Story Rd Park Y �s 6 C 1k • 4 R Maine St x a H N g W-Cau" i or _ - n '6 Lott. lY n Let6a �r Beutl Rd Y&IA 01 Uri t < Otd W,nter Garden p uBa m O R d Ffk ,tv. a rooke Byry ° o F 3 ac warnot Rd Warrior r� FurlonO Way La" �� Aa L.eba ,4 Y Property Boundary Lek. ,tee. wmdn.n * Basemaps are ESRI Maps. = Morton Jones Rd P° * Parcel boundaries based on Orange County Property Appraiser Parcel Data Moore Rd Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage MODICA & ASSOCIATES Figure 1 -Location Map -� 302 Mohawk Road Section 7, T22S, R28E �t I Clermont, Florida 34715 Orange County, Florida P: (352) 394-2000 F: (352) 394-1159 Feet Email: Environmental@Modica.cc 4,000 2,000 0 4,000 www.ModicaAndAssociates.com i t i el • fill'•y' „W -rof dW am.. II ab1 �I�'r Property Boundary * Basemaps are ESRI Maps. * Parcel boundaries based on Orange County Property Appraiser Parcel Data.. Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblages MODICA & ASSOCIATES Figure 2 -Aerial Map -� 302 Mohawk Road Section 7, T22S, R28E �� t Clermont, Florida 34715 Orange County, Florida P: (352) 394-2000 --J F: (352) 394-1159 Feet Email: Environmental@Modica.cc 400 200 0 400 www.ModicaAndAssociates.com 40, M •ELT s:. -s"f. I M --- — - — —----------- # Basemaps are ESRI Maps. Parcel boundaries based on Orange County Property Appraiser Parcel Data. Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage Figure 3 - Soils Map Section 7, T22S, R28E Orange County, Florida Feet 400 200 0 400 40 .qr t Property Boundary ' NRCS Soil Types 15/FELDA FINE SAND, FREQUENTLY FLOODED 20/I1VIMOKALEE FINE SAND 44/SMYRNA FINE SAND 51/WABASSO FINE SAND 54/ZOLFO FINE SAND u, MODICA & ASSOCIATES -s 302 Mohawk Road r Clermont, Florida 34715 P: (352) 394-2000 F: (352) 394-1159 Email: Environmental@Modica.cc www.ModicaAndAssociates.com k F ✓^ < �3� Y 04 7 x t IL Y .. 44r..,.,3 :.-310 its I_ Property Boundary Land Use Types 110, Residential . 200, Agriculture Ry ;': k, NqW 420, Upland Hardwood Forest "—*• ,y aa. «+R►• �" # t yit �, 510, Ditch 630, Wetland Forested Mixed Basemaps are ESRI Maps. Mf 4 Parcel boundaries based on Orange County Property Appraiser Parcel Data. Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage MODICA & ASSOCIATES Figure 4 - Land Use Map -� 302 Mohawk Road Section 7, T22S, R28E �� I Clermont, Florida 34715 Orange County, Florida P: (352) 394-2000 F: (352) 394-1159 Feet Email: Environmental@Modica.cc 400 200 0 400 www.ModicaAndAssociates.com CProperty Boundary Q Eagle_Nest_OR045 330_Ft_Buffer 660_Ft_Buffer { ilk IT •.�i s �` S a4 1►iilt .� u'y L''t.2 a3 1 wt TAW RIPW a. OR045 { LS7 1 LF:f y c. f�JA. IIBasemaps are ESRI Maps. .r '' +,. • ,� r ., 4 y' m < f �_' ,r'i *Parcel boundaries based on Orange County Property Appraiser Parcel Data. Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage Figure 5 - Eagle Nest Map Section 7, T22S, R28E Orange County, Florida Feet 500 250 0 500 j MODICA & ASSOCIATES Or -� 302 Mohawk Road Clermont, Florida 34715 P: (352) 394-2000 F: (352) 394-1159 Email: Environmental@Modica.cc www.ModicaAndAssociates.com If 4 Vi16 man. Vb 4 JEW 01 I Property Boundary�i of Wypnts_11-18-2020_eca Approximate Wetland Lines.,.,,,,t,� Basemaps are ESRI Maps. Parcel boundaries based on Orange County Property Appraiser Parcel Data. Wetland limits flagged by Modica & Associates on November 18, 2020. Map is approximate; lines have not been reviewed by regulatory agencies. Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage MODICA & ASSOCIATES Approximate Wetland Map -� 302 Mohawk Road Figure 6 -Section 7, T22S, R28E �� � Clermont, Florida 34715 Orange County, Florida P: (352) 394-2000 F: (352) 394-1159 Feet Email: Environmental@Modica.cc 400 200 0 400 www.ModicaAndAssociates.com EXHIBIT A �`_.:. led:_" „�4it[ SP_ ::_..w'�tJi2".-'^"� �►�T.�•.. � a ' Ocoee Apopka Land Assemblage ';' Legend Date of Aerial: January 1999' . ' *� + `• x 1 • b • t4• # rJa ` /r • 4 ttt' waaN tN• • '' •ss• . • • 1 . �� ♦ tas. ! !ro ♦ �.•r Na f•tttsaff►Ntf•Nt • • t • f f • • • 1 . • •ai••4 a• f / i 4a•Ma1 • bast• • 1 r• • • f 1 • • • 1 ♦ ♦ •i . Y pit.•„•t 1 a••t1.1.4 • . . . • • i 691 • ♦ • is .,fu• •a• 4•sefH aM �7-�.—• • • • a • • t 1 t • ••• • } ,/�' •1• ti •• •Ni t•fawm•IiH #'11�•/�•Illt .. r+ •4r r t •! e t •• 4 •NH!• •/ ••• 4•saaa•i�ii• to it �„.. • c ■ _ .♦ ♦«f..t+s•Y.1#[t44it1 1 t 1 ► • • • 1 ♦ • 1 IR •e4\••4•.►1/aN11 •Ifa1 • • • • a Isola* • i 1 A i tt • M.ta ►a$ 14 • 4 a 4. i s t at a• 4 • 4 f. « i 46 + 1x4 s•iN•M•MaN•/ \• N ism MM 4 1 . f / S 1 / • • 1 ~ - a • t ••1• aM • " • • a • 1 4 • 1 • •}k•• ;••1 •'sr "!• # ..,•..n� `': ... . WSWW •M ,- •." 1 4 .t•a • •a . •• 4 � ,aa 4, • t a •77 ss •44 f•a •.T•• • „ jai -"s Ito test • t • 1 4� ; "i j t t •v4 ate Fla •..•.. 7 laa• a••1 , 4u... • 1 4 ••• bill— t. •• • aa14 1�y 1 1..«a. 1 •. 4 • • t •t. • a ♦ .r 40466 so o j • a a t [ 4 ' 9 , f NNMf•rstielM4 • • If • • . • • • • • . • t a .. s+ , i. 1 •• •}/1 •i� •.. ,a,asti• •t••M • ••• 1• �sa•r ••••• a f • i 1 11 F ..S . 4� 1 E Is••• •.I1• ••►• •.t\a • ` . t • • a • • • . • a a•a11aa•efM a-•Oat4.w♦i••.•f •••. ►a*.� •a ti r/ �I�� • �t 1�•` N441•••t .YM1♦1 . ••►04, ••• • • !!•S 616401 n W h•• A• • 1 a it i ♦I14t • i +• �Google Earth a*- i • •�� //V • •-- ••s• ems.• oL- o _o- • t• • •. • ( : EXHIBIT B 11/20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Orange County, Florida ,.E %y s3T c L tl a Local office North Florida Ecological Services Field Office t. (904) 731-3336 IB (904) 731-3045 7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite 200 Jacksonville, FL 32256-7517 https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 1/13 11/20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and gLck CQNTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. OW# 3. Log in (if directed to do so) 4. Provide a name and description for your project. 5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. 2. NOAA Fisheriesalso known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Birds NAM E STATUS https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 2/13 ifir`zIMIN11 IPaC: Explore Location Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecpLspecies/1 0477 Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/s pecies/7713 Wood Stork Mycteria americans Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477 Reptiles NAME STATUS Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corals couperi Thre e No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Candidate No critical habitat has been designated for this specie https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6994 Sand Skink Neoseps reynoldsi Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fvvs.gov/ecp/species/4094 Floweriig PI nts NAME STATUS Beautiful Pawpaw Deeringothamnus pulchellus Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/s pecies/4069 Britton's Beargrass Nolina brittoniana Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/spec ies/4460 Florida Bonamia Bonamia grandiflora Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2230 https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 3/13 11 /20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location Papery Whitlow -wort Paronychia chartacea Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1465 Pigeon Wings Clitoria fragrans Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/spec ies/991 Sandlace Polygonella myriophylla Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5745 Scrub Buckwheat Eriogonum longifolium var. gnaphalifolium Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. "�44 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5940 0\ Scrub Lupine Lupinus arldorum Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/736 Scrub Plum Prunus geniculata Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this speci https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2238 Wide -leaf Warea Warea amplexifolia Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp spec'es/412 1M Cri''t��i aI habitats Potentia effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. Migratory birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 4113 11/20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds -of -conservation -con cern.php Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gQyLo2igLatorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandard conservation measures.pdf The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found belowV%%& For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when thg,,se birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA 0 0 American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED .........-.............. ............................................................................-- FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE _.......................................-_.._.._................................._.._..---- BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR ................................................................................... PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN . __._...... THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, .......................................................................................... WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL ................................................................................... ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE ........................................................................................................ WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ... ................................................................................ ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE. ......................................................................................... "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES ............................................................................................................. THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY ............................................................................................................. BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.) ........................................................................................................ Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31 https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 5/13 11 /20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31 This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Common Ground -dove Columbina passerina exigua Breeds Feb 1 to Dec 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA King Rail Rallus elegans This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8936 Least Tern Sterna antillarum This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range \in'41" the continental USA and Alaska. %,,i https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 lok" Limpkin Aramus guarauna This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Alas Prairie Warbler Den roica discolor This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in t eontir�ental USA and Alaska. Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Short -tailed Hawk Buteo brachyurus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA httpsL/ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8742 Breeds May 1 to Sep 5 r Breeds A �20 to Breeds elsewhere Breeds Jan 15 to Aug 31 Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31 Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Breeds Mar 1 to Jun 30 https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 6/13 11/20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8938 Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia gundlachi This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Probability of Presence Summary Breeds Mar 10 to Jun 30 Breeds May 20 to Aug 10 The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence ( ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort (1) https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGS]SX2IRXSOA/resources 7/13 noo/2ouo IPaC: Explore Location Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species inthe 1Okrngrid ceU(s)your project areaover|aps.Thenurnberof surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. ydoData (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. SurveyTirnefrarne Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. NNprobability ofpresence Nbreeding season | survey effort —nodata speuss JAm FEB MAR APR MAY ]uw JUL AUG scp OCT NOV DIFfii— American ��f� ���� �f�f BCCnc Jill Jill IIII lill lill continental USA) in (BCRs) in the Bald Eagle lill N0won'accmmemme NN�������lill1111IINr����IIIIlillJill�����mm�� ��� (This is not a rd of ~� ~Concern (BCC) in this King Rail f+ffff+�++�+ ++++ + +--+ —f�+ —+—+ B�na �° is is a Bird RxooA/mooumoo 8n3 11/20/2020 lPaC: Explore Location Least Tern . . . . .... . . . . 4-++ —++ BCC - BCR (This is aBird of 11 Jill Jill Jill Jill "++ .................... . . . ation ......... Concern (BCC) only in particular. Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA) ......................................... Lesser Yellowlegs ++++ ++ 1+ ++—+ 4-++-1- 4-4-+— ++++ —4-++ +—++ -1-1BCC Ran ewide —+++ 1+—+ (CON) (This is a Bird ...................... . ........ ............ of Conservation Concern (BCC) ............................. .......... *­­ * — throughout its range . .................................. in the continental ........................................... �Wa­n d Alaska.)-'',"*", * . . ........ I ........................ ... Limpkin +_+ PS�.Ea!j&f� +Ill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill 1111 - — - - - — — (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) tt!22&h_Out its En2 in the continental USA and Alaska.) Prairie Warbler BCC Ran ewide ++++ 1111 IA ++++ Jill Jill Jill 11L +1+ —1—+ (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation'',­­*­ Z�_Concern (BC C) '' C C'*)'-*' n throw & tits range in the continental USA and Alaska.)* '-- Prothonotary . . . . . . . . . . . . +—++ —+++ Warbler BCC Lide (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throwghout its range ..... ........ . ... in the continental USA and Alaska.) Red-headed V I I . . . . . . I +--+ —+++Woodpecker III lill Jill Jill "++ BCC Rangewide _Lis a -Bird _. of Conse lion Concern(BCC) throw hour its ran e in the continental USA and Alaska.) ..... ..... I ..................... . .. Short -tailed Hawk . . . . . . . . ++++ —++ +—++ +--++— + —+ +—+ BCC - BCR (This is a Jill Jill Jill Jill I Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA) ...... ............................ Swallow-tailed Kite +4 . . . .... (CON) (This is a Bird of Conservation Concern- (BCC)* throughout range ....................................... in the continental USA and Alaska.) ................................... Jill Jill Jill 11-4-1 —4-1+ +—++ +--+ —+++ —+—+ hftps://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSlSX21RXSOA/resources 9/13 11/20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC BCC - BCR (This is a .............................................. 11111111111111111 Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) onl in particular Bird ...................... Conservation Regions ................................................ s (BCRs) in the I..........................1... continental USA) Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may ap yly), a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide. or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 10/13 11 /20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location Migratory birds delivered through 1PaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Studv and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. s Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ 'Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. Facilities https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 11/13 11 /20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location National Wildlife Refuge lands Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION. Fish hatcheries THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION. AA 114 Wetlands in the National Wetlands Invento y Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Pam of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District." Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommendyou verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. l� N^;01 This location overlaps th feolloi g wetlands: FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND PEM1 Fx FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PF01 Fd RIVERINE R5UBH A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. hftps://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 12/13 11 /20/2020 IPaC: Explore Location The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions ,,.,%%�\ Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory progra and, rVVtary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. �**'' 0 hrips://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HRMKPVEWCZEOTIGSISX2IRXSOA/resources 13113 EXHIBIT C ' l JACKSON ) I Jl ' --.. CALHOUN 12 `;LEOI • BAY LIBERTY WAKULLA ��^1 JGULF �I �� •) FRANKLIN,�"` G X J � \� i USFWS Panama City Office Responsibility Alabama v 08 o „j o •0 oo0 e O Georgia00 , © 1:3,000,000 Mi A• HAMILTON �. ?PyG J...'-` Q 25 50 \��� IBAKER • i DUVAL r Km TAYLOR - y 1\ I LAFAYETTE", Ja`O '`gdF CLAYST JOHNS DIXIE PUTNAM FLAGLER LEVY ' MARIN a -- USFWS 0 --- 9 North Florida Jacksonville Office CITRUS SUMTER Responsibility LAKE � —� t i _ SEMINOLEI i HERNANDO i1 ', F� ----j 1 So RAN E � 1 l i PASCO If--�----�--r • ' I • • • eOJO • • POLK OSCEOLA BREVARD: *, •mo • •; I i INDIAN RIVER ..:-I• P • I �� ECNpeE - --- 1:30,000,000 I NFESO P� SFESO HARDEE _— —_—_ oy ) i STLUCIE�, O SARASOTAI DESOTO ! ' MARTIN Wood Stork Nesting Colonies and - CHARLOTTE ! GLADES CHARLOTTE /� --- --J Core Foraging Areas -------; --- • Active Within 2008-2017 in Florida ! PALM �� �ILEE I HENDRY i • • Colonies Active In FL2008-2017 i J�J— O Colonies Active In GA 2005-2014 -- • , r • Colonies Active In SC 2005-2014 I BROWARD • O Foraging Area Active 2008-2017 t COLLIERI • • Foraging Buffer Radials: USFWS South Florida Counties: 18.6 miles South Florida Central Florida Counties: 15 miles Vero Beach Office MONROE i North Florida Counties: 13 miles Responsibility j • Muun•DADE / L' Neighboring States: 13 miles • r � ) 9 Florida Counties !.� • I • • -� Ji Water USFWS Ecological Services Office Boundary s WOST oobrges update 2018 USFWS JaksomYb FL hftpsJhv .fws.gm/wmflorida/ The Information on this map has been compiled from a —lety of sources and is intended for llusbatfon purposes orgy. No warranty, expressed or impled, is made regarding utility accuracy, reliability, or complelenes of this map. January 27, 2021 City of Ocoee 150 N Lakeshore Drive Ocoee, FL 34761 ARCHITECTURE Business Center Design Plan RE: Progress Commerce Park To Whom It May Concern: The following letter refers to the project above on meeting the requirements outlined in the SR 429 Business Center Design Plan for industrial buildings. The buildings are oriented on site so that all service areas (loading dock, dumpster, etc.) are internal facing and screened with landscaping and low walls where not obstructed by the buildings. All buildings with frontage to any public roads have their primary entrances oriented to the road as specified in design section 4.4.10. The building design complies with the 4.7.3 industrial facade standards as follows: o Awnings have been incorporated at each building entrance. o The facade incorporates the vertical "copper mountain" colored sections to break up the facade into the appearance of single user sections. Each section maintains a building entrance feature. o Sections of the building has been divided horizontally to represents a ground floor area. As designated by the change in paint color from the lower section to the field color. As well at the storefront areas with the awning/decorative banding delineating ground from area above. o All facades of the building will be comprised of painted and textured concrete walls with finished metal accent features along the building fronts. o The four building colors will be used consistently for all buildings on all facades and screen walls. o All prefinished metal features (gutter, downspout, louvers, overhead doors, etc.) will be of a consistent color, integrating with the color palette of the facade. o The primary facade ground floor transparency is required to meet 10%. The typical building elevation design shows 302 linear feet of glass along the 704 feet building facade (43%). All primary building facades will vary slightly with length of building and number of entrances. However, the transparency standard will be met on each building. These buildings will fall into the category of modern/contemporary design as outlined in 4.9.4. The facades are comprised of geometric shapes forming asymmetrical volumes. The building entrances are distinguished with the metal structural elements and large glass sections. Samples of paint color, finished metal, textured concrete walls can be provided if required. Respectfully, Clark M. Stranahan, AIA, NCARB Florida License #91246 Cc: file TYPICAL CORNER ENTRANCE i. ''SIGNAGEN ALL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS, AREA, AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OVER-RIDING LOCAL CODES AND DEED RESTRICTIONS. --.._..-- ------------ ..-.. ----...... 6' M1111. HEIGHT LETTERS AT EACH TEfAtTT ENTRMlCE. • .r �,I., MINI ALUMI111 RACEWAY/STAND-OFF PANTED TO MITER BOWING FOR: AVANT MOUNTING POINT TO WALL FORT: AVPNT GARDE MEDIUM. MATERIAL: y' THICK BRUSHED ALUVSNUM COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED EXISTING WAl ALUMINUM LETTERS - MOUNTED TO RACEWAY ZHU CONCEALED ATTACHMENT TTPICAL INTERMEDIATE ENTRANCE SIGNAGE DESCRIPTION WORK INCLUDES USING TENANT SUPPLIED AND TENANT SPECIFIED PROMOTION GRAPHICS AND SIGNAGE, CONSTRUCTION OF SIGNAGE TO BE DETERMINE (APPROVED BY THE LESSEE ACID LESSOR. SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY BUILDING'SIGNAGE CODES, APPROPRIATE STATE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ACT(S), AMERICANN WITH DISAB ILRIES ACT, AND ANY AND ALL DEED RESTRICTIONS. ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING AT LOCATIONS) SPECIFIED IN THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THIS DOCUMENT. SUBMITTALS TENANT MUST SUABIT COMPLETE ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS FOR ALL SIGNAGE AT A MINIMUM SCALE OF 1I2'=V-D'. TENANT SHALL SUBMR ANY AND ALL SPECIFIC STORAGE PROPOSALS FOR APPROVAL. SUM`,11TTAL SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO TYPEFACE(S), LETTER SIZE, ORIGINAL ART, ATTACHMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION METHODIST, METHODS SIGNS SHALL BE INDIVIDUAL LETTERS PROFESSIONALLY FABRICATED TO HIGH STANDARDS. LETTERS AND SHAPES MUST BE BACKLIT, AND PASS THE LESSORS WRITTEN APPROVAL. OTHER SIGNAGE AND LIGINING.METHODS MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE LESSOR FOR CONSIDERATION, ANY AND ALL HOLIDAY SPECIFIC ANDIOR TEMPORARY SIGNAGE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LESSOR INSTALLATION -ALL SIGNAGE IS TO BE NIOU14TED TO BUILDING RACEWAY BY CONCEALED FASTENERS. -ALL SIGNAGE IS TO BE INSTALLED PLUNIB ACID SECURE WITH UNIFORM SPACING AND IN ACCORD WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS, CITY CODES, APPROPRIATE STATE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ACT, AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. - TENANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL SIGNAGE ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL WORK REPAIRS, AND MAINTENANCE. '- ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO ALL TENANT SIGNAGE MUST BE FED FROM TENANT'S CIRCUITS. MAINTENANCE TERM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTINUING MAINTENANCE AND FULL FUNCTIONING OF ANY AN ALL TEl SPECIFIC SIGGAGE. MALFUNCTIONING LIGHTING, OR SIGN DAMAGE MUST BE REPAIRED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. ANY REPAIR METHODS SHALL BE SAME OR EQUAL TO EXISTING APPROVED SIGNAGEIMETFIODS. EXCLUSIONS MECHANICAL - NO MECHANICAL MOVEMENT. RPICPL 18 %I B" DOCK NUMBER SIGNAGE -NO LIGHTING MEDIODS, BOTTOM OF SIGN 2ABOVE OVERHEAD DOOR NO OFF -FACE LIGHTINGMETHODS. OPENING. CENTER RGN ON DOCK DOOR, SHOP FPRRICATED .OIIO ALUVINV!A PAN STOREFRONT ENTRANCE .MOUNTED SIGNNAGE STOREFRONT ENTRANCE MOUNTED SIGNAGE SHALL BE VINYL DIE -CUT LETTERS CONSISTING OF TENANT NMIE AND HOURS OF OPERATION. SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED ON - PANTED W/ SIGNAGE WITH'S STANDARD STOREFRONT PER DETAIL SHOWN. TYPEFACE SHALL BE HELVETICA, COLOR SHALL BE WHITE. TENANT NAME ME TYPE SIZE SHALL BE 4'MAXI'AUM HEIGHT (HEIGHT MAY BE ADJUSTED 4 3: GLOSS AUTOMOTIVE PANT SYSTEM TO BY THE LESSOR IF THE TENANTS NAHE LENGTH REQUIRES); HOURS OF OPERATION TYPE SIZE SHALL BE 1'.AXIt.1UNI HEIGHT. COLOR TYPEFACE, LAYOUT, TENANT NA.IE, AtAD - MATCH EXISTING BUILDING WALL ADJACENT HOURSOF OPERATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LESSOR BEFORE INSTALLATION. STOREFRONT MOUNTED SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE LO MOUNTING LOCATION, STOREFRONT GLASS ONLY. NO ITENISARETODEATTACHEDTOTHE EXTERIOR OF THE STOREFRONT OR STOREFRONT GLASS. ANY ITEMS OTHER THAN THE TENANT NAME AND VitfTL LETTERS: 10' TALL, FONT SHALL BE AVANT HOURS OF OPERATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LESSOR BEFORE INSTALLATION. — GARDE MEDIUM. COLOR; j8TM6 VETALUC SILVER. OWNERRESPONSIBLESIGLIAGE ALL SUITE DESIGNATION N SIGNAGE IS THE PROPERTY, AND RESPONSIBILITY OF DIE LESSOR. UPKEEP, REPAIR AND ALTERATIONS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF T'�` Y I C ANUMBER DOCK AM Fd 1� SIGN G THE LESSOR. IF SUITE DESIGNATION SIGNAGE HAS BEEN DGED OR IS IN NEED OF REPAIR CONTACT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT.MENT. M,A S®CAI:: 1'=1'-0* North -- 0' 2 4 8' 0o a+ 0 o a a o 0 o a + o a r PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK SCALE: 114"=1'-0" _ J1 OCOEE , FLORIDA McCRANEY ARCHITECTURE Planning & Zoning Commission July 13, 2021 Vice -Chair Lomneck asked if this facility will include a memory care unit. Mr. Lee said only skilled nursing will be available, no memory care. Member Forges inquired if there will be any excess land for future development. Development Services Director Rumer said, if approved, this development will utilize all 12.34 acres. The Public hearing was opened. As no speaker forms were received, the public hearing was closed. (7:00 pm) Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Pruitt Health Skilled Nursing Facility Substantial Amendment to the Fountains at Highland Park PUD/LUP; Project No: RZ-21-03-05, subiect to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting: Moved by Member Mellen. Seconded by MemberForcies: motion carried unanimously. C. Progress Commerce Park — Annexation, Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning to PUD and Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan; Project No(s): AX-01-21-01, CPA-2021-001, RZ-21-02-01 & LS-2021-002. (Advertised in the West Orange Times on Thursday, July 1, 2021) Development Services Director Rumer presented a brief overview of this proposed Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan (PSP), which is approximately 39.96 acres and located on the west side of Ocoee Apopka Road, east of SR 429 and 2,900 feet south of Fullers Cross Road. The site is located within the SR 429 Business Character Area Overlay. The applicant is proposing an Annexation, Large -Scale Comprehensive Map Amendment from Low -Density Residential (4 D.U./Acre) to Light Industrial, rezoning to PUD and a Large -Scale Preliminary Site Plan in order to develop 482,940 SF of Light Industrial/Warehouse use located within eight (8) buildings. Three (3) 27,000 SF buildings are proposed to be located along Ocoee Apopka Road with two (2) 50,000 SF buildings behind them. He stated this property is located within the SR 429 Business Character Area Overlay, which does not intend to facilitate this type of development in the subarea. However, the applicant and City Staff have worked diligently to develop a project size and layout that will meet the intent and desired outcomes of the overlay. Special conditions and criteria that make this project unique and beneficial will be used as new code requirements for the Ocoee Apopka Road Corridor and Business Character Area. The proposed Progress Commercial Park will provide the much -needed extension of sewer service to the area via its contribution towards a new public master lift station. Additionally, right-of-way dedication and a 12-foot trail will be provided along Ocoee Apopka Road. The applicants propose to improve Ocoee Apopka Road with right-of-way dedication, add turn lanes, and construct a new east/west public roadway that will open new properties to development with the future extension of Pine Street. 4 Planning & Zoning Commission July 13, 2021 Discussion: Member Kennedy inquired what type of road is on the other side of SR 429 where the other warehouses are located. Development Services Director Rumer said those warehouses front East Crown Point Road, which is in the jurisdiction of the City of Winter Garden. Sean Carpenter, Applicant, McCraney Property Company, said they developed the nearby industrial business park called Ocoee Business Park, which has been very successful and currently almost at full occupancy. He explained their warehouses bring in commerce jobs such as service and manufacturing companies, which is in high demand. He also explained this project has been scaled down and will not be conducive for big tractor -trailers, but will allow box trucks. He discussed the enhanced landscaping with an added berm along the north side of the property along Demastus Lane. He announced he is happy to answer any questions the Board may have. Vice -Chair Lomneck asked if a noise buffer will be erected along the north side of the property for the property owners on Demastus Lane. Mr. Carpenter explained they decided on enhanced landscaping with a berm for a more natural look as compared to a wall. Development Services Director Rumer explained the properties to the north are zoned agriculture, which does not have public road frontage except for the less than 50 foot paper road called Demastus Lane. Vice -Chair Lomneck expressed his concerns regarding truck traffic along Ocoee Apopka Road. Member Kennedy said the staff report indicated the 429 Business Character Area does not intend to facilitate this type of development. He asked how much and what type of truck traffic will be on this road if this project is approved. Development Services Director Rumer explained there currently are some existing light industrial uses within this corridor; and further, the characteristics within this area were revised with the overlay by increasing to 7 - 9 trips per house per day. This development is proposed to provide a maximum buildout potential of 2,376 daily trips with peak hours from 7:00 to 9:00 am and 4:00 to 6:00 pm with 11 percent being heavy truck traffic. Member Forges stated he believed this type of industrial business park is needed and that Ocoee Apopka Road needs to be widened at some point in the future. Development Services Director Rumer explained the City is planning to make N. Lakewood more of a primary road; and further, the Expressway Authority is undergoing major improvements to the 429 by reconfiguring the exit ramps, lanes and opening the medians to handle traffic loads. The future extension of Pine Street will be utilized instead of Ocoee Apopka Road; and further, the Wurst Road extension will be utilized as well. Member Williams said she is struggling with the timing of this project, because if this project goes forward, it will impact the roadways. Development Services Director Rumer explained Ocoee Apopka Road is not in the County's five-year plan for widening; however, undergoing road improvements nearby will create relief until the County is ready to widen it. 5 Planning & Zoning Commission July 13, 2021 (7.45 pm) Vice -Chair Lomneck opened the public hearing. Lauren Ulmer, 1774 Crown Point Woods Circle, stated she lives nearby and has concerns regarding buffers, water runoff, chemicals in the wells, construction and safety. Vice -Chair Lomneck asked if the stormwater is enclosed. Development Services Director Rumer answered in the affirmative; and further, explained that everything is done indoors with the City's light industrial land use. There will be no manufacturing done outside or outside storage of materials. The stormwater in this area is located in the Lake Apopka Basin, which has some of the most stringent stormwater requirements in the state, because of the restoration of Lake Apopka. David Morse,1825 Demastus Lane, stated he owns the second property from Ocoee Apopka Road, just north of this site. His property faces the subject site, and he stated he would like a buffer. Vice - Chair Lomneck asked him if he would rather see the enhanced landscaping with a berm or an eight to ten -foot wall. Mr. Morse stated he would like it to be more aesthetically pleasing. He stated he is concerned about the traffic on Ocoee Apopka Road; and further, he said there are a lot of families and children living on Demastus Lane and asked that there be no access off of Demastus Lane other than for emergency services. Development Services Director Rumer stated the developers were initially looking for access off of Demastus Lane, but that did not work out, because Demastus is not big enough. The road would have to be dedicated to the County for a public road to be put in. He stated there will be no way to access this project from Demastus Lane with vehicles. Ana Rosa, 1200 Log Landing Drive, stated her concern is rezoning for the traffic, because traffic is very heavy. She believed it would be best to widen Ocoee Apopka Road and then rezone for this project. Development Services Director Rumer explained that currently Ocoee Apopka Road is not failing level of service; however, with the existing background trips, it will fail. He stated again a few nearby road improvements that will create relief until the County is able to improve Ocoee Apopka Road. He explained it is against the law to turn down an applicant due to roadway issues. Vice -Chair Lomneck closed the public hearing. (8:01 pm) Member Mellen asked how changing the rezoning from agriculture to light industrial will impact the values of the nearby homes. Development Services Director Rumer explained bringing sewer to the area will definitely raise property values. He further expressed that this project will always be under one owner and maintained by one owner, which also benefits nearby properties. Member Forges stated he believed a wall at the north end would be safer than a berm. Member Williams stated her concern is still regarding the overall timing. Member Kennedy asked since the overlay was adopted in 2017, what, if any, would be the consequences to the rest of this business area overlay if this light industrial is approved. Development Services Director Rumer explained the overlay in more detail. Planning & Zoning Commission July 13, 2021 (8:22 pm) Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Progress Commerce Park Annexation; Project No: AX-01-21-01, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting: Moved by Member Williams, Seconded by Member Forges; motion carried 4 to 1 with Member Mellen opposing_ Member Forges asked if he could see the buffer before this next motion. Development Services Director Rumer explained where the buffer would be located with a berm. Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Progress Commerce Park Rezoning to PUD; Project No: RZ-21-02-01; and further, add a condition that a 12-foot buffer fence be installed alonq the north side, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting: Moved by Vice -Chair Lomneck, Seconded by Member Williams; motion carried 3 to 2 with Member Kennedy & Member Mellen opposing Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Progress Commerce Park Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Project No: CPA- 2021-001, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting; Moved by Member Forges, Seconded by Member Williams: motion carried 3 to 2 with Member Kennedy & Member Mellen opposing_ Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Denial of the Progress Commerce Park Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan; Project No: LS-2021-002, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting Moved by Member Williams, Seconded by Member Kennedy, motion carried 3 to 2 with Vice -Chair Lomneck and Member Forges opposing. Member Williams stated that she is not opposed to the annexation, rezoning or land use amendment, but believes the details of this project needs further work. Development Services Director Rumer explained the rezoning sets up the criteria; whereas, the site plan demonstrates the rezoning is being met. He further explained the motion for rezoning was to recommend approval with a condition; however, her motion to recommend denial of the site plan will not allow it to meet the zoning requirements. Motion: Move to rescind the previous motion made by Member Williams; Moved by Member Williams, Seconded by Member Mellen: motion carried unanimously. Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Progress Commerce Park Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan; Project No: LS-2021-002, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting; Moved by Vice -Chair Lomneck, Seconded by Member Forges; motion carried 3 to 2 with Member Kennedy & Member Mellen opposing ``% OCOeP florlda AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET Meeting Date: October 19, 2021 Item # / Reviewed By: Contact Name: Anoch Whitfield Department Director: Contact Number: Ext. 1016 City Manager: Subject: 113 W. Oakland Avenue — Aplausos, LLC Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Project No(s): CPA-2021-005 & RZ-21-08-28 Commission District #2 — Rosemary Wilsen Background Summary: The First Reading was held on Tuesday, October 5, 2021. The subject property is approximately 0.29 acres in size and is located at 113 W Oakland Avenue on the north side of W Oakland Avenue, approximately 150 feet west of N Cumberland Avenue. It is within the City's Downtown Redevelopment Area Overlay, and the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Area Overlay, as prescribed in Section 5-3.1, is to attract reinvestment in the downtown area of Ocoee through flexible development regulations, codes, and innovative designs which support land uses or mixes of land uses that promote the economic viability of the City's downtown. Desirous land uses include, but are not limited to, retail, general commercial, restaurants, professional offices and services, and a variety of residential uses. The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment (CPA) to convert the property from Low -Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM) and a corresponding rezoning of the property from R-1AA (Single -Family Dwelling District) to C-2 (Community Commercial District) zoning classification in order to allow for the development of commercial, office and a variety of residential uses or mixed land uses. The table below lists the future land use designations, jurisdiction, existing land uses and zoning classifications of the surrounding parcels: Direction: JPA Future Land Use / Jurisdiction Existing Land Use / Zoning North Low Density Residential / City of Ocoee Vacant lot / R-1AA South Commercial / City of Ocoee Single-family residential uses / R-3 East Low -Density Residential / City of Ocoee Single-family residential use / R-1AA West Low -Density Residential / City of Ocoee Single-family uses / R-1AA In accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the current Low -Density Residential (LDR) future land use designation limits development on the property to one (1) single-family residential and no commercial uses. At a floor area ratio (FAR) of 3.0 under the proposed Commercial future land use, the property could be developed with up to 37,000 square feet of retail, restaurant, office, and other non-residential uses or a mix of residential and non-residential uses. Thus, the proposed CPA and rezoning would allow for the opportunity for commercial, residential, live/work, and mixed uses to help stimulate economic activity near the City's downtown core and, as such, are consistent with and support the goals of the City's Downtown Redevelopment Area Overlay. The proposed map amendment and rezoning are not anticipated to have adverse impacts on existing or planned public infrastructure. Therefore, staff supports the proposed Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning. Issue: Should the City Commission approve the Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLU) Amendment from Low -Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM) land use designation and rezoning from R-1AA (Single -Family Dwelling District) to C-2 (Community Commercial District) zoning classification for the approximately 0.29-acre property located at 113 West Oakland Avenue, assigned parcel ID number 17-22-28- 2873-00-020? Development Review Recommendation: The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on Tuesday, August 31, 2021, to review the proposed Small - Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment and Rezoning, and finding no issues, voted to recommend approval of the proposed Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment from Low -Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM) and the proposed rezoning from R-1AA (Single -Family Dwelling District) to C-2 (Community Commercial District) for the approximately 0.29-acre property located at 113 West Oakland Avenue, assigned parcel ID number 17-22-28-2873-00-020. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) considered the proposed Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment and corresponding Rezoning on September 14, 2021. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLU) Amendment from Low -Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM) land use designation and rezoning from R-1AA (Single -Family Dwelling District) to C-2 (Community Commercial District) zoning classification. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Honorable Mayor and City Commission adopt an ordinance amending the adopted Future Land Use Map from Low -Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM) and amending the Official Zoning Map from R-1AA (Single -Family Dwelling District) to C-2 (Community Commercial District) for the property located at 113 W. Oakland Avenue, assigned parcel ID number 17-22-28-2873-00-020. Attachments: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance Rezoning Ordinance Location Map Aerial Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Financial Impact: None. Type of Item : (please mark with an 'x') X Public Hearing Ordinance First Reading Ordinance Second Reading Resolution Commission Approval Discussion & Direction Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution Reviewed by City Attorney Reviewed by Finance Dept. Reviewed by For Clerk's Dept Use Consent Agenda Public Hearing Regular Agenda N/A N/A N/A ORDINANCE NO.2021- (Small-Scale CPA —113 W Oakland Ave) TAX PARCEL ID: 17-22-28-2873-00-020 CASE NO. CPA-2021-005: 113 W Oakland Avenue — Aplausos LLC CPA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED, TO CHANGE THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY .29 ACRES LOCATED AT 113 WEST OAKLAND AVENUE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO COMMERCIAL (COMM); AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Ocoee (the "Ocoee City Commission") has adopted the City's Comprehensive Plan (the "Ocoee Comprehensive Plan") by Ordinance No. 91-28 on September 18, 1991 pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, the Growth Policy Act (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, sets forth procedures and requirements for a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan and amendments thereto; and WHEREAS, the owner (the "Applicant") of certain real property located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, assigned tax parcel identification number 17-22-28- 2873-00-020, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B", has submitted an application to the Ocoee City Commission to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation (the "Comprehensive Plan Amendment") of said real property from Low Density Residential to Commercial; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5-9(C) of Article V of the Land Development Code of the City of Ocoee, Florida, the Development Services Director has reviewed said Comprehensive Plan Amendment application and determined that said Comprehensive Plan Amendment is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3174(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the City's Local Planning Agency (LPA) conducted a publicly noticed and advertised public hearing on Tuesday, September 14, 2021, to consider and make recommendation of said proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3184(l 1), Florida Statutes, on Tuesday, October 19, 2021, the Ocoee City Commission held a de novo advertised public hearing with respect to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and determined, after consideration of public comments, that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and confirmed as true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. AUTHORITY. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. The Future Land Use Map within the Future Land Use Element of the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to change the future land use designation of the Subject Property, as particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit `B", from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM). SECTION 4. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to revise the adopted Future Land Use Map of the City of Ocoee in order to incorporate the Comprehensive Plan Amendment enacted by this Ordinance. SECTION 5. CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty-one (31) days after adoption, unless challenged prior to that date pursuant to Section 163.3187(5), Florida Statutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021. Space intentionally left blank ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Rusty Johnson, Mayor (SEAL) ADVERTISED , 2021 READ FIRST TIME , 2021. READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED . 2021. UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this day of , 2021. SHUFFIELD LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FREEMAN AND YARR REPLAT 60/99 LOT 2 EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP 113 W Oakland Avenue - Aplausos LLC Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning to Community Commercial CPA-2021-005 & RZ-21-08-28 r ee Street al 0 MIN iWeij S r ORDINANCE NO.2021- (Rezoning Ordinance for 113 W Oakland Ave) TAX PARCEL ID: 17-22-28-2873-00-020 CASE NO. RZ-21-08-28: 113 W Oakland Avenue — Aplausos LLC Rezoning AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT) TO C-2 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.29 ACRES LOCATED AT 113 WEST OAKLAND AVENUE, PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER; FINDING SUCH REZONING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY ZONING MAP; REPEALING INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the owner (the "Applicant") of certain real property located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, as hereinafter described, has submitted an application to the City Commission of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Commission") to rezone said real property (the "Rezoning"); and WHEREAS, the Applicant seeks to rezone certain real property containing approximately 0.29 acres, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" from R-IAA to C-2; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5-9(B) of Article V of the Land Development Code of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Code"), the City Development Services Director has reviewed said Rezoning application and determined that said Rezoning is consistent with the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Ordinance No. 91-28, adopted September 18, 1991, as amended (the "Ocoee Comprehensive Plan"); and WHEREAS, said Rezoning application was scheduled for review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Planning and Zoning Commission"), acting as the Local Planning Agency; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed said Rezoning application for consistency with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and determined that said Rezoning is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of the City, and recommended to the Ocoee City Commission that the zoning classification of said real property be rezoned as requested by the Applicant, and that the Ocoee City Commission find that the Rezoning requested by the Applicant to be consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021, the Ocoee City Commission held a de novo advertised public hearing with respect to the proposed Rezoning of said real property and determined that the Rezoning is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been considered by the Ocoee City Commission in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 166.041(3)(a), Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. The Ocoee City Commission has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. SECTION 2. REZONING. The zoning classification, as defined in the Ocoee City Code, of the Property described in Exhibit "A" containing approximately 0.29 acres located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, is hereby changed from R-IAA to C-2. A map of said land herein described which clearly shows the area of the Rezoning is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference is made a part hereof. SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The Ocoee City Commission hereby finds the Rezoning of the land described in this Ordinance to be consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 4. ZONING MAP. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to revise the Official Zoning Map of the City of Ocoee in order to incorporate the Rezoning enacted by this Ordinance, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said revised Official Zoning Map in accordance with the provisions of Section 5-1(G) of Article V of the Ocoee City Code. SECTION 5. CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 52021. ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Rusty Johnson, Mayor (SEAL) ADVERTISED , 2021 READ FIRST TIME , 2021. READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED .2021. UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this day of 2021. SHUFFIELD LOWMAN & WILSON, P.A. By: City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FREEMAN AND YARR REPLAT 60/99 LOT 2 EXHIBIT "B" 113 W Oakland Avenue - Aplausos LLC Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning to Community Commercial CPA-2021-005 S RZ-21-08-28 Ire -r ��e Street r �. _ -- F ► - ._ 113 W Oakland Avenue - Aplausos LLC Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning to Community Commercial CPA-2021-005 & RZ-21-08-28 A e Street F� no Street i v il4erl s KE STA 113 W Oakland Ave. - Aplausos LLC Surrounding Future Land Use Map �NJ 0 45 90 VINAW ,_ Developments ervices Department 180 EFeet Created: September 2021 IQSubject P roperty Future Land Use Classification: Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) _High Density Residential (HDR) Professional Offices and Services (PS) Commercial (COMM) Light Industrial (LI) Heavy Industrial (HI) Conservation/Floodplains (CONS) Recreation and Open Space (REC) Public F acilities/Institutional (INST) 113 W Oakland Street - Aplausos Surrounding Zoning Map Developments ervices Department 0 45 90 180 Feet Created: September 2021 QSubject Property Zoning Classification: General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban (A-2) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1 AAA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple-Fam ily Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices & Services (P-S) Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) Community Commercial (C-2) General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing &Warehousing (1-1) General Industrial (1-2) Commercial (PUD) HE Low Density (PUD) =Medium Density (PUD) ME High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) //j Unclassified COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT Date Published and Media Name 12B The West Orange Times Thursday October 7 2021 Advertisement or Article FIRST INSERTION CITY OF OCOEE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS APLAUSOS LLC -11s W OAKLAND AVENUE SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO COMMERCIAL (COMA) AND REZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT (R-IAA) TO COMMUNrrY COMMERCIAL (C-2) CASE NUMBER: CPA-2021-005 & RZ-21-08-28 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Article I, Sections 1-8, 1-9 and 1-10, of the City of Ocoee Land Development Code, that on TUESDAY, OCTOBER IS, 2021, AT 6:15 P.M. or as soon thereafter as practical; the OCOEE CITY COMMIS- SION will hold a PUBLIC HEARING at the City of Ocoee Commission Chambers, 150 North Iakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida, to consider the 113 W Oakland Avenue - Aplausos, LLC Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial (COMM) and corresponding Rezoning from Single -Family Dwelling District (R-IAA) to Commercial (C-2). The subject property is assigned parcel number 17-22-28-2873-00-020. The subject property is approximately 0.29 acres in size and is located at on the north side of W Oakland Avenue, approximately 150 feet west of N Cumberland Avenue. The physical address is 113 W Oakland Avenue. The applicant is requesting to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map to allow for the construction of commercial office/retail. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard with respect to the proposed actions. The complete case file, including a complete legal descrip- tion by metes and bounds, may be inspected at the Ocoee Development Services Department, 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. The City Commission may continue the public hearing to other dates and times, as it deems necessary. Any interested party shall be advised that the dates, times, and places of any continuation of these or continued public hearings shall be announced during the hearings and that no further notices regarding these matters will be published You are advised that any person who desires to appeal any decision made during the public hearings will need a record of the proceedings and, for this purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of the proceedings should contact the City ClerKa Office 48 hours in advance ofthe meeting at (407) 905-3105. October 7, 2021 21-03764W