Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 12 Second Reading and Public Hearing of an Ordinance for Ocoee Regional Sports Complex CPA & Text Amendment
City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 18, 2025 Item #: 12 Contact Name: Anoch Whitfield Department Director: Ginger Corless Contact Number: Ext. 1016 City Manager: Craig Shadrix Subject: Second Reading and Public Hearing of an Ordinance for Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) and Conservation (CON) to Commercial (COMM) and Corresponding Text Amendment to the Future Land Use Element; Project No. CPA-2024-006. (Zoning Manager Whitfield) Background Summary: The First Reading and Public Hearing of the Ordinance was held at the November 5, 2024, City Commission Meeting. Owner/Applicant: The developer/owner is Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise/Owner, as represented by Marcos Bastian, AECOM, the applicant. However, the proposed Ocoee Regional Sports Complex (ORSC) is a partnership project between the City and Montierre Development, PLLC. In 2022, the City partnered with Montierre Development to facilitate the development of the ORSC, a proposed 150-acre multi-use project, in an effort to generate substantial economic benefits for the residents of Ocoee and the public in the region by creating thousands of jobs in various industries and delivering on the City's continued commitment to develop attractive and connected places for residents and the public to dine, shop, work, gather, and recreate. General Location: The subject property is within Commission District 3 and is generally located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road. Property Size and Parcel ID No.: The subject property consists of nine (9) parcels totaling approximately 150 acres, assigned parcel identification numbers 07-22-28-0000-00-001 (the Chevron Property), 07-22-28-0000- 00-023, 07-22-28-0000-00-057, 07-22-28-0000-00-041, 07-22-28-0000-00-039, 07-22-28-0000-00-043, 07-22- 28-0000-00-105, 07-22-28-0000-00-060, and 07-22-28-0000-00-074. Existing Site Conditions: The table below summarizes the existing conditions of the property. Current Future Land Use (FLU) Map Designation Current Zoning District Existing Land Use Overlays/Unique Features Low Density Residential (117.7 acres) Conservation (32.3 acres) PUD-LD, R-1AA and County A-1 Most of parcels are vacant, partially wooded lots; a few are occupied by single- family dwelling Wetlands, man-made canal, and Basinger, other hydric fine sandy soils. The property is within the Lake Apopka Drainage Basin, which is within the Ocklawaha River Basin. A large portion of City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org property contains contaminated soils and has been designated a Brownfield. The property is surrounded by the following: jurisdictions, Future Land Use Map designations, zoning districts and existing land uses. Direction Jurisdiction FLUM Designation Zoning District Existing Land Use North Ocoee & Orange County City Commercial County Low Density Residential City PUD-COMM & R- 1A Orange County A-1 Church facility, single- family residential & Vacant South Orange County County Low Density Residential County A-1 Sports facility & vacant wooded land with wetlands East Ocoee & Orange County City Low Density Residential, Conservation, & Light Industrial County Rural & Low Density Residential City A-1, PUD-LD, I-1 & R-1AA County A-1 Various uses, including single-family residential, school, agricultural uses and vacant lands West Ocoee & Orange County City Commercial & Light Industrial County Low Density Residential City PUD-COMM, PUD- IND, & C-3 County R-CE & A-1 Various uses, including single-family residential residential, light industrial/flex warehousing, and vacant lands Proposed Amendment: The applicant proposes two amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The first amendment is for a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment to convert approximately 117.7 acres of Low Density Residential and 32.3 acres of Conservation designated land to 150 acres of commercial designated land. The table below summarizes the applicant's proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment and potential development on the subject property. Proposed FLUM Designation Proposed Use Proposed Development Program Commercial Maximum FAR: 3.0; approximately 19.6 Million SF Multi-sport sports complex, hotel, indoor/outdoor entertainment, restaurant, retail, office and assembly/conference uses and associated infrastructure The proposed text amendment will limit development of the property to 42 acres of sports fields & entertainment venues, 1.33 million SF of mixed use commercial (inclusive of hotel square footage for 1,250 hotel keys), and a maximum of 17,960 net new external daily trips. The development will be served by an amenitized, pedestrian-activated stormwater "riverwalk" and surface, podium, and garage parking. Utilities continues to be coordinated with the Ocoee Utilities Department. NOTE: The proposed text amendment states a maximum development potential of 2.46 million SF because it includes the parking facilities. The Second Amendment is a text amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to update the Activity Center provisions of Section XII of the FLUE and amend Objective 3 and Policy 3.1 to create a new activity City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org center to be known as the "Northwest Activity Center at Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road". Proposed new Policy 3.1.1 defines the boundaries for this new Activity Center and establishes the maximum development potential, infrastructure commitments, and environmental mitigation plan for the proposed new activity center. The proposed text amendment is detailed in Exhibit C of the proposed ordinance, but a summary is provided below: • Uphold certain protective covenants and restrictions to parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-001 (the Chevron Property), • Require that environmental and wetland mitigation plans be prepared in a form acceptable to the City, prior to the approval of any site plan for development, • Adopt by policy the development regulations and controls for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex via the Planned Unit Development Land Use Plan, conditions of approval, development agreement or any other related documents, • Establish maximum intensity for the activity center via specific uses and a maximum floor area ratio of 0.4 in lieu of the 4.0 allowed within the Commercial FLU designation, • Establish a maximum of 17,960 net new external daily trips irrespective of adjustments in the development program and • Formalize owner/developer commitments that would run with the land in perpetuity for transportation, utilities, and other infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate the proposed development of the Northwest Activity Center. Development of the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex within the Northwest Activity Center includes removal and disposal of the contaminated soil on the Brownfield, dedication of land to the City for a new city park and associated parking, extension of 17th Avenue to connect North Lakewood Avenue to Ocoee Apopka Road to improve east-west travel and several transportation improvements. Additionally, through the widening of Ocoee Apopka Road, connectivity with the West Orange Trail will be achieved and promoted. The entire site will be designed with the need for connected pedestrian/bicycle access and safety and the ability of emergency services to move about the project site in mind. Consistency with Florida Statutes: The requested Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map amendment and text amendment are consistent with Sections 163.3177(6)(a)2.e and 2.i. and 163.3177(6)(a)4, Florida Statutes, in that the map amendment and proposed development program address (1) the need for redevelopment of blighted areas, in this case, the removal of contaminated soils, and (2) the need for job creation, capital investment and economic development to strengthen and diversify the City's economy. The proposed development is anticipated to generate over 9,800 construction-related jobs, over 5,100 permanent jobs in the retail, hospitality, restaurant, sports and entertainment, and professional office industries, as well as tourism-related jobs and economic opportunities. Consistency with JPA Agreement: Parcels 07-22-28-0000-00-039, -041, -043, -074, and -105 were annexed into the City in June 2024 without an initial zoning classification. Thus, these five (5) parcels currently have the County's A-1 zoning classification and are designated Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Joint Planning Area (JPA) Agreement Future Land Use Map (FLUM). A prerequisite to amending the City's FLUM in the Comprehensive Plan, the FLUM of the JPA must first be amended and approved by both the City and the County. To this end, the City Commission has approved the Fourth JPA Amendment, and said Fourth JPA Amendment has been sent to the County and is scheduled to go before the Orange County Board of County Commissioners on March 20, 2025. The effective dates of this CPA Ordinance and the corresponding Rezoning Ordinance shall follow the effective date of the fully executed Fourth JPA Amendment. Consistency with Adopted Comprehensive Plan: The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment and text amendment are consistent with the following objectives and policies of the adopted 2002 Comprehensive Plan: City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org Element Objective/Policy Future Land Use Element Policy 1.4 Policy 1.6 Policy 1.7 Policy 2.3 Policy 2.4 Policy 2.7 Policy 5.8 Policy 5.13 Policy 7.7 Wekiva Protection These policies speak to: • Elimination of strip commercial uses by limiting development to intersections of arterial and non-residential collector roads, • Creation of mixed and multi-use development within activity centers, • Promotion of innovative development and strict design criteria for an attractive appearance, • Creation of usable open space, • Availability of public facilities and services prior to or concurrent with the impact of development via construction or payment of a proportionate fair share, • Allowing developments that can be efficiently provided with necessary public services in accordance with the concurrency management system, • Protection of natural wetlands and mitigation of unavoidable wetland impacts, based on consideration of wetland type, value, function, size, condition and location, and • Compliance with the Wekiva River Study Area Protection requirements. Transportation Element Section F Policy 1.3.3 Policy 1.3.4 Policy 1.4.1 Policy 2.2.2 Policy 2.2.4 Policy 2.5.1 Policy 2.8.1 Policy 2.8.2 Policy 2.9.1 These policies speak to: • Access to and integration with the West Orange Trail, • Widening of Ocoee Apopka Road from Silver Star Road to McCormick, • Widening of Maguire Road from Story Road to Maine Street, • Ensuring transportation improvements that enhance the function of planned activity areas and coordinated transportation planning with development and future employment centers, • Provision of adequate north-south travel and maximization of lane miles to connect the north and south sides of the city, • Preservation of needed right-of-way through developer contributions, • Ensuring connectivity of the sidewalk and bicycle networks, and • Increasing the number of commercial areas, parks and recreational facilities served by bicycle/pedestrian facilities which connect to the West Orange Trail. Conservation Element Policy 4.1 Policy 4.2 Policy 4.3 Policy 6.2 Policy 6.10 These policies speak to: • Requiring restoration or enhancement of disturbed wetlands or additional wetlands to mitigate any wetland destruction, • Requiring a 2:1 replacement of area, maintenance of proximal vocational relationship and functionality, and enforcement of alternative mitigation where there is wetland disturbance, • Requiring comprehensive mitigation measures where environmental impacts are unavoidable and • Planting of new landscaping with new development. Recreation & Open Space Element Policy 6.1 This policy speaks to: City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org • Prioritizing sidewalk improvements that create or improve pedestrian access/safety as well as those that connect City parks to commercial and other areas. Access: Access will be from Ocoee Apopka Road, Fullers Cross Road and an extension of 17th Avenue from North Lakewood Avenue to Ocoee Apopka Road. Per the Traffic Impact Analysis, the proposed access points are as follows: • Along Ocoee Apopka Road (5 access points): one (1) signalized full access driveway, one (1) full access unsignalized driveway, two (2) limited access unsignalized driveways plus the new intersection of Ocoee Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension, • Along Fullers Cross Road (2 access points): one (1) full access signalized driveway and one (1) limited access unsignalized driveway, • Along the 17th Avenue Extension (4 access points): one (1) round-about and three (3) full access unsignalized driveways. Transportation: As the request is for a Future Land Use Map amendment with accompanying text amendment to the Future Land Use Element to limit the development of the subject property to a maximum of 17,960 net new external trips, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared based on 17,960 net new external trips comprised of the respective ITE Codes for baseball field, hotel, recreational community center, and shopping center. The TIA was prepared based on methodology developed in accordance with the approved TIA Methodology from the City's concurrency management system and in coordination with City staff. Based on the TIA, there are no roadway segments that are operating below the proposed CPA and development program will result in several roadway segments and intersections anticipated to operate below the adopted level of service standards. The TIA also evaluated possible mitigation options and listed recommendations for improvements aimed at creating capacity as well as improving intersection operations and vehicular movement. The City is currently working with Orange County towards taking ownership of Ocoee Apopka Road from West Silver Star Road to McCormick Road. Below is a list of transportation improvements that are recommended in the TIA to be in place at project build-out in order to accommodate the proposed development: Capacity Improvements Ocoee Apopka Road Widening from two lanes to four lanes from West Silver Star Road to West Road Maguire Road Widening from two lanes to four lanes from Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue Intersection Improvements Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps Dual northbound right turn lanes Signal timing adjustments Clarcona Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue Dual westbound left-turn lanes and an additional south leg receiving lane Northbound right-turn overlap phase Signal timing modification Ocoee-Apopka Road & Fullers Cross Road Dual eastbound left-turn lane and an additional north leg receiving lane Signal timing modification Ocoee-Apopka Road/Maguire Road & Franklin Street Exclusive southbound right-turn lane City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org SR 50 & Maguire Road Eastbound right-turn overlap phase Dual southbound through lanes Signal timing modifications Ocoee-Apopka Road & Ocoee Crown Point Parkway/West Road Signal timing adjustments Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Exclusive eastbound right-turn bypass lane Exclusive northbound left-turn lane Exclusive southbound right-turn bypass lane Driveway Improvements These driveway improvements have been provided to the applicant's civil team for consideration and inclusion in the site plan design. Right-turn lanes needed at: Driveway 4 Driveway 5 Driveway 6 Ocoee Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Left-turn lanes needed at: Driveway 5 Driveway 6 Ocoee Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Lakewood Avenue and 17th Avenue Extension (Northbound Left) Per the proposed text amendment, "the owner/developer shall be responsible for improvements to transportation, utilities, or any other infrastructure associated with the project's development, as specified in the applicable Land Use Plan(s), Development Agreement(s), Conditions of Approval, or equivalent legal instruments." Consequently, the above-listed improvements will be included as transportation commitments within a new Development Agreement binding on the properties within the Northwest Activity Center at Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road boundary. Utilities: The Utilities Department has indicated that, based on the proposed development program and projected demands, water and wastewater treatment capacity are available at the respective treatment plants. Points of connection to the City's system shall be assessed during the preliminary site plan review. The City continues to evaluate reclaimed water offsets needed for compliance with the City's Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) with the St. Johns River Water Management District. The closest point to reclaimed water is a 12-inch reclaimed main located north of State Road 429 on Ocoee Apopka Road. The Utilities Department continues to work with the water/sewer/reclaimed water designer to accurately quantify utility demands and has provided to the applicant team a series of comments and conditions of approval that are to be used for the preparation of the Land Use Plan and Preliminary Site Plan. Stormwater: The subject property is located within the Ocklawaha River Basin (which includes the Lake Apopka Drainage Basin) and the Wekiva Recharge Protection Basin, and, as such, drainage and stormwater design shall be subject to the engineering and protection criteria of each basin. To mitigate impacts from the use of fill within the 100-year FEMA floodplain, compensatory storage for drainage shall be required to accommodate approximately 8.03 acres of impacted floodplain on-site and 0.82 acres of impacted floodplain off-site (within the right-of-way). A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be sought, and no fill shall be used within the floodplain prior to the approval of FEMA and the City. Environmental Analysis: Wetlands and surface waters. The subject property contains wetlands, a man-made canal and Basinger Sand and other fine sands that are well-draining. The CPA proposes to convert the entire site to a Commercial FLU designation, and the proposed development program will impact approximately 32.3 acres of Conservation-designated land. The applicant conducted a UMAM evaluation on the 32.3 acres to evaluate the quality of the wetlands. The UMAM, or Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method, is the Florida Department of City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org Environmental Protection's "standardized procedure for assessing the ecological functions provided by wetlands and other surface waters, the amount that those functions are reduced by a proposed impact, and the amount of mitigation necessary to offset that loss". The UMAM also determines "the degree of improvement in ecological value of proposed mitigation bank activities". Based on the UMAM, the 32.3 acres of Conservation area contains approximately 21.94 acres of wetlands. The UMAM Evaluation showed that the three (3) wetland areas on the site are low quality wetlands with ratings between 3 and 5 out of 10 per evaluation criteria (connectivity, water quality and vegetative community structure). Of the 21.94 acres of wetland area, approximately 9.34 acres of "total functional units" would be impacted per the UMAM. While Policy 6.2 of the Conservation Element requires that there remains a minimum 25-foot upland buffer adjacent to wetlands and the ecological community, this policy and other policies within the Conservation Element also allow alternative wetland protection and mitigation strategies when wetland impacts are unavoidable. Specifically, 1. CON Policy 4.1(c) states "where alteration or removal of wetlands is necessary in order to allow reasonable development of property, either the restoration or enhancement of disturbed wetlands will be provided or additional wetlands will be created to mitigate any wetland destruction, within the same site or watershed, if possible." 2. CON Policy 4.3 states “where disturbance is permitted, requiring a two-for-one replacement of area, maintenance of proximal relationship and functionality, and enforcement of alternative mitigation requirements become necessary.” 3. CON Policy 6.2 states “comprehensive mitigation measures where environmental impacts are unavoidable.” The above provisions on wetlands impacts and mitigation are also reflected in Section 7-4B(1) through (5), Part I, Article VII of the Land Development Code. Based on the 9.34 acres of impact and the required 2:1 remediation ratio, the applicant would need to provide approximately 18.68 acres of equivalent quality wetlands area (9.34 acres of functional units loss x 2). Due to the limited availability of land that would meet the provisions of Policy 4.3, the applicant has instead opted to provide a combination of wetland replacement and a mitigation strategy pursuant to Policy 6.2. Specifically, in an effort to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code, the applicant has committed to (1) preserving, via dedication to the City, a 9.9-acre vacant wooded parcel which is designated Conservation on the Future Land Use Map and which contains wetlands, and (2) establishing a Monitoring and Maintenance (M&M) Plan for the restoration and maintenance of approximately 287.82 acres of conservation lands (comprised of 277.92 acres of Conservation lands owned by the City plus the 9.9-acre to- be-dedicated property). The Public Works Department found that the M&M Plan is acceptable and has requested that a UMAM Evaluation be prepared for both the 9.9-acre to-be-dedicated property and the 277.92 acres of City-owned properties in order to establish a baseline of the existing conditions on these properties as supporting documentation for the Monitoring & Maintenance Plan. During the DRC meeting, the applicant team concurred with this request. Furthermore, the applicant/developer has agreed to establish a perpetual funding mechanism for the conservation M&M Plan covering the 287.82 acres of conservation land. The applicant's environmental consultants have attested at the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting that the proposed mitigation plan satisfies requirements of other agencies. Flora and fauna. An assessment for listed flora and fauna species was conducted at the site on March 21 and 26, 2023, and June 6 and 7, 2023. The work included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings, and vocalizations, which indicated the presence of the species observed. Various flora and fauna species were observed on the site. The assessment found that no plant species listed as "Threatened" or "Endangered" by either the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) were identified during the assessment. However, City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org three (3) species identified on the site are listed as "commercially exploited" by DACS. These species are Cinnamon Ferm, Royal Fern, and Saw Palmetto. According to DACS, commercially exploited species may be removed for development activity but may not be harvested, transported, or sold for commercial gain. Furthermore, though there is a potential for the presence of protected fauna species (such as Gopher Tortoise, Bald Eagle, Indigo Snake, and Wood Stork), no presence of these protected species was observed during the field assessments. The environmental analysis recommends another field assessment at least 90 days prior to construction to ensure no Gopher Tortoises or their burrows are present. Bald Eagle nest identified as OR045 was not present during the June 2023 field assessment, and no other Bald Eagle nests were observed. The applicant noted that the Audubon EagleWatch determined nest OR045 to be "unknown" for the 2022 nesting season. No Wood Stork rookeries were observed. To yield a no net loss of potential Wood Stork foraging habitat, the stormwater management, and littoral shelves within the stormwater management ponds would likely produce a larger foraging habitat than will be impacted. Schools: The proposed Amendment will eliminate student demand for school capacity as the previous residential entitlements will be replaced with this commercial development. Public Safety: The property will be served by Ocoee emergency services. Issue: Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners approve a proposed ordinance for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment to convert approximately 117.7 acres of Low Density Residential and approximately 32.3 acres of Conservation to approximately 150 acres of Commercial future land use designation and for a corresponding text amendment to certain provisions and policies within the Future Land Use Element for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex? Recommendations: Development Review Committee (DRC) Recommendation The DRC considered this item at its September 23, 2024, meeting. The applicant team presented the most current information about the project. Discussion was relative to wetlands and environmental protection strategies, commitments for transportation improvements and other items to be included in a future Development Agreement, timing of when the JPA Amendment would occur, timing for the City taking ownership of Ocoee Apopka Road, and areas of the development that will remain open to the public as well as future Agreements between the owner/developer and the City for the City's use of the sports fields. Following discussion, the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and Text Amendment to the Future Land Use Element for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex. Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency (LPA), considered this item at its October 8, 2024, public hearing, and following discussions regarding timing of transportation improvements, access points along Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road and timing of infrastructure improvements and construction, made a recommendation of approval, by a 4-0 vote with one member absent and one member abstaining, of the proposed ordinance for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment to convert approximately 117.7 acres of Low Density Residential and approximately 32.3 acres of Conservation to approximately 150 acres of Commercial future land use designation and for a corresponding text amendment to certain provisions and policies within the Future Land Use Element for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex. State Agency Comments The proposed Large-Scale CPA and Text Amendment followed the State Expedited Review (SER) process. No concerns or objections from any of the regional and state agency reviewers were received relative to the proposed CPA; however, informational comments were received relative to the need to update the City's Water Supply Plan and the Comprehensive Plan to meet Chapter 163.3177, Florida Statutes. City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners approve the proposed ordinance for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment to convert approximately 117.7 acres of Low Density Residential and approximately 32.3 acres of Conservation to approximately 150 acres of Commercial future land use designation and for a corresponding text amendment to certain provisions and policies within the Future Land Use Element for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Surrounding FLUM 4. Surrounding Zoning Map 5. LSCPA Ordinance - Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6. 01. Application Form 7. 02a. MDTL Affidavit (AECOM Agent Authorization) 8. 02b. MONTIERRE Affidavit (AECOM Agent Authorization) - Copy 9. 03a. MDTL Articles of Incorporation 10. 03b. MDTL Annual Report 11. 04. Comp Plan Amendment_V9 (PZC Transmittal) 12. Exhibit 01. Location Map 13. Exhibit 02. Aerial Image 14. Exhibit 03. Topographic Map 15. Exhibit 04. FEMA Flood Hazard Map 16. Exhibit 05. Soils Map 17. Exhibit 06. (not used) 18. Exhibit 07. Land Use & Land Cover Map 19. Exhibit 08. Wetlands Map 20. Exhibit 09. OCPA DOR Codes Map 21. Exhibit 10. Existing Future Land Use Map 22. Exhibit 11. Proposed Future Land Use Map 23. Exhibit 12. Existing Zoning 24. Exhibit 13. Proposed Zoning Map 25. Exhibit 14. Offsite Water and Wastewater Treatment Plans 26. Exhibit 15. Proposed Development Program 27. Exhibit 16. Policies Matrix 28. Exhibit 17. OCPA Records 29. Exhibit 18a. 300' Buffer Map 30. Exhibit 18b. Surrounding Properties List 31. Exhibit 19. Environmental Assessment Report 32. Exhibit 20. Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 33. Exhibit 21. Traffic Impact Analysis 34. Exhibit 22. Geotechnical Report 35. Exhibit 23. Socio Economic Data 36. Exhibit 24. Subject Area Aerial Image 37. Exhibit 25. FEMA & Wetlands 38. Exhibit 26. Soils and Land Cover 39. Exhibit 27. Topography & Environmental Features 40. Exhibit 28. Conceptual Land Use Plan 41. Exhibit 29. Conceptual Site Plan 42. Advertisement 43. Business Impact Estimate City of Ocoee ▪ 1 N. Bluford Avenue ▪ Ocoee, Florida 34761 Phone: (407) 905-3100 ▪ www.ocoee.org Financial Impacts: None Type of Item: Second Reading Public Hearing UNNAMED LAKEUNNAMED CANAL S S R 4 2 9 N S R 4 2 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd Pi ne St Log Landing Dr Clarcona Ocoee Rd D e m a s t u s L n C l i n g e r C o v e R d 11th Ave 10th Ave 12th Ave 13th Ave 15th Ave 16th Ave 17th Ave Wurst Rd Harris Rd C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r Marigold Park Dr Private Dr Westbridge Ct Lilybean Loop Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Large-Scale CPALocation Map I LAKE MOXIE S S R 4 2 9 N S R 42 9 N Lakewood Ave O c o e e A p o p k a R d Fullers Cross Rd Wurst Rd Peters Ave 17th Ave Li ttle S pring Hill Dr 11th Ave 16th Ave 15th Ave 12th Ave 13th Ave 10th Ave 4th Ave 5th Ave Butler Ave Harris Rd Pine St L o g L a n d i n g D r East Crown Point Rd D e m a s t u s L n C l i n g e r C o v e R d Laurel Ridge Ave Angola St Sable Run Way C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r Cabal lero Rd 6 t h A v e New Meadows CtParker C o v e C t Springfoot St Greenwood Ave Little Iris Ct Little Rock Ct I 0 400 800200Feet Ocoee R egional Sports Complex Large-Scale CPA2022 Aerial Photography LDR LILI LI HDR LI HI INST COMM REC COMM COMM LI INST N Lakewood Ave O c o e e A p o p k a R d Fullers C ross R d 11th Ave 10th Ave 12th Ave 13th Ave 16th Ave 15th Ave 17th Ave P ine S t Wurst Rd N SR 429 Harris Rd Log Landing Dr Anderson Pl D e m a s t u s L n C l i n g e r C o v e R d L a u r e l R i d g e A v e Sable Run Way C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r P a r k e r C o v e C t Jakoblaze Ln Ocoee R egional Sports Complex Large-Scale CPASurrounding Future Land Use Map Created: month year Development ServicesDepartment I 0 410 820205Feet Subject Property Future L and Use C lassification:Low De nsity Residen tia l (LDR )Medium Den sity Residential (MDR)High Density Resid ential (H DR)Professional O ffices and Se rvices (PS)Commercial (COMM)Light Industrial (LI)Heavy Industrial (H I)Conservation/Flood plains (CONS)Recre ation a nd O pen Space (REC)Pub lic Facilitie s/Institutional (INST) PUD-LD I-2 R-1AA A-1 I-1 PUD-IND I-1 PUD-LD R-1APUD-PU PUD-PU PUD-HDPUD-COM M A-1 A-1 PUD-COM M PUD-LD S S R 4 2 9 N S R 4 2 9 N Lakewood Ave O c o e e A p o p k a R d Fullers C ross R d P in e S t Log Landing Dr D e m a s t u s L n 11th Ave 10th Ave 12th Ave 13th Ave 15th Ave 16th Ave 17th Ave Wurst Rd Harris Rd C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r P a r k e r C o v e C t Ocoee Regional Sports ComplexSurrounding Zoning Map Development ServicesDepartment I 0 410 820205Feet Created: month year Subject Property Zoning C lassification:General Agricultural (A-1)Sub urban (A-2)Single-Family D welling (R -1 AAA)Single-Family D welling (R -1 AA)Single-Family D welling (R -1 A)Single-Family D welling (R -1 )One- & Two-Family Dwelling (R-2)Multip le-Fa mily Dwe llin g (R-3)Mob ile Home Su bdivisio n (RT-1)Professiona l O ffices & Services (P-S)Neighb orhood Shopping (C-1 )Commun ity Commercial (C-2)General Co mmercial (C-3) General Industrial (I-2)Commercia l (PUD)Low Density (PUD)Med ium De nsity (PUD) Restricted Ma nufacturin g& Wareh ousing (I-1) High Density (PUD)Pub lic Use (PUD)Unclassified ORDINANCE NO. (Large-Scale CPA – Ocoee Regional Sports Complex) TAX PARCEL ID: 07-22-28-0000-00-001, 07-22-28-0000-00-023, 07-22-28-0000-00-057, 07-22-28-0000-00-041, 07-22-28-0000-00-039, 07-22-28-0000-00-043, 07-22-28-0000-00-105, 07-22-28-0000-00-060, and 07-22-28-0000-00-074 CASE NO. CPA-2024-006: Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment and Text Amendment AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND CONSERVATION TO COMMERCIAL FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND OCOEE APOPKA ROAD INTERSECTION AND AMENDING PROVISIONS AND POLICIES WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PREVAILING IN THE EVENT OF ANY INCONSISTENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Ocoee (the “Ocoee City Commission”) has adopted the City’s Comprehensive Plan (the “Ocoee Comprehensive Plan”) by Ordinance No. 91-28 on September 18, 1991, pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, the Growth Policy Act (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, sets forth procedures and requirements for a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan and amendments thereto; and WHEREAS, the Owner (the “Applicant”) of certain real properties located within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee, Florida, assigned tax parcel identification numbers 07-22- 28-0000-00-001, 07-22-28-0000-00-023, 07-22-28-0000-00-057, 07-22-28-0000-00-041, 07-22- 28-0000-00-039, 07-22-28-0000-00-043, 07-22-28-0000-00-105, 07-22-28-0000-00-060, and 07- 22-28-0000-00-074, more particularly described in Exhibit “A” and depicted in Exhibit “B”, has submitted an application to the Ocoee City Commission to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation of said real properties from Low Density Residential and Conservation to Commercial and to amend certain provisions and policies within the Future Land Use Element (the “Comprehensive Plan Amendment”). WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5-9(C) of Article V of the Land Development Code of the City of Ocoee, Florida, the Development Services Director has reviewed said Comprehensive Plan Amendment application and determined that said Comprehensive Plan Amendment is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3174(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the City’s Local Planning Agency (LPA) conducted a publicly noticed and advertised public hearing on Tuesday, October 8, 2024, to consider and make recommendation of said proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3184(11), Florida Statutes, the Ocoee City Commission held two (2) de novo advertised public hearings, with the first public hearing held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, and the second held on Tuesday, February 18, 2025, with respect to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and determined, after consideration of public comments, that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are hereby ratified and confirmed as true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. AUTHORITY. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes. SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. The Future Land Use Map within the Future Land Use Element of the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to change the future land use designation of the Subject Property, as particularly described in Exhibit “A” and depicted in Exhibit “B”, from approximately 118.6 acres of Low Density Residential and and approximately 32.3 acres of Conservation to approximately 150.9 acres of Commercial, and the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to read as described in Exhibit “C”. SECTION 4. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to revise the adopted Future Land Use Map and the Future Land Use Element of the City of Ocoee in order to incorporate the Comprehensive Plan Amendment enacted by this Ordinance. SECTION 5. CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. This ordinance prevails in the event of any inconsistency with all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereto. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty-one (31) days after adoption, unless challenged prior to that date pursuant to Section 163.3187(5), Florida Statutes, or following adoption and execution date of the Fourth Amendment to the City of Ocoee and Orange County Joint Planning Area Agreement, whichever is later. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ______________________, 2025. ATTEST: Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA Rusty Johnson, Mayor FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this ______ day of _____________________, 2025. FISHBACK DOMINICK By: City Attorney ADVERTISED ______________________, 2025 READ FIRST TIME __________________, 2024. READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED _________________________________, 2025. UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. _______ EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL ID NO.: 07-22-28-0000-00-001 (95.11 ACRES) THE W1/2 OF NE1/4 & E1/2 OF NW1/4 LYING E OF SR 437 IN SEC 07-22-28 & (LESS PT TAKEN FOR R/W DESC AS COMM AT N1/4 CORNER OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S1-3-52W ALONG W LINE OF NE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 30.01 FT TO POB TH N89-50-37E 1280.94 FT TO E LINE OF W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SEC 7- 22-28 TH S0-27-1W 20 FT TH S89-50-37W 1281.16 FT TH S89-43-45W 648.52 FT TO POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SELY TH SWLY ALONG CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95-9-26 ARC LENGTH OF 83.04 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 73.82 FT AND CHORD BRG OF S42-9-2W TO POINT OF TANGENCY TH S5-25-41E 266.84 FT TO POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NELY TH SELY ALONG CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1849.9 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10-47-31 ARC LENGTH OF 348.43 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 347.92 FT AND CHORD BRG OF S10-49-27E TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY TH S16-13-12E 1773.29 FT TH S15-21-49E 59.23 FT TH S13-39-3E 55.93 FT TO POINT LYING ON S LINE OF NW1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S86-56-26W ALONG S LINE 28.44 FT TO POINT ON NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SWLY TH NWLY ALONG NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1941.86 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3-11-30 ARC LENGTH OF 108.17 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 108.15 FT AND CHORD BRG OF N14-37-29W TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY TH N16-13- 13W 16.18 FT TH N16-20-6W 500 FT TH N16-2-55W 1000 FT TH N15-27-46W 407.21 FT TH N7-33- 7W 524.34 FT TH N5-25-43W 24.17 FT TH N89-43-45E 740.7 FT TO POB PER DOC 20190042931) 07-22-28-0000-00-023 (37.12 ACRES) BEG NW COR OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH RUN N86-56-10E 1310.03 FT TH S00-31-51W 1398.44 FT TH S00-31-51W 355.17 FT TH N89-35-48W 592.6 FT N01-06-44E 37.61 FT TH S87-37-29W 726.4 FT TH N00-48-40E 322 FT TH N88-29-43E 489.51 FT TH N01-04-18E 345.22 FT TH N88-06-20E 248.67 FT TH N01-04-18E 652.77 FT TH S87-43-51W 523.06 FT TH N31-10-03W 411.03 FT TO POB (LESS RD R/W) & COMM AT THE CENTER OF SEC 7 TH ALONG W LINE OF SE 1/4 TH S01-04-18W 1672.03 FT TH DEPARTING W LINE RUN S88-55-42E 5.55 FT TO POB TH N87-37-29E 726.4 FT TH S01- 06-44W 37.61 FT TH S89-35-48E 592.6 FT TH S00-31-51W 57.88 FT TH S89-55-44W 590.37 FT TH N00- 04-16W 37.61 FT TH S89-55-44W 726.8 FT TH N00-48-40E 33.58 FT TO POB (LESS RD R/W) 07-22-28-0000-00-057 (6.09 ACRES) BEG SW COR NE1/4 OF SE1/4 N 349.5 FT E 663 FT S 353.9 FT W 663.8 FT TO POB & N 50 FT OF S 125 FT OF E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SEC 07-22-28 07-22-28-0000-00-041 (2.23 ACRES) BEG 574.86 FT S 1 DEG W FROM CENTER OF SEC RUN N 87 DEG E 219.78 FT N 1 DEG E 214.5 FT N 87 DEG E 239.66 FT TH S 1 DEG W 314.53 FT S 87 DEG W 458.80 FT N 100 FT TO POB (LESS W 30 FT RD R/W) IN SEC 07-22-28 07-22-28-0000-00-039 (2.10 ACRES) BEG NW COR OF SE1/4 RUN S 8.71 CHS E 3.33 CHS N 3.35 CHS NWLY TO BEG & NE1/4 OF SW1/4 E OF RD SEC 07-22-28 07-22-28-0000-00-043 (5.02 ACRES) FROM THE NW COR OF NW1/4 OF SE1/4 RUN S 1 DEG W 674.86 FT N 87 DEG E 0.98 FT FOR POB THN N 87 DEG E 458.80 FT N 1 DEG E 314.53 FT N 87 DEG E 283.06 FT S 1 DEG W 650.10 FT S 87 DEG W 221.90 FT N 1 DEG E 228.76 FT W 519.27 FT N 1 DEG E 104.17 FT TO POB (LESS W 30 FT RD R/W) IN SEC 07-22-28 07-22-28-0000-00-105 (1.18 ACRES) (NOTE: AGRICULTURAL PORTION OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY) FROM THE CENTER OF SEC RUN S 01 DEG W 779.03 FT TH N 88 DEG E 1.48 FT FOR POB TH N 88 DEG E 519.27 FT S 01 DEG W 228.76 FT S 87 DEG W 27 FT N 01 DEG W 3.91 FT S 88 DEG W 318.03 FT N 01 DEG E 125 FT S 88 DEG W 173.77 FT N 01 DEG E 100 FT TO POB IN SEC 07-22-28 (LESS RD R/W ON W) 07-22-28-0000-00-060 (1.08 ACRES) BEG AT SE COR OF NE1/4 OF SE1/4 RUN W 656 FT N 75 FT E 656 FT S 75 FT TO POB (LESS E 30 FT FOR R/W) IN SEC 07-22-28 AND 07-22-28-0000-00-074 (1.00 ACRE) (NOTE: HX PORTION OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY) FROM THE CENTER OF SEC RUN S 01 DEG W 779.03 FT TH N 88 DEG E 1.48 FT FOR POB TH N 88 DEG E 519.27 FT S 01 DEG W 228.76 FT S 87 DEG W 27 FT N 01 DEG W 3.91 FT S 88 DEG W 318.03 FT N 01 DEG E 125 FT S 88 DEG W 173.77 FT N 01 DEG E 100 FT TO POB IN SEC 07-22-28 (LESS RD R/W ON W) EXHIBIT “B” EXHIBIT “C” The Future Land Use Element is hereby amended to read as follows, with strike-through representing deleted text, underline representing new text and double-underline representing relocated text. FLUE Section XII *** C. Activity Centers Activity Centers are those areas within the impact zone of major intersections, or which may, by scale and development intensity, become significant economic drivers that would advance Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan goals. The Activity Centers identified by the City include: Good Homes Road Activity Center at Good Homes Road and State Road 50 West Oaks Activity Center at Clarke Road and State Road 50 Minorville Activity Center at Bluford Avenue and State Road 50 Lake Bennet Activity Center at Blackwood Avenue and State Road 50 Silver Star Activity Center at Clarke Road and Silver Star Road *** Activity Centers are major nodes of employment within the City and include residential and support commercial land uses. In order to create successful Activity Centers, policies are within the Comprehensive Plan to direct the Activity Center plan. Mixed and/or multi land use and pedestrian as well as transit travel are emphasized in the design of these Centers. To achieve this mixed- and/or multi-use scenario, which may to allow for ancillary and compatible uses, priorities within these Centers may obtain waivers from standard zoning and Land Development codes where a coordinated pattern of development further enhances the goals established for each Activity Center. Setback allowances and increased floor area ratios are two mechanisms that may be considered within the Activity Center plans. Activity Centers are major nodes of employment within the City that may generally include a mix of residential and commercial land uses. In order to create successful Activity Centers, policies may be added to the Comprehensive Plan to direct the growth, development pattern, and form within Activity Center Areas. Mixed and/or multi-land use, pedestrian travel, and transit are emphasized in the Planning and Design of Activity Centers. To allow for a proper coordination between primary and ancillary uses, and to achieve development patterns and built forms that advance the goals of this Comprehensive Plan, Activity Centers may include site-specific policies and may establish design standards in the Land Development Code and applicable zoning districts to guide development within their boundaries. Specifically, these Activity Centers should encourage residential areasa development pattern that contain a mix of housing types and densities to the extent possible. Retail, service and recreational facilities shall also be integrated within these areas. Non-residential areas shall establish define the hub and the focus of the area. Retail and service establishments, including day care centers, government buildings, and cultural centers, should may also be included within the Centers. Activity Centers should be within walking or bicycling distance to most local residents. Sidewalks should be placed on both sides of the roadways and shall be connected to sidewalks within residential developments. All parking areas shall be heavily landscaped and setback allowances may be given for any parking located behind buildings. The Future Land Use Map (Figure 2) identifies the location of the proposed Activity Centers. Area-specific Activity Center policies are established under Objective 3, Policy 3.1. *** Objective 3 The City shall adopt and implement plans and programs for Interchange Impact Areas, the Downtown Redevelopment Area, and Activity Centers as determined by the City Commission to meet the criteria established by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes to encourage Planned Unit Developments and mixed and multi-use developments (9J-5.006 (3)(b)(2) and (10), FAC). Policy 3.1 The City may require special development plans for Interchange Impact Areas, the Downtown Redevelopment Area and Activity Centers when such plans are needed to effectively coordinate development among multiple projects. The Activity Centers identified by the City include: •Good Homes Road Activity Center at Good Homes Road and State Road 50 •West Oaks Activity Center at Clarke Road and State Road 50 •Minorville Activity Center at Bluford Avenue and State Road 50 •Lake Bennet Activity Center at Blackwood Avenue and State Road 50 •Silver Star Activity Center at Clarke Road and Silver Star Road •Northwest Activity Center, at Ocoee-Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road Policy 3.1.1 Development of lands within the Northwest Activity Center shall comply with sub-policies (a) through (h) as established herein: a) The Northwest Activity Center boundary shall be comprised of parcels numbers 07-22- 28-0000-00-001, 07-22-28-0000-00-023, 07-22-28-0000-00-057, 07-22-28-0000-00-041, 07-22-28-0000-00-039, 07-22-28-0000-00-043, 07-22-28-0000-00-105, 07-22-28-0000- 00-060, and 07-22-28-0000-00-074, totaling 150 acres generally located in the southeast corner of the Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road intersection, and as depicted below.. b) Certain protective covenants and restrictions are applied to Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-001 (Chevron Parcel), in accordance with Special Warranty Deed # 20230735916, dated December 27, 2023. More specifically, these restrictions limit allowable land uses and utilization of groundwater on said parcel. c) To achieve consistency with adopted policies of the Conservation Element and to mitigate approximately 21.94 acres of wetland impacts, prior to site plan approval of any lands within the Northwest Activity Center, the owner/developer shall, to the satisfaction of the City: (1) Provide a plan, as part of the site plan review and approval, for the completion of all required environmental remediation of the Northwest Ocoee Brownfield Area, including excavation and disposal of contaminated soils and/or relocation of contaminated soils under buildings or permanent hardscape and monitoring requirements during construction. The environmental remediation plan shall include provisions for the handling of contaminants during construction to preclude off-site contamination through soil transport, disturbance of dust, stormwater entrainment, and vehicular tracking. (2) Establish a comprehensive stormwater and floodplain management system to treat, retain and enhance stormwater and provide for flood-carrying and flood storage capacity for the site with remediation plans, consistent with SJRWMD permit requirements. (3) Conserve and develop a management plan covering approximately 287 acres of Conservation lands located within the limits of the City of Ocoee. (4) Submit a mitigation plan consistent with permit(s) issued by the SJRWMD for the Northwest Activity Center that offsets the loss of low-quality wetlands on the site with conservation activities that benefit the Lake Apopka and/or Upper Ocklawaha Basin. d) Development of the Northwest Activity Center area, including the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex (ORSC), shall comply with any applicable provisions of Florida’s Wekiva Parkway Protection Act, 2004. e) Development shall be regulated by the ORSC Planned Unit Development (PUD) Land Use Plan and related documents, as approved by the Ocoee City Commission. These may include any recorded easements, conditions of approval and development agreement(s), as deemed necessary. f) Irrespective of any other limitations or conditions, maximum development intensity shall not exceed any of the following parameters: 1. 0.4 maximum floor-to-area Ratio (FAR). For purposes of this policy, maximum FAR shall be calculated using the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex PUD’s net developable acreage. 2. Maximum 42 acres of sports fields area, with no more than 17 multi-purpose-fields. 3. Maximum 1.33 million gross leasable square feet of mixed and multi-use commercial development, including sports & recreational facilities (including indoor and outdoor venues); commercial uses (including restaurants, retail stores, indoor & outdoor entertainment), hotels, offices, and ancillary or related uses. Parking shall be provided via a combination of surface, podium and structured parking facilities. This square footage shall be in addition to the area described in sub-policy 2 as sports field area. 4. Maximum of 1,250 hotel keys. 5. Maximum of 17,960 net new external daily trips g) Owner/developer shall be responsible for improvements to transportation, utilities, or any other infrastructure associated with the project’s development, as specified in applicable Land Use Plan(s), Development Agreement(s), Conditions or Approval, or equivalent legal instruments Form 31 1 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION Development Services – Planning Division 1 N. Bluford Avenue | Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone: 407.905.3157 Received Date – Office Use Only A. Applicant Information 1. Applicant’s Name: 2. Applicant’s Address: 3. Applicant’s Telephone Number: 4. Applicant’s Email Address: B. Property Owner’s Information 1. Property Owner’s Name: 2. Property Owner’s Address: 3. Property Owner’s Telephone Number: 4. Property Owner’s Email Address: C. Subject Property Information 1. Location: 2. Acreage of Property: 3. Current Use: 4. Proposed Use: 5. Existing Zoning: 6. Proposed Zoning: 7. Existing Future Land Use Designation: 8. Proposed Future Land Use Designation: 9. Does the Property Owner hold title to other property in the vicinity? If so, where? 10. Has an amendment for the adjacent property been processed within the past two years? Form 31 2 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN D. Surrounding Property Information E. Required Submittals 1. Completed Application Form 2. Flat fee and review deposit 3. Completed Owner’s Affidavit 4. Completed Annexation and Initial Zoning Hold Harmless Agreement 5. Completed Applicant’s Acknowledgment 6. Location Map 7. Legal description and boundary survey of the property 8. Title certification complying with 177.041, FS.1 9. A list of surrounding property owners within 300' of the subject property, excluding right- of-ways and lakes. 10. Supplemental information as may be required from time to time to process the application. F. Available Facilities 1. Water Service - a. Nearest water main: b. Anticipated water demand: c. Water capacity available: 2. Sewer Service - a. Nearest sewer main: b. Anticipated sewer demand: c. Sewer capacity available: 3. Roads - a. Nearest roadway access: 1 This review does not guarantee capacity availability for public facilities or roads for the project. The applicant may reserve capacity for all public facilities and roads by obtaining a Capacity Reservation Certificate. 1. Zoning: North: East: South: West: 2. Future Land Use: North: East: South: West: Form 31 3 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN b. Anticipated trips per day: c. Roadway capacity available: 4. Fire Service - a. Location of nearest fire hydrant: b. Fire district: c. Estimated fire response time: d. Will any hazardous materials be stored here? 5. Police Service - a. Police service district: b. Estimated police response time: 6. Stormwater Service: a. Location of stormwater retention pond: b. Existing stormwater pond to be used: c. New stormwater system to be built: d. Stormwater will be handled during DRC Review: 7. Solid Waste - a. Nearest solid waste dump: b. Disposal capacity available: c. How any hazardous waste will be disposed: 8. Recreation - a. Anticipated recreation impact: b. Nearest park facility: c. Recreation capacity available: AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN G. OWNER’S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COUNTY OF Affiant, , who being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. Affiant is the (check one) □ fee-simple owner of the property legally described in this application. □ (insert title) of (insert name of company) which entity is the fee-simple owner of the property legally described in this application. 2. A true and correct legal description for the property is attached to and made a part of this affidavit. 3. The attached ownership list contains the names and mailing addresses of all owners having an interest in the property described in this application. 4. The owner desires (specify action sought for said property): 5. The owner has appointed (specify agent) to act as the owner's authorized agent to represent the owner in connection with the proposed action and the property described in this application. 6. The owner agrees to be bound by the actions of the owner’s authorized agent designated above. 7. Affiant affirms and certifies that Affiant, the owner’s authorized agent and the owner will comply with all ordinances, regulations, and provisions of the City Code of the City of Ocoee, and that all applications, plans and documents submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of the Affiant’s, the owner’s authorized agent’s and the owner’s knowledge and belief and further, that this affidavit and all applications, plans and documents submitted herewith shall become part of the official records of the City of Ocoee, and are not returnable. 8. That the accompanying adjacent property owners list is, to the best of their/her/his knowledge, a complete and accurate list of the owner's names and mailing addresses for all property lying within three hundred (300) feet of the perimeter of the subject parcel, as recorded on the latest official Orange County Tax Rolls. 9. That prior to the public hearing, if applicable, signs will be prominently posted on the subject parcel not less than twelve (12) days before the application will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Board or the Board of Adjustment, and will remain posted until final determination, after which time the notices are to be removed and destroyed. Form 31 4 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Affiant’s Signature Sworn to or affirmed and signed by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization on , 20___ . NOTARY PUBLIC [Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of notary or clerk to the left of signature] Affiant is □ personally known; or □ produced the following identification: . Affiant’s Signature Sworn to or affirmed and signed by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization on , 20___ . NOTARY PUBLIC [Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of notary or clerk to the left of signature] Affiant is □ personally known; or □ produced the following identification: . Affiant’s Signature Sworn to or affirmed and signed by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization on , 20___ . NOTARY PUBLIC [Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of notary or clerk to the left of signature] Affiant is □ personally known; or □ produced the following identification: . Form 31 5 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN H. Owner Acknowledgment 1. I, , acknowledge that the City of Ocoee may not defend any challenge to my proposed amendment and related development approvals, and that it may be my sole obligation to defend any and all actions and approvals which authorize the use or development of my property. Submission of this form initiates a process and does not imply approval by the City of Ocoee or any of its boards, commissions, or staff. (This authorization must be notarized.) 2. I hereby represent that I have the lawful right and authority to file this application. 3. Signature of the authorized applicant: <name of applicant> Date: (This section of the Acknowledgment must be completed by the notary.) State of: County of: I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County last aforesaid to take acknowledgments, by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization and who produced as identification and who executed the foregoing instrument freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes expressed therein and acknowledged before me under oath that executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of , . [NOTARIAL SEAL] Notary Public Printed Name Certificate Number: My commission expires: Form 31 6 Updated 9-2023 APPLICATION FEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Development Services – Planning Division 1 North Bluford Avenue | Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone: 407.905.3157 Received Date – Office Use Only A separate application fee is collected for each action sought and for non-contiguous parcels or for parcels held under separate ownership. Development Review Fee The Development Review Fee includes a Flat Fee and Review Costs. The Flat Fee is non-refundable and due with each application. It covers in-house City staff time related to review and processing the application, including Development Review Committee meetings, individual staff review time, clerical time, and site inspections. Deposit In addition to a Flat Fee, except for variances and annexations with initial zoning of one acre or less, the applicant is required to submit a $1,000 deposit as surety for payment of all charges billed for legal, engineering, recording, and other consultants working on behalf of the City, as well as advertising costs. These charges are also known as Review Costs. The balance of the deposit will be returned to the applicant upon issuance of the Certificate of Completion or final action on the application, unless it is used for reimbursement for non-payment of any review costs invoiced to the applicant. Review Costs Applicant shall pay such additional Development Review Fees as may be required by Article I, Section 1-12 of the Land Development Code. "Review Costs" shall mean and refer to the costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with the review and processing of an Application, including but not limited to City Attorney's fees and costs and legal, consultant, and engineering fees and costs, and all advertising costs; provided, however, that Review Costs shall not, include (i) the cost of City staff from time dedicated to the review and processing an Application, and (ii) City Attorney, legal, consultant and engineering fees and costs incurred by the City in reviewing and processing an Application which are expressly included within the Flat Fee pursuant to the provisions of Section 1-12.C.2 hereof. Applicant’s Signature Date Signed Sworn to or affirmed and signed by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization on , 20__. NOTARY PUBLIC [Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of notary or clerk to the left of signature] Affiant is □ personally known; or □ produced the following identification: . OWNER’S AFFIDAVIT Development Services – Planning Division 1 N. Bluford Ave. | Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone: 407.905.3157 Received Date – Office Use Only STATE OF COUNTY OF Affiant, ______________________________________, who being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. Affiant is the (check one) □ fee-simple owner of the property legally described in this application. □(insert title) ___________________ of (insert name of company) ______________________________________ which entity is the fee-simple owner of the property legally described in this application. 2. A true and correct legal description for the property is attached to and made a part of this affidavit. 3. The attached ownership list contains the names and mailing addresses of all owners having an interest in the property described in this application. 4. The owner desires (specify action sought for said property): 5. The owner has appointed (specify agent) ___________________to act as the owner's authorized agent to represent the owner in connection with the proposed action and the property described in this application. 6. The owner agrees to be bound by the actions of the owner’s authorized agent designated above. 7. Affiant affirms and certifies that Affiant, the owner’s authorized agent and the owner will comply with all ordinances, regulations, and provisions of the City Code of the City of Ocoee, and that all applications, plans and documents submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of the Affiant’s, the owner’s authorized agent’s and the owner’s knowledge and belief and further, that this affidavit and all applications, plans and documents submitted herewith shall become part of the official records of the City of Ocoee, and are not returnable. Affiant’s Signature Sworn to or affirmed and signed by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization on __________, __ 20__. NOTARY PUBLIC [Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of notary or clerk to the left of signature] Affiant is □ personally known; or □ produced the following identification: __________________________. Form 36 1 Marcos Bastian Approval of a Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, PUD Rezoning, and Large Scale Site Plan, along with any other planning processes associated with the proposed Ocoee Regional Sports Complex project. MDTL Enterprise, LLC Managerx James W Douglas Orange Florida DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DBEBC39-0F73-4852-A5D9-4D6193A85F01 6/9/2024 OWNER’S AFFIDAVIT Development Services – Planning Division 1 N. Bluford Ave. | Ocoee, FL 34761 Phone: 407.905.3157 Received Date – Office Use Only STATE OF COUNTY OF Affiant, ______________________________________, who being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. Affiant is the (check one) □ fee-simple owner of the property legally described in this application. □(insert title) ___________________ of (insert name of company) ______________________________________ which entity is the fee-simple owner of the property legally described in this application. 2. A true and correct legal description for the property is attached to and made a part of this affidavit. 3. The attached ownership list contains the names and mailing addresses of all owners having an interest in the property described in this application. 4. The owner desires (specify action sought for said property): 5. The owner has appointed (specify agent) ___________________to act as the owner's authorized agent to represent the owner in connection with the proposed action and the property described in this application. 6. The owner agrees to be bound by the actions of the owner’s authorized agent designated above. 7. Affiant affirms and certifies that Affiant, the owner’s authorized agent and the owner will comply with all ordinances, regulations, and provisions of the City Code of the City of Ocoee, and that all applications, plans and documents submitted herewith are true and accurate to the best of the Affiant’s, the owner’s authorized agent’s and the owner’s knowledge and belief and further, that this affidavit and all applications, plans and documents submitted herewith shall become part of the official records of the City of Ocoee, and are not returnable. Affiant’s Signature Sworn to or affirmed and signed by means of □ physical presence or □ online notarization on __________, __ 20__. NOTARY PUBLIC [Print, type, or stamp commissioned name of notary or clerk to the left of signature] Affiant is □ personally known; or □ produced the following identification: __________________________. Form 36 1 Marcos Bastian Approval of a Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, PUD Rezoning, and Large Scale Site Plan, along with any other planning processes associated with the proposed Ocoee Regional Sports Complex project. Montierre Development, PLLC Managerx James W Douglas Orange Florida DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DBEBC39-0F73-4852-A5D9-4D6193A85F01 6/9/2024 5669 SE CROOKED OAK AVE HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 Current Principal Place of Business: Current Mailing Address: 5669 SE CROOKED OAK AVE HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 Entity Name: MDTL ENTERPRISE LLC DOCUMENT# L23000235925 FEI Number: 93-1354512 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: DOUGLAS, JAMES W 5537 SE HAMMOCK RESERVE TERR HOBE SOUND, FL 33455 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Authorized Person(s) Detail : I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 605, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized Person(s) Detail Date FILED Mar 21, 2024 Secretary of State 8833038681CC JAMES DOUGLAS MANAGER 03/21/2024 2024 FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT No Title MGR Name DOUGLAS, JAMES W Address 5537 SE HAMMOCK RESERVE TERR City-State-Zip:HOBE SOUND FL 33455 OCOEE REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Prepared by AECOM for Montierre Development, PLLC. CPA Submittal - September 30, 2024 (PZC Transmittal Package) 2/79 Table of Contents 1. Amendment Request .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Location .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Proposed Amendment ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.3. Consistency with Existing Policies .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4. Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment ............................................................................................................................. 7 Adjacent Future Land Uses ................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5. Existing & Proposed Zoning .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Adjacent Zoning Districts ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6. Proposed Future Land-Use Changes .............................................................................................................................................. 9 1.7. Proposed Text Amendment ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.8. Development Agreements ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.9. Additional Development Standards ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Development Program ......................................................................................................................................................................... 13 PUD Standards ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Parking Requirements ........................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Pervious / Impervious Area Calculations..................................................................................................................................... 15 Public Open Space Area Calculations .......................................................................................................................................... 16 2. Background Information ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Area Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 OCPA Acreage Discrepancy .............................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.2. Existing Context ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3. Topography ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 2.4. FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping (Floodplain Zones) ................................................................................................................... 22 2.5. Soils ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Hydric Soils ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 2.6. Existing Land Cover ............................................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.7. Wetlands ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.8. OCPA Property Use Codes (DOR Codes) ................................................................................................................................... 26 2.9. Existing Future Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.10. Existing Zoning ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.11. Environmental Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................ 29 Flora and Fauna Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................ 29 Wildlife Identified on the Subject Area .......................................................................................................................................... 30 Protected Species .................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) .................................................................................................................................. 31 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)......................................................................................................................................... 32 Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) .............................................................................................................................................. 32 Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) – Core Foraging Area .................................................................................................... 33 2.12. Wekiva Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.13. Existing Entitlements & Prior Planning ....................................................................................................................................... 35 The Chevron Property (07-22-28-0000-00-001) .................................................................................................................. 36 CD&L School Concurrency Mitigation Agreement ................................................................................................................ 37 The “Haunted House” Property (07-22-28-0000-00-023) ............................................................................................... 38 Montierre Acquisitions & Development Agreement .............................................................................................................. 38 Brownfield Designation......................................................................................................................................................................... 39 First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement and Development Agreement ............................................ 39 2024 Annexation Requests ................................................................................................................................................................ 40 3/79 3. Supporting Data and Analysis ........................................................................................................... 41 3.1. Project Introduction & Justification ................................................................................................................................................ 41 Project Mission ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 3.2. Local Demographic and Socio-Economic Analyses ............................................................................................................ 42 Population Distribution by Age ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 Education Attainment (Adults, 25+) ............................................................................................................................................... 44 Commute Time ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Commute Behavior ................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 Retail and Restaurants Spending .................................................................................................................................................... 45 3.3. Local Employment Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................... 46 Employment Distribution ..................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Workforce Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Inflow/Outflow Analysis......................................................................................................................................................................... 48 3.4. Employment Generation Estimates ............................................................................................................................................... 49 Part 1 – Short-Term Construction-Related Employment (3 to 5 years) ....................................................................... 49 Part 2 – Permanent employment ..................................................................................................................................................... 50 Part 3 – Tourism-Generated Employment .................................................................................................................................. 51 3.5. Comprehensive Plan Policy Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 53 Economic Development ...................................................................................................................................................................... 54 Mixed-Use Development ..................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Infill, Redevelopment, and Sprawl Control .................................................................................................................................. 57 Facilities and Services .......................................................................................................................................................................... 58 Special Planning Areas ......................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Development Character and Compatibility................................................................................................................................ 60 Recreation and Open Space ............................................................................................................................................................. 63 Conservation ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 Intergovernmental Coordination...................................................................................................................................................... 66 3.6. Public Facilities Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................................... 67 Transportation ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 2045 Plan – Cost Feasible Plan Projects ..................................................................................................................................... 68 Prioritized List Projects ......................................................................................................................................................................... 68 2045 Plan – Unfunded Needs ........................................................................................................................................................... 69 Transportation Impact Analysis ....................................................................................................................................................... 70 Schools ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 71 Recreation ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 71 Public Facilities & Services ................................................................................................................................................................. 72 Potable Water ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 72 Wastewater ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 72 Drainage ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Solid Waste ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 4. Potential Impacts Analysis & Action Plan........................................................................................ 74 Land Uses ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 Environmental Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 75 TIA Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 76 Transportation & Infrastructure Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 76 Recommended Improvements ........................................................................................................................................................ 76 Trip Equivalency Matrix ......................................................................................................................................................................... 77 4/79 5. List of Exhibits ....................................................................................................................................... 78 5.1. Mapping Exhibits ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 78 5.2. Additional Exhibits (Technical Reports) ........................................................................................................................................ 79 5.3. Large-Format Exhibits .......................................................................................................................................................................... 79 5/79 1. Amendment Request 1.1. Overview This Amendment proposes the development of a tournament-focused Sports Complex integrated with hotels and commercial uses within the urbanized boundaries of the City of Ocoee. The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex (ORSC) will be a first-of-a-kind immersive experience that will not only make Ocoee the premier destination for youth sports in Central Florida, but will also create a new shopping, dining, and entertainment destination for the residents of Ocoee and neighboring communities. Figure 1. Location Map Location The subject area is located in the City of Ocoee, Orange County, Florida, totaling approximately 150 Acres.1 More specifically, the project is east of Ocoee-Apopka Road, south of Fullers Cross Road, west of North Lakewood Avenue, and north of a privately-owned softball facility. Additional information about the subject area is provided in Section 2. A detailed Area Map is provided as Exhibit 1, and an Aerial Image of the subject area is provided as Exhibit 2. 1 OCPA parcel records list a total area of 150.91 Acres, while the surveyed boundaries provide a more accurate total of 6,532,919 sf, or 149.98 Acres. 6/79 1.2. Proposed Amendment This request seeks a large-scale Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment to convert approximately 150 acres from Low Density Residential (LDR, at 117.7 acres) and Conservation (CONS, at 32.3 acres) to Commercial (COMM); a text amendment to the Future Land Use Element to create a new Activity Center (Northwest Activity Center), and respective development guidelines. Table 1. Amendment Overview Existing FLU Designations Proposed FLU Designations Proposed Development Program Net Change Low Density Resid. (LDR) 117.7 Ac.; 4 Du/Ac. max. density (470 DUs max.) Conservation (CONS) 32.3 Ac.; 0.1 FAR (140,698 gross sf max.) Commercial (COMM) 150.0 Ac.; 3.0 FAR Max. (19.6 Million gross sf max. development potential) 42 Acres of sports & entertainment uses 1.33 Million gross sf of mixed commercial uses, and an estimated 1.13 Million gross sf of parking facilities. Maximum Development limited to 18,000 AADT (per trip matrix) Decrease of 470 dwelling units Increase of 42 Acres of sports & entertainment uses Increase of 1.33 Million gross sf of Commercial Uses Increase of 1.13 Million gross sf of Parking facilities. See: Transportation Impact Analysis (pg.70) & Exhibit 21 for traffic & transportation discussion. 1.3. Consistency with Existing Policies This proposed amendment is substantially consistent with, and supported by, the Goals, Objectives, and Policies listed under the following elements of the Comprehensive Plan: Future Land Use (Objectives 1-5, 7); Transportation (Objectives 1.3, 1.4, 2.2, 2.5, 2.7); Recreation & Open Space (Objectives 1, 2, 5, 6, 8); and Conservation (Objective 1, Policies 1.4, 4.1[c]) There are, however, consistency challenges due to anticipated wetland impacts in the subject area that will have to be addressed or mitigated. These are associated with Future Land Use Element Policy 5.3, and Conservation Element Policies 2.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 6.2, and 6.10. Consistency with these policies will be achieved through the implementation of specific strategies, mitigation actions, and commitments that are outlined on Section 4. An expanded policy discussion is provided in Section 3.5 - Comprehensive Plan Policy Analysis. 7/79 1.4. Proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment Figure 2. Existing Future Land Use Map Figure 3. Proposed Future Land Use Map Adjacent Future Land Uses The following existing Future Land Uses are adjacent to the subject area: North: Low Density Residential (LDR) and Commercial (COMM). East: Low Density Residential (LDR), Conservation (CONS), Light Industrial (LI), and Heavy Industrial (HI). South: Low Density Residential (LDR), Light Industrial (LI), Heavy Industrial (HI), and Conservation (CONS). West: Low Density Residential (LDR), Light Industrial (LI), Commercial (COMM), Conservation (CONS). The existing and proposed Future Land Use Maps are provided as Exhibit 10 and Exhibit 11, respectively. 8/79 1.5. Existing & Proposed Zoning Important: Please note that this application does not include a rezoning request. The exhibit below is being provided as a reference for reviewing staff, but the zoning map amendment will be submitted in a separate PUD-Rezoning Application. Figure 4. Existing Zoning Figure 5. Proposed Zoning Adjacent Zoning Districts The following Zoning Districts are adjacent to the subject area: North: Commercial PUD (PUD-COMM); Single-Family Dwelling (R-1A); Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated) East: Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated); General Agricultural (A-1); Low Density PUD (PUD-LD); Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (I-1), General Industrial (I-2). South: Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated); Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (I-1), General Industrial (I-2). West: Commercial PUD (PUD-COMM); Rural Country Estates (R-CE, Unincorporated); Industrial PUD (PUD-IND); Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated); General Agricultural (A-1) 9/79 1.6. Proposed Future Land-Use Changes The following changes are being proposed with this application: Table 2. Site Data Overview Gross Area 150.0 Acres Conveyances / Deductions 6.2 Acres(a) Net Area 143.8 Acres (95.9 % of Gross Area) Stormwater & Open Space Required Proposed Stormwater Management n/a Approx. 15.2 Acres (10.6 % of Net Dev. Acreage) (25.7% of Impervious Area) Public Open Space(b) 35% Min. Approx. 53.0 Acres Approx. 36.9 % of Net Developable Acreage (c) Land Use & Zoning Existing Proposed Future Land Use Low Density Residential (LDR) 117.7 Acres Conservation (CONS) 32.3 Acres Commercial (COMM) 150.0 Acres Future Land Use Element Policies As adopted in Section XII and FLUE Objective 3 See Section Error! Reference source not found. Zoning PUD-LD, R-1AA and Unclassified Planned Use Development (PUD) (Ocoee Regional Sports Complex PUD) School Capacity 119 students (d) No additional school capacity will be required (d) Densities & Intensities Existing Proposed Maximum Intensity (FAR) 3.0 (LDR) 0.1 (CONS) 0.4(e) Maximum Density (DU/Acre) 4.0 n/a (no residential uses proposed) Additional Regulations Per Zoning Districts, and: Eagle Creek of Ocoee PUD - Land Use Plan, Site Plan, PSP; - Development Agreement; - Conditions of Approval. Proposed Planned Unit Development: - Land Use Plan & Site Plan; - Development Agreement; - Conditions of Approval. Proposed Planned Unit Development (to be submitted under separate application) PUD Standards See Table 4 Development Program See Table 3 Notes: (a) Estimated conveyances: 4.2 Ac. ROWs; 2.0 Ac. City Park. (b) See Table 7 & Exhibit 31 for open space calculations. (c) A comprehensive open space system that includes passive and active recreation, public gathering spaces, and stormwater management is included with the PUD Land Use Plan Set. See Table 7 for details. (d) Eagle Creek of Ocoee PUD School Concurrency Mitigation Agreement OCE-16-003 (09/2017 - assumed to be expired) (e) Actual FAR of proposed development program: 2.46M sf / 143.8 Ac = 0.393. Excluded from FAR: (6.2 Ac. Conveyances) 10/79 1.7. Proposed Text Amendment In addition to the Future Land Use Map Amendment, this application proposes a Text Amendment to the following sections of the Future Land Use Element: FLUE Section XII C. Activity Centers (strikethrough / underline formatting applied) Activity Centers are those areas within the impact zone of major intersections, or which may, by scale and development intensity, become significant economic drivers that would advance Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan goals. The Activity Centers identified by the City include: - Good Homes Road Activity Center at Good Homes Road and State Road 50 - West Oaks Activity Center at Clarke Road and State Road 50 - Minorville Activity Center at Bluford Avenue and State Road 50 - Lake Bennet Activity Center at Blackwood Avenue and State Road 50 - Silver Star Activity Center at Clarke Road and Silver Star Road […] Activity Centers are major nodes of employment within the City and include residential and support commercial land uses. In order to create successful Activity Centers, policies are within the Comprehensive Plan to direct the Activity Center plan. Mixed and/or multi land use and pedestrian as well as transit travel are emphasized in the design of these Centers. To achieve this mixed- and/or multi-use scenario, which may to allow for ancillary and compatible uses, priorities within these Centers may obtain waivers from standard zoning and Land Development codes where a coordinated pattern of development further enhances the goals established for each Activity Center. Setback allowances and increased floor area ratios are two mechanisms that may be considered within the Activity Center plans. Activity Centers are major nodes of employment within the City that may generally include a mix of residential and commercial land uses. In order to create successful Activity Centers, policies may be added to the Comprehensive Plan to direct the growth, development pattern, and form within Activity Center Areas. Mixed and/or multi-land use, pedestrian travel, and transit are emphasized in the Planning and Design of Activity Centers. To allow for a proper coordination between primary and ancillary uses, and to achieve development patterns and built forms that advance the goals of this Comprehensive Plan, Activity Centers may include site-specific policies and may establish design standards in the Land Development Code and applicable zoning districts to guide development within their boundaries. Specifically, these Activity Centers should encourage a development pattern residential areas that contains a mix of housing types and densities to the extent possible. Retail, service and recreational facilities shall also be integrated within these areas. Non-residential areas shall define establish the hub and the focus of the area. Retail and service establishments, including day care centers, government buildings, and cultural centers may should also be included within the Centers. Activity Centers should be within walking or bicycling distance to local most residents. 11/79 Sidewalks should be placed on both sides of the roadways and shall be connected to sidewalks within residential developments. All parking areas shall be heavily landscaped and setback allowances may be given for any parking located behind buildings. The Future Land Use Map (Figure 2) identifies the location of the proposed Activity Centers. The location of proposed Activity Centers will be identified in the Future Land Use Map. Area-specific Activity Center policies are included under FLUE Objective 3, Policy 3.1. In 2022, the City of Ocoee partnered with Montierre to facilitate the development of the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex: a 150-Acre multi-use project which, upon completion, will generate substantial economic benefits to the residents of Ocoee and to the general public in the region. This project will become a regional destination, and local hub for approximately 4,940 households / 14,703 residents located within a 1-Mile radius from its boundaries, and therefore it has been recognized as the “Northwest Activity Center”. The Northwest Activity Center policies are listed under Future Land Use Policy 3.1.1: […] Objective 3: The City shall adopt and implement plans and programs for Interchange Impact Areas, the Downtown Redevelopment Area, and Activity Centers, as determined by the City Commission to meet the criteria established by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes to encourage Planned Unit Developments and mixed and multi-use developments. Policy 3.1: The City may require special development plans for Interchange Impact Areas, the Downtown Redevelopment Area and Activity Centers when such plans are needed to effectively coordinate development among multiple projects. The City of Ocoee hereby establishes the following Activity Centers: - Good Homes Road Activity Center, at Good Homes Road and State Road 50. - West Oaks Activity Center, at Clarke Road and State Road 50. - Minorville Activity Center, at Bluford Avenue and State Road 50. - Lake Bennet Activity Center, at Blackwood Avenue and State Road 50. - Silver Star Activity Center, at Clarke Road and Silver Star Road. - Northwest Activity Center, at Ocoee-Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road. Policy 3.1.1: The following policies (a) through (1.7 shall apply to the Northwest Activity Center: a) The Northwest Activity Center boundary shall be comprised of parcels 07-22-28-0000- 00-001; 07-22-28-0000-00-023; 07-22-28-0000-00-057; 07-22-28-0000-00-041; 07- 22-28-0000-00-039; 07-22-28-0000-00-043; 07-22-28-0000-00-105; 07-22-28-0000- 00-060; and 07-22-28-0000-00-074. b) Certain protective covenants and restrictions are applied to Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-001 (Chevron Parcel), in accordance with Special Warranty Deed # 20230735916, dated December 27, 2023. More specifically, these restrictions limit allowable land uses and utilization of groundwater on said parcel. c) To achieve consistency with adopted policies of the Conservation Element and to mitigate approximately 21.94 acres of wetland impacts, prior to site plan approval of any lands within the Northwest Activity Center, the owner/developer shall, to the satisfaction of the City: 12/79 (1) Provide a plan, as part of the site plan review and approval, for the completion of all required environmental remediation of the Northwest Ocoee Brownfield Area, including excavation and disposal of contaminated soils and/or relocation of contaminated soils under buildings or permanent hardscape, and monitoring requirements during construction. The environmental remediation plan shall include provisions for the handling of contaminants during construction to preclude off-site contamination through soil transport, disturbance of dust, stormwater entrainment, and vehicular tracking. (2) Establish a comprehensive stormwater and floodplain management system to treat, retain and enhance stormwater and provide for flood-carrying and flood storage capacity for the site with remediation plans, consistent with SJRWMD permit requirements. (3) Conserve and develop a management plan covering approximately 287.82 acres of Conservation lands located within the limits of the City of Ocoee. (4) Submit a mitigation plan consistent with permit(s) issued by the SJRWMD for the Northwest Activity Center that offsets the loss of low-quality wetlands on the site with conservation activities that benefit the Lake Apopka and/or Upper Ocklawaha Basin. d) Development of the ORSC shall comply with any applicable provisions of Florida’s Wekiva Parkway Protection Act, 2004. e) Development shall be regulated by the ORSC Planned Unit Development (PUD) Land Use Plan and related documents, as approved by the Ocoee City Commission. These may include any recorded easements, conditions of approval and development agreement(s), as deemed necessary. f) Irrespective of any other limitations or conditions, maximum development intensity shall not exceed any of the following parameters: 0.4 maximum floor-to-area Ratio (FAR). For purposes of this policy, maximum FAR shall be calculated using the PUD’s net developable acreage. Maximum 42 Acres of sports fields area, with no more than 17 multi-purpose-fields. Maximum 1.33 million gross leasable square feet of mixed and multi-use commercial development, including sports & recreational facilities (including indoor and outdoor venues); commercial uses (including restaurants, retail stores, indoor & outdoor entertainment), hotels, offices, and ancillary or related uses. Parking shall be provided via surface, podium and structured parking facilities. This square footage shall be in addition to the area described as the sports field area. Maximum of 1,250 hotel keys. Maximum of 17,960 net new external daily trips. g) Owner/developer shall be responsible for improvements to transportation, utilities, or any other infrastructure associated with the project’s development, as specified in applicable Land Use Plan(s), Development Agreement(s), Conditions or Approval, or equivalent legal instruments. 13/79 1.8. Development Agreements During the land acquisition process which preceded this application, Montierre Development, PLLC (Montierre) and the City of Ocoee entered into multiple agreements, which included, among others: (a) Memorandum of Understanding; (b) Purchase and Sale Agreement, and; (c) Development Agreement. None of these, however, are directly tied to the land. During the review and approval process, an additional development agreement will be crafted to define the terms and conditions that will guide the ORSC development. Once approved, this instrument will be included with the PUD documents and will “run with the land”. 1.9. Additional Development Standards Additional development parameters will be managed through separate instruments that include a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning and a Large-Scale Site Plan. While both documents will be submitted as separate applications, Tables (3) through (7), below, are included as references for staff. Development Program Table 3. Proposed Development Program Use Description Proposed Development Program (gross area) Sports Fields(a) 42 Acres / 17 Multi-Purpose Fields Retail (excl. restaurants) 130,000 sf Restaurants 130,000 sf Entertainment 50,000 sf Offices 10,000 sf Hotels 810,000 sf / 1,114 keys Assembly / Conference 20,000 sf Indoor Sports 150,000 sf Outdoor Entertainment 30,000 sf Parking 920,000 sf (structured) / 210,000 sf (surface) Parking Required/Provided 4110 spaces required / 4277 spaces provided Total: 2,460,000 sf (excluding sports fields and surface parking) Notes: (a) May include sports fields, play courts, batting cages, spectator seating areas, training facilities, and other ancillary uses. 14/79 PUD Standards Table 4. Proposed PUD Standards Description Proposed Standard Max. Intensity (FAR) 0.4 Max. Density (DU/Acre) n/a – No residential uses allowed Min. Open Space 35% of Net Developable Acreage Max. Building Coverage 30% of Net Developable Acreage Max. Impervious Surface 50% of Net Developable Acreage PUD Perimeter Setback 25’ Min. 10’ Min. Landscaping Buffer for adjacent properties Internal Setbacks 20’ front / 7.5’ all other (structures with 1-3 stories) 25’ front / 10’ all other (structures with 4 stories of more) Min. Building Separation 15’ Parking Requirements See Table 5. Parking Requirements Maximum Height(b) Retail 3 stories Restaurants 3 stories Entertainment 3 stories Offices 5 stories Hotels 10 stories Parking Structures 6 stories / 7 levels Other / unlisted per Zoning Manager determination Notes: (b) Excluding mechanical areas / mechanical floors. Parking Requirements Table 5. Parking Requirements Use Description Required Parking Sports Fields 1 space for each 3 seats Retail 1 space for each 200 gross sf Restaurants (a) 1 space for each 4 fixed seats, plus; 1 parking space for each 75 gross sf of patron use where fix-seat calculation is not applicable. Entertainment (a) 1 space for each 4 fixed seats, plus; 1 parking space for each 250 gross sf of patron use where fix-seat calculation is not applicable. Indoor Sports 1 space for each 275 gross sf Offices 1 space for each 250 gross sf Hotels 1 space for each hotel key, plus; 1 space for each 3 employees (1 employee for every 4 keys) Assembly / Conference 1 space for each 3 seats Other / unlisted per Zoning Manager determination Notes: (a) Kitchen, services, and restroom square footages are excluded from parking calculation requirements. 15/79 Pervious / Impervious Area Calculations Figure 6. Pervious / Impervious Areas Diagram Buildings Sports Fields Hardscaping Landscaping Stormwater Areas / Water Features Dry Stormwater Areas Parking & Vehicular Circulation ROW Conveyances The illustration above shows the conceptual site plan classified according to the type of development expected in each area. The acreage are summarized below, and a large-format exhibit is included as Exhibit 30 - Pervious / Impervious Areas Plan. Table 6. Pervious / Impervious Areas Gross Area: 150.0 Ac. / Net Area: 143.8 Ac. Area Description Impervious % of Net Pervious % of Net Building Footprints 17.0 Ac. 11.8% Sports Fields 39.6 Ac. 27.5 % Structures (w/ Sports Fields) 2.3 Ac. 1.6 % Hardscaping Areas 26.5 Ac. 18.4 % Landscaping Areas 29.9 Ac. 20.8 % Water Features 11.0 Ac. 7.6 % Dry Stormwater Areas 4.2 Ac. 2.9 % Parking & Circulation 13.3 Ac. 9.2% Total 59.1 Ac. 41.1% 84.7Ac. 58.9 % Notes: Excluded from calculation: 4.2 Ac. ROW conveyance & 2.0 Ac. City Park conveyance A large-scale exhibit with the Pervious / Impervious Calculations is available as Exhibit 30. 16/79 Public Open Space Area Calculations Figure 7. Public Open Space Areas Diagram The diagram above illustrates the integrated system of publicly accessible open spaces provided with the project. The system encompasses a mix of programmed plazas and gathering spaces, along with other hardscape and landscape areas, amenitized water features, and dry stormwater areas. Excluded from the calculation are any restricted-access areas (such as guest amenities) and the controlled access perimeter around the sports fields, even though the latter will be accessible to the general public most of the time. A detailed listing of these areas is included below, and a large-scale exhibit with the Public Open Space Areas Plan is available as Exhibit 30: Table 7. Public Open Space Areas Gross Area: 150.0 Ac. / Net Area: 143.8 Ac. Area Description Excluded from OS Calculation % of Net Public Open Space % of Net Building Footprints 17.0 Ac. 11.8 % Sports Fields 39.3 Ac. 27.3 % 0.3 Ac. 0.2 % Structures (w/ Sports Fields) 2.3 Ac. 1.6 % Hardscaping Areas 7.7 Ac. 5.3 % 18.8 Ac 13.1 % Landscaping Areas 9.0 Ac. 6.2 % 20.9 Ac. 14.5 % Water Features 11.0 Ac. 7.6 % Dry Stormwater Areas 2.2 Ac 1.5 % 2.0 Ac 1.4 % Parking & Circulation 13.3 Ac. 9.2 % Total 90.8 Ac. 63.1% 53.0 Ac. 36.9 % Notes: Excluded from calculation: 4.2 Ac. ROW conveyance & 2.0 Ac. City Park conveyance 17/79 2. Background Information 2.1. Area Overview The proposed Northwest Activity Center is comprised of 9 parcels and approximately 150 Acres, being generally located east of Ocoee-Apopka Road, south of Fullers Cross Road, west of North Lakewood Avenue, and north of a privately-owned softball facility. An aerial image of the subject area and its surroundings is included in Exhibit 2. Figure 8. Area Map All parcels are in Section 7, Township 22, Range 28, described in the Orange County Property Appraiser (OCPA) records as: 2290 Fullers Cross Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-001 (“the Chevron Parcel”); owner: Montierre Development PLLC; 95.1 acres 951 Ocoee-Apopka Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-023 (the “Rodgers Adjacent Property”, or the “Haunted House” Property); owner: Montierre Development PLLC; 37.1 acres2 1104 N Lakewood Avenue; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-057; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC; 6.1 acres 2 OCPA Records Discrepancy Note: See page 18 for additional details. 18/79 1113 Ocoee-Apopka Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-041; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC; 2.2 acres 1305 Ocoee-Apopka Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-039; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC; 2.1 acres 1059 Ocoee-Apopka Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-043; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC ; 5.0 acres Ocoee-Apopka Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-105; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC; 1.2 acres 1102 N Lakewood Avenue; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-060; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC; 1.1 acres 1053 Ocoee-Apopka Road; Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-074; owner: MDTL Enterprise, LLC; 1.0 acre The OCPA records for the subject area parcels are included in Exhibit 17, while surveys and legal descriptions are included in Exhibit 36. OCPA Acreage Discrepancy Figure 9. Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-023 (shaded in gray), OCPA parcel data (blue outlines), and surveyed boundaries (red outline). The geometry discrepancy is shown as a hatched area. If should be noted that area surveys have revealed a geometric discrepancy between the OCPA records and the actual legal descriptions. The OCPA Records list the acreage for property 07-22-28-0000-00-023 as 37.1 Acres. However, the surveyed parcel shows 1,546,320 sf, or 35.50 Acres. The discrepancy seems to happen along the southern boundary of the property. The area in question is highlighted with a blue hatch on the left (Figure 9). 19/79 2.2. Existing Context Figure 10. Aerial Image. The overall context around the subject area is low-density suburban residential, interspersed with active and inactive agricultural land, single-family subdivisions, and a gridded, traditional residential fabric east of North Lakewood Avenue. Within its boundaries, the subject area contains several structures - including occupied and vacant/abandoned residences - which are accessible via Ocoee- Apopka Road or North Lakewood Avenue. The northern portion of the subject area (Chevron Parcel) is characterized by inactive agricultural land, previously utilized for citrus groves and other crops, along with forested wetlands. The central and southern portions of the subject area also contain improved pasture areas, and forested areas with smaller, isolated wetlands. This parcel has been designated as a brownfield due to the presence of arsenic in the upper soil layers from prior agricultural operations. Vehicle access to the project is currently available along the two-lane Fuller Cross Road to the north and the two-lane Ocoee-Apopka Road to the west. A small section of the subject area also borders the two-lane North Lakewood Avenue to the east. To the north of the subject area, there are: a site being developed as a multifamily residential, a church, and open space. West of the subject area includes a single-family subdivision and land owned by the City of Ocoee, which is currently programmed for institutional use. A logistics park with seven buildings and approximately 486,000 sf of light industrial/warehouse space is currently under construction along Ocoee-Apopka Road, also west of the subject area. The privately-owned West Orange Girls Club is located south of the subject area, consisting of a park space with six softball fields. Also to the south of the subject area, there are small commercial uses: a recycling center, single-family homes, undeveloped open space, and wooded areas. 20/79 East of the subject area includes a scrap metal operation and other miscellaneous small businesses, churches, a pre-K through 12th grade school, and single-family homes. Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure adjacent to the subject area is limited: A north-south sidewalk extends along the western edge of the Ocoee-Apopka Road ROW, connecting the NW corner of the subject area to West Road, approximately 3,200 ft north. This sidewalk ends before Damascus Lane, 2800 ft. south of Fullers Cross Road. 21/79 2.3. Topography The subject area contains approximately 32 feet of elevation change from south and east to northwest. The lowest elevation is approximately 95 feet (NAVD88), while the highest is approximately 128 feet (NAVD88). A manmade canal bisects the northern half of the subject area, draining to the northwest under Ocoee-Apopka Road. The discharge location of the canal is the lowest point on the site. Except for this canal, there are no other unique topographic features. A Topographic Map is included in Exhibit 3, and a detailed topographic survey is provided as Exhibit 27. Figure 11. Topographic Map 22/79 2.4. FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping (Floodplain Zones) Figure 12. Flood Hazard Zones Map Approximately 8.03 Acres in the subject area’s northwest corner are located within the 100-Year flood plain (AE zone), with another 3.17 Acres located within the 500- year flood plain (Zone X) The manmade canal running through the center of the subject area is also zoned AE and is connected to the NW floodplain area. The floodplain boundaries were established by LOMR 10-04- 8380P, with the effective date of 02/14/2011. A manmade canal (identified as SW4) is also present, with approximately 0.38 Acres. This canal is not shown on FEMA panels, as it is located beyond the LOMR boundaries. See Figure 17 for location and acreage. Figure 13. Flood Zone Acreages Detail The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Hazard Zones Map is provided in Exhibit 4. The inset image on the left shows a summary of the FEMA Hazard Zone Acreages. AE Zone within the project boundaries: 8.03 Acres (7.65 + 0.38 SW4; not shown) AE Zone within ROW: 0.75 Acres 23/79 2.5. Soils Figure 14. Soils Map According to the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), seven (7) soil types occur within the subject area boundaries, as follows: - Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#3) - Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (#15) - Immokalee fine sand (#20) - Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#26) - Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#40) - Smyrna-Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#44) - Zolfo fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#54) Hydric Soils Hydric soils generally consist of Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, Felda fine sand, and Samsula muck, although pockets of hydric soils can occur within all the listed soil types. Wetlands on the site are predominantly associated with the Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded soil type. The subject area does not include Type “A” Hydrologic Soils Group soils. A detailed description of the soil types is included in Exhibit 19 - Environmental Assessment Report, and a Hydric Soils Rating Map is included as Figure 4A, in the same report. Figure 15. Hydric Soils Rating 24/79 2.6. Existing Land Cover The subject area currently supports six (6) land use types/vegetative communities within its boundaries. These were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 1999). The upland land use types/vegetative communities on the site are classified as Residential, Low Density (110), Open Land (190), Improved Pastures (211), Pine-Mesic Oak (414) and Upland Hardwood Forests (420). The surface water/wetland land use types/vegetative communities on the site are classified, respectively, as Streams and Waterways (510) and Wetland Forested Mixed (630). The vegetation and land use types are further described in Exhibit 19. Figure 16. Land Use / Land Cover Map Due to the history of agriculture use, there are no sensitive natural habitats such as longleaf pine, sand hill, sand pine and/or xeric oak scrub present on the site. No plant species listed as “Threatened” or “Endangered” by either U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) were identified on the subject area during the 2023 initial assessment. A detailed Environmental Report is provided as Exhibit 19. 25/79 2.7. Wetlands Figure 17. Wetlands and Surface Water Bodies Map The subject area contains three identified wetlands, totaling 21.94 acres. These wetlands and surface waters are located within the Southern Ocklawaha River basin. Boundaries have been delineated in accordance with state and federal wetland jurisdictional methodologies and are subject to final confirmation by state and federal regulatory agencies. The wetlands are present in the forested areas, adjacent to the northeastern boundary and in the central and southern portions. Surface waters are present in the form of manmade canals and ditches. The wetlands occur in a brownfield designated area (Northwest Ocoee Brownfield Area), which was designated due to historical contamination by agricultural byproducts and agricultural products testing. The wetlands are of lower quality due to the presence of exotic species, drainage ditches that have altered the local hydrology, and a history of agricultural use and contamination. The subject area’s wetlands and surface waters are not associated with waters regulated under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. The proposed plan requires impacts to the wetlands occurring on the site due to the configuration of proposed uses, drainage infrastructure, and cleanup/capping of soils exposed to contamination. The proposed impacts and mitigation are discussed in greater detail in Section 4 of this document. The Wetlands and Surface Waters Map is included in Exhibit 8, and a survey of the wetland areas is included in Exhibit 27 - Topography & Environmental Features. There are several manmade ditch/canal segments within the site, generally draining from the southeastern margins of wetlands, and discharging under Ocoee-Apopka Road. Segment S-1 collects drainage from Fullers Cross Road and other offsite areas and discharges into the canal under Ocoee-Apopka Road. Similarly to the wetlands, the development plan requires impacts to these surface waters. However, the proposed master stormwater system will address drainage and retention requirements for on- site and offsite water sources and will improve the existing drainage conditions of the site and surrounding areas. 26/79 2.8. OCPA Property Use Codes (DOR Codes) Figure 18. OCPA Property Use Codes Map. The DOR codes associated with the subject area are highlighted in bold. 0000 - Vacant Residential 0001 - Residential 0019 - Residential Vacant H.O.A 0100 - Single Family 0102 - Single Family Class II 0103 - Single Family Class III 0200 - Manufactured Home 0202 - Manufactured Home 0800 - Multifamily 1000 - Commercial Vacant Land 1101 - Condo-Retail 1200 - Store/Office/Res Class I 1210 - Store/Office/Res Class II 1702 - Office Modular 2740 - Auto Repair Garage 4000 - Industrial Vacant Land 4800 - Industrial Warehouse I 5001 - Ag Operations Site 6100 - Ag Grazing / Improved Pasture 6200 - Ag Grazing / Semi-Improved Pasture 6700 - Ag Misc Animals 6801 - Ag Horse Farm 6910 - Ag Field Nursery 7100 - Institutional - Religious 7200 - Institutional - Private School 7500 - Institutional - Charitable 8065 - County Stormwater/Retention 8095 - Municipal Stormwater/Retention 8289 - Municipal Forest Park Recreation 8600 - County (Misc. Buildings) 8610 - County Multi Use Facility 8620 - County Utility - Gas, Electric 8700 - State (Misc. Buildings) 8710 - State Multi-Use Facility 8900 - Municipal (Other) 8920 - Municipal Utility - Gas, Electric 9110 - Private Communication Tower 9400 - Private Right-Of-Way 9900 - Non-Agricultural Acreage 9920 - Private Utility Most of the subject area is characterized by active and inactive agricultural uses, with single-family parcels distributed along the Ocoee-Apopka Road frontage. These smaller properties have been removed from larger agricultural tracts throughout the decades for a variety of reasons, which include: homesteading and other taxing advantages, family transactions, or partial land sales. The two largest parcels in the subject area are known as the “Chevron property” and the “Haunted House / Rogers Adjacent” property. The former has been classified as “Non-Agricultural Acreage” since it was purchased by the Chevron Land and Development Company in 2001, while the latter has been classified as a “municipal use” since 2006 when it was conveyed to the City of Ocoee. Finally, the eastern 7.1 Acres of the subject area - known as the “Lott Properties” - are classified by the property appraiser as industrial and residential. These two parcels will eventually allow an additional east-west connection to be established between Ocoee-Apopka Road and North Lakewood Avenue. 27/79 2.9. Existing Future Land Use Figure 19. Existing Future Land Use Map The subject area’s Future Land Use Map includes Low Density Residential (LDR) and Conservation (CONS). Surrounding future land uses are predominantly Low Density Residential (LDR), with smaller portions of Light and Heavy Industrial (LI / HI), Commercial (COMM), and Conservation (CONS). Adjacent Future Land Uses North: Low Density Residential (LDR) and Commercial (COMM). East: Low Density Residential (LDR), Light Industrial (LI), Heavy Industrial (HI), and Conservation (CONS). South: Low Density Residential (LDR), Light Industrial (LI), Heavy Industrial (HI), and Conservation (CONS). West: Low Density Residential (LDR), Light Industrial (LI), Commercial (COMM), and Conservation (CONS). The entire subject area is located within the Orange County/City of Ocoee Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) Boundary. The area’s Existing Future Land Use Map is presented as Exhibit 10. 28/79 2.10. Existing Zoning Figure 20. Existing Zoning Map The current zoning for the northern portion of the subject area (Chevron Property) is PUD-LD. This zoning designation was adopted with the 2011 approval of the “Eagle Creek of Ocoee” PUD, which was not platted or built. The southern half of the subject area contains unincorporated agricultural and single-family parcels in addition to the 37-Acre R-1AA parcel formerly owned by the City of Ocoee. Adjacent Zoning North: Commercial PUD (PUD-COMM); Single-Family Dwelling (R-1A); Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated) East: Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated); General Agricultural (A- 1); Low Density PUD (PUD-LD); Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (I-1), General Industrial (I- 2). South: Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated); Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (I-1), General Industrial (I-2). West: Commercial PUD (PUD-COMM); Rural Country Estates (R-CE, Unincorporated); Industrial PUD (PUD- IND); Citrus Rural District (A-1, Unincorporated); General Agricultural (A- 1) The Subject Area’s Existing Zoning Map is provided as Exhibit 12, and the 2024 Annexation Requests are discussed on page 40 of this document. 29/79 2.11. Environmental Assessment Between March and June of 2023, the project site was assessed for ecological components, including wetlands and potential for occurrence of listed wildlife and plant species. The resulting report outlines the following components: a) general review of subject area topography; b) review of soil types mapped within the subject area boundaries; c) evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; d) delineation of any on-site wetland/surface water communities; e) field review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna; and, f) an overview of potential development constraints. Since items (a) though (d) have already been discussed in other sections of this document, the following pages will summarize the remaining findings of the Report. Flora and Fauna Assessment An assessment for listed floral and faunal species was conducted at the site on March 21 & 26, 2023 and June 6 & 7, 2023. This work included both direct observations and assessments of indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations which indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are listed by the FWC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species (December 2022) and listed species that have the potential to occur in Orange County. (See: Exhibit 19 - Environmental Assessment Report, Table 1) No plant species listed as “Threatened” or “Endangered” by either the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) were identified on the site during the assessments. However, three (3) species identified on the site are listed as commercially exploited by the FDACS. The harvesting of these species: Cinnamon Fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), Royal Fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis), and Saw Palmetto (Serenoa repens) for commercial gain is prohibited. The FDACS protection of listed plant species centers on preventing the illegal collection, transport, and sale of the listed plants. The FDACS will issue permits for collection purposes. There are no regulations that prohibit the destruction of state-listed flora species as a result of proposed development activities. 30/79 Wildlife Identified on the Subject Area The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the field assessments: Table 8. Species identified on the Subject Area Class Species Scientific Name Reptiles and Amphibians Black Racer Coluber constrictor Brown Anole Anolis sagrei Green Anole Anolis carolinensis Green Tree Frog Hyla cinerea Six-Lined Racerunner Cnemidophorus sexlineatus sexlineatus Southern Cricket Frog Acris gryllus Southern Leopard Frog Lithobates sphenocephalus Birds American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Black Vulture Coragyps atratus Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Great Egret Ardea alba Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus Red-Bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Red-Tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Red-Shouldered Hawk Buteo platypterus Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura Mammals Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus Eastern Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Feral Pig Sus scrofa Nine-Banded Armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus North American Raccoon Procyon lotor Opossum Didelphis virginiana None of the wildlife species listed above are identified in the FWC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species. 31/79 Protected Species The following pages provide a brief outline of protected species with the potential to occur on the site or the area around the site as they may relate to site development. However, no presence of protected species was observed during the field assessments. Table 9. Protected Species Summary Species Scientific Name USFWS Federal- Listing FWC State- Listing Other Protections Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002. Federally protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) Everglade Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis Endangered Florida Scrub-Jay Aphelocoma coerulescens Threatened Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Threatened Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi) Threatened Sand Skink Neoseps reynoldsi Threatened Wood Stork Mycteria americana Threatened Threatened Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) State Listed as “Threatened” by FWC Currently, the Gopher Tortoise is classified as a “Category 2 Candidate Species” by the USFWS, and as of September 2007 and is classified as “Threatened” by FWC. The basis of the “Threatened” classification is due to habitat loss and destruction of burrows. Gopher Tortoises are commonly found in areas with well-drained soils associated with the pine flatwoods, pastures, and abandoned orange groves. Several other protected species known to occur in Orange County have a possibility of occurring in the subject area, as they are gopher tortoise commensal species. These species include the Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Florida Mouse (Podomys floridanus) and the Gopher Frog (Rana capito). However, none of these species were observed during the field assessments. The subject site was surveyed for the existence of Gopher Tortoises through pedestrian and vehicular transects. The survey covered approximately 90% of the suitable habitat present within the subject area. While no burrows were observed, a future survey should be completed at least 90 days prior to construction to ensure that no burrows or tortoises are located on the site. 32/79 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) Figure 21. Bald Eagle’s Nest #OR045 In addition to the field evaluation for listed species, a review of FFWCC’s and Audubon’s Eagle Watch Program databases was performed for recorded Bald Eagle nests within 660 feet of the subject site. The database included a record for one (1) Bald Eagle nest (identified by the FFWCC as OR045), located on the south-central portion of the subject area (Figure 21). In June of 2023, attempts were made to locate the nest, but it was no longer present at its recorded location, and it has been determined to be lost. Some coordination with FFWCC and/or USFWS may be required to confirm the status of nest OR045 and/or to remove it from FFWCC’s records. In addition, no Bald Eagles or other nests were observed within the nest territory at that time. It should be noted that Audubon EagleWatch determined nest OR045 to be “unknown” for the 2022 nesting season (Oct 2021 – May 2022). Therefore, it is not anticipated that any protective measures or permitting action will be required by the USFWS with regards to nest OR045. Thus, no developmental constraints are expected for the subject area with respect to Bald Eagle nests, unless a new nest is found. Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) Federally Listed as “Threatened” by USFWS The Indigo Snake is a federally threatened species. The basis for this listing was a result of dramatic population declines caused by over-collecting for the domestic and international pet trade, as well as mortality caused by rattlesnake collectors who gassed gopher tortoise burrows to collect snakes. Since its listing, habitat loss and fragmentation by residential and commercial expansion have become much more significant threats to the Eastern Indigo Snake. 33/79 This species is widely distributed throughout Central and South Florida, and primarily occurs in sandhill habitat in northern Florida and southern Georgia. No evidence of Eastern Indigo Snakes was observed during the wildlife surveys. Utilizing the 2013 USFWS’s Consultation Key for the Eastern Indigo Snake, the project will not result in the removal of more than 25 acres of Xeric Habitat (scrub, sandhill, or scrubby pine flatwoods) or more than 25 active or inactive gopher tortoise burrows. Therefore, a key determination would result in a finding of “not likely to adversely affect.” During the ERP, State 404 or USACOE Dredge and Fill permit review process, the USFWS may determine that an Indigo Snake survey is required during the review of the project. It should also be noted that Eastern Indigo Snake mitigation may be purchased in lieu of conducting the survey. A FDEP 404 or USACOE permit may also require following the Service’s Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake. As long as the above mentioned “Standard Protection Measures” are adhered to, the development activities associated with the subject site would result in a key determination of “not likely to adversely affect” the eastern Indigo Snake. In addition, a FWC Conservation Permit to relocate Gopher Tortoises will also contain permit conditions relating to the safety of Indigo Snakes. Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) – Core Foraging Area State & Federally listed as “Threatened” by FWC & USFWS Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. The Wood Stork is listed as “Threatened” by the USFWS. The subject area is located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area. Wood Storks typically nest colonially in medium to tall trees that occur in stands located either in swamps or on islands surrounded by relatively broad expanses of open water. Successful breeding sites are those that have limited human disturbance and low exposure to land-based predators. Because of their specialized feeding behavior, Wood Storks forage most effectively in shallow-water areas with highly concentrated prey. Typical foraging sites for the Wood Stork include freshwater marshes, depressions in cypress heads, swamp sloughs, managed impoundments, stock ponds, shallow-seasonally flooded roadside or agricultural ditches and narrow tidal creeks or shallow tidal pools. Good foraging conditions are characterized by water that is relatively calm, open, and having water depths between 5 and 15 inches (5 and 38 cm). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has identified core foraging area (CFA) around all known Wood Stork nesting colonies that is important for reproductive success. In Central Florida, CFAs include suitable foraging habitat (SFH) within a 15-mile radius of the nest colony; CFAs in North Florida include SFH within a 13-mile radius of a colony. The Service believes loss of suitable foraging wetlands within these CFAs may reduce foraging opportunities for the Wood Stork. Based on review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the subject area or within close proximity. The USFWS require that any impacts to on-site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a portion of the Wood Stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through approved mitigation plans or recreated elsewhere on-site so that there would be no net loss of Wood Stork foraging habitat. Most of these potential foraging habitats can be eliminated as potential foraging habitat due to a closed canopy, but most of the subject area ditches contain potential foraging habitat. The construction of the stormwater management system and the littoral 34/79 shelves within the stormwater management ponds would likely produce a larger area of potential Wood Stork foraging habitat than will be impacted. No species-specific survey is anticipated if the design is such that the Wood Stork foraging habitat is the same acreage in pre vs. post development. However, the USFWS and/or another agency make the final determination as to if a species- specific survey is required. It should be noted that wetland impact mitigation usually can serve as Wood Stork foraging mitigation as well. 2.12. Wekiva Study Area Florida’s Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act was signed into law in 2004, with the intent of assuring the protection of surface water and groundwater resources from impacts that may increase nutrient loading and lower water flow. 3 The Act required local comprehensive plans within the Wekiva Study Area to adopt policies and strategies to enhance stormwater management, water supply, and to protect the most effective recharge areas, karst features, and sensitive natural habitats. Properties located within the Wekiva River Protection Area may also be subject to additional regulations and guidelines that aim to manage land use, development, and environmental impacts, to ensure the continued health and integrity of the Wekiva river and its ecosystem. The subject area is not located within the Wekiva River Protection Area, but it is located within the Wekiva Study Area (WSA). Figure 22. Wekiva Study Area Boundary Map. Ocoee’s Guide to the Wekiva Study Area Protection Requirements4 was prepared to help users understand the Wekiva Parkway & Protection Act, and its relationship to Ocoee’s adopted Goals, Objectives and Policies. The guide provides maps, descriptions of responsibilities, and limitations of development in the Wekiva Study Area. The study outlined three main criteria to determine if additional protections were warranted, which are adopted in the Future Land Use element, as follows:5 3 F.S. ss. 369.314-369.324 4 The Guide to the Wekiva Study Area Protection Requirements is available online, at: https://www.ocoee.org/DocumentCenter/View/571 5 Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.2.1 35/79 a) An analysis of soils to determine the presence and location of most effective recharge area, as defined by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Type “A” Hydrologic Soils Group. b) An analysis to determine the presence and location of karst features. This analysis may include but is not limited to the use of geophysical surveys such as microgravity and ground penetrating radar, and may be supplemented with documented locations of sinkholes, light detection and ranging surveys and aerial photographs. c) An analysis to determine the presence and location of sensitive natural habitats including Longleaf Pine, Sand Hill, Sand Pine, and Xeric Oak Scrub. The subject area does not fall within areas mapped as “Most Effective Recharge Areas/Soil Conservation Service Type ‘A’ Soils”.6 There are also no mapped karst features - such as sinkholes or springs - or closed topographic depressions known to occur on the subject area or its surroundings,7 and as previously mentioned in Section 2.6, there are no sensitive natural habitats such as longleaf pine, sand hill, sand pine and/or xeric oak scrub present on the site due to its history of agricultural use. 2.13. Existing Entitlements & Prior Planning The roots of Florida's citrus industry can be traced back to the early Spanish explorers who introduced novelty trees to the region during the 16th century. However, it was not until the 19th century that citrus operations truly took off, spurred in large part by advancements in transportation. Prior to the construction of railroads, citrus growers faced significant challenges in transporting perishable crops to market, relying primarily on slow and unreliable methods. This logistical process was revolutionized with the establishment of reliable routes that connected Central Florida's producers to resale markets in the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. Figure 23. 1890 Map of Orange County, by J.O. Fries (Library of Congress) Figure 24. 1994 Aerial Image (FDOT) A century of agricultural operations has drastically changed Florida’s landscape, fragmenting many of its natural landscapes and permanently changing its ecosystems. The left image above illustrates a small section of J.O. Fries’ Map of Orange County (1890)8 The areas highlighted in green were described as “Bay and Low Hammock Swamps” draining to Lake Apopka. The 1994 6 Guide to the Wekiva Study Area Protection Requirements, Figure 2. 7 Guide to the Wekiva Study Area Protection Requirements, Figure 3. 8 https://www.loc.gov/item/2012592407/ 36/79 Aerial image on the right shows the area changes due to agricultural production and urban development, with the abandoned railroad repurposed as part of West Orange trail system. The Staten railroad station location is also shown on the left, having been renamed in the early 1900s after John T. Fuller’s newly established Packing House. According to anecdotal accounts, the Packing House was destroyed by a fire in the late 1960s. The Chevron Property (07-22-28-0000-00-001) Figure 25. Chevron Property, 1969 Figure 26. Chevron Property, 1994 Until 2001, this parcel was owned by the Grafton Family, and a 1997 survey listed a total of 97.93 Acres.9 This area was eventually reduced to 95.1 Acres, after multiple conveyances were provided for Rights-of-Way along Ocoee-Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road to accommodate future road widening needs. Farming operations were partitioned, with citrus and other specialty crops on the southwest quadrant, with hay - or perhaps other crops – located in areas near the drainage ditch and the forested areas. As the images above illustrate, a substantial amount of clearing happened in the three decades preceding the land sale to Chevron. In February of 1998, the parcel was annexed into the City of Ocoee.10 The annexation agreement established three conveyances to the City as follows: (a) a right-of-way conveyance to create a 100’ ROW along Ocoee-Apopka Road; (b) a 20’ ROW conveyance along Fullers Cross Road (to be measured as a 50-foot width from the centerline of the road); and (c) a 50-foot drainage easement along the northern boundary of the property, adjacent to the widened Fullers Cross ROW. In December of 2001, the property was sold to the Chevron Corporation (Chevron USA, Inc.), which in turn transferred the title to the Chevron Land and Development Company (CL&D) in 2005. This 9 Orange County Comptroller, Book 5412, Page 1372. Exhibit A 10 Ordinance 98-03 (Case # AR-7-07-07) 37/79 subsidiary was created to “acquire property and facilitate their use in conjunction with remedial programs monitored by Chevron Environmental Services (CES). CL&D goal is to ultimately dispose or make other economic use of acquired properties”.11 In 2005, an access easement was recorded to allow the Chevron Environmental Management Company (EMC) to install observation wells and monitoring equipment, and to perform any work deemed necessary to advance the environmental remediation efforts. This easement was terminated in 2023. In 2006, the Chevron Land and Development Company initiated a rezoning application, which became known as Eagle Creek of Ocoee PUD. The rezoning was approved in October of 2008,12 allowing the development of 293 detached and attached single-family units. A preliminary subdivision plan was approved in 2011, with a proposed development program of 245 units. In October of 1998 the City and Chevron entered into a Development Agreement regarding the Eagle Creek of Ocoee.13 This agreement stipulated that Chevron would convey to the City additional portions of Right-of-Way. In January of 2019, the ROW conveyances were completed. Altogether, the easements provided by the Chevron Property over the years total approximately 2.8 Acres. It is our understanding that impact-fee credits have been provided in exchange for these easements, but the amount and status of such credits are yet to be determined. CD&L School Concurrency Mitigation Agreement14 In June of 2017, Chevron entered into a School Concurrency Mitigation Agreement with the School Board of Orange County to provide the necessary proportionate-share mitigation funds to accommodate the PUD’s residential needs, totaling $455,627.98. This sum would be applied towards impact fee credits upon payment. The payment would also allow the Agreement to serve as a Capacity Encumbrance Letter (CEL). In order to fund the newly added capacity, Chevron was also required to post three equal Capacity Reservation Fee payments, as follows: a) $664,384.00, due prior to plat approval; b) $664,384.00, due 12 months from the School Capacity Reservation Certificate (SCRC) issuance, and; c) $664,384.00, due 24 months from the SCRC issuance. Paragraph 10 of agreement provided that it would “terminate, and the Applicant [would] forfeit any administrative fees paid, as well as any capacity encumbered or reserved”, unless a site plan was approved by the applicable local government (City of Ocoee) within 180 days from DRC approval, or if a building permit was not issued within 3 years of a recorded plat. Since the project was never platted or built, it is our understanding that the agreement has since expired. It is unclear from the available documentation if any payments were made, and additional 11 https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF? storagePath=COR%5C2002%5C0225%5C80981238.tif&documentNumber=F02000000936 12 Ordinance 2008-17 (RZ-06-08-05) 13 Ordinance 98-04, and Eagle Creek PSP dated 11/29/2011 (Cond. of Approval #52) 14 OCE-16-003, approved 6/13/17; Orange County Comptroller Document # 2170523657 38/79 consultation with OCPS and the City will be required to determine if the applicant - as the current owner of the land - is eligible to receive any applicable reimbursements or credits. The “Haunted House” Property (07-22-28-0000-00-023) The 37-Acre parcel known as “The Haunted House Parcel” or “The Rodger’s Adjacent Property” was conveyed to the City of Ocoee by the Rogers family and annexed in 2007 with the intent of creating a municipal softball park. Ultimately, the park was not developed due to insufficient funding, and in December of 2023 the parcel was conveyed to Montierre according to terms defined in the Development Agreement, discussed below: Montierre Acquisitions & Development Agreement On December 6, 2022, the City Commission approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Montierre to facilitate the development of the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex. This MOU provided that: (a) the City would enter into a contract with Chevron Land and Development Company to purchase the 95-Acre Chevron Property (the Chevron Contract); (b) the Chevron Contract would then be transferred to Montierre; (c) upon Montierre’s closing on the Chevron contract, the City would convey to Montierre the 37-Acre “Rogers Adjacent Property” property; and (d) the City would enter into a Development Agreement with Montierre to address future development of the properties, and to outline the terms of compensation for the City, in exchange for the conveyed property. On May 18, 2023, a Development Agreement between the City and Montierre was approved. It included the following terms and conditions: Anticipated purchase of the Chevron Property (PID 07-22-28-0000-001) for approximately $4.2 Million, with remediation obligations transferred to Montierre, and legal indemnification to the seller for any environmental claims.15 Montierre will perform any necessary environmental remediation for the development of the property and would release the City from any prior obligations related to the Chevron Contract. Montierre will proceed with the acquisition and annexation of the group of parcels known as the “Rodgers properties”.16 Upon Completion of the purchases listed above, the City will convey to Montierre the 37.1 Acre Parcels known as the “Rodgers Adjacent Property”, with an anticipated appraisal value of $8 Million or less.17 Montierre will, at its sole expense, develop the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex project. The City will receive $20 for each night of hotel bookings, and $5 for each garage parking space rented out within the project, for a period of 30 years from the project’s completion date. 15 The Chevron purchase was completed on 12/14,2023, and recorded on 12/27/2023 - Orange County Comptroller Document #20230735916. 16 See pg. 36 17 The “Rodgers Adjacent Property” (07-22-28-0000-00-023), also referred to as “the Haunted House property” was conveyed to Montierre in December of 2023 for a nominal sum of $1, but with a recorded value of $5.6 Million, according to OCPA records. 39/79 Montierre will be responsible for improvements to Ocoee-Apopka Road, with the City providing transportation impact fee credits for such improvements. Montierre will make certain improvements to existing ballfields within the City. The City will – at no charge – have limited use rights to some of the ORSC fields during off- peak periods. The City will cooperate with Montierre to pursue Tourist Tax Funds (TTF) to assist the development of the project. The City will provide to Montierre a property tax abatement for a period not to exceed 5 years, from the conveyance of the Rodgers Adjacent Property. It should be noted that the Development Agreement is between the City of Ocoee and the project developer, and as such, it is not tied to specific parcels, nor does it run with the land. Brownfield Designation On October 18th, 2023, the City Commission adopted Resolution 2023-08, creating the Ocoee Northwest Brownfield Area, “with the purpose of environmental remediation, rehabilitation, and economic development”. The brownfield boundaries include only the “Chevron” and the “Rodgers Adjacent” parcels. First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement and Development Agreement Following the approval of the Purchase and Sale Agreement and the Development Agreement by the City Commission in May of 2023, and the Brownfield Designation, the City Manager and City Attorney were authorized to take additional steps to execute a Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Program (BSRA). This would allow the developer to benefit from certain incentives and regulatory benefits. Due to the time required to fully execute the BSRA, and in order to expedite the Chevron Property closing process, all parties agreed in December of 2023 to amend both the Purchase and Sale Agreement and the Development Agreement, with additional language to: Clarify that the BSRA would no longer be required prior to closing. Clarify the type, duration, and terms of the Environmental Indemnification Insurance to be purchased by Montierre prior to the closing of the Chevron Sale. Provide specific information regarding Montierre’s financial obligations to the City of Ocoee. 40/79 2024 Annexation Requests Figure 27. Annexation Parcels In March of 2024, Montierre initiated multiple annexation requests to incorporate seven parcels into the ORSC project. The two groups of parcels are known as “The Rodgers Properties” and “The Lott Properties”, located in unincorporated Orange County, with A-1 (Citrus Rural District) zoning. The annexation applications were submitted on March 29, 2024. On April 9, 2024, the Ocoee Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended the approval of the annexation requests. There were no comments or questions from board members or the public. The annexations were also approved unanimously by the City commission, with a first reading on May 7, 2024, and a second reading on May 21, 2024. As of this writing, all parcels have been incorporated into the City Boundaries, and are under the ownership of MDTL Enterprise, LLC. 41/79 3. Supporting Data and Analysis 3.1. Project Introduction & Justification This Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposes the development of a Regional Sports Complex within the City of Ocoee. The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex (ORSC) will be a first-of-a-kind immersive environment that will not only be a nationwide destination for youth sports but will also become a premier entertainment destination for the residents of Ocoee and neighboring communities. Figure 28. ORSC Illustrative Site Plan Project Mission Through a unique blend of sports science and wellness, the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex ignites the passion of future athletes through a transformative athletic journey, creating memories and opportunities for players, coaches, families, and the community. At the ORSC, cutting-edge technology, personalized experiences, and holistic growth converge to create a place that redefines standards in youth sports, enabling players to cherish and participate in the game for years to come. Playing in youth sports is a childhood rite of passage. The feeling of building camaraderie with one’s team, learning life lessons from coaches, and stepping on the field to have a moment to shine. It all seems so important and exciting. And yet, it has become a very disappointing experience: long car rides, mediocre fields, uninspiring ceremonies. The entire event can often feel more like a chore, or an obligation, than a definitive, life-changing journey. The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex will change that through a truly transformative model, where every game feels like an audition for the pros. At the ORSC, game day isn’t a one-off event, but a multi-day destination where each player gets the VIP treatment from the moment they arrive, until they step on the platform for the awards ceremony. It’s the grandeur of the big leagues-style showmanship, tailored to youth sports. 42/79 The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex creates an environment that showcases the power of sports and family. The ORSC environment surpasses all other youth sports events, becoming a premier location that showcases sports technology, while emphasizing the importance of a holistic well- being through a unique, transformative experience. The ORSC vision is to create a haven where every family member is engaged, with a special appreciation for sports, science, and wellness. The ORSC guests indulge themselves in a variety of experiential offerings that are designed to extend beyond the games, and to cater to diverse interests. The goal is to make sure every member of the family feels like an MVP, and to foster family bonding through youth sports, entertainment, and nature. The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex ORSC provides high-end entertainment destinations, museum-quality exhibits, world-class stores, and refined dining options. There are also specially designed areas for neurodiverse play, and safe spaces for the little ones, in addition to nature trails, and a variety of spas and wellness. The ORSC experience is not just about unlocking the athlete in all of us, but initiating a journey that transcends the boundaries of gameplay, inspiring a lifelong passion for sports and collaboration. 3.2. Local Demographic and Socio-Economic Analyses Sections 3.2 and 3.3 introduce the socio-economic data and analyses that were prepared for this application. Both sections are based on a 5-Mile Buffer Study Area,18 using various sources from the United States Census Bureau.19 Subject Area Demographic and Socio-Economic Study Area: Area A: 66.81 Square Miles (42,763 Acres) Area B: 24.17 Square Miles (15,479 Acres) Total: 91.0 Square Miles (58,242 Acres) Figure 29. Demographic and Socio-Economic Study Area Map According to data from the 2020 Census,20 the Study Area has a total population of 178,854, with 1965.4 persons per square mile, or 2,667 persons per square mile once the undeveloped area of Lake Apopka (B) is excluded. 18 Note: for purposes of this section, the 5-Mile Analysis Buffer will be referred to as the “Study Area”. This should not be confused with the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex project boundary, referred to as “Subject Area” throughout the document. 19 Various datasets were utilized for this section, including the 2020 Decennial Census (https://www.census.gov/programs- surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/2020-census-main.html); the 2017-2021 American Community Survey (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs), and the 2021 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) (https://lehd.ces.census.gov & https://onthemap.ces.census.gov. When available, Census summary tables were retrieved using ESRI’s ArcGIS Business Analyst. 20 Refer to Exhibit 23 for data sources and summary tables. 43/79 The developed portion of the Study Area (A) has an average gross density of 1.49 DU/Ac, with an average household size of 2.92 persons. There are 63,714 housing units in the study area, with an estimated housing vacancy rate of 4.3% (3.9% for rental units / 5.1% for owned units). The racial makeup of the study area is 45.5% White, 14.4% African American, 0.9% Native American, 4.0% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, 18.4% from other races, and 16.6% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 38.1% of the population. The gender distribution is 48.2% Male, 51.8% Female. In 2020, there were 4,465 households, out of which 23.6% included children under the age of 18, 54.4% were married couples living together, 22.6% were female-led households not shared with a partner. 38.4% of all households were made up of individuals, and 5.2% had a person 65 years or older living alone. The median household income in the Study Area is estimated to be $69,983, with a per-capita income of $33,807. The median net worth is $142,937, and the estimated poverty rate is 15.1%21 Population Distribution by Age Figure 30 shows the population distribution in 5-year cohorts. The bars represent the study area dataset, compared to Orange County’s population (blue line). The median age of the study area is 36.6 years. The study area’s population distribution presents slightly larger shares than the County for the 0-14 age groups, and a noticeable gap in the 20-29 year-old cohorts (-1.2 & -1.4%, respectively). One possible driver for such deficit could be young adults choosing to reside in places that are either: more convenient, less expensive, or closer to employment. This is, however, only an assumption. Study Area Orange County Figure 30. Population Distribution by Age. Source: US Census Bureau, 2020. 21 ACS Population Summary, Poverty rate is the share of the population with income to poverty level <1.0. For comparison, Orange County’s poverty level is estimated at 13.9%. 44/79 Education Attainment (Adults, 25+) Figure 31 shows education attainment levels for adults (25 or older) within the study area (blue), compared to Orange County (orange). This graph displays a slightly higher concentration of adults without a college degree in the study area (~3% average), and a significant underrepresentation of adults with undergraduate and graduate degrees (- 8.2% and -5%, respectively) Study Area Orange County Figure 31. Educational Attainment for Adults. Source: US Census Bureau, 2020. Commute Time Figure 32 shows the commute times for the Study Area (blue) vs. Orange County (orange). As the graph suggests, the population in the study area has slightly longer commutes, when compared to Orange County. The average travel time for the study area is 32 minutes, against 30.5 minutes countywide. Study Area Orange County Figure 32. Commute Time. Source: US Census Bureau, 2021. 45/79 Commute Behavior Figure 33 summarizes the commute behavior in the study area, where: - Nearly 85% of all workers drive to work; 74% drive alone. - Only 2 out of 100 use public transit, and 1 out of 100 bikes of walks to work. Figure 33. Commute Behavior. Source: US Census Bureau, 2021. Retail and Restaurants Spending According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau, the average annual retail spending (excluding restaurants) within the study area was 21,486.62. This is approximately 8.0% lower than the national average, and 3.1% lower than Orange County’s average. The average annual spending in restaurants was $3,766.43, which is 5.8% lower than the national average, and 3.9% lower than Orange County’s. All data sources for this section are included in Exhibit 23- Socio Economic Data. 46/79 3.3. Local Employment Analysis Employment Distribution Figure 34. Employment distribution within the study area. Source: United States Census Bureau. According to 2021 Data from the US Census Bureau, there are 44,256 jobs within 5 Miles from the subject area. Most of these are concentrated along the West Colonial Drive corridor and the historic center of Winter Garden, with approximately 58% being distributed in Health Care, Construction, Retail (including Restaurants), and Hospitality. The latter three categories represent nearly one-third of all jobs in the study area. Table 10. Job Counts by NAICS Industry Sector (2021) Jobs Share Retail Trade 7,857 17.8% Health Care and Social Assistance 6,736 15.2% Construction 6,166 13.9% Accommodation and Food Services 4,598 10.4% Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation 4,091 9.2% Wholesale Trade 2,291 5.2% Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting 1,970 4.5% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 1,924 4.3% Other Services (Excl. Public Administration) 1,666 3.8% Manufacturing 1,398 3.2% Transportation and Warehousing 1,064 2.4% Finance and Insurance 966 2.2% Public Administration 736 1.7% Educational Services 702 1.6% Real Estate, Rental and Leasing 675 1.5% Information 573 1.3% Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 440 1.0% Management of Companies and Enterprises 243 0.5% Utilities 160 0.4% Mining, Quarrying, and Oil & Gas Extraction - 0.0% Total 44,256 100.0% 47/79 It should also be noted that there are only 183 jobs reported within a 1500-foot buffer from the subject area, most being concentrated into the Education, Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, and Administrative Support Sectors. Workforce Distribution Figure 35. Workforce distribution within the study area. Source: United States Census Bureau. 2021 records from the US Census Bureau show 77,987 workers within the study area. With a few exceptions, this distribution correlates directly with the location of residential land uses in the area. (The exception being the historic center of Winder Garden, where a mix of residential and non- residential uses exists). Together, these two maps illustrate a spatial mismatch between employment and residential locations, typical of post-war suburban development throughout the United States. Table 11. Job Counts by NAICS Industry Sector (2021) Jobs Share Health Care and Social Assistance 10,286 13.2% Accommodation and Food Services 9,373 12.0% Retail Trade 8,740 11.2% Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation 7,515 9.6% Construction 5,169 6.6% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 5,122 6.6% Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 4,734 6.1% Educational Services 4,674 6.0% Transportation and Warehousing 3,162 4.1% Manufacturing 3,121 4.0% Finance and Insurance 3,038 3.9% Wholesale Trade 2,749 3.5% Public Administration 2,729 3.5% Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 2,022 2.6% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,631 2.1% Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,568 2.0% Information 1,356 1.7% Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 733 0.9% Utilities 258 0.3% Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 7 0.0% Total 77,987 100.0% 48/79 Inflow/Outflow Analysis The inflow / outflow analysis of the study area shows that approximately 81% of the total jobs are fulfilled by workers who live elsewhere, while 90% of the area residents work outside of the 5- mile buffer. Figure 36. Inflow/Outflow Totals (left) Figure 37. Outflow Distance & Direction Graph The prevailing commute pattern of area residents is distributed along a SE quadrant that follows the I-4 corridor, extending from Maitland to Lake Buena Vista. A higher concentration of jobs is noticeable near Downtown Orlando, the I-Drive tourist corridor, and the Disney area. Figure 38. Outflow Distribution Map (left) Figure 39. Inflow Distance & Direction Graph The inflow travel pattern to the study area is significantly more scattered, and not as easily discernible. The only visible trend is that most jobs are taken by residents located east of the study area, with longer commutes along the Colonial/408 corridor. Figure 40. Inflow Distribution Map (left) 49/79 3.4. Employment Generation Estimates The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex is expected to generate substantial public benefits for the City of Ocoee and surrounding communities. One such benefit is the creation of direct and indirect jobs associated with: a) the project’s development and construction, along with increased expenditures in roadway construction and infrastructure improvements; b) permanent jobs created by the Sports Complex and its operations: (e.g. shops, restaurants, hotels, entertainment, grounds maintenance), and; c) added local expenditures from increased tourism activity. Regional input-output models are generally accepted as the best method to quantify the full range of economic impacts resulting from projects such as this. Unfortunately, these complex models require equally detailed inputs, which are not knowable at this time, and that will not become available before this application is filed. Therefore, in an effort to provide preliminary estimates that may be useful to the various reviewing teams, this document contains preliminary estimates that are based on general assumptions and comparable case studies. As the ORSC project continues to be refined, and more detailed information becomes available, updated estimates will be promptly shared with staff. Part 1 – Short-Term Construction-Related Employment (3 to 5 years) In large land development projects, a first source of employment is supported by the increase in local expenditures during the project construction. These increase as the pace of work accelerates, reaching a sustained level after 6 to 12 months from initial mobilization. As the project nears completion, the majority of these jobs will taper-off or cease to exist, but a small percentage might remain for an additional period of time, supported by longer-term infrastructure improvements. In most input-output models, jobs are categorized as: Direct Jobs that are supported by the construction process, such as: field workers and trade professionals; managers and supervisors; architects, engineers and other EAC professionals, as well as heavy machinery operators. Supplier Jobs that are associated with the complex supply-chain of that supports the building industry: raw materials, such as cement, steel, lumber; transportation; warehousing; equipment manufacturing; professional support services, such as accounting, banking, and insurance; as well as utilities and infrastructure contractors. Induced Jobs are those generated by increases in local economic activity. When workers receive income from direct or indirect employment, they tend to spend a portion of that income on local goods and services. This spending, in turn, creates demand for additional goods and services, leading to further economic activity and job creation. Both Supplier and Induced Jobs are classified as Indirect Jobs. 50/79 Data from the Economic Policy Institute22 estimates that for every $1 Million dollars in construction expenditures, 16.4 jobs are created, with the following distribution: Table 12. Construction-Related Employment Generation Direct Jobs Supplier Jobs Induced Jobs Total Indirect Jobs Total Jobs 5.5 4.8 6.1 10.9 16.4 For the estimates above, the employment multiplier is 2.98, meaning that for every new job in the construction industry, approximately two other indirect jobs are created. The ORSC is estimated to generate approximately $600 Million dollars in demand for construction services, including $540 Million in direct (project) expenditures, and $60 Million in infrastructure- related improvements. Using these figures, the project is expected to support 9,840 construction- related jobs, as follows: Table 13. Construction-Related Employment Direct Jobs Supplier Jobs Induced Jobs Total Indirect Jobs Total Jobs 3,300 2,880 3,660 6,540 9,840 As already stated, the total number of short-term jobs will be distributed across a three-to-five- year construction timeframe, although it is conceivable that a small portion of these short-term jobs may become permanent when, for instance, a business that was opened during construction grows roots, becoming part of the local economy. Part 2 – Permanent employment Permanent jobs are created as the various components of the project become operational, with full employment realized once the project is completed. As of this writing, the estimated opening for the ORSC project is the first half of 2027. Occupancy-based employment estimates use average square-footage ratios per employee. Unfortunately, there is a significant variance between data sources, with more aggressive figures provided by industry-specific sources, while data published by independent sources or government agencies will lean towards more conservative ranges. The table below has been prepared with data published by Nelson (2004), ITE (1997), and the US Department of Energy (2022). Table 14. Employment Generation Ratios Use Group Employee / 1,000 sf (for each) Direct Job Supplier Jobs Induced Jobs Total Indirect Jobs Total Jobs Retail (General) 3.5 1 0.307 0.426 0.734 1.734 Retail (Specialty) 4 1 0.579 0.576 1.155 2.155 Restaurants 4.5 1 0.496 0.468 0.964 1.964 Hospitality (Standard) 0.75 (per key) 1 0.782 0.628 1.410 2.410 Hospitality (Luxury) 1.0 (per key) 1 0.782 0.628 1.410 2.410 Indoor Sports 2 1 0.525 0.552 1.076 2.076 Entertainment 2.4 1 0.597 0.490 1.087 2.087 Offices 3.2 1 0.519 0.884 1.403 2.403 22 https://www.epi.org/publication/updated-employment-multipliers-for-the-u-s-economy (2019) 51/79 Using the ratios listed above, the ORSC is expected to support approximately 5,200 jobs in total, split between 2,400 direct, and 2,800 indirect jobs: Table 15. ORSC Employment Generation Estimates Use Group Employee /1k sf Development Program (ksf) Direct Jobs Supplier Jobs Induced Jobs Total Indirect Jobs Total Jobs Retail (General) 3.5 30 105 32 44 76 181 Retail (Specialty) 4 100 400 231 230 461 861 Restaurants 4.5 130 585 290 273 563 1148 Hospitality (Standard) 0.75 /key 850 keys 638 498 400 898 1536 Hospitality (Luxury) 1 /key 264 keys 264 206 165 371 635 Indoor Sports 2 150 300 157 165 322 622 Entertainment 2.4 30 72 42 35 77 149 Offices 3.2 10 32 16 28 44 76 Total - - 2,396 1,472 1,340 2,812 5,208 Part 3 – Tourism-Generated Employment In additional to the two employment sources discussed above, successful destinations generate employment from added tourism demand. These impacts may happen at a local, regional, national, or even at a global scale. The economic impact of tourism destinations depends on four primary factors: (a) the nature of the facility or destination; (b) the number of visitors; (c) the average spending per visitor; and (d) the rate of spending that is recirculated in the local economy.23 In absence of a complete Input-Output Model, the following analysis has relied on comparable data from two recent studies: Central Florida’s Economic Impact of Tourism (2022),24 and the Economic Impact of Visitors in New York (2023).25 The Central Florida Model estimated that the region benefits annually from tourism at a rate of $87.6 Billion, from $55.5 Billion in direct visitor spending, which in turn generates 275,000 and 174,500 direct and indirect jobs, respectively: a 1.65 employment multiplier. According to the same study, every $1 Million in visitor spending supports approximately 4.95 direct jobs and 3.15 additional indirect jobs, or 8.1 total jobs. The New York case provided slightly higher generation rates, with 8.65 jobs per Million-dollar spent (6.2 direct / 2.44 indirect jobs). This study also included a categorization of expenditures and impacts by industry sector, along with detailed analyses of impacts in the state’s tax base and labor incomes. Extrapolating from both studies and using an annual spending figure of $350 Million from ORSC visitors, it is estimated that project would have an impact of approximately $546 Million per year in the local economy (1.56 multiplier). 23 Archer (1973); Horvath & Franklin (1999) 24 https://www.cfhla.org/economic-impact-of-tourism, commissioned by the Central Florida Hotel & Lodging Association, Visit Orlando, Orlando North, and Experience Kissimmee. 25 https://esd.ny.gov/sites/default/files/New-York-City-2022-NYS-Tourism-Economic-Impact.pdf, commissioned by the State of New York 52/79 Table 16. Estimated Tourism-Generated Impacts Modeled Expenditure: $350M Expenditure Sector Share (%) Direct Jobs Supplier Jobs Induced Jobs Total Jobs Food & Beverage 17% 459 13 24 496 Lodging 19% 532 4 4 539 Recreation and Entertainment 7% 174 8 7 190 Ground Transportation 11% 259 33 13 306 Retail Trade 9% 180 9 56 244 Business Services 6% - 135 37 171 Air Transport 5% 148 1 1 150 Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 9% 72 108 87 267 Education and Health Care 3% - 1 79 80 Personal Services 1% - 10 24 34 Wholesale Trade 3% - 37 35 72 Manufacturing 3% - 43 36 80 Agriculture, Fishing, Mining 1% - 12 5 18 Communications 2% - 38 22 60 Construction and Utilities 2% - 36 17 53 Government 3% - 14 71 86 Total 100% 1,824 503 519 2,846 According to these estimates, the ORSC project would generate 5.21 direct, and 2.92 indirect jobs for each $1 Million in visitor spending, or a combined total of 8.13 Jobs / $1Million. It should be noted, however, that the project’s total impact cannot be calculated by simply adding the total estimates from each of the analyses presented in this section. In fact, there is a substantial overlap between the total employment numbers provided in Table 15 and Table 16. This relationship can be better illustrated with a supply-demand analogy, where the jobs created by the ORSC project are supported by an additional demand for goods and services that is created by increased tourism. Or reversing the logic: the demand (for tourism spending) that is created by the ORSC jobs needs to be supported by an increased supply (of tourists). 53/79 3.5. Comprehensive Plan Policy Analysis This application has identified nearly 90 Comprehensive Plan references that directly or indirectly relate to the proposed ORSC project. Those have been categorized into 11 common themes, which will be used to streamline the policy analysis and minimize repetition. The table below provides a matrix summarizing elements and themes. Each theme will be presented in greater detail in this section, while a complete matrix is included in Exhibit 16- Policies Matrix. 54/79 Economic Development Ocoee is a vibrant community that is poised for continuing growth. While its economy has been historically rooted in agriculture and residential development, new strategic initiatives will propel it towards greater prosperity and resilience. Agriculture still represents a part of Ocoee's heritage, but the city recognizes that it must continue to diversify its economic base, encouraging growth in other sectors such as healthcare, technology, retail, hospitality, and professional services. This diversification, when paired with increased support for local businesses, promotes the creation of a diverse urban fabric that drives innovation and job creation. The continuing revitalization of major commercial corridors will enhance Ocoee's attractiveness for shopping, dining, and entertainment, while improvements in infrastructure and incentives for mixed-use development can breathe new life into underveveloped areas, attracting visitors and stimulating local economic activity. Ocoee's proximity to Orlando's world-class destinations also creates unique potential in tourism. The development of family-oriented entertainment, outdoor recreation, and cultural attractions will allow it to capture a larger share of the regional market, while preserving the city's small-town character and its rich heritage. Collaboration with private sector partners unlocks new opportunities, while public-private partnerships for infrastructure projects, mixed-use developments, and redevelopment initiatives can leverage local resources and expertise to drive economic growth while sharing risks and rewards. The 2008 economic recession disproportionately impacted suburban communities, with a freefall of housing prices and local tax revenues. In 2008 the Ocoee CRA commissioned AECOM to develop the Target Areas Special Development Plan, which proposed to “create a future for the Ocoee CRA that will include centers of vibrant, urban, mixed use development that ensure enhanced pedestrian and automobile connectivity, flexible land uses, a diverse economic base, a mix of housing types, a shared responsibility of infrastructure financing, open space as a public amenity, and a better development form”. 26 In 2013, Ocoee also partnered with its neighbors to sponsor the Tri-Cities Study27 and develop a shared vision to direct economic growth. This project analyzed the current regional market to determine its strengths and weaknesses, identified target industries, assessed the study area from a site selector’s point of view, and proposed goals and strategies to ensure success. The study also assisted the Tri-Cities partners with potential options for business parks, as well as marketing and branding. While depreciating home prices and a stagnated economy are no longer a concern in 2024, many of the findings of both studies remain relevant today. Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan does not feature a stand-alone Economic Development Element. Instead, many of its economic development goals are embedded into other elements. Section XI of the Future Land Use Element, for instance, briefly describes the city’s economic base, and outlines benefits associated with infill & redevelopment. This section also introduces the 26 AECOM (2010): https://www.ocoeecra.com/DocumentCenter/View/12370/Target-Areas-Special-Development-Plan-PDF 27 Angelou Economics (2013): https://www.ocoeecra.com/DocumentCenter/View/12368/Tri-Cities-SR-Final-Report-PDF 55/79 establishment of Special Overlay Areas and Activity Centers as possible tools to promote economic development.28 Additional references to economic development are found in the Transportation Element, including policies to coordinate the provision of infrastructure to accommodate growth:29 Objective 2.5 and associated policies, for instance, call for enhancement in North-South Connectivity,30 while Objective 2.7 directs the city to ensure that adequare right-of-way is available to acommodate required transportation improvements.31 The Ocoee Regional Sports Center development agreement includes commitments for transportation upgrades, along with other local improvements. As discussed on Section 3.4, the ORSC project will strengthen Ocoee’s competitiveness with a significant number of direct jobs added to the Retail, Hospitality, Food & Services, and the Entertainment Sectors. Short-term jobs will also be created by new investments in infrastructure, while other direct and indirect jobs in the community will be supported through growth in Ocoee’s tourism sector. Mixed-Use Development Mixed-use development promotes the coexistence of compatible land uses within neighborhoods or districts. This strategy is widely recognized as a powerful economic development catalyst, especially in small cities, where space efficiency and economic diversity are paramount. Integrating uses within a single area enriches communities, promotes sustainable growth, and enhances quality of life. Within Ocoee’s context, mixed-use can be a critical tool for revitalization, capitalizing on existing local infrastructure. By consolidating land uses, the urban fabric can be optimized, making efficient use of existing resources and limited space. When paired with densification strategies, mixed-use not only promotes urban infill but also reduces sprawl, preserving green spaces and agricultural land on the city's periphery. Mixed-use development also stimulates economic growth by diversifying revenue streams and attracting investment. The presence of commercial establishments, such as shops, restaurants, and offices, creates employment opportunities and increases tax revenues. Well-designed mixed- use districts become destinations that expand consumer spending, supporting the viability of small businesses and enhancing the local economy. Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan contains multiple policy references related to mixed-use development, most being in the Future Land Use Element. And even though the city’s future land use map has no specific mixed-use designation, the Plan promotes the “successful integration and blending of these distinct uses in order to create a functioning, multi-faceted type of development. Integration is defined as the combination of distinct uses on a single site where impacts from different uses are mitigated through site design techniques, and where different uses are expected to benefit from the close proximity of complementary uses”.32 28 Future Land Use Element; Section XI (pp. 1-28 – 1-33) 29 Transportation Element; Objective 1.3 & Policy 1.3.4 30 Transportation Element; Objective 2.5 & Policy 2.5.1 31 Transportation Element; Objective 2.7 & Policy 2.7.1 32 Future Land Use Element; Section VII (pg. 1-17) 56/79 The City envisions the implementation of mixed-use districts through PUDs, such as the one being proposed. Additional mixed-use support is provided through the designation of Activity Centers.33 Policy 1.4 of the Future Land Use Element states that “the City shall allow mixed and multi-uses” in special planning areas, and PUDs,34 while Policy 1.6 aims to control strip commercial through land regulations.35 The integration of Residential uses into the subject area has been restricted due to pre-existing environmental and legal constraints.36 However, the ORSC proposes a mix of non-residential uses that is compatible and complementary to the existing neighborhood fabric. The subject area surroundings are characterized by a high-concentration of residential uses, but with a near- absence of commercial destinations. These “high-low areas” are prime targets for commercial mixed-use infill projects. When properly designed, the insertion of non-residential uses in high-low areas capitalizes on existing neighborhoods to minimize local trips and promotes pedestrian cross-shopping behavior. The ORSC promotes a “park-once” experience that minimizes single-purpose trips and enhances walkability between destinations. This concept is further backed by FLUE Policy 1.7, which aims to facilitate innovative development.37 Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element directs the City to adopt and implement development programs to support Activity Centers, Redevelopment Areas, and mixed-use development to meet Florida’s statutory requirements,38 while FLUE Policy 3.2 specifically targets the implementation of land use regulations to allow mixed/multi use development.39 Finally, FLUE Policy 3.4 specifies the development of mixed-use zoning provision within the Land Development Code that “shall provide for the implementation of new mixed/multi uses within a variety of higher intensity land use categories”.40 In addition to the references above, support for mixed-use development is found on Policy 1.4 of the Conservation Element, which states that “The City shall encourage the use of innovative development forms, such as planned unit developments, multi-use centers, and others to reduce the need to travel. Incentives such as density bonuses and transfers of development rights shall be used to encourage these forms.” While the ORSC success does not depend on TDRs or density bonuses, it does require creative partnerships, with support from staff and elected officials to overcome site-specific constraints that will be discussed in other sections of this application. In addition to mixed-use development, Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan addresses other closely related subjects relevant in this application’s context. These are: Infill, Redevelopment, and Sprawl Control, which will be discussed in the next section. 33 Future Land Use Element; Section VII (pg. 1-17) 34 Future Land Use Element; Policy 1.4 (pg.1-35) 35 Future Land Use Element; Policy 1.6 (pg.1-35) 36 Special Warranty Deed (12/27/2005) Instr.# 20050874910 37 Future Land Use Element; Policy 1.7 (pg.1-35) 38 Future Land Use Element; Objective 3 (pg. 1-39) 39 Future Land Use Element; Policy 3.2 (pg.1-40) 40 Future Land Use Element. Policy 3.4 (pg.1-40) 57/79 Infill, Redevelopment, and Sprawl Control Section 163.2511 of the Florida Statutes recognizes Infill and redevelopment as important components to promote and sustain a healthy urban fabric. It states that “regional entities and local governments should provide incentives to promote urban infill and redevelopment. Existing programs and incentives should be integrated to the extent possible to promote urban infill and redevelopment and to achieve the goals of the state urban policy”.41 As discussed in the previous section, infill and mixed-use are complementary strategies that seek the efficient utilization of urban infrastructure and services, increasing economic resilience, indirectly contributing to the conservation of the natural environment through the establishment of a more compact development pattern. In addition to the 7 mixed-use policy citations already introduced, 19 other relevant references were identified. These are distributed through the Future Land Use, Transportation, Recreation and Open Spaces, and Intergovernmental Coordination elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and will be discussed in this section. Section XI of the Future Land Use element introduces Infill as “a development alternative that is advantageous to local governments for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to a means of reducing infrastructure investment, improving tax bases, and often restoring the vitality to declining neighborhoods”.42 Although the subject area and much of the surrounding vacant land is rural or underdeveloped, it is has been surrounded by residential development during the last decades. It has remained in its current state due to site-specific challenges. However, proximity to the City’s Historic Center and accessibility to Ocoee’s regional transportation network will ensure its place as a major Activity Center. FLUE Objective 2 seeks to discourage sprawl through the appropriate provision of services and infrastructure, while policy 2.4 proposes the regulation of land use patterns through the Concurrency Management System.43 Policy 2.6 encourages infill development to maximize efficient utilization of facilities and services and suggests the use of regulatory and economic incentives to promote the city’s goal of curbing sprawl. Additional provisions in Policy 2.8 expand on the topic: “The City shall encourage development when and where appropriate facilities and services to support it are available (based on the levels of services standards adopted concurrent with this Comprehensive Plan), thereby discouraging urban sprawl, and ensuring that concurrency is met. The following policy statements demonstrate how compliance shall be implemented: […] - Through appropriate land development regulations and provision of effective urban services, the City shall promote infill development within the municipal boundaries. […] - The land development regulations shall reflect the policy of controlling urban sprawl.” 44 41 S. 163.2511 F.S. 2023 42 Future Land Use Element; Section XI (C) (pg. 1-29) 43 Future Land Use Element; Obj. 2 (pg. 1-37) & Policy 2.4 (pg. 1-38) 44 Future Land Use Element; Policy 2.8 (pp. 1-38; 1-39) 58/79 Infill incentives are also mentioned in Objective 4, which states that “The City shall encourage the redevelopment and renewal of blighted areas by offering incentives to developers.” 45 This subject will be discussed further in other sections of this document. The Transportation Element contains at least nine additional policy references to infill and redevelopment, but since these are primarily related to the adequate provision of transportation infrastructure, they will be discussed in the Facilities and Services section, below. Indirect references to infill and redevelopment are also found in the Conservation, and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the Plan. To minimize repetitiveness, these will be discussed the appropriate sections. Facilities and Services Florida’s concept of concurrency was a response to the rapid population growth and urbanization that characterized the state in the latter half of the 20th century. As cities and counties experienced unprecedented development pressure, policymakers recognized the need for a systematic and coordinated approach to infrastructure planning and investment. In 1972, Florida became one of the first states in the nation to enact comprehensive growth management legislation, laying the foundation for concurrency as a central tenet of land use regulation. One of the key principles of concurrency is the concept of "adequate public facilities," which refers to the availability of infrastructure and services necessary to support development without compromising the health, safety, and welfare of residents. Local governments are required to establish standards for determining when public facilities are considered adequate and to monitor compliance with these standards as development occurs. The provision of adequate facities and services is mandated by Section 163.3180 of the Florida Statutes.46 Excluding the Capital Improvement Element, there are over 40 relevant policy references to the provision of facilities and services in Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan. These are distributed across the Future Land Use, Transportation, Conservation, Recreation and Open Space, and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the Plan. A complete list of references is included in Exhibit 16. The ORSC project will require significant transportation infrastructure improvements, including the widening of Ocoee-Apopka Road, and Fullers Cross Road; both requiring ROW acquisitions. Intersection improvements and upgrades to facilities beyond the immediate surroundings of the project are also expected, requiring coordination with Orange County and other partnering agencies. A detailed discussion on transportation improvements is presented in Section 4 - Potential Impacts while the Traffic Impact Analysis is included as Exhibit 21. Service capacity is available for water, wastewater, and solid waste, while stormwater will be managed through a master stormwater system that is integral to the project’s design. Additional school capacity is not required, as the project will not include residential uses. 45 Future Land Use Element; Objective 4 (pg. 1-40) 46 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0100- 0199/0163/Sections/0163.3180.html 59/79 Special Planning Areas Local Comprehensive Plans are the cornerstone of Florida’s Growth Management. They establish goals, objectives, and policies to guide where, and how, development should be directed, taking into consideration a complex set of social, economic, and environmental considerations. The provision of context-specific policies, and the designation of special districts are crucial to add context-sensitivity to Comprehensive Plans. These districts are well suited to address specific land use needs, opportunities, or challenges; they may vary in size, scope, and purpose, ranging from small-scale neighborhood improvement districts to larger economic development zones or environmental protection areas. Ocoee’s Plan provides for the designation of special planning districts, through the adoption of Policies and the designation of Special Overlay Areas (SOAs), such as the Downtown Redevelopment Area, Interchange Impact Areas, and Activity Centers. Among other objectives, these areas seek to offset negative impacts, sprawling development, and the proliferation of strip commercial development.47 Of special relevance to this application, Activity Centers are designated areas where high levels of economic, social, and recreational activity are concentrated. They serve as focal points with dense development in walkable urban environments, featuring mixed uses and multimodal connectivity. The concept aligns well with principles of smart growth and transit-oriented development, aiming to reduce sprawl, enhance mobility, and improve local quality of life. Activity centers also serve as engines of economic activity, attracting investments and visitors to concentrated areas of commerce and innovation. The clustering of economic activity capitalizes on economies of scale, spur job creation, and stimulate private sector investment in infrastructure and services. These centers may foster community interaction and social exchanges by providing gathering spaces and social infrastructure where residents and visitors can socialize and engage in cultural and recreational activities. Well-planned branding also reinforces local identity and pride, fostering social cohesion. Section XII of Ocoee’s Future Land Use Element defines Activity Centers as “areas within the impact zone of major intersections”.48 This application proposes added language to include centers that “may, by scale and development intensity, become significant economic drivers that would advance the goals of Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan.” 49 A more comprehensive definition is already supported by the Plan. The same section of the Plan expands the concept: ”Activity Centers are major nodes of employment within the City and include residential and support commercial land uses. In order to create successful Activity Centers, policies are within the Comprehensive Plan to direct the Activity Center plan. Mixed and/or multi land use and pedestrian as well as transit travel are emphasized in the design of these Centers.” 50 Policy 1.7 of the Future Land Use encourages the promotion of innovative development; the use of Planned Unit Developments (PUDs); and support for alternative land development regulations to 47 Future Land Use Element; Section XII-C (pg. 1-31) 48 Ibid. 49 See: Section 1.7 Proposed Text Amendment 50 Future Land Use Element; Section XII-C (Pg. 1-32) 60/79 promote projects where “public benefits may be realized”, or where the character of the development may create “useable open spaces”.51 Support for Activity Centers is also expressed in Objective 3 and related policies, where the encouragement for mixed-use provisions and higher intensity development is affirmed.52 The Conservation Element also promotes “the use of innovative development forms, such as planned unit developments, multi-use centers, and others to reduce the need to travel. Incentives such as density bonuses and transfers of development rights shall be used to encourage these forms”. 53 While TDRs are not directly applicable to this project, similar mitigation and conservation efforts are being proposed to offset environmental impacts, as discussed in Section 4. The Transportation Element emphasizes the need for coordinated growth management efforts, stating that the City shall “ensure transportation improvements that enhance the function of planned activity areas”, and “continue to coordinate transportation planning with future population densities, the location of future housing developments and development patterns, and future employment centers”.54 Objectives 2.5 and 2.7 affirm the need for enhanced connectivity and improved access along Ocoee’s North-South corridors and directs the City to “ensure that adequate right-of-way is available to accommodate required transportation improvements”. 55 As discussed throughout this document, the ORSC project is committed to provide significant transportation improvements, which include upgrades to Ocoee-Apopka Road, Fullers Cross Road, and multiple other facilities in the project’s area of influence. This effort will require support from the City of Ocoee, Orange County, neighboring jurisdictions, and the general public, considering the fragmented ownership pattern in the area, and the scale of effort involved. Development Character and Compatibility The identity of a place is derived from its physical, cultural, and socio-economic attributes, but also from aesthetics, appearance, and atmosphere. It can be influenced by factors, such as: the distribution of land uses and densities, the design of civic and public spaces, the character and scale of its transportation infrastructure, and just as importantly: from its economy. Local character encapsulates what makes a city unique and recognizable, distinguishing it from other places. This character is not static: it evolves over time in response to changing needs, economic shifts, technological advancements, and environmental conditions. Maintaining and enhancing local character requires balance and compatibility between a city’s current and future needs, along with the preservation of its natural resources. Ocoee’s Future Land Use Element (FLUE) sets the physical path for successful growth management. It “describes the appropriate location for the future land uses and promulgates the policies regulating the location and development of all land uses”. 56 Land use policies take several factors into consideration, including densities and intensities, expected growth, and the means to 51 Future Land Use Element; Policy 1.7 (Pp. 1-35 – 1-36) 52 Future Land Use Element; Objective 3; Policies 3.1 – 3.4 (Pp. 1-39 – 1-40) 53 Conservation Element, Policy 1.4 (pg. 5-33) 54 Transportation Element; Policies 1.3.3 & 1.3.4 (pg. 2-60) 55 Transportation Element; (pg. 2-63) 56 Future Land Use Element; Introduction (pg. 1-1) 61/79 accommodate future needs, economic feasibility, and fiscal policies. But underlying all land use decision-making aspects is the concept of compatibility. True compatibility is not established through sameness or through uniformity. Rather, it is achieved through complementarity and diversity. The most inviting cities in the world – regardless of size – have a richness of character and diversity. These places manage develop and maintain their unique identity and authenticity, while remaining vibrant and inclusive. They are attractive to local residents and visitors alike. The existing character of the City of Ocoee is described in Section IX of the FLUE: “Ocoee is primarily residential. Residential land uses in the JPA account for 2,648.53 acres or 75.17 percent of the developed land area (excluding water bodies, rights-of-ways, conservation areas and recreation and open space totally 3,523.08 acres) and 30.31 percent of the total developable land area (8,437.78 acres) in the JPA.”57 Objective 1 of the FLUE discusses the compatibility of newly developed and redeveloped properties within the City. Policies 1.1 and 1.3 ensure new plans go through a development review process,58 and that impacts shall be mitigated to ensure the “health, safety, welfare and appearance of the built environment.”59 Policy 1.7 further emphasizes that “land development regulations shall promote innovative development in those cases where a public benefit can be realized and impact can be offset by the development…”60 A mixed-use development - in this case with a combination of retail, restaurants, entertainment venues, and public amenities - fosters a more diverse built environment, where people can live, work, and play within close proximity, reducing the need for long commutes, and promoting walkability. This is further supported by Policy 3.2 which implements regulations allowing for the development of mixed and multi-use development plans,61 while Policy 3.4 of the FLUE states that “The City shall develop mixed use zoning provisions within the Land Development Code which shall provide for the implementation of new “mixed/multi uses within a variety of higher intensity land use categories where the overall impacts of development are determined to be no greater than those that would otherwise result from that permitted by underlying land use.”62 FLUE Policy 2.5 states that “The City shall consider requests for voluntary annexation into the City when those lands are logical extensions of the existing City limits, when services can be properly provided, and when proposed uses are compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the JPA Agreement, and the City’s Annexation Policy.”63 Policy 2.6 encourages infill through incentives such as higher densities where redevelopment investments are shown to be appropriate.64 Both policies recognize the nexus between redevelopment and compatibility with existing contexts. Objective 4 encourages administrators to promote the redevelopment and renewal of blighted areas by offering incentives to developers.65 While the ORSC site does not fit the conventional 57 Future Land Use Element; Section IX (pg. 1-18) 58 Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.1 (pg. 1-34) 59 Future Land Use Element; Policy 1.3 (pg. 1-35) 60 Future Land Use Element; Policy 1.7 (pg. 1-36) 61 Future Land Use Element; Policy 3.2 (pg. 1-40) 62 Future Land Use Element; Policy 3.4 (pg. 1-40) 63 Future Land Use Element; Policy 2,5 (pg. 1-38) 64 Future Land Use Element; Policy 2.6 (pg. 1-38) 65 Future Land Use Element; Obj. 4 (pg. 1-40) 62/79 definition of urban blight, it has been designated as a brownfield, and it is surrounded by undeveloped and underdeveloped areas. The character of the built environment in a city is critical to its identity, and the Future Land Use Element plays an essential role in defining the compatibility between existing and future land uses. Objective 7 states that “The City shall enforce the Land Development Code to preserve existing and future neighborhoods.”66 Policies 7.1 through 7.4 and Policy 7.7 support character preservation through land use compatibility, buffer requirements, density limits, the allowance of non-residential uses where development will not adversely affect surrounding areas.67 Objective 9 establishes that “The City shall encourage the elimination and reduction of uses inconsistent with the City’s character and future land uses”,68 emphasizing the importance of compatibility in defining and enhancing the character of Ocoee. The ORSC project repurposes undesirable, contaminated properties to create a carefully designed world-class sports and entertainment hub that will also lead to additional investments in neighboring underdeveloped properties. Within the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Section F recognizes the importance and value of safe and connected non-motorized forms of transportation,69 while Policy 2.9.1 states that “The City shall increase the number of neighborhoods, commercial areas, parks, and recreation facilities served by bicycle/pedestrian facilities, which connect to the West Orange Trail.”70 With the improvement of pedestrian sidewalks and increased connectivity to the West Orange Trail, the ORSC contributes to the enhancement of safety and connectivity for pedestrian and bicyclist system within the City of Ocoee. The coordination between the City's goals and those of other agencies and jurisdictions, promotes a more coherent and coordinated approach to land use and future development. This is highlighted in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, which sets forth that “The City shall continue to coordinate the comprehensive plan with the plans of local government agencies providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use of the land, with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities and the County to reduce and/or eliminate the duplication of service.”71 In closing: a city's development character is closely tied to how it handles compatibility between diverse – often competing – interests. This complex relationship is evident throughout the different elements of the Plan. While the Future element establishes compatibility as the central decision- making concept for land use decisions, it does embrace mixed uses, infill and redevelopment; meanwhile, the Transportation Element relies on Levels-of-Service, to measure the adequacy of transportation systems and infrastructure, but to achieve these objectives, engineering and design considerations must not ignore livability, walkability, and ultimately, local character. The ORSC will introduce a mix of uses through thoughtfully crafted urban design. This will create a pedestrian-friendly hub for local residents and visitors, and it will provide growth opportunities that will continue to enhance Ocoee’s historic character through careful branding. 66 Future Land Use Element; Obj. 7 (pg. 1-43) 67 Future Land Use Element; Policies 7.1-7.4 and Policy 7.7 (pg. 1-43 – 1-45) 68 Future Land Use Element; Obj. 9 (pg. 1-47) 69 Transportation Element; Section F (pg. 2-15) 70 Transportation Element; Policy 2.9.1 (pg. 2-64) 71 Recreation and Open Space Element; Obj. 1 (pg. 7-22) 63/79 Achieving this delicate balance between old and new will enable Ocoee to preserve its unique character while fostering economic growth in a more diverse environment. Recreation and Open Space Recreation and open spaces are key components of a healthy urban fabric. These areas contribute greatly to quality of life by offering opportunities for relaxation, exercise, leisure, physical health, and mental well-being. Acting as focal points for community interaction, open space and recreational facilities provide a place for residents to gather, socialize, and connect to their community. Open spaces also play a crucial role in environmental sustainability, preserving natural ecosystems and enhancing environmental health. Beyond their social and environmental benefits, recreation and open spaces hold economic value by attracting tourists and supporting local businesses. Both recreational areas and open spaces are essential infrastructure elements, enhancing the livability, vibrancy, and sustainability of cities while enriching the lives of residents and visitors. With Ocoee experiencing accelerated growth and development, the demand for enhanced recreation facilities and the availability of open spaces has become a critical consideration. The Recreation and Open Space Element of the Plan is dedicated to addressing the increasing demand for new and improved recreation facilities, as well as the importance of protecting valuable open space resources, which has been a key concern of Ocoee’s residents and city officials. Goal 1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element, states that “the City shall ensure the acquisition, provision, protection, and enhancement of coordinated, efficient, well-maintained, diverse, and accessible park land, open space and recreation facilities designed to meet the needs of the city's current and future residents of all ages and abilities.”72 This goal is supported by multiple objectives and policies, as well as policies and objectives found in the Future Land Use, Transportation, Conservation, and Intergovernmental Elements. Objective 1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element ensures provision of a comprehensive network of public and private parks and open spaces that meet both current and future residents' needs73 while Objective 2 ensures those parks and open spaces are accessible and inclusive.74 Objective 5 of the Recreation and Open Space element emphasizes a coordinated system of public parks and open space facilities which are compatible with local private recreation resources.75 This objective dovetails with the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, which states that “The City shall continue to coordinate the comprehensive plan with the plans of local government agencies providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use of the land, with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities and the County to reduce and/or eliminate the duplication of services”.76 ORSC’s extensive system of open spaces and parks will be open and accessible to the public and will also be integrated with Ocoee’s park system to the extent possible. The Montierre 72 Recreation and Open Space Element; Section IX (pg. 6-32) 73 Recreation and Open Space Element; Obj. 1 (pg. 6-32) 74 Recreation and Open Space Element; Obj. 2 (pg. 6-33) 75 Recreation and Open Space Element; Obj. 5 (pg. 6-34) 76 Intergovernmental Coordination Element; Obj. 1 (pg. 7-22) 64/79 Development Agreement with the City includes terms for shared-uses, and the improvement of parks and facilities owned by the City. Objective 6 of the Recreation and Open Space element prioritizes improvements in public access to parks.77 Policy 6.1 states that “The City shall prioritize sidewalk improvements that create or improve pedestrian access / safety as well as those that connect City parks to neighborhoods, schools, institutional uses, and commercial areas”.78 Similarly, to increase connectivity and community interaction, Objective 2.9 of the Transportation Element emphasizes access between the West Orange Trail and recreation facilities,79 while Policy 2.9.1 of the Transportation element states “The City shall increase the number of neighborhoods, commercial areas, parks, and recreation facilities served by bicycle/pedestrian facilities, which connect to the West Orange Trail”.80 The proposed infrastructure improvements associated with the ORSC project include enhancements to pedestrian and multi-modal facilities, with new trails and sidewalks, and accommodations for a connection to the West Orange Trail System. Policy 6.2 states that “The City shall prioritize transportation improvements that create or improve off-road bicycle and pedestrian connections to and from City parks, neighborhoods, schools, institutional uses, and commercial areas”,81 which is further emphasized by Policy 6.3, which encourages bike lane infrastructure improvement projects.82 These priorities will be discussed in greater detail in Section 4, which outlines the project’s proposed commitments to transportation improvements and other local infrastructure upgrades. The methods to ensure economic efficiency of parks and open space facilities are presented in Objective 8 of the Recreation and Open Space Element,83 and have been discussed in detail in the Economic Development section of this document. Policy 7.7 of the Future Land Use Element discusses open space requirements for new development projects, requiring 5 percent of the total site to be designated as open space; 84 and as the ORSC falls within the Wekiva Study Area, a 35% minimum open space requirement also applies.85 The ORSC design features an extensive network of open spaces and public gathering spaces that are centered on an amenitized, stormwater system. These spaces are further enhanced by 60 Acres of sports fields and public amenities. As currently proposed, the project exceeds the City’s open space requirements. The City of Ocoee recognizes the importance of providing adequate recreation facilities and providing open spaces as it continues to plan for accelerated growth during the next decades. The Comprehensive Plan outlines goals and objectives to ensure the acquisition, maintenance, and accessibility of parks and open spaces for residents of all ages and abilities. These efforts align 77 Recreation and Open Space Element; Obj. 6 (pg. 6-34) 78 Recreation and Open Space Element; Policy 6.1 (pg. 6-34) 79 Transportation Element; Obj. 2.9 (pg. 2-63) 80 Transportation Element; Policy 2.9.1 pg. 2-64) 81 Recreation and Open Space Element; Policy 6.2 (pg. 6-35) 82 Recreation and Open Space Element; Policy 6.3 (pg. 6-35) 83 Recreation and Open Space Element; Obj. 8 (pg. 6-36) 84 Future Land Use Element; Policy 7.7 (pg. 1-45) 85 Future Land Use Element; Policy 7.7.1 (pg. 1-45) 65/79 with ORSC’s overarching goal of offering sports-centered, family-oriented, recreation opportunities, along with sustainability design and nature-inspired experiences for all. Conservation The natural landscape within the subject area and surrounding properties has changed drastically over time due to agricultural use, an evolving regional transportation infrastructure, and continuing urbanization of rural lands. Ocoee’s conservation element seeks to promote and enhance the use and protection of the City’s natural resources, especially as population growth accelerates and development pressure continues to intensify. The management of competing interests represented by land development and environmental protection is not uncommon in planning. Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code contain provisions to address conflicts while safeguarding the public interest, protecting property rights, and ensuring a reasonable use of the land in a manner that is consistent with the public interest. The first Goal of the conservation element, for instance, states that Ocoee will “ensure the highest environmental quality, consistent with the appropriate growth and development of the city.” 86 However, consistency with certain policies under Conservation Objectives 2, 4 and 6 of the Plan may become challenging due to language stating, for instance, that "development shall be precluded within 25-feet of 100-year floodplain zones”,87 or that “wetlands shall be conserved and protected from physical and hydrologic alterations.”88 Both policies are unquestionably critical to advance Ocoee’s environmental protection goals, but they provide no exceptions for extraordinary scenarios such as the one associated with this application. Policy 4.2, on the other hand, does provide alternatives for reasonable development of challenging properties, with provisions for restoration, enhancement, and mitigation of environmentally compromised areas: “Where alteration or removal of wetlands is necessary in order to allow reasonable development of property, either the restoration or enhancement of disturbed wetlands will be provided or additional wetlands will be created to mitigate any wetland destruction, within the same site or watershed, if possible”.89 Policy 4.3 also establishes that “where wetland disturbance is permitted, requiring a two-for-one replacement of area, maintenance of proximal location relationship and functionality, and enforcement of alternative mitigation requirements become necessary”, 90 while policy 6.2 provides for the establishment of “comprehensive mitigation measures where environmental impacts are unavoidable”.91 This application includes a proposed environmental plan that has been discussed with staff, elected officials, and other stakeholders. It includes a series of actions to offset unavoidable impacts to low-quality wetlands that have been subject to degradation recognized in the brownfield designation for the site through the establishment of new conservation areas, 86 Conservation Element; Sec. IV (pg. 5-33) 87 Conservation Element; Policy 2.3 (pg. 5-34) 88 Conservation Element; Objective 4 (pg. 5-35) 89 Conservation Element; Policy 4.1 (pg. 5-35) 90 Conservation Element; Policy 4.3 (pg. 5-36) 91 Conservation Element; Policy 6.2 (pg. 5-37) 66/79 management of existing conservation lands which already owned by the City, and the establishment of a 96-acre mitigation area adjacent to Lake Beauclair. The proposed plan is outlined in Section 4. Intergovernmental Coordination Ocoee appreciates the critical importance of collaborating with neighboring municipalities, counties, and state agencies, as it plans for future growth. Ocoee’s Comprehensive Plan is committed to addressing multijurisdictional challenge such as annexations, land use compatibility, and transportation improvements through proactive coordination. Ocoee partners with multiple entities at the local, state, and federal level, including among others: Orange County, the neighboring cities of Windermere, Winter Garden, and Apopka, East Central Florida Regional Planning Council, Florida Department of Transportation, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The Intergovernmental Coordination Element provides a framework for structured engagement and decision-making, while the Plan’s other elements supplement this structure with more specific coordination policies that advance the interests of Ocoee’s residents and the broader community. Objective 1 of the Intergovernmental Element ensures the coordination of the comprehensive plan with local government agencies, while Policies 1.1 through 1.3, refer to the Joint Planning Area (JPA) Agreement with Orange County.92 As the project falls within the Joint Planning Area, coordination and cooperation throughout every phase of this project will be required to ensure that the interests of all stakeholders are safeguarded. Similarly, Section II. of the Future Land Use Element is dedicated to the JPA Agreement between the city and the county, stating that “the JPA Agreement facilitates intergovernmental coordination, the evaluation of development impacts, the mitigation of extra jurisdictional impacts, and the timely resolution of inter jurisdictional disputes.” 93 Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element ensures the provision of adequate facilities and services to accommodate new development, while Policy 2.5 states that “The City shall consider requests for voluntary annexation into the City when those lands are logical extensions of the existing City limits, when services can be properly provided, and when proposed uses are compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the JPA Agreement, and the City’s Annexation Policy.94As discussed on page 40 of this document, annexation applications have been submitted to the city for eventual inclusion into the ORSC. FLUE Policy 5.2 discusses the use of development regulations to protect natural resources, including wetlands,95 and need for coordination with federal, state, and regional environmental management agencies. Section 4 of this document discusses proposed impacts and mitigation strategies, including the regulatory requirements and applicable coordination actions required. 92 Intergovernmental Coordination Element; Policies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 (pg. 7-22) 93 Future Land Use Element; Section II. (pg. 1-11) 94 Future Land Use Element; Obj. 2; Policy 2.5 (pg. 1-38) 95 Future Land Use Element; Policy 5.2 (pg. 1-41) 67/79 As the subject area is included in the JPA areas that are within the Wekiva Study Area, the requirements outlined in Section XIV of the Future Land Use Element 96 apply. These are discussed in greater detail in Section 2.12 (page 34). The Transportation Element highlights the importance of interlocal agreements to support transportation improvement projects. Section VI emphasizes coordination to advance priority work programs of responsible agencies,97 Objective 1.3 encourages growth management through multijurisdictional transportation facilities,98 Policy 1.3.2 ensures consistency of transportation improvements through collaboration with the region’s MPO,99 and Objective 2.7 discusses the coordinated acquisition of Right-Of-Ways to accommodate the demand created by new developments.100 This project proposes significant infrastructure investment, and will require coordinated efforts with Orange County, MetroPlan Orlando, and neighboring jurisdictions to ensure that proposed improvements extend seamlessly across jurisdictional lines. Finally, the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan ensures coordination and compliance with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission regarding endangered and rare species.101 The Environmental Report (Exhibit 19) documents any protected species on both the state and federal level which could be present on the subject area. The project is not anticipated to have an adverse impact to state and/or federally protected species. 3.6. Public Facilities Analysis The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Subject Area is designed as a multi-use entertainment project with recreational components, retail, hotels, restaurants, and other ancillary uses. The subject area is located within the service areas of the City of Ocoee but remains largely undeveloped at this time. This section identifies regionally significant public facilities necessary to support the future land uses associated with this application, consistent with Florida Statutes. The master planning considerations associated with new public facilities and services will be more fully evaluated at the time of Detailed Specific Area Plans (DSAPs), Land Use Plans (LUPs), Preliminary Subdivision Plans (PSPs), Development Plans (DPs) and specific site engineering and facilities design. Transportation Central Florida’s MPO, MetroPlan Orlando, maintains a Prioritized Project List (PPL) with upcoming highway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit, aviation, and other transportation-related projects. The list ranks initiatives which have been deemed cost-feasible in the near term, but may still have unfunded phases. The document shows which projects are “next in line” for federal and state funding. The most recent PPL document, adopted in December of 2023,102 lists only one prioritized project near the subject area: PLL # 19: SR-438/Silver Star Rd, from SR-429 to N Bluford Ave. This 96 Future Land Use Element; Section XIV. (pg. 1-48) 97 Transportation Element; Section VI (pg.2-58) 98 Transportation Element; Obj, 1.3 (pg. 2-59) 99 Transportation Element; Policy 1.3.2 (pg. 2-60) 100 Transportation Element; Obj. 2.7 (2.7) 101 Conservation Element; Policy 6.7 (pg. 5-38) 102 https://metroplanorlando.gov/wp-content/uploads/Prioritized-Project-List-PPL-2028-2038-Adopted-7-12-23.pdf 68/79 complete street project has a funding allocation of approximately $1.9 Million for the 2026-2030 period, with $9 Million of funding expected during the 2031-2035 period. Notably, the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan has identified a substantial number of unfunded needs in the project’s surrounding areas. An interactive mapping application with the 2045 MTP data is available at: https://metroplanorlando.gov/maps-tools/dataviewer/, and the 2045 Cost Feasible Plan is available at: https://metroplanorlando.gov/wp-content/uploads/2045-MTP- Cost-Feasible-Plan-Adopted-Dec.-2020-Rev.-Feb.-2024.pdf The illustrations below show funded, prioritized, and unfunded projects near the subject area: 2045 Plan – Cost Feasible Plan Projects Figure 41. 2045 Cost Feasible Projects Map (source: MetroPlan) Prioritized List Projects Figure 42. Prioritized Projects Map (source: MetroPlan) 69/79 2045 Plan – Unfunded Needs Figure 43. Unfunded Needs Map (source: MetroPlan) According to MetroPlan data the two roadway segments immediately adjacent to the subject area alone could represent $37 Million or more in unfunded construction needs.103 The 2.10-Mile segment of Ocoee Apopka Road between Silver Star Road and West Road alone, is estimated at $23 Million. This figure grows to $47 Million when the study’s 2045 planning horizon is applied. The table below outlines typical costs for a few of the most common transportation-related infrastructure improvements from MetroPlan’s 2045 Report.104 103 Using MetroPlan data: Ocoee Apopka Road (Silver Star to West - 2.1 Mile, $23 Million); Fullers Cross Roar (N Lakewood to 500ft West of Ocoee Apopka Rd (1.23 Miles / $14 Millon) (2020 Dollars) 1042045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Cost Feasible Plan. Strategies, Programs and Projects: https://metroplanorlando.gov/plans/metropolitan-transportation-plan 70/79 Transportation Impact Analysis A Future Land Use (FLU) Amendment Transportation Analysis was completed based on State and City requirements to determine the potential impacts of the proposed FLU Amendment. The full report is provided as Exhibit 21 (Traffic Impact Analysis). Traffic was evaluated for existing and future conditions including Short-Term (2035) and Long-Term (2045) horizons. To accommodate the anticipated traffic in the future background conditions (before project trips are added) within the study area, the following roadway capacity deficiencies are identified: Short-term (Year 2035) Background Deficiencies Maguire Road from Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue Long-Term (Year 2045) Background Deficiencies Maguire Road from SR 50 (W Colonial Drive) to Marshall Farms Road Maguire Road from Marshall Farms Road to Story Road Maguire Road from Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue Maguire Road from Kissimmee Avenue to SR 438 (W Franklin Street) SR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from SR 438 (W Franklin Street) to SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) to Fullers Cross Road CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from Fullers Cross Road to West Road CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from West Road to McCormick Road SR 438 (Plant Street/Franklin Street) from E Crown Point Road to SR 429 SR 438 (Plant Street/Franklin Street) from SR 429 to Ocoee Apopka Road SR 438 (Silver Star Road) from Ocoee Apopka Road to Bluford Avenue SR 438 (Silver Star Road) from Ocoee-Hills Road to Clarke Road With trips from the maximum trip generation potential of the proposed FLU added, the following additional roadway capacity deficiencies are identified: Short-term (Year 2035) Buildout Deficiencies (in addition to Background Deficiencies) Maguire Road from Kissimmee Avenue to SR 438 (W Franklin Street) CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) to Fullers Cross Road CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from Fullers Cross Road to West Road CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) from West Road to McCormick Road 71/79 Long-Term (Year 2045) Background Deficiencies (in addition to Background Deficiencies) West Road from CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) to SR 429 All roadway capacity deficiencies identified in the Short-Term (2035) segment analysis as a result of the additional trips have capacity improvements identified in MetroPlan Orlando’s 2045 Needs Plan.105 Schools Public schools are provided by the Orange County School District (OCPS). However, no school capacity is being requested since the project does not contain residential uses. A previously approved PUD (Eagle Creek of Ocoee – Chevron Parcel) included reserved capacity for 119 students that will no longer be required. Recreation Figure 44. Public Parks in proximity to the subject area (highlighted). The Subject Area is located near multiple municipal parks, and approximately 0.3 Miles south from the nearest West Orange Trail crossing. The proposed development program is not anticipated to generate additional residential demand for Parks and Recreation facilities, and it will, in fact be complementary the Ocoee’s recreational infrastructure, granting limited shared use of fields during off-peak hours to the City. The development agreement between the Montierre Development and the City stipulates commitments to additional improvements to existing facilities owned by the city, and an anticipated 4-acre land conveyance for the creation of a new city park. Off-site improvements along Ocoee- Apopka road will also include a multi-use path connection to the West Orange Trail. 105 https://metroplanorlando.gov/plans/metropolitan-transportation-plan/ 72/79 Public Facilities & Services Potable Water The area encompassed by the Planning Area will receive its potable water service from the City of Ocoee Water Department. It is estimated that the complex will have a need for 422,546 gpd (ADF) of potable water. Based on initial discussions with the city, it appears that the water system should have the capacity to serve the needs of the proposed development. There are several potential connection points for potable water system along Ocoee Apopka Road or Fullers Cross Road to a 12” Water Main or to the 10” Water Main at the end of Clinger Cove Road. The closest water treatment plant to the planning area is Forest Oaks WTP at 8724 Hackney Prairie Road, a secondary facility is located at 2260 Macguire Road. Wastewater The Planning Area will have a lift station in the northwestern area of the complex along Fullers Cross Road. The Lift station will connect to the City’s wastewater system at Lakewood Ave. The station estimated flow rate will be 380,292 gpd (ADF). Based on preliminary discussions with the City, the system has the capacity to handle the additional load. The Ocoee Wastewater Treatment Facility is located at 1820 A D Mims Road. It is anticipated that the Sports Complex will utilize the reclaimed water distribution system for irrigation purposes with the planning area. Figure 45. Area Overview. A larger scale map is provided as Exhibit 14 - Offsite Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants The site lies within the City of Ocoee’s Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Service Territory service area of the City of Ocoee Utilities Department, a governmental utility (Exhibit 32). The following pages identify regionally significant public facilities necessary to support the future land uses in the property, consistent with Florida Statutes. The master planning considerations associated with new public facilities and services will be fully evaluated at the time of Detailed Specific Area Plans (DSAPs), Land Use Plans (LUPs), Preliminary Subdivision Plans (PSPs), Development Plans (DPs) and specific site engineering and facilities design. 73/79 Drainage The land encompassed by the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Planning Area is located within SJRWMD’s Southern Ocklawaha River basin (Figure 7-3). An interconnected system of wet detention ponds will provide water quality treatment, peak discharge rate attenuation, and floodplain compensating storage. These ponds, while providing management of stormwater and protection against flooding, may also be used as community features, incorporated aesthetically into parks and community open spaces. Based on site conditions, design configurations and applicable rules and ordinances at the time of final engineering, additional Best Management Practices (BMP’s) such as dry retention treatment areas, exfiltration trenches, grassed waterways and swales, and various Low Impact Development (LID) principles will be evaluated as a supplement to the overall master stormwater management system. As previously discussed (see: Section 2.4), Current Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) published by the FEMA show tha approximately 8.03 Acres of the Subject Area lie within areas mapped as Special Flood Hazard Areas subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance flood, which is commonly known as the “100-year floodplain” (Exhibit 33). Figure 46. Flood Plan Zones and Drainage to Lake Apopka. Areas shown on the map as “Zone AE,” are subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood and have had their base flood elevations determined through detailed study. Adjacent to the Zone AE lands are areas designated as “Zone X” that are shaded, indicating that they are subject to flooding by the 0.2% annual chance flood, or within what is commonly known as the “500-year floodplain.” The portions of the property that are labeled Zone X with no shading represent those areas that are outside of the 500-year floodplain. The drainage system for the site will provide floodplain compensation and protection from flooding consistent with state regulations. Solid Waste The City of Ocoee currently provides commercial solid waste collection services - including the Subject Area - through private contractors. The private contractor utilizes several landfills for disposal of collected waste. In addition, there are multiple Class III and Construction & Demolition debris landfills throughout the County. 74/79 4. Potential Impacts Analysis & Action Plan This section will summarize any potential impacts associated with this application and will outline a plan of action to address potential issues to ensure that the proposed plan safeguards the interests of The City of Ocoee; its residents, and general public, while allowing the applicant to reach the full potential this opportunity has to offer. The ORSC project will be implemented through (a) adoption of policies in the comprehensive plan; (b) inclusion of development standards thought the PUD process, (c) commitments to be formalized through development agreements, conditions of approval, or other legal instruments, and (d) proposed design solutions that are informed by best practices in the fields of Urban Planning, Urban Design, Architecture, Landscape Design, and Engineering, among others. Land Uses As discussed in section 3.5, any potential land use compatibility challenges will be addressed through proposed design, and will be regulated through the PUD approval process, or other site- specific development conditions which shall be subject to approval by the Ocoee City Commission at the appropriate time. A substantial portion of the proposed development program is concentrated along the west half of the subject area, with building heights limited to 3-stories, occasionally above parking podiums. Larger and/or taller elements such as hotels and parking structures have been designed in a manner that provides landscape transition zones and vegetated buffers as well as setbacks from adjacent uses. The western edge of the property, along Ocoee Apopka Road, will be heavily landscaped to minimize any potential visual impacts from the road and is not expected to interfere with neighboring residential uses. The central water feature and pedestrian promenade internalize most of the shopping and entertainment activities, with buildings further buffering adjacent areas from potential noise or visual impacts, while extensive use of landscape design and vegetation will blend sports fields and other public open spaces into the existing environment. The creation of an activity center with purposely crafted guiding policies will increase the diversity of land uses in Ocoee, in an area that thus far has been characterized by a shortage of non- residential uses. The activity center will create a new destination within walkable / bikeable range to local residents and will increase Ocoee’s appeal to local visitors not only from the Greater Orlando Area, but Nationwide. Ocoee has historically seen most of its non-residential development concentrated along the East- West Colonial Corridor, with little success in improving built form or promoting the integration of new projects with the historic fabric of the city. If successful, the ORSC project has potential to change this paradigm, becoming a magnet for development interests along the Norh-South axis that connects Ocoee to Apopka and Windermere. With new development, a renewed opportunity for greater urban design controls and pedestrian- focused community planning will present itself, allowing Ocoee to take meaningful next steps as it transitions towards a more prosperous, vibrant, and walkable environment. 75/79 Environmental Plan To achieve consistency with adopted policies of the Conservation Element, and to mitigate approximately 21.94 Acres of wetland impacts, the project proposes to: Complete required environmental remediation of the Northwest Ocoee Brownfield Area, including capping contaminated soils, excavation and appropriate disposal of contaminated soils, or other remediation that addresses approved environmental remediation plans. Establish a comprehensive stormwater and floodplain management system to treat, retain and enhance stormwater and provide for flood-carrying and flood storage capacity for the site with remediation plans, consistent with SJRWMD permit requirements. Implement a conservation and mitigation plan that will cover approximately 287 acres of Conservation lands located within the limits of the City of Ocoee. The plan identifies specific tracts and actions, as follows: a) Adjacent Parcel Conservation Easement – A conservation easement will be recorded over Parcel 07-22-28-0000-00-087, which includes approximately 9.9 acres of wetlands, which shall also transfer all development rights associated with said parcel to the City of Ocoee. This area will be subject to a management plan to enhance the wetland and upland areas through exotic species control. This parcel is identified as “Tract B” on Exhibit 20. The wetland in the parcel is part of a larger system that extends off-site towards the East and South. b) Management Plan – The City of Ocoee owns several parcels that contain regionally significant wetlands adjacent to the edge of Lake Apopka or along creeks that drain into Lake Apopka. All or portions of these parcels have been placed under conservation easement in previous years as lands set aside for conservation, but management of exotic species was not included. These parcels have been identified as “Tract A” and “Tract C” on Exhibit 20. A plan to address management activities to control exotic species such as general species removal and herbicide treatments will be prepared within 120 days of the issuance of a PUD zoning designation for the property with management activities commencing in the growing season after the approval of the management plan by the City of Ocoee. 76/79 TIA Summary A Transportation Impacts Analysis (TIA) was conducted to assess the traffic impacts associated with the proposed project for Short- Term (Year 2035) and Long-Term (Year 2045) horizons, in accordance with the City and State requirements. The image on the left illustrates the roadway segments that were included in the study area. A detailed version of the map is included on Exhibit 21 (Traffic Impact Analysis). Figure 47. Transportation Analysis Segments Overview Transportation & Infrastructure Plan The project will be required to mitigate impacts through the City’s concurrency requirements during the PUD process. It is anticipated that improvements identified during the PUD review process will be funded with contributions by the developer, in accordance with the State’s requirement for the proportionate share of the project’s impacts. The specifics of this arrangement are under negotiation and will be formalized in a future development agreement based on results of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for the project, which is currently under review by the City. Recommended Improvements Improvements anticipated to be addressed in the development agreement include the widening of Ocoee-Apopka Road, traffic control improvements at adjacent signals, and improvements along Ocoee-Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road to facilitate project access while accommodating non-project traffic capacity needs. It should also be noted that the developer has in prior discussions committed to other off-site improvements, which include sidewalks along Ocoee Apopka Rd and E Fuller Cross Road with 77/79 connections to both project driveways and adjacent streets. The North-South Connection along the West side of Ocoee Apopka Road is planned as a 12’ wide multiuse path. The crossing of West Orange Trail will be retrofitted as a part of the roadway widening to provide the same level of protection to trail users as the existing crossing. Trip Equivalency Matrix Transportation impacts associated with this application were assessed based on a proposed development program that generated a maximum of 17,960 net new daily trips. The specific mix of uses was based on the current preliminary development program, but if changes were to be required, total development would be capped by the 17,960 net new daily trips, according to the Trip Equivalency Matrix listed below: Figure 48. Trip Equivalency Matrix 78/79 5. List of Exhibits 5.1. Mapping Exhibits Exhibit 1. Location Map Exhibit 2. Aerial Image Exhibit 3. Topographic Map Exhibit 4. FEMA Flood Hazard Map Exhibit 5. Soils Map Exhibit 6. (not used) Exhibit 7. Land Use & Land Cover Map (FLUCFCS) Exhibit 8. Wetlands Map Exhibit 9. OCPA DOR Codes Map Exhibit 10. Existing Future Land Use Map Exhibit 11. Proposed Future Land Use Map Exhibit 12. Existing Zoning Map Exhibit 13. Proposed Zoning Map Exhibit 14. Offsite Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants Exhibit 15. Proposed Development Program Exhibit 16. Policies Matrix Exhibit 17. OCPA Records Exhibit 18. 300' Buffer Map & List of Owners 79/79 5.2. Additional Exhibits (Technical Reports) Exhibit 19. Environmental Assessment Report Exhibit 20. Monitoring and Maintenance Plan Exhibit 21. Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit 22. Geotechnical Report Exhibit 23. Socio Economic Data (Summary Tables) 5.3. Large-Format Exhibits Exhibit 24. Subject Area Aerial Image Exhibit 25. FEMA & Wetlands Exhibit 26. Soils & Land Cover Exhibit 27. Topography & Environmental Features Exhibit 28. Conceptual Land Use Plan Exhibit 29. Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit 30. Pervious / Impervious Areas Plan Exhibit 31. Conceptual Open Space Plan Exhibit 32. City of Ocoee - Existing Utilities Exhibit 33. FEMA Flood Map Exhibit 34. Conceptual Drainage Plan Exhibit 35. Conceptual Utilities Plan Exhibit 36. Subject Area Surveys & Legal Descriptions N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d But le r A ve C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d Exhibit 01 - Location Map ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd D e m a s t u s L n Pine St O c o e e A p o p k a R d C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e RdLog Landing Dr Exhibit 02 - Aerial Image ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area 118 116 115 114113112111110109 119117 105 102 125 124 122 123121 124 121 123 122 121 120 108 107 126 104 123 105 106 105 103 101 126 122 127 127 125 123 122121 122 121 120 118 116 106105 128 122 122 118 117 115 115 103101 Exhibit 03 - Topographic Map ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d But le r A ve C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d Exhibit 04 - FEMA Flood Hazard Zones ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area Address_Range Flood Hazard Zones Zone Type 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway Special Floodway Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee Area with Risk Due to Levee N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d But le r A ve C r o wnP o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d 48 44 15 15 35 44 2 20 54 454 34 45 45 40 46 20 7 54 54 54 44 4751 35 3 3 44 54 26 2 54 34 34 20 Exhibit 05 - Soils Map ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area 2: Archbold fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 3: Basinger fine sand, depressional 4: Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 7: Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 15: Felda fine sand, frequently flooded 20: Immokalee fine sand 26: Ona fine sand 34: Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 35: Pomello-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 40: Samsula muck 44: Smyrna fine sand 45: Smyrna-Urban land complex 46: Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 47: Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes 48: Tavares-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 51: Wabasso fine sand 54: Zolfo fine sand Exhibit 06 - Not Used N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d But le r A ve C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d W-1 W-2W-3 W-4 SW-4 SW-2 SW-3 SW-1 Exhibit 08 - Wetlands & Surface Waters ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 00010001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 000100010001 00010001 00010001 0001 0019 0019 0019 0019 0019 0019 0019 0019 00190019 0019 0019 0019 0019 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 01000100 01000100 0100 0100 0100 010001000100 0100 0100 01000100 0100 01000100 0100 010001000100 0100 010001000100 0100 01000100 0100 0100 0102 0102 01020102 010201020102 0102 0102 0102 01020102 0102 0102 01020102 0102 0102 0102 0102 0102 0103 0103 01030103 0103 0103 0103 0103 0103 0103 010301030103 0103 0103 0103010301030103 0103 0103010301030103 0103 010301030103 01030103 01030103 01030103 0103 0103 0103 0103 0103 0103 0103 01030103 0103 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0200 0202 0202 0202 0202 0800 1000 1110 1200 1210 1702 2740 4000 4000 4000 4800 4800 4800 5001 6100 6100 6100 6100 6200 6200 6700 6801 6910 6910 7100 7100 7100 7200 7500 8065 8065 8088 8095 8289 8600 8900 8900 8900 8900 8920 8920 9110 9400 9900 9900 9900 9900 9920 Exhibit 09 - OCPA Property Use Codes (DOR Codes) ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area DOR - Description0000 - Vacant Residential0001 - Residential0019 - Residential Vacant H.O.A0100 - Single Family0102 - Single Family Class II0103 - Single Family Class III 0200 - Manufactured Home0202 - Manufactured Home0800 - Multi-Family1000 - Commercial Vacant Land 1101 - Condo-Retail1200 - Store/Office/Res Class I 1210 - Store/Office/Res Class II1702 - Office Modular2740 - Auto Repair Garage4000 - Industrial Vacant Land4800 - Industrial Warehouse I5001 - Ag Operations Site6100 - Ag Grazing Improved Pasture6200 - Ag Grazing Land Semi-Improved Pasture 6700 - Ag Misc Animals6801 - Ag Horse Farm6910 - Ag Field Nursery7100 - Inst-Religious7200 - Inst-School - Private 7500 - Inst-Charitable8065 - County Stormwater/Retention 8095 - Municipal Stormwater/Retention 8289 - Municipal Forest Park Recreation 8600 - County (Other Bldg)8610 - County Multi Use Facility8620 - County Utility-Gas, Electric8700 - State (Other Bldg)8710 - State Muilti-Use Facility8900 - Municipal (Other)8920 - Municipal Utility, Gas, Electric9110 - Private Communication Tower 9400 - Private Right-Of-Way 9900 - Non-Agricultural Acreage9920 - Pvt Utilities N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d Butler A ve C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d Exhibit 10 - Existing Future Land Use ² Existing Future Land UseLow Density Residential (LDR)& Conservation (CONS) 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Professional Offices and Services (PS) Commercial (COMM) Light Industrial (LI) Heavy Industrial (HI) Conservation/Floodplains (CONS) Recreation and Open Space (REC) Public Facilities/Institutional (INST) Road Right-of-Way Lakes--Natural Water Bodies (LAKE) Unincorporated Territory N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d But le r A ve C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d Exhibit 11 - Proposed Future Land Use ² Proposed Future Land UseCommercial (COMM) 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Professional Offices and Services (PS) Commercial (COMM) Light Industrial (LI) Heavy Industrial (HI) Conservation/Floodplains (CONS) Recreation and Open Space (REC) Public Facilities/Institutional (INST) Road Right-of-Way Lakes--Natural Water Bodies (LAKE) Unincorporated Territory N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd O c o e e A p o p k a R d But l er A ve C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e R d Exhibit 13 - Proposed Zoning ² 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban (A-2) Single-Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) Single-Family Dwelling (R-1AA) Single-Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single-Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two-Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple-Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices & Services (P-S) Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) Community Commercial (C-2) General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (I-1) General Industrial (I-2) Commercial (PUD) Low Density (PUD) Medium Density (PUD) High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) Industrial (PUD) Unclassified Proposed Zoning:PUD-COMM I-1 I-1 Unclassified I-2 PUD-IND A-1 R-1APUD-COMMPUD-COMM PUD-COMM PUD-LD PUD-LD A-1 A-1 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE,Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community ± * NTS Water Treatment Plans (WTP) F:\Proj2023\23618 Ocoee Sports Complex\Gis\Utilities\Figure 7-2 OCU Map.mxd Legend NOTES1) This is n ot a survey.2) This map is fo r plan ning and permitting activity for the above na med project and should be used for those purposes only.3) The aerial imagery sh own he re on was obtained in digital fo rmat from ArcGIS O nline, b ased on the sources sho wn abo ve. *Forest OaksWTP * South WTP *Ocoee WWTF LakeApopka LakeDownLakeButler Ocoee Sport Complex Florida Tpke W Colonial Drive 429 429 50 50 Florida Tpke 408 Exhibit 14 - Offsite Water and Wastewater Treatment Plans EXHIBIT 15 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (CPA SUBMITTAL)8/2/2024 Use Proposed Parking Parking Category Area Req'd Provided Hotels 810,000 sf 1,114 Rooms 1,207 1,114 Rooms Welcome Center 20,000 sf 160,000 sf Community Center Retail (excl. Restaurants)130,000 sf 650 360,000 sf Retail Restaurants 130,000 sf 3,714 Seats 1,067 Entertainment 50,000 sf 200 Indoor Sports 150,000 sf 545 Corporate Offices 10,000 sf 40 Outdoor Entertainment 30,000 sf - Parking Garages 920,000 sf 2,831 Podium Parking 210,000 sf 646 2,460,000 sf Submittal Development Program 42 Ac. Sports Fields (excl. from FAR)1,829,520 sf 400 Surface Parking (excl. from FAR)260,000 sf 800 SITE DATA FAR Gross Acreage 0.385 Actual Conveyances 0.393 Rounded Numbers Fields Required Provided Area for FAR Calculation 4,110 4,277 Total Parking Keys/Seats 0.4 FAR Rounded Up TIA PROGRAM ELEMENT SECTION / OBJECTIVE POLICY / REFERENCE IN T E R G O V E R N A M E N T A L CO O R D I N A T I O N MI X E D U S E DE V E L O P M E N T CH A R A C T E R FA C I L I T I E S & S E R V I C E S IN F I L L & RE D E V E L O P M E N T SP E C I A L P L A N N I N G AR E A S CO M P A T I B I L I T Y CO N S E R V A T I O N SP R A W L C O N T R O L OP E N S P A C E & RE C R E A T I O N EC O N O M I C DE V E L O P M E N T Future Land Use Introduction / Section I - Future Land Use Introduction / Sections II-IV Future Land Use Introduction / Section VII - Future Land Use Introduction / Section IX - Future Land Use Introduction / Section X - Future Land Use Introduction / Section XI - Future Land Use Introduction / Section XII - Future Land Use Objective 1 - Future Land Use Objective 1 Policy 1.1 Future Land Use Objective 1 Policy 1.3 Future Land Use Objective 1 Policy 1.4 Future Land Use Objective 1 Policy 1.6 Future Land Use Objective 1 Policy 1.7 Future Land Use Objective 2 - Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.3 Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.4 Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.5 Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.6 Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.7 Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.8 Future Land Use Objective 2 Policy 2.11 Future Land Use Objective 3 - Future Land Use Objective 3 Policy 3.2 Future Land Use Objective 3 Policy 3.3 Future Land Use Objective 3 Policy 3.4 Future Land Use Objective 4 - Future Land Use Objective 4 Policy 4.2 Future Land Use Objective 5 - Future Land Use Objective 5 Policy 5.2 Future Land Use Objective 5 Policy 5.3 Future Land Use Objective 5 Policy 5.8 Future Land Use Objective 5 Policy 5.12 Future Land Use Objective 5 Policy 5.13 Future Land Use Objective 7 - Future Land Use Objective 7 Policy 7.1 Future Land Use Objective 7 Policy 7.2 Future Land Use Objective 7 Policy 7.3 Future Land Use Objective 7 Policy 7.4 Future Land Use Objective 7 Policy 7.7 Future Land Use Objective 9 Future Land Use Sec. XIV - Wekiva Protection (A)- Future Land Use Sec. XIV - Wekiva Protection (C)- Transportation Section F (Pg 2-19) Transportation Section F (Pg 2.45) Transportation Section F (Pg 2-52) Transportation Table 21 (Pp. 2-54 - 2-56) Transportation Section VI - Transportation Objective 1.3 - Transportation Objective 1.3 Policy 1.3.1 Transportation Objective 1.3 Policy 1.3.2 Transportation Objective 1.3 Policy 1.3.3 Transportation Objective 1.3 Policy 1.3.4 Transportation Objective 1.4 - Transportation Objective 1.4 Policy 1.4.1 Transportation Objective 2.1 - Transportation Objective 2.2 - Transportation Objective 2.2 Policy 2.2.2 Transportation Objective 2.2 Policy 2.2.4 Transportation Objective 2.5 - Transportation Objective 2.5 Policy 2.5.1 Transportation Objective 2.7 - Transportation Objective 2.7 Policy 2.7.1 Transportation Objective 2.9 - Exhibit 16 - Policies Matrix ELEMENT SECTION / OBJECTIVE POLICY / REFERENCE IN T E R G O V E R N A M E N T A L CO O R D I N A T I O N MI X E D U S E DE V E L O P M E N T CH A R A C T E R FA C I L I T I E S & S E R V I C E S IN F I L L & RE D E V E L O P M E N T SP E C I A L P L A N N I N G AR E A S CO M P A T I B I L I T Y CO N S E R V A T I O N SP R A W L C O N T R O L OP E N S P A C E & RE C R E A T I O N EC O N O M I C DE V E L O P M E N T Transportation Objective 2.9 Policy 2.9.1 Conservation Objective 1 Policy 1.4 Conservation Objective 2 Policy 2.3 Conservation Objective 4 Policy 4.1 Conservation Objective 4 Policy 4.2 Conservation Objective 4 Policy 4.3 Conservation Objective 6 Policy 6.2 Conservation Objective 6 Policy 6.7 Conservation Objective 6 Policy 6.9 Conservation Objective 6 Policy 6.10 Conservation Objective 8 Policy 8.1 Recreation & Open Space Objective 1 - Recreation & Open Space Objective 2 - Recreation & Open Space Objective 5 - Recreation & Open Space Objective 6 - Recreation & Open Space Objective 6 Policy 6.1 Recreation & Open Space Objective 6 Policy 6.2 Recreation & Open Space Objective 6 Policy 6.3 Recreation & Open Space Objective 8 - Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 1 - Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 1 Policy 1.1 Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 1 Policy 1.2 Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 1 Policy 1.3 Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 1 Policy 1.7 Intergovernmental Coordination Objective 3 - Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-001 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name 2290 Fullers Cross Rd Names Montierre Development Pllc Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 0100 - Single Family Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 2290 Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $3,777,595 $2,595,080 $2,322,637 $2,112,141 + $22,009 + $19,333 + $8,430 + $6,297 + $702 + $702 + $702 + $702 =$3,800,306 (45%) =$2,615,115 (12%) =$2,331,769 (10%) =$2,119,140 - $658,217 $3,800,306 (48%) $2,564,946 (10%) $2,331,769 (60%) =$1,460,923 Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 n/a n/a n/a $658,217 $0 $499 $0 $11,068 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $3,800,306 $0 $3,800,306 3.2160 (1.36%)$12,221.78 20 % Public Schools: By Local Board $3,800,306 $0 $3,800,306 3.2480 (0.00%)$12,343.39 20 % Orange County (General) $3,800,306 $0 $3,800,306 4.4347 (0.00%)$16,853.22 27 % City Of Ocoee $3,800,306 $0 $3,800,306 4.9500 (0.00%)$18,811.51 30 % Library - Operating Budget $3,800,306 $0 $3,800,306 0.3748 (0.00%)$1,424.35 2 % St Johns Water Management District $3,800,306 $0 $3,800,306 0.1793 (0.00%)$681.39 1 % 16.4028 $62,335.64 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 11413.70 $1.00 $11,413.70 CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE FIRE RESC - N/A - (407)905-3100 467.54 $1.00 $467.54 $11,881.24 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $74,216.88 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $62,335.64 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$62,335.64 Providing You A Savings Of =$0.00 Property Features Property Description THE W1/2 OF NE1/4 & E1/2 OF NW1/4 LYING E OF SR 437 IN SEC 07-22-28 & (LESS PT TAKEN FOR R/W DESC AS COMM AT N1/4 CORNER OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S1-3-52W ALONG W LINE OF NE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 30.01 FT TO POB TH N89-50-37E 1280.94 FT TO E LINE OF W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S0-27-1W 20 FT TH S89-50-37W 1281.16 FT TH S89-43-45W 648.52 FT TO POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SELY TH SWLY ALONG CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95-9-26 ARC LENGTH OF 83.04 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 73.82 FT AND CHORD BRG OF S42-9-2W TO POINT OF TANGENCY TH S5-25-41E 266.84 FT TO POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NELY TH SELY ALONG CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1849.9 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10-47-31 ARC LENGTH OF 348.43 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 347.92 FT AND CHORD BRG OF S10-49-27E TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY TH S16-13-12E 1773.29 FT TH S15-21-49E 59.23 FT TH S13-39-3E 55.93 FT TO POINT LYING ON S LINE OF NW1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S86-56-26W ALONG S LINE 28.44 FT TO POINT ON NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SWLY TH NWLY ALONG NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1941.86 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3-11-30 ARC LENGTH OF 108.17 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 108.15 FT AND CHORD BRG OF N14-37-29W TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY TH N16-13-13W 16.18 FT TH N16-20-6W 500 FT TH N16-2-55W 1000 FT TH N15-27-46W 407.21 FT TH N7-33-7W 524.34 FT TH N5-25-43W 24.17 FT TH N89-43-45E 740.7 FT TO POB PER DOC 20190042931) Total Land Area 4,143,157 sqft (+/-) | 95.11 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land ValueClass Unit Price Class Value 0100 - Single Family PUD-LD70.91 ACRE(S)$52,500.00$3,722,775 $0.00 $3,722,775 0100 - Single Family PUD-LD1 ACRE(S) $52,500.00$52,500 $0.00 $52,500 9600 - Pvt Wetland/LowlandPUD-LD23.2 ACRE(S) $100.00 $2,320 $0.00 $2,320 Buildings Model Code 01 - Single Fam Residence Type Code 0102 - Single Fam Class II Building Value $13,683 Estimated New Cost $45,611 Actual Year Built 1930 Beds 2 Baths 1.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 978 sqft Living Area 768 sqft Exterior Wall Minimum Interior Wall Wall.Bd/Wd Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 768 $42,563 FOP - F/Opn Prch 160 $2,217 USP - Unf S Prch 50 $831 Model Code 06 - Warehouse Type Code 4900 - Ind Open Storage Building Value $8,326 Estimated New Cost $27,752 Actual Year Built 1930 Beds 3 Baths 0.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 2870 sqft Living Area 1806 sqft Exterior Wall Minimum Interior Wall Wall.Bd/Wd Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 1806 $21,437 UST - Unf Storag 1064 $6,315 Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value 5234 - Accessory Building Metal 01/01/1970 234 Unit(s) $12.00 $702 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/Imp 12/14/2023$4,200,00020230735916/ Special Warranty Chevron Land And Development Co Montierre Development Pllc Vacant 12/18/2018$100 20190042931/ Right Of Way Deed Chevron Land And Development Co City Of Ocoee Improved 12/21/2005$2,555,0002005087491008386 / 3045Special Warranty Chevron U S A Inc Chevron Land And Development Co Improved 12/21/2001$2,020,0002001058690106421 / 5015Warranty Deed Grafton Joseph R Godwin Mabel M Etal Chevron U S A Inc Improved Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address OIL-000498 $2,059 $0 Chevron Products Co 2290 Fullers Cross Rd Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Tuesday, Friday)Ocoee Trash (Tuesday, Friday)Ocoee Yard Waste (Monday)Ocoee Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-023 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name Ocoee Used As A Haunted House Names Montierre Development Pllc Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 8900 - Municipal (Other) Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 951 Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $1,269,533 $1,269,533 $1,210,389 $1,101,754 + $39,632 + $33,009 + $27,507 + $23,924 + $4,500 + $4,500 + $4,500 + $4,500 =$1,313,665 (.51%) =$1,307,042 (5.2%) =$1,242,396 (9.9%) =$1,130,178 $1,313,665 (.51%) $1,307,042 (5.2%) $1,242,396 (9.9%) $1,130,178 Tax Year Benefits Other Exemptions Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 n/a $1,307,042 $1,242,396 $1,130,178 $0 $21,383 $20,399 $19,004 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $1,313,665 $0 $1,313,665 3.2160 (1.36%)$4,224.75 20 % Public Schools: By Local Board $1,313,665 $0 $1,313,665 3.2480 (0.00%)$4,266.78 20 % Orange County (General) $1,313,665 $0 $1,313,665 4.4347 (0.00%)$5,825.71 27 % City Of Ocoee $1,313,665 $0 $1,313,665 4.9500 (0.00%)$6,502.64 30 % Library - Operating Budget $1,313,665 $0 $1,313,665 0.3748 (0.00%)$492.36 2 % St Johns Water Management District $1,313,665 $0 $1,313,665 0.1793 (0.00%)$235.54 1 % 16.4028 $21,547.78 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 186.37 $1.00 $186.37 CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE FIRE RESC - N/A - (407)905-3100 168.89 $1.00 $168.89 $355.26 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $21,903.04 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $21,547.78 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$21,547.78 Providing You A Savings Of =$0.00 Property Features Property Description BEG NW COR OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH RUN N86-56-10E 1310.03 FT TH S00-31-51W 1398.44 FT TH S00-31-51W 355.17 FT TH N89-35-48W 592.6 FT N01-06-44E 37.61 FT TH S87-37-29W 726.4 FT TH N00-48-40E 322 FT TH N88-29-43E 489.51 FT TH N01-04-18E 345.22 FT TH N88-06-20E 248.67 FT TH N01-04-18E 652.77 FT TH S87-43-51W 523.06 FT TH N31-10-03W 411.03 FT TO POB (LESS RD R/W) & COMM AT THE CENTER OF SEC 7 TH ALONG W LINE OF SE 1/4 TH S01-04-18W 1672.03 FT TH DEPARTING W LINE RUN S88-55-42E 5.55 FT TO POB TH N87-37-29E 726.4 FT TH S01-06-44W 37.61 FT TH S89-35-48E 592.6 FT TH S00-31-51W 57.88 FT TH S89-55-44W 590.37 FT TH N00-04-16W 37.61 FT TH S89-55-44W 726.8 FT TH N00-48-40E 33.58 FT TO POB (LESS RD R/W) Total Land Area 1,616,787 sqft (+/-) | 37.12 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 8900 - Municipal (Other) R-1AA 36.12 ACRE(S) $34,385.51 $1,242,005 $0.00 $1,242,005 0100 - Single Family R-1AA 1 ACRE(S) $27,527.50 $27,528 $0.00 $27,528 Buildings Model Code 01 - Single Fam Residence Type Code 0102 - Single Fam Class II Building Value $39,632 Estimated New Cost $132,107 Actual Year Built 1920 Beds 3 Baths 1.5 Floors 2 Gross Area 3358 sqft Living Area 1750 sqft Exterior Wall Wood.Shthn Interior Wall Plastered Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 875 $53,515 FOP - F/Opn Prch 768 $11,743 FSP - F/Scr Prch 155 $3,303 FST - Fin Storge 45 $1,407 FUS - F/Up Story 875 $45,503 UEP - Unf E Prch 160 $4,893 UGR - Unf Garage 480 $11,743 Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value 6450 - Fireplace 1 Basic 05/18/1993 3 Unit(s) $1,500.00 $4,500 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/Imp 12/15/2023$5,368,10020230735484/ Special Warranty City Of Ocoee Montierre Development Pllc Improved 08/25/2006$0 2006057015308832 / 4969Warranty Deed Rogers Brenda Bracewell City Of Ocoee Improved 05/22/1996$100 1996563681905067 / 0764Personal Representative's Deed Bracewell Samuel P Rogers Brenda Bracewell Improved 02/01/1986$100 1986246960303750 / 0458Warranty Deed Improved Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page 951 Ocoee Apopka Rd 12/15/2023$5,368,100 $3,067 Special Warranty 3/2 20230735484/ 1912 S Orange Ave 10/27/2023$2,000,000 $445 Special Warranty 0/0 20230626554/ Main St 10/12/2023$21,500 Warranty Deed 0/0 20230615917/ E George Ave 10/12/2023$877,100 Special Warranty 0/0 20230652338/ Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Tuesday, Friday)Ocoee Trash (Tuesday, Friday)Ocoee Yard Waste (Monday)Ocoee Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-039 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name 1305 Ocoee Apopka Rd Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 6200 - Ag Grazing Semi-Imp Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 1305 Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $84,000 $84,000 $64,980 $59,073 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 =$84,000 (0%) =$84,000 (29%) =$64,980 (10%) =$59,073 - $83,714 - $83,714 - $64,694 - $58,787 =$286 (0%) =$286 (0%) =$286 (0%) =$286 QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $83,714 $83,714 $64,694 $58,787 $1,373 $1,294 $1,004 $930 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $286 $0 $286 3.2160 (1.36%)$0.92 20 % Public Schools: By Local Board $286 $0 $286 3.2480 (0.00%)$0.93 20 % Orange County (General) $286 $0 $286 4.4347 (0.00%)$1.27 27 % City Of Ocoee $286 $0 $286 4.9500 $1.42 30 % Library - Operating Budget $286 $0 $286 0.3748 (0.00%)$0.11 2 % St Johns Water Management District $286 $0 $286 0.1793 (0.00%)$0.05 1 % 16.4028 $4.70 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 251.64 $1.00 $251.64 $251.64 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $256.34 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $1,377.84 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$4.70 Providing You A Savings Of =$1,373.14 Property Features Property Description BEG NW COR OF SE1/4 RUN S 8.71 CHS E 3.33 CHS N 3.35 CHS NWLY TO BEG & NE1/4 OF SW1/4 E OF RD SEC 07-22-28 Total Land Area 91,344 sqft (+/-) | 2.10 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 6200 - Ag Grazing Semi-Imp A-1 2.1 ACRE(S) $40,000.00 $84,000 $136.00 $286 Buildings Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value There are no extra features associated with this parcel Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/ Imp 02/16/2024$242,536 20240101174/ Warranty Multiple Rodgers Glen R 1/2 Int Rodgers Terance L 1/2 Int Mdtl Enterprise LLC Vacant 08/08/2007$100 2007055179809401 / 2075Personal Representative's Deed Rodgers Nellie F Estate Rodgers Glen R 1/2 Int Rodgers Terance L 1/2 Int Vacant 02/01/1982$18,500 1982175673503260 / 1704Warranty Deed Vacant Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page Wheeler Rd 07/11/2024$3,750,000 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240417774/ 2998 Dill Rd 04/23/2024$12,500,000 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240255473/ 1305 Ocoee Apopka Rd 02/16/2024$242,536 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240101174 / Lake Pickett Rd 01/26/2024$5,000,000 Special Warranty 0/0 20240064734/ S Tanner Rd 11/29/2023$3,266,200 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20230692626/ E Colonial Dr 11/29/2023$300 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20230692626/ E Colonial Dr 11/29/2023$14,829,300 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20230692626/ Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Traffic Information Ocoee-Apopka Rd 9,120 Vehicles / Day Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-041 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name 1113 Ocoee Apopka Rd Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 5001 - Ag Operations Site Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 1113 Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $89,200 $89,200 $72,352 $65,775 + $201,774 + $170,894 + $144,766 + $127,946 + $6,000 + $6,000 + $6,000 + $6,000 =$296,974 (12%) =$266,094 (19%) =$223,118 (12%) =$199,721 - $78,050 - $78,050 - $61,202 - $54,625 =$193,124 (10%) =$175,567 (10%) =$159,606 (10%) =$145,096 Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $78,050 $78,050 $61,202 $54,625 $1,537 $1,319 $971 $864 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $218,924 $0 $218,924 3.2160 (1.36%)$704.06 21 % Public Schools: By Local Board $218,924 $0 $218,924 3.2480 (0.00%)$711.07 21 % Orange County (General) $193,124 $0 $193,124 4.4347 (0.00%)$856.45 26 % City Of Ocoee $193,124 $0 $193,124 4.9500 $955.96 29 % Library - Operating Budget $193,124 $0 $193,124 0.3748 (0.00%)$72.38 2 % St Johns Water Management District $193,124 $0 $193,124 0.1793 (0.00%)$34.63 1 % 16.4028 $3,334.55 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 188.37 $1.00 $188.37 CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE FIRE RESC - N/A - (407)905-3100 168.89 $1.00 $168.89 $357.26 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $3,691.81 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $4,871.21 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$3,334.55 Providing You A Savings Of =$1,536.66 Property Features Property Description BEG 574.86 FT S 1 DEG W FROM CENTER OF SEC RUN N 87 DEG E 219.78 FT N 1 DEG E 214.5 FT N 87 DEG E 239.66 FT TH S 1 DEG W 314.53 FT S 87 DEG W 458.80 FT N 100 FT TO POB (LESS W 30 FT RD R/W) IN SEC 07-22-28 Total Land Area 97,078 sqft (+/-) | 2.23 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 5001 - Ag Operations Site A-1 2.23 ACRE(S) $40,000.00 $89,200 $5,000.00 $11,150 Buildings Model Code 01 - Single Fam Residence Type Code 0102 - Single Fam Class II Building Value $201,774 Estimated New Cost $283,390 Actual Year Built 1984 Beds 3 Baths 2.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 3394 sqft Living Area 2124 sqft Exterior Wall Conc/Cindr Interior Wall Drywall Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 1740 $197,873 FEP - F/Enc Prch 384 $30,591 FGR - Fin Garage 525 $29,908 FOP - F/Opn Prch 145 $4,094 UCP - Unf Carprt 280 $6,368 UDG - Unf Dt Grg 320 $14,556 Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value 6451 - Fireplace 2 Average 01/01/1992 1 Unit(s) $2,500.00 $2,500 5401 - Carport 2 01/01/1992 1 Unit(s) $1,500.00 $1,500 6140 - Patio 1 01/01/1998 1 Unit(s) $2,000.00 $2,000 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/Imp 02/16/2024$857,464 20240101174/ Warranty Multiple Rodgers Glen R 1/2 Int Rodgers Terance L 1/2 Int Mdtl Enterprise LLC Improved 02/01/1982$18,500 1982175673503260 / 1704Warranty Deed Vacant 03/01/1980$50,000 1980150418003104 / 1902Warranty Deed Vacant Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page 1059 Ocoee Apopka Rd 06/27/2024$3,125,000 $1,426 Warranty Deed 2/2 20240378618/ 1113 Ocoee Apopka Rd 02/16/2024$857,464 $404 Warranty Multiple 3/2 20240101174 / Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address REG-027326 $936 $0 R & R Air Conditioning Service Inc 1113 Ocoee Apopka Rd Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Nearby Amenities (1 mile radius) Barber Shops 1 Beauty Salons 3 Dentists Offices 1 Gas Stations 4 Grocery Store 1 Restaurants 2 Market Stats Sales Within Last 1 Year Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-043 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name Mh With Small Offices Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 5001 - Ag Operations Site Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 1059 Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $200,800 $200,800 $186,399 $169,454 + $49,260 + $45,277 + $36,531 + $29,375 + $8,680 + $8,680 + $8,680 + $8,680 =$258,740 (1.6%) =$254,757 (10.0%) =$231,610 (12%) =$207,509 - $175,700 - $175,700 - $161,299 - $144,354 =$83,040 (8.7%) =$76,418 (10%) =$69,471 (10%) =$63,155 Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $175,700 $175,700 $161,299 $144,354 $2,882 $2,740 $2,510 $2,283 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $83,040 $0 $83,040 3.2160 (1.36%)$267.06 20 % Public Schools: By Local Board $83,040 $0 $83,040 3.2480 (0.00%)$269.71 20 % Orange County (General) $83,040 $0 $83,040 4.4347 (0.00%)$368.26 27 % City Of Ocoee $83,040 $0 $83,040 4.9500 $411.05 30 % Library - Operating Budget $83,040 $0 $83,040 0.3748 (0.00%)$31.12 2 % St Johns Water Management District $83,040 $0 $83,040 0.1793 (0.00%)$14.89 1 % 16.4028 $1,362.09 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 137.20 $1.00 $137.20 CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE FIRE RESC - N/A - (407)905-3100 302.21 $1.00 $302.21 $439.41 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $1,801.50 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $4,244.06 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$1,362.09 Providing You A Savings Of =$2,881.97 Property Features Property Description FROM THE NW COR OF NW1/4 OF SE1/4 RUN S 1 DEG W 674.86 FT N 87 DEG E 0.98 FT FOR POB THN N 87 DEG E 458.80 FT N 1 DEG E 314.53 FT N 87 DEG E 283.06 FT S 1 DEG W 650.10 FT S 87 DEG W 221.90 FT N 1 DEG E 228.76 FT W 519.27 FT N 1 DEG E 104.17 FT TO POB (LESS W 30 FT RD R/W) IN SEC 07-22-28 Total Land Area 218,564 sqft (+/-) | 5.02 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 5001 - Ag Operations Site A-1 5.02 ACRE(S) $40,000.00 $200,800 $5,000.00 $25,100 Buildings Model Code 04 - Commercial Type Code 1700 - Office One Story Building Value $10,551 Estimated New Cost $35,171 Actual Year Built 1992 Beds 0 Baths 0.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 600 sqft Living Area 320 sqft Exterior Wall Wood.Shthn Interior Wall Drywall Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 320 $29,933 UCP - Unf Carprt 280 $5,238 Model Code 02 - Manufactured Home Type Code 0201 - Mobile Home Building Value $24,336 Estimated New Cost $81,120 Actual Year Built 1980 Beds 2 Baths 2.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 1352 sqft Living Area 1352 sqft Exterior Wall Wood.Shthn Interior Wall Drywall Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 1352 $81,120 Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 520 $18,522 Model Code 06 - Warehouse Type Code 4900 - Ind Open Storage Building Value $14,373 Estimated New Cost $18,522 Actual Year Built 2007 Beds Baths Floors 1 Gross Area 520 sqft Living Area 520 sqft Exterior Wall Hardy Brd Interior Wall Drywall Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value 5320 - Canopy Cover Aluminum 1 01/01/2005 800 Unit(s) $2.50 $2,000 6140 - Patio 1 01/01/1980 1 Unit(s) $2,000.00 $2,000 5121 - Pole Building 2 01/01/2001 1440 Unit(s) $3.00 $4,320 5450 - Mobile Home 1 01/01/1970 480 Unit(s) $5.00 $360 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/ Imp 06/27/2024$3,125,000 20240378618/ Warranty Deed Rodgers Glen R Rodgers Connie J Mdtl Enterprise LLC Vacant 02/23/1993$20,000 1993438413104530 / 0995Warranty Deed Rodgers Roland Rodgers Nellie F Rodgers Glen R Rodgers Connie J Vacant Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page 1059 Ocoee Apopka Rd 06/27/2024$3,125,000 $1,426 Warranty Deed 2/2 20240378618/ 1113 Ocoee Apopka Rd 02/16/2024$857,464 $404 Warranty Multiple 3/2 20240101174 / Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Traffic Information Ocoee-Apopka Rd 9,120 Vehicles / Day Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-057 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name 1104 N Lakewood Ave Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 4800 - Ind Warehouse I Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 1104 N Lakewood Ave Ocoee, FL 34761 QR CodeQR Code For Mobile Phone Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $395,850 $395,850 $227,608 $206,916 + $295,489 + $283,232 + $265,640 + $182,720 + $4,869 + $4,869 + $4,869 + $0 =$696,208 (1.8%) =$683,951 (37%) =$498,117 (28%) =$389,636 $518,606 (10%) $471,460 (10%) $428,600 (10%) $389,636 Tax Year Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $1,765 $1,920 $629 $0 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $696,208 $0 $696,208 3.2160 (1.36%)$2,239.00 23 % Public Schools: By Local Board $696,208 $0 $696,208 3.2480 (0.00%)$2,261.28 23 % Orange County (General) $518,606 $0 $518,606 4.4347 (0.00%)$2,299.86 24 % City Of Ocoee $518,606 $0 $518,606 4.9500 $2,567.10 27 % Library - Operating Budget $518,606 $0 $518,606 0.3748 (0.00%)$194.37 2 % St Johns Water Management District $518,606 $0 $518,606 0.1793 (0.00%)$92.99 1 % 16.4028 $9,654.60 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 366.31 $1.00 $366.31 CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE FIRE RESC - N/A - (407)905-3100 443.10 $1.00 $443.10 $809.41 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $10,464.01 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $11,419.76 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$9,654.60 Providing You A Savings Of =$1,765.16 Property Features Property Description BEG SW COR NE1/4 OF SE1/4 N 349.5 FT E 663 FT S 353.9 FT W 663.8 FT TO POB & N 50 FT OF S 125 FT OF E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SEC 07-22-28 Total Land Area 265,111 sqft (+/-) | 6.09 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 4800 - Ind Warehouse I A-1 6.09 ACRE(S) $65,000.00 $395,850 $0.00 $395,850 Buildings Model Code 06 - Warehouse Type Code 4800 - Ind Warehouse I Building Value $295,489 Estimated New Cost $742,434 Actual Year Built 1980 Beds 0 Baths 0.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 6600 sqft Living Area 6600 sqft Exterior Wall Modl.Metal Interior Wall Minimum Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 6600 $742,434 Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value 6040 - Paved Concrete 01/01/2001 2164 Unit(s) $4.50 $4,869 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/Imp 06/27/2024$2,215,300 20240379845/ Warranty Multiple Lott Johnnie Paul Jr Mdtl Enterprise LLC Improved 12/18/2019$100 20190801059/ Trustee's Multiple Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Belinda L Fleming Family Trust 1/2Int Lott Johnnie Paul Jr Improved 08/28/2000$100 2000039756806090 / 4970Warranty Multiple Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Fleming Belinda L 1/2 Int Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Belinda L Fleming Family Trust 1/2Int Improved 12/29/1999$100 2000000227405915 / 0302Warranty Multiple Lott Johnnie P Lott Willie D Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Fleming Belinda L 1/2 Int Improved 06/01/1977$22,500 19771131163 02806 / 0087Warranty Deed Improved 06/01/1976$14,000 1976102841302726 / 1274Warranty Deed Improved Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page 395 Enterprise St 08/30/2024$2,600,000 $89 Special Warranty 0/0 20240509739/ 1200 29Th St 08/22/2024$43,500 $47 Warranty Deed 0/0 20240495728/ 300 W Landstreet Rd 08/16/2024$3,650,000 $197 Special Warranty 0/0 20240483955/ 7200 Gardner St 08/12/2024$3,000,000 $165 Warranty Deed 0/0 20240473483/ 3601 Silver Star Rd 08/08/2024$12,500,000 $121 Special Warranty 0/0 20240469215/ 6757 Edgewater Commerce Pkwy 08/08/2024$2,750,000 $222 Special Warranty 0/0 20240477024/ 1241 Columbia St 08/07/2024$851,283 $190 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240462524/ 1239 Columbia St 08/07/2024$1,033,717 $231 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240462524/ 1964 W Fairbanks Ave 07/30/2024$1,884,500 $370 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240453504/ 1700 N Orange Blossom Trl 07/29/2024$3,000,000 $211 Warranty Deed 0/0 20240448902/ Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Traffic Information Lakewood Ave 6,700 Vehicles / Day Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-060 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name 1102 N Lakewood Ave Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 0001 - Vacant Residential Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 1102 N Lakewood Ave Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $72,900 $72,900 $53,460 $32,000 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $864 + $864 + $864 + $864 =$73,764 (0%) =$73,764 (36%) =$54,324 (65%) =$32,864 $43,742 (10%) $39,765 (10%) $36,150 (10%) $32,864 Tax Year Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $298 $307 $165 $0 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $73,764 $0 $73,764 3.2160 (1.36%)$237.23 26 % Public Schools: By Local Board $73,764 $0 $73,764 3.2480 (0.00%)$239.59 26 % Orange County (General) $43,742 $0 $43,742 4.4347 (0.00%)$193.98 21 % City Of Ocoee $43,742 $0 $43,742 4.9500 $216.52 24 % Library - Operating Budget $43,742 $0 $43,742 0.3748 (0.00%)$16.39 2 % St Johns Water Management District $43,742 $0 $43,742 0.1793 (0.00%)$7.84 1 % 16.4028 $911.55 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 129.27 $1.00 $129.27 $129.27 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $1,040.82 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $1,209.94 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$911.55 Providing You A Savings Of =$298.39 Property Features Property Description BEG AT SE COR OF NE1/4 OF SE1/4 RUN W 656 FT N 75 FT E 656 FT S 75 FT TO POB (LESS E 30 FT FOR R/W) IN SEC 07-22-28 Total Land Area 46,923 sqft (+/-) | 1.08 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 0001 - Vacant Residential A-1 1.08 ACRE(S) $67,500.00 $72,900 $0.00 $72,900 Buildings Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value AB1 - Accessory Building 1 01/01/1979 144 Square Feet $10.00 $864 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/Imp 06/27/2024$234,700 20240379845/ Warranty Multiple Lott Johnnie Paul Jr Mdtl Enterprise LLC Vacant 12/18/2019$100 20190801059/ Trustee's Multiple Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Belinda L Fleming Family Trust 1/2Int Lott Johnnie Paul Jr Vacant 08/28/2000$100 2000039756806090 / 4970Warranty Multiple Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Fleming Belinda L 1/2 Int Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Belinda L Fleming Family Trust 1/2Int Improved 12/29/1999$100 2000000227405915 / 0302Warranty Multiple Lott Johnie P Lott Willer D Lott Johnnie Paul Jr 1/2 Int Fleming Belinda L 1/2 Int Improved 07/14/1989$50,000 1989329655804097 / 2277Warranty Deed Improved Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page 3450 Fairway Ln 09/06/2024$615,000 $313 Warranty Deed 4/2 20240521720/ 6194 Galloping Dr 09/06/2024$360,000 Special Warranty0/0 20240521079/ 6137 Galloping Dr 09/05/2024$397,000 Special Warranty0/0 20240520417/ 1161 Bulwark Oaks Ln 09/05/2024$899,600 $327 Warranty Deed 4/4 20240522513/ 1933 Terrapin Rd 09/05/2024$410,000 $223 Warranty Deed 3/2 20240521059/ 15728 Vienna Dr 09/04/2024$11,468 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240517212/ 15740 Vienna Dr 09/04/2024$11,468 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240517212/ 15752 Vienna Dr 09/04/2024$11,468 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240517212/ 15753 Larkspur St 09/04/2024$6,468 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240517212/ 15741 Larkspur St 09/04/2024$6,468 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240517212/ Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Nearby Amenities (1 mile radius) Barber Shops 1 Beauty Salons 3 Child Daycare 1 Dentists Offices 1 Gas Stations 4 Grocery Store 1 Restaurants 2 Market Stats Sales Within Last 1 Year Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-074 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name 1053 Ocoee Apopka Rd Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 0102 - Single Fam Class II Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address 1053 Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $75,000 $75,000 $55,000 $27,000 + $241,194 + $202,616 + $170,260 + $149,292 + $500 + $500 + $500 + $500 =$316,694 (14%) =$278,116 (23%) =$225,760 (28%) =$176,792 $186,260 (3.0%) $180,835 (3.0%) $175,568 (3.0%) $170,454 Tax Year Benefits Original Homestead Additional Hx Other Exemptions SOH Cap Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,434 $97,281 $50,192 $6,338 $2,798 $2,116 $1,393 $722 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $186,260 $25,000 $161,260 3.2160 (1.36%)$518.61 22 % Public Schools: By Local Board $186,260 $25,000 $161,260 3.2480 (0.00%)$523.77 22 % Orange County (General) $186,260 $50,000 $136,260 4.4347 (0.00%)$604.27 25 % City Of Ocoee $186,260 $50,000 $136,260 4.9500 $674.49 28 % Library - Operating Budget $186,260 $50,000 $136,260 0.3748 (0.00%)$51.07 2 % St Johns Water Management District $186,260 $50,000 $136,260 0.1793 (0.00%)$24.43 1 % 16.4028 $2,396.64 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 105.00 $1.00 $105.00 CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE FIRE RESC - N/A - (407)905-3100 168.89 $1.00 $168.89 $273.89 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $2,670.53 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $5,194.67 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$2,396.64 Providing You A Savings Of =$2,798.03 Property Features Property Description (NOTE: HX PORTION OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY) FROM THE CENTER OF SEC RUN S 01 DEG W 779.03 FT TH N 88 DEG E 1.48 FT FOR POB TH N 88 DEG E 519.27 FT S 01 DEG W 228.76 FT S 87 DEG W 27 FT N 01 DEG W 3.91 FT S 88 DEG W 318.03 FT N 01 DEG E 125 FT S 88 DEG W 173.77 FT N 01 DEG E 100 FT TO POB IN SEC 07-22-28 (LESS RD R/W ON W) Total Land Area 43,550 sqft (+/-) | 1.00 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 0100 - Single Family A-1 1 ACRE(S) $75,000.00 $75,000 $0.00 $75,000 Buildings Model Code 01 - Single Fam Residence Type Code 0102 - Single Fam Class II Building Value $241,194 Estimated New Cost $292,356 Actual Year Built 1998 Beds 3 Baths 2.0 Floors 1 Gross Area 3150 sqft Living Area 2026 sqft Exterior Wall Cb.Stucco Interior Wall Drywall Subarea Description Sqft Value BAS - Base Area 2026 $243,951 FGR - Fin Garage 484 $29,139 FOP - F/Opn Prch 640 $19,266 Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value CPT1 - Carport 1 01/01/2006 1 Unit(s) $500.00 $500 Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument #Book/Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/Imp 02/16/2024$674,476 20240101338/ Warranty Multiple Rodgers Glen R Rodgers Connie J Mdtl Enterprise LLC Improved 11/21/1996$100 1996586100205163 / 4001Quitclaim Deed Rodgers Roland Rodgers Nellie F Rodgers Glen R Rodgers Connie J Vacant Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Nearby Amenities (1 mile radius) Barber Shops 1 Beauty Salons 3 Dentists Offices 1 Gas Stations 5 Grocery Store 1 Restaurants 2 Market Stats Sales Within Last 1 Year Property Record - 07-22-28-0000-00-105 Orange County Property Appraiser • http://www.ocpafl.org Property Summary as of 09/15/2024 Property Name Ocoee Apopka Rd Names Mdtl Enterprise LLC Municipality OCO - Ocoee Property Use 6100 - Ag Grazing Im Pastur Mailing Address 5669 Se Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455-8319 Physical Address Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee, FL 34761 QR Code Value and Taxes Historical Value and Tax Benefits Tax Year Values Land Building(s) Feature(s) Market Value Ag Benefits Assessed Value 2024 2023 2022 2021 $47,200 $47,200 $38,285 $34,805 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 + $0 =$47,200 (0%) =$47,200 (23%) =$38,285 (10%) =$34,805 - $46,870 - $46,870 - $37,955 - $34,475 =$330 (0%) =$330 (0%) =$330 (0%) =$330 QR Code For Mobile Phone Tax Year Benefits Ag Benefits Tax Savings 2024 2023 2022 2021 $46,870 $46,870 $37,955 $34,475 $769 $725 $589 $545 2024 Taxable Value and Estimate of Proposed Taxes Taxing Authority Assd Value Exemption Tax Value Millage Rate Taxes % Public Schools: By State Law (Rle) $330 $0 $330 3.2160 (1.36%)$1.06 20 % Public Schools: By Local Board $330 $0 $330 3.2480 (0.00%)$1.07 20 % Orange County (General) $330 $0 $330 4.4347 (0.00%)$1.46 27 % City Of Ocoee $330 $0 $330 4.9500 $1.63 30 % Library - Operating Budget $330 $0 $330 0.3748 (0.00%)$0.12 2 % St Johns Water Management District $330 $0 $330 0.1793 (0.00%)$0.06 1 % 16.4028 $5.40 2024 Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Levying Authority Assessment Description Units Rate Assessment CITY OF OCOEE OCOEE STORM - DRAINAGE - (407)905-3100 141.38 $1.00 $141.38 $141.38 Tax Savings 2024 Estimated Gross Tax Total: $146.78 Your property taxes without exemptions would be $774.21 Your ad-valorem property tax with exemptions is ‒$5.40 Providing You A Savings Of =$768.81 Property Features Property Description (NOTE: AGRICULTURAL PORTION OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY) FROM THE CENTER OF SEC RUN S 01 DEG W 779.03 FT TH N 88 DEG E 1.48 FT FOR POB TH N 88 DEG E 519.27 FT S 01 DEG W 228.76 FT S 87 DEG W 27 FT N 01 DEG W 3.91 FT S 88 DEG W 318.03 FT N 01 DEG E 125 FT S 88 DEG W 173.77 FT N 01 DEG E 100 FT TO POB IN SEC 07-22-28 (LESS RD R/W ON W) Total Land Area 51,319 sqft (+/-) | 1.18 acres (+/-) GIS Calculated Land Land Use Code Zoning Land Units Unit Price Land Value Class Unit Price Class Value 6100 - Ag Grazing Im Pastur A-1 1.18 ACRE(S) $40,000.00 $47,200 $280.00 $330 Buildings Extra Features Description Date Built Units Unit Price XFOB Value There are no extra features associated with this parcel Sales Sales History Sale Date Sale Amount Instrument # Book/ Page Deed Code Seller(s) Buyer(s) Vac/ Imp 02/16/2024$100,524 20240101338/ Warranty Multiple Rodgers Glen R Rodgers Connie J Mdtl Enterprise LLC Vacant Similar Sales Address Sale Date Sale Amount $/ SQFT Deed Code Beds/ Baths Instrument # Book/ Page 576 Tradeport Dr 07/23/2024$880,000 Special Warranty 0/0 20240427253/ 10 Machete Trl 07/15/2024$5,500,000 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240451777/ N Jefferson St 07/15/2024$5,500,000 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240451777/ Briley Ave 07/15/2024$5,500,000 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240451777/ Briley Ave 07/15/2024$5,500,000 Special Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240451777/ 23965 Wheeler Rd 07/11/2024$3,750,000 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240417774/ 20809 Fort Christmas Rd 05/31/2024$400,000 Warranty Deed 0/0 20240317832/ Ondich Rd 05/23/2024$370,900 Warranty Multiple 0/0 20240304501/ 6912 Swain Rd 05/15/2024$1,530,000 Warranty Deed 0/0 20240293592/ E Colonial Dr 05/06/2024$3,089,400 Warranty Deed 0/0 20240294453/ Services for Location TPP Accounts At Location Account Market Value Taxable Value Business Name(s) Business Address There are no TPP Accounts associated with this parcel. Schools Ocoee (High School) Principal Lisa Jean Karcinski Office Phone 407.905.3000 Grades 2023: | 2022: B | 2019: C Ocoee (Middle School) Principal Cheri Leavitt Office Phone 407.877.5035 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Spring Lake (Elementary) Principal Dr. Aja Wilkins Office Phone 407.877.5047 Grades 2023: | 2022: C | 2019: B Utilities/Services Electric Duke Energy Water Ocoee Recycling (Wednesday)Orange County Trash (Tuesday)Orange County Yard Waste (Wednesday)Orange County Elected Officials State Representative LaVon Bracy Davis County Commissioner Christine Moore State Senate Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson School Board Representative Melissa Byrd US Representative Daniel Webster Orange County Property Appraiser Amy Mercado Anderson Pl N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd Wurst Rd MarigoldParkDr 13th Ave Lilybean Loop D e m a s t u s L n 12th Ave 15th Ave 17th Ave 16th Ave 11th Ave 10th Ave H a r r i s R d O c o e e A p o p k a R d Butler A v e C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r C l i n g e r C o v e Rd L aur el Ridge Av e Exhibit 18 - 300' Buffer Map ² 300' Buffer 0 300 600 900 1,200ft Subject Area SubjectArea Property owners within 300' of the subject property, excluding ROWs and lakes. 282207494400130 CARTAGENA-PESANTE ANNIE A MORALES PEDRO ROMAN 282207000000037 DABIE RAVINDRA 282207000000085 ELLIOTT KENNETH W ELLIOTT SHIRLEY ANN 282207000000054 INNOVATION MONTESSORI INC 282207184200240 JONES HERBERT R 282207494400003 LAKEWOOD MANOR HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC 282208595606110 LOTT ELIZABETH ANNE 282207000000060 LOTT JOHNNIE PAUL JR 282207000000057 LOTT JOHNNIE PAUL JR 282206000000012 OCOEE GLAD TIDINGS ASSEMBLY OF GOD INC 282207000000038 PEREZ ROSA LOPEZ WILLIE 282207000000026 PROGRESS COMMERCE PARK LLC 282207000000061 ROBERTS EDMUND L 282207000000042 ROBERTS EDMUND L JR ROBERTS FRANCES A 282207000000043 RODGERS GLEN R RODGERS CONNIE J 282207184200050 THOMAS LAUREN M THOMAS STEPHEN R 282207184200200 VAN ELLS CHERYL L VAN ELLS MARTIN T 282207494400520 WRIGHT KESHA K 282207000000086 ASSEMBLY OF PENTACOSTAL CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST INC 282207494400210 BARNES JERMAINE M 282207184200001 CROWN POINT WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC 282206000000041 GABLE CAROLYN LIFE ESTATE REM: DONNA SUE GABLE 282206000000080 GABLE CAROLYN LIFE ESTATE REM: DONNA SUE GABLE 282208000000072 GOLDEN HILL PROPERTIES LLC 282207494400530 LOWE PHILIP J 282207494400200 MERCADO KENNETH TORRES AVILES MARIBELLE TOLEDO 282206000000026 MICHAEL WANDA JOAN MICHAEL ANTHONY WAYNE 282207000000036 MORSE DAVID C JR MORSE VICTORIA E 282207494400510 PERRY DESHON N 282207494400230 POKU ABENA P 282207494400500 ROBINSON FELICIA MURREL 282206000000040 RUSHING KALEN RUSHING STEPHANIE 282207000000068 SQUIRES CHARLES LIFE ESTATE REM: MARCIA G HENDERSON 282207000000015 WEST ORANGE GIRLS CLUB INC 282207000000021 WEST THOMAS SCOTT Exhibit 18(b) - List of Owners within 300' Buffer 282207000000049 ZACK INVESTMENTS LAKEWOOD AVENUE LLC 282207000000090 ZACK INVESTMENTS LAKEWOOD AVENUE LLC 282207000000048 ZACK INVESTMENTS LAKEWOOD AVENUE LLC 282207494400190 AZOR-RACINE LEONNE AZOR LECONTE 282208595601120 CHURCH OF GOD OCOEE 282208595601050 CHURCH OF GOD OCOEE 282207494400180 ESCALANTE LEONARDO 282208000000051 FARIAS MAE 282207494400150 FLOYD JANICE I 282207000000082 HARRISON DONALD W 282207000000100 HARRISON EDMOND O LIFE ESTATE REM: JONATHAN EDMOND HARRISON 282207184200230 HAWTHORNE STANTON HAWTHORNE ASHLEY 282207184200220 HOTALEN JOSIAH A HOTALEN JULIE M 282208000000082 JEMS INVESTMENTS LLC 282207000000072 MASK FAMILY TRUST 282207000000099 MASK FAMILY TRUST 282207000000074 MDTL ENTERPRISE LLC 282207000000041 MDTL ENTERPRISE LLC 282207000000105 MDTL ENTERPRISE LLC 282207000000039 MDTL ENTERPRISE LLC 282207000000087 MDTL ENTERPRISE LLC 282208000000090 MORALES JOSE ANTONIO GRANADOS ERIKA YANNETT 282207000000020 ORANGE COUNTY BCC 282208000000053 POTTER SUSAN E ESTATE POTTER KENNETH D 282207000000031 SAUCEDO PEREZ GREGORIO SAUZEDO GREGORY RICARDO 282207000000067 SAUCEDO PEREZ GREGORIO SAUZEDO GREGORY RICARDO 282207494400220 SEIFER PATRICK JOSEPH SEIFER AMY TOMPKINS 282207184200190 SEIFERT ROBERT E SEIFERT CAROLYN L 282207000000073 SMITH AGNES CHRISTINE 282207494400140 TAYLOR TIFFANY CARNEISHA 282207494400160 ANDERSON FELICIA S 282207494400001 CITY OF OCOEE 282206000000056 CITY OF OCOEE 282206000000055 CITY OF OCOEE 282207494400002 CITY OF OCOEE 282207000000083 DS SUNRISE INVESTMENTS LLC 282207000000071 FULLERS CROSSING 429 LLC 282207494400170 HUGHLEY-BROWN TRAMELANIE NICOLE BROWN WILLIE E JR 282207000000092 JOHNSTONE MARGARET A 282207184200180 KAUFFMAN JAMES B KAUFFMAN NATALIE A 282207000000084 LOPEZ FLORES JORGE 282207494400240 MCDERMOTT SHERYL LYN 282207184200060 MELENDEZ JAIME L 282207000000023 MONTIERRE DEVELOPMENT PLLC 282207000000001 MONTIERRE DEVELOPMENT PLLC 282207184200250 RITTEN DAVID L RITTEN ELLEN L 282207000000064 SORENSON SHAWN A SORENSON SHERRIE LYNN 282207000000050 SPIVEY BETTY J TR 282207494400540 TELLEZ HECTOR V TELLEZ MA DEL PILAR 407.894.5969 877.894.5969 407.894.5970 fax Orlando [Headquarters] 3025 East South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Jacksonville 11235 St. Johns Industrial Pkwy N Suite 2 Jacksonville, FL 32246 Key West 1107 Key Plaza Suite 259 Key West, FL 33040 Lantana 445 West Lantana Road Suite 5 Lantana, FL 33462 Tallahassee 2560-1 Barrington Circle Tallahassee, FL 32308 Tampa 6011 Benjamin Road Suite 101-B Tampa, FL 33634 Denver 651 Garrison Street #110 Lakewood, CO 80215 Raleigh-Durham 1408 Christian Avenue Suite 11 Durham, NC 27705 Bismarck 4501 Coleman Street Suite 103 Bismarck, ND 58503 Austin 3801 N Capital of TX Highway Suite E-240 Austin, TX 78746 Midland 5114 West County Road 12 Midland, TX 79706 San Antonio 7700 Broadway Street Suite 104 San Antonio, TX 78209 Orlando [Aquatic & Land Management Operations] 3825 Rouse Road Orlando, FL 32817 info@bio-techconsulting.com www.bio-techconsulting.com July 27, 2024 Jaime Douglas MDTL Enterprise, LLC 5669 SE Crooked Oak Avenue Hobe Sound, Florida 33455 Proj: Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Section 7, Township 22 South, Range 28 East (BTC File #597-33) Re: Updated Environmental Assessment Report Dear Mr. Douglas: In June and July of 2024, Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an updated environmental assessment of the approximately 150-acre Ocoee Sports Complex Site. This site is located in the City of Ocoee, just east of Ocoee Apopka Road, south of Fullers Cross Road and west of North Lakewood Avenue, within Section 7, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida (Figures 1 and 2). This environmental assessment included the following elements: • general review of site topography; • review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries; • evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; • delineation of any on-site wetland/surface water communities; • field review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna; and, • an overview of potential development constraints. TOPOGRAPHY Based upon a review of the USGS Topographic Map present in Figure 3 (Winter Garden, Florida Quadrangle), the subject property is relatively flat with elevations ranging from highs between +150 and +140 feet above the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD) on the eastern portion of the property, to below +110 feet NGVD on the northwestern portion of the site. A wetland area is depicted on the southern portion of the site on the available topographic map. In general, it would appear that the subject site slopes gradually from east to west, south and southwest, towards on- and off-site wetland and surface water areas. Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 2 of 13 SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), seven (7) soil types occur within the subject property boundaries (Figure 4). These soil types include the following: • Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#3) • Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (#15) • Immokalee fine sand (#20) • Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#26) • Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#40) • Smyrna-Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#44) • Zolfo fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#54) The following presents a brief description of each of the soil types mapped for the subject site: Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#3) is a nearly level, very poorly drained soil found in shallow depressions and sloughs and along edges of freshwater marshes and swamps. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 7 inches thick. The water table for this soil type is above the surface for 6 to 9 months or more each year and is within 12 inches of the surface for the rest of the year. Permeability of this soil type is rapid throughout. Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (#15) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on the floodplain of the Econlockhatchee River and other minor streams. This soil is flooded for very long periods following prolonged, intense rains. Typically, the surface layer of this soil type consists of very dark gray fine sand about 3 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 2 to 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and is moderate in the subsoil. Immokalee fine sand (#20) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. In most years the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 3 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate in the subsoil. Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 3 of 13 Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#26) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found in broad areas on the flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. In most years the seasonal high water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 2 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for periods of 6 months or more. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is moderate in the subsoil. Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#40) is a nearly level, very poorly drained soil found in freshwater marshes and swamps. Typically, the upper part of the organic surface layer of this soil type is black muck about 8 inches thick. In most years, undrained areas mapped with this soil type are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year except during extended dry periods. A seasonal high water table fluctuates between depths of about 10 inches and the surface. Permeability of this soil type is rapid throughout. Smyrna-Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#44) is a nearly level, poorly drained soil found on broad flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of black fine sand about 4 inches thick. The seasonal high-water table for this soil type is within 10 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches for more than 6 months. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum. It is moderate to moderately rapid in the subsoil. Zolfo fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#54) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soil found on broad, slightly higher positions adjacent to the flatwoods. The surface layer of this soil type generally consists of dark grayish brown fine sand about 5 inches thick. The seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 24 to 40 inches for 2 to 6 months. It is at a depth of 10 to 24 inches during periods of heavy rain. It recedes to a depth of about 60 inches during extended dry periods. Permeability of this soil type is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is moderate in the subsoil. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers the main components in the Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#3), Felda fine sand, frequently flooded (#15), Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#40) and Smyrna-Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#44) soil types associated with the site to be hydric. The FAESS also considers inclusions present in the Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#3), Felda fine sand, frequently flooded (#15), Immokalee fine sand (#20), Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (#26) and Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (#40) soil types associated with the site to be hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Fourth Edition (March 2007). Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 4 of 13 LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The subject site currently supports six (6) land use types/vegetative communities within its boundaries. These areas were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 1999) (Figure 5). The upland land use types/vegetative communities on the site are classified as Residential, Low Density (110), Open Land (190), Pine-Mesic Oak (414) and Upland Hardwood Forests (420). The wetland/surface water land use types/vegetative communities on the site are classified as Streams and Waterways (510) and Wetland Forested Mixed (630). The following provides a brief description of the land use types/vegetative communities identified on the site. Uplands: 110 Residential, Low Density The site contains several single-family residential homesites that are consistent with the Residential, Low Density (110) FLUCFCS classification. These homesites include occupied and vacant/abandoned residences. Vegetation observed within these areas includes live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora), chinaberry tree (Melia azedarach), sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), beggarticks (Bidens alba), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), guineagrass (Urochloa maxima), caesarweed (Urena lobata), lantana (Lantana strigocamara), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana) and common landscaping plants and shrubs. 190 Open Land The northern and southeastern portions of the site contain inactive agricultural land previously utilized for the production of citrus and other tree crops that is consistent with the Open Land (190) FLUCFCS classification. The southeastern area contains an abandoned warehouse within the open lands. Vegetation observed within this community type includes bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), broomsedge bluestem (Andorpogon virginicus), lantana (Lantana strigocamara), sedges (Carex spp. and Cyperus spp.), beggarticks (Bidens alba), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), dogfennel (Eupatorium cappillifolium), blackberry (Rubus cuneifolius), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta), guineagrass (Urochloa maxima), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), field sandspur (Krameria lanceolata), flat-topped goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia) and cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica). Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 5 of 13 414 Pine-Mesic Oak The site contains several forested upland areas with a mixture of hardwood and coniferous trees that are consistent with the Pine-Mesic Oak (414) FLUCFCS classification. Vegetation observed within this community type includes live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red bay (Persea borbonia), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), pond pine (Pinus serotina), red maple (Acer rubrum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora), Carolina laurel cherry (Prunus caroliniana), strawberry guava (Psidium cattleyanum), Chinese tallowtree (Triadica sebifera), Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra), coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata), caesarweed (Urena lobata), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), blackberry (Rubus cuneifolius), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia) and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). 420 Upland Hardwood Forests The southern portion of the site contains a forested community that is consistent with the Upland Hardwood Forests (420) FLUCFCS classification. Vegetation observed within this community includes live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), sand live oak (Quercus geminata), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), chinaberry tree (Melia azedarach), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora), earpod tree (Enterolobium contortisiliquum), Carolina laurel cherry (Prunus caroliniana), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), lantana (Lantana strigocamara), caesarweed (Urena lobata), winged sumac (Rhus copallium), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia), blackberry (Rubus cuneifolius), muscadine vine (Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbrier (Smilax spp.). Wetland/Surface Water: 510 Streams and Waterways The site contains excavated ditches that are most consistent with the Streams and Waterways (510) FLUCFCS classification. The ditch system on the northern portion of the site and the ditch along the southern boundary extend off-site to the west and connect to off-site wetlands and other surface waters. Vegetation observed within these ditches includes Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), soft rush (Juncus effusus), alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides), common dayflower (Commelina communis), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 6 of 13 virginica), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), smartweed (Persicaria punctatum), wild taro (Colocasia esculenta) and Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana). 630 Wetland Forested Mixed The site contains forested wetland systems that are consistent with the Wetland Forested Mixed (630) FLUCFCS classification. Vegetation observed within these wetlands includes slash pine (Pinus elliottii), pond pine (Pinus serotina), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), red bay (Persea borbonia), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), greenbrier (Smilax spp.), Carolina redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana), pipeworts (Eriocaulon spp.), Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana), coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata) and soft rush (Juncus effusus). UMAM The onsite wetlands were evaluated using the UMAM methodology to provide the City of Ocoee with a wetland quality assessment. The following scores have been assessed to all on-site wetland/surface waters within identified within the project boundaries: W-1 – 630 Wetland Forested Mixed Location Landscape Water Environment Community Structure Delta 4 4 5 4.33 W-2 – 630 Wetland Forested Mixed Location Landscape Water Environment Community Structure Delta 4 3 4 3.67 Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 7 of 13 W-3 – 630 Wetland Forested Mixed Location Landscape Water Environment Community Structure Delta 4 3 4 3.67 Based on the onsite assessment of the wetlands located within the subject property boundaries and detailed in the attached UMAM Parts I & II, the onsite wetlands would be considered low quality due to the surrounding land uses providing minimal habitat support , reduced water quality due to the existing inputs and drainage features, and mixture of exotic and invasive vegetative species that exist throughout the onsite wetlands. PROTECTED SPECIES Using methodologies outlined in the Florida’s Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC’s) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (April 2023); an updated assessment for listed floral and faunal species was conducted at the site in June & July 2024. This assessment included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations which indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are listed by the FWC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species (December 2022) and listed species that have the potential to occur in Orange County (see attached Table 1). No plant species listed as “Threatened” or “Endangered” by either The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) were identified on the site during the assessments conducted. However, three (3) species identified on the site are listed as commercially exploited by the FDACS. The harvesting of these species, cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis) and saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) for commercial gain is prohibited. The FDACS protection of listed plant species centers on preventing the illegal collection, transport and sale of the listed plants. The FDACS will issue permits for collection purposes. There are no regulations that prohibits the destruction of state-listed flora species as a result of proposed development activities. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified on the site during the evaluation of the property: Reptiles and Amphibians black racer (Coluber constrictor) brown anole (Anolis sagrei) Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 8 of 13 green anole (Anolis carolinensis) green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) six-lined racerunner (Cnemidophorus sexlineatus sexlineatus) southern cricket frog (Acris gryllus) southern leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus) Birds American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus) Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) Eastern Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) Great Egret (Ardea alba) Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) Red-bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo platypterus) Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) Mammals eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) feral pig (Sus scrofa) nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) North American raccoon (Procyon lotor) opossum (Didelphis virginiana) None of the above wildlife species are identified in the FWC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species (December 2022). The following provides a brief description of applicable species as they may relate to the development of the site. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) State Listed as “Threatened” by FWC Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 9 of 13 Currently the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is classified as a “Category 2 Candidate Species” by the USFWS, and as of September 2007 is now classified as “Threatened” by FWC, and as “Threatened” by FCREPA. The basis of the “Threatened” classification by the FWC for the gopher tortoise is due to habitat loss and destruction of burrows. Gopher tortoises are commonly found in areas with well-drained soils associated with the pine flatwoods, pastures and abandoned orange groves. Several other protected species known to occur in Orange County have a possibility of occurring in this area, as they are gopher tortoise commensal species. These species include the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Florida mouse (Podomys floridanus) and the gopher frog (Rana capito). However, none of these species were observed during the survey conducted. The FWC provides three (3) options for developers that have gopher tortoises on their site. These options include: 1) avoidance (i.e., maintain at least a 25-foot distance from construction activities), 2) preservation of habitat and 3) off-site relocation. Based on the expected site development plan, the likely option to addressing the on-site gopher tortoise population is off-site relocation and would require that any gopher tortoise within 25 feet of proposed construction activities be relocated off-site to an approved recipient site. Relocation will need to be permitted through FWC prior to any on-site construction activities. The subject site was surveyed for the existence of gopher tortoises through the use of pedestrian and vehicular transects. The survey covered approximately 90% of the suitable habitat present within the subject site boundaries. While no burrows were observed during the field assessment, a future survey should be completed at least 90 days prior to construction to ensure that no burrows or tortoises are located on the site. Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) Federally Listed as “Threatened” by USFWS The indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) is a federally threatened species. The basis for this listing was a result of dramatic population declines caused by over-collecting for the domestic and international pet trade as well as mortalities caused by rattlesnake collectors who gassed gopher tortoise burrows to collect snakes. Since its listing, habitat loss and fragmentation by residential and commercial expansion have become much more significant threats to the eastern indigo snake. This species is widely distributed throughout central and south Florida and primarily occurs in sandhill habitat in northern Florida and southern Georgia. No evidence of eastern indigo snakes was observed within the site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. Utilizing the 2013 USFWS’s Consultation Key for the Eastern Indigo Snake, the project will not result in the removal of more than 25 acres of Xeric Habitat (scrub, sandhill, Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 10 of 13 or scrubby pineflatwoods) or more than 25 active or inactive gopher tortoise burrows. Therefore, a key determination would result in a finding of “not likely to adversely affect.” During the ERP, State 404 or USACOE Dredge and Fill permit review process, the USFWS may determine that an Indigo Snake survey is required during the review of the project. The survey can be accomplished from October 1st thru April 30 for a minimum of five (5) surveys with 2 days of optimal weather (overnight low temperature above 60º F). It should also be noted that eastern indigo snake mitigation may be purchased in lieu of conducting the indigo snake survey. A FDEP 404 or USACOE Permit may also require following the Service’s Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake which will include, but not limited to, posting eastern indigo snake identification signage and educational material at the site, inspecting on-site holes and other refugia, as well as stopping construction to allow any indigo snake to safely vacate the project site. As long as the above mentioned “Standard Protection Measures” are adhered to, the development activities associated with the subject site would result in a key determination of “not likely to adversely affect” the eastern indigo snake. In addition, a FWC Conservation Permit to relocate Gopher tortoises will also contain permit conditions relating to the safety of indigo snakes. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FWC’s imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FWC’s Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A-16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FWC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. In November of 2017, the FWC issued “A Species Action Plan for the Bald Eagle” in response to the sunset of the 2008 Bald Eagle Management Plan. Under the USFWS’s management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. As provided within the above referenced Species Action Plan, the USFWS is the regulating body responsible for issuing permits for Bald Eagles. In 2017, the need to obtain a State permit (FWC) for the take of Bald Eagles or their nests in Florida was eliminated following revisions to Rule 68A-16.002, F.A.C.. A USFWS Bald Eagle “Non-Purposeful Take Permit” is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 11 of 13 660-foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest without a USFWS permit. In addition to the on-site evaluation for listed species, BTC conducted a review of FFWCC’s database (2015-2016 Nesting Season) and Audubon’s Eagle Watch program database (2020-2021 Nesting Season) for recorded Bald Eagle nests within the surrounding 660 feet of the subject site. This review revealed one (1) recorded Bald Eagle nest (identified by FFWCC as OR045) located on the south-central portion of the subject site (Figure 6B and attached Audubon EagleWatch Map). In June of 2023, BTC attempted to locate nest OR045. The nest was determined by BTC to be lost as it was no longer present at its recorded location. In addition, no Bald Eagles or other nests were observed within the nest territory at that time. It should be noted that Audubon EagleWatch determined nest OR045 to be “unknown” for the 2022 nesting season (Oct 2021 – May 2022). Therefore, it is not anticipated that any protective measures or permitting action will be required by the USFWS with regards to nest OR045. Thus, no developmental constraints are expected for the subject site with respect to Bald Eagle nests unless a new nest is found. BTC recommends that monitoring the subject site during the upcoming 2023-2024 Bald Eagle nesting season (October 1st through May 15th) to confirm that no new nests have been constructed within the site or within 660 feet of its boundaries. Additionally, some coordination with FFWCC and/or USFWS may be required to confirm the status of nest OR045 and/or to remove this nest from FFWCC’s records. Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) – Core Foraging Area State & Ferderally listed as “Threatened” by FWC & USFWS The subject site is located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area (Figure 6). Wood Storks typically nest colonially in medium to tall trees that occur in stands located either in swamps or on islands surrounded by relatively broad expanses of open water (Ogden 1991; Rodgers et al. 1996). The Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) is listed as “Threatened” by the USFWS. Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. Their plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely un-feathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Wood Storks are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. Successful breeding sites are those that have limited human disturbance and low exposure to land- based predators. Because of their specialized feeding behavior, Wood Storks forage most effectively in shallow-water areas with highly concentrated prey. Typical foraging sites for the Wood Stork include freshwater marshes, depressions in cypress heads, swamp sloughs, managed impoundments, stock ponds, shallow-seasonally flooded roadside or agricultural ditches and Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 12 of 13 narrow tidal creeks or shallow tidal pools. Good foraging conditions are characterized by water that is relatively calm, open, and having water depths between 5 and 15 inches (5 and 38 cm). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has identified core foraging area (CFA) around all known Wood Stork nesting colonies that is important for reproductive success. In Central Florida, CFAs include suitable foraging habitat (SFH) within a 15-mile radius of the nest colony; CFAs in North Florida include SFH within a 13-mile radius of a colony. The Service believes loss of suitable foraging wetlands within these CFAs may reduce foraging opportunities for the Wood Stork. Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the site or within close proximity. The USFWS require that any impacts to on-site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a portion of the Wood Stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through the purchase of mitigation credits or recreated elsewhere on-site so that there would be no net loss of Wood Stork foraging habitat. Most of these potential foraging habitats can be eliminated as potential foraging habitat due to a closed canopy, but most of the on-site ditches contain potential foraging habitat. The construction of the stormwater management system and the littoral shelves within the stormwater management ponds would likely produce a larger area of potential Wood Stork foraging habitat than will be impacted. No species-specific survey is anticipated if the design of the subject site is such that the Wood Stork foraging habitat is the same acreage in pre vs post development. However, the USFWS and/or another agency make the final determination as to if a species-specific survey is required. Please note that mitigation credits purchased for any wetland impact mitigation will also serve as Wood stork foraging mitigation. Jaime Douglas, MDTL Enterprise, LLC Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Updated Environmental Assessment Report (BTC File #597-33) Page 13 of 13 The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894-5969. Thank you. Regards, Nathan Johnson Field Biologist Daniel Gough Project Manager Attachments Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 1Location Map 0.5 Miles² Legend Ocoee Sports Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 22021 Aerial Map 600 Feet² Legend Ocoee Sp orts Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 3USGS Topog raphic Map 1,000 Feet² Legend Ocoee Sp orts Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) 3 44 26 54 15 54 44 54 40 20 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 4SSURGO Soils Map 700 Feet² Legend Ocoee Sports Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Orange County Soils 3 : Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 15 : Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 20 : Immokalee fine sand 26 : Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 40 : Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 44 : Smyrna-Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 54 : Zolfo fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 4AHydric Soils Rating 700 Feet² Legend Ocoee Spor ts Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Hydric Soils Rating 0% Hydric (or Not Rated) 1-32% Hydric 33-65% Hydric 66-99% Hydric 100% H ydric 190 414 414 630 630 510 510 510 510 630 110 190 110 190 414 414 414 110 420 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/22/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 5FLUCFCS Map 725 Feet² Legend Ocoee Sports Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) FLUCFCS 110 : Residential, Low Density 190 : Open Land 414 : Pine-Mesic Oak 420 : Upland Hardwood Forests 510 : Streams and Waterways 630 : Wetland Forested Mixed OR066 OR061 OR045 OR005 OR061a Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 6BWildlife Proxim ity 0.5 Miles² Legend Oco ee Sp ort s Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Wild lif e [b Audub on Ea glewatch Permanent ID [b Audub on Ea glewatch Temporary ID Buffers_330f t Buffers_660f t [b FFWCC Ea gle Nests 2016 !Æ Scrub -jays [r Red -cockade d Woodpecker [®Wading Bird Rookery %9 Panth er L ocations !F Wo od Sto rk Nesting Colonies Wo od Sto rk Nesting Colony Core Foraging Areas OR045 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 4/9/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 6CWildlife Proxim ity 600 Feet² Legend Ocoe e Sp orts Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Wildl ife [b Au dubo n Eagle watch Permanent ID [b Au dubo n Eagle watch Temporary ID Bu ffers_330 ft Bu ffers_660 ft [b FFWCC Eag le Nests 2016 !Æ Scru b-jays [r Red-cocka ded Woodpecker [®Wad ing Bird Ro okery %9 Pa nther Locatio ns !F Wood Stork N esting Colonies Wood Stork N esting Colony Core Foraging Areas OR066 OR061a OR061 OR045 OR005 Audubon EagleWatch Map © 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS © 2023 TomTom Bald Eagle Nest Locations Permanent 330ft Buffer Around Nest Locations 660ft Buffer Around Nest Locations 6/14/2023, 9:31:40 AM 0 0.55 1.10.28 mi 0 0.85 1.70.42 km 1:36,112 ArcGIS Web AppBuilder © 2023 Microsoft Corporation, © 2023 Maxar, ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS, © 2023 TomTom | Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status State Status REPTILES Alligator mississippiensis American alligator SAT FT(S/A) Drymarchon corais couperi eastern indigo snake LT FT Gopherus polyphemus gopher tortoise C ST Lampropeltis extenuata short-tailed snake N ST Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Florida pine snake N ST Plestiodon reynoldsi sand skink LT FT BIRDS Antigone canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane N ST Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay LT FT Athene cunicularia floridana Florida burrowing owl N ST Polyborus plancus audubonii Crested Caracara LT N Egretta caerulea little blue heron N ST Egretta tricolor tricolored heron N ST Falco sparverius paulus southeastern American kestrel N ST Mycteria americana wood stork LT FT Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker LE FE Platalea ajaja roseate spoonbill N ST Sterna antillarum least tern N ST MAMMALS N/A VASCULAR PLANTS Bonamia grandiflora Florida bonamia LT E Calopogon multiflorus Many-flowered Grass-pink N T Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N E Chionanthus pygmaeus Pygmy Fringe Tree LE E Clitoria fragrans Scrub Pigeon-Wing LT E Coelorachis tuberculosa piedmont jointgrass N LT Deeringothamnus pulchellus beautiful pawpaw LE E Eriogonum longifolium var gnaphalifolium scrub buckwheat LT E Glandularia tampensis Tampa Vervain N E Illicium parviflorum star anise N E Lechea cernua nodding pinweed N T Lechea divaricata Pine Pinweed N E Lupinus aridorum scrub lupine LE E Matelea floridana Florida spiny-pod N E Monotropa hypopithys pinesap N E Najas filifolia Narrowleaf Naiad N T Nemastylis floridana Celestial Lily N E Nolina atopocarpa Florida beargrass N T Nolina brittoniana Britton's beargrass LE E Ophioglossum palmatum hand fern N E Paronychia chartacea ssp chartacea paper-like nailwort LT E Pecluma plumula Plume Polypody N E Pecluma ptilota var. bourgeauana Comb Polypody N E Platanthera integra Yellow Fringeless Orchid N E Polygonella myriophylla Small's jointweed LE E Prunus geniculata scrub plum LE E Pteroglossaspis ecristata Giant Orchid N T Stylisma abdita scrub stylisma N E Warea amplexifolia clasping warea LE E Zephyranthes simpsonii redmargin lily N T Potentially Occuring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Orange County, FloridaTable 1: FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS LE-Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. SSC-Listed as Species of Special Concern by the FFWCC. Defined as a population which warrants special protection, recognition, or consideration because it has an inherent significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance, or substantial human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its becoming a threatened species. (SSC* for Pandion haliaetus (Osprey) indicates that this status applies in Monroe county only.) SAT-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. LT-Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. C-Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN-Non-essential experimental population. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. FE- Listed as Endangered Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service FT- Listed as Threatened Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service FXN- Federal listed as an experimental population in Florida FT(S/A)- Federal Threatened due to similarity of appearance ST- State population listed as Threatened by the FFWCC. Defined as a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is acutely vulnerable to environmental alteration, declining in number at a rapid rate, or whose range or habitat is decreasing in area at a rapid rate and as a consequence is destined or very likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future. ** State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) E-Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act. T-Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. Impact or Mitigation Site PART I - QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.) Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Ocoee Sports Complex W-1 FLUCFCS Code Further classification (optional) Assessment Area Size 630 Wetland Forested Mixed Impact 19.49 Basin/Watershed Name/Number Affected Waterbody (class) Special Classification (i.e. OFW, AP, other local/state/federal designation of importance) Southern Ocklawaha River none Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface waters, uplands AA is a portion of a fragmented wetland system that is surrounded by agricultural use lands (pasture), residential developments and roads. Rim ditching was observed along the western limits of the wetland. AA appears to be hydrologically connected to the on-site upland-cut drainage ditches and culverts which appear to connect to other off-site wetlands/surface waters associated with Lake Apopka. Assessment Area Description AA is a forested wetland community with a scattered, mixed canopy and subcanopy of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), pond pine (Pinus serotina), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), red bay (Persea borbonia), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) and Carolina laurel cherry (Prunus caroliniana); with an understory and groundcover consisting of fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), soft rush (Juncus effusus)greenbrier (Smilax spp.), Carolina redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana), pipeworts (Eriocaulon spp.), Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana) and coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata). Significant nearby features Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional landscape) East Fullers Cross Road is located to the north. Lake Apopka wetlands/surface waters are located to the east.AA commonly occurs within the central Florida region Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use wildlife utilization, food chain support and water filtration and storage None Anticipated Wildlife Utilization Based on Literature Review (List of species that are representative of the assessment area and reasonably expected to be found Anticipated Utilization by Listed Species (List species, their legal classification (E,T, SSC), type of use, and intensity of use of the assessment area) passerines, raptors, woodpeckers, reptiles, amphibians and small-to-medium- sized mammals None Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings nests, etc.): brown anole, black racer, southern cricket frog, raccoon, eastern gray squirrel, armadillo, American Crow, Blue Jay, Black Vulture, Northern Cardinal, Red-shouldered Hawk and Pileated Woodpecker Additional relevant factors: The existing AA upland buffer provides minimal quality of wetland buffering and coverage for wetland dependent wildlife. Wetland "edge effect" from established nuisance and exotic plant species observed within the AA. Degraded hydrologic regime within the AA due to fragmentation and impacts from surrounding historical/current land uses. Minimal regeneration of canopy and subcanopy species. Snags and downed trees were observed within the overall wetland. Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): Nathan Johnson 6/7/2023 w/o pres or current with 40 w/o pres or current with 40 w/o pres or current with 50 w/o pres or current with 0.43 0.00 PART II - Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Section 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.) Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Ocoee Sports Complex W-1 Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: Impact Nathan Johnson 6/7/2023 Scoring Guidance Optimal (10) Moderate (7) Minimal (4) Not Present (0) The scoring of each indicator is based on what would be suitable for the type of wetland or surface water assessed Condition is optimal and fully supports wetland/surface water functions Condition is less than optimal, but sufficient to maintain most wetland/surface water functions Minimal level of support of wetland/surface water functions Condition is insufficient to provide wetland/surface water functions .500 (6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Location and landscape provide limited quality of habitat support outside of the AA. Wetland function is reduced to 40% of optimal ecological value. AA provides no benefits to downstream or hydrologically connected areas. Adjacent road and residential developments provide some wildlife barriers. .500 (6)(b) Water Environment (n/a for uplands)Poor water quality degraded (40%) from nutrient loading and associated absence of an adequate vegetated upland buffer and direct run-off from the surrounding landscape. The plant community composition consists of species tolerant of and associated with moderate water quality degradation or alterations in frequency, depth and duration in inundation or saturation. Evidence of hydrologic stress observed. .500 (6)(c) Community structure 1. Vegetation and/or 2. Benthic Community The vegetative composition of the AA is 50% of optimal ecological value and consists of a mixture of desirable vegetative species and a variety of well-established invasive exotic and/or other invasive plant species. Minimal regeneration of canopy and subcanopy species. Snags and downed trees were observed within the overall wetland. Score = sum of above scores/30 (if uplands, divide by 20) If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas Preservation adjustment factor = FL = delta x acres =-8.446Adjusted mitigation delta = If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) =-0.43 Risk factor = Impact or Mitigation Site Nathan Johnson Ocoee Apopka Road and Lake Apopka wetlands/surface waters are located to the east.AA commonly occurs within the central Florida region Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use wildlife utilization, food chain support and water filtration and storage brown anole, black racer, southern cricket frog, raccoon, eastern gray squirrel, armadillo, American Crow, Blue Jay, Black Vulture, Northern Cardinal, Red-shouldered Hawk and Pileated Woodpecker 6/7/2023 None Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface waters, uplands AA is a small, hydrologically isolated wetland area surrounded by historically disturbed forested uplands and agricultural use lands (pasture). Assessment Area Description AA is a small, isolated wetland area with a mixed canopy and subcanopy of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), pond pine (Pinus serotina), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), red bay (Persea borbonia), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) and Carolina laurel cherry (Prunus caroliniana); with an understory and groundcover consisting of fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), soft rush (Juncus effusus)greenbrier (Smilax spp.), Carolina redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana), pipeworts (Eriocaulon spp.), Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana) and coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata). Significant nearby features Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional landscape) Basin/Watershed Name/Number Affected Waterbody (class) Special Classification (i.e. OFW, AP, other local/state/federal designation of importance) Southern Ocklawaha River none FLUCFCS Code Further classification (optional) Assessment Area Size 630 Wetland Forested Mixed Impact 1.10 PART I - QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.) Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Ocoee Sports Complex W-2 Highly established nuisance and exotic plant species observed within the AA. Degraded hydrologic regime (dry, sandy soils) within the AA due to fragmentation and impacts from surrounding historical/current land uses. Assessment conducted by: Anticipated Wildlife Utilization Based on Literature Review (List of species that are representative of the assessment area and reasonably expected to be found Anticipated Utilization by Listed Species (List species, their legal classification (E,T, SSC), type of use, and intensity of use of the assessment area) passerines, raptors, woodpeckers, reptiles, amphibians and small-to-medium- sized mammals None Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings nests, etc.): Additional relevant factors: Assessment date(s): w/o pres or current with 40 w/o pres or current with 30 w/o pres or current with 40 w/o pres or current with 0.37 0.00 If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) =-0.37 Risk factor = Score = sum of above scores/30 (if uplands, divide by 20) If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas Preservation adjustment factor = FL = delta x acres =-0.403Adjusted mitigation delta = .500 (6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Location and landscape provide limited quality of habitat support outside of the AA. Wetland function is reduced to 40% of optimal ecological value. AA provides no benefits to downstream or hydrologically connected areas. .500 (6)(b) Water Environment (n/a for uplands)Poor water quality degraded from altered hydrology (dry, sandy soils) and 30% optimal value. The plant community composition includes species tolerant of and associated with moderate water quality degradation or alterations in frequency, depth and duration in inundation or saturation. .500 (6)(c) Community structure 1. Vegetation and/or 2. Benthic Community The vegetative composition of the AA consists of a mixture of desirable vegetative species and a variety of well- established invasive exotic and/or other invasive plant species. Scoring Guidance Optimal (10) Moderate (7) Minimal (4) Not Present (0) The scoring of each indicator is based on what would be suitable for the type of wetland or surface water assessed Condition is optimal and fully supports wetland/surface water functions Condition is less than optimal, but sufficient to maintain most wetland/surface water functions Minimal level of support of wetland/surface water functions Condition is insufficient to provide wetland/surface water functions Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: Impact Nathan Johnson 6/7/2023 PART II - Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Section 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.) Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Ocoee Sports Complex W-2 Impact or Mitigation Site PART I - QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION (See Section 62-345.400, F.A.C.) Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Ocoee Sports Complex W-3 FLUCFCS Code Further classification (optional) Assessment Area Size 630 Wetland Forested Mixed Impact 1.35 Basin/Watershed Name/Number Affected Waterbody (class) Special Classification (i.e. OFW, AP, other local/state/federal designation of importance) Southern Ocklawaha River none Geographic relationship to and hydrologic connection with wetlands, other surface waters, uplands AA is a small, hydrologically isolated wetland area surrounded by historically disturbed forested uplands and agricultural use lands (pasture). Assessment Area Description AA is a small isolated wetland area with a mixed canopy and subcanopy of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), pond pine (Pinus serotina), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), red bay (Persea borbonia), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) and Carolina laurel cherry (Prunus caroliniana); with an understory and groundcover consisting of fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis), Virginia chain fern (Woodwardia virginica), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), soft rush (Juncus effusus)greenbrier (Smilax spp.), Carolina redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana), pipeworts (Eriocaulon spp.), Peruvian primrosewillow (Ludwigia peruviana) and coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata). Significant nearby features Uniqueness (considering the relative rarity in relation to the regional landscape) Ocoee Apopka Road and Lake Apopka wetlands/surface waters are located to the east.AA commonly occurs within the central Florida region Functions Mitigation for previous permit/other historic use wildlife utilization, food chain support and water filtration and storage None Anticipated Wildlife Utilization Based on Literature Review (List of species that are representative of the assessment area and reasonably expected to be found Anticipated Utilization by Listed Species (List species, their legal classification (E,T, SSC), type of use, and intensity of use of the assessment area) passerines, raptors, woodpeckers, reptiles, amphibians and small-to-medium- sized mammals None Observed Evidence of Wildlife Utilization (List species directly observed, or other signs such as tracks, droppings, casings nests, etc.): brown anole, black racer, southern cricket frog, raccoon, eastern gray squirrel, armadillo, American Crow, Blue Jay, Black Vulture, Northern Cardinal, Red-shouldered Hawk and Pileated Woodpecker Additional relevant factors: Highly established nuisance and exotic plant species observed within the AA. Moderate degradation of the hydrologic regime within the AA due to fragmentation and impacts from surrounding historical/current land uses. Assessment conducted by: Assessment date(s): Nathan Johnson 6/7/2023 w/o pres or current with 40 w/o pres or current with 30 w/o pres or current with 40 w/o pres or current with 0.37 0.00 PART II - Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Section 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.) Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number Ocoee Sports Complex W-3 Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: Impact Nathan Johnson 6/7/2023 Scoring Guidance Optimal (10) Moderate (7) Minimal (4) Not Present (0) The scoring of each indicator is based on what would be suitable for the type of wetland or surface water assessed Condition is optimal and fully supports wetland/surface water functions Condition is less than optimal, but sufficient to maintain most wetland/surface water functions Minimal level of support of wetland/surface water functions Condition is insufficient to provide wetland/surface water functions .500 (6)(a) Location and Landscape Support Location and landscape provide limited quality of habitat support outside of the AA. Wetland function is reduced to 40% of optimal ecological value. AA provides minimal benefits to downstream or hydrologically connected areas. .500 (6)(b) Water Environment (n/a for uplands)Poor water quality degraded from altered hydrology (some dry, sandy soils) and 30% optimal ecological value. The plant community composition includes both desirable species and undesirable species tolerant of and associated with moderate water quality degradation or alterations in frequency, depth and duration in inundation or saturation. .500 (6)(c) Community structure 1. Vegetation and/or 2. Benthic Community The vegetative composition of the AA consists of a mixture of desirable vegetative species and a variety of well- established invasive exotic and/or other invasive plant species. Score = sum of above scores/30 (if uplands, divide by 20) If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas Preservation adjustment factor = FL = delta x acres =-0.495Adjusted mitigation delta = If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) =-0.37 Risk factor = W-1 W-2 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 W-3 W-4Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGR ID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Project #: 597-33Produced By: EMDate: 6/24/2024 Ocoee Sports Complex SiteOrange County, FloridaFigure 8Wetlands & Surface Waters 530 Feet² Legend Ocoee Sports Complex Site (± 150.91 Ac.) Wetlands W-1, ± 19.49 Ac. W-2, ± 1.1 Ac. W-3, ± 1.35 Ac. Surface Waters SW-1, ± 0.06 Ac. SW-2, ± 1.15 Ac. SW-3, ± 0.38 Ac. SW-4, ± 0.38 Ac. 407.894.5969 877.894.5969 407.894.5970 fax Orlando [Headquarters] 3025 East South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Jacksonville 11235 St. Johns Industrial Pkwy N Suite 2 Jacksonville, FL 32246 Key West 1107 Key Plaza Suite 259 Key West, FL 33040 Lantana 445 West Lantana Road Suite 5 Lantana, FL 33462 Tallahassee 2560-1 Barrington Circle Tallahassee, FL 32308 Tampa 6011 Benjamin Road Suite 101-B Tampa, FL 33634 Denver 651 Garrison Street #110 Lakewood, CO 80215 Raleigh-Durham 1408 Christian Avenue Suite 11 Durham, NC 27705 Bismarck 4501 Coleman Street Suite 103 Bismarck, ND 58503 Austin 3801 N Capital of TX Highway Suite E-240 Austin, TX 78746 Midland 5114 West County Road 12 Midland, TX 79706 San Antonio 7700 Broadway Street Suite 104 San Antonio, TX 78209 Orlando [Aquatic & Land Management Operations] 3825 Rouse Road Orlando, FL 32817 info@bio-techconsulting.com www.bio-techconsulting.com August 13, 2024 Anoch Whitfield City of Ocoee 1 North Bluford Avenue Ocoee, Florida 34761 Proj: Ocoee Sports Complex Site – Ocoee, Orange County, Florida Section 7, Township 22 South, Range 28 East (BTC File #597-33) Re: Monitoring & Maintenance Plan Dear Ms. Whitfield: Based on discussions with City staff for the above referenced project site, a Monitoring and Maintenance Plan is being provided to detail the proposed mitigation within the City of Ocoee limits for the Ocoee Sports Complex project. The mitigation plan is as follows: The mitigation tracts proposed for restoration include approximately 287.82 acres located within the City of Ocoee limits (see attached Figures). The mitigation tracts will be monitored and maintained by the Ocoee Sports Complex entity per the following plan: The wetland and upland restoration areas will be monitored on an annual basis and maintained on a quarterly basis so that exotic species, per the most up-to- date FLEPPC list, do not exceed 5% aerial coverage. Permanent transects will be established in the restoration areas to obtain accurate vegetative data. Maintenance will be implemented on a quarterly basis with the goal of the event being the elimination the exotic component (i.e., 0% after event). Exotic/Nuisance vegetation observed throughout the mitigation areas includes, but not limited to, Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera), greenbrier (Smilax spp.), Peruvian primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), wild taro (Colocasia esculenta), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), cattail (Typha domingensis), caesarweed (Urena lobata), coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata), air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), torpedo grass (Panicum repens), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica), Japanese climbing fern (Lygodium japonicum), and muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia) The mitigation tracts will be monitored and maintained to eradicate all exotic species and consist of a native wetland and upland habitats. The mitigation tracts will be monitored with the following criteria: Vegetation Monitoring The monitoring will consist of general qualitative observations in the mitigation areas. A summary of the data collected will be included in an annual report submitted to the City each year in February. The recorded data obtained from the vegetative monitoring will be provided to the City in report form and will be submitted on an annual basis. Reports will include the following: A. The dates and time of the monitoring event. B. The person responsible for performing the measurements. C. The analytical techniques or methods utilized. D. The results of such analyses including: 1. Status of invader species 2. Coverage by wetland and FACW vegetation. 3. A description of any problems encountered during evaluation and proposed solutions. 4. Panoramic photographs of the area. In addition to the vegetative portion of the monitoring to be conducted, wildlife information will also be gathered and described in the report. Success Criteria As part of the activities that are designed to achieve the restoration of the mitigation tracts, the success criteria for the mitigation areas will consist of the following: Mitigation Tracts Greater than 80 percent coverage by desirable species after 5 years, Less than 5 percent areal coverage by exotic species. The success criteria for the mitigation areas will consist of greater than 80 percent coverage by desirable species after 5 years, and less than 5 percent areal coverage by exotic species to retain a natural condition. MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE Specific management practices will be employed within the mitigation areas that will consist of hand clearing activities and the utilization of herbicidal applications to eliminate invasive and exotic species, as needed. These management practices will be implemented in an effort to control and eradicate any invasive, exotic, or opportunistic species within the mitigation areas. These management practices will be employed within the mitigation areas, initially on a quarterly basis and in perpetuity. All portions of the project’s mitigation areas will be managed for the benefit of wildlife and vegetative composition. Obviously, the most important component of the management is treatment for control of invasive and exotic vegetation, in perpetuity. It is anticipated that the mitigation areas will require little long-term management once the natural systems succeed ecologically and become self-perpetuating. Maintenance will include removal of any invasive or exotic plant species. No more than a 5% total coverage of such exotic or nuisance species shall occur between maintenance events. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at (407) 894-5969. Thank you. Regards, Daniel Gough Project Manager John Miklos President attachments Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User C ommunity Project #:Produced By: JDHDate: 8/16/2024 Tra ct AOrange County, FloridaFigure 22023 A erial Photog rap h 1,25 0 Feet² Legend Tra ct A (± 262 .42 ac.) Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User C ommunity Project #:Produced By: JDHDate: 8/16/2024 Tra ct BOrange County, FloridaFigure 22023 A erial Photog rap h 500 Feet² Legend Tra ct B (± 9 .90 ac.) Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User C ommunity Project #:Produced By: JDHDate: 8/16/2024 Tract COrange County, FloridaFigure 22023 A erial Photog rap h 500 Feet² Legend Tra ct C (± 15.50 ac.) The 2019 list was prepared by the FLEPPC Plant List Committee Tony Pernas, Co-Chair, 2017-2019, National Park Service, Big Cypress National Preserve, tony_pernas@nps.gov Dennis Giardina, Co-Chair, 2017-2019, Florida Fish and Wild- life Conservation Commission, dennis.giardina@myfwc.com Janice Duquesnel, Florida Park Service, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, janice.duquesnel@dep.state.fl.us Alan Franck, Florida International University, Department of Biological Sciences, afranck@fiu.edu Roger L. Hammer, Retired Naturalist and Author, kaskazi44@comcast.net John Kunzer, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, john.kunzer@myfwc.com James Lange, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, jlange@fairchildgarden.org Kenneth Langeland, Professor Emeritus, University of Florida/IFAS, Agronomy Department, gator8@ufl.edu Deah Lieurance, University of Florida/IFAS, Agronomy Department, dmlieurance@ufl.edu Chris Lockhart, Habitats Specialists Inc., chris@lockharts.org Jean McCollom, Natural Ecosystems, jeanm@naples.net Gil Nelson, Professor Emeritus, Florida State University/ iDigBio, gilnelson@bio.fsu.edu Jennifer Possley, Fairchild Topical Botanic Garden, jpossley@fairchildgarden.org Jimi L. Sadle, National Park Service, Everglades National Park, jimi_sadle@nps.gov Dexter Sowell, Florida State University, FNAI, dsowell@fnai.fsu.edu Jessica Spencer, US Army Corps of Engineers, jessica.e.spencer@usace.army.mil Arthur Stiles, Florida Park Service, arthur.stiles@dep.state.fl.us Richard P. Wunderlin, Professor Emeritus, University of South Florida, rwunder@usf.edu FLEPPC List Definitions: Exotic—a species introduced to Florida, purpose- fully or accidentally, from a natural range outside of Florida. Native—a species whose natural range includes Florida. Naturalized exotic—an exotic that sustains itself outside cultivation (it is still exotic; it has not “become” native). Invasive exotic— an exotic that has not only naturalized, but is expanding on its own in Florida native plant communities. Zone: N = north, C = central, S = south, Referring to each species’ general distribution in regions of Florida (not its potential range in the state). Please refer to the map below. north central south Citation example: FLEPPC. 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Internet: www.fleppc.org Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species The mission of the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council is to reduce the impacts of invasive plants in Florida through the exchange of scientific, educational, and technical information. Note: The FLEPPC List of Invasive Plant Species is not a regulatory list. Only those plants listed as Federal Noxious Weeds, Florida Noxious Weeds, Florida Prohibited Aquatic Plants, or in local ordinances are regulated by law. Purpose of the List To provide a list of plants determined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council to be invasive in natural areas of Florida and routinely update the list based upon information of newly identified occurrences and changes in distribution over time. Also, to focus attention on: • The adverse effects exotic pest plants have on Florida’s biodiversity and native plant communities, • The habitat losses in natural areas from exotic pest plant infestations, • The impacts on endangered species via habitat loss and alteration, • The need for pest plant management, • The socio-economic impacts of these plants (e.g., increased wildfires or flooding in certain areas), • Changes in the severity of different pest plant infestations over time, • Providing information to help managers set priorities for research and control programs. www.fleppc.org For more information on invasive exotic plants including links to related web pages, visit: www.fleppc.org CATEGORY I Invasive exotics that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing community structures or ecological functions, or hybridizing with natives. This definition does not rely on the economic severity or geographic range of the problem, but on the documented ecological damage caused. Scientific Name Abrus precatorius Acacia auriculiformis Albizia julibrissin Albizia lebbeck Ardisia crenata Ardisia elliptica Asparagus aethiopicus Bauhinia variegata Bischofia javanica Calophyllum antillanum Casuarina equisetifolia Casuarina glauca Cenchrus purpureus (Pennisetum purpureum) Cinnamomum camphora Colocasia esculenta Colubrina asiatica Cupaniopsis anacardioides Deparia petersenii Dioscorea alata Dioscorea bulbifera Dolichandra unguis-cati (Macfadyena unguis-cati) Eichhornia crassipes Eugenia uniflora Ficus microcarpa1 Hydrilla verticillata Hygrophila polysperma Hymenachne amplexicaulis Imperata cylindrica Ipomoea aquatica Jasminum dichotomum Jasminum fluminense Lantana strigocamara2 Ligustrum lucidum Ligustrum sinense Lonicera japonica Ludwigia peruviana Lumnitzera racemosa Luziola subintegra Lygodium japonicum Lygodium microphyllum Manilkara zapota Melaleuca quinquenervia Common Name rosary pea earleaf acacia mimosa, silk tree woman's tongue coral ardisia shoebutton ardisia asparagus fern orchid tree bishopwood Santa Maria Australian-pine suckering Australian-pine elephantgrass, Napier grass camphor-tree wild taro latherleaf carrotwood Japanese false spleenwort winged yam air potato cat's-claw vine water-hyacinth Surinam cherry laurel fig hydrilla green hygro West Indian marsh grass cogongrass water-spinach Gold Coast jasmine Brazilian Jasmine lantana, shrub verbena glossy privet Chinese privet Japanese honeysuckle Peruvian primrosewillow black mangrove Tropical American watergrass Japanese climbing fern Old World climbing fern sapodilla melaleuca, paper bark Zone C, S C, S N, C C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S C, S S N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S S C, S N, C N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C C, S C, S N, C, S N, C N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S S S N, C, S N, C, S S C, S Scientific Name Melinis repens Microsorum grossum4 Microstegium vimineum Mimosa pigra Nandina domestica Nephrolepis brownii Nephrolepis cordifolia Neyraudia reynaudiana Nymphoides cristata Paederia cruddasiana Paederia foetida Panicum repens Pistia stratiotes Psidium cattleianum Psidium guajava Pueraria montana var. lobata Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Ruellia simplex Salvinia minima Scaevola taccada Schefflera actinophylla Schinus terebinthifolia Scleria lacustris Scleria microcarpa* Senna pendula var. glabrata Solanum tampicense Solanum viarum Sporobolus jacquemontii Syngonium podophyllum Syzygium cumini Tectaria incisa Thelypteris opulenta Thespesia populnea Tradescantia fluminensis Tradescantia spathacea Triadica sebifera (Sapium sebiferum) Urena lobata Urochloa mutica Vitex rotundifolia Common Name Natalgrass serpent fern, wart fern Japanese stiltgrass catclaw mimosa heavenly bamboo, nandina Asian sword fern sword fern Burma reed crested floatingheart sewer vine skunk vine torpedograss water-lettuce stawberry guava guava kudzu downy rose-myrtle Mexican petunia water spangles beach naupaka, half-flower schefflera, umbrella tree Brazilian pepper Wright's nutrush tropical nutrush Christmas senna, climbing cassia wetland night shade tropical soda apple West Indian dropseed arrowhead vine Java plum incised halberd fern jeweled maidenhair fern seaside mahoe small-leaf spiderwort oyster plant Chinese tallow-tree Caesar's weed paragrass beach vitex Zone C, S S N C, S N, C C, S N, C, S S C, S S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S C, S C, S C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S S S C, S N, C C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S N Scientific Name Adenanthera pavonina Agave sisalana Alstonia macrophylla Alternanthera philoxeroides Antigonon leptopus Ardisia japonica Aristolochia elegans (Aristolochia littoralis) Asystasia gangetica Begonia cucullata Broussonetia papyrifera Bruguiera gymnorrhiza Callisia fragrans Casuarina cunninghamiana Cecropia palmata Cenchrus polystachios (Pennisetum polystachios) Cenchrus setaceus (Pennisetum setaceum) Cestrum diurnum Chamaedorea seifrizii Clematis terniflora Cocos nucifera Crassocephalum crepidioides Cryptostegia madagascariensis Cyperus involucratus Cyperus prolifer Dactyloctenium aegyptium Dalbergia sissoo Dalechampia scandens* Distimake tuberosus (Merremia tuberosa) Dracaena hyacinthoides (Sansevieria hyacinthoides) Elaeagnus pungens Elaeagnus umbellata Epipremnum pinnatum cv. ‘Aureum’ Eulophia graminea Ficus altissima Flacourtia indica Hemarthria altissima Heteropterys brachtiata Hyparrhenia rufa Ipomoea carnea subsp fistulosa Kalanchoe x houghtonii Kalanchoe pinnata Common Name red sandalwood sisal hemp devil tree alligatorweed coral vine Japanese ardisia calico flower Ganges primrose wax begonia paper mulberry large-leafed mangrove Inch plant river sheoak trumpet tree mission grass fountain grass day jessamine bamboo palm Japanese clematis coconut palm redflower ragleaf Madagascar rubbervine umbrella plant dwarf papyrus Durban crow's-foot grass Indian rosewood, sissoo spurge-creeper Spanish arbor vine, wood-rose bowstring hemp silverthorn, thorny olive autumn olive, silverberry pothos Chinese crown orchid council tree, false banyan governor's plum limpograss redwing jaragua shrub morning-glory mother of millions life plant Zone S C, S S N, C, S N, C, S N N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S S C, S C, S S S S C, S S N, C S C, S C, S C, S C, S C, S C, S S C, S C, S N, C N C, S C, S S S C, S S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S Scientific Name Koelreuteria elegans subsp. formosana Landoltia punctata Leucaena leucocephala Limnophila sessiliflora Livistona chinensis Macroptilium lathyroides Melaleuca viminalis (Callistemon viminalis) Melia azedarach Melinis minutiflora Mikania micrantha Momordica charantia Murraya paniculata Myriophyllum spicatum Passiflora biflora Phoenix reclinata Phyllostachys aurea Pittosporum pentandrum Platycerium bifurcatum Praxelis clematidea Pteris vittata Ptychosperma elegans Richardia grandiflora Ricinus communis Rotala rotundifolia Ruellia blechum Sesbania punicea Sida planicaulis Solanum diphyllum Solanum torvum Spermacoce verticillata3 Sphagneticola trilobata Stachytarpheta cayennensis Syagrus romanzoffiana Syzygium jambos Talipariti tiliaceum Terminalia catappa Terminalia muelleri Tribulus cistoides Urochloa maxima (Panicum maximum) Vernicia fordii Vitex trifolia Washingtonia robusta Wisteria sinensis Xanthosoma sagittifolium Common Name flamegold tree spotted duckweed leadtree Asian marshweed Chinese fan palm wild bushbean bottlebrush Chinaberry molasses grass mile-a-minute vine balsam-apple orange-jessamine Eurasian water-milfoil twin-flowered passion vine Senegal date palm golden bamboo Taiwanese cheesewood staghorn fern praxelis Chinese brake, ladder brake solitary palm largeflower Mexican clover castorbean dwarf rotala, roundleaf toothcup green shrimp plant rattlebox mata-pasto twinleaf nightshade turkey berry shrubby false buttonweed wedelia nettle-leaf porterweed queen palm Malabar plum, rose-apple mahoe, sea hibiscus tropical-almond Australian–almond puncture vine, burr-nut Guineagrass tung-oil tree simple-leaf chastetree Washington fan palm Chinese wisteria malanga, elephant ear Zone C, S N, C, S N, C, S N,C, S C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C S S N, C, S S N, C, S S C, S N, C S S C N, C, S S N, C, S N, C, S S N, C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S S C, S N, C, S C, S C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S C, S N, C N, C, S 1 Does not include Ficus microcarpa var. fuyuensis, which is sold as “green island ficus”. 2 Historically this non-native has been referred to as Lantana camara, a species not known to occur in Florida. 3 Does not include the native endemic Spermacoce neoterminalis. 4 Microsorum grossum has been previously misidentified as Microsorum scolopendria. * Added to the FLEPPC List of Invasive Species in 2019. Plant names are those published in the Atlas of Florida Plants (http://www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu). For historical specie s nomenclature see “Guide to Vascular Plants of Florida Third Edition.” Wunderlin and Hansen, University of Florida Press. 2011. CATEGORY II Invasive exotics that have increased in abundance or frequency but have not yet altered Florida plant communities to the extent shown by Category 1 species. These species may become Category 1 if ecological damage is demonstrated. Ocoee Regional Sports Complex – Ocoee, FL Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis City of Ocoee, FL Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. September 2024 ãKimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2024 K:\ORL_TPTO\249346000_Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Trans Serv\02_Documentation\02_TIA\OcoeeRegionalSportsComplex_TIA_2024.09.docx Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. i Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS – YEAR 2023 ..................................................................... 4 2.1 Existing Data ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Existing Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................... 4 3.0 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ........................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Trip Generation.......................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Trip Distribution ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Trip Assignment....................................................................................................................... 11 4.0 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ANALYSIS – YEAR 2027 .......................................................... 20 4.1 Background Traffic .................................................................................................................. 20 4.2 Future Improvements ............................................................................................................... 20 4.3 Background Intersection Analysis ............................................................................................ 20 5.0 BUILDOUT CONDITIONS ANALYSIS – YEAR 2027 .................................................................. 26 5.1 Buildout Traffic ........................................................................................................................ 26 5.2 Buildout Intersection Analysis .................................................................................................. 26 5.3 Buildout Turn Lane Analysis .................................................................................................... 36 Driveway 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 36 Driveway 5 ..................................................................................................................................... 36 Driveway 6 ..................................................................................................................................... 36 Driveway 8 ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension ............................................................................ 37 Lakewood Avenue and 17th Avenue Extension ................................................................................ 37 6.0 ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 38 7.0 MULTIMODAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 41 8.0 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 42 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ii List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location & Study Intersections ................................................................................ 3 Figure 2: Existing Volumes ................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3a: Project Trip Distribution .................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3b: Project Trip Distribution (Zoom In) ................................................................................... 13 Figure 3c: Project Trip Distribution (Zoom In) ................................................................................... 14 Figure 3d: Project Trip Distribution (Zoom In) ................................................................................... 15 Figure 4a:Project Trip Assignment .................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4b:Project Trip Assignment (Zoom In) ................................................................................... 17 Figure 4c:Project Trip Assignment (Zoom In) ................................................................................... 18 Figure 4d: Project Trip Assignment (Zoom In) ................................................................................... 19 Figure 5: Background (2027) Intersection Volumes ........................................................................... 23 Figure 6a: Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes ............................................................................... 28 Figure 6b: Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes (Zoom In) .............................................................. 29 Figure 6c: Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes (Zoom In) .............................................................. 30 Figure 6d: Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes (Zoom In) .............................................................. 31 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. iii List of Tables Table 1:Existing (2023) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour) ............................................. 6 Table 2:Existing (2023) Intersection Conditions (Saturday Peak Hour).................................................... 7 Table 3:Trip Generation Summary (Weekday) ........................................................................................ 9 Table 4:Trip Generation Summary (Saturday) ...................................................................................... 10 Table 5:Background (2027) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour) .................................... 24 Table 6:Background (2027) Intersection Conditions (Saturday Peak Hour) ........................................... 25 Table 7:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour) .......................................... 32 Table 8:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour)- 2 ..................................... 33 Table 9:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Saturday PM Peak Hour) ........................................... 34 Table 10:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Saturday PM Peak Hour) -2 .................................... 35 Table 11:Turn Lane Analysis Summary ................................................................................................ 36 Table 12:Existing Roadway Segment Analysis (Weekday Daily Conditions) ......................................... 39 Table 13:Future Roadway Segment Analysis (Weekday Daily Conditions)............................................ 40 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. iv Appendices Appendix A:TIA Methodology Appendix B:Site Plan Appendix C:Turning Movement Counts Appendix D:FDOT’s Florida Traffic Online (FTO) Data Appendix E:Turning Movement Volume Worksheets Appendix F: Signal Timings Appendix G:Synchro Outputs Appendix H: Funded Transportation Improvements Appendix I: NCHRP Report 457 Worksheets Appendix J:City of Ocoee’s CMS (10/18/2023) Appendix K: LYNX Route Map Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn has been retained to analyze and document the traffic impacts associated with the development of Ocoee Regional Sports Complex, a proposed recreational complex bounded by Ocoee- Apopka Road (CR 437) to the west and E Fullers Cross Road to the north in the City of Ocoee, Florida. The methodology and correspondence used to guide this transportation analysis are provided in Appendix A. Ocoee Regional Sports Complex is proposed to consist of the following: · 17 baseball fields · 1,114 cumulative rooms within 3 hotels · 160,000 square feet of community center o 150,000 square feet of indoor sports facilities o 10,000 square feet of corporate offices · 360,000 square feet of retail o 20,000 square feet of welcome center o 130,000 square feet of retail o 130,000 square feet of restaurants o 50,000 square feet of entertainment o 30,000 square feet outdoor entertainment The project site is currently vacant and is anticipated for buildout in Year 2027. As requested by the City, 17th Avenue will be extended to connect with Ocoee-Apopka Road. Access to the development is proposed via four (4) driveways along Ocoee-Apopka Road, two (2) driveways along Fullers Cross Road, and three (3) driveways along the 17th Avenue Extension. For ease of review, project driveways have been numbered in Figure 1 as follows: ·Driveway 1:Full-access driveway along Fullers Cross Road (signalized) ·Driveway 2: Right-in/right-out (RI/RO) driveway along Fullers Cross Road (unsignalized) ·Driveway 3:Northern service exit-only driveway along Ocoee-Apopka Road (unsignalized) ·Driveway 4:Northern full-access driveway along Ocoee-Apopka Road (signalized) ·Driveway 5: Northern access driveway along Ocoee-Apopka Road (unsignalized) ·Driveway 6: Middle directional-access (left-in/right-in/right-out) driveway along Ocoee-Apopka Road (unsignalized) ·Driveway 7:Middle RI/RO service driveway along Ocoee-Apopka Road (unsignalized) ·Driveway 8: Southern full-access driveway along Ocoee-Apopka Road (unsignalized) ·Driveway 9:Western full-access driveway along 17th Avenue Extension (unsignalized) ·Driveway 10: Middle full-access driveway along 17th Avenue Extension (unsignalized) ·Driveway 11: Eastern full-access driveway along 17th Avenue Extension (unsignalized) Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed development and driveways. A site plan is provided in Appendix B. Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2 1.1 STUDY AREA The study area for the proposed development was determined in the traffic impact analysis (TIA) methodology using City of Ocoee’s TIA procedures. In addition to the study intersections and project driveways, the two connection points of the 17th Avenue Extension will also be included in the analysis. The TIA methodology (dated May 8, 2023) is provided in Appendix A. The study area includes the following intersections and roadway segments, as displayed in Figure 1: Study Area Intersections 1. Ocoee Apopka Road & West Road / Ocoee Crown Point Parkway 2. SR 429 SB Ramps & West Road / Clarcona Ocoee Road 3. SR 429 NB Ramps & West Road / Clarcona Ocoee Road 4. N Lakewood Avenue & Clarcona Ocoee Road 5. N Lakewood Avenue & E Fullers Cross Road 6. Ocoee Apopka Road & E Fullers Cross Road 7. N Lakewood Avenue & Wurst Road / Clinger Cove Road 8. Ocoee Apopka Road & W Silver Star Road 9. Ocoee Apopka Road / Maguire Road & W Franklin Street 10. SR 429 NB Ramps & W Franklin Street / Plant Street 11. SR 429 SB Ramps & W Franklin Street / Plant Street 12. Maguire Road & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive) Study Area Roadway Segments · E Crown Point Road o SR 438 to Palm Drive o Palm Drive to E Fullers Cross Road o E Fullers Cross Road to Ocoee Apopka Road · Fullers Cross Road o Ocoee Apopka Road to Lakewood Avenue · Lakewood Avenue o Rewis Street to Wurst Road o Wurst Road to Fullers Cross Road o Fullers Cross Road to Clarcona Ocoee Road · Maguire Road o SR 50 (W Colonial Drive) to Marshall Farms Road o Marshall Farms Road to Story Road o Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue o Kissimmee Avenue to SR 438 (W Franklin Street) · CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) o SR 438 (W Franklin Street) to SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) o SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) to Fullers Cross Road o Fullers Cross Road to West Road o West Road to McCormick Road · SR 438 (Plant Street / Franklin Street) o E Crown Point Road to SR 429 o SR 429 to Ocoee Apopka Road · SR 438 (Silver Star Road) o Ocoee Apopka Road to Bluford Avenue o Bluford Avenue to Ocoee-Hills Road o Ocoee-Hills Road to Clarke Road SR 50 N NOT TO SCALE 3© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 CLARCONA OCOEE RD PLANT ST SILVER STAR RD MA G U I R E R D 5% 10% 35% 25% 10% 10% 15% 35% N L A K E W O O D A V E 5% 5% 5% 30%10% 5% 30% 30%25% E C R O W N P O I N T R D Figure 1: Project Location, Study Area, and Distribution LEGEND Project Location Project Driveway Study Roadway Segment Proposed 17th Avenue Extension # 1 2 4 5 7 9 8 10 11 3 6 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS – YEAR 2023 2.1 EXISTING DATA Turning movement counts (TMCs) were collected at study intersections on Thursday, May 25, 2023, during the PM peak period (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) and on Saturday, April 15, 2023 during the Saturday peak period (1:00 PM – 3:00 PM). All raw TMCs are provided in Appendix C. It should be noted that due to construction at the time of data collection full turning movement counts at the intersections of Clarcona-Ocoee Road with Lakewood Avenue and Lakewood Avenue with Fullers Cross Road were not available. The existing turning movement volumes were adjusted using the seasonal factors published in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)Florida Traffic Online (FTO) database. Relevant seasonal factor data is provided in Appendix D. The volume development worksheets provided in Appendix E display the raw TMCs and corresponding seasonal adjustment. Signal timings are included in Appendix F. Existing turning movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 2. 2.2 EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS An intersection operational analysis was performed for existing (2023) PM and Saturday peak hour conditions using procedures outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition with Synchro (v12) software. Intersection level of service (LOS) and maximum volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for existing conditions are provided in Table 1 for the weekday PM peak hour and Table 2 for the Saturday PM peak hour. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix G. As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, all study area intersections operate with acceptable overall LOS and v/c ratios less than 1.00 under existing weekday and Saturday PM peak hour conditions with the exception of the following: · Weekday PM Peak Hour o Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps § Northbound right (v/c >1.00) o Ocoee-Apopka Road & Fullers Cross Road § Eastbound left (v/c >1.00) o SR 50 & Maguire Road § Eastbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Eastbound right (v/c > 1.00) · Saturday PM Peak Hour o Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps § Northbound right (v/c > 1.00) N NOT TO SCALE Figure 2:Existing Volumes 5© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 1 2 4 6 5E Fullers Cross Rd SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s N L a k e w o o d A v e Oc o e e A p o p k a R d West Rd LEGEND Study Intersection PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes: Weekday (Saturday) 10 Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s 3Clarcona Ocoee Rd 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) 8 Ma g u i r e R d 9 Franklin StPlant St SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s W Silver Star Rd E Crown Point Rd (9 0 ) 1 2 9 (3 7 5 ) 5 4 5 (2 1 3 ) 2 6 7 (40) 59 (134) 158 (68) 111 47 ( 1 9 ) 39 2 ( 2 8 7 ) 13 5 ( 1 1 0 ) 126 (117) 303 (133) 338 (307) (428) 563 (139) 125 62 ( 4 3 ) 73 ( 6 7 ) 824 (509) 317 (294) (1 5 1 ) 2 2 9 (2 8 1 ) 3 9 5 (41) 50 (451) 589 86 (66) 912 (653) (0 ) 1 (0 ) 0 (0 ) 2 (9) 6 (725) 977 (0) 0 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 1 ( 0 ) 0 (0) 991 (711) 9 (2) (6 9 ) 1 4 5 (1 0 ) 1 0 (0 ) 0 (6) 11 (2) 2 (56) 123 9 ( 8 ) 3 ( 4 ) 0 ( 0 ) 1 (0) 2 (0) 0 (0) (1 2 ) 5 (2 9 4 ) 4 6 5 (6 ) 3 0 (315) 433 (24) 81 (9) 4 37 8 ( 2 8 0 ) 31 2 ( 2 6 6 ) 79 ( 3 2 ) 101 (61) 36 (17) 13 (11) (7 ) 1 2 (5 3 ) 9 9 (1 6 2 ) 2 9 0 (3) 3 (5) 8 (5) 2 6 ( 3 ) 66 ( 3 6 ) 82 ( 3 2 ) 59 (37) 12 (5) 139 (134) 11 12 SEE INSET 1 (266) 267 (484) 579 13 1 ( 1 4 7 ) 91 ( 4 5 ) 198 (138) 541 (420) (8 8 ) 1 2 6 (2 6 7 ) 2 9 6 (1 1 ) 2 0 (211) 253 (102) 146 (130) 183 14 9 ( 1 7 4 ) 30 3 ( 2 4 9 ) 25 ( 1 1 ) 73 (22) 155 (57) 10 (8) (5 4 9 ) 6 7 2 (1 9 7 ) 2 9 8 (1 7 3 ) 2 0 8 (143) 262 (1,155) 1,203 (540) 703 72 ( 7 5 ) 25 7 ( 1 9 1 ) 20 9 ( 1 9 1 ) 55 (57) 1,520 (978) 271 (255) (1 9 8 ) 2 9 0 (1 7 7 ) 3 5 1 (147) 239 (380) 425 156 (60) 459 (374) INSET 1 8 (1 2 ) 1 5 (2 8 4 ) 4 2 8 (2 0 3 ) 1 5 9 (11) 13 (97) 171 (10) 19 23 ( 1 0 ) 33 0 ( 2 4 3 ) 18 0 ( 1 1 8 ) 187 (106) 139 (133) 170 (170) Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 6 Table 1:Existing (2023) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB D 0.20 (EBR) 150 (EBR) WB D 0.61 (WBL) 250 (WBT) NB D 0.90 (NBT)725 (NBT) SB D 0.74 (SBT/R) 575 (SBT/R) Overall D (47.6 s)0.90 (NBT) 725 (NBT) EB A 0.26 (EBT/R)150 (EBT/R) WB A 0.48 (WBL) 75 (WBL) SB F 0.76 (SBL) 150 (SBL) Overall A (8.3 s)0.76 (SBL) 150 (SBL) EB A 0.25 (EBT)25 (EBL) WB B 0.43 (WBT)325 (WBT) NB F 1.10 (NBR)775 (NBR) Overall D (37.1 s)1.10 (NBR)775 (NBR) EB A 0.48 (EBT)25 (EBT/R) WB C 0.53 (WBT/R) 475 (WBT/R) NB E 0.01 (NBR)25 (NBR) SB E 0.00 (SBL) 25 (SBL) Overall B (13.4 s)0.53 (WBT/R) 475 (WBT/R) EB A 0.13 (EBL/T/R)0 (EBL/T/R) WB A 0.00 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R) NB A 0.15 (NBL/T/R)25 (NBL/T/R) SB A 0.01 (SBL/T/R)0 (SBL/T/R) Overall A (3.8 s)0.15 (NBL/T/R) 25 (NBL/T/R) EB F 1.20 (EBL)625 (EBL) WB E 0.81 (WBR)200 (WBR) NB C 0.45 (NBT)400 (NBT) SB B 0.37 (SBR)275 (SBR) Overall E (59.9 s)1.20 (EBL)625 (EBL) EB A 0.02 (EBL/T/R)25 (EBL/T/R) WB B 0.34 (WBL/T/R)50 (WBL/T/R) NB B 0.53 (NBL/T/R)100 (NBL/T/R) SB A 0.24 (SBL/T/R)25 (SBL/T/R) Overall B (11.4 s)0.53 (NBL/T/R) 100 (NBL/T/R) EB D 0.42 (EBT/R)250 (EBT/R) WB E 0.79 (WBT/R) 425 (WBT/R) NB A 0.61 (NBT/R)50 (NBT/R) SB B 0.30 (SBT/R) 200 (SBT/R) Overall C (23.3 s)0.79 (WBT/R) 425 (WBT/R) EB C 0.51 (EBL)425 (EBT/R) WB C 0.39 (WBT/R) 250 (WBT/R) NB D 0.69 (NBL) 350 (NBT/R) SB E 0.94 (SBT/R) 675 (SBT/R) Overall D (46.3 s)0.94 (SBT/R) 675 (SBT/R) EB A 0.55 (EBL)150 (EBL) WB C 0.51 (WBT)475 (WBT) NB E 0.93 (NBR)475 (NBR) Overall C (31.3 s)0.93 (NBR)475 (WBT) EB A 0.43 (EBL)200 (EBT) WB A 0.45 (WBT)25 (WBT) SB E 0.81 (SBR)375 (SBR) Overall B (11.1 s)0.81 (SBR)375 (SBR) EB F 1.08 (EBL/EBR)825 (EBR) WB E 0.89 (WBL) 725 (WBT/R) NB E 0.94 (NBT)625 (NBL) SB F 0.99 (SBT)575 (SBT) Overall E (75.9 s)1.08 (EBL/EBR) 825 (EBR) Weekday PM Peak Hour 5 Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Roundabout 2 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized Intersection Control Type Approach 1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Rd 6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signalized 4 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Avenue Signalized Signalized 7 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/ Clinger Cove Rd Stop-Controlled (AWSC) 8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Silver Star Rd Signalized 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Franklin St Signalized 10 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 11 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 12 SR 50 & Maguire Rd Signalized Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 7 Table 2:Existing (2023) Intersection Conditions (Saturday Peak Hour) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB C 0.11 (EBR)75 (EBT) WB B 0.48 (WBL)225 (WBT) NB D 0.84 (NBT) 450 (NBT) SB D 0.66 (SBT/R)375 (SBT/R) Overall D (35.6 s)0.84 (NBT)450 (NBT) EB A 0.23 (EBT/R)25 (EBT/R) WB A 0.38 (WBL)50 (WBL) SB E 0.72 (SBL) 125 (SBL) Overall A (5.6 s)0.72 (SBL)125 (SBL) EB A 0.18 (EBT) 25 (EBL) WB A 0.30 (WBT)175 (WBT) NB F 1.16 (NBR) 575 (NBR) Overall D (36.1 s)1.16 (NBR) 575 (NBR) EB A 0.44 (EBT)25 (EBT) WB C 0.44 (WBT)300 (WBT) NB -0.00 (-) (-) SB -0.00 (-) (-) Overall B (11.1 s)0.44 (EBT) 300 (WBT) EB A 0.06 (EBL/T/R)0 (EBL/T/R) WB -0.00 (-)(-) NB A 0.07 (NBL/T/R)0 (NBL/T/R) SB A 0.01 (SBL/T/R)0 (SBL/T/R) Overall A (3.3 s)0.07 (NBL/T/R) (EBL/T/R) EB D 0.75 (EBL)400 (EBL) WB E 0.70 (WBR) 25 (WBR) NB B 0.31 (NBT) 225 (NBT) SB B 0.30 (SBR) 200 (SBR) Overall C (29.0 s)0.75 (EBL) 400 (EBL) EB A 0.02 (EBL/T/R)25 (EBL/T/R) WB A 0.25 (WBL/T/R) 25 (WBL/T/R) NB A 0.27 (NBL/T/R)50 (NBL/T/R) SB A 0.10 (SBL/T/R)25 (SBL/T/R) Overall A (8.8 s)0.27 (NBL/T/R) 50 (NBL/T/R) EB D 0.28 (EBT/R)125 (EBT/R) WB D 0.66 (WBT/R)275 (WBT/R) NB A 0.52 (NBT/R)25 (NBT/R) SB A 0.22 (SBT/R)125 (SBT/R) Overall B (18.5 s)0.66 (WBT/R) 275 (WBT/R) EB C 0.34 (EBL)275 (EBT/R) WB C 0.13 (WBT/R)75 (WBT/R) NB C 0.50 (NBT/R)275 (NBT/R) SB D 0.94 (SBT/R)375 (SBT/R) Overall C (32.6 s)0.94 (SBT/R) 375 (SBT/R) EB A 0.30 (EBT) 50 (EBL) WB A 0.34 (WBT) 25 (WBT) NB D 0.86 (NBL)250 (NBR) Overall B (14.6 s)0.86 (NBL)250 (NBR) EB A 0.42 (EBL)150 (EBT) WB A 0.39 (WBT)100 (WBT) SB E 0.82 (SBR)350 (SBT/R) Overall B (11.4 s)0.82 (SBR) 350 (SBT/R) EB C 0.76 (EBL)400 (EBT) WB D 0.95 (WBL)375 (WBT/R) NB E 0.92 (NBL)450 (NBL/T/R) SB F 0.85 (SBT)375 (SBT/R) Overall D (48.2 s) 0.95 (WBL)450 (NBL/T/R) Intersection Control Type Approach Saturday PM Peak Hour 1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Rd Signalized 2 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 4 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Avenue Signalized 5 Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Roundabout 6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signalized 7 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/ Clinger Cove Rd Stop-Controlled (AWSC) 8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Silver Star Rd Signalized 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Franklin St Signalized 10 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 11 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 12 SR 50 & Maguire Rd Signalized Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 8 3.0 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC The applicant is proposing to develop the site to consist of 17 baseball fields, 1,114 room hotels, 160,000 square feet of community center (10,000 square feet of corporate offices and 150,000 square feet of indoor sports facilities), and 360,000 square feet of retail (20,000 square feet of welcome center, 130,000 square feet of retail, 130,000 square feet of restaurants, 50,000 square feet of entertainment, and 30,000 square feet of outdoor entertainment). The latest industry standards were used to estimate new external trips to be generated by the site at buildout. FDOT’s districtwide travel demand model was used to assign trips throughout the study area. Buildout of the proposed development is anticipated in Year 2027. 3.1 TRIP GENERATION With the exception of the baseball fields, trip generation for the proposed development was estimated using weekday and Saturday data provided in the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Based on the proposed development program and the unique nature of the development internal capture was estimated at 40%. Pass-by trip rates for the retail component of the development program were obtained from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The baseball fields will typically be used for tournaments, rather than everyday use. Since ITE does not provide data for baseball fields, data was collected at the United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA) Space Coast Complex in Melbourne, Florida, which is a similar facility consisting of 15 baseball fields. Data was collected at the USSSA Space Coast Complex during typical weekday operations and during a Saturday baseball tournament to develop trip generation rates applicable for weekday and Saturday peak hour project trips. The Saturday trip rate is generally reflective of the highest trip rate for the facility. The trip generation study is included in the TIA methodology provided in Appendix A. Table 3 and 4 provide the Daily and PM peak hour trip generation summaries for the project under typical weekday and Saturday (during a tournament) conditions. The proposed development program is anticipated to generate the following: ·Weekday: 17,960 net new external daily trips, 1,439 net new external PM peak hour trips ·Saturday: 16,784 net new external daily trips, 1,590 net new external PM peak hour trips Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 9 Table 3:Trip Generation Summary (Weekday) Total 17 Fields 169.13 2,876 50%1,438 50%1,438 1,114 Rooms 10.46 11,652 50%5,826 50%5,826 160 KSF 28.82 4,612 50%2,306 50%2,306 360 KSF 37.01 13,324 50%6,662 50%6,662 32,464 12,986 19,478 1,518 17,960 Total 17 Fields 12.33 210 77%161 23%49 1,114 Rooms 0.72 797 51%406 49%391 160 KSF 2.50 400 47%188 53%212 360 KSF 3.40 1,224 48%588 52%636 2,631 1,052 1,579 140 1,439 Notes:1Vehicle trip rate and directional splits per ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition. Da i l y ( W e e k d a y ) Land Use Size Units ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 ITE LUC 495: Recreational Community Center 1 ITE LUC 820: Shopping Center (>150k)1 Total Generated Trips 16,232 16,232 Internal Capture 2 =40.0%6,493 In Out Baseball Fields (Weekday)4 Trip Rate Daily (Weekday) 6,493 Net New External Trips 8,980 8,980 Net External Trips 9,739 9,739 Pass by Trips 3 =19.0% of external retail trips 759 759 PM P e a k H o u r ( W e e k d a y ) Land Use Size Units ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 ITE LUC 495: Recreational Community Center 1 ITE LUC 820: Shopping Center (>150k)1 Total Generated Trips Net New External Trips In Out Baseball Fields (Weekday)4 Trip Rate PM Peak Hour (Weekday) 1,343 1,288 Internal Capture 2 =40.0%526 526 747 692 Net External Trips 817 762 Pass by Trips 3 =19.0% of external retail trips 70 70 4 Trip rate obtained from trip generation study performed for USSSA Space Coast Complex . 2Internal Capture assumed to be 40% based on development program and intensity. 3 Pass-by trip rate per ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition . Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 10 Table 4:Trip Generation Summary (Saturday) Total 17 Fields 263.20 4,474 50%2,237 50%2,237 1114 Rooms 9.40 10,468 50%5,234 50%5,234 160 KSF 9.10 1,456 50%728 50%728 360 KSF 46.60 16,776 50%8,388 50%8,388 33,174 13,270 19,904 3,120 16,784 Total 17 Fields 35.87 610 51%311 49%299 1114 Rooms 0.70 775 56%434 44%341 160 KSF 1.07 171 54%92 46%79 360 KSF 4.40 1,584 52%824 48%760 3,140 1,256 1,884 294 1,590 Notes:1Vehicle trip rate and directional splits per ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition 6,635 6,635 Net External Trips 9,952 9,952 704 In Out Daily (Saturday) P M P e a k H o u r ( S a t u r d a y ) Size Units Net New External Trips 8,392 8,392 ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 Total Generated Trips 1,661 Da i l y ( S a t u r d a y ) Size Units Trip Rate ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 628 628 Pass by Trips 3 =31.0% of external retail trips 1,560 1,560 3 Pass-by trip rate based on LUC 821 Saturday rates per ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 1,479 Internal Capture 2 =40.0% In Out Net New External Trips 886 Trip Rate PM Peak Hour (Saturday) Total Generated Trips 16,587 16,587 Internal Capture 2 =40.0% Land Use Baseball Fields (Tournament)4 ITE LUC 495: Recreational Community Center 1 ITE LUC 820: Shopping Center (>150k)1 Land Use Baseball Fields (Tournament)4 ITE LUC 495: Recreational Community Center 1 ITE LUC 820: Shopping Center (>150k)1 4 Trip rate obtained from trip generation study performed for USSSA Space Coast Complex 2Internal Capture assumed to be 40% based on development program and intensity. Net External Trips 1,033 851 Pass by Trips 3 =31.0% of external retail trips 147 147 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 11 3.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Projected traffic demand for project trips on study roadways was derived with the use of the latest adopted regional travel demand model. Land use data for the project was entered into a new traffic analysis zone (TAZ) within the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM v7) model set and situated within the existing roadway network. The model was used to assign trips for all trip purposes between allocated origin and destination pairs using project buildout year model data. Trip distribution for the project was extracted from the completed model assignment and reviewed for logic. Since the proposed development is expected to generate trips from across the region, a revised daily project distribution was created based on engineering judgement. The original model plot showing the percent of daily project distribution is included in the TIA methodology (dated May 8, 2023) provided in Appendix A. The revised daily model project distribution was then referenced to manually assign project distribution at study area intersections and driveways in general accordance with the model output.Figures 3a, 3b, and 3c show the intersection movement project distribution generated by the proposed development within the study area. 3.3 TRIP ASSIGNMENT Project trip distribution percentages were used to assign anticipated project trips to the study area intersections and driveways. Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c show the anticipated PM peak hour project movements generated by the proposed development at study area intersections and driveways on weekdays and Saturday. N NOT TO SCALE Figure 3a:Project Trip Distribution 12© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 1 2 4 5E Fullers Cross Rd SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s N L a k e w o o d A v e Oc o e e A p o p k a R d West Rd 5% 30 % 5% 30% 15% 15% 15 % 10 %15% 15% 5% 5% 5% 25 %5% 5% 10 % 5% 5%10 % LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Percent Distribution Percent Trips In (Pass-by In) Percent Trips Out (Pass-by Out) XX% 5%25% 5% 10 % 10% 11 Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s 30% 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd 10 % 5% 7 5%Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd 10%SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) 15 % 15 % 8 10% 5% Ma g u i r e R d 9 Franklin StPlant St SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s W Silver Star Rd E C r o w n P o i n t R d 5% 25% 15 % 15 % 15% 10% 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 10% 5% 5% 5% 20% 20 % 10 % 10 %5% PROJECT 10 % 5% 5% 10 12 20 % 15 % 5% 15% 10% 5% 20 % 10 % 6 N NOT TO SCALE Figure 3b:Project Trip Distribution (Zoom In)13© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 8 7 4 5 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7 10 % 5% 10 %5% 20% 20 % 10 % 10 % Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 20 % 15 % 5% 15% 5% 20% 2 Demastus Ln 5% 15% 10% 15 %5% 10% 5% 10% 10% 10% 1 DR I V E W A Y 2 DR I V E W A Y 1 FULLERS CROSS RD AP T / C H U R C H D W Y (1 0 % ) 1 0 % (- 4 0 % ) (1 0 % ) 2 % 10 % ( - 3 0 % ) 25 % ( 3 0 % ) 24% (30%) 11% (40%) 4 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 4 6% (- 3 0 % ) 2 % ( 3 0 % ) 9 % ` 11 % ( 4 0 % ) 10 % ( - 3 0 % ) 4% (10%) 5 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 5 2% 11 %4% 11 % 2% ( - 1 0 % ) 8% ( 1 0 % ) 4% 6 DRIVEWAY 6 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D 5% 20 % 10 % LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway Percent Distribution Percent Trips In (Pass-by In) Percent Trips Out (Pass-by Out) XX% 1410 913 11 3 6 34 % 35 % 4% 3 DRIVEWAY 3 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D N NOT TO SCALE Figure 3c:Project Trip Distribution (Zoom In)14© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7 10 % 5% 10 %5% 20% 20 % 10 % 10 % Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway Percent Distribution Percent Trips In (Pass-by In) Percent Trips Out (Pass-by Out) XX% Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 20 % 15 % 3% 23% 3%2%2% 23% 11 5% 15% 10% 5% 20 % 10 % 14 13 DR I V E W A Y 1 1 17th AVE EXT 2% 5% 9% 2%9% 5% 11% (10%) 13% 9 DR I V E W A Y 9 17th AVE EXT (- 1 0 % ) 9 % (1 0 % ) 6 % 15 % ( 1 0 % ) (- 1 0 % ) 2% ( 1 0 % ) 2% (10%) 8 DRIVEWAY 8 O C O E E - A P O P K A R D ( 1 0 % ) 8 % 5% 3% 18% 2% 3% 18% 5% 10 DR I V E W A Y 1 0 17th AVE EXT Demastus Ln 8 7 4 5 10 9 11 3 6 2%2%7% 2%2%9%13% 13% (10%) 13 17th AVE EXT OC O E E - A P O P K A R D 2% 14 %1% 11 % 2% 1% 7 DRIVEWAY 7 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D N NOT TO SCALE Figure 3c:Project Trip Distribution (Zoom In)15© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7 10 % 5% 10 %5% 20% 20 % 10 % 10 % Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway Percent Distribution Percent Trips In (Pass-by In) Percent Trips Out (Pass-by Out) XX% Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 20 % 15 % 5% 15% 10% 5% 20 % 10 % 14 13 10 % 15% 10% 15 % 1417thAVE EXT 17th AVE LA K E W O O D A V E Demastus Ln 8 7 4 5 10 9 11 3 6 N NOT TO SCALE Figure 4a:Project Trip Assignment 16© 2023 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 189 S Orange Ave, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 1 2 4 5E Fullers Cross Rd SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s N L a k e w o o d A v e Oc o e e A p o p k a R d West Rd [3 5 ] 3 5 [2 1 2 ] 2 0 8 37 [ 4 4 ] 224 [266] [106] 104 [106] 104 11 2 [ 1 3 3 ] 75 [ 8 9 ] 112 [133] 104 [106] [44] 37 35 [35] 35 [35] [1 7 6 ] 1 7 3 [3 5 ] 3 5 38 [44] [8 9 ] 7 5 [44] 37 35 [ 3 5 ] 69 [ 7 1 ] LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Percent Distribution Project Trips: Weekday (Pass-by) [Saturday (PB)] XX% 5%25% 5% 69 [ 7 1 ] 75 [89] Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s 30% 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd 75 [ 8 9 ] 37 [44] 7 5%Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd 10%SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) [1 3 3 ] 1 1 2 10 4 [ 1 0 6 ] 8 10% [44] 37 Ma g u i r e R d 9 Franklin StPlant St SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s W Silver Star Rd E C r o w n P o i n t R d 5% [222] 187 [1 3 3 ] 1 1 2 [1 3 3 ] 1 1 2 [106] 104 [89] 75 69 [70] 104 [106] [4 5 ] 3 8 35 [ 3 5 ] 37 [ 4 4 ] 70 [70] [44] 37 [44] 37 [44] 37 [141] 139 15 0 [ 1 7 7 ] 75 [ 8 9 ] [7 0 ] 6 9 [3 6 ] 3 5 PROJECT [7 0 ] 6 9 35 [35] 35 [ 3 5 ] 11 10 12 6 14 9 [ 1 7 7 ] 11 2 [ 1 3 3 ] [45] 38 104 [106] 75 [89] [3 5 ] 3 5 [1 4 1 ] 1 3 9 [7 0 ] 6 9 N NOT TO SCALE Figure 4b:Project Trip Assignment (Zoom In)17© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd 14 9 [ 1 7 7 ] 11 2 [ 1 3 3 ] [3 5 ] 3 5 [106] 104 [44] 37 150 [177] 2 [45] 38 104 [106] 75 [89] [1 0 6 ] 1 0 4 [3 6 ] 3 5 [114] 106 [89] 75 75 [89] 75 [88] 1 DR I V E W A Y 2 DR I V E W A Y 1 FULLERS CROSS RD AP T / C H U R C H D W Y LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway Percent Distribution Project Trip Assignment: Weekday (Pass-by) [Saturday (PB)] XX% [3 5 ] 3 5 [1 4 1 ] 1 3 9 [7 0 ] 6 9 75 [ 8 9 ] 37 [44] [7 0 ] 6 9 [3 6 ] 3 5 Demastus Ln 14 13 [( - 4 4 ) 7 0 ] ( - 2 1 ) 7 0 [( 1 5 ) 1 8 ] ( 7 ) 1 5 75 ( - 2 1 ) [ 8 9 ( - 4 4 ) ] 18 7 ( 2 1 ) [ 2 2 2 ( 4 4 ) ] 166 (21) [169 (44)] 76 (28) [77 (59)] 4 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 4 [1 1 2 ] 9 6 [2 7 ] 2 2 21 [21] 6 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 6 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 [141] 139 15 0 [ 1 7 7 ] 75 [ 8 9 ] [7 0 ] 6 9 8 7 4 5 10 9 11 3 6 [2 3 9 ] 2 3 5 26 1 [ 3 1 0 ] 7 [7] 3 [( - 4 4 ) 6 0 ] ( - 2 1 ) 5 7 [( 4 4 ) 8 0 ] ( 2 1 ) 6 7 15 1 ( 7 ) [ 1 6 6 ( 1 5 ) ] 28 (7) [28 (15)] 5 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 5 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 3 91 [ 9 5 ] 60 ( 7 ) [ 7 1 ( 1 5 ) ] N NOT TO SCALE Figure 4c:Project Trip Assignment (Zoom In)18© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 3 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd [18] 15 [107] 99 14 [ 1 4 ] 62 [ 6 4 ] 37 [44] 173 (7) [193 (15)] 9 [( 1 5 ) 5 6 ] ( 7 ) 5 5 [3 5 ] 3 4 [154] 146 [17] 15 155 [181] 37 [44] 10 [( - 1 4 ) 8 0 ] ( - 7 ) 6 7 [( 1 4 ) 5 3 ] ( 7 ) 4 5 10 4 ( 0 ) [ 1 0 6 ( 0 ) ] 15 ( 7 ) [ 1 8 ( 1 5 ) ] 14 (7) [14 (14)] 8 DR I V E W A Y 1 0 17th AVE EXT DR I V E W A Y 9 DRIVEWAY 8 17th AVE EXT OC O E E - A P O P K A R D LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway Percent Distribution Project Trip Assignment: Weekday (Pass-by) [Saturday (PB)] XX% 16 5 7 Demastus Ln 14 13 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 14 9 [ 1 7 7 ] 11 2 [ 1 3 3 ] [45] 38 104 [106] 75 [89] [3 5 ] 3 5 [1 4 1 ] 1 3 9 [7 0 ] 6 9 75 [ 8 9 ] 37 [44] [7 0 ] 6 9 [3 6 ] 3 5 [141] 139 15 0 [ 1 7 7 ] 75 [ 8 9 ] [7 0 ] 6 9 [27] 22 [162] 158 20 [ 2 1 ] 14 [ 1 4 ] 15 [18] 172 [204] 11 DR I V E W A Y 1 1 17th AVE EXT 8 7 4 5 10 9 11 3 6 [1 3 9 ] 1 1 9 [9 ] 7 91 [ 9 5 ] 7 [7] 7 DRIVEWAY 7 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D [3 2 ] 2 9 [6 2 ] 5 2 29 [ 3 2 ] 62 [ 6 3 ] 97 [115] 90 (7) [91 (15)] 13 17th AVE EXT OC O E E - A P O P K A R D N NOT TO SCALE Figure 4d:Project Trip Assignment (Zoom In)19© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 7 3 5 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd [8 9 ] 7 5 [106] 104 [70] 68 11 2 [ 1 3 3 ] 1417thAVE EXT 17th AVE LA K E W O O D A V E LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway Percent Distribution Project Trip Assignment: Weekday (Pass-by) [Saturday (PB)] XX% 4 16 5 7 Demastus Ln 14 13 9 11 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 14 9 [ 1 7 7 ] 11 2 [ 1 3 3 ] [45] 38 104 [106] 75 [89] [3 5 ] 3 5 [1 4 1 ] 1 3 9 [7 0 ] 6 9 75 [ 8 9 ] 37 [44] [7 0 ] 6 9 [3 6 ] 3 5 [141] 139 15 0 [ 1 7 7 ] 75 [ 8 9 ] [7 0 ] 6 9 3 6 10 8 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 20 4.0 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ANALYSIS – YEAR 2027 4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Traffic conditions were evaluated for Year 2027 background conditions, without the addition of project trips on the roadway network. Background growth for was estimated using an annual growth rate of two percent (2%) plus vested trips as reported in the Ocoee CMS, for roadways not documented in the Ocoee CMS, a five (5%) growth rate was utilized to account for vested traffic. A 5% growth rate was used to forecast the Saturday peak period because there the vested trips as reported in the Ocoee CMS only reflect estimated weekday vested weekday trips. The intersections of Clarcona Ocoee Road with Lakewood Avenue, Fullers Cross Road with Lakewood Avenue, and Ocoee-Apopka Road with Fullers Cross Road were updated with buildout volumes from the Ocoee Village Center TIA and Fullers Cross Apartment TIA previously submitted to the City to account for the change in traffic patterns not captured in existing counts. Excerpts from the previously submitted studies are provided in Appendix E. Turning movement volumes at the intersection of Clarcona Ocoee Road and SR 429 Northbound Ramps were balanced to account for differences in traffic patterns between the Ocoee Village Center and traffic data collected for this study. Volumes were adjusted such that approach and departure volumes between the adjacent intersections were within 10 percent (10%) of each other. Volumes from the Ocoee Village Center TIA and Fullers Cross Apartment TIA were adjusted to Saturday volumes by applying the ratio of the Saturday volumes to the Weekday volumes utilizing data collected for the study. The volume development worksheets provided in Appendix E. Background volumes are in Figure 5. 4.2 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS Based on a review of the MetroPlan Orlando’s Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) for Fiscal Years 2023/24 – 2027/28, and City of Ocoee’s Annual Budget for Fiscal Years 2023-2024. The relocation of the SR 429 Northbound Ramp was identified as part of the Central Florida Expressway’s (CFX) as SR 429 Capacity Improvements Project and is currently under construction and thus included in background conditions. Maguire Road Phase 5 was identified in the City of Ocoee’s Annual Budget for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 but it not currently funded for construction. An excerpt about the SR NB Ramp relocation is included in Appendix H. 4.3 BACKGROUND INTERSECTION ANALYSIS An intersection operational analysis was performed for background (2027) Weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour conditions using procedures outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition with Synchro (v12) software. Intersection level of service (LOS) and maximum volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for background conditions are provided in Table 5 for the weekday PM peak hour and Table 6 for the Saturday PM peak hour. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix G. As shown in Table 5 and Table 6, all study area intersections are expected to operate with acceptable overall LOS and v/c ratios less than 1.00 under background weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour conditions with the exception of the following: · Weekday PM Peak Hour o Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps § Northbound right (v/c > 1.00) o Clarcona Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue (overall LOS F) § Westbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Northbound right (v/c > 1.00) Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 21 o Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road § Southbound approach (v/c >1.00) o Ocoee-Apopka Road & Fullers Cross Road (overall LOS F) § Eastbound left (v/c > 1.00) o Ocoee-Apopka Road & Silver Star Road § Northbound through/right (v/c > 1.00) o Ocoee-Apopka Road/Maguire Road & Franklin Street § Southbound through/right (v/c > 1.00) o SR 50 & Maguire Road (overall LOS F) § Eastbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Eastbound right (v/c > 1.00) § Westbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Northbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Southbound through (v/c > 1.00) · Saturday PM Peak Hour o Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps § Northbound right (v/c > 1.00) o Clarcona Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue § Westbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Northbound right (v/c > 1.00) o SR 50 & Maguire Road § Westbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Northbound left (v/c > 1.00) § Southbound through (v/c > 1.00) To accommodate background traffic the following improvements are recommended: · Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps o Dual northbound right turn lanes o Signal timing adjustments · Clarcona Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue o Dual westbound left-turn lanes and an additional south leg receiving lane o Northbound right-turn overlap phase o Signal timing modification · Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road o Exclusive southbound right-turn lane · Ocoee-Apopka Road & Fullers Cross Road o Dual eastbound left-turn lane and an additional north leg receiving lane o Signal timing modification · Ocoee-Apopka Road & Silver Star Road o Exclusive northbound right-turn lane · Ocoee-Apopka Road/Maguire Road & Franklin Street o Exclusive southbound right-turn lane · SR 50 & Maguire Road o Eastbound right-turn overlap phase o Dual southbound through lanes o Signal timing modifications Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 22 It should be noted that the intersection of SR 50 and Maguire Road is constrained and therefore only improvements that were considered feasible due to the physical constraints of the intersection were included as background improvements. Additionally, there are parallel routes with intersections along SR 50 such as Bluford Avenue and Blackwood Avenue that motorists can utilize. An intersection operational analysis was performed for background (2027) Weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour conditions with improvements using procedures outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition with Synchro (v12) software. Intersection level of service (LOS) and maximum volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for background conditions are provided in Table 5 for the weekday PM peak hour and Table 6 for the Saturday PM peak hour. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix G . With the improvements in place the study area intersections are expected to operate with acceptable overall LOS and v/c ratios less than 1.00 under background weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour conditions, with the exception of SR 50 and Maguire Road. N NOT TO SCALE Figure 5:Background (2027) Intersection Volumes 23© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 1 2 4 6 5E Fullers Cross Rd SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s N L a k e w o o d A v e Oc o e e A p o p k a R d West Rd LEGEND Study Intersection PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes: Weekday (Saturday) 10 Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s 3Clarcona Ocoee Rd 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) 8 Ma g u i r e R d 9 Franklin StPlant St SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s W Silver Star Rd E Crown Point Rd (1 0 8 ) 1 4 8 (4 5 0 ) 6 2 6 (2 5 6 ) 3 0 6 (48) 65 (161) 174 (82) 122 56 ( 2 3 ) 46 1 ( 3 4 4 ) 15 9 ( 1 3 2 ) 148 (140) 356 (160) 397 (368) (514) 660 (167) 147 88 ( 5 2 ) 0 ( 2 ) 74 ( 7 8 ) 983 (611) 378 (353) (1 8 0 ) 2 7 5 (1 ) 0 (3 7 1 ) 5 3 3 (49) 59 (595) 783 104 (79) 1,103 (784) 0 (2) (1 8 1 ) 2 9 1 (5 2 ) 9 4 (2 6 8 ) 4 9 0 (83) 107 (854) 1,111 (135) 175 17 ( 1 4 ) 39 ( 3 4 ) 34 ( 2 9 ) 37 (29) 957 (754) 606 (478) (1 0 5 ) 1 4 8 (2 1 7 ) 3 0 5 (1 4 ) 2 1 (276) 406 (14) 20 (91) 133 49 5 ( 3 2 5 ) 37 3 ( 2 4 4 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 (0) 9 (8) 9 (8) (2 0 ) 3 5 (3 5 4 ) 6 1 2 (2 4 8 ) 4 2 9 (297) 425 (122) 175 (22) 32 50 3 ( 3 4 7 ) 60 9 ( 4 2 0 ) 13 6 ( 9 4 ) 221 (140) 323 (205) 300 (189) (8 ) 1 5 (6 4 ) 1 2 3 (1 9 4 ) 3 6 1 (4) 4 (6) 10 (6) 2 9 ( 4 ) 10 8 ( 4 3 ) 13 5 ( 3 8 ) 74 (44) 15 (6) 174 (161) 11 12 SEE INSET 1 (319) 319 (581) 691 15 7 ( 1 7 6 ) 10 9 ( 5 4 ) 245 (166) 669 (504) (1 0 6 ) 1 5 9 (3 2 0 ) 3 7 5 (1 3 ) 2 6 (253) 331 (122) 192 (156) 240 21 0 ( 2 0 9 ) 42 7 ( 2 9 9 ) 35 ( 1 3 ) 88 (26) 186 (68) 12 (10) (6 5 9 ) 8 6 4 (2 3 6 ) 3 8 3 (2 0 8 ) 2 6 8 (172) 291 (1,386) 1,337 (648) 781 84 ( 9 0 ) 30 0 ( 2 2 9 ) 24 4 ( 2 2 9 ) 61 (68) 1,704 (1,174) 304 (306) (176) 293 (456) 521 197 (72) 583 (449) INSET 1 8 (1 4 ) 2 1 (3 4 1 ) 5 9 1 (2 4 4 ) 2 2 0 (13) 16 (116) 205 (12) 23 32 ( 1 2 ) 45 4 ( 2 9 2 ) 24 7 ( 1 4 2 ) 228 (127) 169 (160) 207 (204) 32 6 ( 2 3 8 ) 44 3 ( 2 1 2 ) Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024│ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 24 Table 5:Background (2027) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB D 0.25 (EBR)175 (EBR) WB D 0.79 (WBL)300 (WBT) NB D 0.95 (NBT) 725 (NBT) SB D 0.87 (SBL)675 (SBT/R) Overall D (50.1 s)0.95 (NBT) 725 (NBT) EB A 0.32 (EBT/R) 25 (EBT/R) WB A 0.58 (WBL) 100 (WBL) SB F 0.79 (SBL) 200 (SBL) Overall A (6.6 s)0.79 (SBL)200 (SBL) EB A 0.33 (EBT)50 (EBL)A 0.33 (EBT)50 (EBL) WB B 0.52 (WBT) 400 (WBT)B 0.51 (WBT) 400 (WBT) NB F 1.50 (NBR)1,375 (NBR)E 0.88 (NBR)450 (NBL) Overall E (67.8 s) 1.50 (NBR) 1,375 (NBR)C (26.8 s) 0.88 (NBR)450 (NBL) EB A 0.60 (EBT)150 (EBL)B 0.80 (EBT)250 (EBT) WB F 1.77 (WBL) 1,600 (WBL)D 0.90 (WBL)475 (WBT/R) NB F 2.69 (NBR)1,725 (NBR)E 0.84 (NBR)675 (NBR) SB E 0.18 (SBT)75 (SBT)E 0.26 (SBT)100 (SBT) Overall F (177.1 s)2.69 (NBR) 1,725 (NBR)D (41.0 s)0.90 (WBL)675 (NBR) EB D 0.86 (EBL/T/R) 175 (EBL/T/R)D 0.86 (EBL/T/R)275 (EBL/T/R) WB B 0.06 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R)B 0.06 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R) NB D 0.81 (NBL/T/R) 150 (NBL/T/R)D 0.81 (NBL/T/R) 225 (NBL/T/R) SB F 1.05 (SBL/T/R) 350 (SBL/T/R)A 0.59 (SBR)100 (SBR) Overall C (24.1 s)1.05 (SBL/T/R) 350 (SBL/T/R)C (19.6 s) 0.86 (EBL/T/R) 275 (EBL/T/R) EB F 1.36 (EBL)1,025 (EBL)E 0.91 (EBL)400 (EBL) WB E 0.92 (WBT) 575 (WBT)E 0.92 (WBT) 575 (WBT) NB D 0.81 (NBT) 650 (NBT)D 0.79 (NBT)750 (NBT) SB D 0.76 (SBT) 700 (SBT)D 0.74 (SBT)725 (SBT) Overall E (68.2 s)1.36 (EBL)1,025 (EBL)D (52.8 s) 0.92 (WBT) 750 (NBT) EB A 0.03 (EBL/T/R)25 (EBL/T/R) WB B 0.48 (WBL/T/R)75 (WBL/T/R) NB C 0.73 (NBL/T/R) 175 (NBL/T/R) SB B 0.44 (SBL/T/R)75 (SBL/T/R) Overall C (17.0 s)0.73 (NBL/T/R) 175 (NBL/T/R) EB D 0.45 (EBT/R) 275 (EBT/R)D 0.45 (EBT/R) 275 (EBT/R) WB E 0.87 (WBT/R)525 (WBT/R)E 0.87 (WBT/R) 525 (WBT/R) NB E 1.01 (NBT/R) 925 (NBT/R)C 0.64 (NBT)475 (NBT) SB C 0.92 (SBL)275 (SBT/R)B 0.66 (SBL)275 (SBT/R) Overall D (49.7 s)1.01 (NBT/R) 925 (NBT/R)C (33.6 s) 0.87 (WBT/R) 525 (WBT/R) EB D 0.75 (EBL)500 (EBT/R)D 0.70 (EBL)500 (EBT/R) WB D 0.52 (WBT/R)325 (WBT/R)D 0.48 (WBT/R) 325 (WBT/R) NB D 0.84 (NBL)450 (NBT/R)D 0.74 (NBL)450 (NBT/R) SB F 1.30 (SBT/R)1,375 (SBT/R)E 0.91 (SBT)575 (SBT) Overall F (84.0 s) 1.30 (SBT/R)1,375 (SBT/R)D (44.4 s)0.91 (SBT)575 (SBT) EB A 0.78 (EBL)200 (EBL) WB C 0.71 (WBT) 525 (WBT) SB E 0.94 (SBL) 600 (SBL) Overall C (32.3 s)0.94 (SBL)600 (SBL) EB A 0.58 (EBL)275 (EBT) WB A 0.59 (WBT)25 (WBT) SB E 0.84 (SBR) 425 (SBR) Overall B (11.5 s)0.84 (SBR) 425 (SBR) EB F 1.25 (EBR)1,200 (EBR)E 1.20 (EBL) 650 (EBT) WB F 0.97 (WBL)1,000 (WBT/R)E 0.91 (WBT/R)1,000 (WBT/R) NB F 1.12 (NBL) 950 (NBL)E 0.97 (NBL) 775 (NBL) SB F 1.15 (SBT) 750 (SBT)F 0.85 (SBL)325 (SBT) Overall F (95.1 s) 1.25 (EBR) 1,200 (EBR)E (69.5 s)1.20 (EBL)1,000 (WBT/R) Eastbound right-turn overlap phase, additional southbound through lane, signal timing modification Weekday PM Peak Hour w/ Improvements Dual northbound right-turn lanes, signal timing adjustments Dual westbound left-turn lanes and an additional receiving lane on south leg, northbound right-turn overlap phase, signal timing modifications Dual eastbound left-turn lane and an additional north leg receiving lane, signal timing modification Yield-controlled exclusive right-turn bypass lane added southbound approach. Exclusive northbound right-turn lane 12 SR 50 & Maguire Rd Signalized Recommended Improvements Exclusive southbound right-turn lane 10 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 11 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Silver Star Rd Signalized 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Franklin St Signalized 6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signalized 7 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/ Clinger Cove Rd Stop-Controlled (AWSC) 4 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Avenue Signalized 5 Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Roundabout 2 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized Intersection Control Type Approach Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Rd Signalized Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024│ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 25 Table 6:Background (2027) Intersection Conditions (Saturday Peak Hour) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB C 0.14 (EBT) 100 (EBT) WB C 0.65 (WBL) 150 (WBL) NB D 0.89 (NBT) 550 (NBT) SB D 0.71 (SBT/R) 425 (SBT/R) Overall D (38.1 s)0.89 (NBT) 550 (NBT) EB A 0.28 (EBT/R)25 (EBT/R) WB A 0.49 (WBL)75 (WBL) SB E 0.74 (SBL)150 (SBL) Overall A (5.7 s)0.74 (SBL) 150 (SBL) EB A 0.24 (EBT)25 (EBL)A 0.24 (EBT)25 (EBL) WB B 0.36 (WBT)225 (WBT)A 0.36 (WBT) 225 (WBT) NB F 1.50 (NBR) 950 (NBR)E 0.80 (NBR) 275 (NBL) Overall E (61.6 s) 1.50 (NBR) 950 (NBR)B (19.3 s)0.80 (NBR) 275 (NBL) EB C 0.47 (EBT) 425 (EBT)C 0.59 (EBT) 500 (EBT) WB F 1.46 (WBL) 1,100 (WBL)C 0.88 (WBL)350 (WBL) NB F 1.17 (NBR) 550 (NBR)D 0.50 (NBR) 275 (NBR) SB E 0.54 (SBT)75 (SBT)E 0.54 (SBT)75 (SBT) Overall E (76.1 s) 1.46 (WBL)1,100 (WBL)D (36.8 s)0.88 (WBL)500 (EBT) EB B 0.60 (EBL/T/R) 100 (EBL/T/R)B 0.60 (EBL/T/R) 100 (EBL/T/R) WB A 0.03 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R)A 0.03 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R) NB B 0.48 (NBL/T/R)75 (NBL/T/R)B 0.48 (NBL/T/R)75 (NBL/T/R) SB C 0.72 (SBL/T/R)150 (SBL/T/R)A 0.36 (SBL/T)50 (SBL/T) Overall B (14.1 s)0.72 (SBL/T/R) 150 (SBL/T/R)B (10.2 s)0.60 (EBL/T/R) 100 (EBL/T/R) EB D 0.83 (EBL)375 (EBL)D 0.61 (EBL)200 (EBL) WB D 0.83 (WBT)300 (WBT)D 0.83 (WBT) 300 (WBT) NB C 0.59 (NBT) 300 (NBT)B 0.38 (NBT) 275 (NBT) SB C 0.49 (SBT) 350 (SBT)B 0.43 (SBT) 325 (SBT) Overall D (35.1 s)0.83 (EBL)375 (EBL)C (31.9 s)0.83 (WBT) 325 (SBT) EB A 0.02 (EBL/T/R)25 (EBL/T/R) WB A 0.31 (WBL/T/R)50 (WBL/T/R) NB A 0.34 (NBL/T/R)50 (NBL/T/R) SB A 0.13 (SBL/T/R)25 (SBL/T/R) Overall B (10.2 s)0.34 (NBL/T/R) 50 (NBL/T/R) EB C 0.29 (EBT/R) 150 (EBT/R)C 0.29 (EBT/R)150 (EBT/R) WB D 0.68 (WBT/R) 325 (WBT/R)D 0.68 (WBT/R) 325 (WBT/R) NB A 0.68 (NBT/R)50 (NBT/R)A 0.37 (NBT)25 (NBT) SB A 0.27 (SBT/R) 150 (SBT/R)A 0.27 (SBT/R)150 (SBT/R) Overall B (19.0 s)0.68 (WBT/R) 325 (WBT/R)B (18.1 s)0.68 (WBT/R) 325 (WBT/R) EB C 0.45 (EBL)325 (EBT/R)C 0.36 (EBL) 300 (EBT/R) WB C 0.18 (WBT/R) 100 (WBT/R)B 0.13 (WBT/R)75 (WBT/R) NB C 0.71 (NBL)100 (NBL)C 0.52 (NBL) 125 (NBL) SB D 0.97 (SBT/R) 425 (SBT/R)D 0.87 (SBT) 275 (SBT) Overall D (36.0 s)0.97 (SBT/R)425 (SBT/R)C (28.4 s)0.87 (SBT) 300 (EBT/R) EB A 0.37 (EBT)75 (EBL) WB A 0.44 (WBT)25 (WBT) SB D 0.88 (SBR) 275 (SBR) Overall B (15.4 s)0.88 (SBR) 275 (SBR) EB A 0.56 (EBL)225 (EBT) WB A 0.49 (WBT)175 (WBT) SB E 0.85 (SBR) 400 (SBR) Overall B (13.2 s)0.85 (SBR) 400 (SBR) EB D 0.80 (EBR) 500 (EBT)D 0.89 (EBR) 625 (EBT) WB E 1.14 (WBL)475 (WBT/R)D 0.88 (WBL)450 (WBT/R) NB F 1.06 (NBL)625 (NBL)E 0.93 (NBL) 525 (NBL) SB F 1.02 (SBT) 500 (SBT)F 0.83 (SBL) 225 (SBT) Overall E (60.9 s) 1.14 (WBL)625 (NBL)D (50.0 s)0.93 (NBL) 625 (EBT) Yield-controlled exclusive right-turn bypass lane added southbound approach. Exclusive northbound right-turn lane 11 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 12 SR 50 & Maguire Rd Signalized Eastbound right-turn overlap phase, additional southbound through lane, signal timing modification 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Franklin St Signalized Exclusive southbound right-turn lane 10 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 7 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/ Clinger Cove Rd Stop-Controlled (AWSC) 8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Silver Star Rd Signalized Dual eastbound left-turn lane and an additional north leg receiving lane, signal timing modification 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized Dual northbound right-turn lanes, signal timing adjustments 4 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Avenue Signalized Dual westbound left-turn lanes and an additional receiving lane on south leg, northbound right-turn overlap phase, signal timing modifications 5 Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Roundabout 6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signalized Saturday PM Peak Hour w/ Improvements Intersection Control Type Approach Saturday PM Peak Hour Recommended Improvements 1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Rd Signalized 2 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 26 5.0 BUILDOUT CONDITIONS ANALYSIS – YEAR 2027 5.1 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC Future traffic conditions for the proposed development were evaluated for Year 2027 buildout conditions. Buildout volumes were developed by adding anticipated project trips to Year 2027 background volumes. Buildout (2027) Weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections are displayed in Figures 6a, 6b, 6c, and 6d.Volume development worksheets for all study area intersections are provided in Appendix E. The following assumptions were made for buildout traffic: · Volumes to/from Ocoee Crown Point Woods were estimated using ITE LUC 210 for 53 dwelling units · Volumes to/from the east leg of 17th Avenue were approximately 50% of volumes along Wurst Road 5.2 BUILDOUT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS An intersection operational analysis was performed for buildout (2027) Weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour conditions using procedures outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition with Synchro (v12) software. The widening of Ocoee-Apopka Road to four lanes from W Silver Star Road to West Road is assumed to be in place for buildout geometry as part of project improvements outline in Section 6.0 of the report. Intersection level of service (LOS) and maximum volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for buildout conditions are provided in Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, and Table 10. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix G. With the background improvements in place and the addition of project trips, all study intersections are expected to operate with an acceptable overall LOS and v/c ratios less than 1.00 under buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour conditions with the exception of the following: · Weekday PM Peak Hour o Ocoee-Apopka Road & West Road § Westbound left (v/c > 1.00) o Lakewood Avenue and Fullers Cross Road (Overall LOS F) § Eastbound approach (v/c > 1.00) § Northbound approach (v/c > 1.00) o SR 50 & Maguire Road § Eastbound left (v/c > 1.00) · Saturday PM Peak Hour o Ocoee-Apopka Road & West Road § Westbound left (v/c > 1.00) No additional intersection capacity deficiencies at SR 50 and Maguire Road were identified as a result of project traffic. To accommodate buildout traffic the following improvements are recommended: · Ocoee-Apopka Road & West Road o Dual westbound left-turn lanes o Signal timing adjustments · Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road o Exclusive eastbound right-turn bypass lane Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 27 o Exclusive northbound left-turn lane o Exclusive southbound right-turn bypass lane Intersection level of service (LOS) and maximum volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for buildout conditions with improvements are provided in Table 7 and 9. Additionally, project driveways were evaluated assuming recommended improvements were in place. Synchro outputs are provided in Appendix G. With the recommended improvements all study intersections and project driveways are expected to operate with an acceptable overall LOS and v/c ratios less than 1.00 under buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour conditions with the exception of SR 50 and Maguire, which was identified as a background deficiency and the minor street approaches at the intersection of Lakewood Avenue and 17th Avenue. The approaches of 17th Avenue are expected to operate with LOS F but with v/c ratios less than 1.00 during the weekday PM peak hour, which is typical of a stop-controlled approach at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. The intersection of Lakewood Avenue with 17th Avenue/17th Avenue Extension is recommended to remain a two-way stop-controlled intersection consistent with existing conditions. N NOT TO SCALE Figure 6a:Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes 28© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 1 2 4 6 5E Fullers Cross Rd SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s N L a k e w o o d A v e Oc o e e A p o p k a R d West Rd LEGEND Study Intersection PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes: Weekday (Saturday) 10 Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s 3Clarcona Ocoee Rd 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) 8 Ma g u i r e R d 9 Franklin StPlant St SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s W Silver Star Rd E Crown Point Rd (1 0 8 ) 1 4 8 (4 8 5 ) 6 6 1 (4 6 8 ) 5 1 4 (48) 65 (161) 174 (82) 122 56 ( 2 3 ) 49 8 ( 3 8 8 ) 15 9 ( 1 3 2 ) 148 (140) 356 (160) 621 (634) (620) 764 (273) 251 18 6 ( 1 8 5 ) 0 ( 2 ) 16 3 ( 1 6 7 ) 1,095 (744) 482 (459) (3 1 3 ) 3 8 7 (1 ) 0 (5 0 4 ) 6 4 5 (155) 163 (684) 858 173 (149) 1,207 (890) 0 (2) (3 5 7 ) 4 6 4 (5 2 ) 9 4 (3 0 3 ) 5 2 5 (83) 107 (854) 1,111 (357) 362 17 ( 1 4 ) 39 ( 3 4 ) 34 ( 2 9 ) 37 (29) 957 (754) 644 (522) (1 0 5 ) 1 4 8 (2 8 7 ) 3 7 4 (1 4 ) 2 1 (417) 545 (14) 20 (91) 133 64 5 ( 5 0 2 ) 44 8 ( 3 3 3 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 (0) 9 (8) 9 (8) (5 5 ) 7 0 (4 9 5 ) 7 5 1 (3 1 8 ) 4 9 8 (297) 425 (122) 175 (67) 70 50 3 ( 3 4 7 ) 75 8 ( 5 9 7 ) 24 8 ( 2 2 7 ) 325 (246) 323 (205) 375 (278) (8 ) 1 5 (1 3 4 ) 1 9 2 (2 3 0 ) 3 9 6 (4) 4 (6) 10 (6) 2 9 ( 4 ) 18 3 ( 1 3 2 ) 13 5 ( 3 8 ) 74 (44) 15 (6) 211 (205) 11 12 SEE INSET 1 (319) 319 (625) 728 15 7 ( 1 7 6 ) 10 9 ( 5 4 ) 280 (201) 704 (539) (1 0 6 ) 1 5 9 (4 0 9 ) 4 5 0 (1 3 ) 2 6 (297) 368 (122) 192 (156) 240 24 5 ( 2 4 4 ) 49 6 ( 3 7 0 ) 35 ( 1 3 ) 88 (26) 186 (68) 12 (10) (6 5 9 ) 8 6 4 (2 3 6 ) 3 8 3 (2 0 8 ) 2 6 8 (172) 291 (1,386) 1,337 (648) 781 84 ( 9 0 ) 30 0 ( 2 2 9 ) 31 3 ( 3 0 0 ) 136 (157) 1,704 (1,174) 304 (306) (176) 293 (500) 558 197 (72) 653 (519) INSET 1 8 (1 4 ) 2 1 (4 7 4 ) 7 0 3 (2 4 4 ) 2 2 0 (13) 16 (160) 242 (12) 23 32 ( 1 2 ) 55 8 ( 3 9 8 ) 24 7 ( 1 4 2 ) 228 (127) 204 (195) 207 (204) 32 6 ( 2 3 8 ) 48 0 ( 2 5 6 ) Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 N NOT TO SCALE 29© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 8 7 4 5 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 DR I V E W A Y 2 DR I V E W A Y 1 FULLERS CROSS RD AP T / C H U R C H D W Y OC O E E - A P O P K A R D OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 3 DRIVEWAY 4 DRIVEWAY 5 O C O E E - A P O P K A R D LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes: Weekday (Saturday) (20) 26 (557) 812 (89) 75 16 (12) 895 (605) 75 (88) 1 (3 5 ) 3 5 (558) 821 (44) 37 985 (705) 2 (8 6 1 ) 1 , 3 1 1 1, 3 8 5 ( 9 4 1 ) 7 (7) 3 4 (6 9 6 ) 1 , 1 2 1 (1 2 4 ) 8 8 1, 2 7 5 ( 8 6 7 ) 35 (43) 5 30 ( 2 2 ) 0 ( 0 ) 11 ( 9 ) (1 0 6 ) 1 0 4 (0 ) 0 (3 6 ) 3 5 Demastus Ln 14 13 9 11 (5 5 ) 7 0 (4 9 5 ) 7 5 1 (3 1 8 ) 4 9 8 325 (246) 323 (205) 375 (278)50 3 ( 3 4 7 ) 75 8 ( 5 9 7 ) 24 8 ( 2 2 7 ) (297) 425 (122) 175 (67) 70 (1 0 5 ) 1 4 8 (2 8 7 ) 3 7 4 (1 4 ) 2 1 0 (0) 9 (8) 9 (8)64 5 ( 5 0 2 ) 44 8 ( 3 3 3 ) 0 ( 0 ) (417) 545 (14) 20 (91) 133 (8 ) 1 5 (1 3 4 ) 1 9 2 (2 3 0 ) 3 9 6 74 (44) 15 (6) 211 (205)9 ( 4 ) 18 3 ( 1 3 2 ) 13 5 ( 3 8 ) (4) 4 (6) 10 (6) 2 3 10 6(14) 11 (0) 0 (11) 9 187 (213) 0 (0) 104 (136) 17 ( 1 7 ) 1, 1 6 1 ( 7 2 2 ) 20 8 ( 2 6 6 ) (1 9 ) 2 0 (6 9 3 ) 1 , 1 1 4 (3 3 ) 2 2 DRIVEWAY 6 O C O E E - A P O P K A R D ( 7 9 2 ) 1 , 1 8 1 (2 7 ) 2 2 1, 2 0 8 ( 7 8 1 ) 67 ( 8 6 ) 21 (21) 6 Figure 6b:Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes (Zoom In) N NOT TO SCALE 30© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 7 3 5 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7 Wurst Rd Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 (27) 22 (162) 158 20 ( 2 1 ) 14 ( 1 4 ) 15 (18) 172 (204)8 DR I V E W A Y 9 DR I V E W A Y 8 17th AVE EXT 17th AVE EXT 4 16 5 7 (7 1 ) 6 2 (3 5 ) 3 4 (154) 146 (17) 15 155 (181) 37 (44) Demastus Ln 14 13 9 11 LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes: Weekday (Saturday) (5 5 ) 7 0 (4 9 5 ) 7 5 1 (3 1 8 ) 4 9 8 325 (246) 323 (205) 375 (278)50 3 ( 3 4 7 ) 75 8 ( 5 9 7 ) 24 8 ( 2 2 7 ) (297) 425 (122) 175 (67) 70 (1 0 5 ) 1 4 8 (2 8 7 ) 3 7 4 (1 4 ) 2 1 0 (0) 9 (8) 9 (8)64 5 ( 5 0 2 ) 44 8 ( 3 3 3 ) 0 ( 0 ) (417) 545 (14) 20 (91) 133 (8 ) 1 5 (1 3 4 ) 1 9 2 (2 3 0 ) 3 9 6 74 (44) 15 (6) 211 (205)9 ( 4 ) 18 3 ( 1 3 2 ) 13 5 ( 3 8 ) (4) 4 (6) 10 (6) 2 Clinger Cove Rd 3 6 10 10 11 [18] 15 [107] 99 14 [ 1 4 ] 62 [ 6 4 ] 37 [44] 180 [208] 9 [7 4 6 ] 9 0 9 [6 7 ] 5 2 95 0 [ 7 9 2 ] 22 [ 3 3 ] 21 [28] 8 DR I V E W A Y 9 DRIVEWAY 8 17th AVE EXT OC O E E - A P O P K A R D DRIVEWAY 7 OC O E E - A P O P K A R D [7 1 2 ] 1 , 1 1 4 [6 2 ] 5 2 1, 1 4 6 [ 7 1 8 ] 62 [ 6 3 ] 97 [115] 97 [106] 13 17th AVE EXT OC O E E - A P O P K A R D [8 1 9 ] 1 , 2 0 4 [9 ] 7 1, 2 0 8 [ 7 8 1 ] 7 [7] 7 Figure 6c:Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes (Zoom In) N NOT TO SCALE Figure 6d:Buildout (2027) Intersection Volumes (Zoom In)31© 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 200 S Orange Ave, Suite 600, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 7 3 5 1 26 E Fullers Cross Rd 17th Avenue N L a k e w o o d A v e 5 7 Wurst Rd Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 8 4 16 5 7 Demastus Ln 14 13 9 11 LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Project Driveway PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes: Weekday (Saturday) (5 5 ) 7 0 (4 9 5 ) 7 5 1 (3 1 8 ) 4 9 8 325 (246) 323 (205) 375 (278)50 3 ( 3 4 7 ) 75 8 ( 5 9 7 ) 24 8 ( 2 2 7 ) (297) 425 (122) 175 (67) 70 (1 0 5 ) 1 4 8 (2 8 7 ) 3 7 4 (1 4 ) 2 1 0 (0) 9 (8) 9 (8)64 5 ( 5 0 2 ) 44 8 ( 3 3 3 ) 0 ( 0 ) (417) 545 (14) 20 (91) 133 (8 ) 1 5 (1 3 4 ) 1 9 2 (2 3 0 ) 3 9 6 74 (44) 15 (6) 211 (205)9 ( 4 ) 18 3 ( 1 3 2 ) 13 5 ( 3 8 ) (4) 4 (6) 10 (6) 2 Clinger Cove Rd 10 3 6 (8 9 ) 7 5 (2 4 4 ) 4 6 7 (9 7 ) 1 5 7 (106) 104 (70) 68 11 2 ( 1 3 3 ) 23 6 ( 1 9 1 ) 44 ( 1 9 ) 1417thAVE EXT 17th AVE LA K E W O O D A V E 32 (23) 76 (80) Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 32 Table 7:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB D 0.26 (EBR)175 (EBR)E 0.84 (EBR) 225 (EBR) WB F 1.27 (WBL)1,075 (WBL)E 0.78 (WBT)475 (WBL) NB E 0.99 (NBT)1,050 (NBT)D 0.94 (NBT)950 (NBT) SB E 0.88 (SBL)750 (SBT/R)D 0.88 (SBL)725 (SBT/R) Overall F (82.8 s)1.27 (WBL)1,075 (WBL)C (58.8 s) 0.94 (NBT) 950 (NBT) EB A 0.48 (EBT/R)25 (EBT/R) WB A 0.79 (WBL)175 (WBL) SB F 0.91 (SBR)375 (SBR) Overall B (13.1 s)0.91 (SBR)375 (SBR) EB A 0.60 (EBL)100 (EBL) WB C 0.62 (WBT)525 (WBT) NB F 0.94 (NBL)675 (NBL) Overall C (34.4 s)0.94 (NBL)675 (NBL) EB B 0.82 (EBT)250 (EBT) WB D 0.91 (WBL)475 (WBL) NB E 0.94 (NBL)725 (NBR) SB E 0.26 (SBT)100 (SBT) Overall D (44.2 s)0.94 (NBL)725 (NBR) EB F 1.18 (EBL/T/R)700 (EBL/T/R)D 0.88 (EBL/T)275 (EBL/T) WB B 0.09 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R)C 0.09 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R) NB F 1.12 (NBL/T/R)525 (NBL/T/R)C 0.74 (NBT/R)175 (NBT/R) SB B 0.77 (SBR)200 (SBL/T/R)B 0.77 (SBR)200 (SBR) Overall F (64.0 s)1.18 (EBL/T/R) 700 (EBL/T/R)C (18.9 s)0.88 (EBL/T)275 (EBL/T) EB E 0.91 (EBL)400 (EBL) WB F 0.98 (WBR)600 (WBR) NB D 0.91 (NBR)700 (NBR) SB E 0.92 (SBT/R)925 (SBT/R) Overall E (61.6 s)0.98 (WBR) 925 (SBT/R) EB B 0.04 (EBL/T/R)25 (EBL/T/R) WB C 0.61 (WBL/T/R)100 (WBL/T/R) NB F 0.99 (NBL/T/R)400 (NBL/T/R) SB C 0.62 (SBL/T/R)125 (SBL/T/R) Overall E (37.5 s)0.99 (NBL/T/R) 400 (NBL/T/R) EB D 0.53 (EBT/R)300 (EBT/R) WB F 0.94 (WBT/R)625 (WBT/R) NB D 0.77 (NBT)700 (NBT) SB C 0.84 (SBL)375 (SBT/R) Overall D (43.1 s)0.94 (WBT/R) 700 (NBT) EB D 0.83 (EBL)500 (EBT/R) WB D 0.52 (WBT/R)325 (WBT/R) NB D 0.80 (NBL)550 (NBT/R) SB E 0.96 (SBT)675 (SBT) Overall D (48.7 s)0.96 (SBT)675 (SBT) EB A 0.71 (EBL)200 (EBL) WB B 0.83 (WBT)225 (WBT) SB E 0.95 (SBL)675 (SBL) Overall C (26.3 s)0.95 (SBL)675 (SBL) EB A 0.60 (EBL)275 (EBT) WB A 0.62 (WBT) 25 (WBT) SB E 0.84 (SBR)425 (SBR) Overall B (12.0 s)0.84 (SBR)425 (SBR) EB E 1.20 (EBL)650 (EBT) WB E 0.96 (WBT/R)1,075 (WBT/R) NB E 0.97 (NBL)525 (NBL) SB F 0.89 (SBL)350 (SBL) Overall E (72.5 s)1.20 (EBL) 1,075 (WBT/R) WB F 0.91 (WBL/R)200 (WBL/R) SB(L)E 0.12 (SBL)25 (SBL) Overall -0.91 (WBL/R) 200 (WBL/R) EB F 0.92 (EBL/T/R)200 (EBL/T/R) WB F 0.71 (WBL/T/R)125 (WBL/T/R) NB(L)A 0.07 (NBL)25 (NBL) SB(L)A 0.05 (SBL)25 (SBL) Overall -0.92 (EBL/T/R) 200 (EBL/T/R) Weekday PM Peak Hour w/ Improvements Intersection Control Type Approach Weekday PM Peak Hour Recommended Improvements 1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Rd Signalized 2 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 4 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Avenue Signalized Dual westbound left-turn lanes, signal timing adjustments Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Roundabout Yield-controlled exclusive right-turn bypass lane added to eastbound approach. Exclusive northbound left- turn lane. 6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signalized 5 12 SR 50 & Maguire Rd Signalized 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Franklin St Signalized 10 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized Stop-Controlled (AWSC) 8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Silver Star Rd Signalized 13 Ocoee-Apopka Road & 17th Avenue Extension Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 14 Lakewood Avenue & 17th Avenue Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 11 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 7 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/ Clinger Cove Rd Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 33 Table 8:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Weekday PM Peak Hour)- 2 Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB A 0.58 (EBT)25 (EBT) WB A 0.65 (WBT/R) 450 (WBT/R) NB F 0.78 (NBL/T/R)175 (NBL/T/R) SB F 0.71 (SBR)75 (SBR) Overall B (13.0 s)0.78 (NBL/T/R) 450 (WBT/R) NB(R)B 0.09 (NBR)25 (NBR) Overall -0.09 (NBR)25 (NBR) WB(R)B 0.01 (WBR)0 (WBT/R) Overall -0.01 (WBR) (WBT/R) EB E 0.27 (EBL/T/R)50 (EBL/T/R) WB E 0.86 (WBT/R) 200 (WBT/R) NB B 0.47 (NBT) 350 (NBT) SB A 0.56 (SBL)100 (SBL) Overall B (13.5 s)0.86 (WBT/R) 350 (NBT) WB(R)B 0.08 (WBR)25 (WBR) Overall -0.08 (WBR) 25 (WBR) WB(R)B 0.05 (WBR)25 (WBR) SB(L)B 0.13 (SBL)25 (SBL) Overall -0.13 (SBL)25 (SBL) WB(R)B 0.02 (WBR)25 (WBR) Overall -0.02 (WBR) 25 (WBR) WB(R)C 0.07 (WBR)25 (WBR) SBL B 0.03 (SBL)25 (SBL) Overall -0.07 (WBR) 25 (WBR) EB(L)A 0.01 (EBL/T)0 (EBL/T) SB B 0.13 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) Overall -0.13 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) WB(L)A 0.03 (WBL/T)25 (WBL/T) NB B 0.16 (NBL/R)25 (NBL/R) Overall -0.16 (NBL/R) 25 (NBL/R) EB(L)A 0.02 (EBL/T)25 (EBL/T) SB A 0.05 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) Overall -0.05 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) 17 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 3 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 21 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 7 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 24 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway 10 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 25 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway 11 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 22 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 8 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 23 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway 9 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 20 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 6 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 18 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 4 Signalized 19 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 5 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 15 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway 1 Signalized 16 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway 2 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) Intersection Control Type Approach Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 34 Table 9:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Saturday PM Peak Hour) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB D 0.24 (EBR)125 (EBR)D 0.24 (EBR)125 (EBR) WB E 1.05 (WBL) 600 (WBL)D 0.97 (WBL)425 (WBL) NB E 0.95 (NBR)625 (NBT)E 0.95 (NBR)625 (NBT) SB D 0.75 (SBT/R)475 (SBT/R)D 0.75 (SBT/R)475 (SBT/R) Overall D (57.2 s)1.05 (WBL)625 (NBT)D (54.3 s)0.97 (WBL)625 (NBT) EB A 0.45 (EBT/R)25 (EBT/R) WB A 0.70 (WBL) 150 (WBL) SB E 0.87 (SBR)300 (SBR) Overall B (12.0 s)0.87 (SBR)300 (SBR) EB A 0.42 (EBL) 75 (EBL) WB B 0.47 (WBT)325 (WBT) NB E 0.90 (NBL)475 (NBL) Overall C (26.2 s)0.90 (NBL)475 (NBL) EB D 0.71 (EBT)575 (EBT) WB D 0.89 (WBL) 375 (WBL) NB E 0.80 (NBL)350 (NBR) SB E 0.19 (SBT)75 (SBT) Overall D (47.5 s)0.89 (WBL)575 (EBT) EB F 0.99 (EBL/T/R)375 (EBL/T/R)C 0.76 (EBL/T)175 (EBL/T) WB A 0.05 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R)A 0.05 (WBL/T/R)0 (WBL/T/R) NB C 0.72 (NBL/T/R)150 (NBL/T/R)B 0.50 (NBT/R)75 (NBT/R) SB A 0.50 (SBR)75 (SBL/T/R)A 0.50 (SBR)75 (SBR) Overall D (26.4 s)0.99 (EBL/T/R) 375 (EBL/T/R)B (12.9 s)0.76 (EBL/T)175 (EBL/T) EB D 0.56 (EBL)200 (EBL) WB E 0.84 (WBR)325 (WBR) NB A 0.42 (NBR)75 (NBR) SB C 0.55 (SBT/R)400 (SBT/R) Overall C (30.5 s)0.84 (WBR)400 (SBT/R) EB A 0.03 (EBL/T/R)25 (EBL/T/R) WB B 0.42 (WBL/T/R)75 (WBL/T/R) NB B 0.53 (NBL/T/R)100 (NBL/T/R) SB B 0.28 (SBL/T/R)50 (SBL/T/R) Overall B (12.2 s)0.53 (NBL/T/R) 100 (NBL/T/R) EB C 0.35 (EBT/R)175 (EBT/R) WB D 0.69 (WBT/R)350 (WBT/R) NB A 0.54 (NBT)25 (NBT) SB B 0.38 (SBT/R)225 (SBT/R) Overall B (17.9 s)0.69 (WBT/R)350 (WBT/R) EB C 0.45 (EBL)300 (EBT/R) WB C 0.14 (WBT/R)100 (WBT/R) NB D 0.84 (NBT/R)450 (NBT/R) SB C 0.90 (SBT)325 (SBT) Overall C (32.7 s)0.90 (SBT) 450 (NBT/R) EB A 0.41 (EBT) 75 (EBL) WB A 0.52 (WBT)25 (WBT) SB E 0.87 (SBL)325 (SBL) Overall B (16.5 s)0.87 (SBL)325 (SBL) EB A 0.60 (EBL)225 (EBT) WB A 0.52 (WBT)175 (WBT) SB E 0.85 (SBR)400 (SBR) Overall B (13.0 s)0.85 (SBR)400 (SBR) EB C 0.80 (EBL)525 (EBT) WB D 0.88 (WBL)475 (WBT/R) NB E 0.93 (NBL)525 (NBL) SB F 0.90 (SBL)300 (SBL) Overall D (49.0 s)0.93 (NBL)525 (NBL) WB D 0.58 (WBL/R)100 (WBL/R) SB(L)A 0.08 (SBL) 25 (SBL) Overall -0.58 (WBL/R)100 (WBL/R) EB D 0.56 (EBL/T/R)100 (EBL/T/R) WB D 0.42 (WBL/T/R)50 (WBL/T/R) NB(L)A 0.08 (NBL) 25 (NBL) SB(L)A 0.02 (SBL) 25 (SBL) Overall -0.56 (EBL/T/R) 100 (EBL/T/R) Dual westbound left-turn lanes, signal timing adjustments Saturday PM Peak Hour w/ Improvements Intersection Control Type Approach Saturday PM Peak Hour Recommended Improvements 1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Rd Signalized 2 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 3 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 4 Clarcona Ocoee Rd & Lakewood Avenue Signalized 5 Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road Roundabout Yield-controlled exclusive right-turn bypass lane added to eastbound approach. Exclusive northbound left- turn lane. 6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Signalized 12 SR 50 & Maguire Rd Signalized 10 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Signalized 11 Plant St/ W Franklin St & SR 429 SB Ramps Signalized 7 Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/ Clinger Cove Rd Stop-Controlled (AWSC) 8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Silver Star Rd Signalized 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Franklin St Signalized 13 Ocoee-Apopka Road & 17th Avenue Extension Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 14 Lakewood Avenue & 17th Avenue Stop-Controlled (TWSC) Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 35 Table 10:Buildout (2027) Intersection Conditions (Saturday PM Peak Hour) -2 Level of Service (overall delay ) Max Movement V/C Ratio Max 95th Percentile Queue (ft) EB A 0.55 (EBT)200 (EBT) WB A 0.58 (WBT/R) 425 (WBT/R) NB F 0.32 (NBL/T/R)125 (NBL/T/R) SB F 0.10 (SBR)50 (SBR) Overall B (19.0 s)0.58 (WBT/R)425 (WBT/R) NB(R)B 0.01 (NBR)0 (NBR) Overall -0.01 (NBR) (NBR) WB(R)A 0.01 (WBR)0 (WBT/R) Overall -0.01 (WBR) (WBT/R) EB D 0.26 (EBL/T/R)50 (EBL/T/R) WB E 0.61 (WBT/R) 300 (WBT/R) NB B 0.32 (NBT) 200 (NBT) SB A 0.47 (SBL)100 (SBL) Overall B (15.0 s)0.61 (WBT/R)300 (WBT/R) WB(R)B 0.07 (WBR)25 (WBR) Overall -0.07 (WBR) 25 (WBR) WB(R)B 0.04 (WBR)25 (WBR) SB(L)B 0.12 (SBL)25 (SBL) Overall -0.12 (SBL)25 (SBL) WB(R)B 0.01 (WBR)0 (WBR) Overall -0.01 (WBR) (WBR) WB(R)B 0.07 (WBR)25 (WBR) SBL A 0.04 (SBL)25 (SBL) Overall -0.07 (WBR) 25 (WBR) EB(L)A 0.02 (EBL/T)0 (EBL/T) SB B 0.14 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) Overall -0.14 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) WB(L)A 0.03 (WBL/T)25 (WBL/T) NB B 0.19 (NBL/R)25 (NBL/R) Overall -0.19 (NBL/R) 25 (NBL/R) EB(L)A 0.02 (EBL/T)25 (EBL/T) SB A 0.06 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) Overall -0.06 (SBL/R)25 (SBL/R) 24 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway 10 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 25 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway 11 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 22 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 8 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 23 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway 9 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 21 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 7 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 19 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 5 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 20 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 6 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 17 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 3 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) 18 Ocoee-Apopka Road & Driveway 4 Signalized 15 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway 1 Signalized 16 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway 2 Stop-Controlled (TWSC) Intersection Control Type Approach Saturday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 36 5.3 BUILDOUT TURN LANE ANALYSIS A turn lane analysis was conducted at the proposed project driveway to assess the need for exclusive ingress left-turn and right-turn lanes utilizing procedures outlined in the National Highway Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP) Report 457. The turn lane analysis was performed assuming the widening of Ocoee Apopka Road would be in place.Table 11 summarizes the turn lane analysis. NCHRP Worksheets are provided in Appendix I. Table 11:Turn Lane Analysis Summary DRIVEWAY 2 Based on the anticipated weekday PM peak hour volumes making an eastbound right-turn movement at Driveway 2, an ingress right-turn lane is warranted. The recommended deceleration length for a roadway with a design speed of 40 miles per hour (posted speed is 35 mph) is 155 feet, per the FDOT Design Manual. DRIVEWAY 5 Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a northbound right-turn movement at Driveway 4, an ingress right-turn lane is warranted. The recommended deceleration length for a roadway with a design speed of 50 miles per hour (posted speed is 45 mph) is 290 feet, per the FDOT Design Manual. DRIVEWAY 6 Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour volumes making a northbound right-turn movement at Driveway 5, an ingress right-turn lane is warranted. The recommended deceleration length for a roadway with a design speed of 50 miles per hour (posted speed is 45 mph) is 290 feet, per the FDOT Design Manual. Warrant Met?95th percentile queue Warrant Met?95th percentile queue Southbound Left-Turn Yes < 1 veh Yes < 1 veh Northbound Right-Turn Yes N/A No N/A Southbound Left-Turn Yes < 1 veh Yes < 1 veh Northbound Right-Turn Yes N/A Yes N/A Westbound Right-Turn No N/A No N/A Eastbound Left-Turn No N/A No N/A Westbound Left-Turn No N/A No N/A Eastbound Right-Turn No N/A No N/A Eastbound Left-Turn No N/A No N/A Westbound Right-Turn No N/A No N/A Northbound Right-Turn Yes N/A Yes N/A Soutbound Left-Turn Yes < 1 veh Yes < 1 veh Northbound Left-Turn Yes < 1 veh Yes < 1 veh Southbound Right-Turn No N/A No N/A 17th Ave Extension & Lakewood Avenue Driveway Turn Lane Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday PM Peak Hour Fullers Cross Rd & Driveway 2 Eastbound Right-Turn Yes N/A No N/A 17th Ave Extension & Driveway 11 Ocoee-Apopka Rd & Driveway 5 Ocoee-Apopka Rd & Driveway 6 Ocoee-Apopka Rd & Driveway 8 17th Ave Extension & Driveway 10 N/A 17th Ave Extension & Driveway 9 17th Ave Extension Ocoee-Apopka Road Northbound Right-Turn Yes N/A Yes Ocoee-Apopka Rd & Driveway 7 Northbound Right-Turn No N/A No N/A Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 37 Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a southbound left-turn movement at Driveway 5, an ingress left-turn is warranted. The recommended turn lane length for the southbound left-turn lane at Driveway 5 is 340 feet to accommodate for deceleration from the 50 mph design speed and two queued vehicles (50 feet). DRIVEWAY 8 Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a northbound right-turn movement at Driveway 6, an ingress right-turn lane is warranted. The recommended deceleration length for a roadway with a design speed of 50 miles per hour (posted speed is 45 mph) is 290 feet, per the FDOT Design Manual. Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a southbound left-turn movement at Driveway 6, an ingress left-turn is warranted. The recommended turn lane length for the southbound left-turn lane at Driveway 5 is 340 feet to accommodate for deceleration from the 50 mph design speed and two queued vehicles (50 feet). OCOEE-APOPKA ROAD AND 17TH AVENUE EXTENSION Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a northbound right-turn at the intersection of Ocoee-Apopka Road and the 17th Avenue Extension, a right- turn lane is warranted. The recommended deceleration length for a roadway with a design speed of 50 miles per hour (posted speed is 45 mph) is 290 feet, per the FDOT Design Manual. Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a southbound left-turn at the intersection of Ocoee-Apopka Road and the 17th Avenue Extension, a left-turn lane is warranted. The recommended turn lane length for the southbound left-turn lane at Driveway 5 is 340 feet to accommodate for deceleration from the 50 mph design speed and two queued vehicles (50 feet). LAKEWOOD AVENUE AND 17TH AVENUE EXTENSION Based on the anticipated buildout weekday PM peak hour and Saturday PM peak hour volumes making a northbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Lakewood Avenue and 17th Avenue, a left-turn lane is warranted. The recommended turn lane length for the northbound left-turn lane at is 195 feet to accommodate for deceleration from the assumed design speed of 35 mph and two queued vehicles (50 feet). Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 38 6.0 ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS A daily roadway segment analysis was performed for existing, future background, and future buildout conditions. Roadway data was obtained from the City of Ocoee’s Concurrency Management System (updated 10/18/2023). The City of Ocoee’s Management System is included in Appendix J. Background growth was developed by forecasting Year 2023 daily volumes using a two percent (2%) annual growth rate and adding vested trips as reported in the City of Ocoee’s CMS. Buildout volumes were developed by adding anticipated project trips to background volumes.Tables 12 and 13 provide the existing and future roadway segment analyses, respectively. The following roadway segments are expected to exceed their adopted LOS with the addition of project traffic: · Maguire Road, from Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue · Ocoee-Apopka Road, from W Silver Star Road to Fullers Cross Road · Ocoee-Apopka Road, from Fullers Cross Road to West Road The following improvements are recommended to accommodate project traffic: · Widen Maguire Road from two lanes to four lanes, from Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue · Widen Ocoee-Apopka Road two lanes to four lanes, from W Silver Star Road to West Road Maguire Road Phase 5 improvements include the widening on Maguire Road from SR 50 to Story Road. Ocoee-Apopka Road can be widened from two lanes to four lanes adjacent to the project frontage; however, Orange County will need to acquire additional right-of-way to complete the rest of the recommended improvement. Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 39 Table 12:Existing Roadway Segment Analysis (Weekday Daily Conditions) From To E Crown Point Road SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Palm Dr E 2 C3C 19,530 8,532 538 9,070 0.46 C Palm Dr Fullers Cross Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 8,262 916 9,178 0.46 C Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 10,544 1,010 11,554 0.57 C Fullers Cross Road Ocoee Apopka Rd Lakewood Ave E 2 C3R 20,160 3,867 2,548 6,415 0.32 C Lakewood Avenue Rewis St Wurst Rd C 2 C3R 17,640 7,481 1,378 8,859 0.50 C Wurst Rd Fullers Cross Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 7,481 2,052 9,533 0.47 C Fullers Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 5,712 4,441 10,153 0.50 C Maguire Road SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Marshall Farms Rd D 2 C3C 19,530 13,905 1,111 15,016 0.77 D Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd D 2 C3C 19,530 13,770 552 14,322 0.73 D Story Rd Kissimmee Ave D 2 C3C 19,530 15,626 1,342 16,968 0.87 D Kissimmee Ave SR 438 (W Franklin St)D 2 C3C 19,530 13,974 1,710 15,684 0.80 D CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) SR 438 (W Franklin St)SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd)E 2 C3C 21,700 13,260 3,769 17,029 0.78 D SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd) Fullers Cross Rd E 2 C3C 19,530 11,126 5,626 16,752 0.86 D Fullers Cross Rd West Rd E 2 C3C 19,530 14,688 1,788 16,476 0.84 D West Rd McCormick Rd E 2 C3C 19,530 14,835 1,314 16,149 0.83 D SR 438 (Plant Street/ Franklin Street) E Crown Point Rd SR 429 E 2 C3C 21,700 15,198 2,009 17,207 0.79 D SR 429 Ocoee Apopka Rd E 2 C3C 21,700 13,668 2,775 16,443 0.76 D SR 438 (Silver Star Road) Ocoee Apopka Rd Bluford Ave E 2 C3C 21,700 15,198 1,410 16,608 0.77 D Bluford Ave Ocoee-Hills Rd E 2 C3R 22,400 11,934 1,096 13,030 0.58 C Ocoee-Hills Rd Clarke Rd E 2 C3R 22,400 15,410 1,308 16,718 0.75 C West Road Ocoee Apopka Rd SR 429 E 4 C3C 32,940 19,588 1,530 21,118 0.64 C Notes: 1. Data obtained from the City of Ocoee's Concurrency Management Spreadsheet (updated 10/18/2023). Roadway Segment V/C Ratio LOSAdopted LOS Number of Lanes Context Classification Daily MSV Volumes 1 Vested Trips1 Roadway Attributes1 Existing (2023) Conditions - Daily Daily + Vested Ocoee Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 40 Table 13:Future Roadway Segment Analysis (Weekday Daily Conditions) From To E Crown Point Road SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Palm Dr E 2 C3C 19,530 8,532 2% 538 9,773 0.50 C 9,773 5% 898 10,671 0.55 C Palm Dr Fullers Cross Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 8,262 2% 916 9,859 0.49 C 9,859 5% 898 10,757 0.53 C Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 10,544 2% 1,010 12,423 0.62 C 12,423 5% 898 13,321 0.66 C Fullers Cross Road Ocoee Apopka Rd Lakewood Ave E 2 C3R 20,160 3,867 2% 2,548 6,734 0.33 C 6,734 20% 3,592 10,326 0.51 C Lakewood Avenue Rewis St Wurst Rd C 2 C3R 17,640 7,481 2% 1,378 9,476 0.54 C 9,476 10% 1,796 11,272 0.64 C Wurst Rd Fullers Cross Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 7,481 2% 2,052 10,150 0.50 C 10,150 10% 1,796 11,946 0.59 C Fullers Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd E 2 C3R 20,160 5,712 2% 4,441 10,624 0.53 C 10,624 30% 5,388 16,012 0.79 C Maguire Road SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Marshall Farms Rd D 2 C3C 19,530 13,905 2% 1,111 16,162 0.83 D 16,162 10% 1,796 17,958 0.92 D Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd D 2 C3C 19,530 13,770 2% 552 15,457 0.79 D 15,457 10% 1,796 17,253 0.88 D Story Rd Kissimmee Ave D 2 C3C 19,530 15,626 2% 1,342 18,256 0.93 D 18,256 10% 1,796 20,052 1.03 F Kissimmee Ave SR 438 (W Franklin St)D 2 C3C 19,530 13,974 2% 1,710 16,836 0.86 D 16,836 10% 1,796 18,632 0.95 D CR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) SR 438 (W Franklin St)SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd)E 2 C3C 21,700 13,260 2% 3,769 18,122 0.84 D 18,122 5% 898 19,020 0.88 D SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd) Fullers Cross Rd E 2 C3C 19,530 11,126 2% 5,626 17,669 0.90 D 17,669 15% 2,694 20,363 1.04 F Fullers Cross Rd West Rd E 2 C3C 19,530 14,688 2% 1,788 17,687 0.91 D 17,687 35% 6,286 23,973 1.23 F West Rd McCormick Rd E 2 C3C 19,530 14,835 2% 1,314 17,372 0.89 D 17,372 5% 898 18,270 0.94 D SR 438 (Plant Street/ Franklin Street) E Crown Point Rd SR 429 E 2 C3C 21,700 15,198 2% 2,009 18,460 0.85 D 18,460 5% 898 19,358 0.89 D SR 429 Ocoee Apopka Rd E 2 C3C 21,700 13,668 2% 2,775 17,570 0.81 D 17,570 5% 898 18,468 0.85 D SR 438 (Silver Star Road) Ocoee Apopka Rd Bluford Ave E 2 C3C 21,700 15,198 2% 1,410 17,861 0.82 D 17,861 5% 898 18,759 0.86 D Bluford Ave Ocoee-Hills Rd E 2 C3R 22,400 11,934 2% 1,096 14,014 0.63 C 14,014 5% 898 14,912 0.67 C Ocoee-Hills Rd Clarke Rd E 2 C3R 22,400 15,410 2% 1,308 17,988 0.80 C 17,988 5% 898 18,886 0.84 C West Road Ocoee Apopka Rd SR 429 E 4 C3C 32,940 19,588 2% 1,530 22,733 0.69 C 22,733 30% 5,388 28,121 0.85 D Notes: 1. Data obtained from the City of Ocoee's Concurrency Management Spreadsheet (updated 10/18/2023). 2027 Daily + Vested V/C Ratio LOS Roadway Segment Background (2027) Conditions - Daily Adopted LOS Number of Lanes Context Classification Daily MSV Volumes V/C Ratio LOS% Assign Project Traffic 2027 Background Volumes Weekday Daily Project Traffic Buildout (2027) Conditions - DailyRoadway Attributes1 Existing (2023) Volumes 1 Applied Growth Rate Vested Trips1 Ocoee Sports Regional Sports Complex │ Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 41 7.0 MULTIMODAL ASSESSMENT An assessment of impacts and connectivity to existing and future funded transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and trail facilities within the study area was conducted. This assessment includes a narrative of provisions this project will maintain or improve upon relating to sidewalk connections, bicycle facilities, and transit stops near the project site. Continuous sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy / West Rd north of the proposed project. No sidewalks and bike lanes are currently found along Ocoee Apopka Rd adjacent to the driveways of the project. As shown in the LYNX bus system map provided in Appendix K, the area within the proposed development is within Neighborlink Service Area 811. Sidewalks will be provided along Ocoee Apopka Rd and E Fuller Cross Road with connections to both project driveways and adjacent streets. Ocoee Sports Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 42 8.0 CONCLUSION This traffic impact analysis was performed to assess the traffic impacts associated with the development of Ocoee Regional Sports Complex, a proposed recreation complex bounded by Ocoee-Apopka Road (CR 437) to the west and E Fullers Cross Road to the north in the city of Ocoee, Florida. The project is proposed to consist of the following: · 17 baseball fields · 1,114 cumulative rooms within 3 hotels · 160,000 square feet of community center o 150,000 square feet of indoor sports facilities o 100,000 square feet of corporate offices · 360,000 square feet of retail o 20,000 square feet of welcome center o 130,000 square feet of retail o 130,000 square feet of restaurants o 50,000 square feet of entertainment o 30,000 square feet of outdoor entertainment The project site is currently vacant and is anticipated for buildout in Year 2027. As requested by the City, 17th Avenue will be extended to connect with Ocoee-Apopka Road. Access to the development is proposed via four (4) driveways along Ocoee-Apopka Road, two (2) driveways along Fullers Cross Road, and three (3) driveways along the 17th Avenue Extension. Based on ITE trip generation data and procedures, the proposed development is anticipated to generate the following: ·Weekday: 17,960 net new external daily trips, 1,439 net new external PM peak hour trips ·Saturday: 16,784 net new external daily trips, 1,590 net new external PM peak hour trips Operational analyses for existing, background, and buildout conditions were performed at all driveways and intersections within the study area. The operational analyses indicated multiple deficiencies at the study intersections during existing, background, and buildout conditions. Recommended improvements for background and buildout scenarios are listed below. The following improvements were identified to accommodate background traffic: · Clarcona Ocoee Road & SR 429 NB Ramps o Dual northbound right turn lanes o Signal timing adjustments · Clarcona Ocoee Road & Lakewood Avenue o Dual westbound left-turn lanes and an additional south leg receiving lane o Northbound right-turn overlap phase o Signal timing modification · Lakewood Avenue & fillers Cross Road o Exclusive southbound right-turn lane · Ocoee-Apopka Road & Fullers Cross Road o Dual eastbound left-turn lane and an additional north leg receiving lane o Signal timing modification · Ocoee-Apopka Road/Maguire Road & Franklin Street o Exclusive southbound right-turn lane Ocoee Sports Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 43 · SR 50 & Maguire Road o Eastbound right-turn overlap phase o Dual southbound through lanes o Signal timing modifications With these background improvements in place, the following additional intersection improvements were identified to accommodate buildout traffic: · Ocoee-Apopka Road & West Road o Dual westbound left-turn lanes o Signal timing adjustments · Lakewood Avenue & Fullers Cross Road o Exclusive eastbound right-turn bypass lane o Exclusive northbound left-turn lane Results of the roadway segment analysis show that there are not deficiencies anticipated under existing and background (2027) conditions. Under buildout (2027) conditions, the following roadway segments are expected to exceed their adopted LOS with the addition of project traffic: · Maguire Road, from Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue · Ocoee-Apopka Road, from W Silver Star Road to Fullers Cross Road · Ocoee-Apopka Road, from Fullers Cross Road to West Road Maguire Road Phase 5 improvements include the widening on Maguire Road from SR 50 to Story Road. Ocoee-Apopka Road can be widened from two lanes to four lanes adjacent to the project frontage; however, Orange County will need to acquire additional right-of-way to complete the rest of the recommended improvement. The need for ingress turn lanes at the project driveways, the intersection of Lakewood Avenue with 17th Avenue, and the intersection of Ocoee-Apopka Road with the 17th Avenue Extension was evaluated using NCHRP Report 457 guidelines. Right turn lanes are recommended at the following driveways and intersections: · Driveway 2 · Driveway 5 · Driveway 6 · Driveway 8 · Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Left-turn lanes are recommended at the following driveways and intersections: · Driveway 6 · Driveway 8 · Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension · Lakewood Avenue and 17th Avenue (northbound left) The recommended length for the eastbound right turn-lane at Driveway 2 is 155 feet. The recommended length for the northbound right-turn lane at Driveway 5 is 290 feet. The recommended length for the northbound right-turn lane at Driveway 6 is 290 feet. The recommended length for the southbound left-turn lane at Driveway 6 is 340 feet. The recommended length for the northbound right-turn lane at Driveway 8 is 290 feet. The recommended length for the southbound left-turn lane at Driveway 8 is 340 feet. The recommended length for the northbound right-turn lane at Ocoee-Apopka and 17th Avenue Extension is 290 feet. The recommended length for the southbound left turn lane at Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Ocoee Sports Regional Sports Complex │Traffic Impact Analysis September 2024 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 44 Avenue Extension is 340 feet. The recommended length for the northbound left-turn lane at Lakewood Avenue and 17th Avenue is 195 feet. APPENDIX A TIA Methodology Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 1 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 MEMORANDUM To: Michael Rumer Development Services Director, City of Ocoee From: James M. Taylor, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: May 8, 2023 Subject: Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Methodology Ocoee Regional Sports Complex PURPOSE The following is a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) methodology outline for the above-referenced project. The forthcoming TIA will generally conform to the methodology herein and the policies and guidelines of the City of Ocoee. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ocoee Regional Sports Complex is a proposed recreational complex bounded by Ocoee-Apopka Road (CR 437) to the west and E Fullers Cross Road to the north in the City of Ocoee, Florida. The project site is currently vacant. Full buildout of the development program is anticipated in Year 2030 and is proposed to consist of the following: · 16 baseball fields · 200 room hotels (3) · 2 multipurpose fields · 131,000 square feet of office · 132,000 square feet of retail · 2.7-acre park area with playground Access to the development will be provided via seven (7) driveways along Ocoee-Apopka Road and two (2) driveways along Fullers Cross Road.Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed development and driveways. The site plan is provided in Attachment A. Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 2 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 TRIP GENERATION With the exception of the baseball fields, trip generation for the proposed development was estimated using weekday and Saturday data provided in the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE)Trip Generation Manual. Internal capture was determined using the methodology provided in ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook,3rd Edition. Pass-by trip rates for the retail component of the development program were obtained from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. All relevant excerpts from ITE publications are provided in Attachment B. The following ITE Land Use Codes (LUC) were used: · LUC 310: Hotel · LUC 488: Soccer Complex · LUC 710: General Office Building · LUC 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k, no supermarket) The baseball fields will typically be used for tournaments, rather than everyday use. Since ITE does not provide data for baseball fields, data was collected at the United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA) Space Coast Complex in Melbourne, Florida, which is a similar facility consisting of 15 baseball fields. Data was collected at the USSSA Space Coast Complex during typical weekday operations and during a Saturday baseball tournament to develop trip generation rates applicable for weekday and Saturday peak hour project trips. The Saturday trip rate is generally reflective of the highest trip rate for the facility. The trip generation study is included in Attachment C. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the estimated Daily and PM peak hour trip generation under typical weekday and Saturday (during a tournament) conditions. The proposed development program is anticipated to generate the following: ·Weekday: 14,491 net new external daily trips, 1,122 net new external PM peak hour trips ·Saturday: 16,277 net new external daily trips, 1,497 net new external PM peak hour trips Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 3 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 Table 1:Trip Generation Summary (Weekday) Total 16 Fields 169.13 2,706 50%1,353 50%1,353 600 Rooms 10.13 6,078 50%3,039 50%3,039 2 Fields 71.33 143 50%72 50%71 131 KSF 11.20 1,467 50%734 50%733 132 KSF 67.52 8,913 50%4,457 50%4,456 19,307 1,532 17,775 3,284 14,491 Total 16 Fields 12.33 197 77%152 23%45 600 Rooms 0.69 414 51%211 49%203 2 Fields 16.43 33 66%22 34%11 131 KSF 1.59 208 17%35 83%173 132 KSF 5.19 685 50%343 50%342 1,537 172 1,365 243 1,122 Notes:1Vehicle trip rate and directional splits per ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition 4 Trip rate obtained from trip generation study performed for USSSA Space Coast Complex 2Internal Capture based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Internal Capture Reduction Calculation Spreadsheet 3 Pass-by trip rate per ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Net New External Trips 555 567 Net External Trips 677 688 Pass by Trips 3 =40.0% of external retail trips 122 121 Total Generated Trips 763 774 Internal Capture 2 =11.2%(see attached capture matrices)86 86 In Out Baseball Fields (Weekday)4 Trip Rate PM Peak Hour (Weekday) P M P e a k H o u r ( W e e k d a y ) Land Use Size Units ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 ITE LUC 488: Soccer Complex 1 ITE LUC 710: General Office Building 1 ITE LUC 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k, no supermarket)1 Net New External Trips 7,247 7,244 Net External Trips 8,889 8,886 Pass by Trips 3 =40.0% of external retail trips 1,642 1,642 9,652 Internal Capture 2 =7.9%(see attached capture matrices)766 766 ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 ITE LUC 488: Soccer Complex 1 ITE LUC 710: General Office Building 1 ITE LUC 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k, no supermarket)1 Total Generated Trips 9,655 In Out Baseball Fields (Weekday)4 Trip Rate Daily (Weekday) D a i l y ( W e e k d a y ) Land Use Size Units Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 4 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 Table 2:Trip Generation Summary (Saturday) Total 16 Fields 263.20 4,211 50%2,106 50%2,105 600 Rooms 9.15 5,488 50%2,744 50%2,744 2 Fields 404.88 810 50%405 50%405 131 KSF 2.21 290 50%145 50%145 132 KSF 81.07 10,701 50%5,351 50%5,350 21,500 1,178 20,322 4,045 16,277 Total 16 Fields 35.87 574 51%293 49%281 600 Rooms 0.70 420 56%235 44%185 2 Fields 37.48 75 48%36 52%39 131 KSF 0.53 69 54%37 46%32 132 KSF 6.22 821 52%427 48%394 1,959 161 1,799 302 1,497 Notes:1Vehicle trip rate and directional splits per ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition 589 589 Net External Trips 10,162 10,160 In Out Daily (Saturday) P M P e a k H o u r ( S a t u r d a y ) Size Units Net New External Trips 8,139 8,138 ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 Total Generated Trips 1,028 D a i l y ( S a t u r d a y ) Size Units Trip Rate ITE LUC 310: Hotel 1 (see attached capture matrices)80 80 Pass by Trips 3 =40.0% of external retail trips 2,023 2,022 700 3 Pass-by trip rate per ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition 931 Internal Capture 2 =8.2% In Out ITE LUC 488: Soccer Complex 1 Net New External Trips 797 Trip Rate PM Peak Hour (Saturday) Total Generated Trips 10,751 10,749 Internal Capture 2 =5.5%(see attached capture matrices) Land Use Baseball Fields (Tournament)4 ITE LUC 710: General Office Building 1 ITE LUC 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k, no supermarket)1 Land Use Baseball Fields (Tournament)4 ITE LUC 710: General Office Building 1 ITE LUC 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k, no supermarket)1 4 Trip rate obtained from trip generation study performed for USSSA Space Coast Complex 2Internal Capture based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Internal Capture Reduction Calculation Spreadsheet Net External Trips 948 851 Pass by Trips 3 =40.0% of external retail trips 151 151 ITE LUC 488: Soccer Complex 1 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 5 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT Projected traffic demand of project trips on study roadways was derived with the use of the latest adopted regional travel demand model. Land use data for the project was entered into a new traffic analysis zone (TAZ) within the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM v7) model set and situated within the existing roadway network. The model was used to assign trips for all trip purposes between allocated origin and destination pairs using the latest regional model data. Trip distribution for the project was extracted from the completed model assignment and revised based on local knowledge. The resulting model plot showing the percent of daily project distribution is provided in Attachment D. Daily model project distribution will be referenced to manually assign project distribution at the study area intersections and driveways in general accordance with model output. Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 6 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 STUDY AREA Based on the City of Ocoee’s latest TIA guidelines, the study area shall include all roadway segments where project trips consume five percent (5%) or more of the Daily adopted maximum service volume (MSV), and all signalized intersections within the five percent (5%) significance area. The test for five percent (5%) significance is provided in Table 3. Therefore, based on the information above, the study area will include an analysis of the following intersections and roadway segments, which are also shown in Figure 1: Study Area Intersections 1. Ocoee Apopka Road & West Road / Ocoee Crown Point Parkway 2. SR 429 SB Ramps & West Road / Clarcona Ocoee Road 3. SR 429 NB Ramps & West Road / Clarcona Ocoee Road 4. N Lakewood Avenue & Clarcona Ocoee Road 5. N Lakewood Avenue & E Fullers Cross Road 6. Ocoee Apopka Road & E Fullers Cross Road 7. N Lakewood Avenue & Wurst Road / Clinger Cove Road 8. Ocoee Apopka Road & W Silver Star Road 9. Ocoee Apopka Road / Maguire Road & W Franklin Street 10. SR 429 NB Ramps & W Franklin Street / Plant Street 11. SR 429 SB Ramps & W Franklin Street / Plant Street 12. Maguire Road & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive) Study Area Roadway Segments · E Crown Point Road o Fullers Cross Road to Ocoee Apopka Road · Fullers Cross Road o Ocoee Apopka Road to Lakewood Avenue · Lakewood Avenue o Rewis Street to Wurst Road o Wurst Road to Fullers Cross Road o Fullers Cross Road to Clarcona Ocoee Road · Maguire Road o SR 50 (W Colonial Drive) to Marshall Farms Road o Marshall Farms Road to Story Road o Story Road to Kissimmee Avenue o Kissimmee Avenue to SR 438 (W Franklin Street) · SR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Road) o SR 438 (W Franklin Street) to SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) o SR 438 (W Silver Star Road) to Fullers Cross Road o Fullers Cross Road to West Road o West Road to McCormick Road · SR 438 (Plant Street / Franklin Street) o E Crown Point Road to SR 429 o SR 429 to Ocoee Apopka Road · SR 438 (Silver Star Road) o Ocoee Apopka Road to Bluford Avenue o Bluford Avenue to Ocoee-Hills Road o Ocoee-Hills Road to Clarke Road Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 7 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 Table 3:Significance Test (Saturday) Maintaining Agency Adopted LOS Number of Lanes % Assign 3 Daily Project Trips Max % Impact 4 Sandy Cove & Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Ocoee E 2 15,600 1.0%163 1.04%No Clarke Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Ocoee E 2 17,700 0.0% 0 0.00%No Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)AD Mims Rd Orange E 4 39,800 1.0%163 0.41%No AD Mims Rd Hackney-Prairie Rd Orange E 2 17,700 0.0% 0 0.00%No Hackney-Prairie Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Orange E 2 15,600 0.0% 0 0.00%No Clarcona Ocoee Rd McCormick Rd Orange E 2 17,700 0.0% 0 0.00%No Old Winter Garden Rd SR 50 Ocoee D 4 32,400 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 50 Maine St Ocoee D 4 32,400 0.0% 0 0.00%No Old Winter Garden Rd SR 50 Ocoee D 2 14,800 3.0%488 3.30%No SR 50 Geneva St Ocoee D 2 14,800 3.0%488 3.30%No Geneva St Orlando Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Orlando Ave McKey St Ocoee D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No McKey St SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Lakewood Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 429 Lakewood Ave Orange E 4 33,800 35.0% 5,697 16.86%Yes Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd/Lake Meadow Rd Orange E 4 39,800 5.0%814 2.05%No Ingram Rd/Lake Meadow Rd Clarke Rd Orange E 4 39,800 4.0%651 1.64%No Clarke Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Orange E 4 39,800 3.0%488 1.23%No SR 50 White Rd Ocoee D 4 39,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No White Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Ocoee D 4 39,800 1.0%163 0.41%No SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) A.D. Mims Rd Ocoee D 4 39,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No A.D. Mims Rd Hackney-Prairie Rd Ocoee D 2 17,700 0.0% 0 0.00%No Hackney-Prairie Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Ocoee D 2 17,700 1.0%163 0.92%No Clarcona Ocoee Rd McCormick Rd Planned Roadway --Planned Roadway 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Palm Dr Orange E 2 17,700 2.0%326 1.84%No Palm Dr Fullers Cross Rd Orange E 2 15,600 2.0%326 2.09%No Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd Orange E 2 15,600 2.0%326 2.09%No Flewelling Ave Rewis St Ocoee Hills Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd Lakewood Ave Orange E 2 15,600 48.0% 7,813 50.08%Yes Geneva St Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 3.0%488 3.30%No Old Winter Garden Rd SR 408 (East-West Expy)Orange D 4 39,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 408 (East-West Expy)SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Orange D 4 39,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Balboa Dr Orange D 2 17,700 0.0% 0 0.00%No Balboa Dr White Rd Orange D 2 17,700 0.0% 0 0.00%No White Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Orange D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No A.D. Mims Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Blackwood Ave Bluford Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarke Rd Daily Maximum Service Volume 2 Include Segment In Study Area?5 Project ImpactRoadway Attributes 1 Segment From To E Crown Point Rd Good Homes Rd Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 8 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 Table 3:Significance Test (Saturday) (cont.) Maintaining Agency Adopted LOS Number of Lanes % Assign 3 Daily Project Trips Max % Impact 4 Hackney-Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No Hempel Ave Gotha Rd Old Winter Garden Rd Orange D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No Ingram Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd McCormick Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Johio Shores Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) A.D. Mims Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Kissimmee Ave Maguire Rd McKey St Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Rewis St Wurst Rd Ocoee C 2 7,300 5.0%814 11.15%Yes Wurst Rd Fullers Cross Rd Orange C 2 7,300 8.0% 1,302 17.84%Yes Fullers Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Orange C 2 7,300 40.0% 6,511 89.19%Yes Park Ridge Gotha Rd Roberson Rd / Moore Rd Ocoee D 2 17,700 2.0%326 1.84%No Roberson Rd / Moore Rd Tomyn Blvd Ocoee D 2 17,700 4.0%651 3.68%No Tomyn Blvd Old Winter Garden Rd Ocoee D 4 39,800 4.0%651 1.64%No Old Winter Garden Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Ocoee D 4 32,400 5.0%814 2.51%No SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Marshall Farms Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 10.0% 1,628 11.00%Yes Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 10.0% 1,628 11.00%Yes Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 10.0% 1,628 11.00%Yes Kissimmee Ave SR 438 (W Franklin St)Ocoee D 2 14,800 10.0% 1,628 11.00%Yes Maine St Maguire Rd Blackwood Ave Planned Roadway --Planned Roadway 0.0% 0 0.00%No Marshall Farms Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Maguire Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No Ocoee Apopka Rd Ingram Rd Orange E 2 17,700 4.0%651 3.68%No Ingram Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Orange E 2 17,700 3.0%488 2.76%No McKey St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Ocoee E 2 15,600 3.0%488 3.13%No Montgomery Ave Blackwood Ave White Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No E Crown Point Rd Stonegate Dr Planned Roadway --Planned Roadway 0.0% 0 0.00%No Stonegate Dr Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Ocoee Hills Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd)Flewelling Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 438 (W Franklin St)SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd)Orange C 2 7,300 15.0% 2,442 33.45%Yes SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd)Fullers Cross Rd Orange C 2 16,800 15.0% 2,442 14.54%Yes Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Orange C 2 16,800 35.0% 5,697 33.91%Yes West Rd McCormick Rd Orange C 2 16,800 5.0%814 4.85%No SR 50 Maguire Rd Planned Roadway --Planned Roadway 0.0% 0 0.00%No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Ocoee E 4 33,800 1.0%163 0.48%No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Ocoee E 4 33,800 4.0%651 1.93%No Blackwood Ave Hempel Ave Ocoee E 4 33,800 4.0%651 1.93%No Hempel Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Orange E 4 33,800 3.0%488 1.44%No Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Orange E 4 39,800 3.0%488 1.23%No Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Daily Maximum Service Volume 2 Include Segment In Study Area?5 Project ImpactRoadway Attributes 1 SR 437 (Ocoee Apopka Rd) Segment From To Old Winter Garden Rd Lakewood Ave Maguire Rd McCormick Rd Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 9 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 Table 3:Significance Test (Saturday) (cont.) Maintaining Agency Adopted LOS Number of Lanes % Assign 3 Daily Project Trips Max % Impact 4 Roberson Rd Windermere Rd Maguire Rd Orange E 2 17,700 1.0%163 0.92%No Russell Dr Flewelling Ave Willow Creek Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No E Crown Point Rd SR 429 FDOT E 2 15,600 5.0%814 5.22%Yes SR 429 Ocoee Apopka Rd FDOT E 2 15,600 5.0%814 5.22%Yes Ocoee Apopka Rd Bluford Ave FDOT E 2 17,700 5.0%814 4.60%No Bluford Ave Ocoee-Hills Rd FDOT E 2 17,700 5.0%814 4.60%No Ocoee-Hills Rd Clarke Rd FDOT E 2 17,700 5.0%814 4.60%No Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd FDOT E 4 39,800 5.0%814 2.05%No Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd FDOT E 4 39,800 5.0%814 2.05%No 9th St SR 429 FDOT D 6 59,900 0.0% 0 0.00%No SR 429 Marshall Farms Rd FDOT D 6 59,900 0.0% 0 0.00%No Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd FDOT D 6 59,900 0.0% 0 0.00%No Maguire Rd Bluford Ave FDOT D 6 59,900 10.0% 1,628 2.72%No Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave FDOT D 6 59,900 3.0%488 0.81%No Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd FDOT D 6 59,900 3.0%488 0.81%No Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd FDOT D 6 59,900 1.0%163 0.27%No Good Homes Rd Apopka Vineland Rd FDOT D 6 59,900 1.0%163 0.27%No Story Rd 9th St Maguire Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Taylor St Franklin St McKey St & Kissimmee Ave Ocoee D 2 14,800 2.0%326 2.20%No Tomyn Blvd Warrior Rd Maguire Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No West Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd SR 429 Orange E 4 33,800 30.0% 4,883 14.45%Yes Montgomery Ave Clarke Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No Willow Creek Rd Russell Dr Wurst Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 0.0% 0 0.00%No McKinnon Rd Roberson Rd Orange E 2 15,600 0.0% 0 0.00%No Roberson Rd Warrior Rd Orange E 2 15,600 0.0% 0 0.00%No Lakewood Ave Adair St Orange D 2 14,800 3.0%488 3.30%No Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Ocoee D 2 14,800 1.0%163 1.10%No Notes: 1. Roadway attributes were obtained from the City of Ocoee Concurrency Management Spreadsheet (CMS), updated 2/2/2022 2. Daily Maximum Service Volume (MSV) obtained from the City of Ocoee Concurrency Management Spreadsheet (CMS), updated 2/2/2022 3. Percent project traffic assignment was determined as the maximum across the segment (per revised distribution) 4. Percent impact was calculated as the estimated daily project traffic divided by the Daily MSV 5. Roadway segments included within the study area in accordance with City of Ocoee's latest TIA guidelines Daily Maximum Service Volume 2 Include Segment In Study Area?5 Project ImpactRoadway Attributes 1 Windermere Rd Wurst Rd Segment From To SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) White Rd SR 438 (Plant St/Franklin St) SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) SR 50 N NOT TO SCALE LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Study Roadway Segment # 10© 2023 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 189 S Orange Ave, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology May 2023 CLARCONA OCOEE RD PLANT ST SILVER STAR RD MA G U I R E R D 11 9 8 6 5 4 1 12 E C R O W N P O I N T R D 10 2 3 22% 9% 13% 14% 5% 3% 10% 50% 29% 14% N L A K E W O O D A V E 7 2% 9% 7% Figure 1a: Project Location, Study Area, and Distribution (per model) SR 50 N NOT TO SCALE 11© 2023 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 189 S Orange Ave, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology May 2023 CLARCONA OCOEE RD PLANT ST SILVER STAR RD MA G U I R E R D 11 9 8 6 5 4 1 12 10 2 3 5% 10% 40% 25% 10% 7% 15% 35% N L A K E W O O D A V E 7 3% 5% 2% 40%*5% 5% * Contingent on SR 429 Wayfinding 40% 30% 35% E C R O W N P O I N T R D Figure 1a: Project Location, Study Area, and Distribution (revised) LEGEND Project Location Study Intersection Study Roadway Segment # Ocoee Regional Sports Complex TIA Methodology, Page 12 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The forthcoming TIA will include an analysis for roadway segments and intersections within the study area. Turning movement counts (TMCs) will be collected during the weekday PM peak period (4PM – 6PM) and Saturday peak period (observed to be 1 PM – 3 PM based on a nearby FDOT count station). To develop existing volumes, the TMCs will be adjusted by a seasonal factor based on the latest data from FDOT’s Florida Traffic Online (FTO) Web Application. Existing volumes will be forecasted to Year 2030 background volumes using a two percent (2%) annual growth rate. Vested trips provided in the City of Ocoee’s latest Concurrency Management Spreadsheet (CMS), as well as supplemental data provided by the City of Ocoee that are not yet captured in the CMS, will be applied to background traffic volumes. Buildout traffic volumes will be derived by adding project volumes to background volumes. An intersection capacity analysis will be performed using the operational analysis procedures outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition. Specifically, Synchro (v11) software will be used to evaluate existing, background, and buildout operational conditions at the study area intersections and project driveways by reporting volume to capacity (v/c) ratios, level of service, and queue length demands. Future driveways will be evaluated for turn lane needs. If necessary, mitigating measures for any operational deficiencies identified due to project traffic impact will be recommended in the TIA. REPORT/CONCLUSIONS All analyses and findings will be documented in a report to be provided to the City of Ocoee for review. ATTACHMENT A Site Plan DIGITALLY SIGNED BY CAMILO LOPEZ URBAN DESIGNER CLOPEZDX@GMAIL.COM 02.10.23 PROOF OF CONCEPT SITE PLAN PROGRAM: (16) BASEBALL FIELDS (2) MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS (1) PARK & PLAYGROUND (1) WELCOME CENTER 15,000 SF (3) 200-ROOM HOTELS COMMERCIAL/OFFICE SPACES 257,000 SF (2) PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE (528 SPACES) ON-STREET PARKING (+/-350 SPACES) NOTES: 1. TYP. NEW STREET R.O.W. 60’ TYP. NEW STREET LAYOUT SIDEWALK, TREE GRATE, ON-STREET PKG, TRAVEL LANE, TRAVEL LANE, ON-STREET PKG, TREE GRATE, SIDEWALK. -- THE NEW 2-STORY, 3-LEVEL PARKING GARAGE WILL BE FREE OF CHARGE AND HOUSE OVER 520 PARKING SPACES AS WELL AS TWO ELEVATORS, FOUR SETS OF STAIRS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS. THE FRONT OF THE GARAGE FEATURES A PUBLIC PLAZA FOR RELAXING AND MICRO EVENTS AND GIVES US MORE GREAT SPACE TO EXPAND OUR AWARD-WINNING FARMERS MARKET. SITE DATA: LOCATION ADDRESS: 2290 FULLERS CROSS RD OCOEE, FLORIDA 34761 -- PARCEL ID: 07-22-28-0000-00-001 -- ZONING: PUD-LD -- LAND USE: VACANT - 9900 - NON-AG ACREAGE -- LOT SIZE (GROSS): 147.7 (AC) ASSEMBLY PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 45 AC/ 30.4% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA: 102.7 AC/ 69.6% -- PROPOSED STORMWATER RETENTION AREA(S): 7.5 AC LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE W1/2 OF NE1/4 & E1/2 OF NW1/4 LYING E OF SR 437 IN SEC 07-22-28 & (LESS PT TAKEN FOR R/W DESC AS COMM AT N1/4 CORNER OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S1-3-52W ALONG W LINE OF NE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 30.01 FT TO POB TH N89-50-37E 1280.94 FT TO E LINE OF W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S0-27-1W 20 FT TH S89-50-37W 1281.16 FT TH S89-43-45W 648.52 FT TO POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SELY TH SWLY ALONG CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95-9-26 ARC LENGTH OF 83.04 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 73.82 FT AND CHORD BRG OF S42-9-2W TO POINT OF TANGENCY TH S5-25-41E 266.84 FT TO POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NELY TH SELY ALONG CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1849.9 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10-47-31 ARC LENGTH OF 348.43 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 347.92 FT AND CHORD BRG OF S10-49-27E TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY TH S16-13-12E 1773.29 FT TH S15-21-49E 59.23 FT TH S13-39-3E 55.93 FT TO POINT LYING ON S LINE OF NW1/4 OF SEC 7-22-28 TH S86-56-26W ALONG S LINE 28.44 FT TO POINT ON NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SWLY TH NWLY ALONG NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1941.86 FT CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3-11-30 ARC LENGTH OF 108.17 FT CHORD LENGTH OF 108.15 FT AND CHORD BRG OF N14-37-29W TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY TH N16-13-13W 16.18 FT TH N16-20-6W 500 FT TH N16-2-55W 1000 FT TH N15-27-46W 407.21 FT TH N7-33-7W 524.34 FT TH N5-25-43W 24.17 FT TH N89-43-45E 740.7 FT TO POB PER DOC 20190042931). SCALE: 1’=140’ 0’ 140’70’ 280’ ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER OF RECORD PLAZA COURT YARD COURT YARD ATTACHMENT B ITE Excerpts 499 Land Use: 310 Hotel Description A hotel is a place of lodging that provides sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as a full-service restaurant, cocktail lounge, meeting rooms, banquet room, and convention facilities. A hotel typically provides a swimming pool or another recreational facility such as a fitness room. All suites hotel (Land Use 311), business hotel (Land Use 312), motel (Land Use 320), and resort hotel (Land Use 330) are related uses. Additional Data Twenty-five studies provided information on occupancy rates at the time the studies were conducted. The average occupancy rate for these studies was approximately 82 percent. Some properties in this land use provide guest transportation services (e.g., airport shuttle, limousine service, golf course shuttle service) which may have an impact on the overall trip generation rates. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Minnesota, New York, Ontario (CAN), Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. For all lodging uses, it is important to collect data on occupied rooms as well as total rooms in order to accurately predict trip generation characteristics for the site. Trip generation at a hotel may be related to the presence of supporting facilities such as convention facilities, restaurants, meeting/banquet space, and retail facilities. Future data submissions should specify the presence of these amenities. Reporting the level of activity at the supporting facilities such as full, empty, partially active, number of people attending a meeting/banquet during observation may also be useful in further analysis of this land use. Source Numbers 170, 260, 262, 277, 280, 301, 306, 357, 422, 507, 577, 728, 867, 872, 925, 951, 1009, 1021, 1026, 1046 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000–399) Hotel(310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Rooms On a: Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 9 Avg. Num. of Rooms: 202 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.07 6.35 - 9.79 1.35 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 200 300 4000 1000 2000 3000 4000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation:T = 9.69(X) - 326.34 R²= 0.93 X = Number of Rooms T = T r i p s E n d s 505General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000–399) Hotel(310) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Rooms On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 10 Avg. Num. of Rooms: 192 Directional Distribution: 56% entering, 44% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.72 0.49 - 1.23 0.20 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 200 300 4000 100 200 300 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation:T = 0.69(X) + 5.95 R²= 0.80 X = Number of Rooms T = T r i p s E n d s 506 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 Land Use: 488 Soccer Complex Description A soccer complex is an outdoor facility that is used for non-professional soccer games. It may consist of multiple fields. The size of each field within the land use may vary to accommodate games for different age groups. On-site amenities may include stadium seating, a fitness trail, an activities shelter, aquatic center, picnic grounds, basketball and tennis courts, and a playground. Public park (Land Use 411) is a related use. Additional Data Caution should be used when applying these data. Peaking at soccer complexes typically occurred in time periods shorter than 1 hour. These peaking periods may have durations of 10 to 15 minutes. To assist in the future analysis of this land use, it is important to collect driveway counts in 10-minute intervals. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 1990s and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Indiana, New Jersey, and Washington. Source Numbers 377, 519, 565, 722, 856, 908, 952, 956, 1004 250 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 Soccer Complex(488) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Fields On a: Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num. of Fields: 8 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Field Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 404.88 117.43 - 628.44 *** Data Plot and Equation Caution –Small Sample Size 0 2 4 6 8 100 2000 4000 6000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= *** X = Number of Fields T = T r i p s E n d s 256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 Soccer Complex(488) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:Fields On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 11 Avg. Num. of Fields: 14 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Field Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.48 17.14 - 107.40 17.87 Data Plot and Equation 0 10 20 30 400 1000 2000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation:T = 26.09(X) + 156.36 R²= 0.66 X = Number of Fields T = T r i p s E n d s 257General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799) 707 Land Use: 710 General Office Building Description A general office building is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building houses multiple tenants that can include, as examples, professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers, a banking institution, a restaurant, or other service retailers. A general office building with a gross floor area of 10,000 square feet or less is classified as a small office building (Land Use 712). Corporate headquarters building (Land Use 714), single tenant office building (Land Use 715), medical-dental office building (Land Use 720), office park (Land Use 750), research and development center (Land Use 760), and business park (Land Use 770) are additional related uses. Additional Data If two or more general office buildings are in close physical proximity (within a close walk) and function as a unit (perhaps with a shared parking facility and common or complementary tenants), the total gross floor area or employment of the paired office buildings can be used for calculating the site trip generation. If the individual buildings are isolated or not functionally related to one another, trip generation should be calculated for each building separately. For study sites with reported gross floor area and employees, an average employee density of 3.3 employees per 1,000 square feet GFA (or roughly 300 square feet per employee) has been consistent through the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. No sites counted in the 2010s reported both GFA and employees. The average building occupancy varies considerably within the studies for which occupancy data were provided. The reported occupied gross floor area was 88 percent for general urban/suburban sites and 96 percent for the center city core and dense multi-use urban sites. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the eight center city core sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 2.8 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 2.9 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 2.9 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 3.0 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799) The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 18 dense multi-use urban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 1.5 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.5 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.5 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 23 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected are as follows: • 1.3 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.3 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.3 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.4 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN)Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. Source Numbers 161, 175, 183, 184, 185, 207, 212, 217, 247, 253, 257, 260, 262, 273, 279, 297, 298, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 321, 322, 323, 324, 327, 404, 407, 408, 419, 423, 562, 734, 850, 859, 862, 867, 869, 883, 884, 890, 891, 904, 940, 944, 946, 964, 965, 972, 1009, 1030, 1058, 1061 708 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 General Office Building(710) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 5 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:94 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.21 1.24 - 7.46 1.70 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 2000 100 200 300 400 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= *** X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA T = T r i p s E n d s 712 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 General Office Building(710) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA:82 Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.53 0.30 - 1.57 0.52 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 2000 20 40 60 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= *** X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA T = T r i p s E n d s 713General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799) 197 Land Use: 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) Description A shopping plaza is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has between 40,000 and 150,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). The term “plaza” in the land use name rather than “center” is simply a means of distinction between the different shopping center size ranges. Various other names are commonly used to categorize a shopping plaza within this size range, depending on its specific size and tenants, such as neighborhood center, community center, and fashion center. Its major tenant is often a supermarket but many sites are anchored by home improvement, discount, or other stores. A shopping plaza typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities are common tenants. A shopping plaza is almost always open-air and the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building. The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between shopping plaza and shopping center (Land Use 820) is based on an examination of trip generation data. For a shopping plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the presence or absence of an on-site supermarket. The 40,000 square feet GFA threshold between shopping plaza and strip retail plaza (Land Use 822) was selected based on an examination of the overall shopping center/plaza database. No shopping plaza with a supermarket as its anchor is smaller than 40,000 square feet GLA. Shopping center (>150k) (Land Use 820), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses. Land Use Subcategory The presence or absence of a supermarket in a shopping plaza has been determined to have a measurable effect on site trip generation. Therefore, data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: sites with a supermarket anchor and sites without a supermarket. Additional Data The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 156, 159, 186, 198, 204, 211, 213, 239, 259, 260, 295, 301, 304, 305, 307, 317, 319, 358, 376, 390, 400, 404, 437, 444, 446, 507, 580, 598, 658, 728, 908, 926, 944, 946, 960, 973, 974, 1004, 1009, 1025, 1069 198 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket -Yes(821) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Saturday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:78 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 116.15 92.93 - 167.89 25.80 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 2000 10000 20000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation:T = 71.92(X) + 3469.67 R²= 0.74 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA T = T r i p s E n d s 204 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Supermarket -Yes(821) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 17 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA:75 Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.26 6.15 - 15.10 2.07 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 2000 1000 2000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation:T = 7.60(X) + 125.07 R²= 0.76 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA T = T r i p s E n d s 205General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 734 733 0 0 35 173 Retail 4,457 4,456 0 0 343 342 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 1,425 1,424 0 0 174 56 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 3,039 3,039 0 0 211 203 9,655 9,652 0 0 763 774 Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 153 176 0 0 8 27 Retail 399 328 0 0 46 38 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 89 117 0 0 14 14 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 125 145 0 0 18 7 766 766 0 0 86 86 % Reduction Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 581 557 0 0 27 146 Retail 4,058 4,128 0 0 297 304 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 1,336 1,307 0 0 160 42 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 2,914 2,894 0 0 193 196 8,889 8,886 0 0 677 688 GROSS TRIP GENERATION IN P U T Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Internal Capture Reduction Calculations Methodology for A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour based on the Trip Generation Handbook , 3rd Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Methodology for Daily based on the average of the Unconstrained Rates for the A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour SUMMARY INTERNAL TRIPS OU T P U T Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 7.9%0.0%11.2% EXTERNAL TRIPS OU T P U T Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour WEEKDAY Enter Exit Office 734 733 Retail 4,457 4,456 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 1,425 1,424 Residential 0 0 Hotel 3,039 3,039 9,655 9,652 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 24% 34%0%2%0% Retail 16%21%2%20%3% Restaurant 17% 28%4%11%5% Cinema/Entertainment 1%11% 16%4%1% Residential 3%22% 21%0%2% Hotel 38% 15% 39%0%1% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 20% 13%1%2%0% Retail 18%40% 13% 24%9% Restaurant 22% 29%16% 11% 38% Cinema/Entertainment 3%2%2%2%1% Residential 30% 14% 17%0%6% Hotel 2%3%6%0%0% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 176 246 0 11 0 Retail 691 936 89 891 111 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 14 150 221 57 14 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 1,140 456 1,170 0 30 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 891 0 7 0 0 Retail 128 0 185 0 258 Restaurant 161 1,293 228 0 1,140 (Average of A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour) DA I L Y Origin Land Use Destination Land Use Estimated Trip Destinations within a Mixed-Use Development (Daily) (Average of A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour) DAILY GROSS TRIP GENERATION DA I L Y Land Use Daily Estimated Trip Origins within a Mixed-Use Development (Daily) *** BASED ON ENTER *** DA I L Y (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use DA I L Y Origin Land Use Destination Land Use *** BASED ON EXIT *** DA I L Y (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use WEEKDAY Cinema/Entertainment 22 89 0 0 15 Residential 220 602 0 0 182 Hotel 11 134 0 0 0 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 176 0 0 0 0 Retail 128 0 89 0 111 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 14 89 0 0 14 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 11 134 0 0 0 Enter Exit Office 153 176 Retail 399 328 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 89 117 Residential 0 0 Hotel 125 145 766 766 DA I L Y *** MINIMUM *** DA I L Y (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use INTERNAL TRIPS DA I L Y Land Use Daily WEEKDAY Enter Exit Office 35 173 Retail 343 342 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 174 56 Residential 0 0 Hotel 211 203 763 774 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 20%4%0%2%0% Retail 2%29%4%26%5% Restaurant 3%41%8%18%7% Cinema/Entertainment 2%21% 31%8%2% Residential 4%42% 21%0%3% Hotel 0%16% 68%0%2% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 8%2%1%4%0% Retail 31%29% 26% 46% 17% Restaurant 30% 50%32% 16% 71% Cinema/Entertainment 6%4%3%4%1% Residential 57% 10% 14%0%12% Hotel 0%2%5%0%0% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 35 7 0 3 0 Retail 7 99 14 89 17 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 1 12 17 5 1 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 0 32 138 0 4 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 27 0 2 0 0 P.M. PEAK HOUR GROSS TRIP GENERATION P. M . P E A K Land Use P.M. Peak Hour Table 6.1 Unconstrained Internal Person Trip Capture Rates P. M . P E A K Origin Land Use Destination Land Use *** BASED ON EXIT *** P. M . P E A K (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use for Trip Origins within a Mixed-Use Development (P.M. Peak Hour) P. M . P E A K Origin Land Use Destination Land Use Table 6.2 Unconstrained Internal Person Trip Capture Rates for Trip Destinations within a Mixed-Use Development (P.M. Peak Hour) *** BASED ON ENTER *** P. M . P E A K (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use WEEKDAY Retail 11 0 45 0 36 Restaurant 11 172 56 0 150 Cinema/Entertainment 2 14 0 0 2 Residential 20 34 0 0 25 Hotel 0 7 0 0 0 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent. Residential Hotel Office 27 0 0 0 0 Retail 7 0 14 0 17 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 1 12 0 0 1 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 0 7 0 0 0 Enter Exit Office 8 27 Retail 46 38 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 14 14 Residential 0 0 Hotel 18 7 86 86 INTERNAL TRIPS P. M . P E A K Land Use P.M. Peak Hour P. M . P E A K *** MINIMUM *** P. M . P E A K (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use WEEKDAY Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 145 145 0 0 37 32 Retail 5,351 5,350 0 0 427 394 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 3,445 3,445 0 0 340 343 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 2,744 2,744 0 0 235 185 11,685 11,684 0 0 1,039 954 Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 31 35 0 0 10 6 Retail 303 266 0 0 32 44 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 107 125 0 0 16 21 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 148 163 0 0 22 9 589 589 0 0 80 80 % Reduction Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 114 110 0 0 27 26 Retail 5,048 5,084 0 0 395 350 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 3,338 3,320 0 0 324 322 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 2,596 2,581 0 0 213 176 11,096 11,095 0 0 959 874 5.0%0.0%8.0% EXTERNAL TRIPS OU T P U T Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour INTERNAL TRIPS OU T P U T Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour GROSS TRIP GENERATION IN P U T Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Internal Capture Reduction Calculations Methodology for A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour based on the Trip Generation Handbook , 3rd Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Methodology for Daily based on the average of the Unconstrained Rates for the A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour SUMMARY SATURDAY Enter Exit Office 145 145 Retail 5,351 5,350 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 3,445 3,445 Residential 0 0 Hotel 2,744 2,744 11,685 11,684 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 24% 34%0%2%0% Retail 16%21%2%20%3% Restaurant 17% 28%4%11%5% Cinema/Entertainment 1%11% 16%4%1% Residential 3%22% 21%0%2% Hotel 38% 15% 39%0%1% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 20% 13%1%2%0% Retail 18%40% 13% 24%9% Restaurant 22% 29%16% 11% 38% Cinema/Entertainment 3%2%2%2%1% Residential 30% 14% 17%0%6% Hotel 2%3%6%0%0% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 35 49 0 2 0 Retail 829 1,124 107 1,070 134 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 34 362 534 138 34 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 1,029 412 1,056 0 27 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 1,070 0 17 0 0 Retail 25 0 448 0 233 Restaurant 32 1,552 551 0 1,029 *** BASED ON ENTER *** DA I L Y (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use DA I L Y Origin Land Use Destination Land Use *** BASED ON EXIT *** DA I L Y (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use (Average of A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour) DA I L Y Origin Land Use Destination Land Use Estimated Trip Destinations within a Mixed-Use Development (Daily) (Average of A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour) DAILY GROSS TRIP GENERATION DA I L Y Land Use Daily Estimated Trip Origins within a Mixed-Use Development (Daily) SATURDAY Cinema/Entertainment 4 107 0 0 14 Residential 44 722 0 0 165 Hotel 2 161 0 0 0 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 35 0 0 0 0 Retail 25 0 107 0 134 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 4 107 0 0 14 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 2 161 0 0 0 Enter Exit Office 31 35 Retail 303 266 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 107 125 Residential 0 0 Hotel 148 163 589 589 INTERNAL TRIPS DA I L Y Land Use Daily DA I L Y *** MINIMUM *** DA I L Y (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use SATURDAY Enter Exit Office 37 32 Retail 427 394 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 340 343 Residential 0 0 Hotel 235 185 1,039 954 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 20%4%0%2%0% Retail 2%29%4%26%5% Restaurant 3%41%8%18%7% Cinema/Entertainment 2%21% 31%8%2% Residential 4%42% 21%0%3% Hotel 0%16% 68%0%2% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 8%2%1%4%0% Retail 31%29% 26% 46% 17% Restaurant 30% 50%32% 16% 71% Cinema/Entertainment 6%4%3%4%1% Residential 57% 10% 14%0%12% Hotel 0%2%5%0%0% Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 6 1 0 1 0 Retail 8 114 16 102 20 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 7 72 106 27 7 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 0 30 126 0 4 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel *** BASED ON ENTER *** P. M . P E A K (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use P. M . P E A K Origin Land Use Destination Land Use *** BASED ON EXIT *** P. M . P E A K (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use for Trip Origins within a Mixed-Use Development (P.M. Peak Hour) P. M . P E A K Origin Land Use Destination Land Use Table 6.2 Unconstrained Internal Person Trip Capture Rates for Trip Destinations within a Mixed-Use Development (P.M. Peak Hour) P.M. PEAK HOUR GROSS TRIP GENERATION P. M . P E A K Land Use P.M. Peak Hour Table 6.1 Unconstrained Internal Person Trip Capture Rates SATURDAY Office 34 0 3 0 0 Retail 11 0 88 0 40 Restaurant 11 214 109 0 167 Cinema/Entertainment 2 17 0 0 2 Residential 21 43 0 0 28 Hotel 0 9 0 0 0 Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Ent.Residential Hotel Office 6 0 0 0 0 Retail 8 0 16 0 20 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 2 17 0 0 2 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel 0 9 0 0 0 Enter Exit Office 10 6 Retail 32 44 Restaurant 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 16 21 Residential 0 0 Hotel 22 9 80 80 INTERNAL TRIPS P. M . P E A K Land Use P.M. Peak Hour P. M . P E A K *** MINIMUM *** P. M . P E A K (Exit) Land Use (Enter) Land Use SATURDAY ATTACHMENT C Trip Generation Study kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 MEMORANDUM From: James M. Taylor, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: May 8, 2023 Subject: Trip Generation Study Ocoee Regional Sports Complex PURPOSE This trip generation study was completed for the proposed Ocoee Regional Sports Complex (ORSC), which will provide services unique from any one Land Use Code (LUC) contained in the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. ORSC is a proposed baseball complex consisting of 16 baseball fields to be located in the City of Ocoee, Florida. A LUC that most coincides with characteristics of ORSC is LUC 488 (Soccer Complex). The description for this LUC is not fully reflective of the use and characteristics of ORSC. Therefore, data was collected at the United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA) Space Coast Complex in Melbourne, Florida, which is a similar facility consisting of 15 baseball fields. Data was collected at the USSSA Space Coast Complex during typical weekday operations and during a Saturday baseball tournament to develop trip generation rates applicable for weekday and Saturday peak hour project trips. The Saturday trip rate is generally reflective of the highest trip rate for the facility. DATA COLLECTION Turning movement count (TMC) data was collected at the four (4) USSSA driveways during the following days and times: • Tuesday, April 4th and Wednesday, April 5th from 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM • Saturday, March 25th from 7 AM – 11 PM, during a baseball tournament Figure 1 displays the locations of the four (4) driveways surveyed at the surveyed USSSA Space Coast Complex site. ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study 2© 2023 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 189 S Orange Ave, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 Phone: (407)-898-1511 Figure 1:Driveway Count Locations Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Trip Generation Study N NOT TO SCALE N NOT TO SCALE North Driveway LEGEND Site Driveways Mid Driveway South Driveway USSSA Space Coast Complex Driveway ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Trip Generation Study: Ocoee Regional Sports Complex – Page 3 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION The total driveway volume data at USSSA Space Coast Complex was compiled into inbound and outbound vehicle trips for both the weekday and Saturday data sets. The resulting data was then used to determine trip rate per baseball field and directional distribution (in % / out %) for the weekday and Saturday peak hours. The turning movement count data is provided in Attachment A. The processed data showing peak hour turning movement counts by driveway is provided in Attachment B. A summary of the weekday and Saturday data collection efforts are provided in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. As shown in the tables, the weekday peak hour trip rate is 12.33 trips/baseball field and the Saturday peak hour trip rate (during a tournament) is 35.87 trips/baseball field. Table 1: Summary of Data Collection (Weekday) Table 2: Summary of Data Collection (Saturday) IN2 OUT2 TOTAL Rate (trips / field)IN OUT 15 142 43 185 12.33 77% 23% Notes: Directional Distribution Weekday Peak Hour1 [1] Peak hour of all four (4) driveways occurred between 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM [2] INs and OUTs were obtained by adding peak hour trips of all four (4) driveways Number of Fields Vehicle tripsSite Location Melbourne IN2 OUT2 TOTAL Rate (trips / field)IN OUT 15 275 263 538 35.87 51% 49% Notes: Directional Distribution Saturday Peak Hour1 [1] Peak hour of driveway 1 occurred between 12:45 - 1:45 PM, peak hour of driveways 2 & 3 occurred between 12:30 - 1:30 PM, and peak Hour of driveway 4 occurred between 1:30 - 2:30 PM [2] INs and OUTs were obtained by adding peak hour trips of all four (4) driveways Number of Fields Vehicle tripsSite Location Melbourne ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Trip Generation Study: Ocoee Regional Sports Complex – Page 4 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 DAILY TRIP GENERATION Although 24-hour data was not collected for the USSSA Space Coast Complex site, a daily trip generation rate was estimated using the previously compiled peak hour driveway volumes. The 11th Edition of ITE’s Trip Generation Manual provides vehicle time-of-day distributions for a variety of land uses. Time-of-day distribution for LUC 488 (Soccer Complex) was used to back calculate peak hour trips into estimated daily trips, as it most coincides with characteristics of ORSC for any LUC contained in the Trip Generation Manual. The vehicle time-of-day distributions are provided in Attachment C. As shown in the attachment, 9.5% of trips for LUC 488 occur between 4PM-6PM and 100% of trips for LUC 488 occur between 7AM-11PM. These time-of-day distributions are shown in Tables 3 and 4, which were used to estimate the weekday daily trip rate of 169.13 trips/baseball field and the Saturday daily trip rate (during a tournament) of 263.20 trips/baseball field. Table 3: Estimation of Daily Trip Generation Rate (Weekday) Table 4: Estimation of Daily Trip Generation Rate (Saturday) 15 241 9.5%2,537 169.13 Notes: [1] Vehicle trips obtained from two (2) days of weekday data collection at the United States Specialty Sports Accosication (USSSA) Space Coast Complex [2] Vehicle time of day distribution for LUC 488 provided by ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used, which is the closest LUC for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex contained within ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Estimation of Weekday Daily Trip Rate Site Location Number of Fields Daily Trips (A / B) Daily Rate (trips/field) Melbourne Total Weekday Trips 4PM-6PM (A)1 4PM-6PM Percent of Daily Trips (B) 15 3,948 100.0% 3,948 263.20 Notes: [1] Vehicle trips obtained from Saturday tournament day data collection at the United States Specialty Sports Accosication (USSSA) Space Coast Complex [2] Vehicle time of day distribution for LUC 488 provided by ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used, which is the closest LUC for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex contained within ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Estimation of Saturday Daily Trip Rate Site Location Number of Fields Daily Trips (A / B) Daily Rate (trips/field) Melbourne Total Saturday Trips 7AM-11PM (A)1 7AM-11PM Percent of Daily Trips (B) ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Trip Generation Study: Ocoee Regional Sports Complex – Page 5 kimley-horn.com 189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL, 32801 407 898 1511 CONCLUSION Ocoee Regional Sports Complex (ORSC) will provide services unique from any one LUC contained in the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. This memorandum summarizes trip generation data collected at United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA) Space Coast Complex during a tournament to document trip generation characteristics that can be applied to estimate the trip generation potential of ORSC. Results of the analysis provided herein indicate the following peak hour (of generator) trip rates: • Weekday: 12.33 vehicle trips per baseball field (77% entering / 23% exiting) • Saturday (during a tournament): 35.87 vehicle trips per baseball field (51% entering / 49% exiting). These average trip rates can be applied to estimate the trip generation potential of future baseball complexes based on their planned number of fields. Additionally, daily trip generation rates were developed using the collected data and information provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Trip Generation Manual. Results of the assessment yield an average weekday daily trip rate of 169.13 trips per baseball field and an average Saturday daily trip rate of 263.20 vehicle trips per baseball field (during a tournament). K:\ORL_TPTO\249346000_Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Trans Serv\02_Documentation\00_Trip Generation Study\OcoeeRegionalSportsComplex_TripGenerationStudy_2023.05.08.docx ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study ATTACHMENT A Turning Movement Counts ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields North Dwy/Flexx: Integrative Muscular Therapy Parking DwyDate:4/5/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Wednesday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 1 0 2 1 2 -1 4:30 PM 0 3 0 4 3 4 -1 4:45 PM 0 1 0 4 1 4 -3 5:00 PM 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 5:30 PM 0 4 0 3 4 3 1 5:45 PM 0 4 0 1 4 1 3 Totals 0 17 0 15 17 15 2 TIME Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Going IN Going OUT Cars ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields North Dwy/Flexx: Integrative Muscular Therapy Parking DwyDate:4/6/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Thursday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 4:30 PM 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 3 0 2 3 2 1 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 5:45 PM 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Totals 0 6 0 7 6 7 -1 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Gen Study TIME Cars Trip Going IN Going OUT ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields Mid Dwy Date:4/5/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Wednesday NL SR WT EL ET ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 4:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 4:30 PM 3 3 0 0 0 1 6 1 5 4:45 PM 0 5 0 2 0 1 5 3 2 5:00 PM 2 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 2 5:15 PM 2 5 1 2 0 0 8 2 6 5:30 PM 2 14 1 8 0 7 17 15 2 5:45 PM 10 20 0 2 0 1 30 3 27 Totals 19 53 2 16 0 11 74 27 47 Going OUTGoing IN Cars TIME Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields Mid Dwy Date:4/6/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Thursday NL SR WT EL ET ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4:15 PM 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 -1 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 5:30 PM 1 11 0 2 0 1 12 3 9 5:45 PM 2 15 0 2 0 0 17 2 15 Totals 4 32 0 5 0 3 36 8 28 Going IN Going OUT Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Gen Study TIME Cars Trip ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields South Dwy Date:4/5/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Wednesday NL SR WT EL ET ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 -2 4:30 PM 3 1 0 2 1 2 4 5 -1 4:45 PM 0 3 0 2 0 1 3 3 0 5:00 PM 1 2 0 1 0 1 3 2 1 5:15 PM 6 6 0 0 0 1 12 1 11 5:30 PM 6 8 0 4 1 2 14 7 7 5:45 PM 9 6 0 3 0 2 15 5 10 Totals 26 26 0 13 2 11 52 26 26 Going OUTGoing IN Cars TIME Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields South Dwy Date:4/6/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Thursday NL SR WT EL ET ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 4:15 PM 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 4:30 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 4:45 PM 2 3 0 2 0 2 5 4 1 5:00 PM 5 9 0 3 0 1 14 4 10 5:15 PM 5 11 0 1 0 1 16 2 14 5:30 PM 12 22 0 3 0 4 34 7 27 5:45 PM 16 25 0 3 0 3 41 6 35 Totals 41 74 0 16 0 12 115 28 87 Going IN Going OUT Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Gen Study TIME Cars Trip ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & USSSA Space Coast Complex Date:4/5/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Wednesday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 0 0 3 0 3 -3 TIME Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Going IN Going OUT Cars ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & USSSA Space Coast Complex Date:4/6/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Thursday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 4:00 PM 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 4:15 PM 0 1 0 2 1 2 -1 4:30 PM 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 5:00 PM 0 6 0 2 6 2 4 5:15 PM 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 5:30 PM 0 5 0 2 5 2 3 5:45 PM 0 5 0 2 5 2 3 Totals 0 22 0 12 22 12 10 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Gen Study TIME Cars Trip Going IN Going OUT ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields North Dwy/Flexx: Integrative Muscular Therapy Parking DwyDate:3/25/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Saturday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 7:00 AM 0 18 0 1 18 1 17 7:15 AM 0 28 0 5 28 5 23 7:30 AM 0 23 0 8 23 8 15 7:45 AM 0 11 0 1 11 1 10 8:00 AM 0 12 0 1 12 1 11 8:15 AM 0 13 0 1 13 1 12 8:30 AM 0 3 0 1 3 1 2 8:45 AM 0 7 0 4 7 4 3 9:00 AM 0 10 0 3 10 3 7 9:15 AM 0 18 0 2 18 2 16 9:30 AM 0 6 0 0 6 0 6 9:45 AM 0 3 0 1 3 1 2 10:00 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 10:15 AM 0 5 0 10 5 10 -5 10:30 AM 0 5 0 9 5 9 -4 10:45 AM 0 9 0 10 9 10 -1 11:00 AM 0 11 0 4 11 4 7 11:15 AM 0 14 0 3 14 3 11 11:30 AM 0 4 0 6 4 6 -2 11:45 AM 0 9 0 7 9 7 2 12:00 PM 0 5 0 3 5 3 2 12:15 PM 0 8 0 15 8 15 -7 12:30 PM 0 8 0 17 8 17 -9 12:45 PM 0 16 0 37 16 37 -21 1:00 PM 0 19 0 8 19 8 11 1:15 PM 0 30 0 1 30 1 29 1:30 PM 0 22 0 10 22 10 12 1:45 PM 0 11 0 4 11 4 7 2:00 PM 0 14 0 3 14 3 11 2:15 PM 0 6 0 14 6 14 -8 2:30 PM 0 5 0 11 5 11 -6 2:45 PM 0 3 0 48 3 48 -45 3:00 PM 0 11 0 4 11 4 7 3:15 PM 0 12 0 0 12 0 12 3:30 PM 0 7 0 2 7 2 5 3:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 4:00 PM 0 3 0 4 3 4 -1 4:15 PM 0 4 0 7 4 7 -3 4:30 PM 0 9 0 8 9 8 1 4:45 PM 0 5 0 6 5 6 -1 5:00 PM 0 1 0 23 1 23 -22 5:15 PM 0 8 0 21 8 21 -13 5:30 PM 0 4 0 6 4 6 -2 5:45 PM 0 10 0 2 10 2 8 6:00 PM 0 3 0 5 3 5 -2 6:15 PM 0 6 0 4 6 4 2 6:30 PM 0 4 0 12 4 12 -8 6:45 PM 0 5 0 7 5 7 -2 7:00 PM 0 0 0 7 0 7 -7 7:15 PM 0 1 0 29 1 29 -28 7:30 PM 0 2 0 16 2 16 -14 7:45 PM 0 1 0 4 1 4 -3 8:00 PM 0 1 0 4 1 4 -3 8:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 8:30 PM 0 0 0 9 0 9 -9 8:45 PM 0 1 0 14 1 14 -13 9:00 PM 0 0 0 18 0 18 -18 9:15 PM 0 0 0 23 0 23 -23 9:30 PM 0 0 0 9 0 9 -9 9:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 10:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 10:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 458 0 496 458 496 -38 TIME Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip GenerationGoing IN Going OUT ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields Mid Dwy Date:3/25/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Saturday NL SR WT EL ET ER IN OUT OUTCOME 7:00 AM 3 16 0 0 0 0 19 0 19 7:15 AM 2 27 0 5 0 1 29 6 23 7:30 AM 1 25 2 6 0 0 28 6 22 7:45 AM 4 9 0 1 0 3 13 4 9 8:00 AM 2 19 0 1 0 1 21 2 19 8:15 AM 7 14 0 0 0 0 21 0 21 8:30 AM 3 5 0 1 0 1 8 2 6 8:45 AM 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 9:00 AM 2 8 0 0 0 1 10 1 9 9:15 AM 2 8 0 4 0 0 10 4 6 9:30 AM 2 5 0 2 0 0 7 2 5 9:45 AM 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 10:00 AM 0 5 0 1 0 2 5 3 2 10:15 AM 3 6 0 7 0 3 9 10 -1 10:30 AM 2 1 0 1 0 4 3 5 -2 10:45 AM 3 8 0 4 0 1 11 5 6 11:00 AM 1 12 0 1 0 4 13 5 8 11:15 AM 2 8 0 0 0 2 10 2 8 11:30 AM 9 7 0 1 0 3 16 4 12 11:45 AM 5 10 0 1 0 3 15 4 11 12:00 PM 2 6 0 8 0 7 8 15 -7 12:15 PM 5 8 0 8 0 0 13 8 5 12:30 PM 0 11 0 7 0 7 11 14 -3 12:45 PM 2 11 0 26 0 9 13 35 -22 1:00 PM 4 13 0 5 0 3 17 8 9 1:15 PM 7 14 0 1 0 0 21 1 20 1:30 PM 1 9 0 4 0 2 10 6 4 1:45 PM 2 5 0 6 0 1 7 7 0 2:00 PM 1 5 0 3 0 2 6 5 1 2:15 PM 0 6 1 28 0 4 7 32 -25 2:30 PM 4 8 0 24 0 3 12 27 -15 2:45 PM 3 5 0 12 0 9 8 21 -13 3:00 PM 0 7 1 5 0 1 8 6 2 3:15 PM 5 7 0 4 0 1 12 5 7 3:30 PM 2 7 0 4 0 1 9 5 4 3:45 PM 1 4 0 0 0 1 5 1 4 4:00 PM 9 6 0 4 0 4 15 8 7 4:15 PM 1 6 0 6 0 9 7 15 -8 4:30 PM 2 6 0 4 0 2 8 6 2 4:45 PM 0 9 0 8 0 3 9 11 -2 5:00 PM 1 4 0 12 0 2 5 14 -9 5:15 PM 2 3 0 3 0 1 5 4 1 5:30 PM 0 7 1 1 0 1 8 2 6 5:45 PM 2 3 0 2 0 1 5 3 2 6:00 PM 0 2 0 3 0 5 2 8 -6 6:15 PM 2 2 0 3 0 3 4 6 -2 6:30 PM 1 3 1 15 0 7 5 22 -17 6:45 PM 1 2 0 13 0 1 3 14 -11 7:00 PM 1 1 0 5 0 2 2 7 -5 7:15 PM 0 2 0 9 0 2 2 11 -9 7:30 PM 2 1 0 5 0 4 3 9 -6 7:45 PM 0 4 0 3 0 0 4 3 1 8:00 PM 0 2 0 10 0 0 2 10 -8 8:15 PM 1 1 0 22 0 4 2 26 -24 8:30 PM 0 1 0 11 1 6 1 18 -17 8:45 PM 0 0 0 16 0 12 0 28 -28 9:00 PM 0 0 0 23 0 3 0 26 -26 9:15 PM 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 12 -12 9:30 PM 0 1 0 6 0 6 1 12 -11 9:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Totals 118 398 6 377 1 159 522 537 -15 TIME Going IN Going OUT Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Generation ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & 60/90 Quad Baseball Fields South Dwy Date:3/25/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Saturday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 7:00 AM 16 30 3 2 46 5 41 7:15 AM 47 35 4 6 82 10 72 7:30 AM 7 24 5 3 31 8 23 7:45 AM 5 11 3 2 16 5 11 8:00 AM 11 10 2 1 21 3 18 8:15 AM 8 9 2 0 17 2 15 8:30 AM 11 12 0 0 23 0 23 8:45 AM 8 8 2 2 16 4 12 9:00 AM 10 11 0 6 21 6 15 9:15 AM 10 8 1 2 18 3 15 9:30 AM 6 3 2 3 9 5 4 9:45 AM 5 4 2 1 9 3 6 10:00 AM 4 3 2 1 7 3 4 10:15 AM 6 8 3 5 14 8 6 10:30 AM 4 5 7 2 9 9 0 10:45 AM 4 11 3 1 15 4 11 11:00 AM 10 17 1 4 27 5 22 11:15 AM 7 10 4 5 17 9 8 11:30 AM 4 6 10 6 10 16 -6 11:45 AM 3 11 3 1 14 4 10 12:00 PM 9 12 3 8 21 11 10 12:15 PM 4 4 15 9 8 24 -16 12:30 PM 7 8 12 19 15 31 -16 12:45 PM 11 22 8 47 33 55 -22 1:00 PM 11 21 4 16 32 20 12 1:15 PM 7 17 3 7 24 10 14 1:30 PM 9 8 8 16 17 24 -7 1:45 PM 5 10 1 3 15 4 11 2:00 PM 3 9 5 12 12 17 -5 2:15 PM 3 3 16 16 6 32 -26 2:30 PM 2 10 11 12 12 23 -11 2:45 PM 12 12 18 20 24 38 -14 3:00 PM 11 17 4 6 28 10 18 3:15 PM 12 13 6 5 25 11 14 3:30 PM 8 5 0 2 13 2 11 3:45 PM 2 11 7 4 13 11 2 4:00 PM 5 7 8 0 12 8 4 4:15 PM 4 11 11 8 15 19 -4 4:30 PM 6 4 9 8 10 17 -7 4:45 PM 0 3 8 4 3 12 -9 5:00 PM 2 3 9 3 5 12 -7 5:15 PM 4 3 6 1 7 7 0 5:30 PM 3 8 5 0 11 5 6 5:45 PM 0 4 4 2 4 6 -2 6:00 PM 5 5 5 3 10 8 2 6:15 PM 2 8 5 7 10 12 -2 6:30 PM 1 1 11 18 2 29 -27 6:45 PM 2 0 12 6 2 18 -16 7:00 PM 0 1 15 15 1 30 -29 7:15 PM 1 1 5 2 2 7 -5 7:30 PM 0 1 6 4 1 10 -9 7:45 PM 1 0 4 1 1 5 -4 8:00 PM 0 0 18 13 0 31 -31 8:15 PM 0 0 7 14 0 21 -21 8:30 PM 0 0 27 14 0 41 -41 8:45 PM 0 1 16 15 1 31 -30 9:00 PM 0 0 1 3 0 4 -4 9:15 PM 0 0 0 6 0 6 -6 9:30 PM 0 0 9 8 0 17 -17 9:45 PM 0 0 7 1 0 8 -8 10:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 -1 10:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 338 479 389 411 817 800 17 TIME Going IN Going OUT Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip Generation ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Location:Stadium Pkwy & USSSA Space Coast Complex Date:3/25/2023 City:Melbourne Day:Saturday NL SR EL ER IN OUT OUTCOME 7:00 AM 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 7:15 AM 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 7:30 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 8:00 AM 0 4 0 1 4 1 3 8:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 8:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 AM 0 8 0 2 8 2 6 9:30 AM 0 1 0 2 1 2 -1 9:45 AM 0 3 0 1 3 1 2 10:00 AM 0 1 0 2 1 2 -1 10:15 AM 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 10:30 AM 0 5 0 2 5 2 3 10:45 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 11:00 AM 0 6 0 2 6 2 4 11:15 AM 0 4 0 2 4 2 2 11:30 AM 0 3 0 1 3 1 2 11:45 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 12:00 PM 0 3 0 1 3 1 2 12:15 PM 0 2 0 8 2 8 -6 12:30 PM 0 7 0 9 7 9 -2 12:45 PM 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 1:00 PM 0 5 0 2 5 2 3 1:15 PM 0 5 0 1 5 1 4 1:30 PM 0 4 0 2 4 2 2 1:45 PM 0 7 0 4 7 4 3 2:00 PM 0 6 0 8 6 8 -2 2:15 PM 0 5 0 19 5 19 -14 2:30 PM 0 3 0 2 3 2 1 2:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 4 -4 3:00 PM 0 4 0 1 4 1 3 3:15 PM 0 4 0 3 4 3 1 3:30 PM 0 4 0 1 4 1 3 3:45 PM 0 5 0 2 5 2 3 4:00 PM 0 2 0 5 2 5 -3 4:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 5 -5 4:30 PM 0 1 0 6 1 6 -5 4:45 PM 0 3 0 1 3 1 2 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 5:30 PM 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 6:15 PM 0 5 0 3 5 3 2 6:30 PM 0 0 0 7 0 7 -7 6:45 PM 0 1 0 5 1 5 -4 7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 PM 0 0 0 3 0 3 -3 7:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 PM 0 1 0 18 1 18 -17 8:00 PM 0 0 0 14 0 14 -14 8:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 PM 0 0 0 3 0 3 -3 9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 9:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 2 -2 10:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 2 -2 10:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 -1 10:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 155 0 163 155 163 -8 TIME Trip Gen Study Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Trip GenerationGoing IN Going OUT ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study ATTACHMENT B Processed Data ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study IN OUT TOTAL North Driveway 5:00 PM 1 1 2 5:15 PM 3 1 4 5:30 PM 2 2 4 5:45 PM 3 1 4 TOTAL 9 5 14 Mid Driveway 5:00 PM 3 2 5 5:15 PM 6 1 7 5:30 PM 15 9 24 5:45 PM 24 3 27 TOTAL 48 15 63 South Driveway 5:00 PM 9 3 12 5:15 PM 14 2 16 5:30 PM 24 7 31 5:45 PM 28 6 34 TOTAL 75 18 93 USSSA Driveway 5:00 PM 3 2 5 5:15 PM 1 1 2 5:30 PM 3 1 4 5:45 PM 3 1 4 TOTAL 10 5 15 185 IN 142 OUT 43 100%IN 77%OUT 23% United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA) Space Coast Complex 5800 Stadium Pkwy, Melbourne, FL 32940 Peak Hour Total DISTRIBUTION Summary of Weekday Peak Hour Data Collection Driveway and Peak Hour WEEKDAY ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study IN OUT TOTAL North Driveway 12:45 PM 16 37 53 1:00 PM 19 8 27 1:15 PM 30 1 31 1:30 PM 22 10 32 TOTAL 87 56 143 Mid Driveway 12:30 PM 11 14 25 12:45 PM 13 35 48 1:00 PM 17 8 25 1:15 PM 21 1 22 TOTAL 62 58 120 South Driveway 12:30 PM 15 31 46 12:45 PM 33 55 88 1:00 PM 32 20 52 1:15 PM 24 10 34 TOTAL 104 116 220 USSSA Driveway 1:30 PM 4 2 6 1:45 PM 7 4 11 2:00 PM 6 8 14 2:15 PM 5 19 24 TOTAL 22 33 55 538 IN 275 OUT 263 100%IN 51%OUT 49% United States Specialty Sports Association (USSSA) Space Coast Complex 5800 Stadium Pkwy, Melbourne, FL 32940 Peak Hour Total DISTRIBUTION Summary of Saturday Tournament Peak Hour Data Collection Driveway and Peak Hour SATURDAY ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study ATTACHMENT C Vehicle Time-of-Day Distributions from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study Land Use Code Land Use Setting Time Period # Data Sites Time Total Entering Exiting 12:00 - 1:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 1:00 - 2:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 2:00 - 3:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 3:00 - 4:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 4:00 - 5:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 5:00 - 6:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 6:00 - 7:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 7:00 - 8:00 AM 2.9%5.3%0.5% 8:00 - 9:00 AM 8.0%14.0%2.1% 9:00 - 10:00 AM 8.9%12.5%5.3% 10:00 - 11:00 AM 13.3%13.4%13.2% 11:00 - 12:00 PM 11.8%13.5%10.1% 12:00 - 1:00 PM 14.4%14.6%14.2% 1:00 - 2:00 PM 12.6%13.1%12.2% 2:00 - 3:00 PM 11.0%10.2%11.9% 3:00 - 4:00 PM 6.1%1.6%10.6% 4:00 - 5:00 PM 7.2%1.0%13.4% 5:00 - 6:00 PM 2.3%0.6%4.0% 6:00 - 7:00 PM 1.4%0.3%2.5% 7:00 - 8:00 PM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 8:00 - 9:00 PM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 9:00 - 10:00 PM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 10:00 - 11:00 PM 0.0%0.0%0.0% 11:00 - 12:00 AM 0.0%0.0%0.0% % of 24-Hour Vehicle Trips General Urban/Suburban Saturday 1 Soccer Complex 488 Hourly Distribution of Entering and Exiting Vehicle Trips by Land Use Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition ATTACHMENT C: Trip Generation Study ATTACHMENT D CFRPMv7 Model Outputs # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # #^ S R 4 2 9 Lakewood Ave West Rd E Crown Point Rd SilverStar Rd Wurst Rd Ocoee-Ap op k a Rd R e w i s S t Fullers Cross Rd SB SR 429 to Franklin B luford Ave Clarcona-Ocoee Rd F l e w e lli n g A v e N B S R 4 2 9 f m F r a n k l i n S B S R 4 2 9 t o C l a r c o n a -O c o e e Crown Point Cross Rd SR 429 3 8 1 2 9 50 7 0 5 2 9 14 3 6 21 86 22 41 11 5 2 8 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 9 0 3 1 0 0 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project Distribution - Ocoee Regional Sports Complex CFRPMv7 - 2030 - 2/19/2023 Legend ^Project Location #TAZ Centroid Centroid Connectors Lanes per direction = 1 Lanes per direction = 2 Lanes per direction = 4 ° # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # #^ SR 429 Bay St Orlando Ave Lakewood Ave Maple St Ingram Rd Ocoee-Apopka Rd Fullers Cross Rd Wurst Rd M aguire R d Clarcona-OcoeeRd 9th St West Rd Hennis Rd Flewelling Av e E Crown Point Rd Silver StarRd P l a n t S t K i s s imm ee Ave T a yl o r S t R e w i s S t NBSR429toFranklin W Crown Point Rd Ocoee Hills Rd R u s s e ll D r Franklin St Bluford Ave Bethune Ave S B S R 4 2 9 f m C l a r c o n a -O c o e e SR 4 29 3 1 0 8 2 21 9 50 7 11 5 1310 2 9 14 3 6 2616 86 41 22 2 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 7 0 3 9 7 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project Distribution - Ocoee Regional Sports Complex CFRPMv7 - 2030 - 2/19/2023 Legend ^Project Location #TAZ Centroid Centroid Connectors Lanes per direction = 1 Lanes per direction = 2 Lanes per direction = 3 Lanes per direction = 4 ° ### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # #### #^ SR 42 9 Bay St 9th St Blu ford Ave Colonial Dr Orla ndo Ave Story Rd Lak ewood Av e Maple St P l a n t S t Ocoee-Apopka Rd Ingram Rd Clarke Rd Wurst Rd Florid a's Turnpike Bin ion Rd M aguire R d West Rd Hennis Rd Flewelling Ave SilverStarRd Vineland Rd W h i t e R d E Crown Point Rd C r e s t A v e Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Main St T p k t o N B S R 4 2 9 K i s s i m m e e A v e McCormick Rd Fullers Cross Rd TaylorSt R e w i s S t Divison St NBSR429toFranklin W C r o w n P o i n t R d Ocoee Hills Rd M arshallFar m s R d B e u l a h R d Franklin St J a m ela D r Lakeview Ave Gen ev a St Pennsylvania Ave C i t r u s O a k s A v e Beth une Av e Bla ck woo d Av e SR 42 9 1 3 8 0 6 11 2 21 7 4 9 50 5 13 10 2 9 16 14 3 6 26 86 17 22 0 1 17 3 0 2 0 1 5 8 1 0 0 0 8 3 3 2 1 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 3 1 00 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 3 2 1 4 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 4 1 3 0 7 0 0 9 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Project Distribution - Ocoee Regional Sports Complex CFRPMv7 - 2030 - 2/19/2023 Legend ^Project Location #TAZ Centroid Centroid Connectors Lanes per direction = 1 Lanes per direction = 2 Lanes per direction = 3 Lanes per direction = 4 Lanes per direction > 4 ° APPENDIX B Site Plan 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 7 3 28 - 2 2 - 0 7 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 6 28 - 2 2 - 0 7 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 5 4 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 5 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 4 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 3 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 2 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 4 9 4 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 9 9 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 4 9 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 7 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 5 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 4 2 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 6 8 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 6 1 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 6 7 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 6 06 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 5 6 06 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 2 06 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 8 0 06 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 4 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 7 1 FL U : C ( P U D ) ZO N I N G : C ( P U D ) 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 0 5 0 FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E 28 - 2 2 - 0 7 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 6 0 FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 5 0 FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 4 0 FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 3 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 2 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 1 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 2 0 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 1 9 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 1 8 0 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 3 8 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 3 7 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 9 2 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 6 4 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 1 8 4 2 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : L I ZO N I N G : I N D ( P U D ) FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : H I ZO N I N G : I - 2 FL U : L I ZO N I N G : I - 1 FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - 1 A FL U : C ZO N I N G : C ( P U D ) FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : A - 1 FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : R - C E FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) FL U : L D R ZO N I N G : L D - P U D LA K E W O O D M A N O R P U D 07 - 2 2 - 2 8 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 3 1 FL U : L D R ( C O U N T Y ) ZO N I N G : A - 1 ( C O U N T Y ) PU D B O U N D A R Y 60 ' R O W CO N V E Y A N C E 3. 8 A C R E S O C O E E - A P O P K A R O A D ( R O W V A R I E S ) FULLERS CROSS ROAD (ROW VARIES) (PROPOSED ROAD - 60' ROW) NO R T H L A K E W O O D A V E N U E PU D B O U N D A R Y PU D B O U N D A R Y 15 ' D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T 10 ' L A N D S C A P E B U F F E R RO W C O N V E Y A N C E 0. 4 A C R E S EX I S T I N G W E L L 15 ' D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T 20 ' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 10 ' L A N D S C A P E B U F F E R 10 ' U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 15 ' D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T Fe e t 0 15 0 30 0 Sunday, September 15, 2024 5:29:50 PMC:\Users\BastianM\Desktop\WIP\Ocoee\470-Planning\70.CAD\PD_Rezoning (1st Submittal) 2290 FULLERS CROSS ROAD OCOEE, FLORIDA OCOEE REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX 09/15/24PUD - 1st Submittal AECOM 150 N Orange Ave, Suite 201 Orlando, FL 32801 (407)843-6552 Montierre Development 5669 SE Crooked Oak Ave Hobe Sound, FL 33455 ©2 0 2 4 A E C O M C o r p o r a t i o n Printed date: Filename: Dr a w i n g T i t l e : Revisions N°DateDescription FI L E N A M E : DW N B Y : DE S I G N E D B Y : QA / Q C B Y : SI Z E PR O J E C T M A N A G E R : PL O T S C A L E : DA T E : PR O J E C T # Sh e e t Ke y p l a n : 30 " X 4 2 " 09 / 1 3 BS T N BS T N -- - 08 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 4 BL AS I N D I C A T E D P. 0 8 60 7 2 9 4 6 5 -- -CO N C E P T U A L SI T E P L A N CO N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N APPENDIX C Turning Movement Counts National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 25 78 40 0 46 100 25 0 15 88 47 0 68 115 18 25 690 7:15 AM 18 83 58 0 54 124 8 0 15 88 33 0 60 50 23 18 632 7:30 AM 13 60 48 0 55 109 2 0 13 60 58 0 74 95 34 23 644 7:45 AM 16 72 45 0 44 140 5 0 19 49 44 0 77 46 26 20 603 8:00 AM 19 63 44 0 34 114 3 0 23 72 62 0 73 50 28 15 600 8:15 AM 15 87 61 0 42 136 7 0 24 66 44 0 88 41 16 12 639 8:30 AM 21 94 72 1 31 108 12 0 14 59 19 0 86 49 26 16 608 8:45 AM 26 70 45 0 31 101 5 0 14 49 40 0 76 36 19 21 533 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :153 607 413 1 337 932 67 0 137 531 347 0 602 482 190 150 4949 APPROACH %'s :13.03%51.70%35.18%0.09%25.22%69.76%5.01%0.00%13.50%52.32%34.19%0.00%42.28%33.85%13.34%10.53% PEAK HR :7:00 AM 37 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :72 293 191 0 199 473 40 0 62 285 182 0 279 306 101 86 2569 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.720 0.883 0.823 0.000 0.905 0.845 0.400 0.000 0.816 0.810 0.784 0.000 0.906 0.665 0.743 0.860 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 28 121 50 0 29 95 4 0 13 24 20 2 58 37 21 6 508 4:15 PM 23 114 49 0 28 82 4 0 14 31 21 0 76 35 27 4 508 4:30 PM 23 140 47 0 31 96 8 0 11 31 22 0 61 49 30 14 563 4:45 PM 34 136 47 0 28 68 12 0 13 41 25 0 77 51 31 17 580 5:00 PM 38 130 72 0 33 79 11 0 12 55 30 1 66 86 31 14 658 5:15 PM 30 146 67 1 38 125 15 0 19 39 21 0 63 61 31 12 668 5:30 PM 27 131 76 0 38 101 11 0 9 32 33 0 78 81 34 15 666 5:45 PM 33 138 52 0 26 87 10 0 18 32 27 0 78 75 30 12 618 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :236 1056 460 1 251 733 75 0 109 285 199 3 557 475 235 94 4769 APPROACH %'s :13.46%60.24%26.24%0.06%23.70%69.22%7.08%0.00%18.29%47.82%33.39%0.50%40.93%34.90%17.27%6.91% PEAK HR :5:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :128 545 267 1 135 392 47 0 58 158 111 1 285 303 126 53 2610 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.842 0.933 0.878 0.250 0.888 0.784 0.783 0.000 0.763 0.718 0.841 0.250 0.913 0.881 0.926 0.883 Data - Total Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd 0.874 0.942 0.882 0.854 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-001 5/25/2023 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0.9770.964 0.806 0.837 0.922 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 0.931 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 15 0 5 0 0 141 56 0 92 229 0 0 538 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 7 0 10 0 0 161 62 0 83 213 0 0 536 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 16 2 11 0 0 155 59 0 106 123 0 0 472 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 17 0 18 0 0 137 54 0 106 159 0 0 491 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9 0 10 0 0 124 65 0 86 164 0 0 458 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 11 7 29 0 0 132 73 0 108 127 0 0 487 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 26 15 56 0 0 107 92 0 98 139 0 0 533 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 18 13 54 0 0 114 101 0 118 103 0 0 521 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 119 37 193 0 0 1071 562 0 797 1257 0 0 4036 APPROACH %'s :34.10%10.60%55.30%0.00%0.00%65.58%34.42%0.00%38.80%61.20%0.00%0.00% PEAK HR :7:00 AM 37 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 55 2 44 0 0 594 231 0 387 724 0 0 2037 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.809 0.250 0.611 0.000 0.000 0.922 0.931 0.000 0.913 0.790 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 12 0 16 0 0 104 27 0 60 130 0 0 349 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 21 0 13 0 0 94 39 0 83 128 0 0 378 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 19 0 17 0 0 95 29 0 72 178 0 0 410 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 123 30 0 92 179 0 0 444 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 19 0 12 0 0 150 24 0 97 196 0 0 498 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 15 0 11 0 0 165 32 0 87 176 0 0 486 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 22 0 0 130 41 0 62 229 0 0 501 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 22 0 17 0 0 118 28 0 71 223 0 0 479 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 135 0 118 0 0 979 250 0 624 1439 0 0 3545 APPROACH %'s :53.36%0.00%46.64%0.00%0.00%79.66%20.34%0.00%30.25%69.75%0.00%0.00% PEAK HR :5:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 73 0 62 0 0 563 125 0 317 824 0 0 1964 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.830 0.000 0.705 0.000 0.000 0.853 0.762 0.000 0.817 0.900 0.000 0.000 Data - Total SR 429 SB Ramps SR 429 SB Ramps West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd 0.721 0.925 0.865 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-002 5/25/2023 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0.9800.865 0.873 0.970 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 0.947 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 NB Ramp & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 50 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 11 146 1 0 0 274 27 0 570 7:15 AM 36 0 73 0 0 1 0 0 15 152 0 0 0 257 17 0 551 7:30 AM 27 1 70 0 0 0 0 0 17 155 0 0 0 208 23 0 501 7:45 AM 30 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 23 125 0 0 0 229 16 0 501 8:00 AM 43 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 19 121 0 0 0 217 25 0 495 8:15 AM 19 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 19 111 0 1 0 208 19 0 450 8:30 AM 33 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 18 119 0 0 0 226 18 0 459 8:45 AM 23 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 11 115 0 0 0 182 20 0 407 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :261 2 525 0 0 1 0 0 133 1044 1 1 0 1801 165 0 3934 APPROACH %'s :33.12%0.25%66.62%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%11.28%88.55%0.08%0.08%0.00%91.61%8.39%0.00% PEAK HR :7:00 AM 37 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :143 1 282 0 0 1 0 0 66 578 1 0 0 968 83 0 2123 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.715 0.250 0.904 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.717 0.932 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.883 0.769 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 29 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 21 100 0 1 0 165 11 0 387 4:15 PM 27 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 8 98 0 0 0 183 18 0 391 4:30 PM 47 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 12 105 0 0 0 204 13 0 452 4:45 PM 39 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 9 119 0 0 0 226 17 0 512 5:00 PM 68 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 13 166 0 0 0 231 22 0 597 5:15 PM 48 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 16 157 0 1 0 208 17 0 549 5:30 PM 60 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 12 136 0 1 0 233 31 0 570 5:45 PM 53 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 7 130 0 0 0 240 16 0 545 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :371 0 685 0 0 0 0 0 98 1011 0 3 0 1690 145 0 4003 APPROACH %'s :35.13%0.00%64.87%0.00%8.81%90.92%0.00%0.27%0.00%92.10%7.90%0.00% PEAK HR :5:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :229 0 395 0 0 0 0 0 48 589 0 2 0 912 86 0 2261 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.842 0.000 0.968 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.750 0.887 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.950 0.694 0.000 Data - Total SR 429 NB Ramp SR 429 NB Ramp West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd 0.959 0.250 0.938 0.873 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-003 5/25/2023 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0.9470.945 0.892 0.945 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 0.931 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 206 0 1 0 310 0 1 521 7:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 220 0 0 0 264 0 1 487 7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 0 0 0 232 0 0 462 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0 0 1 243 0 0 441 8:00 AM 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 0 243 0 1 438 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 185 0 0 1 226 0 0 413 8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 237 0 0 408 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 1 0 0 201 0 1 374 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 1569 1 1 2 1956 0 4 3544 APPROACH %'s :0.00%50.00%50.00%0.00%0.32%99.56%0.06%0.06%0.10%99.69%0.00%0.20% PEAK HR :7:00 AM 37 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 852 0 1 1 1049 0 2 1911 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.333 0.930 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.846 0.000 0.500 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 1 0 175 0 0 338 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 1 0 204 0 1 357 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 0 0 211 0 4 394 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 1 0 245 0 0 467 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 0 1 0 249 0 2 509 5:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 261 0 1 0 231 0 1 496 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 1 0 260 0 3 492 5:45 PM 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 231 0 1 1 251 0 2 490 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 1690 0 7 1 1826 0 13 3543 APPROACH %'s :33.33%0.00%66.67%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%99.47%0.00%0.41%0.05%99.24%0.00%0.71% PEAK HR :5:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 977 0 4 1 991 0 8 1987 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.250 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.936 0.000 1.000 0.250 0.953 0.000 0.667 Data - Total N Lakewood Ave N Lakewood Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd 0.500 0.936 0.846 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-004 5/25/2023 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0.9760.375 0.250 0.934 0.951 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM 0.917 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:3-Way Yield (NB/SB/EB)Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 29 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 20 0 0 2 0 0 57 7:15 AM 26 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 17 0 0 1 0 0 47 7:30 AM 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 4 0 56 7:45 AM 41 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 58 0 0 0 4 0 109 8:00 AM 54 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 91 1 0 0 0 0 151 8:15 AM 83 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 171 8:30 AM 48 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 69 8:45 AM 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 6 0 1 0 0 0 26 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :318 8 3 0 0 4 8 1 4 5 321 2 1 3 8 0 686 APPROACH %'s :96.66%2.43%0.91%0.00%0.00%30.77%61.54%7.69%1.20%1.51%96.69%0.60%8.33%25.00%66.67%0.00% PEAK HR :7:45 AM 40 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :226 5 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 2 249 2 0 0 4 0 500 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.681 0.417 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.625 0.000 0.375 0.250 0.684 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 40 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 0 75 4:15 PM 31 3 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 1 30 1 0 0 0 0 73 4:30 PM 40 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 6 0 42 2 0 0 1 0 96 4:45 PM 32 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 23 0 0 1 0 0 62 5:00 PM 30 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 1 29 0 0 0 1 0 70 5:15 PM 22 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 1 32 0 0 0 0 0 65 5:30 PM 28 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 49 0 1 0 0 0 85 5:45 PM 31 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 42 2 1 1 0 0 85 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :254 16 0 4 0 8 12 0 25 5 275 5 2 3 2 0 611 APPROACH %'s :92.70%5.84%0.00%1.46%0.00%40.00%60.00%0.00%8.06%1.61%88.71%1.61%28.57%42.86%28.57%0.00% PEAK HR :4:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :143 10 0 2 0 3 9 0 8 2 123 3 0 2 1 0 306 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.894 0.833 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.750 0.450 0.000 0.333 0.500 0.732 0.375 0.000 0.500 0.250 0.000 Data - Total N Lakewood Ave N Lakewood Ave E Fullers Cross Rd E Fullers Cross Rd 0.693 0.875 0.681 0.250 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-005 5/25/2023 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM 0.7970.901 0.600 0.680 0.750 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 0.731 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 3 65 5 0 10 94 106 0 69 9 0 0 5 9 22 0 397 7:15 AM 3 49 2 0 7 110 99 0 76 10 2 0 0 13 19 0 390 7:30 AM 3 57 15 0 22 111 115 0 57 10 1 0 4 8 15 0 418 7:45 AM 6 47 15 0 27 112 122 0 64 22 1 0 4 11 28 0 459 8:00 AM 8 48 16 0 50 90 112 0 69 39 7 0 5 25 23 0 492 8:15 AM 11 47 26 0 34 88 142 0 80 27 5 0 11 34 45 0 550 8:30 AM 2 58 8 0 22 87 108 0 84 7 1 0 8 23 40 0 448 8:45 AM 0 65 6 0 11 100 102 0 66 7 0 0 5 9 19 0 390 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :36 436 93 0 183 792 906 0 565 131 17 0 42 132 211 0 3544 APPROACH %'s :6.37%77.17%16.46%0.00%9.73%42.11%48.17%0.00%79.24%18.37%2.38%0.00%10.91%34.29%54.81%0.00% PEAK HR :7:45 AM 40 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :27 200 65 0 133 377 484 0 297 95 14 0 28 93 136 0 1949 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.614 0.862 0.625 0.000 0.665 0.842 0.852 0.000 0.884 0.609 0.500 0.000 0.636 0.684 0.756 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 2 91 5 0 11 68 90 0 73 13 1 0 4 19 25 0 402 4:15 PM 4 98 3 0 28 61 92 0 106 13 0 0 4 17 30 0 456 4:30 PM 1 120 12 0 16 63 91 0 98 23 5 0 4 12 25 0 470 4:45 PM 0 106 4 0 10 63 95 0 95 16 3 0 2 12 29 0 435 5:00 PM 1 144 3 0 17 73 74 0 87 16 1 0 6 8 26 0 456 5:15 PM 2 120 8 0 19 83 91 0 109 22 1 0 3 8 20 0 486 5:30 PM 1 106 10 0 20 86 108 0 116 24 0 0 2 11 27 0 511 5:45 PM 1 95 9 0 23 70 105 0 121 19 2 0 2 9 28 0 484 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :12 880 54 0 144 567 746 0 805 146 13 0 27 96 210 0 3700 APPROACH %'s :1.27%93.02%5.71%0.00%9.88%38.92%51.20%0.00%83.51%15.15%1.35%0.00%8.11%28.83%63.06%0.00% PEAK HR :5:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :5 465 30 0 79 312 378 0 433 81 4 0 13 36 101 0 1937 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.625 0.807 0.750 0.000 0.859 0.907 0.875 0.000 0.895 0.844 0.500 0.000 0.542 0.818 0.902 0.000 Data - Total Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd E Fullers Cross Rd E Fullers Cross Rd 0.869 0.941 0.883 0.714 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-006 5/25/2023 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0.9480.845 0.898 0.912 0.938 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 0.886 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:4-Way Stop Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 2 15 15 0 10 13 0 0 2 4 2 0 60 0 12 0 135 7:15 AM 2 15 18 0 11 12 0 0 0 3 3 0 51 0 15 0 130 7:30 AM 1 21 18 0 6 17 0 0 0 2 3 0 47 0 20 0 135 7:45 AM 0 37 20 0 13 18 0 0 1 1 1 0 58 1 33 0 183 8:00 AM 3 61 19 0 23 61 2 0 1 2 1 0 41 1 48 0 263 8:15 AM 0 56 20 0 27 75 0 0 1 6 1 0 38 1 36 0 261 8:30 AM 0 15 20 0 13 50 1 0 1 1 2 0 44 3 20 0 170 8:45 AM 0 10 24 0 8 11 0 0 1 1 2 0 28 1 6 0 92 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :8 230 154 0 111 257 3 0 7 20 15 0 367 7 190 0 1369 APPROACH %'s :2.04%58.67%39.29%0.00%29.92%69.27%0.81%0.00%16.67%47.62%35.71%0.00%65.07%1.24%33.69%0.00% PEAK HR :7:45 AM 40 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :3 169 79 0 76 204 3 0 4 10 5 0 181 6 137 0 877 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.250 0.693 0.988 0.000 0.704 0.680 0.375 0.000 1.000 0.417 0.625 0.000 0.780 0.500 0.714 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 1 28 74 0 21 19 2 0 1 0 3 0 28 2 14 0 193 4:15 PM 1 28 67 0 20 21 0 0 1 2 1 0 40 2 15 0 198 4:30 PM 3 25 69 0 20 17 0 0 0 1 2 0 31 0 21 0 189 4:45 PM 3 23 61 0 17 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 29 1 15 0 162 5:00 PM 2 28 69 0 18 24 0 0 2 0 1 0 26 1 15 0 186 5:15 PM 6 20 67 0 16 13 1 0 0 5 0 0 32 4 9 0 173 5:30 PM 2 28 73 0 27 18 0 0 1 1 1 0 40 3 17 0 211 5:45 PM 2 23 81 0 21 11 5 0 0 2 0 0 41 4 18 0 208 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :20 203 561 0 160 135 8 0 5 12 8 0 267 17 124 0 1520 APPROACH %'s :2.55%25.89%71.56%0.00%52.81%44.55%2.64%0.00%20.00%48.00%32.00%0.00%65.44%4.17%30.39%0.00% PEAK HR :5:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :12 99 290 0 82 66 6 0 3 8 2 0 139 12 59 0 778 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.500 0.884 0.895 0.000 0.759 0.688 0.300 0.000 0.375 0.400 0.500 0.000 0.848 0.750 0.819 0.000 Data - Total N Lakewood Ave N Lakewood Ave Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd 0.756 0.694 0.594 0.880 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-007 5/25/2023 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 0.9220.946 0.856 0.650 0.833 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 0.834 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: EASTBOUND2 Explanation for extra leg movements00000000000000000000 NL NT NR NU NL2 SL ST SR SU SR2 EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU WT2 E2R2 TOTAL Movements entering the extra leg7:00 AM 0 56 20 0 0 39 85 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 43 35 20 0 1 0 310 NL2 Movements coming from NB on Ocoee Apopka Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Regions Bank Driveway) 7:15 AM 1 57 37 0 0 40 95 5 0 0 0 8 9 0 29 31 24 0 0 0 336 SR2 Movements coming from SB on Ocoee Apopka Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Regions Bank Driveway)7:30 AM 1 73 22 0 0 39 107 3 0 0 1 7 4 0 30 48 29 0 0 0 364 WT2 Movements coming from WB on W Silver Star Rd entering into the Extra Leg (Regions Bank Driveway) 7:45 AM 0 91 31 0 1 34 118 4 0 0 0 9 3 0 21 34 46 0 0 0 3928:00 AM 0 78 37 0 0 36 103 4 0 1 4 16 3 0 30 37 33 0 0 0 382 Movements exiting the extra leg 8:15 AM 3 93 51 0 0 36 106 9 0 0 3 11 0 0 31 38 30 0 1 0 412 E2R2 Movements exiting from Extra Leg (Regions Bank Driveway) entering into Ocoee Apopka Rd heading SB8:30 AM 2 70 40 0 0 19 102 7 0 0 1 9 2 0 45 49 22 0 3 0 371 8:45 AM 1 68 36 0 0 32 96 3 0 0 0 14 3 0 26 32 18 0 0 0 329 NL NT NR NU NL2 SL ST SR SU SR2 EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU WT2 E2R2 TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :8 586 274 0 1 275 812 40 0 1 9 80 24 0 255 304 222 0 5 0 2896 APPROACH %'s :0.92%67.43%31.53%0.00%0.12%24.38%71.99%3.55%0.00%0.09%7.96%70.80%21.24%0.00%32.44%38.68%28.24%0.00%0.64% PEAK HR :7:45 AM 40 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :5 332 159 0 1 125 429 24 0 1 8 45 8 0 127 158 131 0 4 0 1557 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.417 0.892 0.779 0.000 0.250 0.868 0.909 0.667 0.000 0.250 0.500 0.703 0.667 0.000 0.706 0.806 0.712 0.000 0.333 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU NBL2 SBL SBT SBR SBU SBR2 EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU WBT2 EB2R2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU NL2 SL ST SR SU SR2 EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU WT2 E2R2 TOTAL4:00 PM 1 91 41 0 0 49 75 5 0 0 3 30 6 0 33 26 39 0 0 0 399 4:15 PM 2 106 51 0 2 38 79 13 0 0 6 33 0 0 35 36 45 0 0 0 4464:30 PM 2 113 36 0 1 35 77 11 0 0 8 45 5 0 31 39 36 0 0 0 439 4:45 PM 2 108 47 0 1 39 71 9 0 1 4 40 6 0 44 38 44 0 2 0 4565:00 PM 4 117 34 0 2 49 81 7 0 0 4 48 7 0 36 32 45 0 0 0 466 5:15 PM 1 109 36 0 0 44 94 2 0 0 4 36 1 0 46 32 58 0 1 0 4645:30 PM 3 94 42 0 2 48 83 5 0 0 1 47 5 0 40 37 40 0 1 0 448 5:45 PM 3 98 44 0 0 42 82 2 0 0 2 36 1 0 33 39 46 0 0 0 428 NL NT NR NU NL2 SL ST SR SU SR2 EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU WT2 E2R2 TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :18 836 331 0 8 344 642 54 0 1 32 315 31 0 298 279 353 0 4 0 3546 APPROACH %'s :1.51%70.08%27.75%0.00%0.67%33.05%61.67%5.19%0.00%0.10%8.47%83.33%8.20%0.00%31.91%29.87%37.79%0.00%0.43% PEAK HR :4:45 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :10 428 159 0 5 180 329 23 0 1 13 171 19 0 166 139 187 0 4 0 1834 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.625 0.915 0.846 0.000 0.625 0.918 0.875 0.639 0.000 0.250 0.813 0.891 0.679 0.000 0.902 0.914 0.806 0.000 0.500 0.000 23-130163-008 5/25/2023 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 0.9840.953 0.952 0.860 0.905 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 0.945 PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.845 0.928 0.663 0.882 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Data - Total Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd W Silver Star Rd W Silver Star Rd National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Occoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd & W Franklin St City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 14 48 3 0 7 89 43 0 38 15 47 0 5 21 7 0 337 7:15 AM 15 33 2 0 8 92 29 0 47 26 55 0 5 22 6 0 340 7:30 AM 19 57 3 0 5 114 21 0 44 11 54 0 6 25 7 0 366 7:45 AM 17 51 3 0 4 106 23 0 58 24 35 0 10 31 6 0 368 8:00 AM 20 54 1 0 11 109 29 0 58 18 54 0 6 15 3 0 378 8:15 AM 17 59 3 0 13 84 29 0 69 22 59 0 6 25 11 0 397 8:30 AM 10 70 5 0 8 110 37 0 35 24 50 0 4 25 8 0 386 8:45 AM 32 48 0 0 8 85 25 0 41 21 47 0 2 19 9 0 337 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :144 420 20 0 64 789 236 0 390 161 401 0 44 183 57 0 2909 APPROACH %'s :24.66%71.92%3.42%0.00%5.88%72.45%21.67%0.00%40.97%16.91%42.12%0.00%15.49%64.44%20.07%0.00% PEAK HR :7:45 AM 40 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :64 234 12 0 36 409 118 0 220 88 198 0 26 96 28 0 1529 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.800 0.836 0.600 0.000 0.692 0.930 0.797 0.000 0.797 0.917 0.839 0.000 0.650 0.774 0.636 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 35 67 4 0 9 70 31 0 53 30 33 0 10 29 23 0 394 4:15 PM 34 71 5 0 7 77 37 0 70 49 49 0 0 36 19 0 454 4:30 PM 28 66 3 0 3 78 33 0 70 35 56 0 4 35 16 0 427 4:45 PM 33 72 5 0 9 72 41 0 69 34 40 0 1 38 17 0 431 5:00 PM 31 87 7 0 6 76 38 0 44 28 38 0 5 46 21 0 427 5:15 PM 40 87 8 0 7 81 53 0 37 24 26 0 5 37 20 0 425 5:30 PM 32 65 1 0 7 86 35 0 61 43 38 0 4 26 13 0 411 5:45 PM 21 77 5 0 5 69 37 0 48 33 38 0 1 24 16 0 374 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :254 592 38 0 53 609 305 0 452 276 318 0 30 271 145 0 3343 APPROACH %'s :28.73%66.97%4.30%0.00%5.48%62.98%31.54%0.00%43.21%26.39%30.40%0.00%6.73%60.76%32.51%0.00% PEAK HR :4:15 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :126 296 20 0 25 303 149 0 253 146 183 0 10 155 73 0 1739 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.926 0.851 0.714 0.000 0.694 0.971 0.909 0.000 0.904 0.745 0.817 0.000 0.500 0.842 0.869 0.000 Data - Total Occoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Occoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd W Franklin St W Franklin St 0.912 0.908 0.843 0.798 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-009 5/25/2023 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0.9580.884 0.977 0.866 0.826 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 0.963 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 NB Ramps & W Franklin St/Plant St City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 37 1 46 0 0 0 0 0 31 84 0 2 0 103 21 0 325 7:15 AM 48 2 46 0 0 0 0 0 40 87 0 1 0 103 15 0 342 7:30 AM 50 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 50 81 0 1 0 102 19 0 351 7:45 AM 74 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 40 60 0 1 0 99 17 0 364 8:00 AM 69 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 39 92 0 0 0 88 13 0 375 8:15 AM 70 1 71 0 0 0 0 0 31 91 0 1 0 103 8 0 376 8:30 AM 51 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 35 87 0 1 0 111 10 0 346 8:45 AM 59 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 29 83 0 0 0 84 29 0 318 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :458 4 443 0 0 0 0 0 295 665 0 7 0 793 132 0 2797 APPROACH %'s :50.61%0.44%48.95%0.00%30.51%68.77%0.00%0.72%0.00%85.73%14.27%0.00% PEAK HR :7:30 AM 39 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :263 1 266 0 0 0 0 0 160 324 0 3 0 392 57 0 1466 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.889 0.250 0.899 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.800 0.880 0.000 0.750 0.000 0.951 0.750 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 49 4 66 0 0 0 0 0 40 95 0 0 0 104 37 0 395 4:15 PM 73 10 93 0 0 0 0 0 45 129 0 3 0 117 27 0 497 4:30 PM 73 8 92 0 0 0 0 0 72 113 0 0 0 99 37 0 494 4:45 PM 60 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 54 90 0 1 0 128 42 0 463 5:00 PM 66 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 64 93 0 0 0 115 50 0 466 5:15 PM 54 1 58 0 0 0 0 0 50 59 0 0 0 147 40 0 409 5:30 PM 51 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 77 130 0 0 0 114 33 0 468 5:45 PM 74 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 29 102 0 0 0 103 14 0 381 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :500 23 597 0 0 0 0 0 431 811 0 4 0 927 280 0 3573 APPROACH %'s :44.64%2.05%53.30%0.00%34.59%65.09%0.00%0.32%0.00%76.80%23.20%0.00% PEAK HR :4:15 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :272 18 351 0 0 0 0 0 235 425 0 4 0 459 156 0 1920 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.932 0.450 0.944 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.816 0.824 0.000 0.333 0.000 0.896 0.780 0.000 Data - Total SR 429 NB Ramps SR 429 NB Ramps W Franklin St/Plant St W Franklin St/Plant St 0.901 0.922 0.928 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-010 5/25/2023 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0.9660.911 0.897 0.904 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0.975 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 SB Ramps & W Franklin St/Plant St City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 33 0 50 0 94 76 0 0 0 93 51 0 397 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 32 0 56 0 83 101 0 0 0 86 52 0 410 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 15 0 47 0 61 114 0 0 0 115 52 0 404 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 20 0 70 0 59 84 0 0 0 114 39 0 386 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 15 0 41 0 81 113 0 0 0 134 44 0 428 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 15 0 38 0 88 114 0 0 0 125 42 0 422 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 10 0 41 0 71 105 0 0 0 116 52 1 396 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 16 0 27 0 49 104 0 0 0 106 28 0 330 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 156 0 370 0 586 811 0 0 0 889 360 1 3173 APPROACH %'s :29.66%0.00%70.34%0.00%41.95%58.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.12%28.80%0.08% PEAK HR :7:30 AM 39 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 65 0 196 0 289 425 0 0 0 488 177 0 1640 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.813 0.000 0.700 0.000 0.821 0.932 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.910 0.851 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 17 0 25 0 61 124 0 0 0 111 37 0 375 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 24 0 25 1 50 151 0 0 0 145 47 0 443 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 33 0 40 1 72 151 0 1 0 134 45 0 477 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 14 0 39 0 63 133 0 0 0 138 51 0 438 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 18 0 27 0 81 144 0 0 0 124 55 0 449 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 12 0 32 0 47 90 0 0 0 156 48 0 385 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 25 0 42 0 64 178 0 0 0 121 43 0 473 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 15 0 24 0 64 124 0 0 0 146 30 0 403 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 158 0 254 2 502 1095 0 1 0 1075 356 0 3443 APPROACH %'s :38.16%0.00%61.35%0.48%31.41%68.52%0.00%0.06%0.00%75.12%24.88%0.00% PEAK HR :4:15 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 89 0 131 2 266 579 0 1 0 541 198 0 1807 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.674 0.000 0.819 0.500 0.821 0.959 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.933 0.900 0.000 23-130163-011 5/25/2023 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM 0.9470.750 0.940 0.962 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM 0.958 PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.725 0.884 0.934 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Data - Total SR 429 SB Ramps SR 429 SB Ramps W Franklin St/Plant St W Franklin St/Plant St National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Maguire Rd & SR 50 W Colonial Dr City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 7:00 AM 105 38 32 0 42 37 8 0 31 241 105 1 28 166 8 13 855 7:15 AM 130 49 46 0 28 58 7 0 19 286 129 1 36 198 12 17 1016 7:30 AM 126 60 61 0 40 70 7 0 25 242 127 1 59 239 7 12 1076 7:45 AM 145 72 58 0 34 60 4 0 45 344 166 0 46 255 16 10 1255 8:00 AM 138 64 50 0 39 65 12 0 33 260 138 1 32 219 11 13 1075 8:15 AM 171 60 44 0 42 62 14 0 37 277 164 2 48 231 10 15 1177 8:30 AM 160 49 59 0 37 72 19 0 21 323 157 1 36 250 11 18 1213 8:45 AM 165 51 55 0 51 69 9 0 31 269 152 1 50 202 12 18 1135 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :1140 443 405 0 313 493 80 0 242 2242 1138 8 335 1760 87 116 8802 APPROACH %'s :57.34%22.28%20.37%0.00%35.33%55.64%9.03%0.00%6.67%61.76%31.35%0.22%14.58%76.59%3.79%5.05% PEAK HR :7:45 AM 40 TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :614 245 211 0 152 259 49 0 136 1204 625 4 162 955 48 56 4720 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.898 0.851 0.894 0.000 0.905 0.899 0.645 0.000 0.756 0.875 0.941 0.500 0.844 0.936 0.750 0.778 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 4:00 PM 169 55 50 0 47 68 11 0 45 315 160 0 60 314 29 16 1339 4:15 PM 149 77 50 0 41 57 13 0 58 295 171 3 65 318 15 18 1330 4:30 PM 149 75 51 0 45 68 14 0 69 304 167 3 55 333 12 15 1360 4:45 PM 166 81 61 0 56 65 14 0 61 296 179 0 53 392 10 12 1446 5:00 PM 174 69 45 0 53 54 23 0 71 306 185 2 67 409 21 12 1491 5:15 PM 183 73 51 0 55 70 21 0 55 297 172 1 42 386 12 15 1433 5:30 PM 162 71 44 1 51 54 18 0 51 282 163 1 41 314 20 18 1291 5:45 PM 153 93 42 0 48 56 10 0 62 303 176 3 58 364 21 13 1402 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :1305 594 394 1 396 492 124 0 472 2398 1373 13 441 2830 140 119 11092 APPROACH %'s :56.89%25.89%17.18%0.04%39.13%48.62%12.25%0.00%11.09%56.34%32.26%0.31%12.49%80.17%3.97%3.37% PEAK HR :4:30 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :672 298 208 0 209 257 72 0 256 1203 703 6 217 1520 55 54 5730 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.918 0.920 0.852 0.000 0.933 0.918 0.783 0.000 0.901 0.983 0.950 0.500 0.810 0.929 0.655 0.900 Data - Total Maguire Rd Maguire Rd SR 50 W Colonial Dr SR 50 W Colonial Dr 0.973 0.898 0.887 0.933 AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 23-130163-012 5/25/2023 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM 0.9610.956 0.921 0.961 0.907 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 0.940 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd/Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 23 88 58 0 23 65 4 0 10 34 21 0 65 37 36 11 475 1:15 PM 20 93 50 0 28 70 2 0 11 39 15 0 72 37 25 5 467 1:30 PM 25 83 48 0 33 72 7 0 8 36 14 0 75 28 27 10 466 1:45 PM 22 111 57 0 26 80 6 0 11 25 18 0 59 31 29 10 485 2:00 PM 15 105 45 0 25 61 13 0 15 27 22 0 68 38 15 8 457 2:15 PM 21 105 43 0 25 82 5 0 19 25 18 0 69 39 22 8 481 2:30 PM 20 96 53 0 25 55 5 0 14 22 24 2 61 30 28 9 444 2:45 PM 21 98 51 0 30 75 9 0 7 23 19 0 44 33 26 11 447 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :167 779 405 0 215 560 51 0 95 231 151 2 513 273 208 72 3722 APPROACH %'s :12.36%57.66%29.98%0.00%26.03%67.80%6.17%0.00%19.83%48.23%31.52%0.42%48.12%25.61%19.51%6.75% PEAK HR :1:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :90 375 213 0 110 287 19 0 40 134 68 0 271 133 117 36 1893 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.900 0.845 0.918 0.000 0.833 0.897 0.679 0.000 0.909 0.859 0.810 0.000 0.903 0.899 0.813 0.818 23-130121-001 4/15/2023 Data - Total CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd West Rd/Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy West Rd/Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 0.9760.892 0.929 0.931 0.935 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 17 1 8 0 0 117 34 0 60 122 0 0 359 1:15 PM 0 0 0 0 20 0 12 0 0 95 44 0 80 124 0 0 375 1:30 PM 0 0 0 0 13 1 10 0 0 102 37 0 79 136 0 0 378 1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 15 0 13 0 0 114 24 0 75 127 0 0 368 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 15 0 0 83 49 0 68 118 0 0 338 2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 12 0 15 0 0 98 37 0 67 136 0 0 365 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 14 2 12 0 0 93 45 0 49 121 0 0 336 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 18 0 7 0 0 96 35 0 56 112 0 0 324 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 114 4 92 0 0 798 305 0 534 996 0 0 2843 APPROACH %'s :54.29%1.90%43.81%0.00%0.00%72.35%27.65%0.00%34.90%65.10%0.00%0.00% PEAK HR :1:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 65 2 43 0 0 428 139 0 294 509 0 0 1480 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.813 0.500 0.827 0.000 0.000 0.915 0.790 0.000 0.919 0.936 0.000 0.000 23-130121-002 4/15/2023 Data - Total SR 429 SB Ramps SR 429 SB Ramps West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 0.9790.859 0.939 0.934 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 NB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 34 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 14 121 0 0 0 148 7 0 387 1:15 PM 40 1 71 0 0 0 0 0 12 96 0 0 0 164 17 0 401 1:30 PM 35 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 9 113 0 0 0 180 28 2 440 1:45 PM 41 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 6 121 0 0 0 161 14 0 417 2:00 PM 30 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 9 81 0 0 0 156 14 0 357 2:15 PM 54 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 16 92 0 0 0 149 6 0 375 2:30 PM 44 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 10 99 0 0 0 127 16 0 381 2:45 PM 37 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 9 103 0 0 0 130 14 0 366 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :315 1 564 0 0 0 0 0 85 826 0 0 0 1215 116 2 3124 APPROACH %'s :35.80%0.11%64.09%0.00%9.33%90.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%91.15%8.70%0.15% PEAK HR :1:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :150 1 281 0 0 0 0 0 41 451 0 0 0 653 66 2 1645 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.915 0.250 0.949 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.732 0.932 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.907 0.589 0.250 23-130121-003 4/15/2023 Data - Total SR 429 NB Ramps SR 429 NB Ramps West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 0.9350.939 0.911 0.858 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 1 0 150 0 0 334 1:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 1 0 180 0 1 345 1:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 0 4 0 206 0 1 395 1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 3 0 175 0 0 373 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 0 167 0 3 316 2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 1 0 155 0 0 307 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 1 0 141 0 1 326 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 147 0 1 319 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1376 0 11 0 1321 0 7 2715 APPROACH %'s :0.00%99.21%0.00%0.79%0.00%99.47%0.00%0.53% PEAK HR :1:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 725 0 9 0 711 0 2 1447 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.929 0.000 0.563 0.000 0.863 0.000 0.500 23-130121-004 4/15/2023 Data - Total N Lakewood Ave N Lakewood Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 0.9160.927 0.861 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:3-Way Yield (NB/SB/EB)Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 9 3 1 0 0 2 2 0 3 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 34 1:15 PM 14 6 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 35 1:30 PM 17 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 36 1:45 PM 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 32 2:00 PM 22 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 47 2:15 PM 11 6 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 36 2:30 PM 20 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 40 2:45 PM 18 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 29 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :127 24 1 0 0 10 15 0 10 2 98 1 0 1 0 0 289 APPROACH %'s :83.55%15.79%0.66%0.00%0.00%40.00%60.00%0.00%9.01%1.80%88.29%0.90%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00% PEAK HR :1:45 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :69 10 0 0 0 4 8 0 5 2 56 1 0 0 0 0 155 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.784 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.667 0.000 0.417 0.500 0.875 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 23-130121-005 4/15/2023 Data - Total N Lakewood Ave N Lakewood Ave E Fullers Cross Rd E Fullers Cross Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM 0.8240.790 0.600 0.842 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:CR 437/0coee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 2 60 1 0 13 51 75 0 83 4 1 0 3 3 15 0 311 1:15 PM 1 72 2 0 7 61 65 0 76 4 2 0 3 7 15 0 315 1:30 PM 2 64 0 0 4 53 74 0 71 7 2 0 2 9 15 0 303 1:45 PM 3 62 1 0 10 75 69 0 88 7 3 0 3 5 10 0 336 2:00 PM 3 81 2 0 8 61 74 0 76 8 5 0 0 5 16 0 339 2:15 PM 3 85 2 0 7 69 71 0 83 5 1 0 2 3 15 0 346 2:30 PM 3 66 1 0 7 61 66 0 68 4 0 0 6 4 20 0 306 2:45 PM 2 71 0 0 3 59 68 0 80 4 2 0 3 7 11 0 310 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :19 561 9 0 59 490 562 0 625 43 16 0 22 43 117 0 2566 APPROACH %'s :3.23%95.25%1.53%0.00%5.31%44.10%50.59%0.00%91.37%6.29%2.34%0.00%12.09%23.63%64.29%0.00% PEAK HR :1:45 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :12 294 6 0 32 266 280 0 315 24 9 0 11 17 61 0 1327 PEAK HR FACTOR :1.000 0.865 0.750 0.000 0.800 0.887 0.946 0.000 0.895 0.750 0.450 0.000 0.458 0.850 0.763 0.000 23-130121-006 4/15/2023 Data - Total CR 437/0coee Apopka Rd CR 437/0coee Apopka Rd E Fullers Cross Rd E Fullers Cross Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM 0.9590.867 0.938 0.888 0.742 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:N Lakewood Ave & Clinger Cove Rd/Wurst Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:4-Way Stop Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 2 12 34 0 11 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 33 0 6 0 110 1:15 PM 3 12 37 0 8 6 2 0 2 1 0 0 34 2 9 0 116 1:30 PM 0 10 35 0 11 4 0 0 1 3 2 0 31 1 6 0 104 1:45 PM 3 15 35 0 8 10 2 0 0 0 1 0 33 1 7 0 115 2:00 PM 1 19 40 0 9 7 1 0 1 3 3 0 35 1 11 0 131 2:15 PM 2 6 46 0 9 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 32 1 12 0 120 2:30 PM 1 13 41 0 6 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 34 2 7 0 116 2:45 PM 4 22 39 0 6 5 0 0 0 1 2 0 29 0 5 0 113 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :16 109 307 0 68 60 5 0 7 12 9 0 261 8 63 0 925 APPROACH %'s :3.70%25.23%71.06%0.00%51.13%45.11%3.76%0.00%25.00%42.86%32.14%0.00%78.61%2.41%18.98%0.00% PEAK HR :1:45 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :7 53 162 0 32 36 3 0 3 5 5 0 134 5 37 0 482 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.583 0.697 0.880 0.000 0.889 0.900 0.375 0.000 0.750 0.417 0.417 0.000 0.957 0.625 0.771 0.000 23-130121-007 4/15/2023 Data - Total N Lakewood Ave N Lakewood Ave Clinger Cove Rd/Wurst Rd Clinger Cove Rd/Wurst Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM 0.9200.925 0.888 0.464 0.936 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd & W Silver Star Rd City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 3 58 57 0 31 72 2 0 3 23 3 0 35 28 26 0 341 1:15 PM 4 76 62 0 29 62 4 0 4 25 4 0 31 35 23 0 359 1:30 PM 4 64 42 0 28 60 1 0 1 29 2 0 36 29 22 0 318 1:45 PM 2 69 49 0 35 65 3 0 2 21 3 0 52 36 32 0 369 2:00 PM 2 75 50 0 26 56 2 0 4 22 1 0 51 33 29 0 351 2:15 PM 3 92 51 0 25 68 2 0 1 23 3 0 36 24 28 0 356 2:30 PM 0 72 45 0 34 57 3 0 0 23 1 0 24 24 30 0 313 2:45 PM 1 66 51 0 31 66 1 0 0 20 2 0 39 40 40 0 357 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :19 572 407 0 239 506 18 0 15 186 19 0 304 249 230 0 2764 APPROACH %'s :1.90%57.31%40.78%0.00%31.32%66.32%2.36%0.00%6.82%84.55%8.64%0.00%38.83%31.80%29.37%0.00% PEAK HR :1:15 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :12 284 203 0 118 243 10 0 11 97 10 0 170 133 106 0 1397 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.750 0.934 0.819 0.000 0.843 0.935 0.625 0.000 0.688 0.836 0.625 0.000 0.817 0.924 0.828 0.000 23-130121-008 4/15/2023 Data - Total Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd W Silver Star Rd W Silver Star Rd PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:15 PM - 02:15 PM 0.9460.879 0.900 0.894 0.852 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd & W Franklin St City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 9 54 3 0 7 68 38 0 53 35 28 0 3 17 5 1 321 1:15 PM 20 65 2 0 5 58 25 0 69 22 33 0 2 18 9 0 328 1:30 PM 18 63 4 0 4 53 38 0 45 21 39 0 2 19 0 0 306 1:45 PM 24 62 3 0 2 70 51 0 49 27 40 0 2 12 8 0 350 2:00 PM 24 67 1 0 3 55 50 1 54 30 25 0 2 9 8 0 329 2:15 PM 22 75 3 0 1 71 35 0 63 24 26 0 2 17 6 0 345 2:30 PM 16 54 1 0 6 60 21 0 46 32 35 0 3 10 9 0 293 2:45 PM 12 57 2 0 3 61 42 0 63 21 35 0 3 9 2 0 310 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :145 497 19 0 31 496 300 1 442 212 261 0 19 111 47 1 2582 APPROACH %'s :21.94%75.19%2.87%0.00%3.74%59.90%36.23%0.12%48.31%23.17%28.52%0.00%10.67%62.36%26.40%0.56% PEAK HR :1:30 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :88 267 11 0 10 249 174 1 211 102 130 0 8 57 22 0 1330 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.917 0.890 0.688 0.000 0.625 0.877 0.853 0.250 0.837 0.850 0.813 0.000 1.000 0.750 0.688 0.000 23-130121-009 4/15/2023 Data - Total Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd W Franklin St W Franklin St PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM 0.9500.915 0.882 0.955 0.870 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 NB Ramps & SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 40 1 47 0 0 0 0 0 29 92 0 2 0 94 9 0 314 1:15 PM 55 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 40 98 0 1 0 78 12 0 329 1:30 PM 46 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 39 91 0 2 0 90 15 0 327 1:45 PM 43 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 29 106 0 0 0 110 22 0 354 2:00 PM 54 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 33 85 0 3 0 96 11 0 326 2:15 PM 56 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 29 77 0 2 0 87 17 0 311 2:30 PM 44 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 40 85 0 2 0 74 10 0 311 2:45 PM 52 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 30 92 0 2 0 78 9 0 307 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :390 1 367 0 0 0 0 0 269 726 0 14 0 707 105 0 2579 APPROACH %'s :51.45%0.13%48.42%0.00%26.66%71.95%0.00%1.39%0.00%87.07%12.93%0.00% PEAK HR :1:15 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :198 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 141 380 0 6 0 374 60 0 1336 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.900 0.000 0.983 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.881 0.896 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.850 0.682 0.000 23-130121-010 4/15/2023 Data - Total SR 429 NB Ramps SR 429 NB Ramps SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:15 PM - 02:15 PM 0.9440.938 0.948 0.822 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:SR 429 SB Ramps & SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 8 0 35 0 67 118 0 0 0 104 33 0 365 1:15 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 33 0 67 123 0 1 0 106 28 0 371 1:30 PM 0 0 0 0 11 0 42 0 54 124 0 0 0 96 38 0 365 1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 37 0 77 119 0 0 0 114 39 0 399 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 11 0 22 0 53 110 0 2 0 106 50 1 355 2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 33 0 46 102 0 0 0 112 31 0 331 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 12 0 26 1 61 114 0 0 0 92 30 0 336 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 13 0 29 0 37 113 0 0 0 98 33 0 323 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 88 0 257 1 462 923 0 3 0 828 282 1 2845 APPROACH %'s :25.43%0.00%74.28%0.29%33.29%66.50%0.00%0.22%0.00%74.53%25.38%0.09% PEAK HR :1:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 45 0 147 0 265 484 0 1 0 420 138 0 1500 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.865 0.000 0.875 0.000 0.860 0.976 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.921 0.885 0.000 23-130121-011 4/15/2023 Data - Total SR 429 SB Ramps SR 429 SB Ramps SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 0.9400.906 0.957 0.912 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location:Maguire Rd & SR 50/W Colonial Dr City:Ocoee Project ID: Control:Signalized Date: NS/EW Streets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL 1:00 PM 132 53 47 0 54 51 15 0 29 298 134 2 41 269 12 22 1159 1:15 PM 138 57 30 0 40 48 20 0 29 285 140 4 38 236 13 31 1109 1:30 PM 144 41 63 0 48 46 25 0 36 275 131 2 37 249 12 25 1134 1:45 PM 135 46 33 0 49 46 15 0 40 297 135 1 36 224 20 25 1102 2:00 PM 120 62 50 0 47 48 20 0 37 285 132 3 45 268 7 16 1140 2:15 PM 121 56 44 0 48 53 11 0 19 229 128 2 47 233 17 17 1025 2:30 PM 145 53 47 0 42 38 11 0 34 263 116 1 36 235 13 17 1051 2:45 PM 110 55 40 0 34 39 10 0 21 260 140 1 51 275 15 18 1069 NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES :1045 423 354 0 362 369 127 0 245 2192 1056 16 331 1989 109 171 8789 APPROACH %'s :57.35%23.22%19.43%0.00%42.19%43.01%14.80%0.00%6.98%62.47%30.09%0.46%12.73%76.50%4.19%6.58% PEAK HR :1:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :549 197 173 0 191 191 75 0 134 1155 540 9 152 978 57 103 4504 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.953 0.864 0.687 0.000 0.884 0.936 0.750 0.000 0.838 0.969 0.964 0.563 0.927 0.909 0.713 0.831 23-130121-012 4/15/2023 Data - Total Maguire Rd Maguire Rd SR 50/W Colonial Dr SR 50/W Colonial Dr PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM 0.9720.926 0.952 0.971 0.938 APPENDIX D FDOT’s Florida Traffic Online (FTO) Data 2022 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 7500 ORANGE COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.98 WEEK DATES SF PSCF ================================================================================ 1 01/01/2022 - 01/01/2022 1.01 1.03 2 01/02/2022 - 01/08/2022 1.03 1.05 3 01/09/2022 - 01/15/2022 1.05 1.07 4 01/16/2022 - 01/22/2022 1.04 1.06 5 01/23/2022 - 01/29/2022 1.03 1.05 6 01/30/2022 - 02/05/2022 1.01 1.03 7 02/06/2022 - 02/12/2022 1.00 1.02 8 02/13/2022 - 02/19/2022 0.98 1.00 * 9 02/20/2022 - 02/26/2022 0.98 1.00 *10 02/27/2022 - 03/05/2022 0.98 1.00 *11 03/06/2022 - 03/12/2022 0.97 0.99 *12 03/13/2022 - 03/19/2022 0.97 0.99 *13 03/20/2022 - 03/26/2022 0.97 0.99 *14 03/27/2022 - 04/02/2022 0.97 0.99 *15 04/03/2022 - 04/09/2022 0.97 0.99 *16 04/10/2022 - 04/16/2022 0.98 1.00 *17 04/17/2022 - 04/23/2022 0.98 1.00 *18 04/24/2022 - 04/30/2022 0.98 1.00 *19 05/01/2022 - 05/07/2022 0.98 1.00 *20 05/08/2022 - 05/14/2022 0.98 1.00 *21 05/15/2022 - 05/21/2022 0.98 1.00 22 05/22/2022 - 05/28/2022 0.99 1.01 23 05/29/2022 - 06/04/2022 0.99 1.01 24 06/05/2022 - 06/11/2022 1.00 1.02 25 06/12/2022 - 06/18/2022 1.01 1.03 26 06/19/2022 - 06/25/2022 1.02 1.04 27 06/26/2022 - 07/02/2022 1.02 1.04 28 07/03/2022 - 07/09/2022 1.03 1.05 29 07/10/2022 - 07/16/2022 1.04 1.06 30 07/17/2022 - 07/23/2022 1.03 1.05 31 07/24/2022 - 07/30/2022 1.02 1.04 32 07/31/2022 - 08/06/2022 1.01 1.03 33 08/07/2022 - 08/13/2022 1.00 1.02 34 08/14/2022 - 08/20/2022 0.99 1.01 35 08/21/2022 - 08/27/2022 1.00 1.02 36 08/28/2022 - 09/03/2022 1.02 1.04 37 09/04/2022 - 09/10/2022 1.03 1.05 38 09/11/2022 - 09/17/2022 1.05 1.07 39 09/18/2022 - 09/24/2022 1.03 1.05 40 09/25/2022 - 10/01/2022 1.01 1.03 41 10/02/2022 - 10/08/2022 0.99 1.01 42 10/09/2022 - 10/15/2022 0.97 0.99 43 10/16/2022 - 10/22/2022 0.98 1.00 44 10/23/2022 - 10/29/2022 0.99 1.01 45 10/30/2022 - 11/05/2022 1.00 1.02 46 11/06/2022 - 11/12/2022 1.01 1.03 47 11/13/2022 - 11/19/2022 1.03 1.05 48 11/20/2022 - 11/26/2022 1.02 1.04 49 11/27/2022 - 12/03/2022 1.02 1.04 50 12/04/2022 - 12/10/2022 1.01 1.03 51 12/11/2022 - 12/17/2022 1.01 1.03 52 12/18/2022 - 12/24/2022 1.03 1.05 53 12/25/2022 - 12/31/2022 1.05 1.07 * PEAK SEASON 23-FEB-2023 09:11:22 830UPD 5_7500_PKSEASON.TXT APPENDIX E Turning Movement Volume Worksheets Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.98 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)129 545 267 135 392 47 59 158 111 338 303 126 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)129 545 267 135 392 47 59 158 111 338 303 126 Heavy Vehicle 0% 2% 4% 1% 3% 4% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 5% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 9 37 18 13 38 5 1 3 2 32 29 12 Background Volume (2027)148 626 306 159 461 56 65 174 122 397 356 148 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5% 30%5%30% Direction N/A OUT OUT N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 35 208 0 37 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 35 208 0 37 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)148 661 514 159 498 56 65 174 122 621 356 148 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #1 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.98 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)0 0 0 73 0 62 0 563 125 317 824 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 73 0 62 0 563 125 317 824 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 3% 1% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 0 52 12 36 93 0 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 88 0 74 0 660 147 378 983 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%15%15% 15% 15% 15% Direction N/A N/A N/A IN N/A IN N/A OUT OUT OUT IN N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 75 0 112 0 104 104 104 112 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 75 0 112 0 104 104 104 112 0 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 163 0 186 0 764 251 482 1,095 0 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour SR 429 SB Ramps West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #2 SR 429 SB Ramps & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)229 0 395 0 0 0 50 589 0 0 912 86 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)229 0 395 0 0 0 50 589 0 0 912 86 Heavy Vehicle 2% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 4% 2% 0% 0% 2% 7% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 5 59 0 0 118 11 Volume Balancing 59 88 Background Volume (2027)275 0 533 0 0 0 59 783 0 0 1,103 104 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)15%15%15% 10%15% 10% Direction IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A OUT IN N/A N/A OUT OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 112 0 112 0 0 0 104 75 0 0 104 69 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 112 0 112 0 0 0 104 75 0 0 104 69 Buildout Volume (2027)387 0 645 0 0 0 163 858 0 0 1,207 173 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour SR 429 NB Ramp West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #3 SR 429 NB Ramp & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.98 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)1 0 2 1 0 0 6 977 0 9 991 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)1 0 2 1 0 0 6 977 0 9 991 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Clarcona Ocoee Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #4 N Lakewood Ave & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.98 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Buildout Traffic from Ocoee Village Center Study (2021)191 55 282 30 35 15 87 900 142 504 795 30 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% Growth Factor 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Vested Trips 77 32 174 10 103 16 42 67 3 Background Volume (2027)291 94 490 34 39 17 107 1,111 175 606 957 37 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)25%5%25% 5% Direction OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 173 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 187 38 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 173 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 187 38 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)464 94 525 34 39 17 107 1,111 362 644 957 37 Weekday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Clarcona Ocoee Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #4 N Lakewood Ave & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.80 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)145 10 0 0 3 9 11 2 123 0 2 1 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)145 10 0 0 3 9 11 2 123 0 2 1 Heavy Vehicle 1% 10% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound E Fullers Cross Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #5 N Lakewood Ave & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.80 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Buildout Traffic from Ocoee Village Center Study (2021)108 223 15 0 251 333 283 14 93 8 8 0 Heavy Vehicle 1% 10% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% Growth Factor 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Vested Trips 27 55 4 0 92 122 89 4 29 Background Volume (2027)148 305 21 0 373 495 406 20 133 9 9 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%10% 20% 20% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A IN IN OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 69 0 0 75 150 139 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 69 0 0 75 150 139 0 0 0 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)148 374 21 0 448 645 545 20 133 9 9 0 Weekday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound E Fullers Cross Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #5 N Lakewood Ave & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.95 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)5 465 30 79 312 378 433 81 4 13 36 101 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)5 465 30 79 312 378 433 81 4 13 36 101 Heavy Vehicle 0% 2% 0% 4% 4% 1% 2% 0% 0% 8% 3% 2% [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound E Fullers Cross Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Buildout Volumes (Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 26 460 322 122 545 450 386 159 29 246 265 182 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2025 Volumes 26 460 322 122 545 450 386 159 29 246 265 182 Heavy Vehicle 0% 2% 0% 4% 4% 1% 2% 0% 0% 8% 3% 2% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.04 1.04 1.04 Vested Trips 8 134 94 9 42 35 44 47 32 Background Volume (2027)35 612 429 136 609 503 425 175 32 300 323 221 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5% 20% 10% 15% 20%5% 10%15% Direction OUT OUT OUT IN IN N/A N/A N/A IN IN N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 35 139 69 112 149 0 0 0 38 75 0 104 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 35 139 69 112 149 0 0 0 38 75 0 104 Buildout Volume (2027)70 751 498 248 758 503 425 175 70 375 323 325 Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound E Fullers Cross Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #6 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)12 99 290 82 66 6 3 8 2 139 12 59 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)12 99 290 82 66 6 3 8 2 139 12 59 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 2 16 48 46 37 3 24 2 10 Background Volume (2027)15 123 361 135 108 9 4 10 2 174 15 74 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10% 5%10%5% Direction N/A OUT OUT N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 69 35 0 75 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 69 35 0 75 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)15 192 396 135 183 9 4 10 2 211 15 74 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #7 N Lakewood Ave & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.98 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)15 428 159 180 330 23 13 171 19 170 139 187 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)15 428 159 180 330 23 13 171 19 170 139 187 Heavy Vehicle 13% 2% 2% 2% 5% 0% 0% 2% 11% 3% 1% 2% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 5 129 48 53 98 7 23 19 26 Background Volume (2027)21 591 220 247 454 32 16 205 23 207 169 228 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)15%15%5%5% Direction N/A IN N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A IN N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 112 0 0 104 0 0 37 0 0 35 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 112 0 0 104 0 0 37 0 0 35 0 Buildout Volume (2027)21 703 220 247 558 32 16 242 23 207 204 228 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd W Silver Star Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound W Silver Star Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #8 Ocoee Apopka Rd & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)126 296 20 25 303 149 253 146 183 10 155 73 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)126 296 20 25 303 149 253 146 183 10 155 73 Heavy Vehicle 2% 2% 0% 8% 6% 4% 5% 5% 29% 10% 3% 7% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.20 1.20 1.20 Vested Trips 23 55 4 8 100 49 58 34 42 Background Volume (2027)159 375 26 35 427 210 331 192 240 12 186 88 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%10% 5% 5% Direction N/A IN N/A N/A OUT OUT IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 75 0 0 69 35 37 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 75 0 0 69 35 37 0 0 0 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)159 450 26 35 496 245 368 192 240 12 186 88 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour Occoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd W Franklin St Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound W Franklin St INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #9 Occoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.97 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)272 18 351 0 0 0 239 425 0 0 459 156 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)272 18 351 0 0 0 239 425 0 0 459 156 Heavy Vehicle 7% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2% 11% 0% 0% 2% 4% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 SR 429 NB Ramp Relocation -326 -22 -421 443 326 35 62 0 0 87 29 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 443 0 326 293 521 0 0 583 197 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5%5%10% Direction N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 37 0 0 70 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 37 0 0 70 0 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 480 0 326 293 558 0 0 653 197 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour SR 429 NB Ramps W Franklin St/Plant St Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound W Franklin St/Plant St INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #10 SR 429 NB Ramps & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)0 0 0 91 0 131 267 579 0 0 541 198 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 91 0 131 267 579 0 0 541 198 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 4% 3% 3% 0% 0% 3% 5% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 31 66 0 0 85 31 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 109 0 157 319 691 0 0 669 245 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5%5% 5% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A OUT OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 35 35 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 35 35 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 109 0 157 319 728 0 0 704 280 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour SR 429 SB Ramps W Franklin St/Plant St Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound W Franklin St/Plant St INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #11 SR 429 SB Ramps & Weekday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)672 298 208 209 257 72 262 1,203 703 271 1,520 55 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)672 298 208 209 257 72 262 1,203 703 271 1,520 55 Heavy Vehicle 1% 3% 1% 1% 4% 3% 9% 2% 1% 0% 2% 4% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Vested Trips 138 61 43 18 22 6 8 38 22 11 62 2 Background Volume (2027)864 383 268 244 300 84 291 1,337 781 304 1,704 61 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%10% Direction N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Buildout Volume (2027)864 383 268 313 300 84 291 1,337 781 304 1,704 136 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. Weekday PM Peak Hour Maguire Rd SR 50 W Colonial Dr Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound SR 50 W Colonial Dr INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #12 Maguire Rd & Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vested Trips 236 271 Background Volume (2027)0 1,085 0 0 1,117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2% 7%2%13% Direction N/A IN IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN Project Distribution (%)2%9% 2%13% Direction N/A OUT N/A OUT OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 29 52 62 29 0 0 0 0 90 0 97 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction OUT Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 29 52 62 29 0 0 0 0 97 0 97 Buildout Volume (2027)0 1,114 52 62 1,146 0 0 0 0 97 0 97 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #13 17th Avenue Extension & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R TMC (estimated from data collected 5/25/2023) 0 371 145 41 166 0 0 0 0 70 0 30 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 371 145 41 166 0 0 0 0 70 0 30 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Fullers Cross Apt 66 57 Background Volume (2027)0 467 157 44 236 0 0 0 0 76 0 32 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%15% 15%10% Direction IN N/A N/A N/A N/A IN OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 75 0 0 0 0 112 104 0 68 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 75 0 0 0 0 112 104 0 68 0 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)75 467 157 44 236 112 104 0 68 76 0 32 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #14 17th Avenue/17th Avenue Extension & Lakewood Avenue Weekday PM Peak Hour Lakewood Avenue 17th Avenue/17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 0 0 11 0 29 25 576 0 0 670 15 2025 Volumes 0 0 0 11 0 29 25 576 0 0 670 15 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Vested Trips 107 123 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 11 0 30 26 706 0 0 820 16 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5% 10% 10% 10% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN IN IN N/A Project Distribution (%)15%5%10% Direction OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 104 0 35 0 0 0 0 106 75 75 75 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 104 0 35 0 0 0 0 106 75 75 75 0 Buildout Volume (2027)104 0 35 11 0 30 26 812 75 75 895 16 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #15 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway #1/Fullers Cross Apt Dwy Weekday PM Peak Hour Driveway #1/Fullers Cross Apt Dwy Fullers Cross Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 587 0 0 685 0 2025 Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 587 0 0 685 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Fullers Cross Apt 107 123 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 717 0 0 835 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5%15% 5%20% Direction N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT IN N/A IN N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 104 37 0 150 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 104 37 0 150 0 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 35 0 0 0 0 821 37 0 985 0 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #16 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway #2 Weekday PM Peak Hour Driveway #2 Fullers Cross Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 808 0 0 820 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 808 0 0 820 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fullers Cross Apt 236 271 Background Volume (2027)0 1,076 0 0 1,124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)34%35%1% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 235 0 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 235 0 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Buildout Volume (2027)0 1,311 0 0 1,385 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #17 Driveway #3 & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #3 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total 53 DU 1.03 55 63%35 37%20 55 Notes:1 Vehicle trip rate and directional splits per ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition. 35 20 In Out Trip Rate PM Peak Hour (Weekday) PM P e a k H o u r (W e e k d a y ) Land Use Size Units ITE LUC 210: Single Family Housing Detached 1 Total Generated Trips Crown Point Woods Trip Generation Summary - Weekday Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 19 797 0 0 804 16 11 0 9 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 19 797 0 0 804 16 11 0 9 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0%1%0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vested Trips 236 271 Background Volume (2027)20 1,065 0 0 1,107 17 11 0 9 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%2% 25% 10%11%24% Direction N/A OUT IN IN IN N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 70 15 187 75 0 0 0 0 76 0 166 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass-by Distribution (-40% IN/10% OUT)10% 30%-30%40%30% Pass-by Direction IN/OUT IN IN IN OUT OUT Pass-by Trips 0 -21 7 21 -21 0 0 0 0 28 0 21 Total Project Trips 0 49 22 208 54 0 0 0 0 104 0 187 Buildout Volume (2027)20 1,114 22 208 1,161 17 11 0 9 104 0 187 [1] Ocoee Crown Point Woods volumes estimated by using ITE LUC 210 for 53 DU and existing directional splits along Ocoee Apopka Road. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #18 Driveway #4/Ocoee Crown Point Woods Dr & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #4/Ocoee Crown Point Woods Dr Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0%2%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vested Trips 236 271 Background Volume (2027)0 1,085 0 0 1,117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2% 9%10% Direction N/A IN IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Distribution (%)6%11%4% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 57 67 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass-by Distribution -30%30%(-30% IN/40% OUT)10% Pass-by Direction IN IN IN/OUT OUT Pass-by Trips 0 -21 21 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total Project Trips 0 36 88 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Buildout Volume (2027)0 1,121 88 0 1,275 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #19 Driveway #5 & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #5 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vested Trips 236 271 Background Volume (2027)0 1,085 0 0 1,117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)11% 3% 8% 2% Direction N/A IN IN IN IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Distribution (%)2%11%3% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 96 22 60 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction IN Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 96 22 67 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Buildout Volume (2027)0 1,181 22 67 1,208 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #20 Driveway #6 & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #6 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vested Trips 236 271 Background Volume (2027)0 1,085 0 0 1,117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)14% 1%2% Direction N/A IN IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Distribution (%)2%11%1% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 119 7 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 119 7 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Buildout Volume (2027)0 1,204 7 0 1,208 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #21 Driveway #7 & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #7 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 816 0 0 813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0%2%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Background Volume (2027)0 849 0 0 846 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)9% 6% 2%15%2% Direction N/A IN IN IN OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 67 45 15 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass-by Distribution -10% 10% 10%(-10% IN/10% OUT)10% Pass-by Direction IN IN IN IN/OUT OUT Pass-by Trips 0 -7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total Project Trips 0 60 52 22 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Buildout Volume (2027)0 909 52 22 950 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #22 Driveway #8 & Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #8 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2% 5%13% 5% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN IN IN IN IN Project Distribution (%)9%2%9%11% Direction N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 62 0 14 15 99 0 0 173 37 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction OUT Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 62 0 14 15 99 0 0 180 37 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 62 0 14 15 99 0 0 180 37 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #23 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway #9 Weekday PM Peak Hour Driveway #9 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)3% 2% 5% 18% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN IN IN N/A Project Distribution (%)8%5%18%3% Direction OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 55 0 34 0 0 0 0 146 15 37 155 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction OUT Pass-by Trips 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 62 0 34 0 0 0 0 146 15 37 155 0 Buildout Volume (2027)62 0 34 0 0 0 0 146 15 37 155 0 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #24 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway #10 Weekday PM Peak Hour Driveway #10 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:747 IN 692 OUT 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 5/25/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2%3% 3% 23%23% 2% Direction N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A OUT IN OUT N/A N/A IN IN PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 14 0 20 22 158 0 0 172 15 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 14 0 20 22 158 0 0 172 15 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 14 0 20 22 158 0 0 172 15 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #25 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway #11 Weekday PM Peak Hour Driveway #11 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.98 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)90 375 213 110 287 19 40 134 68 307 133 117 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)90 375 213 110 287 19 40 134 68 307 133 117 Heavy Vehicle 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 5% 0% 1% 3% 1% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Background Volume (2027)108 450 256 132 344 23 48 161 82 368 160 140 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5% 30%5%30% Direction N/A OUT OUT N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 35 212 0 44 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 35 212 0 44 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)108 485 468 132 388 23 48 161 82 634 160 140 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #1 CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd/Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd West Rd/Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.98 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)0 0 0 65 2 43 0 428 139 294 509 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 65 2 43 0 428 139 294 509 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 2% 50% 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 78 2 52 0 514 167 353 611 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%15%15% 15% 15% 15% Direction N/A N/A N/A IN N/A IN N/A OUT OUT OUT IN N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 89 0 133 0 106 106 106 133 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 89 0 133 0 106 106 106 133 0 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 167 2 185 0 620 273 459 744 0 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #2 SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour SR 429 SB Ramps West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.93 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)150 1 281 0 0 0 41 451 0 2 653 66 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)150 1 281 0 0 0 41 451 0 2 653 66 Heavy Vehicle 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Volume Balancing 34 54 Background Volume (2027)180 1 371 0 0 0 49 595 0 2 784 79 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)15%15%15% 10%15% 10% Direction IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A OUT IN N/A N/A OUT OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 133 0 133 0 0 0 106 89 0 0 106 70 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 133 0 133 0 0 0 106 89 0 0 106 70 Buildout Volume (2027)313 1 504 0 0 0 155 684 0 2 890 149 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #3 SR 429 NB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour SR 429 NB Ramps West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 9 725 0 2 711 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 9 725 0 2 711 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #4 N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Buildout Traffic from Ocoee Village Center Study (2021)191 55 282 30 35 15 87 900 142 504 795 30 Adjustment Factor to 2023 Saturday 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Existing Volume (2023)139 40 206 22 26 11 64 657 104 368 580 22 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% Growth Factor 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 Background Volume (2027)181 52 268 29 34 14 83 854 135 478 754 29 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)25%5%25% 5% Direction OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 176 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 222 44 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 176 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 222 44 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)357 52 303 29 34 14 83 854 357 522 754 29 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #4 N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave Clarcona Ocoee Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.82 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)69 10 0 0 4 8 6 2 56 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)69 10 0 0 4 8 6 2 56 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 10% 0% 0% 50% 0% 17% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #5 N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday PM Peak Hour Factor:0.82 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Buildout Traffic from Ocoee Village Center Study (2021)108 223 15 0 251 333 283 14 93 8 8 0 Adjustment Factor to Saturday 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Existing Volume (2023)81 167 11 0 188 250 212 11 70 6 6 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 10% 0% 0% 50% 0% 17% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.3 Background Volume (2027)105 217 14 0 244 325 276 14 91 8 8 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%10% 20% 20% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A IN IN OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 70 0 0 89 177 141 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 70 0 0 89 177 141 0 0 0 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)105 287 14 0 333 502 417 14 91 8 8 0 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #5 N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)12 294 6 32 266 280 315 24 9 11 17 61 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)12 294 6 32 266 280 315 24 9 11 17 61 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 2% 1% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #6 CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Buildout Volumes (Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)26 460 322 122 545 450 386 159 29 246 265 182 Adjustment to Saturday 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 2025 Volumes 18 322 225 85 382 315 270 111 20 172 186 127 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 2% 1% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.1 Vested Trips Background Volume (2027)20 354 248 94 420 347 297 122 22 189 205 140 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5% 20% 10% 15% 20%5% 10%15% Direction OUT OUT OUT IN IN N/A N/A N/A IN IN N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 35 141 70 133 177 0 0 0 45 89 0 106 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 35 141 70 133 177 0 0 0 45 89 0 106 Buildout Volume (2027)55 495 318 227 597 347 297 122 67 278 205 246 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #6 CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd E Fullers Cross Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)7 53 162 32 36 3 3 5 5 134 5 37 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)7 53 162 32 36 3 3 5 5 134 5 37 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 3% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Background Volume (2027)8 64 194 38 43 4 4 6 6 161 6 44 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10% 5%10%5% Direction N/A OUT OUT N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 70 36 0 89 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 70 36 0 89 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)8 134 230 38 132 4 4 6 6 205 6 44 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #7 N Lakewood Ave & Clinger Cove Rd/Wurst Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour N Lakewood Ave Clinger Cove Rd/Wurst Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:15 PM - 02:15 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)12 284 203 118 243 10 11 97 10 170 133 106 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)12 284 203 118 243 10 11 97 10 170 133 106 Heavy Vehicle 0% 2% 2% 4% 3% 10% 0% 3% 10% 1% 0% 2% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Background Volume (2027)14 341 244 142 292 12 13 116 12 204 160 127 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)15%15%5%5% Direction N/A IN N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A IN N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 133 0 0 106 0 0 44 0 0 35 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 133 0 0 106 0 0 44 0 0 35 0 Buildout Volume (2027)14 474 244 142 398 12 13 160 12 204 195 127 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #8 Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd & W Silver Star Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd W Silver Star Rd Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.95 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)88 267 11 11 249 174 211 102 130 8 57 22 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)88 267 11 11 249 174 211 102 130 8 57 22 Heavy Vehicle 3% 1% 0% 0% 2% 3% 3% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Background Volume (2027)106 320 13 13 299 209 253 122 156 10 68 26 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%10% 5% 5% Direction N/A IN N/A N/A OUT OUT IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 89 0 0 71 35 44 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 89 0 0 71 35 44 0 0 0 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)106 409 13 13 370 244 297 122 156 10 68 26 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #9 Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd & W Franklin St Saturday PM Peak Hour Ocoee Apopka Rd/Maguire Rd W Franklin St Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.94 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:15 PM - 02:15 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)198 0 177 0 0 0 147 380 0 0 374 60 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)198 0 177 0 0 0 147 380 0 0 374 60 Heavy Vehicle 4% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 2% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 SR 429 NB Ramp Relocation -238 -212 212 238 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 212 0 238 176 456 0 0 449 72 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5%5%10% Direction N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 44 0 0 70 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 44 0 0 70 0 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 256 0 238 176 500 0 0 519 72 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #10 SR 429 NB Ramps & SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St Saturday PM Peak Hour SR 429 NB Ramps SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.94 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)0 0 0 45 0 147 266 484 0 0 420 138 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 45 0 147 266 484 0 0 420 138 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 22% 0% 4% 2% 1% 0% 0% 3% 4% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 54 0 176 319 581 0 0 504 166 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5%5% 5% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN N/A N/A OUT OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 35 35 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 35 35 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 54 0 176 319 625 0 0 539 201 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #11 SR 429 SB Ramps & SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St Saturday PM Peak Hour SR 429 SB Ramps SR 438/W Franklin St/Plant St Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.97 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)549 197 173 191 191 75 143 1,155 540 255 978 57 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)549 197 173 191 191 75 143 1,155 540 255 978 57 Heavy Vehicle 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 7% 5% 1% 1% 0% 2% 7% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.2 Vested Trips Background Volume (2027)659 236 208 229 229 90 172 1,386 648 306 1,174 68 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%10% Direction N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 Buildout Volume (2027)659 236 208 300 229 90 172 1,386 648 306 1,174 157 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #12 Maguire Rd & SR 50/W Colonial Dr Saturday PM Peak Hour Maguire Rd SR 50/W Colonial Dr Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 810 0 0 817 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment to Saturday 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2025 Volumes 0 567 0 0 572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Background Volume (2027)0 680 0 0 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2% 7%2%13% Direction N/A IN IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN Project Distribution (%)2%9% 2%13% Direction N/A OUT N/A OUT OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 32 62 63 32 0 0 0 0 91 0 115 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction OUT Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 32 62 63 32 0 0 0 0 106 0 115 Buildout Volume (2027)0 712 62 63 718 0 0 0 0 106 0 115 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #13 17th Avenue Extension & CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R TMC (estimated from data collected 4/15/2023)0 203 81 16 159 0 0 0 0 67 0 19 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 203 81 16 159 0 0 0 0 67 0 19 Heavy Vehicle 0% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Background Volume (2027)0 244 97 19 191 0 0 0 0 80 0 23 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%15% 15%10% Direction IN N/A N/A N/A N/A IN OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 89 0 0 0 0 133 106 0 70 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 89 0 0 0 0 133 106 0 70 0 0 0 Buildout Volume (2027)89 244 97 19 191 133 106 0 70 80 0 23 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #14 17th Avenue/17th Avenue Extension & Lakewood Avenue Saturday PM Peak Hour Lakewood Avenue 17th Avenue/17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Buildout Volumes (Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 0 0 11 0 29 25 576 0 0 670 15 Adjustment to Saturday 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 2025 Volumes 0 0 0 8 0 20 18 403 0 0 469 11 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.1 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 9 0 22 20 443 0 0 516 12 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5% 10% 10% 10% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN IN IN N/A Project Distribution (%)15%5%10% Direction OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 106 0 36 0 0 0 0 114 89 88 89 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 106 0 36 0 0 0 0 114 89 88 89 0 Buildout Volume (2027)106 0 36 9 0 22 20 557 89 88 605 12 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #15 Fullers Cross Road & Driveway #1/Fullers Cross Apt Dwy Saturday PM Peak Hour Driveway #1/Fullers Cross Apt Dwy Fullers Cross Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Buildout Volumes (Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 587 0 0 685 0 Adjustment to Saturday 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 2025 Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 0 0 480 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.1 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 452 0 0 528 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)5%15% 5%20% Direction N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT IN IN IN N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 106 44 0 177 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 106 44 0 177 0 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 35 0 0 0 0 558 44 0 705 0 Saturday PM Peak Hour Driveway #2 Fullers Cross Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Driveway #2 INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #16 Fullers Cross Road & Weekday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Weekday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA) 0 565 0 0 574 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Volumes 0 565 0 0 574 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Background Volume (2027)0 622 0 0 631 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)34%35%1% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 239 0 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 239 0 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Buildout Volume (2027)0 861 0 0 941 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 [1] Ocoee Crown Point Woods volumes estimated by using ITE LUC 210 for 53 DU and existing directional splits along Ocoee Apopka Road. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #17 Driveway #3 & CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #3 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total 53 DU 1.04 55 54%30 46%25 55 Notes:1 Vehicle trip rate and directional splits per ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition. 30 25 In Out ITE LUC 210: Single Family Housing Detached 1 Trip Rate Peak Hour (Saturday) PM P e a k H o u r (W e e k d a y ) Land Use Size Units Total Generated Trips Crown Point Woods Trip Generation Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)16 794 0 0 806 14 14 0 11 0 0 0 Adjustment to Saturday 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.70 2025 Volumes 16 556 0 0 564 14 14 0 11 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0%1%0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Background Volume (2027)19 667 0 0 677 17 14 0 11 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)10%2% 25% 10%11%24% Direction N/A OUT IN IN IN N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 70 18 222 89 0 0 0 0 77 0 169 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass-by Distribution (-40% IN/10% OUT)10% 30% -30%40%30% Pass-by Direction IN/OUT IN IN IN Pass-by Trips 0 -44 15 44 -44 0 0 0 0 59 0 44 Total Project Trips 0 26 33 266 45 0 0 0 0 136 0 213 Buildout Volume (2027)19 693 33 266 722 17 14 0 11 136 0 213 [1] Ocoee Crown Point Woods volumes estimated by using ITE LUC 210 for 53 DU and existing directional splits along Ocoee Apopka Road. Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #4/Ocoee Crown Point Woods Dr Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #18 Driveway #4/Ocoee Crown Point Woods Dr & Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 810 0 0 817 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment to Saturday 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 2025 Volumes 0 567 0 0 572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0%2%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.35 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Background Volume (2027)0 680 0 0 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2% 9%10% Direction N/A IN IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Distribution (%)6%11%4% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 60 80 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass-by Distribution -30% 30%(-30% IN/40% OUT)10% Pass-by Direction IN IN IN/OUT OUT Pass-by Trips 0 -44 44 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Total Project Trips 0 16 124 0 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Buildout Volume (2027)0 696 124 0 867 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #5 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #19 Driveway #5 & Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 810 0 0 817 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment to Saturday 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.70 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2025 Volumes 0 567 0 0 572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Background Volume (2027)0 680 0 0 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffic Diversions 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)11% 3% 8% 2% Direction N/A IN IN IN IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Distribution (%)2%11%3% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 112 27 71 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction IN Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 112 27 86 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Buildout Volume (2027)0 792 27 86 781 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 [1] Demastus Lane volumes estimated by using ITE LUC 210 for 6 DU and existing directional splits along Ocoee Apopka Road. Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #6 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #20 Driveway #6 & Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 810 0 0 817 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment to Saturday 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.70 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2025 Volumes 0 567 0 0 572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Background Volume (2027)0 680 0 0 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffic Diversions 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)14% 1%2% Direction N/A IN IN N/A IN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Distribution (%)2%11%1% Direction N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 139 9 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 139 9 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Buildout Volume (2027)0 819 9 0 781 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 [1] Demastus Lane volumes estimated by using ITE LUC 210 for 6 DU and existing directional splits along Ocoee Apopka Road. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #21 Driveway #7 & CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #7 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.96 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 2025 Volumes (estimated from Fullers Crossing Apt TIA)0 810 0 0 817 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjustment to Saturday 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2025 Volumes 0 567 0 0 572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0%2%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Background Volume (2027)0 680 0 0 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)9% 6% 2%15%2% Direction N/A IN IN IN OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT PM Peak Hour Trips 0 80 53 18 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass-by Distribution -10% 10% 10%(-10% IN/10% OUT)10% Pass-by Direction IN IN IN IN/OUT OUT Pass-by Trips 0 -14 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Total Project Trips 0 66 67 33 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Buildout Volume (2027)0 746 67 33 792 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #22 Driveway #8 & CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Saturday PM Peak Hour CR 437/Ocoee Apopka Rd Driveway #8 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2% 5%13% 5% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN IN IN IN IN Project Distribution (%)9%2%9%11% Direction N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 64 0 14 18 107 0 0 193 44 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction OUT Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 64 0 14 18 107 0 0 208 44 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 64 0 14 18 107 0 0 208 44 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #23 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway #9 Saturday PM Peak Hour Driveway #9 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)3% 2% 5% 18% Direction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IN IN IN IN N/A Project Distribution (%)8%5%18%3% Direction OUT N/A OUT N/A N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A N/A OUT N/A PM Peak Hour Trips 56 0 35 0 0 0 0 154 17 44 181 0 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement?Yes Pass-by Distribution 10% Pass-by Direction OUT Pass-by Trips 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 71 0 35 0 0 0 0 154 17 44 181 0 Buildout Volume (2027)71 0 35 0 0 0 0 154 17 44 181 0 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #24 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway #10 Saturday PM Peak Hour Driveway #10 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Saturday Peak Hour Factor:0.92 Saturday Hour Trip Generation:886 IN 704 OUT 01:45 PM - 02:45 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R Raw TMC (collected 4/15/2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seasonal Factor [1]1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Existing Volume (2023)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Vehicle 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Factor 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 Background Volume (2027)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT TRIPS Net New External Trips Project Distribution (%)2%3% 3% 23%23% 2% Direction N/A N/A N/A OUT N/A OUT IN OUT N/A N/A IN IN PM Peak Hour Trips 0 0 0 14 0 21 27 162 0 0 204 18 Pass-by Trips Pass-by Movement? Pass-by Distribution Pass-by Direction Pass-by Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 14 0 21 27 162 0 0 204 18 Buildout Volume (2027)0 0 0 14 0 21 27 162 0 0 204 18 [1] Seasonal factor provided by FDOT's FTO for the week of data collection is shown to be less than 1.00. A seasonal factor of 1.00 was applied instead for a conservative analysis. INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET INTERSECTION #25 17th Avenue Extension & Driveway #11 Saturday PM Peak Hour Driveway #11 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Figure 7(a)NTS NOcoee Village Center 5095Project № 198+(28)=226 208+(14)=222 237 10 9 68 2 86 West Rd 52 110+(16)=126 45 2543 5 14 5 + ( 3 2 ) = 1 7 7 West Rd Oc o e e - A p o p k a R d SR 4 2 9 S B R a m p s 669+(42)=711 359+(45)=404 603+(48)=651 143 8467 + ( 8 ) = 7 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd SR 4 2 9 N B R a m p s 84+(7)=91 788+(87)=875 54 473+(56)=529 22 7 48 0 + ( 5 2 ) = 5 3 2 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4 14 867+(87)=954 59 12 4 + ( 4 0 ) = 1 6 4 7 48 7 16 884+(77)=961 181+(35)=216 1538 Ad a i r S t Clarcona-Ocoee Rd 6 Fuller’s Cross Rd 33 267+(42)=309 58+(28)=86 8 60 1 11 0 + ( 3 2 ) = 1 4 2 360 169+(48)=217 7 39 0 29 3 16 Oc o e e - A p o p k a R d 8 Wurst Rd 81+(28)=109 3 115 7 13 7 + ( 5 5 ) = 1 9 2 20 5 8 3 7 1712 7 + ( 4 9 ) = 1 7 6 64 + ( 2 4 ) = 8 8 La k e w o o d A v e 7*Refer to Figure 8b/c for intersections and 3 1 2 5 Legend: 000 +[000] + (000) = 000 Total TrafficProject Trips Pass-by TripsBackground Traffic Cl a r c o n a - O c o e e R d (3 0 ) 82 2 - [ 5 0 ] + ( 2 3 ) = 7 9 5 33 4 + [ 5 0 ] + ( 9 3 ) = 4 7 7 5+ [ 7 ] + ( 1 5 ) = 2 7 89+[53]+(49)=191 (55) 282+(13)=295 8+ [ 2 ] + ( 3 3 ) = 4 3 [7 ] + ( 3 7 ) = 4 4 85 9 - [ 9 ] + ( 5 0 ) = 9 0 0 12 4 + ( 1 8 ) = 1 4 2 (15) (35) [2]+(28)=30 Project Access Pr o j e c t e d P . M . P e a k H o u r Tr a f f i c V o l u m e s [5 ] + ( 3 4 ) = 3 9 91 9 - [ 3 ] + ( 8 6 ) = 1 , 0 0 2 [4]+(9)=13 Access 1 99 1 - [ 1 6 ] + ( 8 6 ) = 1 , 0 6 1 [1 6 ] + ( 2 1 ) = 3 7 [18]+(52)=70 Access 2 [14]+(14)=28 1, 1 4 6 - [ 1 2 ] + ( 5 ) + ( 8 4 ) = 1 , 2 2 3 [1 2 ] + ( 1 7 ) = 2 9 Access 3 [1 0 ] + ( 1 4 ) = 2 4 1, 1 6 1 - [ 1 0 ] + ( 1 1 3 ) = 1 , 2 6 4 [4]+(14)=18 1, 1 4 6 - [ 5 ] + ( 9 8 ) = 1 , 2 3 9 [5 ] + ( 5 ) = 1 0 [18]+(47)=65 Access 4 4 NT SN Lakewood Ave Fi g u r e 7 ( b ) Oc o e e V i l l a g e C e n t e r 50 9 5 Pr o j e c t № Le g e n d : 00 0 + [ 0 0 0 ] + ( 0 0 0 ) = 0 0 0 To t a l T r a f f i c Pr o j e c t T r i p s Pa s s - b y T r i p s Ba c k g r o u n d T r a f f i c Figure 7(c)NTS NOcoee Village Center 5095Project № Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 0 (26) 460 37 (3 3 ) 0 411+(100)=511 46 + ( 2 6 ) = 7 2 0 37 + ( 3 3 ) = 7 0 33 4 + ( 1 0 2 ) = 4 3 6 217+(66)=283 (14) 93 0 (8) (8) 27 1 + ( 6 2 ) = 3 3 3 18 6 + ( 6 5 ) = 2 5 1 0 10 8 15 4 + ( 6 9 ) = 2 2 3 (1 5 ) Access 5 Access 7 Fuller’s Cross Rd L a k e w o o d A v e 7 Access 6 Legend: 000 +[000] + (000) = 000 Total Traffic Project Trips Pass-by Trips Background Traffic Legend: Background + {Vested} + [Pass-by] + (Project) = Total Oc o e e A p o p k a R d 372+(14)=386 62+{88}+(9)=159 29 44 3 + ( 7 ) = 4 5 0 53 8 + ( 7 ) = 5 4 5 64 + { 5 3 } + ( 5 ) = 1 2 2 95+{83}+(4)=182 47+{208}+(10)=265 11+{221}+(14)=246 26 44 1 + ( 1 9 ) = 4 6 0 12 + { 3 0 0 } + ( 1 0 ) = 3 2 2 La k e w o o d A ve 10+{314}+(7)=331 {14} 125+{113}+(3)=241 6+ { 3 7 3 } + ( 9 ) = 3 8 8 2+ { 3 6 6 } = 3 6 8 0 Fullers Cross Rd 15 2 + { 1 3 3 } + ( 5 ) = 2 9 0 {3 0 0 } {1 4 } 10 4 5 + { 5 3 } + ( 5 ) = 1 1 0 3 (2 4 )(7) (14) 90 8 + { 8 3 } + ( 1 5 ) = 1 0 0 6 (9 ) 10 4 5 + { 5 3 } + ( 1 9 ) = 1 1 1 7 [12]+(11)=23 90 8 + { 8 3 } + ( 1 3 ) = 1 0 0 4 [1 2 ] + ( 2 4 ) = 3 6 [1]+(24)=25 135+{441}=576 [1 ] + ( 2 8 ) = 2 9 [1 ] + ( 1 0 ) = 1 1 [1]+(14)=15 158+{512}=670 Driveway B Driveway A Dr i v e w a y C {6} {6} {6} N Not to Scale 4 FigureProjected PM Peak Intersection Volumes Fullers Cross Apartments 21238, v1.1 SITE APPENDIX F Signal Timings Intersection: Clarcona-Ocoee Road at SR 429 NB Ramps Node: 404 Port: Equipment: Intelight Model: X3 Software: MaxTime 2.1.3 Date: 02/07/22 Address: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EBL WB NB EB 5 15 5 15 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 5.0 5.0 3.7 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7 7 7 7 24 24 NL MIN/LK NL MIN/LK Y Y 5-SECTION Y R Y Speed (mph)45 45 30 45 Veh Crossing Distance (ft)128 164 110 92 Grade -1.8% 1.7%2.4%-1.8% Ped Crossing Distance (ft)24 82 82 Ped Clearance (sec)7 24 24 11 21 22 31 Day Plan Time Pattern 160 130 130 160 1 0:01 FREE (49) 20 20 20 20 1 9:30 22 90 85 85 100 1 19:30 FREE (49) 2 0:01 FREE (49) 50 25 25 40 2 6:00 11 2 9:30 21 110 105 105 120 2 15:00 31 2 19:00 21 2 20:00 FREE (49) 15 45 45 145 7 0:01 FREE (49) 0/0/0/0 1/0/0/0 1/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 7 8:00 22 Day Plan S M T W T F S 7 20:00 FREE (49) 1 2 7 Notes: 1. Reference: Green 6. Transition Ped Mode: Pattern (None) 2. Max Mode: Max Inhibit 7. Patterns 11, 21, 22, 31: Coord Ø2 & Ø6 3. Force Mode: Floating 8. Patterns 11, 21, 22, 31: Ref Point Ø2 & Ø6 4. Coordination Mode: Auto Permissive 9. Alt Seq 02 = Reverse Ø1 & Ø2 5. Correction Mode: Shortway (Auto) Lagging Phases Split 4 Split 5 Split 6 Split 7 Split 8 Offset Split 3 Recall/Memory Detector Delay (sec) Detector Switching Dual Entry Overlap Flash COORDINATION PLANS Coordination Pattern Cycle Split 1 Split 2 Flash Don't Walk (sec) ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING BASIC TIMING Phase Direction Min Green (sec) Vehicle Gap (sec) Max Green 1 (sec) Max Green 2 (sec) Yellow (sec) All-Red (sec) Walk (sec) CDI 10-20-21 Node: 402 CDI: CDO: Date: 09/02/22 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Direction SBL NB EBL WB NBL SB WBL EB Min Green (sec)5 15 5 5 5 15 5 5 Vehicle Gap (sec)2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 Max Green 1 (sec)25 60 25 35 25 60 25 35 Max Green 2 (sec)35 50 25 20 20 50 25 35 Yellow (sec)4.8 4.8 3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red (sec)2.0 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.1 Walk (sec)7 7 7 7 Flash Don't Walk (sec)31 16 28 23 Memory NL LK NL LK NL LK NL LK Soft Recall Min Recall X X X X Max Recall Delay (sec) Detector Switching 1 > 6 3 > 8 5 > 2 7 > 4 Dual Entry X X X X Overlap Flash 5-SECT Y 5-SECT R 5-SECT Y 5-SECT R Speed (mph)45 45 25 45 45 45 45 25 Veh Distance (ft)114 144 128 118 94 161 150 105 Grade (%)-0.3 0.4 0.7 -0.5 0.4 -0.3 -0.5 0.7 Ped Distance (ft)107 55 98 79 Ped Clearence (sec)31 16 28 23 Coordination Pattern 11 12 21 22 31 Day Time Action Cycle 160 160 130 130 160 1 0:01 FREE(49) Split 1 30 30 20 20 25 1 9:30 22 Split 2 55 55 45 45 65 1 19:30 FREE(49) Split 3 15 15 15 15 15 2 0:01 FREE(49) Split 4 60 60 50 50 55 2 6:00 11 Split 5 20 25 20 20 20 2 6:35 12 Split 6 65 60 45 45 70 2 7:20 11 Split 7 30 30 20 20 25 2 9:30 21 Split 8 45 45 45 45 45 2 15:00 31 Offset 0 0 51 51 116 2 19:00 21 Sequence Pattern 1 1 1 1 1 2 20:00 FREE(49) Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 7 0:01 FREE(49) 1 (Sunday)7 8:00 22 2 (Monday)3 4 5 6 7 20:00 FREE(49) 7 (Saturday) Notes Ring 1 2 2) Max Mode: Max Inhibit 3) Force Mode: Floating 5) Correction Mode: Shortway (Auto) 6) Transition Ped Mode: Pattern (None) 4) Coordination Mode: Auto Permissive 8) Reference Point: Phases 4 & 8 1,2,a,3,4,b 9) Back-up prevent for Phases 1 & 5 5,6,a,7,8,b 7) Coordinated Phases: Phases 4 & 8 Sequence 1 ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING 1) Offset Reference: Beginning of Green BASIC TIMING COORDINATION PLANS Equipment: Intelight Intersection: Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd-Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy R:\Traffic Engineering\TMC Master Folder\SIGNAL TIME SHEETS\Proposed Revisions\Timesheets 11-2-22\Ocoee Apopka Rd & West Rd-Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy - Node 402, 11/9/2022, 11:38 AM 9/2/2022 \\ocnas\divisions\Traffic Engineering\Jamel\Timesheet revisions\Time sheet revisions 5-5-20\Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd-Node 335.Revision.F, 5/18/2020, 9:35 AM Node: 335 Equipment: Eagle CDI: CDO: Date: 05/05/2020 Phase 12345678 Direction EB/WB NB/SB Min Green (sec)515 Vehicle Gap (sec)3.0 3.5 Max Green 1 (sec)55 65 Max Green 2 (sec)60 55 Yellow (sec)4.8 4.8 All-Red (sec)2.0 2.0 Walk (sec)7 Flash Don't Walk (sec)17 Recall/Memory NL SF/LK Delay (sec)CD10 Detector Switching Dual Entry Overlap Flash RY Speed (mph)45 45 Veh Distance (ft)78 63 Grade (%)-0.5 -0.6 Ped Distance (ft)59 Ped Clearence (sec)17 Coordination Pattern Day Time Pattern Cycle MAX II Split 1 1 0:01 FREE Split 2 2 0:01 FREE Split 3 2 16:00 PH 1 Split 4 2 19:00 FREE Split 5 Split 6 Split 7 Split 8 Offset Lagging Phases Source Day Equate 1 Equate 2 Equate 3 Equate 4 Equate 5 17 2 3456 R1 1 2 R2 Basic Ring Structure ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING Intersection: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Fullers Cross Rd Notes: PH = Phase BASIC TIMING COORDINATION PLANS Hazem El-Assar, P.E.Digitally signed by Hazem El-Assar, P.E. DN: cn=Hazem El-Assar, P.E., o=Orange County, ou=Traffic Engineering, email=hazem.el-assar@ocfl.net, c=US Date: 2020.05.18 09:35:22 -04'00' 3-12-20 DR Intersection: West Road/Clarcona-Ocoee Road at SR 429 SB Ramps Node: 403 Port: Equipment: Intelight Model: X3 Software: MaxTime 2.1.3 Date: 04/09/21 Address: 12345678 WB WBL EB SB 15 5 15 5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 45 20 45 20 45 20 45 20 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 7 16 SF/LK NL SF/LK NL YY Y 5-SECTION YR Speed (mph)45 45 45 30 Veh Crossing Distance (ft)75 94 109 110 Grade 2.0%2.0% 2.1%1.4% Ped Crossing Distance (ft)56 Ped Clearance (sec)16 11 21 22 31 Day Plan Time Pattern 160 130 130 160 1 0:01 FREE (49) 19:3022 135 105 105 135 1 19:30 FREE (49) 20:01FREE (49) 26:0011 50 30 30 35 2 9:30 21 85 75 75 100 2 15:00 31 2 19:00 21 25 25 25 25 2 20:00 FREE (49) 154 45 45 145 7 0:01 FREE (49) 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/5/0 7 8:00 22 Day Plan S M T W T F S 7 20:00 FREE (49) 1 9 2 99999 7 9 Notes: 1. Reference: Green 6. Transition Ped Mode: Pattern (None) 2.Max Mode: Max Inhibit 7.Patterns 11, 21, 22, 31: Coord Ø2 & Ø6 3.Force Mode: Floating 8.Patterns 11, 21, 22, 31: Ref Point Ø2 & Ø6 4.Coordination Mode: Auto Permissive 9.Alt Seq 05 = Reverse Ø5 & Ø6 5.Correction Mode: Shortway (Auto) ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING BASIC TIMING Phase Direction Min Green (sec) Vehicle Gap (sec) Max Green 1 (sec) Max Green 2 (sec) Yellow (sec) All-Red (sec) Walk (sec) Flash Don't Walk (sec) Recall/Memory Detector Delay (sec) Detector Switching Dual Entry Overlap Flash COORDINATION PLANS Coordination Pattern Cycle Split 1 Split 2 Split 3 Lagging Phases Split 4 Split 5 Split 6 Split 7 Split 8 Offset 39 KE^h>dEdd/D/E' APPENDIX G Synchro Outputs G-1:Existing Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)59 158 111 338 303 126 129 545 267 135 392 Future Volume (vph)59 158 111 338 303 126 129 545 267 135 392 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 45.0 45.0 25.0 55.0 55.0 20.0 65.0 65.0 25.0 70.0 Total Split (%)9.4% 28.1% 28.1% 15.6% 34.4% 34.4% 12.5% 40.6% 40.6% 15.6% 43.8% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 116 (73%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 158 111 338 303 126 129 545 267 135 392 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 59 158 111 338 303 126 129 545 267 135 392 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 60 161 102 345 309 117 132 556 245 138 400 48 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 4 2 3 4 Cap, veh/h 407 1122 500 564 1416 616 262 617 506 190 540 65 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1583 1781 3554 1545 1781 1870 1535 1781 1625 195 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 161 102 345 309 117 132 556 245 138 0 448 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1583 1781 1777 1545 1781 1870 1535 1781 0 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 5.2 7.5 18.2 12.4 10.8 7.8 45.4 20.4 8.1 0.0 34.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 5.2 7.5 18.2 12.4 10.8 7.8 45.4 20.4 8.1 0.0 34.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 407 1122 500 564 1416 616 262 617 506 190 0 605 V/C Ratio(X)0.15 0.14 0.20 0.61 0.22 0.19 0.50 0.90 0.48 0.73 0.00 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 443 1122 500 564 1416 616 300 680 558 279 0 719 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.63 0.63 0.63 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.1 39.2 40.0 34.1 47.2 46.5 36.4 51.1 42.8 39.7 0.0 47.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.4 0.3 0.7 0.4 10.9 1.0 2.0 0.0 4.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.9 4.3 5.7 1.8 9.9 8.1 5.8 28.8 11.7 6.5 0.0 23.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 35.2 39.5 41.0 35.5 47.5 47.1 36.7 62.0 43.7 41.7 0.0 52.2 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D D E D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 323 771 933 586 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.2 42.1 53.6 49.7 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 59.6 11.8 71.7 16.6 60.0 25.0 58.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.2 58.2 8.5 47.1 13.2 63.2 18.2 37.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.1 47.4 5.6 14.4 9.8 36.9 20.2 9.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 5.4 0.0 2.3 0.0 5.2 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 47.6 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)563 317 824 73 62 Future Volume (vph) 563 317 824 73 62 Turn Type NA pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 5 2 8 8 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 6 5 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.8 11.8 29.8 10.7 10.7 Total Split (s)100.0 35.0 135.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)62.5% 21.9% 84.4% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 563 125 317 824 0 0 0 0 73 0 62 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 563 125 317 824 0 0 0 0 73 0 62 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1856 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 574 128 323 841 0 74 0 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 0 2195 488 674 3081 0 98 0 87 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.12 1.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 2970 639 1767 3647 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 354 348 323 841 0 74 0 57 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1739 1767 1777 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 9.4 9.5 7.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 9.4 9.5 7.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 5.6 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.37 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1356 1327 674 3081 0 98 0 87 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.26 0.26 0.48 0.27 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1356 1327 876 3081 0 215 0 191 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.93 0.93 0.88 0.88 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 5.6 5.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 74.6 0.0 74.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 11.3 0.0 8.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 5.8 5.8 2.6 0.1 0.0 6.0 0.0 4.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 6.1 6.1 3.6 0.2 0.0 85.9 0.0 82.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A F F Approach Vol, veh/h 702 1164 131 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.1 1.1 84.3 Approach LOS A A F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 145.5 16.7 128.9 14.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 128.2 28.2 93.2 19.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 9.0 11.5 8.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.4 0.9 4.5 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 8.3 HCM 6th LOS A Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee RdExisting (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)50 589 912 86 229 395 Future Volume (vph)50 589 912 86 229 395 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 120.0 100.0 100.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%)12.5% 75.0% 62.5% 62.5% 25.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee RdExisting (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 589 0 0 912 86 229 0 395 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 589 0 0 912 86 229 0 395 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 0 0 1870 1796 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 620 0 0 960 0 241 0 375 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 0 0 2 7 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 382 2510 0 0 2254 382 0 340 Arrive On Green 0.06 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3647 0 0 3647 1522 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 620 0 0 960 0 241 0 375 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1777 0 0 1777 1522 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.0 19.7 0.0 34.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.0 19.7 0.0 34.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 382 2510 0 0 2254 382 0 340 V/C Ratio(X)0.14 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.63 0.00 1.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 475 2510 0 0 2254 382 0 340 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.96 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 0.0 57.1 0.0 62.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.9 0.0 79.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 30.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 15.2 0.0 61.0 0.0 142.5 LnGrp LOS B A B E F Approach Vol, veh/h 673 960 616 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.0 15.2 110.6 Approach LOS A B F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 108.5 40.0 120.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 93.0 34.3 113.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 23.7 36.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.7 0.0 4.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 37.1 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR SBL Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)6 977 9 991 1 2 1 Future Volume (vph)6 977 9 991 1 2 1 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Split Perm Split Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)18.0 92.0 18.0 92.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 Total Split (%)11.3% 57.5% 11.3% 57.5% 15.0% 15.0% 16.3% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 147 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 977 0 9 991 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 977 0 9 991 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 6 997 0 9 1011 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 356 2088 939 334 1892 0 371 201 170 214 224 190 Arrive On Green 0.14 1.00 0.00 0.01 0.53 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3526 1585 1781 3647 0 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 6 997 0 9 1011 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1763 1585 1781 1777 0 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 29.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 29.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 2088 939 334 1892 0 371 201 170 214 224 190 V/C Ratio(X)0.02 0.48 0.00 0.03 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 356 2088 939 441 1892 0 371 201 170 214 224 190 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.90 0.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.5 0.0 0.0 19.9 24.4 0.0 63.7 0.0 63.8 62.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 26.5 0.7 0.0 19.9 25.5 0.0 63.8 0.0 63.9 62.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A B C E E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1003 1020 3 1 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.9 25.5 63.9 62.0 Approach LOS A C E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.0 92.0 24.0 8.4 101.6 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.2 85.2 17.2 11.2 85.2 19.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 31.7 2.2 2.4 2.0 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 13.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 3.8 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 170 3 193 15 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 174 4 198 16 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 4 212 17 188 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 200 3 161 28 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.7 4.4 3.9 3.5 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 174 4 198 16 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1374 1112 1356 1139 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.977 0.750 0.974 0.933 Flow Entry, veh/h 170 3 193 15 Cap Entry, veh/h 1343 834 1321 1062 V/C Ratio 0.127 0.004 0.146 0.014 Control Delay, s/veh 3.7 4.4 3.9 3.5 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 0 1 0 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)433 81 4 13 36 101 5 465 30 79 312 378 Future Volume (vph) 433 81 4 13 36 101 5 465 30 79 312 378 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 42.0 42.0 30.0 42.0 42.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 Total Split (%)18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 433 81 4 13 36 101 5 465 30 79 312 378 Future Volume (veh/h) 433 81 4 13 36 101 5 465 30 79 312 378 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1841 1841 1870 1870 1870 1870 1781 1856 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 456 85 4 14 38 95 5 489 29 83 328 359 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 8 3 2 Cap, veh/h 380 392 332 166 136 117 449 1078 913 459 1122 958 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.58 0.58 0.03 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1753 1841 1585 1781 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 456 85 4 14 38 95 5 489 29 83 328 359 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1753 1841 1585 1781 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 23.9 6.0 0.3 1.2 3.1 9.4 0.2 24.0 1.3 3.2 13.6 18.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 23.9 6.0 0.3 1.2 3.1 9.4 0.2 24.0 1.3 3.2 13.6 18.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 380 392 332 166 136 117 449 1078 913 459 1122 958 V/C Ratio(X)1.20 0.22 0.01 0.08 0.28 0.81 0.01 0.45 0.03 0.18 0.29 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 380 411 349 403 405 349 719 1078 913 669 1122 958 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.76 0.76 0.76 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.1 52.4 50.1 67.0 70.0 73.0 14.2 19.5 14.6 14.9 15.2 16.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 113.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.1 12.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 24.2 5.2 0.2 1.0 2.7 7.6 0.1 15.2 0.8 2.2 9.3 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 174.2 52.6 50.1 67.2 71.1 85.2 14.3 20.5 14.7 15.0 15.7 17.0 LnGrp LOS F D D E E F B C B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 545 147 523 770 Approach Delay, s/veh 154.3 79.8 20.2 16.2 Approach LOS F E C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 18.7 12.2 99.1 8.3 40.3 7.7 103.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 35.2 25.0 49.1 24.0 35.2 25.3 * 49 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.9 11.4 5.2 26.0 3.2 8.0 2.2 20.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 3.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 59.9 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th AWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 7: N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.4 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 8 2 139 12 59 12 99 290 82 66 6 Future Vol, veh/h 3 8 2 139 12 59 12 99 290 82 66 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 3 3 2 Mvmt Flow 3 9 2 151 13 64 13 108 315 89 72 7 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay, s/veh8.9 11 12.3 9.9 HCM LOS A B B A Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %3% 23% 66% 53% Vol Thru, %25% 62% 6% 43% Vol Right, %72% 15% 28% 4% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 401 13 210 154 LT Vol 12 3 139 82 Through Vol 99 8 12 66 RT Vol 290 2 59 6 Lane Flow Rate 436 14 228 167 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.529 0.023 0.333 0.24 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.37 5.737 5.25 5.166 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 819 628 676 688 Service Time 2.434 3.737 3.347 3.255 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.532 0.022 0.337 0.243 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.3 8.9 11 9.9 HCM Lane LOS B A B A HCM 95th-tile Q 3.2 0.1 1.5 0.9 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)13 171 166 139 15 428 180 330 Future Volume (vph)13 171 166 139 15 428 180 330 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 66.0 66.0 22.0 88.0 Total Split (%)32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 50.8% 50.8% 16.9% 67.7% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 20 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 171 19 166 139 187 15 428 159 180 330 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 171 19 166 139 187 15 428 159 180 330 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1737 1856 1870 1870 1707 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 13 174 19 169 142 191 15 437 162 184 337 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 11 3 2 2 13 2 2 2 5 2 Cap, veh/h 124 418 46 249 179 241 568 716 265 615 1111 76 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 1047 1656 181 1179 710 955 932 1301 482 1781 1690 115 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 13 0 193 169 0 333 15 0 599 184 0 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1047 0 1837 1179 0 1665 932 0 1783 1781 0 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 11.4 18.2 0.0 24.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 11.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 25.8 0.0 11.4 29.6 0.0 24.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 11.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 124 0 463 249 0 420 568 0 981 615 0 1187 V/C Ratio(X)0.10 0.00 0.42 0.68 0.00 0.79 0.03 0.00 0.61 0.30 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 152 0 513 281 0 465 568 0 981 725 0 1187 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.85 0.00 0.85 0.97 0.00 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.5 0.0 40.6 53.0 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 9.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.6 5.5 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.3 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 9.1 9.7 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.9 0.0 7.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 57.9 0.0 41.2 58.4 0.0 53.8 0.1 0.0 2.4 10.4 0.0 10.2 LnGrp LOS E D E D A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 206 502 614 544 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 55.3 2.4 10.2 Approach LOS D E A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 91.5 38.5 14.0 77.5 38.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 82.0 36.3 16.0 60.0 36.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 31.6 7.6 2.0 27.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.4 1.2 0.4 4.8 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 23.3 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)253 146 10 155 126 296 25 303 Future Volume (vph) 253 146 10 155 126 296 25 303 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 12.1 35.1 Total Split (s)22.0 62.0 40.0 40.0 22.0 47.0 21.0 46.0 Total Split (%)16.9% 47.7% 30.8% 30.8% 16.9% 36.2% 16.2% 35.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 253 146 183 10 155 73 126 296 20 25 303 149 Future Volume (veh/h) 253 146 183 10 155 73 126 296 20 25 303 149 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1470 1752 1856 1796 1870 1870 1870 1781 1811 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 264 152 191 10 161 76 131 308 21 26 316 155 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 29 10 3 7 2 2 2 8 6 4 Cap, veh/h 514 367 461 361 411 194 193 575 39 291 337 166 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.16 0.16 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.01 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 735 924 972 1192 563 1781 1728 118 1697 1146 562 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 264 0 343 10 0 237 131 0 329 26 0 471 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1660 972 0 1754 1781 0 1846 1697 0 1709 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.9 0.0 24.1 0.9 0.0 13.3 6.5 0.0 18.8 1.4 0.0 35.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.9 0.0 24.1 4.9 0.0 13.3 6.5 0.0 18.8 1.4 0.0 35.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.33 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 514 0 829 361 0 605 193 0 614 291 0 503 V/C Ratio(X)0.51 0.00 0.41 0.03 0.00 0.39 0.68 0.00 0.54 0.09 0.00 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 540 0 829 361 0 605 292 0 614 438 0 524 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)0.87 0.00 0.87 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.88 0.00 0.88 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 37.2 30.9 0.0 32.3 33.8 0.0 35.2 31.7 0.0 57.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 1.9 4.2 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 22.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 9.2 0.0 16.1 0.4 0.0 9.9 5.4 0.0 13.4 1.1 0.0 26.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 25.3 0.0 38.6 31.0 0.0 34.2 38.0 0.0 36.2 31.8 0.0 79.5 LnGrp LOS C D C C D D C E Approach Vol, veh/h 607 247 460 497 Approach Delay, s/veh 32.8 34.1 36.7 77.0 Approach LOS C C D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.1 50.8 9.8 49.3 70.9 14.7 44.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 34.0 14.9 40.9 56.0 15.9 39.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.9 15.3 3.4 20.8 26.1 8.5 37.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 1.3 0.0 1.8 2.3 0.2 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 46.1 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: SR 429 NB Ramps & Plant St/W Franklin St Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)239 425 459 156 290 351 Future Volume (vph) 239 425 459 156 290 351 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 25.1 25.1 Total Split (s)25.0 84.0 59.0 59.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%)19.2% 64.6% 45.4% 45.4% 35.4% 35.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 23 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 10: SR 429 NB Ramps & Plant St/W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: SR 429 NB Ramps & Plant St/W Franklin St Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 239 425 0 0 459 156 290 0 351 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 239 425 0 0 459 156 290 0 351 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1737 0 0 1870 1841 1796 0 1767 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 246 438 0 0 488 150 309 0 336 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 11 0 0 2 4 7 0 9 Cap, veh/h 446 1129 0 0 957 798 413 0 362 Arrive On Green 0.17 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.24 0.00 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1737 0 0 1870 1560 1711 0 1497 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 246 438 0 0 488 150 309 0 336 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1737 0 0 1870 1560 1711 0 1497 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 8.8 21.7 0.0 28.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 8.8 21.7 0.0 28.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 446 1129 0 0 957 798 413 0 362 V/C Ratio(X)0.55 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.19 0.75 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 542 1129 0 0 957 798 512 0 448 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.89 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 23.7 45.6 0.0 48.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.5 3.4 0.0 21.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 18.9 6.2 14.7 0.0 18.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 14.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 31.4 24.2 49.0 0.0 69.4 LnGrp LOS B A C C D E Approach Vol, veh/h 684 638 645 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.9 29.7 59.6 Approach LOS A C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.0 73.5 38.5 91.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 52.0 38.9 77.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 29.0 30.5 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 3.6 0.9 3.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 31.3 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)267 579 541 198 91 131 Future Volume (vph) 267 579 541 198 91 131 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)13.0 25.0 51.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)27.0 104.0 77.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%)20.8% 80.0% 59.2% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 267 579 541 198 91 131 Future Volume (veh/h) 267 579 541 198 91 131 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1826 1352 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 281 609 569 188 96 124 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 5 37 4 Cap, veh/h 647 1477 1255 1197 126 152 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1856 1856 1547 1287 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 281 609 569 188 96 124 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1856 1856 1547 1287 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 9.5 10.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 9.5 10.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 647 1477 1255 1197 126 152 V/C Ratio(X)0.43 0.41 0.45 0.16 0.76 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 802 1477 1255 1197 190 230 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 0.74 0.74 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 57.2 57.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.2 13.0 15.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.5 7.5 0.6 0.1 6.4 14.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.0 4.9 0.9 0.2 70.2 73.2 LnGrp LOS A A A A E E Approach Vol, veh/h 890 757 220 Approach Delay, s/veh 4.9 0.7 71.9 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.6 94.9 19.5 110.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 70.0 19.2 97.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.0 2.0 12.1 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 4.9 0.6 4.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.1 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)262 1203 703 271 1520 672 298 209 257 72 Future Volume (vph) 262 1203 703 271 1520 672 298 209 257 72 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 41.8 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)22.0 73.0 73.0 25.0 76.0 49.0 53.0 29.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%)12.2% 40.6% 40.6% 13.9% 42.2% 27.2% 29.4% 16.1% 18.3% 18.3% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 2.0 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 6.8 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min Min None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 23 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Existing (2023) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 262 1203 703 271 1520 55 672 298 208 209 257 72 Future Volume (veh/h) 262 1203 703 271 1520 55 672 298 208 209 257 72 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1767 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1870 1841 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 273 1253 659 282 1583 57 700 310 217 218 268 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 9 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 3 Cap, veh/h 252 1971 612 318 2025 73 748 570 389 262 271 232 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.40 0.40 0.22 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 3264 5106 1585 3456 5059 182 3456 2004 1368 3456 1841 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 273 1253 659 282 1065 575 700 272 255 218 268 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1632 1702 1585 1728 1702 1838 1728 1763 1609 1728 1841 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.9 35.9 36.2 14.5 49.1 49.2 35.8 23.5 24.3 11.2 26.2 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.9 35.9 36.2 14.5 49.1 49.2 35.8 23.5 24.3 11.2 26.2 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 252 1971 612 318 1363 736 748 501 458 262 271 232 V/C Ratio(X)1.08 0.64 1.08 0.89 0.78 0.78 0.94 0.54 0.56 0.83 0.99 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 1971 612 326 1363 736 802 501 458 420 271 232 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 83.1 45.0 15.0 80.8 47.1 47.1 69.3 54.5 54.8 82.0 76.6 45.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 80.6 1.0 58.9 23.7 4.5 8.1 17.5 1.2 1.5 7.6 51.9 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 13.8 21.6 32.3 12.0 28.9 31.8 24.5 16.0 15.3 9.1 22.9 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 163.6 45.9 73.9 104.5 51.6 55.2 86.8 55.7 56.3 89.6 128.5 48.6 LnGrp LOS F D F F D E F E E F F D Approach Vol, veh/h 2185 1922 1227 554 Approach Delay, s/veh 69.1 60.5 73.6 103.4 Approach LOS E E E F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 78.9 20.7 58.4 24.6 76.3 46.1 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.9 69.2 21.9 * 46 17.0 66.2 41.8 26.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.9 51.2 13.2 26.3 16.5 38.2 37.8 28.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 14.6 0.4 3.1 0.1 22.0 1.1 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 70.4 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)40 134 68 307 133 117 90 375 213 110 287 Future Volume (vph)40 134 68 307 133 117 90 375 213 110 287 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 45.0 45.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 45.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 34.6% 34.6% 15.4% 38.5% 38.5% 15.4% 34.6% 34.6% 15.4% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 51 (39%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 134 68 307 133 117 90 375 213 110 287 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 134 68 307 133 117 90 375 213 110 287 19 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 137 63 313 136 108 92 383 196 112 293 19 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 Cap, veh/h 532 1331 585 648 1595 707 257 458 381 207 441 29 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.75 0.75 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1562 1781 3554 1576 1781 1870 1557 1781 1735 113 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 41 137 63 313 136 108 92 383 196 112 0 312 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1562 1781 1777 1576 1781 1870 1557 1781 0 1848 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 3.3 3.4 13.2 1.3 2.5 5.0 25.3 14.1 6.1 0.0 19.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 3.3 3.4 13.2 1.3 2.5 5.0 25.3 14.1 6.1 0.0 19.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 532 1331 585 648 1595 707 257 458 381 207 0 469 V/C Ratio(X)0.08 0.10 0.11 0.48 0.09 0.15 0.36 0.84 0.51 0.54 0.00 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 595 1331 585 648 1595 707 345 550 458 278 0 543 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.6 26.4 26.5 19.7 9.1 9.3 35.3 46.6 42.4 36.2 0.0 43.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 9.8 1.9 0.8 0.0 4.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.4 2.6 2.5 8.8 1.0 1.7 3.8 17.9 9.3 4.7 0.0 14.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.6 26.6 26.9 19.9 9.2 9.7 35.6 56.4 44.3 37.1 0.0 47.5 LnGrp LOS C C C B A A D E D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 241 557 671 424 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.2 15.3 50.0 44.8 Approach LOS C B D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.8 38.6 10.4 66.2 13.6 39.8 20.0 56.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.2 38.2 8.5 42.1 13.2 38.2 13.2 37.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 27.3 3.8 4.5 7.0 21.7 15.2 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.8 0.0 1.1 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 35.6 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)428 294 509 67 43 Future Volume (vph) 428 294 509 67 43 Turn Type NA pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 5 2 8 8 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 6 5 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.8 11.8 29.8 10.7 10.7 Total Split (s)75.0 30.0 105.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)57.7% 23.1% 80.8% 19.2% 19.2% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 428 139 294 509 0 0 0 0 67 0 43 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 428 139 294 509 0 0 0 0 67 0 43 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 437 142 300 519 0 68 0 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1937 624 783 3022 0 95 0 85 Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 2736 851 1781 3647 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 292 287 300 519 0 68 0 40 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1717 1781 1777 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1303 1259 783 3022 0 95 0 85 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.22 0.23 0.38 0.17 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1303 1259 985 3022 0 264 0 235 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 60.6 0.0 59.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 9.6 0.0 4.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.3 2.0 0.1 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 2.9 0.1 0.0 70.1 0.0 63.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A E E Approach Vol, veh/h 579 819 108 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.4 1.1 67.8 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 117.4 15.3 102.1 12.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 98.2 23.2 68.2 19.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 7.7 2.0 6.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 0.7 3.5 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 5.6 HCM 6th LOS A Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)41 451 655 66 151 281 Future Volume (vph)41 451 655 66 151 281 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 105.0 85.0 85.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)15.4% 80.8% 65.4% 65.4% 19.2% 19.2% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 41 451 0 0 655 66 151 0 281 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 41 451 0 0 655 66 151 0 281 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 44 485 0 0 704 0 162 0 272 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 547 2679 0 0 2379 264 0 235 Arrive On Green 0.06 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 0 3647 1585 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 44 485 0 0 704 0 162 0 272 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 0 1777 1585 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 11.1 0.0 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 11.1 0.0 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 547 2679 0 0 2379 264 0 235 V/C Ratio(X)0.08 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.61 0.00 1.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 670 2679 0 0 2379 264 0 235 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.97 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 51.8 0.0 55.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.9 0.0 107.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 9.1 0.0 22.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 56.7 0.0 162.6 LnGrp LOS A A A E F Approach Vol, veh/h 529 704 434 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.6 9.2 123.1 Approach LOS A A F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 94.0 25.0 105.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 78.0 19.3 98.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 12.6 21.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.0 0.0 3.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 36.1 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT Ø4 Ø8 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)9 725 2 711 Future Volume (vph)9 725 2 711 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)15.0 65.0 15.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 50.0% 11.5% 50.0% 19% 19% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 725 0 2 711 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 725 0 2 711 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 788 0 2 773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 327 1806 805 403 1774 0 484 262 222 249 262 222 Arrive On Green 0.02 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3647 0 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 788 0 2 773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 0 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 327 1806 805 403 1774 0 484 262 222 249 262 222 V/C Ratio(X)0.03 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 419 1806 805 511 1774 0 484 262 222 249 262 222 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.94 0.94 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.7 0.0 0.0 16.2 20.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.8 0.7 0.0 16.2 21.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A B C Approach Vol, veh/h 798 775 0 0 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.9 21.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.3 71.7 25.0 7.1 72.9 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.2 58.2 18.2 8.2 58.2 18.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 20.1 0.0 2.1 2.0 0.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.1 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 3.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 77 0 96 15 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 79 0 99 18 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 8 107 10 86 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 96 2 77 21 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.2 0.0 3.3 3.5 Approach LOS A -A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 79 0 99 18 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1369 1237 1366 1264 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.974 1.000 0.968 0.852 Flow Entry, veh/h 77 0 96 15 Cap Entry, veh/h 1333 1237 1322 1077 V/C Ratio 0.058 0.000 0.072 0.014 Control Delay, s/veh 3.2 2.9 3.3 3.5 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)315 24 9 11 17 61 12 294 6 32 266 280 Future Volume (vph) 315 24 9 11 17 61 12 294 6 32 266 280 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 60.0 60.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)23.1% 46.2% 46.2% 15.4% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 315 24 9 11 17 61 12 294 6 32 266 280 Future Volume (veh/h) 315 24 9 11 17 61 12 294 6 32 266 280 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 328 25 9 11 18 58 12 306 6 33 277 263 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 440 400 356 150 98 83 484 993 841 572 1022 866 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.53 0.53 0.03 0.55 0.55 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 328 25 9 11 18 58 12 306 6 33 277 263 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.0 1.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 4.7 0.4 11.9 0.2 1.1 10.3 11.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22.0 1.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 4.7 0.4 11.9 0.2 1.1 10.3 11.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 440 400 356 150 98 83 484 993 841 572 1022 866 V/C Ratio(X)0.75 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.18 0.70 0.02 0.31 0.01 0.06 0.27 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 440 729 649 319 622 527 779 993 841 702 1022 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.7 39.6 39.3 57.2 58.9 60.6 13.9 17.1 14.4 13.5 15.7 16.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.9 10.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 15.7 1.1 0.4 0.6 1.0 3.8 0.3 8.5 0.2 0.8 7.5 7.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.4 39.7 39.3 57.4 59.8 70.6 13.9 17.8 14.4 13.6 16.3 16.8 LnGrp LOS D D D E E E B B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 362 87 324 573 Approach Delay, s/veh 50.3 66.7 17.6 16.4 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 13.6 10.5 75.9 7.6 36.0 8.5 77.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 43.2 13.0 23.1 14.0 53.2 23.3 * 13 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.0 6.7 3.1 13.9 2.8 3.4 2.4 13.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 29.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th AWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 7: N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 5 5 134 5 37 7 53 162 32 36 3 Future Vol, veh/h 3 5 5 134 5 37 7 53 162 32 36 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 Mvmt Flow 3 5 5 146 5 40 8 58 176 35 39 3 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay, s/veh7.8 9.2 8.7 8.3 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %3% 23% 76% 45% Vol Thru, %24% 38% 3% 51% Vol Right, %73% 38% 21% 4% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 222 13 176 71 LT Vol 7 3 134 32 Through Vol 53 5 5 36 RT Vol 162 5 37 3 Lane Flow Rate 241 14 191 77 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.274 0.018 0.248 0.102 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.094 4.681 4.668 4.767 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 878 763 769 752 Service Time 2.116 2.719 2.697 2.796 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.274 0.018 0.248 0.102 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.7 7.8 9.2 8.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 0.1 1 0.3 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)11 97 170 133 12 284 118 243 Future Volume (vph)11 97 170 133 12 284 118 243 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 70.0 Total Split (%)36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 45.5% 45.5% 18.2% 63.6% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 40 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 97 10 170 133 106 12 284 203 118 243 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 97 10 170 133 106 12 284 203 118 243 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1752 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1856 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 102 11 179 140 112 13 299 214 124 256 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 10 Cap, veh/h 164 362 39 281 212 169 695 574 410 653 1189 51 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 1128 1646 178 1280 962 770 1112 1014 726 1753 1766 76 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 0 113 179 0 252 13 0 513 124 0 267 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1128 0 1824 1280 0 1732 1112 0 1740 1753 0 1842 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 5.7 14.9 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 0.0 5.7 20.5 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 164 0 401 281 0 381 695 0 984 653 0 1240 V/C Ratio(X)0.07 0.00 0.28 0.64 0.00 0.66 0.02 0.00 0.52 0.19 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 267 0 569 399 0 540 695 0 984 783 0 1240 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.93 0.00 0.93 0.98 0.00 0.98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 0.0 35.7 44.2 0.0 39.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 6.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.4 2.4 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 4.6 8.5 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 2.0 0.0 4.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 36.0 46.6 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 8.0 0.0 7.2 LnGrp LOS D D D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 125 431 526 391 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 43.4 1.8 7.5 Approach LOS D D A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 80.1 29.9 11.9 68.2 29.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 64.0 34.3 14.0 44.0 34.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.1 22.5 5.0 2.0 17.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 1.7 0.2 3.9 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 18.5 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)211 102 8 57 88 267 11 249 Future Volume (vph) 211 102 8 57 88 267 11 249 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 11.1 35.1 Total Split (s)17.0 51.0 34.0 34.0 17.0 42.0 17.0 42.0 Total Split (%)15.5% 46.4% 30.9% 30.9% 15.5% 38.2% 15.5% 38.2% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 5.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 211 102 130 8 57 22 88 267 11 11 249 174 Future Volume (veh/h) 211 102 130 8 57 22 88 267 11 11 249 174 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1870 1722 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 222 107 137 8 60 23 93 281 12 12 262 183 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 2 12 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 Cap, veh/h 662 380 486 478 468 179 190 564 24 300 279 195 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.54 0.54 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 745 954 1136 1288 494 1767 1781 76 1781 1025 716 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 222 0 244 8 0 83 93 0 293 12 0 445 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1699 1136 0 1781 1767 0 1857 1781 0 1741 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 0.0 13.8 0.5 0.0 3.4 4.1 0.0 14.1 0.5 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.1 0.0 13.8 0.5 0.0 3.4 4.1 0.0 14.1 0.5 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.41 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 662 0 866 478 0 647 190 0 588 300 0 473 V/C Ratio(X)0.34 0.00 0.28 0.02 0.00 0.13 0.49 0.00 0.50 0.04 0.00 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 675 0 866 478 0 647 272 0 606 463 0 568 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.94 0.00 0.94 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.91 0.00 0.91 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.7 0.0 28.1 22.5 0.0 23.4 29.6 0.0 30.5 27.9 0.0 24.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 20.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.5 0.0 10.5 0.3 0.0 2.7 3.2 0.0 10.4 0.4 0.0 14.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 19.0 0.0 28.9 22.5 0.0 23.8 31.5 0.0 31.1 28.0 0.0 44.6 LnGrp LOS B C C C C C C D Approach Vol, veh/h 466 91 386 457 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.2 23.7 31.2 44.2 Approach LOS C C C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 46.0 6.9 41.0 62.1 11.9 36.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 28.0 11.9 35.9 45.0 10.9 35.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.1 5.4 2.5 16.1 15.8 6.1 28.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.6 1.5 0.1 1.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 32.6 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: SR 429 NB Ramps & Plant St/W Franklin St Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)147 380 374 60 198 177 Future Volume (vph) 147 380 374 60 198 177 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 25.1 25.1 Total Split (s)24.0 77.0 53.0 53.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%)21.8% 70.0% 48.2% 48.2% 30.0% 30.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 10 (9%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 10: SR 429 NB Ramps & Plant St/W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: SR 429 NB Ramps & Plant St/W Franklin St Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 147 380 0 0 374 60 198 0 177 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 147 380 0 0 374 60 198 0 177 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1841 0 0 1870 1870 1841 0 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 156 404 0 0 398 58 211 0 170 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 4 0 0 2 2 4 0 10 Cap, veh/h 733 1346 0 0 1154 978 246 0 208 Arrive On Green 0.10 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1841 0 0 1870 1585 1753 0 1485 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 156 404 0 0 398 58 211 0 170 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1841 0 0 1870 1585 1753 0 1485 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 12.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 12.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 733 1346 0 0 1154 978 246 0 208 V/C Ratio(X)0.21 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.06 0.86 0.00 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 918 1346 0 0 1154 978 413 0 350 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.2 0.0 45.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 4.2 0.0 3.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 9.9 0.0 8.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 50.4 0.0 48.9 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D Approach Vol, veh/h 560 456 381 Approach Delay, s/veh 2.0 0.7 49.7 Approach LOS A A D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.6 74.9 22.5 87.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 46.0 25.9 70.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 2.0 14.9 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.8 0.5 2.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.6 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)266 484 420 138 45 147 Future Volume (vph) 266 484 420 138 45 147 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)13.0 25.0 51.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)27.0 85.0 58.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)24.5% 77.3% 52.7% 22.7% 22.7% 22.7% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 266 484 420 138 45 147 Future Volume (veh/h) 266 484 420 138 45 147 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1856 1841 1574 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 283 515 447 133 48 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 4 22 4 Cap, veh/h 672 1430 1157 1145 165 172 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1856 1560 1499 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 283 515 447 133 48 141 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1856 1560 1499 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.8 9.9 6.7 1.3 3.2 9.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 9.9 6.7 1.3 3.2 9.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 672 1430 1157 1145 165 172 V/C Ratio(X)0.42 0.36 0.39 0.12 0.29 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 859 1430 1157 1145 248 258 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.7 4.2 4.1 1.8 45.0 47.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.2 1.4 15.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.5 5.8 3.9 1.1 2.3 13.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.1 4.9 4.9 2.0 46.3 62.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A D E Approach Vol, veh/h 798 580 189 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 4.3 58.6 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.5 75.6 18.9 91.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 51.0 18.2 78.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.8 8.7 11.7 11.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 3.5 0.4 3.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.4 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)143 1155 540 255 978 549 197 191 191 75 Future Volume (vph) 143 1155 540 255 978 549 197 191 191 75 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 41.8 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)20.0 70.0 70.0 20.0 70.0 35.0 40.0 20.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)13.3% 46.7% 46.7% 13.3% 46.7% 23.3% 26.7% 13.3% 16.7% 16.7% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 2.0 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 6.8 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min Min None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 17 (11%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Existing Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 143 1155 540 255 978 57 549 197 173 191 191 75 Future Volume (veh/h) 143 1155 540 255 978 57 549 197 173 191 191 75 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1870 1870 1870 1870 1796 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1796 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 147 1191 501 263 1008 59 566 203 178 197 197 70 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 2 2 2 2 7 2 3 2 2 2 7 Cap, veh/h 192 2193 681 276 2229 130 612 413 343 244 231 188 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 3374 5106 1585 3456 4934 288 3456 1827 1518 3456 1870 1522 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 147 1191 501 263 695 372 566 195 186 197 197 70 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 1702 1585 1728 1702 1818 1728 1763 1582 1728 1870 1522 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 26.0 20.8 11.4 21.1 21.2 24.2 14.5 15.4 8.4 15.5 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 26.0 20.8 11.4 21.1 21.2 24.2 14.5 15.4 8.4 15.5 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 192 2193 681 276 1538 822 612 399 358 244 231 188 V/C Ratio(X)0.76 0.54 0.74 0.95 0.45 0.45 0.92 0.49 0.52 0.81 0.85 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 268 2193 681 276 1538 822 640 399 358 297 231 188 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 69.7 31.8 9.9 68.7 28.3 28.3 60.7 50.5 50.9 68.7 64.4 41.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.3 0.5 5.1 41.0 1.0 1.8 18.9 0.9 1.3 12.8 31.0 5.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.3 15.9 12.4 10.7 13.5 14.5 17.9 10.7 10.4 7.5 14.4 4.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 78.0 32.3 14.9 109.7 29.3 30.1 79.6 51.5 52.2 81.5 95.4 46.6 LnGrp LOS E C B F C C E D D F F D Approach Vol, veh/h 1839 1330 947 464 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.2 45.4 68.4 82.2 Approach LOS C D E F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 74.6 17.7 41.1 20.0 71.2 33.8 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.9 63.2 12.9 * 33 12.0 63.2 27.8 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 23.2 10.4 17.4 13.4 28.0 26.2 17.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 16.1 0.1 2.0 0.0 23.6 0.4 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 48.2 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. G-2: Background Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)65 174 122 397 356 148 148 626 306 159 461 Future Volume (vph)65 174 122 397 356 148 148 626 306 159 461 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 45.0 45.0 25.0 55.0 55.0 20.0 65.0 65.0 25.0 70.0 Total Split (%)9.4% 28.1% 28.1% 15.6% 34.4% 34.4% 12.5% 40.6% 40.6% 15.6% 43.8% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 116 (73%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 65 174 122 397 356 148 148 626 306 159 461 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 65 174 122 397 356 148 148 626 306 159 461 56 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 178 109 405 363 134 151 639 275 162 470 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 4 2 3 4 Cap, veh/h 350 999 445 513 1279 556 252 670 550 185 588 71 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1582 1781 3554 1545 1781 1870 1535 1781 1623 197 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 66 178 109 405 363 134 151 639 275 162 0 527 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1582 1781 1777 1545 1781 1870 1535 1781 0 1819 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 6.1 8.5 18.2 14.9 12.6 8.5 53.3 22.4 9.1 0.0 41.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 6.1 8.5 18.2 14.9 12.6 8.5 53.3 22.4 9.1 0.0 41.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 350 999 445 513 1279 556 252 670 550 185 0 659 V/C Ratio(X)0.19 0.18 0.25 0.79 0.28 0.24 0.60 0.95 0.50 0.87 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 380 999 445 513 1279 556 282 680 558 263 0 719 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.16 0.16 0.16 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.7 43.5 44.4 42.5 51.7 50.7 35.3 50.1 40.2 38.8 0.0 45.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.4 1.3 7.1 0.5 1.0 0.2 6.4 0.2 15.5 0.0 7.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.4 5.0 6.5 9.3 11.5 9.2 4.9 28.7 10.6 8.2 0.0 27.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.8 43.9 45.7 49.6 52.2 51.7 35.6 56.5 40.4 54.3 0.0 53.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D D E D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 353 902 1065 689 Approach Delay, s/veh 43.5 51.0 49.3 53.3 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.1 64.1 12.4 65.5 17.4 64.8 25.0 52.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.2 58.2 8.5 47.1 13.2 63.2 18.2 37.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.1 55.3 6.2 16.9 10.5 43.6 20.2 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 5.7 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 50.1 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)660 378 983 88 74 Future Volume (vph) 660 378 983 88 74 Turn Type NA pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 5 2 8 8 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 6 5 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.8 11.8 29.8 10.7 10.7 Total Split (s)100.0 35.0 135.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)62.5% 21.9% 84.4% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 660 147 378 983 0 0 0 0 88 0 74 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 660 147 378 983 0 0 0 0 88 0 74 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1856 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 673 150 386 1003 0 90 0 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 0 2115 471 667 3049 0 114 0 101 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.16 1.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 2969 640 1767 3647 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 416 407 386 1003 0 90 0 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1739 1767 1777 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 1.2 1.2 9.8 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 1.2 1.2 9.8 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 6.7 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.37 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1307 1279 667 3049 0 114 0 101 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.32 0.32 0.58 0.33 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1307 1279 837 3049 0 215 0 191 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.89 0.89 0.80 0.80 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 73.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.0 11.4 0.0 7.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.9 0.9 3.4 0.2 0.0 7.3 0.0 5.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 1.0 1.1 3.6 0.2 0.0 85.3 0.0 80.7 LnGrp LOS A A A A F F Approach Vol, veh/h 823 1389 158 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.1 1.2 83.3 Approach LOS A A F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 144.1 19.6 124.5 15.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 128.2 28.2 93.2 19.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 11.8 3.2 10.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.2 1.0 5.5 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 6.6 HCM 6th LOS A Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)59 783 1103 104 275 533 Future Volume (vph)59 783 1103 104 275 533 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 120.0 100.0 100.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%)12.5% 75.0% 62.5% 62.5% 25.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 783 0 0 1103 104 275 0 533 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 59 783 0 0 1103 104 275 0 533 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 0 0 1870 1796 1870 0 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 62 824 0 0 1161 0 289 0 499 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 0 0 2 7 2 0 5 Cap, veh/h 313 2510 0 0 2250 382 0 332 Arrive On Green 0.06 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3647 0 0 3647 1522 1781 0 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 62 824 0 0 1161 0 289 0 499 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1777 0 0 1777 1522 1781 0 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 0.0 24.3 0.0 34.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 0.0 24.3 0.0 34.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 2510 0 0 2250 382 0 332 V/C Ratio(X)0.20 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.76 0.00 1.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 404 2510 0 0 2250 382 0 332 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 58.9 0.0 62.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.0 0.0 242.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 17.7 0.0 54.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 67.9 0.0 305.0 LnGrp LOS B A B E F Approach Vol, veh/h 886 1161 788 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.1 16.6 218.0 Approach LOS A B F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 108.3 40.0 120.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 93.0 34.3 113.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 30.5 36.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.3 0.0 6.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 67.8 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)107 1111 175 606 957 291 94 490 34 39 17 Future Volume (vph) 107 1111 175 606 957 291 94 490 34 39 17 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)18.0 92.0 92.0 18.0 92.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%)11.3% 57.5% 57.5% 11.3% 57.5% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 16.3% 16.3% 16.3% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 147 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 107 1111 175 606 957 37 291 94 490 34 39 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 107 1111 175 606 957 37 291 94 490 34 39 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 1134 159 618 977 38 297 96 459 35 40 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 357 1877 843 349 1857 72 371 201 170 214 224 190 Arrive On Green 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.53 0.53 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3526 1584 1781 3487 136 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 1134 159 618 498 517 297 96 459 35 40 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1763 1584 1781 1777 1846 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 29.1 29.1 13.4 7.7 17.2 2.8 3.1 1.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 29.1 29.1 13.4 7.7 17.2 2.8 3.1 1.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 357 1877 843 349 946 983 371 201 170 214 224 190 V/C Ratio(X)0.30 0.60 0.19 1.77 0.53 0.53 0.80 0.48 2.69 0.16 0.18 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 357 1877 843 349 946 983 371 201 170 214 224 190 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.73 0.73 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.7 0.0 0.0 36.0 24.3 24.3 69.7 67.2 71.4 63.2 63.3 62.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.1 0.4 358.6 2.1 2.0 16.4 7.9 778.6 1.6 1.7 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.1 0.5 0.2 63.9 18.2 18.8 11.1 7.5 68.5 2.5 2.9 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 32.0 1.1 0.4 394.6 26.4 26.3 86.1 75.1 850.0 64.8 65.0 63.4 LnGrp LOS C A A F C C F E F E E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1402 1633 852 90 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.4 165.7 496.4 64.7 Approach LOS A F F E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.0 92.0 24.0 18.0 92.0 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.2 85.2 17.2 11.2 85.2 19.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 31.1 19.2 13.2 2.0 5.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 7.2 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 177.1 HCM 6th LOS F Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh43.2 Intersection LOS E Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 699 22 592 1085 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 725 28 635 1162 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 486 1126 556 216 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 893 65 655 937 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.6 11.3 26.6 61.7 Approach LOS D B D F Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 725 28 635 1162 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 841 438 783 1107 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.965 0.798 0.932 0.933 Flow Entry, veh/h 699 22 592 1085 Cap Entry, veh/h 811 349 730 1033 V/C Ratio 0.863 0.064 0.811 1.050 Control Delay, s/veh 29.6 11.3 26.6 61.7 LOS D B D F 95th %tile Queue, veh 11 0 9 24 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Future Volume (vph) 425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 42.0 42.0 30.0 42.0 42.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 Total Split (%)18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Future Volume (veh/h) 425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1781 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 447 184 31 316 340 210 37 644 410 143 641 470 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 8 3 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 Cap, veh/h 328 372 315 423 369 315 178 795 674 216 848 730 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1841 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 447 184 31 316 340 210 37 644 410 143 641 470 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1841 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 23.9 14.0 2.6 23.8 28.8 19.6 1.9 48.3 32.1 7.1 46.1 36.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 23.9 14.0 2.6 23.8 28.8 19.6 1.9 48.3 32.1 7.1 46.1 36.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 328 372 315 423 369 315 178 795 674 216 848 730 V/C Ratio(X)1.36 0.49 0.10 0.75 0.92 0.67 0.21 0.81 0.61 0.66 0.76 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 328 411 349 423 408 349 414 795 674 389 848 730 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.1 56.9 52.4 42.5 62.8 59.2 30.2 40.3 35.7 33.0 35.7 33.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 182.5 1.0 0.1 7.1 24.7 4.2 0.1 2.3 1.0 2.2 4.1 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 40.8 11.0 1.9 16.0 22.4 12.9 1.4 25.9 15.3 5.5 27.3 19.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 228.6 57.9 52.5 49.6 87.6 63.3 30.3 42.6 36.6 35.2 39.7 35.9 LnGrp LOS F E D D F E C D D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 662 866 1091 1254 Approach Delay, s/veh 172.9 67.8 39.9 37.8 Approach LOS F E D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 38.6 16.4 74.9 30.0 38.6 10.7 80.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 35.2 25.0 49.1 24.0 35.2 25.3 * 49 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.9 30.8 9.1 50.3 25.8 16.0 3.9 48.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 68.2 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th AWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 7: N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 17 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 10 2 174 15 74 15 123 361 135 108 9 Future Vol, veh/h 4 10 2 174 15 74 15 123 361 135 108 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 11 2 189 16 80 16 134 392 147 117 10 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10 14.3 20.5 13.2 HCM LOS A B C B Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %3% 25% 66% 54% Vol Thru, %25% 63% 6% 43% Vol Right, %72% 13% 28% 4% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 499 16 263 252 LT Vol 15 4 174 135 Through Vol 123 10 15 108 RT Vol 361 2 74 9 Lane Flow Rate 542 17 286 274 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.738 0.032 0.474 0.436 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.899 6.676 5.971 5.733 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 738 532 600 625 Service Time 2.947 4.772 4.029 3.792 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.734 0.032 0.477 0.438 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 20.5 10 14.3 13.2 HCM Lane LOS C A B B HCM 95th-tile Q 6.6 0.1 2.5 2.2 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)16 205 207 169 21 591 247 454 Future Volume (vph)16 205 207 169 21 591 247 454 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 66.0 66.0 22.0 88.0 Total Split (%)32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 50.8% 50.8% 16.9% 67.7% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 20 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 16 205 23 207 169 228 21 591 220 247 454 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 16 205 23 207 169 228 21 591 220 247 454 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1737 1856 1870 1870 1707 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 209 23 211 172 233 21 603 224 252 463 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 11 3 2 2 13 2 2 2 5 2 Cap, veh/h 102 462 51 255 197 268 435 600 223 275 1062 76 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.12 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 980 1654 182 1139 707 958 822 1300 483 1781 1684 120 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 0 232 211 0 405 21 0 827 252 0 496 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 980 0 1836 1139 0 1665 822 0 1783 1781 0 1804 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 13.5 22.8 0.0 30.1 1.8 0.0 60.0 14.1 0.0 18.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 32.2 0.0 13.5 36.3 0.0 30.1 1.8 0.0 60.0 14.1 0.0 18.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.07 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 102 0 513 255 0 465 435 0 823 275 0 1138 V/C Ratio(X)0.16 0.00 0.45 0.83 0.00 0.87 0.05 0.00 1.01 0.92 0.00 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 102 0 513 255 0 465 435 0 823 275 0 1138 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.59 0.00 0.59 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.9 0.0 38.7 54.3 0.0 44.6 19.3 0.0 35.0 43.2 0.0 12.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.6 19.9 0.0 16.3 0.1 0.0 23.4 23.3 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 10.3 13.1 0.0 20.7 0.7 0.0 36.8 8.4 0.0 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 60.6 0.0 39.3 74.1 0.0 60.9 19.4 0.0 58.4 66.4 0.0 12.9 LnGrp LOS E D E E B F E B Approach Vol, veh/h 248 616 848 748 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 65.4 57.4 31.0 Approach LOS D E E C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.0 42.0 22.0 66.0 42.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 82.0 36.3 16.0 60.0 36.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.2 38.3 16.1 62.0 34.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 49.7 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)331 192 12 186 159 375 35 427 Future Volume (vph) 331 192 12 186 159 375 35 427 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 12.1 35.1 Total Split (s)22.0 62.0 40.0 40.0 23.0 47.0 21.0 45.0 Total Split (%)16.9% 47.7% 30.8% 30.8% 17.7% 36.2% 16.2% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 115 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 331 192 240 12 186 88 159 375 26 35 427 210 Future Volume (veh/h) 331 192 240 12 186 88 159 375 26 35 427 210 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1470 1752 1856 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1811 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 345 200 250 12 194 92 166 391 27 36 445 219 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 29 10 3 7 2 2 2 2 6 4 Cap, veh/h 460 355 444 259 371 176 197 596 41 264 343 169 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.16 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 738 922 881 1190 564 1781 1726 119 1781 1145 564 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 345 0 450 12 0 286 166 0 418 36 0 664 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1660 881 0 1754 1781 0 1846 1781 0 1709 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.0 0.0 32.6 1.4 0.0 17.4 8.1 0.0 24.9 1.8 0.0 38.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 32.6 11.9 0.0 17.4 8.1 0.0 24.9 1.8 0.0 38.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.33 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 460 0 799 259 0 548 197 0 637 264 0 511 V/C Ratio(X)0.75 0.00 0.56 0.05 0.00 0.52 0.84 0.00 0.66 0.14 0.00 1.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 460 0 799 259 0 548 287 0 637 408 0 511 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 Upstream Filter(I)0.64 0.00 0.64 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.78 0.00 0.78 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.5 0.0 42.0 39.0 0.0 36.7 32.8 0.0 36.1 31.3 0.0 52.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.4 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.0 3.5 14.0 0.0 2.5 0.2 0.0 145.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 11.9 0.0 20.0 0.6 0.0 12.6 7.6 0.0 17.1 1.4 0.0 54.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.0 0.0 43.9 39.3 0.0 40.3 46.8 0.0 38.5 31.5 0.0 197.5 LnGrp LOS C D D D D D C F Approach Vol, veh/h 795 298 584 700 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.6 40.2 40.9 188.9 Approach LOS D D D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 46.6 10.5 50.9 68.6 16.4 45.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 34.0 14.9 40.9 56.0 16.9 38.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.0 19.4 3.8 26.9 34.6 10.1 40.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.1 2.9 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 84.0 HCM 6th LOS F Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)293 521 583 197 443 326 Future Volume (vph) 293 521 583 197 443 326 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 13.1 13.1 Total Split (s)25.0 84.0 59.0 59.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%)19.2% 64.6% 45.4% 45.4% 35.4% 35.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 23 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 293 521 583 197 443 326 Future Volume (veh/h) 293 521 583 197 443 326 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1737 1870 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 302 537 601 181 457 299 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 11 2 4 2 2 Cap, veh/h 389 1077 851 710 484 431 Arrive On Green 0.22 1.00 0.46 0.46 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1737 1870 1560 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 302 537 601 181 457 299 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1737 1870 1560 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.2 0.0 33.5 9.3 32.7 22.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.2 0.0 33.5 9.3 32.7 22.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 389 1077 851 710 484 431 V/C Ratio(X)0.78 0.50 0.71 0.25 0.94 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 438 1077 851 710 533 474 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.85 0.85 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.1 0.0 28.4 21.8 46.4 42.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 1.4 3.0 0.5 23.8 3.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 7.5 0.8 20.4 5.9 24.0 13.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.6 1.4 31.4 22.3 70.2 45.5 LnGrp LOS C A C C E D Approach Vol, veh/h 839 782 756 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.8 29.3 60.4 Approach LOS A C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.4 66.2 87.6 42.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 52.0 77.0 38.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.2 35.5 2.0 34.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.2 3.9 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 32.3 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)319 691 669 245 109 157 Future Volume (vph) 319 691 669 245 109 157 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)13.0 25.0 51.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)27.0 104.0 77.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%)20.8% 80.0% 59.2% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 319 691 669 245 109 157 Future Volume (veh/h) 319 691 669 245 109 157 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1826 1870 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 336 727 704 231 115 147 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 5 2 4 Cap, veh/h 583 1451 1200 1174 200 175 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.78 1.00 1.00 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1856 1856 1547 1781 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 336 727 704 231 115 147 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1856 1856 1547 1781 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 18.3 0.0 0.0 8.0 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 18.3 0.0 0.0 8.0 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 583 1451 1200 1174 200 175 V/C Ratio(X)0.58 0.50 0.59 0.20 0.58 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 711 1451 1200 1174 263 230 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.3 5.1 0.0 0.0 54.8 56.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 1.2 1.5 0.3 3.7 21.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.8 10.3 0.9 0.2 6.8 16.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.2 6.3 1.5 0.3 58.5 77.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1063 935 262 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.3 1.2 69.2 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.6 91.1 21.4 108.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 70.0 19.2 97.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 2.0 14.0 20.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 6.7 0.6 6.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.5 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)291 1337 781 304 1704 864 383 244 300 84 Future Volume (vph) 291 1337 781 304 1704 864 383 244 300 84 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 41.8 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)22.0 73.0 73.0 25.0 76.0 49.0 53.0 29.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%)12.2% 40.6% 40.6% 13.9% 42.2% 27.2% 29.4% 16.1% 18.3% 18.3% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 2.0 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 6.8 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min Min None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 23 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background (2027) Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 291 1337 781 304 1704 61 864 383 268 244 300 84 Future Volume (veh/h) 291 1337 781 304 1704 61 864 383 268 244 300 84 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1767 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1870 1841 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 303 1393 727 317 1775 64 900 399 279 254 312 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 9 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 3 Cap, veh/h 252 1878 583 326 1945 70 802 578 399 298 271 232 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.09 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 3264 5106 1585 3456 5059 182 3456 1992 1378 3456 1841 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 303 1393 727 317 1194 645 900 353 325 254 312 80 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1632 1702 1585 1728 1702 1838 1728 1763 1608 1728 1841 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.9 42.7 33.7 16.5 59.8 60.0 41.8 32.0 32.4 13.0 26.5 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.9 42.7 33.7 16.5 59.8 60.0 41.8 32.0 32.4 13.0 26.5 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 252 1878 583 326 1309 706 802 511 466 298 271 232 V/C Ratio(X)1.20 0.74 1.25 0.97 0.91 0.91 1.12 0.69 0.70 0.85 1.15 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 1878 583 326 1309 706 802 511 466 420 271 232 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 83.1 49.5 14.8 81.3 52.5 52.6 69.1 56.7 56.9 81.1 76.7 45.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 122.5 2.0 125.1 42.0 11.1 18.3 70.7 3.9 4.6 11.3 101.9 4.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 16.3 25.2 47.6 14.1 35.6 39.7 37.1 21.1 19.9 10.4 29.5 5.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 205.5 51.4 139.8 123.2 63.7 70.8 139.8 60.6 61.5 92.4 178.6 49.8 LnGrp LOS F D F F E E F E E F F D Approach Vol, veh/h 2423 2156 1578 646 Approach Delay, s/veh 97.2 74.6 106.0 128.8 Approach LOS F E F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 76.0 22.6 59.4 25.0 73.0 49.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.9 69.2 21.9 * 46 17.0 66.2 41.8 26.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.9 62.0 15.0 34.4 18.5 44.7 43.8 28.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.7 0.5 3.3 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 95.1 HCM 6th LOS F Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)59 783 1103 104 275 533 Future Volume (vph)59 783 1103 104 275 533 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 115.0 95.0 95.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%)12.5% 71.9% 59.4% 59.4% 28.1% 28.1% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 783 0 0 1103 104 275 0 533 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 59 783 0 0 1103 104 275 0 533 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 0 0 1870 1796 1870 0 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 62 824 0 0 1161 0 289 0 499 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 0 0 2 7 2 0 5 Cap, veh/h 317 2528 0 0 2268 373 0 570 Arrive On Green 0.06 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3647 0 0 3647 1522 1781 0 2723 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 62 824 0 0 1161 0 289 0 499 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1777 0 0 1777 1522 1781 0 1362 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 0.0 24.5 0.0 28.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 0.0 24.5 0.0 28.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 317 2528 0 0 2268 373 0 570 V/C Ratio(X)0.20 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.77 0.00 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 408 2528 0 0 2268 438 0 669 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 59.7 0.0 61.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 17.7 0.0 16.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 67.9 0.0 73.1 LnGrp LOS B A B E E Approach Vol, veh/h 886 1161 788 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.1 16.2 71.2 Approach LOS A B E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 109.1 39.2 120.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 88.0 39.3 108.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 30.1 30.4 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.2 3.1 6.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 26.8 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)107 1111 175 606 957 291 94 490 34 39 17 Future Volume (vph) 107 1111 175 606 957 291 94 490 34 39 17 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)18.0 60.0 60.0 50.0 92.0 30.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)11.3% 37.5% 37.5% 31.3% 57.5% 18.8% 18.8% 31.3% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max None Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 147 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 107 1111 175 606 957 37 291 94 490 34 39 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 107 1111 175 606 957 37 291 94 490 34 39 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 1134 159 618 977 38 297 96 459 35 40 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 324 1423 639 687 1857 72 501 271 545 147 154 131 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.81 0.81 0.20 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3526 1584 3456 3487 136 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 1134 159 618 498 517 297 96 459 35 40 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1763 1584 1728 1777 1846 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 27.8 3.9 27.9 29.1 29.1 12.9 7.4 23.2 2.9 3.2 1.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 27.8 3.9 27.9 29.1 29.1 12.9 7.4 23.2 2.9 3.2 1.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 324 1423 639 687 946 983 501 271 545 147 154 131 V/C Ratio(X)0.34 0.80 0.25 0.90 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.35 0.84 0.24 0.26 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 324 1423 639 933 946 983 501 271 545 147 154 131 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.4 11.9 9.6 62.5 24.3 24.3 64.0 61.6 48.5 68.7 68.8 68.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 4.2 0.8 9.1 2.1 2.0 5.1 3.6 14.6 3.8 4.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.7 9.2 2.5 18.8 18.2 18.8 10.0 6.8 26.4 2.7 3.1 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.9 16.1 10.4 71.7 26.4 26.3 69.1 65.2 63.1 72.5 72.8 69.8 LnGrp LOS D B B E C C E E E E E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1402 1633 852 90 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.2 43.5 65.4 72.2 Approach LOS B D E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.0 92.0 30.0 38.6 71.4 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.2 85.2 23.2 43.2 53.2 13.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 31.1 25.2 29.9 29.8 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 7.2 0.0 1.9 8.8 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 39.6 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh19.6 Intersection LOS C Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 699 22 592 1085 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 725 28 635 1162 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 486 1126 556 216 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 893 65 655 937 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.6 11.3 26.6 9.5 Approach LOS D B D A Lane Left Left Left Left Right Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.409 0.591 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.535 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.544 4.544 Entry Flow, veh/h 725 28 635 475 687 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 841 438 783 1167 1167 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.965 0.798 0.932 0.980 0.901 Flow Entry, veh/h 699 22 592 466 619 Cap Entry, veh/h 811 349 730 1144 1051 V/C Ratio 0.863 0.064 0.811 0.407 0.589 Control Delay, s/veh 29.6 11.3 26.6 7.3 11.2 LOS D B D A B 95th %tile Queue, veh 11 0 9 2 4 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Future Volume (vph) 425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Turn Type Prot NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 42.0 42.0 30.0 42.0 42.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 Total Split (%)18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Future Volume (veh/h) 425 175 32 300 323 221 35 612 429 136 609 503 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1781 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 447 184 31 316 340 210 37 644 410 143 641 470 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 8 3 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 Cap, veh/h 490 358 303 414 369 315 183 811 687 222 862 742 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.47 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1841 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 447 184 31 316 340 210 37 644 410 143 641 470 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1841 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.4 14.1 2.6 24.0 28.8 19.6 1.8 47.6 31.6 7.0 45.4 35.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.4 14.1 2.6 24.0 28.8 19.6 1.8 47.6 31.6 7.0 45.4 35.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 490 358 303 414 369 315 183 811 687 222 862 742 V/C Ratio(X)0.91 0.51 0.10 0.76 0.92 0.67 0.20 0.79 0.60 0.65 0.74 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 516 411 349 414 408 349 420 811 687 396 862 742 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 67.7 58.0 53.4 43.6 62.8 59.2 29.3 39.2 34.6 32.0 34.7 32.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 20.0 1.1 0.1 8.2 24.7 4.2 0.4 5.9 2.8 3.1 5.8 4.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 15.6 11.1 1.9 16.3 22.4 12.9 1.4 29.2 17.6 5.7 28.9 20.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 87.7 59.2 53.5 51.8 87.6 63.3 29.7 45.1 37.4 35.2 40.5 36.2 LnGrp LOS F E D D F E C D D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 662 866 1091 1254 Approach Delay, s/veh 78.2 68.6 41.7 38.3 Approach LOS E E D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.8 38.6 16.3 76.2 30.0 37.4 10.7 81.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 35.2 25.0 49.1 24.0 35.2 25.3 * 49 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.4 30.8 9.0 49.6 26.0 16.1 3.8 47.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 52.8 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)16 205 207 169 21 591 220 247 454 Future Volume (vph)16 205 207 169 21 591 220 247 454 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 22.0 88.0 Total Split (%)32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 50.8% 50.8% 50.8% 16.9% 67.7% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 20 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 16 205 23 207 169 228 21 591 220 247 454 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 16 205 23 207 169 228 21 591 220 247 454 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1737 1856 1870 1870 1707 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 209 23 211 172 233 21 603 224 252 463 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 11 3 2 2 13 2 2 2 5 2 Cap, veh/h 102 462 51 255 197 268 459 935 792 380 1062 76 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 980 1654 182 1139 707 958 822 1870 1583 1781 1684 120 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 0 232 211 0 405 21 603 224 252 0 496 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 980 0 1836 1139 0 1665 822 1870 1583 1781 0 1804 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 13.5 22.8 0.0 30.1 1.7 30.9 10.7 8.6 0.0 18.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 32.2 0.0 13.5 36.3 0.0 30.1 2.9 30.9 10.7 8.6 0.0 18.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 102 0 513 255 0 465 459 935 792 380 0 1138 V/C Ratio(X)0.16 0.00 0.45 0.83 0.00 0.87 0.05 0.64 0.28 0.66 0.00 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 102 0 513 255 0 465 459 935 792 448 0 1138 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.60 0.00 0.60 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.9 0.0 38.7 54.3 0.0 44.6 17.3 24.0 18.9 18.8 0.0 12.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.6 19.9 0.0 16.3 0.1 2.3 0.6 2.0 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 10.3 13.1 0.0 20.7 0.6 18.9 6.7 5.9 0.0 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 60.6 0.0 39.3 74.1 0.0 60.9 17.4 26.3 19.5 20.8 0.0 13.0 LnGrp LOS E D E E B C B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 248 616 848 748 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 65.4 24.3 15.6 Approach LOS D E C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.0 42.0 17.0 71.0 42.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 82.0 36.3 16.0 60.0 36.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.2 38.3 10.6 32.9 34.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 0.0 0.4 5.2 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 33.6 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)331 192 12 186 159 375 35 427 210 Future Volume (vph) 331 192 12 186 159 375 35 427 210 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 12.1 35.1 35.1 Total Split (s)22.0 62.0 40.0 40.0 23.0 47.0 21.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%)16.9% 47.7% 30.8% 30.8% 17.7% 36.2% 16.2% 34.6% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 331 192 240 12 186 88 159 375 26 35 427 210 Future Volume (veh/h) 331 192 240 12 186 88 159 375 26 35 427 210 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1470 1752 1856 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1811 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 345 200 250 12 194 92 166 391 27 36 445 219 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 29 10 3 7 2 2 2 2 6 4 Cap, veh/h 494 375 469 285 404 191 223 549 38 230 488 420 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.02 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 738 922 881 1190 564 1781 1726 119 1781 1811 1557 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 345 0 450 12 0 286 166 0 418 36 445 219 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1660 881 0 1754 1781 0 1846 1781 1811 1557 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.8 0.0 32.2 1.3 0.0 16.7 8.5 0.0 26.0 1.9 31.3 16.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.8 0.0 32.2 11.5 0.0 16.7 8.5 0.0 26.0 1.9 31.3 16.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 494 0 844 285 0 595 223 0 587 230 488 420 V/C Ratio(X)0.70 0.00 0.53 0.04 0.00 0.48 0.74 0.00 0.71 0.16 0.91 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 494 0 844 285 0 595 309 0 587 374 542 466 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 Upstream Filter(I)0.64 0.00 0.64 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.2 0.0 40.0 36.0 0.0 33.9 33.8 0.0 39.1 34.1 51.7 45.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 2.8 6.1 0.0 4.0 0.2 15.3 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 11.2 0.0 19.8 0.6 0.0 12.1 7.2 0.0 18.0 1.5 22.7 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 29.0 0.0 41.5 36.3 0.0 36.7 39.8 0.0 43.1 34.4 67.1 46.5 LnGrp LOS C D D D D D C E D Approach Vol, veh/h 795 298 584 700 Approach Delay, s/veh 36.1 36.7 42.2 58.9 Approach LOS D D D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 50.1 10.5 47.4 72.1 16.7 41.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 34.0 14.9 40.9 56.0 16.9 38.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.8 18.7 3.9 28.0 34.2 10.5 33.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 2.0 2.9 0.2 1.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 44.4 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)291 1337 781 304 1704 864 383 244 300 84 Future Volume (vph) 291 1337 781 304 1704 864 383 244 300 84 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 7 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 25.2 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)22.0 68.0 56.0 30.0 76.0 56.0 53.0 29.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%)12.2% 37.8% 31.1% 16.7% 42.2% 31.1% 29.4% 16.1% 14.4% 14.4% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 3.2 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 23 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 291 1337 781 304 1704 61 864 383 268 244 300 84 Future Volume (veh/h) 291 1337 781 304 1704 61 864 383 268 244 300 84 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1767 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1870 1841 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 303 1393 727 317 1775 64 900 399 279 254 312 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 9 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 3 Cap, veh/h 252 1838 998 359 1953 70 932 575 397 298 379 170 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.39 0.39 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 3264 5106 1585 3456 5059 182 3456 1992 1378 3456 3497 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 303 1393 727 317 1194 645 900 353 325 254 312 80 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1632 1702 1585 1728 1702 1838 1728 1763 1608 1728 1749 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.9 43.2 22.6 16.3 59.7 59.8 46.3 32.0 32.5 13.0 15.7 7.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.9 43.2 22.6 16.3 59.7 59.8 46.3 32.0 32.5 13.0 15.7 7.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 252 1838 998 359 1314 709 932 508 464 298 379 170 V/C Ratio(X)1.20 0.76 0.73 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.69 0.70 0.85 0.82 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 1838 998 422 1314 709 937 508 464 420 379 170 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 83.1 50.7 7.1 79.6 52.3 52.3 64.9 57.0 57.1 81.1 78.6 51.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 122.5 2.2 3.3 17.4 10.8 17.8 21.5 4.0 4.7 11.3 18.1 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 16.3 25.6 10.9 12.7 35.4 39.6 31.0 21.2 20.0 10.4 12.7 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 205.5 52.9 10.5 97.0 63.1 70.1 86.4 61.0 61.9 92.4 96.6 60.0 LnGrp LOS F D B F E E F E E F F E Approach Vol, veh/h 2423 2156 1578 646 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.3 70.2 75.7 90.4 Approach LOS E E E F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 76.3 22.6 59.1 26.7 71.6 55.7 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.9 69.2 21.9 * 46 22.0 61.2 48.8 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.9 61.8 15.0 34.5 18.3 45.2 48.3 17.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.8 0.5 3.3 0.4 14.3 0.2 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 69.5 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West RdBackground (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)48 161 82 368 160 140 108 450 256 132 344 Future Volume (vph)48 161 82 368 160 140 108 450 256 132 344 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 45.0 45.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 45.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 34.6% 34.6% 15.4% 38.5% 38.5% 15.4% 34.6% 34.6% 15.4% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 51 (39%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West RdBackground (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 161 82 368 160 140 108 450 256 132 344 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 161 82 368 160 140 108 450 256 132 344 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 164 75 376 163 128 110 459 232 135 351 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 Cap, veh/h 477 1198 530 583 1454 644 264 514 428 208 494 32 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.17 0.68 0.68 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1573 1781 3554 1575 1781 1870 1558 1781 1734 114 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 164 75 376 163 128 110 459 232 135 0 374 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1573 1781 1777 1575 1781 1870 1558 1781 0 1848 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 4.2 4.3 13.2 2.0 3.9 5.7 30.7 16.5 7.0 0.0 23.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 4.2 4.3 13.2 2.0 3.9 5.7 30.7 16.5 7.0 0.0 23.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 477 1198 530 583 1454 644 264 514 428 208 0 527 V/C Ratio(X)0.10 0.14 0.14 0.65 0.11 0.20 0.42 0.89 0.54 0.65 0.00 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 537 1198 530 583 1454 644 341 550 458 265 0 543 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.6 29.9 30.0 25.6 12.5 12.8 32.9 45.3 40.2 34.7 0.0 41.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 15.0 1.9 1.5 0.0 5.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.8 3.4 3.2 5.7 1.5 2.6 4.4 21.8 10.4 5.5 0.0 16.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 26.6 30.2 30.6 27.5 12.6 13.5 33.3 60.3 42.1 36.2 0.0 47.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C B B C E D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 288 667 801 509 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.7 21.2 51.3 44.1 Approach LOS C C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 42.5 10.6 61.1 14.4 43.9 20.0 51.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.2 38.2 8.5 42.1 13.2 38.2 13.2 37.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 32.7 4.3 5.9 7.7 25.6 15.2 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.8 0.0 1.4 0.1 2.9 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 38.1 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)514 353 611 78 52 Future Volume (vph) 514 353 611 78 52 Turn Type NA pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 5 2 8 8 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 6 5 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.8 11.8 29.8 10.7 10.7 Total Split (s)75.0 30.0 105.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)57.7% 23.1% 80.8% 19.2% 19.2% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 514 167 353 611 0 0 0 0 78 0 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 514 167 353 611 0 0 0 0 78 0 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 524 170 360 623 0 80 0 48 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1872 604 733 2996 0 108 0 96 Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 2734 853 1781 3647 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 352 342 360 623 0 80 0 48 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1717 1781 1777 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1259 1217 733 2996 0 108 0 96 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.28 0.28 0.49 0.21 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1259 1217 905 2996 0 264 0 235 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 59.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 9.4 0.0 3.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.3 0.3 2.6 0.1 0.0 5.2 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.5 3.4 0.1 0.0 69.5 0.0 63.1 LnGrp LOS A A A A E E Approach Vol, veh/h 694 983 128 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.5 1.3 67.1 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 116.4 17.5 98.9 13.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 98.2 23.2 68.2 19.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 9.8 2.0 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.3 0.9 4.4 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 5.7 HCM 6th LOS A Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)49 595 786 79 180 371 Future Volume (vph)49 595 786 79 180 371 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 105.0 85.0 85.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)15.4% 80.8% 65.4% 65.4% 19.2% 19.2% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 49 595 0 0 786 79 180 0 371 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 49 595 0 0 786 79 180 0 371 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 640 0 0 845 0 194 0 354 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 481 2679 0 0 2371 264 0 235 Arrive On Green 0.07 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 0 3647 1585 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 640 0 0 845 0 194 0 354 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 0 1777 1585 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.5 0.0 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.5 0.0 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 481 2679 0 0 2371 264 0 235 V/C Ratio(X)0.11 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.73 0.00 1.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 601 2679 0 0 2371 264 0 235 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.96 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 52.9 0.0 55.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 10.8 0.0 247.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.2 0.0 37.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 63.7 0.0 303.2 LnGrp LOS A A A E F Approach Vol, veh/h 693 845 548 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.7 9.8 218.4 Approach LOS A A F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 93.7 25.0 105.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 78.0 19.3 98.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 15.5 21.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 0.0 4.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 61.6 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)83 854 135 478 754 181 52 268 29 34 14 Future Volume (vph)83 854 135 478 754 181 52 268 29 34 14 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)15.0 65.0 65.0 15.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 50.0% 50.0% 11.5% 50.0% 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 854 135 478 754 29 181 52 268 29 34 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 854 135 478 754 29 181 52 268 29 34 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 928 131 520 820 32 197 57 259 32 37 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 411 1958 873 355 2012 79 484 262 222 65 68 58 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.04 0.04 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3487 136 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 928 131 520 418 434 197 57 259 32 37 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1846 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 26.0 7.2 8.2 16.9 16.9 6.8 3.5 18.2 2.3 2.5 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 26.0 7.2 8.2 16.9 16.9 6.8 3.5 18.2 2.3 2.5 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 411 1958 873 355 1026 1065 484 262 222 65 68 58 V/C Ratio(X)0.22 0.47 0.15 1.46 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.22 1.17 0.49 0.54 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 457 1958 873 355 1026 1065 484 262 222 249 262 222 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.6 26.6 20.7 29.0 15.2 15.2 51.0 49.6 55.9 61.4 61.5 60.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.7 0.3 224.1 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.4 112.9 5.6 6.5 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.0 17.0 4.9 43.4 11.0 11.3 5.3 3.0 21.8 2.1 2.4 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 12.8 27.3 21.0 253.1 16.4 16.4 51.5 50.0 168.8 67.0 68.0 63.2 LnGrp LOS B C C F B B D D F E E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1149 1372 513 84 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.5 106.1 110.6 66.8 Approach LOS C F F E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.6 81.8 25.0 15.0 78.4 11.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.2 58.2 18.2 8.2 58.2 18.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 18.9 20.2 10.2 28.0 4.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 76.1 HCM 6th LOS E HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh14.1 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 465 20 410 694 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 521 20 440 851 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 457 814 408 151 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 545 34 570 683 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 6.4 10.6 16.3 Approach LOS B A B C Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 521 20 440 851 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 866 602 910 1183 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.892 0.990 0.933 0.816 Flow Entry, veh/h 465 20 410 694 Cap Entry, veh/h 772 596 849 965 V/C Ratio 0.602 0.033 0.483 0.719 Control Delay, s/veh 14.5 6.4 10.6 16.3 LOS B A B C 95th %tile Queue, veh 4 0 3 6 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Future Volume (vph) 297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 60.0 60.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)23.1% 46.2% 46.2% 15.4% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Future Volume (veh/h) 297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 309 127 21 197 214 130 21 369 229 98 438 320 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 371 343 306 409 259 219 315 841 713 392 890 754 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.45 0.45 0.04 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 309 127 21 197 214 130 21 369 229 98 438 320 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 18.7 8.1 1.4 12.2 14.5 10.0 0.8 17.6 12.1 3.8 20.8 17.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.7 8.1 1.4 12.2 14.5 10.0 0.8 17.6 12.1 3.8 20.8 17.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 371 343 306 409 259 219 315 841 713 392 890 754 V/C Ratio(X)0.83 0.37 0.07 0.48 0.83 0.59 0.07 0.44 0.32 0.25 0.49 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 411 729 649 409 622 527 598 841 713 492 890 754 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.74 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.3 45.6 42.9 41.6 54.5 52.6 19.7 24.5 23.0 19.0 23.3 22.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.7 0.7 0.1 0.9 6.6 2.6 0.1 1.2 0.9 0.2 1.4 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 14.4 6.5 1.0 9.1 11.5 7.4 0.6 11.7 7.6 2.8 13.6 10.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 50.9 46.3 43.0 42.4 61.2 55.1 19.7 25.7 23.9 19.2 24.7 23.7 LnGrp LOS D D D D E E B C C B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 457 541 619 856 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.3 52.9 24.8 23.7 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.1 24.8 12.8 65.4 20.0 31.9 9.4 68.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 43.2 13.0 23.1 14.0 53.2 23.3 * 13 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.7 16.5 5.8 19.6 14.2 10.1 2.8 22.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.5 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 35.1 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th AWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 7: N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 6 6 161 6 44 8 64 194 38 43 4 Future Vol, veh/h 4 6 6 161 6 44 8 64 194 38 43 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 7 7 175 7 48 9 70 211 41 47 4 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay, s/veh8.1 10 9.4 8.7 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %3% 25% 76% 45% Vol Thru, %24% 38% 3% 51% Vol Right, %73% 38% 21% 5% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 266 16 211 85 LT Vol 8 4 161 38 Through Vol 64 6 6 43 RT Vol 194 6 44 4 Lane Flow Rate 289 17 229 92 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X)0.34 0.024 0.307 0.126 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.234 4.911 4.825 4.928 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 847 724 743 725 Service Time 2.267 2.972 2.872 2.974 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.341 0.023 0.308 0.127 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.4 8.1 10 8.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 0.1 1.3 0.4 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)13 116 204 160 14 341 142 292 Future Volume (vph)13 116 204 160 14 341 142 292 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 70.0 Total Split (%)36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 45.5% 45.5% 18.2% 63.6% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 40 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 116 12 204 160 127 14 341 244 142 292 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 116 12 204 160 127 14 341 244 142 292 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1752 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 122 13 215 168 134 15 359 257 149 307 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 Cap, veh/h 175 425 45 315 249 198 621 532 381 589 1132 48 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.64 0.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 1077 1648 176 1254 964 769 1060 1014 726 1781 1781 75 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 0 135 215 0 302 15 0 616 149 0 320 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1077 0 1824 1254 0 1732 1060 0 1740 1781 0 1857 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 6.5 18.2 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.5 0.0 6.5 24.8 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 175 0 471 315 0 447 621 0 912 589 0 1180 V/C Ratio(X)0.08 0.00 0.29 0.68 0.00 0.68 0.02 0.00 0.68 0.25 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 233 0 569 382 0 540 621 0 912 715 0 1180 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.00 0.87 0.86 0.00 0.86 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 0.0 32.7 42.6 0.0 36.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 8.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.3 3.8 0.0 2.5 0.1 0.0 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 5.3 9.9 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.7 0.0 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 45.2 0.0 33.0 46.4 0.0 39.2 0.1 0.0 3.5 9.9 0.0 9.3 LnGrp LOS D C D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 149 517 631 469 Approach Delay, s/veh 34.2 42.2 3.4 9.5 Approach LOS C D A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 75.9 34.1 12.2 63.7 34.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 64.0 34.3 14.0 44.0 34.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 26.8 6.0 2.0 20.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 1.6 0.3 5.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 19.0 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)253 122 10 68 106 32 13 299 Future Volume (vph) 253 122 10 68 106 32 13 299 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 11.1 35.1 Total Split (s)17.0 51.0 34.0 34.0 17.0 42.0 17.0 42.0 Total Split (%)15.5% 46.4% 30.9% 30.9% 15.5% 38.2% 15.5% 38.2% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 5.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 253 122 156 10 68 26 106 32 13 13 299 209 Future Volume (veh/h) 253 122 156 10 68 26 106 32 13 13 299 209 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1737 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 266 128 164 11 72 27 112 34 14 14 315 220 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 11 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 586 342 439 397 396 148 189 459 189 529 324 227 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 745 954 1087 1297 486 1767 1259 518 1781 1025 716 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 266 0 292 11 0 99 112 0 48 14 0 535 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1699 1087 0 1783 1767 0 1777 1781 0 1741 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.7 0.0 17.0 0.8 0.0 4.5 4.6 0.0 1.9 0.6 0.0 32.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.7 0.0 17.0 0.8 0.0 4.5 4.6 0.0 1.9 0.6 0.0 32.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.41 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 586 0 781 397 0 544 189 0 649 529 0 551 V/C Ratio(X)0.45 0.00 0.37 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.59 0.00 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.97 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 586 0 781 397 0 544 261 0 649 688 0 568 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.86 0.00 0.86 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.00 0.87 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.2 0.0 32.4 26.8 0.0 28.1 27.8 0.0 22.8 24.0 0.0 19.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.7 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.4 0.0 12.3 0.4 0.0 3.6 3.6 0.0 1.5 0.4 0.0 16.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.7 0.0 33.6 27.0 0.0 28.9 30.7 0.0 22.8 24.0 0.0 47.4 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C C D Approach Vol, veh/h 558 110 160 549 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.9 28.7 28.4 46.8 Approach LOS C C C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 39.6 7.2 46.2 56.6 12.5 40.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 28.0 11.9 35.9 45.0 10.9 35.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 6.5 2.6 3.9 19.0 6.6 34.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.1 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 36.0 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)176 456 449 72 212 238 Future Volume (vph) 176 456 449 72 212 238 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 12.1 12.1 Total Split (s)24.0 77.0 53.0 53.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%)21.8% 70.0% 48.2% 48.2% 30.0% 30.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 10 (9%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 176 456 449 72 212 238 Future Volume (veh/h) 176 456 449 72 212 238 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 187 485 478 68 226 225 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 678 1318 1095 928 288 256 Arrive On Green 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1856 1870 1585 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 485 478 68 226 225 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1856 1870 1585 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 15.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 15.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 678 1318 1095 928 288 256 V/C Ratio(X)0.28 0.37 0.44 0.07 0.79 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 845 1318 1095 928 419 373 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.91 0.91 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 45.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.7 1.2 0.1 3.4 11.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 10.0 10.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.6 0.7 1.2 0.1 47.6 56.4 LnGrp LOS A A A A D E Approach Vol, veh/h 672 546 451 Approach Delay, s/veh 2.4 1.1 52.0 Approach LOS A A D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.7 71.4 85.1 24.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 46.0 70.0 25.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 2.0 2.0 17.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 3.5 3.4 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.4 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)319 581 504 166 54 176 Future Volume (vph) 319 581 504 166 54 176 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)13.0 25.0 51.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)27.0 85.0 58.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)24.5% 77.3% 52.7% 22.7% 22.7% 22.7% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 319 581 504 166 54 176 Future Volume (veh/h) 319 581 504 166 54 176 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1856 1841 1870 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 339 618 536 158 57 167 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 4 2 4 Cap, veh/h 601 1399 1093 1117 226 198 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1856 1560 1781 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 339 618 536 158 57 167 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1856 1560 1781 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.7 13.7 11.2 1.9 3.2 11.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.7 13.7 11.2 1.9 3.2 11.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 601 1399 1093 1117 226 198 V/C Ratio(X)0.56 0.44 0.49 0.14 0.25 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 755 1399 1093 1117 295 258 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.4 5.2 6.1 2.5 43.3 47.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.8 19.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.7 8.2 6.4 1.6 2.6 16.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.3 6.2 7.5 2.7 44.2 66.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A D E Approach Vol, veh/h 957 694 224 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.0 6.4 61.1 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.4 71.8 20.7 89.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 51.0 18.2 78.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 13.2 13.5 15.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 4.3 0.4 4.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 13.2 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)172 1386 648 306 1174 659 236 229 229 90 Future Volume (vph) 172 1386 648 306 1174 659 236 229 229 90 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 41.8 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)20.0 70.0 70.0 20.0 70.0 35.0 40.0 20.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)13.3% 46.7% 46.7% 13.3% 46.7% 23.3% 26.7% 13.3% 16.7% 16.7% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 2.0 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 6.8 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min Min None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 17 (11%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background (2027) Conditions, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report April 2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 172 1386 648 306 1174 68 659 236 208 229 229 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 172 1386 648 306 1174 68 659 236 208 229 229 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 177 1429 594 315 1210 70 679 243 214 236 236 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 6 Cap, veh/h 222 2151 668 276 2149 124 640 408 345 280 231 189 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.19 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 3401 5106 1585 3456 4937 286 3456 1826 1543 3456 1870 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 177 1429 594 315 834 446 679 236 221 236 236 83 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1700 1702 1585 1728 1702 1819 1728 1777 1593 1728 1870 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.7 33.7 27.0 12.0 27.5 27.5 27.8 17.8 18.8 10.1 18.5 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.7 33.7 27.0 12.0 27.5 27.5 27.8 17.8 18.8 10.1 18.5 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 2151 668 276 1482 792 640 397 356 280 231 189 V/C Ratio(X)0.80 0.66 0.89 1.14 0.56 0.56 1.06 0.59 0.62 0.84 1.02 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 270 2151 668 276 1482 792 640 397 356 297 231 189 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 69.1 34.9 10.8 69.0 31.7 31.7 61.1 52.1 52.5 68.0 65.8 40.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.8 1.1 14.7 97.1 1.6 2.9 52.6 2.4 3.3 18.4 65.4 7.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.7 19.9 17.2 14.5 16.9 18.2 24.3 12.9 12.4 8.9 19.1 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 81.9 35.9 25.5 166.1 33.2 34.6 113.7 54.5 55.8 86.4 131.1 47.6 LnGrp LOS F D C F C C F D E F F D Approach Vol, veh/h 2200 1595 1136 555 Approach Delay, s/veh 36.8 59.8 90.1 99.6 Approach LOS D E F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.9 72.1 19.3 40.7 20.0 70.0 35.0 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.9 63.2 12.9 * 33 12.0 63.2 27.8 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 29.5 12.1 20.8 14.0 35.7 29.8 20.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 18.5 0.1 2.2 0.0 22.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 60.9 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)49 595 786 79 180 371 Future Volume (vph)49 595 786 79 180 371 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 95.0 75.0 75.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%)15.4% 73.1% 57.7% 57.7% 26.9% 26.9% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 49 595 0 0 786 79 180 0 371 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 49 595 0 0 786 79 180 0 371 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 640 0 0 845 0 194 0 336 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 479 2672 0 0 2365 268 0 419 Arrive On Green 0.07 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 0 3647 1585 1781 0 2790 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 640 0 0 845 0 194 0 336 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 0 1777 1585 1781 0 1395 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 13.5 0.0 15.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 13.5 0.0 15.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 479 2672 0 0 2365 268 0 419 V/C Ratio(X)0.11 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.72 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 599 2672 0 0 2365 401 0 629 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.96 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 52.7 0.0 53.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.0 5.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 10.6 0.0 9.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 57.9 0.0 59.1 LnGrp LOS A A A E E Approach Vol, veh/h 693 845 530 Approach Delay, s/veh 0.7 9.9 58.7 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 93.5 25.2 104.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 68.0 29.3 88.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 15.6 17.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 2.4 4.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 19.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)83 854 135 478 754 181 52 268 29 34 14 Future Volume (vph)83 854 135 478 754 181 52 268 29 34 14 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)15.0 50.0 50.0 35.0 70.0 25.0 25.0 35.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 38.5% 38.5% 26.9% 53.8% 19.2% 19.2% 26.9% 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 854 135 478 754 29 181 52 268 29 34 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 854 135 478 754 29 181 52 268 29 34 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 928 125 520 820 32 197 57 248 32 37 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 415 1575 703 591 1998 78 484 262 493 65 68 58 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.17 0.57 0.57 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.04 0.04 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3487 136 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 928 125 520 418 434 197 57 248 32 37 13 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1846 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 28.9 7.6 19.1 17.1 17.1 6.8 3.5 16.6 2.3 2.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 28.9 7.6 19.1 17.1 17.1 6.8 3.5 16.6 2.3 2.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 415 1575 703 591 1018 1058 484 262 493 65 68 58 V/C Ratio(X)0.22 0.59 0.18 0.88 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.22 0.50 0.49 0.54 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 454 1575 703 750 1018 1058 484 262 493 181 190 161 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.4 35.6 28.1 52.6 15.5 15.5 51.0 49.6 36.6 61.4 61.6 60.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 1.5 0.5 9.8 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.8 5.7 6.5 1.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.7 19.1 5.4 13.8 11.1 11.5 5.3 3.0 10.8 2.1 2.4 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.7 37.2 28.6 62.4 16.7 16.7 51.5 50.0 37.4 67.1 68.1 62.8 LnGrp LOS B D C E B B D D D E E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1143 1372 502 82 Approach Delay, s/veh 34.8 34.0 44.4 66.9 Approach LOS C C D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.2 81.3 25.0 29.0 64.4 11.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.2 63.2 18.2 28.2 43.2 13.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 19.1 18.6 21.1 30.9 4.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.1 5.0 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 36.8 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh10.2 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 465 20 410 694 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 521 20 440 851 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 457 814 408 151 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 545 34 570 683 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 6.4 10.6 7.1 Approach LOS B A B A Lane Left Left Left Left Right Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.525 0.475 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.535 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.544 4.544 Entry Flow, veh/h 521 20 440 447 404 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 866 602 910 1238 1238 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.892 0.990 0.933 0.667 0.980 Flow Entry, veh/h 465 20 410 298 396 Cap Entry, veh/h 772 596 849 825 1213 V/C Ratio 0.602 0.033 0.483 0.361 0.326 Control Delay, s/veh 14.5 6.4 10.6 8.6 6.0 LOS B A B A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 4 0 3 2 1 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Future Volume (vph) 297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 60.0 60.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)23.1% 46.2% 46.2% 15.4% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Future Volume (veh/h) 297 122 22 189 205 140 20 354 248 94 420 347 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 309 127 20 197 214 123 21 369 216 98 438 303 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 503 230 204 324 258 219 378 967 820 459 1010 856 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.54 0.54 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 309 127 20 197 214 123 21 369 216 98 438 303 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.9 8.7 1.4 12.3 14.5 9.4 0.7 15.4 9.9 3.3 18.3 14.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.9 8.7 1.4 12.3 14.5 9.4 0.7 15.4 9.9 3.3 18.3 14.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 503 230 204 324 258 219 378 967 820 459 1010 856 V/C Ratio(X)0.61 0.55 0.10 0.61 0.83 0.56 0.06 0.38 0.26 0.21 0.43 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 800 729 649 324 622 527 661 967 820 564 1010 856 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.5 53.1 50.0 42.9 54.5 52.4 15.0 18.9 17.5 14.5 18.0 17.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 2.1 0.2 3.3 6.7 2.3 0.1 1.1 0.7 0.2 1.4 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 7.7 7.2 1.0 9.5 11.5 6.9 0.5 10.8 6.6 2.4 12.6 9.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 44.7 55.2 50.2 46.2 61.2 54.6 15.0 19.9 18.3 14.7 19.3 18.2 LnGrp LOS D E D D E D B B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 456 534 606 839 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.9 54.2 19.2 18.4 Approach LOS D D B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.8 24.8 12.3 74.1 20.0 23.6 9.4 77.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 43.2 13.0 23.1 14.0 53.2 23.3 * 13 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.9 16.5 5.3 17.4 14.3 10.7 2.7 20.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 1.5 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 31.9 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)13 116 204 160 14 341 244 142 292 Future Volume (vph)13 116 204 160 14 341 244 142 292 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 70.0 Total Split (%)36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 45.5% 45.5% 45.5% 18.2% 63.6% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 40 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 116 12 204 160 127 14 341 244 142 292 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 116 12 204 160 127 14 341 244 142 292 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1752 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 122 13 215 168 134 15 359 257 149 307 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 Cap, veh/h 172 425 45 315 246 196 621 981 831 589 1132 48 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.64 0.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 1077 1648 176 1254 953 760 1060 1870 1585 1781 1781 75 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 0 135 215 0 302 15 359 257 149 0 320 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1077 0 1824 1254 0 1713 1060 1870 1585 1781 0 1857 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 6.5 18.2 0.0 17.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.8 0.0 6.5 24.8 0.0 17.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 172 0 471 315 0 442 621 981 831 589 0 1180 V/C Ratio(X)0.08 0.00 0.29 0.68 0.00 0.68 0.02 0.37 0.31 0.25 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 230 0 569 382 0 534 621 981 831 715 0 1180 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.00 0.89 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.2 0.0 32.7 42.6 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 8.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.3 3.8 0.0 2.7 0.1 1.0 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 5.3 9.9 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.5 0.4 2.7 0.0 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 45.4 0.0 33.0 46.4 0.0 39.5 0.1 1.0 0.9 9.9 0.0 9.3 LnGrp LOS D C D D A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 149 517 631 469 Approach Delay, s/veh 34.2 42.4 0.9 9.5 Approach LOS C D A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 75.9 34.1 12.2 63.7 34.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 64.0 34.3 14.0 44.0 34.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 26.8 6.0 2.0 20.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 1.6 0.3 3.3 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 18.1 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)253 122 10 68 106 32 13 299 209 Future Volume (vph) 253 122 10 68 106 32 13 299 209 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 11.1 35.1 35.1 Total Split (s)17.0 51.0 34.0 34.0 17.0 42.0 17.0 42.0 42.0 Total Split (%)15.5% 46.4% 30.9% 30.9% 15.5% 38.2% 15.5% 38.2% 38.2% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 5.1 6.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 253 122 156 10 68 26 106 32 13 13 299 209 Future Volume (veh/h) 253 122 156 10 68 26 106 32 13 13 299 209 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1737 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 266 128 164 11 72 27 112 34 14 14 315 220 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 11 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 742 428 548 526 549 206 215 313 129 363 364 309 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 745 954 1087 1297 486 1767 1250 515 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 266 0 292 11 0 99 112 0 48 14 315 220 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1699 1087 0 1783 1767 0 1764 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 0.0 16.2 0.6 0.0 3.7 5.4 0.0 2.3 0.7 17.1 12.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 0.0 16.2 0.6 0.0 3.7 5.4 0.0 2.3 0.7 17.1 12.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 742 0 976 526 0 755 215 0 442 363 364 309 V/C Ratio(X)0.36 0.00 0.30 0.02 0.00 0.13 0.52 0.00 0.11 0.04 0.87 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 749 0 976 526 0 755 275 0 576 522 610 517 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.86 0.00 0.86 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.9 0.0 25.6 18.5 0.0 19.3 32.5 0.0 31.8 33.6 32.3 31.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.4 1.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 6.1 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.7 0.0 11.7 0.3 0.0 2.9 4.3 0.0 1.8 0.5 10.4 7.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.1 0.0 26.2 18.5 0.0 19.7 34.4 0.0 31.9 33.7 38.3 33.7 LnGrp LOS B C B B C C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 558 110 160 549 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 19.6 33.7 36.3 Approach LOS C B C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 52.6 7.2 33.6 69.2 13.3 27.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 28.0 11.9 35.9 45.0 10.9 35.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.6 5.7 2.7 4.3 18.2 7.4 19.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.1 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 28.4 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)172 1386 648 306 1174 659 236 229 229 90 Future Volume (vph) 172 1386 648 306 1174 659 236 229 229 90 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 41.8 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)20.0 66.0 66.0 24.0 70.0 41.0 38.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 Total Split (%)13.3% 44.0% 44.0% 16.0% 46.7% 27.3% 25.3% 14.7% 12.7% 12.7% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 2.0 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 6.8 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min Min None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 17 (11%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Background w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 172 1386 648 306 1174 68 659 236 208 229 229 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 172 1386 648 306 1174 68 659 236 208 229 229 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 177 1429 581 315 1210 70 679 243 214 236 236 85 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 2 6 Cap, veh/h 222 2100 652 358 2217 128 732 382 323 283 296 128 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 3401 5106 1585 3456 4937 286 3456 1826 1543 3456 3554 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 177 1429 581 315 834 446 679 236 221 236 236 85 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1700 1702 1585 1728 1702 1819 1728 1777 1593 1728 1777 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.7 34.3 24.6 13.5 26.8 26.8 28.9 18.2 19.1 10.1 9.8 6.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.7 34.3 24.6 13.5 26.8 26.8 28.9 18.2 19.1 10.1 9.8 6.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 2100 652 358 1528 817 732 371 333 283 296 128 V/C Ratio(X)0.80 0.68 0.89 0.88 0.55 0.55 0.93 0.64 0.66 0.83 0.80 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 270 2100 652 369 1528 817 779 372 333 343 296 128 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 69.1 36.1 9.5 66.3 30.2 30.2 58.0 54.1 54.5 67.8 67.5 45.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.8 1.2 15.2 20.5 1.4 2.6 16.7 3.5 4.9 13.6 19.6 24.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.7 20.3 16.1 11.2 16.5 17.7 20.5 13.3 12.8 8.6 9.0 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 81.9 37.3 24.8 86.8 31.6 32.8 74.7 57.7 59.3 81.5 87.1 69.2 LnGrp LOS F D C F C C E E E F F E Approach Vol, veh/h 2187 1595 1136 557 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.6 42.8 68.2 82.0 Approach LOS D D E F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.9 74.1 19.4 38.6 23.5 68.5 39.0 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.9 63.2 14.9 * 31 16.0 59.2 33.8 12.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 28.8 12.1 21.1 15.5 36.3 30.9 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 18.7 0.2 2.0 0.1 19.3 0.8 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 50.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. G-3:Buildout Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 Future Volume (vph)65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 45.0 45.0 25.0 55.0 55.0 20.0 65.0 65.0 25.0 70.0 Total Split (%)9.4% 28.1% 28.1% 15.6% 34.4% 34.4% 12.5% 40.6% 40.6% 15.6% 43.8% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 116 (73%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 56 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 178 109 634 363 134 151 674 470 162 508 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 4 2 3 4 Cap, veh/h 340 958 426 500 1237 538 240 680 558 183 613 69 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.08 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1582 1781 3554 1546 1781 1870 1535 1781 1638 184 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 66 178 109 634 363 134 151 674 470 162 0 565 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1582 1781 1777 1546 1781 1870 1535 1781 0 1822 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 6.2 8.6 18.2 15.0 12.6 8.5 57.4 44.9 10.1 0.0 45.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 6.2 8.6 18.2 15.0 12.6 8.5 57.4 44.9 10.1 0.0 45.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 340 958 426 500 1237 538 240 680 558 183 0 682 V/C Ratio(X)0.19 0.19 0.26 1.27 0.29 0.25 0.63 0.99 0.84 0.88 0.00 0.83 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 369 958 426 500 1237 538 271 680 558 250 0 720 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 44.9 45.8 50.9 52.8 51.8 35.6 50.6 46.7 45.1 0.0 45.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.4 1.4 134.8 0.5 1.0 2.3 32.1 12.1 19.3 0.0 8.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.5 5.1 6.6 42.7 11.5 9.1 6.7 41.4 26.4 9.1 0.0 29.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.1 45.4 47.3 185.7 53.3 52.8 37.9 82.8 58.8 64.4 0.0 54.2 LnGrp LOS D D D F D D D F E E D Approach Vol, veh/h 353 1131 1295 727 Approach Delay, s/veh 45.0 127.5 68.8 56.5 Approach LOS D F E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 65.0 12.4 63.6 17.3 66.7 25.0 51.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.2 58.2 8.5 47.1 13.2 63.2 18.2 37.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.1 59.4 6.3 17.0 10.5 47.0 20.2 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 5.6 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 82.8 HCM 6th LOS F Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)764 482 1095 163 186 Future Volume (vph) 764 482 1095 163 186 Turn Type NA pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 5 2 8 8 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 6 5 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.8 11.8 29.8 10.7 10.7 Total Split (s)100.0 35.0 135.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)62.5% 21.9% 84.4% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 764 251 482 1095 0 0 0 0 163 0 186 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 764 251 482 1095 0 0 0 0 163 0 186 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1856 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 780 256 492 1117 0 166 0 173 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1621 532 625 2848 0 214 0 191 Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 2707 858 1767 3647 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 530 506 492 1117 0 166 0 173 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1694 1767 1777 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 0.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 17.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 0.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 17.2 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.51 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1102 1051 625 2848 0 214 0 191 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.48 0.48 0.79 0.39 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1102 1051 692 2848 0 215 0 191 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.81 0.81 0.64 0.64 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 68.3 0.0 69.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.2 1.3 3.6 0.3 0.0 16.0 0.0 40.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.7 0.7 6.8 0.2 0.0 12.1 0.0 14.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 1.2 1.3 9.0 0.3 0.0 84.3 0.0 109.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A F F Approach Vol, veh/h 1036 1609 339 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.3 2.9 97.2 Approach LOS A A F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 135.0 29.0 106.0 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 128.2 28.2 93.2 19.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 21.3 2.0 19.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 9.8 1.0 7.8 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 13.1 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)163 858 1207 173 387 645 Future Volume (vph) 163 858 1207 173 387 645 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 115.0 95.0 95.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%)12.5% 71.9% 59.4% 59.4% 28.1% 28.1% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 145 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 163 858 0 0 1207 173 387 0 645 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 163 858 0 0 1207 173 387 0 645 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1841 1870 0 0 1870 1796 1870 0 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 172 903 0 0 1271 0 407 0 607 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 0 0 2 7 2 0 5 Cap, veh/h 288 2411 0 0 2065 431 0 660 Arrive On Green 0.11 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1753 3647 0 0 3647 1522 1781 0 2723 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 172 903 0 0 1271 0 407 0 607 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1753 1777 0 0 1777 1522 1781 0 1362 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.3 0.0 35.9 0.0 34.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.3 0.0 35.9 0.0 34.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 288 2411 0 0 2065 431 0 660 V/C Ratio(X)0.60 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.94 0.00 0.92 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 2411 0 0 2065 438 0 669 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.82 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 0.0 59.6 0.0 59.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 29.3 0.0 18.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 27.0 0.0 19.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 88.8 0.0 77.4 LnGrp LOS B A C F E Approach Vol, veh/h 1075 1271 1014 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.3 22.8 82.0 Approach LOS A C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.6 100.0 44.4 115.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 88.0 39.3 108.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.5 39.3 37.9 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 11.6 0.8 7.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 34.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)107 1111 362 644 957 464 94 525 34 39 17 Future Volume (vph) 107 1111 362 644 957 464 94 525 34 39 17 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)18.0 60.0 60.0 50.0 92.0 30.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)11.3% 37.5% 37.5% 31.3% 57.5% 18.8% 18.8% 31.3% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max None Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 147 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 107 1111 362 644 957 37 464 94 525 34 39 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 107 1111 362 644 957 37 464 94 525 34 39 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 1134 332 657 977 38 473 96 492 35 40 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 318 1384 622 726 1857 72 501 271 563 147 154 131 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.78 0.78 0.21 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3526 1584 3456 3487 136 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 1134 332 657 498 517 473 96 492 35 40 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1763 1584 1728 1777 1846 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 31.0 12.4 29.7 29.1 29.1 21.7 7.4 23.2 2.9 3.2 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 31.0 12.4 29.7 29.1 29.1 21.7 7.4 23.2 2.9 3.2 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 318 1384 622 726 946 983 501 271 563 147 154 131 V/C Ratio(X)0.34 0.82 0.53 0.91 0.53 0.53 0.94 0.35 0.87 0.24 0.26 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 318 1384 622 933 946 983 501 271 563 147 154 131 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.7 13.8 11.8 61.6 24.3 24.3 67.8 61.6 48.3 68.7 68.8 68.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 4.6 2.7 10.2 2.1 2.0 28.4 3.6 17.1 3.8 4.0 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.8 9.9 6.2 19.9 18.2 18.8 17.1 6.8 28.6 2.7 3.1 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.2 18.4 14.5 71.9 26.4 26.3 96.2 65.2 65.3 72.5 72.8 70.1 LnGrp LOS D B B E C C F E E E E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1575 1672 1061 92 Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 44.2 79.1 72.2 Approach LOS B D E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.0 92.0 30.0 40.4 69.6 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.2 85.2 23.2 43.2 53.2 13.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 31.1 25.2 31.7 33.0 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 7.2 0.0 1.9 8.9 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 44.2 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh64.0 Intersection LOS F Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 872 22 679 1366 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 902 28 731 1466 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 582 1399 733 216 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 1101 65 751 1210 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 116.8 15.3 98.5 13.9 Approach LOS F C F B Lane Left Left Left Left Right Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.389 0.611 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.535 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.544 4.544 Entry Flow, veh/h 902 28 731 571 895 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 762 331 653 1167 1167 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.967 0.798 0.929 0.980 0.901 Flow Entry, veh/h 872 22 679 560 806 Cap Entry, veh/h 737 264 607 1144 1051 V/C Ratio 1.183 0.085 1.119 0.489 0.767 Control Delay, s/veh 116.8 15.3 98.5 8.6 17.5 LOS F C F A C 95th %tile Queue, veh 28 0 21 3 8 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)425 175 70 375 323 325 70 751 498 248 758 Future Volume (vph) 425 175 70 375 323 325 70 751 498 248 758 Turn Type Prot NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 42.0 42.0 30.0 42.0 42.0 32.0 56.0 56.0 32.0 56.0 Total Split (%)18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 18.8% 26.3% 26.3% 20.0% 35.0% 35.0% 20.0% 35.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 425 175 70 375 323 325 70 751 498 248 758 503 Future Volume (veh/h) 425 175 70 375 323 325 70 751 498 248 758 503 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1781 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1841 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 447 184 74 395 340 342 74 791 524 261 798 529 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 8 3 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 Cap, veh/h 490 397 337 435 408 349 137 1296 578 314 881 576 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.21 0.21 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.49 0.49 0.11 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 1781 3554 1585 1753 2027 1324 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 447 184 74 395 340 342 74 791 524 261 687 640 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1870 1585 1697 1856 1585 1781 1777 1585 1753 1749 1602 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.4 13.7 6.2 24.0 28.5 34.4 4.1 26.0 48.6 14.5 58.5 60.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.4 13.7 6.2 24.0 28.5 34.4 4.1 26.0 48.6 14.5 58.5 60.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 490 397 337 435 408 349 137 1296 578 314 760 697 V/C Ratio(X)0.91 0.46 0.22 0.91 0.83 0.98 0.54 0.61 0.91 0.83 0.90 0.92 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 516 411 349 435 408 349 351 1296 578 402 760 697 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 67.7 55.0 52.1 48.9 65.3 67.9 38.4 32.9 38.7 31.3 42.1 42.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 20.0 0.8 0.3 17.8 10.3 35.8 3.3 2.1 20.3 11.1 16.1 19.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 15.6 10.8 4.5 9.5 20.3 23.6 3.4 15.9 27.9 11.3 36.7 35.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 87.7 55.9 52.4 66.7 75.6 103.7 41.7 35.0 59.0 42.5 58.2 61.8 LnGrp LOS F E D E E F D D E D E E Approach Vol, veh/h 705 1077 1389 1588 Approach Delay, s/veh 75.7 81.2 44.4 57.1 Approach LOS E F D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.8 42.0 23.9 65.3 30.0 40.8 12.7 76.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 35.2 25.0 49.1 24.0 35.2 25.3 * 49 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.4 36.4 16.5 50.6 26.0 15.7 6.1 62.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 61.6 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th AWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 7: N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh37.5 Intersection LOS E Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 10 2 211 15 74 15 192 396 135 183 9 Future Vol, veh/h 4 10 2 211 15 74 15 192 396 135 183 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 11 2 229 16 80 16 209 430 147 199 10 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay, s/veh11.3 19.7 56.8 19.4 HCM LOS B C F C Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %2% 25% 70% 41% Vol Thru, %32% 63% 5% 56% Vol Right, %66% 13% 25% 3% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 603 16 300 327 LT Vol 15 4 211 135 Through Vol 192 10 15 183 RT Vol 396 2 74 9 Lane Flow Rate 655 17 326 355 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.994 0.038 0.608 0.625 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.459 7.864 6.707 6.334 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 662 453 538 569 Service Time 3.499 5.951 4.753 4.383 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.989 0.038 0.606 0.624 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 56.8 11.3 19.7 19.4 HCM Lane LOS F B C C HCM 95th-tile Q 15.4 0.1 4 4.3 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)16 242 207 204 21 703 220 247 558 Future Volume (vph)16 242 207 204 21 703 220 247 558 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 22.0 88.0 Total Split (%)32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 32.3% 50.8% 50.8% 50.8% 16.9% 67.7% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 20 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 16 242 23 207 204 228 21 703 220 247 558 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 16 242 23 207 204 228 21 703 220 247 558 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1737 1856 1870 1870 1707 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 247 23 211 208 233 21 717 224 252 569 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 11 3 2 2 13 2 2 2 5 2 Cap, veh/h 77 470 44 226 221 248 388 935 792 300 1078 63 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 948 1684 157 1100 793 888 746 1870 1583 1781 1709 99 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 0 270 211 0 441 21 717 224 252 0 602 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 948 0 1841 1100 0 1680 746 1870 1583 1781 0 1808 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 0.0 16.1 20.2 0.0 33.3 2.6 44.6 13.5 8.6 0.0 24.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 35.5 0.0 16.1 36.3 0.0 33.3 9.6 44.6 13.5 8.6 0.0 24.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 77 0 514 226 0 469 388 935 792 300 0 1140 V/C Ratio(X)0.21 0.00 0.53 0.93 0.00 0.94 0.05 0.77 0.28 0.84 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 77 0 514 226 0 469 388 935 792 368 0 1140 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 63.1 0.0 39.6 56.8 0.0 45.8 27.3 36.4 26.1 25.6 0.0 13.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 1.0 41.4 0.0 27.1 0.1 3.1 0.4 14.2 0.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 11.9 14.7 0.0 24.2 0.9 27.4 8.3 8.8 0.0 14.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 64.5 0.0 40.6 98.2 0.0 72.9 27.4 39.5 26.6 39.8 0.0 15.0 LnGrp LOS E D F E C D C D B Approach Vol, veh/h 286 652 962 854 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.9 81.1 36.2 22.3 Approach LOS D F D C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.0 42.0 17.0 71.0 42.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 82.0 36.3 16.0 60.0 36.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 26.0 38.3 10.6 46.6 37.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.6 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 43.1 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)368 192 12 186 159 450 35 496 245 Future Volume (vph) 368 192 12 186 159 450 35 496 245 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 12.1 35.1 35.1 Total Split (s)22.0 62.0 40.0 40.0 23.0 47.0 21.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%)16.9% 47.7% 30.8% 30.8% 17.7% 36.2% 16.2% 34.6% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 368 192 240 12 186 88 159 450 26 35 496 245 Future Volume (veh/h) 368 192 240 12 186 88 159 450 26 35 496 245 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1470 1752 1856 1796 1870 1870 1870 1781 1811 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 383 200 250 12 194 92 166 469 27 36 517 255 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 29 10 3 7 2 2 2 8 6 4 Cap, veh/h 461 356 445 260 372 177 208 602 35 202 541 465 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.16 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 738 922 881 1190 564 1781 1749 101 1697 1811 1557 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 383 0 450 12 0 286 166 0 496 36 517 255 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1660 881 0 1754 1781 0 1850 1697 1811 1557 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.0 0.0 32.5 1.4 0.0 17.4 8.1 0.0 31.2 1.9 36.7 19.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 32.5 11.9 0.0 17.4 8.1 0.0 31.2 1.9 36.7 19.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.05 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 461 0 800 260 0 549 208 0 637 202 541 465 V/C Ratio(X)0.83 0.00 0.56 0.05 0.00 0.52 0.80 0.00 0.78 0.18 0.96 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 461 0 800 260 0 549 298 0 637 339 542 466 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 Upstream Filter(I)0.59 0.00 0.59 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.71 0.71 0.71 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.3 0.0 42.0 38.9 0.0 36.7 32.8 0.0 38.2 32.6 51.2 44.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 1.7 0.3 0.0 3.5 9.5 0.0 6.1 0.3 22.4 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 7.1 0.0 19.7 0.6 0.0 12.6 7.2 0.0 21.4 1.4 26.8 11.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 43.7 39.2 0.0 40.2 42.2 0.0 44.3 32.9 73.6 45.1 LnGrp LOS D D D D D D C E D Approach Vol, veh/h 833 298 662 808 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 40.1 43.8 62.8 Approach LOS D D D E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 46.7 10.5 50.9 68.7 16.4 44.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 34.0 14.9 40.9 56.0 16.9 38.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.0 19.4 3.9 33.2 34.5 10.1 38.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.8 2.9 0.2 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 48.7 HCM 6th LOS D Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)293 558 653 197 480 326 Future Volume (vph) 293 558 653 197 480 326 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s)25.0 84.0 59.0 59.0 46.0 46.0 Total Split (%)19.2% 64.6% 45.4% 45.4% 35.4% 35.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 23 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 293 558 653 197 480 326 Future Volume (veh/h) 293 558 653 197 480 326 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1737 1870 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 302 575 673 181 495 299 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 11 2 4 2 2 Cap, veh/h 426 1043 808 674 520 463 Arrive On Green 0.23 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1737 1870 1560 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 302 575 673 181 495 299 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1737 1870 1560 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.7 0.0 22.7 2.7 35.4 21.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.7 0.0 22.7 2.7 35.4 21.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 426 1043 808 674 520 463 V/C Ratio(X)0.71 0.55 0.83 0.27 0.95 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 468 1043 808 674 534 476 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.81 0.81 0.79 0.79 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.7 0.0 6.6 5.2 45.1 40.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 1.7 7.9 0.8 27.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 7.3 0.9 8.1 1.7 26.1 13.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 19.6 1.7 14.5 6.0 72.1 43.1 LnGrp LOS B A B A E D Approach Vol, veh/h 877 854 794 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.9 12.7 61.2 Approach LOS A B E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.9 63.2 85.0 45.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 52.0 77.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.7 24.7 2.0 37.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.6 4.3 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 26.3 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)319 728 704 280 109 157 Future Volume (vph) 319 728 704 280 109 157 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)13.0 25.0 51.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)27.0 104.0 77.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%)20.8% 80.0% 59.2% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 319 728 704 280 109 157 Future Volume (veh/h) 319 728 704 280 109 157 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1826 1352 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 336 766 741 264 115 147 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 5 37 4 Cap, veh/h 559 1451 1200 1174 144 175 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.78 1.00 1.00 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1856 1856 1547 1287 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 336 766 741 264 115 147 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1856 1856 1547 1287 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 19.9 0.0 0.0 11.3 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 19.9 0.0 0.0 11.3 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 559 1451 1200 1174 144 175 V/C Ratio(X)0.60 0.53 0.62 0.22 0.80 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 687 1451 1200 1174 190 230 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 0.57 0.57 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.3 5.3 0.0 0.0 56.3 56.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 1.4 1.4 0.3 18.4 21.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.9 11.0 0.8 0.1 7.9 16.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.4 6.7 1.4 0.3 74.7 77.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A E E Approach Vol, veh/h 1102 1005 262 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.6 1.1 76.3 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.6 91.0 21.4 108.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 70.0 19.2 97.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 2.0 14.0 21.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 7.4 0.6 6.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.9 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)291 1337 781 304 1704 864 383 313 300 84 Future Volume (vph) 291 1337 781 304 1704 864 383 313 300 84 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 7 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 25.2 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)22.0 68.0 56.0 30.0 76.0 56.0 53.0 29.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%)12.2% 37.8% 31.1% 16.7% 42.2% 31.1% 29.4% 16.1% 14.4% 14.4% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 3.2 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 23 (13%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 291 1337 781 304 1704 136 864 383 268 313 300 84 Future Volume (veh/h) 291 1337 781 304 1704 136 864 383 268 313 300 84 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1767 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1870 1841 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 303 1393 716 317 1775 142 900 399 279 326 312 79 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 9 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 3 Cap, veh/h 252 1838 998 359 1861 148 932 535 370 367 379 170 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.39 0.39 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 3264 5106 1585 3456 4821 385 3456 1992 1378 3456 3497 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 303 1393 716 317 1252 665 900 353 325 326 312 79 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1632 1702 1585 1728 1702 1801 1728 1763 1608 1728 1749 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.9 43.2 22.0 16.3 64.3 64.7 46.3 32.9 33.4 16.8 15.7 7.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.9 43.2 22.0 16.3 64.3 64.7 46.3 32.9 33.4 16.8 15.7 7.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 252 1838 998 359 1314 695 932 473 431 367 379 170 V/C Ratio(X)1.20 0.76 0.72 0.88 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.75 0.75 0.89 0.82 0.46 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 1838 998 422 1314 695 937 473 431 420 379 170 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 83.1 50.7 7.0 79.6 53.7 53.8 64.9 60.2 60.4 79.4 78.6 51.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 122.5 2.2 3.1 17.4 15.9 25.0 21.5 6.3 7.4 18.5 18.1 8.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 16.3 25.6 10.6 12.7 38.7 42.9 31.0 22.1 20.8 13.2 12.7 5.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 205.5 52.9 10.1 97.0 69.6 78.8 86.4 66.5 67.8 97.8 96.6 59.8 LnGrp LOS F D B F E E F E E F F E Approach Vol, veh/h 2412 2234 1578 717 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.4 76.2 78.1 93.1 Approach LOS E E E F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 76.3 26.2 55.5 26.7 71.6 55.7 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.9 69.2 21.9 * 46 22.0 61.2 48.8 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.9 66.7 18.8 35.4 18.3 45.2 48.3 17.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.4 0.4 3.2 0.4 14.3 0.2 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 72.5 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 13: Ocoee Apopka Rd & 17th Ave Extension Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 97 1114 52 62 1146 Future Vol, veh/h 97 97 1114 52 62 1146 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - 185 185 - Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 102 102 1173 55 65 1206 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1906 1173 0 0 1228 0 Stage 1 1173 - - - - - Stage 2 733 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.13 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.219 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *129 233 - - 565 - Stage 1 *293 - - - - - Stage 2 *582 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *114 233 - -565 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver *217 - - - - - Stage 1 *293 - - - - - Stage 2 *515 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 83.7 0 0.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -225 565 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.908 0.116 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -83.7 12.2 - HCM Lane LOS - - F B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -7.5 0.4 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 14: N Lakewood Ave & 17th Ave Extension/17th Ave Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 17.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 104 0 68 76 0 32 75 467 157 44 236 112 Future Vol, veh/h 104 0 68 76 0 32 75 467 157 44 236 112 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 170 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, %- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 113 0 74 83 0 35 82 508 171 48 257 122 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1189 1257 318 1209 1233 594 379 0 0 679 0 0 Stage 1 414 414 - 758 758 - - - - - - - Stage 2 775 843 - 451 475 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 165 171 723 160 177 505 1179 - - 913 - - Stage 1 616 593 - 399 415 - - - - - - - Stage 2 391 380 - 588 557 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 138 148 723 129 153 505 1179 - - 913 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 138 148 -129 153 - - - - - - - Stage 1 573 553 - 371 386 - - - - - - - Stage 2 339 353 - 492 519 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 92.5 66.8 0.9 1 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1179 - - 203 166 913 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 - - 0.921 0.707 0.052 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh)8.3 - -92.5 66.8 9.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - - F F A A - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.2 - - 7.4 4.3 0.2 - - Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 15: Driveway 1/FC Apartments & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)26 812 75 75 895 104 0 0 30 Future Volume (vph)26 812 75 75 895 104 0 0 30 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Split NA NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 Detector Phase 2 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Total Split (s)110.0 110.0 110.0 110.0 110.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)68.8% 68.8% 68.8% 68.8% 68.8% 15.6% 15.6% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 51 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 15: Driveway 1/FC Apartments & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 15: Driveway 1/FC Apartments & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 26 812 75 75 895 16 104 0 35 11 0 30 Future Volume (veh/h) 26 812 75 75 895 16 104 0 35 11 0 30 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 855 0 79 942 17 73 50 37 12 0 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 381 1487 558 1444 26 114 64 47 50 0 45 Arrive On Green 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.03 Sat Flow, veh/h 586 1870 1585 646 1817 33 1781 998 739 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 855 0 79 0 959 73 0 87 12 0 32 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 586 1870 1585 646 0 1850 1781 0 1737 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 35.3 6.4 0.0 7.9 1.1 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 37.5 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 35.3 6.4 0.0 7.9 1.1 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 381 1487 558 0 1470 114 0 112 50 0 45 V/C Ratio(X)0.07 0.58 0.14 0.00 0.65 0.64 0.00 0.78 0.24 0.00 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 381 1487 558 0 1470 212 0 206 212 0 188 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.76 0.76 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.2 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 7.0 73.1 0.0 73.8 76.0 0.0 77.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.3 5.8 0.0 11.1 2.4 0.0 18.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.5 0.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 17.7 5.6 0.0 7.0 0.9 0.0 2.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.5 1.2 0.0 4.4 0.0 9.2 78.8 0.0 84.9 78.4 0.0 95.9 LnGrp LOS A A A A E F E F Approach Vol, veh/h 882 1038 160 44 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.4 8.9 82.1 91.1 Approach LOS A A F F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 133.2 10.5 133.2 16.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 104.0 19.0 104.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 39.5 5.2 37.3 9.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.4 0.1 10.3 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 13.0 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 16: Driveway 2 & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 821 37 0 985 0 35 Future Vol, veh/h 821 37 0 985 0 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Free - None Storage Length - 185 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, %0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 Mvmt Flow 864 39 0 1037 0 37 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 864 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - -6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 *405 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - -*405 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 14.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h)405 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.091 - - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh)14.8 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.3 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 17: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 3 (Service Dwy)Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 7 1331 0 0 1385 Future Vol, veh/h 0 7 1331 0 0 1385 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 8 1447 0 0 1505 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 724 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 *556 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, %1 -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -*556 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 11.6 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h)-556 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.014 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) -11.6 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 18: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Woods/Driveway 4 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)11 0 104 0 20 1114 22 208 1161 Future Volume (vph)11 0 104 0 20 1114 22 208 1161 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 24.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 Total Split (s)40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 15.0 120.0 Total Split (%)25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 65.6% 65.6% 65.6% 9.4% 75.0% Yellow Time (s)3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.6 5.6 5.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max None C-Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 18: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Woods/Driveway 4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 18: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Woods/Driveway 4 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 0 9 104 0 187 20 1114 22 208 1161 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 0 9 104 0 187 20 1114 22 208 1161 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 0 9 109 0 179 21 1173 23 219 1222 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 51 9 18 192 0 207 359 2487 1109 391 2839 42 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.10 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 117 71 141 1406 0 1585 449 3554 1585 1781 3585 53 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 21 0 0 109 0 179 21 1173 23 219 606 634 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 330 0 0 1406 0 1585 449 1777 1585 1781 1777 1861 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.7 2.4 23.7 0.7 5.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.2 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 17.7 2.4 23.7 0.7 5.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.57 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 78 0 0 192 0 207 359 2487 1109 391 1407 1474 V/C Ratio(X)0.27 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.86 0.06 0.47 0.02 0.56 0.43 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 192 0 0 311 0 341 359 2487 1109 395 1407 1474 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 63.8 0.0 0.0 67.2 0.0 68.2 7.6 10.8 7.3 8.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 11.9 0.3 0.6 0.0 1.7 1.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.6 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 12.5 0.4 13.7 0.4 3.5 0.7 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 65.6 0.0 0.0 69.9 0.0 80.0 7.9 11.4 7.3 10.2 1.0 0.9 LnGrp LOS E E F A B A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 21 288 1217 1459 Approach Delay, s/veh 65.6 76.2 11.3 2.3 Approach LOS E E B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.7 118.8 26.5 133.5 26.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 5.6 6.8 5.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.2 98.2 34.4 113.2 34.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.9 25.7 20.2 2.0 19.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.2 0.0 11.4 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 13.5 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 19: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 5 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 35 1121 88 0 1275 Future Vol, veh/h 0 35 1121 88 0 1275 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - Free - None Storage Length - 0 - 185 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 37 1180 93 0 1342 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 590 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 451 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, %-- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -451 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 13.7 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h)-451 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.082 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) -13.7 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) -0.3 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 20: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 6 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 21 1181 22 67 1208 Future Vol, veh/h 0 21 1181 22 67 1208 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - 180 185 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 22 1243 23 71 1272 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 622 0 0 1266 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 430 - - 545 - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -430 - - 545 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 13.8 0 0.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -430 545 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.051 0.129 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -13.8 12.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - B B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -0.2 0.4 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 21: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 7 (Service Dwy)Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 7 1204 7 0 1208 Future Vol, veh/h 0 7 1204 7 0 1208 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 8 1309 8 0 1313 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 659 0 0 - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 406 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -406 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 14 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -406 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.019 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -14 - HCM Lane LOS - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 22: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 8 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 21 909 52 22 950 Future Vol, veh/h 0 21 909 52 22 950 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - 185 185 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 22 957 55 23 1000 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 957 0 0 1012 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 313 - - 685 - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -313 - - 685 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 17.4 0 0.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -313 685 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.071 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -17.4 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - - C B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -0.2 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 23: 17th Ave Extension & Driveway 9 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 99 180 37 62 14 Future Vol, veh/h 15 99 180 37 62 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 108 196 40 67 15 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 236 0 - 0 356 216 Stage 1 - - - -216 - Stage 2 - - - -140 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1331 - - - 642 824 Stage 1 - - - -820 - Stage 2 - - - -887 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1331 - - -634 824 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - -634 - Stage 1 - - - -809 - Stage 2 - - - -887 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 1 0 11.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1331 - - - 662 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.125 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 0 - -11.2 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - -0.4 HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 24: Driveway 10 & 17th Ave Extension Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 146 15 37 155 62 34 Future Vol, veh/h 146 15 37 155 62 34 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, %0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 159 16 40 168 67 37 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 175 0 415 167 Stage 1 - - - -167 - Stage 2 - - - -248 - Critical Hdwy - -4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1401 - 594 877 Stage 1 - - - -863 - Stage 2 - - - -793 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - -1401 - 576 877 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - -576 - Stage 1 - - - -863 - Stage 2 - - - -768 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 1.5 11.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)656 - - 1401 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 - - 0.029 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh)11.5 - -7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.6 - - 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 25: 17th Ave Extension & Driveway 11 Buildout (2027), Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 22 158 172 15 14 20 Future Vol, veh/h 22 158 172 15 14 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 24 172 187 16 15 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 203 0 - 0 415 195 Stage 1 - - - -195 - Stage 2 - - - -220 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1369 - - - 594 846 Stage 1 - - - -838 - Stage 2 - - - -817 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1369 - - -583 846 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - -583 - Stage 1 - - - -822 - Stage 2 - - - -817 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.9 0 10.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1369 - - - 713 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - - 0.052 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 0 - -10.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.1 - - - 0.2 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 Future Volume (vph)65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 39.0 39.0 31.0 55.0 55.0 20.0 70.0 70.0 20.0 70.0 Total Split (%)9.4% 24.4% 24.4% 19.4% 34.4% 34.4% 12.5% 43.8% 43.8% 12.5% 43.8% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 116 (73%), Referenced to phase 4:WBT and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 65 174 122 621 356 148 148 661 514 159 498 56 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 66 178 109 634 363 134 151 674 470 162 508 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 4 2 3 4 Cap, veh/h 472 294 130 994 465 202 255 721 592 184 637 72 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1575 3456 3554 1544 1781 1870 1536 1781 1638 184 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 66 178 109 634 363 134 151 674 470 162 0 565 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1575 1728 1777 1544 1781 1870 1536 1781 0 1822 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 7.7 9.0 28.3 16.2 11.2 8.2 55.4 20.5 8.8 0.0 43.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 7.7 9.0 28.3 16.2 11.2 8.2 55.4 20.5 8.8 0.0 43.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 472 294 130 994 465 202 255 721 592 184 0 709 V/C Ratio(X)0.14 0.61 0.84 0.64 0.78 0.66 0.59 0.94 0.79 0.88 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 472 691 306 994 1046 454 289 739 607 211 0 720 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 70.9 49.4 64.4 74.3 49.3 33.7 47.2 9.7 37.9 0.0 43.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 9.0 44.3 1.0 11.3 14.6 1.2 19.5 8.2 27.0 0.0 7.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.7 7.1 9.0 19.0 13.1 9.2 6.4 37.8 13.0 8.8 0.0 28.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 46.3 79.8 93.6 65.3 85.6 63.9 34.9 66.8 17.9 64.8 0.0 50.4 LnGrp LOS D E F E F E C E B E D Approach Vol, veh/h 353 1131 1295 727 Approach Delay, s/veh 77.8 71.7 45.3 53.6 Approach LOS E E D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.6 68.5 45.1 28.8 17.0 69.1 52.8 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 * 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.2 63.2 8.5 * 47 13.2 63.2 24.2 31.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.8 57.4 2.5 18.2 10.2 45.9 30.3 11.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.6 0.1 5.8 0.0 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 58.8 HCM 6th LOS E Notes * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout w/ Improvements, Weekday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 18.9 Intersection LOS C Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2 1 2 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 872 22 679 1366 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 902 28 731 1466 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 582 1399 733 216 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 1101 65 751 1210 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.7 15.3 19.1 13.9 Approach LOS D C C B Lane Left Right Left Left Right Left Right Designated Moves LT R LTR L TR LT R Assumed Moves LT R LTR L TR LT R RT Channelized Lane Util 0.813 0.187 1.000 0.259 0.741 0.389 0.611 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.535 2.535 2.609 2.535 2.535 2.535 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.544 4.544 4.976 4.544 4.544 4.544 4.544 Entry Flow, veh/h 733 169 28 189 542 571 895 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 836 836 331 729 729 1167 1167 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.964 0.982 0.798 0.979 0.912 0.980 0.901 Flow Entry, veh/h 706 166 22 185 494 560 806 Cap Entry, veh/h 806 821 264 713 664 1144 1051 V/C Ratio 0.877 0.202 0.085 0.259 0.744 0.489 0.767 Control Delay, s/veh 31.4 6.5 15.3 8.1 23.2 8.6 17.5 LOS D A C A C A C 95th %tile Queue, veh 11 1 0 1 7 3 8 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 Future Volume (vph)48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 33.0 33.0 32.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 45.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 25.4% 25.4% 24.6% 38.5% 38.5% 15.4% 34.6% 34.6% 15.4% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 51 (39%), Referenced to phase 4:WBTL and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 164 84 647 163 128 110 495 431 135 396 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 Cap, veh/h 360 814 356 616 1397 621 252 545 455 198 528 31 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.32 0.66 0.66 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1555 1781 3554 1579 1781 1870 1559 1781 1749 102 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 164 84 647 163 128 110 495 431 135 0 419 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1555 1781 1777 1579 1781 1870 1559 1781 0 1850 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 4.8 5.7 25.2 2.2 4.2 5.6 33.1 35.2 6.8 0.0 26.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 4.8 5.7 25.2 2.2 4.2 5.6 33.1 35.2 6.8 0.0 26.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 360 814 356 616 1397 621 252 545 455 198 0 559 V/C Ratio(X)0.14 0.20 0.24 1.05 0.12 0.21 0.44 0.91 0.95 0.68 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 420 814 356 616 1397 621 331 550 458 258 0 559 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.5 40.5 40.8 32.5 13.9 14.3 32.1 44.4 45.1 34.0 0.0 40.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.6 1.6 49.2 0.2 0.7 0.4 19.6 29.8 2.3 0.0 6.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.2 4.0 4.3 23.5 1.6 2.8 4.3 24.7 24.2 5.4 0.0 18.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 36.6 41.1 42.4 81.7 14.1 15.0 32.6 64.0 74.9 36.3 0.0 47.6 LnGrp LOS D D D F B B C E E D D Approach Vol, veh/h 297 938 1036 554 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 60.9 65.2 44.9 Approach LOS D E E D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.6 44.7 10.6 59.0 14.3 46.1 32.0 37.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.2 38.2 8.5 42.1 13.2 38.2 25.2 25.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 37.2 4.7 6.2 7.6 28.6 27.2 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.7 0.0 1.4 0.1 2.8 0.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 57.2 HCM 6th LOS E Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)620 459 744 167 2 185 Future Volume (vph) 620 459 744 167 2 185 Turn Type NA pm+pt NA Split NA Prot Protected Phases 6 5 2 8 8 8 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 6 5 2 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.8 11.8 29.8 10.7 10.7 10.7 Total Split (s)75.0 30.0 105.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)57.7% 23.1% 80.8% 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 2: SR 429 SB Ramps & West Rd/Clarona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 620 273 459 744 0 0 0 0 167 2 185 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 620 273 459 744 0 0 0 0 167 2 185 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1159 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 633 279 468 759 0 170 2 172 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 50 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1406 619 665 2768 0 222 0 198 Arrive On Green 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 2493 1057 1781 3647 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 469 443 468 759 0 170 0 172 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1680 1781 1777 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 13.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 13.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.63 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1041 984 665 2768 0 222 0 198 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.45 0.45 0.70 0.27 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1041 984 732 2768 0 264 0 235 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.83 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 55.0 0.0 55.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.2 1.2 2.1 0.2 0.0 10.5 0.0 24.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.6 0.6 5.8 0.1 0.0 10.1 0.0 11.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 1.2 1.2 7.4 0.2 0.0 65.5 0.0 80.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A E F Approach Vol, veh/h 912 1227 342 Approach Delay, s/veh 1.2 3.0 73.0 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 108.1 25.1 83.0 21.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 98.2 23.2 68.2 19.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.0 17.5 2.0 15.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.6 0.8 6.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)155 684 2 890 149 313 1 504 Future Volume (vph) 155 684 2 890 149 313 1 504 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 38.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 36.7 36.7 36.7 Total Split (s)20.0 95.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%)15.4% 73.1% 57.7% 57.7% 57.7% 26.9% 26.9% 26.9% Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 45 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 3: SR 429 NB Ramps & Clarona Ocoee Rd/Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 155 684 0 2 890 149 313 1 504 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 155 684 0 2 890 149 313 1 504 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 167 735 0 2 957 0 337 1 485 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 401 2456 0 28 2032 376 0 590 Arrive On Green 0.11 1.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1 3484 1585 1781 0 2790 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 167 735 0 514 445 0 337 0 485 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1869 1617 1585 1781 0 1395 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 0.0 23.9 0.0 21.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 0.0 0.0 20.5 20.6 0.0 23.9 0.0 21.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 401 2456 0 1118 943 376 0 590 V/C Ratio(X)0.42 0.30 0.00 0.46 0.47 0.90 0.00 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 483 2456 0 1118 943 401 0 629 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.85 0.85 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.7 0.0 0.0 15.6 15.6 0.0 49.9 0.0 48.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.1 1.3 0.0 21.8 0.0 8.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.8 0.2 0.0 12.7 11.3 0.0 18.8 0.0 12.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.9 0.3 0.0 16.6 16.9 0.0 71.6 0.0 57.7 LnGrp LOS B A B B E E Approach Vol, veh/h 902 959 822 Approach Delay, s/veh 2.2 16.8 63.4 Approach LOS A B E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 82.8 33.2 96.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 5.7 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 68.0 29.3 88.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.9 22.6 25.9 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 6.5 1.5 5.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 26.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)83 854 357 522 754 357 52 303 29 34 14 Future Volume (vph)83 854 357 522 754 357 52 303 29 34 14 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 5 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 11.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)15.0 50.0 50.0 35.0 70.0 25.0 25.0 35.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 38.5% 38.5% 26.9% 53.8% 19.2% 19.2% 26.9% 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max None Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 4: N Lakewood Ave & Clarcona Ocoee Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 83 854 357 522 754 29 357 52 303 29 34 14 Future Volume (veh/h) 83 854 357 522 754 29 357 52 303 29 34 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 90 928 351 567 820 32 388 57 294 32 37 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 363 1299 579 635 1758 69 484 262 513 181 190 161 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.50 0.50 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3487 136 3456 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 928 351 567 418 434 388 57 294 32 37 14 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1846 1728 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 32.7 27.3 20.8 19.8 19.8 14.1 3.5 18.2 2.1 2.4 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 32.7 27.3 20.8 19.8 19.8 14.1 3.5 18.2 2.1 2.4 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 363 1299 579 635 896 931 484 262 513 181 190 161 V/C Ratio(X)0.25 0.71 0.61 0.89 0.47 0.47 0.80 0.22 0.57 0.18 0.19 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 395 1299 579 750 896 931 484 262 513 181 190 161 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.5 50.6 48.3 51.8 20.9 20.9 54.2 49.6 36.5 53.4 53.5 52.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 3.1 4.3 11.7 1.7 1.7 13.1 1.9 4.6 2.1 2.3 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.2 22.4 17.8 15.0 13.0 13.4 11.3 3.2 13.2 1.9 2.2 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 24.9 53.7 52.6 63.6 22.6 22.6 67.3 51.5 41.1 55.6 55.8 54.0 LnGrp LOS C D D E C C E D D E E D Approach Vol, veh/h 1369 1419 739 83 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.5 39.0 55.6 55.4 Approach LOS D D E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 72.3 25.0 30.7 54.3 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.2 63.2 18.2 28.2 43.2 13.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 21.8 20.2 22.8 34.7 4.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.1 4.5 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 47.5 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh26.4 Intersection LOS D Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 637 20 495 1018 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 726 20 533 1233 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 619 1112 613 151 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 765 34 732 981 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.1 8.8 21.3 9.5 Approach LOS F A C A Lane Left Left Left Left Right Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LT R RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.494 0.506 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.535 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.544 4.544 Entry Flow, veh/h 726 20 533 609 624 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 734 444 738 1238 1238 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.877 0.990 0.929 0.667 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 637 20 495 406 612 Cap Entry, veh/h 644 440 686 825 1214 V/C Ratio 0.989 0.045 0.722 0.492 0.504 Control Delay, s/veh 58.1 8.8 21.3 11.0 8.5 LOS F A C B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 15 0 6 3 3 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)297 122 67 278 205 246 55 495 318 227 597 Future Volume (vph) 297 122 67 278 205 246 55 495 318 227 597 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4 4 8 Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)11.1 22.5 22.5 11.0 22.5 22.5 11.7 22.5 22.5 12.0 33.8 Total Split (s)30.0 60.0 60.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (%)23.1% 46.2% 46.2% 15.4% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 15.4% 15.4% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 All-Red Time (s)2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.1 6.8 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:NBTL and 8:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 6: Ocoee Apopka Rd & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 297 122 67 278 205 246 55 495 318 227 597 347 Future Volume (veh/h) 297 122 67 278 205 246 55 495 318 227 597 347 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 309 127 64 290 214 230 57 516 296 236 622 320 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 551 287 255 362 324 274 296 1562 697 488 1123 578 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.88 0.09 0.49 0.49 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 2270 1168 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 309 127 64 290 214 230 57 516 296 236 487 455 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1781 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1660 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 8.4 4.6 14.0 14.6 18.7 2.3 3.2 4.7 9.1 24.8 24.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 8.4 4.6 14.0 14.6 18.7 2.3 3.2 4.7 9.1 24.8 24.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 551 287 255 362 324 274 296 1562 697 488 879 821 V/C Ratio(X)0.56 0.44 0.25 0.80 0.66 0.84 0.19 0.33 0.42 0.48 0.55 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 858 729 649 362 622 527 555 1562 697 512 879 821 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 49.3 47.7 47.1 57.6 59.5 19.3 4.6 4.7 15.9 22.9 22.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 1.1 0.5 10.2 1.9 5.7 0.3 0.6 1.9 0.7 2.5 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 7.4 6.8 3.3 5.1 11.6 12.7 1.6 1.9 2.7 6.6 16.0 15.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 41.2 50.3 48.2 57.3 59.5 65.2 19.6 5.2 6.6 16.7 25.4 25.6 LnGrp LOS D D D E E E B A A B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 500 734 869 1178 Approach Delay, s/veh 44.4 60.4 6.6 23.7 Approach LOS D E A C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.4 29.3 18.2 64.0 20.0 27.7 11.1 71.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.1 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.0 6.8 6.7 * 6.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.9 43.2 13.0 23.1 14.0 53.2 23.3 * 13 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 20.7 11.1 6.7 16.0 10.4 4.3 26.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 1.8 0.1 3.8 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 30.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th AWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 7: N Lakewood Ave & Wurst Rd/Clinger Cove Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.2 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 6 6 205 6 44 8 134 230 38 132 4 Future Vol, veh/h 4 6 6 205 6 44 8 134 230 38 132 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 Mvmt Flow 4 7 7 223 7 48 9 146 250 41 143 4 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9 12.5 13 10.5 HCM LOS A B B B Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1 Vol Left, %2% 25% 80% 22% Vol Thru, %36% 38% 2% 76% Vol Right, %62% 38% 17% 2% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 372 16 255 174 LT Vol 8 4 205 38 Through Vol 134 6 6 132 RT Vol 230 6 44 4 Lane Flow Rate 404 17 277 189 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.531 0.028 0.422 0.282 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.731 5.76 5.487 5.374 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 768 620 657 668 Service Time 2.731 3.808 3.52 3.408 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.526 0.027 0.422 0.283 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13 9 12.5 10.5 HCM Lane LOS B A B B HCM 95th-tile Q 3.2 0.1 2.1 1.2 Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)13 160 204 195 14 474 244 142 398 Future Volume (vph)13 160 204 195 14 474 244 142 398 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)23.7 23.7 27.7 27.7 30.0 30.0 30.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (s)40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 70.0 Total Split (%)36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4% 45.5% 45.5% 45.5% 18.2% 63.6% Yellow Time (s)3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 40 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 8: Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Silver Star Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 160 12 204 195 127 14 474 244 142 398 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 160 12 204 195 127 14 474 244 142 398 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1856 1752 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1841 1856 1752 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 168 13 215 205 134 15 499 257 149 419 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 3 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 10 Cap, veh/h 179 479 37 310 298 195 537 931 789 515 1095 34 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 1041 1700 132 1203 1056 690 956 1870 1585 1753 1790 56 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 0 181 215 0 339 15 499 257 149 0 432 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1041 0 1832 1203 0 1746 956 1870 1585 1753 0 1846 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 8.7 19.1 0.0 19.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 4.3 0.0 13.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.4 0.0 8.7 27.7 0.0 19.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 4.3 0.0 13.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 179 0 516 310 0 492 537 931 789 515 0 1129 V/C Ratio(X)0.08 0.00 0.35 0.69 0.00 0.69 0.03 0.54 0.33 0.29 0.00 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 210 0 571 346 0 544 537 931 789 634 0 1129 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.3 0.0 31.5 42.5 0.0 35.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 10.9 0.0 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.4 5.2 0.0 3.2 0.1 1.7 0.9 0.4 0.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 7.0 10.1 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.9 0.4 3.0 0.0 9.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 44.5 0.0 31.9 47.7 0.0 38.4 0.2 1.8 1.0 11.2 0.0 11.8 LnGrp LOS D C D D A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 195 554 771 581 Approach Delay, s/veh 32.8 42.0 1.5 11.7 Approach LOS C D A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 73.3 36.7 12.5 60.8 36.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 5.7 6.0 6.0 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 64.0 34.3 14.0 44.0 34.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.0 29.7 6.3 2.5 22.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.9 1.3 0.3 4.5 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 17.9 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)297 122 10 68 106 409 13 370 244 Future Volume (vph) 297 122 10 68 106 409 13 370 244 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 31.0 32.0 32.0 12.1 31.1 11.1 35.1 35.1 Total Split (s)17.0 51.0 34.0 34.0 17.0 42.0 17.0 42.0 42.0 Total Split (%)15.5% 46.4% 30.9% 30.9% 15.5% 38.2% 15.5% 38.2% 38.2% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 5.1 6.1 6.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 9: Maguire Rd/Ocoee Apopka Rd & W Franklin St Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 297 122 156 10 68 26 106 409 13 13 370 244 Future Volume (veh/h) 297 122 156 10 68 26 106 409 13 13 370 244 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1870 1722 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 313 128 164 11 72 27 112 431 14 14 389 230 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 2 12 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 Cap, veh/h 690 401 514 483 498 187 211 515 17 157 434 365 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 745 954 1087 1297 486 1767 1801 59 1781 1870 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 313 0 292 11 0 99 112 0 445 14 389 230 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 0 1699 1087 0 1783 1767 0 1860 1781 1870 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 16.5 0.7 0.0 4.0 5.1 0.0 24.7 0.6 21.0 12.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 16.5 0.7 0.0 4.0 5.1 0.0 24.7 0.6 21.0 12.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 690 0 915 483 0 685 211 0 531 157 434 365 V/C Ratio(X)0.45 0.00 0.32 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.53 0.00 0.84 0.09 0.90 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 690 0 915 483 0 685 274 0 607 316 610 513 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.82 0.00 0.82 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.8 0.0 27.6 21.1 0.0 22.1 30.6 0.0 36.9 32.1 28.2 25.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.4 2.1 0.0 9.0 0.2 10.5 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 8.4 0.0 11.8 0.3 0.0 3.1 4.1 0.0 18.0 0.5 12.3 6.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.2 0.0 28.4 21.1 0.0 22.5 32.6 0.0 45.9 32.3 38.7 27.4 LnGrp LOS B C C C C D C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 605 110 557 633 Approach Delay, s/veh 23.1 22.4 43.2 34.5 Approach LOS C C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 48.3 7.2 37.5 65.3 13.1 31.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 5.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 28.0 11.9 35.9 45.0 10.9 35.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.0 6.0 2.6 26.7 18.5 7.1 23.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.8 1.8 0.1 2.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 32.7 HCM 6th LOS C Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)176 500 519 72 256 238 Future Volume (vph) 176 500 519 72 256 238 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 6 Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)12.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (s)24.0 77.0 53.0 53.0 33.0 77.0 Total Split (%)21.8% 70.0% 48.2% 48.2% 30.0% 70.0% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 10 (9%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 10: Plant St/W Franklin St & SR 429 NB Ramps Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 176 500 519 72 256 238 Future Volume (veh/h) 176 500 519 72 256 238 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1841 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 187 532 552 68 272 225 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 4 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 636 1283 1067 904 313 279 Arrive On Green 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1841 1870 1585 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 532 552 68 272 225 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1841 1870 1585 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 15.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 15.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 636 1283 1067 904 313 279 V/C Ratio(X)0.29 0.41 0.52 0.08 0.87 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 799 1283 1067 904 421 375 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.89 0.89 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.1 43.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.9 1.7 0.2 13.7 9.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.6 0.6 0.9 0.1 12.8 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 7.1 0.9 1.7 0.2 57.8 52.7 LnGrp LOS A A A A E D Approach Vol, veh/h 719 620 497 Approach Delay, s/veh 2.5 1.5 55.4 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.9 69.7 83.6 26.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 46.0 70.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 2.0 2.0 18.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.2 3.8 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 16.5 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)319 625 539 201 54 176 Future Volume (vph) 319 625 539 201 54 176 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Detector Phase 1 6 2 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)6.0 15.0 15.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s)13.0 25.0 51.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s)27.0 85.0 58.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%)24.5% 77.3% 52.7% 22.7% 22.7% 22.7% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 11: W Franklin St/Plant St & SR 429 SB Ramps Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 319 625 539 201 54 176 Future Volume (veh/h) 319 625 539 201 54 176 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1856 1841 1574 1841 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 339 665 573 214 57 167 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 4 22 4 Cap, veh/h 562 1399 1093 1117 190 198 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1856 1560 1499 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 339 665 573 214 57 167 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1856 1560 1499 1560 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.7 15.3 12.5 2.8 3.8 11.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.7 15.3 12.5 2.8 3.8 11.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 562 1399 1093 1117 190 198 V/C Ratio(X)0.60 0.48 0.52 0.19 0.30 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 717 1399 1093 1117 248 258 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.9 5.4 6.2 2.5 43.6 47.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 1.2 1.6 0.3 1.2 19.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 4.8 8.9 6.9 2.3 2.7 16.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.9 6.6 7.8 2.9 44.9 66.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A D E Approach Vol, veh/h 1004 787 224 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 6.5 61.2 Approach LOS A A E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.4 71.8 20.7 89.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 51.0 18.2 78.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 14.5 13.5 17.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 4.9 0.4 5.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 13.0 HCM 6th LOS B Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)172 1386 648 306 1174 659 236 300 229 90 Future Volume (vph) 172 1386 648 306 1174 659 236 300 229 90 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 7 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Detector Phase 1 6 7 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)13.1 41.8 25.2 26.0 38.8 25.2 47.6 12.1 49.5 49.5 Total Split (s)20.0 66.0 41.0 24.0 70.0 41.0 38.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 Total Split (%)13.3% 44.0% 27.3% 16.0% 46.7% 27.3% 25.3% 14.7% 12.7% 12.7% Yellow Time (s)4.8 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)3.3 2.0 3.2 3.2 2.0 3.2 2.6 3.1 2.5 2.5 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)8.1 6.8 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None C-Min None None None Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 17 (11%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 12: Maguire Rd & SR 50 (W Colonial Drive)/SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 172 1386 648 306 1174 157 659 236 208 300 229 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 172 1386 648 306 1174 157 659 236 208 300 229 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1870 1870 1870 1870 1796 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1796 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 177 1429 668 315 1210 162 679 243 214 309 236 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 2 2 2 2 7 2 3 2 2 2 7 Cap, veh/h 222 2100 988 358 2043 274 732 347 293 343 296 127 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 3374 5106 1585 3456 4555 610 3456 1812 1531 3456 3554 1522 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 177 1429 668 315 904 468 679 236 221 309 236 83 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1687 1702 1585 1728 1702 1761 1728 1763 1580 1728 1777 1522 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 34.3 17.2 13.5 29.9 29.9 28.9 18.8 19.7 13.3 9.8 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 34.3 17.2 13.5 29.9 29.9 28.9 18.8 19.7 13.3 9.8 6.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 2100 988 358 1527 790 732 338 303 343 296 127 V/C Ratio(X)0.80 0.68 0.68 0.88 0.59 0.59 0.93 0.70 0.73 0.90 0.80 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 268 2100 988 369 1527 790 779 369 331 343 296 127 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 69.1 36.1 5.3 66.3 31.1 31.1 58.0 56.6 57.0 66.8 67.5 45.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.2 1.2 2.4 20.5 1.7 3.3 16.7 5.2 7.2 25.5 19.6 23.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.7 20.3 8.1 11.2 18.1 19.0 20.5 13.7 13.2 11.4 9.0 5.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 82.2 37.3 7.7 86.8 32.7 34.3 74.7 61.8 64.2 92.3 87.1 68.4 LnGrp LOS F D A F C C E E E F F E Approach Vol, veh/h 2274 1687 1136 628 Approach Delay, s/veh 32.1 43.3 70.0 87.2 Approach LOS C D E F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.0 74.1 22.0 36.0 23.5 68.5 39.0 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 8.1 6.8 7.1 * 7.2 8.0 6.8 7.2 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.9 63.2 14.9 * 31 16.0 59.2 33.8 12.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.8 31.9 15.3 21.7 15.5 36.3 30.9 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 19.1 0.0 1.9 0.1 19.7 0.8 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 49.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 13: Ocoee Apopka Rd & 17th Ave Extension Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 106 115 712 62 63 718 Future Vol, veh/h 106 115 712 62 63 718 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - 185 185 - Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 110 120 742 65 66 748 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1248 742 0 0 807 0 Stage 1 742 - - - - - Stage 2 506 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.23 - - 4.13 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.83 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 - - 2.219 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *324 415 - - 816 - Stage 1 *470 - - - - - Stage 2 *748 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *298 415 - -816 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver *381 - - - - - Stage 1 *470 - - - - - Stage 2 *688 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 25.7 0 0.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -398 816 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.578 0.08 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -25.7 9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - D A - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -3.5 0.3 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 14: N Lakewood Ave & 17th Ave Extension/17th Ave Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 106 0 70 80 0 23 89 244 97 19 191 133 Future Vol, veh/h 106 0 70 80 0 23 89 244 97 19 191 133 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - 170 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, %- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 Mvmt Flow 115 0 76 87 0 25 97 265 105 21 208 145 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 847 887 281 873 907 318 353 0 0 370 0 0 Stage 1 323 323 - 512 512 - - - - - - - Stage 2 524 564 - 361 395 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 282 283 758 271 276 723 1206 - - 1189 - - Stage 1 689 650 - 545 536 - - - - - - - Stage 2 537 508 - 657 605 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 251 255 758 225 248 723 1206 - - 1189 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 251 255 -225 248 - - - - - - - Stage 1 634 636 - 501 493 - - - - - - - Stage 2 477 467 - 578 592 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 28.1 28 1.7 0.4 HCM LOS D D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1206 - - 342 266 1189 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.08 - - 0.559 0.421 0.017 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh)8.2 - -28.1 28 8.1 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - - D D A A - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.3 - - 3.2 2 0.1 - - Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 15: Driveway 1/FC Apartments & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)20 557 89 88 605 106 0 0 22 Future Volume (vph)20 557 89 88 605 106 0 0 22 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Split NA NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 4 Detector Phase 2 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s)82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 25.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%)63.1% 63.1% 63.1% 63.1% 63.1% 19.2% 19.2% 17.7% 17.7% Yellow Time (s)3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 15: Driveway 1/FC Apartments & E Fullers Cross Rd HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 15: Driveway 1/FC Apartments & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 557 89 88 605 12 106 0 36 9 0 22 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 557 89 88 605 12 106 0 36 9 0 22 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 580 0 92 630 12 74 50 38 9 0 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 358 1062 453 1091 21 281 155 118 253 0 226 Arrive On Green 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.00 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 787 1781 1585 834 1829 35 1781 986 749 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 21 580 0 92 0 642 74 0 88 9 0 23 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 787 1781 1585 834 0 1864 1781 0 1735 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 15.5 0.0 8.4 0.0 27.6 4.7 0.0 5.8 0.6 0.0 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 29.3 15.5 0.0 23.9 0.0 27.6 4.7 0.0 5.8 0.6 0.0 1.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 358 1062 453 0 1111 281 0 274 253 0 226 V/C Ratio(X)0.06 0.55 0.20 0.00 0.58 0.26 0.00 0.32 0.04 0.00 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 358 1062 453 0 1111 281 0 274 253 0 226 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.91 0.91 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.5 7.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 16.2 48.1 0.0 48.6 48.1 0.0 48.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.2 2.3 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.6 8.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 17.0 4.1 0.0 5.0 0.5 0.0 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.8 8.9 0.0 21.0 0.0 18.4 50.4 0.0 51.7 48.3 0.0 49.4 LnGrp LOS B A C B D D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 601 734 162 32 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.1 18.7 51.1 49.1 Approach LOS A B D D Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 82.0 23.0 82.0 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 77.5 18.5 77.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 31.3 3.6 29.6 7.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.5 0.0 5.2 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 19.0 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 16: Driveway 2 & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 558 44 0 705 0 35 Future Vol, veh/h 558 44 0 705 0 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Free - None Storage Length - 185 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, %0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 581 46 0 734 0 36 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 581 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - -6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 *628 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - -*628 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 11.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h)628 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh)11.1 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.2 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 17: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 3 (Service Dwy)Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 7 861 0 0 941 Future Vol, veh/h 0 7 861 0 0 941 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 8 936 0 0 1023 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 468 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 *750 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, %1 -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -*750 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.8 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h)-750 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) -9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 18: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Woods/Driveway 4 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)14 0 136 0 19 693 33 266 722 Future Volume (vph)14 0 136 0 19 693 33 266 722 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s)40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 28.0 90.0 Total Split (%)30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 47.7% 47.7% 47.7% 21.5% 69.2% Yellow Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max None C-Max Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 18: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Woods/Driveway 4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 18: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Woods/Driveway 4 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 0 11 136 0 213 19 693 33 266 722 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 0 11 136 0 213 19 693 33 266 722 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 0 10 142 0 203 20 722 32 277 752 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 65 11 21 233 0 240 498 2250 1003 587 2687 61 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.15 1.00 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 139 71 140 1405 0 1585 700 3554 1585 1781 3552 80 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 25 0 0 142 0 203 20 722 32 277 376 393 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 351 0 0 1405 0 1585 700 1777 1585 1781 1777 1856 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.2 1.4 12.2 1.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.9 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 16.2 1.4 12.2 1.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.60 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 0 0 233 0 240 498 2250 1003 587 1344 1404 V/C Ratio(X)0.26 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.85 0.04 0.32 0.03 0.47 0.28 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 242 0 0 388 0 415 498 2250 1003 751 1344 1404 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.5 0.0 0.0 53.5 0.0 53.7 9.0 11.0 8.9 6.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 8.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.3 0.4 8.0 0.6 3.8 0.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.9 0.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 61.7 9.2 11.4 9.0 7.1 0.5 0.5 LnGrp LOS D E E A B A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 25 345 774 1046 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.9 59.3 11.2 2.3 Approach LOS D E B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 88.3 25.7 104.3 25.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 56.0 34.0 84.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 14.2 18.9 2.0 18.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 5.4 0.1 5.4 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.0 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 19: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 5 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 43 696 124 0 867 Future Vol, veh/h 0 43 696 124 0 867 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Stop - Free - None Storage Length - 0 - 185 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 45 725 129 0 903 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 363 0 - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 634 - 0 0 - Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, %-- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -634 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 11.1 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h)-634 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.071 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) -11.1 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) -0.2 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 20: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 6 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 21 792 27 86 781 Future Vol, veh/h 0 21 792 27 86 781 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - 180 185 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 22 825 28 90 814 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 413 0 0 853 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - 4.14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - 2.22 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 588 - - 782 - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -588 - - 782 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 11.4 0 1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -588 782 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.037 0.115 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -11.4 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS - - B B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -0.1 0.4 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 21: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 7 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 7 819 9 0 781 Future Vol, veh/h 0 7 819 9 0 781 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 8 890 10 0 849 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 450 0 0 - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.94 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 556 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -556 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 11.6 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -556 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.014 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -11.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 22: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Driveway 8 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 28 746 67 33 792 Future Vol, veh/h 0 28 746 67 33 792 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - 185 185 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, %0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 29 777 70 34 825 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 777 0 0 847 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy -6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 397 - - 790 - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -397 - - 790 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 14.8 0 0.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)- -397 790 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.073 0.044 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - -14.8 9.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - -0.2 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 23: 17th Ave Extension & Driveway 9 Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 107 208 44 64 14 Future Vol, veh/h 18 107 208 44 64 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 20 116 226 48 70 15 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 274 0 - 0 406 250 Stage 1 - - - -250 - Stage 2 - - - -156 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1289 - - - 601 789 Stage 1 - - - -792 - Stage 2 - - - -872 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1289 - - -591 789 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - -591 - Stage 1 - - - -779 - Stage 2 - - - -872 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.1 0 11.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1289 - - - 619 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - - 0.137 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)7.8 0 - -11.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - -0.5 HCM 6th TWSC Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 24: Driveway 10 & 17th Ave Extension Buildout (2027), Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/28/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 154 17 44 181 71 35 Future Vol, veh/h 154 17 44 181 71 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, %0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 167 18 48 197 77 38 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 185 0 469 176 Stage 1 - - - -176 - Stage 2 - - - -293 - Critical Hdwy - -4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1390 - 553 867 Stage 1 - - - -855 - Stage 2 - - - -757 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - -1390 - 531 867 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - -531 - Stage 1 - - - -855 - Stage 2 - - - -727 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 1.5 12.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)609 - - 1390 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.189 - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s/veh)12.3 - -7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.7 - - 0.1 - Timings Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 Future Volume (vph)48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 2 2 6 Detector Phase 3 8 8 7 4 4 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s)11.5 37.9 37.9 11.8 30.9 30.9 11.8 44.8 44.8 11.8 41.8 Total Split (s)15.0 33.0 33.0 32.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 45.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 Total Split (%)11.5% 25.4% 25.4% 24.6% 38.5% 38.5% 15.4% 34.6% 34.6% 15.4% 34.6% Yellow Time (s)3.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s)3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)6.5 7.9 7.9 6.8 7.9 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min None Min Min None Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 130 Offset: 51 (39%), Referenced to phase 4:WBT and 8:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 1: Ocoee Apopka Rd & Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy/West Rd Buildout w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 09/16/2024 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 161 82 634 160 140 108 485 468 132 388 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width Adj.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 164 84 647 163 128 110 495 431 135 396 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 Cap, veh/h 360 814 356 670 1397 621 252 545 455 198 528 31 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.32 0.66 0.66 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1555 3456 3554 1579 1781 1870 1559 1781 1749 102 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 164 84 647 163 128 110 495 431 135 0 419 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1555 1728 1777 1579 1781 1870 1559 1781 0 1850 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 4.8 5.7 23.9 2.2 4.2 5.6 33.1 35.2 6.8 0.0 26.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 4.8 5.7 23.9 2.2 4.2 5.6 33.1 35.2 6.8 0.0 26.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 360 814 356 670 1397 621 252 545 455 198 0 559 V/C Ratio(X)0.14 0.20 0.24 0.97 0.12 0.21 0.44 0.91 0.95 0.68 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 420 814 356 670 1397 621 331 550 458 258 0 559 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.5 40.5 40.8 43.5 13.9 14.3 32.1 44.4 45.1 34.0 0.0 40.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.6 1.6 25.6 0.2 0.7 0.4 19.6 29.8 2.3 0.0 6.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.2 4.0 4.3 16.4 1.6 2.8 4.3 24.7 24.2 5.4 0.0 18.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 36.6 41.1 42.4 69.2 14.1 15.0 32.6 64.0 74.9 36.3 0.0 47.6 LnGrp LOS D D D E B B C E E D D Approach Vol, veh/h 297 938 1036 554 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 52.2 65.2 44.9 Approach LOS D D E D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.6 44.7 10.6 59.0 14.3 46.1 32.0 37.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.8 6.8 6.5 7.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.2 38.2 8.5 42.1 13.2 38.2 25.2 25.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 37.2 4.7 6.2 7.6 28.6 25.9 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.7 0.0 1.4 0.1 2.8 0.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 54.3 HCM 7th LOS D Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 6th Roundabout Ocoee Regional Sports Complex 5: N Lakewood Ave & E Fullers Cross Rd Buildout w/ Improvements, Saturday PM Peak Hour Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report 08/27/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.9 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2 1 2 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 637 20 495 1018 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 726 20 533 1233 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 619 1112 613 151 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 765 34 732 981 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.3 8.8 10.5 9.5 Approach LOS C A B A Lane Left Right Left Left Right Left Right Designated Moves LT R LTR L TR LT R Assumed Moves LT R LTR L TR LT R RT Channelized Lane Util 0.844 0.156 1.000 0.246 0.754 0.494 0.506 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.535 2.535 2.609 2.535 2.535 2.535 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.544 4.544 4.976 4.544 4.544 4.544 4.544 Entry Flow, veh/h 613 113 20 131 402 609 624 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 808 808 444 813 813 1238 1238 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.858 0.982 0.990 0.977 0.913 0.667 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 526 111 20 128 367 406 612 Cap Entry, veh/h 693 794 440 794 742 825 1214 V/C Ratio 0.758 0.140 0.045 0.161 0.495 0.492 0.504 Control Delay, s/veh 23.4 6.0 8.8 6.2 12.0 11.0 8.5 LOS C A A A B B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 7 0 0 1 3 3 3 APPENDIX H Funded Transportation Improvements 407-383-5817 Construction@CFXway.com www.CFXway.com @DriveEPASS For more information: Quick Facts Project Timeline: January 2022 - Late 2024 Estimated Project Cost: $178 Million For the safety of motorists and work crews, speed limits will be strictly enforced during construction. Speeding fines are doubled in work zones when workers are present. Motorists are reminded to change lanes for safety when they see Road Rangers assisting other motorists or flashing lights — it’s Florida law. Work Zone Safety During construction, temporary lane and ramp closures will be necessary to accommodate work. To minimize the impact of construction to motorists traveling on SR 429, lane and ramp closures will not be permitted during peak travel times. There will be night and weekend work on this project. What to Expect The Central Florida Expressway Authority is performing capacity improvements on State Road 429 (Daniel Webster Western Beltway) from south of Florida’s Turnpike to West Road to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow. This 6.1-mile project will add a lane in each direction, expanding the expressway from four to six travel lanes. Several noise walls are proposed in this segment. Please see the map for proposed wall locations. CFX is relocating the exit from northbound SR 429 to SR 438/Plant Street/Franklin Street and adding a new All-Electronic Tolling (AET) gantry. The project will also add travel and turn lanes at SR 438/Plant Street/Franklin Street and improve drainage throughout the project corridor. Wider median shoulders will be added that can temporarily accommodate additional traffic during emergency response events, such as traffic accidents or hurricane evacuations. This is one of three capacity improvements projects on SR 429 between Tilden Road and SR 414. Project Description Project Map (Larger map on back) SR 429 CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS: SEGMENT 2 SOUTH OF FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE TO WEST ROAD429 The Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) is an independent agency of the State of Florida that operates and maintains a regional network of expressways for 3.3 million residents of Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, and Seminole counties and more than 75 million annual visitors to Central Florida. CFX’s 125-centerline mile, user-funded system which includes 73 interchanges, 14 mainline toll plazas, 5 mainline gantries, 76 ramp toll plazas and 343 bridges. On average, more than 1.3 million toll transactions are recorded daily, over 95 percent of them electronically. CFX operates E-PASS, the first electronic toll collection system in Florida, with more than one million E-PASS accounts. For more information, visit CFXway.com. Central Florida Expressway Authority: 4974 ORL Tower Road, Orlando, FL 32807 Phone: 407.690.5000 | Fax: 407.690.5011 | Email: Info@CFXWay.com Project Map SR 429 CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS: SEGMENT 2 SOUTH OF FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE TO WEST ROAD429 Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. Para más información en español acerca del proyecto, por favor comuníquese con Kevin Camara al 786-859-1826 o por correo electrónico a Kevin.Camara@QCAusa.com. APPENDIX I NCHRP Report 457 NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Fullers Cross Road and Driveway 2 Eastbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 35 858 37 OUTPUT Value 29 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Fullers Cross Road and Driveway 2 Eastbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 35 602 44 OUTPUT Value 105 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 5 Northbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 1209 88 OUTPUT Value 22 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 5 Northbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 820 124 OUTPUT Value 42 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 6 Southbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour 4-lane roadway INPUT Value 67 1275 1203 OUTPUT Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.0 6.0 Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable Message Opposing volume (Vo) check:O.K. Combined volume (VA and VO) check:O.K. Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Variable Left-turning volume (VL), veh/h: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Note: When VO < 400 veh/h (dashed line), a left-turn lane is not normally warranted unless the advancing volume (VA) in the same direction as the left-turning traffic exceeds 400 veh/h (VA > 400 veh/h). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Left-Turning Volume (VL), veh/h Four-Lane Undivided Road Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left-turn treatment warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 6 Southbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour 4-lane roadway INPUT Value 86 867 819 OUTPUT Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.0 6.0 Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable Message Opposing volume (Vo) check:O.K. Combined volume (VA and VO) check:O.K. Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Variable Left-turning volume (VL), veh/h: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Note: When VO < 400 veh/h (dashed line), a left-turn lane is not normally warranted unless the advancing volume (VA) in the same direction as the left-turning traffic exceeds 400 veh/h (VA > 400 veh/h). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Left-Turning Volume (VL), veh/h Four-Lane Undivided Road Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left-turn treatment warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 6 Northbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 1203 22 OUTPUT Value 22 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 6 Northbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 819 27 OUTPUT Value 42 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 7 Northbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 1211 7 OUTPUT Value 21 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 7 Northbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 828 9 OUTPUT Value 42 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 8 Southbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour 4-lane roadway INPUT Value 22 972 961 OUTPUT Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.0 6.0 Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable Message Opposing volume (Vo) check:O.K. Combined volume (VA and VO) check:O.K. Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Variable Left-turning volume (VL), veh/h: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Note: When VO < 400 veh/h (dashed line), a left-turn lane is not normally warranted unless the advancing volume (VA) in the same direction as the left-turning traffic exceeds 400 veh/h (VA > 400 veh/h). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Left-Turning Volume (VL), veh/h Four-Lane Undivided Road Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left-turn treatment warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 8 Southbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour 4-lane roadway INPUT Value 33 825 813 OUTPUT Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.0 6.0 Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable Message Opposing volume (Vo) check:O.K. Combined volume (VA and VO) check:O.K. Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Variable Left-turning volume (VL), veh/h: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Note: When VO < 400 veh/h (dashed line), a left-turn lane is not normally warranted unless the advancing volume (VA) in the same direction as the left-turning traffic exceeds 400 veh/h (VA > 400 veh/h). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Left-Turning Volume (VL), veh/h Four-Lane Undivided Road Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left-turn treatment warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 8 Northbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 961 52 OUTPUT Value 32 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and Driveway 8 Northbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 813 67 OUTPUT Value 43 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 9 Eastbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 13% 114 217 OUTPUT Value 445 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 9 Eastbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 14% 125 252 OUTPUT Value 412 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 9 Westbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 217 37 OUTPUT Value 30797 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 9 Westbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 252 44 OUTPUT Value 14982 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 10 Westbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 19% 192 161 OUTPUT Value 407 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 10 Westbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 20% 225 171 OUTPUT Value 400 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 10 Eastbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 161 15 OUTPUT Value 129783 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 10 Eastbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 171 17 OUTPUT Value 97074 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 11 Eastbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 12% 180 187 OUTPUT Value 476 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 11 Eastbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 14% 189 222 OUTPUT Value 428 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 11 Westbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 187 15 OUTPUT Value 63082 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Driveway 11 Westbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 222 18 OUTPUT Value 27595 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Southbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour 4-lane roadway INPUT Value 62 1208 1166 OUTPUT Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.0 6.0 Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable Message Opposing volume (Vo) check:O.K. Combined volume (VA and VO) check:O.K. Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Variable Left-turning volume (VL), veh/h: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Note: When VO < 400 veh/h (dashed line), a left-turn lane is not normally warranted unless the advancing volume (VA) in the same direction as the left-turning traffic exceeds 400 veh/h (VA > 400 veh/h). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Left-Turning Volume (VL), veh/h Four-Lane Undivided Road Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left-turn treatment warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Southbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour 4-lane roadway INPUT Value 63 781 774 OUTPUT Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.0 6.0 Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable Message Opposing volume (Vo) check:O.K. Combined volume (VA and VO) check:O.K. Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Variable Left-turning volume (VL), veh/h: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Note: When VO < 400 veh/h (dashed line), a left-turn lane is not normally warranted unless the advancing volume (VA) in the same direction as the left-turning traffic exceeds 400 veh/h (VA > 400 veh/h). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Left-Turning Volume (VL), veh/h Four-Lane Undivided Road Left-turn treatment not warranted. Left-turn treatment warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 1166 52 OUTPUT Value 23 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant Ocoee-Apopka Road and 17th Avenue Extension Northbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 45 774 62 OUTPUT Value 47 right-turn bay for a 4-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 4-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Lakewood Avenue Northbound Left-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 11% 699 348 OUTPUT Value 421 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Left-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Lakewood Avenue Northbound Left-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 30 21% 430 324 OUTPUT Value 330 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 3.0 5.0 1.9Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment warranted. Variable Average time for making left-turn, s: Critical headway, s: Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Op p o s i n g V o l u m e ( V O), v e h / h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Lakewood Avenue Southbound Right-Turn - Weekday PM Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 392 112 OUTPUT Value 1782 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay NCHRP Report 457 - Right-Turn Warrant 17th Avenue Extension and Lakewood Avenue Southbound Right-Turn - Saturday Peak Hour Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 30 343 133 OUTPUT Value 3391 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Variable Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadw ay 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Ri g h t - T u r n V o l u m e , v e h / h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay APPENDIX J City of Ocoee’s CMS CITY OF OCOEE - CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SPREADSHEET (CMS) - UPDATED 10/18/2023 Sandy Cove & Wurst Rd Clarke Rd Ocoee E 2 25 C3R - 758166 20,160 5,712 1,259 6,971 C 0.35 999 0.09 0.535 275 61 336 C 0.34 Clarke Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Ocoee E 2 40 C3R 7107 - 20,160 6,338 1,192 7,530 C 0.37 999 0.09 0.535 305 57 362 C 0.36 Adair St Wurst Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R 8161 - 20,160 5,704 933 6,637 C 0.33 999 0.09 0.535 275 45 320 C 0.32 SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) AD Mims Rd Orange E 4 45 C3R 7101 - 33,570 15,764 886 16,650 C 0.50 1,665 0.09 0.535 759 43 802 C 0.48 AD Mims Rd Hackney-Prairie Rd Orange E 2 45 C3R 76 757038 20,160 15,968 942 16,910 C 0.84 999 0.09 0.535 769 45 814 C 0.81 Hackney-Prairie Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Orange E 2 30 C3R -- 20,160 10,833 811 11,644 C 0.58 999 0.09 0.535 522 39 561 C 0.56 Clarcona Ocoee Rd McCormick Rd Orange E 2 50 C3R -- 20,160 14,911 1,586 16,497 C 0.82 999 0.09 0.535 718 76 794 C 0.79 Old Winter Garden Rd SR 50 Ocoee D 4 30 C3C -- 32,940 12,867 392 13,259 C 0.40 1,629 0.09 0.535 620 19 639 C 0.39 SR 50 Maine St Ocoee D 4 30 C3C -- 32,940 7,033 0 7,033 C 0.21 1,629 0.09 0.535 339 0 339 C 0.21 Old Winter Garden Rd SR 50 Ocoee D 2 35 C3C 8080 - 19,530 7,282 405 7,687 C 0.39 963 0.09 0.535 351 20 371 C 0.39 SR 50 Geneva St Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 750261 19,530 11,016 1,018 12,034 C 0.62 963 0.09 0.535 530 49 579 C 0.60 Geneva St Orlando Ave Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 750261 19,530 11,016 325 11,341 C 0.58 963 0.09 0.535 530 16 546 C 0.57 Orlando Ave McKey St Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 755092 19,530 6,732 0 6,732 C 0.34 963 0.09 0.535 324 0 324 C 0.34 McKey St SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) Ocoee D 2 35 C4 109 - 15,840 8,580 36 8,616 D 0.54 783 0.09 0.535 413 2 415 D 0.53 SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) Lakewood Ave Ocoee D 2 25 C3R - 758056 20,160 8,568 108 8,676 C 0.43 999 0.09 0.535 413 5 418 C 0.42 SR 429 Lakewood Ave Orange E 4 35 C3R 454.9 - 33,570 27,363 2,672 30,035 C 0.89 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,318 129 1,447 C 0.87 Lakewood Ave Ingram Rd/Lake Meadow Rd Orange E 4 45 C3R 70 757002 33,570 21,829 3,417 25,246 C 0.75 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,051 165 1,216 C 0.73 Ingram Rd/Lake Meadow Rd Clarke Rd Orange E 4 45 C3R 70 757002 33,570 21,829 909 22,738 C 0.68 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,051 44 1,095 C 0.66 Clarke Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Orange E 4 45 C3R 69 - 33,570 22,075 480 22,555 C 0.67 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,063 23 1,086 C 0.65 SR 50 White Rd Ocoee D 4 45 C3C 7138 758170 32,940 23,780 584 24,364 C 0.74 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,145 28 1,173 C 0.72 White Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) Ocoee D 4 45 C3C 7139 - 32,940 30,816 160 30,976 D 0.94 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,484 8 1,492 D 0.92 SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) A.D. Mims Rd Ocoee D 4 45 C3R 7140 - 33,570 21,368 1,711 23,079 C 0.69 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,029 82 1,111 C 0.67 A.D. Mims Rd Hackney-Prairie Rd Ocoee D 2 45 C3R 7141 - 20,160 17,126 2,477 19,603 D 0.97 999 0.09 0.535 825 119 944 D 0.94 Hackney-Prairie Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Ocoee D 2 45 C3R -- 20,160 11,533 1,037 12,570 C 0.62 999 0.09 0.535 555 50 605 C 0.61 Clarcona Ocoee Rd McCormick Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3R -- 20,160 4,200 0 4,200 C 0.21 999 0.09 0.535 202 0 202 C 0.20 SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) Palm Dr Orange E 2 45 C3C 8184 - 19,530 8,532 538 9,070 C 0.46 963 0.09 0.535 411 26 437 C 0.45 Palm Dr Fullers Cross Rd Orange E 2 35 C3R - 758006 20,160 8,262 916 9,178 C 0.46 999 0.09 0.535 398 44 442 C 0.44 Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd Orange E 2 35 C3R -- 20,160 10,544 1,010 11,554 C 0.57 999 0.09 0.535 508 49 557 C 0.56 Flewelling Ave Rewis St Ocoee Hills Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R 8091 758054 20,160 1,881 359 2,240 C 0.11 999 0.09 0.535 91 17 108 C 0.11 Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd Lakewood Ave Orange E 2 35 C3R -- 20,160 3,867 2,548 6,415 C 0.32 999 0.09 0.535 186 123 309 C 0.31 Geneva St Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Ocoee D 2 25 C3C -- 19,530 7,522 0 7,522 C 0.39 963 0.09 0.535 362 0 362 C 0.38 Old Winter Garden Rd SR 408 (East-West Expy) Orange E 4 45 C3R 1066 - 33,570 30,411 142 30,553 C 0.91 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,464 7 1,471 C 0.88 SR 408 (East-West Expy) SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Orange E 4 45 C3C - 758109 32,940 25,500 310 25,810 C 0.78 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,228 15 1,243 C 0.76 SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) Balboa Dr Orange E 2 45 C3R 104 - 20,160 20,974 64 21,038 F 1.04 999 0.09 0.535 1,010 3 1,013 F 1.01 Balboa Dr White Rd Orange E 2 45 C3R 104 - 20,160 20,974 64 21,038 F 1.04 999 0.09 0.535 1,010 3 1,013 F 1.01 White Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) Orange E 2 35 C3R 1026 - 20,160 8,159 0 8,159 C 0.40 999 0.09 0.535 393 0 393 C 0.39 Hackney-Prairie Rd Clarke Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R -- 20,160 1,678 32 1,710 C 0.08 999 0.09 0.535 81 2 83 C 0.08 Hempel Ave Gotha Rd Old Winter Garden Rd Orange E 2 30 C3R 1011 - 20,160 8,026 0 8,026 C 0.40 999 0.09 0.535 386 0 386 C 0.39 Ingram Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd McCormick Rd Ocoee D 2 30 C3R 8162 - 20,160 2,368 187 2,555 C 0.13 999 0.09 0.535 114 9 123 C 0.12 Johio Shores Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) A.D. Mims Rd Ocoee D 2 30 C3R -- 20,160 1,711 160 1,871 C 0.09 999 0.09 0.535 82 8 90 C 0.09 Kissimmee Ave Maguire Rd McKey St Ocoee D 2 35 C3R - 757008 20,160 3,009 54 3,063 C 0.15 999 0.09 0.535 145 3 148 C 0.15 Rewis St Wurst Rd Ocoee C 2 35 C3R 332 758057 17,640 7,481 1,378 8,859 C 0.50 873 0.09 0.535 360 66 426 C 0.49 Wurst Rd Fullers Cross Rd Orange E 2 30 C3R 332 - 20,160 7,481 2,052 9,533 C 0.47 999 0.09 0.535 360 99 459 C 0.46 Fullers Cross Rd Clarcona Ocoee Rd Orange E 2 35 C3R 66.1 758393 20,160 5,712 4,441 10,153 C 0.50 999 0.09 0.535 275 214 489 C 0.49 Park Ridge Gotha Rd Roberson Rd / Moore Rd Ocoee D 2 45 C3R 128 758340 20,160 34,639 261 34,900 F 1.73 999 0.09 0.535 1,668 13 1,681 F 1.68 Roberson Rd / Moore Rd Tomyn Blvd Ocoee D 2 45 C3R 128 758340 20,160 34,639 1,112 35,751 F 1.77 999 0.09 0.535 1,668 54 1,722 F 1.72 Tomyn Blvd Old Winter Garden Rd Ocoee D 4 45 C3R 6080 - 33,570 30,733 8,993 39,726 F 1.18 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,480 433 1,913 F 1.15 Old Winter Garden Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr)Ocoee D 4 35 C3C 6080 - 32,940 30,733 5,022 35,755 F 1.09 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,480 242 1,722 F 1.06 SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) Marshall Farms Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3C 18 758053 19,530 13,905 1,111 15,016 D 0.77 963 0.09 0.535 670 53 723 D 0.75 Marshall Farms Rd Story Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 758053 19,530 13,770 552 14,322 D 0.73 963 0.09 0.535 663 27 690 D 0.72 Story Rd Kissimmee Ave Ocoee D 2 35 C3C 333 - 19,530 15,626 1,342 16,968 D 0.87 963 0.09 0.535 752 65 817 D 0.85 Kissimmee Ave SR 438 (W Franklin St) Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 758051 19,530 13,974 1,710 15,684 D 0.80 963 0.09 0.535 673 82 755 D 0.78 Maine St Maguire Rd Blackwood Ave Marshall Farms Rd SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) Maguire Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 758052 19,530 3,315 0 3,315 C 0.17 963 0.09 0.535 160 0 160 C 0.17 Ocoee Apopka Rd Ingram Rd Orange E 2 50 C3R 9050 758193 20,160 5,640 353 5,993 C 0.30 999 0.09 0.535 272 17 289 C 0.29 Ingram Rd Apopka Vineland Rd Orange E 2 50 C3R 8075 - 20,160 4,803 2,468 7,271 C 0.36 999 0.09 0.535 231 119 350 C 0.35 McKey St Kissimmee Ave Bluford Ave Ocoee E 2 25 C4 - 755090 21,600 3,264 0 3,264 D 0.15 1,071 0.09 0.535 157 0 157 D 0.15 Montgomery Ave Blackwood Ave White Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R -- 20,160 3,033 0 3,033 C 0.15 999 0.09 0.535 146 0 146 C 0.15 Planned Roadway McCormick Rd Planned Roadway Good Homes Rd Lakewood Ave Maguire Rd Planned Roadway Planned Roadway E Crown Point Rd Vested Trips Clarcona Ocoee Rd Clarke Rd Generalized Service Volume 2023 Volume Apopka Vineland Rd Blackwood Ave Bluford Ave Speed Limit (mph) Context Class- ification V/C (with Vested Trips) A.D. Mims Rd Generalized Service Volume K- Factor D- Factor 2023 Volume Vested Trips 2023 Volume + Vested Trips Roadway LOS (with Vested Trips) V/C (with Vested Trips) 2023 Volume + Vested Trips Roadway LOS (with Vested Trips) Roadway Characteristics Traffic Counts Capacity Analysis Segment From To Maintain- ing Agency Adopted LOS Number of Lanes Available Stations Daily PM Peak Hour Peak Direction Orange County Count Station ID FDOT Count Station ID CITY OF OCOEE - CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SPREADSHEET (CMS) - UPDATED 10/18/2023 Vested Trips Generalized Service Volume 2023 Volume Speed Limit (mph) Context Class- ification V/C (with Vested Trips) Generalized Service Volume K- Factor D- Factor 2023 Volume Vested Trips 2023 Volume + Vested Trips Roadway LOS (with Vested Trips) V/C (with Vested Trips) 2023 Volume + Vested Trips Roadway LOS (with Vested Trips) Roadway Characteristics Traffic Counts Capacity Analysis Segment From To Maintain- ing Agency Adopted LOS Number of Lanes Available Stations Daily PM Peak Hour Peak Direction Orange County Count Station ID FDOT Count Station ID E Crown Point Rd Stonegate Dr Stonegate Dr Ocoee Apopka Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R -- 20,160 6,422 127 6,549 C 0.32 999 0.09 0.535 309 6 315 C 0.32 Ocoee Hills Rd SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) Flewelling Ave Ocoee D 2 25 C3R - 758055 20,160 2,652 0 2,652 C 0.13 999 0.09 0.535 128 0 128 C 0.13 SR 438 (W Franklin St) SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd) FDOT E 2 35 C3C - 758334 21,700 13,260 3,769 17,029 D 0.78 1,070 0.09 0.535 638 181 819 D 0.77 SR 438 (W Silver Star Rd) Fullers Cross Rd Orange E 2 45 C3C 73 755094 19,530 11,126 5,626 16,752 D 0.86 963 0.09 0.535 536 271 807 D 0.84 Fullers Cross Rd West Rd Orange E 2 45 C3C - 755094 19,530 14,688 1,788 16,476 D 0.84 963 0.09 0.535 707 86 793 D 0.82 West Rd McCormick Rd Orange E 2 40 C3C 71 758293 19,530 14,835 1,314 16,149 D 0.83 963 0.09 0.535 714 63 777 D 0.81 SR 50 Maguire Rd Maguire Rd Bluford Ave Ocoee E 4 35 C3C 110.5 - 32,940 26,763 5,598 32,361 D 0.98 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,289 270 1,559 D 0.96 Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave Ocoee E 4 35 C3C 110 - 32,940 31,619 4,406 36,025 F 1.09 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,522 212 1,734 F 1.06 Blackwood Ave Hempel Ave Ocoee E 4 35 C3C 110 - 32,940 31,619 378 31,997 D 0.97 1,629 0.09 0.535 1,522 18 1,540 D 0.95 Hempel Ave Citrus Oaks Ave Orange E 4 35 C3R - 758337 33,570 28,560 0 28,560 C 0.85 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,375 0 1,375 C 0.83 Citrus Oaks Ave Good Homes Rd Orange E 4 45 C3R 6038 758337 33,570 30,585 0 30,585 C 0.91 1,665 0.09 0.535 1,473 0 1,473 C 0.88 Orlando Ave Bluford Ave Montgomery Ave Ocoee D 2 30 C3R 7169.5 - 20,160 5,855 45 5,900 C 0.29 999 0.09 0.535 282 2 284 C 0.28 Rewis St Lakewood Ave Flewelling Ave Ocoee D 2 25 C3R - 758054 20,160 1,887 36 1,923 C 0.10 999 0.09 0.535 91 2 93 C 0.09 Roberson Rd Windermere Rd Maguire Rd Orange E 2 40 C3R 2007 758198 20,160 12,770 264 13,034 C 0.65 999 0.09 0.535 615 13 628 C 0.63 Russell Dr Flewelling Ave Willow Creek Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R 8107 - 20,160 2,286 0 2,286 C 0.11 999 0.09 0.535 110 0 110 C 0.11 E Crown Point Rd SR 429 FDOT E 2 35 C3C - 750302 21,700 15,198 2,009 17,207 D 0.79 1,070 0.09 0.535 732 97 829 D 0.77 SR 429 Ocoee Apopka Rd FDOT E 2 35 C3C - 750662 21,700 13,668 2,775 16,443 D 0.76 1,070 0.09 0.535 658 134 792 D 0.74 Ocoee Apopka Rd Bluford Ave FDOT E 2 45 C3C - 755120 21,700 15,198 1,410 16,608 D 0.77 1,070 0.09 0.535 732 68 800 D 0.75 Bluford Ave Ocoee-Hills Rd FDOT E 2 45 C3R - 750089 22,400 11,934 1,096 13,030 C 0.58 1,110 0.09 0.535 575 53 628 C 0.57 Ocoee-Hills Rd Clarke Rd FDOT E 2 45 C3R 89.1 - 22,400 15,410 1,308 16,718 C 0.75 1,110 0.09 0.535 742 63 805 C 0.73 Clarke Rd Johio Shores Rd FDOT E 4 45 C3R - 750012 37,300 15,810 1,808 17,618 C 0.47 1,850 0.09 0.535 761 87 848 C 0.46 Johio Shores Rd Good Homes Rd FDOT E 4 45 C3R -- 37,300 16,456 611 17,067 C 0.46 1,850 0.09 0.535 792 29 821 C 0.44 9th St SR 429 FDOT E 6 45 C3C 7057 750661 54,100 56,100 0 56,100 F 1.04 2,680 0.09 0.535 2,701 0 2,701 F 1.01 SR 429 Marshall Farms Rd FDOT E 6 45 C3C - 750518 54,100 52,530 830 53,360 D 0.99 2,680 0.09 0.535 2,529 40 2,569 D 0.96 Marshall Farms Rd Maguire Rd FDOT E 6 45 C3C 7058 - 54,100 52,286 1,653 53,939 D 1.00 2,680 0.09 0.535 2,518 80 2,598 D 0.97 Maguire Rd Bluford Ave FDOT E 6 45 C3C - 750018 54,100 45,900 1,564 47,464 C 0.88 2,680 0.09 0.535 2,210 75 2,285 C 0.85 Bluford Ave Blackwood Ave FDOT E 6 45 C3C - 750304 54,100 50,490 1,429 51,919 D 0.96 2,680 0.09 0.535 2,431 69 2,500 D 0.93 Blackwood Ave Clarke Rd FDOT E 6 45 C3C 304.1 - 54,100 52,207 2,379 54,586 F 1.01 2,680 0.09 0.535 2,514 115 2,629 D 0.98 Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd FDOT E 6 45 C3C 629.5 750629 54,100 34,680 2,243 36,923 C 0.68 2,680 0.09 0.535 1,670 108 1,778 C 0.66 Good Homes Rd Apopka Vineland Rd FDOT E 6 45 C3C 7060 750645 54,100 35,190 297 35,487 C 0.66 2,680 0.09 0.535 1,694 14 1,708 C 0.64 Story Rd 9th St Maguire Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3C 112 - 19,530 9,055 191 9,246 C 0.47 963 0.09 0.535 436 9 445 C 0.46 Taylor St Franklin St McKey St & Kissimmee Ave Ocoee D 2 35 C3C - 755090 19,530 3,264 0 3,264 C 0.17 963 0.09 0.535 157 0 157 C 0.16 Tomyn Blvd Warrior Rd Maguire Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3R - 758327 20,160 7,956 7,847 15,803 C 0.78 999 0.09 0.535 383 378 761 C 0.76 West Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd SR 429 Orange E 4 35 C3C 2024 758194 32,940 19,588 1,530 21,118 C 0.64 1,629 0.09 0.535 943 74 1,017 C 0.62 Montgomery Ave Clarke Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3R -- 20,160 6,567 299 6,866 C 0.34 999 0.09 0.535 316 14 330 C 0.33 Clarke Rd Good Homes Rd Ocoee D 2 35 C3R 7169 758381 20,160 8,002 299 8,301 C 0.41 999 0.09 0.535 385 14 399 C 0.40 Willow Creek Rd Russell Dr Wurst Rd Ocoee D 2 25 C3R 8107 - 20,160 2,286 0 2,286 C 0.11 999 0.09 0.535 110 0 110 C 0.11 McKinnon Rd Roberson Rd Orange E 2 35 C3R 7051 - 20,160 5,672 21 5,693 C 0.28 999 0.09 0.535 273 1 274 C 0.27 Roberson Rd Warrior Rd Orange E 2 35 C3R 121 - 20,160 13,189 341 13,530 C 0.67 999 0.09 0.535 635 16 651 C 0.65 Lakewood Ave Adair St Orange E 2 25 C3R 7130 758059 20,160 7,778 747 8,525 C 0.42 999 0.09 0.535 375 36 411 C 0.41 Adair St A.D. Mims Rd Ocoee D 2 30 C3R - 758059 20,160 5,100 1,212 6,312 C 0.31 999 0.09 0.535 246 58 304 C 0.30 SR 438 (Plant St/Franklin St) SR 438 (Silver Star Rd) SR 50 (W Colonial Dr) White Rd Windermere Rd Wurst Rd Planned Roadway Ocoee Crown Point Pkwy Planned Roadway Planned Roadway Planned Roadway Planned Roadway Ocoee Apopka Rd Old Winter Garden Rd Planned Roadway Planned Roadway Planned Roadway APPENDIX K LYNX Route Map LYNX is the public transit provider for Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. Additional connectivity with Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-841-5969 phone golynx.com web DIRECT SERVICE TO: Other accessible formats available upon request Effective: DECEMBER 2023 WELCOME ABOARD! Riding LYNX is also easy on your wallet. You can pay for your trip as you board the bus: Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... LYNX operates 79 Links to great places throughout Central Florida. If you don’t see your destination here, CONTACT US and we can connect you to the right Link for your trip. ONE RIDE Regular $2.00 with LYNXdiscount fare ID $1.00 ALL-DAY Regular $4.50 with LYNXdiscount fare ID $2.25 LYMMO is currently Fare Free. Please see individual Link schedules for more information. EXACT FARE REQUIRED No change given. Public Notice of Title VI Rights The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a LYNX: • LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with LYNX. • For more information on LYNX’ Civil Rights Program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact, 407-841-2279 ext. 6171, email Title6officer@golynx.com, or visit our administrative office at 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. For more information, visit www.golynx.com. • Inquiries or complaints related to Title VI may be sent in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. • A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor-TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590. • If information is needed in another language, contact 407-841-2279. 104 LIMITED-STOP SERVICE FROM LYNX CENTRAL STATION TO SEMORAN BLVD 4 4 Ga r l a n d A v e Ro s a l i n d A v e Su m m e r l i n A v e Robinson StLivingston St Mi l l s A v e VIRGINIA DR CORRINE DR Princeton St Ed g e w a t e r D r BU M B Y A V E PR I M R O S E D R MA G U I R E B L V D CR Y S T A L L A K E DR Se m o r a n B l v d Al d e r D r Ox a l i s A v e Se m o r a n B l v d Grant St Dahlia Dr Colonial Dr Colonial Dr Amelia St Colonial Dr Al a f a y a T r l UNIVERSITY BLVD BATES RD FAIRBANKS AVEOS C E O L A A V E LEE RD Go l d e n r o d R d DE A N R D RO U S E R D VALENCIA COLLEGE LN OLEANDER DR Ec o n l o c k h a t c h e e T r l HangingMoss Rd Bamboo Dr Fo r s y t h R d Fo r s y t h R d 408 408 417 417 423 426 426 436551 551 441 1792 Aloma Av e CURRY FORD RD 29 29 28 28 104 104 104 2829 436S TO ORLANDO INT’L AIRPORT 436S TO FERN PARK SUPERSTOP 125TO WEST OAKS MALL 436S LYNX CentralStation OrlandoFashion Square AdventHealth Orlando ColonialHigh School ColonialPlaza SuperStop ValenciaCollegeEast University of Central Florida SuperStop OrlandoExecutiveAirport Winter Park AdventHealthOrlando LYNXCentral Church Street OrlandoHealth/Amtrak ORLANDO AZALEA PARK GOLDENROD UNION PARK EAST COLONIAL DRIVESchematic Map Not to Scale See brochure for Links: 13, 434, NL821, NL822 UCF Area S See brochure for Links: 6, 13, 51 Colonial Plaza SuperStop B 50 Azalea Park Downtown Orlando Orlando Fashion Square Pine Hills University of Central Florida Valencia College East West Oaks Mall Winter Garden Links 28, 29, 48, 49, 104 , 105 , NeighborLink 812 C COLONIAL DRIVE EAST/WEST BROCHURE Lake Sherwood Lake Hiawassee Lake Apopka 105 LIMITED-STOP SERVICE FROM LYNX CENTRAL STN.TO POWERS DR 4 4 4 Colonial Dr Colonial Dr Old Winter Garden Rd Story Rd Bl a c k w o o d A v e Ca r t e r R d BE U L A H RD 9t h S t Bluford AveColonial Dr Amelia St FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE Old Winter Garden RdWashington St Jo h n Y o u n g P k w y Fe r g u s o n A v e OR A N G E B L O S S O M TR L WE S T M O R E L A N D D R Ed g e w a t e r D r Hu g h e y A v e JO H N Y O U N G P K W Y Ki r k m a n R d KI R K M A N R D Westgate Dr ValenciaCollege Dr Pi n e H i l l s R d Po w e r s D r Po w e r s D r Princeton St SILVER STAR RD OAKLAND AVE Silver Star Rd Silver Star Rd Belco DrShader Rd BALBOA DR CLARCONA-OCOEE RD LEE RD Maury R d Indian Hill Rd North Ln Hi a w a s s e e R d HIA W A S S E E R D AP O P K A - V I N E L A N D R D AP O P K A - V I N E L A N D R D PA R K A V E MA I N S T PLANT S T CREST A V E CR O W N P O I N T R D FULLER CROSS RD Cl a r k e R d Me r c y D r 408 441 441 408 429 429 429 50 STO N E Y B R O O K WE S T P K W Y AVALON RD Connect with LakeXpress 50 to Lake County at Park Ave 49 49 48 48 105105 105 54 125 545425 37 37 37 TO FLORIDA MALL 25 54 125TO LYNX CENTRALSTATION 125 25 25 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA LYNX CentralStation WestOaks Mall SuperStop Greyhound Pine Hills ShoppingCenter ValenciaCollegeWest Florida Dept of Children & Families CentralFloridaFairgrounds Silver Hills Center Walmart EvansHighSchool Westside Tech West Orange High School WinterGardenShoppingCenter Health Center Hospital WinterGardenVillage Church Street Orlando Health/Amtrak WINTER GARDEN OCOEE OAKLAND PINE HILLS ORLANDO WEST COLONIAL DRIVESchematic Map Not to Scale See brochure for Links: 54, 125, 312, NL811, NL812, NL813 Colonial Dr West/West Oaks Mall D 855.RAIL.411 Easy LYNX connections sunrail.com SUNRAIL CENTRAL FLORIDA’S COMMUTER TRAIN Rides On Demand LYNX See & Say LYNX Paw Pass Download these apps to help you pay your fare, report safety and security concerns and schedule your NeighborLink ride on demand. Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO HospitalPoint of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO HospitalPoint of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links LYNX is the public transit provider for Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. Additional connectivity with Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-841-5969phone golynx.comweb DIRECT SERVICE TO: Other accessible formats available upon request Effective: DECEMBER 2023 WELCOME ABOARD! Riding LYNX is also easy on your wallet. You can pay for your trip as you board the bus: Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... LYNX operates 79 Links to great places throughout Central Florida. If you don’t see your destination here, CONTACT US and we can connect you to the right Link for your trip. ONE RIDE Regular $2.00 with LYNX discount fare ID $1.00 ALL-DAY Regular $4.50 with LYNX discount fare ID $2.25 LYMMO is currently Fare Free. Please see individual Link schedules for more information. EXACT FARE REQUIRED No change given. Public Notice of Title VI Rights The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a LYNX: • LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with LYNX. • For more information on LYNX’ Civil Rights Program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact, 407-841-2279 ext. 6171, emailTitle6officer@golynx.com, or visit our administrative office at 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. For more information, visitwww.golynx.com. • Inquiries or complaints related to Title VI may be sent in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. • A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor-TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590. • If information is needed in another language, contact 407-841-2279. 104 LIMITED-STOP SERVICEFROM LYNX CENTRALSTATION TO SEMORAN BLVD 4 4 Ga r l a n d A v e Ro s a l i n d A v e Su m m e r l i n A v e Robinson St Livingston St Mi l l s A v e VIRGINIA DR CORRINE DR Princeton St Ed g e w a t e r D r BU M B Y A V E PR I M R O S E D R MA G U I R E B L V D CR Y S T A L L A K E DR Se m o r a n B l v d Al d e r D r Ox a l i s A v e Se m o r a n B l v d Grant St Dahlia Dr Colonial DrColonial Dr Amelia St Colonial Dr Al a f a y a T r l UNIVERSITY BLVD BATES RD FAIRBANKS AVE OS C E O L A A V E LEE RD Go l d e n r o d R d DE A N R D RO U S E R D VALENCIA COLLEGE LNOLEANDER DR Ec o n l o c k h a t c h e e T r l HangingMoss Rd Bamboo Dr Fo r s y t h R d Fo r s y t h R d 408 408 417 417 423 426 426 436 551 551441 17 92 Aloma Av e CURRY FORD RD 29 29 28 28104 104 104 28 29 436S TO ORLANDO INT’L AIRPORT 436S TOFERN PARKSUPERSTOP 125TO WESTOAKS MALL 436S LYNXCentralStation OrlandoFashionSquare AdventHealthOrlando ColonialHigh SchoolColonialPlazaSuperStop ValenciaCollegeEast University ofCentral FloridaSuperStop OrlandoExecutiveAirport WinterPark AdventHealthOrlando LYNXCentral ChurchStreet Orlando Health/Amtrak ORLANDO AZALEA PARK GOLDENROD UNION PARK EAST COLONIAL DRIVE Schematic Map Not to Scale See brochure for Links: 13, 434, NL821, NL822 UCF AreaS See brochure for Links: 6, 13, 51 Colonial Plaza SuperStop B 50 Azalea Park Downtown Orlando Orlando Fashion Square Pine Hills University of Central Florida Valencia College East West Oaks Mall Winter Garden Links 28, 29, 48, 49, 104, 105, NeighborLink 812 CCOLONIAL DRIVE EAST/WEST BROCHURE Lake Sherwood Lake Hiawassee Lake Apopka 105 LIMITED-STOP SERVICEFROM LYNXCENTRAL STN.TO POWERS DR 4 4 4 Colonial DrColonial Dr Old WinterGarden Rd Story Rd Bl a c k w o o d A v e Ca r t e r R d BE U L A H RD 9t h S t Bluford Ave Colonial Dr Amelia St FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE Old Winter Garden Rd Washington St Jo h n Y o u n g P k w y Fe r g u s o n A v e OR A N G E B L O S S O M TR L WE S T M O R E L A N D D R Ed g e w a t e r D r Hu g h e y A v e JO H N Y O U N G P K W Y Ki r k m a n R d KI R K M A N R D Westgate Dr ValenciaCollege Dr Pi n e H i l l s R d Po w e r s D r Po w e r s D r Princeton St SILVER STAR RD OAKLAND AVE Silver Star Rd Silver Star Rd Belco Dr Shader Rd BALBOA DR CLARCONA-OCOEE RD LEE RD Maury R d Indian Hill Rd North Ln Hi a w a s s e e R d HIA W A S S E E R D AP O P K A - V I N E L A N D R D AP O P K A - V I N E L A N D R D PA R K A V E MA I N S T PLANT S T CREST A V E CR O W N P O I N T R D FULLER CROSS RD Cl a r k e R d Me r c y D r 408 441 441 408 429 429 429 50 ST O N E Y B R O O K WE S T P K W Y AVALON RD Connect with LakeXpress 50 to Lake County at Park Ave 49 49 48 48105105 105 54 125 54 54 25 37 37 37 TO FLORIDA MALL 25 54 125TO LYNXCENTRALSTATION 125 25 25812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA LYNXCentralStation WestOaks MallSuperStop GreyhoundPine HillsShoppingCenter Valencia CollegeWest Florida Dept ofChildren & Families CentralFloridaFairgrounds Silver HillsCenter Walmart EvansHighSchool Westside Tech West OrangeHigh School WinterGardenShoppingCenter Health Center Hospital WinterGarden Village ChurchStreet OrlandoHealth/Amtrak WINTER GARDEN OCOEEOAKLAND PINE HILLS ORLANDO WEST COLONIAL DRIVE Schematic Map Not to Scale See brochure for Links: 54, 125, 312, NL811, NL812, NL813 Colonial Dr West/West Oaks MallD 855.RAIL.411 Easy LYNX connections sunrail.com SUNRAIL CENTRAL FLORIDA’S COMMUTER TRAIN Rides On Demand LYNX See & Say LYNX Paw Pass Download these apps to help you pay your fare, report safety and security concerns and schedule your NeighborLink ride on demand. Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO Hospital Point of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO Hospital Point of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links LNX_Lft_ColonialDr_WEB LYNX has 21 brochures, listed below, to help you find your bus. Each one shows the Links serving a certain area, like Fern Park, or a particular service, like LYMMO. You can also use the table to the right, which shows each Link and the brochure it appears on. Note that some Links are shown on more than one brochure. A Apopka SuperStop B Colonial Plaza SuperStop C Colonial Dr East/West D Colonial Dr West/West Oaks Mall E Destination Parkway F Dixie Belle Dr & Gatlin Ave G FastLink Services H Fern Park SuperStop I Florida Mall SuperStop K Kissimmee Intermodal Station L LYNX Central Station M LYMMO N Orlando International Airport O Poinciana Walmart Center P Rosemont SuperStop Q Sanford Seminole Centre R SunRail Connections S UCF Area T Disney Area U Washington Shores SuperStop V Winter Park Village Area LYNX BUS SERVICE BROCHURES CAN’T FIND YOUR LINK? QUESTIONS? Visit us online golynx.com Give us a call 407.841.LYNX Like us on Facebook facebook.com/golynx Follow us on Twitter @lynxbusorlando Link Brochure 1 R V 3 F L 6 B F 7 I L 8 E L 9 P R V 10 K 11 L N R 13 B L S 15 L S 18 K L R 19 L U 20 L U 21 L U 23 P R V 24 U 25 L U 26 K O 28 C L 29 C L 34 Q R 36 L U 37 I 38 E L Link Brochure 40 L R U 42 E I N R 44 A 45 Q R 46E Q R 46W Q R 48 C L 49 C L 51 B L N 54 D L 55 K 56 K T 57 K U 102 H L R V 103 H Q 104 B C L S 105 C D L 106 A L P 107 I L 108 I K 111 E I N R 125 D L R 155 K R 300 L T Link Brochure 301 T 302 P T 303 T U 304 T 306 O R T 307 T 350 E L T 405 A 416 O 426 O 434 R S 436N A H R 436S F H N 443 P R V 612 K Link Brochure FastLink 407 G K N 418 G I R 441 G I K L LYMMO L M Orange Line L M Lime Line M Grapefruit Line NeighborLink 601 O 604 O R 811 D 812 C D 813 D 821 S 822 S 831 K R 841 E 851 Q R 852 A H R V EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 2023 - ALL BUS SERVICE FREQUENCIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Times indicate departures from the BEGINNING of the route. Diagrams show major points on each Link – buses make additional local stops along the way. BUS SERVICE FREQUENCY To plan your trip or view full bus schedule visit golynx.com Sem o r a n B l v d / Cur r y F o r d R d Sem o r a n B l v d / Col o n i a l D r 15mins approximate time away > Orla n d o Fas h i o n S q u a r e 22mins 40mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y L INBOUND to LYNX Central Station28 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:55 am 5:35 am 5:41 am DAY 5–6 am :25, :49 :35 :41 6–7 am :19, :45 7–8 am :12, :40 :40 8–9 am :09, :41 9 am–1 pm :10, :40 :31 :38 1–2pm :10, :35 :37 2–4 pm :05, :35 4–5 pm :08, :40 :36 5–6 pm :11, :42 EVE 6–7 pm :14, :44 :40 7–8 pm :14, :45 :36 :39 NIGHT 8–9 pm :30 -- 9–11 pm :35 LAST TRIP 10:35 pm 9:36 pm 7:39 pm LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y L Orl a n d o Fas h i o n S q u a r e 15mins approximate time away > Sem o r a n B l v d / Col o n i a l D r 22*mins Bam b o o D r / Ald e r D r 28mins 40mins Sem o r a n B l v d / Cur r y F o r d R d OUTBOUND to Azalea Park28 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:15 am 4:45 am 4:45 am DAY 5 am–7 pm :15, :45 :45 :45 NIGHT 7–11 pm :45 -- LAST TRIP 11:45 pm 8:45 pm 6:45 pm * Weekday 5:05 am trip departs from Semoran Blvd & Colonial Dr NEIGHBORLINK Winter Garden NeighborLink 812 is based out of the Winter Garden Regional Shopping Center at SR 50 and Park Avenue. The service area includes the communities of Winter Garden and Oakland. Passengers can book their ride using the RIDES ON DEMAND app or by calling 407-244-0808. 812 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 6:00 am 6:30 am NOSERVICEALL-DAY :00*:30 LAST TRIP 7:25 pm 7:30 pm * 90 minute service after 6:00 pm Monday to Friday Alo m a A v e / For s y t h R d Sem o r a n B l v d / Col o n i a l D r 17mins Gol d e n r o d R d / Bat e s R d 8mins approximate time away > Orl a n d o Fas h i o n S q u a r e 24mins 42mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y L INBOUND to LYNX Central Station29 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:28 am 5:59 am 6:06 am DAY 5–6 am :28, :56 :59 -- 6–8 am :20, :48 :06 8–9 am :18, :48 :56 9–10 am :18, :50 :54 :02 10 am–1 pm :20, :50 :54 :00 1–2 pm :15, :45 :55 2–3 pm :00, :57 3–4 pm :58 4–5 pm :18, :48 5–6 pm :17, :52 -- EVE 6–7 pm :23, :52 :02 7–8 pm :22, :52 :59 :03 NIGHT 8–9 pm :55 :01 9–10 pm :59 -- -- 10–11 pm -- -- -- 11 pm–12 am :01, :45 -- -- LAST TRIP 12:45 am 10:03 pm 8:01 pm LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y L Orla n d o Fas h i o n S q u a r e 15mins approximate time away > Sem o r a n B l v d / Col o n i a l D r 22mins 35mins Alo m a A v e / For s y t h R d OUTBOUND to Goldenrod29 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:35 am 5:15 am 5:15 am DAY 5–6 am :05, :30 :15 :15 6 am–7 pm :00, :30 NIGHT 7 pm–12 am :15 -- LAST TRIP 12:15 am 9:15 pm 7:15 pm Silv e r H i l l s Cen t e r Col o n i a l D r / Pin e H i l l s R d 13mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 19mins 32mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y N INBOUND to LYNX Central Station49 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:40 am 5:10 am 5:05 am DAY 5–7 am :05, :35 :10 :05 7 am–6 pm :00, :30 :05EVE 6–7 pm :05, :35 NIGHT 7–9 pm :05 9 pm–12 am :10 -- LAST TRIP 11:05 am 10:10 pm 8:05 pm LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y N Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 12mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Pin e H i l l s R d 18mins Nor t h L n / Pin e H i l l s R d 37mins 42mins Silv e r H i l l s Cen t e r OUTBOUND to Silver Hills Center49 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:30 am*6:15 am* 6:15 am* DAY 5–6 am :30*-- -- EVE 6 am–8 pm :00, :30 :15 :15NIGHT 8 pm–12 am :15 LAST TRIP 12:15 am 11:15 pm 9:15 pm * Trips Depart from Silver Hills Center and serve North Ln/Pine Hills Rd at 4:22, 5:17 & 5:47 am (Mon-Fri), 4:50 & 5:50 am (Sat), 4:45 & 5:45 am (Sun). Silv e r S t a r R d / Hia w a s s e e R d approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Pin e H i l l s R d 18mins Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 24mins 37mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y N INBOUND to LYNX Central Station48 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 3:50 am 4:35 am 4:35 am DAY 4–5 am :20, :50 :35 :35 5–6 am :15, :45 :30 :30 6–7 am :15, :40 7 am–5 pm :10, :40 5–6 pm :10, :45 EVE 6–7 pm :15, :45 NIGHT 7–11 pm :30 LAST TRIP 11:30 pm 9:30 pm 7:30 pm LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y N Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 12mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Pin e H i l l s R d 18mins 35mins Silv e r S t a r R d / Hia w a s s e e R d OUTBOUND to Pine Hills48 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:15 am 4:45 am 4:50 am DAY 5 am–8 pm :15, :45 :45 :45EVE 8–11 pm :45 LAST TRIP 11:45 pm 10:45 pm 9:45 pm UC F Sup e r S t o p Val e n c i a Col l e g e E a s t 28mins Ala f a y a T r a i l / Col o n i a l D r 13mins approximate time away > Sem o r a n B l v d / Col o n i a l D r 45mins Col o n i a l P l a z a Sup e r S t o p 54mins 65 mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y R INBOUND to LYNX Central Station104 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:35 am 5:10 am 5:10 am DAY 5–6 am :05, :30,:55 :10, :40 :10 6–7 am :25, :55 :05 7–8 am :05, :30 :00 8–9 am :00, :30 9 am–5pm 5–6 pm :30 6–7 pm :00, :30 :10 7–8 pm :00 NIGHT 8–9 pm :05 9–10 pm :15 -- LAST TRIP 10:15 pm 10:10 pm 8:00 pm LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y R Col o n i a l P l a z a Sup e r S t o p 10mins approximate time away > Sem o r a n B l v d / Col o n i a l D r 21mins Val e n c i a Col l e g e E a s t 36mins Ala f a y a T r a i l / Col o n i a l D r 50mins 58mins UC F Sup e r S t o p OUTBOUND to University of Central Florida104 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:20 am 5:15 am 5:45 am DAY 5–6 am :20, :45 :15, :45 :45 6 am–7 pm :15, :45 NIGHT 7–10 pm :15 :15 LAST TRIP 10:15 pm 10:15 pm 8:45 pm MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:02 am 5:08 am 5:00 am* DAY 5–6 am :30, :32 :33 :00 6–7 am :00, :30 :03, :33,:35 7–8 am :29, :35 9–10 am :25, :55 :29, :30 10 am–12 pm 12–2pm 2–4 pm :31, :35 4–5 pm :30 EVE 5–6 pm :00, :30 :34, :35 6–7 pm :34, :40 7–9 pm :05 :15 EVE 9–10 pm :35 :38 -- LAST TRIP 10:35 pm 10:43 pm 8:00 pm Col o n i a l D r / * Par k A v e ^ Wes t O a k s M a l l Sup e r S t o p 29mins Bla c k w o o d A v e / Old W i n t e r G d n . R d . 26mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Hia w a s s e e R d 41mins Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 54mins 65mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y Q INBOUND to LYNX Central Station105 LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y Q Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 13mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Hia w a s s e e R d 28mins 65 mins Col o n i a l D r / Par k A v e OUTBOUND to Winter Garden105 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:15 am 5:20 am 6:15 am* DAY 5–6 am :15, :45 :45 :15 6 am–7 pm :15, :45 EVE 7–9 pm :15 :15 NIGHT 9–11 pm :15 :15 LAST TRIP 11:15 pm 11:15 pm 9:15 pm Trips shown in black start from West Oaks Mall SuperStop to LYNX Central Station. Trips shown in purple start from Winter Garden Shopping Center and serve West Oaks Mall SuperStop to LYNX Central Station. * All Sunday trips starts from West Oaks Mall SuperStop. Trips shown in purple end at Colonial Dr/Park Ave. Trips shown in black end at West Oaks Mall SuperStop. Early morning trip starts from West Oaks Mall to Park Ave at 5:04 am (Mon-Fri) * All Sunday trips serve Blackwood Ave/Old Winter Garden Rd Wes t O a k s M a l l Sup e r S t o p 40mins Bla c k w o o d A v e / Old W i n t e r G d n . R d . 43mins(33)Sat (36)Sat (54)Sat LNX_Lft_ColonialDr_WEB LYNX is the public transit provider for Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. Additional connectivity with Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-841-5969 phone golynx.com web DIRECT SERVICE TO: Other accessible formats available upon request Effective: DECEMBER 2023 WELCOME ABOARD! Riding LYNX is also easy on your wallet. You can pay for your trip as you board the bus: Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... LYNX operates 79 Links to great places throughout Central Florida. If you don’t see your destination here, CONTACT US and we can connect you to the right Link for your trip. ONE RIDE Regular $2.00 with LYNXdiscount fare ID $1.00 ALL-DAY Regular $4.50 with LYNXdiscount fare ID $2.25 LYMMO is currently Fare Free. Please see individual Link schedules for more information. EXACT FARE REQUIRED No change given. Public Notice of Title VI Rights The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a LYNX: • LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with LYNX. • For more information on LYNX’ Civil Rights Program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact, 407-841-2279 ext. 6171, email Title6officer@golynx.com, or visit our administrative office at 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. For more information, visit www.golynx.com. • Inquiries or complaints related to Title VI may be sent in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. • A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor-TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590. • If information is needed in another language, contact 407-841-2279. Lake Sherwood Lake Apopka Starke Lake 105 LIMITED-STOP SERVICE FROM LYNX CENTRAL STN.TO POWERS DR 4 4 4 Colonial Dr Colonial Dr Old Winter Garden Rd Story RdBl a c k w o o d Av e Ca r t e r Rd 9t h S t Bluford Ave Colonial Dr Rollins St Ma u r y Rd Or a n g e A v e Ed g e w a t e r D r Amelia St RobinsonSt Mi l l s A v e FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE Old Winter Garden Rd Washington St JO H N Y O U N G P K W Y OR A N G E B L O S S O M T R L ORANGE BLOSSOM TRL SEMORAN BLVD MAITLAND BLVD KEENE RD MCCORMICK RD LEE RD Hu g h e y A v e WE S T M O R E L A N D D R I V E JO H N Y O U N G P K W Y KI R K M A N R D PI N E H I L L S R D IV E Y L N PO W E R S DR Silver Star Rd Princeton St SILVER STAR RD BALBOA DR CLARCONA-OCOEE RD PA R K A V E CL A R C O N A R D CLARCONA-OCOEE RD FULLER CROSS RD HI A W A S S E E RD HIA W A S S E E R D AP O P K A - VI N E L A N D R D AP O P K A - V I N E L A N D R D PA R K A V E DA N I E L S R D MA I N S T OAKLAND AVE PLANT S T Cl a r k e R d ME R C Y D R CR O W N P O I N T R D LA K E W O O D A V E 408 441 441 408 429 429 50 414 AVALON RD Connect with LakeXpress 50 to Lake County at Park Ave 105105 54 54 105 125 125 125 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 811 813 LYNXCentralStation WESTOAKS MALL SUPERSTOP Greyhound Pine Hills ShoppingCenter Florida Dept of Children & Families CentralFloridaFairgrounds AdventHealthOrlando SilverHillsCenter EvansHighSchool Wal-mart West Oaks Library CitrusElementary MagnoliaSchool Westside Tech West Orange High School WinterGardenVillage OcoeeHigh School WinterGarden ShoppingCenter Health Central Hospital ChurchStreet Orlando Health/Amtrak WINTER GARDEN OAKLANDOCOEE PINE HILLS CLARCONA APOPKA ORLANDO COLONIAL DR WEST/WEST OAKS MALL Schematic Map Not to Scale See brochure for Links: 28, 29, 48, 49, 104 Colonial Drive C AdventHealth Orlando Downtown Orlando Health Central Hospital Ocoee Pine Hills West Oaks Mall SuperStop Winter Garden Links 54, 105 , 125 , NeighborLink 811 , NL 812 , NL 813 D COLONIAL DR WEST/ WEST OAKS MALL 855.RAIL.411 Easy LYNX connections sunrail.com SUNRAIL CENTRAL FLORIDA’S COMMUTER TRAIN BROCHURE Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO HospitalPoint of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO HospitalPoint of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links LYNX is the public transit provider for Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. Additional connectivity with Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-841-5969phone golynx.comweb DIRECT SERVICE TO: Other accessible formats available upon request Effective: DECEMBER 2023 WELCOME ABOARD! Riding LYNX is also easy on your wallet. You can pay for your trip as you board the bus: Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... LYNX operates 79 Links to great places throughout Central Florida. If you don’t see your destination here, CONTACT US and we can connect you to the right Link for your trip. ONE RIDE Regular $2.00 with LYNX discount fare ID $1.00 ALL-DAY Regular $4.50 with LYNX discount fare ID $2.25 LYMMO is currently Fare Free. Please see individual Link schedules for more information. EXACT FARE REQUIRED No change given. Public Notice of Title VI Rights The Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a LYNX: • LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, and national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a complaint with LYNX. • For more information on LYNX’ Civil Rights Program, and the procedures to file a complaint, contact, 407-841-2279 ext. 6171, emailTitle6officer@golynx.com, or visit our administrative office at 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. For more information, visitwww.golynx.com. • Inquiries or complaints related to Title VI may be sent in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801. • A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator, East Building, 5th Floor-TCR, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590. • If information is needed in another language, contact 407-841-2279. Lake Sherwood Lake Apopka Starke Lake 105 LIMITED-STOP SERVICEFROM LYNXCENTRAL STN.TO POWERS DR 4 4 4 Colonial Dr Colonial Dr Old WinterGarden Rd Story Rd Bl a c k w o o d Av e Ca r t e r Rd9t h S t Bluford Ave Colonial Dr Rollins St Ma u r y Rd Or a n g e A v e Ed g e w a t e r D r Amelia St RobinsonSt Mi l l s A v e FLORIDA’S TURNPIKE Old Winter Garden Rd Washington St JO H N Y O U N G P K W Y OR A N G E B L O S S O M T R L ORANGE BLOSSOM TRL SEMORAN BLVD MAITLAND BLVD KEENE RD MCCORMICK RD LEE RD Hu g h e y A v e WE S T M O R E L A N D D R I V E JO H N Y O U N G P K W Y KI R K M A N R D PI N E H I L L S R D IV E Y L N PO W E R S DR Silver Star Rd Princeton St SILVER STAR RD BALBOA DR CLARCONA-OCOEE RD PA R K A V E CL A R C O N A R D CLARCONA-OCOEE RDFULLER CROSS RD HI A W A S S E E RD HIA W A S S E E R D AP O P K A - VI N E L A N D R D AP O P K A - V I N E L A N D R D PA R K A V E DA N I E L S R D MA I N S T OAKLAND AVE PLANT S T Cl a r k e R d ME R C Y D R CR O W N P O I N T R D LA K E W O O D A V E 408 441 441 408 429 429 50 414 AVALON RD Connect with LakeXpress 50 to Lake County at Park Ave 105 105 54 54 105 125 125 125 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 812 NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA NEIGHBORLINKSERVICE AREA 811 813 LYNXCentralStation WESTOAKS MALLSUPERSTOP Greyhound Pine HillsShoppingCenter Florida Dept ofChildren & Families CentralFloridaFairgrounds AdventHealthOrlando SilverHillsCenter EvansHighSchool Wal-mart West OaksLibrary CitrusElementary MagnoliaSchool WestsideTech West OrangeHigh School WinterGardenVillage OcoeeHigh School WinterGardenShopping Center Health CentralHospital ChurchStreet Orlando Health/Amtrak WINTER GARDEN OAKLAND OCOEE PINE HILLS CLARCONA APOPKA ORLANDO COLONIAL DR WEST/WEST OAKS MALL Schematic Map Not to Scale See brochure for Links: 28, 29, 48, 49, 104 Colonial DriveC AdventHealth Orlando Downtown Orlando Health Central Hospital Ocoee Pine Hills West Oaks Mall SuperStop Winter Garden Links 54, 105, 125, NeighborLink 811, NL 812, NL 813 DCOLONIAL DR WEST/ WEST OAKS MALL 855.RAIL.411 Easy LYNX connections sunrail.com SUNRAIL CENTRAL FLORIDA’S COMMUTER TRAIN BROCHURE Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO Hospital Point of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links Regular Links SEE ROUTE SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INFO Hospital Point of Interest LYNX SuperStop FastLinks Stops only as shown LEGEND SunRail line and station Service every 30 minutes or better during day times Service every 60 minutes or less frequently Select Service Connecting Links LNX_Lft_WOaksMall_WEB Old W i n t e r G a r d e n Rd/ H i a w a s s e e R d Old W i n t e r Gar d e n R d / I v e y L n Wes t O a k s Mal l 17mins approximate time away >25mins (23)Sat (40)Sat(16)Sat 44mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y R INBOUND to LYNX Central Station54 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:20 am 5:25 am NO SERVICEDAY 6 am–7 pm :20 :25 LAST TRIP 7:20 pm 6:25 pm Old W i n t e r Gar d e n R d / I v e y L n Old W i n t e r G a r d e n Rd/ H i a w a s s e e R d LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y R 15mins (13)Sat (19)Sat (34)Sat approximate time away >22mins 38mins Wes t O a k s Mal l OUTBOUND to West Oaks Mall54 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:30 am 6:30 am NO SERVICEALL-DAY :30 :30 LAST TRIP 7:30 pm 7:30 pm MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:02 am 5:08 am 5:00 am* DAY 5–6 am :30, :32 :33 :00 6–7 am :00, :30 :03, :33,:35 7–8 am :29, :35 9–10 am :25, :55 :29, :30 10 am–12 pm 12–2pm 2–4 pm :31, :35 4–5 pm :30 EVE 5–6 pm :00, :30 :34, :35 6–7 pm :34, :40 7–9 pm :05 :15 EVE 9–10 pm :35 :38 -- LAST TRIP 10:35 pm 10:43 pm 8:00 pm Col o n i a l D r / * Par k A v e ^ Wes t O a k s M a l l Sup e r S t o p 29mins Bla c k w o o d A v e / Old W i n t e r G d n . R d . 26mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Hia w a s s e e R d 41mins Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 54mins 65mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y Q INBOUND to LYNX Central Station105 LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y Q Col o n i a l D r / Joh n Y o u n g P k w y 13mins approximate time away > Col o n i a l D r / Hia w a s s e e R d 28mins 65 mins Col o n i a l D r / Par k A v e OUTBOUND to Winter Garden105 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:15 am 5:20 am 6:15 am* DAY 5–6 am :15, :45 :45 :15 6 am–7 pm :15, :45 EVE 7–9 pm :15 :15 NIGHT 9–11 pm :15 :15 LAST TRIP 11:15 pm 11:15 pm 9:15 pm Trips shown in black start from West Oaks Mall SuperStop to LYNX Central Station. Trips shown in purple start from Winter Garden Shopping Center and serve West Oaks Mall SuperStop to LYNX Central Station. * All Sunday trips starts from West Oaks Mall SuperStop. Trips shown in purple end at Colonial Dr/Park Ave. Trips shown in black end at West Oaks Mall SuperStop. Early morning trip starts from West Oaks Mall to Park Ave at 5:04 am (Mon-Fri) * All Sunday trips serve Blackwood Ave/Old Winter Garden Rd Wes t O a k s M a l l Sup e r S t o p 40mins Bla c k w o o d A v e / Old W i n t e r G d n . R d . 43mins(33)Sat (36)Sat (54)Sat Wes t O a k s Mal l Silv e r S t a r R d / Hia w a s s e e R d 13mins approximate time away > Wal m a r t o n Prin c e t o n S t 30mins Ora n g e A v e / Prin c e t o n S t 47mins Mill s A v e / Col o n i a l D r 55mins Silv e r S t a r R d / Pin e H i l l s R d 21mins 62mins LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y W INBOUND to LYNX Central Station125 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:20 am 4:15 am 5:05 am DAY 4–5 am :50 :45 -- 5–6 am :05, :30, :50 :10, :40 6–7 am :10, :40 :00 7–8 am :10, :30, :50 8 am–2 pm :15, :45 2–4 pm :05, :25, :45 4–5 pm :05, :30, :50 EVE 5–6 pm :10, :35 6–7 pm :05, :35 7–8 pm :40 :55 8–9 pm :00, :50 :50 :50 NIGHT 9–10 pm :50 -- 10–11 pm :45 :45 LAST TRIP 11:45 pm 11:45 pm 10:00 pm* LYN X C e n t r a l Sta t i o n - B a y W Mill s A v e / Col o n i a l D r 9mins approximate time away > OUTBOUND to West Oaks Mall125 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 4:30 am 5:00 am 4:55 am DAY 5–6 am :00, :30 :30 :50 6–7 am :00, :20, :40 :00, :30 7 am–3 pm :00, :30 3–6 pm :00, :20, :40 EVE 6–7 pm :00, :20, :45 7–8 pm :15, :45 :00, :45 NIGHT 8–10 pm :45 10 pm–12 am :45 -- LAST TRIP 12:45 am 12:45 am 9:50 pm Ora n g e A v e / Prin c e t o n S t 18mins (17)Sat Wal m a r t o n Prin c e t o n S t 35mins (30)Sat Silv e r S t a r R d / Pin e H i l l s R d 44mins (36)Sat Wes t O a k s Mal l 65mins (54)Sat Silv e r S t a r R d / Hia w a s s e e R d 54mins (44)Sat * 10:00 pm trip ends at Silver Star/John Young Pkwy NEIGHBORLINK Ocoee NeighborLink 811 is based out of the West Oaks Mall SuperStop. The service area includes the community of Ocoee. Passengers can book their ride using the RIDES ON DEMAND app or by calling 407-244-0808. 811 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 5:30 am 5:30 am NOSERVICE DAY 6 am–1 pm :30 :30 1–7 pm :35 LAST TRIP 7:35 pm 7:30 pm * Reservation Required for 6:30 am and 5:35 pm (Mon-Fri) and 6:30 am and 5:30 pm (Sat) trips on Clarcona Rd NEIGHBORLINK Pine Hills NeighborLink 813 is based out of the West Oaks Mall SuperStop. The service area includes the community of Pine Hills. Passengers can book their ride using the RIDES ON DEMAND app or by calling 407-244-0808. 813 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 6:30 am 6:30 am NOSERVICE DAY 7 am–1 pm :30 :30 1–7 pm :35 LAST TRIP 7:35 pm 7:30 pm NEIGHBORLINK Winter Garden NeighborLink 812 is based out of the Winter Garden Regional Shopping Center at SR 50 and Park Avenue. The service area includes the communities of Winter Garden and Oakland. Passengers can book their ride using the RIDES ON DEMAND app or by calling 407-244-0808. 812 MINS AFTER THE HOUR MON–FRI SAT SUN/HOL FIRST TRIP 6:00 am 6:30 am NOSERVICEALL-DAY :00*:30 LAST TRIP 7:25 pm 7:30 pm * 90 minute service after 6:00 pm Monday to Friday LYNX has 21 brochures, listed below, to help you find your bus. Each one shows the Links serving a certain area, like Fern Park, or a particular service, like LYMMO. You can also use the table to the right, which shows each Link and the brochure it appears on. Note that some Links are shown on more than one brochure. A Apopka SuperStop B Colonial Plaza SuperStop C Colonial Dr East/West D Colonial Dr West/West Oaks Mall E Destination Parkway F Dixie Belle Dr & Gatlin Ave G FastLink Services H Fern Park SuperStop I Florida Mall SuperStop K Kissimmee Intermodal Station L LYNX Central Station M LYMMO N Orlando International Airport O Poinciana Walmart Center P Rosemont SuperStop Q Sanford Seminole Centre R SunRail Connections S UCF Area T Disney Area U Washington Shores SuperStop V Winter Park Village Area LYNX BUS SERVICE BROCHURES CAN’T FIND YOUR LINK? QUESTIONS? Visit us online golynx.com Give us a call 407.841.LYNX Like us on Facebook facebook.com/golynx Follow us on Twitter @lynxbusorlando Link Brochure 1 R V 3 F L 6 B F 7 I L 8 E L 9 P R V 10 K 11 L N R 13 B L S 15 L S 18 K L R 19 L U 20 L U 21 L U 23 P R V 24 U 25 L U 26 K O 28 C L 29 C L 34 Q R 36 L U 37 I 38 E L Link Brochure 40 L R U 42 E I N R 44 A 45 Q R 46E Q R 46W Q R 48 C L 49 C L 51 B L N 54 D L 55 K 56 K T 57 K U 102 H L R V 103 H Q 104 B C L S 105 C D L 106 A L P 107 I L 108 I K 111 E I N R 125 D L R 155 K R 300 L T Link Brochure 301 T 302 P T 303 T U 304 T 306 O R T 307 T 350 E L T 405 A 416 O 426 O 434 R S 436N A H R 436S F H N 443 P R V 612 K Link Brochure FastLink 407 G K N 418 G I R 441 G I K L LYMMO L M Orange Line L M Lime Line M Grapefruit Line NeighborLink 601 O 604 O R 811 D 812 C D 813 D 821 S 822 S 831 K R 841 E 851 Q R 852 A H R V EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 2023 - ALL BUS SERVICE FREQUENCIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Times indicate departures from the BEGINNING of the route. Diagrams show major points on each Link – buses make additional local stops along the way. BUS SERVICE FREQUENCY To plan your trip or view full bus schedule visit golynx.com Rides On Demand LYNX See & Say LYNX Paw Pass Download these apps to help you pay your fare, report safety and security concerns and schedule your NeighborLink ride on demand. LNX_Lft_WOaksMall_WEB Report Cover Page Ocoee RSC Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Prepared for: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 189 South Orange Ave, Suite 1000 Orlando, Florida 32801 1675 Lee Road Winter Park, FL 32789 P (407) 740-6110 Terracon.com Facilities | Environmental |Geotechnical |Materials Report Cover L etter to Sign September 8, 2023 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc 189 South Orange Ave, Suite 1000 Orlando, Florida 32801 Attn: Scott Mingonet - Principal P:407 427 1622 E:Scott.Mingonet@kimley-horn.com Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC 2290 E Fullers Cross Rd Ocoee, Orange County Florida Terracon Project No. H1235192 Dear Mr. Mingonet: We have completed the scope of Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering services for the above referenced project in general accordance with Terracon Proposal No. PH1235192 dated June 9, 2023. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical preliminary recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of foundations and floor slabs for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Lorimar G. Rosario Rivera Brendan S. O’Brien, P.E. Senior Staff Engineer Senior Engineer Florida PE # 52047 This item has been digitally signed and sealed by Brendan S. O’Brien, P.E. on the date adjacent to the seal. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials i Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 Project Description .......................................................................................... 1 Site Conditions ................................................................................................ 3 Soils Survey............................................................................................. 3 Geotechnical Characterization ......................................................................... 5 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 6 General Potential for Sinkhole Development .................................................... 7 Geotechnical Overview .................................................................................... 8 Preliminary Earthwork ..................................................................................... 9 Site Preparation........................................................................................ 9 Fill Material Types ..................................................................................... 9 Fill Compaction Requirements ..................................................................... 9 Earthwork Construction Considerations ....................................................... 10 Construction Observation and Testing ......................................................... 11 Preliminary Foundations ................................................................................ 11 Preliminary Pavements .................................................................................. 11 Preliminary Stormwater Management Considerations ..................................... 12 Final Geotechnical Evaluation ........................................................................ 12 General Comments ........................................................................................ 12 Figures GeoModel Attachments Exploration and Testing Procedures Site Location and Exploration Plans Exploration and Laboratory Results Supporting Information Note: This report was originally delivered in a web-based format.Blue Bold text in the report indicates a referenced section heading. The PDF version also includes hyperlinks which direct the reader to that section and clicking on the logo will bring you back to this page. For more interactive features, please view your project online at client.terracon.com. Refer to each individual Attachment for a listing of contents. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 1 Introduction This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering services performed for the proposed development to be located at 2290 E Fullers Cross Rd in Ocoee, Orange County Florida. The purpose of these services was to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: ■Subsurface soil conditions ■Groundwater conditions ■Preliminary earthwork considerations ■Preliminary foundation recommendations ■Preliminary pavement options ■Preliminary stormwater pond considerations The geotechnical engineering Scope of Services for this project included the advancement of eight standard penetration test (SPT) borings, six machine auger borings, five hand auger borings, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. Drawings showing the site and boring locations are shown on the Site Location and Exploration Plan, respectively. The results of the laboratory testing performed on soil samples obtained from the site during our field exploration are included on the boring logs in the Exploration Results section. Project Description Our understanding of the project conditions is as follows: Item Description Information Provided An email request for proposal was provided on June 7th,2023. The request included general description of project, and a schematic site plan_NV01 with marked up boring locations for buildings, roadway, stormwater, and wetland. Project Description Provided information shows the project consists of a sport complex with baseball fields, parking garages, hotels, commercial/office spaces, and associate paved areas. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 2 Item Description Proposed Structures Structures associated with the project includes three hotels up to 4-stories and about 199,500 SF/each, five 3-levels parking garages about 65,000 SF/each, and multiple single-story commercial/office buildings’ foot prints range from 6,000 SF to 17,000 SF. Building Construction Not provided. we anticipate that hotels will be constructed using concrete tilt-up panels, steel frame, and slab-on-grade construction techniques. Parking garages will be constructed using precast, prestressed concrete and slab-on-grade construction techniques. Commercial retails/offices will be Load- bearing masonry walls with wood frames and Slab-on-Grade. Finished Floor Elevation Not provided; boring depths have assumed that finished floor will be near the existing grades. Maximum Loads Not provided. In the absence of information provided by the design team, we will use the following loads in estimating settlement based on our experience with similar projects. For hotels ■Columns: 360 kips ■Walls: 15 kips per linear foot (klf) ■Slabs: 250 pounds per square foot (psf) For parking garages ■Columns: 500 kips For commercial retails/offices ■Columns: 75 kips ■Walls: less than 5 kips per linear foot (klf) Slabs: 100 pounds per square foot (psf) Free-Standing Retaining Walls Retaining walls are not expected to be constructed as part of site development to achieve final grades. Below-Grade Structures Not anticipated with the exception of utilities and/or stormwater drainage features. Pavements Asphalt/Concrete surfacing is common in the area for projects of this nature and is the assumed preference. Stormwater Management Two stormwater retention ponds were planned locate in Parcel #5 and Parcel # 13. It’s our understanding that underground exfiltration systems are planned as well. Terracon should be notified if any of the above information is inconsistent with the planned construction, especially the grading limits, as modifications to our recommendations may be necessary. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 3 Site Conditions The following description of site conditions is derived from our site visit in association with the field exploration and our review of publicly available topographic maps. Item Description Parcel Information The project is located at 2290 E Fullers Cross Rd in Ocoee, Orange County Florida. Provided site plan shown the project site included multiple parcels in Orange County, Florida, gross lot size is about 150.4 acres. The approximate center of size Latitude/Longitude is 28.587639° N 81.547561° W See Site Location Existing Improvements None. Current Ground Cover Portions of site moderately-heavily vegetated, rest of site covered by grass. Existing Topography Ground surface elevations range from about +125 to +100 feet, generally sloping to the north towards the west. Wetlands were noted in provided plan. Soils Survey The Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida as prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS; later renamed the Natural Resource Conservation Service - NRCS), dated August 1989, identifies the predevelopment soil types at the subject site as Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (3), Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (15), Immokalee fine sand (20), Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (26), Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (40), Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (44), Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (46), Zolfo fine sand and 0 to 2 percent slopes (54). A Soils Map is included with this GeoReport, depicting the applicable Soil Survey map portion for the subject site. 3 – Basinger fine sand, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level and poorly drained. It is typically found in shallow depressions and sloughs along edges of freshwater marshes and swamps. In its natural state, water stands on the surface of this soil type for 6 to 9 months during most years and is within 12 inches of the surface for the rest of the year. This soil type is sometimes associated with a surficial organic layer, typical thickness of 7 inches, typical organic contents of between 1 and 8 percent. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 4 15 – Felda fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded. This soil type is nearly level and poorly drained. It is typically found on the flood plain of the Econlockhatchee River and of minor streams. This soil type is flooded for very long periods following prolonged, intense rains. In its natural state, during years of normal rainfall, this soil type has a seasonal high groundwater table fluctuating between the surface and a depth of 10 inches (0.8 feet) for 2 to 6 months. Flooding occurs frequently during rainy periods. Flooding normally lasts from 1 to 4 months. This soil type is predominantly sandy above a typical depth of 24 inches (1.8 feet) and below a typical depth of 47 inches (3.9 feet). Between typical depths of 24 and 47 inches (1.8 and 3.9 feet), this soil type exists as silty sand to clayey sand (USCS Classification symbol SM to SC). 20 – Immokalee fine sand. This soil type is nearly level and poorly drained. It is typically found on broad flatwoods. During years of normal precipitation, this soil type has a seasonal high groundwater table within 10 inches (0.8 feet) of the surface for 1 to 3 months, receding to a depth of between 10 and 40 inches (0.8 and 3.3 feet) for more than 6 months. This soil type is predominantly sandy between the surface and a depth of 35 inches (2.9 feet) and also from a depth of 58 inches (4.8 feet) to the maximum defined depth of 80 inches (6.7 feet). Between these depths, this soil type is typically composed of sand with silt to silty sand. 26 – Ona fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level and poorly drained. It is typically found in broad areas on the flatwoods. In most years, a seasonal high groundwater table is within 10 inches (0.8 feet) of the surface for 1 month to 2 months. It recedes to a depth of 10 to 40 inches (0.8 to 3.3 feet) for periods of 6 months or more. 40 – Samsula muck, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level and very poorly drained. It is typically found in freshwater marshes and swamps. In its natural state, groundwater is at or above the surface of this soil type for 6 to 9 months or more except during extended dry periods. This soil type exists as muck (USCS classification PT, or “peat”) to a typical depth of 40 inches (3.3 feet); typical organic contents of this muck layer are greater than 20 percent. Thereafter, to the maximum defined depth of 80 inches (6.7 feet), this soil type is sand to silty sand (USCS classification SP to SM). 44 – Smyrna, wet, fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level and poorly drained. It is typically found on broad flatwoods. In its natural state and during years of normal rainfall, this soil type has a seasonal high groundwater table within 10 inches (0.8 feet) of the surface, receding to a depth of 10 to 40 inches (0.8 to 3.3 feet) for more than six months. 46 – Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. It is typically found on low ridges and knolls on the uplands. In its natural state and during years of normal rainfall, Tavares fine sand has an apparent seasonal high groundwater table at a depth of between 40 and 80 inches (3.3 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 5 and 6.7 feet) for more than 6 months, receding to a depth of more than 80 inches (6.7 feet) during dry seasons. Tavares fine sand is predominantly sandy throughout the defined profile of 80 inches (6.7 feet). 54 – Zolfo fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes. This soil type is nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. It is typically found on broad, slightly higher positions adjacent to the flatwoods. In its natural state, during years of normal rainfall, this soil type has a seasonal high groundwater table at a depth of between 24 and 40 inches (2.0 and 3.3 feet) for 2 to 6 months, receding to a depth of 60 inches (5.0 feet) during prolonged dry periods. Geotechnical Characterization We have developed a general characterization of the subsurface conditions based upon our review of the subsurface exploration, laboratory data, geologic setting and our understanding of the project. This characterization, termed GeoModel, forms the basis of our geotechnical calculations and evaluation of the site. Conditions observed at each exploration point are indicated on the individual logs. The individual logs can be found in the Exploration Results and the GeoModel can be found in the Figures attachment of this report. As part of our analyses, we identified the following model layers within the subsurface profile. For a more detailed view of the model layer depths at each boring location, refer to the GeoModel. Model Layer Layer Name General Description 1 SP/SP-SM Fine Sand to Fine Sand with Silt 2 SM Silty Fine Sand 3 SC Clayey Fine Sand 4 CH/CL Fat to Silty Clay 5 ML Silt The borings encountered a variety of soils at different depths, about 4 to 8 feet of Layer 1 at most locations, underlain by Layers 2 and 3. Some locations identified Layers 4 and 5, generally at a depth of about 13 feet or deeper to the maximum explored depth of 6 to 55 feet below existing grades. Soils were generally very loose to medium dense, medium stiff to very stiff. An exception to this soil profile is boring B-8 which encountered dense clayey sand conditions from 8 to 10 feet where the boring was terminated. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 6 Groundwater The borings were observed during drilling for the presence and level of groundwater. Groundwater levels were observed from a depth of 0.8 to 7.5 feet below existing grade. Longer term monitoring in cased holes or piezometers would be required to better define groundwater conditions at the site. The water levels observed in the borings can be found on the boring logs in Exploration Results. It should be recognized that fluctuations of the groundwater table will occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff and other factors not evident at the time the boring was performed. In addition, perched water can develop within higher permeability soils overlying less permeable soils. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the future may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. We estimate that during the normal wet season (typically June through October) with rainfall and recharge at a maximum, groundwater levels will be at the ground surface to about 3 feet below existing grade. Our estimates of the seasonal groundwater conditions are based on the USDA Soil Survey, the encountered soil types, antecedent weather conditions, and the interpreted water levels. The water levels observed in the borings can be found on the boring logs in Exploration Results, and are summarized below along with the estimated normal seasonal high groundwater table. Boring Number Approximate Depth to Encountered Water Table (feet) Approximate Depth to Estimated Seasonal High Water Table (feet) B-1 2.0 0.8 B-2 5.0 1.0 B-3 3.0 2.0 B-4 2.1 2.0 B-5 3.0 2.0 B-6 2.0 1.0 B-7 6.0 2.0 B-8 3.7 2.0 B-9 2.2 1.0 S-1 4.1 2.0 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 7 Boring Number Approximate Depth to Encountered Water Table (feet) Approximate Depth to Estimated Seasonal High Water Table (feet) S-2 0.8 0.0 S-3 7.5 3.0 S-4 5.7 3.0 S-5 4.2 0.0 S-6 4.0 1.0 S-7 4.4 1.0 S-8 4.0 2.0 S-9 6.4 2.0 W-1 GNE to 6.0 feet.2.0 1.“GNE”–Groundwater Not Encountered These seasonal water table estimates do not represent the temporary rise in water table that occurs immediately following a storm event, including adjacent to other stormwater management facilities. This is different from static groundwater levels in wet ponds and/or drainage canals which can affect the design water levels of new, nearby ponds. The seasonal high groundwater table may vary from normal when affected by extreme weather changes, localized or regional flooding, karst activity, future grading, drainage improvements, or other construction that may occur on or around the site following the date of this report. General Potential for Sinkhole Development Sinkhole development occurs in Florida and varies geographically from areas with almost no potential or a very low potential to areas with a high potential where sinkholes occur frequently. The subject property is located in Area III as mapped by the Florida Geological Survey (FGS) web site. The cover (over limestone bedrock) in Area III is between 30 to 200 feet thick and is generally cohesive clayey sediments of low permeability. Sinkholes are most numerous, of varying size, and develop abruptly in Area III. The risk of sinkhole occurrence at most sites is small even in areas known to have a higher than average risk of sinkhole occurrence. Based on our prior experience in this area, the potential for sinkhole activity is considered to be moderate low. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 8 A review of Florida Geologic Survey’s on-line Subsidence Incident Reports (SIRs) database reveals the closest reported sinkhole is about 1.5 miles northeast of the subject site. It should be noted that the number of sinkholes is based on information reported to the FGS and does not necessarily reflect the number of sinkholes confirmed by public or private industry. During our limited evaluation, we did not encounter traditional signs associated with potential sinkhole development such as loss of circulation of drilling fluid, obvious raveled zones, surface depressions, etc. However, this evaluation was not planned to specifically address sinkhole potential. If the sinkhole potential of the site is to be evaluated in detail, additional site-specific data must be obtained. This might include using geophysical methods such as Electrical Resistivity tests and additional geotechnical tests such as Cone Penetration Test (CPT) soundings and/or more/deeper Standard Penetration Test borings. Interpretation of the test data should be done by a professional geologist/engineer familiar with the use of these tests under local conditions. However, it should be noted that even if indicators of sinkhole activity are found, it is impossible to predict if, when or precisely where a sinkhole may occur. If requested, Terracon can assist in assessing the sinkhole potential of the location of the proposed construction. Geotechnical Overview The site appears suitable for the proposed construction of the retail building areas based upon geotechnical conditions encountered in the test borings, provided that the recommendations provided in this report are implemented in the design and construction phases of this project. At this time the parking garage and the hotel areas need additional exploration to further evaluation the soil and groundwater conditions to address the heavier loading and specific characteristics of these structures. The subsurface materials generally consisted of a variety of soils at different depths from fine sand to fine sand with silt, silty to clayey sand, clays, and silts from the surface to the maximum explored depth of 6 to 55 feet below existing grades. Also, different densities were obtained while performing the logs from very loose to medium dense for granular soils and medium stiff to very stiff for fine grained soils. Only boring B-8 encountered dense clayey sand conditions from 8 to 10 feet where the boring was terminated. Borings W-2 to W-4 at the southeast portion of the site where the muck was expected were cancelled. Groundwater was encountered between 0.8 and 7.5 feet below existing grade during drilling. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 9 Our opinion of pavement section thickness design has been developed based on our understanding of the intended use, and subgrade preparation recommended. Traffic information is currently not available for us to generate an opinion of the minimum pavement component thickness. Our Geotechnical Engineer can provide pavement section minimum thickness in accordance with local Orange County standards. The recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of field and laboratory testing (presented in the Exploration Results), engineering analyses, and our current understanding of the proposed project. The General Comments section provides an understanding of the report limitations. Preliminary Earthwork Earthwork is anticipated to include clearing and grubbing, excavations, and engineered fill placement. The following sections provide recommendations for use in the preparation of specifications for the work. Recommendations include critical quality criteria, as necessary, to render the site in the state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for preliminary foundations, floor slabs, and pavements. Site Preparation Prior to placing fill, existing vegetation and root mat should be removed. Complete stripping of the topsoil should be performed in the proposed building and parking/driveway areas. Normal or traditional site preparation procedures should be sufficient for the intended use at this site. The normal or traditional procedures include proof-rolling the site prior to any fill placement. Placing clean sand fill in lifts compacted to the projected final grades while performing density tests to verify compaction to a minimum of the soils’ ASTM D1557 maximum density. Fill Material Types Fill required to achieve design grade should be classified as structural fill and general fill. Structural fill is material used below, or within 10 feet of structures, pavements or constructed slopes and is generally less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve. Fill Compaction Requirements Structural and general fill should meet the following compaction requirements. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 10 Item Structural Fill Minimum Compaction Requirements 1 95 percent of the material’s maximum modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D 1557). Moisture Content 2 Within ±2 percent of optimum moisture content as determined by the Modified Proctor test, at the time of placement and compaction. Minimum Testing Frequency One field density test per 5,000 square feet or fraction thereof per 1-foot lift in pavement areas; per 2,500 square feet in building areas. 1.We recommend that engineered fill be tested for moisture content and compaction during placement. Should the results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified moisture or compaction limits have not been met, the area represented by the test should be reworked and retested as required until the specified moisture and compaction requirements are achieved. 2.Specifically, moisture levels should be maintained low enough to allow for satisfactory compaction to be achieved without the cohesionless fill material pumping when proofrolled. Earthwork Construction Considerations construction equipment. Upon completion of filling and grading, care should be taken to maintain the subgrade water content prior to construction of floor slabs. Construction traffic over the completed subgrades should be avoided. The site should also be graded to prevent ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. Water collecting over, or adjacent to, construction areas should be removed. If the subgrade desiccates, saturates, or is disturbed, the affected material should be removed, or the materials should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted, prior to floor slab construction. The groundwater table could affect over-excavation efforts, especially for over-excavation and replacement of lower strength soils. A temporary dewatering system consisting of sumps with pumps could be necessary to achieve the recommended depth of over-excavation. As a minimum, excavations should be performed in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations” and its appendices, and in accordance with any applicable local, and/or state regulations. Construction site safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor who controls the means, methods, and sequencing of construction operations. Under no circumstances shall the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 11 information provided herein be interpreted to mean Terracon is assuming responsibility for construction site safety, or the contractor's activities; such responsibility shall neither be implied nor inferred. Construction Observation and Testing The earthwork efforts should be monitored under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Monitoring should include documentation of adequate removal of vegetation and topsoil, proof-rolling and mitigation of areas delineated by the proof-roll to require mitigation. Preliminary Foundations For the retail buildings we did not encounter any soil or groundwater conditions that would prevent the project as described from being founded on shallow foundations. However, in the case of the parking garage and Hotel areas ground improvement or deep foundations may need to be considered. It should be noted that known contaminants may impact foundations options is selected. If deep foundations are to be evaluated, deeper borings are required to identify a bearing stratum for piles. Detailed allowable bearing capacity and predicted structure settlement calculations will need to be provided in the final design-level geotechnical evaluation once the project parameters are more defined. Preliminary Pavements Groundwater conditions will severely alter the design or performance of traditional pavements on this project. Underdrains or an exfiltration trench are recommended underneath the pavements to manage groundwater. Typical flexible pavement sections will include natural subgrade, stabilized subgrade, basecourse and asphalt wearing surface. Typical rigid pavements would include a free- draining subgrade and concrete wearing surface. Pavement grades should be set where there is a minimum separation of 18 inches between the bottom of the base course and the seasonal high groundwater level for flexible pavements and 12 inches between the bottom of the concrete surface and the seasonal high groundwater level for rigid pavement. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 12 Preliminary Stormwater Management Considerations Soil and groundwater conditions exist that could severely affect the design or performance of normal stormwater facilities. Based upon the relatively high groundwater conditions, we would expect that a wet detention would be the likely stormwater treatment facility without significant grade increase to the site. Laboratory permeability test results performed for the S-borings are shown in Table 1 in the Exploration Results. Final Geotechnical Evaluation The scope of this evaluation was preliminary in nature for due diligence acceptance of the property and was not intended to develop final design level documents. As your plans move forward, we would be please to provide a proposal for a Final Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation. It should be noted that the southeast area where muck is expected will need further field exploration and laboratory testing as appropriate to characterize muck and if this area is to be developed. General Comments Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Variations will occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in this report, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the absence of our observation and testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations. Our Scope of Services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Our services and any correspondence are intended for the sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and are accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with no third-party beneficiaries intended. Any third-party access to services or correspondence is solely for Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials 13 information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client. Reliance upon the services and any work product is limited to our client and is not intended for third parties. Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their own risk. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any use of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly effect excavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing. Site safety and cost estimating including excavation support and dewatering requirements/design are the responsibility of others. Construction and site development have the potential to affect adjacent properties. Such impacts can include damages due to vibration, modification of groundwater/surface water flow during construction, foundation movement due to undermining or subsidence from excavation, as well as noise or air quality concerns. Evaluation of these items on nearby properties are commonly associated with contractor means and methods and are not addressed in this report. The owner and contractor should consider a preconstruction/precondition survey of surrounding development. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Figures Contents: GeoModel (4 of pages) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 DE P T H B E L O W G R A D E ( F e e t ) Ocoee RSC Ocoee, FL Terracon Project No. H1235192 Layering shown on this figure has been developed by the geotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurface conditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineering for this project. Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 GEOMODEL This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions. First Water Observation The groundwater levels shown are representative of the date and time of our exploration. Significant changes are possible over time. Water levels shown are as measured during and/or after drilling. In some cases, boring advancement methods mask the presence/absence of groundwater. See individual logs for details. Clayey Fine Sand3 Fat to Silty Clay4 Silt5 LEGEND Poorly-graded Sand Poorly-graded Sand with Silt Silty Sand Fat Clay Sandy Silt Sandy Fat Clay Clayey Sand Silty Clay Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name Fine Sand to Fine Sand with Silt1 Silty Fine Sand2 SC CH/CL ML SP/SP-SM SM 13.5 23.5 33.5 48.5 50 1 2 4 2 5 2 8 13.5 18.5 28.5 33.5 55 1 4 3 2 4 2 5 4 18.5 55 1 3 2 3 6 8 10 2 1 2 2.1 4 6 8 13.5 18.5 55 1 2 1 3 4 2 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 DE P T H B E L O W G R A D E ( F e e t ) Ocoee RSC Ocoee, FL Terracon Project No. H1235192 Layering shown on this figure has been developed by the geotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurface conditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineering for this project. Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 GEOMODEL This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions. First Water Observation The groundwater levels shown are representative of the date and time of our exploration. Significant changes are possible over time. Water levels shown are as measured during and/or after drilling. In some cases, boring advancement methods mask the presence/absence of groundwater. See individual logs for details. Clayey Fine Sand3 Fat to Silty Clay4 Silt5 LEGEND Poorly-graded Sand with Silt Silty Sand Fat Clay Clayey Sand Poorly-graded Sand Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name Fine Sand to Fine Sand with Silt1 Silty Fine Sand2 SC CH/CL ML SP/SP-SM SM 2 4 8 13.5 18.5 25 1 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 5.5 6.5 7 1 2 1 2 6 4 10 1 3 3.7 10 1 2.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 DE P T H B E L O W G R A D E ( F e e t ) Ocoee RSC Ocoee, FL Terracon Project No. H1235192 Layering shown on this figure has been developed by the geotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurface conditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineering for this project. Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 GEOMODEL This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions. First Water Observation The groundwater levels shown are representative of the date and time of our exploration. Significant changes are possible over time. Water levels shown are as measured during and/or after drilling. In some cases, boring advancement methods mask the presence/absence of groundwater. See individual logs for details. Clayey Fine Sand3 Fat to Silty Clay4 Silt5 LEGEND Poorly-graded Sand with Silt Clayey Sand Silty Sand Sandy Fat Clay Poorly-graded Sand Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name Fine Sand to Fine Sand with Silt1 Silty Fine Sand2 SC CH/CL ML SP/SP-SM SM 5 15 1 3 4.1 3.5 6.5 12.5 15 1 3 2 4 0.8 6 10 15 2 1 2 7.5 6.5 7 1 2 5.7 5 10 15 2 1 2 4.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 DE P T H B E L O W G R A D E ( F e e t ) Ocoee RSC Ocoee, FL Terracon Project No. H1235192 Layering shown on this figure has been developed by the geotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurface conditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineering for this project. Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 W-1 GEOMODEL This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions. First Water Observation The groundwater levels shown are representative of the date and time of our exploration. Significant changes are possible over time. Water levels shown are as measured during and/or after drilling. In some cases, boring advancement methods mask the presence/absence of groundwater. See individual logs for details. Clayey Fine Sand3 Fat to Silty Clay4 Silt5 LEGEND Poorly-graded Sand with Silt Silty Sand Sandy Fat Clay Poorly-graded Sand Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name Fine Sand to Fine Sand with Silt1 Silty Fine Sand2 SC CH/CL ML SP/SP-SM SM 1 5 10 15 1 2 4 2 4 1 15 1 2 4.4 4.5 6 1 2 4 7 1 6.4 6 1 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Attachments Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Exploration and Testing Procedures Field Exploration Number of Borings Approximate Boring Depth (feet)1 Location 6 SPT 1 Hand Auger 10 to 55 7 Building area 2 SPT 10 Roadway 6 Machine Auger 3 Hand Augers 15 6 to 7 Stormwater management area 1 Hand Auger 6 Wetland area 1.Below the ground surface. Boring Layout and Elevations: Terracon personnel provided the boring layout using handheld GPS equipment (estimated horizontal accuracy of about ±10 feet) and referencing existing site features. If elevations and a more precise boring layout are desired, we recommend borings be surveyed. Subsurface Exploration Procedures: We advanced soil borings with a track-mounted drill rig using rotary wash techniques as necessary depending on soil conditions. Five samples were obtained in the upper 10 feet of each boring and at intervals of 5 feet thereafter. We obtained representative samples primarily by the split-barrel sampling procedure. In the split-barrel sampling procedure, a standard, 2-inch O.D., split-barrel sampling spoon is driven into the boring with a 140-pound automatic SPT (Standard Penetration Test) hammer falling 30 inches. We recorded the number of blows required to advance the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch sampling interval as the standard penetration resistance value, N. Soil Test Borings utilizing SPT split spoon or auger sampling were conducted as necessary for potential stormwater management system locations to provide soil samples for laboratory permeability and classification testing. The samples were placed in appropriate containers, taken to our soil laboratory for testing, and classified by a Geotechnical Engineer. In addition, we observed and record groundwater levels during drilling and sampling. The machine auger borings were performed by hydraulically turning a 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger into the ground in 5-foot increments. Additional flights were added until the desired termination depth was achieved. The auger was then extracted without further rotation and representative soil samples were retrieved from the auger. Samples were visually classified in the field and were then packaged and returned to our soils laboratory for further classification and testing. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials The hand auger boring procedure consisted of manually turning a 3-inch diameter, 6-inch long sampler into the soil until it was full. The sampler was then retrieved and the soils in the sampler were visually examined and classified. The procedure was repeated until the desired termination depth was achieved or shallow groundwater levels caused collapse of the borehole. Samples of representative strata were obtained for further visual examination and classification in our laboratory. The sampling depths, penetration distances, and other sampling information was recorded on the field boring logs. The samples were placed in appropriate containers and taken to our soil laboratory for testing and classification by a Geotechnical Engineer. Our exploration team prepared field boring logs as part of the drilling operations. These field logs included visual classifications of the materials encountered during drilling and our interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples. Final boring logs were prepared from the field logs. The final boring logs represent the Geotechnical Engineer's interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on observations and tests of the samples in our laboratory. Laboratory Testing The project engineer reviewed the field data and assigned laboratory tests. The laboratory testing program included the following types of tests: ■Moisture Content ■Wash No. 200 Sieve Analysis ■Atterberg Limits ■Constant Head Permeability The laboratory testing program often included examination of soil samples by an engineer. Based on the results of our field and laboratory programs, we described and classified the soil samples in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Site Location and Exploration Plans Contents: Site Location Plan Soils Map Exploration Plan Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITTOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (QUADRANGLE) ISSUED: 1984 WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA N LX AS LX BSO H1235192 AS SHOWN H1235192 6-27-23 RSC OCOEE 2290 EAST FULLERS CROSS ROAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT ORLANDO, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 SIT E 5000450040003000250035002000150050001000500 FEET SCALE 1"=1000' E FULLERS CROSS RD TO L L R O A D 4 2 9 OC O E E A P O P K A R D N L A K E W O O D A V E Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBITSOILS MAPLX AS LX BSO H1235192 AS SHOWN H1235192 6-27-23 RSC OCOEE 2290 EAST FULLERS CROSS ROAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT ORLANDO, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 5000450040003000250035002000150050001000500 FEET SCALE 1"=1000' SOIL LEGEND BASINGER FINE SAND, FREQUENTLY PONDED, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES FELDA FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES, FREQUENTLY FLOODED 3 15 U.S.D.A. SOIL SURVEY FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA SIT E E FULLERS CROSS RD TO L L R O A D 4 2 9 OC O E E A P O P K A R D N L A K E W O O D A V E IMMOKALEE FINE SAND20 ONA FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES26 SAMSULA MUCK, FREQUENTLY PONDED, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES SMYRNA, WET, FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES 40 44 TAVARES FINE SAND, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES46 ZOLFO FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES54 N Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: Project Mngr: File No. Date: Scale: Project No.EXHIBIT 1675 LEE ROAD WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 FAX. (407) 740-6112PH. (407) 740-6110 BORING LOCATION PLANLX AS LX BSO H1235192 AS SHOWN H1235192 9-1-23 RSC OCOEE 2290 EAST FULLERS CROSS ROAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT ORLANDO, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA N B-1 B-3B-2 B-6 B-8 B-4 B-9 B-5 B-7 S-1 S-2 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-3 S-4 S-9 W-1 NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE APOPKA OCOEE ROAD EA S T F U L L E R S C R O S S R O A D LEGEND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF HAND AUGER BORING APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF MACHINE AUGER BORING Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Exploration and Laboratory Results Contents: Boring Logs (B-1 through B-9) (S-1 through S-9) (W-1) Table 1 - Summary of Stormwater Area Borings and Laboratory Testing Results Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. 3-2-3-3 N=5 4-4-3-4 N=7 3-2-2-1 N=4 3-4-3-3 N=7 4-5-8-9 N=13 2-2-3 N=5 3-3-3 N=6 2-2-2 N=4 4-4-4 N=8 53.9 102-28-74 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), light brown to grayish brown, loose POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark brown, loose POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), gray to grayish brown, loose to medium dense SILTY SAND (SM), light gray, loose FAT CLAY (CH), medium stiff to stiff 4.0 6.0 13.5 23.5 83 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 20 25 30 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5940° Longitude: -81.5520° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 07-18-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-18-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 2.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 4 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-3-2 N=5 2-3-2 N=5 2-2-3 N=5 5-8-8 N=16 35.3 FAT CLAY (CH), medium stiff to stiff (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), with shell fragments, greenish gray, loose SILT (ML), greenish gray, very stiff Boring Terminated at 50 Feet 33.5 48.5 50.0 26 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 35 40 45 50 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5940° Longitude: -81.5520° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 07-18-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-18-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 2.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 4 2 5 SA M P L E T Y P E 5-3-4-4 N=7 6-8-4-10 N=12 10-11-11-13 N=22 6-4-8-8 N=12 10-12-11-11 N=23 3-3-4 N=7 2-2-2 N=4 2-3-3 N=6 3-2-3 N=5 28.9 36-25-11 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), grayish brown, loose POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), light gray, medium dense SANDY FAT CLAY (CH), gray, very stiff CLAYEY SAND (SC), gray, loose SILTY SAND (SM), gray, loose SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), greenish gray, medium stiff 2.0 8.0 13.5 18.5 28.5 35 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 20 25 30 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5940° Longitude: -81.5502° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-16-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-16-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 5.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 4 3 2 4 SA M P L E T Y P E 4-2-3 N=5 3-2-3 N=5 3-3-4 N=7 3-4-4 N=8 7-7-8 N=15 60.3 SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), greenish gray, medium stiff (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), greenish gray, loose to medium dense with shell fragments Boring Terminated at 55 Feet 33.5 55.0 33 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 35 40 45 50 55 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5940° Longitude: -81.5502° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-16-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-16-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 5.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 4 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-2-3-3 N=5 3-2-4-3 N=6 5-4-6-8 N=10 8-10-12-13 N=22 4-3-5-5 N=8 3-4-4 N=8 2-2-2 N=4 3-3-2 N=5 5-4-4 N=8 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), light brown, loose POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown, loose CLAYEY SAND (SC), light brown to grayish brown, loose to medium dense SILTY SAND (SM), light gray, loose to medium dense 2.0 4.0 18.5 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 20 25 30 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5912° Longitude: -81.5503° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-3 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 07-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 3.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 3 2 SA M P L E T Y P E WOH-WOH-1 N=1 WOH-WOH-WOH N=0 1-1-1 N=2 1-1-1 N=2 2-2-3 N=5 48.6 SILTY SAND (SM), light gray, loose to medium dense (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), light gray to greenish gray, very loose to loose Boring Terminated at 55 Feet 33.5 55.0 40 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 35 40 45 50 55 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5912° Longitude: -81.5503° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-3 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 07-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 3.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-2-2-2 N=4 2-2-2-2 N=4 5-6-8-8 N=14 10-9-8-10 N=17 10-10-11-9 N=21 19.0 SILTY SAND (SM), light gray to gray, loose to medium dense POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), gray, medium dense SILTY SAND (SM), gray, medium dense Boring Terminated at 10 Feet 6.0 8.0 10.0 9 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5891° Longitude: -81.5502° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-4 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 07-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 2.1 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 2 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-2-3-3 N=5 4-4-7-7 N=11 6-5-6-6 N=11 4-5-5-6 N=10 5-6-5-4 N=11 4-4-3 N=7 1-2-1 N=3 1-3-3 N=6 4-5-4 N=9 22.3 34.3 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown, loose POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), gray, medium dense SILTY SAND (SM), brown, medium dense POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark brown, medium dense CLAYEY SAND (SC), grayish brown, medium dense SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), gray, stiff SILTY SAND (SM), gray, loose to medium dense 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 13.5 18.5 9 20 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 20 25 30 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5875° Longitude: -81.5501° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-5 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 3.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 1 3 4 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 1-1-1 N=2 2-1-2 N=3 1-2-3 N=5 1-1-1 N=2 5-6-6 N=12 43.6 50.5 SILTY SAND (SM), gray, loose to medium dense (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), gray, very loose to loose SILTY SAND (SM), gray, medium dense Boring Terminated at 55 Feet 33.5 53.5 55.0 33 38 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 35 40 45 50 55 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5875° Longitude: -81.5501° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-5 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 3.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-4-4-5 N=8 2-2-2-2 N=4 5-7-9-10 N=16 7-8-8-8 N=16 6-7-7-7 N=14 5-2-3 N=5 3-2-2 N=4 3-3-3 N=6 14.7 27.7 39-26-13 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), light brown, medium dense SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown, loose FAT CLAY (CH), grayish brown, very stiff SILTY SAND (SM), light brown, medium dense CLAYEY SAND (SC), gray, loose SILTY SAND (SM), light gray, loose Boring Terminated at 25 Feet 2.0 4.0 8.0 13.5 18.5 25.0 60 40 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 20 25 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5925° Longitude: -81.5501° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. B-6 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 07-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 2.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 4 2 3 2 SA M P L E T Y P E POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), gray SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown Boring Terminated at 7 Feet 2.5 4.0 5.5 6.5 7.0 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5851° Longitude: -81.5482° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hand Auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: Hand Auger BORING LOG NO. B-7 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-18-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-18-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 6.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-3-3-3 N=6 2-2-2-2 N=4 3-4-6-8 N=10 5-6-6-7 N=12 6-15-17-15 N=32 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), light gray, loose POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), light brown to grayish brown, loose to medium dense CLAYEY SAND (SC), gray to grayish brown, medium dense to dense Boring Terminated at 10 Feet 2.0 4.0 10.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5919° Longitude: -81.5495° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. B-8 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-15-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-15-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 3.7 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 3 SA M P L E T Y P E 3-2-3-3 N=5 5-4-3-3 N=7 2-3-3-4 N=6 4-5-4-4 N=9 7-11-13-10 N=24 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), grayish brown to brown, loose POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark brown, medium dense Boring Terminated at 10 Feet 6.0 10.0 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 1 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5883° Longitude: -81.5494° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. B-9 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-15-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-15-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 2.2 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 SA M P L E T Y P E 5.4POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown CLAYEY SAND (SC), grayish brown Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 5.0 15.0 11 7 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5926° Longitude: -81.5517° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. S-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-15-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-15-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 4.1 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 3 SA M P L E T Y P E 6.3POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), orangish brown CLAYEY SAND (SC), grayish brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown SANDY FAT CLAY (CH), light gray Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 3.5 6.5 12.5 15.0 11 9 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5914° Longitude: -81.5515° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hand Auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: Hand Auger BORING LOG NO. S-2 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: M. Cornele Boring Completed: 07-12-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 07-12-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 0.8 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 3 2 4 SA M P L E T Y P E 13.0SILTY SAND (SM), orangish brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 6.0 10.0 15.0 5 15 Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: BR 898 BORING LOG NO. S-3 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-18-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-18-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 7.5 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5861° Longitude: -81.5500° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: PE R C E N T F I N E S 2 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 5.4 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), light gray to brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown to dark brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown Boring Terminated at 7 Feet 2.2 6.5 7.0 16 6 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5841° Longitude: -81.5490° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hand Auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: Hand Auger BORING LOG NO. S-4 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-18-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-18-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 5.7 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 29.5SILTY SAND (SM), brown to dark brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 5.0 10.0 15.0 0 21 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5936° Longitude: -81.5482° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. S-5 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-15-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-15-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 4.2 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 2 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 24.0POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown SILTY SAND (SM), orangish brown SANDY FAT CLAY (CH), gray SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 1.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 0 10 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5913° Longitude: -81.5482° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. S-6 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-15-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-15-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 4.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 4 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 17.2POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown to brown Boring Terminated at 15 Feet 1.0 15.0 0 11 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5888° Longitude: -81.5480° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Mud Rotary Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: D-50 BORING LOG NO. S-7 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-15-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-15-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 4.4 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 9.1 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown SILTY SAND (SM), grayish brown to light brown Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 4.5 6.0 5 6 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5866° Longitude: -81.5480° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hand Auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: Hand Auger BORING LOG NO. S-8 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 4.0 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 2 SA M P L E T Y P E 21.4 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), gray to brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), brown to dark brown Boring Terminated at 7 Feet 2.0 7.0 0 9 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5864° Longitude: -81.5469° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hand Auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: Hand Auger BORING LOG NO. S-9 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater encountered at a depth of about 6.4 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 SA M P L E T Y P E POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), light brown to grayish brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark brown Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 5.0 6.0 Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L H 1 2 3 5 1 9 2 O C O E E R S C . G P J T E R R A C O N _ D A T A T E M P L A T E . G D T 9 / 7 / 2 3 DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 28.5842° Longitude: -81.5474° GR A P H I C L O G MO D E L L A Y E R DEPTH Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hand Auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with bentonite chips upon completion. Notes: Project No.: H1235192 Drill Rig: Hand Auger BORING LOG NO. W-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates IncCLIENT: Orlando, FL Driller: J. Rodriguez Boring Completed: 08-17-2023 PROJECT: Ocoee RSC Elevations were not determined. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for a description of field and laboratory procedures used and additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. 2290 E Fuller Cross Road Ocoee, FL SITE: Boring Started: 08-17-2023 1675 Lee Rd Winter Park, FL Groundwater not encountered to a depth of about 6 ft. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS PE R M E A B I L I T Y (f t / d a y ) PE R C E N T F I N E S 1 SA M P L E T Y P E Depth Below Ground Surface (feet) Depth Below Ground Surface (feet) Depth to Top of Aquifer S-1 0.0 4.1 2 5.0 30 11 6 S-2 0.0 0.8 0 3.5 25 11 6 S-3 0.0 7.5 3 0.0 25 5 3 S-4 2.3 5.7 3 6.5 30 16 9 S-5 0.0 4.2 0 0.0 25 0 0 S-6 0.0 4 1 1.0 25 0 0 S-7 0.0 4.4 1 1.0 25 0 0 S-8 1.0 4 2 4.5 30 5 3 S-9 2.0 6.4 2 7.0 25 0 0 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF STORMWATER AREA BORINGS AND LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS Project Name: Ocoee RSC OCOEE, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA TERRACON PROJECT NO. H1235192 20 6 13 13 (1) "Groundwater Not Encountered" to the specified depth. Theoretical HorizontalSaturated Permeability (Kh, ft/day) 0 6 0 0 0 Observed GWT(1)Estimated SHGWT (2) Base of Aquifer (2)Seasonal high Groundwater table depth is based in the Soil Survey of Orange County, Florida published by the USDA/NRCS. Porosity (%) Boring Number Sample Depth (feet) Measured Mean Saturated Permeability (Km, ft/day) Theoretical Vertical Unsaturated Permeability (Kv, ft/day) Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Supporting Information Contents: General Notes Unified Soil Classification System Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. 500 to 1,000 2,000 to 4,000 4,000 to 8,000 1,000 to 2,000 less than 500 > 8,000 Unconfined Compressive Strength Qu, (psf) Non-plastic Low Medium High DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS Hand Penetrometer Torvane Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Photo-Ionization Detector Organic Vapor AnalyzerSA M P L I N G WA T E R L E V E L FI E L D T E S T S (HP) (T) (DCP) (PID) (OVA) GENERAL NOTES Over 12 in. (300 mm) 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) Particle Size < 5 5 - 12 > 12 Percent of Dry Weight Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES 0 1 - 10 11 - 30 > 30 Plasticity Index Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES Percent of Dry Weight Major Component of Sample Trace With Modifier RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Trace With Modifier DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt or Clay Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents < 15 15 - 29 > 30 Term PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Water levels indicated on the soil boring logs are the levels measured in the borehole at the times indicated. Groundwater level variations will occur over time. In low permeability soils, accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Water Initially Encountered Auger Cuttings Rock Core Grab Sample No Recovery Shelby Tube Standard Penetration Test Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy of such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. Hard Very Stiff Stiff Medium Stiff Very Soft Automatic Hammer SPT N-Value (Blows/Ft.) < 3 < 1 1 - 3 3 - 6Medium Dense SoftLoose Very Dense Dense Very Loose Automatic Hammer SPT N-Value (Blows/Ft.) 3 - 8 8 - 24 24 - 40 > 40 6 - 12 12 - 24 > 24 ST R E N G T H T E R M S Descriptive Term (Consistency) Descriptive Term (Density) CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.) Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing, field visual-manual procedures or standard penetration resistance (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Ocoee RSC | Ocoee, Orange County Florida September 8, 2023 | Terracon Project No. H1235192 Facilities |Environmental |Geotechnical | Materials Unified Soil Classification System Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Soil Classification Group Symbol Group Name B Coarse-Grained Soils: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Gravels: More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels: Less than 5% fines C Cu≥4 and 1≤Cc≤3 E GW Well-graded gravel F Cu<4 and/or [Cc<1 or Cc>3.0]E GP Poorly graded gravel F Gravels with Fines: More than 12% fines C Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F, G, H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F, G, H Sands: 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands: Less than 5% fines D Cu≥6 and 1≤Cc≤3 E SW Well-graded sand I Cu<6 and/or [Cc<1 or Cc>3.0]E SP Poorly graded sand I Sands with Fines: More than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G, H, I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G, H, I Fine-Grained Soils: 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve Silts and Clays: Liquid limit less than 50 Inorganic:PI > 7 and plots above “A” line J CL Lean clay K, L, M PI < 4 or plots below “A” line J ML Silt K, L, M Organic:𝐿𝐿 𝑛𝑣𝑑𝑛 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑑 𝐿𝐿 𝑛𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑑<0.75 OL Organic clay K, L, M, N Organic silt K, L, M, O Silts and Clays: Liquid limit 50 or more Inorganic:PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clay K, L, M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic silt K, L, M Organic:𝐿𝐿 𝑛𝑣𝑑𝑛 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑑 𝐿𝐿 𝑛𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑑<0.75 OH Organic clay K, L, M, P Organic silt K, L, M, Q Highly organic soils:Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve. B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well- graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay. E Cu = D60/D10 Cc = F If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. H If fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. I If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with gravel,” whichever is predominant. L If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O PI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P PI plots on or above “A” line. Q PI plots below “A” line. 6010 2 30 DxD )(D 2020 Census Profile One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2010 2020 2023 Annual Rate Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 2000-2020 2010-2020 2020-2023 Total Population 11,442 100.0%14,074 100.0%14,703 100.0%2.18%2.09%1.35% Household Population 11,413 99.7%14,068 100.0%14,697 100.0%2.20%2.11%1.35% Group Quarters 29 0.3%6 0.0%6 0.0%-8.44%-14.58%0.00% Population Density 1,907.0 -2,387.9 -2,494.6 - Total Housing Units 3,931 100.0%4,672 100.0%4,940 100.0%2.12%1.74%1.73% Total Households 3,611 91.9%4,465 95.6%4,754 96.2%2.17%2.15%1.95% Total Vacant 320 8.1%176 3.8%186 3.8%0.32%-5.80%7.65% Average Household Size 3.16 -3.15 -3.09 - - - 2020 Population by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 14,074 100.0%8,705 61.9%5,369 38.1% Population Reporting One Race 11,732 83.4%8,113 57.6%3,619 25.7% White 6,409 45.5%5,392 38.3%1,017 7.2% Black 2,022 14.4%1,962 13.9%59 0.4% American Indian 129 0.9%39 0.3%90 0.6% Asian 567 4.0%556 4.0%11 0.1% Pacific Islander 15 0.1%11 0.1%4 0.0% Some Other Race 2,590 18.4%154 1.1%2,436 17.3% Population Reporting Two or More Races 2,342 16.6%592 4.2%1,750 12.4% Diversity Index 84.6 - - - - 2020 Population 18+ by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 10,481 74.5%6,798 78.1%3,683 68.6% Population Reporting One Race 8,837 62.8%6,405 73.6%2,432 45.3% White 5,063 36.0%4,415 50.7%648 12.1% Black 1,447 10.3%1,414 16.2%33 0.6% American Indian 101 0.7%33 0.4%67 1.2% Asian 447 3.2%439 5.0%8 0.1% Pacific Islander 12 0.1%8 0.1%4 0.1% Some Other Race 1,767 12.6%96 1.1%1,671 31.1% Population Reporting Two or More Races 1,644 11.7%392 4.5%1,252 23.3% 2020 Population <18 by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 3,593 25.5%1,907 21.9%1,686 31.4% Population Reporting One Race 2,895 20.6%1,708 19.6%1,187 22.1% White 1,346 9.6%976 11.2%369 6.9% Black 575 4.1%548 6.3%26 0.5% American Indian 28 0.2%5 0.1%23 0.4% Asian 120 0.9%117 1.3%4 0.1% Pacific Islander 3 0.0%3 0.0%0 0.0% Some Other Race 822 5.8%58 0.7%765 14.2% Population Reporting Two or More Races 698 5.0%200 2.3%498 9.3% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 5 2020 Census Profile One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles Group Quarters Population by Type 2020 Number Percent Total 6 0.0% Institutionalized population 0 0.0% Correctional facilities for adults 0 0.0% Juvenile facilities 0 0.0% Nursing facilities/Skilled-nursing facilities 0 0.0% Other institutional facilities 0 0.0% Noninstitutionalized population 6 0.0% College/University student housing housing 0 0.0% Military Quarters 0 0.0% Other noninstitutional facilities 6 0.0% Population by Sex 2020 Number Percent Male 7,085 50.3% Female 6,989 49.7% Population by Age 2020 Number Percent Total 14,074 100% Age 0-4 868 6.2% Age 5-9 997 7.1% Age 10-14 1,093 7.8% Age 15-19 1,049 7.5% Age 20-24 952 6.8% Age 25-29 916 6.5% Age 30-34 1,069 7.6% Age 35-39 1,017 7.2% Age 40-44 1,007 7.2% Age 45-49 901 6.4% Age 50-54 904 6.4% Age 55-59 872 6.2% Age 60-64 789 5.6% Age 65-69 631 4.5% Age 70-74 419 3.0% Age 75-79 295 2.1% Age 80-84 152 1.1% Age 85+144 1.0% Age 18+10,481 74.5% Age 65+1,641 11.7% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 5 2020 Census Profile One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles Households by Type 2020 Number Percent Total 4,465 100% Married Couple Households 2,430 54.4% With Own Children <18 1,055 23.6% Without Own Children <18 1,375 30.8% Cohabitating Couple Households 320 7.2% With Own Children <18 147 3.3% Without Own Children <18 173 3.9% Male Householder, No Spouse/Partner 706 15.8% Living Alone 310 6.9% 65 Years and over 87 1.9% With Own Children <18 102 2.3% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 189 4.2% No Relatives Present 104 2.3% Female Householder, No Spouse/Partner 1,009 22.6% Living Alone 337 7.5% 65 Years and over 145 3.2% With Own Children <18 252 5.6% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 361 8.1% No Relatives Present 59 1.3% Households by Size 2020 Number Percent Total 4,465 100% 1 Person Household 646 14.5% 2 Person Household 1,278 28.6% 3 Person Household 900 20.2% 4 Person Household 866 19.4% 5 Person Household 416 9.3% 6 Person Household 216 4.8% 7+ Person Household 142 3.2% Population by Relationship 2020 Number Percent Total 14,074 100% In Households 14,068 100.0% Householder 4,398 31.3% Opposite-Sex Spouse 2,371 16.9% Same-Sex Spouse 36 0.3% Opposite-Sex Unmarried Partner 287 2.0% Same-Sex Unmarried Partner 19 0.1% Biological Child 4,397 31.3% Adopted Child 73 0.5% Stepchild 195 1.4% Grandchild 492 3.5% Brother or Sister 241 1.7% Parent 261 1.9% Parent-in-law 89 0.6% Son-in-law or Daughter-in-law 111 0.8% Other Relatives 410 2.9% Foster Child 12 0.1% Other Nonrelatives 675 4.8% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 5 2020 Census Profile One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles Households by Age of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 4,465 100% Householder Age 15-24 109 2.4% Householder Age 25-34 653 14.6% Householder Age 35-44 937 21.0% Householder Age 45-54 955 21.4% Householder Age 55-59 461 10.3% Householder Age 60-64 454 10.2% Householder Age 65-74 560 12.5% Householder Age 75-84 256 5.7% Householder Age 85+82 1.8% Family Households by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 3,514 100% Householder is White Alone 1,736 38.9% Householder is Black Alone 544 12.2% Householder is American Indian Alone 21 0.5% Householder is Asian Alone 155 3.5% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 4 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 545 12.2% Householder is Two or More Races 510 11.4% Households with Hispanic Householder 1,128 25.3% Nonfamily Households by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 951 100% Householder is White Alone 633 14.2% Householder is Black Alone 103 2.3% Householder is American Indian Alone 2 0.0% Householder is Asian Alone 18 0.4% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 1 0.0% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 82 1.8% Householder is Two or More Races 113 2.5% Households with Hispanic Householder 195 4.4% Total Housing Units by Occupancy 2020 Number Percent Total 4,672 100% Occupied Housing Units 4,465 95.6% Vacant Housing Units 176 3.8% For Rent 50 28.4% Rented, not Occupied 4 2.3% For Sale Only 33 18.8% Sold, not Occupied 27 15.3% For Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use 11 6.2% For Migrant Workers 0 0.0% Other Vacant 51 29.0% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 5 2020 Census Profile One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles Owner-Occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 3,181 100% Householder is White Alone 1,828 57.5% Householder is Black Alone 482 15.2% Householder is American Indian Alone 12 0.4% Householder is Asian Alone 147 4.6% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 4 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 291 9.1% Householder is Two or More Races 417 13.1% Hispanic Householder 710 22.3% Renter-Occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 1,284 100% Householder is White Alone 541 42.1% Householder is Black Alone 165 12.9% Householder is American Indian Alone 12 0.9% Householder is Asian Alone 25 1.9% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 1 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 336 26.2% Householder is Two or More Races 205 16.0% Hispanic Householder 612 47.7% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 5 2020 Census Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2010 2020 2023 Annual Rate Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 2000-2020 2010-2020 2020-2023 Total Population 145,853 100.0%173,630 100.0%178,854 100.0%2.25%1.76%0.92% Household Population 144,959 99.4%172,540 99.4%177,764 99.4%2.27%1.76%0.92% Group Quarters 895 0.6%1,090 0.6%1,090 0.6%-0.27%1.99%0.00% Population Density 1,602.8 -1,908.0 -1,965.4 - Total Housing Units 54,886 100.0%62,076 100.0%63,714 100.0%2.24%1.24%0.80% Total Households 49,434 90.1%58,909 94.9%60,959 95.7%2.26%1.77%1.06% Total Vacant 5,452 9.9%3,148 5.1%2,755 4.3%1.94%-5.34%-16.29% Average Household Size 2.93 -2.93 -2.92 - - - 2020 Population by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 173,630 100.0%135,910 78.3%37,720 21.7% Population Reporting One Race 150,899 86.9%127,755 73.6%23,144 13.3% White 64,500 37.1%57,131 32.9%7,369 4.2% Black 60,131 34.6%58,598 33.7%1,533 0.9% American Indian 743 0.4%352 0.2%391 0.2% Asian 9,026 5.2%8,920 5.1%106 0.1% Pacific Islander 144 0.1%109 0.1%35 0.0% Some Other Race 16,355 9.4%2,644 1.5%13,710 7.9% Population Reporting Two or More Races 22,731 13.1%8,155 4.7%14,576 8.4% Diversity Index 81.1 - - - - 2020 Population 18+ by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 131,505 75.7%104,766 77.1%26,738 70.9% Population Reporting One Race 115,347 66.4%99,206 73.0%16,142 42.8% White 51,806 29.8%46,829 34.5%4,977 13.2% Black 43,692 25.2%42,798 31.5%894 2.4% American Indian 586 0.3%278 0.2%308 0.8% Asian 7,291 4.2%7,223 5.3%68 0.2% Pacific Islander 110 0.1%80 0.1%30 0.1% Some Other Race 11,863 6.8%1,997 1.5%9,865 26.2% Population Reporting Two or More Races 16,157 9.3%5,561 4.1%10,596 28.1% 2020 Population <18 by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 42,125 24.3%31,144 22.9%10,982 29.1% Population Reporting One Race 35,552 20.5%28,549 21.0%7,003 18.6% White 12,694 7.3%10,302 7.6%2,392 6.3% Black 16,439 9.5%15,799 11.6%640 1.7% American Indian 158 0.1%74 0.1%83 0.2% Asian 1,735 1.0%1,697 1.2%38 0.1% Pacific Islander 34 0.0%29 0.0%5 0.0% Some Other Race 4,492 2.6%647 0.5%3,845 10.2% Population Reporting Two or More Races 6,574 3.8%2,595 1.9%3,979 10.5% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 5 2020 Census Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Group Quarters Population by Type 2020 Number Percent Total 1,090 0.6% Institutionalized population 859 0.5% Correctional facilities for adults 81 0.0% Juvenile facilities 30 0.0% Nursing facilities/Skilled-nursing facilities 748 0.4% Other institutional facilities 0 0.0% Noninstitutionalized population 231 0.1% College/University student housing housing 0 0.0% Military Quarters 0 0.0% Other noninstitutional facilities 231 0.1% Population by Sex 2020 Number Percent Male 83,609 48.2% Female 90,021 51.8% Population by Age 2020 Number Percent Total 173,630 100% Age 0-4 10,328 5.9% Age 5-9 11,397 6.6% Age 10-14 12,639 7.3% Age 15-19 12,594 7.3% Age 20-24 10,947 6.3% Age 25-29 11,108 6.4% Age 30-34 11,824 6.8% Age 35-39 12,183 7.0% Age 40-44 11,924 6.9% Age 45-49 11,819 6.8% Age 50-54 11,996 6.9% Age 55-59 11,720 6.7% Age 60-64 10,393 6.0% Age 65-69 8,108 4.7% Age 70-74 6,041 3.5% Age 75-79 3,914 2.3% Age 80-84 2,403 1.4% Age 85+2,293 1.3% Age 18+131,505 75.7% Age 65+22,759 13.1% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 5 2020 Census Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Households by Type 2020 Number Percent Total 58,909 100% Married Couple Households 28,940 49.1% With Own Children <18 12,160 20.6% Without Own Children <18 16,780 28.5% Cohabitating Couple Households 3,800 6.5% With Own Children <18 1,470 2.5% Without Own Children <18 2,330 4.0% Male Householder, No Spouse/Partner 9,324 15.8% Living Alone 4,918 8.3% 65 Years and over 1,282 2.2% With Own Children <18 1,221 2.1% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 2,097 3.6% No Relatives Present 1,088 1.8% Female Householder, No Spouse/Partner 16,845 28.6% Living Alone 6,263 10.6% 65 Years and over 2,693 4.6% With Own Children <18 4,329 7.3% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 5,436 9.2% No Relatives Present 817 1.4% Households by Size 2020 Number Percent Total 58,909 100% 1 Person Household 11,181 19.0% 2 Person Household 17,262 29.3% 3 Person Household 11,380 19.3% 4 Person Household 9,935 16.9% 5 Person Household 5,160 8.8% 6 Person Household 2,413 4.1% 7+ Person Household 1,577 2.7% Population by Relationship 2020 Number Percent Total 173,630 100% In Households 172,540 99.4% Householder 59,055 34.2% Opposite-Sex Spouse 28,585 16.6% Same-Sex Spouse 421 0.2% Opposite-Sex Unmarried Partner 3,533 2.0% Same-Sex Unmarried Partner 251 0.1% Biological Child 52,725 30.6% Adopted Child 910 0.5% Stepchild 2,243 1.3% Grandchild 5,573 3.2% Brother or Sister 3,019 1.7% Parent 3,483 2.0% Parent-in-law 878 0.5% Son-in-law or Daughter-in-law 978 0.6% Other Relatives 4,138 2.4% Foster Child 134 0.1% Other Nonrelatives 6,613 3.8% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 5 2020 Census Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Households by Age of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 58,909 100% Householder Age 15-24 1,466 2.5% Householder Age 25-34 8,287 14.1% Householder Age 35-44 11,827 20.1% Householder Age 45-54 12,595 21.4% Householder Age 55-59 6,385 10.8% Householder Age 60-64 5,781 9.8% Householder Age 65-74 7,980 13.5% Householder Age 75-84 3,462 5.9% Householder Age 85+1,128 1.9% Family Households by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 43,949 100% Householder is White Alone 17,829 30.3% Householder is Black Alone 14,484 24.6% Householder is American Indian Alone 194 0.3% Householder is Asian Alone 2,279 3.9% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 35 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 3,761 6.4% Householder is Two or More Races 5,367 9.1% Households with Hispanic Householder 8,767 14.9% Nonfamily Households by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 14,960 100% Householder is White Alone 7,497 12.7% Householder is Black Alone 4,479 7.6% Householder is American Indian Alone 39 0.1% Householder is Asian Alone 533 0.9% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 13 0.0% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 921 1.6% Householder is Two or More Races 1,478 2.5% Households with Hispanic Householder 2,200 3.7% Total Housing Units by Occupancy 2020 Number Percent Total 62,076 100% Occupied Housing Units 58,909 94.9% Vacant Housing Units 3,148 5.1% For Rent 1,287 40.9% Rented, not Occupied 122 3.9% For Sale Only 553 17.6% Sold, not Occupied 243 7.7% For Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use 411 13.1% For Migrant Workers 5 0.2% Other Vacant 527 16.7% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 5 2020 Census Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Owner-Occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 38,987 100% Householder is White Alone 18,800 48.2% Householder is Black Alone 10,901 28.0% Householder is American Indian Alone 140 0.4% Householder is Asian Alone 2,308 5.9% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 25 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 2,450 6.3% Householder is Two or More Races 4,363 11.2% Hispanic Householder 6,082 15.6% Renter-Occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 19,922 100% Householder is White Alone 6,526 32.8% Householder is Black Alone 8,063 40.5% Householder is American Indian Alone 92 0.5% Householder is Asian Alone 504 2.5% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 22 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 2,233 11.2% Householder is Two or More Races 2,482 12.5% Hispanic Householder 4,885 24.5% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 5 2020 Census Profile Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2010 2020 2023 Annual Rate Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 2000-2020 2010-2020 2020-2023 Total Population 1,145,956 100.0%1,429,908 100.0%1,497,941 100.0%2.36%2.24%1.44% Household Population 1,112,252 97.1%1,393,347 97.4%1,461,380 97.6%2.34%2.28%1.48% Group Quarters 33,704 2.9%36,561 2.6%36,561 2.4%3.37%0.82%0.00% Population Density 1,269.1 -1,582.8 -1,658.1 - Total Housing Units 487,839 100.0%561,851 100.0%588,018 100.0%2.23%1.42%1.41% Total Households 421,847 86.5%519,437 92.5%547,159 93.1%2.20%2.10%1.61% Total Vacant 65,992 13.5%42,414 7.5%40,859 6.9%2.67%-4.32%-1.14% Average Household Size 2.64 -2.68 -2.67 - - - 2020 Population by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 1,429,908 100.0%956,883 66.9%473,025 33.1% Population Reporting One Race 1,164,813 81.5%891,192 62.3%273,621 19.1% White 629,789 44.0%531,362 37.2%98,427 6.9% Black 277,027 19.4%263,624 18.4%13,403 0.9% American Indian 6,328 0.4%2,207 0.2%4,121 0.3% Asian 78,348 5.5%76,870 5.4%1,478 0.1% Pacific Islander 1,417 0.1%1,114 0.1%303 0.0% Some Other Race 171,904 12.0%16,015 1.1%155,889 10.9% Population Reporting Two or More Races 265,095 18.5%65,691 4.6%199,404 13.9% Diversity Index 84.2 - - - - 2020 Population 18+ by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 1,115,798 78.0%762,435 79.7%353,363 74.7% Population Reporting One Race 919,818 64.3%717,314 75.0%202,504 42.8% White 516,466 36.1%444,821 46.5%71,645 15.1% Black 204,357 14.3%196,009 20.5%8,348 1.8% American Indian 5,018 0.4%1,769 0.2%3,249 0.7% Asian 63,193 4.4%62,245 6.5%948 0.2% Pacific Islander 1,134 0.1%925 0.1%209 0.0% Some Other Race 129,650 9.1%11,545 1.2%118,105 25.0% Population Reporting Two or More Races 195,980 13.7%45,121 4.7%150,859 31.9% 2020 Population <18 by Race Total Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total 314,110 22.0%194,448 20.3%119,662 25.3% Population Reporting One Race 244,995 17.1%173,878 18.2%71,117 15.0% White 113,323 7.9%86,541 9.0%26,782 5.7% Black 72,670 5.1%67,615 7.1%5,055 1.1% American Indian 1,310 0.1%438 0.0%872 0.2% Asian 15,155 1.1%14,625 1.5%530 0.1% Pacific Islander 283 0.0%189 0.0%94 0.0% Some Other Race 42,254 3.0%4,470 0.5%37,784 8.0% Population Reporting Two or More Races 69,115 4.8%20,570 2.1%48,545 10.3% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 5 2020 Census Profile Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County Group Quarters Population by Type 2020 Number Percent Total 36,561 2.6% Institutionalized population 10,249 0.7% Correctional facilities for adults 4,685 0.3% Juvenile facilities 303 0.0% Nursing facilities/Skilled-nursing facilities 5,078 0.4% Other institutional facilities 183 0.0% Noninstitutionalized population 26,312 1.8% College/University student housing housing 22,616 1.6% Military Quarters 0 0.0% Other noninstitutional facilities 3,696 0.3% Population by Sex 2020 Number Percent Male 696,512 48.7% Female 733,396 51.3% Population by Age 2020 Number Percent Total 1,429,908 100% Age 0-4 77,243 5.4% Age 5-9 87,290 6.1% Age 10-14 93,673 6.6% Age 15-19 108,924 7.6% Age 20-24 113,229 7.9% Age 25-29 113,367 7.9% Age 30-34 108,437 7.6% Age 35-39 103,859 7.3% Age 40-44 98,787 6.9% Age 45-49 93,955 6.6% Age 50-54 89,817 6.3% Age 55-59 87,668 6.1% Age 60-64 76,304 5.3% Age 65-69 60,853 4.3% Age 70-74 47,837 3.3% Age 75-79 30,625 2.1% Age 80-84 19,240 1.3% Age 85+18,800 1.3% Age 18+1,115,798 78.0% Age 65+177,355 12.4% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 5 2020 Census Profile Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County Households by Type 2020 Number Percent Total 519,437 100% Married Couple Households 229,102 44.1% With Own Children <18 97,479 18.8% Without Own Children <18 131,623 25.3% Cohabitating Couple Households 42,363 8.2% With Own Children <18 12,966 2.5% Without Own Children <18 29,397 5.7% Male Householder, No Spouse/Partner 99,486 19.2% Living Alone 58,017 11.2% 65 Years and over 11,922 2.3% With Own Children <18 9,416 1.8% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 17,557 3.4% No Relatives Present 14,496 2.8% Female Householder, No Spouse/Partner 148,486 28.6% Living Alone 64,347 12.4% 65 Years and over 23,779 4.6% With Own Children <18 33,083 6.4% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 40,239 7.7% No Relatives Present 10,817 2.1% Households by Size 2020 Number Percent Total 519,437 100% 1 Person Household 122,364 23.6% 2 Person Household 162,301 31.2% 3 Person Household 94,638 18.2% 4 Person Household 80,482 15.5% 5 Person Household 36,285 7.0% 6 Person Household 14,605 2.8% 7+ Person Household 8,762 1.7% Population by Relationship 2020 Number Percent Total 1,429,908 100% In Households 1,393,347 97.4% Householder 519,482 37.3% Opposite-Sex Spouse 224,647 16.1% Same-Sex Spouse 4,480 0.3% Opposite-Sex Unmarried Partner 38,712 2.8% Same-Sex Unmarried Partner 3,653 0.3% Biological Child 386,035 27.7% Adopted Child 6,525 0.5% Stepchild 16,675 1.2% Grandchild 33,882 2.4% Brother or Sister 22,114 1.6% Parent 27,478 2.0% Parent-in-law 6,845 0.5% Son-in-law or Daughter-in-law 6,715 0.5% Other Relatives 27,035 1.9% Foster Child 743 0.1% Other Nonrelatives 68,326 4.9% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 5 2020 Census Profile Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County Households by Age of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 519,437 100% Householder Age 15-24 28,087 5.4% Householder Age 25-34 94,641 18.2% Householder Age 35-44 104,110 20.0% Householder Age 45-54 100,096 19.3% Householder Age 55-59 48,907 9.4% Householder Age 60-64 43,227 8.3% Householder Age 65-74 62,519 12.0% Householder Age 75-84 28,251 5.4% Householder Age 85+9,599 1.8% Family Households by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 346,473 100% Householder is White Alone 157,863 30.4% Householder is Black Alone 64,331 12.4% Householder is American Indian Alone 1,545 0.3% Householder is Asian Alone 19,336 3.7% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 268 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 40,408 7.8% Householder is Two or More Races 62,722 12.1% Households with Hispanic Householder 112,152 21.6% Nonfamily Households by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 172,964 100% Householder is White Alone 99,024 19.1% Householder is Black Alone 29,861 5.7% Householder is American Indian Alone 683 0.1% Householder is Asian Alone 6,714 1.3% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 167 0.0% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 13,441 2.6% Householder is Two or More Races 23,074 4.4% Households with Hispanic Householder 40,142 7.7% Total Housing Units by Occupancy 2020 Number Percent Total 561,851 100% Occupied Housing Units 519,437 92.5% Vacant Housing Units 42,414 7.5% For Rent 20,963 49.4% Rented, not Occupied 1,445 3.4% For Sale Only 5,006 11.8% Sold, not Occupied 1,651 3.9% For Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use 7,543 17.8% For Migrant Workers 27 0.1% Other Vacant 5,779 13.6% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 5 2020 Census Profile Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County Owner-Occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 279,246 100% Householder is White Alone 159,248 57.0% Householder is Black Alone 38,675 13.8% Householder is American Indian Alone 961 0.3% Householder is Asian Alone 17,679 6.3% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 187 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 21,163 7.6% Householder is Two or More Races 41,333 14.8% Hispanic Householder 66,616 23.9% Renter-Occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder 2020 Number Percent Total 240,191 100% Householder is White Alone 97,639 40.7% Householder is Black Alone 55,517 23.1% Householder is American Indian Alone 1,267 0.5% Householder is Asian Alone 8,371 3.5% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 248 0.1% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 32,686 13.6% Householder is Two or More Races 44,463 18.5% Hispanic Householder 85,678 35.7% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Population density is measured in square miles. Esri's Diversity Index summarizes racial and ethnic diversity. The index shows the likelihood that two persons, chosen at random from the same area, belong to different race or ethnic groups. The index ranges from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (complete diversity). Source: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census data. April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 5 ACS Housing Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTALS Total Population 190,855 7,219 Total Households 57,766 1,847 Total Housing Units 62,423 1,911 OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY MORTGAGE STATUS Total 37,497 100.0%1,351 Housing units with a mortgage/contract to purchase/similar debt 26,705 71.2%1,234 No Second Mortgage and No Home Equity Loan 23,754 63.3%1,195 Multiple Mortgages 2,452 6.5%328 Second mortgage and Home Equity Loan 45 0.1%41 Only Home Equity Loan 1,954 5.2%294 Only Second Mortgage 454 1.2%142 Home Equity Loan without Primary Mortgage 499 1.3%253 Housing units without a mortgage 10,793 28.8%821 AVERAGE VALUE BY MORTGAGE STATUS Housing units with a mortgage N/A N/A Housing units without a mortgage N/A N/A OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY MORTGAGE STATUS & SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS Total 37,497 100.0%1,351 With a mortgage: Monthly owner costs as a percentage of household income in past 12 months Less than 10.0 percent 1,602 4.3%267 10.0 to 14.9 percent 3,986 10.6%537 15.0 to 19.9 percent 5,090 13.6%572 20.0 to 24.9 percent 4,069 10.9%493 25.0 to 29.9 percent 2,652 7.1%380 30.0 to 34.9 percent 2,003 5.3%366 35.0 to 39.9 percent 1,262 3.4%293 40.0 to 49.9 percent 1,577 4.2%341 50.0 percent or more 4,166 11.1%672 Not computed 298 0.8%96 Without a mortgage: Monthly owner costs as a percentage of household income in past 12 months Less than 10.0 percent 5,260 14.0%613 10.0 to 14.9 percent 1,864 5.0%337 15.0 to 19.9 percent 1,081 2.9%270 20.0 to 24.9 percent 661 1.8%199 25.0 to 29.9 percent 473 1.3%202 30.0 to 34.9 percent 147 0.4%100 35.0 to 39.9 percent 179 0.5%99 40.0 to 49.9 percent 445 1.2%202 50.0 percent or more 540 1.4%180 Not computed 142 0.4%123 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 6 ACS Housing Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability RENTER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY CONTRACT RENT Total 20,269 100.0%1,426 With cash rent 19,412 95.8%1,298 Less than $100 27 0.1%41 $100 to $149 120 0.6%57 $150 to $199 109 0.5%65 $200 to $249 45 0.2%39 $250 to $299 19 0.1%37 $300 to $349 200 1.0%120 $350 to $399 38 0.2%78 $400 to $449 90 0.4%83 $450 to $499 101 0.5%79 $500 to $549 243 1.2%128 $550 to $599 266 1.3%154 $600 to $649 961 4.7%349 $650 to $699 497 2.5%154 $700 to $749 796 3.9%353 $750 to $799 752 3.7%236 $800 to $899 2,122 10.5%392 $900 to $999 1,957 9.7%393 $1,000 to $1,249 3,473 17.1%607 $1,250 to $1,499 3,694 18.2%647 $1,500 to $1,999 2,723 13.4%445 $2,000 to $2,499 965 4.8%536 $2,500 to $2,999 189 0.9%69 $3,000 to $3,499 27 0.1%35 $3,500 or more 0 0.0%0 No cash rent 857 4.2%623 Median Contract Rent $1,098 N/A Average Contract Rent N/A N/A RENTER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY INCLUSION OF UTILITIES IN RENT Total 20,269 100.0%1,426 Pay extra for one or more utilities 19,354 95.5%1,325 No extra payment for any utilities 915 4.5%541 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 6 ACS Housing Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability RENTER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY GROSS RENT Total:20,269 100.0%1,426 With cash rent: 19,412 95.8%1,298 Less than $100 0 0.0%0 $100 to $149 0 0.0%0 $150 to $199 82 0.4%56 $200 to $249 51 0.3%40 $250 to $299 65 0.3%59 $300 to $349 86 0.4%73 $350 to $399 52 0.3%45 $400 to $449 13 0.1%32 $450 to $499 40 0.2%27 $500 to $549 137 0.7%77 $550 to $599 62 0.3%63 $600 to $649 226 1.1%152 $650 to $699 351 1.7%182 $700 to $749 337 1.7%142 $750 to $799 519 2.6%200 $800 to $899 1,409 7.0%486 $900 to $999 1,414 7.0%312 $1,000 to $1,249 4,220 20.8%583 $1,250 to $1,499 3,868 19.1%620 $1,500 to $1,999 4,491 22.2%681 $2,000 to $2,499 1,334 6.6%554 $2,500 to $2,999 482 2.4%194 $3,000 to $3,499 83 0.4%65 $3,500 or more 87 0.4%63 No cash rent 857 4.2%623 Median Gross Rent $1,291 N/A Average Gross Rent N/A N/A Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 6 ACS Housing Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSING UNITS BY UNITS IN STRUCTURE Total 62,423 100.0%1,911 1, detached 45,476 72.9%1,683 1, attached 3,312 5.3%536 2 754 1.2%233 3 or 4 1,861 3.0%498 5 to 9 2,779 4.5%452 10 to 19 2,471 4.0%420 20 to 49 1,647 2.6%348 50 or more 1,053 1.7%287 Mobile home 2,958 4.7%645 Boat, RV, van, etc.111 0.2%115 HOUSING UNITS BY YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT Total 62,423 100.0%1,911 Built 2020 or later 120 0.2%65 Built 2010 to 2019 6,326 10.1%626 Built 2000 to 2009 14,353 23.0%1,190 Built 1990 to 1999 13,283 21.3%967 Built 1980 to 1989 13,780 22.1%1,097 Built 1970 to 1979 7,453 11.9%704 Built 1960 to 1969 3,079 4.9%388 Built 1950 to 1959 2,776 4.4%560 Built 1940 to 1949 645 1.0%241 Built 1939 or earlier 607 1.0%179 Median Year Structure Built 1992 N/A OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 Owner occupied Moved in 2019 or later 2,232 3.9%415 Moved in 2015 to 2018 8,848 15.3%751 Moved in 2010 to 2014 7,093 12.3%678 Moved in 2000 to 2009 11,007 19.1%952 Moved in 1990 to 1999 5,021 8.7%491 Moved in 1989 or earlier 3,296 5.7%414 Renter occupied Moved in 2019 or later 3,010 5.2%687 Moved in 2015 to 2018 10,147 17.6%1,021 Moved in 2010 to 2014 5,491 9.5%846 Moved in 2000 to 2009 1,152 2.0%287 Moved in 1990 to 1999 312 0.5%148 Moved in 1989 or earlier 156 0.3%123 Median Year Householder Moved Into Unit 2013 N/A Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 6 ACS Housing Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY HOUSE HEATING FUEL Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 Utility gas 2,314 4.0%379 Bottled, tank, or LP gas 563 1.0%283 Electricity 53,318 92.3%1,729 Fuel oil, kerosene, etc.346 0.6%517 Coal or coke 0 0.0%0 Wood 60 0.1%160 Solar energy 323 0.6%114 Other fuel 0 0.0%0 No fuel used 842 1.5%241 OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY VEHICLES AVAILABLE Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 Owner occupied No vehicle available 829 1.4%222 1 vehicle available 9,056 15.7%758 2 vehicles available 17,621 30.5%1,020 3 vehicles available 7,037 12.2%651 4 vehicles available 2,338 4.0%510 5 or more vehicles available 616 1.1%167 Renter occupied No vehicle available 2,079 3.6%612 1 vehicle available 9,058 15.7%897 2 vehicles available 6,667 11.5%843 3 vehicles available 1,622 2.8%371 4 vehicles available 795 1.4%528 5 or more vehicles available 47 0.1%38 Average Number of Vehicles Available N/A N/A VACANT HOUSING UNITS Total vacant housing units 4,645 100.0% HUs MOE (ACS 5-Yr) 869 For rent 1,222 26.3%541 Rented, not occupied 181 3.9%117 For sale only 493 10.6%188 Sold, not occupied 383 8.2%186 Seasonal/occasional 937 20.2%445 For migrant workers 5 0.1%34 Other 1,425 30.7%463 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 6 ACS Housing Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY VALUE Total 37,497 100%1,351 Less than $10,000 605 1.6%235 $10,000 to $14,999 125 0.3%94 $15,000 to $19,999 114 0.3%74 $20,000 to $24,999 271 0.7%186 $25,000 to $29,999 150 0.4%78 $30,000 to $34,999 227 0.6%126 $35,000 to $39,999 50 0.1%46 $40,000 to $49,999 382 1.0%170 $50,000 to $59,999 380 1.0%174 $60,000 to $69,999 110 0.3%59 $70,000 to $79,999 187 0.5%81 $80,000 to $89,999 438 1.2%132 $90,000 to $99,999 354 0.9%108 $100,000 to $124,999 1,261 3.4%267 $125,000 to $149,999 1,768 4.7%289 $150,000 to $174,999 2,630 7.0%376 $175,000 to $199,999 2,797 7.5%468 $200,000 to $249,999 6,177 16.5%667 $250,000 to $299,999 5,782 15.4%607 $300,000 to $399,999 8,124 21.7%798 $400,000 to $499,999 1,948 5.2%323 $500,000 to $749,999 2,495 6.7%350 $750,000 to $999,999 546 1.5%155 $1,000,000 to $1,499,999 345 0.9%151 $1,500,000 to $1,999,999 140 0.4%102 $2,000,000 or more 91 0.2%67 Median Home Value $256,248 N/A Average Home Value N/A N/A Data Note: N/A means not available. 2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 6 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTALS Total Population 190,855 7,219 Total Households 57,766 1,847 Housing Units 62,423 1,911 POPULATION 15+ BY MARITAL STATUS Total 149,585 100%5,636 Never married 53,931 36.1%2,911 Married 71,971 48.1%2,568 Widowed 6,415 4.3%677 Divorced 17,268 11.5%1,489 POPULATION 25+ BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Total 125,006 100%4,842 No schooling 3,125 2.5%676 Nursery School 39 0.0%53 Kindergarden 11 0.0%21 1st to 4th Grade 1,157 0.9%368 5th to 8th Grade 3,682 2.9%659 Some High School 11,609 9.3%1,454 High School Diploma 28,682 22.9%2,420 GED 4,488 3.6%662 Some College 24,342 19.5%1,629 Associates degree 13,167 10.5%1,121 Bachelors degree 23,254 18.6%1,598 Masters degree 8,988 7.2%1,153 Professional school degree 1,704 1.4%367 Doctorate degree 757 0.6%267 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16+ BY OCCUPATION Total 94,233 100%4,254 Management 9,480 10.1%906 Business and financial operations 3,729 4.0%540 Computer and mathematical 1,872 2.0%339 Architecture and engineering 1,029 1.1%273 Life, physical, and social science 347 0.4%126 Community and social services 1,294 1.4%386 Legal 811 0.9%216 Education, training, and library 5,107 5.4%903 Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media 2,051 2.2%452 Healthcare practitioner, technologists, and technicians 5,363 5.7%691 Healthcare support 3,042 3.2%576 Protective service 2,062 2.2%536 Food preparation and serving related 7,679 8.1%1,199 Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance 5,094 5.4%825 Personal care and service 2,950 3.1%580 Sales and related 11,752 12.5%1,232 Office and administrative support 11,355 12.0%921 Farming, fishing, and forestry 230 0.2%120 Construction and extraction 6,947 7.4%1,293 Installation, maintenance, and repair 2,037 2.2%354 Production 2,173 2.3%397 Transportation and material moving 7,829 8.3%1,039 CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16+ BY INDUSTRY Total 94,233 100%4,254 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 366 0.4%127 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 34 0.0%60 Construction 8,560 9.1%1,265 Manufacturing 3,663 3.9%685 Wholesale trade 2,377 2.5%434 Retail trade 10,661 11.3%1,069 Transportation and warehousing 4,481 4.8%634 Utilities 455 0.5%180 Information 2,169 2.3%670 Finance and insurance 2,632 2.8%404 Real estate and rental and leasing 2,551 2.7%457 Professional, scientific, and technical services 4,722 5.0%625 Management of companies and enterprises 70 0.1%93 Administrative and support and waste management services 7,122 7.6%1,067 Educational services 7,011 7.4%959 Health care and social assistance 12,100 12.8%1,077 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 6,676 7.1%808 Accommodation and food services 11,608 12.3%1,410 Other services, except public administration 3,730 4.0%616 Public administration 3,244 3.4%506 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN BY RACE Total 190,855 100%7,219 Not Hispanic or Latino 150,307 78.8%6,401 White alone 57,015 29.9%3,277 Black or African American alone 73,472 38.5%4,995 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 198 0.1%138 Asian alone 9,972 5.2%1,465 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0%0 Some other race alone 2,553 1.3%647 Two or more races 7,097 3.7%1,656 Hispanic or Latino 40,547 21.2%3,754 White alone 19,179 10.0%2,259 Black or African American alone 2,962 1.6%1,052 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 774 0.4%620 Asian alone 112 0.1%148 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0%0 Some other race alone 9,719 5.1%1,969 Two or more races 7,802 4.1%1,918 RACE Total 190,855 100%7,219 White alone 76,194 39.9%3,945 Black or African American alone 76,434 40.0%5,135 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 972 0.5%641 Asian alone 10,083 5.3%1,473 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0%0 Some other race alone 12,272 6.4%2,107 Two or more races 14,899 7.8%2,551 TOTAL POPULATION BY AGE Total Population 190,855 100%7,219 Under 5 years 13,217 6.9%1,239 5 to 9 years 14,006 7.3%1,405 10 to 14 years 14,047 7.4%1,311 15 to 19 years 12,529 6.6%1,027 20 to 24 years 12,051 6.3%1,228 25 to 29 years 14,389 7.5%1,536 30 to 34 years 13,373 7.0%1,835 35 to 39 years 12,993 6.8%1,170 40 to 44 years 13,920 7.3%1,298 45 to 49 years 13,188 6.9%1,350 50 to 54 years 12,803 6.7%1,125 55 to 59 years 12,337 6.5%1,020 60 to 64 years 10,082 5.3%982 65 to 69 years 8,552 4.5%760 70 to 74 years 5,860 3.1%695 75 to 79 years 3,260 1.7%414 80 to 85 years 2,482 1.3%452 85 years and over 1,767 0.9%310 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION BY SEX BY AGE Total 190,855 100%7,219 Male Population 91,815 48.1%4,135 Under 5 years 6,706 3.5%854 5 to 9 years 6,746 3.5%771 10 to 14 years 7,397 3.9%1,002 15 to 19 years 6,272 3.3%723 20 to 24 years 5,472 2.9%784 25 to 29 years 6,970 3.7%1,212 30 to 34 years 6,918 3.6%1,575 35 to 39 years 6,091 3.2%791 40 to 44 years 6,974 3.7%1,026 45 to 49 years 5,562 2.9%817 50 to 54 years 6,346 3.3%820 55 to 59 years 6,041 3.2%797 60 to 64 years 5,078 2.7%599 65 to 69 years 3,766 2.0%490 70 to 74 years 2,466 1.3%461 75 to 79 years 1,505 0.8%286 80 to 85 years 972 0.5%327 85 years and over 533 0.3%187 Female Population 99,039 51.9%4,240 Under 5 years 6,510 3.4%897 5 to 9 years 7,260 3.8%1,175 10 to 14 years 6,650 3.5%845 15 to 19 years 6,257 3.3%721 20 to 24 years 6,579 3.4%940 25 to 29 years 7,419 3.9%944 30 to 34 years 6,455 3.4%942 35 to 39 years 6,902 3.6%861 40 to 44 years 6,947 3.6%795 45 to 49 years 7,626 4.0%1,075 50 to 54 years 6,457 3.4%771 55 to 59 years 6,296 3.3%636 60 to 64 years 5,004 2.6%770 65 to 69 years 4,786 2.5%569 70 to 74 years 3,394 1.8%520 75 to 79 years 1,754 0.9%300 80 to 85 years 1,510 0.8%312 85 years and over 1,234 0.6%248 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME Total 57,766 100%1,847 Less than $10,000 3,545 6.1%692 $10,000 to $14,999 1,756 3.0%346 $15,000 to $19,999 2,016 3.5%475 $20,000 to $24,999 2,167 3.8%468 $25,000 to $29,999 2,490 4.3%391 $30,000 to $34,999 2,199 3.8%393 $35,000 to $39,999 2,726 4.7%511 $40,000 to $44,999 3,165 5.5%446 $45,000 to $49,999 2,517 4.4%536 $50,000 to $59,999 4,738 8.2%638 $60,000 to $74,999 5,470 9.5%683 $75,000 to $99,999 7,908 13.7%748 $100,000 to $124,999 5,151 8.9%576 $125,000 to $149,999 3,676 6.4%748 $150,000 to $199,999 4,700 8.1%708 $200,000 or more 3,542 6.1%414 Median Household Income $63,679 N/A Average Household Income $86,428 N/A HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE <25 YEARS BY INCOME Total 1,096 100%224 Less than $10,000 229 20.9%133 $10,000 to $14,999 72 6.6%55 $15,000 to $19,999 36 3.3%27 $20,000 to $24,999 17 1.6%12 $25,000 to $29,999 11 1.0%18 $30,000 to $34,999 66 6.0%88 $35,000 to $39,999 114 10.4%87 $40,000 to $44,999 6 0.5%9 $45,000 to $49,999 58 5.3%53 $50,000 to $59,999 283 25.8%136 $60,000 to $74,999 110 10.0%75 $75,000 to $99,999 30 2.7%58 $100,000 to $124,999 26 2.4%31 $125,000 to $149,999 26 2.4%23 $150,000 to $199,999 0 0.0%0 $200,000 or more 13 1.2%22 Median Household Income for HHr <25 $42,838 N/A Average Household Income for HHr <25 N/A N/A Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE 25-44 YEARS BY INCOME Total 21,059 100%1,367 Less than $10,000 1,242 5.9%298 $10,000 to $14,999 509 2.4%213 $15,000 to $19,999 670 3.2%356 $20,000 to $24,999 700 3.3%281 $25,000 to $29,999 995 4.7%275 $30,000 to $34,999 830 3.9%274 $35,000 to $39,999 1,072 5.1%364 $40,000 to $44,999 743 3.5%246 $45,000 to $49,999 796 3.8%246 $50,000 to $59,999 1,627 7.7%455 $60,000 to $74,999 1,998 9.5%399 $75,000 to $99,999 3,141 14.9%510 $100,000 to $124,999 2,254 10.7%395 $125,000 to $149,999 1,476 7.0%596 $150,000 to $199,999 2,035 9.7%538 $200,000 or more 972 4.6%171 Median Household Income for HHr 25-44 $69,412 N/A Average Household Income for HHr 25-44 N/A N/A HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE 45-64 YEARS BY INCOME Total 24,485 100%1,358 Less than $10,000 1,293 5.3%579 $10,000 to $14,999 610 2.5%194 $15,000 to $19,999 664 2.7%256 $20,000 to $24,999 853 3.5%307 $25,000 to $29,999 702 2.9%180 $30,000 to $34,999 701 2.9%191 $35,000 to $39,999 876 3.6%248 $40,000 to $44,999 1,841 7.5%352 $45,000 to $49,999 1,125 4.6%447 $50,000 to $59,999 1,887 7.7%345 $60,000 to $74,999 2,227 9.1%490 $75,000 to $99,999 3,625 14.8%517 $100,000 to $124,999 1,993 8.1%344 $125,000 to $149,999 1,810 7.4%427 $150,000 to $199,999 2,106 8.6%377 $200,000 or more 2,172 8.9%355 Median Household Income for HHr 45-64 $70,815 N/A Average Household Income for HHr 45-64 N/A N/A Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE 65+ BY INCOME Total 11,126 100%759 Less than $10,000 782 7.0%237 $10,000 to $14,999 564 5.1%185 $15,000 to $19,999 645 5.8%189 $20,000 to $24,999 596 5.4%212 $25,000 to $29,999 782 7.0%216 $30,000 to $34,999 602 5.4%185 $35,000 to $39,999 663 6.0%242 $40,000 to $44,999 576 5.2%147 $45,000 to $49,999 539 4.8%160 $50,000 to $59,999 941 8.5%268 $60,000 to $74,999 1,136 10.2%268 $75,000 to $99,999 1,112 10.0%210 $100,000 to $124,999 878 7.9%242 $125,000 to $149,999 365 3.3%150 $150,000 to $199,999 560 5.0%285 $200,000 or more 386 3.5%125 Median Household Income for HHr 65+$48,164 N/A Average Household Income for HHr 65+N/A N/A Data Note: N/A means not available. 2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 7 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTALS Total Population 14,513 525 Total Households 4,142 97 Housing Units 4,376 94 POPULATION 15+ BY MARITAL STATUS Total 11,351 100%443 Never married 4,260 37.5%317 Married 5,164 45.5%155 Widowed 362 3.2%36 Divorced 1,565 13.8%155 POPULATION 25+ BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Total 9,340 100%440 No schooling 261 2.8%72 Nursery School 0 0.0%0 Kindergarden 0 0.0%0 1st to 4th Grade 249 2.7%60 5th to 8th Grade 598 6.4%117 Some High School 1,412 15.1%332 High School Diploma 2,006 21.5%233 GED 591 6.3%106 Some College 1,705 18.3%104 Associates degree 668 7.2%64 Bachelors degree 1,214 13.0%72 Masters degree 535 5.7%91 Professional school degree 33 0.4%38 Doctorate degree 69 0.7%58 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16+ BY OCCUPATION Total 7,169 100%378 Management 576 8.0%51 Business and financial operations 375 5.2%75 Computer and mathematical 205 2.9%47 Architecture and engineering 62 0.9%16 Life, physical, and social science 28 0.4%19 Community and social services 44 0.6%15 Legal 27 0.4%57 Education, training, and library 320 4.5%120 Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media 41 0.6%16 Healthcare practitioner, technologists, and technicians 349 4.9%56 Healthcare support 63 0.9%24 Protective service 282 3.9%283 Food preparation and serving related 604 8.4%152 Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance 344 4.8%79 Personal care and service 191 2.7%51 Sales and related 672 9.4%78 Office and administrative support 810 11.3%86 Farming, fishing, and forestry 93 1.3%54 Construction and extraction 1,418 19.8%265 Installation, maintenance, and repair 115 1.6%42 Production 134 1.9%40 Transportation and material moving 417 5.8%56 CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16+ BY INDUSTRY Total 7,169 100%378 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 70 1.0%44 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 0 0.0%0 Construction 1,301 18.1%144 Manufacturing 455 6.3%327 Wholesale trade 206 2.9%43 Retail trade 671 9.4%115 Transportation and warehousing 209 2.9%62 Utilities 73 1.0%58 Information 88 1.2%14 Finance and insurance 165 2.3%45 Real estate and rental and leasing 88 1.2%17 Professional, scientific, and technical services 329 4.6%58 Management of companies and enterprises 23 0.3%47 Administrative and support and waste management services 799 11.1%174 Educational services 461 6.4%100 Health care and social assistance 748 10.4%67 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 260 3.6%33 Accommodation and food services 783 10.9%120 Other services, except public administration 267 3.7%56 Public administration 173 2.4%45 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN BY RACE Total 14,513 100%525 Not Hispanic or Latino 8,975 61.8%417 White alone 5,936 40.9%429 Black or African American alone 2,011 13.9%285 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 93 0.6%90 Asian alone 312 2.1%96 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0%0 Some other race alone 192 1.3%113 Two or more races 431 3.0%82 Hispanic or Latino 5,538 38.2%443 White alone 2,280 15.7%308 Black or African American alone 200 1.4%256 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 310 2.1%283 Asian alone 22 0.2%144 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0%0 Some other race alone 2,254 15.5%433 Two or more races 472 3.3%116 RACE Total 14,513 100%525 White alone 8,216 56.6%465 Black or African American alone 2,211 15.2%285 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 403 2.8%261 Asian alone 335 2.3%98 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0 0.0%0 Some other race alone 2,445 16.8%416 Two or more races 903 6.2%116 TOTAL POPULATION BY AGE Total Population 14,513 100%525 Under 5 years 868 6.0%84 5 to 9 years 931 6.4%125 10 to 14 years 1,362 9.4%109 15 to 19 years 1,001 6.9%88 20 to 24 years 1,010 7.0%96 25 to 29 years 1,375 9.5%366 30 to 34 years 797 5.5%104 35 to 39 years 1,083 7.5%133 40 to 44 years 987 6.8%86 45 to 49 years 963 6.6%83 50 to 54 years 1,147 7.9%159 55 to 59 years 889 6.1%76 60 to 64 years 676 4.7%103 65 to 69 years 496 3.4%66 70 to 74 years 491 3.4%86 75 to 79 years 172 1.2%31 80 to 85 years 138 1.0%46 85 years and over 126 0.9%34 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION BY SEX BY AGE Total 14,513 100%525 Male Population 7,611 52.4%471 Under 5 years 305 2.1%60 5 to 9 years 524 3.6%116 10 to 14 years 649 4.5%84 15 to 19 years 603 4.2%86 20 to 24 years 493 3.4%67 25 to 29 years 893 6.2%498 30 to 34 years 360 2.5%66 35 to 39 years 646 4.5%136 40 to 44 years 559 3.9%69 45 to 49 years 382 2.6%49 50 to 54 years 735 5.1%176 55 to 59 years 500 3.4%69 60 to 64 years 316 2.2%118 65 to 69 years 240 1.7%62 70 to 74 years 215 1.5%70 75 to 79 years 82 0.6%25 80 to 85 years 31 0.2%11 85 years and over 77 0.5%36 Female Population 6,902 47.6%205 Under 5 years 563 3.9%75 5 to 9 years 408 2.8%55 10 to 14 years 713 4.9%99 15 to 19 years 398 2.7%41 20 to 24 years 516 3.6%81 25 to 29 years 482 3.3%69 30 to 34 years 437 3.0%83 35 to 39 years 437 3.0%45 40 to 44 years 428 2.9%55 45 to 49 years 582 4.0%84 50 to 54 years 412 2.8%48 55 to 59 years 389 2.7%46 60 to 64 years 360 2.5%69 65 to 69 years 256 1.8%28 70 to 74 years 276 1.9%55 75 to 79 years 90 0.6%19 80 to 85 years 107 0.7%46 85 years and over 49 0.3%17 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME Total 4,142 100%97 Less than $10,000 81 2.0%28 $10,000 to $14,999 118 2.8%32 $15,000 to $19,999 201 4.9%43 $20,000 to $24,999 186 4.5%38 $25,000 to $29,999 97 2.3%35 $30,000 to $34,999 135 3.3%55 $35,000 to $39,999 283 6.8%73 $40,000 to $44,999 193 4.7%42 $45,000 to $49,999 134 3.2%29 $50,000 to $59,999 229 5.5%36 $60,000 to $74,999 436 10.5%84 $75,000 to $99,999 792 19.1%57 $100,000 to $124,999 300 7.2%43 $125,000 to $149,999 260 6.3%40 $150,000 to $199,999 485 11.7%123 $200,000 or more 213 5.1%41 Median Household Income $74,121 N/A Average Household Income $92,337 $5,324 HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE <25 YEARS BY INCOME Total 21 100%13 Less than $10,000 0 0.0%0 $10,000 to $14,999 0 0.0%0 $15,000 to $19,999 0 0.0%0 $20,000 to $24,999 7 33.3%10 $25,000 to $29,999 4 19.0%17 $30,000 to $34,999 0 0.0%0 $35,000 to $39,999 2 9.5%19 $40,000 to $44,999 0 0.0%0 $45,000 to $49,999 0 0.0%0 $50,000 to $59,999 0 0.0%0 $60,000 to $74,999 8 38.1%19 $75,000 to $99,999 0 0.0%0 $100,000 to $124,999 0 0.0%0 $125,000 to $149,999 0 0.0%0 $150,000 to $199,999 0 0.0%0 $200,000 or more 0 0.0%0 Median Household Income for HHr <25 $29,217 N/A Average Household Income for HHr <25 N/A N/A Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE 25-44 YEARS BY INCOME Total 1,524 100%113 Less than $10,000 27 1.8%30 $10,000 to $14,999 38 2.5%30 $15,000 to $19,999 41 2.7%30 $20,000 to $24,999 31 2.0%25 $25,000 to $29,999 39 2.6%57 $30,000 to $34,999 101 6.6%62 $35,000 to $39,999 71 4.7%49 $40,000 to $44,999 22 1.4%15 $45,000 to $49,999 37 2.4%35 $50,000 to $59,999 20 1.3%19 $60,000 to $74,999 172 11.3%44 $75,000 to $99,999 348 22.8%46 $100,000 to $124,999 121 7.9%34 $125,000 to $149,999 65 4.3%31 $150,000 to $199,999 308 20.2%177 $200,000 or more 83 5.4%34 Median Household Income for HHr 25-44 $84,407 N/A Average Household Income for HHr 25-44 N/A N/A HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE 45-64 YEARS BY INCOME Total 1,820 100%72 Less than $10,000 22 1.2%16 $10,000 to $14,999 27 1.5%9 $15,000 to $19,999 117 6.4%54 $20,000 to $24,999 41 2.3%29 $25,000 to $29,999 40 2.2%23 $30,000 to $34,999 19 1.0%13 $35,000 to $39,999 110 6.0%37 $40,000 to $44,999 109 6.0%31 $45,000 to $49,999 51 2.8%26 $50,000 to $59,999 118 6.5%36 $60,000 to $74,999 220 12.1%136 $75,000 to $99,999 387 21.3%49 $100,000 to $124,999 143 7.9%29 $125,000 to $149,999 163 9.0%47 $150,000 to $199,999 145 8.0%64 $200,000 or more 109 6.0%38 Median Household Income for HHr 45-64 $76,632 N/A Average Household Income for HHr 45-64 N/A N/A Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 7 ACS Key Population & Household Facts One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS WITH HOUSEHOLDER AGE 65+ BY INCOME Total 777 100%62 Less than $10,000 32 4.1%21 $10,000 to $14,999 53 6.8%28 $15,000 to $19,999 43 5.5%22 $20,000 to $24,999 107 13.8%38 $25,000 to $29,999 14 1.8%16 $30,000 to $34,999 15 1.9%11 $35,000 to $39,999 100 12.9%118 $40,000 to $44,999 62 8.0%28 $45,000 to $49,999 46 5.9%16 $50,000 to $59,999 91 11.7%32 $60,000 to $74,999 36 4.6%19 $75,000 to $99,999 58 7.5%27 $100,000 to $124,999 36 4.6%14 $125,000 to $149,999 32 4.1%23 $150,000 to $199,999 32 4.1%23 $200,000 or more 21 2.7%18 Median Household Income for HHr 65+$41,850 N/A Average Household Income for HHr 65+N/A N/A Data Note: N/A means not available. 2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 7 of 7 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTALS Total Population 190,855 7,219 Total Households 57,766 1,847 Total Housing Units 62,423 1,911 POPULATION AGE 3+ YEARS BY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Total 183,454 100.0%6,988 Enrolled in school 52,990 28.9%2,904 Enrolled in nursery school, preschool 4,021 2.2%935 Public school 1,987 1.1%537 Private school 2,034 1.1%762 Enrolled in kindergarten 2,994 1.6%624 Public school 2,147 1.2%557 Private school 847 0.5%281 Enrolled in grade 1 to grade 4 10,859 5.9%1,114 Public school 8,707 4.7%930 Private school 2,152 1.2%568 Enrolled in grade 5 to grade 8 11,228 6.1%1,161 Public school 9,627 5.2%1,075 Private school 1,601 0.9%453 Enrolled in grade 9 to grade 12 11,278 6.1%1,029 Public school 10,349 5.6%984 Private school 929 0.5%305 Enrolled in college undergraduate years 9,772 5.3%1,048 Public school 7,999 4.4%987 Private school 1,773 1.0%369 Enrolled in graduate or professional school 2,838 1.5%680 Public school 1,503 0.8%493 Private school 1,334 0.7%471 Not enrolled in school 130,464 71.1%4,214 POPULATION AGE 65+ BY RELATIONSHIP AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Total 21,920 100.0%1,330 Living in Households 21,346 97.4%1,324 Living in Family Households 17,283 78.8%1,279 Householder 7,385 33.7%645 Spouse 4,863 22.2%531 Parent 3,192 14.6%597 Parent-in-law 765 3.5%302 Other Relative 670 3.1%221 Nonrelative 407 1.9%209 Living in Nonfamily Households 4,063 18.5%502 Householder 3,776 17.2%477 Nonrelative 287 1.3%115 Living in Group Quarters 574 2.6%149 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE AND SIZE Family Households 44,297 76.7%1,685 2-Person 14,721 25.5%947 3-Person 12,254 21.2%1,156 4-Person 8,663 15.0%794 5-Person 5,232 9.1%713 6-Person 2,046 3.5%355 7+ Person 1,381 2.4%327 Nonfamily Households 13,469 23.3%1,070 1-Person 10,785 18.7%994 2-Person 2,247 3.9%413 3-Person 259 0.4%110 4-Person 71 0.1%64 5-Person 8 0.0%15 6-Person 99 0.2%149 7+ Person 0 0.0%0 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE UNDER 18 YEARS BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with one or more people under 18 years 23,393 40.5%1,369 Family households 23,298 40.3%1,368 Married-couple family 13,872 24.0%1,008 Male householder, no wife present 2,473 4.3%575 Female householder, no husband present 6,954 12.0%817 Nonfamily households 95 0.2%64 Households with no people under 18 years 34,373 59.5%1,519 Married-couple family 15,472 26.8%1,028 Other family 5,527 9.6%662 Nonfamily households 13,374 23.2%1,068 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE 65 YEARS AND OVER, HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with Pop 65+14,779 25.6%858 1-Person 3,358 5.8%446 2+ Person Family 10,971 19.0%769 2+ Person Nonfamily 449 0.8%181 Households with No Pop 65+42,987 74.4%1,784 1-Person 7,427 12.9%906 2+ Person Family 33,326 57.7%1,588 2+ Person Nonfamily 2,234 3.9%421 HOUSEHOLD TYPE BY RELATIVES AND NONRELATIVES FOR POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDSPOPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS Total 190,069 100.0%7,218 In Family Households 171,571 90.3%7,172 In Married-Couple Family 110,439 58.1%5,936 Relatives 108,652 57.2%5,805 Nonrelatives 1,786 0.9%658 In Male Householder-No Spouse Present-Family 15,735 8.3%2,786 Relatives 13,395 7.0%2,363 Nonrelatives 2,339 1.2%739 In Female Householder-No Spouse Present-Family 45,398 23.9%4,026 Relatives 41,912 22.1%3,744 Nonrelatives 3,486 1.8%735 In Nonfamily Households 18,498 9.7%2,017 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION AGE 5+ YEARS BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH Total 177,638 100.0%6,764 5 to 17 years Speak only English 24,847 14.0%1,922 Speak Spanish 5,671 3.2%1,020 Speak English "very well" or "well"5,060 2.8%927 Speak English "not well"449 0.3%273 Speak English "not at all"162 0.1%140 Speak other Indo-European languages 4,790 2.7%1,158 Speak English "very well" or "well"4,702 2.6%1,095 Speak English "not well"88 0.0%72 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 555 0.3%258 Speak English "very well" or "well"544 0.3%257 Speak English "not well"11 0.0%17 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak other languages 316 0.2%218 Speak English "very well" or "well"316 0.2%218 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 18 to 64 years Speak only English 79,218 44.6%3,909 Speak Spanish 20,799 11.7%2,503 Speak English "very well" or "well"14,716 8.3%1,328 Speak English "not well"2,548 1.4%486 Speak English "not at all"3,535 2.0%1,865 Speak other Indo-European languages 15,539 8.7%2,622 Speak English "very well" or "well"12,829 7.2%1,743 Speak English "not well"2,424 1.4%829 Speak English "not at all"286 0.2%127 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 3,153 1.8%814 Speak English "very well" or "well"2,362 1.3%491 Speak English "not well"679 0.4%340 Speak English "not at all"112 0.1%108 Speak other languages 831 0.5%438 Speak English "very well" or "well"818 0.5%437 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"13 0.0%21 65 years and over Speak only English 15,695 8.8%1,144 Speak Spanish 2,726 1.5%449 Speak English "very well" or "well"1,681 0.9%350 Speak English "not well"584 0.3%177 Speak English "not at all"461 0.3%197 Speak other Indo-European languages 2,333 1.3%487 Speak English "very well" or "well"1,583 0.9%413 Speak English "not well"424 0.2%174 Speak English "not at all"327 0.2%181 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 1,069 0.6%268 Speak English "very well" or "well"603 0.3%222 Speak English "not well"422 0.2%153 Speak English "not at all"44 0.0%40 Speak other languages 96 0.1%60 Speak English "very well" or "well"85 0.0%47 Speak English "not well"11 0.0%17 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY PLACE OF WORK Total 92,582 100.0%4,240 Worked in state and in county of residence 82,039 88.6%3,860 Worked in state and outside county of residence 9,645 10.4%1,028 Worked outside state of residence 899 1.0%274 SEX BY CLASS OF WORKER FOR THE CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16 YEARS AND OVER Total: 94,233 100.0%4,254 Male: 49,050 52.1%2,854 Employee of private company workers 35,802 38.0%2,326 Self-employed in own incorporated business workers 3,456 3.7%578 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 2,582 2.7%488 Local government workers 3,080 3.3%620 State government workers 361 0.4%128 Federal government workers 681 0.7%211 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 3,007 3.2%738 Unpaid family workers 82 0.1%67 Female: 45,183 47.9%2,442 Employee of private company workers 32,127 34.1%2,088 Self-employed in own incorporated business workers 1,032 1.1%224 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 3,566 3.8%603 Local government workers 4,489 4.8%768 State government workers 1,556 1.7%380 Federal government workers 485 0.5%253 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 1,776 1.9%437 Unpaid family workers 153 0.2%102 POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS AND PRESENCE OF A COMPUTER Total 190,069 100.0%7,218 Population <18 in Households 49,352 26.0%3,048 Have a Computer 48,759 25.7%3,037 Have NO Computer 594 0.3%363 Population 18-64 in Households 119,371 62.8%5,178 Have a Computer 117,105 61.6%5,169 Have NO Computer 2,266 1.2%630 Population 65+ in Households 21,346 11.2%1,324 Have a Computer 19,858 10.4%1,317 Have NO Computer 1,488 0.8%311 HOUSEHOLDS AND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTIONS Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 With an Internet Subscription 51,337 88.9%1,802 Dial-Up Alone 27 0.0%27 Broadband 45,281 78.4%1,667 Satellite Service 4,060 7.0%617 Other Service 688 1.2%200 Internet Access with no Subscription 1,524 2.6%358 With No Internet Access 4,905 8.5%603 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Total 92,582 100.0%4,240 Drove alone 68,556 74.0%3,102 Carpooled 9,846 10.6%1,432 Public transportation (excluding taxicab)1,975 2.1%460 Bus or trolley bus 1,904 2.1%441 Light rail, streetcar or trolley 0 0.0%0 Subway or elevated 55 0.1%88 Long-distance/Commuter Train 16 0.0%25 Ferryboat 0 0.0%0 Taxicab 333 0.4%194 Motorcycle 75 0.1%53 Bicycle 342 0.4%311 Walked 668 0.7%228 Other means 2,756 3.0%814 Worked at home 8,030 8.7%1,334 WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS (WHO DID NOT WORK FROM HOME) BY TRAVEL TIME TO WORK Total 84,552 100.0%3,894 Less than 5 minutes 1,288 1.5%431 5 to 9 minutes 3,099 3.7%576 10 to 14 minutes 7,006 8.3%798 15 to 19 minutes 10,377 12.3%1,189 20 to 24 minutes 11,334 13.4%1,124 25 to 29 minutes 6,997 8.3%830 30 to 34 minutes 18,311 21.7%1,590 35 to 39 minutes 4,802 5.7%685 40 to 44 minutes 4,407 5.2%675 45 to 59 minutes 11,433 13.5%1,574 60 to 89 minutes 3,242 3.8%642 90 or more minutes 2,255 2.7%422 Average Travel Time to Work (in minutes) N/A N/A FEMALES AGE 20-64 YEARS BY AGE OF OWN CHILDREN AND EMPLOYMENT STATUS Total 59,620 100.0%2,947 Own children under 6 years only 4,873 8.2%814 In labor force 3,431 5.8%566 Not in labor force 1,442 2.4%562 Own children under 6 years and 6 to 17 years 4,982 8.4%635 In labor force 3,356 5.6%525 Not in labor force 1,626 2.7%368 Own children 6 to 17 years only 12,041 20.2%1,079 In labor force 9,694 16.3%995 Not in labor force 2,347 3.9%450 No own children under 18 years 37,723 63.3%2,496 In labor force 28,664 48.1%2,022 Not in labor force 9,060 15.2%1,351 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION BY AGE & TYPES OHEALINSURANCE COVERAGEOF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE Total 190,123 100.0%7,218 Under 19 years:51,688 27.2%3,170 One Type of Health Insurance:43,996 23.1%2,902 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 19,354 10.2%1,874 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 3,253 1.7%663 Medicare Coverage Only 0 0.0%0 Medicaid Coverage Only 21,125 11.1%2,166 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 210 0.1%248 VA Health Care Only 54 0.0%84 2+ Types of Health Insurance 3,294 1.7%818 No Health Insurance Coverage 4,398 2.3%881 19 to 34 years:41,864 22.0%2,975 One Type of Health Insurance:29,486 15.5%2,437 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 20,007 10.5%2,140 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 4,991 2.6%788 Medicare Coverage Only 0 0.0%0 Medicaid Coverage Only 4,200 2.2%882 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 132 0.1%87 VA Health Care Only 155 0.1%136 2+ Types of Health Insurance 1,937 1.0%491 No Health Insurance Coverage 10,442 5.5%1,482 35 to 64 years:75,218 39.6%3,507 One Type of Health Insurance:54,643 28.7%2,608 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 40,180 21.1%2,204 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 8,401 4.4%1,060 Medicare Coverage Only 920 0.5%280 Medicaid Coverage Only 4,473 2.4%866 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 355 0.2%205 VA Health Care Only 314 0.2%143 2+ Types of Health Insurance 6,335 3.3%843 No Health Insurance Coverage 14,240 7.5%2,029 65+ years:21,353 11.2%1,324 One Type of Health Insurance:10,090 5.3%902 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 765 0.4%233 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 112 0.1%90 Medicare Coverage Only 9,175 4.8%870 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 0 0.0%0 VA Health Care Only 37 0.0%42 2+ Types of Health Insurance:10,595 5.6%981 Employer-Based & Direct-Purchase Health Insurance 10 0.0%15 Employer-Based Health & Medicare Insurance 2,673 1.4%435 Direct-Purchase Health & Medicare Insurance 2,442 1.3%616 Medicare & Medicaid Coverage 2,701 1.4%528 Other Private Health Insurance Combos 0 0.0%0 Other Public Health Insurance Combos 272 0.1%137 Other Health Insurance Combinations 2,497 1.3%402 No Health Insurance Coverage 668 0.4%308 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION BY RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL Total 189,428 100.0%7,194 Under .50 12,483 6.6%1,896 .50 to .99 16,034 8.5%2,377 1.00 to 1.24 10,114 5.3%2,054 1.25 to 1.49 11,687 6.2%2,731 1.50 to 1.84 13,434 7.1%2,023 1.85 to 1.99 4,920 2.6%1,488 2.00 and over 120,755 63.7%5,713 CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS Total 141,445 100.0%5,433 Veteran 7,335 5.2%835 Nonveteran 134,110 94.8%5,300 Male 66,920 47.3%3,244 Veteran 6,541 4.6%799 Nonveteran 60,379 42.7%3,139 Female 74,525 52.7%3,212 Veteran 794 0.6%217 Nonveteran 73,731 52.1%3,206 CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE Total 7,335 100.0%835 Gulf War (9/01 or later), no Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 1,481 20.2%512 Gulf War (9/01 or later) and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 603 8.2%185 Gulf War (9/01 or later), and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), and Vietnam Era 15 0.2%25 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 1,013 13.8%276 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01) and Vietnam Era 78 1.1%49 Vietnam Era, no Korean War, no World War II 2,170 29.6%440 Vietnam Era and Korean War, no World War II 100 1.4%84 Vietnam Era and Korean War and World War II 7 0.1%12 Korean War, no Vietnam Era, no World War II 243 3.3%109 Korean War and World War II, no Vietnam Era 0 0.0%0 World War II, no Korean War, no Vietnam Era 14 0.2%18 Between Gulf War and Vietnam Era only 1,395 19.0%312 Between Vietnam Era and Korean War only 182 2.5%91 Between Korean War and World War II only 33 0.4%38 Pre-World War II only 0 0.0%0 HOUSEHOLDS BY POVERTY STATUS Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 Income in the past 12 months below poverty level 8,184 14.2%883 Married-couple family 1,997 3.5%405 Other family - male householder (no wife present)425 0.7%184 Other family - female householder (no husband present)2,550 4.4%393 Nonfamily household - male householder 1,158 2.0%317 Nonfamily household - female householder 2,054 3.6%603 Income in the past 12 months at or above poverty level 49,582 85.8%1,751 Married-couple family 27,346 47.3%1,361 Other family - male householder (no wife present)3,641 6.3%701 Other family - female householder (no husband present)8,338 14.4%875 Nonfamily household - male householder 5,331 9.2%640 Nonfamily household - female householder 4,926 8.5%579 Poverty Index 114 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 7 of 8 ACS Population Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY OTHER INCOME Social Security Income 14,364 24.9%880 No Social Security Income 43,402 75.1%1,782 Retirement Income 9,113 15.8%731 No Retirement Income 48,654 84.2%1,820 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS <10% of Income 597 2.9%333 10-14.9% of Income 1,617 8.0%549 15-19.9% of Income 1,968 9.7%436 20-24.9% of Income 2,062 10.2%576 25-29.9% of Income 2,184 10.8%480 30-34.9% of Income 1,641 8.1%343 35-39.9% of Income 1,537 7.6%351 40-49.9% of Income 1,875 9.3%339 50+% of Income 5,261 26.0%713 Gross Rent % Inc Not Computed 1,527 7.5%655 HOUSEHOLDS BY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 With public assistance income 1,658 2.9%318 No public assistance income 56,108 97.1%1,836 HOUSEHOLDS BY FOOD STAMPS/SNAP STATUS Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 With Food Stamps/SNAP 10,984 19.0%964 With No Food Stamps/SNAP 46,782 81.0%1,715 HOUSEHOLDS BY DISABILITY STATUS Total 57,766 100.0%1,847 With 1+ Persons w/Disability 15,784 27.3%1,208 With No Person w/Disability 41,983 72.7%1,688 Data Note: N/A means not available. Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2021, adjusted for inflation. 2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 8 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTALS Total Population 14,513 525 Total Households 4,142 97 Total Housing Units 4,376 94 POPULATION AGE 3+ YEARS BY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Total 13,968 100.0%520 Enrolled in school 3,624 25.9%174 Enrolled in nursery school, preschool 142 1.0%60 Public school 82 0.6%72 Private school 59 0.4%23 Enrolled in kindergarten 183 1.3%34 Public school 167 1.2%34 Private school 16 0.1%10 Enrolled in grade 1 to grade 4 809 5.8%96 Public school 647 4.6%96 Private school 161 1.2%105 Enrolled in grade 5 to grade 8 1,115 8.0%100 Public school 986 7.1%98 Private school 129 0.9%44 Enrolled in grade 9 to grade 12 857 6.1%83 Public school 827 5.9%82 Private school 31 0.2%21 Enrolled in college undergraduate years 424 3.0%62 Public school 356 2.5%67 Private school 68 0.5%36 Enrolled in graduate or professional school 94 0.7%34 Public school 12 0.1%17 Private school 82 0.6%35 Not enrolled in school 10,344 74.1%412 POPULATION AGE 65+ BY RELATIONSHIP AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Total 1,423 100.0%111 Living in Households 1,423 100.0%111 Living in Family Households 1,203 84.5%109 Householder 572 40.2%59 Spouse 391 27.5%54 Parent 77 5.4%50 Parent-in-law 53 3.7%73 Other Relative 16 1.1%32 Nonrelative 94 6.6%105 Living in Nonfamily Households 220 15.5%32 Householder 203 14.3%28 Nonrelative 17 1.2%38 Living in Group Quarters 0 0.0%0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE AND SIZE Family Households 3,336 80.5%101 2-Person 981 23.7%50 3-Person 868 21.0%150 4-Person 593 14.3%72 5-Person 499 12.0%67 6-Person 208 5.0%41 7+ Person 187 4.5%66 Nonfamily Households 807 19.5%43 1-Person 675 16.3%45 2-Person 71 1.7%32 3-Person 38 0.9%22 4-Person 23 0.6%59 5-Person 0 0.0%0 6-Person 0 0.0%0 7+ Person 0 0.0%0 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE UNDER 18 YEARS BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with one or more people under 18 years 1,914 46.2%77 Family households 1,898 45.8%77 Married-couple family 1,125 27.2%66 Male householder, no wife present 213 5.1%59 Female householder, no husband present 559 13.5%82 Nonfamily households 17 0.4%20 Households with no people under 18 years 2,228 53.8%101 Married-couple family 983 23.7%67 Other family 454 11.0%141 Nonfamily households 790 19.1%43 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE 65 YEARS AND OVER, HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with Pop 65+1,002 24.2%70 1-Person 199 4.8%28 2+ Person Family 791 19.1%68 2+ Person Nonfamily 12 0.3%17 Households with No Pop 65+3,140 75.8%103 1-Person 476 11.5%48 2+ Person Family 2,545 61.4%108 2+ Person Nonfamily 119 2.9%31 HOUSEHOLD TYPE BY RELATIVES AND NONRELATIVES FOR POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDSPOPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS Total 14,513 100.0%525 In Family Households 13,427 92.5%536 In Married-Couple Family 7,966 54.9%362 Relatives 7,747 53.4%350 Nonrelatives 219 1.5%220 In Male Householder-No Spouse Present-Family 2,237 15.4%771 Relatives 1,880 13.0%707 Nonrelatives 358 2.5%202 In Female Householder-No Spouse Present-Family 3,224 22.2%422 Relatives 2,738 18.9%317 Nonrelatives 486 3.3%151 In Nonfamily Households 1,085 7.5%98 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION AGE 5+ YEARS BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH Total 13,644 100.0%516 5 to 17 years Speak only English 2,009 14.7%141 Speak Spanish 865 6.3%177 Speak English "very well" or "well"771 5.7%155 Speak English "not well"15 0.1%24 Speak English "not at all"78 0.6%75 Speak other Indo-European languages 51 0.4%34 Speak English "very well" or "well"51 0.4%34 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 23 0.2%18 Speak English "very well" or "well"23 0.2%18 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak other languages 27 0.2%36 Speak English "very well" or "well"27 0.2%36 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 18 to 64 years Speak only English 5,940 43.5%404 Speak Spanish 2,868 21.0%267 Speak English "very well" or "well"1,808 13.3%157 Speak English "not well"545 4.0%114 Speak English "not at all"515 3.8%165 Speak other Indo-European languages 245 1.8%76 Speak English "very well" or "well"222 1.6%55 Speak English "not well"23 0.2%32 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 166 1.2%54 Speak English "very well" or "well"145 1.1%59 Speak English "not well"21 0.2%40 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak other languages 28 0.2%53 Speak English "very well" or "well"15 0.1%88 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"13 0.1%21 65 years and over Speak only English 1,213 8.9%108 Speak Spanish 180 1.3%41 Speak English "very well" or "well"132 1.0%40 Speak English "not well"34 0.2%21 Speak English "not at all"14 0.1%23 Speak other Indo-European languages 16 0.1%24 Speak English "very well" or "well"16 0.1%24 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 14 0.1%29 Speak English "very well" or "well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not well"14 0.1%29 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Speak other languages 0 0.0%0 Speak English "very well" or "well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not well"0 0.0%0 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY PLACE OF WORK Total 7,097 100.0%381 Worked in state and in county of residence 6,139 86.5%300 Worked in state and outside county of residence 923 13.0%185 Worked outside state of residence 35 0.5%23 SEX BY CLASS OF WORKER FOR THE CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16 YEARS AND OVER Total: 7,169 100.0%378 Male: 4,254 59.3%393 Employee of private company workers 3,278 45.7%320 Self-employed in own incorporated business workers 318 4.4%181 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 200 2.8%45 Local government workers 182 2.5%33 State government workers 43 0.6%61 Federal government workers 100 1.4%32 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 133 1.9%25 Unpaid family workers 0 0.0%0 Female: 2,914 40.6%167 Employee of private company workers 2,246 31.3%168 Self-employed in own incorporated business workers 60 0.8%47 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 183 2.6%39 Local government workers 308 4.3%112 State government workers 46 0.6%35 Federal government workers 23 0.3%80 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 49 0.7%25 Unpaid family workers 0 0.0%4 POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS AND PRESENCE OF A COMPUTER Total 14,513 100.0%525 Population <18 in Households 3,843 26.5%215 Have a Computer 3,702 25.5%201 Have NO Computer 140 1.0%100 Population 18-64 in Households 9,248 63.7%417 Have a Computer 9,021 62.2%406 Have NO Computer 227 1.6%81 Population 65+ in Households 1,423 9.8%111 Have a Computer 1,284 8.8%113 Have NO Computer 139 1.0%28 HOUSEHOLDS AND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTIONS Total 4,142 100.0%97 With an Internet Subscription 3,537 85.4%102 Dial-Up Alone 0 0.0%0 Broadband 3,275 79.1%103 Satellite Service 198 4.8%33 Other Service 62 1.5%29 Internet Access with no Subscription 138 3.3%29 With No Internet Access 467 11.3%55 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Total 7,097 100.0%381 Drove alone 5,094 71.8%210 Carpooled 677 9.5%124 Public transportation (excluding taxicab)35 0.5%24 Bus or trolley bus 35 0.5%24 Light rail, streetcar or trolley 0 0.0%0 Subway or elevated 0 0.0%0 Long-distance/Commuter Train 0 0.0%0 Ferryboat 0 0.0%0 Taxicab 0 0.0%0 Motorcycle 1 0.0%16 Bicycle 176 2.5%301 Walked 47 0.7%36 Other means 636 9.0%336 Worked at home 430 6.1%90 WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS (WHO DID NOT WORK FROM HOME) BY TRAVEL TIME TO WORK Total 6,667 100.0%376 Less than 5 minutes 37 0.6%29 5 to 9 minutes 206 3.1%63 10 to 14 minutes 477 7.2%74 15 to 19 minutes 635 9.5%69 20 to 24 minutes 655 9.8%86 25 to 29 minutes 450 6.7%42 30 to 34 minutes 1,582 23.7%146 35 to 39 minutes 294 4.4%62 40 to 44 minutes 545 8.2%83 45 to 59 minutes 1,255 18.8%393 60 to 89 minutes 317 4.8%293 90 or more minutes 214 3.2%75 Average Travel Time to Work (in minutes) N/A N/A FEMALES AGE 20-64 YEARS BY AGE OF OWN CHILDREN AND EMPLOYMENT STATUS Total 4,042 100.0%161 Own children under 6 years only 263 6.5%35 In labor force 187 4.6%32 Not in labor force 76 1.9%26 Own children under 6 years and 6 to 17 years 347 8.6%56 In labor force 250 6.2%51 Not in labor force 96 2.4%42 Own children 6 to 17 years only 1,168 28.9%100 In labor force 734 18.2%84 Not in labor force 434 10.7%78 No own children under 18 years 2,265 56.0%161 In labor force 1,656 41.0%161 Not in labor force 609 15.1%74 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION BY AGE & TYPES OHEALINSURANCE COVERAGEOF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE Total 14,513 100.0%525 Under 19 years:3,986 27.5%216 One Type of Health Insurance:3,440 23.7%156 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 1,594 11.0%168 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 189 1.3%35 Medicare Coverage Only 0 0.0%0 Medicaid Coverage Only 1,617 11.1%158 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 1 0.0%48 VA Health Care Only 39 0.3%83 2+ Types of Health Insurance 97 0.7%31 No Health Insurance Coverage 449 3.1%166 19 to 34 years:3,359 23.1%283 One Type of Health Insurance:1,980 13.6%133 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 1,394 9.6%111 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 312 2.1%69 Medicare Coverage Only 0 0.0%0 Medicaid Coverage Only 176 1.2%61 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 23 0.2%32 VA Health Care Only 75 0.5%121 2+ Types of Health Insurance 74 0.5%45 No Health Insurance Coverage 1,305 9.0%454 35 to 64 years:5,745 39.6%253 One Type of Health Insurance:3,607 24.9%145 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 2,708 18.7%138 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 588 4.1%121 Medicare Coverage Only 60 0.4%25 Medicaid Coverage Only 238 1.6%64 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 13 0.1%17 VA Health Care Only 0 0.0%0 2+ Types of Health Insurance 558 3.8%122 No Health Insurance Coverage 1,580 10.9%217 65+ years:1,423 9.8%111 One Type of Health Insurance:620 4.3%64 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 27 0.2%20 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 3 0.0%17 Medicare Coverage Only 591 4.1%64 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 0 0.0%0 VA Health Care Only 0 0.0%0 2+ Types of Health Insurance:784 5.4%97 Employer-Based & Direct-Purchase Health Insurance 0 0.0%0 Employer-Based Health & Medicare Insurance 179 1.2%32 Direct-Purchase Health & Medicare Insurance 153 1.1%30 Medicare & Medicaid Coverage 252 1.7%135 Other Private Health Insurance Combos 0 0.0%0 Other Public Health Insurance Combos 12 0.1%11 Other Health Insurance Combinations 188 1.3%36 No Health Insurance Coverage 18 0.1%26 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION BY RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL Total 14,477 100.0%526 Under .50 961 6.6%322 .50 to .99 1,153 8.0%234 1.00 to 1.24 600 4.1%178 1.25 to 1.49 745 5.1%165 1.50 to 1.84 1,234 8.5%246 1.85 to 1.99 211 1.5%151 2.00 and over 9,573 66.1%382 CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS Total 10,670 100.0%430 Veteran 563 5.3%57 Nonveteran 10,107 94.7%423 Male 5,746 53.9%410 Veteran 446 4.2%33 Nonveteran 5,300 49.7%423 Female 4,924 46.1%174 Veteran 117 1.1%92 Nonveteran 4,807 45.1%160 CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE Total 563 100.0%57 Gulf War (9/01 or later), no Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 90 16.0%100 Gulf War (9/01 or later) and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 53 9.4%25 Gulf War (9/01 or later), and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), and Vietnam Era 0 0.0%0 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 89 15.8%34 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01) and Vietnam Era 0 0.0%6 Vietnam Era, no Korean War, no World War II 135 24.0%38 Vietnam Era and Korean War, no World War II 52 9.2%48 Vietnam Era and Korean War and World War II 0 0.0%0 Korean War, no Vietnam Era, no World War II 33 5.9%12 Korean War and World War II, no Vietnam Era 0 0.0%0 World War II, no Korean War, no Vietnam Era 0 0.0%0 Between Gulf War and Vietnam Era only 99 17.6%43 Between Vietnam Era and Korean War only 12 2.1%11 Between Korean War and World War II only 0 0.0%5 Pre-World War II only 0 0.0%0 HOUSEHOLDS BY POVERTY STATUS Total 4,142 100.0%97 Income in the past 12 months below poverty level 419 10.1%61 Married-couple family 162 3.9%42 Other family - male householder (no wife present)97 2.3%72 Other family - female householder (no husband present)91 2.2%40 Nonfamily household - male householder 11 0.3%28 Nonfamily household - female householder 58 1.4%12 Income in the past 12 months at or above poverty level 3,723 89.9%100 Married-couple family 1,947 47.0%80 Other family - male householder (no wife present)408 9.9%160 Other family - female householder (no husband present)631 15.2%82 Nonfamily household - male householder 437 10.6%44 Nonfamily household - female householder 301 7.3%26 Poverty Index 82 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 7 of 8 ACS Population Summary One_Mile_Buffer 1 Prepared by Esri Area: 5.89 square miles 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY OTHER INCOME Social Security Income 1,095 26.4%71 No Social Security Income 3,048 73.6%98 Retirement Income 478 11.5%48 No Retirement Income 3,665 88.5%101 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS <10% of Income 168 14.6%293 10-14.9% of Income 65 5.6%24 15-19.9% of Income 132 11.4%31 20-24.9% of Income 97 8.4%29 25-29.9% of Income 72 6.2%45 30-34.9% of Income 109 9.5%33 35-39.9% of Income 29 2.5%20 40-49.9% of Income 96 8.3%23 50+% of Income 289 25.1%53 Gross Rent % Inc Not Computed 95 8.2%242 HOUSEHOLDS BY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Total 4,142 100.0%97 With public assistance income 36 0.9%18 No public assistance income 4,106 99.1%97 HOUSEHOLDS BY FOOD STAMPS/SNAP STATUS Total 4,142 100.0%97 With Food Stamps/SNAP 774 18.7%99 With No Food Stamps/SNAP 3,368 81.3%101 HOUSEHOLDS BY DISABILITY STATUS Total 4,142 100.0%97 With 1+ Persons w/Disability 1,261 30.4%126 With No Person w/Disability 2,881 69.6%103 Data Note: N/A means not available. Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2021, adjusted for inflation. 2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 07, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 8 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability TOTALS Total Population 1,409,949 0 Total Households 475,292 2,844 Total Housing Units 554,517 859 POPULATION AGE 3+ YEARS BY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Total 1,362,713 100.0%1,580 Enrolled in school 374,387 27.5%3,685 Enrolled in nursery school, preschool 23,691 1.7%1,792 Public school 11,945 0.9%1,141 Private school 11,746 0.9%1,535 Enrolled in kindergarten 18,331 1.3%1,363 Public school 15,029 1.1%1,271 Private school 3,302 0.2%643 Enrolled in grade 1 to grade 4 66,816 4.9%2,562 Public school 56,403 4.1%2,320 Private school 10,413 0.8%1,349 Enrolled in grade 5 to grade 8 70,690 5.2%2,672 Public school 60,949 4.5%2,475 Private school 9,741 0.7%1,118 Enrolled in grade 9 to grade 12 71,446 5.2%1,643 Public school 62,970 4.6%1,774 Private school 8,476 0.6%1,045 Enrolled in college undergraduate years 99,051 7.3%2,567 Public school 81,487 6.0%2,730 Private school 17,564 1.3%1,552 Enrolled in graduate or professional school 24,362 1.8%2,047 Public school 15,714 1.2%1,797 Private school 8,648 0.6%1,122 Not enrolled in school 988,326 72.5%3,598 POPULATION AGE 65+ BY RELATIONSHIP AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Total 169,351 100.0%130 Living in Households 165,982 98.0%576 Living in Family Households 127,065 75.0%1,590 Householder 55,639 32.9%1,387 Spouse 37,266 22.0%1,267 Parent 20,278 12.0%1,693 Parent-in-law 5,378 3.2%921 Other Relative 6,462 3.8%819 Nonrelative 2,042 1.2%450 Living in Nonfamily Households 38,917 23.0%1,574 Householder 34,996 20.7%1,495 Nonrelative 3,921 2.3%527 Living in Group Quarters 3,369 2.0%569 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE AND SIZE Family Households 316,908 66.7%3,449 2-Person 122,656 25.8%3,084 3-Person 79,329 16.7%2,738 4-Person 64,587 13.6%2,312 5-Person 32,822 6.9%1,699 6-Person 10,722 2.3%1,150 7+ Person 6,792 1.4%725 Nonfamily Households 158,384 33.3%2,959 1-Person 114,872 24.2%2,644 2-Person 35,168 7.4%1,619 3-Person 5,639 1.2%773 4-Person 2,115 0.4%369 5-Person 422 0.1%245 6-Person 148 0.0%152 7+ Person 20 0.0%32 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE UNDER 18 YEARS BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with one or more people under 18 years 157,798 33.2%2,960 Family households 156,531 32.9%2,933 Married-couple family 100,412 21.1%2,683 Male householder, no wife present 12,577 2.6%1,117 Female householder, no husband present 43,542 9.2%1,900 Nonfamily households 1,267 0.3%381 Households with no people under 18 years 317,494 66.8%3,208 Married-couple family 120,249 25.3%2,795 Other family 40,128 8.4%1,944 Nonfamily households 157,117 33.1%2,947 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE 65 YEARS AND OVER, HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with Pop 65+114,824 24.2%1,579 1-Person 31,769 6.7%1,493 2+ Person Family 78,903 16.6%1,495 2+ Person Nonfamily 4,152 0.9%462 Households with No Pop 65+360,468 75.8%2,752 1-Person 83,103 17.5%2,390 2+ Person Family 238,005 50.1%3,420 2+ Person Nonfamily 39,360 8.3%1,640 HOUSEHOLD TYPE BY RELATIVES AND NONRELATIVES FOR POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDSPOPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS Total 1,379,273 100.0%2,498 In Family Households 1,144,577 83.0%5,810 In Married-Couple Family 772,348 56.0%10,425 Relatives 761,206 55.2%10,342 Nonrelatives 11,142 0.8%1,771 In Male Householder-No Spouse Present-Family 97,764 7.1%7,099 Relatives 86,805 6.3%6,234 Nonrelatives 10,959 0.8%1,363 In Female Householder-No Spouse Present-Family 274,465 19.9%8,113 Relatives 253,012 18.3%7,158 Nonrelatives 21,453 1.6%2,113 In Nonfamily Households 234,696 17.0%5,772 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION AGE 5+ YEARS BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH Total 1,326,558 100.0%115 5 to 17 years Speak only English 147,891 11.1%2,917 Speak Spanish 56,310 4.2%2,061 Speak English "very well" or "well"52,430 4.0%2,552 Speak English "not well"2,919 0.2%588 Speak English "not at all"961 0.1%293 Speak other Indo-European languages 18,453 1.4%2,002 Speak English "very well" or "well"17,090 1.3%1,910 Speak English "not well"1,363 0.1%489 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%34 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 4,170 0.3%575 Speak English "very well" or "well"3,857 0.3%560 Speak English "not well"313 0.0%240 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%34 Speak other languages 1,625 0.1%428 Speak English "very well" or "well"1,564 0.1%433 Speak English "not well"61 0.0%68 Speak English "not at all"0 0.0%34 18 to 64 years Speak only English 567,171 42.8%5,122 Speak Spanish 254,317 19.2%3,256 Speak English "very well" or "well"198,747 15.0%4,903 Speak English "not well"36,567 2.8%2,869 Speak English "not at all"19,003 1.4%2,857 Speak other Indo-European languages 69,740 5.3%3,790 Speak English "very well" or "well"59,244 4.5%3,102 Speak English "not well"8,723 0.7%1,213 Speak English "not at all"1,773 0.1%505 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 27,737 2.1%1,625 Speak English "very well" or "well"22,735 1.7%1,476 Speak English "not well"4,285 0.3%628 Speak English "not at all"717 0.1%261 Speak other languages 9,793 0.7%1,744 Speak English "very well" or "well"9,176 0.7%1,547 Speak English "not well"500 0.0%206 Speak English "not at all"117 0.0%114 65 years and over Speak only English 114,229 8.6%1,268 Speak Spanish 38,500 2.9%872 Speak English "very well" or "well"23,945 1.8%1,305 Speak English "not well"9,713 0.7%1,041 Speak English "not at all"4,842 0.4%739 Speak other Indo-European languages 8,635 0.7%828 Speak English "very well" or "well"5,824 0.4%602 Speak English "not well"1,918 0.1%421 Speak English "not at all"893 0.1%268 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 6,992 0.5%701 Speak English "very well" or "well"4,271 0.3%548 Speak English "not well"1,576 0.1%336 Speak English "not at all"1,145 0.1%502 Speak other languages 995 0.1%279 Speak English "very well" or "well"724 0.1%184 Speak English "not well"182 0.0%127 Speak English "not at all"89 0.0%82 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY PLACE OF WORK Total 704,814 100.0%5,317 Worked in state and in county of residence 605,513 85.9%6,055 Worked in state and outside county of residence 91,040 12.9%3,575 Worked outside state of residence 8,261 1.2%1,111 SEX BY CLASS OF WORKER FOR THE CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16 YEARS AND OVER Total: 716,749 100.0%5,194 Male: 376,337 52.5%3,489 Employee of private company workers 284,749 39.7%3,935 Self-employed in own incorporated business workers 23,783 3.3%1,573 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 17,756 2.5%1,291 Local government workers 15,209 2.1%1,227 State government workers 6,333 0.9%941 Federal government workers 6,582 0.9%980 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 21,036 2.9%1,687 Unpaid family workers 889 0.1%293 Female: 340,412 47.5%3,279 Employee of private company workers 242,393 33.8%3,815 Self-employed in own incorporated business workers 11,294 1.6%1,039 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 29,704 4.1%2,022 Local government workers 23,228 3.2%1,482 State government workers 10,292 1.4%903 Federal government workers 6,921 1.0%1,002 Self-employed in own not incorporated business workers 15,857 2.2%1,697 Unpaid family workers 723 0.1%233 POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS AND PRESENCE OF A COMPUTER Total 1,379,273 100.0%2,498 Population <18 in Households 310,962 22.5%316 Have a Computer 308,064 22.3%882 Have NO Computer 2,898 0.2%851 Population 18-64 in Households 902,329 65.4%2,260 Have a Computer 888,142 64.4%2,697 Have NO Computer 14,187 1.0%1,608 Population 65+ in Households 165,982 12.0%576 Have a Computer 153,514 11.1%1,327 Have NO Computer 12,468 0.9%1,172 HOUSEHOLDS AND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTIONS Total 475,292 100.0%2,844 With an Internet Subscription 431,934 90.9%3,307 Dial-Up Alone 543 0.1%199 Broadband 370,374 77.9%3,902 Satellite Service 25,117 5.3%1,453 Other Service 4,625 1.0%754 Internet Access with no Subscription 9,625 2.0%1,060 With No Internet Access 33,733 7.1%1,614 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Total 704,814 100.0%5,317 Drove alone 528,882 75.0%6,012 Carpooled 65,365 9.3%2,918 Public transportation (excluding taxicab)11,891 1.7%1,235 Bus or trolley bus 11,398 1.6%1,211 Light rail, streetcar or trolley 41 0.0%40 Subway or elevated 291 0.0%163 Long-distance/Commuter Train 161 0.0%122 Ferryboat 0 0.0%34 Taxicab 2,556 0.4%526 Motorcycle 1,164 0.2%354 Bicycle 3,058 0.4%573 Walked 8,595 1.2%1,156 Other means 10,970 1.6%1,723 Worked at home 72,333 10.3%3,366 WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS (WHO DID NOT WORK FROM HOME) BY TRAVEL TIME TO WORK Total 632,481 100.0%6,119 Less than 5 minutes 7,689 1.2%957 5 to 9 minutes 31,002 4.9%1,874 10 to 14 minutes 57,522 9.1%2,381 15 to 19 minutes 87,744 13.9%3,323 20 to 24 minutes 103,357 16.3%3,565 25 to 29 minutes 52,834 8.4%2,253 30 to 34 minutes 125,117 19.8%3,749 35 to 39 minutes 27,133 4.3%1,870 40 to 44 minutes 33,244 5.3%1,921 45 to 59 minutes 63,559 10.0%3,215 60 to 89 minutes 29,601 4.7%1,938 90 or more minutes 13,679 2.2%1,634 Average Travel Time to Work (in minutes) 28.7 0.5 FEMALES AGE 20-64 YEARS BY AGE OF OWN CHILDREN AND EMPLOYMENT STATUS Total 445,126 100.0%443 Own children under 6 years only 33,743 7.6%2,053 In labor force 23,823 5.4%1,502 Not in labor force 9,920 2.2%1,277 Own children under 6 years and 6 to 17 years 29,828 6.7%1,951 In labor force 19,982 4.5%1,890 Not in labor force 9,846 2.2%975 Own children 6 to 17 years only 84,926 19.1%2,376 In labor force 66,684 15.0%2,479 Not in labor force 18,242 4.1%1,422 No own children under 18 years 296,629 66.6%2,891 In labor force 225,677 50.7%3,291 Not in labor force 70,952 15.9%2,520 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION BY AGE & TYPES OHEALINSURANCE COVERAGEOF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE Total 1,399,076 100.0%935 Under 19 years:332,240 23.7%959 One Type of Health Insurance:292,737 20.9%3,075 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 140,882 10.1%4,375 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 28,538 2.0%2,406 Medicare Coverage Only 409 0.0%260 Medicaid Coverage Only 120,551 8.6%4,262 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 2,085 0.1%593 VA Health Care Only 272 0.0%191 2+ Types of Health Insurance 16,065 1.1%1,752 No Health Insurance Coverage 23,438 1.7%2,372 19 to 34 years:352,428 25.2%1,175 One Type of Health Insurance:263,133 18.8%3,710 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 188,724 13.5%3,404 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 43,459 3.1%2,840 Medicare Coverage Only 922 0.1%388 Medicaid Coverage Only 26,387 1.9%1,882 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 1,967 0.1%576 VA Health Care Only 1,674 0.1%473 2+ Types of Health Insurance 17,308 1.2%1,590 No Health Insurance Coverage 71,987 5.1%3,268 35 to 64 years:547,823 39.2%622 One Type of Health Insurance:418,166 29.9%4,162 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 297,719 21.3%4,956 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 72,741 5.2%3,414 Medicare Coverage Only 7,799 0.6%814 Medicaid Coverage Only 33,027 2.4%2,087 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 4,064 0.3%892 VA Health Care Only 2,816 0.2%557 2+ Types of Health Insurance 43,028 3.1%2,251 No Health Insurance Coverage 86,629 6.2%3,809 65+ years:166,585 11.9%385 One Type of Health Insurance:73,981 5.3%2,542 Employer-Based Health Ins Only 4,518 0.3%652 Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only 2,432 0.2%545 Medicare Coverage Only 66,788 4.8%2,462 TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only 61 0.0%68 VA Health Care Only 182 0.0%106 2+ Types of Health Insurance:88,749 6.3%2,577 Employer-Based & Direct-Purchase Health Insurance 491 0.0%276 Employer-Based Health & Medicare Insurance 18,423 1.3%1,324 Direct-Purchase Health & Medicare Insurance 20,728 1.5%1,776 Medicare & Medicaid Coverage 19,817 1.4%1,376 Other Private Health Insurance Combos 49 0.0%51 Other Public Health Insurance Combos 3,649 0.3%582 Other Health Insurance Combinations 25,592 1.8%1,289 No Health Insurance Coverage 3,855 0.3%948 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability POPULATION BY RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL Total 1,377,713 100.0%2,532 Under .50 83,249 6.0%5,111 .50 to .99 108,236 7.9%5,891 1.00 to 1.24 71,112 5.2%5,165 1.25 to 1.49 67,243 4.9%5,514 1.50 to 1.84 107,889 7.8%6,834 1.85 to 1.99 38,279 2.8%4,437 2.00 and over 901,705 65.4%9,746 CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS Total 1,096,754 100.0%481 Veteran 61,700 5.6%2,501 Nonveteran 1,035,054 94.4%2,629 Male 534,300 48.7%390 Veteran 53,675 4.9%2,179 Nonveteran 480,625 43.8%2,291 Female 562,454 51.3%236 Veteran 8,025 0.7%990 Nonveteran 554,429 50.6%1,038 CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE Total 61,700 100.0%2,501 Gulf War (9/01 or later), no Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 11,377 18.4%1,275 Gulf War (9/01 or later) and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 4,968 8.1%804 Gulf War (9/01 or later), and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), and Vietnam Era 358 0.6%150 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 9,524 15.4%1,124 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01) and Vietnam Era 1,721 2.8%480 Vietnam Era, no Korean War, no World War II 16,379 26.5%938 Vietnam Era and Korean War, no World War II 402 0.7%161 Vietnam Era and Korean War and World War II 88 0.1%66 Korean War, no Vietnam Era, no World War II 2,765 4.5%497 Korean War and World War II, no Vietnam Era 48 0.1%47 World War II, no Korean War, no Vietnam Era 595 1.0%169 Between Gulf War and Vietnam Era only 10,589 17.2%1,053 Between Vietnam Era and Korean War only 2,680 4.3%395 Between Korean War and World War II only 206 0.3%102 Pre-World War II only 0 0.0%34 HOUSEHOLDS BY POVERTY STATUS Total 475,292 100.0%2,844 Income in the past 12 months below poverty level 62,710 13.2%2,168 Married-couple family 14,187 3.0%1,064 Other family - male householder (no wife present)3,291 0.7%523 Other family - female householder (no husband present)16,128 3.4%1,143 Nonfamily household - male householder 11,746 2.5%1,043 Nonfamily household - female householder 17,358 3.7%1,056 Income in the past 12 months at or above poverty level 412,582 86.8%3,000 Married-couple family 206,474 43.4%3,437 Other family - male householder (no wife present)23,129 4.9%1,775 Other family - female householder (no husband present)53,699 11.3%1,830 Nonfamily household - male householder 65,983 13.9%2,461 Nonfamily household - female householder 63,297 13.3%2,130 Poverty Index 106 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 7 of 8 ACS Population Summary Orange County, FL Prepared by Esri Orange County, FL (12095) Geography: County 2017-2021 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±)Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY OTHER INCOME Social Security Income 114,709 24.1%2,232 No Social Security Income 360,583 75.9%3,016 Retirement Income 73,400 15.4%2,117 No Retirement Income 401,892 84.6%3,104 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS <10% of Income 4,606 2.2%555 10-14.9% of Income 12,565 6.1%1,394 15-19.9% of Income 19,984 9.7%1,506 20-24.9% of Income 25,411 12.3%1,733 25-29.9% of Income 23,789 11.5%1,703 30-34.9% of Income 18,251 8.8%1,271 35-39.9% of Income 13,986 6.8%1,223 40-49.9% of Income 23,126 11.2%1,543 50+% of Income 54,152 26.2%2,568 Gross Rent % Inc Not Computed 10,661 5.2%1,171 HOUSEHOLDS BY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Total 475,292 100.0%2,844 With public assistance income 14,045 3.0%1,156 No public assistance income 461,247 97.0%2,940 HOUSEHOLDS BY FOOD STAMPS/SNAP STATUS Total 475,292 100.0%2,844 With Food Stamps/SNAP 70,520 14.8%2,592 With No Food Stamps/SNAP 404,772 85.2%3,687 HOUSEHOLDS BY DISABILITY STATUS Total 475,292 100.0%2,844 With 1+ Persons w/Disability 110,131 23.2%2,964 With No Person w/Disability 365,161 76.8%4,182 Data Note: N/A means not available. Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2021, adjusted for inflation. 2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey Reliability:high medium low April 23, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 8 of 8 Business Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Data for all businesses in area Total Businesses:5,547 Total Employees:49,212 Total Residential Population:178,854 Employee/Residential Population Ratio (per 100 Residents)28 Businesses Employees by SIC Codes Number Percent Number Percent Agriculture & Mining 127 2.3%885 1.8% Construction 427 7.7%3,578 7.3% Manufacturing 72 1.3%924 1.9% Transportation 157 2.8%1,684 3.4% Communication 51 0.9%294 0.6% Utility 9 0.2%257 0.5% Wholesale Trade 123 2.2%2,801 5.7% Retail Trade Summary 1,104 19.9%11,865 24.1% Home Improvement 62 1.1%1,082 2.2% General Merchandise Stores 66 1.2%1,290 2.6% Food Stores 137 2.5%1,582 3.2% Auto Dealers & Gas Stations 111 2.0%507 1.0% Apparel & Accessory Stores 68 1.2%427 0.9% Furniture & Home Furnishings 78 1.4%806 1.6% Eating & Drinking Places 343 6.2%4,729 9.6% Miscellaneous Retail 238 4.3%1,440 2.9% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Summary 469 8.5%2,211 4.5% Banks, Savings & Lending Institutions 72 1.3%474 1.0% Securities Brokers 72 1.3%219 0.4% Insurance Carriers & Agents 70 1.3%386 0.8% Real Estate, Holding, Other Investment Offices 255 4.6%1,132 2.3% Services Summary 2,084 37.6%22,786 46.3% Hotels & Lodging 17 0.3%2,352 4.8% Automotive Services 121 2.2%480 1.0% Movies & Amusements 150 2.7%922 1.9% Health Services 355 6.4%5,062 10.3% Legal Services 74 1.3%322 0.7% Education Institutions & Libraries 106 1.9%6,409 13.0% Other Services 1,262 22.8%7,239 14.7% Government 79 1.4%1,652 3.4% Unclassified Establishments 845 15.2%275 0.6% Totals 5,547 100.0%49,212 100.0% Source: Copyright 2023 Data Axle, Inc. All rights reserved. Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2023. Date Note: Data on the Business Summary report is calculated using Esri’s Data allocation method which uses census block groups to allocate business summary data to custom areas. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 2 Business Summary 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Businesses Employees by NAICS Codes Number Percent Number Percent Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 19 0.3%198 0.4% Mining 0 0.0%0 0.0% Utilities 3 0.1%165 0.3% Construction 462 8.3%3,830 7.8% Manufacturing 94 1.7%980 2.0% Wholesale Trade 119 2.1%2,791 5.7% Retail Trade 714 12.9%6,804 13.8% Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers 96 1.7%443 0.9% Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores 50 0.9%469 1.0% Electronics & Appliance Stores 24 0.4%322 0.7% Building Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers 62 1.1%1,082 2.2% Food & Beverage Stores 103 1.9%1,360 2.8% Health & Personal Care Stores 75 1.4%535 1.1% Gasoline Stations & Fuel Dealers 15 0.3%67 0.1% Clothing, Clothing Accessories, Shoe and Jewelry Stores 89 1.6%507 1.0% Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 101 1.8%543 1.1% General Merchandise Stores 98 1.8%1,475 3.0% Transportation & Warehousing 117 2.1%1,578 3.2% Information 96 1.7%685 1.4% Finance & Insurance 220 4.0%1,095 2.2% Central Bank/Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 74 1.3%481 1.0% Securities & Commodity Contracts 76 1.4%227 0.5% Funds, Trusts & Other Financial Vehicles 70 1.3%386 0.8% Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 250 4.5%1,190 2.4% Professional, Scientific & Tech Services 444 8.0%2,380 4.8% Legal Services 85 1.5%351 0.7% Management of Companies & Enterprises 38 0.7%77 0.2% Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 220 4.0%1,083 2.2% Educational Services 137 2.5%6,568 13.3% Health Care & Social Assistance 472 8.5%6,646 13.5% Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 138 2.5%760 1.5% Accommodation & Food Services 374 6.7%7,205 14.6% Accommodation 17 0.3%2,352 4.8% Food Services & Drinking Places 357 6.4%4,853 9.9% Other Services (except Public Administration)706 12.7%3,250 6.6% Automotive Repair & Maintenance 102 1.8%383 0.8% Public Administration 79 1.4%1,652 3.4% Unclassified Establishments 845 15.2%275 0.6% Total 5,547 100.0%49,212 100.0% Source: Copyright 2023 Data Axle, Inc. All rights reserved. Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2023. Date Note: Data on the Business Summary report is calculated using Esri’s Data allocation method which uses census block groups to allocate business summary data to custom areas. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 2 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Population Summary 2010 Total Population 145,853 2020 Total Population 173,630 2020 Group Quarters 1,090 2023 Total Population 178,854 2023 Group Quarters 1,090 2028 Total Population 182,536 2023-2028 Annual Rate 0.41% 2023 Total Daytime Population 145,271 Workers 60,054 Residents 85,217 Household Summary 2010 Households 49,434 2010 Average Household Size 2.93 2020 Total Households 58,909 2020 Average Household Size 2.93 2023 Households 60,959 2023 Average Household Size 2.92 2028 Households 62,818 2028 Average Household Size 2.89 2023-2028 Annual Rate 0.60% 2010 Families 37,030 2010 Average Family Size 3.35 2023 Families 45,013 2023 Average Family Size 3.36 2028 Families 46,099 2028 Average Family Size 3.34 2023-2028 Annual Rate 0.48% Housing Unit Summary 2000 Housing Units 39,855 Owner Occupied Housing Units 71.2% Renter Occupied Housing Units 23.4% Vacant Housing Units 5.4% 2010 Housing Units 54,886 Owner Occupied Housing Units 61.7% Renter Occupied Housing Units 28.3% Vacant Housing Units 9.9% 2020 Housing Units 62,076 Owner Occupied Housing Units 62.8% Renter Occupied Housing Units 32.1% Vacant Housing Units 5.1% 2023 Housing Units 63,714 Owner Occupied Housing Units 65.2% Renter Occupied Housing Units 30.5% Vacant Housing Units 4.3% 2028 Housing Units 65,835 Owner Occupied Housing Units 64.6% Renter Occupied Housing Units 30.8% Vacant Housing Units 4.6% Data Note: Household population includes persons not residing in group quarters. Average Household Size is the household population divided by total households. Persons in families include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Per Capita Income represents the income received by all persons aged 15 years and over divided by the total population. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2023 Households by Income Household Income Base 60,959 <$15,000 9.8% $15,000 - $24,999 6.8% $25,000 - $34,999 8.4% $35,000 - $49,999 12.2% $50,000 - $74,999 15.2% $75,000 - $99,999 14.4% $100,000 - $149,999 15.8% $150,000 - $199,999 8.6% $200,000+8.9% Average Household Income $98,787 2028 Households by Income Household Income Base 62,818 <$15,000 8.1% $15,000 - $24,999 5.2% $25,000 - $34,999 7.0% $35,000 - $49,999 10.3% $50,000 - $74,999 14.8% $75,000 - $99,999 14.8% $100,000 - $149,999 17.3% $150,000 - $199,999 11.5% $200,000+11.0% Average Household Income $115,662 2023 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 41,528 <$50,000 4.3% $50,000 - $99,999 1.5% $100,000 - $149,999 2.5% $150,000 - $199,999 5.4% $200,000 - $249,999 9.3% $250,000 - $299,999 12.3% $300,000 - $399,999 32.6% $400,000 - $499,999 11.4% $500,000 - $749,999 15.2% $750,000 - $999,999 3.1% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 1.6% $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 0.3% $2,000,000 +0.6% Average Home Value $395,334 2028 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 42,528 <$50,000 4.0% $50,000 - $99,999 2.3% $100,000 - $149,999 0.9% $150,000 - $199,999 4.9% $200,000 - $249,999 8.7% $250,000 - $299,999 11.0% $300,000 - $399,999 31.8% $400,000 - $499,999 12.5% $500,000 - $749,999 17.0% $750,000 - $999,999 3.7% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 2.1% $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 0.4% $2,000,000 +0.8% Average Home Value $419,273 Data Note: Income represents the preceding year, expressed in current dollars. Household income includes wage and salary earnings, interest dividends, net rents, pensions, SSI and welfare payments, child support, and alimony. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Median Household Income 2023 $69,983 2028 $81,210 Median Home Value 2023 $345,290 2028 $357,463 Per Capita Income 2023 $33,807 2028 $39,970 Median Age 2010 35.0 2020 37.5 2023 36.6 2028 37.1 2020 Population by Age Total 173,630 0 - 4 5.9% 5 - 9 6.6% 10 - 14 7.3% 15 - 24 13.6% 25 - 34 13.2% 35 - 44 13.9% 45 - 54 13.7% 55 - 64 12.7% 65 - 74 8.1% 75 - 84 3.6% 85 +1.3% 18 +75.7% 2023 Population by Age Total 178,853 0 - 4 6.3% 5 - 9 6.7% 10 - 14 6.9% 15 - 24 12.6% 25 - 34 15.3% 35 - 44 13.3% 45 - 54 12.7% 55 - 64 12.4% 65 - 74 8.7% 75 - 84 3.9% 85 +1.2% 18 +76.0% 2028 Population by Age Total 182,536 0 - 4 6.4% 5 - 9 6.6% 10 - 14 6.9% 15 - 24 11.8% 25 - 34 14.7% 35 - 44 14.8% 45 - 54 11.9% 55 - 64 11.4% 65 - 74 9.2% 75 - 84 4.8% 85 +1.4% 18 +76.2% 2020 Population by Sex Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Males 83,609 Females 90,021 2023 Population by Sex Males 86,679 Females 92,175 2028 Population by Sex Males 88,224 Females 94,312 2010 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 145,853 White Alone 51.8% Black Alone 33.7% American Indian Alone 0.4% Asian Alone 4.8% Pacific Islander Alone 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 5.8% Two or More Races 3.4% Hispanic Origin 18.4% Diversity Index 72.8 2020 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 173,630 White Alone 37.1% Black Alone 34.6% American Indian Alone 0.4% Asian Alone 5.2% Pacific Islander Alone 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 9.4% Two or More Races 13.1% Hispanic Origin 21.7% Diversity Index 81.1 2023 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 178,854 White Alone 36.3% Black Alone 34.8% American Indian Alone 0.4% Asian Alone 5.4% Pacific Islander Alone 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 9.7% Two or More Races 13.3% Hispanic Origin 22.4% Diversity Index 81.6 2028 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 182,537 White Alone 34.7% Black Alone 34.8% American Indian Alone 0.5% Asian Alone 5.6% Pacific Islander Alone 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 10.8% Two or More Races 13.6% Hispanic Origin 23.5% Diversity Index 82.4 Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. The Diversity Index measures the probability that two people from the same area will be from different race/ethnic groups. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2020 Population by Relationship and Household Type Total 173,630 In Households 99.4% Householder 34.0% Opposite-Sex Spouse 16.5% Same-Sex Spouse 0.2% Opposite-Sex Unmarried Partner 2.0% Same-Sex Unmarried Partner 0.1% Biological Child 30.4% Adopted Child 0.5% Stepchild 1.3% Grandchild 3.2% Brother or Sister 1.7% Parent 2.0% Parent-in-law 0.5% Son-in-law or Daughter-in-law 0.6% Other Relatives 2.4% Foster Child 0.1% Other Nonrelatives 3.8% In Group Quaters 0.6% Institutionalized 0.5% Noninstitutionalized 0.1% 2023 Population 25+ by Educational Attainment Total 120,636 Less than 9th Grade 5.5% 9th - 12th Grade, No Diploma 7.5% High School Graduate 22.6% GED/Alternative Credential 3.7% Some College, No Degree 17.4% Associate Degree 11.6% Bachelor's Degree 20.8% Graduate/Professional Degree 10.8% 2023 Population 15+ by Marital Status Total 143,206 Never Married 35.6% Married 49.2% Widowed 4.3% Divorced 10.9% 2023 Civilian Population 16+ in Labor Force Civilian Population 16+99,069 Population 16+ Employed 96.1% Population 16+ Unemployment rate 3.9% Population 16-24 Employed 11.5% Population 16-24 Unemployment rate 10.6% Population 25-54 Employed 65.9% Population 25-54 Unemployment rate 3.3% Population 55-64 Employed 16.4% Population 55-64 Unemployment rate 2.6% Population 65+ Employed 6.2% Population 65+ Unemployment rate 0.8% Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2023 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total 95,190 Agriculture/Mining 0.4% Construction 8.2% Manufacturing 4.4% Wholesale Trade 2.1% Retail Trade 11.1% Transportation/Utilities 5.9% Information 2.4% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 6.2% Services 55.5% Public Administration 3.9% 2023 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total 95,191 White Collar 60.6% Management/Business/Financial 17.0% Professional 20.6% Sales 11.1% Administrative Support 11.9% Services 19.5% Blue Collar 19.9% Farming/Forestry/Fishing 0.2% Construction/Extraction 6.2% Installation/Maintenance/Repair 2.3% Production 2.6% Transportation/Material Moving 8.5% 2020 Households by Type Total 58,909 Married Couple Households 49.1% With Own Children <18 20.6% Without Own Children <18 28.5% Cohabitating Couple Households 6.5% With Own Children <18 2.5% Without Own Children <18 4.0% Male Householder, No Spouse/Partner 15.8% Living Alone 8.3% 65 Years and over 2.2% With Own Children <18 2.1% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 3.6% No Relatives Present 1.8% Female Householder, No Spouse/Partner 28.6% Living Alone 10.6% 65 Years and over 4.6% With Own Children <18 7.3% Without Own Children <18, With Relatives 9.2% No Relatives Present 1.4% 2020 Households by Size Total 58,909 1 Person Household 19.0% 2 Person Household 29.3% 3 Person Household 19.3% 4 Person Household 16.9% 5 Person Household 8.8% 6 Person Household 4.1% 7 + Person Household 2.7% Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 6 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2020 Households by Tenure and Mortgage Status Total 58,909 Owner Occupied 66.2% Owned with a Mortgage/Loan 51.3% Owned Free and Clear 14.9% Renter Occupied 33.8% 2023 Affordability, Mortgage and Wealth Housing Affordability Index 83 Percent of Income for Mortgage 29.7% Wealth Index 87 2020 Housing Units By Urban/ Rural Status Total 62,076 Urban Housing Units 99.9% Rural Housing Units 0.1% 2020 Population By Urban/ Rural Status Total 173,630 Urban Population 99.8% Rural Population 0.2% Data Note: Households with children include any households with people under age 18, related or not. Multigenerational households are families with 3 or more parent-child relationships. Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported only to the tract level. Esri estimated block group data, which is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 7 of 8 Community Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Top 3 Tapestry Segments 1.Urban Edge Families (7C) 2.Boomburbs (1C) 3.Workday Drive (4A) 2023 Consumer Spending Apparel & Services: Total $$124,036,052 Average Spent $2,034.75 Spending Potential Index 93 Education: Total $$94,644,309 Average Spent $1,552.59 Spending Potential Index 87 Entertainment/Recreation: Total $$210,547,295 Average Spent $3,453.92 Spending Potential Index 91 Food at Home: Total $$376,689,716 Average Spent $6,179.39 Spending Potential Index 91 Food Away from Home: Total $$214,089,623 Average Spent $3,512.03 Spending Potential Index 94 Health Care: Total $$409,979,532 Average Spent $6,725.50 Spending Potential Index 91 HH Furnishings & Equipment: Total $$167,325,788 Average Spent $2,744.89 Spending Potential Index 93 Personal Care Products & Services: Total $ $54,338,706 Average Spent $891.40 Spending Potential Index 93 Shelter: Total $$1,390,813,224 Average Spent $22,815.55 Spending Potential Index 92 Support Payments/Cash Contributions/Gifts in Kind: Total $$176,704,720 Average Spent $2,898.75 Spending Potential Index 93 Travel: Total $$128,476,290 Average Spent $2,107.59 Spending Potential Index 94 Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs: Total $$74,764,978 Average Spent $1,226.48 Spending Potential Index 94 Data Note: Consumer spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households that reside in the area. Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue. Total and Average Amount Spent Per Household represent annual figures. The Spending Potential Index represents the amount spent in the area relative to a national average of 100. Source: Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Esri. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 8 of 8 Customer purchasing behaviors 5-Mile_Buffer Area: 91 square miles Prefer Local vs National Stores Disagree completely Disagree somewhat Agree somewhat Agree Completely Economy Directly Impacts Spending Habits Disagree completely Disagree somewhat Agree somewhat Agree completely Online spending market potential Index value HH Purchased Pet Food Internet/Online Last 12 Mo 99 Bought Clothing Online Last 6 Mo 100 Purchased Groceries Online Last 30 Days 101 Bought Shoes Online Last 6 Mo 102 Ordered Any Item Online Last 6 Mo 100 Filled Prescription Online Last 12 Mos 94 Purchased Music Through Other Online Site Last 6 Mo 85 Ordered Fitness Apparel/Equipment Online Last 6 Mo 103 Age profile 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85 7.5%5.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5% Dots show comparison to Florida Advertising Market Potential - Have seen ad last 30 days" (index) At Bus Stop or Train Station/30 Days In Store/30 Days On Billboard/30 Days On Mobile Device/30 Days 0 20 40 60 80 100 Age profile: 5 year increments Online Shopping by Store for the Last 6 Months Amazon EBay Etsy Overstock Walmart Gap Macy`s Nordstrom Target CVS 0%5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80% 75.7% 16.5% 13.7% 3.0% 31.2% 3.0% 9.5% 4.1% 23.5% 5.0% Dots show comparison to Florida 46.3% Spent $500+ on Internet Orders in the last 6 Months Key facts $69,983 Median Household Income $57,206 Median Disposable Income 178,854 Total Population Urban Edge Families Dominant Tapestry Segment Source: Esri-MRI-Simmons, Esri. The vintage of the data is 2023. © 2024 Esri Demographic and Income Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Summary Census 2010 Census 2020 2023 2028 Population 145,853 173,630 178,854 182,536 Households 49,434 58,909 60,959 62,818 Families 37,030 43,949 45,013 46,099 Average Household Size 2.93 2.93 2.92 2.89 Owner Occupied Housing Units 33,879 38,987 41,528 42,528 Renter Occupied Housing Units 15,557 19,922 19,431 20,289 Median Age 35.0 37.5 36.6 37.1 Trends: 2023-2028 Annual Rate Area State National Population 0.41%0.63%0.30% Households 0.60%0.77%0.49% Families 0.48%0.74%0.44% Owner HHs 0.48%0.93%0.66% Median Household Income 3.02%3.34%2.57% 2023 2028 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 5,947 9.8%5,092 8.1% $15,000 - $24,999 4,117 6.8%3,285 5.2% $25,000 - $34,999 5,143 8.4%4,402 7.0% $35,000 - $49,999 7,416 12.2%6,490 10.3% $50,000 - $74,999 9,263 15.2%9,277 14.8% $75,000 - $99,999 8,802 14.4%9,273 14.8% $100,000 - $149,999 9,621 15.8%10,877 17.3% $150,000 - $199,999 5,236 8.6%7,199 11.5% $200,000+5,415 8.9%6,923 11.0% Median Household Income $69,983 $81,210 Average Household Income $98,787 $115,662 Per Capita Income $33,807 $39,970 Census 2010 Census 2020 2023 2028 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0 - 4 10,486 7.2%10,328 5.9%11,205 6.3%11,745 6.4% 5 - 9 11,264 7.7%11,397 6.6%12,061 6.7%12,019 6.6% 10 - 14 11,465 7.9%12,639 7.3%12,382 6.9%12,594 6.9% 15 - 19 11,307 7.8%12,594 7.3%11,787 6.6%11,339 6.2% 20 - 24 9,270 6.4%10,947 6.3%10,781 6.0%10,282 5.6% 25 - 34 19,230 13.2%22,932 13.2%27,415 15.3%26,876 14.7% 35 - 44 21,985 15.1%24,107 13.9%23,808 13.3%27,073 14.8% 45 - 54 21,974 15.1%23,815 13.7%22,626 12.7%21,705 11.9% 55 - 64 15,035 10.3%22,113 12.7%22,114 12.4%20,732 11.4% 65 - 74 8,065 5.5%14,149 8.1%15,556 8.7%16,774 9.2% 75 - 84 4,263 2.9%6,317 3.6%6,957 3.9%8,811 4.8% 85+1,507 1.0%2,293 1.3%2,161 1.2%2,586 1.4% Census 2010 Census 2020 2023 2028 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 75,567 51.8%64,500 37.1%64,959 36.3%63,394 34.7% Black Alone 49,183 33.7%60,131 34.6%62,166 34.8%63,499 34.8% American Indian Alone 608 0.4%743 0.4%795 0.4%846 0.5% Asian Alone 6,950 4.8%9,026 5.2%9,571 5.4%10,240 5.6% Pacific Islander Alone 144 0.1%144 0.1%147 0.1%144 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 8,481 5.8%16,355 9.4%17,437 9.7%19,678 10.8% Two or More Races 4,920 3.4%22,731 13.1%23,779 13.3%24,736 13.6% Hispanic Origin (Any Race)26,856 18.4%37,720 21.7%40,093 22.4%42,894 23.5% Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census in 2020 geographies. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 2 Demographic and Income Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Area State USA Trends 2023-2028Trends 2023-2028 Annual Rate (in percent)3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income 2023 2028 Population by AgePopulation by Age Percent 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2023 Household Income 2023 Household Income <$15K 9.8% $15K - $24K 6.8% $25K - $34K 8.4%$35K - $49K 12.2% $50K - $74K 15.2% $75K - $99K 14.4% $100K - $149K 15.8% $150K - $199K 8.6% $200K+ 8.9% 2023 Population by Race2023 Population by Race Percent 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 White Black Am. Ind.Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2023 Percent Hispanic Origin: 22.4% Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. U.S. Census Bureau 2020 decennial Census in 2020 geographies. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 2 Economic Development Profile 5-Mile_Buffer Area: 91 square miles WorkforceOverview Employment 19.5% Services 19.9% Blue Collar 60.6% White Collar Businesses 5,547 Total Businesses 49,212 Total Employees Labor Force by Industry 12.8% 12.3% 11.3% 9.1% 7.6% 7.4% 7.1% 5.0% 4.8% 4.0% 3.9% 3.4% 2.8% 2.7% 2.5% 2.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% Commute Time: Minutes Percent of Commuters 0%4%8%12%16%20%24% 1.5% 3.7% 8.3% 12.3% 13.4% 8.3% 21.7% 5.7% 5.2% 13.5% 3.8% 2.7% Transportation to Work 2.1% Took Public Transportation 10.6% Carpooled 0.7% Walked to Work 0.4% Bike to Work 74% Drove Alone to Work Source:This infographic contains data provided by Esri (2023), Esri-Data Axle (2023), ACS (2017-2021), Esri-U.S. BLS (2023), AGS (2023).© 2024 Esri Community Overview Home Value 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 1.5%1.6%2.5%3.1%4.3%5.4%9.3%11.4%12.3%15.2% 32.6% Home Ownership 68.1% 31.9% Owner Occupied HUs Renter Occupied HUs Household Income 0 5 10 15 20 6.8%8.4%8.6%8.9%9.8% 12.2%14.4%15.2%15.8% Educational Attainment < 9th Grade 5.5% No Diploma 7.5% HS Diploma 22.6% GED 3.7% Some College 17.4% Associate's Degree 11.6% Bachelor's Degree 20.8% Grad/Prof Degree 10.8% Tapestry segments 7C Urban Edge Families 10,861 households 17.8% of Households 1C Boomburbs 7,697 households 12.6% of Households 4A Workday Drive 7,299 households 12.0% of Households Key Facts 63,714 Total Housing Units 83 Housing Affordability Index 8,184 Households Below the Poverty Level 36.6 Median Age $57,206 Median Disposable Income 178,854 Total Population 87 Wealth Index 82 Diversity Index 110 Total Crime Index Source:This infographic contains data provided by Esri (2023), Esri-Data Axle (2023), ACS (2017-2021), Esri-U.S. BLS (2023), AGS (2023).© 2024 Esri INCOME $69,983 Median Household Income $33,807 Per Capita Income $142,837 Median Net Worth Employment Overview 5-Mile_Buffer Area: 91 square miles EDUCATION 13.0% No High School Diploma 22.6% High School Diploma 29.0% Some College/Associate's Degree 31.6% Bachelor's/Grad/Prof Degree BUSINESS 5,547 Total Businesses 49,212 Total Employees KEY FACTS 178,854 Population 36.6 Median Age 60,959 Households $57,206 Median Disposable Income COMMUTERS 15.2% Spend 7+ hours commuting to and from work per week 74.0% Drive Alone to Work © 2024 Esri Source: This infographic contains data provided by Esri (2023, 2028), Esri-Data Axle (2023), Esri-MRI-Simmons (2023), ACS (2017-2021). EMPLOYMENT 60.6% White Collar 19.9% Blue Collar 19.5% Services 3.9% Unemployment Rate Restaurant Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Population 178,854 182,536 Population 18+135,933 139,143 Households 60,959 62,818 Median Household Income $69,983 $81,210 Expected Number of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults Percent MPI Went to Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 93,022 68.4%104 Went to Family Restaurant/Steak House 4+ Times/30 Days 30,549 22.5%109 Spent $1-30 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 8,288 6.1%91 Spent $31-50 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 12,062 8.9%104 Spent $51-100 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 21,834 16.1%108 Spent $101-200 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 13,839 10.2%104 Spent $201+ at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 6,811 5.0%102 Spent $1-100 at Fine Dining Restaurants/30 Days 4,065 3.0%99 Spent $101-200 at Fine Dining Restaurants/30 Days 2,394 1.8%76 Spent $201+ at Fine Dining Restaurants/30 Days 2,463 1.8%90 Went for Breakfast at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 13,641 10.0%98 Went for Lunch at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 22,349 16.4%101 Went for Dinner at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 60,840 44.8%103 Went for Snacks at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 2,005 1.5%105 Went on Workday to Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 39,953 29.4%99 Went on Weekend to Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 52,693 38.8%106 Went to Applebee`s/6 Mo 17,203 12.7%95 Went to Bob Evans/6 Mo 2,004 1.5%66 Went to Buffalo Wild Wings/6 Mo 12,113 8.9%110 Went to California Pizza Kitchen/6 Mo 2,101 1.5%110 Went to Carrabba`s/6 Mo 2,903 2.1%109 Went to The Cheesecake Factory/6 Mo 9,820 7.2%117 Went to Chili`s Grill & Bar/6 Mo 15,410 11.3%126 Went to Cracker Barrel/6 Mo 13,312 9.8%100 Went to Denny`s/6 Mo 8,279 6.1%107 Went to Golden Corral/6 Mo 4,553 3.3%114 Went to IHOP/6 Mo 10,879 8.0%112 Went to Logan`s Roadhouse/6 Mo 2,378 1.7%101 Went to Longhorn Steakhouse/6 Mo 8,165 6.0%109 Went to Olive Garden/6 Mo 20,223 14.9%109 Went to Outback Steakhouse/6 Mo 10,699 7.9%112 Went to Red Lobster/6 Mo 8,955 6.6%106 Went to Red Robin/6 Mo 7,408 5.4%108 Went to Ruby Tuesday/6 Mo 2,114 1.6%94 Went to Texas Roadhouse/6 Mo 16,095 11.8%111 Went to T.G.I. Friday`s/6 Mo 3,505 2.6%118 Went to Waffle House/6 Mo 7,432 5.5%125 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Restaurant/6 Mo 125,905 92.6%102 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Rest 9+ Times/30 Days 59,234 43.6%112 Spent $1-10 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 5,061 3.7%90 Spent $11-20 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 10,645 7.8%93 Spent $21-40 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 22,738 16.7%101 Spent $41-50 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 12,307 9.1%98 Spent $51-100 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 28,834 21.2%103 Spent $101-200 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 18,696 13.8%111 Spent $201+ at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 8,475 6.2%120 Ordered Eat-In Fast Food/6 Mo 28,856 21.2%104 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 3 Restaurant Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Number of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults Percent MPI Ordered Home Delivery Fast Food/6 Mo 20,544 15.1%113 Take-Out/Drive-Thru/Curbside Fast Food/6 Mo 81,470 59.9%103 Ordered Take-Out/Walk-In Fast Food/6 Mo 31,421 23.1%104 Bought Breakfast at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 50,302 37.0%106 Bought Lunch at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 74,560 54.9%102 Bought Dinner at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 77,224 56.8%105 Bought Snack at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 18,615 13.7%103 Bought from Fast Food Restaurant on Weekday/6 Mo 90,602 66.7%102 Bought from Fast Food Restaurant on Weekend/6 Mo 76,271 56.1%107 Bought A&W/6 Mo 2,570 1.9%92 Bought Arby`s/6 Mo 22,804 16.8%94 Bought Baskin-Robbins/6 Mo 5,153 3.8%121 Bought Boston Market/6 Mo 2,865 2.1%109 Bought Burger King/6 Mo 38,925 28.6%103 Bought Captain D`s/6 Mo 4,392 3.2%115 Bought Carl`s Jr./6 Mo 7,293 5.4%114 Bought Checkers/6 Mo 4,492 3.3%133 Bought Chick-Fil-A/6 Mo 53,478 39.3%120 Bought Chipotle Mexican Grill/6 Mo 25,605 18.8%117 Bought Chuck E. Cheese`s/6 Mo 1,834 1.3%129 Bought Church`s Fried Chicken/6 Mo 6,483 4.8%147 Bought Cold Stone Creamery/6 Mo 3,780 2.8%99 Bought Dairy Queen/6 Mo 20,134 14.8%98 Bought Del Taco/6 Mo 5,301 3.9%119 Bought Domino`s Pizza/6 Mo 23,514 17.3%107 Bought Dunkin` Donuts/6 Mo 18,199 13.4%90 Bought Five Guys/6 Mo 14,126 10.4%107 Bought Hardee`s/6 Mo 5,623 4.1%81 Bought Jack in the Box/6 Mo 11,939 8.8%130 Bought Jersey Mike`s/6 Mo 11,178 8.2%114 Bought Jimmy John`s/6 Mo 8,446 6.2%106 Bought KFC/6 Mo 25,092 18.5%107 Bought Krispy Kreme Doughnuts/6 Mo 11,754 8.6%126 Bought Little Caesars/6 Mo 18,604 13.7%117 Bought Long John Silver`s/6 Mo 3,179 2.3%99 Bought McDonald`s/6 Mo 70,403 51.8%103 Bought Panda Express/6 Mo 20,410 15.0%124 Bought Panera Bread/6 Mo 17,181 12.6%98 Bought Papa John`s/6 Mo 13,100 9.6%119 Bought Papa Murphy`s/6 Mo 5,407 4.0%111 Bought Pizza Hut/6 Mo 18,862 13.9%113 Bought Popeyes Chicken/6 Mo 23,215 17.1%123 Bought Sonic Drive-In/6 Mo 18,517 13.6%115 Bought Starbucks/6 Mo 29,289 21.5%105 Bought Steak `N Shake/6 Mo 4,421 3.3%111 Bought Subway/6 Mo 29,500 21.7%100 Bought Taco Bell/6 Mo 38,263 28.1%103 Bought Wendy`s/6 Mo 37,639 27.7%106 Bought Whataburger/6 Mo 13,065 9.6%162 Bought White Castle/6 Mo 3,399 2.5%101 Bought Wing-Stop/6 Mo 6,812 5.0%149 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 3 Restaurant Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Went to Fine Dining Restaurant/6 Mo 15,187 11.2%92 Went to Fine Dining Restaurant/30 Days 11,370 8.4%92 Went to Fine Dining Restaurant 2+ Times/30 Days 4,785 3.5%85 Used DoorDash Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 18,299 13.5%116 Used Grubhub Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 7,918 5.8%107 Used Postmates Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 2,479 1.8%107 Used Restrnt Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 31,547 23.2%105 Used Uber Eats Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 10,298 7.6%117 Used Yelp Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 2,784 2.0%123 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 3 Restaurant Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Population 22,381,338 23,091,949 Population 18+18,121,037 18,733,674 Households 8,909,543 9,259,577 Median Household Income $65,081 $76,713 Expected Number of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults Percent MPI Went to Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 12,107,755 66.8%101 Went to Family Restaurant/Steak House 4+ Times/30 Days 3,894,495 21.5%105 Spent $1-30 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 1,223,454 6.8%101 Spent $31-50 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 1,624,550 9.0%105 Spent $51-100 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 2,763,475 15.3%103 Spent $101-200 at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 1,748,376 9.6%99 Spent $201+ at Family Restaurant/Steak House/30 Days 854,181 4.7%96 Spent $1-100 at Fine Dining Restaurants/30 Days 553,571 3.1%102 Spent $101-200 at Fine Dining Restaurants/30 Days 412,973 2.3%98 Spent $201+ at Fine Dining Restaurants/30 Days 359,541 2.0%99 Went for Breakfast at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 1,909,206 10.5%103 Went for Lunch at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 3,041,478 16.8%103 Went for Dinner at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 7,787,493 43.0%99 Went for Snacks at Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 252,032 1.4%99 Went on Workday to Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 5,500,826 30.4%102 Went on Weekend to Family Restaurant/Steak House/6 Mo 6,470,575 35.7%97 Went to Applebee`s/6 Mo 2,360,090 13.0%98 Went to Bob Evans/6 Mo 381,136 2.1%94 Went to Buffalo Wild Wings/6 Mo 1,394,854 7.7%95 Went to California Pizza Kitchen/6 Mo 226,778 1.3%89 Went to Carrabba`s/6 Mo 428,579 2.4%121 Went to The Cheesecake Factory/6 Mo 1,079,528 6.0%96 Went to Chili`s Grill & Bar/6 Mo 1,724,222 9.5%105 Went to Cracker Barrel/6 Mo 1,872,247 10.3%105 Went to Denny`s/6 Mo 1,089,802 6.0%106 Went to Golden Corral/6 Mo 588,548 3.2%111 Went to IHOP/6 Mo 1,292,265 7.1%100 Went to Logan`s Roadhouse/6 Mo 307,135 1.7%98 Went to Longhorn Steakhouse/6 Mo 1,106,385 6.1%110 Went to Olive Garden/6 Mo 2,575,106 14.2%105 Went to Outback Steakhouse/6 Mo 1,341,425 7.4%105 Went to Red Lobster/6 Mo 1,135,146 6.3%101 Went to Red Robin/6 Mo 892,696 4.9%98 Went to Ruby Tuesday/6 Mo 298,375 1.6%99 Went to Texas Roadhouse/6 Mo 1,994,264 11.0%103 Went to T.G.I. Friday`s/6 Mo 389,415 2.1%98 Went to Waffle House/6 Mo 844,762 4.7%106 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Restaurant/6 Mo 16,472,594 90.9%100 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Rest 9+ Times/30 Days 7,115,172 39.3%101 Spent $1-10 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 776,884 4.3%104 Spent $11-20 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 1,546,594 8.5%101 Spent $21-40 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 3,051,654 16.8%101 Spent $41-50 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 1,675,088 9.2%100 Spent $51-100 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 3,677,531 20.3%99 Spent $101-200 at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 2,209,899 12.2%99 Spent $201+ at Fast Food Restaurant/30 Days 926,176 5.1%98 Ordered Eat-In Fast Food/6 Mo 3,818,899 21.1%103 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 3 Restaurant Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Number of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults Percent MPI Ordered Home Delivery Fast Food/6 Mo 2,360,655 13.0%97 Take-Out/Drive-Thru/Curbside Fast Food/6 Mo 10,590,134 58.4%100 Ordered Take-Out/Walk-In Fast Food/6 Mo 3,838,754 21.2%95 Bought Breakfast at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 6,301,123 34.8%100 Bought Lunch at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 9,708,880 53.6%100 Bought Dinner at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 9,600,126 53.0%98 Bought Snack at Fast Food Restaurant/6 Mo 2,307,600 12.7%95 Bought from Fast Food Restaurant on Weekday/6 Mo 11,876,406 65.5%100 Bought from Fast Food Restaurant on Weekend/6 Mo 9,294,733 51.3%98 Bought A&W/6 Mo 369,695 2.0%99 Bought Arby`s/6 Mo 3,239,291 17.9%100 Bought Baskin-Robbins/6 Mo 547,089 3.0%97 Bought Boston Market/6 Mo 341,941 1.9%97 Bought Burger King/6 Mo 5,108,206 28.2%101 Bought Captain D`s/6 Mo 527,719 2.9%104 Bought Carl`s Jr./6 Mo 880,486 4.9%103 Bought Checkers/6 Mo 510,867 2.8%114 Bought Chick-Fil-A/6 Mo 6,060,938 33.4%102 Bought Chipotle Mexican Grill/6 Mo 2,735,262 15.1%94 Bought Chuck E. Cheese`s/6 Mo 197,679 1.1%105 Bought Church`s Fried Chicken/6 Mo 698,301 3.9%119 Bought Cold Stone Creamery/6 Mo 469,688 2.6%92 Bought Dairy Queen/6 Mo 2,783,724 15.4%101 Bought Del Taco/6 Mo 585,683 3.2%98 Bought Domino`s Pizza/6 Mo 2,847,311 15.7%97 Bought Dunkin` Donuts/6 Mo 2,474,778 13.7%92 Bought Five Guys/6 Mo 1,691,894 9.3%96 Bought Hardee`s/6 Mo 911,730 5.0%98 Bought Jack in the Box/6 Mo 1,277,083 7.0%104 Bought Jersey Mike`s/6 Mo 1,320,546 7.3%101 Bought Jimmy John`s/6 Mo 1,023,150 5.6%96 Bought KFC/6 Mo 3,149,384 17.4%100 Bought Krispy Kreme Doughnuts/6 Mo 1,261,607 7.0%101 Bought Little Caesars/6 Mo 2,197,703 12.1%104 Bought Long John Silver`s/6 Mo 423,322 2.3%99 Bought McDonald`s/6 Mo 9,124,059 50.4%100 Bought Panda Express/6 Mo 2,245,620 12.4%102 Bought Panera Bread/6 Mo 2,240,292 12.4%96 Bought Papa John`s/6 Mo 1,478,820 8.2%101 Bought Papa Murphy`s/6 Mo 724,794 4.0%112 Bought Pizza Hut/6 Mo 2,268,756 12.5%102 Bought Popeyes Chicken/6 Mo 2,492,750 13.8%99 Bought Sonic Drive-In/6 Mo 2,201,553 12.1%103 Bought Starbucks/6 Mo 3,488,436 19.3%94 Bought Steak `N Shake/6 Mo 546,189 3.0%103 Bought Subway/6 Mo 3,928,517 21.7%100 Bought Taco Bell/6 Mo 4,923,495 27.2%100 Bought Wendy`s/6 Mo 4,790,158 26.4%101 Bought Whataburger/6 Mo 1,251,456 6.9%117 Bought White Castle/6 Mo 420,935 2.3%94 Bought Wing-Stop/6 Mo 646,150 3.6%106 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 3 Restaurant Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Went to Fine Dining Restaurant/6 Mo 2,136,588 11.8%97 Went to Fine Dining Restaurant/30 Days 1,619,345 8.9%99 Went to Fine Dining Restaurant 2+ Times/30 Days 723,335 4.0%97 Used DoorDash Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 1,984,875 11.0%95 Used Grubhub Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 886,196 4.9%90 Used Postmates Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 290,716 1.6%94 Used Restrnt Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 3,906,959 21.6%97 Used Uber Eats Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 1,054,181 5.8%90 Used Yelp Site/App for Take-Out/Del/30 Days 275,043 1.5%92 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 3 Retail Demand by Industry 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Spending Potential Average Amount NAICS Code Industry Summary Index Spent Total 44-45, 722 Retail Trade, Food Services & Drinking Places 92 $25,253.06 $1,539,401,083 44-45 Retail Trade 92 $21,486.62 $1,309,803,073 722 Food Services & Drinking Places 94 $3,766.43 $229,598,010 NAICS Code Industry Subsector & Group 441 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers 93 $2,643.07 $161,118,674 4411 Automobile Dealers 92 $2,240.77 $136,594,819 4412 Other Motor Vehicle Dealers 98 $186.87 $11,391,324 4413 Auto Parts, Accessories & Tire Stores 95 $215.43 $13,132,531 442 Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores 95 $925.44 $56,413,703 4421 Furniture Stores 94 $579.06 $35,299,059 4422 Home Furnishings Stores 96 $346.37 $21,114,645 443, 4431 Electronics and Appliance Stores 94 $281.20 $17,141,823 444 Bldg Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers 95 $1,354.75 $82,584,329 4441 Building Material and Supplies Dealers 95 $1,236.53 $75,377,936 4442 Lawn and Garden Equipment and Supplies Stores 89 $118.22 $7,206,393 445 Food and Beverage Stores 90 $4,828.00 $294,310,128 4451 Grocery Stores 90 $4,494.38 $273,972,631 4452 Specialty Food Stores 90 $150.60 $9,180,343 4453 Beer, Wine, and Liquor Stores 89 $183.03 $11,157,154 446, 4461 Health and Personal Care Stores 90 $665.96 $40,596,196 447, 4471 Gasoline Stations 93 $2,681.85 $163,483,048 448 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores 93 $1,067.53 $65,075,320 4481 Clothing Stores 94 $847.65 $51,671,919 4482 Shoe Stores 92 $206.05 $12,560,418 4483 Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores 93 $13.83 $842,984 451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, and Book Stores 97 $404.46 $24,655,644 4511 Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Stores 98 $335.00 $20,421,436 4512 Book Stores and News Dealers 94 $69.46 $4,234,208 452 General Merchandise Stores 91 $3,803.91 $231,882,374 4522 Department Stores 93 $336.99 $20,542,583 4523 Gen. Merch. Stores, incl. Warehouse Clubs, Supercenters 91 $3,466.92 $211,339,791 453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 89 $508.15 $30,976,198 4531 Florists 90 $26.17 $1,595,292 4532 Office Supplies, Stationery, and Gift Stores 93 $84.79 $5,168,812 4533 Used Merchandise Stores 92 $72.56 $4,422,908 4539 Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers 87 $324.63 $19,789,185 454 Nonstore Retailers 90 $2,322.31 $141,565,635 4541 Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses 92 $2,065.06 $125,884,250 4542 Vending Machine Operators 92 $32.88 $2,004,209 4543 Direct Selling Establishments 75 $224.37 $13,677,177 722 Food Services & Drinking Places 94 $3,766.43 $229,598,010 7223 Special Food Services 93 $13.34 $813,307 7224 Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages)90 $84.42 $5,146,041 7225 Restaurants and Other Eating Places 94 $3,668.67 $223,638,662 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household-based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Source: Esri 2023/2028 Consumer Spending databases are derived from the 2019, 2020 and 2021 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics and industry estimates derived from 2017 Economic Census, U.S. Census Bureau. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 1 Retail Demand Outlook 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Top Tapestry Segments Percent Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Urban Edge Families (7C)17.8%Population 178,854 182,536 Boomburbs (1C)12.6%Households 60,959 62,818 Workday Drive (4A)12.0%Families 45,013 46,099 Bright Young Professionals (8C)11.6%Median Age 36.6 37.1 Home Improvement (4B)10.3%Median Household Income $69,983 $81,210 2023 2028 Projected Consumer Spending Forecasted Demand Spending Growth Apparel and Services $124,036,052 $149,612,498 $25,576,446 Men's $23,379,764 $28,201,072 $4,821,308 Women's $42,020,823 $50,683,903 $8,663,080 Children's $19,814,764 $23,912,295 $4,097,531 Footwear $27,788,043 $33,508,544 $5,720,501 Watches & Jewelry $8,688,565 $10,480,557 $1,791,992 Apparel Products and Services (1)$2,344,093 $2,826,126 $482,033 Computer Computers and Hardware for Home Use $14,685,875 $17,716,486 $3,030,611 Portable Memory $252,990 $305,180 $52,190 Computer Software $780,756 $941,709 $160,953 Computer Accessories $1,403,323 $1,692,442 $289,119 Entertainment & Recreation $210,547,295 $254,075,027 $43,527,732 Fees and Admissions $40,747,883 $49,167,628 $8,419,745 Membership Fees for Clubs (2)$15,672,785 $18,913,122 $3,240,337 Fees for Participant Sports, excl. Trips $7,073,803 $8,535,592 $1,461,789 Tickets to Theatre/Operas/Concerts $2,963,055 $3,572,649 $609,594 Tickets to Movies $1,675,807 $2,021,393 $345,586 Tickets to Parks or Museums $1,728,828 $2,087,982 $359,154 Admission to Sporting Events, excl. Trips $3,159,216 $3,810,787 $651,571 Fees for Recreational Lessons $8,420,500 $10,161,120 $1,740,620 Dating Services $53,888 $64,982 $11,094 TV/Video/Audio $75,522,079 $91,111,286 $15,589,207 Cable and Satellite Television Services $46,675,876 $56,304,309 $9,628,433 Televisions $8,461,435 $10,208,496 $1,747,061 Satellite Dishes $101,644 $122,685 $21,041 VCRs, Video Cameras, and DVD Players $283,415 $341,974 $58,559 Miscellaneous Video Equipment $714,811 $861,894 $147,083 Video Cassettes and DVDs $391,238 $472,014 $80,776 Video Game Hardware/Accessories $2,323,927 $2,803,718 $479,791 Video Game Software $1,108,911 $1,337,905 $228,994 Rental/Streaming/Downloaded Video $7,425,454 $8,961,587 $1,536,133 Installation of Televisions $90,372 $108,992 $18,620 Audio (3)$7,799,596 $9,412,114 $1,612,518 Rental and Repair of TV/Radio/Sound Equipment $145,400 $175,596 $30,196 Pets $48,742,627 $58,827,719 $10,085,092 Toys/Games/Crafts/Hobbies (4)$9,120,908 $11,006,937 $1,886,029 Recreational Vehicles and Fees (5)$7,885,186 $9,517,835 $1,632,649 Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment (6)$17,423,364 $21,047,662 $3,624,298 Photo Equipment and Supplies (7)$2,623,434 $3,165,465 $542,031 Reading (8)$6,748,001 $8,138,110 $1,390,109 Catered Affairs (9)$1,733,813 $2,092,385 $358,572 Food $590,779,340 $712,657,691 $121,878,351 Food at Home $376,689,716 $454,366,460 $77,676,744 Bakery and Cereal Products $48,206,090 $58,144,225 $9,938,135 Meats, Poultry, Fish, and Eggs $81,624,454 $98,449,592 $16,825,138 Dairy Products $36,005,883 $43,428,897 $7,423,014 Fruits and Vegetables $73,865,079 $89,086,305 $15,221,226 Snacks and Other Food at Home (10)$136,988,210 $165,257,441 $28,269,231 Food Away from Home $214,089,623 $258,291,231 $44,201,608 Alcoholic Beverages $36,773,596 $44,352,933 $7,579,337 Data Note: The Consumer Spending data is household-based and represents the amount spent for a product or service by all households in an area. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. This report is not a comprehensive list of all consumer spending variables therefore the variables in each section may not sum to totals. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 3 Retail Demand Outlook 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles 2023 2028 Projected Consumer Spending Forecasted Demand Spending Growth Financial Value of Stocks/Bonds/Mutual Funds $1,998,170,971 $2,409,768,176 $411,597,205 Value of Retirement Plans $7,638,101,823 $9,214,077,065 $1,575,975,242 Value of Other Financial Assets $430,488,440 $519,038,599 $88,550,159 Vehicle Loan Amount excluding Interest $226,479,441 $273,489,981 $47,010,540 Value of Credit Card Debt $175,483,906 $211,693,226 $36,209,320 Health Nonprescription Drugs $9,719,219 $11,732,876 $2,013,657 Prescription Drugs $20,030,307 $24,173,985 $4,143,678 Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses $5,943,158 $7,169,172 $1,226,014 Home Mortgage Payment and Basics (11)$753,928,306 $909,782,319 $155,854,013 Maintenance and Remodeling Services $221,179,501 $266,973,143 $45,793,642 Maintenance and Remodeling Materials (12)$45,867,697 $55,395,989 $9,528,292 Utilities, Fuel, and Public Services $327,578,754 $395,183,671 $67,604,917 Household Furnishings and Equipment Household Textiles (13)$6,899,883 $8,323,367 $1,423,484 Furniture $47,862,105 $57,758,651 $9,896,546 Rugs $2,225,850 $2,685,668 $459,818 Major Appliances (14)$30,483,560 $36,788,830 $6,305,270 Housewares (15)$6,181,910 $7,458,081 $1,276,171 Small Appliances $4,071,643 $4,910,766 $839,123 Luggage $837,787 $1,010,924 $173,137 Telephones and Accessories $5,785,502 $6,977,834 $1,192,332 Household Operations Child Care $30,563,763 $36,909,219 $6,345,456 Lawn and Garden (16)$36,910,607 $44,550,855 $7,640,248 Moving/Storage/Freight Express $5,086,973 $6,136,535 $1,049,562 Housekeeping Supplies (17)$52,245,135 $63,024,897 $10,779,762 Insurance Owners and Renters Insurance $45,014,155 $54,337,743 $9,323,588 Vehicle Insurance $126,963,007 $153,186,822 $26,223,815 Life/Other Insurance $38,580,137 $46,560,536 $7,980,399 Health Insurance $275,663,280 $332,640,917 $56,977,637 Personal Care Products (18)$31,220,560 $37,658,557 $6,437,997 School Books and Supplies (19)$7,800,540 $9,414,236 $1,613,696 Smoking Products $22,842,777 $27,560,858 $4,718,081 Transportation Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases $180,868,699 $218,354,132 $37,485,433 Gasoline and Motor Oil $146,048,280 $176,231,198 $30,182,918 Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs $74,764,978 $90,200,506 $15,435,528 Travel Airline Fares $26,704,730 $32,222,922 $5,518,192 Lodging on Trips $41,012,706 $49,506,451 $8,493,745 Auto/Truck Rental on Trips $4,573,546 $5,518,820 $945,274 Food and Drink on Trips $31,757,161 $38,323,321 $6,566,160 Data Note: The Consumer Spending data is household-based and represents the amount spent for a product or service by all households in an area. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. This report is not a comprehensive list of all consumer spending variables therefore the variables in each section may not sum to totals. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 3 Retail Demand Outlook 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles (1) Apparel Products and Services includes shoe repair and other shoe services, apparel laundry and dry cleaning, alteration, repair and tailoring of apparel, clothing rental and storage, and watch and jewelry repair. (2) Membership Fees for Clubs includes membership fees for social, recreational, and health clubs. (3) Audio includes satellite radio service, radios, stereos, sound components, equipment and accessories, digital audio players, records, CDs, audio tapes, streaming/ downloaded audio, musical instruments and accessories, and rental and repair of musical instruments. (4) Toys and Games includes toys, games, arts and crafts, tricycles, playground equipment, arcade games, online entertainment and games, and stamp and coin collecting. (5) Recreational Vehicles & Fees includes docking and landing fees for boats and planes, payments on boats, trailers, campers and RVs, rental of boats, trailers, campers and RVs, and camp fees. (6) Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment includes exercise equipment and gear, game tables, bicycles, camping equipment, hunting and fishing equipment, winter sports equipment, water sports equipment, other sports equipment, and rental/repair of sports/recreation/exercise equipment. (7) Photo Equipment and Supplies includes film, film processing, photographic equipment, rental and repair of photo equipment, and photographer fees. (8) Reading includes digital book readers, books, magazine and newspaper subscriptions, and single copies of magazines and newspapers. (9) Catered Affairs includes expenses associated with live entertainment and rental of party supplies. (10) Snacks and Other Food at Home includes candy, chewing gum, sugar, artificial sweeteners, jam, jelly, preserves, margarine, fats and oils, salad dressing, nondairy cream and milk, peanut butter, frozen prepared food, potato chips and other snacks, nuts, salt, spices, seasonings, olives, pickles, relishes, sauces, gravy, other condiments, soup, prepared salad, prepared dessert, baby food, miscellaneous prepared food, and nonalcoholic beverages. (11) Mortgage Payment and Basics includes mortgage interest, mortgage principal, property taxes, homeowners insurance, and ground rent on owned dwellings. (12) Maintenance and Remodeling Materials includes supplies/tools/equipment for painting and wallpapering, plumbing supplies and equipment, electrical/heating/AC supplies, materials for roofing/gutters, materials for plaster/panel/siding, materials for patio/fence/brick work, landscaping materials, and insulation materials for owned homes. (13) Household Textiles includes bathroom linens, bedroom linens, kitchen linens, dining room linens, other linens, curtains, draperies, slipcovers and decorative pillows. (14) Major Appliances includes dishwashers, disposals, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, stoves, ovens, microwaves, window air conditioners, electric floor cleaning equipment, sewing machines, and miscellaneous appliances. (15) Housewares includes flatware, dishes, cups glasses, serving pieces, nonelectric cookware, and tableware. (16) Lawn and Garden includes lawn and garden supplies, equipment and care service, indoor plants, fresh flowers, and repair/rental of lawn and garden equipment. (17) Housekeeping Supplies includes soaps and laundry detergents, cleaning products, toilet tissue, paper towels, napkins, paper/plastic/foil products, stationery, giftwrap supplies, postage, and delivery services. (18) Personal Care Products includes hair care products, nonelectric articles for hair, wigs, hairpieces, oral hygiene products, shaving needs, perfume, cosmetics, skincare, bath products, nail products, deodorant, feminine hygiene products, adult diapers, other miscellaneous care products and personal care appliances. (19) School Books and Supplies includes school books and supplies for college, elementary school, high school, vocational/technical school, preschool and other schools. Data Note: The Consumer Spending data is household-based and represents the amount spent for a product or service by all households in an area. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. This report is not a comprehensive list of all consumer spending variables therefore the variables in each section may not sum to totals. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 3 Retail Demand Outlook Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Top Tapestry Segments Percent Demographic Summary 2023 2028 The Elders (9C)5.5%Population 22,381,338 23,091,949 Urban Edge Families (7C)4.9%Households 8,909,543 9,259,577 Senior Escapes (9D)4.9%Families 5,732,103 5,946,148 Silver & Gold (9A)4.3%Median Age 42.9 43.4 Up and Coming Families (7A)3.5%Median Household Income $65,081 $76,713 2023 2028 Projected Consumer Spending Forecasted Demand Spending Growth Apparel and Services $17,714,511,327 $21,318,009,614 $3,603,498,287 Men's $3,375,096,772 $4,061,036,482 $685,939,710 Women's $6,073,393,840 $7,307,180,986 $1,233,787,146 Children's $2,651,945,393 $3,194,483,855 $542,538,462 Footwear $3,972,415,424 $4,780,286,171 $807,870,747 Watches & Jewelry $1,283,759,522 $1,544,649,950 $260,890,428 Apparel Products and Services (1)$357,900,375 $430,372,170 $72,471,795 Computer Computers and Hardware for Home Use $2,087,693,528 $2,512,590,206 $424,896,678 Portable Memory $36,964,572 $44,491,297 $7,526,725 Computer Software $117,071,994 $140,871,628 $23,799,634 Computer Accessories $207,353,682 $249,469,738 $42,116,056 Entertainment & Recreation $30,759,572,787 $37,010,869,241 $6,251,296,454 Fees and Admissions $5,644,841,563 $6,795,671,254 $1,150,829,691 Membership Fees for Clubs (2)$2,207,688,441 $2,657,165,200 $449,476,759 Fees for Participant Sports, excl. Trips $1,001,868,438 $1,205,643,784 $203,775,346 Tickets to Theatre/Operas/Concerts $436,617,877 $525,236,573 $88,618,696 Tickets to Movies $229,103,990 $275,942,477 $46,838,487 Tickets to Parks or Museums $227,889,471 $274,703,854 $46,814,383 Admission to Sporting Events, excl. Trips $443,699,623 $533,949,555 $90,249,932 Fees for Recreational Lessons $1,089,837,321 $1,313,239,671 $223,402,350 Dating Services $8,136,403 $9,790,139 $1,653,736 TV/Video/Audio $11,267,781,033 $13,551,766,666 $2,283,985,633 Cable and Satellite Television Services $7,181,437,997 $8,633,205,536 $1,451,767,539 Televisions $1,216,523,180 $1,463,714,598 $247,191,418 Satellite Dishes $13,957,471 $16,801,279 $2,843,808 VCRs, Video Cameras, and DVD Players $39,782,364 $47,875,027 $8,092,663 Miscellaneous Video Equipment $103,058,609 $123,998,423 $20,939,814 Video Cassettes and DVDs $56,285,742 $67,770,123 $11,484,381 Video Game Hardware/Accessories $330,193,671 $397,503,991 $67,310,320 Video Game Software $160,401,013 $193,091,066 $32,690,053 Rental/Streaming/Downloaded Video $1,029,183,439 $1,239,332,829 $210,149,390 Installation of Televisions $12,741,886 $15,326,145 $2,584,259 Audio (3)$1,100,523,724 $1,324,689,241 $224,165,517 Rental and Repair of TV/Radio/Sound Equipment $23,691,938 $28,458,408 $4,766,470 Pets $7,421,902,673 $8,926,595,894 $1,504,693,221 Toys/Games/Crafts/Hobbies (4)$1,295,740,809 $1,559,966,687 $264,225,878 Recreational Vehicles and Fees (5)$1,148,683,854 $1,382,422,762 $233,738,908 Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment (6)$2,332,758,868 $2,811,724,306 $478,965,438 Photo Equipment and Supplies (7)$372,964,371 $449,118,376 $76,154,005 Reading (8)$1,042,159,688 $1,253,158,531 $210,998,843 Catered Affairs (9)$232,739,928 $280,444,765 $47,704,837 Food $86,146,191,865 $103,646,308,103 $17,500,116,238 Food at Home $55,695,813,843 $66,997,630,978 $11,301,817,135 Bakery and Cereal Products $7,171,301,025 $8,626,108,431 $1,454,807,406 Meats, Poultry, Fish, and Eggs $12,060,377,256 $14,506,161,046 $2,445,783,790 Dairy Products $5,380,169,682 $6,471,831,301 $1,091,661,619 Fruits and Vegetables $10,947,760,401 $13,168,662,958 $2,220,902,557 Snacks and Other Food at Home (10)$20,136,205,479 $24,224,867,243 $4,088,661,764 Food Away from Home $30,450,378,022 $36,648,677,125 $6,198,299,103 Alcoholic Beverages $5,444,589,491 $6,549,289,738 $1,104,700,247 Data Note: The Consumer Spending data is household-based and represents the amount spent for a product or service by all households in an area. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. This report is not a comprehensive list of all consumer spending variables therefore the variables in each section may not sum to totals. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 3 Retail Demand Outlook Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State 2023 2028 Projected Consumer Spending Forecasted Demand Spending Growth Financial Value of Stocks/Bonds/Mutual Funds $305,916,759,621 $367,695,770,954 $61,779,011,333 Value of Retirement Plans $1,119,188,443,883 $1,345,910,902,735 $226,722,458,852 Value of Other Financial Assets $67,516,858,503 $81,116,522,806 $13,599,664,303 Vehicle Loan Amount excluding Interest $30,797,502,810 $37,085,486,825 $6,287,984,015 Value of Credit Card Debt $25,483,249,348 $30,658,183,419 $5,174,934,071 Health Nonprescription Drugs $1,452,659,330 $1,747,318,278 $294,658,948 Prescription Drugs $3,126,104,684 $3,757,960,461 $631,855,777 Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses $898,191,243 $1,080,284,342 $182,093,099 Home Mortgage Payment and Basics (11)$103,050,258,164 $124,025,211,573 $20,974,953,409 Maintenance and Remodeling Services $31,158,783,874 $37,492,923,602 $6,334,139,728 Maintenance and Remodeling Materials (12)$6,488,934,936 $7,811,309,927 $1,322,374,991 Utilities, Fuel, and Public Services $48,159,602,904 $57,925,625,654 $9,766,022,750 Household Furnishings and Equipment Household Textiles (13)$1,003,316,386 $1,207,231,519 $203,915,133 Furniture $6,817,246,407 $8,204,444,414 $1,387,198,007 Rugs $330,608,991 $397,700,774 $67,091,783 Major Appliances (14)$4,373,744,321 $5,262,796,969 $889,052,648 Housewares (15)$888,431,300 $1,069,157,921 $180,726,621 Small Appliances $597,833,339 $719,359,101 $121,525,762 Luggage $118,183,759 $142,268,662 $24,084,903 Telephones and Accessories $876,325,567 $1,054,013,809 $177,688,242 Household Operations Child Care $3,919,854,644 $4,724,805,123 $804,950,479 Lawn and Garden (16)$5,443,508,449 $6,546,769,831 $1,103,261,382 Moving/Storage/Freight Express $759,803,663 $914,247,567 $154,443,904 Housekeeping Supplies (17)$7,752,307,516 $9,324,815,709 $1,572,508,193 Insurance Owners and Renters Insurance $6,481,862,212 $7,797,057,752 $1,315,195,540 Vehicle Insurance $18,267,059,758 $21,978,893,122 $3,711,833,364 Life/Other Insurance $5,581,220,055 $6,713,991,814 $1,132,771,759 Health Insurance $41,225,310,432 $49,579,215,935 $8,353,905,503 Personal Care Products (18)$4,541,403,545 $5,463,957,915 $922,554,370 School Books and Supplies (19)$1,103,271,139 $1,328,119,875 $224,848,736 Smoking Products $3,621,836,584 $4,354,185,185 $732,348,601 Transportation Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases $25,195,772,935 $30,331,348,489 $5,135,575,554 Gasoline and Motor Oil $21,057,029,114 $25,335,812,594 $4,278,783,480 Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs $10,925,853,644 $13,145,774,459 $2,219,920,815 Travel Airline Fares $3,758,987,551 $4,524,625,063 $765,637,512 Lodging on Trips $5,790,920,322 $6,969,621,973 $1,178,701,651 Auto/Truck Rental on Trips $645,065,458 $776,457,300 $131,391,842 Food and Drink on Trips $4,525,170,199 $5,446,113,838 $920,943,639 Data Note: The Consumer Spending data is household-based and represents the amount spent for a product or service by all households in an area. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. This report is not a comprehensive list of all consumer spending variables therefore the variables in each section may not sum to totals. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 3 Retail Demand Outlook Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State (1) Apparel Products and Services includes shoe repair and other shoe services, apparel laundry and dry cleaning, alteration, repair and tailoring of apparel, clothing rental and storage, and watch and jewelry repair. (2) Membership Fees for Clubs includes membership fees for social, recreational, and health clubs. (3) Audio includes satellite radio service, radios, stereos, sound components, equipment and accessories, digital audio players, records, CDs, audio tapes, streaming/ downloaded audio, musical instruments and accessories, and rental and repair of musical instruments. (4) Toys and Games includes toys, games, arts and crafts, tricycles, playground equipment, arcade games, online entertainment and games, and stamp and coin collecting. (5) Recreational Vehicles & Fees includes docking and landing fees for boats and planes, payments on boats, trailers, campers and RVs, rental of boats, trailers, campers and RVs, and camp fees. (6) Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment includes exercise equipment and gear, game tables, bicycles, camping equipment, hunting and fishing equipment, winter sports equipment, water sports equipment, other sports equipment, and rental/repair of sports/recreation/exercise equipment. (7) Photo Equipment and Supplies includes film, film processing, photographic equipment, rental and repair of photo equipment, and photographer fees. (8) Reading includes digital book readers, books, magazine and newspaper subscriptions, and single copies of magazines and newspapers. (9) Catered Affairs includes expenses associated with live entertainment and rental of party supplies. (10) Snacks and Other Food at Home includes candy, chewing gum, sugar, artificial sweeteners, jam, jelly, preserves, margarine, fats and oils, salad dressing, nondairy cream and milk, peanut butter, frozen prepared food, potato chips and other snacks, nuts, salt, spices, seasonings, olives, pickles, relishes, sauces, gravy, other condiments, soup, prepared salad, prepared dessert, baby food, miscellaneous prepared food, and nonalcoholic beverages. (11) Mortgage Payment and Basics includes mortgage interest, mortgage principal, property taxes, homeowners insurance, and ground rent on owned dwellings. (12) Maintenance and Remodeling Materials includes supplies/tools/equipment for painting and wallpapering, plumbing supplies and equipment, electrical/heating/AC supplies, materials for roofing/gutters, materials for plaster/panel/siding, materials for patio/fence/brick work, landscaping materials, and insulation materials for owned homes. (13) Household Textiles includes bathroom linens, bedroom linens, kitchen linens, dining room linens, other linens, curtains, draperies, slipcovers and decorative pillows. (14) Major Appliances includes dishwashers, disposals, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, stoves, ovens, microwaves, window air conditioners, electric floor cleaning equipment, sewing machines, and miscellaneous appliances. (15) Housewares includes flatware, dishes, cups glasses, serving pieces, nonelectric cookware, and tableware. (16) Lawn and Garden includes lawn and garden supplies, equipment and care service, indoor plants, fresh flowers, and repair/rental of lawn and garden equipment. (17) Housekeeping Supplies includes soaps and laundry detergents, cleaning products, toilet tissue, paper towels, napkins, paper/plastic/foil products, stationery, giftwrap supplies, postage, and delivery services. (18) Personal Care Products includes hair care products, nonelectric articles for hair, wigs, hairpieces, oral hygiene products, shaving needs, perfume, cosmetics, skincare, bath products, nail products, deodorant, feminine hygiene products, adult diapers, other miscellaneous care products and personal care appliances. (19) School Books and Supplies includes school books and supplies for college, elementary school, high school, vocational/technical school, preschool and other schools. Data Note: The Consumer Spending data is household-based and represents the amount spent for a product or service by all households in an area. Detail may not sum to totals due to rounding. This report is not a comprehensive list of all consumer spending variables therefore the variables in each section may not sum to totals. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 3 Retail Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Population 178,854 182,536 Population 18+135,933 139,143 Households 60,959 62,818 Median Household Income $69,983 $81,210 Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults or HHs Adults/HHs MPI Apparel (Adults) Bought Men`s Clothing/12 Mo 83,369 61.3%100 Bought Women`s Clothing/12 Mo 72,893 53.6%103 Bought Shoes/12 Mo 103,012 75.8%102 Bought Fine Jewelry/12 Mo 29,565 21.7%106 Bought Watch/12 Mo 20,178 14.8%107 Automobiles (Households) HH Owns or Leases Any Vehicle 56,570 92.8%102 HH Bought or Leased New Vehicle/12 Mo 6,352 10.4%103 Automotive Aftermarket (Adults) Bought Gasoline/6 Mo 124,960 91.9%102 Bought or Changed Motor Oil/12 Mo 72,191 53.1%103 Had Vehicle Tune-Up/12 Mo 34,813 25.6%103 Beverages (Adults) Drank Non-Diet (Regular) Cola/6 Mo 53,767 39.6%107 Drank Beer or Ale/6 Mo 53,720 39.5%100 Cameras (Adults) Own Digital Point and Shoot Camera/Camcorder 13,399 9.9%90 Own Digital SLR Camera or Camcorder 13,813 10.2%94 Printed Digital Photos/12 Mo 36,771 27.1%100 Cell Phones (Adults/Households) Bought Cell Phone/12 Mo 48,011 35.3%101 Have a Smartphone 129,331 95.1%102 Have Android Phone (Any Brand) Smartphone 54,943 40.4%105 Have Apple iPhone Smartphone 76,489 56.3%100 HH Owns 1 Cell Phone 16,301 26.7%88 HH Owns 2 Cell Phones 22,641 37.1%95 HH Owns 3+ Cell Phones 21,185 34.8%121 HH Has Cell Phone Only (No Landline Telephone)42,165 69.2%101 Computers (Households) HH Owns Computer 52,259 85.7%100 HH Owns Desktop Computer 24,715 40.5%101 HH Owns Laptop or Notebook 43,578 71.5%102 HH Owns Apple/Mac Brand Computer 14,352 23.5%97 HH Owns PC/Non-Apple Brand Computer 43,988 72.2%102 HH Purchased Most Recent Home Computer at Store 23,044 37.8%97 HH Purchased Most Recent Home Computer Online 16,619 27.3%99 HH Spent $1-499 on Most Recent Home Computer 9,212 15.1%95 HH Spent $500-999 on Most Recent Home Computer 12,464 20.4%101 HH Spent $1K-1499 on Most Recent Home Computer 7,007 11.5%95 HH Spent $1500-1999 on Most Recent Home Computer 2,554 4.2%91 HH Spent $2K+ on Most Recent Home Computer 3,171 5.2%96 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 4 Retail Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults or HHs Adults/HHs MPI Convenience Stores (Adults) Shopped at C-Store/6 Mo 88,426 65.1%102 Bought Brewed Coffee at C-Store/30 Days 15,778 11.6%96 Bought Cigarettes at C-Store/30 Days 8,170 6.0%98 Bought Gas at C-Store/30 Days 54,302 39.9%101 Spent $1-19 at C-Store/30 Days 9,674 7.1%96 Spent $20-39 at C-Store/30 Days 14,154 10.4%106 Spent $40-50 at C-Store/30 Days 10,111 7.4%96 Spent $51-99 at C-Store/30 Days 8,941 6.6%107 Spent $100+ at C-Store/30 Days 28,622 21.1%101 Entertainment (Adults) Attended Movie/6 Mo 52,465 38.6%104 Went to Live Theater/12 Mo 8,112 6.0%87 Went to Bar or Night Club/12 Mo 21,839 16.1%99 Dined Out/12 Mo 68,729 50.6%97 Gambled at Casino/12 Mo 14,862 10.9%102 Visited Theme Park/12 Mo 17,463 12.8%110 Viewed Movie (Video-on-Demand)/30 Days 16,254 12.0%108 Viewed TV Show (Video-on-Demand)/30 Days 11,287 8.3%110 Used Internet to Download Movie/30 Days 8,972 6.6%110 Downloaded Individual Song/6 Mo 28,102 20.7%103 Used Internet to Watch Movie/30 Days 47,848 35.2%103 Used Internet to Watch TV Program/30 Days 30,056 22.1%100 Played (Console) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 18,504 13.6%106 Played (Portable) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 8,865 6.5%98 Financial (Adults) Have 1st Home Mortgage 56,253 41.4%109 Used ATM or Cash Machine/12 Mo 87,324 64.2%102 Own Any Stock 19,017 14.0%93 Own U.S. Savings Bonds 8,712 6.4%90 Own Shares in Mutual Fund (Stocks)16,174 11.9%87 Own Shares in Mutual Fund (Bonds)9,691 7.1%83 Have Interest Checking Account 50,614 37.2%95 Have Non-Interest Checking Account 51,552 37.9%100 Have Savings Account 100,964 74.3%100 Have 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan 33,139 24.4%100 Own or Used Any Credit/Debit Card/12 Mo 126,479 93.0%100 Avg $1-110 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 15,750 11.6%101 Avg $111-225 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 11,205 8.2%108 Avg $226-450 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 13,319 9.8%106 Avg $451-700 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 12,387 9.1%99 Avg $701-1000 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 10,099 7.4%91 Avg $1001-2000 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 15,243 11.2%95 Avg $2001+ Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 13,806 10.2%92 Did Banking Online/12 Mo 80,678 59.4%101 Did Banking by Mobile Device/12 Mo 68,758 50.6%105 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 4 Retail Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults/HHs Adults/HHs MPI Grocery (Adults) HH Used Bread/6 Mo 58,217 95.5%101 HH Used Chicken (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 43,140 70.8%102 HH Used Turkey (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 9,267 15.2%103 HH Used Fish or Seafood (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 37,825 62.0%103 HH Used Fresh Fruit or Vegetables/6 Mo 53,989 88.6%100 HH Used Fresh Milk/6 Mo 50,694 83.2%101 HH Used Fish or Seafood (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 37,825 62.0%100 Health (Adults) Exercise at Home 2+ Times/Wk 67,150 49.4%100 Exercise at Club 2+ Times/Wk 16,172 11.9%101 Visited Doctor/12 Mo 107,243 78.9%99 Used Vitamins or Dietary Supplements/6 Mo 90,738 66.8%101 Home (Households) HH Did Home Improvement/12 Mo 24,172 39.7%101 HH Used Maid/Prof Cln Svc (+ Furn/Carpet)/12 Mo 18,729 30.7%101 HH Purchased Low Ticket HH Furnishing/12 Mo 14,964 24.5%100 HH Purchased Big Ticket HH Furnishing/12 Mo 17,535 28.8%101 HH Bought Small Kitchen Appliance/12 Mo 16,668 27.3%105 HH Bought Large Kitchen Appliance/12 Mo 10,512 17.2%106 Insurance (Adults/Households) Currently Carry Life Insurance 72,599 53.4%104 Personally Carry Any Med/Hosp/Accident Insur 114,908 84.5%99 Homeowner Carries Home/Personal Property Insurance 83,244 61.2%99 Renter Carries Home/Pers Property Insurance 16,580 12.2%102 HH Has 1 Vehicle Covered w/Auto Insurance 18,384 30.2%98 HH Has 2 Vehicles Covered w/Auto Insurance 20,958 34.4%105 HH Has 3+ Vehicles Covered w/Auto Insurance 16,343 26.8%101 Pets (Households) HH Owns Cat 12,418 20.4%88 HH Owns Dog 24,813 40.7%103 Psychographics (Adults) Represents adults who "completely agree" with the statement: Am Interested in How to Help Env: 4-Agr Cmpl 26,307 19.4%104 Buying American Is Important: 4-Agr Cmpl 41,240 30.3%94 Buy Based on Quality Not Price: 4-Agr Cmpl 21,432 15.8%105 Buy on Credit Rather Than Wait: 4-Agr Cmpl 18,493 13.6%107 Only Use Coupons Brands Usually Buy: 4-Agr Cmpl 14,666 10.8%98 Will Pay More for Env Safe Prods: 4-Agr Cmpl 15,852 11.7%96 Buy Based on Price Not Brands: 4-Agr Cmpl 37,544 27.6%102 Am Interested in How to Help Env: 4-Agr Cmpl 26,307 19.4%104 Reading (Adults) Bought Digital Book/12 Mo 25,537 18.8%100 Bought Hardcover Book/12 Mo 35,158 25.9%95 Bought Paperback Book/12 Mo 45,025 33.1%97 Read Daily Newspaper (Paper Version)17,609 13.0%84 Read Digital Newspaper/30 Days 65,683 48.3%95 Read Magazine (Paper/Electronic Vers)/6 Mo 118,773 87.4%100 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 4 Retail Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults or HHs Adults/HHs MPI Restaurants (Adults) Went to Family Restrnt/SteakHse/6 Mo 93,022 68.4%104 Went to Family Restrnt/SteakHse 4+ Times/30 Days 30,549 22.5%109 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Restaurant/6 Mo 125,905 92.6%102 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Rest 9+ Times/30 Days 59,234 43.6%112 Ordered Eat-In Fast Food/6 Mo 28,856 21.2%104 Ordered Home Delivery Fast Food/6 Mo 20,544 15.1%113 Take-Out/Drive-Thru/Curbside Fast Food/6 Mo 81,470 59.9%103 Ordered Take-Out/Walk-In Fast Food/6 Mo 31,421 23.1%104 Television & Electronics (Adults/Households) Own Tablet 83,216 61.2%104 Own E-Reader 17,878 13.2%92 Own E-Reader/Tablet: Apple iPad 51,974 38.2%103 HH Owns Internet Connectable TV 26,667 43.7%102 Own Portable MP3 Player 16,222 11.9%107 HH Owns 1 TV 9,612 15.8%87 HH Owns 2 TVs 15,889 26.1%92 HH Owns 3 TVs 14,567 23.9%104 HH Owns 4+ TVs 16,142 26.5%117 HH Subscribes to Cable TV 20,428 33.5%99 HH Subscribes to Fiber Optic TV 3,458 5.7%108 HH Owns Portable GPS Device 11,846 19.4%93 HH Purchased Video Game System/12 Mo 4,931 8.1%101 HH Owns Internet Video Device for TV 33,718 55.3%105 Travel (Adults) Took Domestic Trip in Continental U.S./12 Mo 72,632 53.4%99 Took 3+ Domestic Non-Business Trips/12 Mo 18,344 13.5%97 Spent $1-999 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 18,389 13.5%99 Spent $1K-1499 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 9,080 6.7%105 Spent $1500-1999 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 5,064 3.7%98 Spent $2K-2999 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 5,154 3.8%95 Spent $3K+ on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 9,140 6.7%101 Used Intrnt Travel Site for Domestic Trip/12 Mo 7,676 5.6%101 Took Foreign Trip (Incl Alaska & Hawaii)/3 Yrs 46,326 34.1%103 Took 3+ Foreign Trips by Plane/3 Yrs 10,190 7.5%103 Spent $1-999 on Foreign Vacations/12 Mo 10,079 7.4%95 Index: Spent $1K-2999 on Foreign Vacations/12 Mo 5,016 3.7%121 Spent $3K+ on Foreign Vacations/12 Mo 6,427 4.7%111 Used General Travel Site: Foreign Trip/3 Yrs 8,583 6.3%99 Spent Night at Hotel or Motel/12 Mo 62,653 46.1%102 Took Cruise of More Than One Day/3 Yrs 15,351 11.3%112 Member of Frequent Flyer Program 37,756 27.8%101 Member of Hotel Rewards Program 40,265 29.6%103 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 4 Retail Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Population 22,381,338 23,091,949 Population 18+18,121,037 18,733,674 Households 8,909,543 9,259,577 Median Household Income $65,081 $76,713 Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults or HHs Adults/HHs MPI Apparel (Adults) Bought Men`s Clothing/12 Mo 10,979,722 60.6%99 Bought Women`s Clothing/12 Mo 9,440,805 52.1%101 Bought Shoes/12 Mo 13,426,437 74.1%99 Bought Fine Jewelry/12 Mo 3,731,139 20.6%100 Bought Watch/12 Mo 2,580,659 14.2%103 Automobiles (Households) HH Owns or Leases Any Vehicle 8,221,537 92.3%101 HH Bought or Leased New Vehicle/12 Mo 892,648 10.0%99 Automotive Aftermarket (Adults) Bought Gasoline/6 Mo 16,568,448 91.4%101 Bought or Changed Motor Oil/12 Mo 9,485,364 52.3%102 Had Vehicle Tune-Up/12 Mo 4,483,842 24.7%100 Beverages (Adults) Drank Non-Diet (Regular) Cola/6 Mo 6,717,637 37.1%100 Drank Beer or Ale/6 Mo 7,201,316 39.7%100 Cameras (Adults) Own Digital Point and Shoot Camera/Camcorder 1,978,505 10.9%99 Own Digital SLR Camera or Camcorder 1,808,525 10.0%92 Printed Digital Photos/12 Mo 4,782,090 26.4%98 Cell Phones (Adults/Households) Bought Cell Phone/12 Mo 6,303,893 34.8%99 Have a Smartphone 16,960,614 93.6%100 Have Android Phone (Any Brand) Smartphone 7,250,664 40.0%104 Have Apple iPhone Smartphone 9,948,983 54.9%97 HH Owns 1 Cell Phone 2,897,609 32.5%107 HH Owns 2 Cell Phones 3,510,984 39.4%101 HH Owns 3+ Cell Phones 2,367,977 26.6%92 HH Has Cell Phone Only (No Landline Telephone)6,119,914 68.7%100 Computers (Households) HH Owns Computer 7,624,059 85.6%100 HH Owns Desktop Computer 3,606,644 40.5%101 HH Owns Laptop or Notebook 6,216,772 69.8%99 HH Owns Apple/Mac Brand Computer 2,017,972 22.6%94 HH Owns PC/Non-Apple Brand Computer 6,400,218 71.8%101 HH Purchased Most Recent Home Computer at Store 3,546,016 39.8%102 HH Purchased Most Recent Home Computer Online 2,359,633 26.5%96 HH Spent $1-499 on Most Recent Home Computer 1,468,332 16.5%104 HH Spent $500-999 on Most Recent Home Computer 1,851,043 20.8%102 HH Spent $1K-1499 on Most Recent Home Computer 1,004,892 11.3%93 HH Spent $1500-1999 on Most Recent Home Computer 376,870 4.2%92 HH Spent $2K+ on Most Recent Home Computer 458,277 5.1%95 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 4 Retail Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults or HHs Adults/HHs MPI Convenience Stores (Adults) Shopped at C-Store/6 Mo 11,579,540 63.9%100 Bought Brewed Coffee at C-Store/30 Days 2,167,858 12.0%99 Bought Cigarettes at C-Store/30 Days 1,135,100 6.3%103 Bought Gas at C-Store/30 Days 7,323,023 40.4%102 Spent $1-19 at C-Store/30 Days 1,298,755 7.2%97 Spent $20-39 at C-Store/30 Days 1,764,193 9.7%99 Spent $40-50 at C-Store/30 Days 1,375,769 7.6%98 Spent $51-99 at C-Store/30 Days 1,157,493 6.4%104 Spent $100+ at C-Store/30 Days 3,820,321 21.1%101 Entertainment (Adults) Attended Movie/6 Mo 6,630,225 36.6%99 Went to Live Theater/12 Mo 1,187,942 6.6%96 Went to Bar or Night Club/12 Mo 2,889,206 15.9%98 Dined Out/12 Mo 9,385,064 51.8%99 Gambled at Casino/12 Mo 1,926,950 10.6%99 Visited Theme Park/12 Mo 2,081,237 11.5%99 Viewed Movie (Video-on-Demand)/30 Days 1,981,287 10.9%99 Viewed TV Show (Video-on-Demand)/30 Days 1,383,793 7.6%101 Used Internet to Download Movie/30 Days 1,085,208 6.0%99 Downloaded Individual Song/6 Mo 3,527,519 19.5%97 Used Internet to Watch Movie/30 Days 5,946,105 32.8%96 Used Internet to Watch TV Program/30 Days 3,827,151 21.1%95 Played (Console) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 2,157,442 11.9%93 Played (Portable) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 1,103,746 6.1%92 Financial (Adults) Have 1st Home Mortgage 6,792,201 37.5%99 Used ATM or Cash Machine/12 Mo 11,418,878 63.0%100 Own Any Stock 2,663,657 14.7%98 Own U.S. Savings Bonds 1,225,576 6.8%95 Own Shares in Mutual Fund (Stocks)2,460,906 13.6%99 Own Shares in Mutual Fund (Bonds)1,525,919 8.4%98 Have Interest Checking Account 7,161,606 39.5%100 Have Non-Interest Checking Account 6,887,483 38.0%100 Have Savings Account 13,278,361 73.3%99 Have 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan 4,105,432 22.7%93 Own or Used Any Credit/Debit Card/12 Mo 16,823,019 92.8%100 Avg $1-110 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 2,072,258 11.4%100 Avg $111-225 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 1,437,152 7.9%104 Avg $226-450 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 1,689,848 9.3%101 Avg $451-700 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 1,704,252 9.4%102 Avg $701-1000 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 1,451,339 8.0%98 Avg $1001-2000 Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 2,056,912 11.4%97 Avg $2001+ Monthly Credit Card Expenditures 1,959,401 10.8%98 Did Banking Online/12 Mo 10,545,852 58.2%99 Did Banking by Mobile Device/12 Mo 8,504,203 46.9%98 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 4 Retail Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults/HHs Adults/HHs MPI Grocery (Adults) HH Used Bread/6 Mo 8,441,763 94.7%100 HH Used Chicken (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 6,176,821 69.3%99 HH Used Turkey (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 1,302,514 14.6%99 HH Used Fish or Seafood (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 5,395,046 60.6%101 HH Used Fresh Fruit or Vegetables/6 Mo 7,859,053 88.2%100 HH Used Fresh Milk/6 Mo 7,317,816 82.1%100 HH Used Fish or Seafood (Fresh or Frozen)/6 Mo 5,395,046 60.6%96 Health (Adults) Exercise at Home 2+ Times/Wk 8,824,386 48.7%99 Exercise at Club 2+ Times/Wk 2,104,343 11.6%99 Visited Doctor/12 Mo 14,513,158 80.1%100 Used Vitamins or Dietary Supplements/6 Mo 12,193,657 67.3%102 Home (Households) HH Did Home Improvement/12 Mo 3,539,568 39.7%101 HH Used Maid/Prof Cln Svc (+ Furn/Carpet)/12 Mo 2,778,060 31.2%102 HH Purchased Low Ticket HH Furnishing/12 Mo 2,152,491 24.2%98 HH Purchased Big Ticket HH Furnishing/12 Mo 2,518,650 28.3%99 HH Bought Small Kitchen Appliance/12 Mo 2,306,215 25.9%99 HH Bought Large Kitchen Appliance/12 Mo 1,462,320 16.4%101 Insurance (Adults/Households) Currently Carry Life Insurance 9,113,930 50.3%98 Personally Carry Any Med/Hosp/Accident Insur 15,367,117 84.8%99 Homeowner Carries Home/Personal Property Insurance 11,234,959 62.0%100 Renter Carries Home/Pers Property Insurance 2,162,421 11.9%100 HH Has 1 Vehicle Covered w/Auto Insurance 2,895,263 32.5%106 HH Has 2 Vehicles Covered w/Auto Insurance 2,963,204 33.3%101 HH Has 3+ Vehicles Covered w/Auto Insurance 2,237,641 25.1%95 Pets (Households) HH Owns Cat 1,948,512 21.9%95 HH Owns Dog 3,441,981 38.6%98 Psychographics (Adults) Represents adults who "completely agree" with the statement: Am Interested in How to Help Env: 4-Agr Cmpl 3,380,938 18.7%100 Buying American Is Important: 4-Agr Cmpl 6,061,157 33.4%104 Buy Based on Quality Not Price: 4-Agr Cmpl 2,791,691 15.4%102 Buy on Credit Rather Than Wait: 4-Agr Cmpl 2,377,973 13.1%103 Only Use Coupons Brands Usually Buy: 4-Agr Cmpl 2,131,395 11.8%107 Will Pay More for Env Safe Prods: 4-Agr Cmpl 2,174,957 12.0%98 Buy Based on Price Not Brands: 4-Agr Cmpl 4,976,445 27.5%101 Am Interested in How to Help Env: 4-Agr Cmpl 3,380,938 18.7%100 Reading (Adults) Bought Digital Book/12 Mo 3,324,604 18.3%97 Bought Hardcover Book/12 Mo 4,799,641 26.5%98 Bought Paperback Book/12 Mo 5,971,393 33.0%97 Read Daily Newspaper (Paper Version)2,871,740 15.8%103 Read Digital Newspaper/30 Days 8,900,165 49.1%97 Read Magazine (Paper/Electronic Vers)/6 Mo 15,787,274 87.1%100 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 4 Retail Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Number of Percent of Product/Consumer Behavior Adults or HHs Adults/HHs MPI Restaurants (Adults) Went to Family Restrnt/SteakHse/6 Mo 12,107,755 66.8%101 Went to Family Restrnt/SteakHse 4+ Times/30 Days 3,894,495 21.5%105 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Restaurant/6 Mo 16,472,594 90.9%100 Went to Fast Food/Drive-In Rest 9+ Times/30 Days 7,115,172 39.3%101 Ordered Eat-In Fast Food/6 Mo 3,818,899 21.1%103 Ordered Home Delivery Fast Food/6 Mo 2,360,655 13.0%97 Take-Out/Drive-Thru/Curbside Fast Food/6 Mo 10,590,134 58.4%100 Ordered Take-Out/Walk-In Fast Food/6 Mo 3,838,754 21.2%95 Television & Electronics (Adults/Households) Own Tablet 10,671,834 58.9%100 Own E-Reader 2,569,402 14.2%99 Own E-Reader/Tablet: Apple iPad 6,632,191 36.6%98 HH Owns Internet Connectable TV 3,821,744 42.9%100 Own Portable MP3 Player 2,016,303 11.1%99 HH Owns 1 TV 1,592,345 17.9%98 HH Owns 2 TVs 2,533,606 28.4%100 HH Owns 3 TVs 2,074,906 23.3%102 HH Owns 4+ TVs 2,010,155 22.6%100 HH Subscribes to Cable TV 3,207,671 36.0%106 HH Subscribes to Fiber Optic TV 423,459 4.8%90 HH Owns Portable GPS Device 1,858,665 20.9%100 HH Purchased Video Game System/12 Mo 598,866 6.7%84 HH Owns Internet Video Device for TV 4,590,357 51.5%98 Travel (Adults) Took Domestic Trip in Continental U.S./12 Mo 9,538,826 52.6%98 Took 3+ Domestic Non-Business Trips/12 Mo 2,434,668 13.4%97 Spent $1-999 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 2,408,123 13.3%97 Spent $1K-1499 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 1,114,318 6.1%97 Spent $1500-1999 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 636,559 3.5%92 Spent $2K-2999 on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 669,962 3.7%93 Spent $3K+ on Domestic Vacations/12 Mo 1,193,787 6.6%99 Used Intrnt Travel Site for Domestic Trip/12 Mo 970,394 5.4%96 Took Foreign Trip (Incl Alaska & Hawaii)/3 Yrs 5,858,933 32.3%98 Took 3+ Foreign Trips by Plane/3 Yrs 1,256,492 6.9%95 Spent $1-999 on Foreign Vacations/12 Mo 1,330,483 7.3%94 Index: Spent $1K-2999 on Foreign Vacations/12 Mo 564,096 3.1%102 Spent $3K+ on Foreign Vacations/12 Mo 724,247 4.0%94 Used General Travel Site: Foreign Trip/3 Yrs 1,057,886 5.8%92 Spent Night at Hotel or Motel/12 Mo 8,038,799 44.4%98 Took Cruise of More Than One Day/3 Yrs 1,971,580 10.9%108 Member of Frequent Flyer Program 4,944,352 27.3%99 Member of Hotel Rewards Program 5,202,563 28.7%100 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average.Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 4 Sports and Leisure Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Population 178,854 182,536 Population 18+135,933 139,143 Households 60,959 62,818 Median Household Income $69,983 $81,210 Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Participated in Aerobics/12 Mo 11,652 8.6%103 Participated in Archery/12 Mo 3,311 2.4%100 Participated in Backpacking/12 Mo 5,014 3.7%104 Participated in Baseball/12 Mo 3,843 2.8%110 Participated in Basketball/12 Mo 8,786 6.5%113 Participated in Bicycling (Mountain)/12 Mo 4,812 3.5%99 Participated in Bicycling (Road)/12 Mo 15,485 11.4%95 Participated in Boating (Power)/12 Mo 5,799 4.3%89 Participated in Bowling/12 Mo 9,443 6.9%104 Participated in Canoeing or Kayaking/12 Mo 8,867 6.5%87 Participated in Fishing (Fresh Water)/12 Mo 12,527 9.2%88 Participated in Fishing (Salt Water)/12 Mo 4,941 3.6%105 Participated in Football/12 Mo 3,284 2.4%102 Participated in Frisbee/12 Mo 4,253 3.1%91 Participated in Golf/12 Mo 10,496 7.7%97 Participated in Hiking/12 Mo 22,941 16.9%89 Participated in Horseback Riding/12 Mo 2,203 1.6%84 Participated in Hunting w/Rifle/12 Mo 3,604 2.7%78 Participated in Hunting w/Shotgun/12 Mo 2,568 1.9%76 Participated in Ice Skating/12 Mo 3,218 2.4%106 Participated in Jogging or Running/12 Mo 15,620 11.5%102 Participated in Motorcycling/12 Mo 3,347 2.5%93 Participated in Pilates/12 Mo 4,003 2.9%105 Participated in Ping Pong/12 Mo 4,872 3.6%104 Participated in Rock Climbing/12 Mo 2,240 1.6%106 Participated in Roller Skating/12 Mo 2,733 2.0%126 Participated in Skiing (Downhill)/12 Mo 2,958 2.2%85 Participated in Soccer/12 Mo 4,621 3.4%108 Participated in Softball/12 Mo 2,256 1.7%102 Participated in Swimming/12 Mo 19,582 14.4%96 Participated in Target Shooting/12 Mo 6,077 4.5%90 Participated in Tennis/12 Mo 5,105 3.8%98 Participated in Volleyball/12 Mo 3,380 2.5%106 Participated in Walking for Exercise/12 Mo 44,493 32.7%97 Participated in Weight Lifting/12 Mo 19,265 14.2%100 Participated in Yoga/12 Mo 14,711 10.8%99 Participated in Zumba/12 Mo 5,374 4.0%128 Spent $1-99 on Sports/Recreation Equipment/12 Mo 8,580 6.3%90 Spent $100-249 on Sports/Recreation Equipment/12 Mo 8,104 6.0%95 Spent $250+ on Sports/Recreation Equipment/12 Mo 13,822 10.2%100 Attend College Basketball Game/12 Mo 1,544 1.1%103 Attend College Football Game/12 Mo 2,839 2.1%101 Attend High School Sports Events/12 Mo 3,761 2.8%97 Attend MLB Regular Season Baseball Game/12 Mo 3,607 2.7%100 Attend Sports Events 15,506 11.4%101 Listen to Sports on Radio 11,017 8.1%92 Watch Alpine Skiing or Ski Jumping on TV 3,600 2.6%90 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Watch Auto Racing (Not NASCAR) on TV 5,576 4.1%97 Watch Bicycle Racing on TV 2,872 2.1%104 Watch Bowling on TV 3,233 2.4%106 Watch Boxing on TV 10,453 7.7%123 Watch College Basketball on TV 16,427 12.1%100 Watch College Football on TV 36,157 26.6%100 Watch Esports on TV 4,776 3.5%110 Watch Figure Skating on TV 6,577 4.8%95 Watch Fishing on TV 4,379 3.2%100 Watch Gymnastics on TV 7,266 5.3%111 Watch High School Sports on TV 6,469 4.8%105 Watch Horse Racing (at Track or OTB) on TV 3,559 2.6%94 Watch International Soccer on TV 9,403 6.9%119 Watch LPGA Golf on TV 3,814 2.8%96 Watch Marathon/Triathlon/Obstacle Race on TV 1,915 1.4%111 Watch Men`s Tennis on TV 9,061 6.7%98 Watch MLB Playoffs/World Series Baseball on TV 21,311 15.7%98 Watch MLB Regular Season Baseball on TV 23,729 17.5%94 Watch MLS Soccer on TV 7,642 5.6%116 Watch Motorcycle Racing on TV 2,435 1.8%111 Watch NASCAR Auto Racing on TV 9,498 7.0%90 Watch NBA Playoffs or Finals Basketball on TV 22,589 16.6%116 Watch NBA Regular Season Basketball on TV 22,189 16.3%118 Watch NCAA Tournament Basketball on TV 14,812 10.9%105 Watch NFL Playoffs or Super Bowl Football on TV 44,697 32.9%100 Watch NFL Sun/Mon/Thu Night Football Games on TV 44,491 32.7%101 Watch NFL Weekend Football Games on TV 41,606 30.6%101 Watch NHL Playoffs/Stanley Cup Ice Hockey on TV 9,142 6.7%94 Watch NHL Regular Season Ice Hockey on TV 9,388 6.9%89 Watch Oth Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) on TV 4,615 3.4%119 Watch PGA Golf on TV 15,652 11.5%92 Watch Pro Beach Volleyball on TV 2,809 2.1%113 Watch Pro Bull Riding on TV 3,310 2.4%97 Watch Rodeo on TV 2,384 1.8%100 Watch Sports on TV 82,685 60.8%99 Watch Summer Extreme Sports on TV 2,713 2.0%114 Watch Summer Olympics on TV 15,068 11.1%99 Watch Track & Field on TV 5,835 4.3%133 Watch U.S. Men's Soccer National Team on TV 5,496 4.0%113 Watch U.S. Women's Soccer National Team on TV 5,089 3.7%110 Watch Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) on TV 6,659 4.9%111 Watch Winter Extreme Sports on TV 2,743 2.0%105 Watch Winter Olympics on TV 9,429 6.9%90 Watch WNBA Basketball on TV 4,857 3.6%132 Watch Women's Tennis on TV 9,647 7.1%106 Watch World Cup Soccer on TV 8,070 5.9%111 Watch Wrestling (WWE) on TV 5,538 4.1%105 College Basketball Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)3,936 2.9%104 College Football Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)7,998 5.9%106 Golf Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)2,141 1.6%99 High School Sports Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)2,506 1.8%90 Intl Soccer Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)3,015 2.2%97 MLB Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)5,203 3.8%92 MLS Soccer Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)1,637 1.2%103 NASCAR Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)2,018 1.5%94 NBA Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)6,566 4.8%125 NFL Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)13,960 10.3%110 NHL Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)2,459 1.8%81 Pro Wrestling Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)1,377 1.0%85 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Member of AARP 21,859 16.1%96 Member of Church Board 4,037 3.0%112 Member of Fraternal Order 2,943 2.2%88 Member of Religious Club 3,918 2.9%104 Member of Union 6,044 4.4%96 Member of Veterans Club 3,275 2.4%95 Participate in Indoor Gardening or Plant Care 20,758 15.3%95 Attended Adult Education Course/12 Mo 15,582 11.5%103 Visited Aquarium/12 Mo 8,138 6.0%107 Went to Art Gallery/12 Mo 8,843 6.5%91 Attended Auto Show/12 Mo 6,478 4.8%105 Did Baking/12 Mo 40,185 29.6%94 Barbecued/12 Mo 43,532 32.0%101 Went to Bar or Night Club/12 Mo 21,839 16.1%99 Went to Beach/12 Mo 36,247 26.7%96 Played Billiards or Pool/12 Mo 6,029 4.4%103 Played Bingo/12 Mo 5,327 3.9%112 Did Birdwatching/12 Mo 7,874 5.8%79 Played Board Game/12 Mo 30,965 22.8%101 Read Book/12 Mo 51,166 37.6%96 Participated in Book Club/12 Mo 5,702 4.2%105 Went on Overnight Camping Trip/12 Mo 18,337 13.5%100 Played Cards/12 Mo 23,510 17.3%95 Played Chess/12 Mo 5,112 3.8%95 Played Computer Game Offline (w/Software)/12 Mo 11,891 8.7%100 Played Computer Game Online/12 Mo 20,391 15.0%97 Cooked for Fun/12 Mo 37,984 27.9%101 Did Crossword Puzzle/12 Mo 16,032 11.8%89 Danced or Went Dancing/12 Mo 9,896 7.3%113 Attended Dance Performance/12 Mo 3,616 2.7%102 Dined Out/12 Mo 68,729 50.6%97 Flew a Drone/12 Mo 3,565 2.6%104 Attended State or County Fair/12 Mo 9,691 7.1%99 Participated in Fantasy Sports League/12 Mo 6,589 4.8%103 Did Furniture Refinishing/12 Mo 6,232 4.6%97 Gambled at Casino/12 Mo 14,862 10.9%102 Gambled in Las Vegas/12 Mo 5,158 3.8%119 Participated in Genealogy/12 Mo 6,433 4.7%94 Attended Horse Races/12 Mo 2,387 1.8%109 Participated in Karaoke/12 Mo 5,375 4.0%122 Bought Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 45,148 33.2%105 Played Lottery 6+ Times/30 Days 14,926 11.0%112 Bought Daily Drawing Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 5,096 3.7%119 Bought Instant Game Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 25,780 19.0%104 Bought Mega Millions Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 24,531 18.0%111 Bought Powerball Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 26,539 19.5%111 Attended Movie/6 Mo 52,465 38.6%104 Attended Movie 1+ Times Wk/90 Days 1,230 0.9%109 Attended Movie 2-3 Times Month/90 Days 1,762 1.3%103 Attended Movie 1 Time Month/90 Days 3,807 2.8%107 Attended Movie < 1 Time Month/90 Days 37,411 27.5%101 Saw Action Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 15,245 11.2%109 Saw Adventure Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 15,128 11.1%108 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Saw Animation Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 7,672 5.6%116 Saw Biography Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 3,689 2.7%111 Saw Comedy Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 14,376 10.6%111 Saw Crime Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 8,188 6.0%108 Saw Drama Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 12,817 9.4%106 Saw Family Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 4,728 3.5%118 Saw Fantasy Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 7,620 5.6%113 Saw Horror Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 5,620 4.1%113 Saw Romance Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 3,506 2.6%115 Saw Science Fiction Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 7,247 5.3%113 Saw Thriller Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 7,786 5.7%115 Went to Museum/12 Mo 13,768 10.1%96 Attended Classical Music/Opera Performance/12 Mo 3,375 2.5%95 Attended Country Music Performance/12 Mo 4,586 3.4%99 Attended Rock Music Performance/12 Mo 7,713 5.7%97 Played Musical Instrument/12 Mo 10,691 7.9%93 Did Painting/Drawing/Sculpting/12 Mo 13,472 9.9%95 Did Photo Album or Scrapbooking/12 Mo 5,832 4.3%97 Did Photography/12 Mo 15,437 11.4%100 Did Sudoku Puzzle/12 Mo 12,446 9.2%95 Participated in Tailgating/12 Mo 3,692 2.7%103 Went to Live Theater/12 Mo 8,112 6.0%87 Visited Theme Park/12 Mo 17,463 12.8%110 Visited Theme Park 5+ Days/12 Mo 3,927 2.9%115 Participated in Trivia Games/12 Mo 9,827 7.2%94 Played (Console) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 18,504 13.6%106 Played (Portable) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 8,865 6.5%98 Visited Indoor Water Park/12 Mo 2,474 1.8%105 Did Woodworking/12 Mo 6,892 5.1%89 Went to Zoo/12 Mo 15,568 11.5%108 Bought 1-2 DVDs/30 Days 3,557 2.6%102 Bought 3+ DVDs/30 Days 2,651 2.0%93 Rented 1 DVD (Movie or Other Video)/30 Days 2,911 2.1%108 Rented 2 DVDs (Movie or Other Video)/30 Days 2,026 1.5%93 Rented 3+ DVDs (Movie or Other Video)/30 Days 3,503 2.6%94 Rented Action or Adventure Movie/30 Days 22,820 16.8%100 Rented Classic Movie/30 Days 5,520 4.1%93 Rented Comedy Movie/30 Days 16,574 12.2%93 Rented Drama Movie/30 Days 14,040 10.3%95 Rented Family or Children`s Movie/30 Days 7,102 5.2%96 Rented Foreign Movie/30 Days 1,977 1.5%74 Rented Horror Movie/30 Days 6,624 4.9%101 Rented Musical Movie/30 Days 2,711 2.0%93 Rented News or Documentary Movie/30 Days 4,625 3.4%93 Rented Romance Movie/30 Days 5,699 4.2%98 Rented Science Fiction Movie/30 Days 6,860 5.0%93 Rented TV Show Movie/30 Days 7,393 5.4%89 Rented Western Movie/30 Days 2,290 1.7%91 Rented/Purchased DVD/Blu-Ray from Amazon/30 Days 15,526 11.4%97 Rented/Purchased DVD/Blu-Ray from Netflix/30 Days 5,108 3.8%94 Rented/Purchased DVD/Blu-Ray from Redbox/30 Days 9,099 6.7%106 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential 5-Mile_Buffer Prepared by Esri Area: 91 square miles Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Bought Children`s Toy or Game/12 Mo 53,218 39.2%103 Spent $1-49 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 9,749 7.2%100 Spent $50-99 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 4,619 3.4%107 Spent $100-199 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 10,386 7.6%99 Spent $200-499 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 15,629 11.5%105 Spent $500+ on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 8,510 6.3%106 Bought Infant Toy/12 Mo 9,456 7.0%97 Bought Pre-School Toy/12 Mo 10,142 7.5%103 Bought Boy Action Figure for Child/12 Mo 11,488 8.5%115 Bought Girl Action Figure for Child/12 Mo 4,136 3.0%98 Bought Action Game for Child/12 Mo 3,905 2.9%119 Bought Bicycle for Child/12 Mo 9,373 6.9%120 Bought Board Game for Child/12 Mo 21,424 15.8%105 Bought Builder Set for Child/12 Mo 8,006 5.9%104 Bought Car for Child/12 Mo 10,969 8.1%108 Bought Construction Toy for Child/12 Mo 9,703 7.1%103 Bought Fashion Doll for Child/12 Mo 6,751 5.0%110 Bought Large/Baby Doll for Child/12 Mo 10,245 7.5%116 Bought Doll Accessories for Child/12 Mo 5,664 4.2%107 Bought Doll Clothing for Child/12 Mo 5,275 3.9%107 Bought Educational Toy for Child/12 Mo 20,426 15.0%105 Bought Electronic Doll or Animal for Child/12 Mo 3,481 2.6%100 Bought Electronic Game for Child/12 Mo 8,619 6.3%112 Bought Mechanical Toy for Child/12 Mo 5,746 4.2%108 Bought Model Kit or Set for Child/12 Mo 5,067 3.7%101 Bought Plush Doll or Animal for Child/12 Mo 13,072 9.6%96 Bought Sound Game for Child/12 Mo 1,783 1.3%105 Bought Water Toy for Child/12 Mo 11,412 8.4%102 Bought Word Game for Child/12 Mo 3,489 2.6%113 Bought Digital Book/12 Mo 25,537 18.8%100 Bought Hardcover Book/12 Mo 35,158 25.9%95 Bought Paperback Book/12 Mo 45,025 33.1%97 Bought 1-3 Books/12 Mo 29,582 21.8%102 Bought 4-6 Books/12 Mo 15,483 11.4%96 Bought 7+ Books/12 Mo 27,317 20.1%96 Bought Fiction Book/12 Mo 41,295 30.4%96 Bought Non-Fiction Book/12 Mo 40,007 29.4%99 Bought Biography/12 Mo 12,634 9.3%101 Bought Children`s Book/12 Mo 14,335 10.5%101 Bought Cookbook/12 Mo 9,194 6.8%97 Bought History Book/12 Mo 12,859 9.5%91 Bought Mystery Book/12 Mo 14,676 10.8%87 Bought Novel/12 Mo 20,823 15.3%92 Bought Religious Book (Not Bible)/12 Mo 8,793 6.5%105 Bought Romance Book/12 Mo 8,721 6.4%107 Bought Science Fiction Book/12 Mo 9,500 7.0%102 Bought Personal/Business Self-Help Book/12 Mo 12,613 9.3%111 Bought Travel Book/12 Mo 2,272 1.7%92 Purchased Greeting Card/6 Mo 72,112 53.0%98 Bought Book from Barnes & Noble Store/12 Mo 14,874 10.9%105 Bought Book from Oth Book Store/12 Mo 12,352 9.1%94 Bought Book from Amazon Online/12 Mo 48,321 35.5%100 Bought Book from Barnes & Noble Online/12 Mo 3,508 2.6%100 Bought Book from iTunes/Apple Books/12 Mo 2,287 1.7%103 Listened to Audiobook/6 Mo 11,495 8.5%102 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Demographic Summary 2023 2028 Population 22,381,338 23,091,949 Population 18+18,121,037 18,733,674 Households 8,909,543 9,259,577 Median Household Income $65,081 $76,713 Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Participated in Aerobics/12 Mo 1,471,286 8.1%97 Participated in Archery/12 Mo 421,996 2.3%96 Participated in Backpacking/12 Mo 646,365 3.6%100 Participated in Baseball/12 Mo 440,560 2.4%94 Participated in Basketball/12 Mo 969,035 5.3%93 Participated in Bicycling (Mountain)/12 Mo 623,260 3.4%96 Participated in Bicycling (Road)/12 Mo 2,167,588 12.0%99 Participated in Boating (Power)/12 Mo 871,733 4.8%100 Participated in Bowling/12 Mo 1,198,598 6.6%99 Participated in Canoeing or Kayaking/12 Mo 1,296,635 7.2%95 Participated in Fishing (Fresh Water)/12 Mo 1,863,296 10.3%98 Participated in Fishing (Salt Water)/12 Mo 666,587 3.7%107 Participated in Football/12 Mo 426,212 2.4%99 Participated in Frisbee/12 Mo 576,184 3.2%92 Participated in Golf/12 Mo 1,485,840 8.2%104 Participated in Hiking/12 Mo 3,171,649 17.5%93 Participated in Horseback Riding/12 Mo 331,588 1.8%95 Participated in Hunting w/Rifle/12 Mo 564,883 3.1%92 Participated in Hunting w/Shotgun/12 Mo 416,520 2.3%93 Participated in Ice Skating/12 Mo 374,295 2.1%93 Participated in Jogging or Running/12 Mo 1,858,681 10.3%91 Participated in Motorcycling/12 Mo 487,040 2.7%102 Participated in Pilates/12 Mo 479,420 2.6%94 Participated in Ping Pong/12 Mo 588,265 3.2%94 Participated in Rock Climbing/12 Mo 273,380 1.5%97 Participated in Roller Skating/12 Mo 295,650 1.6%102 Participated in Skiing (Downhill)/12 Mo 431,377 2.4%92 Participated in Soccer/12 Mo 543,036 3.0%95 Participated in Softball/12 Mo 280,462 1.5%95 Participated in Swimming/12 Mo 2,723,024 15.0%100 Participated in Target Shooting/12 Mo 850,063 4.7%94 Participated in Tennis/12 Mo 643,141 3.5%93 Participated in Volleyball/12 Mo 410,595 2.3%96 Participated in Walking for Exercise/12 Mo 6,144,413 33.9%100 Participated in Weight Lifting/12 Mo 2,461,743 13.6%96 Participated in Yoga/12 Mo 1,870,162 10.3%94 Participated in Zumba/12 Mo 568,195 3.1%101 Spent $1-99 on Sports/Recreation Equipment/12 Mo 1,230,143 6.8%97 Spent $100-249 on Sports/Recreation Equipment/12 Mo 1,117,514 6.2%98 Spent $250+ on Sports/Recreation Equipment/12 Mo 1,767,602 9.8%96 Attend College Basketball Game/12 Mo 202,803 1.1%102 Attend College Football Game/12 Mo 370,648 2.0%99 Attend High School Sports Events/12 Mo 496,087 2.7%96 Attend MLB Regular Season Baseball Game/12 Mo 441,630 2.4%92 Attend Sports Events 1,915,791 10.6%94 Listen to Sports on Radio 1,493,681 8.2%94 Watch Alpine Skiing or Ski Jumping on TV 521,131 2.9%97 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 1 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Watch Auto Racing (Not NASCAR) on TV 762,445 4.2%100 Watch Bicycle Racing on TV 373,014 2.1%102 Watch Bowling on TV 416,013 2.3%102 Watch Boxing on TV 1,149,614 6.3%101 Watch College Basketball on TV 2,146,683 11.8%98 Watch College Football on TV 4,851,841 26.8%101 Watch Esports on TV 544,918 3.0%94 Watch Figure Skating on TV 954,398 5.3%103 Watch Fishing on TV 610,713 3.4%105 Watch Gymnastics on TV 884,814 4.9%101 Watch High School Sports on TV 762,323 4.2%92 Watch Horse Racing (at Track or OTB) on TV 535,162 3.0%106 Watch International Soccer on TV 1,024,679 5.7%97 Watch LPGA Golf on TV 575,752 3.2%108 Watch Marathon/Triathlon/Obstacle Race on TV 227,825 1.3%99 Watch Men`s Tennis on TV 1,253,086 6.9%101 Watch MLB Playoffs/World Series Baseball on TV 2,897,891 16.0%100 Watch MLB Regular Season Baseball on TV 3,268,870 18.0%97 Watch MLS Soccer on TV 860,768 4.8%98 Watch Motorcycle Racing on TV 302,111 1.7%103 Watch NASCAR Auto Racing on TV 1,472,126 8.1%104 Watch NBA Playoffs or Finals Basketball on TV 2,531,797 14.0%97 Watch NBA Regular Season Basketball on TV 2,435,164 13.4%97 Watch NCAA Tournament Basketball on TV 1,854,782 10.2%99 Watch NFL Playoffs or Super Bowl Football on TV 5,921,855 32.7%100 Watch NFL Sun/Mon/Thu Night Football Games on TV 5,886,999 32.5%100 Watch NFL Weekend Football Games on TV 5,466,802 30.2%100 Watch NHL Playoffs/Stanley Cup Ice Hockey on TV 1,277,084 7.0%98 Watch NHL Regular Season Ice Hockey on TV 1,338,140 7.4%95 Watch Oth Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) on TV 542,793 3.0%105 Watch PGA Golf on TV 2,444,675 13.5%108 Watch Pro Beach Volleyball on TV 317,600 1.8%96 Watch Pro Bull Riding on TV 454,207 2.5%100 Watch Rodeo on TV 316,343 1.7%99 Watch Sports on TV 11,109,978 61.3%100 Watch Summer Extreme Sports on TV 337,931 1.9%107 Watch Summer Olympics on TV 2,029,332 11.2%100 Watch Track & Field on TV 621,893 3.4%107 Watch U.S. Men's Soccer National Team on TV 661,298 3.6%102 Watch U.S. Women's Soccer National Team on TV 632,852 3.5%102 Watch Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) on TV 802,295 4.4%101 Watch Winter Extreme Sports on TV 364,149 2.0%105 Watch Winter Olympics on TV 1,407,949 7.8%101 Watch WNBA Basketball on TV 496,879 2.7%101 Watch Women's Tennis on TV 1,249,701 6.9%103 Watch World Cup Soccer on TV 938,933 5.2%97 Watch Wrestling (WWE) on TV 689,103 3.8%98 College Basketball Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)490,773 2.7%97 College Football Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)1,016,448 5.6%101 Golf Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)321,271 1.8%111 High School Sports Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)334,259 1.8%90 Intl Soccer Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)377,060 2.1%91 MLB Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)734,816 4.1%97 MLS Soccer Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)197,200 1.1%93 NASCAR Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)289,844 1.6%101 NBA Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)687,128 3.8%98 NFL Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)1,701,675 9.4%101 NHL Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)371,570 2.1%92 Pro Wrestling Super Fan (10-10 on 10 Scale)203,582 1.1%94 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 2 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Member of AARP 3,437,409 19.0%113 Member of Church Board 477,078 2.6%99 Member of Fraternal Order 457,718 2.5%103 Member of Religious Club 501,534 2.8%100 Member of Union 743,301 4.1%88 Member of Veterans Club 511,203 2.8%111 Participate in Indoor Gardening or Plant Care 2,840,114 15.7%97 Attended Adult Education Course/12 Mo 1,959,901 10.8%98 Visited Aquarium/12 Mo 982,309 5.4%97 Went to Art Gallery/12 Mo 1,290,072 7.1%99 Attended Auto Show/12 Mo 839,485 4.6%103 Did Baking/12 Mo 5,563,166 30.7%97 Barbecued/12 Mo 5,673,747 31.3%98 Went to Bar or Night Club/12 Mo 2,889,206 15.9%98 Went to Beach/12 Mo 4,903,084 27.1%97 Played Billiards or Pool/12 Mo 739,995 4.1%95 Played Bingo/12 Mo 655,462 3.6%104 Did Birdwatching/12 Mo 1,322,073 7.3%100 Played Board Game/12 Mo 3,911,855 21.6%95 Read Book/12 Mo 7,113,934 39.3%100 Participated in Book Club/12 Mo 715,683 3.9%99 Went on Overnight Camping Trip/12 Mo 2,370,093 13.1%97 Played Cards/12 Mo 3,234,188 17.8%98 Played Chess/12 Mo 655,859 3.6%91 Played Computer Game Offline (w/Software)/12 Mo 1,574,775 8.7%99 Played Computer Game Online/12 Mo 2,879,048 15.9%103 Cooked for Fun/12 Mo 4,858,197 26.8%97 Did Crossword Puzzle/12 Mo 2,510,903 13.9%104 Danced or Went Dancing/12 Mo 1,192,031 6.6%102 Attended Dance Performance/12 Mo 471,684 2.6%100 Dined Out/12 Mo 9,385,064 51.8%99 Flew a Drone/12 Mo 445,454 2.5%98 Attended State or County Fair/12 Mo 1,284,878 7.1%98 Participated in Fantasy Sports League/12 Mo 803,434 4.4%94 Did Furniture Refinishing/12 Mo 854,788 4.7%99 Gambled at Casino/12 Mo 1,926,950 10.6%99 Gambled in Las Vegas/12 Mo 580,267 3.2%100 Participated in Genealogy/12 Mo 922,420 5.1%101 Attended Horse Races/12 Mo 303,334 1.7%104 Participated in Karaoke/12 Mo 590,439 3.3%101 Bought Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 5,795,029 32.0%101 Played Lottery 6+ Times/30 Days 1,872,479 10.3%105 Bought Daily Drawing Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 573,708 3.2%100 Bought Instant Game Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 3,335,430 18.4%101 Bought Mega Millions Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 2,990,480 16.5%101 Bought Powerball Lottery Ticket/12 Mo 3,234,009 17.8%102 Attended Movie/6 Mo 6,630,225 36.6%99 Attended Movie 1+ Times Wk/90 Days 155,520 0.9%103 Attended Movie 2-3 Times Month/90 Days 229,839 1.3%101 Attended Movie 1 Time Month/90 Days 462,836 2.6%97 Attended Movie < 1 Time Month/90 Days 4,849,203 26.8%98 Saw Action Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 1,855,614 10.2%99 Saw Adventure Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 1,865,855 10.3%99 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 3 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Saw Animation Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 898,110 5.0%102 Saw Biography Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 463,735 2.6%105 Saw Comedy Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 1,728,497 9.5%100 Saw Crime Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 1,019,112 5.6%101 Saw Drama Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 1,608,046 8.9%100 Saw Family Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 555,998 3.1%104 Saw Fantasy Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 905,013 5.0%101 Saw Horror Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 656,052 3.6%99 Saw Romance Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 411,977 2.3%102 Saw Science Fiction Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 842,813 4.7%99 Saw Thriller Genre Movie at Theater/6 Mo 894,673 4.9%99 Went to Museum/12 Mo 1,824,334 10.1%95 Attended Classical Music/Opera Performance/12 Mo 495,367 2.7%105 Attended Country Music Performance/12 Mo 618,874 3.4%100 Attended Rock Music Performance/12 Mo 1,027,222 5.7%97 Played Musical Instrument/12 Mo 1,462,095 8.1%95 Did Painting/Drawing/Sculpting/12 Mo 1,830,360 10.1%96 Did Photo Album or Scrapbooking/12 Mo 768,444 4.2%95 Did Photography/12 Mo 1,963,619 10.8%96 Did Sudoku Puzzle/12 Mo 1,722,831 9.5%99 Participated in Tailgating/12 Mo 455,891 2.5%95 Went to Live Theater/12 Mo 1,187,942 6.6%96 Visited Theme Park/12 Mo 2,081,237 11.5%99 Visited Theme Park 5+ Days/12 Mo 461,324 2.5%101 Participated in Trivia Games/12 Mo 1,350,491 7.5%97 Played (Console) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 2,157,442 11.9%93 Played (Portable) Video or Electronic Game/12 Mo 1,103,746 6.1%92 Visited Indoor Water Park/12 Mo 294,533 1.6%94 Did Woodworking/12 Mo 1,012,140 5.6%99 Went to Zoo/12 Mo 1,818,741 10.0%95 Bought 1-2 DVDs/30 Days 473,811 2.6%102 Bought 3+ DVDs/30 Days 386,839 2.1%102 Rented 1 DVD (Movie or Other Video)/30 Days 357,243 2.0%99 Rented 2 DVDs (Movie or Other Video)/30 Days 305,894 1.7%106 Rented 3+ DVDs (Movie or Other Video)/30 Days 530,567 2.9%107 Rented Action or Adventure Movie/30 Days 3,004,063 16.6%99 Rented Classic Movie/30 Days 802,321 4.4%102 Rented Comedy Movie/30 Days 2,310,600 12.8%97 Rented Drama Movie/30 Days 1,981,305 10.9%101 Rented Family or Children`s Movie/30 Days 909,097 5.0%93 Rented Foreign Movie/30 Days 332,298 1.8%93 Rented Horror Movie/30 Days 839,564 4.6%96 Rented Musical Movie/30 Days 386,224 2.1%99 Rented News or Documentary Movie/30 Days 682,236 3.8%102 Rented Romance Movie/30 Days 774,310 4.3%100 Rented Science Fiction Movie/30 Days 955,422 5.3%98 Rented TV Show Movie/30 Days 1,061,462 5.9%95 Rented Western Movie/30 Days 366,891 2.0%109 Rented/Purchased DVD/Blu-Ray from Amazon/30 Days 2,054,659 11.3%96 Rented/Purchased DVD/Blu-Ray from Netflix/30 Days 757,969 4.2%105 Rented/Purchased DVD/Blu-Ray from Redbox/30 Days 1,174,230 6.5%102 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 4 of 5 Sports and Leisure Market Potential Florida Prepared by Esri Florida (12) Geography: State Expected Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Adults/HHs Percent MPI Bought Children`s Toy or Game/12 Mo 6,751,673 37.3%98 Spent $1-49 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 1,265,850 7.0%98 Spent $50-99 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 581,372 3.2%101 Spent $100-199 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 1,376,857 7.6%99 Spent $200-499 on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 1,987,517 11.0%100 Spent $500+ on Toys or Games for Child/12 Mo 1,007,892 5.6%94 Bought Infant Toy/12 Mo 1,266,065 7.0%98 Bought Pre-School Toy/12 Mo 1,283,621 7.1%98 Bought Boy Action Figure for Child/12 Mo 1,327,192 7.3%100 Bought Girl Action Figure for Child/12 Mo 564,352 3.1%101 Bought Action Game for Child/12 Mo 432,367 2.4%99 Bought Bicycle for Child/12 Mo 1,043,441 5.8%100 Bought Board Game for Child/12 Mo 2,614,783 14.4%96 Bought Builder Set for Child/12 Mo 995,471 5.5%97 Bought Car for Child/12 Mo 1,334,640 7.4%98 Bought Construction Toy for Child/12 Mo 1,247,658 6.9%99 Bought Fashion Doll for Child/12 Mo 808,299 4.5%98 Bought Large/Baby Doll for Child/12 Mo 1,184,222 6.5%100 Bought Doll Accessories for Child/12 Mo 709,541 3.9%101 Bought Doll Clothing for Child/12 Mo 653,019 3.6%99 Bought Educational Toy for Child/12 Mo 2,529,222 14.0%97 Bought Electronic Doll or Animal for Child/12 Mo 456,046 2.5%98 Bought Electronic Game for Child/12 Mo 989,811 5.5%97 Bought Mechanical Toy for Child/12 Mo 679,735 3.8%96 Bought Model Kit or Set for Child/12 Mo 656,029 3.6%98 Bought Plush Doll or Animal for Child/12 Mo 1,745,847 9.6%96 Bought Sound Game for Child/12 Mo 234,069 1.3%103 Bought Water Toy for Child/12 Mo 1,441,538 8.0%97 Bought Word Game for Child/12 Mo 418,057 2.3%101 Bought Digital Book/12 Mo 3,324,604 18.3%97 Bought Hardcover Book/12 Mo 4,799,641 26.5%98 Bought Paperback Book/12 Mo 5,971,393 33.0%97 Bought 1-3 Books/12 Mo 3,911,552 21.6%101 Bought 4-6 Books/12 Mo 2,037,559 11.2%95 Bought 7+ Books/12 Mo 3,700,320 20.4%97 Bought Fiction Book/12 Mo 5,621,040 31.0%98 Bought Non-Fiction Book/12 Mo 5,248,256 29.0%98 Bought Biography/12 Mo 1,670,474 9.2%100 Bought Children`s Book/12 Mo 1,846,992 10.2%98 Bought Cookbook/12 Mo 1,254,361 6.9%99 Bought History Book/12 Mo 1,804,269 10.0%96 Bought Mystery Book/12 Mo 2,256,624 12.5%100 Bought Novel/12 Mo 2,929,134 16.2%97 Bought Religious Book (Not Bible)/12 Mo 1,112,243 6.1%100 Bought Romance Book/12 Mo 1,101,164 6.1%101 Bought Science Fiction Book/12 Mo 1,172,782 6.5%94 Bought Personal/Business Self-Help Book/12 Mo 1,458,987 8.1%96 Bought Travel Book/12 Mo 356,061 2.0%109 Purchased Greeting Card/6 Mo 9,832,091 54.3%100 Bought Book from Barnes & Noble Store/12 Mo 1,861,514 10.3%98 Bought Book from Oth Book Store/12 Mo 1,698,014 9.4%97 Bought Book from Amazon Online/12 Mo 6,244,732 34.5%97 Bought Book from Barnes & Noble Online/12 Mo 467,117 2.6%100 Bought Book from iTunes/Apple Books/12 Mo 296,820 1.6%101 Listened to Audiobook/6 Mo 1,433,503 7.9%96 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by MRI-Simmons in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028. April 04, 2024 ©2024 Esri Page 5 of 5 07-22-28-0000-00-07328-22-07-0000-00-08628-22-07-0000-00-05407-22-28-0000-00-085 07-22-28-0000-00-084 07-22-28-0000-00-08307-22-28-0000-00-08207-22-28-0000-00-10007-22-28-4944-00-001 07-22-28-0000-00-099 07-22-28-0000-00-04907-22-28-0000-00-080 07-22-28-0000-00-087 07-22-28-0000-00-015 07-22-28-0000-00-042 07-22-28-0000-00-068 07-22-28-0000-00-061 07-22-28-0000-00-067 07-22-28-0000-00-026 06-22-28-0000-00-056 06-22-28-0000-00-012 06-22-28-0000-00-080 06-22-28-0000-00-040 07-22-28-0000-00-071 FLU: C (PUD) ZONING: C (PUD) 07-22-28-1842-00-050 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 28-22-07-1842-00-260 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE07-22-28-1842-00-250 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-240 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-230 07-22-28-1842-00-220 07-22-28-1842-00-210 07-22-28-1842-00-200 07-22-28-1842-00-190 07-22-28-1842-00-180 07-22-28-0000-00-03807-22-28-0000-00-037 07-22-28-0000-00-09207-22-28-0000-00-064 07-22-28-1842-00-001 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CEFLU: LI ZONING: IND (PUD) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: HI ZONING: I-2 FLU: LI ZONING: I-1 FLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: R-1A FLU: C ZONING: C (PUD) FLU: LDR ZONING: A-1 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: R (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: LDRFLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: LD-PUD LAKEWOOD MANOR PUD 07-22-28-0000-00-031 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) PUD BOUNDARY W-1 19.49 ACRES W-2 1.1 ACRES W-3 1.35 ACRES W-4 20.89 ACRES 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 103 103 104 105 106 108 109 107 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 116 116 115 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 117117 118 117 116 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 125 125 123 119 126 123 124 116 119120 125 124 123 122 126 127 121 120 119 O C O E E -A P O P K A R O A D (R O W V A R I E S ) FU L L E R S C R O S S R O A D (R O W V A R I E S ) NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE Note: Existing wetland boundaries have been field-delineated in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Final configuration subject to approval by regulatory agencies SW-1 ~0.06ACRES SW-2 ~1.15 ACRES SW-3 0.38 ACRES SW-4 0.38 ACRES 122 123 121 122 122 122 123 124 PUD BOUNDARY 06-22-28-0000-00-001 FLU: LDR & CONS ZONING: PUD-LD 06-22-28-0000-00-039 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-041 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-043 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-105 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-057 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-060 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-023 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED EXISTING WELL 06-22-28-0000-00-074 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED Feet 0 150 300 Su n d a y , S e p t e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 2 4 5 : 2 9 : 5 0 PMC: \ U s e r s \ B a s t i a n M \ D e s k t o p \ W I P \ O c o e e \ 4 7 0 - P l a n n i n g \ 7 0 . C A D \ P D _ R e z o n i n g ( 1 s t S u b m i t t a l ) 22 9 0 F U L L E R S C R O S S R O A D OC O E E , F L O R I D A OC O E E R E G I O N A L S P O R T S C O M P L E X 09 / 1 5 / 2 4 P U D - 1 s t S u b m i t t a l AE C O M 15 0 N O r a n g e A v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 Or l a n d o , F L 3 2 8 0 1 (4 0 7 ) 8 4 3 - 6 5 5 2 Mo n t i e r r e D e v e l o p m e n t 56 6 9 S E C r o o k e d O a k A v e Ho b e S o u n d , F L 3 3 4 5 5 ©2024 AECOM Corporation Pr i n t e d d a t e : Fi l e n a m e : Drawing Title: Re v i s i o n s N° Da t e De s c r i p t i o n FILE NAME: DWN BY: DESIGNED BY:QA/QC BY: SIZE PROJECT MANAGER: PLOT SCALE: DATE: PROJECT # Sheet Key plan: 30"X42" BSTN BSTN -- 9/15/2024 BL AS INDICATED EX. 24 60729465 --- AERIAL IMAGE AERIAL IMAGE PROPOSED 60' ROW CONVEYANCE EXISTING LIFT STATION FEMA FLOOD HAZARD ZONES MAP WETLANDS AND SURFACE WATERS MAP Su n d a y , S e p t e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 2 4 5 : 2 9 : 5 0 PMC: \ U s e r s \ B a s t i a n M \ D e s k t o p \ W I P \ O c o e e \ 4 7 0 - P l a n n i n g \ 7 0 . C A D \ P D _ R e z o n i n g ( 1 s t S u b m i t t a l ) 22 9 0 F U L L E R S C R O S S R O A D OC O E E , F L O R I D A OC O E E R E G I O N A L S P O R T S C O M P L E X 09 / 1 5 / 2 4 P U D - 1 s t S u b m i t t a l AE C O M 15 0 N O r a n g e A v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 Or l a n d o , F L 3 2 8 0 1 (4 0 7 ) 8 4 3 - 6 5 5 2 Mo n t i e r r e D e v e l o p m e n t 56 6 9 S E C r o o k e d O a k A v e Ho b e S o u n d , F L 3 3 4 5 5 ©2024 AECOM Corporation Pr i n t e d d a t e : Fi l e n a m e : Drawing Title: Re v i s i o n s N° Da t e De s c r i p t i o n FILE NAME: DWN BY: DESIGNED BY:QA/QC BY: SIZE PROJECT MANAGER: PLOT SCALE: DATE: PROJECT # Sheet Key plan: 30"X42" BSTN BSTN -- 09/15/2024 BL AS INDICATED EX. 25 60729465 --- FEMA &WETLANDS SOILS MAP LAND USE / LAND COVER MAP (FLUCFCS) Su n d a y , S e p t e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 2 4 5 : 2 9 : 5 0 PMC: \ U s e r s \ B a s t i a n M \ D e s k t o p \ W I P \ O c o e e \ 4 7 0 - P l a n n i n g \ 7 0 . C A D \ P D _ R e z o n i n g ( 1 s t S u b m i t t a l ) 22 9 0 F U L L E R S C R O S S R O A D OC O E E , F L O R I D A OC O E E R E G I O N A L S P O R T S C O M P L E X 09 / 1 5 / 2 4 P U D - 1 s t S u b m i t t a l AE C O M 15 0 N O r a n g e A v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 Or l a n d o , F L 3 2 8 0 1 (4 0 7 ) 8 4 3 - 6 5 5 2 Mo n t i e r r e D e v e l o p m e n t 56 6 9 S E C r o o k e d O a k A v e Ho b e S o u n d , F L 3 3 4 5 5 ©2024 AECOM Corporation Pr i n t e d d a t e : Fi l e n a m e : Drawing Title: Re v i s i o n s N° Da t e De s c r i p t i o n FILE NAME: DWN BY: DESIGNED BY:QA/QC BY: SIZE PROJECT MANAGER: PLOT SCALE: DATE: PROJECT # Sheet Key plan: 30"X42" BSTN BSTN -- 09/15/2024 BL AS INDICATED EX. 26 60729465 --- SOILS& LAND COVER LIMIT OF RETAINING WALL LIMIT OF RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL LIMIT OF RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL 07-22-28-0000-00-07328-22-07-0000-00-08628-22-07-0000-00-05407-22-28-0000-00-085 07-22-28-0000-00-084 07-22-28-0000-00-08307-22-28-0000-00-08207-22-28-0000-00-10007-22-28-4944-00-001 07-22-28-0000-00-099 07-22-28-0000-00-04907-22-28-0000-00-080 07-22-28-0000-00-087 07-22-28-0000-00-015 07-22-28-0000-00-042 07-22-28-0000-00-068 07-22-28-0000-00-061 07-22-28-0000-00-067 07-22-28-0000-00-026 06-22-28-0000-00-056 06-22-28-0000-00-012 06-22-28-0000-00-080 06-22-28-0000-00-040 07-22-28-0000-00-071 FLU: C (PUD) ZONING: C (PUD) 07-22-28-1842-00-050 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 28-22-07-1842-00-260 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-250 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-240 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-230 07-22-28-1842-00-220 07-22-28-1842-00-210 07-22-28-1842-00-200 07-22-28-1842-00-190 07-22-28-1842-00-180 07-22-28-0000-00-038 07-22-28-0000-00-037 07-22-28-0000-00-09207-22-28-0000-00-064 07-22-28-1842-00-001 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CEFLU: LI ZONING: IND (PUD) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: HI ZONING: I-2 FLU: LI ZONING: I-1 FLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: R-1A FLU: C ZONING: C (PUD) FLU: LDR ZONING: A-1 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: R (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: LDRFLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: LD-PUD LAKEWOOD MANOR PUD 07-22-28-0000-00-031 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) PUD BOUNDARY W-1 19.49 ACRES W-2 1.1 ACRES W-3 1.35 ACRES W-4 20.89 ACRES 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 103 103 104 105 106 108 109 107 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 116 116 115 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 117117 118 117 116 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 125 125 123 119 126 123 124 116 119120 125 124 123 122 126 127 121 120 119 OCOEE - A P O P K A R O A D (ROW V A R I E S ) FU L L E R S C R O S S R O A D (R O W V A R I E S ) NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE Note: Existing wetland boundaries have been field-delineated in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Final configuration subject to approval by regulatory agencies SW-1 ~0.06ACRES SW-2 ~1.15 ACRES SW-3 0.38 ACRES SW-4 0.38 ACRES 122 123 121 122 122 122 123 124 PUD BOUNDARY PUD BOUNDARY 06-22-28-0000-00-001 FLU: LDR & CONS ZONING: PUD-LD 06-22-28-0000-00-039 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-041 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-043 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-105 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-057 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-060 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED 06-22-28-0000-00-023 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED EXISTING WELL 06-22-28-0000-00-074 FLU: LDR ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED Feet 0 150 300 Su n d a y , S e p t e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 2 4 5 : 2 9 : 5 0 PMC: \ U s e r s \ B a s t i a n M \ D e s k t o p \ W I P \ O c o e e \ 4 7 0 - P l a n n i n g \ 7 0 . C A D \ P D _ R e z o n i n g ( 1 s t S u b m i t t a l ) 22 9 0 F U L L E R S C R O S S R O A D OC O E E , F L O R I D A OC O E E R E G I O N A L S P O R T S C O M P L E X 09 / 1 5 / 2 4 PU D - 1 s t S u b m i t t a l AE C O M 15 0 N O r a n g e A v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 Or l a n d o , F L 3 2 8 0 1 (4 0 7 ) 84 3 - 6 5 5 2 Mo n t i e r r e D e v e l o p m e n t 56 6 9 S E C r o o k e d O a k A v e Ho b e S o u n d , F L 3 3 4 5 5 ©2024 AECOM Corporation Pr i n t e d d a t e : Fi l e n a m e : Drawing Title: Re v i s i o n s N° Da t e De s c r i p t i o n FILE NAME: DWN BY: DESIGNED BY:QA/QC BY: SIZE PROJECT MANAGER: PLOT SCALE: DATE: PROJECT # Sheet Key plan: 30"X42" BSTN BSTN --- 09/15/2024 BL AS INDICATED EX. 27 60729465 --- TOPOGRAPHY & EXIST. COND. TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED 60' ROW CONVEYANCE EXISTING LIFT STATION 07-22-28-0000-00-07328-22-07-0000-00-08628-22-07-0000-00-05407-22-28-0000-00-085 07-22-28-0000-00-084 07-22-28-0000-00-08307-22-28-0000-00-08207-22-28-0000-00-10007-22-28-4944-00-001 07-22-28-0000-00-099 07-22-28-0000-00-04907-22-28-0000-00-080 07-22-28-0000-00-087 07-22-28-0000-00-015 07-22-28-0000-00-042 07-22-28-0000-00-068 07-22-28-0000-00-061 07-22-28-0000-00-067 07-22-28-0000-00-026 06-22-28-0000-00-056 06-22-28-0000-00-012 06-22-28-0000-00-080 06-22-28-0000-00-040 07-22-28-0000-00-071 FLU: C (PUD) ZONING: C (PUD) 07-22-28-1842-00-050 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 28-22-07-1842-00-260 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-250 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-240 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE 07-22-28-1842-00-230 07-22-28-1842-00-220 07-22-28-1842-00-210 07-22-28-1842-00-200 07-22-28-1842-00-190 07-22-28-1842-00-180 07-22-28-0000-00-038 07-22-28-0000-00-037 07-22-28-0000-00-09207-22-28-0000-00-064 07-22-28-1842-00-001 FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CEFLU: LI ZONING: IND (PUD) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: HI ZONING: I-2 FLU: LI ZONING: I-1 FLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: R-1A FLU: C ZONING: C (PUD) FLU: LDR ZONING: A-1 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)FLU: LDR ZONING: R-CE FLU: R (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: LDRFLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: R (COUNTY) FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY)FLU: R (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY)ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) FLU: LDR ZONING: LD-PUD LAKEWOOD MANOR PUD 07-22-28-0000-00-031 FLU: LDR (COUNTY) ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) PUD BOUNDARY 60' ROW CONVEYANCE 3.8 ACRES OCOEE - A P O P K A R O A D (ROW V A R I E S ) FU L L E R S C R O S S R O A D (R O W V A R I E S ) (P R O P O S E D R O A D - 6 0 ' R O W ) NORTH LAKEWOOD AVENUE PUD BOUNDARY East Parking Garage 6 Stories / 7 Levels 431,500 sf / 1,278 spaces NW Water Feature (PARKING BELOW) ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT River Walk MAIN STREET CENTRAL WATER FEATURE SURFACE PARKING Dry Stormwater & Landscaping (typ.) Note: conceptual roadway layout provided for preliminary coordination and discussion purposes only. Actual roadway configuration will be subject to design, engineering, review, and approval by regulatory agencies. PUD BOUNDARY 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER Storage North Hotel (East Tower) 10 Stories 214,238 sf / 358 Units Amenities Deck 47,000 sf Arrival / Podium 2 Stories 129,016 sf Amenities Deck 69,000 sf North Hotel (West Tower) 10 Stories 304,890 sf / 571 Units Welcome Center 2 Stories 18,427 sf West Parking Garage 6 Stories / 7 Levels 374,460 sf / 1,151 spaces Boardwalk North ArrivalPlaza Retail Promenade Splash Pad Plaza 'Train Station' Restaurant 8,340 sf Gathering Stairs Drop-off Service Yard Service Yard Waterfront Dining Restaurant 4,000 sf Restrooms Entertainment 17,510 sf Retail 15,550 sf Restaurants 13,120 sf Entertainment 17,410 sf Retail 10,610 sf Restrooms Restaurant 8,110 sf Citrus Tower CirculationRideshare Drop-off Lawn Pedestrian Bridge (TYP.) Stairs Waterfront Dining Retail & Restaurants 35,580 sf Retail 15,260 sf Retail & Restaurants 4,010 sf garage access Retail 11,470 sf PODIUM RETAIL DISTRICT Restaurant Retail 2,160 sf Retail 11,220 sf Retail 1,730 sf Retail 2,190 sf Retail & Restaurants 19,550 sf Restaurant 5,690 sf Restaurant 5,920 sf Retail 10,680 sf Retail 14,900 sf Restrooms & Circ. Rest. Stairs Stairs service area short-term parking Drop-off Food Hall 17,280 sf Restaurant 6,790 sf Retail 15,310 sf Restaurant 5,240 sf Playground Outdoor Dining PlazaArrival Garden Amenities Deck 38,000 sf Parking Garage 2 Stories / 3 Levels 108,150 sf / 366 spaces surface parking Guest Terrace Boutique Hotel 6 Stories 154,828 sf / 185 Units surface parking Arrival & Drop-off Entertainment 36,000 sf Play Courts MLB-Sized Baseball Field MLB-Sized Championship Field MLB-Sized Baseball Field MLB-Sized Baseball Field MLB-Sized Baseball Field Truncated MLB Baseball Field Truncated MLB Baseball Field Small Baseball Field Accessible Baseball Field Multi-Use Field MLB-Sized Baseball Soccer + Football Multi-Use Field MLB-Sized Baseball Soccer + Football Multi-Use Field MLB-Sized Baseball Soccer + Football Multi-Use Field Small Baseball Soccer + Football Multi-Use Field Small Baseball Soccer + Football Multi-Use Field Small Baseball Football Truncated MLB Baseball Field Football Field indoor Sports & Fitness 150,000 sf Maintenance Optional Controlled Access Perimeter (typ.) Service Yard Guest Drop-off Arrival Water Feature City Park & Shared Overflow Parking ROW CONVEYANCE 0.4 ACRES Dry Retention (typ.) Covered Seating (typ.) Batting Cages (typ.) Press Box (typ.) MULTI-PURPOSE SPORTS FIELDS EXISTING WELL Service / Emergency Access Road(Private) 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT service exit only service exit only Restrooms Restrooms Restrooms Restrooms Playground Playground Feet 0 150 300 Su n d a y , S e p t e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 2 4 5 : 2 9 : 5 0 PMC: \ U s e r s \ B a s t i a n M \ D e s k t o p \ W I P \ O c o e e \ 4 7 0 - P l a n n i n g \ 7 0 . C A D \ P D _ R e z o n i n g ( 1 s t S u b m i t t a l ) 22 9 0 F U L L E R S C R O S S R O A D OC O E E , F L O R I D A OC O E E R E G I O N A L S P O R T S C O M P L E X 09 / 1 5 / 2 4 PU D - 1 s t S u b m i t t a l AE C O M 15 0 N O r a n g e A v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 Or l a n d o , F L 3 2 8 0 1 (4 0 7 ) 84 3 - 6 5 5 2 Mo n t i e r r e D e v e l o p m e n t 56 6 9 S E C r o o k e d O a k A v e Ho b e S o u n d , F L 3 3 4 5 5 ©2024 AECOM Corporation Pr i n t e d d a t e : Fi l e n a m e : Drawing Title: Re v i s i o n s N° Da t e De s c r i p t i o n FILE NAME: DWN BY: DESIGNED BY:QA/QC BY: SIZE PROJECT MANAGER: PLOT SCALE: DATE: PROJECT # Sheet Key plan: 30"X42" BSTN BSTN --- 08/21/2024 BL AS INDICATED 60729465 --- CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 44 1 4 4 3 - 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Article I, Sections 1-8 and 1-10, and Article V, Section 5-9, of the City of Ocoee Land Development Code that on TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2025, AT 6:15 P.M. or as soon thereafter as practical, the OCOEE CITY COMMISSION will hold a PUBLIC HEARING at the City of Ocoee Commission Chambers located at 1 North Bluford Avenue, Ocoee, Florida, to consider a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment to convert approximately 117.7 acres of Low Density Residential (LDR) and approximately 32.3 acres of Conservation (CON) to approximately 150 acres of Commercial (COMM) and corresponding text amendment to the Future Land Use Element for the Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Project. The subject property is comprised of 9 parcels, assigned parcel ID numbers 07-22-28-0000- 00-001, 07-22-28-0000-00-023, 07-22-28-0000-00-057, 07-22-28-0000-00-041, 07-22-28-0000-00-039, 07-22-28-0000-00-043, 07-22-28-0000-00-105, 07-22- 28-0000-00-060, and 07-22-28-0000-00-074. The subject property is generally locatedwithin the southeast corner of the intersection of Fullers Cross Road and Ocoee Apopka Road. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND CONSERVATION TO COMMERCIAL FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND OCOEE APOPKA ROAD INTERSECTION AND AMENDING PROVISIONS AND POLICIES WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PREVAILING IN THE EVENT OF ANY INCONSISTENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard with respect to the proposed action. The complete case file may be inspected at the Ocoee Development Services Department, located at 1 North Bluford Avenue, Ocoee, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays. The City Commission may continue the public hearing to other dates and times as it deems necessary. Any interested party shall be advised that the dates, times, and places of any continuation of these or continued public hearings shall be announced during the hearings and that no further notices regarding these matters will be published. You are advised that any person who desires to appeal any decision made during the public hearings will need a record of the proceedings and, for this purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of the proceedings should contact the City Clerk’s Office 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (407) 905-3105. Melanie Sibbitt, City Clerk Publish Date: February 6, 2025 UNNAMED LAKEUNNAMED CANAL S SR 4 29 N S R 4 2 9 Ocoee Apopka Rd N Lakewood Ave Fullers Cross Rd Pine St Log Landing Dr Clarcona Ocoee Rd D em a s t us L n Clin ge r Cov e R d 11th Ave 10th Ave 12th Ave 13th Ave 15th Ave 16th Ave 17th Ave Wurst Rd Harris Rd C r o w n P o i n t W o o d s C i r Marigold Park Dr Private Dr Westbridge Ct Lilybean Loop Ocoee Regional Sports Complex Large-Scale CPA Location Map I CITY OF OCOEE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE OCOEE REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX LARGE-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) AND CONSERVATION (CON) TO COMMERCIAL (COMM) AND CORRESPONDING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT CASE NUMBER: CPA-2024-006 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN 1991, AS AMENDED; AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE OCOEE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND CONSERVATION TO COMMERCIAL FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FULLERS CROSS ROAD AND OCOEE APOPKA ROAD INTERSECTION AND AMENDING PROVISIONS AND POLICIES WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF THE OFFICIAL CITY FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PREVAILING IN THE EVENT OF ANY INCONSISTENCY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed project is anticipated to bring thousands of construction and permanent jobs, remove/cap contaminated soils and improve wetland preservation resources. Thus, the proposed ordinance will help the City achieve its goals of bringing economic opportunities to the city, improving a designated Brown Field site and advancing the City's wetlands mitigation efforts. The wetlands impacted by this development have been evaluated using FDEP's methodology and was found to be low quality wetlands. To off-set their impact, the applicant will provide a monitoring and maintenance plan for quality wetlands elsewhere in the City. The proposed project will also provide transportation improvements. Thus, the proposed ordinance will serve the public health, safety and welfare. The Ocoee Regional Sports Complex is anticipated to promote and bring about significant positive economic impacts to the City via improvements to transportation and utility infrastructure, dedication of land for a new city park, containment/capping of contaminated soils, and construction and permanent jobs in a variety of industries, including hotel/lodging, professional sports and sports medicine, retail, dining, entertainment, and office. N/A N/A N/A N/A