HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #11 Amendment to Meadow Ridge PUD
center of GOOd Li
.. <";&.
9~~fIr
AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 6, 2007
Item # Ll
Contact Name:
Contact Number:
Antonio Fabre, AICP
407 -905-3100/1019
Reviewed By:
Department Director:
City Manager:
Subject: Substantial Amendment to the Meadow Ridge PUD (FKA: Westridge PUD)
Project # LS-2005-011
Commission District # 3 - Rusty Johnson
ISSUE:
Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners approve an Ordinance for a Substantial Amendment
to the Meadow Ridge PUD?
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The Meadow Ridge PUD is located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maguire Road and
Moore Road. The residential portion of the PUD consists of 152 single-family lots. The City Commission,
on March 7, 2006, reviewed and approved the Final Subdivision Plan for the residential portion of Meadow
Ridge PUD. After construction started, the home builder noticed that due to their home product design and
the size of the lots, the addition of a typical size swimming pool would exceed the maximum 50 percent
impervious surface development standard for the PUD. Accordingly, the applicant has requested an
increase of the maximum allowable impervious area for certain residential lots.
DISCUSSION:
As indicated above, this amendment will change a Condition of Approval in the previously approved
Meadow Ridge PUD. Specifically, the applicant is requesting to change the previously approved maximum
impervious area of 50% for each lot to an average impervious area of 58% for all lots in the subdivision.
Certain residential lots will have higher maximum impervious surface area allowed and others will be less,
but the average of all lots will not exceed 58% within the entire subdivision. Please note this increase of
impervious area request assumes the entire project gets built-out with every lot having the biggest home
product with a reasonable sized swimming pool. Most likely, the project will not develop in this manner.
Eventually, the approval of the requested action will allow the homebuilder greater flexibility in product mix,
options, size, and reasonable pool area that they can offer to potential buyers.
For your review and consideration, the packet contains a memorandum from the City Engineering
Department that states, according to the design engineer of record, "the stormwater system as designed
will support the increase in the average impervious area to 58%". Therefore, the requested development
standard amendment appears to be technically feasible. In addition, please find the attached letters by the
design engineer of record requesting this impervious surface area change.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed Meadow Ridge PUD Amendment was reviewed by the Development Review Committee
(DRC) on September 26, 2007. According to the City's Land Development Code, alterations to an
approved PUD Land Use Plan shall be classified as either substantial or nonsubstantial amendments by
the DRC. The Committee determined that the proposed amendment was considered to be a substantial
amendment due to the criteria established in the City's Land Development Code. Accordingly, the
proposed substantial amendment will be presented at a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Commission.
Staff suggested that the developer provide a table and a drawing that indicates the impervious surface ratio
permitted for each residential lot. When the discussion was finished, the Committee voted to recommend
approval of the proposed Amendment to Meadow Ridge PUD permitting an average 58% impervious ratio
for all residential lots.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed Meadow Ridge PUD Impervious Surface
Amendment on October 9, 2007. City Staff presented a brief overview of the proposed impervious surface
amendment and answered several questions regarding this request. Additionally, staff handed a new
proposed table representing all the lots on Meadow Ridge indicating their maximum impervious percentage
for each lot. Staff supports this new table because it's more conservative that the original proposal.
The Public Hearing was opened for the Meadow Ridge PUD Amendment. There was an abutting property
owner from the public to speak regarding this PUD Amendment. He asked questions regarding stormwater
and drainage concerns of the area. The Mayor approached the podium to answer the drainage concerns
posed by the abutting property owner. All of these questions were addressed adequately in the P&Z
meeting.
After finishing its deliberations, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval to the Meadow Ridge PUD Impervious Surface Amendment with the new table presented at the
meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the recommendation of the DRC and Planning & Zoning Commission, Staff recommends that the
Mayor and City Commissioners approve the Ordinance which allows for a Substantial Amendment to the
Conditions of Approval for Meadow Ridge PUD to permit an average 58% impervious ratio for all residential
lots per the attached table.
Attachments:
Location Map;
Donald W. Mcintosh Associates, Inc. Letter dated August 16, 2007;
Donald W. Mcintosh Associates, Inc. Letter dated August 22,2007;
Donald W. Mcintosh Associates, Inc. Letter dated August 31, 2007;
Engineering Department Memorandum dated September 20,2007;
Meadow Ridge Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage Table (by lot);
Ordinance.
Financial Impact:
None.
Type of Item: (please mark with an "x")
Public Hearing
X Ordinance First Reading
Ordinance Second Reading
Resolution
Commission Approval
Discussion & Direction
For Clerk's Dept Use:
Consent Agenda
Public Hearing
_ Regular Agenda
Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk
Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution
Reviewed by City Attorney
Reviewed by Finance Dept.
Reviewed by ( )
N/A
X N/A
N/A
I
-1
I II - ---.J
~l
L- 1 I 1
Rd BeRSON Rn I I I
1 ~
MoodE RD
Meadow Ridge
Location Map
1=. \ \\II'~
t= 0 I{= V-
[:j AN ~~e-' J ~~~<
~ ~i=j ~~ ~ ~~
t=t=~t= ~ t=-~ I ~
~ 6~ ~- I
\-- T'lf I-- f-Q \ I L
~ ,dD~~1 10 E ~~I>d(H
\ if~ ~ · - -'}- - -01.5 I n ~
'-n"J-"""''''~~ I L 1" - 1'-; > - ~
I (/":': ., '\"7 r:':'! I-- --- Z ~ '-+-- :;
T ;: L l" e- --- ~ ---"--1 ~
S' I fil ~'". := f-'~ ~ I<
y 'j; _ '-" e- r --,:I-- \ I - Ii:
~ ttttm _:1: '-~ ,. PI] FlI
I~ r1 ~!J= lJ. , I 1 '
\~ I lR I I @
_ ~~ ["2 I
18 l I -\ \~
~.~ .-. l
0::: - v
a:~U
'w 1/ I Ii II
~
I
l-
I'- T
O-cn
Ll II ,+,-\ ~~
~'l 1 l~
~~I~~
1 l~'~
I lj~
I III "--- I" ~
-
J,----
r---
-
I r
~I
Cl
0:::
W
0:::
:::>
CD
~
:2:
~
~
tj
~ND~
) -o...:lIIA~ 410 1
. Hl~EBRO
CJ '-- OK,
~ g ~ 11
~ I I n\:l~ -'I
~rlSi'~~ ~~~\ n-kIIj(}RE I T -
~ ~~~i'i 1 I _ III e-L
~ '-I..~nl/::]s. _ \\ \ '\ I T I I \;Ar~~~ I i ~\J /
~s '=' I I I I' I I ~ """ ~ ~1/A
rfJ-L c.J IT"::::: ffittB ~y
4t" e- e- r"
,~ _ ~~fI>,'" '" \'
"' wt: ~.
\~V ~ ,,~
~
r
IMOOIRE RD
r U IT] -TIn-
f--I
i\
I~I
DONALD W. MciNTOSH
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CiVIL ENGINEERS
LAND PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
.
2200 Park Ave. North
Winter Park. FL
32789-2355
Fax 407-644-8318
407-644-4068
http://www.dwma.com
August 16, 2007
Mr. Russell B. Wagner, AICP
City of Ocoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, FL 34761
Re: Meadow Ridge Lot Impervious Area
Dear Russ:
This letter is provided to confIrm that the stormwater system for the Meadow Ridge project was
designed to accommodate a maximum 58 percent impervious area for every lot in the
development. This assumption was made to allow for all lots to accommodate the proposed
product mix and a reasonable pool area. Please see attached typical lot impervious calculation
which was provided, in the stormwater calculations approved by the St. Johns River Water
Management District and the City.
Sincerely,
. McINTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
C:
1. Antonio Fabre, AICP
Mr. Jason Hill
Mr. Donald W. McIntosh, Jr.
John M. Florio, P.E.
George D. Delaney, P.E.
Michael R. Todd, P.E.
~ lE(C~~\Y1~ ~
AUG 2 0 2007
CITY OF OCOEE
rrT/rk/file
F: IProj2005\25 044 IENGadmin\CIEC 156.doc
..
,"
1-
65'
o
N
D-lO
~I
TOTAL AREA
LOT 7,150 SF
1/2 R/W 1,625 SF
TOTAL 8,775 SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA
HOUSE PAD 3,500 SF
DRIVEWA y 496 SF
SIDEWALK 196 SF
ROAD & CURB 910 SF
TOTAL 5,102 SF
PERVIOUS AREA C (PER LOT)
8,775 - 5,102 = 3,673 SF
IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
(5,102 SF)
= 58.1 %
(8,775 SF)
1.1 DONALD W. McINTOSH ASSOCIA1ES, INe. MEADOW RI)GE (FKA WES1RI)GE)
ENGI&RS PLANNERS SUIM:tORS aTY C1F OCOEE. FUJRl)A
Z2UD P- A\IOIU[ 1IClRlH. _. P-. PUlIlIDA 32,. (.07) M4-'"
_........e.... _.......!!!!I..... _.........!!L.
..... lJl15 ..... lJl15 ..... lJl15
--
2>><<
r- 08/22/0_7 WE, D 10: 12 FAX
-'*- -~ -~-
I~I
DoNALD W. McINTastt
AsSOCIATES, INc.
eVIL ENC'NEEFOG
lANo PlANlIEAlI
SURIIEVOI>$
.~.
2200 Parl< Ave. North
Winter Park. FL
32789-2355
Fox 40'-844-8318
III 001
August 22, 2007
~
AUG2Z.
~ reD\'U~
~
Mr. Russett B. Wagner, AIep
City ofOcoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, FL 34761
CITY OF OCOEE
Re: Meadow 'Ridge Lot Impervious Area
Dear Russ:
Pmsuant to our phone conversation yesterday and on behalf of our client Pulte Home
Corporation please accept this lener as our fonnal request for a waiver to the City
requirement of a maximum allowable lot impervious area of 50 percent. Due to the
approved lot size for this development (65'x,110' minimum) and the proposed home
sizes (2599-3522 sf under roof) the addition of a pool to the lots would exceed the
current maximum 50 percent impervious percentage allowed by the City. We are
therefore requesting that the maximum lot impervious percentage be increased to 58
percent for this project. This will allow for the construction of normal size pool area on
the lot should a homeowner wish to have one.
The constructed stonnwater system for the Meadow Ridge project was designed to
accommodate an average of 58 percent impervious area. for every lot in the
development. This assumption was made to allow for all lots to accommodate the
proposed product mix and a reasonable pool area. Understanding that not eyery lot in
the development will construct a pool, this project wide percent impervious area of 58%
will never be exceeded. Please see attached typical lot impervious calculation (signed
and sealed) which was provided in the stonnwatcr calculations approved by the St.
Johns River Water Management District and the City.
I tmderstand that this request is required to go to the City Council for their review and
considemtion. Given that this community 15 intended to be a higher end development to
be consistent with the adjacent developments, we respectfully request staffs
recommendation for approval of this waiver to the Council.
Sincerely,
c:
J. Antonio Fabre, AlCP
Ms. Tina Demostene, AICP
Mr. Jason Hill
Mr. Donald W. Mcintosh, Jr.
John M. Florio, P.E.
George D. Delaney, P.E.
m /rk/file
407-644-4068
1': Il'roj!OOS\25044It:NGadminlC\EC I 51.doc
hap: Ilwww.dwrna.com
. .
_~2~WED 1~:13 FAX.
I, ,
If
llJ002
,
....,t' . ......
I- . 65' --f TOTAL AREA
LOT 7,150 SF
1/2 R/W 1,625 SF
TOTAL 8,775 SF
0
t'\l
_ DCIWJ) W. ......... ~A1D. INC.
.... .1.11_ ......
_... .... ...... _ ....1UlIIIA ... CIPJ ---
--
-
IMPERVIOUS AREA
HOUSE PAD 3,500 SF'
DRIVEWA Y 496 SF
SIDEWALK 196 SF
ROAD c!c CURB 910 SF
TOTAL 5,102 SF
PERVIOUS AREA' (PER LOT)
8,775 - 5,102 = 3,673 SF
IMPE8V10US PE~CENT AGE
(5,102 SF)
== 58.1 ~
(8,775 SF)
DONALD W. McINTOSH
A8SQc.~n:s. INC.
CER11F.B'OF
AQT iltl.lt ~- 88
.' "'>'.,'~'::,':~'6>
WtDROLOGIC DATA
f~f
DONALD W. MciNTOSH
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS
LAND PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
~.
T)-
2200 Park Ave. North
Winter Park. FL
32789-2355
Fax 407-644-8318
407-644-4068
htto: //VIMIW.dwma.com
August 3 1, 2007
Delivery
David Wheeler, P.E.
City of Ocoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, PL 34761
Re: Meadow Ridge Pools
Dear David,
Pursuant to my discussions with Ryan Howard and per your request, this letter is
provided to clarify the impervious area assumed in the master stormwater system for
water quality treatment and discharge rate attenuation. It is also intended to
demonstrate that the addition of pools to the individual hornesites has no adverse impact
to the stormwater system.
The Master Stormwater System Calculations utilized the Soil Conservation Service
(SCS) Technical Release 55 (TR-55) to calculate the runoff curve number for the
residential lots (typica11/6 Ac. lot). See attached excerpts from the approved
Stormwater Calculations (D-I, D-2, D-3). The TR-55 value is used to determine the
direct runoff from the site in order to si~e the stormwater ponds for discharge rate
attenuation. The water quality calculation accounted for a project wide Oots, roads,
amenities) irnpervious area of 35.70 acres or roughly 62.8% of the total non-water
surface area (see attached excerpt frorn the approved Stormwater Calculations P.I).
In order to demonstrate that the addition of pools to the individual lots has no adverse
impact to the Master Stormwater System I have attached a calculation to determine the
maxirnurn project wide lot impervious percentage with the following assumption, 1) that
every lot contained the largest available home foot print and 2) every lot contained a 20'
x 50' pool/deck area. The calculation demonstrates that the maximum realized average
lot impervious area would be 56.9% for the project. Sorne lots will have slightly rnore
than 60% impervious; sorne will have less than 50% impervious; however, the
maxirnurn aggregate will be less than 57%.
In summary, it is our professional opinion that there is no issue from a stormwater
managernent perspective for the addition of a pool/deck area to any/all lots within the
developrnent. Trying to set a maximum impervious number on every lot or maintaining
an accounting of overall percent impervious area would be a cumbers orne and confusing
process for both the developer and the City. We respectfully submit that the
calculations confirm that other than meeting all the required building setback limitations
(7.5' rear and sideyard; 7.5' from face of walls), there should be no prohibition to the
construction of pools should a homeovvner wish to do so.
F: \Proj2005\25044 IENGadminlCIEC 159 .doc
f~'
David Wheeler, P.E.
Re: MeadowRidge Pools
August 31,2007
Page 2
Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact rne.
Sincerely,
Jo 0 send"P.E.'
P 0 ect Manager
F 'da Registration No: 52127
C: Russ Wagner, AlCP
Mr. Mark Thomson
Ms. Tina Dernonstone
Mr. Donald W. McIntosh, JI.
John M. Florio, P.E.
George D. Delaney, P.E.
m Irk
F: IProj2005\25 044\ENGadmin \C\EC 159 .doc
DONALD W. MciNTOSH Associates, Inc.
2200 PARK AVENUE NORTH. WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789-2355 . [407J 644-4068. FAX [407J 644-8318
I ~-~ I DONALD W. -MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
2200 Park Avenue North Winter Park, Florida 32789-2355
. ~ 407-644-4068 Fax 407-644-8318 httpJ/www.dwma.com
Project . m P flA d DlA.1 lZd4 e
Subject --.W I MptNlOlll &l('AAj~h~
By Jrr --
Date 61Zlloi
l
Ck.
Date
No.
Sheet
Of
o iotrJ t!- c-f I~ : 152-
. M{ ~e~+ ho~ tLt-f)(lil. t : 3S2-2--'S~ LAV\d~(' rroP
· Or l if tvJ~ (AreA C 3 car" qa. mq e.-), ;? ~ I tAll r1 X 20' dV-f) ':; ;.f50 ~
S\~CA\t to ~W\+ door' U-uJY\ clf'V~ 7 Lf' w;~ X 1st LoUlq '" (00 s-P
o StO--\fldCA'/'d 160) AreA: ?-;z I dQep x so' w\de; IIOO~
. T/?i0-oJ. {Joo\ WoJ-hll 0'-Af~(1t, ArM: !~'lAJldt X:2(/ lOv'lq -::: 335 s-t'
~ ToteJ lo+ \1'\Ilp-t(VI~U~ a(e~ - (.bel 3u(~~ a(tR-= 51(02 S.\! -33IQs-9 -:: 48zt-J S~
· 1;W pfoUQ.U \YVl~( \J IOU ~ {)f~ (6(\ ~ on.Ll1) = 1../ 82'-1 s~ )( 152. I~ ~ 133lLJSsr ~ 1~,53h
· lOW f)YO'b ~ ~t:r 104 ac e( cut ~ ( cn Ids 61\ ~ ) '" .1.'1.57 Ac-
t 1;h-J pwGect w\de. La-\- (Y\fAX.\'NL~M lmp-tv'vlous o.ssuVY\.u-\~ LVtfL[ lo{ ha~ ~
?oo\ Q.rd +n.e. \~f'qP~+ YlO<Y\L~r'f\_V\t: liD.83At/2~.S7Ac- "-O.5(nC] =: 5~,q/.'
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES. INC.
"r"" ."
SHEET r-f
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRIDGE)
Wet Detention Water Quality Calculations
Date: 4/1212005
By: MPB
Revised: 9/26/05
Basin:
Treatment Pond:
Basin Area:
POST 1t2 & 3
SMA-1, 2 & 3
60.96 acres
Land Cover
Open Space (Good)
!rnj>~rvi~~s
Water Surface
Totals
Area Summa
Pervious
Area ac
21.15
Water Total
Surface lac) Area lac)
21.15
35.70
4.11 4.11
4.11 60.96
35.70
21.15
35.70
Treatment Volume Calculations
Does system discharge directly to O.F.W. or Class Jill waters? No
1-in. x Total Area =
2.5-in. x Impervious Area =
lRequired Treatment Volume =
Stage
n vd
111
1.21
123
124
125
126
127
127.5
Area
ac
1.79
. . 3.?6
4.11
4.56
5.02
5.51
5.99
6.75
Minimum weir elevation =
1/2 Treatment volume elevation =
Desi n Weir Elevation =
Treatment Volume Provided =
5.08 ac-f1
7.44 ac-ft
7.44 ac-ft
T ~l O(W- e..-XC,LUSlVQ..D+
SMA wLl..\..e.(' SU(~
~ wOo Cj(p -Lt, \ h 5Cn .6SA<.
% \mpeV\JlOuS lJ.:)~d In .
wo..-+U" tlJ.all~ ~D.lL!-uJa...no.{\
- 35/70':';-. CSCo,5S =- {J,wZ.5
. . :: (oZ.s%
Pond Data
0.00.
4.34
9.13
14.39
20.14
23.33
Bottom
Grade Break
DNW
Outside Top of Berm
124.65 ft
123.86 ft
Permanent Pool Volume Calculations
Drainage Area (ae): 60.96
Residence Time (days): 21
Wet Season (days): 153
Wet Season Rainfall (in): 32
Runoff Coefficient: 0.66
Base Flow (cfs): 0.2745
Littoral Zone Provided? No
124.80 ft
8.17 ac-ft
PPV R~ql.!.ired (a~-ft):
PPV Pr~"ide~Ja~-ft):
Mean I:)ee...th (ft):
Max. Depth (ft):
26.10
32.62
7.9
12
PAV(Wet Det)
F:IProj2004124202IENGCalcslStonnIWestridge-Basin.xls
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRIDGE)
Post Development Basin Hydrology Calculations
Basin:
R~~iv~ng Node:
Basin Area:
POST-1
SMA-1
13.92 acres
Curve Number CN Calculations
Soil Index Number
26
44
46
Land Cover
Commercial & Business
- .' - -'- - .-- - -.-. - -"'
Commercial & Business
~/ Residential 1/6 Acre
-- - '- ._.
Water Surface
Soil Index Name
Dna Fine Sand
Smyma Fine Sand
Tavares Fine Sand. 0 to 5% slo es
Hydrologic
Grou
A
D
D
D
Time of Concentration (T c) Calculations
, Equations
Sheet Flow:
Shallow Concentrated Flow:
. Channel Flow:
Calculations
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
Channel/Pi e Flow
Tt=
Tt=
Tt=
Length
(L)
ft
185
335
CN
89
$
otal:
o 007(nL)0.s
(4.8)0.5 (SO.4/1 00)
L
60V
L
60V
Roughness
Coefficient
n
0.3
Area ac
5.31
3.49
4.26
0.86
13.92
where:
where: .
where:
Slope
(S)
%
1.00
1.00
,- .
ll-.I
SHEET ~ ;.
Date: 4/12/2005
By: MPB
Ck:
Revised 9/30/2005
CN x Area
472.6
331.6
383.4
84.3
~
I
L ~ 300 ft.
S = slope (%)
n = Manning's Roughness Coeff.
Unpaved: V=16.1345 (S)0.5
PaVed~ V=20.3282 (S)0.5
V=2.5 fps (assumed)
Travel Time
(Tv
2.50
I Time of Cone. =
32 Minutes
Post Development
F:\Proj2004124202\ENGCalcs\Stonn\Westridge-Basin.xls
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
SHEET 0_- J..
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRIDGE)
Post Development Basin Hydrology Calculations
Date: 4/12/2005
By: MPB
Ck:
Basin:
~~~i~_n9 Node:
Basin Area:
POST.2
SMA-2
43.60 acres
Revised 9/30/2005
Curve Number CN Calculations
Soil Index Number
20
46
Soil Index Name
Immokalee Fine Sand
Tavares Rne Sand, 0 to 5% slo es
-'":>
Land Cover
Residential 1/6 Acre
Residential 1/6 Acre
- .~.- ~., . -
*7th Ave
Water Surface
Hydrologic
Grou
A
D
A
D
Area ac CN x Area
25.44 1755.4 ~
14.24 1281.6 ~
1.50 147.0
2.42 237.2
otal: 43.60
Composite CN = 78
Roughness Slope Velocity Travel lime
Coefficient (S) (V) (TJ
n % s (min
0.4 1.00 37.0
0.30 1.11 3.7
2.50 4.0
.~ Time of Cone. = . 45 Minutes
-">
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
Shallo.~ ~nc:. (P~ved)
ChannellPi e Flow
Time of Concentration (T c) Calculations
Length
(L)
ft
180
250
600
* The Coefficient used by PEC for 7th Avenue Secondary Collection System was a Rational Coefficient. To be
conservative the Curve Number of 98 is used. This change does not affect the Composite Curve Number for the
overall POST.2 basin.
Post Development
F:IProj2004124202IENGCalcsIStOlmIWestridge-Basin.xls
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRIDGE)
Post Development Basin Hydrology Calculations
Basin:
~~~'!ying Node:
Basin Area:
POST-3
SMA-3
3.44 acres
Curve Number CN Calculations
Soil Index Number
26
---;::.
Land Cover
Re~i~e~til!!11/6 Acre
Water Surface
Soil Index Name
Ona Fine Sand
Hydrologic
Grou
D
D
CN
90
98
Area ac
1.70
1.74
3.44
Total:
Time of Concentration (T c) Calculations
Length
(L)
ft
75
250
250
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
Shallow Conc. (Paved)
ChanneVPi e Flow
. ~asin:
'. Receiving Node:
Basin Area:
Roughness
Coefficient
n
0.4
Slope
(S)
%
1.00
0.30
WETLAND
999.<w.eTLAND)'
25.46 acres
Curve Number CN Calculations
Soil Index Number
3
26
42
Land Cover
Wetlands
Soil Index Name
Basinger Fine Sand, depressional
Ona Fine Sand
SanTbel-Muck
Hydrologic
Grou
D
CN
98
Area ae
25.46
25.46
otal:
Time of Concentration (T c) Calculations
Length
(L)
ft
100
500
900
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
Shallow Conc. (Unpaved)
Channel/Pi e Flow
Roughness
Coefficient
n
0.24
0.24
Slope
(S)
%
0.50
Note: 10-minute Time of Concentration is used where calculated value is less.
CN x Area
153.0,
170.5
"', ").
SHEET 1..1: -'
Date: 4/12/2005
By: MPB
Ck:
Revised 9/30/2005
~
Composite CN = 94
Velocity
(V)
f s
1.11
2.50
I Time of Cone. =
CN x Area
2495.1
Travel Time
(TJ
(min)
18.4
3.7
1.7
24 Minutes
Composite CN = 98
Velocity
(V)
s
1.50
2.50
I Time of Cone. =
Travel Time
(TJ
(min
20.3
5.6
6.0
32 Minutes
Post Development
F :\Proj2004\24202\ENGCaIcs\Stonn\ Westridge-Basin.xls
Chapter 2
Estimating Runoff
Technical Release 55
Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds
Table 2-2a Runoff curve numbers for urban areas 1/
Cover description
Curve numbers for
-hydrologic soil group _
Cover type and hydrologic condition
Average percent
impervious area 21
A
B
c
D
Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)
Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.) 31:
Poor condition (grass cover < 50%) ..........................................
Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%) ..................................
Good condition (grass cover> 75%) .........................................
Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc.
(excluding right-of-way) .............................................................
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding
right-of-way) ................................. ...............................................
Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) ..........................
Gravel (including right-of-way) .................................................
Dirt (including right-of-way) ......................................................
Western desert urban areas:
Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only) ,jI .....................
Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier,
desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch
and basin. borders) ........ ................................................. .............
Urban districts:
Commercial and business .................................................................
Industrial...... ........ ...............................................................................
Residential districts by average lot size:
1/ --:;..1/8 acre or less (town houses) ..........................................................
1 (p 1/4 acre ................................................................................................
1/3 acre .............................................. ................. .................................
1/2 acre .................................................................. .... .............. ............
1 acre .................... ..................................................... ...... ...... ..............
2 acres ..................................................................................................
Developing urban areas
Newly graded areas
(pervious areas only, no vegetation) 51................................................................
Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types
similar to those in table 2-2c).
68 79 86 89
49 69 79 84
39 61 74 80
98 98 98 98
98 98 98 98
83 89 92 93
76 85 89 91
72 82 87 89
63 77 85 88
96 96 96 96
85 89 92 94 95
72 81 88 91 93
65 77 85 90 92~
38 61 75 83 87
30 57 72 81 86
25 54 70 80 85
20 51 68 79 84
12 46 65 77 82
77
86
91
94
) Average runoff condition, and I. = 0.2S.
* 2 The average percent impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's. Other assumptions are as follows: impervious areas are
directly connected to the drainage system, impervious areas have a CN of 98, and pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in
good hydrologic condition. CN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4.
3 CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture. Composite CN's may be computed for other combinations of open space
cover type.
4 Composite CN's for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage
(CN = 98) and the pervious area CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition.
5 Composite CN's to use for the design of temporllIY measures during grading and construction should be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4
based on the degree of development (impervious area percentage) and the CN's for the newly graded pervious areas.
(210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986)
2-5
Mayor
S. Scott Vandergrift
c.enter of Good L .
<\.~e l~j~
Commissioners
Gary Hood, District 1
Scott Anderson, District 2
Rusty Johnson, District 3
Joel F. Keller, District 4
City Manager
Robert Frank
MEMORANDUM
TO:
J. Antonio Fabre, Planning Department
FROM:
Ryan P. Howard, E.I. , Engineer II thru David Wheeler, P.E. , City Engineer
DATE:
September 20, 2007
RE:
Meadow Ridge waiver to increase allowable 50% impervious.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the request from a stormwater engineering standpoint
and after reviewing the original stormwater calculations as well as supplemental information
supplied by the design engineer of record, the stormwater system as designed will support the
increase in the average impervious area to 58%. The stormwater system as designed was initially
based on several conservative assumptions that when compared to the actual conditions provided
more than enough treatment and storage for the additional increase in impervious area. The 58%
impervious area is based on the ultimate maximum possible area of imperviousness. This would
be if every lot had the largest size house foot print and a pool.
The City ofOcoee. 150 N Lakeshore Drive. Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100. fax: (407) 656-8504. www.ci.ocoee.tlus
,\
TI
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage (by
Lot # Lot Area (sf) Max Imp. % Max Imp. Area (sf)
1 9646 50 4823
2 8222 59 4851
3 9006 54 4863
4 7182 60 4309
5 11477 50 5739
6 7150 60 4290
7 7150 60 4290
8 9553 51 4872
9 8125 60 4875
10 9553 51 4872
11 7150 60 4290
12 7150 60 4290
13 7150 60 4290
14 11486 50 5743
15 7150 60 4290
16 7150 60 4290
17 8994 54 4857
18 7150 60 4290
19 7170 60 4302
20 7910 60 4746
21 7500 60 4500
22 8419 58 4883
23 8453 58 4903
24 7150 60 4290
25 7150 60 4290
26 7150 60 4290
27 7150 60 4290
28 7150 60 4290
29 8946 55 4920
30 7151 60 4291
31 7150 60 4290
32 7923 60 4754
33 11124 60 6674
34 7150 60 4290
35 7150 60 4290
36 7150 60 4290
37 8812 55 4847
38 8804 55 4842
39 8080 60 4848
40 7777 60 4666
41 8324 59 4911
42 7840 60 4704
\
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lot # Lot Area (sf) Max Imp. % Max Ifnp. Area (sf)
43 7280 60 4368
44 7280 60 4368
45 7280 60 4368
46 8729 56 4888
47 12273 50 6137
48 9399 52 4887
49 8830 55 4857
50 7280 60 4368
51 7280 60 4368
52 7280 60 4368
53 7840 60 ,1704
54 8954 55 4925
55 7674 60 4604
56 7594 60 4556
57 7518 60 4511
58 9626 50 4813
59 8933 54 4824
60 7605 60 4563
61 11977 50 5989
62 12162 50 6081
63 11287 50 5644
64 8815 55 4848
65 8042 60 4825
66 7733 60 4640
67 7814 60 4688
68 8096 60 4858
69 7875 60 4725
70 7312 60 4387
71 7313 60 4388
72 7312 60 4387
73 7312 60 4387
74 10229 50 5115
75 8650 56 4844
76 10331 50 5166
77 7317 60 4390
78 7312 60 4387
79 7313 60 4388
80 7313 60 4388
81 7875 60 4725
82 8102 60 4861
83 7781 60 4669
84 7748 60 4649
.
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
lot # Lot Area (sf) Max Imp. % Max imp. Area (sf)
85 7637 60 4582
86 9014 S4 4868
87 9436 S2 4907
88 7424 60 4454
89 7150 60 4290
90 7150 60 4290
91 8516 57 4854
92 9251 52 4811
93 9598 51 4895
94 10307 SO 5154
95 7803 60 4682
96 7800 60 4680
97 7800 60 4680
98 7800 60 4680
99 7800 60 4680
100 7800 60 4680
101 7899 60 4739
102 8740 56 4894
103 10997 50 5499
104 8654 56 4846
105 7810 60 4686
106 7818 60 4691
107 9258 S3 4907
108 12977 50 6489
109 8475 57 4831
110 8125 60 4875
111 8137 60 4882
112 7800 60 4680
113 7800 60 4680
114 7800 60 4680
115 8271 59 4880
116 8266 59 4877
117 8963 54 4840
118 8880 55 4884
119 8173 60 4904
120 8160 60 4896
121 7990 60 4794
122 9060 54 4892
123 14173 50 7087
124 14479 50 7240
125 8795 55 4837
126 8219 59 4849
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lot 1:1 Lot Area (sf) Max Imp % Max Imp. Area (sf)
127 8730 56 4889
128 10812 50 5406
129 10129 SO 5065
130 8385 58 48b3
131 8125 60 4875
132 8125 60 4875
133 8750 55 4813
134 8125 60 4875
135 8125 60 4875
136 8125 60 4875
137 8125 60 4875
138 8331 58 4832
139 9639 51 4916
140 10238 SO 5119
141 8476 57 4831
142 8125 60 4875
143 8125 60 4875
144 8125 60 4875
145 8125 60 4875
146 8125 60 4875
147 11920 50 5960
148 13058 SO 6529
149 9767 50 4884
150 7150 60 4290
151 7150 60 4290
152 7246 60 4348
Project 1287864 57 731631
. . . \
CD
~
0
2
0
;;l
(/)
J: gJ
>-
~
J: ~ a
c
J:
5
-i
i:
-0
~
s
8
(/)
-0
~
(")
2 ~
~ 0, ~ ~
:;:
ill " 'i
0
~ l{~ (,11
,CD
'" '" (,11 ~
0 0 ..
"
'3
_~, M
~
'<
"
z
'"
~
i"Q
,
'"
~~
>0
'"
,:.,~
2:
;:;
"l
"
~
,
.l:
~
~
l
~
(JI
<0
(]I
t->
(]I
..
(]I
,'0
i:1>
o
'(,11
.....
~"'.
__ ~~~ _~$n.::~~_~~
_:'~---- r":'-';':^J'c::cr;;--
1" 1
..
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA
APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE
RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SECOND REVISED
LAND USE PLAN FOR WESTRIDGE PUD (KIN/A
MEADOW RIDGE PUD) ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE
INTERSECTION OF MAGUIRE ROAD AND MOORE
ROAD, AS PETITIONED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER;
AMENDING THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE
SECOND REVISED LAND USE PLAN FOR WESTRIDGE
PUD (KIN/A. MEADOW RIDGE PUD) TO ALLOW A
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA RATIO FOR EACH
INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL LOT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A LOT TABLE PROVIDED BY THE PROPERTY
OWNER, IN LIEU OF A MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA
RATIO OF 50% PER LOT FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS,
AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED; REPEALING
INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of certain real property located within the corporate limits
of the City of Ocoee, Florida, as described in the Exhibit" A" has petitioned the City Commission
of the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Commission") to approve an amendment (the
"Amendment") to the residential portion of the Second Revised Land Use Plan for Westridge PUD
(k/n/a Meadow Ridge PUD), as approved by the Ocoee City Commission on August 17,2004 (the
"Land Use Plan");
WHEREAS, the Amendment was scheduled for study and recommendation and
was reviewed by the Development Review Committee ("DRC") on September 26, 2007;
WHEREAS, the DRC recommended approval of the Amendment;
WHEREAS, the Amendment was scheduled for study and recommendation by the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City ofOcoee, Florida ("PZC"); and
ORLA_608435.1
-1-
'~
WHEREAS, on October 9,2007, the PZC held an advertised public hearing and
recommended approval of the Amendment;
WHEREAS, the Ocoee City Commission held a de novo public hearing with public
notice thereof with respect to the proposed Amendment and this Ordinance on
; and
WHEREAS, the Ocoee City Commission considered this Ordinance in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Section 166.041(3), Florida Statutes, and determined that this
Ordinance is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Authority. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the
authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida
and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes.
SECTION 2. Amendment to the Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan is
hereby amended to allow a maximum impervious area ratio for each individual residential lot in
accordance with the lot table attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference incorporated
herein, in lieu of a maximum impervious area ratio of 50% per lot for all residential lots, as
previously approved. The foregoing Amendment amends, supersedes and replaces any contrary
provision contained in any previously approved Land Use Plans for Westridge (k/n/a Meadow
Ridge) PUD.
SECTION 3.
Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. The Ocoee City Commission
hereby finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
ORLA_608435.1
-2-
SECTION 4.
Inconsistent Ordinances. All ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict or inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded.
SECTION 5. Severabilitv. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any
court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion
hereto.
SECTION 6.
Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of
,2007.
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA
Beth Eikenberry, City Clerk
S. Scott Vandergrift, Mayor
(SEAL)
ADVERTISED ,2007
READ FIRST TIME ,2007
READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED
, 2007
UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO.
FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY
THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA;
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
this _ day of , 2007.
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
By:
City Attorney
ORLA_608435.1
-3-
EXHIBIT" A"
MEADOW RIDGE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 28
East, Orange County, Florida, described as follows:
Commence at the Southwest corner of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, and run
NOo021'38"W along the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32 for a distance of
1330.98 feet to the Southwest corner of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32;
thence N89047'54"E along the South line of said North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 for a distance of
60.00 feet to a point on the East right-of-way line of Maguire Road (County Road 439), said
point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence NOo021'38"W along said right-of-way line,
737.39 feet to a point of cusp with a curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 20.00 feet
and a chord bearing of S47025'37"E; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a
central angle of 94007'59" for a distance of 32.86 feet to the point of compound of curvature of a
curve concave Northerly having a radius of 575.00 feet and a chord bearing of N78004'23"E;
thence Easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 14052'01" for a distance of
149.20 feet to the point of tangency; thence N70038'22"E, 190.00 feet to the point of curvature of
a curve concave Southerly having a radius of 510.00 feet and a chord bearing of S84053'45"E;
thence Easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48055'46" for a distance of
435.53 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence NOoo04'05"W, 518.02 feet; thence N89055'55"E
along the South right-of-way line of Moore Road, as described in Official Records Book 4343,
Page 4532, of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, 1762.55 feet; thence S45012'20"E
along the Southwesterly line of lands described in Official Records Book 7900, Page 391, of said
Public Records for a distance of 70.88 feet to a point on the East line of said North 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4; thence SOo020'36"E along said line and the Westerly right-of-way line of Seventh
Avenue for a distance of275.18 feet; thence SlO058'19"W along said Westerly right-of-way line
for a distance of 305.80 feet; thence SOo020'36"E along said Westerly right-of-way line, 659.64
feet; thence S89047'54"W along the aforesaid South line of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4
for a distance of2522.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 66.401 acres more or less and being subject to any rights-of-way, restrictions and
easements of record.
ORLA_608435.1
-4-
,
.-
EXHIBIT "B"
[See attached table]
ORLA_608435.1
-5-
MeadoW Ridge
Maxirt'lUrt'll.otlmpervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lot #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
l.ot Area (sf)
9646
8222
9006
7182
11477
7150
7150
9553
8125
9553
7150
7150
7150
11486
7150
7150
8994
7150
7170
7910
7500
8419
8453
7150
7150
7150
7150
7150
8946
7151
7150
7923
11124
7150
7150
7150
8812
8804
8080
7777
8324
7840
Max Imp. %
50
59
54
60
50
60
60
51
60
51
60
60
60
50
60
60
54
60
60
60
60
58
58
60
60
60
60
60
S5
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4823
4851
4863
4309
5739
4290
4290
4872
4875
4872
4290
4290
4290
5743
4290
4290
4857
4290
4302
4746
4500
4883
4903
4290
4290
4290
4290
4290
4920
4291
4290
4754
6674
4290
4290
4290
4847
4842
4848
4666
4911
4704
55
60
60
59
60
Meadow Ridge
Maximum lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
LoU
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
lot Area (sf)
7280
7280
7280
8729
12273
9399
8830
7280
7280
7280
7840
8954
7674
7594
7518
9626
8933
7605
11977
12162
11287
8815
8042
7733
7814
8096
7875
7312
7313
7312
7312
10229
8650
10331
7317
7312
7313
7313
7875
8102
7781
7748
Max Imp. %
60
60
60
S6
SO
52
S5
60
60
60
60
55
60
60
60
SO
54
60
SO
SO
SO
S5
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
50
56
50
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4368
4368
4368
4888
6137
4887
4857
4368
4368
4368
4704
4925
4604
4556
4511
4813
4824
4563
5989
6081
5644
4848
4825
4640
4688
4858
4725
4387
4388
4387
4387
5115
4844
5166
4390
4387
4388
4388
4725
4861
4669
4649
, .
Meadow Ridge
Maximum lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
LoU
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
1.20
121
122
123
124
125
126
Lot Area (sf)
1637
9014
9436
7424
7150
7150
8516
9251
9598
10307
7803
7800
7800
7800
7800
7800
7899
8740
10997
8654
7810
7818
9258
12977
8475
8125
8137
7800
7800
7800
8271
8266
8963
8880
8173
8160
7990
9060
14173
14479
8795
Max Irnp. %
60
54
52
60
60
60
57
52
51
50
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
56
50
56
60
60
53
50
57
60
60
60
60
60
S9
59
54
55
60
60
60
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4582
4868
4907
4454
4290
4290
4854
4811
4895
5154
4682
4680
4680
4680
4680
4680
4739
4894
5499
4846
4686
4691
4907
6489
4831
4875
4882
4680
4680
4680
4880
4877
4840
4884
4904
4896
4794
4892
7087
7240
4837
4849
54
SO
50
59
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lot #
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
lot Area (sf)
8730
10812
10129
8385
8125
8125
8750
8125
8125
8125
8125
8331
9639
10238
8476
8125
8125
8125
8125
8125
11920
13058
9767
7150
7150
7246
Project
1287864
Max Imp. %
56
50
50
58
60
60
5S
60
60
60
60
58
51
50
57
60
60
60
50
60
50
50
50
60
60
60
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4889
5406
5065
4863
4875
4875
4813
4875
4875
4875
4875
4832
4916
5119
4831
4875
4875
4875
4875
4875
5960
6529
4884
4290
4290
4348
57
731631
~~
0($0;) ::friO}t 3l1f1d
I'
..~~,m;.
l.w
(j
a
62
3::
o
a
"t.
Lw
.~
~
i5
~
Ul
~
Go
~
6
.J
i
~
i
i
~
I
'"
...
~
.~
<;
~
~
g
..
~i?
~s
~~
~~
p;it
~'<i;
~9i