HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #10 Medaow Rdige PUD Amendment
AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: November 20,2007
Item # l 0
Contact Name:
Contact Number:
Antonio Fabre, AICP
407 -905-3100/1019
Reviewed By:
Department Director:
City Manager:
Su~ject: Su~~!a.n!i;;3IArriendment to the Meadow Ridge PUD (FKA: WestridgePUD)
PrOject # LS-2005-0t1
Commission District # 3"7 Rusty Johnson
ISSUE:
Should the Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners approve an Ordinance for a Substantial Amendment
to the Meadow Ridge PUD?
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The Meadow Ridge PUD is located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maguire Road and
Moore Road. The residential portion of the PUD consists of 152 single-family lots. The City Commission,
on March 7, 2006, reviewed and approved the Final Subdivision Plan for the residential portion of Meadow
Ridge PUD. After construction started, the home builder noticed that due to their home product design and
the size of the lots, the addition of a typical size swimming pool would exceed the maximum 50 percent
impervious surface development standard for the PUD. Accordingly, the applicant has requested an
increase of the maximum allowable impervious area for certain residential lots.
DISCUSSION:
As indicated above, this amendment will change a Condition of Approval in the previously approved
Meadow Ridge PUD. Specifically, the applicant is requesting to change the previously approved maximum
impervious area of 50% for each lot to an average impervious area of 58% for all lots in the subdivision.
Certain residential lots will have higher maximum impervious surface area allowed and others will be less,
but the average of all lots will not exceed 58% within the entire subdivision. Please note this increase of
impervious area request assumes the entire project gets built-out with every lot having the biggest home
product with a reasonable sized swimming pool. Most likely, the project will not develop in this manner.
Eventually, the approval of the requested action will allow the homebuilder greater flexibility in product mix,
options, size, and reasonable pool area that they can offer to potential buyers.
For your review and consideration, the packet contains a memorandum from the City Engineering
Department that states, according to the design engineer of record, "the stormwater system as designed
will support the increase in the average impervious area to 58%". Therefore, the requested development
standard amendment appears to be technically feasible. In addition, please find the attached letters by the
design engineer of record requesting this impervious surface area change.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed Meadow Ridge PUD Amendment was reviewed by the Development Review Committee
(DRC) on September 26, 2007. According to the City's Land Development Code, alterations to an
approved PUD Land Use Plan shall be classified as either substantial or nonsubstantial amendments by
the DRC. The Committee determined that the proposed amendment was considered to be a substantial
amendment due to the criteria established in the City's Land Development Code. Accordingly, the
proposed substantial amendment will be presented at a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Commission.
Staff suggested that the developer provide a table and a drawing that indicates the impervious surface ratio
permitted for each residential lot. When the discussion was finished, the Committee voted to recommend
approval of the proposed Amendment to Meadow Ridge PUD permitting an average 58% impervious ratio
for all residential lots.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed Meadow Ridge PUD Impervious Surface
Amendment on October 9, 2007. City Staff presented a brief overview of the proposed impervious surface
amendment and answered several questions regarding this request. Additionally, staff handed a new
proposed table representing all the lots on Meadow Ridge indicating their maximum impervious percentage
for each lot. Staff supports this new table because it's more conservative that the original proposal.
The Public Hearing was opened for the Meadow Ridge PUD Amendment. There was an abutting property
owner from the public to speak regarding this PUD Amendment. He asked questions regarding stormwater
and drainage concerns of the area. The Mayor approached the podium to answer the drainage concerns
posed by the abutting property owner. All of these questions were addressed adequately in the P&Z
meeting.
After finishing its deliberations, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval to the Meadow Ridge PUD Impervious Surface Amendment with the new table presented at the
meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the recommendation of the DRC and Planning & Zoning Commission, Staff recommends that the
Mayor and City Commissioners approve the Ordinance which allows for a Substantial Amendment to the
Conditions of Approval for Meadow Ridge PUD to permit an average 58% impervious ratio for all residential
lots per the attached table.
Attachments:
Location Map;
Donald W. Mcintosh Associates, Inc. Letter dated August 16,2007;
Donald W. Mcintosh Associates, Inc. Letter dated August 22,2007;
Donald W. Mcintosh Associates, Inc. Letter dated August 31,2007;
Engineering Department Memorandum dated September 20,2007;
Meadow Ridge Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage Table (by lot);
Ordinance.
Financial Impact:
None.
Type of Item: (please mark with an "x'?
X Public Hearing
Ordinance First Reading
X Ordinance Second Reading
Resolution
Commission Approval
Discussion & Direction
For Clerk's Deot Use:
Consent Agenda
Public Hearing
_ Regular Agenda
Original Document/Contract Attached for Execution by City Clerk
Original Document/Contract Held by Department for Execution
Reviewed by City Attorney
Reviewed by Finance Dept.
Reviewed by ( )
O:\Staff Reports\2007\SR07085 _JAF _MeadowRidgeAmendmenttoPU D _ CC.doc
N/A
X N/A
N/A
I
1
----, -
--
Meadow Ridge
Location Map
'~[ ~~ ~~ \~\\..,,--
c=f ~1B '\ - "J ~>
----' ~ __ ~ f- f- ~
--- ---;;;;:: ;::
c- t=~ ~ == = ---1 h::
f- f-h ~ ---=1
e= '--~ :=, j - \ \Q
Im~~~ ~ - HWiMOORT5. ~
~I 1= ~ -j ~ ~
\ if \~~>f'.f- ~; L 1S:: = ~~ CO J
! (7' T '\''''~ " I- - ~ C-+--- ~
s L 1 Il r---,IJ \- -----i~ ~ i--o-
o I T [ij f----j~ f--- -----l I WT ~
J' DC-'- l' ~
~ mc-~ =----, QlJj~l~
I~,- -A c::J:i; =:::j "
~I II T ""~ I I ~
-~[ ,~
~ ~n ~~w
~ ~-o
~ I J~ I
-L H I" T
w I ~
~
I
et-
--
-
-
mLT S ~ L
-=1 l l nJ1==:
f~N~'~ c-
: 1~R ~ _1
IT-Ni-
-
-----1
i--------
i---------J
_ U1
I
RchB~ RscbN RQj l
'--
I
MOO E RD
~J
Cl
0:::
W
0:::
:::>
C>
<(
:2
...
~
~AA
~Z)i4~ L-
') 0
H DRNEBR ~1 I
Ii OOK
f-----
~T 'S ~ ~ ~\ IC!<\LlIOAE I I I)
~11if1 ~ 0~ II I I 1 1 il'- hi c---'L
~~"^ ~~s ~ t : : t t \'~ \ 2- I lilifdrnE$f1 Tl ~ '~
e ~ - "- I T ~ c- ~[[[[ll] =l~~
~~ ~~== \IIIIIJH~G~ \
,('I~ lD~ I ~y ~ \\
k '--L ~ - ~ ""'( ~
~=:; \~VI ~ ~
~
MOOWE ~D
r UTI--
---l
DONALD W. McINTOSH
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CIVIL ENG!i\!::E;;S
LAND PLAh!i\l::RS
SU;:;:IJ:YO?:S
2200 Park Ave. North
Winter Park. FL
32789-2355
Fax 407-644-8318
407-644-4068
http://www.dwma.com
Mr. Russell B. Wagner, AICP
City of Ocoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, FL 3476l
August 16, 2007 ~
./'..\~\
/:/ \ '. \ \
(l~\ \.~~\ \ .1,/
<::; :---.. \ /~"\ \/ /
./"'\ ~.\" I Jf>'/ .cNV
./'" / l ~y .\.;~<.../
\ \./\\1';'~
\'~~~
\ '
\)
Re: Meadow Ridge Lot Impervious Area
Dear Russ:
This letter is provided to confirm that the stormwater system for the Meadow Ridge project was
designed to accollullodate a maximum 58 percent impervious area for every lot in the
development. This assumption was made to allow for all lots to accoDU11odate the proposed
product mix and a reasonable pool area. Please see attached typical lot impervious calculation
which was provided in the stom1water calculations approved by the St. Johns River Water
Management District and the City.
Sincerely,
:V. MCINTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
C: J. Antonio Fabre, AICP
Mr. Jason Hill
Mr. Donald W. McIntosh, Jr.
John M. Florio, P.E.
George D. Delaney, P.E.
Michael R. Todd, P.E.
I.'@.I ~t,~: c~ 2:7 ~ I ~I
u u %Wv v I t1b1
! I _
I CITY OJ: Of'OCf"'
# 1 '..J Lot
JIT Irk/file
F :Proj2005'250~\E"Gadmil1'C\EC 156.doc
I~ 65' ~I TOTAL AREA
LOT 7,1 50 SF
1/2 R /W 1,625 SF
TOTAL 8,775 SF
0
N
IMPERVIOUS
HOUSE PAD
DRIVEWA Y
SIDEWALK
ROAD & CURB
TOTAL
AREA
3,500 SF
496 SF
196 SF
910 SF
5,102 SF
PERVIOUS AREA (PER LOT)
8.775 - 5,102 = 3.673 SF
IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
(5,102 SF)
(8,775 SF)
= 58.1%
11.11 DONAW W. McINTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC. MEADOW RIOOE (fKA ~
. ~V[NlJl: tlO!ll'll. ~ Fl.CRlllA 32789 (~ Cf1'Y OF OCOEE. FI.ORIOA
_....-E!- ~ lrO--!:!f!L ~ "".....:!!L
PAJt, 1/06 OAtto 1106 PAJt, 1/06
--
2S044
O~/~~/U7 ~.t:V lU:l~ r':\.\
-..--".
I4l 001
I
i
August 22, 2007
~ ~~ ~ ~ \W ~ ~
i\a~G , 2 ~~
JWi .... ~
CITY OF OCOEE
Mr. Russell B. Wagner, AICP
City of Ocoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, FL 34761
Dm'.!AI.D W. MC!I\I'roSM
Assccum:s, I~.
Re: Meadow'Ridge Lot lmpcr"iou5 Area
Dear Russ:
CVIl. ENG!NEE"5
Pursuant to our ph.one conversation yesterday and on behalf of our client Pulte Home
COTporation please accept this letter as our formal request for a waiver to the City
requirement of a maximum allowable lot impervious area of 50 percent. Due to the
approved lot size for this development (65'xl10' minimum) and the proposed home
sizes (2599-3522 sfunderroot) the addition ofa pool to the lots would exceed the
current ma~jmurn 50 percent impervious percentage allowed by the City. We are
therefore n::questing~t the maximum lot impervious percentage be increased to 58
percent for this project. This will allow for the constrUction of normal size pool area on
the lot should a homeowner wish to have one.
SllR\f:VC~
The constructed stcnnwater system for the Meadow Ridge project was designed to
accommodate an average of 58 percent impervious area for every lot in the
development. This assumption was made to anow for all lots to accommodate the
proposed product mix and a reasonable pool area. Undersumding that not every lot in
the development will construct a pool, this project wide percent impervious area of 58%
will never be exceeded. Please see attached typical lot impervious calculation (signed
and sealed) which was provided in the stormwatcr calculations a?proved by the St.
Johns RiVeT Water Management District and the City.
LA''':> plA!'-....<;RS
I 1..IDderstand that this request is required to go to the City Council for their review and
consideration. Given that this community is intended to be a higher end development to
be consistent with the adjacent developments, we respectfully request staffs
recommendation for approval of this waiver to the Council.
-~......
V
Sincerely,
20100 Perk Aw. NorVI
C:
J. Antonio Fabre, .AlCP
Ms. Tina Demostene, AICP
Mr. Jason Hill
Mr. Donald W. McIntosh, Jr.
John M. Florio. P .E.
George D. Delar.iey, P.E.
Winter Park. FL
32769-2355
Fc" 407-644-831 8
JTT/rk/file
F: Il'roj20OS\25 O<14\l:.NGlllminlC\EC] 57.doc
40'-644-4CSe
I"lt:t;p, //I/VW"II.dwrne.ccm
. _ 08/22/07 WED l~; lJ FAX_
141002
--- - --'.--
----------
t~ .
65'
~
o
N
~ W. ~ ~A1GS. ~
~ ~ ~
==,.. ~ eeaTlL _ ~ IUl!i!lIA .ma (cPJ ~
--
~
TOTAL
LOT
1/2 R!W
TOTAL
AREA
7,150 SF
1.625 SF
8.775 SF
IMPERVIOUS
HOUSE PAD
DRIVEWA Y
SIDEWALK
ROAD &: CURB
TOTAL
AREA
3.500 SF'
496 SF
196 SF
910 SF
5.102 SF
PERVIOUS AREA (PER lOT.)
8.775 - 5,102 = 3,673 SF
IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
(5.102 SF)
(8.775 SF)
= 58.1 %
DONALD W. MciNTOSH
~lAn:8. INC.
.CER~lE'OF
AtfTHO itZAnQtWO. ea
~ ; .>~: ,>;'. .~: .;:::" .'~':~~~ ..~.
.~
em(jJI~~
1
t
t
J
J
DONALD W. MciNTOSH
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CiVlL ENGiNEEi1S
lANo PLANNERS
SUMVEYORS
2200 Park Ave. North
Winter Park. FL
32789-2355
Fax 407-644-8318
407-644-4068
http://www.dwma.com
August 3 I, 2007
Delivery
David Wheeler, P.E.
City of Ocoee
150 North Lakeshore Drive
Ocoee, FL 34761
Re: Meadow Ridge Pools
Dear David,
Pursuant to my discussions with Ryan Howard and per your request, this letter is
provided to clarify the impervious area assumed in the master stormwater system for
water quality treatment and discharge rate attenuation. It is also intended to
demonstrate that the addition of pools to the individual homesites has no adverse impact
to the stormwater system.
The Master Stormwater System Calculations utilized the Soil Conservation Service
(SCS) Technical Release 55 (TR-55) to calculate the runoff curve number for the
residential lots (typicall/6 Ac. lot). See attached excerpts from the approved
Stormwater Calculations (D-1, D-2, D-3). The TR-55 value is used to determine the
direct runoff from the site in order to si~ the stormwater ponds for discharge rate
attenuation. The water quality calculation accounted for a project wide (lots, roads,
amenities) impervious area of35.70 acres or roughly 62.8% of the total non-water
surface area (see attached excerpt from the approved Stormwater Calculations F-1).
In order to demonstrate that the addition of pools to the individual lots has no adverse
impact to the Master Stormwater System I have attached a calculation to determine the
maximum project \vide lot impervious percentage with the following assumption, I) that
every lot contained the largest available home foot print and 2) every lot contained a 20'
x 50' pool/deck area. The calculation demonstrates that the maximum realized average
lot impervious area would be 56.9% for the project. Some lots will have slightly more
than 60% impervious; some will have less than 50% impervious; however, the
maximum aggregate will be less than 57%.
In summary, it is our professional opinion that there is no issue from a stormwater
management perspective for the addition of a pool/deck area to any/all lots within the
development. Trying to set a maximum impervious number on every lot or maintaining
an accounting of overall percent impervious area would be a cumbersome and confusing
process for both the developer and the City. We respectfully submit that the
calculations confirm that other than meeting all the required building setback limitations
(7.5' rear and sideyard; 7.5' from face of walls), there should be no prohibition to the
construction of pools should a homeowner wish to do so.
F:\Proj2005\25044\ENGadmin\C\EC 159 .doc
1
David W7zeeler, P.E.
Re: Meadow Ridge Pools
August 31, 2007
Page 2
Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jo 0 send,P.E..
P 0 ect Manager
F 'da Registration No: 52127
C: Russ Wagner, AICP
Mr. Mark Thomson
Ms. Tina Demonstone
Mr. Donald W. McIntosh, Jr.
John M. Florio, P .E.
George D. Delaney, P.E.
m Irk
f: \Proj2005\2504-l\ENGadmin \C\EC 159 .doc
DONALD \fI.1. MciNTOSH Associates, Inc.
2200 PARK AVENUE NORTH. WINTER DARK. FLORIDA 32789-2355. (407)6444068. FAX [407J 644-83.18
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
By JTi
O p",1 ;7-, JIO-,'
ar.e '-;"'- \.
Project
Subject
2200 Park Avenue North Winter Park, Florida 32789-2355
407-6.<14-4068 Fax 407-644-3318 http://w''''N,dwma,~orn
i"V\pr~~OlAi I4dtl P
Lol- I y~\. W:iV LOUS (~l.r:uJ t- h G~\
I
Ck.
Date
No,
Sheet
Of
o loi-rJ * d' i oI-s : I S2-
. ~(qe~+ h~ .fL+[JIlYLt : 3S~1--S~ LAY\d~{' ,roC'
. Dr 1 V'W-.lCu.j arw... L"O CUr qa roq e.,): ;2 ~ I W 1 d.D )( 2-D' de.tp "::: "-1-56 ~P
6 S\ch.wtA.\~ tD 401\+ door .(toJY\ cl1l\Je)u~ : Lj-J l.,Ulch.. X IS' Lonq ::: 1.00 soP
o 0t((\J\dC\~~d 1601 ktA: 'A~ 1 dQep X So' uncle; IIOO~
. TIt7i~llJ 1700\ lJJ~'\-h^ .S\.Af~(l~ ArM: \~Jwldt X2G' lOf\q ~ 338 ~Ai
D To-\--d to+ \i\J\~-t(Vl~U) CjrcOt - .pooI5v(~uCtu_Q"::5!Co2S~-33cs-9"" Lf8z'-is~
· 10M prouQ.c.-t- \Th1r-e(\J LOU" ()fQfA (6(\ ~ on.ly) = '--181'-1 sf 'X lS21~ =- 733,2c.iSs+' = 1(P,t\3/\c
· lOW efuoQ.<:t 10-+ o..cerCtq~ (6ft loG 6I\~) = 2'1.57 Ac.
1;+6J p(o~e c-i- wdQ.. Lo-\ fY\1J\.K\mULM \ '{V{p-tv' vioGtS CiSSUY'Y\ll\'1 Q.,vu~ lo{ hD s o~
?oo\ (}.1\~ +n.t \G\f\q?l,'A rlQ(Y\.L -Rvt-9'(\i~,J : 1~.8~ At. / Z~.s7Ac -= O.s(o~ -::: ~Iq;:
J
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOClATES,INC.
'.;
-~~1
SHEET 1
-'
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRJDGE)
Wet Detention Water Quality Calculations
Date: 4/1212005
By: MPB
Revised: 9/26/05
Basin:
Treatment Pond:
Basin Area:
POST 1 ~ 2 & 3
SMA-1, 2 & 3
60.96 acres
Pervious Impervious Water Total
Land Cover Area (ac) Area (ac) Surface (ac) Area (ac)
Open Space (Good) 21.15 21.15
!m"p~rvi~lJs 35.70 35.70
Water Surface 4.11 4.11
Totals 21.15 35.70 4.11 60.96
Area Summary
Treatment Volume Calculations
Does system discharge directly to O.F.W. or Class 1111 waters?
i-in. x Total Area = 5.08 ac-ft
2.S-in. x Impervious Area = 7.44 ac-ft
IRequired Treatment Volume = 7.44 ac-ft
Pond Data
No
, . \'
T u+o.l 0. no... e..-~ e.-ll.1S l Vc. D,
n
SMA t,0CL\..e. (' t::.'~l{-t-o.LL
:: 1.00. q(p - Lt, \ \ -:: 5i.D .6-5/",-
Bottom
Grade Break
DNW
, -
% \Mre{\IlcNS Vl5€.d l{~ .
lAJO.Jtf' ~VlD..ll~ C:c..Lc.u.la...\1.OJ\
<= 75;'10 -;: S(o,BS =- {j,&;2.5
:: (uZ.'8;~
0.00.
4.34
9.13
14.39
20.14
23.33
Outside Top of Berm
Minimum weir elevation =
1/2 Treatment volume elevation =
124.65 ft
123.86 ft
Permanent Pool Volume Calculations
Drainage Area (ac): 60.96
Residence Time (days): 21
Wet Season (days): 153
Wet Season Rainfall (in): 32
Runoff Coefficient: 0.66
Base Flow (cis): 0.2745
Littoral Zone Provided? No
Desi n Weir elevation =
Treatment Volume Provided =
124.80 ft
8.17 ac-ft
~~y ~~qu..ired (a~-ft):
PPY:f.r~vide~(aC?-ft):
~eanl?ep.!h (ft):
Max. Depth (ft):
26.10
32.62
7.9
12
i
I
I
PAVI~Net O6t)
F:\Proj2004\2 4202IENGCalcslStormIWestridge-Basin.xls
DONALD W. McINTOSH ASSOCIATES, iNC.
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRJDGE)
Post Development Basin Hydrology Calculations
Basin:
Re~~iv~n9 Node:
Basin Area:
POST-i
SMA-1
13.92 acres
Curve Number (CN) Calculations
Soil Index Number
26
44
46
Soil Index Name
Dna Fine Sand
Smyrna Fine Sand
Tavares Fine Sand. 0 to 5% slopes
SHEET V-
Date: 4/12/2005
By: MPS
Ck:
Revise::.! 9/3012005
Hydrologic Group
BID
BID
A
Land Cover
Commercial & Business
CommerciaTa.- Business
-7 Residential 1/6 Acre
WaterSulface
Hydrologic
Group
A
D
D
D
CN
89
$
Area (ac)
5.31
3.49
4.26
0.86
13.92
Total: I
Time of Concentration (Te) Calculations
. Equations
Sheet Flow:
Tt=
0.007(nUO.8
(4.8)0.5 (50.4/100)
where:
Shallow Concentrated Flow:
Tt=
L
60V
where:
Channel Flow:
Tt=
L
60V
where:
Calculations
CN x Area
472.6
331.6
383.4 ~
84.3
I
I (jomposlte CN = 91
I
L :5 300 ft.
S = slope (%)
n = Manning's Roughness CoeTI.
Unpaved: V=16.1345 (S)0.5
Paved~ V=20.3282 (5)0.5
V=2.5 fps (assumed)
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
ChanneVPi e Flow
Length
(Ll
ft
185
335
Roughness
Coefficient
n
0.3
Travel Time
(TJ
min)
30.1
2.2
2.50
I Time of Cone. =
32 Minutes
Post Development
F:\Proj2004\24202\ENGCaicslStorm\Westridge-8asin.xls
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
f. "
SHEET ~- ~
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRJDGE)
Post Development Basin Hydrology Calculations
Date: 4/12/2005
By: MPB
Ck:
Basin:
I!~ce.iyin~ Node:
Basin Area:
POST-2
SMA-2
43.60 acres
Revised 9/30/2005
Curve Number CN Calculations
Soil Index Number
20
46
Soil Index Name
Immokalee Fine Sand
Tavares Fine Sand. 0 to 5% slopes
Hydrologic
Land Cover Grou CN Area ac CN x Area
-"":> Residential 1/6 Acre A ~ 25.44 1755.4 ~
-"> Residential 1/6 Acre 0 14.24 1281.6 ...0---
*7th Ave A 98 1.50 147.0
Water Surface D 98 2.42 237.2
Total: 43.60
Composite CN = 78
Time of Concentration (T c) Calculations
Length
(L)
ft
180
250
600
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
Shaliow Cone. (Paved)
ChanneltPi e Flow
Roughness
Coefficient
n)
0.4
Slope
(S)
%
1.00
0.30
Velocity
(V)
( s
1.11
2.50
Travei Time
(TJ
imin)
37.0
3.7
4.0
.1 Time of Cone. = - 45. Minutes
. The Coefficient used by PEC for 7th Avenue Secondary Collection System was a Rational Coefficient. To be
conservative the Curve Number of 98 is used. This change does not affect the Composite Curve Number for the
overall POST-2 basin.
Post Development
F:\Proj2004124202\ENGCalcslS tonnlWestridge-8asin.xls
DONALD W. MciNTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
MEADOW RIDGE (FKA WESTRlDGE)
Post Development Basin Hydrology Calculations
Basin:
~~c.e!ying Node:
Basin Area:
POST-3
SMA-3
3.44 acres
Curve Number CN Calculations
Soil Index Number
26
Soil Index Name
Ona Fine Sand
.i' "
SHEET iL::." ;.~
Date: 4/12/2005
By: MPB
Ck:
Revised 9/30f2005
-'/
Land Cover
Residential 1/6 Acre
water Surface
Hydrologic
Group
D
D
CN
~
98
Area (ac)
1.70
1.74
3.44
10tal:1
Time of Concentration (T c) Calculations
Length
(L)
(ft)
75
250
250
Roughness
Coefficient
n)
0.4
CN x Area
153.0 ~
170.5
I
, Composite CN = 94
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
- - - - -
Shallow Cone. (Paved)
ChannellPi e Flow
Slope Velociiy Travel lIme
(S) (V) (TJ
% fps (min)
1.00 18.4
0.30 1.11 3.7
2.50 1.7
1 ime of Cone. = 24 Minutes
. ~asin:
'. Receiving Node:
Basin Area:
WETLAND
999JWETLAND)'
25.46 acres
Curve Number (CN) Calculations
Soil Index Number
3
26
42
Soil Index Name
Basinger Fine Sand, depressional
Ona Fine Sand
SanlbelMuck
. Hydrologic Group
D
BID
BID
Land Cover
Wetlands
Hydrologic
Group
D
CN
98
Total: 1
Area (ac)
25.46
25.46
Time of Concentration (T J Calculations
Length
(L)
ft
100
500
900
Roughness
Coefficient
n
0.24
0.24
Slope
(S)
(%)
0.50
T e of Flow
Sheet Flow
Shallow Cone. (Unpaved)
Channel/Pi e Flow
Note: 1D-minute Time of Concentration is used where calculated value is less.
CN x Area
2495.1
1
I Composite CN =
98
i
Velociiy
(V)
( s)
I ravel Time
(TJ
(min)
20.3
5.6
6.0
1.50
2.50
I Time of Cone. =
32 Minutes
Post Development
F:\Proj2004\24202\ENGCalcs\Storm\ Westridge-Basin.xls
Chapter 2
Estimating Runoff
Technical Release 55
Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds
Table 2-2a
Runoff CliVe numbers for urban areas JI
--.-
Cover description
CliVe numbers for
-hydrologic soil group -
Cover type and hydrologic condition
Average percent
impervious area 21
A
B
c
D
Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)
Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.);Y:
Poor condition (grass cover < 50%) ..........................................
Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%) ..................................
Good condition (grass cover> 75%) .........................................
Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc.
(excluding right-of-way) ............ ......................... ........................
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and st~mn sewers (excluding
right-of-way) ............................... ................... ....... ....... .......... ......
Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) ..........................
Gravel (including right-of-way) .................................................
Dirt (including right-of-way) ......................................................
Western desert urban areas:
Natural desert landscaping (perviOUS areas only) g .....................
Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier,
desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand or gravel mulch
and basin borders) ......................................................................
Urban districts:
Commercial and business .................................................................
Industrial ........................................................ ......... ...... ......... ........ .....
Residential districts by average lot size:
y. --",,"1/8 acre or less (town houses) ..........................................................
(p 1/4 acre ................................................................................................
1/3 acre ........................ ...................... .... ............ ...... ....... ......... ............
112 acre .................................................. .................. ....... .... .................
1 acre ............ ........ ........................................................... ....................
2 acres ........... ........ ......... ............... ................................... ...... ..............
Developing urban areas
Newly graded areas
(pervious areas only, no vegetation)!Y .............
Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types
similar to those in table 2-2c).
68 79 86 89
49 69 79 84
39 61 74 80
98 98 98 98
98 98 98 98
83 89 92 93
76 85 89 91
72 82 87 88
63 77 85 88
96 96 96 96
85 89 92 94 95
72 81 88 91 93
65 77 85 90 9"
38 61 75 8.3 874--
30 57 72 81 85
'r 54 70 80 85
~O
20 51 68 79 84
12 46 65 77 8:!
77
86
91
94
I Average nmoff condition, and 1. = 0.28.
2 The average percent impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's. Other asswnptions are as follows: impervious areas are
directly connected to the drainage system, impenious areas have a CN of 98, and pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in
good hydrologic condition. CN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4.
3 CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture. Composite CN's may be computed ror other combinations of open space
cover type.
4 Composite CN's for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage
(CN = 98) and the pervious area CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition.
5 Composite CN's to use for the design of temporary measures during grading and constnlction should be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4
based on the degree of development (impervious area percentage) and the CN's for the newly graded pen-ious areas.
*
(210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986)
2-5
This is a sample letterhead using the Papyrus font
Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM
TO:
J. Antonio Fabre, Planning Department
FROM:
Ryan P. Howard, E.I. , Engineer II thru David Wheeler, P.E. , City Engineer
DATE:
September 20,2007
RE:
Meadow Ridge waiver to increase allowable 50% impervious.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the request from a stormwater engineering standpoint and
after reviewing the original stormwater calculations as well as supplemental information supplied by the
design engineer of record, the stormwater system as designed will support the increase in the average
impervious area to 58%. The stormwater system as designed was initially based on several conservative
assumptions that when compared to the actual conditions provided more than enough treatment and
storage for the additional increase in impervious area. The 58% impervious area is based on the ultimate
maximum possible area of imperviousness. This would be if every lot had the largest size house foot
print and a pool.
file:/ /C:\City%20Commission\2007\N ov%2020\MeadowRidgePUDAmendment\Meadow... 11/1212007
Meadow Ridge
Maximum lot.lrnpeMolls Ar(i!a Percentage (by lot)
Lot #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Lot Area {sf}
9646
8222
9006
7182
11477
7150
7150
9553
8125
9553
7150
7150
7150
11486
7150
1150
8994
7150
7170
7910
7500
8419
8453
7150
7150
7150
7150
7150
8946
7151
7150
79'23
11124
7150
7150
7150
8812
8804
8080
7171
8324
7840
Max Irnp..%
50
59
54
60
50
60
60
51
60
51
60
60
60
50
60
60
54
60
60
60
60
58
58
60
60
60
60
60
55
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
60
60
59
60
Max Imp. Area {sf)
4823
4851
4863
4309
5739
4290
4290
4872
4875
4872
4290
4290
4290
5743
4290
4290
4857
4290
4302
4746
4500
4883
4903
4290
4290
4290
4290
4290
4920
4291
4290
4754
6674
4290
4290
4290
4847
4842
4848
4666
4911
4704
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot tmpervious Area Percentage (by lot)
lot #
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
S5
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
lot Area (sf)
72.80
7280
7280
8729
12273
9399
8830
7280
7280
7280
7840
8954
7674
7594
7518
9626
8933
7605
11977
12162
11287
8815
8042
7733
7814
8096
7875
7312
731.3
7312
73'12
10229
8650
10331
7317
7312
7313
7313
7875
8102
7781
7748
Max Imp. %
60
60
60
56
50
52
55
60
60
60
60
55
60
60
60
50
54
60
SO
50
SO
55
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
6.0
50
56
50
60
60
6(11
60
60
60
60
60
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4368
4368
4368
4888
6137
4887
4857
4368
4368
4368
4704
4925
4604
4556
4511
4813
4824
4563
5989
6081
5644
4848
4825
4640
4688
4858
4725
4387
4388
4387
4387
5115
4844
5166
4390
4387
4388
4388
4725
4861
4669
4649
Meadow Ridge
Maximum lot Impeflllous Area Percentage (by lot)
LotI
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
12.2
123
1~4
125
126
Lot Area {sf}
1'637
9014
9436
7424
7150
7150
8516
9251
9598
10307
7803
7800
7800
1800
7800
7800
7899
8140
10997
8654
7810
7818
9258
12977
8475
8125
8137
7800
7800
7800
8271
8266
8963
8880
8173
8160
1990
9060
14173
14479
8795
82.19
Max Imp. %
60
S4
52
60
60
60
57
52
51
50
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
56
50
56
60
60
53
50
57
60
60
60
60
60
59
59
54
55
60
60
60
54
50
50
55
59
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4582
4868
4907
4454
42.90
4290
4854-
4811
4895
5154
4682
4680
4680
4680
4680
4680
4739
4894
5499
4846
4686
4691
4907
6489
4831
4875
4882
4680
4680
4680
48 SO
4877
4840
4884
4904
4896
4794
4892
7087
7240
4837
4849
I .. ----
Meadow Ridge
Maximum lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lotti
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
Lot Area (sf)
8730
10812
10129
8385
8125
8125
8750
8125
8125
8125
8125
8331
9639
10238
8476
8125
8125
812.5
8125
8125
11920
13058
9767
1150
7150
7246
Project
1287864
Max Imp. %
56
50
SO
58
60
60
55
60
60
50
60
58
51
50
57
60
60
60
60
60
SO
50
50
60
60
60
57
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4889
5406
50'65
4863
4875
4875
4813
4875
4875
4875
4875
4832
4916
5119
4831
4875
4875
4875
4875
4875
5960
6529
4884
4290
4290
4348
731631
'i,.~~
~ l 1;
~,.
~~"
1iJi
~~
iil~
g
i1
~
I
~~'r:m
:~~"',o
:et~
~fiii-8
~i(t
f;!~
~C!
f!:~'~
~~
~tl~g
;!;\n
'';)~
8[~C fI'
,~4Y
~
n,
b
t:J
a
~
::tr
(3
Q
n,
m
o
~~"i1
,t~
!
p.....
~@2~
~~
~<~ ,/ (It
~~:~ /:~; '0 >"
;~t /'sa&: /'
, -J :;:~/
:t?,~8
t,<; I
---I
::-.,,-. :
~~*! i
;!\'4 ,
-"'---~-i
m
l~
i;1;;_
"'0.;;111
~!t.t-
/
/''''-
L./"'- /' I' :::--..
~- '.... ;. ?,/ /
---""'---",,,,,,...-"" "',,-
,~,
~
~
:.
~'
~
;;l
~~,tCJt
~~~o
-,.;-;;.~..__.-.~-
;~t!
,')~
-;;;-
~~!'~
Ii.'L
u~~ 2l
~~
~:l1
~izf!'~
#;':l_,
\1:~ ~.8:
;~ !i
\
!
~
o
m
!
~
I:
S
-I
I
en
i
I
g ~
~ ~~2
o ~~'
.':~I";lQ
o .I;'!l-""
P'<<s
! ~~Ii
~'~
mi~~
o~
m]~s
o ~g;
~~
::!'E@
,~""I
~'!:
-~:ti;~ ~
~~-
I
rn" .'1
~<lli (',' J
i~~ I ~~tll
~ ",\1
m
o
1
g
"';; j
~~'~l
;~\; ,
;,yilt
~:~~
,~'i
,4:)~
~g!l:
~~
F>><:.i
~~:~
~~
.; 'o\lI ,3SO!I ~~A
3IIW_a:1
;~~~ I ^~J. "."
:~{.jt I ~~a:! ';ij~ th~l:
~<~ ~~ ,!;: ~ ! ;~~ :
8 I gIg lOti ai~~ -
. _J...~O: 0"'" ~
gig { 81 ~i t"
"'9t! l81f
I ii~ W ! ~a", /., I
j ';1:~' ::~(a / ~'~t.- !
,.~.\ j ;~ ~ I
I
ai@ 8:
",'(1
8
g 8
~~ 2~
~~-t ~~t
,"!}%1 ;!):~
~';
?Jl;'\lJ
:.;~1
~~
......,~.l)J:
~<-
~~o. a~~.f ~~:t
'.. J -", I <il<li'" ,. ~,~ /
i I 8 i :,~~ / J~*;! ~~1: I
-.. j-ti/~t, 0 I I
0", i "'" ! 8 ! m ,
fi!j~ J'~~Q .. ~:~ I' 0 I fJt
..~.. - ( >{ic.....; f ;;:t;81, ~3 I 01
f';~ ~"f J ).c~ j ~~t...l ;:~
c,. I ~.~ <Jt/ ~~~
{ ~'lt.;
!
8
,,~
~:::t
.t:'\4
g
S
~',,,
~;;;~
~''4
g
S
f!~
~~:,m
i{'q
"!g \
~;~E \
$\-'fI .
,)>J
::'<.1
q~.;;
}\40
~XE:
~~'
!
g
~
--*- \-----1
-
PUL TE: HOME r.;ORP
-=:~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA
APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE
RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SECOND REVISED
LAND USE PLAN FOR WESTRIDGE PUD (K/N/A MEADOW
RIDGE PUD) ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE
INTERSECTION OF MAGUIRE ROAD AND MOORE
ROAD, AS PETITIONED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER;
AMENDING THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE
SECOND REVISED LAND USE PLAN FOR WESTRIDGE
PUD (KIN/A MEADOW RIDGE PUD) TO ALLOW A
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA RATIO FOR EACH
INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL LOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
A LOT TABLE PROVIDED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER,
IN LIEU OF A MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA RATIO OF
50% PER LOT FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AS
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED; REPEALING INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of certain real property located within the corporate limits of
the City of Ocoee, Florida, as described in the Exhibit "A" has petitioned the City Commission of
the City of Ocoee, Florida (the "Ocoee City Commission") to approve an amendment (the
"Amendment") to the residential portion of the Second Revised Land Use Plan for Westridge PUD
(k/n/a Meadow Ridge PUD), as approved by the Ocoee City Commission on August 17,2004 (the
"Land Use Plan");
WHEREAS, the Amendment was scheduled for study and recommendation and was
reviewed by the Development Review Committee ("DRC") on September 26, 2007;
WHEREAS, the DRC recommended approval of the Amendment;
WHEREAS, the Amendment was scheduled for study and recommendation by the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City ofOcoee, Florida ("PZC"); and
WHEREAS, on October 9,2007, the PZC held an advertised public hearing and
recommended approval of the Amendment;
ORLA_ 608435.1
-1-
WHEREAS, the Ocoee City Commission held a de novo public hearing with public
notice thereof with respect to the proposed Amendment and this Ordinance on
; and
WHEREAS, the Ocoee City Commission considered this Ordinance in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Section 166.041 (3), Florida Statutes, and determined that this
Ordinance is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Authority. The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the
authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of Florida
and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes.
SECTION 2. Amendment to the Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan is
hereby amended to allow a maximum impervious area ratio for each individual residential lot in
accordance with the lot table attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference incorporated
herein, in lieu of a maximum impervious area ratio of 50% per lot for all residential lots, as
previously approved. The foregoing Amendment amends, supersedes and replaces any contrary
provision contained in any previously approved Land Use Plans for Westridge (k/n1a Meadow
Ridge) PUD.
SECTION 3. Ocoee Comprehensive Plan. The Ocoee City Commission
hereby finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
SECTION 4. Inconsistent Ordinances. All ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict or inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any
ORLA_608435.1
-2-
court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion
hereto.
SECTION 6.
Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of
ATTEST:
Beth Eikenberry, City Clerk
(SEAL )
FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY
THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA;
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
this _ day of , 2007.
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
By:
City Attorney
ORLA_608435.1
,2007.
APPROVED:
CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA
S. Scott Vandergrift, Mayor
ADVERTISED ,2007
READ FIRST TIME ,2007
READ SECOND TIME AND ADOPTED
, 2007
UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO.
-3-
EXHIBIT" A"
MEADOW RIDGE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 28
East, Orange County, Florida, described as follows:
Commence at the Southwest comer of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, and run
NOo021 '38"W along the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32 for a distance of
1330.98 feet to the Southwest comer of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32;
thence N89047'54"E along the South line of said North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 for a distance of
60.00 feet to a point on the East right-of-way line of Maguire Road (County Road 439), said
point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N00021 '38"W along said right-of-way line,
737.39 feet to a point of cusp with a curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 20.00 feet
and a chord bearing of S47025'37"E; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a
central angle of 94007'59" for a distance of 32.86 feet to the point of compound of curvature of a
curve concave Northerly having a radius of 575.00 feet and a chord bearing of N78004'23"E;
thence Easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 14052'01" for a distance of
149.20 feet to the point oftangency; thence N70038'22"E, 190.00 feet to the point of curvature of
a curve concave Southerly having a radius of 510.00 feet and a chord bearing of S84053'45"E;
thence Easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48055'46" for a distance of
435.53 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence NOoo04'05"W, 518.02 feet; thence N89055'55"E
along the South right-of-way line of Moore Road, as described in Official Records Book 4343,
Page 4532, of the Public Records of Orange County, Florida, 1762.55 feet; thence S45012'20"E
along the Southwesterly line of lands described in Official Records Book 7900, Page 391, of said
Public Records for a distance of 70.88 feet to a point on the East line of said North 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4; thence S00020'36"E along said line and the Westerly right-of-way line of Seventh
Avenue for a distance of275.18 feet; thence SlO058'19"W along said Westerly right-of-way line
for a distance of 305.80 feet; thence S00020'36"E along said Westerly right-of-way line, 659.64
feet; thence S89047'54"W along the aforesaid South line of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4
for a distance of2522.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 66.401 acres more or less and being subject to any rights-of-way, restrictions and
easements of record.
ORLA_608435.1
-4-
.. n_----,
. . < .
EXHIBIT "B"
[See attached table]
ORLA_608435.1
-5-
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lot If
1
2
.3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Lot Area (sf)
9646
8222
9006
7182
11477
7150
7150
9553
8125
9553
7150
7150
7150
11486
7150
7150
8994
7150
7170
7910
7500
8419
8453
7150
7150
7150
7150
7150
8946
7151
7150
7923
11124
7150
7150
7150
8812
8804
8080
7777
8324
7840
Maxlmp. %
SO
59
54
60
50
60
60
51
60
51
60
60
60
50
60
60
54
60
60
60
60
58
58
60
60
60
60
60
55
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
60
60
59
60
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4823
4851
4863
4309
5739
4290
4290
4872
4875
4872
4290
4290
4290
5743
4290
4290
4857
4290
4302
4746
4500
4883
4903
4290
4290
4290
4290
4290
4920
4291
4290
4754
6674
4290
4290
4290
4847
4842
4848
4666
4911
4704
Meadow Ridge
Maximum lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
loU
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
lot Area (sf)
7280
7280
7280
8729
12273
9399
8830
7280
7280
7280
7840
8954
7674
7594
7518
9626
8933
7605
11977
12162
11287
8815
8042
7733
7814
8096
7875
7312
7313
7312
7312
10229
8650
10331
7317
7312
7313
7313
7875
8102
7781
7748
Max Imp. %
60
60
60
56
SO
52
55
60
60
60
60
S5
60
60
60
50
54
60
SO
50
SO
55
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
50
56
50
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Max Imp. Area (sf)
4368
4368
4368
4888
6137
4887
4857
4368
4368
4368
4704
4925
4604
4556
4511
4813
4824
4563
5989
6081
5644
4848
482S
4640
4688
4858
4725
4387
4388
4387
4387
5115
4844
5166
4390
4387
4388
4388
4725
4861
4669
4649
Meadow RIdge
Maximum lot Impervious Area Percentage (by lot)
Lot If
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
ill
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
Lot Area (sf)
7637
9014
9436
7424
7150
7150
8516
9251
9598
10307
7803
7800
7800
7800
7800
7800
7899
8740
10997
8654
7810
7818
9258
12977
8475
8125
8137
7800
7800
7800
8271
8266
8963
8880
8173
8160
7990
9060
14173
14479
8795
8219
Max Imp. %
60
54
52
60
60
60
57
52
51
SO
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
56
50
56
60
60
53
50
57
60
60
60
60
60
59
59
54
55
60
60
60
54
50
50
55
59
Max Imp, Area (sf)
4582
4868
4907
4454
4290
4290
4854
4811
4895
5154
4682
4680
4680
4680
4680
4680
4739
4894
5499
4846
4686
4691
4907
6489
4831
4875
4882
4680
4680
4680
4880
4877
4840
4884
4904
4896
4794
4892
7087
7240
4837
4849
Meadow Ridge
Maximum Lot Impervious Area Percentage {by lot}
lot 1#
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
Lot Area (sf)
8730
10812
10129
8385
8125
8125
8750
8125
8125
8125
8125
8331
9639
10238
8476
8125
8125
8125
8125
8125
11920
13058
9767
7150
7150
7246
Project
1287864
Max Imp. %
56
50
50
58
60
60
ss
60
60
60
60
58
S1
50
57
60
60
60
60
60
50
50
50
60
60
60
57
fv1ax Imp. Area (sf)
4889
5406
5065
4863
4875
4875
4813
4875
4875
4875
4875
4832
4916
5119
4831
4875
4875
4875
4875
4875
5960
6529
4884
4290
4290
4348
731631
g
~
~
~
iJ{
~
~
~
II:
I
s
""I
~
I
I
:;:
~
1 _u_~J
~~
..----H=~-_______-
CORP
~