Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-12-2008 Agenda Packetma, 0 �l e Center Of Good ZCommissioners tv S. Scott Vander , Ihg Bi'ift Gary Hood. District 1 �t O T Scott AnderJohnson, District? _ Ciri• Manage r ` L•r /yT Rusty Johnson, District 3 Robert Frank T v - Joel Keller, District 4- PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY) UPDATED August 12, 2008 AGENDA 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER A. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum II. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held July 8, 2008 III. OLD BUSINESS IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Hampton Inn Ocoee PUBLIC HEARING Senior Planner Howell 1. Large Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan B. Eagle Creek PUBLIC HEARING Senior Planner Howell 1. PUD Rezoning 2. PUD Land Use Plan C. 141° Amendment to City of Ocoee/Orange PUBLIC HEARING Principal Planner Rumer County Joint Planning Area Agreement V. MISCELLANEOUS A. Project Status Report B. August Calendar VI. ADJOURNMENT OAP 8 ZAgendas@008Vwgust 12, 2008 P 6 Z Agendwdoc NOTE: Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meetings take place on the second Tuesday of every month at 7,00 pm in the Ocoee Commission Chambers in City Hall unless otherwise advertised, Any person who desires to appeal any decision at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose may need W ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings ,s made which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. More Man one Commissioner may participate or hear discussions regarding a matter which will come before Me Commission for action. Also in accordance with Flonda statue 28626 Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should cooed the Office of Me City Cleric, 150 No" Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee. FL U761 (407) 9063105, 48 hours in advance of the meeting. City of Ocoee • 150 N Lakeshore Once • Ocoee, Florida 34761 phone: (407) 905-3100 • fax: (407) 656-8504 • xww cl ococe.0.us ITEM NUMBER Il. A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting held on July 8, 2008 i• MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTING AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Sills called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Following a moment of silent meditation and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, a quorum was declared present. PRESENT: Chairman Sills, Vice Chair Golden, Members Campbell, Conkling, McKey, Morris, Rhodus, and West. Also present were City Attorney Palmer, Planning Director Wagner, Development Services Director Shadrix, Senior Planner Howell, and Deputy City Clerk Sibbitt. ABSENT: Member Dillard was absent excused. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, May 13, 2008. • Member McKev. seconded by Member Campbell. moved to acceot the Minutes of the Mav 13. 2008. Plannino and Zonino Commission meetino. Motion carried unanimously. OAK TRAIL RESERVE - FINAL SUB. PLAN & CLARKE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLANS Planning Director Wagner stated that Oak Trail Reserve is on the Consent Agenda due to recently researching the Land Development Code and realizing that Final Subdivision Plans can actually go on the consent agenda unless a member chooses to discuss the case and pulls it from the consent agenda. Vice Chair Golden announced he would like to pull Oak Trail Reserve - Final Subdivision Plan & Clarke Road Improvement Plan from the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS OAK TRAIL RESERVE - FINAL SUB. PLAN & CLARKE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLANS Senior Planner Howell gave a brief presentation on the project and stated that the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Oak Trail Reserve was approved on November 7, 2006, and the applicant is modifying the plans on the southern portion of the site from Townhomes to single-family use due to current market • conditions and the SJRWMD requisites. Accordingly, the Land Use Plan was amended to reflect the Applicant's request. The Final Subdivision Plan as Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting July 8, 2008 proposed is consistent with the Preliminary Subdivision Plan and Amended Land Use Plan. �J�lAI Q DEVEL The be efopment ReviewComm tteeEmet onJune 25,OMMEf) 20108N to review the Oak Trail Reserve FSP. The applicant was made aware of the following issues: • The City will require a copy of the SJRWMD permit prior to construction. • CLOMR-F (Conditional Letter of Map Revision based on Fill) must be approved prior to construction. STAFF RECOMMEND/ TIQt� Stall recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend approval of the Final Subdivision Plan for Oak Trail Reserve PUD, as date stamped received by the City on June 9, 2008, subject to the CLOMR-F requests being approved prior to construction. • DISCUSSION Member McKay inquired about crosswalks and stated they need to address the pedestrian situation regarding trying to cross that intersection. He further stated since it was mentioned that in the future they will be putting a trail he feels they should consider 8ft sidewalks and consider putting a gate from the clubhouse that leads to the trail. 40 Planning Director Wagner stated they already have an agreement with Arden Park Developer on the west side of the road to put the 8ft sidewalks along that side of the road. He further added the City's plan is to continue to put the 8ft sidewalk further south on Clarke Road, when funds become available. Planning Director Wagner stated the crosswalks may be put on the local streets but the County is pretty restrictive about putting crosswalks on main roadways. A brief discussion ensued regarding signalization on Hackney Prairie. Vice Chair Golden stated the plans show they are in the floodplains and that they will be going for a conditional letter. He inquired if they are close to getting that approval. Jack Smith, Engineer for the project, stated they should be getting something back to the City by this week and then the application goes to FEMA. Vice Chair Golden further stated there are a few trees that he felt could have been saved in between the homes and in the rear lots but were marked for removal. Mr. Smith stated they can look back at those but they did try to save as many trees as they could unless the grade changes did not allow for it. Planning Director Wagner stated when they have their pre -construction conference they do send the arborist out with the engineer to look at all the trees, so if it shows on the 0 I • Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting July 8, 2008 plans that it is to be removed then the likelihood is greater then not; however, they have had instances where they do save trees that they thought were to come out. Richard Gonzalez, landowner, stated they are strong believers of trails and briefly touched on donating trees to the City for the park parcel that is proposed in that area. Member West seconded by Member McKev. moved to recommend aooroval of the Final Subdivision Plan for Oak Trail Reserve PUD. as date stamped received by the City on June 9. 2008. subject to the CLOMR-F reouests being approved prior to construction. Motion carried unanimousiv. OLD BUSINESS — None NEW BUSINESS PRESTIGE ACADEMY — SPECIAL EXCEPTION Senior Planner Howell gave a brief presentation on the project and stated that, in accordance with Section 4-8.B(2) of the Land Development Code, the proposed use must be considered in relation to the compatibility with the surrounding land . uses. Prestige Academy is anticipated to be compatible with the surrounding uses in the proposed location. The proposed facility will be exclusively for developmentally delayed children, and thus is not intended to have a large amount of children in attendance, or generate additional traffic beyond what is already generated on -site. STgFF RECOMMENDATIQN Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Special Exception for the Prestige Academy child care center located on the north side of SR 50, across from Health Central Hospital, subject to the five Conditions of Approval provided on the attached site plan. DISCUSSION The Public Hearing was opened for Prestige Academy — Special Exception. As no one wished to speak the Public Hearing was closed for Prestige Academy — Special Exception. Member McKey stated his concern is the traffic pattern and the traffic. He stated he is familiar with the area and knows it is hard to get in/out of. He further stated he feels the applicant should have someone to direct traffic during peak hours for safety reasons. Senior Planner Howell stated the portion the applicant will be occupying is the northern side and the student population does not seem like it will be great enough to affect the traffic. Member Mckey inquired if the students 0 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting July 8, 2008 s would arrive by bus or vehicle. Senior Planner Howell stated the owner is present to answer any questions. The Public Hearing was reopened for Prestige Academy — Special Exception. Paul Novac, owner of Prestige Academy, stated the student population will be 30- 40 students maximum, which is square footage requirement from the State. He stated they do not provide bus service. He further stated they will be staggering the start time of their classes so cars will not all be dropping off at the same time. Vice Chair Golden inquired about the ages of the students. Mr. Novac stated it will be between 3-6 yrs. He stated the program is to help with early intervention and get the children ready for first grade. The Public Hearing was closed for Prestige Academy — Special Exception. Vice Chair Golden inquired if there were any additional conditions on the land use or playground; as far as the Special Exception. Senior Planner Howell stated the five conditions were the only conditions and they will be putting down a rubber mat over the parking spaces that can be removed should that use go away. • Member Rhodus. seconded by Member Camobell. moved to recommend aooroval of the Soecial Exception for the Prestige Academv child care center located on the north side of SR 50. across from Health Central Hosoital. subject to the five Conditions of ADproval orovided on the site olan. Motion carried unanimously. CITRUS OAKS CENTER — SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & PUD REZONING/LAND USE PLAN Senior Planner Howell reminded the board that after they review the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as the Local Planning Agency this item will be presented to the City Commission and then transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs in Tallahassee for an ultimate approval for land use change. He further gave a brief presentation of the project and stated, of the 2.13 acres, approximately 0.96 acres are proposed to be re-classified from Professional Offices & Services to Commercial, with the remaining acreage retaining a Future Land Use Designation of ConservationHFloodplains. The entire property is being simultaneously rezoned to PUD-Commercial. ST4FF RECQMMENDATION Staffrespectfully recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency recommend approval of a Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan • 4 I Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting July 8, 2008 Amendment for approximately 0.96 acres of the Citrus Oaks Center located on the southeast corner of the intersection of SR 50 and Citrus Oaks Avenue from a designation of Professional Offices & Services to Commercial, with the remainder of the property retaining a Future Land Use designation of Conservation/Flood plai ns. DISCUSSION Member McKay stated to the south of the building it states "parcel 2" and he was inquiring if there really is another parcel. Senior Planner Howell stated it may have been two separate parcels at one time but he believes, according to the property appraiser's website, it is currently listed as one parcel. Vice Chair Golden stated he would like to understand the traffic between a professional office building and commercial use building and inquired as to how the analysis was done. Senior Planner Howell stated they did not ask for a traffic study since they did work with the City on a Developer's Agreement that does limit the uses to what is in the building next door. He stated this is a smaller building so theoretically it can not generate as much traffic. The Public Hearing was opened for Citrus Oaks Center — Small Scale • Comprehensive Plan Amendment & PUD Rezoning/Land Use Plan. Laura Turner, Laura Turner Planning Services, stated they agree with the conditions of approval and support staffs recommendation for approval. Vice Chair Golden inquired if they have any potential leases for the building. Ms. Turner stated at this time they do not. The Public Hearing was closed for Citrus Oaks Center — Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment & PUD Rezoning/Land Use Plan. Member West. seconded by Member Camobell. moved to recommend aonroval of a Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment for aoproximately 0.96 acres of the Citrus Oaks Center located on the southeast comer of the intersection of SR 50 and Citrus Oaks Avenue from a desianation of Professional Offices & Services to Commercial. with the remainder of the property retainino a Future Land Use designation of Conservation/Floodolains. Motion carried unanimouslv. Senior Planner Howell gave a brief presentation on the rezoning of the property and further stated the applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from Professional Offices & Services (P-S) to PUD-Commercial. Currently, the main tenant is a medical clinic that has indicated they will not renew their lease, which expires on August 31, 2008. Senior Planner Howell stated the comments from • the Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment discussion will carry over. 5 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting July 8, 2008 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COM J.ITTF RE OMMENDATION The Development Review Committee DRC met on June 25, 2008, and reviewed the applicant's request. The applicant was notified that all concerns in regards to the review of the project had been satisfied. The Planning Department requested that check -cashing businesses should be added to the list of prohibited uses on the Land Use Plan and in the Development Agreement. The Police Department requested day -labor establishments be added to the list of prohibited uses on the Land Use Plan and in the Development Agreement. DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the rezoning of the Citrus Oaks Center from a designation of Professional Offices & Services (P-S) to PUD, including the Land Use Plan subject to the incorporation of the above referenced prohibited uses on the Land Use Plan and in the Development Agreement. STgpF RECOJAENDATION to respe u y recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the proposed rezoning of the Citrus Oaks Center located at the intersection of Citrus Oaks Boulevard and SR 50 from a designation of • Professional Offices & Services (P-S) to PUD, including the Land Use Plan subject to the incorporation of the above referenced prohibited uses on the Land Use Plan and in the Development Agreement. The Public Hearing was opened for Citrus Oaks Center — PUD Rezoning/Land Use Plan. As no one wished to speak the Public Hearing was closed for Citrus Oaks Center— PUD Rezoning/Land Use Plan. Member McKev, seconded by Vice Chair Golden, _moved to recommend aDDrovel of the oroDosed rezoning of the Citrus Oaks Center locateri at the intersection of Citrus Oaks Boulevard and SR 50 from a designation of Professional Offices, & Services (P-S) to PUD. including the Land Use Plan suhiect to the incorooration of the referenced orohibited uses on the Land Use Plan and in the Develooment ADreement. Motion carried unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS Development Services Director Shadrix stated they are ramping up to begin the process of their evaluation appraisal report, which is a big deal for this community since it gives them the opportunity to look at the comprehensive plan and how well it is effectively implemented in vision with the City of Ocoee. They will be setting up workshops with the Planning and Zoning Commission to give them the • 6 • • Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting July 8, 2008 opportunity to identify issues that they see facing the City of Ocoee that could pose potential growth issues. First phase of the appraisal report is the preparation of an issues list. He briefly expressed the importance of being a community and how the report will help. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:01 p.m. Attest: APPROVED: Melanie Sibbitt, Deputy City Clerk Jim Sills, Chairman ITEM NUMBER IV. A. PUBLIC HEARING Hampton Inn Ocoee Large Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan ,ire Center of Good ti, Mayor R S. Scott Vandergrift QCIO Citv Manaeer Robert Frank STAFF REPORT TO: The Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Bobby Howell, MPA - Senior Planner ((� DATE: August 12, 2008 v RE: Hampton Inn Ocoee Large -Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan Project # LS-2007-017 Commissioners Gary Hood, District 1 Scott Anderson, District-2 Rusty Johnson, District 3 Joel F. Keller, District 4 ISSUE: Should the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Large -Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan for Hampton Inn Ocoee? BACKGROUND: The subject parcel is approximately 2.56 acres in size and is located on the south side of Westrun Road. The proposed Hampton Inn hotel is located on Lot 4 of the West 50 Commercial subdivision. This development will be the first development in the West 50 Commercial Subdivision, which was approved by the City Commission on May 15, 2007. The Large -Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan proposes the construction of a 4 story Hampton Inn hotel that is 61,489 square feet in area. The table below references the future land uses, zoning classifications and existing land uses of the surrounding parcels: Direction Future Land Use Zoning Classification Existing Land Use North Commercial C-3 (General vacant parcel in West 50 Commercial Commercial) Subdivision II East Commercial Orange County Twelve single-famity, residences Agricultural (A-1) outh Commercial C-3 (General Master retention pond for West 50 Commercial Commercial Subdivision West Commercial C-3 (Genere� vacant parcel in West 50 Commercial Commercial Subdivision DISCUSSION: The proposed hotel will have 101 rooms, with on -site amenities including a swimming pool. A Jwater fountain will serve as a focal point when entering the property. The plan has been designed in accordance with all applicable requirements of the Land Development Code, except for those the applicant Is seeking waivers from. August 12, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 When the West 50 Commercial Subdivision plans were presented to the City Commission for approval, the subdivision developer requested a waiver from the Land Development Code requirements for -architectural cohesiveness in a commercial subdivision. This would have required the developer to provide a master architectural theme for the subdivision at the time the construction plans were presented for approval. The developer contended that this requirement would preclude nationally recognized end users from locating in the subdivision since the majority have a recognizable architectural style. The City Commission did not approve the waiver request, and agreed that the first building that is constructed in the West 50 Commercial Subdivision will determine the master architectural theme of the subdivision. If a waiver is requested in the future by a property owner in the subdivision who contends they cannot design their building to be cohesive with the theme that has been set, the City Commission agreed to evaluate each requests on a case -by -case basis. WAIVER REQUESTS: n order to proceed with review of the Large -Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan, the applicant has requested three waivers from the requirements of the Land Development Code. The City Commission has sole discretion to approve waivers from Code requirements based upon four criteria: 1. If the project is part of an integrated and master planned development; 2. If the project is compatible with surrounding developments; 3. If the project imposes no impacts on City infrastructure greater than that generated by other uses normally permitted in the underlying zoning districts; and for, 4. If the project provides an offsetting public benefit which is technically sound and measurable. The applicant has justified all waiver requests by providing an upgraded architectural theme to the building that includes a stone veneer around the perimeter of the building. This upgrade is above and beyond the architectural requirements of the Land Development Code. The first waiver that is being requested is to Table 5-2 in Article V of the Land Development ACode. This section of the Land Development Code permits a maximum building height of 45- eet in the C-3 (General Commercial) zoning district. The applicant has requested a waiver too his requirement of the Land Development Code to permit a maximum height of 55-feet. The architectural elevations indicate a proposed maximum height of the building of 52.5-feet, with this height being on the main design feature on the front fagade of the building. /// Section 5-5 (A) of the Land Development Code permits a 10-percent height increase for / portions of buildings that are not habitable. The design feature in question exceeds the 10- v percent increase by 3-feet, thus the need for a height waiver. The elevations indicate the maximum height of the building where habitable space is 44-feet, 6-inches, which falls under the 45-foot maximum height requirement. This waiver request is only for the main design feature on the front fagade of the building. The second and third waivers that are requested are to Section B.10 B (4) (A), and Section 6.10 B (4) (D) of the Land Development Code. Section 6.10 B (4) (A) requires a 4:1 replacement ratio of all protected trees on a development site. Section 6.10 B (4) (D) of the Land Development Code requires 1) replacement trees to be planted on site, 2) the donation of replacement trees, or 3) a fee paid to the City for the purpose of planting trees on public property for protected trees that are removed from a development site. August 12, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 The applicant has proposed the removal of five Live Oak trees on site, which are considered - protected trees by the Land Development Code. Based on the provisions of the Land _ Development Code, -each protected tree over 8-inches diameter breast height (dbh) that is /proposed for removal is required to be replacedat a 4:1 ratio at the expense of the developer with a minimum size 2-inch dbh tree. According to staffs calculations, 20 trees with a minimum of 2-inches dbh would be required to be provided on site as replacement trees. This would require on1v 40 total inches of replacement dbh to be provided on site. One of the trees that the applicant is proposing to remove has a dbh of 30-inches, which is approximately 75-percent of the required total dbh that would be provided if the waiver is not granted. The applicant conveyed to staff early in the review process that this waiver was being requested since the required replacement trees could not adequately be provided on site. A total of 122 new trees are being provided on site in accordance with the landscape requirements of the Land Development Code. An examination of the landscape plan confirms that there appears to Is is recommending approval of all three wavier requests since the applicant has agreed to provide an upgraded architectural theme to the building that includes a stone veneer around the perimeter of the building. This improvement is above and beyond the architectural requirements of the Land Development Code. Since this building is the first building that is proposed for construction in the West 50 Commercial Subdivision, it will set the master architectural theme if the waiver requests are approved. The stone veneer that is proposed around the perimeter of the building is an easy and effective upgrade that has been undertaken by nationally recognized end users such as Texas Roadhouse, and is proposed by Hampton Inn which is one of the largest hotel chains in the United States. Based on this rationale, staff feels that future waiver requests to the established architectural theme of the West 50 Commercial Subdivision will be negated, and the West 50 Commercial Subdivision will become a model for high quality, upscale architecture in the City of Ocoee that will be emulated citywide if the three waivers are approved. Furthermore, staff is of the opinion that these waivers will provide an offsetting public benefit which is technically sound and measurable in the form of higher tax base that is collected on the Hampton Inn hotel, and any future buildings that are constructed in the West 50 Commercial Subdivision since these buildings will be appraised at higher values as are commercial buildings in upscale areas such as Dr. Phillips, and Winter Park that are designed with similar architectural upgrades. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on July 23, 2008 and reviewed the Large - Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan. The applicant was notified of outstanding concerns on the plans from the Planning Division, the Engineering Department, and the Legal Department. No additional concerns were addressed, and the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Large -Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan, and all three waiver requests, subject to the satisfaction of the outstanding concerns prior to the plans being presented to the City Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: JStaff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Large -Scale Preliminary/Final Site Plan for Hampton Inn Ocoee, and all three waiver requests subject to the satisfaction of the outstanding concerns prior to the plans being presented to the City Commission. August 12, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 Attachments Location Map Planning Division Comments — Engineering Department Comments Legal Department Comments Final Subdivision / Final She Plan for Hampton Inn Ocoee Architectural elevations, Hampton Inn Ocoee O1Staff Reports\2008\SR080043_BH_Hamptonlnn_LargeScaleFinalSitePlan_PBZ.doc Hampton Inn Location Map —........ Floridas Turnpike arms Tomyn I e h II Mayo S. Scott Vandergrift Citv Manaeer Robert Frank MEMORANDUM DATE: August 5,2008 TO: Sherry Seaver, Development Review Coordinator FROM: Bobby Howell,MPA- SeniorPlannerM SUBJ: Hampton Inn — Preliminary/Final Site Plan, 0 review LS-2007-017 Commissioners Gary Hood, District 1 Scott Anderson, District 2 Rusty Johnson, District-3 Joel F. Keller, District 4 The Planning Division recommends approval of the above referenced plan submittal subject to the satisfaction of the following comments. These comments should be satisfied prior to this item being scheduled for presentation to the City Commission. 1. (Repeat Comment — 6/18108) Please remove Sheet C-2,.the Boundary Survey from the plan set which is not an accurate description of the property. The survey provided on Sheet C-2A is an accurate description of the property and should be the only survey provided in the plan set. Mavor ,S+oe Center of Good_Li��d� Commissioners S. Scott Vandergrift—=K=-"_ \a Gary Hood, District 1 � i+ Scott Anderson, District 2 City Manager �`.'a Rusty Johnson, District 3 Robert Frank Joel F. Keller, District 4 Hampton Inn — LS-2007-017 Large Scale Site Plan-3rd Staff Review Engineering Department Comments June 27,2008 The following are the results of your third submittal for the above referenced project. If you have any questions pertaining to the requested information, please contact our office. 1:6. Resolved (Repeat Comment) Please revise plans to rename the Erosion Control Plan to the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Check to ensure the following items are included on the SWPPP. Relocate all notes from within the plan set referencing erosion control onto this sheet. Remove the erosion control notes from the General Notes Sheet. 1. Site Area Disturbed: (acres) 2. Site Location: Section, Township, and Range 3. Location: Address. Site Plan 1. Drainage Patterns (flow lines) 2. Slopes 3. Area Disturbed/ Areas Not Disturbed 4. Location and Details of BMPS (Structural controls such as (but not limited to) silt fences or turbidity barriers, non-structural controls such as (but not limited to) alum systems or polyacrylamide. 5. Location of wetlands and surface waters. 6. Location (latitude and Longitude) of outfall(s) to surface water. 7. BMP detail drawings. 8. Description of construction activities. 9. Construction Sequence. 10. Soil Types. 11. Dewatering Methods and Locations. 12. BMP's : Description. 13. Permanent Stabilization: Description. 14. Permanent Stormwater Management Control: Description. 15. Potential Pollutants During Construction. City of`0 a •I50 NLWhm Dnw-0m ,Ronda34761 Phone (407) 905-3100 - F.x: (407) 656-8504 • . Hampton hm June 27, 2008 Page 2 of 2 16. Inspections: Construction site will be inspected for erosion problems daily and after each rainfall greater than 0.5 inches. A rain gauge will be on site to — -measure the rainfall amounts. 8:28. Resolved 29. (Repeat Comment) Please contact the City of Ocoee Engineering Department to have the latest City Utility Details entailed to be included on the plans. The "Restrained Pipe Table" needs to be filed out by the engineer of record. 30. (Repeat Comment) Show all utilities to include water and fire on the landscape plans to insure that no trees are planted within 10' of any pipes. The landscape plans now show the old water layout and must be revised to indicate latest design. Fire Department Comments Resolved The Following are comments generated from the February 8, 2008 second submittal. (Repeat Comment) Add a FDC for the building to be located in the front portion of the site and located within 50' of a fire hydrant. Move the FDC to the same island as the fire hydrant. The fire hydrant which was located in the rear of the building with the last submittal must be placed back on the plans to provide access to rear of the building. 2: 5. Resolved Engineering Department Ryan Howard, P.E. Engineer II NICK PALMER. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY (407) 244-7133 The following comments were included in the City Attorney's prior memorandum, however, they were not fully addressed as part of the Applicant's current submittal. The following comments may also relate to prior comments provided by other City Departments that were not fully addressed as part of the Applicant's current submittal. 1. [Repeat Comment] Please provide a Title Opinion or Title Certification (the "Title Report") showing the record title holder of the property with your next submittal. Please note that the Title Report must also show all mortgages not satisfied or released of record nor otherwise terminated by law. The Title Report must be less than six months old and certified or addressed to the City of Ocoee. Please include copies of all documents referenced in the Title Report. Please be advised that the City Attorney has not received a copy of the Title Report. 2. [Revised Comment] Pursuant to discussions at the December 11, 2007 TSRC meeting, the Applicant agreed to depict and label on the Plan the existing Temporary Construction Easements encumbering and benefiting the property, per the Agreement recorded June 29, 2007 in Official Records Book 9328, Page 4269, Public Records of Orange County, Florida. Please revise the Plan to depict and label, by reference to the above -noted recordina information. these Temoorary Construction Easements. We note that the Temporary Construction Easements have been depicted on the Plan, however, above - noted Official Record Book & Page references have not been added. Please revise the labels for each Temporary Construction Easement to reference Official Records Book 9328, Page 4269. 3. [Revised Comment] Please revise COA # 28 on sheet C-3A to insert the phrase "that certain real property located south of the project site and described as Tract A of between "on" and "West" in line 3. III. Comments in Resoonse to Current Submittal The following comments are based on changes since the Applicant's priorsubmittal(s) or relate to new information or documents that have been provided since the Applicant's prior submittal(s). 4. Please find attached a draft Easement Encroachment Agreement that addresses the placement of the proposed dumpster, storage shed and other improvements within the existing drainage easement area located near the eastern boundary of the subject property. Please note that the attached draft was prepared at the direction of City Staff for discussion purposes with the Association and is subject to review and approval by City Staff. In addition, please note that all mortgage holders, if any, will be required to execute a Joinder and Consent to this agreement. FOLEY $ NLLP DRAFT fJuly 14, 2008)LARDER THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: Dorothy E. Watson, Esq. FOLEY & LARDNER 111 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1800 Post Office Box 2193 Orlando, FL 32802-2193 (407)423-7656 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: For Recording Purposes Only Engineering Department CITY OF OCOEE 150 N. Lakeshore Drive Ocoee, Florida 34761 EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2008 by and among KAPS HOSPITALITY LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 6601 South Magnolia Avenue, Ocala, Florida 34476 (the "Owner"), the WEST 50 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, whose address is 1411 Edgewater Drive, Suite 101, Orlando, Florida, 32804 (the "Association"), and the CITY OF OCOEE, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida 34761 (the "City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner owns fee simple title to certain real property lying and being situate in Orange County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Hampton Inn Property"); and WHEREAS, the Hampton Ian Property is located within a commercial subdivision known as "West 50 Commercial Subdivision," as shown on the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 70, Page 84, Public Records of Orange County, Florida (the "West 50 Plat"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the West 50 Plat, the Hampton Inn Property is subject to a 20' wide drainage and access easement in favor of the City and the Association (the "Easement"), which is located over, upon, under and across a portion of Hampton Inn Property, which area is more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Easement Area"); and WHEREAS, contemporaneous with the execution of this Agreement, the City Commission of the City has approved that certain Preliminary/Fittal Site Plan for Hampton Inn ORIA_1055531.2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 20081 Ocoee, as prepared by Sycamore Engineering, Inc. and date stamped as received by the City.on — - . with such additional revisions thereto as may be reflected in the minutes of said City Commission meeting (the "Site Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Site Plan includes the design, engineering and construction details for the placement of a dumpstey storage shed and certain other improvements (collectively, the "Improvements") within the Easement Area; and WHEREAS, the City and the Association are willing to permit the Owner to place the Improvements within the Easement Area, subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants stated herein and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Develooment in Accordance with the Site Plan. The Owner hereby agrees that the Hampton Inn Property shall be developed in accordance with the Site Plan and all permits and approvals issued by the City and other governmental entities; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not preclude the Owner, its successors or assigns from seeking modifications to the portion of the Site Plan relating to the Easement Area. Any future modification to the portion of the Site Plan relating to the Easement Area shall be reviewed by the City in its capacity both as a governmental agency and as the holder of an easement affected by the requested modification. In its capacity an easement holder, the parties hereto agree that the City may, in its sole and absolute discretion, accept or reject any such proposed modification. SECTION 3. Permission for Placement of Imorovements. The City and the Association hereby give the Owner permission to place the Improvements within the Easement Area in accordance with the Site Plan. This permission does not restrict, diminish, or eliminate any rights of the City or the Association with respect to the Easement, including the rights to access, inspect, maintain, operate, construct and/or reconstruct any existing or future drainage improvements located within the Easement Area. SECTION 4. Relocation of Imorovements ORIA_1086531.2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 20081 (a) The Owner, at the Owner's sole cost and expense, shall immediately ' - remove any or all of the Improvements from the Easement Area in the event the Association or the City, including their agents or assigns, directs the Owner to remove such Improvements in order to access, inspect, maintain, operate, construct and/or reconstruct any existing or future drainage improvements located within the Easement Area. (b) The Association and/or the City, including their agents or assigns, may move any improvements within the Easement Area or remove any improvements from the Easement Area in order to access, inspect, maintain, operate, construct and/or reconstruct any existing or future. drainage improvements located within the Easement Area without notice to the Owner. SECTION 5. Reimbursement of Expenses. If the Association and/or the City, or their agents or assigns, relocates or removes any of the Improvements pursuant to Section 4(b) above, then the Owner shall, within thirty (30) days, reimburse the Association, the City, or their assigns, as applicable, for any and all costs and expenses incurred in relocating or removing such Improvements. SECTION 6. Indemniri. The Owner agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and the Association, and their respective officials, agents, employees and assigns from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, proceedings, causes of action, losses, damages, injuries, liabilities, costs, charges or expenses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' and paralegals' fees and costs (whether incurred before, during or after trial, or any appellate level), arising from or in any way related to the Agreement or the Owner's placement of the Improvements within the Easement Area. SECTION 7. Covenant Runnine with the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Hampton Inn Property, and shall inure to and be for the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns and any person, firm, corporation, or entity who may become the successor -in -interest to the Hampton hm Property or any portion thereof subject to the Easement. SECTION 8. Attornevs' Fees. In the event that any party hereto finds it necessary to commence an action against one or both of the other parties to enforce any provision of this Agreement or because of a breach of any terms hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party(ies) its reasonable attorneys' fees, paralegals' fees and costs incurred in connection therewith, at both trial and appellate levels, including bankruptcy proceedings, without regard to whether any legal proceedings are commenced or whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. SECTION 9. Amendments. No amendment, modification or other change in this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties unless in writing an executed by all the parties hereto. ORI 1088531.2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT rJuly 14, 20081 SECTION 10. Specific Performance. Both the City and the Association shall _ have the right to -enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement by an action for specific performance. SECTION 11. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the provisions contained herein shall be construed, controlled and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Florida, with venue in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida SECTION 12. Time is of the Essence. Time is hereby declared of the essence to the lawful performance of the duties and obligations contained in this Agreement. SECTION 13. Further Documentation. The parties agree that at any time following a request therefore by another party, each shall execute and deliver to the other party such further documents and instruments, in form and substance reasonably necessary to confirm and/or effectuate the obligations of each of the parties hereunder. SECTION 14. Captions. Captions of the Sections and Subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and -reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of the Agreement. SECTION 15. Severability. If any word, sentence, phrase, paragraph, provision, or portion of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereof so long as the purpose and intent of this Agreement can still be achieved. SECTION 16. Effective Date. This Agreement shall first be executed by the Owner and the Association and submitted to the City for approval by the Ocoee City Commission. Upon approval by the Ocoee City Commission, this Agreement shall be executed by the City. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date of execution by the City. SECTION 17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. SECTION 18. Recordation of Agreement. The parties hereto agree that an executed original of this Agreement shall be recorded by the City, at the Owner's expense, in the Public Records of Orange County, Florida (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK7 ORLA_1a865312 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 20081 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner, the Association and the City have caused this _ instrument to be executed by their duly authorized elected officials, partners, and/or officers as of the day and year fast above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in OWNER: the presence of: KAPS HOSPITALITY LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: Print Name: Print Name: Title: Print Name: STATE OF COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared as of KAPS HOSPITALITY LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and that s/he acknowledged executing the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily under authority duly vested in him by said company. S/he [ ] is personally known to me, or [ ] produced as identification. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this _ day of 2008. Signature of Notary Name of Notary (Typed, Printed or Stamped) Commission Number (if not legible on Beall My Commission Expires (if not legible on seal) ORLk 1086531.2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 20081 Signed, sealed and delivered in ASSOCIATION: the presence of WEST 50 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit M Print Name: Print Name: Title: Print Name: STATE OF COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared . as of WEST 50 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, and that s/he acknowledged executing the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily under authority duly vested in him by said corporation. S/he [ ] is personally known to me, or [ ] produced as identification. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this _ day of , 2008. Signature of Notary Name of Notary (Typed, printed or stamped) Commission Number (if not legible on sear My Commission Expires (if not legible on seal) ORLA_10865311 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Print Name: Print Name: FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY THIS DAY OF , 2008 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP City Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 20081 CITY: CITY OF OCOEE, a Florida municipal corporation Attest: S. Scott Vandergrift, Mayor Beth Eikenberry, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE OCOEE CITY COMMISSION AT A MEETING HELD ON 2008 UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to make acknowledgments, personally appeared SCOTT VANDERGRIFT and BETH EIKENBERRY, respectively, of the City of Ocoee, a Florida municipal corporation, and that they severally acknowledged executing the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily under authority duly vested in them by said municipality. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of .2008. Signature of Notary Name of Notary (Typed, Printed or stamped) Commission Number (if not legible on seal) My Commission Expires (if not legible on seall ORIA_1086531 2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 2008] JOINDER AND CONSENT TO AGREEMENT BY hereby joins in and consents to this Drainage Easement Access Agreement on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns as a contract purchaser and developer of a portion of the Heavener Subdivision and agrees that the provisions of this Drainage Easement Access Agreement are binding on its, its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has executed this Joinder and Consent as of the day of Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of Print Name: Print Name: Print Name: [CORPORATE SEAL] 0RIA_1086531.2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT [July 14, 20081 EXHIBIT "A" (The "Hampton Ina Pronerty"1 Lot 4 of West 50 Commercial Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 70, Page 84, Public Records of Orange County, Florida. ORL-,1088531.2 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DRAFT fJLily 14, 20081 EXHIBIT "B" - (The "Easement Area"I 10 ORLA_1D66531.2 ITEM NUMBER IV. B. PUBLIC HEARING Eagle Creek PUD Rezoning PUD Land Use Plan r oter�of Good Lrr/n Mayor 8 S. Scott Vandergrift �CDE City Manager Robert Frank STAFF REPORT TO: The Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Bobby Howell, MPA - Senior Planner tp DATE: August12,2008 RE: Eagle Creek of Ocoee PUD Rezoning / Land Use Plan Project # RZ-06-08-05 Commissioners Gary Hood, District 1 — Scott Anderson, District 2 Rusty Johnson, District 3 Joel F. Keller, District 4 ISSUE: Should the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the PUD Rezoning / Land Use Plan for Eagle Creek of Ocoee? BACKGROUND: he subject property is located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Ocoee -Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road. It is approximately 97.90 acres in size, and is currently vacant except for several abandoned agricultural structures. The property was annexed into the City in 1999 with an Annexation Agreement, and rezoned to R-1AA (Single -Family Dwelling). The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from R-1AA to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of developing a residential community that combines townhomes and single- family detached homes in a Traditional Neighborhood Design that cannot be accomplished via the requirements of the Land Development Code. The table below references the future land uses, zoning classifications and existing land uses of the surrounding parcels: Direction Future Land Use - Zoni y, Classification Existiv Land Use North Commercial, Low PU ommercial, Vacant land, Glad Tidings Church Density Residential Single -Family Dwelling R-1A) grange East Low Density Residential, County Citrus Scattered areas of Single -Family Conservation/Floodgqlains Rural dwellings and wetland areas South Conservationffloodplains Single -Family Dwelling Wetland area that is the site of a future (R-1AAl, City park West Low Density Residential Orange County Crown Pointe Woods residential Residential subdivision Augustl2,2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Land Use Plan proposes access to the development at 3 points. One full access point will be provided along Ocoee -Apopka Road. This access point will lead into a boulevard style entranceway that will terminate at a roundabout which will provide access into the single-family detached portion of the development. A fountain is proposed to be provided in the planter provided in the boulevard. The developer has proposed a 240-foot long left turn lane with a 50- foot taper southbound on Ocoee -Apopka Road to lead into this portion of the development. Two additional access points are proposed along Fullers Cross Road. A full access is proposed approximately 700-feet east of the intersection of Fullers Cross Road and Ocoee -Apopka Road. This access point will lead into a boulevard style entranceway that will terminate at a dundabout which will provide access into the townhome portion of the development. This riveway lines up with the shared access drive leading into the Glad Tidings Church and the City owned property on the north side of Fullers Cross Road. The developer has proposed a 185-foot long left turn lane with a 50-foot taper westbound on Fullers Cross Road to lead into the full access point. The second access point on Fullers Cross Road that is proposed is a right-in/right-out approximately 450-feet east of the full access point. This access point will also lead into the townhome portion of the development, and will continue south into the single-family detached portion of the development. Additionally, the developer has proposed an off -site 205-foot right turn lane with a 50-foot taper leading from Fullers Cross Road to Lakewood Avenue. The developer has proposed an interior roadway network that will be comprised of roundabouts and a boulevard style roadway in the center of the site. The townhome units in addition to many of the lots in the single-family detached portions of the development are proposed to be accessed via alleyways. /fhe Land Use Plan proposes 245 total units on 66.19 acres of the property for a net density of \// 2.5 units per acre, which is lower than what is permissible under the current zoning and future land use designations. Of the 245 total units, 80 are proposed for townhomes, and 165 are proposed for single-family detached units. The development is proposed to be developed in up to 4 phases. /The townhome units are proposed to have an average square footage of 2,600 square feet, and be two story units. Parking in the townhome area will be provided in garages in each unit and in (// surface lots. The townhome units are proposed to be alley loaded to achieve a neo-traditional design as is seen in communities such as Baldwin Park and Celebration, A minimum of a 5-foot front yard setback and a 20-foot rear yard setback abutting the alleyway are proposed. The Land Use Plan proposes 4 different types of lot styles for the single-family detached units that TgI Jude: Estate, Manor, Village, and Cottage. elve of the 165 single-family detached units are proposed to be Estate lots. The Land Use Plan proposes a minimum lot size of 11,760 square feet for this lot type, with a minimum living area of 3,600 square feet. The Estate lots are proposed along the eastern portion of the development, with the rear of each lot abutting a proposed open space area and trail system. A minimum of a 20-foot front yard setback, 7.5-foot side yard setback, and a 20-foot rear yard setback are proposed for this lot type. August 12, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 Twenty-seven of the 165 single-family detached units are proposed to be Manor lots. The Land Use Plan proposes a minimum lot size of 11,600 square feet for this lot type, with a minimum living area of 3,000 square feet. The Manor lots are proposed along the eastern and southern portions of the development. A minimum of a 20-foot front yard setback, 7.5-foot side yard setback, and a 20-foot rear yard setback are proposed for this lot type. Thirty-one of the 165 single-family detached units are proposed to be Village lots. The Land Use Plan proposes a minimum lot size of 8,700 square feet for this lot type, with a minimum living area of 2,500 square feet. This lot type will be primarily concentrated in the central portion of the development. Many of the units provided in this lot type are proposed to be alley load oriented, with detached garages to achieve a neo-traditional design. A minimum of a 15-foot front yard setback, 5-foot side yard setback, and 20-foot rear setback are proposed. Ninety-five of the 165 single-family detached units are proposed to be Cottage lots. The Land se Plan proposes a minimum lot size of 5,200 square feet, with a minimum living area of 1,845 square feet. Like the Village lot type, the Cottage lot type will be primarily concentrated in the central portion of the development. Many of the units provided in this lot type are proposed to be alley load oriented, with a minimum of a 5-foot front yard setback proposed. A minimum of a 5- foot side yard setback and 20-foot rear setback are proposed. The developer has proposed on -site amenities that will be constructed during various phases of development. The main on -site amenity that will be constructed is a clubhouse and community pool. This is proposed to be constructed in the central portion of the development concurrent with the first phase of construction. In addition to the clubhouse, a tot lot will be constructed ✓adjacent to the clubhouse. A gazebo is proposed for construction in the park area of the townhome portion of the development. At the southern edge of the property adjacent to the south end of the stormwater pond, a fishing dock is proposed for construction. A jogging trail is proposed that will wind through the conservation/open space area that will be provided along the eastern portion of the property. Of the 97,90 total acres, approximately 31.71 acres are planned to be reserved for either open space or park area. The additional roadway improvements are necessary beyond those proposed by the developer in order to satisfy State mandated traffic concurrency requirements. The surrounding roadway networks are over capacity, and as a result the development has been determined not to be concurrent. The additional traffic mitigation roadway improvements identified by the developer Include two turn lanes on Ocoee -Apopka Road that include a southbound left turn lane leading east onto Fullers Cross Road, and a northbound right turn lane leading east onto Fullers Cross Road. These turn lane have been estimated to cost $225,000. In addition to the necessary turn lanes, staff believes that the right turn lane at Lakewood Avenue is unnecessary. According to the developer, this improvement is estimated to cost $75,000. Since the developer has agreed to dedicate 20-feet of additional right-of-way beyond what is required per the existing 1999 Annexation Agreement, a $50,000 traffic mitigation credit has been proposed by staff_ Based on this, it is staffs opinion that the $250,000 traffic concurrency mitigation contribution will help pay for the intersection improvements that will be necessary as a result of the impacts generated by the proposed development at Ocoee -Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road. August 12, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 Staff has estimated the cost of the total required upgrades to the intersection at $500,000. The -- proposed upgrades will include left turn lanes on all four legs of the intersection and a traffic ' signal upgrade. if -Eagle Creek does not commence construction within 3 years of the effective date of the Development Agreement, the developer will be required to make a cash contribution o the City in the amount of $250,000 to allow the City to undertake the required improvements. If the project commences construction within 3 years of the effective date of the Development Agreement, said improvements must be constructed by the developer. The City will contribute up to $250,000 in transportation impact fee credits to the upgrades. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on June 11, 2008 and reviewed the PUD Land Use Plan/Rezoning request. The applicant was notified of several outstanding items on the PUD Land Use Plan that needed to be resolved prior to the item being scheduled for City Commission, The Public Works Department indicated that City garbage trucks will need two- way access in the proposed alleyways for safety purposes. The Legal Department indicated that a Sewer Refunding Agreement is necessary since no sewer service can currently be provided to the property. The Legal Department recommended that a Condition of Approval be added to the Development Agreement that requires this agreement be in place prior to the approval of a Preliminary/Final Subdivision Plan. The Planning Department requested removal of the neighborhood access gate leading south into the proposed City Park since the neighborhood streets will be public. Additionally, it was conveyed to the applicant that right-of-way comer clips should be added to the Land Use Plan at the intersection of Fullers Cross Road, and Oooee-Apopka Road, and at the intersection of the proposed access point along Ocoee -Apopka Road and Ocoee -Apopka Road. The Planning Department indicated that the Development Agreement should reflect these right-of- way dedications. The Planning Department recommended a minimum of a 10-15-foot front yard setback for all lot styles in the development, and requested an additional meeting with the developer to discuss the outstanding issues related to the project and the Development Agreement prior to the project being presented to the City Commission. No additional concerns were addressed, and the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PUD Rezoning / Land Use Plan for Eagle Creek of Ocoee subject to the above requested changes and any requested changes per the requested follow-up meeting being incorporated into the PUD Land Use Plan and/or Development Agreement prior to the item being presented to the City Commission for approval. SyAFF RECOMMENDATION: .\-/ S/tall recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the PUD Rezoning / Land Use Plan for Eagle Creek of Ocoee subject to the satisfaction of the outstanding staff comments, and any changes that were requested in the follow-up meeting to the DRC meeting being incorporated into the PUD Land Use Plan and/or the Development Agreement prior to City Commission action. August 12, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 Attachments: Location Map Surrounding Future Land Use Map Surrounding Zoning Map Planning Department comments Renaissance Planning Group comments Legal Department comments Eagle Creek of Ocoee PUD Land Use Plan O:\Staff Reports\2008\SR080042_BH_EagleCreekRZ_2_PBZ.doc Eagle Creek Location Map Clarmna Ocoee _.2nd 3rd V m L 41h G 7T 5th Sin 7] L= 'Oth Northern Durengo �i 11th m Fort Collins C 12th - SI a m Llttle Action o - 3 13th New Meadows s Worst ��-' 1�115th Little Rock Little Iris 6th _ SWin9tool + Cedar Point Laurel Ridge K — U Anderson o m m LAKE ldOXIE Burnt Tree �_,..--Aobile--.. . _-- Security ri Eagle Creek Surrounding Zoning Map OCOE o�oee commenn� oe.uopmem uepanmcm 1 InO NuWs 1,000 feet M0170 0 w w 1.020 FM Pnnted: June 2008 QSubject Property Unincorporated Territory ® and Other Municipalties Zoning Classification. General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban(A-2) Single-Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA) ' Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices & Services (P-S) Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) ! Community Commercial (C-2) General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (1-1) General Industrial (1-2) d Commercial (PUD) a Low Density (PUD) Medium Density (PUD) i!,I High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) Unclassified Lakes and Water Bodies City of Ocoee Florida Mayor S. Scott Vaadergdit Commissioners Crary Hood District 1 Scott Anderson Distort 2 RustyJohnson District 3 Joel F. Keller Dmuict 4 City Manager Robert D. Frank ti [�y�6COEE _ MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7,2008 TO: Sherry Seaver, Development Review Coordinator FROM: Bobby Howell, Senior Planner SUBJ: Eagle Creek of Ocoee — 4" Staff Review Rezoning The Planning Division recommends approval of the PUD land use plan contingent upon satisfaction of the outstanding items. Please note these items should be clarified prior to this item being scheduled for City Commission. 1. Please ensure the comment from the Public Works Director at the June 11 DRC meeting regarding garbage trucks needing 2-way access in the alleyways is shown on the plans. 2. Please show all required intersection/roadway improvements that were negotiated at the July 2 meeting on the plans and on the improvement table on Sheet 8. City of Ocoee • 150 N Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761 phone: (407) 905-3100 • fix (407) 656-8504 • m .ci.ocoee.flos RENAISSANCE PLANNING GROUP 100 East Pine Street, Ste 401 Orlando, Florida 32801 • phone: 407-487-0061 . fax: 407-487-0058 April 23, 2008 Mr. Russ Wagner, AICP Community Development Director City of Ocoee 150 North Lakeshore Drive Ocoee, FL 34761 Subject: Eagle Creek of Ocoee - 3" Site Plan and Traffic Study Review Ocoee Project No - RZ-06-0805 Dear Mr. Wagner: At your request, Renaissance Planning Group has reviewed the referenced site plan and traffic study dated received March 24', 2008 regarding concurrency and traffic operations. At this time, we offer the following comments: • The volume identified on Clarcona - Ocoee Road in Table 1 - Roadway parameters and Existing Level of Services is actually the vested traffic, please revise the table and analysis to reflect a 2007 traffic count of 9,335 with 8,214 vested trips on Clarcona-Ocoee Road. • The maps need to be revised to label the streets to reflect the CMS database. Clarcona-Ocoee Road does not extend north of SR 429, that road is West Road. • Table 4 needs to be revised to account for the correct background traffic on Clarcona-Ocoee Road as identified in comment 1. • Based on the numbers provided a right -turn lane at entrance 1 will be required. The FDOT driveway handbook states under the note that the over 45 mph thresholds may be used if the road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and speeds are known to be over 45 mph on Ocoee - Apopka Road. • The study conclusions states the level of service impacts on Ocoee- Apopka Road and the intersections are based on background traffic, however they are needed for this project to meet level of service standards. Please revise the conclusion to include a list of required on site and off site improvements necessary to meet concurrency. Nick Lepp, AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Renaissance Planning Croup \\SnapI\sharcI\Projects\OcoeeUtevie sTagle Creek\Sprev2.doc w wwx i tiestn a tw ork xom :FOLEY FOLEY & LARDNER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW MEMORANDUM CLIENT-MPTTER NUMBER =03]r-0r94 TO: Sherry Seaver, Development Review Coordinator FROM: Nicholas N. Palmer, Assistant City Attorney DATE: May 5, 2008 RE: Eagle Creek of Ocoee Rezoning Project No. RZ-06-08-05 (Third Review) In connection with the above -referenced project, we have reviewed the following documents: 1. Letter of Transmittal from Land Design Innovations dated March 19, 2008 and stamped received by the City of Ocoee on March 20, 2008; 2. Applicant's Response Packet to prior City Comments (the "Response Letter"); and 3. P.U.D. Land Use Plan for Eagle Creek of Ocoee, stamped received by the City of Ocoee on March 20, 2008 (the "Plan"). The memorandum supersedes our previous memoranda dated November 13, 2006 and June 18, 2007. Based upon our review of the documents noted above and pursuant to the Land Development Code, we have the following comments: I. Comments Directed to Citv Staff The following comments are addressed to and/or request direction from City Staff and unless otherwise noted, do not require any response from the Applicant. These comments should be discussed as TSRC so that the Applicant and City Attorney are fully advised regarding City Staffs direction. 1. City Staff should note that a blackline markup showing the Applicant's proposed changes to the Conditions of Approval is attached hereto for review. City Staff should review and advise whether the proposed changes are acceptable. In connection with such ORLA_937434.1 :FOLEY FOLEY d L>RONER LV review, City Staff should note the changes that we requested pursuant to Comment No. 5 below. City Staff should specifically address COA Nos. 5-11, 16, 19, 47, 52, 53, and 57. 2. City Staff should advise as to the Applicant's required transportation fair - share contribution and whether any off -site transportation improvements will be required in connection with the development of the project. Please note that the Applicant's fair -share contribution and other requirements related to transportation improvements will need to be reflected in the final Development Agreement. Specifically, City Staff should note that the Response Letter indicates that the Applicant intends to: (i) construct the transportation improvements described on Sheet 6 of the Plan, and (ii) and provide a fair -share contribution in the amount of $5,429.00. City Staff should evaluate and advise whether this is acceptable. 3. City Staff should advise the City Attorney as to the specific method by which the Applicant will be required to provide sewer service to the Project and any other requirements related the sanitary sewer system that will serve the Project. City Staff should note that the Response Letter indicates that the Applicant conceptually agrees to entering into a Sewer Refunding Agreement, per Section 173-20 of the City Code. City Staff should specifically address whether such an agreement would be acceptable. Please note that any requirements related to the sanitary sewer system for the project may need to be reflected in the final development agreement. 4. City Staff should note that the Response Letter indicates the proposed trails may be located in a SJRWNID Conservation Easement. The boundaries of and permitted uses in the conservation area, however, may not be determined until the Final Subdivision Plan for the Project is submitted. City Staff should evaluate and advise whether any specific requirements related to the proposed trails should be incorporated into the Plan and Development Agreement at this time. II. Reueat Comments The following comments were included in the City Attorney's prior memoranda regarding the Plan, however, they were not fully addressed as part of the Applicant's current submittal. The following comments may also relate to prior comments provided by other City Departments that were not fully addressed as part of the Applicant's current submittal. None. M. New Comments in Response to Current Submittal The following comments are based on changes made to the Plan since the Applicant's first submittal or relate to new information or documents that have been provided since Applicant's prior submittal. 5. Please revise the School Concurrency Note Chart on Sheet 8 of the Plan to clarify that the "Allowable Density for Proposed Zoning" of 3.0 du/acre is based on the ORLA_937434.1 VOLEY FOLEY G LMNEP LLY property's existing R-IAA zoning classification, and not the proposed PUD zoning for the property. follows: phases. 6. Please revise the Conditions of Approval on all applicable documents as a. Revise COA No. 1 to reflect that the project will be developed in four (4) b. Revise COA No. 13 to add the following: "The Owner or its successor shall be required to disconnect any such well when reclaimed water becomes available. The foregoing requirement shall be incorporated into all applicable Declaration(s) for the project." Revise COA No. 52 to add the following: "Provision requiring a 6' vinyl privacy fence on all three (3) sides of any lot with an accessory structure." d. Revise COA No. 57 to replace the words "Final Site Plan" with the words "Final Subdivision Plan" 7. Revise COA No. 57 to add the following: "The Remediation Plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City. No Certificate of Completion shall be issued for Phase 1 of the project, or any portion thereof, until such time that all remediation required pursuant to the approved Remediation Plan is completed by the Developer and approved by the City." Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. cc: Paul E. Rosenthal, City Attorney ORIA_937434.1 ITEM NUMBER IV. C. PUBLIC HEARING 14t" Amendment to City of Ocoee/Orange County Joint Planning Area Agreement Mayor S. Scott Vandergrift City Manager Robert Frank �,oeCenter of Goode d' OCDE STAFF REPORT DATE: August 04, 2008 TO: The Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Michael Rumer, Principal Planner %j%%l, SUBJECT: 14' Amendment to Ocoee -Orange County Joint Planning Area Agreement ISSUE: Commissioners Gary Hood, District 1 Scott Anderson, District 2 Rusty Johnson, District 3 Joel F. Keller, District 4- Should the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend changes to the Joint Planning Area (JPA) Boundary and JPA Land Use Map? BACKGROUND: The area proposed to be added to the JPA encompasses the neighborhood known as the ,Rose Hill subdivision. The area was located within the JPA prior to 1999 and was subsequently removed from the JPA by the Third Amendment that was approved in 1999. The general area is characterized as an older established residential neighborhood bordered by the West Oaks Mall on the west, Good Homes Plaza on the south, and the Orange County Solid Waste Transfer Station on the northeast boundaries. The area is accessed by an entrance on Good homes Road and another on White Road. The Rose Hill subdivision is comprised of three phases, each with its own independent Home ,Owners Association (HOA) and elected Board of Directors. The Phase 3 HOA President and Vice President met with the City Manager and staff back in 2007 to explore the option for annexing into the Ocoee city limits. Subsequently, a community meeting to discuss annexation was held on Thursday, November 8, 2007 at the Ocoee Oaks United Methodist Church. The Mayor, City Manager and Chief of Police attended the meeting and answered questions from residents. DISCUSSION: The proposed changes are three fold. First, the area of Rose Hill that includes Phases 1-3 are proposed to be added to the JPA (see attached map). Second, the JPA Future Land Use Map will be revised to provide the designation of "Low Density Residential' (LDR) to the additional lands. Lastly, changes to the text of the JPA Agreement (see Draft Fourteenth Amendment to joint Planning Area Agreement) are proposed. The changes to the agreement revise language dealing with annexations, infrastructure, and enclaves. City of Ocoee • 150 N Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761 phone: (407)905-3100• flex: (407) 656-8504 -w .ci.ocoee.n.us 44/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the proposed 14v' Amendment to the Joint Planning Area Agreement between City of Ocoee and Orange County providing for amendments to the JPA Boundary by adding in the area known as Rose Hill phases 1-3 and amending the JPA Land Use Map. Attachments: Joint planning Area Boundary Map Future Land Use Map Aerial Draft 14`" Amendment to Joint Planning Area Agreement Between Orange County and the City of Ocoee Page 2 of 2 • FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO JOINT PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF OCOEE THIS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO JOINT PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT (this .Amendment.) is made and entered into as of the day of 2008, by and between ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the County.) and the CITY OF OCOEE, a Florida municipal corporation (the City.). RECITALS WHEREAS, the County and the City have entered into a certain Joint Planning Area Agreement, dated February 11, 1994 as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated August 4, • 1998, as amended by the Second Amendment thereto dated January 19, 1999 as amended by the Third Amendment thereto dated November 2, 1999, as amended by the Fourth Amendment hereto dated November 14, 2000, as amended by the Fifth Amendment thereto dated May 6, 2003, as amended by the Sixth Amendment thereto dated July 15, 2003, as amended by the Seventh through Tenth Amendments thereto dated February 10, 2004, as amended by the Eleventh Amendment thereto dated April 6, 2004, as amended by the Twelfth Amendment thereto dated August 3, 2004, as amended by the Thirteenth Amendment thereto dated November 29, 2005, and as amended by that certain First Amendment to Joint Planning Area Land Use Map, dated August 4, 1988 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Joint Planning Area Agreement.); and WHEREAS, both the County and the City exercise comprehensive planning authority pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land 010 Development Regulation Act, and enforce land development regulations to regulate the development • of land within the respective areas ofjurisdiction of each party; and WHEREAS, the provisions of the Joint Planning Area Agreement set forth certain procedures for amending the future land use designations shown on the Joint Planning Area Land Use Map (hereinafter the JPA Land Use Map.); and WHEREAS, the County and City desire to amend the Joint Planning Area Agreement to add lands within unincorporated Orange County to the Joint Planning Area within which the City may annex lands and to establish the future land uses with respect to those lands; and WHEREAS, the County and the City have the authority to enter into this Amendment pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act in general and Section 163.3171, Florida Statutes, in particular; and WHEREAS, the City has notified the County of the Proposed Map Amendment pursuant to • the provisions of Section 8C of the Joint Planning Area Agreement and requested that the County amend the JPA Land Use Map as it relates to the Affected Parcels; and WHEREAS, the County has advised the City that it desires that separate public hearings he held with respect to this Amendment; and WHEREAS, the local planning agencies of both the County and the City have considered this Amendment and made recommendations to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners and the Ocoee City Commission, respectively; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3171(3), Florida Statutes, this Amendment has been approved at advertised public hearings held by both the Orange County Board of County Commissioners and the Ocoee City Commission. 020 0 • NOW THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe covenants made by each party to the other and of the mutual advantages to be realized by the parties hereto, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the County and the City hereby agree as follows: Section 1, Recitals. The above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. Section 2, Authority This Amendment is entered into pursuant to (1) Chapters 125, 163 and 166, Florida Statutes, (2) the general authority of Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, relating to interlocal agreements, (3) the Charters of the County and City, and (4) the Joint Planning Area Agreement. Section 3. Definitions. All terms and phrases used in this Amendment shall be as defined in the Joint Planning Area Agreement unless otherwise indicated. • Section4. Amendment to Joint Plannine Area. The existineRevised Exhibit aA.to the Joint Planning Area Agreement, which depicts the Joint Planning Area, is hereby repealed and the ';,nnd Revised Exhibit aA. attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference is substituted in lieu thereof. All references in the Joint Planning Area Agreement to Exhibit aA. or Revised Exhibit aA. shall be deemed to refer to the Second Exhibit aA. attached hereto. Section5. Amendment to Joint PlannineArea Land Use Man. The existing Revised xhibit B. to the Joint Planning Area Agreement which sets forth the Joint Planning Area Land Use Map is hereby repealed and the Second Revised Exhibit B. attached hereto and made apart hereof by this reference is substituted in lieu thereof. All references in the Joint Planning Area Agreement to Exhibit aB. or Revised Exhibit B. shall be deemed to refer to Second Revised Exhibit B. attached hereto. • 030 Section 6. Text Chance —Future Annexation. Subsection 6.13. of the Joint Planning • Area Agreement, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: D. Future Annexation. 1. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that lands located within the Join Planning Area, including any enclaves located therein, are logical candidates for annexation by the City, subject to the provisions of Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. - --„_reef-fthe City shall provide written notice of the proposed annexation, fiscal impact analvsis and a corresponding service plan to the Countv at least fifteen (15) days prior to the initial readine of the nronosed annexation ordinance and shall provide written notice to all affected property owners at least fifteen N 5) days orior to the initial readine of the proposed annexation ordinance. In the event that such an 0 analysis is conducted which, in the sole opinion of the City meets the requirement of this subsection, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement are otherwise complied with, then the County covenants and agrees that: (1) it will not oppose the Annexation by the City of any such lands located within the JPA and (2) it will not file suit against the City challenging the validity of any ordinance annexing into the corporate limits of the City any such lands located within the Joint Planning Area or otherwise challenge or appose any such annexation ordinances. The agreement of the County as set forth in this Section 6(D) is a material inducement to the City to enter into this agreement and it is acknowledged and agreed that the City would not enter into this Agreement but for the inclusion of this Section 6(D). 2. Nothing herein shall be construed as amending any annexation law nor altering the interest 040 • 60 of either party under the Municipal Annexation or Contraction Act, Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. No area within the JPA shall be considered as within the jurisdiction of the Town until such time as annexation of such area has been lawfully completed. Annexation shall not be construed as removing any area within the JPA from the coverage of this Agreement. -:y _moo k W. ► m a .T.:z.`:,: of =T =d all P�Fnqks Slid PFOP@Fty Fights dss@eiated with sail, 050 b, WhoFe-t:;rT- 1, - a OF ---- — -A__ .1.,. ,.".....:.... 4me _fthis . -----• _ d. .,ti__the Town h as aaflme - - — -- !.L than +ft). C L J., p sides 48py ..11 .� .�L..... 060 •ost 6. Infrastructure. As the Town lawfully annexes property located within the Joint Planning Area, as described in this Agreement, the parties agree to work together in good faith to enter into Interlocal Agreements to resolve any and all issues related to the transferring of that infrastructure, associated permits and other property rights (such as easements) which primarily benefit the area that is subject to the annexation, _ - "-Zw.;.'09-k L-L--Zea ;:,;pYa-.-: „allo- including but not limited to those improvements described above. 7. Enclaves. a. Within two (2) years from the effective date of this Agreement, the Town and the County shall work together in good faith to enter into interlocal agreements pursuant to Section 171.046(2)(a), Florida Statutes, to eliminate enclaves of ten (10) acres or less which exist on the effective date of this Agreement. • b. For County -owned property which will become or becomes surrounded by the Town as a result of an annexation, the County may in its sole discretion provide the Town with written notice prior to or after the annexation informing the Town whether it desires for the Town to annex the "enclave," and the Town agrees to comply with the County's request regarding the enclave within six (6) months. Such County -owned property shall not be deemed to be an enclave if the County does not request said property to be annexed by the Town. Section 7. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Joint Planning Area Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect. 0 070 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and City have executed this Amendment on behalf of the County and City, respectively, and have set their seals hereto as of the date set forth above. ATTEST: Martha O. Haynie, County Comptroller as Clerk of Board of County Commissioners Deputy Clerk WITNESSED: Printed Name: Printed Name: FOR THE USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA; APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY this day of , 2008/ By: City Attorney ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Board of County Commissioners By: County Mayor DATE: CITY OF OCOEE, a Florida municipal corporation M S. SCOTT VANDERGRIFT, Mayor Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED BY THE OCOEE CITY COMMISSION AT A MEETING HELD ON ,2008 UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO. t:t • 5:\WC bYUGRMNNPA\Ocoee\14TH AIr1END 1PA-between OG&Ocoee-DRAFT.wpd I[] 0 090 ITEM NUMBER V. MISCELLANEOUS A. Project Status Update B. August Calendar 09 & Z\Divider Sheets dcc - PROJECT STATUS UPDATE PROJECT TYP"F._ DATE REVIEW 'sDe•� PROJECT NAME _ - NO. SUBMITTAL RECEWED - ER- MmAI. .STATUS NUMBER Alberto Lugo-Janer Aldi Food Store / Shoppes of West Oaks Arden Park North Belmere Shoppes Bhaffa Lot Split 3420 Big Eagle Drive Booster Juice / Meadow Ridge Commercial Citrus Medical and Executive Office Park Citrus Oaks Center Rezoning and SSCPA Connector Road from East of Adair Street to East of Ingram Road Crown Point Retail Center DePaiva Annexation & Rezoning Diplomat Tower Diplomat Tourer Dr. Mendro / Opus South Dunkin Donuts 11204 W. Colonial Drive Dunkin Donuts 11204 W. Colonial Drive Wall Sign 05/20/08 AF list Wall Sign APPROVED on 5-22-08 New Construction Bldg 05128M AF 2nd New Construction - Building APPROVED on 5-29-O8 Large Scale Preliminary LS-2007-016 Subdivision Plan 03tO6/DB BH 2nd Staff comments sent on 4-1&08 Annexation & AX-06-07-09 Substantial AF & RZ-07-06-10 Change 02/19/08 MR 3rd APPROVED by City Commission on 4-1-08 Plat 06113IN AF 4th Plat DENIED 6-26-08 Interior Build Out 04/29108 BH tat Interior Build Out APPROVED on 5-02-08 LS-99-014 Plat 11/16/06 BH 8lh Plat DENIED on 03/28I07 Rezoning & RZ-08-04-04 Small Scale CPA-2008- Comp. Plan 002 Amendment 06/09/08 BH 2nd Public Hearing at City Commission B119/O8 with LS-2007-015 review 06/24/08 AF 2nd Approved on 713/08 P/F Subdivison Plan & P/F site LS-200&D05 Plan 06/16/08 BH 1st Staff comments sent out 7/17108 AX-03-08-12 Annexation & RZ-08-03-02 Rezoning 03/03M8 MR tat APPROVED by City Commission on 6117108 LS-2007-024 LSP/FSP 03/05/08 AF 2nd Staff comments sent on 4-8-08 New 3 Story Office Building 07/10/08 AF tat DENIED on 8/5/08 Inledor Alteration 071021DB AF flat Interior Alteration APPROVED on7-10-08 Wall Sign Front Elevation 05/03/08 BH 1st Wall Sign Front Elevation APPROVED on 6-06-08 Face Replacement on Pylon 06/03/08 BH tat Face Replacement on Pylon APPROVED on 6-06-08 Current Project Stalus2.xls/Revisw 8/72008 1 of 5 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE PROJECT TVPE9F DATE REVIEW sue PROJECT NAME _ NO. _ BUBMITTAL RECEIVED ER MITTAL STATUS. NUMBER Dunkin Donuts Wall Sign Side 11204 W. Colonial Drive Elevation 06/03/08 BH 1st Wall Sign Side Elevation APPROVED on 6-06-08 Dunkin Donuts Ceiling Mounted 11204 W. Colonial Drive Window Sign 06/03/08 SH 1at Ceiling Mounted Window Sign APPROVED on 6-06-08 Dunkin Donuts Menu Board / 112D4 W. Colonial Drive Speakers OXGM8 BH 1at Menu Board / Speakers APPROVED on 6-06-08 Dunkin Donuts 11204 W Colonial Drive Directory Sign 06/03/O8 BH list Directory Sign APPROVED on 64)6-D8 Awning Front Dunkin Donuts Elevation Non 11204 W Colonial Drive Illuminated 06/03/08 BH tat Awning Fran Elevation Non Illuminated APPROVED 6-6-08 Dunkin Donuts Awning Drive 11204 W Colonial Drive Thru 06103/O8 BH 1st Awning Drive Thw APPROVED on 6-06-08 Awning Side Dunkin Donuts Elevation 11204 W. Colonial Drive Illuminated 06/03/08 BH list Awning Side Elevation Illuminated APPROVED on 6-06-08 Awning Side Dunkin Donuts Elevation Non 11204 W. Colonial Drive Illuminated 06103/08 BH 1st Awning Sale Elevation Non Illuminated APPROVED 6-06-08 Eagle Creek of Ocoee Rezoning RZ-06-08-05 Rezoning 03124/08 BH 3rd Public Hearing at P S Z on 8112108 Eagles Landing Phase I Plat 05/12/08 AF 3rd Plat APPROVED on 6-02-08 Eagles Landing Phase II Plat OB131107 AF tat Plat DENIED on 10/10/07 Eagles Landing Phase III Plat OWF31/07 AF tat Plat DENIED on 10/10/07 Annex, Rez 8 East Crown Industrial AX-07-07-10 CPA 0225/OB MR 2nd Staff comments sent out on 4/3/08 Small Scale Site Fifth Third Bank (al Fountains West) SS-2007-007 Plan D4117/08 AF 3rd Approved - Pending approval of the Fountains West Plat First Class Cleaners / Fountains West Wall Sign 05/09/08 SH tat Wall Sign DENIED on 5-12-08 First Class Cleaners / Fountains West Wall Sign D522108 BH 2nd Well Sign APPROVED on 5-27-O8 Double Faced Flonda Auto Auction Monument Sign 06/191W BH tat Double Faced Monument Sign APPROVED on 6.23-08 Amendment to PreliminarylFinal Foote Property SS-2005-003 Subdivision Plan 10/18/07 BH tat Approved by City Commission on 5&W Fountains at Highland Park LS-2007-023 RX/LUP/PSP O5130108 AF 3rd Staff comments sent out on 7/1/UB Fountains West Plat 06/18/08 AF 3rd Plat APPROVED on 6-24-08 Freeman Commerce Center LS-2008-001 Final Site Plan 01/23/08 AF tat Staff comments Sent out on 221/08 Current Project St9tus2.xls/Rev'lew 8(//2008 2 of 5 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE PROJECT TYPE OF D REVIEW sue - 1 PROJECT NAME _ - NO.. SUBMITTAL ,� RECEIVED ER E UMB STATUS NUMBER ER Preliminary/Fins F/X Warehouse Complex LS-2007-022 Site Plan 07/14/08 BH 2nd Staff comments sent out 8/5/08 Glad Tidings Church LS-2007-018 Expansion 02/20/08 AF 2nd Staff comments sent out on 4-1-33 Hair Cutlery / Fountains West Wall Sign 05/14/08 AF tat Wall Sign APPROVED on 5-15-08 Hair Cutlery / Fountains West Interior Build Out 05/14/08 AF tat Interior Build Out APPROVED on 5-15-08 Large Scale Site Hampton Inn LS-2007-017 Plan 06/05/08 BH 4th Public Hearing at P & Z on 8/12108 Construction Hampton Inn Bldg 05/28/08 BH 2nd New Construction- Building APPROVED on 6-02-08 Health Central Medical Office Building LS-2008-002 LSP/FSP 04/30/08 AF 2nd Staff comments sent out 615108 Cabinet Wall Sign & Face Change on Pylon Highpoinl Church / Ocoee Commerce Ctr Sign 04/02/08 BH tat Cabinet Wall Sign & Face Change on Pylon Sign DENIED 4/4/08 Ingram Estates LS-2005-001 Revisions to FSP 06/17/08 AF 2nd APPROVED on 6/24108 Jenny Craig / Ocoee Commons Interior Alteration 07/07/08 AF tat Interior Alteration APPROVED on 7-10-08 Just For Brakes Building Plans 08/2B/07 BH tat Wall Sign DENIED 828/07 Lakewood Manor lke Lakewood Estates Lakevrood Manor MR Lakewood Estates Lauren Beth Avenue Magic Nails / Maguire Shoppes at Meadow Ridge Mail & Ship / Marion Park Marshall Fames Business Center McCormick Woods Phase II Meadow Ridge Commercial Plat Review 07/11/08 BH 3rd Plat Review APPROVED on 7-29-08 Entry Wall 08/04/08 BH tat Entry Wall Plat 03/12/08 MR Interior Alteration O6/06/08 SH Wall Sign Non - Illuminated 07/03/08 BH Large Scale Site LS-2008-004 Plan 0324/08 AF Plat 0510110B AF Plat 0925/07 BH 1 at Conceptual Plat DENIED on 3-27-08 tat Innterior Alteration APPROVED on 61M08 2nd jWall Sign Non -Illuminated APPROVED on 7-08-08 tat 'Staff comments sent out on 5/7108 2nd I Plat APPROVED on 5-15-OB tat Plat DENIED on 10-22-07 Current Project Sbdus2.xls/Review 8U2008 3 of 5 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE P ROJECT TYPEQF DATE REVIEW sue PROJECT NAME NO. SUBMITTAL RECEIVED ER MITfAL STATUS NUMBER Meadow Ridge U mmercial Maguire Road. Bldg D Building Plans 05113/08 BH 3rtl New Shell Building APPROVED on 5-14-08 Milton Groves Plat 04/16/08 AF 3rtl Replat of lot 78 APPROVED on 5-05-08 Nails & Spa I Fountains West Wall Sign 08/04/08 BH tat Wall Sign NYC Dance / Plantation Groves Interior Alteration 0529/08 AF tat Interior Alteration APPROVED on 6-02-08 NYC Dance / Maguire Groves Wall Sign 07/141W AF 1st APPROVED on 7116/08 Large Scale Final Subdivision Oak Trail Reserve PLO LS-2007-010 Plan 04/14/08 AF 3rd Approved by P & Z; Scheduled for City Commission 811g/08. Small Scale Sile Oaks Commerce Center SS-2007-005 Plan 07/14M8 BH 4th Staff comments due 8/11/08 Courtesy Prelimmary/Final Ocoee Carrier Annex Review Site plan 07/07/08 AF tat Staff comments sent out 814/08 Small Scale Site Owes Car Wash SS-2007-006 Plan 05/15/08 BH 3rtl APPROVED on 713/08 Carwash Tunnel & Equipment Ocoee Car Wash Room 06/06/08 BH 2nd Carwash Tunnel & Equipment Room APPROVED on 6-06-08 Small Scale Site Ocoee Oaks United Methodist Church Addition SS.2008-001 Plan 05/19/08 BH tat Staff comments sent out 6/12708 Ocoee Pines Final Subdivision Plans LS-2D07-015 FSP 0327108 AF 2nd Staff comments sent out 5/9/08 Small Scale She Ocoee Town Shops LS-2008-006 Plan D8/04108 AF tat Staff comments due 9-02-08 O'Donnell Automotive/Grace Park Metal Shed 0624/08 AF tat APPROVED Pizza Hut / Fountains West Interior Alteration o6/02108 BH 1st Interior Alteration APPROVED on 6-05-08 Wall Sign & Pizza Hut / Fountains West Panel 08/05/08 BH 2nd Wall Sign It Panel APPROVED on 8-05-08 Positanos / Good Homes Plaza 2 Wall Signs 06/19/08 AF 2nd 2 Wall Signs APPROVED on 6-24-DO 03-08-5E- Special Prestige Academy 015 Exception 04/21/08 BH tat Approved by City Commission 8/5/09 Prestige Gunile - Ocoee LS-2007-012 Final Site Plan 0920N7 BH 2nd Staff comments sent out on 11/05/07: no response Rezoning to Professional Parkway Town Center RZ-08-0303 PUD 03`11/08 AF tat Staff comments sent out on 527/08 Current Project Status2.xls/Review 8172DDB 4 of 5 PROJECT STATUS UPDATE PROJECT TYPE -OF DATE REVIEW sua- PROJECTNAME NO. SUBMITTAL RECENED ER MIITAL NUMBER 1 Wall Sign, 1 Under Canopy Publix—Liquors 1720 E. Silver Star Road Reserve at Meadow Lake (Ika Prairie Lake - Tract A) Shoppes at West Oaks Smith ROW Vacation Sumrust Bank Fountains West PUD. Lot 1 Sunni Bank Fountains West 2605 Oceee Apopka Road Thomas Landing at Lake Meadow Value Place Hotel Villa Roma Final Subdivision Plan Villages of Wesme a Phase II West 50 Commercial Subdivision West Colonial Parcel (Walia) West Orange Orthopedics Medical Office West Orange Orthopedics Medical Office West Road Right -of -Way Vacation Request Worsham Zero Gravity / Maguire Shoppes flca Meadow Ridge Commercial STATUS Sign 06/05/08 AF 1st 1 Wall Sign, 1 Under Canopy Sign APPROVED on 6-11-08 LS-2006-001 Revisions to FSP 04/O15106 BH 1st APPROVED but waiting on SJRWM approval letter Large Scale Site APPROVED by City Commission on 4-15-08 LS-2007-013 Plan 02/19/08 AF 4th Waiting for executed Development Agreement 8 Revised plans VAC-08-013 Vacation 04102MB MR tat Vacation of Easement Small Scale Site SS-2007-003 Plan 06/05r08 AF 3rd Approved - Pending approval of the Fountains West Plat New Construction Bldg 04/07/08 AF tat New Construction Bldg APPROVED on 4-14-08 Plat Review 136/23108 AF tat Plat revww - staff comments sent out on 7/17/08 Large Scale Site LS-2007-020 Plan 10/12/07 AF 1st Staff comments sent on 12/4107 - no response LS-2008-003 LSSP 0729= AF 2nd Staff comments due 825/08 Plat 0129= BH tat Plat DENIED on 2-14-08 Plat 08/15/07 BH 2nd Plat DENIED on 09/10107. AX-05-08-25 LS-07-021 AX 8 PSP O6/12108 BH 5th Staff comments sent out 7117108 Small Scale Site SS-2005-013 Plan 07/28/08 BH 5lh Approved 8/1/08 New Building 06/03/08 BH 1st New Building APPROVED on 6-06-08 VAC-2008- 015 Vacation 05/19/08 AF tat Stag comments sent out 6116108 Interior Renovation 06/02/08 AF flat Interior Renovation APPROVED on 6.04-08 Interior Alteration 08/06/08 BH tsl Interior Alteration Current Project Status2.xls/Review 8/72008 5 of 5 I Sara on Tue 3 4 School Advisory 5 City Commission Board 7:15 p.m. 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers @ Comm. Chambers t 10 11 Tem lie, 12 Planning& Charter Review Board Zoning Commission 7 p.m. 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers @ Comm. Chambers 9/19 Agenda Items 0/19 Staff Reports Doe to City Clerk 17 18 City Commission Workshop 7 p.m. 0 Chambers @ Comm. Chambers First Dar of School 24 25 Tentative Charter Review Board 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers 9/02 Agenda Items Due to City Clerk 31 Due to City Mgr. 19 City Commission 7:15 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers Wed _ Thu Fri Sat 1 2 6 General Employee pension Board 10 a.m. Police/Fire Pension Board 1:00 p.m. both na, Comm. Chambers 13 city commission Budget Workshop 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers 9/19 Agenda Published 7 human Relations Diversity Board 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers 14 Board of 15 Adjustment 6 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers CACOFD 7 p.m. @ Fire Station One 9 16 20 city Commission 21 Police Infraction 22 23 Workshop Bearing Board (if necessary) 7p.m. 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers @ Comm. Chambers 26 Code Enforcement 27 Community 28 CACOPD 7 p.m. Grant Review Board 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers 7 p.m. @ Comm. Chambers @ Comm. Chambers 9/02 Staff Reports 9/02 Agenda Published Due to City Mgr. 29 30