HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-25-86 WS
MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORKSHOP - PLANNING AND ZONING & CITY
COMMISSION HELD FE8RUARY 25. 1986
.
PRESENT: Mayor Ison, Commissioners Cox; and Hager; Chairman
Breeze. Planning and Zoning Members Smith; Swickerath:
Brooklyn; Sanders; Cook; and Linebarier, City Attorney
Kruppenbacher, City Clerk Catron, City Planner Wagner, and
Deputy Clerk Louloudis.
ABSENT: Commissioners Bateman; and Rodgers. and Planning and
Zoning Attorney Ron Colella.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor
7:45
Ison called the scheduled Joint workshop to order
p.m.. Mayor Ison then led those present in prayer.
at
BRIEFING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN - CITY ATTORNEY
e
Florida Legislature passed laws which will change the ways
that local governments plan and zone their land. The law
provides for planned growth, and there are ten elements of
the law which governments must comply with, and this must be
done by 1989. Mr. Kruppenbacher stated the law provides for
two amendments to the plan per calendar year. The amendment
process takes 100 plus days, and it is alright to overlap the
scheduling process of the amendments. Mr. Kruppenbacher
stated we cannot zone property which is other that what the
plan provides, we must amend the plan to do this. The City
will decide the zoning classifications, such as commercial,
residential, historical, and industrial.
The ten elements,
follows:
which we must comply with by 1989,
are as
1. Capital Improvement
2. Must provide coordination with adJacent local entities.
3. Policy Recommendations- the implementation of the plan.
4. Provide for future uses of the land, such as educational.
recreational. commercial, residential, etc.
5. Traffic circulation element for bike and pedestrian
pathways, and maJor thoroughfares.
6. Sanitary system - provide for solid waste. drainage.
potable water, and acquifer recharge protection.
7. Conservation element - provide a plan of how we plan to
protect conservation.
8. Recreation and Open Space Element.
9. Housing element - provision for existing residents and
anticipated growth, and the elimination of sub-standard
housing.
10. Intergovernmental Coordination. Each element must
coordinate within itself.
.
If the City does not comply the State will come in, pass an
Ordinance, cut off all State funds, and provide a plan for us
1
.
.
,JOINT WORKSHOP
FEBRUARY 25, 1986
PAGE 2
at our expense. Mr. Kruppenbacher stated we should start now
and we will %inish with the %irst amendment on August 5,
1986. The Commission agreed to begin immediately and to do
all the rezonings at one time. The schedule %or the %irst
amendment is as %ollows:
1. Preparation 0% maps, narratives.
and advertisements completed March 14, 86
2.
Placement 0% Public Hearing Notices
in newspaper prior to P & Z Comm. Mtg.
March 19, 86
3.
P & Z Comm. Mtg. to review proposed
amendments and hold public hearings.
April 8, 86
4.
Submit proposed amendments to State &
Local Governments.
April 11, 86
5.
Place advertisements %or two required
public hearings to be held a%ter minimum
90 day review period by State
July 2. 86
6.
Hold %irst City Comm. Public Hearing
July 15, 86
7.
Hold second City Comm. Public Hearing
and vote on proposed Ordinance to amend
the Comprehensive Plan.
August 5, 86
A~ter we submit the plan to the State. they have 90 days to
review it, then they will issue a "Notice 0% Compliance". 1%
any citizen obJects, they have 21 days to hold a hearing.
Mr. Kruppenbacher stated they were working on di%~erent
angles. On April 8, 86 we will have a Joint meeting with the
Planning & 20ning Board and the City Commission. We will
then write a resolution and resolve it.
Chairman Breeze %elt we should resist this law, and use the
City resources to ~ight it. Chairman Breeze asked the
attorney what would happen i% we ignored the law. Mr.
Kruppenbacher ~elt we would be caught %ast. Mr. Linebarier
asked what happens i% the State doesn't %inish their review
in the 90 days allowed. Mr. Kruppenbacher %elt that the
State would have to waive any obJections they might have to
our plan, in that case. Mr. Kruppenbacher stated that it
could be very di%%icult or somewhat simple, depending on the
rules which are still being drafted. Chairman Breeze will be
put on the Tri-County League of Cities Agenda to see if any
other local entities obJect and are willing to take a stand.
Mr. Swickerath asked i% we could hold a Joint meeting on
March 19, 1986, so the Planning and 20ning Board can have
enough time to review the proposed plan.
2
JOINT WORKSHOP
FEBRUARY 2~, 1986
PAGE 3
e
Comm. Cox also felt the City should fight the law, and stated
those politicians who voted for it should be ousted.
Comm. Hager felt the City could not fight the 5tate, the City
will conform with some type of plan. Comm. Hager thought we
should comply with this ruling but felt the State would not
be ready to do the reviews, or even have the rules settled
before 1989.
The Joint workshop was
9:00 p.m..
adJourned into a Special Session at
--:JUu-aL------- -
MAYOR ISON
CHAIRMAN BREEZE
ATTEST:
DEPUTY CLERK LOULOUDIS
e
..e
3