HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-13-2010 Agenda Packet, 4:0—
Mayor
S. Scott Vandergrift
City Manager
Robert Frank
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
(LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY)
July 13, 2010
CALL TO ORDER
A. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum
CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA
A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting held June 8, 2010
III. OLD BUSINESS
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. HEALTH CENTRAL ANNEXATION AND REZONING
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Project Status Report
B. August Calendar
VI. ADJOURNMENT
O:\P & Z\Agendas\2010\July 13, 2010 P & Z Agenda.doc
PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioners
Gary Hood, District 1
Rosemary Wilsen, District 2
Rusty Johnson, District 3
Joel F. Keller, District 4
7:00 PM
PRINCIPAL PLANNER RUMER
NOTE: Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meetings take place on the second Tuesday of every month at 7:00 pm in the Ocoee
Commission Chambers in City Hall unless otherwise advertised. Any person who desires to appeal any decision at this meeting will need a record
of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is based. More than one Commissioner may participate or hear discussions regarding a matter which will come
before the Commission for action. Also in accordance with Florida Statue 286.26: Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any
of these proceedings should contact the Office of the City Clerk, 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, FL 34761 (407) 905-3105, 48 hours in
advance of the meeting.
City of Ocoee • 150 N Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100 • fax: (407) 656-8504 • www.ci.ocoee.fl.us
ITEM NUMBER 11. A.
Minutes of the
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
held on
June 8, 2010
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) BOARD AND PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTING AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 2010
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Campbell and Chairman Vandergrift called the joint meeting to order
at 7:01 p.m. Following a moment of silent meditation and the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag, a quorum was declared present for both boards.
PRESENT: Chairman Sills, Vice Chair Golden, Members Campbell, Conkling,
Dillard, McKey, Morris, and West. Also present were City Attorney
Rosenthal, CRA Administrator Wagner, Development Services
Director Shadrix, Senior Planner Howell, Principal Planner Rumer,
and Deputy City Clerk Sibbitt.
Chairman Vandergrift, Vice Chair R. Johnson, Board Members
Hood, Wilsen, Keller, Corless, and C. Johnson.
ABSENT: Member De La Portilla was absent unexcused.
City Attorney Rosenthal explained the presentation that would be presented
tonight and explained why this was a joint meeting. He further stated following the
CRA meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission (acting as the LPA) will
continue their meeting to allow the actual actions and public hearings. The CRA
Members are invited and encouraged to stay through the public hearing process
of the LPA.
CRA TARGET AREAS SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Development Services Director Shadrix stated it has been almost a year since
they started the CRA process and they now have something before them that they
are ready to take through this iterative process of adoption. They have a good
document before them that will do a lot of things for the city but is in no way in
final form so they are expecting some really good dialogue as they move through
the process up to adoption. He further stated that this special development plan
for the CRA target areas is intended to provide a more streamline process for a
majority of stakeholders and they have met with most of the stakeholders in each
of the target areas. One of the overwhelming majority issues has been that they
do not want to go through a lengthy PUD process so they are all trying to figure
out how they can get to the same point, which is getting a good street network in.
Development Services Director Shadrix explained they are looking to get a
mechanism in place so they can guide high quality development so that they can
create the type of mobility based network that the city wants. He further explained
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
the importance of the growth patterns in the city, green field areas, and the interim
steps the city will be taking.
Frances Chandler -Marino stated she is with AECOM and is very happy to be
back to speak with everyone about the special development plan. She further
explained that the process was as much about collaboration as it has been about
planning. When they came to initiate the process about a year ago they had a
very aggressive schedule that they wanted to meet, partially because the city was
seeing a lot of development activity and people who wanted to come in wanted an
easier way to go through the process. Ms. Chandler -Marino explained this was a
long process because it was about getting it right and she further presented her
power -point presentation which is attached for review.
Overview of the presentation included the following:
➢ Project Outcomes
➢ CRA Project Area
➢ Community Participation Process
➢ CRA Framework Plan
➢ Transportation Network
➢ Open Space
➢ Land Use Strategy
➢ Target Area Opportunities
➢ Regulatory Construction - (Phase 1) CRA Impact Area Special
Development Plan, (Phase 2) Form -based Regulations
➢ CRA Target Areas - Three (3) areas
➢ Recommendation/Next Step
After the presentation, City Attorney Rosenthal stated his recommendation is for
the CRA Board to handle all staff level questions before it goes before the
Planning & Zoning Commission as a Public Hearing.
CRA Board Member Keller stated in the 3rd target area he noticed that they
could basically pick and choose what they wanted to put in there and inquired if
there was a limit to how much of any one type they could pick and choose. Ms.
Chandler -Marino stated that there is a limit because the land use is still
establishing the maximum limits for that area. What they were trying to do
because of the multiple land uses in that area was trying not to be so parcel
oriented about it. They still do have the cap in the land use and zoning but it
would now just apply to the whole of the area instead of just a piece of it. City
Attorney Rosenthal stated that Board Member Keller's question is specifically
addressed in the ordinance that the Planning & Zoning Commission and City
2
7
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
Commission have in the section entitled "Underlying Zoning". It indicates that the
underlying zoning remains in effect so there will not be a need for any rezoning;
however, for each parcel within the target areas they can basically mix horizontally
and vertically and move around within the property the uses based upon an
agreement between the land owner and the city. He further explained that section
of the ordinance as well as the comprehensive plan that is in effect.
CRA Board Member Keller stated in target area 2 it seems they are looking more
at roads but the rest of areas as long as they kept the grid pattern it seems they
can move to accommodate what they are looking at doing. Ms. Chandler -Marino
stated it really is about connections and there is nothing about setting an
alignment for those roads. CRA Board Member Keller commented that he really
likes the 16ft. sidewalks.
CRA Board Member C. Johnson inquired what the next step would be in going
into the approval process. City Attorney Rosenthal briefly explained the public
hearing process, overlay mapping process, and noticing all individual property
owners within the three (3) target areas. He further explained that as mentioned
in the presentation this is in some respect an interim step so there will be some
unanswered questions, but they have provided in the ordinance a process for a
resolution of answered questions which they think will also protect the rights of the
property owner's. He briefly explained the process the land owner would be able
to take should they disagree with their interpretations.
CRA Chairman Vandergrift inquired about the first reading being a public hearing
and also what would stop them from going to a second reading. City Attorney
Rosenthal stated that it falls within the particular statute of the Florida Statutes
which requires two advertised public hearings and two readings of the ordinance.
CRA Chairman Vandergrift further inquired if the option was available should
they have any objections to any of the target areas (1, 2, and 3), to be able to
adopt and move forward with just 1 and 2 or 2 and 3. City Attorney Rosenthal
stated that would be within the legally permissible options available to either the
Planning & Zoning Commission or the City Commission.
CRA Board Member C. Johnson stated there are some clauses in the ordinance
that specifically state these provisions are made applicable to all development and
redevelopment within the CRA target area. She further added that they define the
CRA target area as both unincorporated and incorporated areas, so she would like
to know how that would effect unincorporated parcels and whether it may be
better not to reference unincorporated parcels in this exercise. City Attorney
Rosenthal stated she is correct and in the ordinance under Section A5, it states
that any land located within the CRA Target Area but are in unincorporated
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
Orange County, the ordinance does not apply. He further explained that what
they try to do is as those lands are annexed into the city, they will give them notice
before they annex that they will be subject to the regulations. He briefly spoke
about the Hawthorne Property off of Maine Street which was annexed into the City
but is not within the CRA. CRA Board Member C. Johnson stated there is no
specific reference to the JPA and was inquiring if it would be appropriate at a
minimum to be mentioned. City Attorney Rosenthal stated the JPA only really
relates to land comprehensive plan amendments and they are not making any
amendments to the comprehensive plan. They did not really view this as a JPA
issue but if the county has some questions about that, they do not have any
concerns and would be happy to add a recital regarding consistency with the JPA.
CRA Board Member Corless commented that they are moving forward toward
the goals that they set forth in the CRA several years ago. She further inquired as
why there is no discussion on uses for area 3 but there are for areas 1 and 2.
City Attorney Rosenthal stated they did clarify that in the ordinance. The
ordinance has the prohibited uses as being specifically applicable to all of the
target areas. CRA Administrator Wagner stated that on page 69 there is a
paragraph under zoning regulating plans but he realizes there is a typo since it
should read: "Target Area 3 shall conform to the prohibited uses..." CRA Board
Member Corless inquired if they had specific break out sessions with target area
2 because she did not recall seeing it in the presentation. Development Services
Director Shadrix stated that they had a lot of meetings and discussion with the
stakeholders in target area 2; not in the same formal way as they had with areas 1
and 3. He further stated of the 114 meetings he has had over the last several
months, a number of them occurred in many of the target areas. He believes in
order to balance it out and be more consistent, he certainly would welcome a sit
down collective meeting with target area 2 landowners to work on individual
issues. Development Services Director Shadrix briefly pointed out the
differences of the target areas. CRA Board Member Corless inquired if they
would have another chance to make comments as it relates to the height, develop
form, and other issues that provide the framework as they go through the process
of the development and adoption of the form -based code. Ms. Chandler -Marino
stated the answer is yes and what they had envisioned as well as the city is that in
the form -based code they would really get into the regulations and clarify all of the
internal inconsistencies. She further stated this is partially why Craig wanted to
have some interim steps. Development Services Director Shadrix added that
the code has been both their friend and their enemy and with this time table that
they are on, now is the appropriate time to start thinking about collective
consensus.
4
1
I
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
Member McKey stated that transportation has been mentioned several times and
he was wondering if the CRA board has addressed or looked into the light rail
system and whether West Oaks Mall would be the trail head or the target areas.
CRA Board Member Keller stated he believes we are about twenty years out
before they have us possibly getting a light rail system. He further stated he does
not recall any real discussion with it from the CRA point of view and does not
believe at this point that it has been put through onto the plans. CRA Board
Member C. Johnson stated that she works closely with Lynx and also through the
MetroPlan process and she knows that with Lynx they are initiating their long
range study to identify the bus rapid transit corridors which will be the precursor to
the longer term vision for rail. The SR 50 corridor is one of those workforce
corridors and they feel it will be prudent to keep that in mind as it relates to the
CRA planning efforts. CRA Board Member Corless added that as they go
through the form -based code they can reinforce transit oriented developments and
that they are actually helping support our redevelopment activities so they are set-
up to receive transit in the future. Development Services Director Shadrix
commented that he is glad that these issues were brought to light because these
questions are excellent building blocks for long range planning for the City of
Ocoee. He further briefly discussed transportation and the possibility of a joint
meeting with Winter Garden regarding rail.
Member West commented that the CRA has done a heck of a job and it is really
exciting to see what they have done. Vice Chair Golden stated he has heard
that this urban design will not really have a market to in fill. He further inquired if
they have looked at other markets as well as how does staff feel with the grid they
would be putting over the properties to in fill development. Ms. Chandler -Marino
stated they would have to look at all the target areas differently because it was not
one type of standard that applied to all of them. She further reviewed each target
area and explained the design regulated for that area. Vice Chair Golden stated
the list of prohibited uses looks similar to the activity center uses but is more
expanded. He further inquired as to how they developed this list. CRA
Administrator Wagner explained that the list prohibits more suburban highway
commercial types of uses and reflects uses that they have already put into
development agreements to create a more urban character development.
Member Sills commented that that this is a beautiful project but he knows it will
require a lot of funding for this which may include options such as a bond,
property tax increase, or a fire fee.
CRA Board Member R. Johnson stated in the last year or two they have had
economic development problems but one of the things that will help is to push this
process. He further stated he feels they are far way ahead of other areas for
doing what they are doing with the CRA. They need to look at the long view of
R
I
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
what is happening and since the developers are almost all in favor of this, he feels
it is something they should be proud of.
ADJOURNMENT
The CRA Board adjourned at 8:22 p.m.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting continued.
Vice Chair Golden stated he noticed the traffic intersection access for many of
the target areas were not at the major intersections that abuts those target areas
and inquired as to why it was done that way. Ms. Chandler -Marino stated there
is a good State Department of Transportation reason for that since they limit how
close you can have access points to your major intersection and they adhered to
all state regulations when they cited the access points.
The Public Hearing was opened
Shaman Foradi, 1575 Maguire Road # 102, stated he is here on behalf of
American Land Developers and the owners of the Orange Plaza. He further
spoke in favor of the CRA approval explaining they would like to go along with the
city's vision and the urban design which they feel will attract people to this area.
Scott Glass, Shutts and Bowen, LLP, addressed the board on behalf of his clients
who stated that no one has ever met with them. He further stated there is a letter
that was provided to the city and is included in the board's packet which
addresses their concerns. Mr. Glass further explained his client's concerns and
stated they are requesting to defer consideration and adoption of the CRA Target
Area 2 Special Plan Overlay until they are able to reassemble the stakeholders in
that area to address those concerns and requests they may have.
Randy June, 132 W. Plant Street, thanked staff for the process and stated he
voices some of the similar concerns that Mr. Glass presented but they do not want
to stop the approval of Target Area 2. He further stated they are ready to move
forward and look forward to meeting with the others in that area.
Development Services Director Shadrix stated that he agrees with the
comments presented by Scott Glass and Randy June. He further stated they
have been very gracious with being up front with them and he does agree with
some of the points made in the letter by Mr. Glass. Development Services
Director Shadrix stated he feels it is a good time to get the Target Area 2 group
together and have some dialogue. Chairman Campbell clarified that Mr. Shadrix
will be meeting with Target Area 2 prior to the 2"d Reading. Development
6
A
U
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
Services Director Shadrix stated that he wants to reiterate that they have had a
lot of meetings individually one on one with different stakeholders in Area 2 and
will commit to calendaring some defined timelines.
The Public Hearing was closed
DISCUSSION
Member McKey thanked all staff, consultants, public, and CRA members since he
can recognize their efforts and time that they have all spent on this. He further
stated he is in favor of this and would like to keep it rolling. Member Dillard
stated the one thing he has not heard is how this dovetails with the adjacent
property owners not in the target areas so that this looks seamless. Ms.
Chandler -Marino stated while these plans just speak for the Target Areas when
they do a form -based code one of the things they find most useful about it is that it
is able to do a couple of things that this level of planning can not do. She further
explained phasing in and addressing the adjacency to redevelop without being
over burdensome.
Vice Chair Golden stated this is a great plan but he wanted to caution that they
do not water down the plans too much in these final negotiations going toward
approval and adoption. He feels they should really stick to what the city wants
and envisions for these areas while guiding the developers. He further
commented that since these are green field sites there is an opportunity to have
really nice parks.
Member Sills thanked CRA Administrator Wagner and consultants for doing a
fantastic job.
Chairman Campbell stated this is a tremendous amount of work and really shows
where a lot of people have put a lot of thought in the vision of where we want the
City of Ocoee to go in the next 20-25 years. He further stated he feels they have
an opportunity to raise the caliber of what Central Florida thinks of Ocoee as a
City.
Member Sills, seconded by Member McKey, moved to recommend to the QY
Commission the CRA Target Area Special Development Plan, Consistency
Determination and proposed Ordinance per staffs recommendation. Motion
carried unanimously.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
CONSENT AGENDA
Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting held on Tuesday, April
13, 2010.
Member West, seconded by Member Sills, moved to accept the Minutes of the
April 13 2010 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS — None
NEW BUSINESS
RT OCOEE, LLC — REZONING
Senior Planner Howell gave a brief presentation on the subject property stating
the applicant is requesting to rezone the property from 1-2 to 1-1 (Restricted
Manufacturing & Warehousing). He further explained that the rezoning is being
requested to permit a wholesale/internet vehicle sales location where customers
will be invited onto the premises by appointment only. The applicant has agreed
to place limitations in regards to operation on the property in an effort to limit traffic
impacts to the site. These use limitations include: no transport trucks on site;
and, only wholesale or internet used vehicle sales.
Rezoning the property to 1-1 to permit the proposed use is logical, given that it is
adjacent to several automotive related uses and since there are several areas in
the City where used car sales are permitted. Additionally, it is anticipated the
proposed rezoning from 1-2 to 1-1 will result in a less intense use than can
currently be permitted on the property with the 1-2 zoning designation.
DISCUSSION
Member McKey stated he is curious as to how the vehicles will be transported if
there is a restriction allowing large carrying type vehicles onto the premises.
The Public Hearing was opened
Thomas Skelton, American Civil Engineering Co., stated they agree with staff
comments and to answer Member McKey, each car will be driven individually to
the site and the sale will be by appointment only. Chairman Campbell inquired if
the sales would be high end or specialty type vehicles. Robert Thomas,
representative for the owner, answered it would be any and all motor vehicles
within a reasonable size. Chairman Campbell clarified that any and all vehicles
would be up to and including motor homes. Mr. Thomas stated that it would not
include motor homes.
8
I
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
Ed Newman, 553 Roper Parkway, stated that what Mr. Thomas is trying to do is
being done now throughout the industrial area. He further stated others have
been refused to rezone their property to retail. Mr. Newman stated in 1989 and
1993 he tried to change his zoning on his property and was denied. He
commented that he feels that retail needs to be in a retail area and the area of the
subject property is in a wholesale area. He further explained his objections.
Senior Planner Howell interjected that there will be a development agreement
that will address use limitations, such as: no transport trucks on site.
Robert Thomas stated they have a comprehensive agreement with the city on
what can and can not be done. He further stated they have also provided the city
with a copy of their leases, which require no mechanical work, no transport or
unloading, and no complete detail work. It also stipulates that their sale can not
be any more than the 90% wholesale and 10% retail, which the retail will generate
off the internet. Mr. Thomas further explained this property will be a place for
people to have offices to be able to display 4-6 cars (depending on the size) inside
and outside. They may possibly have 100-150 cars a week that leave and come
back but as he mentioned this is all written in his lease agreement which goes with
the use of the land. Member Sills stated that he mentioned he would have cars
on the lots for display for sale and it seems to him that it is a retail lot rather than
an internet wholesale. Mr. Thomas stated the concept of the vehicles being there
is that people come to the auction on Tuesday and now they will have a place
close by where they can fill a load with; it will be a wholesale operation. They
need the retail internet part because they feel you should have some way to be
able to work with both and he feels the 10% is fair.
Member Conkling inquired how his business will coexist with a large whole sale
auction such as the Florida Auto Auction near by. Are they not both investors
doing the same business in that area? Mr. Thomas stated they are but they
purchase from the auction, individuals, and car dealers and have been in the car
business since 1976. Member Dillard inquired from staff how the 90%/10%
would be enforceable. Senior Planner Howell stated the only mechanism they
have to enforce that is through the development agreement. He further stated it is
stipulated under the agreement with them but they can not physically go out and
watch what they are doing on the internet. City Attorney Rosenthal stated that
as a practical matter if they had a complaint or it became apparent that there was
a lot of traffic and public going in/out then it may be something the city could
monitor. There are no reports that get submitted to the city, it is a condition that
would be violated and if it is violated it is enforceable by specific performance. Mr.
Thomas stated that if DMV has those figures available then it is something that
9
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
can be provided to the city without a problem. Member McKey stated it lookslike
this property is adjacent to an 1-1 zoned property. Senior Planner Howell stated
that the property across the street is 1-1 as well. Member Conkling asked for Mr.
Thomas to please explain the transporter process.
Paul Bruegger, 601 Roper Pkwy, stated that the transport trucks are unbearable,
they leave oil and they come at night. He stated he will be directly across the
street from this. He stated he knows Mr. Thomas and he is a business man, if he
can do what he says he is going to do then he does not have a problem.
Dennis Jones Sr., 651 Roper Pkwy, stated he has owed property in Ocoee for an
excess of 37 years and he has never been able to retail cars off his property. He
further stated as late as this year they have been turned down to retail cars as well
as his tenants who lease a space from him. Mr. Jones further voiced his
objections to the rezoning of 1-2 to 1-1 of the property across the street from his
and added since they have been denied for a retail license then he feels it does
not need to be done now.
Mr. Newman stated that as Mr. Tomas mentioned they will have 150 cars a week;
however, the way the property is laid out they have an average of 40 parking
spots, with 20 employees, plus the owner, secretary, and receptionist. Where are
all the cars supposed to go? Mr. Thomas stated that if they divide approximately
140 cars a week by 7 days, they would only have 20 cars a day on the property.
Mr. Bruegger expressed his concern to Mr. Thomas about not detailing cars on
the property.
The Public Hearing was closed
Member Conkling stated they have heard from several of the owners here who
have stated that they were denied retail licenses and was wondering if staff could
state whether or not that was accurate. Senior Planner Howell stated he is not
aware of that and some of the issues were before his time with the city dating
back approximately 20 years ago but he can check and see if any formal
applications had been submitted. Vice Chair Golden inquired if they could add in
the development agreement that the DMV transaction report be submitted to the
city annually so they can refer to it. City Attorney Rosenthal stated that is easy
to add into the development agreement. Member McKey inquired how they
would control the truck issue. Senior Planner Howell stated other than what is in
the development agreement if they receive complaints they can refer them to
Code Enforcement. City Attorney Rosenthal added that if the complaint is in
the public street they can refer that to the Police Department. A brief discussion
ensued regarding the transport vehicle that would be used to deliver/pick-up
10
'(
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
vehicles. Senior Planner Howell stated the site plan is still under review so staff
could ask the engineer of record to demonstrate that no transport trucks would be
able to go on site including smaller car carriers such as F250's.
Member Sills stated he feels they are opening a can of worms by changing the
zoning from 1-2 to 1-1 and is not in favor of it. He feels they may suddenly get
others on Roper Parkway wanting to change their zoning and soon it will be a
retail sale in an industrial park.
Member Sills seconded by Member McKey, moved to recommend to the City
Commission denial of the proposed rezoning of RT-Ocoee, LLC, Project #RZ-09-
11-08. After a brief discussion, motion failed 4-4.
Member McKey, seconded by Vice Chair Golden, moved to recommend to the
City Commission approval of the proposed rezoning of RT-Ocoee, LLC, Proiect
#RZ-09-11-08 with the condition that the DMV report be filed with the city on an
annual basis and subject to the execution of a development agreement when the
ordinance comes before the City Commission. Motion carried 5-3.
10-YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN — PROPOSED
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Principal Planner Rumer gave a brief presentation stating that according to the
Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act, Chapter 369, Part III, FS, each local
government is required to amend its comprehensive plan to include an up-to-date
10-Year Water Supply Facility Work Plan to include an evaluation of the present
and projected growth demand for a 10-year planning period.
Over the past year, the City's consultant has been working with SJRWMD on the
development of the 10-year plan. Staff reviewer for SJRWMD has afforded the
City the option of going through a pre -transmittal review of the 10-year plan and
associated comprehensive plan amendments and has provided comments that
staff has addressed.
DISCUSSION
Vice Chair Golden inquired if any maps in the comprehensive plan were updated
since it is not shown in the Policy 2.2. Principal Planner Rummer stated they
had map updates to the comprehensive plan that dealt with aquifer recharge or
class "A" soils but not to well heads. A brief discussion ensued regarding well
head protection areas.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
June 8, 2010
Member McKey commented that in the document it states they allow 10% of the
water to be lost and he feels that is horrid in this day and needs to be tightened
up. Utilities Director Smith explained that the 10% loss is not uncommon and
they are required to do some of the flushing. They do have a little bit less loss but
that is just a goal that was established.
The Public Hearing was opened. As no one wished to speak, the Public Hearing
was closed.
Vice Chair Golden, seconded by Member McKey, moved to recommend to the
City Commission the approval of: 1) addition of a 10-Year Water Supply Facilities
Work Plan by reference to the Comprehensive Plan and 2) additions to the Future
Land Use Element, Conservation Element, Potable Water Sub -Element Sanitary
Sewer Sub -Element, and Intergovernmental Coordination Element for the
purpose of implementing the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Motion
carried unanimously.
MISCELLANEOUS
Development Services Director Shadrix thanked the board personally and
professionally for the degree of professionalism and competence they have shown
since they have thrown a lot at them this month. He further stated the next
meeting will be just as busy and he would like to apologize in advance. He briefly
explained some of the projects the board can expect to be hearing in the near
future.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:52 p.m.
Attest:
APPROVED:
Melanie Sibbitt, Deputy City Clerk Bradley Campbell, Chairman
12
ITEM NUMBER IV. A.
PUBLIC HEARING
HEALTH CENTRAL
ANNEXATION and REZONING
Mayor
S. Scott Vandergrift
City Manager
Robert Frank
_ ,r enter of Good t _
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 2010
TO: The Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Michael Rumer, Principal Plann
THROUGH: Craig Shadrix, Development Services Director
SUBJECT: Health Central
Annexation/Rezoning
AX-06-10-22 & RZ-10-06-06
ISSUE:
Commissioners
Gary Hood, District 1
Rosemary Wilsen, District 2
Rusty Johnson, District 3
Joel F. Keller, District 4
Should the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Annexation and Rezoning of
the Health Central parcels?
BACKGROUND:
General Location: The subject properties are located on the north side of Old Winter Garden Road,
west of SR 408, and east of Division Street. One parcel is located on the south side of W. Colonial
Drive (SR 50) and west of SR 408.
Parcel Identification Numbers: 28-22-28-0000-00-002 (9700 W Colonial Drive), 28-22-28-6689-01-010
(3755 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-010(3802 Grove Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-030 (3818 Grove
Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-041 (3824 Grove Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-071 (3854 Grove Street), 28-22-
28-6689-02-090 (1280 Arlington Ave), 28-22-28-6689-02-110 (1398 Arlington Ave), 28-22-28-6689-02-
150 (3867 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-170 (3847 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-190 (3827 Jane
Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-200 (3817 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-210 (3801 Jane Street), 28-22-
28-6689-03-010 (1330 Ohio Ave.), 28-22-28-6689-10-010 (3900 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-10-030
(3924 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-10-040 (3928 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-10-050 (3913 Old Winter
Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-10-140 (3907 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-010 (1405
Rowe Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-030 (3826 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-060 (3832 Jane Street),
28-22-28-6689-11-080 (3838 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-110 (3844 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-
11-140 (3885 old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-180 (3873 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-
28-6689-11-200 (3861 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-220 (3845 Old Winter Garden
Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-280 (3813 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-010 (3663 Old
Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-030 (3863 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-050
(3711 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-110 (1406 Rowe Ave), 28-22-28-6689-12-120
(3747 Old Winter Garden Road
City of Ocoee - 150 N Lakeshore Drive - Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100 - fax: (407) 656-8504 - www.ci.ocoee.fl.us
Project: Health Central Annexation and Rezoning
AX-06-10-22 & RZA 0-06-06
Parcel Size: 24.68 +/-acres
Actual land use, and unique features of the subject properties: The properties are comprised of several
residential units, and vacant land (green fields).
CONSISTENCY WITH STATE & LOCAL REGULATIONS:
Annexation: With respect to State annexation criteria, Chapter 171.044 of the Florida Statutes grants
municipalities the authority to annex contiguous, compact, non -circuitous territory so long as it does not
create an enclave. Annexation of the subject properties will lessen an existing enclave that the subject
parcels are contained within. The subject properties are contiguous to the City limits on the north and
west. To the north and west is property owned by Health Central. Health Central and the City will not be
entering into an Annexation or Developer Agreement with this annexation as the parcels are located
within the Target Area #3 of the CRA Target Areas Special Development Plan.
Joint Planning Area Agreement: The subject properties are located within the Ocoee -Orange County
Joint Planning Area (JPA) and are being considered for annexation as outlined in the JPA Agreement.
Orange County has been notified of this petition in accordance with Subsection 13-A of the City of
Ocoee -Orange County Joint Planning Area Agreement.
Rezoninq:
The table below references the future land uses, zoning classifications and existing land uses of the
parcel located on the south side of SR 50:
Direction
Future Land Use
Zoning Classification
Existing Land Use
North
Commercial
C-2(Community Commercial
Offices
East
Commercial
A-1 (Orange Count
Vacant
South
Professional Offices and
Services
P-S (Professional Offices and Services)
Vacant
West
Professional Offices and
Services
P-S (Professional Offices and Services)
Vacant
The table below references the future land uses, zoning classifications and existing land uses of the
other subject parcels:
Direction
Future Land Use
Zoning Classification
Existing Land Use
North
Medium Density
R-3 (Multiple -Family Dwelling)
Vacant
East
N/A
N/A
SR 408
South
Low Density Residential /
Commercial
C-1 (Commercial) / A-1 (Agriculture)
Gas Station / Single -Family
Dwelling
West
Professional Offices and
Services
P-S (Professional Offices and Services)
Vacant
The proposed zoning designations for the properties are C-2 (Community Commercial) for the parcel
on the south side of SR 50. This parcel has a Future Land Use designation of Commercial. The
proposed C-2 zoning is also the same zoning designation as the existing Hospital. A zoning designation
of P-S (Professional Offices and Services) is proposed for a parcel with the Future Land Use
Designation of Professional Offices and Services and the remaining parcels are proposed to have an
R-3 (Multiple -Family Dwelling) zoning designation.
Page 2 of 3
Project: Health Central Annexation and Rezoning
AX-06-10-22 & RZ-10-06-05
Comprehensive Plan: The annexation is consistent with the Future Land Use Element Policy 2.5 that
states in part, "The City shall consider requests for voluntary annexation into the City when those lands
are logical extensions of the existing City limits, when services can be properly provided, and when
proposed uses are compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan the JPA Agreement, and the City's
Annexation Policy...." [Emphasis added]. The rezoning is consistent with Future Land Use Element
Policy 1.15 that states in part, "The City may assign an initial zoning, after annexation, which is
consistent with both the Future Land Use Map and the JPA Agreement..."
DISCUSSION:
Annexation Feasibility & Public Facilities Analysis Report: Based upon the projected impacts of the
proposed use and size of the parcel, Staff determined that urban services, specifically water service
could be adequately provided to the subject properties. Should the applicant choose to develop the
property in the future; however, they will be required to make certain improvements in accordance with
the Land Development Code. (See attached "Annexation Feasibility Analysis")
Summary: The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City limits, urban services can be
provided, and the annexation meets state and local regulations. Furthermore, the requested Future
Land Use and initial zoning classifications are consistent with the land use classifications on the Future
Land Use Map and the JPA Land Use Map. The land use and initial zoning are also consistent and
compatible with surrounding properties.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) RECOMMENDATION:
On July 7, 2010, the DRC met to determine if the proposed annexation was consistent with the City's
regulations and policies. Based on the above analysis and subsequent discussions, the DRC
recommended approval of the annexation and rezoning of the Health Central parcels as presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis and the subsequent DRC recommendation, Staff recommends that the
Planning & Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend approval of the
annexation of the +/-24.68 acres of land known as the Health Central Parcels, and rezoning to C-2
(Community Commercial), P-S (Professional Offices and Services), and R-3 (Multiple -Family Dwelling)
District.
Attachments:
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map with proposed Zoning Designations
2007 Aerial
Annexation Feasibility Analysis Report
Page 3 of 3
Location •
OrangeWest Central)lth
Annexation•Rezoning
l IIII III _
�IIIII � A
•: � Illnlllllllll 11111111111
• •• • • •� � 'iii� III�I�IIU�IIIIlI��iil��lltt�lt
� `Ilr II 11 Illrlll 11'. ail el 11 1 I� I
'� ' - _ �• IIIIIIP.!�IIIIIIIIIIIII
V"rrQ ,IN 911111111191111
�i,�/
.11111111111111111ON
I Jim - K-lum 911
Am
loss
loss I
r�
DepartmentAWN
to
Ocoee Community Developr
Printed:i
t
IIIkes and Water Bodies
Parcels
Low Density Residential
After Proposed Annexation
Expressways
r
Low Density Residential
MediumResidential
i D• Residential
'��°'� Professional 'I� 11 I I
s,g; Offices • Se
Commercialis
Light Industrial
,j Heavy Industrial
a, • • ►
dplains
Recreation and Open Spac;-
* •Facilities/Institutional
Road Right -of -Way
Lakes --Natural Water Bod
Unincoroorated Territory
1:6,59Z980877
16080 0 160 320 480 Feet
gm<»<�■
Clubject Property
Unincorporated Territory
EMand Other Municipalties
Zoning Classification:
1M General Agricultural (-1)
Suburban (A-2)
Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AAA)
Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA)
Single -Family Dwelling (R-IA)
Single -Family Dwelling (R-1)
One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2)
Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3)
Ml Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1)
Neighborhood Shopping (C-1)
=Community Commercial (C-2)
General Commercial (C-3)
Restricted Manufacturing
& Warehousing (1-1)
=General industrial
M Commercial (PUD)
Low Density (PUD)
Medium Density (PUD)
High Density (PUD)
M Public Use (PUD)
Unclassified
ON LA:os_2*4 XI/2tpr Q, 11 JPIR_
N
.0 et
V
ic r
_ICrYS
ry , � aff ± EM
CITY OF OCOEE
ANNEXATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
CASE NUMBER: AX-06-10-22
APPLICANT NAME: HEALTH CENTRAL
PROJECT NAME: HEALTH CENTRAL ANNEXATION AND REZONING
This form is used to evaluate annexation requests to determine the feasibility of providing urban
services to individual properties. Each department has filled in the appropriate section and the findings
are summarized below.
I. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Michael Rumer
A. Applicant/Owner
1. Owner (if different from Applicant): West Orange Health Care District aka Health Central
B. Property Location
1. General Location:
The parcels are generally located on the North side of old
Winter garden Road, East of Division Street and West of
East West Expressway (SR 408). An additional parcel is
located on the South side of Colonial Drive (SR 50), East of
the existing Health Central Hospital.
2. Parcel Identification Numbers:
28-22-28-0000-00-002 (9700 W Colonial Drive), 28-22-28-
6689-01-010 (3755 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-
010(3802 Grove Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-030 (3818
Grove Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-041 (3824 Grove Street),
28-22-28-6689-02-071 (3854 Grove Street), 28-22-28-6689-
02-090 (1280 Arlington Ave), 28-22-28-6689-02-110 (1398
Arlington Ave), 28-22-28-6689-02-150 (3867 Jane Street),
28-22-28-6689-02-170 (3847 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-
02-190 (3827 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-200 (3817
Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-02-210 (3801 Jane Street), 28-
22-28-6689-03-010 (1330 Ohio Ave.), 28-22-28-6689-10-
010 (3900 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-10-030 (3924 Jane
Street), 28-22-28-6689-10-040 (3928 Jane Street), 28-22-
28-6689-10-050 (3913 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-
6689-10-140 (3907 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-
6689-11-010 (1405 Rowe Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-030
(3826 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-060 (3832 Jane
Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-080 (3838 Jane Street), 28-22-
28-6689-11-110 (3844 Jane Street), 28-22-28-6689-11-140
(3885 old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-180
(3873 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-200
(3861 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-220
(3845 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-11-280
(3813 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-010
(3663 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-030
(3863 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-050
(3711 Old Winter Garden Road), 28-22-28-6689-12-110
(1406 Rowe Ave), 28-22-28-6689-12-120 (3747 Old Winter
Garden Road
3. Street Addresses:
See above
4. Size of Parcels:
24.68
C. Use Characteristics
Page 1 of 4
C
Applicant Name: Health Central
Project Name: Health Central Annexation and Rezoning
Case #: Ax-06-10-22
1.
Existing Use:
Vacant
2.
Proposed Use:
Mixed Use
3.
Density/ Intensity:
Not Available
4.
Projected Population:
Not Available
D. Zoning and Land Use
1.
Orange County Future Land Use:
Office, Commercial, & Medium Density
2.
Orange County Zoning:
C-1, Professional Office, A-1, & R-2
3.
Existing Ocoee Future Land Use:
Medium Density Residential, Commercial, &
Professional Offices and Services
4.
Proposed Ocoee Zoning:
R-3 and C-2
E. Consistencv
1.
Joint Planning Area
Yes
2.
Comprehensive Plan:
Yes
Chief Pete McNeil
mated Res onse Time:
3-5 Minutes
EFIREEPARTMENT
ance to Property:
Distance from Station 2 (Clarke Rd & A.D. Mims) is
1.5 miles
3. Fire Flow Requirements:
Fire Flow is 500 gpm
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief Charlie Brown
1.
Police Patrol Zone / Grid / Area:
Zone 4 / Grid 51 (Health Central)
2.
Estimated Response Time:
1 Minute 30 Seconds for Emergencies.
3.
Distance to Property:
Approx. 1.28 Miles
4.
Average Travel Time
1 Minute 45 Seconds Drive Time.
I IV. ECONOMIC VALUE Michael Rumer
1. Property Appraiser Taxable Value: 1 $2,960,165
2.
Property Appraiser Just Value
$2,960,165
3.
Estimated City Ad Valorem Taxes:
$16,273
4.
Anticipated Non -Ad Valorem Taxes:
Not Available
5.
Potential Impact Fees:
Not Available
6.
Total Project Revenues:
$581 per Dwelling for Yearly Taxes and $46,655 in
Impact Fees
V. BUILDING DEPARTMENT Michael Rumer
1. Within the 100-year Flood Plain:
Yes, Portion of northern parcel on Colonial Drive has
100 Year Flood Plan — Zone A
Page 2 of 4
Applicant Name: Health Central
Project Name: Health Central Annexation and Rezoning
Case #: Ax-06-10-22
VI. UTILITIES David Wheeler, P.E.
A. Potable Water
1. In Ocoee Service Area:
Yes
2. City Capable of Serving Area:
Yes
3. Extension Needed:
An on -site extension will be needed as development
ensues.
4. Location and Size of
Nearest Water Main:
Property accesses a 8" water line on Grove Street and
a 12" water line on Old Winter Garden Road.
B.
C
VIII
Sanitary Sewer
1.
In Ocoee Service Area:
Yes
2.
City Capable of Serving Area:
Yes
3.
Extension Needed:
No
4.
Location and Size of
Nearest Force Main:
6" Force Main on -site
5.
Annexation Agreement Needed:
No
Other
1. Utility Easement Needed:
Yes
2. Private Lift Station Needed:
Existing
3. Well Protection Area Needed:
No
TRANSPORTATION Michael Rumer
1. Paved Access:
Yes
2. ROW Dedication:
No
3. Traffic Study:
No
4. Traffic Analysis Zone:
610
. PRELIMINARY CONCURRENCY
EVALUATION Michael Rumer
At this time, adequate transportation capacity exists.
A.
Transportation:
At this time, adequate park/recreation capacity exists.
B.
Parks / Recreation:
At this time, adequate water/sewer capacity exists.
C.
Water / Sewer:
N/A
D.
Stormwater:
At this time, adequate solid waste capacity exists.
E.
Solid Waste:
N/A
F.
Impact Fees:
Page 3 of 4
Applicant Name: Health Central
Project Name: Health Central Annexation and Rezoning
Case M Ax-06-10-22
IX. SITE SPECIFIC ISSUES All Departments
The site is located within the City of Ocoee's newly established CRA Target Area Design
Overlay. The site is mostly green field with two or three single-family homes on individual lots.
X. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE REGULATIONS: Michael Rumer
This property is contiguous with the City Limits and reduces the area of an enclave; therefore
this annexation is consistent with CH. 171.043 (1) & (2), Florida Statutes.
Page 4 of 4
ITEM NUMBER V.
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Project Status Update
B. August Calendar
OAP & Z\Divider Sheets.doc
d
1
•F.:3 zus 'a" 1 ;F t E Y� +..""... _E »' a Y # •e,�°�"+�.{.q
STATl1S�'�'
PROJEGT�`l1R�i4'TE'
'r•
,• ...r'. ..aa. Y ,+, ....
•, ., •t?yy. :� .. ,....: .+.., Y.Y..-:f.,
. r <^,a. ,.. . .F. . ., , ;z r vr.. 4el x::." ::. r
"JS 1,. f, dY'y+i§. a.:.', k,,, d ;�y$�
1fr,'i= i
r.+, »..4'
«. a.:�...Y aY.,:, a# r ..
5...,«.
J'; #,.#..
pa ., t,. '. a "?"'...
�,�.r
.. t "4^ afi, i..�.
�... Y a< ..::. ...
4 . a x"�. ..,: �';,.,. :: & {., ,�',re,...
ret ,... xa's"re re , • � u :... .k»'1 ,, .,. ,
_.� � f. # ,d� „?,�F � `'i:-^ .tF K.'t,^ .....
.,b'M.
Current
,4.. .=. ,_.
t5, � Yw ..«FrM1 *n''"2rv's"ie%F,. p
} re5.�
fi
� .<w &=
J 1 � ., .. ,•¢.++14f
#, k, % .t <;�.,-��
43i Q �°*rti�».,y-re
: A i. ��1
aEt'^4'.
,%%
� ,�✓a. a 2 .?.t'.^ t E: .°�:
�
�, ,� � � # � Projects � � _� �
� �
;�: B I . �►i' � � REC � re�
� :., �,
Commercial
And Everything Under the Sun
IReview
01/19/10
AF
1st
Wall Sign DENIED 1/21/10
—�
Commercial
IReview
' 05/20/10
BH
4th
Monument Sign APPROVED 5/20/10
BB&T Bank
_
_
Commercial
Belmere
Review
08/06/09
MR 1st
New Retail Building B DENIED 08/06/09
Casa Mirella Apartments (fka Maguire Shoppes
Commercial
New Apartment Building (Type II) 36 units
Review
Review
06/04/09
MR 1st
DENIED 6/17/09
II)
Shoppes
T
New Apartment Building (Type I ) 24 units
Casa Mirella Apartments (fka Maguire
MR
DENIED 6/17/09
Review
06/04/09
1 st
_
II)
( fka Maguie Shoppes
Casa Mirella A artments r
P
Commercial
�
Review
06/04/09
MR 1 st
Clubhouse - DENIED 7/13/09
Commercial
Repair Center
Review
� 05113/1
AF 1 st Wall Sign DENIED 5/14110 — - -
Cellphone
PF Small Scale
/
_
Plan 02/08/10�
AF 3rd Staff Comments sent out 6/18/10
Central Sweeping
—I
SS- 2009 004 Site
City Place at Maguire (fka Professional Park way
j Rezoning to
RZ-08-03-03 PUD 12/18/08 '
AF 3rd Staff comments sent out on 2/5/09
Town Center)
-
-- S lam I Scale Site
Classic Smiles
� SS-2010-003 Plan 06/01 /10
BH 1 st Staff comments sent out 6/22/10
—
T P/F Small Scale
Crystal Investment Business Plaza
SS-2008-004 Site Plan I 09/17/09 1
BH 3rd IComments sent out 10/26/09
Diplomat Tower _
Commercial
Review 12/14/09
AF 2nd New 3 Story Office Building DENIED 12/16/09
Preliminary
Eagle Creek of Ocoee
LS-2009-002 Subdivision Plan 02/01/10
� _ �
n Staff comments sent out 3/18/10
BH 2 d —.
�,
-- _
Annex, Rez &
Waiting on JPA Amendment to process to City
East Crown Industrial
AX-07-07-10 CPA 02/25/08
MR 2nd commission
_ - - --
- —
Commercial
Florida Furniture Center
Review 06/16/10
�
sWall Sign APPROVED 6/21/10 _
t AF 1 �
Lot Grading
Forestbrooke Subdivision Phase III
'2001-001 1Revision 07/01/10
4—
BH 1st (Staff Comments due 7/08/10 —
5/3/10
Foundation of Li hts
01-10SE-016 04/20/10
BH 1i st Staff Comments sent
Current Project Status2.xls/Review
7/7/2010
1 of 4
Foundation of Lights
Foundation of Lights (Deo Sharma)
F/X Warehouse Complex
Glad Tidings Church Addition
HighPoint Church
Hudson's Furniture —
Le Pup
Manheim Orlando Auto Auction REVISED
Marshall Farms Business Center
McCormick Woods Phase 2 -- Lot 159
McDonalds @ 11131 W. Colonial Drive
Miracle Mile Raceway (Towne Square Shopping
Discount Pharmacy (Ocoee Commo
101-10SE-016
06/29/10 j BH
Commercial
�. Review
07/91/10 BH
Preliminary/Final
LS-2007-023 Site Plan
05/11/09 BH
LS-2007-018
P/F Site Plan
03/25/10
1 AF
Commercial
Review
06/02/10
MR
Commercial
—
Review
06/01 /10
AF
,Commercial
Review
06/10/10 BH
1
Commercial
Review 05/25/10 AF
LS-2009-003
Final Site Plan 12/10/09 AF
Plan Review
Ocoee Oaks United Methodist Church
AX-04-10-20
Park Square RZ-10-04-03
05/24/10 AF
Commercial
Review 06/29/10 AF
Commercial
. Review
07/06/10
Commercial
Review
Commercial
Review
Annexation &
Rezoning
2nd Staff Comments due 7/09/10
1st _ Bathroom Remodel DENIED 7/6/10
On hold pending receipt of the Joinder &
4th i Consent Forms
5th Staff Comments sent 5/3/10
1st Interior Buildout APPROVED 6/2/10
1st Monument Sign DENIED 6/01/10
1st Wall sign APPROVED 6/11/10
SED Above Gound Fuel Tank
3rd APPROVED 5/25/10
2nd ',Staff Comments sent out 1/11/10
3301 McCormick Woods Drive
1 st Model Conversion APPROVED 5/25/10
I
j Refresh landscaping - new plants, etc
1st APPROVED7/01/10
AF � 1st I Wall Sign DENIED 7/7/10
06/03/10 BH
05/24/10
05/19/10
BH
AF
1 st Interior Alteration APPROVED 6/08/10
1st IAluminum Fence APPROVED 5/25/10
2nd j Staff Comments sent out 6/8/10
Current Project Status2.xls/Review 7/7/2010 2 of 4
40p.
Quality Car Care 751 Roper Pkwy
Ram's Auto Center, 150 HM Bowness Rd
Ram's Auto Center, 150 HM Bowness Rd
Regions Bank (Maguire Groves)
RLF Realty International (Maguire Shoppi
Roberson Road AX & RZ
RT - Ocoee, LLC
Select Physical Therapy
at the
Silver
Stor Kwik
Sweetwater Carwash
Thrift Mart (Westgate Resorts)
Transaction Data Systems
UPS
AX-05-010-21
RZ-10-05-04
!RZ-09211-08
SS-2009-005
SS-2008-005
LS-2010-001
SS-2010-004
Commercial
Review
05/24/10
AF_
Commercial
Review
05/19/10
AF
Commercial
Review
05/19/10
AF
Commercial
Review 03/03/10
AF
Commercial
Review 7/07/10 AF
nexation with j
Initial Zoning of
PUD 05/24/10 AF
Rezoning & P/F—
Site Plan 06/09/10 BH
Commercial
Review 07/07/10 I BH_
!Small Scale Site -
Plan 04/26/10 AF
Commercial
Review
01/20/09 AF
Large Scale
Preliminary/Finall�
Site Plan 06/28/10 BH
!Commercial
Review 09/24/09 BH
Commercial
Review
06/29/10 j BH
Small Scale Site
Plan
06/08/10 AF
_
Commercial
Review
05/20/10 BH
7/7/2010
1 st ' LDC conformance & Zoning Approval
LDC conformance &Zoning Approval
APPROVED 6�19110
1st I �„-.--.nPPR.,
1 st Wall Sign APPROVED 5/24/10_
1 st Wire & Install Outside Lighting DENIED 3/4/10
1st Sign APPROVED 7/7/10
1 st Staff comments sent out 6/17/10
3rd Staff comments sent out 6/30/10
1 st I Relocate Sign
3rd Staff Comments sent out 5/24/10
1 st DENIED 2/6/09
3rd _ Staff Comments due 7/09/10
2nd I Wall Sign (revision) DENIED 8/26/09
1st all Sign APPROVED 7/01/10
1 st Staff Comments sent out 6/24/10
Curb Around Wash Basin, Metal Building
3rd Cover, Install Lighting APPROVED 5/18/10
3 of 4
Current Project Status2.xls/Review
Annexation,
Rezoning, &
IAX-05-08-25
Large Scale
RZ-08-09-06
Preliminary
West Colonial Parcel (Walia)1
West -OrangeCommercal Center (2705 Rew
LS-07-021
Subdivision Plan 10/23/08
BH 6th
_
Development
pment Agreement under discussion
Circle)
Whitaker TowingS-2010-001
Commercial
Review
SSSP
01/04/10
+06/18/10
AF 1 st Antennas on Existing Tower DENIED 1/20/10
AF �2n Sd tall Comments due 06/28/10
ommercial---^
Yordan Cafe
Review
06/28/10
AF 1st j
Wall Si n APPROVED 6/29/10
Current Project Status2.xls/Review 7/7/2010 4 of 4
on Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
D
7:00 p.m.
@ Comm. Chambers
7
City Hall closed in
City
�G
observance of
CommissionIndependence
°�. 'IL"
Day
7: 15 p.m.
�l�
@ Comm. Chambers
1
12
1 Planning &1
14
15 CACO D
1
Zoning Commission
7:00 p.m.
17
7:00 p.m.
@ Fire Station One
@ Comm. Chambers
Police Infraction
7/20 Agenda Items
7/20Staff Reports
7/20 Agenda
Hearinc, Board
Due to City Clerk
Due to City Manager
Published
7:00 P.M.
Comm. Chambers
18
19
20
21
22 Tentative
23
24
Employee Committee
City
Board of Adjustment
'@. 1:30 p.m.
Commission
6:00 p.m.
Parks & Recreation
7:I5 p.m.
CACOPD
Advisory Bd
@ Comm. Chambers
7:00 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
@ Comm. Chambers
(a� 'Tom Ison Center
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Code Enforcement
7:00 p.m.
8/03 Agenda Items
@ Comm. Chambers
8/03 Agenda
Due to City Clerk
8/03 Staff Reports
Published