HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-28-2010 Minutes MINUTES OF THE CITY OF OCOEE
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 28, 2010
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Godek called the regular meeting of the Ocoee Code Enforcement Board to order
at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers at City Hall. Member Lowery led the Invocation
and Member Alexander led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The roll was called and a
quorum was declared present.
PRESENT: Chairman Godek, Vice Chair M. Godek, Members Alexander, Lowery, and
Alternate Member Kelley. Also present were Code Enforcement Officer
Delgado, Code Enforcement Officer Loeffler, Code Enforcement Officer
Rodriguez, Code Enforcement Officer Siegrist, Fire Inspector Sorenson,
Administrative Assistant Ballard, Attorney Sneed, Assistant City Attorney
Hamilton, and Deputy City Clerk Sibbitt.
ABSENT: Members Amey, Hopper, Osborne, and Sais were absent excused.
GUESTS: None.
Administrative Assistant Ballard administered the oath to the Code Enforcement Officers,
Fire Inspector, and anyone intending to speak regarding a case.
CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD AND WILL BE
ACTED UPON BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS DISCUSSION IS DESIRED BY A
MEMBER OF THE BOARD, IN WHICH CASE THE CHAIRMAN WILL INSTRUCT THE BOARD CLERK TO REMOVE THE ITEM FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA AND SUCH ITEM WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
The Consent Agenda consisted of approval of Items A, B and C. *Note: Consent Agenda was
amended.
A. Minutes of the August 24, 2010, Code Enforcement Board Meeting
B. Dismissal or Compliance. (Case Numbers 10 -188, 10 -221, 10 -231, 10 -232, 10 -237, 10-
238, 10 -239, 10 -240, and 10 -242 were transferred to consent.)
Case Number Respondent Location of Violation
1) 10 -188 Margin, LLC 399 Enterprise Street # 407
Affordable Mercedes -Benz & BMW, INC
2) 10 -221 Sandy's Home Decor 9401 W Colonial Drive # 712
3) 10 -231 Christopher Blaine Andrews 307 Longshadows Court
4) 10 -232 Loli Alarcon & Walter Alarcon 3435 McCormick Woods Dr.
5) 10 -237 Rams Auto Center, INC 150 11 M Bowness Rd
6) 10 -238 Iovonne E Riestra 1826 Cassingham Circle
7) 10 -239 Kamaldai Ramkissoon & Ramdeholl Devi 1401 Prairie Oaks Court
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
8) 10 -240 Silver Star Learning Center, INC. 241 Ocoee Apopka Road
9) 10 -242 Florida Bank OF Commerce E Silver Star Road
C. Order of Continuance (October 26, 2010, Meeting). (Case Number 10 -243 was
transferred to consent.)
Case Number Respondent Location of Violation
1) 10 -243 Nga Hoang Phung 2130 Laurel Blossom Circle
Kevin Dong Huynh
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Member Alexander, moved to approve the Consent
Agenda as presented by city staff Motion carried unanimously.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Member Lowery, moved to hear the cases in the following
order: Case Nos. 97 -149, 06 -117, 10 -241, and 07 -163; then revert back to the agenda.
Motion carried unanimously.
COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS - None.
HEARINGS OF STATEMENTS OF VIOLATIONS
PURSUANT TO THE HEARING RULES ADOPTED BY THIS BOARD ON JUNE 27, 1995, VARIOUS DOCUMENTS ARE USED BY THE CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN EACH CASE AND ARE REPORTED IN THE CASE TESTIMONY GIVEN BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
IN THESE MINUTES THE TITLES TO THOSE DOCUMENTS WILL BE ABBREVIATED AS FOLLOWS:
ACFD - AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE FOR DEMOLITION, AOC - AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE, AONC - AFFIDAVIT OF NON - COMPLIANCE,
ATF- APPLICATION TO FORECLOSE, CO - COMPLIANCE ORDER, CMFD — COMMISSION MEETING FOR DETERMINATION, CS — CONTINUED
STAY, CTR - COPY TO RESPONDENT, ECO — EXTENDED COMPLIANCE ORDER, EX- EXHIBITS, FS- FEES STAYED, LDC — Land Development
Code, NOCV - NOTICE OF CODE VIOLATION, NOH - NOTICE OF HEARING, NS -No Service, OAF - ORDER AUTHORIZING FORECLOSURE, OIF/L-
ORDER IMPOSING FINE/LIEN, ONC - ORDER OF NON - COMPLIANCE, OOC - ORDER OF CONTINUANCE, , ORF — ORDER REDUCING FINE,
PDFS - PER DAY FINE SUSPENDED, POS - PROOF OF SERVICE, RFR - REQUEST FOR REHEARING, RFRDUC- REQUEST FOR REDUCTION
DENIED UNTIL COMPLIANCE, ROF- REDUCTION OF FINE, SFH — SUBPOENA FOR HEARING, SOV - STATEMENT OF VIOLATION (S) and WD —
WITHDREW.
HEARINGS ON STATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS PURSUANT TO NOTICES OF
HEARINGS
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Alternate Member Kelley, moved in Case No. 97 -149 to
re -hear case for request of reduction of fine. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 97 -149 — Douglas and Nancy Pridgen
509 Nicole Blvd. Officer Cronnon
Violation Cited: 165-3
11 -05 -97 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 12 -08 -97
12 -09 -97 SOV
12 -09 -97 NOH Meeting Date: 01 -27 -98
12 -09 -97 POS Certified Mail
12 -30 -97 POS Hand Delivery
01 -27 -98 CO Comply by 02 -03 -98 or be fined $100 /per day
02 -10 -98 ANC Re- inspection date: 02 -04 -98
02 -24 -98 OIFL Recorded 02 -27 -98
09 -01 -09 AC
09 -01 -09 OIFL Total due: $459,200
Observation: Inoperable vehicle in front yard.
Page 2 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Officer Loeffler gave a brief summary of the case and stated this case was observed and
presented to the Code Enforcement Board prior to any of the current officer being employed
by the city. He further stated he was sent out to the property on May 12, 2009, and did report
that there was some form of inoperable vehicle on the property but he was not sure if it was
the same vehicle.
Attorney Sneed stated she would recommend they let the respondent give his testimony first
then they can question the officer.
Lynn Walker Wright, Attorney representing the respondent, stated that this is a rental
property and they are here to prove that the notice sent in 1998 was never received by the
respondent. Mr. Pridgen did however; receive a notice informing him of the $459,200 fine
which is why he asked her to represent him. Ms. Wright stated that Mr. Pridgen is here and
prepared to testify that he did live at that address at one time, there were two trucks in front of
the residence back in the 90's (both trucks were operable), and he has worked for a car store
for many years which requires him to take a flat bed truck home leaving his personal vehicle
at his address. She further explained and provided exhibits to help her testimony and had Mr.
Pridgen give his testimony.
Chairman Godek inquired from the respondent if he is testifying that this violation has never
happened. Mr. Pridgen stated that is correct. Chairman Godek inquired if in the past did
the officers not have to go back to observe if the violation had been corrected. Officer
Loeffler stated he is not sure how it was handled prior to his employment. Alternate
Member Kelley stated that looking at the paperwork it shows that in December 30, 1997, a
letter was hand delivered to him by Officer G. Edwards. Mr. Pridgen stated he believes that
was a notice that was for a car that was not on his property and he had spoken with a lady
officer and explained that to her. Vice Chair M. Godek stated that the two pictures he
presented as evidence were not dated and shows an unidentified location. Alternate
Member Kelley stated that in the letter it mentions truck and never mentions a car so he is not
sure how the neighbor's vehicle may have been the vehicle in question. Mr. Pridgen stated
his truck has never had a flat tire. Member Lowery inquired if he has the letter from
December 1997 because that would have informed him of the hearing. Mr. Pridgen stated he
looked at the letter but contacted the City and was referred to a lady in code enforcement who
he informed that the vehicle in question was not his car. Member Alexander inquired if any
of the conversations that Mr. Pridgen is stating that took place, located in the file. Officer
Loeffler stated there are no notations in the file regarding the conversations just the routine
required mailings. Alternate Member Kelley inquired as to what code violations were cited
because he is hearing several violations from the testimony. Officer Loeffler stated from
what he reviewed in the files it was165 -3 which is supported by definition 165 -4. Vice Chair
M. Godek stated that using the letter that Mr. Pridgen submitted as evidence along with his
request for reduction. It stated that the truck in question was legally tagged from 1998 -2007;
however looking back at his registrations they are dated in 1999. He further stated based on
the evidence in front of them it seemed that Mr. Pridgen has one year and three months of
Page 3 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
violations because they have nothing showing compliance. Assistant City Attorney
Hamilton stated that the board can do whatever it deems appropriate, but he does have the file
and the vehicle that was the subject of the notice is only identified as a gray truck in the front
yard with the appearance of being inoperable. The proof of delivery is from Officer Edwards
stating that on December 30, 1997, he did hand delivery to the respondent. Attorney Sneed
reminded the board that this is a recorded lien, and they are only making a recommendation to
the City Commission.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded bv Member Lowery, moved in Case No. 97 -149 to
recommend to the City Commission to reduce the fine to $4,550. Motion carried unanimously.
Member Lowery, seconded bv Vice Chair M. Godek, moved in Case No. 06 -117 to re -hear
case for request of reduction of fine. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 06 -117 — David W. Driesse
471 Little Aspen Court Officer Siegrist
Violation Cited: 115 -5, 115 -3, 108 -23Q
08 -10 -06 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 08 -28 -06
08 -30 -06 SOV
08 -30 -06 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -26 -06
08 -30 -06 POS Certified Mail
09 -06 -06 POS Regular Mail
09 -0609 POS Posting
09 -26 -06 CO Comply by 10 -10 -06 or be fined $150 /per day
10 -11 -06 ANC Re- inspection date: 02 -04 -98
10 -24 -06 OIFL As of 10 -11 -06
10 -12 -09 AC
10 -14 -09 OIFL Total due: $164,400
10 -14 -09 POS Regular & Certified Mail
Observation: Weed/grass growth over 10 ". Also large dead tree limbs and branches in backyard. Also 8ft.
white fence in backyard in poor condition.
Officer Siegrist gave a brief history of the case and further stated that the total fine amount
due is $164,400.
David Driesse stated he received the letter from the City regarding a lien on his property from
his neighbor on Labor Day. He further stated the letter was addressed to the Medina's and he
has no idea who they are. He also stated he had never received a notice of violation in 2006.
Mr. Driesse further explained the only violation he has ever received to his Maitland address
from the City was for his neighbor's boat being parked in his driveway and he immediately
brought that into compliance. He further stated the envelope he did receive this time reads,
"return to sender not deliverable as addressed ". It was mailed regular and not first class
certified and was addressed to 471 Little Aspen Court. The mail carrier gave the letter to his
neighbor who in turn contacted him to pick it up. Mr. Driesse stated that 471 Little Aspen
Court is a rental property and he has not resided there since 2005. Attorney Sneed advised
the board that the notice requirement is that if you send it by mail the government agency is
Page 4 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
required to send it certified to the address listed on the property appraiser's office unless the
City has another address of record. If it is returned and refused the City can then send it
regular mail and post City Hall which constitutes a notice. Mr. Driesse stated that he was
notified at his Maitland address for the boat that was in his driveway and feels that at some
point the City knew where he lived. Officer Siegrist stated that he has no knowledge of a
boat in the driveway but he does have several proof of services for certified and regular mail.
He also posted a notice. Member Alexander inquired about the Medians' that were
mentioned in his letter. Mr. Driesse read the letter aloud to the board. Attorney Sneed
stated it seems like an obvious cut and paste mistake. She further explained the orders are a
form and the clerk cuts and paste the respondents name into the field. Alternate Member
Kelley inquired if we happen to know the address of the respondent back in 2006. Officer
Siegrist stated in 2006 Mr. Driesse's address according to the property appraiser's office was
471 Little Aspen Court. Mr. Driesse inquired if the post office is required to forward his mail
after a year. Officer Siegrist stated he is not aware but does believe paperwork has to be filed
for that to happen. Attorney Sneed stated based on the documents in the file, constructive
notice was provided to the respondent. Vice Chair M. Godek inquired if they could cross -
reference the Medina respondents to see if they somehow escaped some kind of violations. A
brief discussion ensued regarding the Medina name in the document. Attorney Sneed
advised the board that they did not have to make a decision tonight; they have the right to
continue this and have city staff bring the files before the board for review.
Member Lowery, seconded by Vice Chair M. Godek, moved in Case No. 06 -117 to table this
case to the next meeting so staff can look further into the allegations and provide the correct
paperwork so a recommendation can be made. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -241— Sanjeey Bhatta & Pritha Dhungana
3420 Big Eagle Drive Officer Loeffler
Violation Cited: 115 -5, 115 -3, 143 -15, 143 -2E
08 -16 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 09 -03 -10
09 -15 -10 SOV
09 -15 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -28 -10
09 -15 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
Observation: Excessive weed/grass growth. Trash and debris, unauthorized accumulation (Solid Waste)
container (Franchisee).
Officer Loeffler gave a brief history of the case and further stated, as of September 24, 2010,
the property is in compliance.
Sanjeey Bhatta stated that he just realized the envelope has his address wrong and he would
have complied a lot sooner had he known he needed to change his address.
Alternate Member Kellen, seconded by Member Lowery, moved in Case No. 10 -241 to find
the respondent in violation as cited as of August 31, 2010, but in compliance as of September
24, 2010 and no fine be assessed at this time. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 5 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Alternate Member Kelley, seconded by Member Alexander, moved in Case No. 07 -163 to re-
hear case for request of reduction of fine. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 07 -163 — Denver Harper
19 Cedar Key Court Officer Delgado
Violation Cited: 108 -22, 108 -24, 108 -19A, 108 -23, 108 -19I
07 -31 -07 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 08 -10 -07
08 -14 -07 SOV
08 -14 -07 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -28 -07
08 -14 -07 POS Certified Mail
08 -28 -07 CO Comply by 09 -11 -07 or be fined $50 /per day per violation
08 -29 -07 POS Regular & Certified Mail
09 -12 -07 ANC
09 -25 -07 OIFL
08 -21 -08 AC
06 -23 -09 OIFL Total due: $17,250
Observation: Interior electrical not to code, unsafe electrical condition (extension cords). Permit required.
Washer waste not connected to waste septic system. No smoke detectors installed. Trash/debris. Kitchen and
bathrooms under sink water damaged. Water damage around bathtub, floors, and walls. Holes throughout.
Bathtub and shower in master bedroom does not work. Roach infested.
Officer Delgado gave a brief history of the case and further stated that the tenant did get a
permit, but still did not come into full compliance until August 21, 2008. Member Lowery
inquired if in 2008 all inspections were done and passed. Officer Delgado stated that is
correct, he did have all required inspections. She further explained that he pulled a permit to
fix the violations, but when it expired, another code case was opened for that violation which
is what she believes prompted the full compliance. Alternate Member Kelley inquired who
owns the property. Russell Harper stated that Denver Harper was his great - grandfather, but
he passed in 2000 and his grandfather inherited the properties. When they inherited the
properties, they were all a mess so he has been taking care of the properties one at a time. His
grandfather lives in Georgia, and he works for him in maintaining the properties. Alternate
Member Kelley inquired if there was anyone living in the home at the time. Mr. Harper
stated that he had relocated the tenants, so the house was empty when he was working on it.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Alternate Member Kelley, moved in Case No. 07 - 163 to
recommend to the City Commission to reduce the fine to $1, 725. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 6 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Case No. 10 -217 — Radio Shack
9401 W. Colonial Drive Ste. 410 Fire Inspector Sorenson
Violation Cited: NFPA 1
08 -10 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 08 -18 -10
08 -19 -10 SOV Hand Delivery
08 -19 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -28 -10
08 -19 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
Observation: Missing or damaged ceiling tiles.
Fire Inspector Sorenson gave a brief history of the case and further stated, as of September
15, 2010, the property was in compliance. The city is requesting the recovery of the
administrative cost of $413.55.
Member Alexander, seconded by Vice Chair M. Godek, moved in Case Number 10 -217 to
ind the respondent in violation as cited as o August 17 2010 but in comsliance as o
September 15, 2010, and no fine be assessed at this time; however, the respondent pay the
administrative cost of $413.55. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -219 — Jospeh C. Elcinette & Emmanuel J. Pierre
2026 Cassingham Circle Officer Delgado
Violation Cited: 115 -5, 115 -7
08 -19 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: REPEAT VIOLATION
08 -19 -10 SOV
08 -19 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -28 -10
08 -19 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
Observation: Excessive weed or grass growth. Duty of property owner.
Officer Delgado gave a brief history of the case providing exhibits and further stated this is a
repeat violation. She further stated as of August 26, 2010, the property was in compliance.
This is the third time this violation has come before the board for this address. She stated they
have a fine against the property for $500. Officer Delgado stated there are tenants in the
home. She further stated she went by the home today and the grass is overgrown again.
Attorney Sneed advised the board that the respondent had 10 days of repeat violation but it
seems they are a repeat again. Officer Delgado stated this seems to be a pattern with the
respondents. Attorney Sneed advised the board that because this is a repeat violation, and
they have heard testimony again tonight that the respondent is in non - compliance; they can
impose a fine for the 10 days plus each, and every day they continue to remain in violation
from today's date.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Alternate Member Kelley, moved in Case Number 10 -219
to find the respondent in violation as a repeat violator as cited as of August 17, 2010, fine
them $750 for repeat violation, and be given until October 5, 2010, to come into compliance
or be fined $100 /per day thereafter. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 7 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Case No. 10 -229 — MFCS Investors, LLC
1100 Blackwood Avenue Officer Delgado
Violation Cited: 115 -5, 115 -7
09 -01 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: REPEAT VIOLATION
09 -01 -10 SOV
09 -01 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -28 -10
09 -01 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
Observation: Excessive weed or grass growth. Duty of property owner.
Officer Delgado gave a brief history of the case providing exhibits and further stated this is a
repeat violation. She further stated as of September 7, 2010, the property was in compliance.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Member Alexander, moved in Case Number 10 -229 to
find the respondent in violation as a repeat violator as cited as of August 21, 2010, and in
compliance as of September 7, 2010, but the respondent to pay a fine of $750. Motion
carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -233 — Arturo Velasquez & Adelfina Velasquez
470 Wurst Road Officer Loeffler
Violation Cited: LDC 6 -4 6(b), 168 -6B1
08 -06 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 08 -17 -10
09 -16 -10 SOV
09 -16 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -28 -10
09 -16 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
Observation: Trailer/RV's parked on private property.
Officer Loeffler gave a brief history of the case providing exhibits. He further stated, as of
today, the property is in compliance.
Member Lowery, seconded by Vice Chair M. Godek, moved in Case Number 10 -233 to find
the respondent in violation as cited as of August 13, 2010, but in compliance as of September
28, 2010, and no fine be assessed at this time. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -236 — Gaitree & Rory B. Shananhan
1334 Vickers Lake Drive Officer Delgado
Violation Cited: 115 -1, 115 -5A, 108 -23 (1) (2)
08 -19 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 09 -01 -10
09 -03 -10 SOV
09 -03 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 09 -28 -10
09 -03 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
09 -17 -10 POS Posting
Observation: Conditions constituting a nuisance - general requirements interior /exterior. Excessive weed or
grass growth.
Officer Delgado gave a brief history of the case providing exhibits and further stated, as of
today, the property is in non - compliance. The city is looking to abate the nuisance by
Page 8of13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
removing the tree limbs that are hanging onto the roof. A brief discussion ensued regarding
abating the property.
Member Lowery, seconded by Alternate Member Kelley, moved in Case No. 10 -236 to find
the respondent in violation as cited as of August 29, 2010, and be given until October 8, 2010,
to comply or be fined $150 /per day thereafter per violation. Also authorize the City to abate
the nuisance and add the cost to the fine. Motion carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
Case No. 08 -074 — Fernando Rodriguez and Edith Mendoza
2691 Horn Lake Circle Officer Rodriguez
Violation Cited: 105.4, 51 -128g
01 -30 -08 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 02 -27 -08
03 -10 -08 SOV
03 -10 -08 NOH Meeting Date: 03 -25 -08
03 -10 -08 POS Regular & Certified Mail
03 -25 -08 CO Given until 04 -08 -08 to comply or be fined $200 /per day
04 -09 -08 ANC
04 -22 -08 OIFL
01 -25 -10 ANC
Observation: Failure to obtain any required inspections for a screen room, permit #0600992, issued on April
28, 2006, and expired on November 1, 2006, and $25.00 due fore re- inspection fee.
Officer Rodriguez stated that this case is an old case and she is asking for the case to be
amended to only have Edith Mendoza as a respondent and remove Fernando Rodriguez.
Member Lowery, seconded by Alternate Member Kelley, moved in Case No. 08 - 074 to
dismiss Fernando Rodriguez as a respondent from the case. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -124 — Jeremy & Emma Bellis
321 Trancas Court Officer Siegrist
Violation Cited: 168 -6
05 -18 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 06 -01 -10
06 -02 -10 SOV
06 -02 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 06 -22 -10
06 -02 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
06 -22 -10 CO Given until 08-13-10 to comply or be fined $100 /per day thereafter
06 -25 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
07 -29 -10 OC Board extended compliance date to 08 -24 -10
07 -29 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Extension to 09 -27 -10
Observation: Camper trailer parked (no tag) in front/side yard.
In compliance.
Page 9of13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Case No. 10 -152 — Richard R. Wilson Jr. Life Estate REM: Joel David Buckley
23 Cockles Key Drive Officer Siegrist
Violation Cited: 165 -3, 115 -3
06 -03 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 06 -06 -10
06 -06 -10 SOV
06 -06 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 07 -27 -10
06 -06 -10 POS Regular and Certified Mail
07 -14 -10 POS Hand Delivery
07 -29 -10 CO Given until 09 -17 -10 to comply or be fmed $100 /per day
07 -29 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
09 -15 -10 AC
Observation: Prohibited Acts, Junk Vehicles on Property, No Valid Tags & Disrepair.
In compliance as of September 15, 2010.
Case No. 10 -193 — Marie Lina & Jean Rhodes Camille
2109 El Marra Drive Officer Rodriguez
Violation Cited: 115 -5
07 -07 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 07 -28 -10
07 -29 -10 SOV
07 -29 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
07 -29 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09-10-10 to comply or be fmed $50 /per day
09 -15 -10 AC
Observation: Excessive weed or grass growth.
In compliance.
Case No. 10 -194 — GianMarco Rossi
2382 Laurel Blossom Circle Officer Rodriguez
Violation Cited: 115 -5
07 -07 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 07 -28 -10
07 -29 -10 SOV
07 -29 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
07 -29 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09 -10 -10 to comply or be fined $50 /per day
09 -15 -10 AC
Observation: Excessive weed or grass growth.
In compliance.
Page 10 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Case No. 10 -195 — Dinh Nguyen
2496 Laurel Blossom Circle Officer Rodriguez
Violation Cited: 115 -5
07 -07 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 07 -28 -10
07 -29 -10 SOV
07 -29 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
07 -29 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09-10-10 to comply or be fined $50 /per day
Also abate and add cost to the fine.
09 -15 -10 AC
Observation: Excessive weed or grass growth.
In compliance.
Case No. 10 -203 — Alison G. Chariot
6836 Sawmill Blvd. Officer Rodriguez
Violation Cited: 115 -3, 108 -23 I
07 -29 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 08- 0506 -10
08 -09 -10 SOV
08 -09 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
08 -09 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09 -10 -10 to comply or be fmed $100 /per day per violation
Also abate and add cost to the fine.
09 -13 -10 ANC
Observation: Prohibited acts, general requirements, remove misc. junk/debris from property, replace /secure
broken window.
Officer Rodriguez stated this is to impose fine, and they have an administrative cost of
$398.01.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Member Alexander, moved in Case No. 10 -203 to impose
fine effective September 11, 2010, and have respondent pay all administrative cost. Also
authorize abatement and add cost to the fine. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -209 — Luis A. Barragan
464 Northern Durango Officer Loeffler
Violation Cited: 115 -3, 168 -6 B (1) (a) (b)
07 -13 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 07 -19 -10
08 -12 -10 SOV
08 -12 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
08 -12 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09 -03 -10 to comply or be fmed $100 /per day per violation
Observation: Parking on public or private property, prohibited acts.
In compliance.
Page 11 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
Case No. 10 -210 — Edgardo & Natalie Caruso
409 Little Spring Hill Drive Officer Loeffler
07 -21 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 07 -28 -10
08 -12 -10 SOV
08 -12 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
08 -12 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09-03-10 to comply or be fined $100 /per day per violation
Also abate the nuisance and add cost to the fme
Observation: Prohibited acts, general requirements (broken window, fallen decayed tree limbs).
Officer Loeffler stated this is to impose fine.
Vice Chair M. Godek, seconded by Member Lowery, moved in Case No. 10 -210 to impose
fine effective September 4, 2010, and authorize abatement and add cost to the fine. Motion
carried unanimously.
Case No. 10 -212 — Denise Brown
204 Audrey Street Officer Loeffler
Violation Cited: 115 -5 A.C., 115 -3, 115 -6, 108.23Q
07 -28 -10 NOCV Re- Inspection Date: 08 -05 -10
08 -12 -10 SOV
08 -12 -10 NOH Meeting Date: 08 -24 -10
08 -12 -10 POS Regular & Certified Mail
08 -24 -10 CO Given until 09-03-10 to comply or be fined $250 /per day per violation
Also abate nuisance and add cost to the fme
Observation: Excessive weed or grass. Prohibited acts, abandoned or unsafe swimming pool, general
requirements.
Officer Loeffler stated this is to impose fine.
Member Lowery, seconded by Alternate Member Kelley, moved in Case No. 10 -212 to
impose fine effective September 4, 2010, and authorize abatement and add cost to the fine.
Motion carried unanimously.
COMMENTS
Officer Siegrist thanked citizens for their compliance.
Chairman Godek announced this would be Deputy City Clerk Sibbitt's last meeting, and a
new recording clerk will be stepping in.
Member Alexander, Lowery, and Alternate Member Kelley all thanked the Code
Enforcement Officers for a wonderful job. Member Lowery also thanked the attorney for
keeping the board in line.
Chairman Godek inquired if e -better place was still in use since he had heard it was no
q
longer available. Officer Loeffler stated there is a new system on the website which is very
similar to e -better place.
Page 12 of 13
Code Enforcement Board Minutes
September 28, 2010
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m.
ttest: APPR 1 % I :
//lam
Melanie Sibbitt, Deputy City Cler Robert Godek, Chairman
Page 13 of 13