HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-12-2003 Agenda Packet Mayor ,S C Good Lf bg Commissioners
S. Scott Vandergrift . -. Danny Howell, District 1
OCity Scott Anderson, District 2
Manager - _ - Rusty Johnson, District 3
Jim Gleason �7° _ Nancy J. Parker, District 4
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA
(Local Planning Agency)
Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum
IL CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting held Tuesday, July 8, 2003
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. Ocoee Crown Point PUD
1. Land Use Plan (Public Hearing)
2. Preliminary Subdivision Plan (Public Hearing)
3. Public Buildings Authorization (Public Hearing)
4. Final Subdivision Plan
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Project Status Report
B. August Calendar
C. Zoning Map & Future Land Use Map
V. ADJUOURNMENT
NOTE: Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meetings take place on the second Tuesday of every month at
7:00 pm in the Ocoee Commission Chambers in City Hall unless otherwise advertised. Any person who desires to
appeal any decision at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which indudes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
based.
Also, in accordance with Florida Statute 286.26: Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of
these proceedings should contact the Office of the City Clerk, 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, FL 34761 (407)
905- 3105, 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
4
City of Ocoee • 150 N Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905 -3100 • fax: (407) 656 -8504 • www.ci.ocoee.fl.us
0
TAE 71111�Vl 1117MTJ?7215011�lyfl"�
REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY,JULY 8,2003
AS LOCAL PLANNING AGE NCY
Vice -Chairman Golden called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Following a moment of
silent meditation and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, a quorum was declared
present.
PRESENT: Vice Chairman Golden, Members Campbell, Keller, Landefeld, McKey,
Rhodus, Riffe (arrived at 7:12 p.m.) and West. Also present were Chief
Assistant City Attorney Cookson, Community Development Director
Wagner, Planning Manager Lewis, Senior Planner Grimms, Principal
Planner James, and Deputy City Clerk Maxwell.
ABSENT: OCPS Representative Foltz
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Vice -Chairman Golden opened the floor for nominations for Chairman of the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
Member McKey, seconded by Member Keller, moved to nominate Vice -Chairman
Golden as Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 7-0.
Member Keller, seconded by Member Riffe, moved to nominate Member McKey as Vice -
Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 7-0.
The Consent Agenda consisted of Items III A and B.
A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held May
13,2003.
B. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held June
10,2003.
Member Keller, seconded by Member Landefeld, moved to approve the May 13, 2003,
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes as presented, Motion carried 7-0.
Member Landefeld, seconded by Vice -Chairman McKey, moved to approve the June 16,
2003, Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes as presented. Motion carried 7-0.
DRAFT
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July 8, 2003
NEW BUSINESS
Adair Pointe Subdivision — Project # AR-02-10-07 - Annexation & Initial Zoning
Senior Planner Grimms presented the staff report for the proposed annexation and
initial zoning to R-1 for the Adair Pointe Property.
The Adair Pointe property includes approximately 3.52 acres located within a County
enclave. The property is located on the east side of Adair Street approximately 1,400 feet
north of Wurst Road, between Vignetti Park and Sorenson Field.
The Applicant has prepared a Preliminary Subdivision Plan for the property, as well as an
Annexation Agreement. The Applicant wishes to develop a single-family residential
subdivision and requests a zoning designation of R-1 "Single -Family Dwelling District".
The proposed R-1 zoning is consistent with the County and City's Future Land Use
designation of Low -Density Residential.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) voted unanimously to recommend approval
of the proposed annexation, subject to addressing the legal documents as described in the
comments from the City Attorney dated June 13, 2003. (Chief Assistant City Attorney
comments on file)
Based on the recommendation of DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the proposed annexation and initial
zoning of R-1 for the Adair Pointe property, subject to addressing all of the comments in
the June 13, 2003, memo from the Chief Assistant City Attorney, including execution of
the Annexation Agreement.
Senior Planner Grimms stated that the Assistant City Attorney comments dated June 13,
2003, have been addressed.
The public hearing was opened.
Mr. Pecht with Pecht Evans Engineering, Inc. was available to answer questions.
19
A c7
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July 8, 2003
Member Riffe, seconded by Member Keller, moved to recommend approval to the City
Commission of the Annexation & Initial Zoning for Adair Pointe Subdivision. Motion
carried 8-0.
Adair Preliminary Subdivision Plan — Project # LS-02-008
Senior Planner Grimms presented the staff report for the proposed Preliminary
Subdivision Plan for the Adair Pointe property.
The developer is requesting one wavier from the normal Code requirement of one (1)
recreational amenity for a subdivision with 10 to 50 lots, justification for not having any
recreational amenity located within subdivision is that the City's recreational facility,
Sorenson Park, is located adjacent on the east side of the subject property.
On June 23 2003, The DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
Preliminary Subdivision Plan, conditioned on removal from the plan any indication that
there will be a sidewalk along the Westside of Lot 10. The sidewalk is to stop at the
southern boundary of Tract "B".
Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff recommends that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Adair
Pointe Subdivision including the requested wavier, as date stamped received by the City
on June 25, 2003.
Board members asked several questions to which Senior Planner Grimms, Planning
Manager Lewis and Community Development Director Wagner responded.
Why does the sidewalk stop? The sidewalk extends to the end of the cul-de-sac down the
eastern edge of the retention and tract and the sidewalk would be in the setback of the
house.
Community Development Wagner stated that the City of Ocoee purchased the Glad
Tidings Church Property that is immediately south of the Adair Pointe property. He
further stated that the developer could be required to donate a piece of recreational
equipment to the park, which would have to be addressed during this meeting due to the
wavier request by the developer.
The public hearing was opened.
As no one wished to speak, the public hearing was closed.
3
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July, 8, 2003
Member Riffe asked why the sidewalk ends where it does? Community Development
Director Wagner stated that the sidewalk ends into a piece of private property. Member
Riffe stated it was silly for a sidewalk to dead end and the Applicant should make the
sidewalk improvement.
Member Landefeld, seconded by Member Rhodus, moved to recommend approval to the
City Commission of the Adair Pointe Subdivision Preliminary Subdivision Plan -Project #
LS-02-008 as approved by Staff recommendation including the requested wavier, as date
stamped received by the City on June 25, 2003. Motion failed 3 —5 with Chairman
Golden, Vice -Chairman McKey, Members Riffe, Keller and Campbell voting no.
Member Riffe, seconded by Member Keller, moved recommend approval to the City
Commission of the Adair Pointe Subdivision Preliminary Subdivision Plan -Project # LS-
02-008 based on Staff recommendation including the requested the wavier as date
stamped by the City on June 25, 2003, with an additional condition that the applicant
provide one piece of recreational equipment to the City of Ocoee for recreational
purposes and to make an effort to contact the property owner to the south to be able to
install the sidewalk an additional 30feet to the City of Ocoee property line.
Motion carried 7-1 with Member Landefeld voting no.
Big Ten Tires Special Exception Petition #145E-001
Community Development Director Wagner stated staff has made a recommendation of
approval of this project but based on subsequent information received, the conditions of
approval may change.
Chief Assistant City Attorney Cookson reviewed what a "Special Exception" is and
when it is appropriate to grant a "Special Exception". Mr. Cookson also advised the
Planning & Zoning Commission that they must follow the guidelines set fourth in the
Code requirements.
Planning Manager Lewis presented the staff report for Big Ten Tires Special Exception
Petition # 1-45E-00 I -
The 0.96-acre parcel is located on the northwest boundary of the Plantation Groves
Shopping Center. Within Plantation Groves Shopping Center, the property abuts the
following land uses: the Ocoee Fire Station on the east, the retail shopping to the
southeast and a Mobil Gas Station on the south.
The applicant proposes to build an eight -bay retail tire store on the last vacant out parcel
in the Plantation Groves Shopping Center. In addition to tire sales and service, the
4
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July 8, 2003
applicant will also undertake various other automotive activities. This use is permitted
with conditions within the Plantation Groves PUD since the project follows conventional
Community Commercial/C-2 zoning district regulations. In an attempt to ensure
compatibility with the surrounding uses, Staff has stipulatedenhanced landscaping and
architectural features for the project to upgrade its image. The applicant has met all the
proposed requirements for the Special Exception petition as shown in the "Conditions of
Approval" on the "Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception" plan date stamped
"Received June 25, 2003."
In addition to the special exception, Big Ten Tires has also requested a wavier from
Subsection 6-14.C. (2)(c)(iv) of the Land Development Code that states: "Six foot high
brick screening walls with landscaping per the Ocoee Land Development Code are
required where professional office, service, commercial, or industrial projects about
residential properties."
Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the
Special Exception for the construction of the Big Ten Tires in the Plantation Groves
Shopping Center Commercial POD including the requested wavier in accordance with the
"Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception" date stamped "received June 24, 2003, but
there may possibly be modifications.
The public hearing was opened.
Board members asked several questions to which Planning Manager Lewis and
Community Development Director Wagner responded. (Responses underlined).
Selby Weeks with Klima Weeks Civil Engineering, Inc. representative for the owner of
the Big Ten Tire Store project was also present to answer questions.
The following people spoke in opposition of the Big Ten Tire Special Exception:
Rex Heinecke, 810 Grovesmere Loop, Harvey Hertzman, 2605 Elwick Street, Mary
Rambhacus, 339 Highbrook Blvd., Mohannad Yaqub, 201 Belhaven Falls Drive,
Jacqueline Lewis, 484 Belhaven Falls Drive, Lean Amburn, 1792 Slough Court, Scott
Ricker, 131 Covered Bridge Drive, Mike Rushing, 1623 Sherbourne Street, Winter
Garden, John Hovey, 10651 Oakview Pointe Terrace, Gotha, Rafael Rondon, 933
Grovesmere Loop, Ed Garsudem 941 Grovesmere Loop, Don Kahrer, 829 Grovesmere
Loop, Robert Jensen, 102 Carisbooke, Jeff Sikora, 211 Highbrooke Blvd., Jose Rivera,
214 Highbrooke Blvd., Doug Madill, 11018 Groveshire Court, Brain Py, 11012
Orangeshire Court and Rick Raysik, 11001 Orangeshire Court,
it t
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July 8, 2003
Chairman Golden stated there were e-mails sent by citizens who were opposed to the
proposed project.
Applicant Shelby Weeks answered questions of concerns by residents, which were:
1. The store will have enhanced entrance and bay doors.
2. There will be sprinklers installed for those who have fire concerns.
3. The store hours will be open during daylight hours and there will be no noise or
lights during the evenings.
The public hearing was closed.
Community Development Director Wagner stated the board would convene for a break_
anddiscuss the comments with the Chief Assistant City Attorney.
Recess 9:0 7 p.m. — 9:22 p.m.
Community Development Director Wager pointed out that the "Special Exception" is a
permitted use with special conditions. The "Special Exception" cannot be denied because
someone does not like Big Ten Tires, all factors must be considered but the main purpose
of a "Special Exception" is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents and
the surrounding areas. Staff reformulated their recommendation based upon new
information provided by area residents as follows:
Recommend approval of the "Special Exception" subject to the conditions that were
earlier mentioned but also in addition to the following conditions.
1. Applicant must meet noise standards as identified in the Land Development Code
(LDC), which is no more than 70 decibels at the property line.
2. Applicant to install the six-foot brick wall as required by the LDC.
3. Applicant must provide significant additional enclosed building space to store
hazardous waste materials, used tires and batteries.
4. The architect of the building must upgrade to match the design character of the
surroundings buildings and neighborhoods.
5. All outside equipment must be enclosed in sound retardant enclosures.
6. The applicant must provide expert real estate documentation that the proposed
uses will not adversely affect surrounding property values and diminish the
character of surrounding residential uses.
Member Riffe, seconded by Member Keller, moved to recommend denial to the City
Commission of the Big Ten Tires Application for Special Exception based on the
following specific findings which include the proposed use and structure would not be
M
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July 8, 2003
compatible with the uses, structures and activities on adjacent and nearby lands, and the
proposed use and structure would result in noise, odor, glares, vibration, and other
similar characteristics which would be detectable at the property line and which -would
exceed the level of permitted uses. Motion carried 5-2 with Members Landefeld and West
voting no.
Richard A. Doss — Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Case # SSCPA-
03-003 and Rezoning — Case # RZ-03-03-03
Principal Planner James presented the staff report for the proposed Rezoning and Small
Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Richard A. Doss, Jr.
The Applicant's request involves a 1.3 I(Lot 11) area parcel and a 0.363 area parcel (Lot
8). The subject'properties are bounded on the south by West Columbus Street, on the
north by West Orlando Avenue, on the west by South Kissimmee Avenue, and on the east
by the new Fire Station #1 now under construction. Lot 11 is west of the railroad tracks
and Lot 8 is east of the rail -road tracks.
Cumberland Avenue road right-of-way was abandoned by the City for construction of the
new Fire Station #1. This right-of-way is split down the road centerline to provide an
additional 0.05-acre to Lot 8, making it a 0.363 acre parcel.
The applicant is requesting the rezoning of both parcels from R- I AA (Single Family
Dwelling) zoning classification to 1-1 (Restricted Manufacturing and Warehousing)
zoning classification. Rezoning Lot 8 would require a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to change the "Low Density Residential" future Land Use classification to
the "Light Industrial" future land use classification. Future land use classification of
"Light Industrial" for Lot 11 is consistent with the above requested rezoning and will not
require a comprehensive plan amendment.
The proposed rezoning to 1-1 for Lot 11 is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and
staff recommends the rezoning request from R-lAA to 1-1 for Lot 11 to be approved.
The proposed rezoning to 1-1 for Lot 8 is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map and
staff does not recommend the rezoning or the small-scale comprehensive plan
amendment request from R- I AA to 1-1 for Lot 8 to be approved.
The public hearing was opened.
Applicant Richard Doss, Jr. gave background information regarding the history of his
property and was available to answer questions.
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
July 8, 2003
The following people spoke regarding the Rezoning and the Small Scale Comprehensive
Plan Amendment:
James Fleming, 511 Orange Avenue and Cathie Starn, 408 Kaila Court.
•,
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding Case # RZ-03-03-03 and # SSCPA-03-003-
Vice-Chairman cKey, seconded by Member Riffe, moved to recommend denial to the
City Commission of the Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment on the small parcel
pursuant to staff recommendation. Motion carried 7-0.
Member Keller, seconded by Member Riffe, moved to recommend denial to the City
Commission of the rezoning of the small parcel pursuant to staff recommendation.
Motion carried 7-0.
Vice -Chairman McKey, seconded by Member West, moved to recommend approval to
the City Commission of the re -zoning of the large parcel pursuant to staff
recommendation without the execution of the Development Agreement providing
additional right-of-way land on Maguire Road and South Kissimmee Avenue, and without
restricting access to the property from Columbus Street. Motion carried 7-0.
None
OTHER BUSINESS
Community Development Director Wagner announced the Coke Property would be on
the August 12, 2003, Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Attest:
Brenda Maxwell, Deputy City Clerk
James Golden, Chairman
,, ,Itel of Good 1, i,,.
Mayor
S. Scott Vandergrift
City Manager
Jim Gleason
Commissioners
Danny Howell, District 1
Scott Anderson, District 2
Rusty Johnson, District 3
Nancy J. Parker, District 4
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 8, 2003
TO: The Planning and Zoning Commission Qom'
FROM: Robert Lewis, AICP, Planning Manager
THROUGH: Russ Wagner, AICP, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Ocoee Crown Point PUD (f.k a — "Coke Property")
Final Subdivision Plan, Phase 1
Project # LS-02-004
ISSUE:
Should the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Phase 1 Final
Subdivision Plan for the Ocoee Crown Point PUD?
BACKGR
OUND:
The Ocoee Crown Point PUD property includes a total of about 364 acres located mostly
between SR 429 (Western Beltway) and Lake Apopka. The first phase of construction in the
Ocoee Crown Point PUD will be the high school and the infrastructure needed to support the
high school.
DISCPSSION-.
The Phase 1 Final Subdivision Plan covers only a portion of the Ocoee Crown Point PUD
property, including the high school site (Tract # 5, about 51 acres), the extension of Ocoee
Crown Point Parkway, the necessary utilities to serve the high school site, and a few of the storm
water retention ponds. Ocoee Crown Point Parkway will be extended from the point where it
currently ends at the entrance to the single family portion of Westyn Bay, across Staten Branch
(the stream / drainage way along the northern edge of the PUD) and southward to a point just
south of the main entrance to the high school site. Utilities will also be constructed within the
future road right-of-way for Village Center Drive along the northeast edge of the high school site.
However, only an access easement will be provided over that road at this time — the road itself
will be constructed and dedicated at a future date when the Village Center is developed.
Essentially all of the infrastructure will be constructed by the City while the School Board is
constructing the high school, with the school board paying approximately 1/4 of the cost for these
improvements.
Most of the permitting for construction of these facilities has been done with the state agencies
(SJRWMD and FDEP). Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been determined and a
conceptual storm water management master plan for the entire PUD has been approved.
During the normal City review, a number of comments were generated by staff reviewers asking
for more details and clarification on various issues. Even though there are a fair amount of
comments, all of these details can be resolved with an administrative review, which has been
done with other projects in the past.
City of Ocoee ® 150 N Lakeshore Drive ® Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100 - fax: (407) 656-8504 - w-,vw.ci.ocoee.fl.us
August 8, 2003
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION*
The Final Subdivision Plan for Phase 1 of the Ocoee Crown Point PUD was reviewed by the
Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 4, 2003. There were several technical
issues to be addressed from the City Attorney, the Public Works / Engineering Department
(Hartman & Associates), PEC (the City's engineering consultant) and the Planning Division that
were identified in written staff comments (see attached memos). The written comments ask for
a variety of clarifications and details to be addressed on the plans. The most significant issues
were discussed and the Project Engineer was informed that some minor comments could be
provided after Planning and Zoning Commission and City Commission action on the plans.
When the discussion was finished, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the Final Subdivision Plan for Phase 1, subject to addressing all of the written staff comments
and any additional, issues brought up at the public hearings through an administrative review.
The plans that were received on August 6, 2003 are the same plans that were reviewed by the
DRC.
STAFF IFIECOMMENDATI,011:
Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Ocoee Crown Point PUD Final
Subdivision Plan for Phase 1, as, date stamped received by the City on August 6, 2003,
b-uAj6l77i* aj!V,—e-7Jk-k9 ?X 101*1v-uw�,.r jVmAwroivents and anj, additional issues brought
up at the public hearings through an administrative review. Approval of the Phase I Final
Subdivision Plan will also need to be subject to approval of the Ocoee Crown Point PUX-
Land Use Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plan.
Attachments: Memo with Attorney staff comments, dated August 1, 2003
Memo with PEC staff comments, dated August 7, 2003 August 1, 2003
Memo with Public Works / Engineering comments (Hartman & Assoc.) dated A
Memo with Planning staff comments dated August 4, 2003 Ocoee Crown Point PUD Final Subdivision Plan, Phase 1, date stamped August 6, 2003
OAStaff Reporls\2003\SR03070 P&Z.doc
FOLEY:LARDNER
MEMORANDUM
CLIENT -MATTER NUMBER
020377-0563
TO: Carolyn Alexander, Development Review Coordinator
FROM: Paul E. Rosenthal, Esq., City Attorney
Scott A. Cookson, Esq., Assistant City Attorney
DATE: August 1, 2003
RE: Ocoee Crown Point PUD — PUD Land Use Plan/Preliminary Subdivision Plan
(Third Review)
Project No. LS-02-004
In connection with the above -referenced project, we have reviewed the following
documents: I I
1. Ocoee Crown Point PUD Land Use PlanlPreliminary Subdivision Plan prepared by
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. stamped received by the City of Ocoee on July 23, 2003 (the
"LUPIPSP"); and
2. Ocoee Crown Point Development Standards stamped received by the City of Ocoee
on July 22, 2003 ("Development Standards").
This memorandum supersedes our prior memoranda dated August 19, 2002 and
January 23, 2003. Based upon our review of the documents noted above pursuant to the Land
Development Code, we have the following comments'.
1. Please be advised that the Sheet numbering on the LUP/PSP is incorrect
and inconsistent with what is set forth on the Index on the Cover Sheet.
Please ensure that each Sheet is consecutively numbered and that all
inconsistencies are corrected.
2. Attached please find the most recent version of the Declaration of
Conditions of Approval (the "Declaration") which is submitted in lieu of
the PUD Developer Agreement otherwise required by the Land
Development Code. Please note that this Declaration will need to be
executed by both the City and the School Board.
3. Attached please find a draft of the proposed PUD Zoning Ordinance for
review by City Staff.
FOLEY & LARDNER
006.304250.
4. City Staff should confirm that the Development Standards have been
revised to be consistent with the current version of the LUP/PSP-
5. City Staff should be advised that by reference in the Conditions of
Approval, the Development Standards become a part of the PUD Land
Use Plan. As such, amendments, waivers or modifications to the
Development Standards subsequent to approval of the PUD Zoning
Ordinance could only be made by Ordinance. In order to avoid having the
City strictly bound to the Development Standards without a PUD Land
Use Plan amending Ordinance, City Staff should consider the following
options: 1) delete Condition of Approval ("COA") 2 from the LUPIPSP,
or 2) revise Condition of Approval 2 to add the following thereto:
"Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City, or its assigns, as developer of
the PUD may grant waivers from, amend or modify the Development
Standards to the extent such waivers, amendments or modifications arenot
expressly inconsistent with the Land Use Plan and the Land Development
Code." Deletion of COA 2 will not preclude the City, as a landowner,
from requiring compliance with the Development Standards as part of a
real estate sales contract. This would be the more typical approach rather
than I having them created as governmental zoning requirements.
6. Please note the following approvals that will be required with this Project:
a) PUD Ordinance for Land Use Plan approval (approval conditioned
upon approval of items b-e);
b) Approval of the Declaration of Conditions of Approval (approval
conditioned upon approval of items c-e);
C) Special approval relating to public buildings (approval conditioned
C�
upon approval of items d and e);
d) Special approval relating to alcoholic beverage locational
requirements (approval conditioned upon approval of item e);
e) Approval of the First Amendment to Tri-Party Easement
Agreement;
f) Preliminary Subdivision Plan approval;
g) Final Subdivision Plan for Phase I infrastructure; and
h) Approval of specified sheets from the PUD Land Use Plan as the
"Master Plan" under the Interlocal Agreement; and
Authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to execute all documents
necessary to convey the OCSB sites to OCBS and to accept the
IQ
006.304250.
FOLEY:LARDNER
OCSB owned property to be conveyed to the City, including all
necessary deeds and easements.
7. COA 12 references a landscape buffer adjacent to the residential
subdivision along the Ocoee Parkway having shade trees every 30'. It is
our understanding that this is in reference to Ocoee Crown Point Parkway,
but there is no such residential subdivision adjacent thereto. This COA
may need to be deleted or amended. To the extent this may impose
additional landscape costs on the City which exceed Code requirements,
serious consideration should be given to deleting this COA.
8. [Similar Comment on FSP] City Staff should consider including the
following COA to the LUP/PSP and a similar note placed on the Phase 1
Infrastructure FSP and Landscape Plans (the "FSP"):
"Notwithstanding anything contained in these Conditions
of Approval or shown on any sheet of the plans to which
these Conditions of Approval are attached, the City is under
no obligation to include any specific level of landscaping
(including, but not limited to trees, bushes or decorative
details, structures or fountains) with any of the subdivision
infrastructure.
9. [Similar Comment on FSP] If the City does not install all of the
landscaping set forth in the Landscape Plan, then the LUP/PSP and FSP
needs to address phasing of landscaping improvements. Again, this goes
the question as to whether the landscaping is a PUD zoning and/or Code
requirement or something that can be done at the option of the developer
(i.e., the City). This should be clarified to avoid unanticipated landscape
costs to the City.
10. City Staff should consider having the following Condition of Approval
added to the LUP/PSP to create some flexibility in the development of the
City property:
"The Owner of each tract within the PUD shall have the
right to apply to the City for a change in the land use or
specific Conditions of Approval as they relate to that tract
without the requirement that the tract owner obtain the
joinder and consent of any other land owner within the
PUD."
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call.
3
006.3G4250.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
TO: David Wheeler, P.E.
City of Ocoee Director of Public Works
-:-ROM: Leylah Saavedra, P.E.
DATE: August 7, 2003
RE: Crown Point
PUD Land Use Plan / Preliminary Subdivision Plan
■
Pursuant to the City of Ocoee's request, PEC has reviewed the Preliminary
Subdivision Plans associated with the above -mentioned project, dated July 23,
2003. Note that these constructions plans were revised pursuant to the City of
Ocoee latest review comments dated November 13, 2002.
Based upon review of the above information, PEC is currently coordinating with the
Consultant (VHB / Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.) on the resolution of minor
drainage concerns, which will not affect the design of the proposed works,
Consequently, PEC recommends the approval of this project contingent upon the
resolution of the minor outstanding drainage concerns, which are to be addressed
in a final submittal to the City for record keeping purposes, as well as the following
highway design concerns:
1. Please provide sight distance analysis along the roadways including at the
SR 429 bridge crossings.
Pavement sections appear inadequate. Please revisit.
3. Please address the West Orange Trail crossings at all roadways including
required treatment.
4. Median openings on CR 437 just north of Fullers Cross Road and south of
Village Center Drive are too close to the signalized intersections. Please
consider removing these openings or modify access.
viFgjn",-.'ots
pA'.-Inne"s
13UNt
''YWS
'If
Page 2
Mr. David Wheeler
August 7, 2003
5. Several turn lane lengths appear to be substandard. Please revisit.
6. We suggest extending the four -land section on CR 437 to the south some
distance away from the intersection of Fuller Cross Road.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 407-422-
8062,extension 192 or via e-mail at lls@peconline.com
cc: Russ Wagner, City of Ocoee
David Hamstra, PEC
:8 Z
CLIENT -MATTER NUMBER
020377-0563
TO: Carolyn Alexander, Development Review Coordinator
FROM: Paul E. Rosenthal, Esq., City Attorney
Scott A. Cookson, Esq., Assistant City Attorney
DATE: August 1, 2003
RE: Ocoee Crown Point PUD — Phase 1 Infrastructure Final Subdivision Plan
(First Review)
Project No. LS-02-004
In connection with the above -referenced project, we have reviewed the following
t�
documents: I
1. Ocoee Crown Point PUD Phase 1 Infrastructure Final Subdivision Plan stamped
received by the city of Ocoee July 30, 2003 (the "FSP"); and
2. Crown Point PUD Phase I Infrastructure Landscape Plans stamped received by Foley
& Lardner August 1, 2003 (the "Landscape Plans").
Based upon our review of the documents noted above pursuant to the Land
Development Code, we have the following comments:
1. Please be advised that the Sheet numbering on the FSP is incorrect and
inconsistent with what is set forth on the Index on the Cover Sheet. Please
ensure that each Sheet is appropriately numbered and referenced on the
Index on the Cover Sheet and that all inconsistencies are corrected.
2. COA 31 on the Land Use Plan requires decorative fountains in Pond 8, 11
and 6F. Pond 8 is to be constructed with Phase 1 infrastructure. City Staff
should determine whether the cost for the fountain has been included in
the project budget and whether the City wants to commit to constructing
the fountain. City Staff should consider the cost implications on the City
that would not normally be imposed on other developers.
3. [Similar Comment of Land Use Plan] it is our understanding that the
Landscape Plans are to be incorporated into the FSP. City Staff should
consider including the following COA to the Land Use Plan and a similar
note placed on the FSP and Landscape Plans:
FOLEY & LARDINER
006304555.
I FOLEY:LARDNER
"Notwithstanding anything contained in these Conditions
of Approval or shown on any sheet of the plans to which
these Conditions of Approval are attached, the City is under
no obligation to include any specific level of landscaping
(including, but not limited to trees, bushes or decorative
details, structures or fountains) with any of the subdivision
infrastructure.
4. [Similar Comment on Land Use Plan] If the City does not install all of
the landscaping set forth in the Landscape Plan, then the Land Use Plan
and FSP needs to address phasing of landscaping improvements. Again,
this goes the question as to whether the landscaping is a PUD zoning
and/or Code requirement or something that can be done at the option of
the developer (i.e., the City). This should be clarified to avoid
unanticipated landscape costs to the City.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call.
P
006,304555.
rmatex of Good I.,r,_
Mayor
S. Scott Vhndergrift
City Manager
Jim Gleason
Commissioners
Danny Howell, District 1
Scott Anderson, District 2
Rusty Johnson, District 3
Nancy J. Parker, District 4
TO: Planning + • Zoning Commission
THROUGH:FROM: Robert Lewis, AICP, Planning Manager
Russ Wagner,•CommunityDevelopment Director
ProjectSUBJECT: Ocoee Crown Point PUD (f.ka — "Coke Property')
PUD Land Use Plan, Preliminary Subdivision Plan and
Authorization of Public Buildings
0i4
Should the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval the PUD Land Use Plan and
the Preliminary Subdivisionfor • !•' Crown Point PUD, including authorization
public buildings proposed within the PUD?
The Ocoee Crown Point PUD property, formerly known as the "Coke Property', includes a total
of about 364 acres located adjacent to Lake Apopka. Most of the property is located north and
west of SR 429 (Western Beltway), but it also includes land on both sides of Fullers Cross Road
south of the Beltway, and on both sides of Ocoee Apopka Road south of the Beltway at the
intersection of those two roads. The northern edge of the property is bounded by the centerline
of Staten Branch, which is a significant stream/drainage way leading to Lake Apopka. All of the
subject property is currently undeveloped and is covered with mostly planted pine trees, as well
as significant wetlands. About 92 acres of the property is occupied by wetlands, mostly adjacent
to Lake Apopka and Staten Branch. The West Orange Trail also runs through the central
portion of the site.
In the Ocoee Comprehensive Plan and in the Ocoee -Orange County Joint Planning Area (JPA)
Agreement, the Ocoee Crown Point PUD property has a mix of future land use designations
including Commercial, Professional Offices and Services, Public Facilities/Institutional, Low
Density Residential and Conservation/Floodplains over the wetland areas. The proposed uses
within the PUD are consistent with these Future Land Use designations.
The Westyn Bay subdivision is adjacent to the northern boundary of the Ocoee Crown Point
PUD and has mostly R-1AA zoning, with C-2 zoning near Ocoee Apopka Road. The property
located to the east of the subject property, south of the Beltway, is owned by the Glad Tidings
Church. The southeast corner of Fullers Cross Road and Ocoee Apopka Road is undeveloped
with R-1AA zoning, and is owned by Chevron (currently under review for a Comprehensive Plan
amendment to a Commercial future land use designation [Faraway Farms]). The Crown Point
Woods subdivision is on the west side of Ocoee Apopka Road (unincorporated Orange County).
All the other property adjacent to the southern boundary of the Ocoee Crown Point PUD is in
unincorporated Orange County and is currently undeveloped.
City of Ocoee ® 150 N Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100 - fax: (407) 656-8504 ® vvww.ci.ocoee.fl.us
August 8, 2003
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2
"Coke Property " Proiect History
The city of Ocoee and the Orange County School Board jointly purchased the "Coke Property'
in 2000, with a small additional land purchase in 2001 by the School Board, The two parties
agreed to divide the property into essentially two equal parts, less the wetland areas that would
not be developed, and divide the costs of preparing the plans. The School Board portion of the
project includes a new high school and a new elementary school, as well as adult work force
education facilities and possibly a bus mai nte nance/sto rage facility. Construction on the new
high school is expected to begin in early September 2003.
On its portion of the property, the City of Ocoee intends to build a new fire station, a public safety
training facility, a large public park with various recreation facilities (including much needed ball
fields) and a small scale public boat ramp and associated service facilities (the Waterfront
Village) adjacent to Lake Apopka. In order to cover the costs of building the necessary roads
and utilities to serve the property, the plan anticipates that portions of the property will be sold to
private developers for various commercial and residential uses. From the beginning, the City
and School Board worked on a strategic method to enable the City to pay for all costs of the
development by selling parcels to private developers. The overall design concept for the Ocoee
Crown Point PUD is to build a mixed -use neighborhood with complimentary residential and
commercial uses, supplemented byschools and other beneficial public facilities.
The City and School Board have been working together on this project for over three years.
Prior to acquiring the property, a market feasibility study was done along with all,other usual due
diligence efforts. Before buying the property, the City wanted to be sure that a financially
feasible project could be developed that would meet the needs of both the City and the School
Board for public uses, but would also be able to support itself in the present real estate market.
After the property was purchased, all the usual data about the site was gathered (soils,
wetlands, endangered species, traffic, etc.) and the plans were prepared and reviewed by City
staff in the same fashion as any other development project within the City, utilizing peer reviews
for legal, engineering and traffic issues.
Prior to entering into an agreement with the School Board to jointly purchase the property,
presentations were made to the city Commission regarding the feasibility of the project.
Approval was given to enter into the agreement with the School Board and to proceed with
purchasing the property and contracting with consultants to do the project design work. As work
on the project progressed, an additional parcel of land was purchased by the School Board and
additional property was annexed into the City to complete the current project boundaries.
In September of 2001, City Staff and the project consultants (VHB and Canin Associates) made
a presentation to the city Commission to obtain consent to move forward with the master plan.
The plan that was presented at that time included the multiple uses and spatial locations
identified in the current PUD master plan. The economic program for the project was also
spelled out by the City's market consultant at that time.
The City Commission gave its consent to move forward with the master plan, so the PUD Land
Use Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan were finalized over time and submitted for review
by City Staff. The School Board has also had input on the master plan, specifically on issues
that relate to the School Board portion of the project. Progress was delayed for several months
when the School Board reevaluated its schedule for building the high school, but when the
schedule was finalized for construction to begin this fall, the review of the plans was resumed,
resulting in the current PUD Land Use Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan submittal.
August 8, 2003
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3
DISCUSSION:
Master Plan Elements
As indicated above, the Ocoee Crown Point PUD includes a mixture of land uses including the
following: the high school site and other School Board properties adjacent to the West Orange
Trail; the elementary school site and public park areas adjacent to a residential neighborhood
and conservation areas; a Waterfront Village on Lake Apopka; a mixed use Village Center
across from the high school and adjacent to other commercial land in the Westyn Bay project;
and other commercial/office uses and important public facilities adjacent to Ocoee Apopka Road
and Fullers Cross Road. The PUD Land Use Plan also has provisions allowing townhomes to
be developed on the School Board site located between the high school and the Western
Beltway (Tract # 13), if that property is not developed as a bus maintenance/storage facility.
All of the jurisdictional wetland areas on the site have been identified and approved by the
proper agencies. Essentially all of the wetland areas within the PUD will be preserved in
conservation areas. One small isolated wetland area will be removed with the construction of a
road and a retention pond, and another degraded wetland area will be modified and improved
with the construction of a retention pond (similar to wetland modifications in Westyn Bay).
The first phase of construction in the Ocoee Crown Point PUD will be the high school and the
infrastructure needed for the high school. Future phases will be developed according to market
demands as soon as the property can be sold to private developers. The PUD has been
designed with a master storm water system and a conceptual storm water management master
plan has been approved by SJRWMD.
Roadway Network
The road network within the Ocoee Crown Point PUD will be built around Ocoee Crown Point
Parkway. With Phase 1 of the project, this spine road will be extended from the point where it
currently ends at the entrance to the single family portion of Westyn Bay, across Staten Branch
(the stream / drainage way along the northern edge of the PUD) and southward to a point just
south of the main entrance to the high school site. The remaining portion of the spine road, from
the end of Phase 1 construction to its termination at Fullers Cross Road just west of the Western
Beltway overpass, will be constructed with future phases. '
There will be a large Roundabout located on Ocoee Crown Point Parkway located just south of
the Staten Branch crossing. Roads leading east and west from the Roundabout will provide
access to the north side of the high school and the Village Center (to the east), and to the large
public park, the water front area and the single family neighborhood (to the west). Another road
also provides access to the single family neighborhood from Ocoee Crown Point Parkway.
There will be a local road within the single family neighborhood that will be stubbed out to the
provide future access to the adjacent property to the south. Access to Tract # 13, located
between the West Orange Trail and the Western Beltway (bus facility / townhome site), will be
provided at the north end by a small road leading from Village Center Drive through the Work
Force education parcels, and at the south end by Ocoee Crown Point Parkway.
In order to address the traffic impacts of the new development anticipated within the Ocoee
Crown Point PUD, a traffic study was done to identify off -site traffic impacts and appropriate
mitigation. The Conditions of Approval and notes in the plans, as well as the road improvements
shown on the plans reflect the findings and recommendations of the traffic study. Left and right
turn lanes are shown on Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road as well as .intersection
improvements. The private developers who acquire the various tracts in the PUD will be
responsible for all future infrastructure construction related to the parcels they develop.
August 8, 2003
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4
Village, Center and Work Force
The Village Center area (Tracts # 6C, # 6D, # 6E & # 6F) is located adjacent to the north side of
the high school site, west of Ocoee Apopka Road and south of Staten Branch. This area will
include mixed commercial, office and possibly residential uses and will be very pedestrian
friendly, taking advantage of the West Orange Trail and the high school. Village Center Drive,
along the north side of the high school site, will have on -street parking and many pedestrian
friendly elements. The School Board Work Force education sites (Tracts # 6A, # 6B, # 6G, # 7A
& 7B) will also be a part of the Village Center area. All buildings within the Village Center area
(commercial as well as Work Force) will be oriented towards the street with parking areas
located primarily to the sides and rear of the buildings to maintain a pedestrian friendly
character.
In order to insure that all development within the Ocoee Crown Point PUD maintains the high
standards and character desired by the City and the School Board, the Ocoee Crown Point PUD
Development Standards have been prepared (see copy attached). These standards will not be
part of the PUD zoning ordinance for the project, but they will be used as deed restrictions when
the various tracts are sold to private developers. The standards give many detailed guidelines
for how all the commercial, residential and public facilities within the PUD will be developed and
what the buildings will look like. They include many illustrations and pictures showing what
buildings, lighting, streets and landscaping should look like, The PUD zoning standards and the
Development Standards provide f6r the options and guidelines for developing the single family
neighborhood as a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) rather than a conventional
larger lot development. As indicated earlier, there is also the option and guidelines for
developing Tract # 13 as townhomes rather than a bus maintenance/storage facility. The utilities
and access for Tract # 13 have been designed to accommodate the more intense use of a
townhome development.
Public Buildings
Section 5-7 of the Land Development Code requires public hearings to be held prior to
authorizing such uses at the proposed location. As indicated above, the Ocoee Crown Point
PUD includes several public buildings and facilities, including a high school, an elementary
school adult work force education facilities, a bus maintenance/storage facility, a fire station, a
public school,
training facility, a public park (including ball fields, shelters and amphitheater) and a
Waterfront Village (including -a small scale public boat ramp). Along with review, of the Ocoee
Crown Point PUD Land Use Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan, the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Commission will also need to review and consider authorizing the
proposed locations for all of the above public buildings and facilities.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Ocoee Crown Point PUD Land Use Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plan were reviewed
by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 4, 2003. There were several technical
issues to be addressed from the City Attorney, from the Planning Division and from PEC (the
City's engineering consultant) that were identified in written staff comments (see attached
memos). Most of the written comments ask for minor clarifications and details to be addressed
on the plans. The most significant issues were discussed and two additional comments were
added to the Planning Division list.
August 8, 2003
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 5
When the discussion was finished, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of
both the PUD Land Use Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan, subject to addressing all of
the written staff comments and any additional issues brought up at the public hearings through
an administrative review. The plans that were received on August 6, 2003 are the same plans
that were reviewed by the DRC.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following:
a) PUD Zoning for the Ocoee Crown Point PUD and the PUD Land Use Plan;
b) The Ocoee Crown Point PUD Preliminary Subdivision Plan;
c) Authorization of all of the proposed public buildings and facilities included in the PUD;
Subject to addressing all of the written staff comments and any additional issues brought up at
the public hearings through an administrative review, and subject to execution of the Declaration
of Conditions of Approval.
All plans to be approved as'date-stamped received by the City on August 6, 2003, with the
additional changes identified in the written staff comments.
Attachments: Copy of Public Hearing Advertisements
Property Location Map
Ocoee Crown Point PUD Development Standards
Memo with Attorney staff comments, dated August 1, 2003
Memo with PEG staff comments, dated August 7, 2002
Memo with Planning staff comments dated August 4, 2003 ate stamped August 6, 2003
Ocoee Crown Point PUD Land Use Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plan, d
O.\Staff Repo rts\2003\SR03071 P&Z.doc
THURSDAY,r
CITY OF OCOEE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
OCOEE CROWN POINT PUD
CASE NUMBER LS-02.004
ZONING, LAND USE FLAN AND
PRELIMINARY suso ISION PLAN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 4.5 B., Ocoee Land Development
Code, that on Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 7:00 P.m., or as soon thereafter
as practical, the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION will hold a PUBLIC HEAR.
ING at the Ocoee City Commission Chambers, 150 North Lakeshore Drive,
Ocoee, Florida, to consider the proposed PUD Zoning, PUD Land Use Plan
and Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Ocoee Crown Paint PUD, located oP-
proximately 650 feet west Of the intersection of the Western Expressway
(State Road 429) and Fullers Cross Road,
r;It
ik
The Planning and Zoning Commission will review and may make recom.
mendation to the City Commission concerning the proposed PUD Zoning,
PUD Land Use Pion and Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Ocoee Crown
Point PUD based upon its conformance with the requirements of the Ocoee
pment Re -
Land Development Code and the recommendation of the Develoview Committee.
The complete case file, including a complete legal description by metes and
bounds, may be inspected at the Ocoee Community Development Depart -
a m and North
00 p m MondayDrive,keshore Ocoee,
FFriday, except legal holidays. Florida, between the of 8:00
The Planning and Zoning Commission may continue the public hearing to
other dates and times, as it deems necessary. Any Interested party shall be
advised that the dates, times, and places of any continuation of this or can-
tinued no ices regarlic ding these matters shall be willbeing P publishe hed.
ring and that no
Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard with re.
spec'
to the proposed PUD Zoning, PUD Land Use Plan and Preliminary
Subdivision Pion. Any Person wishing to appeal any decision made during
the public hearing will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is mode
which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is based.
Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of the Pro-
ceedings should contact the City Clerk's Office 48 hours in advance of the
meeting at (407) 90S-3105.
JEAN GRAFTON, CITY CLERK 7/31l03
OLS5155038
-"RLANDO SENTINEL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2003
CITY OF OCOEE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING ON
THE LOCATION OF PUB-
LIC BUILDINGS AND
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
LOCATIONAL
REQUIREMENTS WITHIN
TE
`OCOEE CROWN POINT
PUD
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-
EN, pursuant to Sections 5-
7.B, Ocoee Land Develop.
ment Code, that on Tues.
day, August 12, 2003, at 7:OC
p.m., or as soon thereafter
_IC HEARING of the Ocoee'
:ity Commission Chambers,
150 North Lakeshore Drive,
Dcoee, Florida, to consider
the location of public build-
ings within the Ocoee Crown
Point PUD property, locat-
ed approximately 650 feet
west of the intersection of
the Western. Expressway
(State Road 429) and Full-
ers Cross Rood intersection
(the "Ocoee Crown Point
PUD property'). In addi-
tion, pursuant to Sections 5-
7.B, Ocoee Land Develop.
ment Code and Section 38.
5.1, City of Ocoee Code of
Ordinances, on Tuesday,
September 2, 2003, at 7:15
p.m., or as soon thereafter
a separate PUBLIC
ZINGS at the Ocoee
the location of public bU110-
ings within the Ocoee Crown
Point PUD property and to
consider an exemption to
the alcoholic beverage Iota•
tionai requirements of the
City of Ocoee Code of Ordi-
nances within the Ocoee
Crown Point PUD property.
The complete case file, in-
cluding a complete legal de•
scription by metes and
bounds of the Ocoee Crown''
Point PUD property, may
be inspected at the Ocoee
Community Development
Department, 150 North
Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee,
Florida, between the hours
of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 P.m.,
Monday through Friday, ex -
The Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or. the
Ocoee City Commission
may continue the public
hearings to other dates and
times, as They deem neces-
sary. Any interested party
shall be advised that the
dates, times, and places of
any continuation of these or
continued public hearings
shall be announced during
the hearings and that no fur-
ther notices regarding these
matters will be published.
Interested parties may ap-
pear at the public hearings
and be heard with respect'
thereto. Any person wishing
to appeal any decision made
during the public hearings
will need a record of the
Proceedings and for this
Purpose may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of
the proceedings Is made
which Includes the testimo-
ny and evidence upon which
the appeal is based. Persons
with disabilities needing as-
sistance to participate In
in
GRAFTON, CITY
m
I DISTA a Eel OUT IMON-WRISSAW A,
rl 10 U20 mf
�HB
�
Y'D1/1t8��ll�/
u ..~~~_ Crown
city �m/O��
'
INTRODUCTION .................................
SECTIONi~GENERAL STANDARDS ...,...,.,.~.~.`^~^`^``^^~^^^`'^`-
\.1 Key Elements ...................... '..............................
���Pl�D -
l�� Illustrative Conceptual .,.-^---^'
1.3 Village Center Character ....................................
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
-`-------'`
UA |�
iJU | / —Page
~�
.-. ~-. .........
D�/uL1 �
. . °~~~~.~_..~.~~.2
....,������'''3
....... ... ....�����.............. �... ..... 3
'~^^'-~^^'~--^~''-^..................... 3
..........................................3
SECTION
2~BUILDING PLACEMENT & ORIENTATION ^~~^`^^~`~^`^``~`^^`^~^^^'^^`~^^^``^`^^`~^~~`,^~~,~,.,...4
2'1
Building Placement / Setbacks / Building Coverage ....................................
............... _
�
2�LOt�o���x�
.
�x/cuu^uvu ~--' .~~~.~..._.~._~.-_-,~~._._^~~_.._,~_.,^_~'
2.3
PlaceD�eDtK[T�dr8Dce8..--..'-.--'^'.~-`~~~'-^-''^~^-^' ,,_,_~_.__,.~-4
�.4
Building Expansion -.-.`..~.,,.~.^''-^--' -_~.......,—.-.--..~--`-.~...
�
'%
J
SECTION
3~PARKING S1A2�A0JS~.,~~,~^,,.~,^^.~``^`^'~~`'^^^ ,,.,,,,,,,~~_,,,,,^,,,,_,,,,.,,,~,~,_.,,,,,,~,....,
.
3l
�u�u�u� .--.~-.. .._,_._.___,_.,_~_.�
T.O�c�i0D3 -_'~'~------'-'--''
5
3.2
Service ' .,,.,_.~._..I.0CDtn)DS....~~.~~'-~-'~'^,-.~'---^'''
3.3
..~.--.-.-.---..--~,^..`-.-~_.-._
Parking -.--.-~~~._...~.~_..~'--''
SECTION4~LIGHTING ,,.,.^....~~_..,~..,..^,~.,~^~~^^~~~^``~`^``^```~^`~~.~^~ .....`....`.....`........'..~.~..�
4.1
Minimum Lighting Requirement.... ~^~.......... ~'-'^'~~-.'_..........................
........ -
~
4.2
Light .~~~,._,.,~,,,__,^'_..,._~_^,.^,,._ -^---^^'~`^'^~~~~^^
6
4.3
Site ~--.~...`.~-..-'~-- -----,~'—..~~~.,-..-..
��CTI0� � ~ ���D)��TI��D�8I��S1A�nU&B�) ...-.~.-`....-....~. -.--....'
`
.,'----~..~.�
�.}
Detached Residential \�D�S '- ----..~....-`-~-.
..-~_^.~.-~''''
5.2
Multi -Unit Residential Buildings ......
, ~.,.__,.__....2U
._~,^,,_,,,,,,~~,,,,~�4
VILLAGE
SECTlON6
6'1
`_~..~_`_.~.,__....~~~_,__..�4
--`, ��8udOIdS .-....~-..-.-_..-~....... .
��
6�
-A�nior(�0�1S..~~..---^'~'-'''^''--''
vu�u�� Center Facade ~_n_
.
'
. �7
6�
.
{�o��h�8o���8l�...~......~._._--'_.,,..~~,.,.~_.__~,.,._
czuuuo��^.�u�"^, �--
�.4
, __,.,^~.,__.~_,~.,.~.,..,,,.._,.28
(�OD��oT�181��0��zcnu�ruuuuo.—......~. ....^.,.._,.~.~.^,.,.,_.~._,.,.,._..,.`,,29
6.5
]J��..^'`'^^~^^~~^^~~~^'~'~-''
6�
.
(�0IolC� ,..,,_~.._,_,~._.._ ._..___~__,,~'_.._,�0
~._.-.^^.-..~~-
~...32
6.7
..............................
Roof Patch ~^~~'~~~._...... .~^.-._..-._^ .
.~'.-..~._~.--..,...---...��
� ~/^°°~ `~.~~.'~ Pointe -
City �'o�Omee
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
S8C7KXN6
~ �l���Q��B����]��SD���I��»�8D�
6/9
--.—.'..------.------~-..��
~''~`^~~—''~'^^'^^—''~—^—^^'—.,_,~_,~_~,_____.__.,_..,^.36
6.|O
'^^~'~'^'—'^'~'''~'`'''—'—^~~---''
6�\
.
���uu//�—^'^^^^~^-- ....~—_.'~—..—~—'. ,.~...~,,~__._.~.,~,_._..,—..37
6\�
'
�h�om '^^^'~~^'—~~'^—~^^ ,_..',`,,~.~`._,.~_`__,,.38
--=-� —'^^''^^'^^^`'--
61�
'
�8�8d� -.~---'—'^'''''—'',^—._,,_,..,..,_,._,~_,.,__~...43
''—
6.14
Color{ —._....,~.......................... '~^—' '''._.,.._._.._,,_____~..44
��
�T��D�008 °...~~~~,,.,,.,,,,,,,~^,,,,,^,.~,.,.,,.,,,,,~,
��C7lO��~��7BD�K�O�0�0��I�z�vvxu��� .~...~.,..,^, .__~.._..�~_.,_.,,_,~___4
7T Standards .............. _
. eu��»,o��muo^ ,.,._~.~_._.___.,~,____.~~45
7.2 Commercial Frontage ^'''—'^--^^'----- .__...,.... 47
7� ]3 8jhO��lo�\~oou�c ...—`—__.,___._.,,,~~_..
. �uuuuc���u^ "`"^^~�` ' ^_.,,._``_.,._.__~.~.__,,_._—.�8
7.4 Office .—.—._--~........—_—.'.~~---.
~,,^_^,,~~4g
��C7l0�� STREET
�
49
,_____~.,___,~,.,_..__,._—.
8.1 Introduction —,~'^'—'—'^—`—~'^—~'^^—^''
. .—..
8.2 (lD'�t[�0�YDI8��� --~'''—.—'~'''`—''^—^--^'''
,,,_.~~_~_~_..~_4g
'
.--....'.----.—.—~~..—...~.~..��
8.� 5idevY&UkS..—~—^^^',~^—^'--^^^~''—''
8,4 Traffic^'---'^'—^~^--''------~'
�^,u^"^`e—'`''—''
._,._,___,___,...—.4g
�t[c�tl��cS .-.~_.—~—..~'.—~.--. ^~—'``--'--''—^`—^--^~'''''��
. .~...,~~.~
8�
.
8.6 Median Planting
.—,...---.._--^—._..~..50
..~..,....,~_^,,~.,.,~,~^..~~..,.,,._,~..��
SECTION 9 LANDSCAPE ��
g| {�cDc[uli.8D�Q�8��StoDd4Cd8_.--.~..~--,,__,_.__,,_,_.,.~__,,..._.._
. ..^.--._.~.—_~.~~.~~—..��
9,2 l.��0So8�omo�uxcuu�u."....—__._._._
oycu�^,u ~~__._.___,.~_,,,.~_._~._,.,,,~54
q.� P1�o1b88t�o81..—.__..~—'~—.~~^'~.''^ . _,...~,_,',.__,.__,,..__'.._ 55
9/4 '—~~~'~~'~,`^'--^'''~____._.~~,_~_~_~_~,55
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - INTRODUCTIOM
City of Ocoee
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Ocoee Crown Point PUD Development Standard Guidelines is to set forth general design
standards to ensure the development of a well-balanced., vital, pedestrian -oriented project.
The Development Standard Guidelines should be used as a planning tool for the projects approved within Ocoee
Crown Point PM They should be used in conjunction with other City of Ocoee regulations and ordinances.
The Ocoee Crown Point PUD Development Standard Guidelines have been prepared to implement the following
design principles.
• Create a Village Center with a strong sense of place and a pedestrian friendly environment.
• Design streetscapes that are pedestrian in scale, safe, secure and protected from climate.
• Provide linked pedestrian systems through the community.
• Provide open spaces as social and recreational gathering places for residents, visitors, and
workers.
• Preserve and enhance existing vegetation and environmental systems.
Page
Ocoee Crown Point IDUD
City of Ocoee
ME=
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - GENERAL STANDARDS
1.1 Key Elements
The general intent of the Guidelines for Ocoee Crown Point PUD is to encourage the development of a
vital, pedestrian- oriented district that can support a variety of residential, retail, commercial and
institutional uses.
In general, development shall conform with applicable regulations of the City of Ocoee and Ordinance
#99-23 (as amended from time to time-)
The key elements proposed in the Village Center include the following:
0 Mix of Uses
Street -oriented retail, office, high school, work force and restaurants with residential or office space
above will face commercial streets
® Public Spaces
The plan is oriented around a Main Street that incorporates a high school and is surrounded by the West
Orange Trail and community and environmental parks to the south. The proposed Village Center invites
users of the West Orange Trial and the Crown Point High School to enjoy and patronize establishments
on Main Street.
0 Urban Design Character
All buildings and entrances will orient to Main Street to reinforce the pedestrian -oriented character and
the buildings will be built to a build -to line that is established at the interior sidewalk edge. This is not
intended as a limiting concept, however, patios and sidewalk cafes require a slightly greater setback.
0 Housing
Mixed -use buildings, with apartments or offices on the second floor, are anticipated along the Main
Street. Additionally, town homes may be developed in the Town Center Area adjacent to the Main
Street.
0 Pedestrian Connections
Key pedestrian paths are proposed to connect the Village Center to the environmental park, community
park, high school and residential neighborhoods.
0 Transit Connections
The village plan and proposed transportation circulation plan anticipate the coordination and confluence
of several modes of transportation, i.e., Walking, bicycling, autos and buses, to occur within the Ocoee
Crown Point PUD project, High school bus circulation, however, will be discouraged on the Main
Street. ..— Page 2
1 -7� as �
51_11(0"011 I" . 7 0 UiC:4�1
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
1.2
1.3
1.4
Illustrative Conceptual Site Plan
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - GENERAL STANDARDS
The illustrative plan reflects anticipated development. Actual development may vary depending on
market conditions but will be compatible with the intent of this zone. This illustrative Plan reflects the
development envisioned at Ocoee Crown Point PUD. The specific location and scale of buildings,
parking lots, stormwater ponds and access points within may vary, depending on market conditions and
detailed design, but shall be compatible with the intent of this plan.
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
Village Center Character
Buildings are oriented towards the street with main entrances and/or windows facing the street.
Parking may occur at the front of the buildings in the form
of parallel parking on the street, but the bulk of the parking
is to the side and rear of the building in order to maintain
pedestrian -friendly street edges.
Service areas should be placed away from the addressing
street and screened from view.
Support Graphics
The numerous graphics included herein are intended to give
clear direction as to the intent of the village design, and overall
Ocoee Crown Point PUD development. The graphic images are intended to supplement and clarify the
written text.
Page 3
Ocoee Crown Point PUD EVELOP1,1ENT STANDARDS - BUILDING PLACEMENT & ORIENTATION
City of Ocoee
SECTION 2 - BUILDING PLACEMENT & ORIENTATION
2.1 Building Placement/Setbacks/Building Coverage
Buildings are encouraged to have a clear relationship to the street. Buildings sited close to the street,
tv of the street. On larger parcels, buildings should also address secondary
strengthen the activity and vitali
streets.
The fundamental objective of the urban design is the forming of public space. The build -to line is
mandatory and is the line parallel to the street where buildings are to be located. A build -to line will be
established on a tract -by -tract basis. This generally will approximate 15'from back of curb, but may vary
up to two feet from building to building,
0' side yards are permitted. 5' rear yard set back is permitted. Maximum building coverage 95%.
Maximum building height 45'.
2.2 Orientation to the Street
All buildings are encouraged to reinforce the street framework by locating the "main" building faqade
n
either parallel or perpendicular to the street. Buildings placed at irregular or random angles to the street
maintain a consistent
are not encouraged. Similarly, multiple building complexes are encouraged to
street orientation. Buildings may also reinforce the curved nature of streets.
2.3 Placement of Entrances
Building entrances should be visible from the street, well lit, and easily accessible by employees and
visitors. Entrances should be conveniently located and adjacent to on and off street parking. Canopies,
lighting and roof forms will generally identify entrances. Through -lobbies or breezeways that address
both the street and parking lots are permitted.
2.4 Building Expression
Buildings are encouraged to have consistent window expressions visible from the street. A "punched"
window expression is desirable, Large expanses of glass curtain walls are discouraged as being generally
inconsistent with the Master Plan. Streetside, windowless building elevations are also discouraged.
Buildings should express a clear base, middle and top with strong, cornice lines. Sloping roofs are less
desirable.
Page 4
L".
aanin assoacals
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
SECTION 3 - PARKING STANDARDS
3.1 Parking Locations
EVELOP11ENT STANDARDS - PARKING STANDARD.
Parking with clear and convenient access for visitors and employees is required. A landscape zone or
low screenwall or fence is encouraged between parking lots and secondary streets. Parking areas should
have distinct access routes to allow for clear circulation within the site. Handicapped parking is to be
located to the rear of buildings with access provided to the buildings and the street.
3,2 Service Location
Service and loading activities must occur at the rear or side yard of the building, and must be screened
from public view. Building service areas oriented away from major streets are encouraged. Service
areas should be screened by walls of a material compatible with the exterior wall of the main building so
that the visual elements remain seamless.
3.3 Parking
3.11 Minimum or maximum parking requirements will not be established. Parking lots are part of the total
parking count which also includes on -street parallel parking. Parking for the Village will be evaluated in
total and will take into consideration shared parking with other uses, such as the work force which has
mostly after-hours parking. I
33.2 Tandem parking is allowed.
3.3.3 On -street parking may be used to meet parking requirements.
33A On -street parking will occur on the Main Street in the Village Center and along the community park road
connecting to the residential subdivision.
33.5 Parking lots shall be developed behind buildings with convenient handicapped parking.
3.3.6 Shared parking lots, easily accessible from service streets may occur and are encouraged. Where feasible,
all parking lots shall have pedestrian and vehicular interconnections.
33,7 Shared parking decks, accessible from the service streets of the Village Center, are also permissible.
3,3.8 Exterior wall materials for parking -decks should be compatible with the exterior wall materials utilized
for adjacent buildings and shall be suitably landscaped to soften their visual impact.
a Preclude any outlandish architectural styles, and colors, etc.
0 Promote a uniform architectural style within each building faqade.
• Preclude large monolithic building facades without architectural detail in order to break up the
0
visual impact of the building mass.
• gnage for commercial establishments and prohibit inappropriate signage that
Promote appropriate si
can detract for the character of the village.
Page 5
Me;�
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of Ocoee
SECTION 4 - LIGHTING
4.1 Minimum Lighting Requirement
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LIGHTING
All site lighting shall meet the requirements established in ordinance #99-23 by the City of Ocoee.
4.2 Light Intensity
Lighting shall be designed to prevent excessive light spillage on to adjacent sites. Intensity shall be no
greater than required for vehicular and pedestrian safety.
4.3 Site Lighting Specifications
4.3.1 pole top luminaries shall be installed in the traditional neighborhood areas and along store fronts within
the Village Center. Areas outside the Village Center may utilize an alternative pole selection with a
"flat" lens type.
4.3.2 Adequate Pathway Lighting shall be provided on all walkways which are not adequately illuminated by
adjacent street lights as shown in Figure 6-1 - Pedestrian Path Lighting.
12 f I Pole and Fixture or
Round Light Ballard
(8" Diameter)
Figure 6-1 -
Pedestrian Path Lighting
4.3.3 Style
a. Exterior parking lot lighting fixtures shall be complementary in style and be compatible in color to the
overall City of Ocoee development street lighting system.
b. The finish of all free-standing fixtures, supports and poles shall be colored in black. Period -style
fixtures within the traditional neighborhood area will utilize a one or two -pole luminaire light fixture
(see Figure 6-4),
Page 6
r �'
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LIGHTING'
Figure 6-2
Parking Lot Lighting
c. Architectural lighting shall be consistent in design and level of illumination. It shall enhance not
only the building design, but also the adjoining landscape.
d. Lighting designs v I �hich incorporate flood lighting of large areas or elevations will not be allowed
unless approved by the City Of Ocoee.
e. Metal halide lamps shall be used for all exterior illumination unless otherwise approved by the
City of Ocoee.
4.3.4 Poles
Joint -use poles which use an integrated system that combines lighting, traffic control devices, signs, and
other elements are recommended on West Road Extension and Ocoee Apopka Road and should be
coordinated with FDOT. (See Figure 6-3 - Joint Use Pole),
Figure 6-3
Joint Use Pole Page 7
canin associates
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT ,STANDARDS - LIGHTING
City of Ocoee
The Ocoee Crown Point PUD street lights shall conform to light below:
Figure 6-4 -
Pole Top Luminaire
Page 8
candnassociaces
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
SECTION 5 - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
5.1 Single -Family Detached Residential Units
Single -Family Detached Residential Units may be built on identified single-family development parcels
within the Crown Point Community.
A - SINGLE-FAMILY LARGE LOT CRITERIA MATRIX
Approximate"
Side
-
woe 1 , ---I
Ze, Lot)
(Leroy
-
aH !
Ii F G
Lot Size
x I 10'Min.
------
A B C D
15- Min. 1 5'Min, _15'yV1 T WIP-J -----
_n, E M in. L�_IN�l r
---
20' in, 20'Min,
b—)xllo' in.
15'Min.j�� Min.
15* yi-, 5'Mm,
Min. ' in,T5'Mir
8,Mki. 1 WA
B - SINGLE-FAMILY TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) CRITERIA MATRIX
Approximatee'
bloo I _ .
porilcol Verol_rn)°_J Rear
lane sr 1 Rear I street Front I Side
Street i Side
! Lane" 1 Rear I street _I-- Front 1 ___
(SK54) - �1�nl to, ", in 1' lb oruem r -_ E-1—
"'1 1 3 =Mia CF I 57M' 1B
(55,.65) x 100'Min. 110-Min, TWO. 15*0r0*&l2'Min:12U �_Aln-
NOTE: All setbacks are measured from prn:;' s:-"-tu(e to Property line, unless otherwise noted
'Side loaded allay garage minimum setback *L^, �, edge of pavement.
Pool setbacks also apply to screen encl3s.rss
Maximum impervious cover not to exceed 75% :1 rdmdusd lots.
Where zero,lot line arclidecture is utilizes. 1 will be 0,
Rear lane garage setbacks measured frz.-i edge cipivement.
Encroachment of aft pads, chimneys, r0-f �. __,.ergs, utility equipment, bey windows and privacy wells may extend into yard setbacks.
71 Sea Design Guidelines Book
5.1,1 Building Heights-, Maximum building heights are two stories.
5.12 Foundations: Preferred materials are brick, stucco or stone.
TMin.
2' Min.
Salloack"
2'Min.
5.1.3 Foundation Heights: House foundations shall be elevated a minimum of 18" above grade in the front of
the house, and in the rear of the house also, if the back of the house is visible from the street or lane. Due
to minimized front yard setbacks, a minimum of three (3) risers from the grade level to the finished floor
elevation of the front porch or stoop is desirable to provide privacy within the dwelling from passers-by.
5.1.4 Porches must be useable, and shall be a minimum of six feet (6') in depth. Front porches shall not be
screened.
5.1.5 Chimneys: Chimneys may encroach into the side yard or front yard setbacks.
5.1.6 Exterior Cladding: Recommended materials include stucco, siding, brick or stone, or any combination.
Other materials may be used, but are subject to Plan Review. When utilizing concrete block wall
construction on the first floor and utilizing frame on the second floor, and skinning the structure with
stucco, measures must be taken to ensure that the difference in the stucco thickness is not visible and the
wall surface is of uniform thickness. This requirement also applies when using stucco over gable end
trusses that bear on concrete block walls. if lap siding is used, lap exposure shall not be less than 6" nor
more than 8".
Page 9
cminassociates
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
d materials include wood or wrought iron or PVC. Aluminum is
5,13 Porch Railings: Recommendeddiscouraged. Railing styles shall be consistent with their respective architectural styles.
5,1.8 Columns: Columns shall be authentically styled, and consistent with their respective style of architecture.
or fiberglass. Other materials may be pap
at the
Recommended materials may include wood C ood, with their capital and base
discretion and approval of the Plan Review. Posts may be made of w
made of wood trim. Decorative round columns of Sonombe material finished with stucco are acceptable.
The use of boxed -out frame and concrete block column blocks trimmed with j-molds is not permitted.
5.1.9 Condenser Units: May be placed in side yards, but are not permitted in the front yard.
5,1.10 Elevation Diversity: To the extent possible, avoid replication of same or similar elevations within three -
to four house groups on either side of a residential street. The design intent of each streetscape is to have
elevation and style diversity.
5.1.11 Front Facade Design: Variety of the structure's massing and building ofrms is encouraged. This will
create different and interesting facades along the streetscape. Facades shall be properly scaled and
C proportioned. Architectural style elements of the home shall be applied on all sides of the structure and
includes window trim, window muntin patterns, attic ventilation louvers, eave details, etc,
5.1.12 Garages: Garages are mandatory and may be one -car or two -car, or uphold a second story to serve as a
bonus room or extra bedroom. Garages that face the street shall contain the same or similar architectural
details that are used on the main structure and shall have architectural interest as if designed as the front
faqade of ahouse. The designer shall endeavor to make the garage and garage door appear as inconspicuous
as possible. For two -car garages, garage door treatments may include two separate garage doors instead
of a single -wide one, shadowed garage doors by recessing the door's inset behind the front wall, staggering
the front wall to create interesting roof lines. etc. Front -loaded garages should have a second -story
Side -loaded front
structure above the garage. S garages Ces are discouraged.
5.1.13 Ceiling Heights: First -floor ceilings shall be a minimum of nine feet, four inches (9'-4") for concrete
block construction and nine feet (91) for frame construction. Ten feet (10') is preferred. Second -floor
ceilings shall be a minimum of nine (9') feet. These dimensions will give the front elevation some
proportional stature and allow for appropriate window and door headers, as well as appropriate frieze
and eave details.
5.1.14 Windows: Window headers shall be at eight feet (8') above the finished floor minimum, for both first
and second floors. Windows shall be vertically proportioned. Horizontal sliders are not permitted.
ns shall be consistent w ith the historical architectural style of
5.1.15 Window Muntins: Window muntin patter on all sides of the structure. Recommendations for 36" x 60"
the structure and be applied to all windows
windows are 6-pane over 6-pane, and for 36** x 72" windows, 9-pane over 9-pane.
5.1.16 Shutters: If shutters are part of the design, then each shutter shall be, at a minimum, equal to half of the
window width for windows up to 4' 0" wide. Shutters are not permitted on single or mulled windows
greater than 4' 01' wide.
Page 10
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
city of Ocoee
5.1.17 Roof Materials: Finish roof material shall be consistent and appropriate with the architectural character
of the structure.
5.1.18 Fascias: Recommended size is eight inches (8"). Six inches (6") is minimal. Four inches (4") is
unacceptable.
5.1.19 Eaves: A minimum of six feet (6') of separation must be achieved between architectural projections/
overhangs of adjacent homes, measured from the outer face of the fascia, In the case where houses are
ten feet (10') apart, measured from the face of the building wall of one unit to the face of the building
wall of the next unit, then any architectural projectionloverhang must extend a maximum of two feet
measured to the outer face of the fascia.
5.1.20 Exterior Trim/Details: Any architectural appointments or trim details must be consistent With the
architectural style of the structure. If architectural appointments such as shutters or louvers are decorative,
they may be of wood or copolymer material. if stucco cladding is used, trim details must be raised or
profiled by the use of j-molds or expanded polystyrene (EPS, foam). Details such as shutters, louvers or
any other element may not be scored into the stucco.
5,1.21 Architectural styles: The goal of the Ocoee Crown Point PUD streetscapes is to attain an eclectic blend
of varied, yet complementary vernacular styles. Such acceptable styles shall include, but not be limited
to Colonial Revival, Classical Revival, Key West/Caribbean, CraftsmanlBungalow, Carolina Cottage,
Coastal, Spanish, Florida Cracker, Georgian and Victorian (see representative samples of preferred
architectural styles). Other compatible architectural styles may be permitted at the discretion and approval
of the Plan Review and Approval Team. The following exhibits graphically illustrate appropriate design
standards for Single -Family Detached Residential development, with reference to site planning,
architectural character, porches, garage options, fences, and lighting.
Page 11
Ocoee Crown Point PUD —DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
ACCEPTABLE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER/STREETSCAPE
TYPICAL FACADE SECTIONS FOR
SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
FWT.
TAL
q'min. 74W
V,
min,
,Stoop Option One -,Story Forck
min,
+1 2d4Y+'
orch in,
ort
Rq. FIN
Two-,5tory rorck
- Page 12
cminassociacej
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
ACCEPTABLE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER/STREETSCAPE
Flowering groundcover and shrub beds or varying
heights to achieve a layered effect. The tallest
shrubs shall be maintained at least 6" below the
finish floor OF the porch or portico.
Understory Ornamental Trees.
Decorative white pvc or pt white wood fence.
Low shrub or groundcover planting in
front of Fence.
Canopy or Specimen shade
tree spored 30-50' O-c- tYP-
See Appendix I for plant list
ao OF acceptable species.
on
o
. 0-
St, Augustine gross
sod tree lown.
0.
6
2'Landscapel 1Al
1, Walk
Strip .1 i
101 Min. Setback 1 Landscape and
1 Utility E.s.rn-L
Page 13
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
Street trees spaced �17—e
'-/-50, o.c. Lyp- in IT Esrnt.. Lane
R.O.W. 5/13
St. Augustine gross ", — -----
Street FTTFTA sod tree lawn.
Prop/R.0 V4
Line
27-, Gar, N
Sloop or
Optional 5' Porch
Geroge 5' Min, Garage Setback
From Front Facade
House
Min,`
"/Xes
L I —LL0111-
Lot Width
Vor.es
SINGLE FA MIT L'Vj LOT
FRONTLOADED
GARAGE
6'-0' Min, Vorcn
to, MinFront
Yard eLbok
Prop
Une
Stoop or
Optional Porch
Street t e5
spaced �/- 50'
o'C in R 0pis
W,
—5vaet
St. Augustine
gross sod Lree,
town,
sod
Holk
SINGLE FAMLY LOT
ALLEY LOADED
GARAGE
Page 14
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
SINGLE-FAMILY GARAGE OPTIONS
I Gar.
Front Loading
Rear Garage
Alley Lot Garage
Side Entrance Garage
N
5"
Standard Front
Loading Garage
I NOT j PERMITTED
Page 15
Ke T --p — iflis a -pj±j�rm
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
TreNcI4II;hUhhL-, AMI
PLAT 1(;, eE WzLU.)ED 04
A2C.11-rECTURA- cLADELINES It,
FUTJRF.
3 —
ty 0.
_„t! and -I,,
j
'61
Typical Elevation (styles may vary)
General Notes
Acceptable . Fence Materials: Grad, A Red or White Cedar and S. Yellow Pine or non -fa Z hue PVC.
Acceptable Color and Finish: 2 coats white exterior latex enamel or solid white paint 52v
Approved Manufacturers! Walpole Woodworkers (800) 343-6948; Benson Fence (800) 47-^P-6; Kroy Budding Products (800) 933-5769 or approved equal.
Approved Dimensions: Front yard fences -Max. 3'- 0" high. Rear yard fences - Max. - 0" high.
AcceptableLocations: Front and rear yards only. In side yards only up to budding fact
Acceptable Styles:
Front Yard Fences: Evenly spiced picket with Or without bottom kicker b�7 . -
scalloped picket; alternating pickets; and closed picket,
Rear Yard Fences: Spaced picket with facia; board fence with trellis Or Picjt� mppers; and trellis panels.
Major Components
Posts: Shall be a minimum 4" diameter and finished with I Post cap.
Pickets: Shall be a minimum 2" wide, evenly spaced and securely anchor--- :o rAings
Railings: Top and bottom rails shall be a min. 2,, x W' and securely posts.
Fasteners: Shall be rust proof and concealed from direct view.
Typical Front Yard Fence Detail
Page 16
Ocoee Crown Point P D pEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -.RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
city Of Ocoee
i
NGTE=
FENCING GUIDELINES 114D FENCING
PLAN T4 BE INC_UpE:) IN
ARCH TECTURAL GUIDELINES IN
FUTURE.
mox.
2-0 max.
q-0' mar.
3 mir.
{yC.
T'/v posts and :cps
Typ, gate hn-d—e
�I Finish 3rode of =-cd - mulch
/— Tyr. c0nt ete scoter
1 rtinim.m
i fuf La•.ox�pe
-0, t'yp.--k i7at<
,is
soLtion view
a: Nalf 5-Is
Acceptable Fence Materials: Grade A Red or White Cedar and S. Yellow Pine or non -fading white PVC.
Acceptable Color and Finisb: 2 coats white exterior latex enamel or solid white paint satin.
Approved Dimensions: Front yard fences —Max. 3' — 0" high. Rear yard fences — Niax. 6' — 0" high.
Side Yard Fences — Max. 6\General Notes (3.4A)
Acceptable Fence Materials: Grade A Red or White Cedar and S. Yellow pine or non -fading white PVC.
Acceptable Color and Finish, 2 coats white exterior latex enamel or solid white paint satin.
Walpole Woodworkers (800) 343.6948; Benso
Approved Manufacturers: n Fence (800) 479-1026; Kroy Building Products (800) 933-5769 or approved equal
-
Approved 3' — 0" h gh. Rear yard fences —Max. G' — 0" hig
Approved Dimensions: Front yard fences — Mah. Side Yard Fences — lviax 6 — 0" high.
Acceptable Styles:
ed picket.
Front Yazd Fences (if used in sear): Evenly spaced picket with or without bottom kicker bd; scalloped picker alternating pickets; and closet.
Rear Yard Fences: Spaced picket with facia; board fence with trellis or picket toppers; and trellis panels.
Major Components:
Posts: Shall be. a minimum 4" diameter and finished with a post cap.
Pickets: Shall be a minimum 2" wide, boards shall be a minimum of 6" wide, evenly spaced and securely anchored to railings
Railings: Top and bottom rails shall be a min. 2" x 4" and securely anchored to posts.
Fasteners: Shall be rust proof and concealed from direct view-0" high
Typical t I Fence Detail
Page 17
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of Ocoee
—011 tcl 11
wcsyort
sphCrC
Bedt-Ord
Tudor
yr
I Ya -0
Urn
Old snybrook
cololli�ll
victoruill
EiII1100th
icket TOPS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
Darien
OEM
M
Y,l
Nantucket
princess Anne
Queen Anne
Round Top
Bostollm"
El
Pendant
Andovcr lZollildc(l Slant
Page 18
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
I
Mail boxes shall be joint hung in groups of two and located on every other building lot line.
Cast Aluminum Mailbox
19 --22�"-
SCALE:.75"=12"
Page 19
ccnin associates
Ocoee Crown Point PUD —DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
5.2 Multi -Unit Residential Buildings
Multi -Unit Residential Buildings include all attached residential units, including duplexes, townhomes
and flats. Design standards for multi -unit residential buildings differ from the detached residential unit
standards. These standards are comprised of three sections: General Criteria and Townhouse Criteria,
The townhouse criteria are applicable to townhouse buildings only. The General Criteria are applicable
to duplexes and residential flats.
5.2,1 General Criteria
A. Building Orientation: multi -unit buildings shall be arranged on their site so that the fronts of the
buildings (those facades that face the public way) enhance the quality of the living environment and
the public realm and exhibit pleasing architectural character. Garage doors and surface parking
shall not be oriented toward the fronts of the buildings, nor shall garage doors and surface parking
have an imposing presence within views from any public roadway. Parking shall be located behind
the buildings.
B. Setbacks: Buildings shall be positioned at build -to line, in most cases, ten feet from the public right-
of-way.
C. Porches: Where buildings have ground level porches and patios close to the public realm, they shall
be elevated a minimum of 24" for additional privacy, unless otherwise prohibited by code.
D. Exterior Cladding: Recommended materials include stucco, siding, brick or stone, or any combination.
Other materials may be used, but are subject to approval by the Plan Review and Approval Team.
When utilizing concrete block wall construction on the first floor and utilizing frame on the second
floor, and skinning the structure with stucco, measures must be taken to ensure that the difference in
the stucco thickness is not visible and the wall surface is of uniform thickness. This requirement
also applies when using stucco over gable end trusses that bear on concrete block walls. If lap sidinp,
is used, lap exposure shall not be less than 6" nor more than 8".
E. Porch Railings: Recommended materials include wood, wrought iron or PVC. Aluminum is
discouraged. Railing styles shall be consistent with their respective architectural styles.
F. Columns: Columns shall be authentically styled, and consistent with their respective style of
architecture. Materials may include wood or fiberglass. Other materials may be permitted at the
discretion and approval of the Plan Review and Approval Team. Posts may be made of wood with
their capital and base made of wood trim. Decorative round columns of Sonotube material finished
with stucco are acceptable. The use of boxed out frame and concrete block column blocks trimmed
with j -molds is not permitted.
G. Front Facade Design: Variety of the structure's massing and building forms is encouraged. This will
create different and interesting facades along the streetscape. Facades shall be property scaled and
proportioned. Architectural style elements of the buildings shall be applied on all sides of the structure
and includes window trim, window muntin patterns, attic ventilation louvers, eave details, etc.
Page 20
ccninassociates
Ocoee Crown Point PUD ,DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
city of Ocoee
H, Ceiling Heights: First -floor ceilings shall be, a minimum of nine ' feet, four inches (91-4") for concrete
block construction and nine feet (9
for frame construction. Ten feet (10') is preferred. Second -
floor ceilings shall be a minimum of nine (9') feet. These dimensions will give the front elevation
some proportional stature and allow for appropriate window and door headers, as well as appropriate
frieze and eave details.
I. Windows: Window headers shall be at eight feet (8') above the finished floor minimum, for both
first and second floors. Windows shall be vertically proportioned. Horizontal sliders are not permit-
ted.
J. Window Muntins: Window muntin patterns shall be consistent with the historical architectural style
of the structure and be applied to all windows on all sides of the structure. Recommendations for
36" x 60" windows are 6-pane over 6-pane, and for 36" x 72" windows, 9-pane over 9-pane.
K. Shutters: If shutters are part of the design, then each shutter shall be, at a minimum, equal to half of
the window width for windows up to 4' 01' wide. Shutters are not permitted on single or mulled
windows greater than 4' 01' wide.
L. Roof Materials: Finish roof material shall be consistent and appropriate with the architectural character
of the structure.
M, Fascias: Recommended size is eight inches (8"). Six inches (6") is minimal, Four inches (4") is
unacceptable.
N, Eaves: A minimum of six feet (6') of separation must be achied between architectural projections/
overhangs of adjacent buildings, measured from the outer facvee of the fascia.
O. Exterior Trim/Details: Any architectural appointments or trim details must be consistent with the
architectural style of the structure, If architectural appointments such as shutters or louvers are
decorative, they may be of wood or copolymer material. if stucco cladding is used, trim details must
be raised or profiled by the use of j-molds or expanded polystyrene (EPS, foam). Details such as
shutters, louvers or any other element may not be scored into the stucco.
P. Ancillary Structures: Any ancillary structures such as dumpster enclosures, mail kiosks, recycle
centers, etc., shall have architectural character complimentary to the principal structures.
5.2.2 Townhouse Criteria
The following criteria are applicable, to townhouse buildings only.
A, Driveways, garages and surface parking shall be located at the rear of the unit.
B. Unit Separations: In order to minimize the horizontal read of the roof lines on multiple -unit attached
townhouses, units shall be visually partitioned to a maximum of six (6) grouped units. This may be
achieved by staggered, unaligned front facades, varied finished floor heights or parapeted separation
walls.
Page 21
5_4 _*_ _21 e 1, 2 re- 0 TO [
_7kLo K
WMIX
City of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
C. Foundation Heights: Townhouse foundations shall be elevated a minimum of 24" above grade in the
front of the house, and in the rear of the house also, if the back of the house is visible from the street,
unless otherwise disallowed by building codes. Due to minimized front yard setbacks, a minimum
of four (4) risers from the grade level to the finished floor elevation of the front porch or stoop is
desirable to provide privacy within the dwelling from passers-by,
D. Porches: Minimum six feet (6' 0") of depth so they are usable. Front porches shall not be screened.
E. Condenser Units: May be placed in the back yards or side yards only.
Desirable Townhouse Architectural Character
Page 22
ccnin associates
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
F_ ATTACHED HOUSING - RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES
TOWNHOME CRITERIA MATRIX
Residential Buildin Setbacks Garage belDacKb Side
ear
side---
Encroachment
Side
Front Side Zero Side Corner
, aneu
Corner
Front Side Re Setback 51
Q
Approximate Side Corner Rea
H I
K
M
N Q
C F
Lot Size A 0. 5* min.
18'Min. u, min.
is'Min.
3- min.
5'Min. N/A NIA Z Min.
V Min
x 90'Min. 10'Min. 0'&1 Min. J9 Min. 15'Min.
(Y 5, min.
i R' Min.
n.
'Min, TMin. 31111-
,2a.29)
(30'-39) x W Min. W Min. OVO Min. 10'Min. 15'M n. J8'Min. TMin.
3'Min. 0. 5' min.
IW
(401-45) x 99 n in.. 0&10W11T1.1 ,,,.U5'Min. 18'Min..
from principal structure to property line, unless otherwise noted,
NOTE: All setbacks are measured
it jo, from edge of pavement.
Side loaded alley garage minimum setback
21 pool setbacks also apply to screen enclosures.
11 maximum impervious cover not to exceed 90% on individual lots.
* Rear lane garage setbacks measured from edge of pavement. and privacy walls may extend into yard setbacks.
bay windows
* Encroachment of a/c pads, chimneys, roof overhangs, utility equipment,
Page 23
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of Ocoee
6.1 Design Standards
The, standards are aimed at enhancing
the appearance of buildings by
promoting interesting architecture.
Styles and facades of each individual
building can promote an eclectic mix
of architectural styles and
appearances.
Village center (highlighted)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ® VILLAGE CENTER
Page 24
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER'
city of Ocoee
6.2 Village Center Facade Design Guidelines - Major Goals
The Facade Design Guidelines have six major goals:
• Promote high -quality, pedestrian -friendly, diverse architecture.
• Preclude stores from looking like exact copies of their shopping mall counterparts. a s
• Preclude any outlandish architectural styles, and colors, etc.
• Promote a uniform architectural style within each building facade.
• Preclude large monolithic building facades without architectural detail in order to break up the
visual impact of the building mass.
• Promote appropriate signage for commercial establishments and prohibit inappropriate signage that
can detract from the character of the village.
TYPICAL BUILDINGS
Typical Main Street Ambiance
Page 25
Kati I jUep�� U*i_aLv[JJ-
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
TYPICAL BUILDINGS
Desirable Streetscape ana tFuitattig oEul-
Desirable Streetscape & Buttaing rucuuva
Page 26
r s 4 6,4(aliars
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee,
6.3 Building Length, Height and Scale
6.3.1 This building is an example of a larger building.
still being appropriate for a traditional downtown
Pierce, Florida.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
It possesses an urban quality and human scale, while
The Rawlerson Building is located in downtown Fort
The Rawlerson Building
6.3,2 Buildings, other than the.,high school within Ocoee Crown Point PUD, shall have for the most part
frontages between 50' and 100' in length, with storefront bays of approximately 25' to 50'. This rhythm
of architecturally diverse, urban buildings helps give a unique character and human scale and promotes
visual identity for retailers. Buildings shall incorporate elements of the Crown Point High School style,
and use complementary colors and materials in the design.
6.3.3 Appropriate variations in fenestration, materials, and expression lines will be necessary to preserve the
intimacy and human scale. Such buildings should nevertheless present a coordinated and balance facade
to the street; a "theme park" look of false fronts on a larger building is not intended.
Desirable High School kracaae aturt� inut- o- r—P
Page 27
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
6.4 Commercial Storefront Facade
M F"" IF 10
M L
Law m
KMI
71ri i I1=-m__'
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
ORMCE
Hoods
UPPER FACADE
Pier
�-Expression Line
Transom
Window
t facades among a group of contiguous storefronts in an individual building
6,4,1 The coordination of storefront appearance. The design guidelines, which are appropriate, are
is necessary to create a successful overall ap-
as follows:
• When considering building color selection, sign location and size, and awning or canopy location
and size, always take the existing context into consideration. The new storefront should be compat-
ible with the architectural style of the adjacent high school and the existing storefronts within the
same building.
• Continue horizontal lines such as building trim, cornice lines or decoration from one storefront to
the next whenever possible.
6.4.2 The basic commercial storefront facade consists of thee parts:
• The storefront with entrance and display windows;
• The expression line which delineates the transition between storefront and from the upper facade
above;
• The upper facade which contains the horizontal area utilized for wall signage, canopies or awnings
(the area may also have windows if it is a multi -story building);
• The cornice which is the architectural feature that tops the building.
* Graphic Source - city of Winter Park
Page 28
IPUD -VILLAGE CENTER
Ocoee Crown Point DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
6.5 Expression Line
6.5.1 The Expression Line is the architecturaade
tureon thadthe ground floor level and the upper facThis detail reinforces the pedestrian scale and traditional
composition of the architecture.
6.5.2 An Expression Line shall be either a cornice Or molding extending a minimum of three inches, or offset
in the surface plane of the building wall of a minimum of three inches.
STOREFRONT
Desirable
Undesirable
t Windows
Ll Kickplate
., metal Base
Page 29
* Graphic Source - City of Winter Park annassoclaces
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
6.6 Cornice
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
The cornice, which is the top architectural feature of the building, generally reflects the, style Of the
building. In many cases the cornices have historical as well as architectural significance and therefore
should be preserved as a contributing element to the appeal of the building. As a result, this cornice
should not be covered with incompatible materials, veneers or signs. Building owners and tenants are
encouraged, when possible, to expose the cornice facade in order to achieve these goals.
* Graphic Source - City of Winter Park
ORNICE
EXPRESSION LINE
Page 30
L
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
city --f Ocoee
1J
Desirable
CORNICE AND EXPRESSION LINE
Cornices Visible and
Enhanced with Colors
Compatible to Building
Expression Line
Projects Enough to
Create a Shadow Line
Cornices Removed or Covered
with Incompatible Material
Expression Line Covered
by Awning
Page 31
Kew -31fifl[4-- PRIiN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
city of Ocoee
6.7 Roof Pitch
Varied roof pitches will be permitted, as long as it fits in with the adjacent building's architectural style
0
and should be approved by the Crown Point Architectural Review Committee. Generally, however,
steep, pitched roofs are discouraged.
The upper facade is typically the area where wall signage, awnings or canopies are located. There are
certain design features that should be observed in dealing with the upper facade area. These include the
following:
• There should be for each individual building, an architecturally coherent utilization of either cano-
pies or awnings so that the building appears whole.
• There should be compatibility in height, size, materials and color between the canopies or awnings
on a building so that each individual storefront still portrays compatibility for each individual build-
ing.
• There should be waltsignage of similar material and composition to the building so that this signage
is compatible with the building's architectural composition.
Desirable
Undesirable
UPPER FACADE
JUPPER FACADE
Awnings & Canopies are
Uniform in Size,
Height and Color
Wall Sign too Large,
Covering Decorative Cornice
UJII)El� FACADL
Page 32
F4 cai pio [a REP
.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
city of Ocoee
6.9 Awnings
Canvas awnings can be one of the most important design elements ha
e toreVillagebuildinR. it also can be a very important element contcontributingn to theracter of the Crown Point
Center. Awnings also provide the functional benefit of providing shelter from Florida's omnipresent sun
shoppers. There are certain design guidelines that should be followed
or rain, which is crucial for retail e following:
in the application of awnings. These include th
• Fabric awnings, such as canvas, vinyl -coated can I vas or acrilan are encouraged. Metal awnings such
an
as aluminum, copper d bronze should be utilized in a controlled manner, in a way which will
enhance and emphasize hierarchical spaces such as main entrances and porticoes of the building.
•
Awnings should be architecturally coherent across the . building in terms of heightshould not be, s z
and color so as to provide a unified appearance to an individual store. Awnings materials
of
radically uneven or unusual shapes. However, a certain amount of diversity in the building facades
is desirable and should be encouraged.
• The cumulative effect of individual storefront awnings on a building should be considered in designing
a new awning.
• An awning should reinforce the frame of the storefront or office and should not cover the piers or the
space between the second story building windows and cornice.
• Awnings covering second story windows should conform to the size of the individual windows or
should complement the first floor storefront awning in terms of size, materials, height, color, etc.
0 The color of the fabric awning should complement the building's color scheme.
Page 33
;JT11i
0 n L7
PUD
Ocoee Crown POInt —
City of Ocoee
AWNINGS
,Desirable
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
Second Story Awnings
Coordinate with Ground Floor
Storefront Awnings
Awnings Uniform in Height,
Size, Materials and color
UPPER FACADE
Awnings & Canopies are
Uneven Sizes,
I-leights and Color
Undesirable
* Graphic Source - City of Winter Park annassoclates
Page 34
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
TYPICAL AWNINGS
Examples of Appropriate Facades, Awnings and Store Signage
Page 35
Ocoee Crown Potnt IPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
City of Ocoee
6.10 Canopies
A canopy is a permanent appendage to a building which functions as a horizontal element covering the
storefront sidewalk. Canopies provide the same benefits to the shopper that are accomplished by awnings.
canopies as a permanent building elementuations
etimeselereflect the historic character of a building since this
than canvas awnings. Canopies in someCanopis generally are more difficult as a
was the predominant style of shelter used for older businceildings.
e here is less vertical area facing the street and there
design feature in producing an appealing imagsidewalk to reinforce the awning. The design guidelines
are typically supports to the building wall or
that should be followed in the treatment of canopies are as follows:
• Flat canopies should be dressed -up with 12-24 inch fabric awning valance so as to increase visual
appeal of the canopy. canopies should be of colors that complement building's
• Canopies and any signage on the face of
color scheme.
* Graphic Source - City of Winter Park aninassoclar-es Page 36
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
city of Ocoee
6.11 Lighting
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS- VILLAGE CENTER
The nighttime appearance of a building is an important consideration in building design. Lighting may
serve as a security function as well as promoting business after hours. Certain design guidelines should
be utilized in the use of lighting as follows:
• Use lighting efficiently and sparingly to highlight display windows, entrances, signs and architec-
tural detail.
4- Balance the intensity of overall lighting with that of display windows.
0 Light sources should be shielded. Avoid high intensity floor lights directed at pedestrian or vehicles.
• The spillover from lighting in proximity to residential settings should be minimized so as not to be a
nuisance.
• Storefronts shall remain unshuttered at night. Storefronts should provide view of interior spaces lit
from within (backless displays).
memos M.
Outdoor Lighting is Shielded and
Enhances Architectural Detail
Display Lights Directed Toward
Display and Away from Pedestrians
Avoid Floor Lights
Graphic Source - City of Winter Park Page 37
ccninassociates
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
City of Ocoee
6.12,1 Signs play a particularly important role in the appearance of individual storefronts and buildings The
strongly influence the public's perceptions of the Crown Point
size and design characteristics of signs strong -, rs tend to overestimate the value and function A
Village Center and its individual businesses. Business owne
of signage when the success of a business is primarily related to the appeal of the products and prices.
successful sign is not one which stands out t
om jacfrozoint Villae Ceer. Aside m compliance with the zoning regulations,
quality image of the Crown Po n
there are certain other design guidelines which should be followed:
1) The size, color, shape and location of a sign should complement the building facade. Building
elements such as windows, cornices or decorative details should not be obscured.
2) Sign material should be chosen which heannonizithand complement the building's design. Signs
should never be so large as to overpor the facade.
3) Individual storefront signs should be compatible with the other storefronts within the same building
in terms of design, size and placement on the building.
4) Temporary window signs, such as special sale signs, are not permitted, All signs must be pre -
approved by the Crown Ponit Village Center Architectural Review committee.
5) Front lighting of signs is encouraged.
6) Signage above the expression line shall be prohibited except:
Wall mounted hanging signs that are highly decorative and compliment the building facade.
0 small window signs.
0 Signs that identify a building, incorporated in the cornice detail.
C
6.12.2 Other types of signage located above the expressions line shall not be allowed.
Page 38
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of ocoee
SIGNS
Desirable
Undesirable
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
Signs are Coordinated in Size and
Placement with Building and
Adjacent Storefront
Awning Sign Covers Masonry Pier
Sale Sign too Large for Storefront and
Poorly Placed in Display Window
* Graphic Source - City of Winter Park Page 39
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
lo,(MIN.)
8'(MIN.)
1'(TYP.)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
SIGNS
Typical free-standing signs are encouraged
Page 40
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
SIGNS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
Second Story Watt Mounted Hanging
Signs. Proportional in Scale and
Complementary to the Building Facade.
Wall Mounted Sign Covers Cornice.
The Sign is out of Proportion with the
Building Facade.
Graphic Source - City of Winter Park Page 41
aninassoclaces
Ocoee Crown Point PUD - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
6.13 Facade Coordination
The coordination of storefront facades among a group of contiguous storefronts in an individual building
is necessary to create a successful overall appearance. The design guidelines which are appropriate are
as follows:
• building canopy location
When considering the build color selection, sign location and size, and awning or
size, always take the existing context into consideration. The new storefront should coordinate with
the architectural style of the building and the existing storefronts within the same building.
® Continue horizontal lines such as building trim, cornice lines or decoration from one storefront to
the next whenever possible.
Architectural Details and Cornice
Are Exposed and Enhanced
Awnings Coordinate in Size, Color
And Placement
Cornice is Covered by Awnings
individual Storefronts are Painted
Contrasting Colors, Fagade is not
Architecturally Unified
Undesirable
Page 43
�AGAIIMFT�o DILK
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - VILLAGE CENTER
City of Ocoee
6.14 Color
The color palette can make the most dramatic improvements to a building or one of the most offensive
changes to a building. Choosing the right combination of colors can unify the building elements with the
facade as well as relate the building to others on the street. There is no reason to limit color variation to
what was original to a building. A business can benefit if the color of a building is changed in that
customers will take notice. However, selection of colors compatible with surrounding buildings is essential.
This does not mean that the color must match, but they should not compete. Color schemes that are too
bright or intense, electric or Day-Glo shall not be utilized. Colors shall be approved by the Crown Point
Village Center Architectural Review Committee,
L)et;llctum-
Colors of the Storefronts are Coordinated to Unify the
Appearance of the Entire Building Facade
Undesirable
Individual Storefronts Painted Various Colors
Which Breakup the Uniform Appearance of the
Building Facades
* Graphic Soture - City of Winter Park
Page 44
Ocoee Crown Point PUD. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - OTHER COZY MERCIAfJOFFICE STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
SECTION 7 - OTHER COMMERCIAL/OFFICE STANDARDL'
7.1 Architectural Standards
The objective of the Architectural Design Guidelines is to establish aesthetic and thematic standards for
Ocoee Crown Point PUD. Flexibility in interpretation and innovation is encouraged to create distinct
building identities and interesting diversity while utilizinp, the southeastern vernacular architectural
0 theme(s) especially on the main streets and in the traditional neighborhood area. The larger commercial
buildings may employ other compatible architectural design. Building facades should be varied and
articulated to provide visual interest within a harmonious, organizing theme, rather than creating an
overly monotonous image. Use of arcades or bays are encouraged.
Architectural Theme (Southeastern vernacular) - The architectural character for the Ocoee Crown Point
PUD project is derived from local and regional architectural styles which have been populanir in Florida
since thelate 19thcentury. This vernacular architecture includes the Coastal/Plantation, ColoalRevival
and Classical Revival styles and eclectic variations of each, which must be approved by the City of Ocoee.
The intent is not to create highly_themed period architecture, but rather architectural diversity and interest
that draws on these vernacular elements,
Architectural Elements - T ' he use of the southeastern vernacular architectural elements which make up
these traditional styles will provide a continuity and cohesiveness needed to tie much of the Ocoee Crown
Point PUD development together. Use of architectural styles, features and materials that are indigenous
to the region are encouraged. (See Figure 7-1 - Architectural Applications.)
7.2 Commercial Frontage
Commercial out -parcels may be developed by national franchises, however, traditional elements of
Southeastern Vernacular architecture shall be incorporated. Every effort should be made during the
design process to incorporate materials and details which are compatible with the Southeastern
Vernacular styles. The City of Ocoee will work with national franchises to help find appropriate solutions
to incorporating the Southeastern Vernacular Theme. (See Figure 7-1- Architectural Applications.)
Page 45
-J� -JK
Lo"'61 121re -��dp
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - OTHER COMMERCIALIOFFICE STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
IN
Its,
-tj
Recommended
Figure 7-1 �-
Architectural Applications
Not Recommended
C — Page
ccnin associates I
Ocoee Crown Point PUD- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - OTHER C01IMERCIALIOFFICE STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
7.3 Commercial Buildings (Shopping Center) I
Large shopping center buildings may incorporate elements of the Southeastern vernacular architectural
theme and other quality architectural styles. Roof forms and building elements shall be articulated to
provide variety and interest. The following pictures are examples of how a large commercial building
can be enriched to provide variety and interest.
Figure 7 -2 -
Commercial Buildings
Page 47
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -OTHER COXIMERCIALIOFFICE STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
7.4.1 Office buildings located along Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road shall also incorporate elements
of the southeastern vernacular architectural theme or other appropriate design treatments. Large horizontal
masses should be broken where possible to provide visual interest. The buildings' aesthetic appearance
should be addressed as well as its functional aspects.
7.4.2 Mixed use is encouraged with Tract #9. Permitted uses include commercial or office on the ground floor
with residential or office on the floors above.
7,43 Office buildings shall incorporate elements of the Southeastern Vernacular architectural theme or other
formal or compatible themes as illustrated below. Office buildings should be articulated to provide
interest to the facade by providing variation in the building mass and roof forms.
7.4.4 The following pictures are examples of how an appropriate architectural style can be incorporated into
an office building.
Figure 7-3
Office Buildings
Page 48
rads lilli , 0 ius
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPWENT STANDARDS - STREET STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
mim
8.1 Introduction
The following standards reflect standards for the street types to be incrorated for Rear Lanes�o Ocoee Crown Point
PUD. These include Village Center Main Streets, Residential Streetsoapnd Alleys
Several Design Objectives are incorporated into the street system in the plan.
8.1.1 Provide a plan that is designed to create greater roadway connectivity within and around the Ocoee
Crown Point PUD Development.
8.1.2 Ensure that the traffic that moves through the Village on its Main Streets is calmed, and moves ng the width
at a slow
speed compatible with a pedestrian -friendly environment, This is accomplished by reduci
of lanes, providing on -street parallel parking, landscapinp, with shade trees, the introduction of signals,
when warranted, safe pedestrian crossings and placing buildings up closer to the street.
8.2 On -Street Parking
Parallel parking shall be provided in the Village Center on all streets and along the community park on
the northern residential connection road.
8.3 Sidewalks
, sidewalks loshall be installed on each side of the street. In like manner,
In residential neighborhoods cated on both sides of the street. In the Village Center, street
sidewalks in the Village Center shall be
trees, and furniture shall be located within the sidewalk area.
Handicap access shall be provided on all approaches, at all intersections and at all pedestrian crossing
areas.
The thickness and minimum width of the sidewalks, and the esign for handicap access shall be in
compliance with current FDOT design standards, currentADAandd Florida Accessibility Code Standards,
8.4 Traffic Calming
"Traffic Calming" is a term used to describe the slowing of vehiVilla
ular speeds anesidentiad in some streets are to
cases, the
reduction in traffic volume along certain streets. The Crown Point Village and R
be traffic calmed. Speed may be controlled n
������ by a nuseltraffic calming methods may be incorporated nity were needed, but this list is illustrative
only and other devices not listed, but recognized by the City of Ocoee, to accomplish the same purpose
may also be employed:
® Bump Outs
0 Change in Street Surface Texture or Material
Page 49
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
• Clear Signage
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -,STREET STANDARDS
• On -Street Parking
• Optical street width reduction, such as street trees, median plantings, paving patterns, street lights
and street furniture
® Pedestrian -Operated Signals at Crossings
® Roundabouts
• Smaller Building Setbacks
• Stop Signs
0 Traffic Circles
0 Reduced Curb Radii to a Minimum of fifteen (15') at Curb Edges.
In addition to providing traffic calming within the community, several of these devices also are intended
to reduce the distance necessary for pedestrian crossings and to enhance the attractiveness of walking
throughout the neighborhoods. All such devices must be engineered and constructed to allow the efficient
utilization of the same by emergency vehicles. Pedestrian crossings within the Village Center and Ocoee
Apopka Road shall have full pedestrian features with marked crosswalks.
8.5 Street Trees
On all village streets, shade trees shall be installed prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for
village uses. Street trees shall be planted 50 feet (50') on center.
All roadway landscaping shall conform to the City of Ocoee Ordinance #99-23 for sight distances and
clear recovery areas.
8.6 Median Planting
The median plantings are intended to provide seasonal color and act as a buffer between traffic lanes.
The plant material may include a mixture of shade and ornamental trees and shrubs in varying sizes. All
plants shall be at a clear distance from intersections.
Page 50
0 M a
Ocoee CrownPo • ,
City VIM f Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - STREET STANDARDS
Ocoee Crown Point Parkway - 120' Right -of -Way
Ocoee ''o61
Page 51
Ocoee Crown Point PUD
City of Ocoee
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - STREET STANDARDS
Roadway Adjacent to Community Park - 50'Right-of-Way
x
Village Center- 601 Right -of -Way
Page 52
Ocoee Crown Point Pi,l.D DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
SECTION 9 - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
9.1 General Landscape Standards
9.1.1 Objectives
The objective of this section is to promote and enhance the aesthetic character of Ocoee Crown Point
PUD. The Design Standards and conceptual landscape site plans for the Crown Point Village Center
focus on identifying treatment options for streetscape, open space, off-street parking and service areas.
For the purposes of these Design Standards, site furniture, irrigation and landscape lighting are considered
landscape elements.
9.1.2 General Responsibilities
The property owner and/or tenant shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance of the landscape
and irrigation on their specific parcel and within abutting right-of-ways in accordance with their Master
Landscape and Irrigation Plans,
9.1.3 Preservation Of Existing Vegetation
A reasonable effort will be made to preserve existing natural tree cover, if any. All trees that have a
minimum trunk caliper of twelve (12) inches or larger will be considered for preservation.
9.1.4 Safety Standards
All landscape materials shall be planted in a manner which will not impede or create a hazard for vehicular
or pedestrian traffic.
9.2 Specific Landscape Requirements
9.2.1 Streetscape and Building Landscaping
• The landscape areas designated along the streetscape and adjacent to the buildings shall be landscaped
completely with trees, shrubs, groundcovers and/or annuals.
• The landscape for Ocoee Crown Point PUD shall be in accordance with the Conceptual Landscape
set plans and shall be appropriate to the scale and design of each building. Shrubs and groundcovers
will be used around the base of the trees and in pots/planters to provide accent and seasonal color.
• The landscaped area along the streetscape or `street side' of each building shall present an attractive
appearance, emphasizing and reinforcing the primary entry of the structure. Shade and/or flowering
trees shall be incorporated into the landscape design along the street and wherever areas will
appropriately allow space for these elements. The use of movable pots and planters, wall trellises,
flower boxes, etc., is encouraged to bring color and diversity into the streetscape (see exhibits for
illustrations). All buildings with interior courtyards shall be appropriately landscaped and, where
space allows, provided with sitting areas and other amenities such as water features for pedestrian
enjoyment.
Page 53
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
• Where space allows, landscape treatments along the sides of buildings shall be a continuation of the
design of the streetscape.
• Landscape treatment of the building rear yards and service areas shall focus on clearly defining
points of building access and pedestrian pathways. Service areas external to the building envelope
shall be landscaped and screened from public view by decorative walls or fences (see exhibits for
illustration).
9.2.2 Landscape Buffers
• Where buffer areas exist, landscaping will be provided in combination with decorative walls and/or
fences to provide an effective visual screen. The landscaping shall consist of a combination of trees
and shrub and groundcover beds of varying heights, seasonal color and texture.
• Adjacent to vehicular use areas, landscape buffers will be provided to screen parking from direct
view. The screening in this buffer area shall typically consist of shade trees and understory trees,
shrub beds and decorative fences or walls. The tallest shrubs should be typically maintained at a
minimum height of 3 feet. All areas between the street curb and right-of-way line where a fight -of -way
abuts a parcel shall also be landscaped.
9,23 Parking Lot Landscaping'
Entry drives into parking areas shall be landscaped and shall incorporate the design of landscaping
in adjoining buffer areas. The design shall utilize only approved trees and shrubs in a manner that
visually emphasizes the area and offers the driver and pedestrian an attractive appearance from the
street. Landscape treatment of entry areas shall be designed to allow safe viewing distances for
vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
The majority of the off-street parking lots in Ocoee Crown Point PUD will require both perimeter
and interior landscaping to influence the micro -climate and break up the large expanses of paved
surface area. Where feasible, interior planting islands will be provided between, at the ends and
within rows of parking spaces (see exhibits for illustrations of these islands). Canopy shade trees
will be introduced in these interior islands to provide an effective shade canopy. Trees will be installed
that are limbed up to facilitate sight distance, provide shade and help to reduce the impact of this
visual scale of the parking.
• All perimeter and interior planting islands of parking lots shall be provided with shade trees selected
from the Master Plant List (see Appendix and exhibits for illustrations). In addition, the landscape
area under the trees shall be planted with shrubs and/ or groundcovers. Parking lots shall be designed
to minimize vehicle overhang encroachment into any landscaped areas.
9.3 Plant Material
All plant material installed within the Ocoee Crown Point PUD shall equal or exceed the standards for
Florida No. 1, as given in "Grades. and Standards for Nursery Plant," Parts I and Part 11, current edition,
State of Florida Department of Agriculture, and any amendments thereto. All plant materials should be
capable of flourishing in Central Florida's climate and soil conditions.
Page 54
Ocoee Crown Point PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
All plant material used in the Ocoee Crown Point PUD shall be selected from the Master Plant List,
unless otherwise noted the plant material sizes and specifications listed are the minimum sizes at the
time of planting.
9.4 Landscape Maintenance
All landscape areas shall be maintained in order to maintain the appearance of Ocoee Crown Point PUD.
Maintenance will include, but not be necessarily limited to the following: Keeping all papers, trash,
debris and unsightly items picked up and disposed of; replenishing mulch in shrub and groundcover
beds at periodic intervals; keeping all weeds out of landscaped areas; mowing and edging as required to
keep lawn areas at a suitable height and in a neat and attractive condition; trimming and pruning all
landscaping using hand or other tools, in order to present a neat appearance at all times; and watering
and fertilizing all plant materials as required to maintain a vigorous and healthy condition.
9.5 Landscape Irrigation
The parcel owner and/or tenant shall be responsible for the installation, maintenance and proper utilization
of an automatically controlled landscape irrigation system for each parcel and the areas between the
street curb and right-of-way line where a right-of-way abuts a parcel.
The irrigation system shall provide adequate irrigation with full coverage. In streetscape areas with small
landscape cutouts and/or pots, adequate underground sleeving and special drip and bubbler heads shall
be installed to minimize overspray. A water sensor gauge shall be employed on all irrigation systems to
prevent overwatering. Irrigation devices shall not be installed above finish grade where they could create
a tripping hazard for pedestrians. The irrigation backflow preventor and automatic controls shall be
located in designated service areas and screened from public view.
Page 55
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
— Building
Wall Ke'(,-666C6
Awrilrlg6
On Street Parking
Street Level
Furniture, & LarldoGaplmg
Page 56
fiff-m Plpi! LIP
Ocoee Crown Point PUD — DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
50OL? (AA1'F,5 Or, OfH�P, APROM? MAffZl&
op
00
Page 57
-1 —1
4RLK�-
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS
City of Ocoee
2 way
aiole'a
End ->
lolarldo,
Center
median
Fe, ri m cte r
buffero
0
Page 58
--T m-lj 10 a P� �0 to Lc*l
o8/01/2003 14:48 FAX 407 481 8447 HARIMA-N L,-, AJbUklAihS
ufflcll*�
James E ch.,15KOP"'r,
A, RynnIng.Rt_MAA.
D MuOer. PT,
Mlaharl D,
',C EJ'Aril%
,jr.MOR ASSOUNTF11
ylecn H. Ham. C-NLC
K� Lasht;- I�E
P oufmnc. P.G.
]on D. FOX, 11F
I,r,y t L"YMA' RL, 02LI
013
HARTMAN& ASSOCIATES, INC. ANSUU&0!
surveyors & management consultants E. C'000. RG
oiio;neevq� hvdro2eo1O0$tS� �k RL M R.A.
David Wheeler, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Ocoee
rffl��=
William D. Musser, X"
FROM:
Ernesto Esgueyra '��7 e'--
Hartman & Associates, Inc.
Cityof Ocoee Consulting Engineers
DATE; August 1, 2003
SUBSECT' Crown Pointe, Phase I - Information
Final Subdivision Plan Review
I
Aadrlw t QQ VO , , '
Join VrUUtnCY'P.F-
otome s' viinc,
1. WOOW. U.
T'Tad Sh1w, PE
RE„ DEE
Jill M. HuOkin,, P'F
ox-Ad "'I. NO.Un, T',r-
valartc! C. Davis. P C,
C311r!e5 m, 3huhz, PE.
do M. 1"a r LI, M C P. Q EP
C.. micnelle (Gaylord
HAI# 02.011 8.00%4� L W. WOiK�,1-1"-&
BrUQV Vlrv(w' "Ci
o1,B. 11mlecri i%UkA-
j K. StcvarU PF
LlavLrly J. Garrcu.PF,
Hartman & Associates, Inc. (I-Lj) completed the first final construction plan review for the project
referenced above based on a submittal package received by the City on July 24, 2003. H.A.I. received the
revised set of construction drawings on Wednesday afternoon, July 30, 2003, The plans were reviewed in
ment Code with primary on Sections
accordance with the City of ocoee!s Land Devoe DCA (LDQ ac"ssibility codesattention, the CitYs Utility
IV and VI. In addition, considerations were given to ADA] it is our understanding that the
Standards, and general experience with common engineering practice ic by others as
master drainage is being reviewed by Professional Engineering, Consultant (PEC) and Traffic 4� t applicable because of prior
well. There may be certain project specific items noted below that are no applicable
negotiated dealings between the parties that have not been mad(,- known to HAI in the short timefrarne Of
two (2) days that we have had the plans. We understand you have been out this week and trust you will
amend our comments as appropriate; The followin-, are Our comments and/or recommendations -
I Plans are required to identify responsible parties providing utilities (water, sewer,
electricity, gas, etc.). See checklist-
2. North arrow clearly shown on Sheet C130 and not shown on Sheet C116.
3. Sealed boundary survey not included in plans provided to HAI.
4, Existing zoning Of Property and adjacent parcels not noted.
5. Grading from adjacent property not clearly shown.
6. Right-of-way widths of all existing streets not clearly labeled on C 112 thru C 115.
7, Existing streets names missing on Cl 12. provided to HAI. We assume this was provided
8. Soils Report of the development was not
to PEC. 9. Final approvals will require a Erasion Control Plan w/ proof of Notice of Intent should be
flied with EPA before the Pre Construction Meeting.
201 EAST pTNE s1rRELT - SUM 1000 . 0pJ,6",1,D0,FL3280l
TELENIONL (407) 1339-3955 - PAX (407) $39-3790 • Www-00115111thai.com
A TEm%. *iTCH COMPANY
OM.ANT)o FoWf NfMS pl-AmriVrION Jt\CKSONVILLE DESTTN XI'LANTA
1 08/01/2003 14:48 FAX 407 481 8447 HARDIAN, & ASSWiAlho
City of Ocoee
August 1, 2003
Page 2 of 3
10 calculations are Missing.
11. Impervious area calr mits included with submittal or applied for.
Provideall necessary Perond designnot , printouts from modeling
12. Drainage, calculations to support pWe assume this is being
programs with storm vent identified were Proincludingvided
reviewed by PEC. Also, the, drainage pipe lengths are not labeled and a note stating all
curb inlet tops are precast concrete was not provided.
13. Cross section of pavement do not include asphalt thickness or compaction requirements
for base and sub -grade. all concrete pipe joints will be wrapped with -filter
14, A note on the plans indicating that
fabric was not included. 15. A note indicating that densities at - utility and storm structures (inlets/manholes within
roadway to 3' in back of curb) shall be 98% within pavement areas., T- 18 0 ( and a density ed)
of 95%
for structures outside paved areas, but within ROW per AASHTO rno was
not included.
16. Curve data was not provided on all the center lines.
17. Code requires minimum radius z 275' for all streets with 3500 AHM was not able to
DT unless Street is
superelevated. Since We were not provided with the Traffic Study,
confirm whether this applies to the proposed access road connecting the roundabout to
Ocoee -Apopka Road.
18. Please indicate the following on pavement sections:
0 Slabgrade shall extend outward horizontally, 12" beyond the base or 12" beyond
back of curb. Subgrade under timerock & curbs: Stabilize top 6" to FBV50 or LBR40 &
0
compact to minimum 95% AASHTO T-I 80 for top 12.
BaseCourse shall be compacted to a minimum density = 95% or max, density T-
areas with high GWT as recommended by
Igo for limerock. Use soil cement at gel
soils engineer. section does not match the existing roadway Pavement
19. t-ntraace intersection pavement section on Ocoee Crown point parkway includes 4-foot
section. The existing pavemeritthe point of extension for this project these lanes have
bicycle lanes on either side, at and pedestrians. We understand
been eliminated. This may Create confusion for cyclists
that were considered during project development that we
that there may be other factors your attention.
lack knowledge of on this issue; therefore, we simply bring it to
20. call -outs for return radii at all intersections and street stub -outs were not inTcluded.
be an
21. Code requires that a temporary cul de sac at station 32+00 bet his may
issue for the Emergency Response Personnel. provided nor included details on
22. Construction barricades at dead end streets were not
plans.
08/01/2003 14:49 FAX 407 481 8447 HARDIA-N &- A,--U',IAiEz,
city of Ocoee
August 1, 2003
Page 3 of 3
23. A 4-ft. wide sidewalk on both sides of all streets (require 5' wide if > 3500 ADT or along
the length of tract frontage including >=4' separation from SIW to the back of curb or >=
6' from EOP). Please verify required width based on traffic study.
24. All side walks fronting ponds and under driveways shall be 6" thick, This should be
indicated on the sidewalk detail on C43 0.
25, The checklist/code requires that a verification of sight distance from any intersection be
per FDOT standards and Green Book. No such verification was provided to HAL
26. Provide intersection detail showing spot elevations at the connection to existing
pavement to determine if valley gutter is required.
27. overall topographic drainage plan of the basin and any sub basins showing pre and post
drainage features, any offsite drainage including flow mows, and the ultimate receiving
water facility or surface waters into which the runoff from the site will be discharged
were not provided. The drainage plan should have sufficient topographical information
with elevations to verify the location of ridges, streams, using V contour intervals,
28. The primary and secondary drainage systems could not be reviewed without the benefit
of drainage calculations. construction shall be certified by a
29. If berm is constructed of fill material, the design and
PGE according to the City checklist. Not provided.
IM Skimmer should extend 6" below the TV (NWL) elevation and 6" above the DHW of the
pond.
31. Provide l' separation between street base bottom & estimated SHWT, otherwise induce
the water table by an underdrain system, provided the base bottom is not more than 2'
below SHWL- HM can not confirm compliance with code above since we didn't get a
copy of the geotechnical report, nor is the S14WL provided on pro -files. HGL to be set at
least 6" below gutter of a 10 year storm frequency and HGL for Arterial and Collector
Streets 1.0 feet below gutter. 32. Minimum storm culvert shall be 1591 under driveways and 18" under roadways. Some of
the proposed culverts under the roadway are not in compliance 33. Retention ponds 8 and 9 have slopes steeper than 5:1 and would require fencing
34. Ponds side slopes and berms shall be sodded.
')5. Dry pond bottoms shall be grass and mulch
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
End of Memorandum.
SR\V/sma/02,0119-009/cOrTeSP
CrownPainte PhLdoc
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
TO: David Wheeler, P.E.
City of Ocoee Director of Public Works
FROM: Leylah Saavedra, P.E.
DATE: August 7, 2003
RE: Crown Point PUD
Phase I Infrastructure
Since PEC's last memorandum (Review Comments No. 1) dated July 14, 2003, the
following additional-,, information has been received from the Consultant (VHB
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.):
➢ Stormwater Management Computations Response to Comments, and
➢ Report of Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
for the Coke Property
Based upon review of the above information, PEC is currently coordinating with the
Consultant on the resolution of minor drainage concerns, which will not affect the
design of the proposed works, Consequently, PEC recommends the approval of
this project contingent upon the resolution • the minor outstanding drainage
concerns, which are to be addressed in a final submittal to the City for record
keeping purposes as well as the following highway design comments:
1 Consider adding a westbound left turn -lane at West Grove Subdivision
entrance.
2. Consider increasing the pavement section to a minimum of 10" limerock
base and either 3" Type "S" structural coarse or 2.5" Type "S" with V FC-3
friction course.
3. A 720' radius at a 35 mph design speed requires super elevation (N=RC).
Please revisit. Also it appears that the existing roadway to the east is super
elevated (based on the inlet median shown on sheet C1 11). Please show
the super elevation transition on the plans.
R. X
U0101PUt' iY
MO
Sl�;m
151M
�J P, 2,2 _' _ )
3"'801 - 4071
0 dn r orid;-i 3
. r, f,, X
Page 2
Mr. David Wheeler
August 7,2003
4. What is the proposed functional classification for this facility? A posted
speed limit of 25 mph seems low.
5. Multi -lane facilities typically require overhead school zone signing / flashing
beacon. Please advise.
�Igpiip 11111 11111111 111 111 111 11 111,
if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 407-422-
8062,extension 192 or via e-mail at lls@peconline.com
cc: Russ Wagner, City of Ocoee
David Hams'tra, PEC
I
itilavor
S. Scott Vander -rift
City 14tanaler
Jim Gleason
--,,ter of Good r
0 . ' I_�iu+l
DATE: August 4, 2003
TO: Development Review Committee
FROM: Robert Lewis, AICP, Planning Manager
Commissioners
Danny 11oNN,ell, District 1
Scott �Iderson, District 2
Rusty John son. District 3
Nana- J. Pjrker, District. 4
SUBJ: Planning Comments
Ocoee Crown Point PUD, 3rd Staff Review
PUD Land Use Plan / Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Received July 23, 2003
These comments are intended to list the remaining concerns of the Planning Division related to
the current plan submittal. It is our intent that these comments be addressed with revisions to
the plans that will be made after the public hearings for the PUD Land Use Plan / Preliminary
Subdivision Plan.
1) Sheet C004 — In the 41h line of Note # 1, change "Agreement Number 1"to "Amendment
Number 1'.
2) Sheet C004 — The plan currently shows the road leading from Village Center Drive
(Tracts # 33 and # 33A) past Tracts # 6D, # 7A and # 7B to Tract # 13 as a single
continuous tract — Tract # 34. The plan should show a line separating that road tract for
the Village Center Drive tract. I should also show that road as three separate tracts (#
34A, # 34B and # 34C) rather than one tract.
3) Sheet C004 — The Inter -local Agreement Property Distribution table should show Tract #
34 as three separate tracts (# 34A [City] — between # 33 and the WO Trail; # 34B [City]
— between the WO Trail and # 713; and # 34C [School Board] — between # 6D and # 13).
4) Sheet C005 — Provide a new footnote for the Detached Housing — Residential
Guidelines tables. The footnotes currently include a note (# 3) describing the maximum
impervious cover on individual lots as 75%. Instead of one footnote for this purpose,
there should be two — one note for Single Family Large Lot table and one note for the
Single Family Traditional Neighborhood table. The first note (large lots) should describe
the maximum impervious cover on individual lots as 65%. The second note (traditional
lots) should describe the maximum impervious cover on individual lots as 75%. (See
Comment # 19 below for a similar change to Condition of Approval # 18.)
5) Please revise the same tables located on page 9 in the Ocoee Crown Paint PUD
Development Standards to be consistent with the changes described in the previous
comment.
City or Ocoee - 150 N Lakeshore Drive - Ocoee, Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100 • fax: (407) 656-8504 1 NVWW.ci. Ocoee. fl. us
August 4, 2003
Development Review Committee
Page 2
6) Sheet C005 — Please make the following revisions to the Master Development Plan
table:
a. Please provide a 3.0 FAR in the Floor Area Ration IDensity cell for Tract # 11.
b. Please change the Land Use cell description for Tract # 12 from 'Institutional" to
"R. 0. W. & Retention".
c. Please delete the entire line for Tract R6 (the tract from the Westyn Bay subdivision).
d. Please delete the second sentence in the Notes cell for Tract # 3, that reads "The
setbacks for the ball fields shall be 25 feet to any property line"
5) Sheet C005 — Provide a Traffic Impact Mitigation table showing the road and
intersection improvements that need to be built along with the development of this PUD,
consistent with the recommendations of the traffic study. The information in the table
should also indicate which improvements will be built along with each of the tracts within
the PUD (who is responsible) and when those improvements need to be built (timing of
construction relative to development of each tract). This table should be on Sheet C005
or some other sheet that makes it part of the PUD land use plan.
6) Sheet C006 — The changes that were made on Sheet C005 to the various tables also
need to be made to the same tables on Sheet C006.
7) Sheet C006 — It appears that the driveway cuts shown from the east side of Ocoee
Crown Point Parkway to the high school site (Tract # 5) do not match up with driveways
shown on the current site plan for the high school. There are other sheets in this plan
set that also have this discrepancy. Please revise all sheets for consistency.
8) Sheet C101 — It appears that the large access arrows shown on the plan do not match
up with the appropriate driveway cut locations on Tracts # 5, # 9, # 10 and # 11. This
discrepancy is also on Sheets C103 and C104. Please revise all sheets for consistency.
9) Sheet C103 — The water main line connection shown along the east side of Ocoee
Apopka Road under the Western Beltway (connecting the water main north of the
Beltway with the water main south of the Beltway) should be deleted from the plans.
10) Sheet C104 — [Repeat Comment] The large arrows indicating the location of access
points to the tracts on Sheet C104 should match the curb cut locations shown on the
plan. That sheet should also show an additional access point for Tract 9 from Fullers
Cross Road at its eastern boundary, which will function as a joint access with the
adjacent property to the east.
11) Sheet C104 — The turn lane improvements shown that provide access to each of the
tracts from Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers; Cross Road do not appear to be sufficient.
Please review the traffic study for the appropriate turn lane improvements and revise
this sheet (and other appropriate sheets) to show adequate turn lane improvements,
consistent with the Traffic Impact Mitigation table to be provided on Sheet C005.
12) Sheet C104 —Provide a note on this sheet that reads as follows: "Commercial uses on
Tracts # 9 and # 10 shall complete all traffic operational improvements at the time of
development of each tract, based upon a detailed traffic impact analysis."
13) Sheet C104 — [Repeat Comment] Revise the Plan to show sidewalks to be constructed
along Ocoee Apopka Road and Fullers Cross Road adjacent to the subject property.
August 4, 2003
Development Review Committee
Page 3
14) Sheet C200 — The road and intersection improvements and the appropriate cross
section drawings on this sheet need to be revised to reflect the improvements
recommended by the traffic study (see Comment # 11 above).
15) Sheet C300 — The Notes Regarding West Road Extension on Sheet C300 deal mostly
with the timing of construction for Ocoee Crown Point Parkway that were addressed in
the Westyn Bay plans. These notes are not really necessary for these plans and so
they should be deleted from these plans.
16) Sheet C400 — [Repeat Comment] Even though there are Conditions of Approval
related to underground utilities on Sheet X100, to make this absolutely clear, Sheet
C400 should also include a note that reads: `All utility lines to be constructed within the
Crown Point PUD shall be placed below ground."
17) Sheet L108 — The title of this sheet, located at the bottom right corner, should_ be
revised to read "Conceptual Open Space / Signage Plan" (a / should be added between
Space and Signage).
18) Sheet X100 — Please delete "childcare facility"from the list of prohibited uses (last line)
in Condition of Approval # 5
19) Sheet X100 — Please revise the maximum building coverage and maximum impervious
surface figures in Condition of Approval # 18 for single family large lots (first two lines)
from 40% and 50% to 55% and 65%, respectively, to be consistent with the notes
referenced in Comment # 4 above.
20) Sheet X100 — Please revise the last part of Condition of Approval # 20 to read as
follows: `:.. placed back off the street at least 25' from the road right-of-way line on all
residential lots."
21) Sheet X100 — General Comment — There are several places within these Conditions of
Approval that still need to be edited. Some of the section titles should be underlined
and bold to be consistent with the rest. There are also several places that need to be
edited to be consistent with other changes that have occurred on the plans — please
review all the Conditions of Approval and revise them as necessary for consistency.
22) Development Standards — In the Ocoee Crown Point PUD Development Standards,
delete any references to a name for the high school, it should be referenced only as the
high school site (there is at least one reference on page 27, but there may be others).
23) Sheet C104 — Revise the plans to show the sanitary sewer force main from the lift
station located on Fullers Cross Road (SW corner of Tract # 10) running eastward on
Fullers Cross Road, rather than to the west as currently shown. Provide a note
indicating that the force main will be connected to the City's wastewater treatment
system at a future date.
24) Sheet L102 — Revise the plans to show the West Orange Trail crossing Ocoee Apopka
Road on the south side of Village Center Drive, rather than crossing Village Center
Drive on the west side of Ocoee Apopka Road and then crossing Ocoee Apopka Road.
O:\CAlexander\DRC\DRC 2003\DRC03076.doc
- --V1-r Of Cnnq r -
A I —av of
S. Scott Vandent-rirt
(JtV Manager
Jim Gleason
DATE: August 5, 2003
(ryomm_is s ione ns
Danny 1-lowell, District I
Scott Anderson, District 2
Fusty Johiison, District :3
Nancy J. Parker, District 4
TO: Development Review Committee
FROM: Robert Lewis, AICP, Planning Manager
SUBJ: Planning Comments
Ocoee Crown Point PUD, 1st Staff Review
Final Subdivision Plan, Phase 1, Received July 30, 2003
These comments are intended to list most of the remaining concerns of the Planning Division
related to the current plan submittal. It is our intent that these comments be addressed with
revisions to the plans that wilt ' be made after the public hearings for the PUD Land Use Plan
Preliminary Subdivision Plan. I
1) Sheet COOO — The Index of drawings should include all landscape plan and hardscape
plan drawings.
2) Sheet C002 — Provide a note indicating that street lights along Ocoee Crown Point
Parkway will have standard Florida Power (Progress Energy) bronze colored spun
concrete poles and standard black shoebox style light fixtures with flat lenses (like the
street lights that were used on Maguire Road).
3) Sheet C110 (and others) — If there will be any drainage pipes and/or other drainage
structures leading from the high school site to Pond 9 at the south end of the site, those
improvements should be shown on all sheets in the plan set that include Pond 9.
4) Sheet C1 11 (and others) — The lift station tract adjacent to Pond 8 is currently shown to
be located right up against the road right-of-way line. Per Condition of Approval # 42 in
the PUD Land Use Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan, the lift station and the
fencing around it need to be set back at least 25'from the road right-of-way line.
5) Sheet C1 11 (and others) — There are a number of existing large trees located west of
Ocoee Crown Point Parkway, between the Staten Branch wetland area and the future
road that leads to the public park area to the west. Revise all appropriate sheets in the
plan set to show the location of those trees, with their sizes. The plans should also
include notes and details showing how those trees will be preserved.
6) Sheet C1 11 (and others) — There is a sidewalk HC access apron located on the west
side of Ocoee Crown Point Parkway on the south side of the Roundabout. The plans
should show a sidewalk connecting that HC access apron to the sidewalk running along
the west side of Ocoee Crown Point Parkway.
City of Ocoee - 150 N Lakeshore Drive - Ocoee. Florida 34761
phone: (407) 905-3100 - fax: (407) 656-8504 - www.ci-OcOcc- fl. I's
August 5, 2003
Development Review Committee
Page 2
7) Sheet C116 (and others) — The plans show a handrail along the edge of the sidewalk
on the west side of Ocoee Crown Point Parkway adjacent to Pond 8. Provide detail
drawings showing what that handrail will look like — it should be a decorative handrail,
rather than a standard MOT style railing (reference Sheet HD-1 in landscape plans).
8) Sheet C116 (and others) — The plans show HC access aprons on both sides of the
three roads leading north, west and south from the Roundabout, but not the road
leading east from the Roundabout towards the future Village Center. HC access aprons
should be shown on both sides of the east road as well.
9) Sheet C117 (and others) — Information on some sheets in the plan set indicates that
Pond 6/7 will be a wet pond, while information on other sheets indicates that it will be a
dry pond. Please revise all appropriate plan sheets for consistency.
10) Sheet C140 — Typical Section E shows a "Handrail per FOOT Index 850" Revise This
section to indicate that this handrail will be a decorative handrail and provide appropriate
detail drawings to show what it will look like.
11) Sheet C140 — Typical Section E shows a 30" exposed face on the retaining wall below
the handrail discussed in the previous comment. Provide a note and/or detail drawing
indicating what the finish on that retaining wall will be and what it will look like.
12) Sheet C153 (and others)'— The plans show a sanitary sewer force main crossing
Ocoee Apopka Road on the south side of the Ocoee Crown Point Parkway intersection.
Please indicate how this road crossing for the force main will be made (i.e. — open cut,
directional drill, etc.).
13) Sheet C153 (and others) — The plans show the road right-of-way for Ocoee Apopka
Road to be a consistent 120' in width. Please confirm that this is accurate — we believe
that the road right-of-way is not that wide at some locations.
14) Sheet C154 — The drawing at the top of this sheet has a note and arrow referencing a
"Proposed Force Main" but it appears that the arrow is pointing to the wrong line on the
drawing — please confirm and revise if necessary.
15) Sheet C154 (and others) — The plans show the road right-of-way for Ocoee Apopka
Road to be a consistent 120' in width adjacent to properties on the west side of Ocoee
Apopka Road that are currently under review for two new subdivisions. The approval of
those subdivision plans may result in changes in the road right-of-way width at those
locations. Please confirm the resulting new road right-of-way lines and revise the plans
if necessary.
16) Sheet C156 (and others) — The plans show decorative pavers to be used on a portion
of the bridge and around the landscape island in the middle of the Roundabout'. Would
it be possible to use the same decorative pavers at the four crosswalks over the four
roads leading away from the Roundabout?
17) Sheet C304 — This sheet shows a water main to be constructed along the future Village
Center Drive. Please provide a note to clarify that the School Board will be constructing
that water main.
18) Sheet C304 — This sheet shows a future sanitary sewer main to be constructed along
the future Village Center Drive. Please provide a note to clarify when that sewer main
will be constructed and who will be responsible for building it.
August 5, 2003
Development Review Committee
Page 3
19) Sheet C310 — Please clarify why the plans show striping in the north -bound left turn lane
on Ocoee Crown Point Parkway at the elementary school entrance across from the
main entrance to the high school. True, that turn lane will not be used until the
elementary school is built, which could be several years in the future — but why not just
leave it without any striping?
20) Sheet C310 — The plans shows striping along the west side of Ocoee Crown Point
Parkway as it transitions from two south -bound lanes to one — is that really necessary?
21) Sheet C310 —The plan shows striping in the middle of Ocoee Crown Point Parkway just
north of the residential subdivision entrance at the south end of the Phase 1
construction. Why is that area striped? Please revise the plan to show a
grass/landscaped median with curbs at that location instead of striped pavement.
22) Sheet C331 — The plan shows that the slope on the side of Pond 8 adjacent to Ocoee
Crown Point Parkway to vary somewhat. The cross section indicates that the slope is
3:1, but it varies. Please provide more markings on the plan drawing showing what the
slope is at various locations along around the pond.
23) Sheet C331 — The plan appears to show a slope of 50:1 at one location on the side of
Pond 8 adjacent to Ocoee Crown Point Parkway. Please review and verify that slope.
24) Sheet C331 — The plan drawing and the cross section show a 6' chain link fence around
Pond 8 — revise the plan to delete that fence.
25) Sheet C331 — The cross section for Pond 8 should show the elevation at the
maintenance berm, Normal Water Level elevation and the elevation at the point where
the side slope of the pond changes from 6:1 to 2:1.
26) Sheet C420 — The lift station site plan should show the lift station fencing (and the rest
of the lift station equipment) moved back from the road right-of-way line so that the
fencing is at least 25' back from the right-of-way line (see Comment # 4 above).
27) Sheet C420 — Revise the lift station detail drawings to show a 6' black, decorative metal
fence, with posts and rails painted black, instead of a chain link fence, per Condition of
Approval # 42 in the PUD Land Use Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision Plan.
28) Sheet C430 — Revise the street sign detail drawing to show a decorative black pole and
decorative signs to match the street signs that are being used in the adjacent Westyn
Bay subdivision.
29) Sheet C430 — This sheet includes a detail drawing for a Temporary Jumper Connection
(a large backflow preventer assembly). Please indicate where this device will be located
on the site. Provide a note with this detail drawing indicating that this assembly will be
screened from view with shrubs and other landscaping materials.
30) Sheet LA-1 — The plans show some kind of median adjacent to either side of the cross
walks over all four roads leading away from the Roundabout. However, the landscape
plan does not indicate what will be done in most of those medians — will they be
concrete or grass/landscaped areas?
31) Sheet LA-2 — The lift station site adjacent to Pond 8 will be moved back at least 25'
from the road right-of-way line. The landscape plan should show shrubs to screen the
front of the lift station fencing, as well as other landscaping, if appropriate.
August 5, 2003
Development Review Committee
Page 4
32) Sheet LA-2 — Provide a detail drawing and specifications for the proposed floating
fountain to be located within Pond 8.
33) Sheet LA-2 — The plan shows a number of cypress trees to be planted along the upper
slope of Pond 8 adjacent to Ocoee Crown Point Parkway. However, the engineering
plans indicate that that slope will be fairly steep (3:1 or steeper). It may not be realistic
to expect to be able to plant those trees on a slope that steep. Please evaluate that
proposal and provide notes or detail drawings if necessary to describe how this will be
accomplished.
34) Sheet LA-4 — The plan currently shows part of the median area within Ocoee Crown
Point Parkway to be striped (see Comment # 21 above). The landscape plan should be
revised consistent with that comment on the engineering plans and it should indicate
what will be done within that median area — grass, landscaping, etc.
35) Sheet LS-1 — The landscaping materials specifications should show the trunk size of
trees to be measured in DBH rather than CAL..
36) Sheet LD-11 — The plans need to provide a detail drawing showing how existing trees to
be preserved will be protected during construction (either in the engineering plans or in
the landscape plans).
37) Sheet HP-1 — The plans show a monument structure in the middle of the Roundabout,
but no detail drawing of what it might look like (this was shown in the PSP and on
various drawings in the FSP). These plans should include some indication of what type
of monument might be placed within the Roundabout, as an option, and a note
indicating that it will, be designed and constructed separately.
38) Sheet HP-1 & HD-1 — The landscape plans show a Residential Entry Icon to be placed
in the northern -most quadrant of the Roundabout intersection. This structure was not
included on any of the engineering plans. Please revise the engineering plans and/or
the landscape plans for consistency.
39) Sheet HP-1 & HD-1 — Provide notes indicating that the two monuments described in the
previous two comments are options and indicating when they might be constructed.
The notes should also indicate who will be responsible for constructing these
monuments and who will maintain them. The engineering plans and the landscape
plans should also show appropriate easements for construction and maintenance of
those monuments.
40) General Landscaping — Comment # 3 from the City Attorney should be incorporated
into the landscape plan, indicating that the landscaping will be phased. The landscape
plan should have some indication of how the landscaping will be phased.
oACA1exander\DRC\DRC 2003\DRC03077.doc
ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Design & Construction
6501 Magic Way - Orlando, Florida 32809
Tel: (407) 317-3700 Fax (407) 317-3761
August 12,2003
Mr. Russell Wagner
Director of Planning
City of Ocoee
ISO N. Lakeshore Dr.
Ocoee, Florida 34761
9e: Ocoee Crown PointNorth Relief High School
zzmm��
Thank you for Your continued efforts to maintain the schedule for the OCPS West
North Relief High School in the Crown Point PUD. Many project obstacles and delays
have been overcome thanks to your efforts. However, we are at a critical point in our
schedule. We must receive the Ocoee City Commissioners' approval of the project, as anticipated, at their meeting on September 2, 2003. This is needed in order to have the
real estate closing as scheduled on September 3, 2003. We have already missed our preferred construction start date in July. It is imperative that School construction
activities commence this September, otherwise the School opening may have to fall back a year to August 2006. This would surely be considered
da failure by all parties involve.
The URS Program Management Team was contracted by OcPs in 1999. Since that
time, we have opened 21 New Schools on schedule and within budget. We need the new High School in Ocoee to be a collaborat;
IvG success between the City Of Ocoee and
the School District. Completion of this School should serve as if of collaboration
for others to follow. Thus far, we are pleased with the cooperation we have received from the City of Ocoee in regards to our Relief School Project. Please advise if there is anything that remains for us to accomplish to ensure that School construction can
commence next month.
Steven Gertel, Director
New/Replacement Schools
"The Or,1119c County �cllool Board is all equal opportunity agency,"
AMeRICM tMYM DIUMLITIgg AOVOOA-TE To —lip— �0407-6�60-3834
Sil ORAME AVEME Fox 401-6MUS3
OCOEE, ftORJf)A34?61-2M4
PI
AUG 1 2 20,03
Mr. James (301den, ch"aa
and contalissioms
00 North Lakeshore Ddve
00000, Flodda 34761
I - Land Use PI= ROzone to the maximum banclit of the City of Ocoee for s*.
2. PRIhWhay Subdivision Plan Uso your best judgment to determine.
I PublwBuilding Authorization Defied all bwMmggL OCPS wants the tax payen
of 00000 to Wall 3 uAlion dollars of rowtv and
Wet shwturts to SOM OWY thent. OCPS Board
MOMbefS WON to nalle the Kebuilt H& School,
000ce 108h School, They iguore ADA
'Q014flons and have 2 DisorhWoodon Complaints
fw agawt OCPS 0A 2 West orange county
schook
4. Final SubdWsion Plan Delay for 60 days so public can iwiew plan.
That is MY r0commondations and opifflon Ibr the August 12, 2003 Agenda,
hS
If "a a Mg
i
O
C I
o
a
U
U
®
® r•
c
U
C1a
O p Q Cc
M C1
=
Z w
U Ems)
O
c tC
O
v
. u
W
cq,NJ
d
,0-
a
N
C)
u
N Q
0�
0
CL
'
Z 0 U
0 U-
N Hjw � �
'
C
m� E
N
CT)
ciS
0
O
N
_
O~d
CV
E 4CZ5
EUiiJ oO
oc
'_
o ° N
ilsLO
as
O
o
+•
aca
Z Z
co
U
a
�.
Z Q
as®d
Z c
5
+
o
(Dcads
s'
O=
ctsj
M
�VJ
�"a
E
iLE
F
a
ou
O J qJ
J W � i.�.
a
\
M
T
O p
c
O
O
U
`i
it {
o
+�+
0- M
w
d CL to c� '
c �" { K Q o
T
\
M=
a
a) Q i
0) ivR Mco
M
O
0 c
y� o
cs
c
���/A�
w U)
cu '
a)
+� (
W a>
�
tC Ql !n
to
E
?
Lu
—
�a
as%
�®�
Z
Cr
�E?
E{
E!
.O
c
N=
O
U) C)
asCES
¢w
t�
o
C6
-o
o
�O
w
cutearsCo
s
.oCL
ca cn
Z
a E O c
o
a
Hi�it
o
4
a
UN
(Dt
aE'E (n
o E
U°
c!
.ww
E
W
y
c
> �
c,,j
o
U)a
� G
x,
�
��H-��
Q 0
06 N O N` O a7 c
CLrUr�U(U) 0
to
O O
U'>U0
> tC
O
C`3cc
ax
LF-
:Ji
T
d
(n c c Y
r iN�N,
in
T
T
T
T
G
.
ii�
C
—!
Cc
J
Cc
—! J (rj 1-1 —I
CC Cc f-`Cc cc
J
Cc
J
cc
0
r-
I-
Cc
I
N
M
N
CO M N:M N
�`Os
M
O
N
N
M
ti
N
u
W
r
O
N
N N O r O
N
N
N
ci
O
T
CO
0
d (0' a) { M 00
a a 010: a
h
a
00
0
M
0
Ci)
a
J
c
CO
o „ otf
c
�- 63
c
cd
c
csf
c
co
(}
tL Q
p
a2$
CL
I I f!J CL
(Zasas; a> c
Lt
cas
'er
CL
'� c
�-
a>c
CL
cv
isl
c
o
�c�
o
cu a c n� as . M- o
-
o
tts -
ca o
ca _
as o c
a)
c O
c� ,�
•-
vs
ca •-
cs cs U cs ca
c>
cs
H
y.
m oca=E
E
o.
a>sas
E z+
w E
o a
E°
tli
o
as 9
�._a
,� as c
c "
(D
d CC
CL in
to CL W co j i1> U)! J 0 U)CL
U)
J IL to
U) <L <C
CL U)
F-
x
�0N
Cf)
00
O 001 CO
':oC� ;
o
0o
0C?
ju
Os
CO
N
co MO
OOO
0
CVI? O
Co
0
CV
0
0CL
CrOV
9L1
Cc
U)
U) i U) ; U) f U)
U)
U) ii
N U)
U)d
J
U) It W jU)',
d
J
d
F35
5bx x
c
us rn caas
o
CL
a
c c
c
c
_ _ca
O}�
_
O o
od
U 0)
J
it1
0 o
{— F- O
c c oo l as I
w
CL (?
_i
ti n
t C �_ z(
W
CL
o a> E >1>
c
Q
c
as E
c CL
NO2= U
aa)i 0)
td
v
U
vQ)o
U)
CC
co
W w
Q
Q
E E, U! U
U
U
C3 <i
t� U)
a
0
T
" d
CL
p
f a>
(CL (D w
U °�
tp
® a) a) O
ro z
c a)
° � z 1
,o
c
0cz o
o
}® x
c
C7
° CZ 0
p c a
v
c�
c
Cj
O > C: O c
�
°
� -a (n
`n 8rU)
o aci
ao
E
W
ril
UID `�° oZ
Vi
®
"-
4p
B oa
C7 a)
ro
c
a
En
c
o; o°�ac,�L�
n c� a _ w
h
o (n
C)
c' LO in
{
ca a x
o
ro
a) r- w
,- cco S
co0)
C6
_
Q O Ce) e
(0
O c
(�
o
(D
�
O>
.-• a U a°)
coN+oWU�d
M
t3
U
o
-vz
OL
o` 0)coz
=
z C3
o a) ! o ° c V
0
a)
tii
w5
C i O M a O ++ J
Gl
emu) OTC
°
C4
TS
.4
o
a): 'a Z71 O O d) O Rf
E y U)N � N cu s7. p
ao)
c`od
vi
°�
c
W
E c ci i� a�Wv
L
C6U)
EEl a z
i
a)a
IL
cc
o
o
o
O:i oo1 O
Va
O
U
wQ
.a{cui
tO C c' a) N
"—
c
N
z
a) t CZ! a) O' ttS O
.,
p)
ca
O
a
v)�
C>
O
cry' u); v); 5 a? W 2 E
m m=
d
�1
r r r N C7
N
Cf)
N�
1 I
,
j
i
i
h
cr
tz
F
CL tc h cc
a
C)
o
o'
CO f 4 CY) N N
C) O
(Y)
(*)
r
tI f�41 Cp r
o
CD
o oo C)'
ca
O
O a Ni7jc
Q
c a) c
cu
CO
a) '- c c c
'�
c c-
c w c c. o c
O a)
�
ca c:of
U) c e�
a) R) a)
cA c -a a- .a
O
ca N
cud O O I c0) .O
c c a d c a s >
X a
cL c
O RS
ca E..FL
a> 'c c n. c c
O
a)
N
u)
E x x( c c m
= c N O U N
(D
a) =
,� v a)
to C a) a)
L E N
EOEa)ccac._cns�
(ii c
c
(TS C • i?)
a) c c a
c,Ec(Aa)E cao
" vat»"<(nUQJL1C!)
cEOEcaL
JLLdUdxU-®.d
IL0 LLCl KC CQCnCCd —!C)
N
N
� rj•
O
V
O
O
O
1 0)
OO7
O Qr
mQN
NO
O
OQ
0
O CO
0O
OO
OQNa
OO NC
0r 0
�
Cl)
o 9 (0
CL Cd
r) IL ON
t Q.pL
O U
Q O
a 0CC
`
cc
JCO
LC
O
(n QOQ
5 cs'
$CD�)
3
Q
a) 06 c
h
m
o
U.
E c v o
O0
0.-�10•=
(a
Q
co
a)
u)
a)
..o roiwE° o� Eax>
m a) u) > es
w
(D Co > c _ E > (� OCo cu sa
%
iY
w
7c
ca
IL
O z
LL. CL
O ra)
U- V
o tc : /ai O /O� /cll�
( tea) O�
/O� �0
IL CL j LL C) I U- V {J
ca
0
I.
i
i3 O
0)
. C .a
O a
O
0) m
LL O
r Qi
E N co
fl O ca
a
O
0 0
. O
C3 a
yy
�
�
Q7
N
N
'0 <D
C > M
co Q
G
C i O
2
�- 'N ro
V N
0
0
0
O � ��
O
cam C o �
cD � od 00
� S a a>
c6�
Iiv
y=• v
o°�
o
�'p rnS
(0'�ji°�
21 o c
O
c) rnen
m Uo u
!W
r
T ®
C I g' O
i. 41
W
CL
W O
LL
e-+ In 1
D. •a w
Q 4 O c O
c``o t 3 M v
N
�
� a ai
0
uai
coE (D o c C
oil
cp 0
a E °'
W
o
N
as .J
O
Z
a a
c
0
�' c a
. C cn
C
c to
a)•-
O
O
�.
O O O
0)0 N
v'd
a C c� ccS
Oy
CKS
�O U
QU
Ow-
co
K.
J oIca
OO
u
O
0 co
a)
*0 >.NC
LviOU
N�
�N
OO
N
u 06
b-
0
Qw n
O
vC-
tm
I-
O
05
co
Q
ioo-
°�'Ic -14
�—
'Au
CZ 0
rr �C
CL
ccU
U?
2 =Z
F-13�
a3" O
U) 0U
� W
ce)
N. r
r N
Z
Q
LU
CL i (D
f
Zi
W
F�
F—
a
�- X
�
W
I,
o
a
o
c) o
o o' o�
o o
...i
Q
Y W
U
d
O
00
O
C7
N
M� !()
N N
r co f:
`r N
r7' N
N N
Q
Y W
(o
O
U)
O
00
O
co h
O� O
CJ, N r
O'' r r
r r
O' r
OC
_ C
co
O
O
-O C O
co
CL
50.. C 0
C
C.
(
O
U)
cn
0 co
*:3 O a? N
6 E tD W
O
O
•iz
in
N
C
C in
(1O—
Rf C,
N O
C
C C
Q O
C
0 O
is
a
Q
O
, 1
b a) C V
N
N
O I C N i
N ¢j O
C N
C N
Q
U
M J to
F-1 Q CC! U)
CC ,U) Q (1)
Q CC
Q OC
r
1 (
r
h-
00
O
ua
o
cn
o
o
fi? N
CA
9
o
C7a
9O
O 1
r O
<C
co O
o W
N
a
N o
o �
N}
o)
cO*)
o
dc�o
Uj
j
cru
U
o (D
o
OE a)
a)!
Q>
O
Q
N 1
OO�
O
O
f E
t
OE
c0
o
"
h
nz
@
@ �
�U �
ccca�a
a
O U
.0 C
v7 Y
-0
VS W
'O C
to I fl.. O i
C � O
O
"� _
C
O
C
CU
0) X
O
O 7 i2
C>
O— C ftf
C! X
tCS tD U C
p > C
E
O
N
(DUTCH
M D <
M �0 Y
Y# Xi-jU)<1
-j :=i02CL2w
cl
0
C)
C\l
z
cq
E
c
ow
CC
0
to —
E =3
2
—
CL
0)
a -")
>1
_0
a)
:3
C5 3:
c
ca =3 C:j-
0
:t-_
> (D
C6
cr,
CL Co
D-.Q
0
E
a) 0
w
0
C\j
LL
co
0
ca
a)
:3
— C:
0
C6
(a 0)
Ca
0 w
a)
U
Z
=CL
(0U)
c 1:
z
C6
CL
co
a)
U)
(D 0
cc
0
0 -co
C3 a
.2
-F
a)
E cri
a)
0)
cm
CL
CY)
!R
C6
0
0
0
Q
=
U)
4-
0
0
.2
Co U)
d) 3: u)
00
!R2
LP)
C6
a)
>
>
cc
(J)
05
c
42
a)
a)
(0
co
(D 0 M
a)
-a
-0
LO
Ch
CL U)
cn
0
0
=
.0
:3
r-
(D
C
0)
:3
�o
c
m
tt--
o
2
CL
E C
E
4
r
.0
0 m
E
E
c
E U)
E
c
c 0
(D
W.
E
E
0
o
-Lo
o
0
CD
E
CD
E
.>
0
0
a)
iF- 2
r- CO
E
E =CL
00)
CC cx
ca
6) x
Ca
rn
0
Q
0
o C'u
C2
W M
S U
U)
U)
0
c
a
c
U
N
c
U
c
,It
C\l
C\l
C\j
C\l
CV
0
cc
CC
Cc:
cr-
CC
C\l
CDO
N
C\j
o
CV
0
co
0
co
00
Cf)
C\j
0
co
d
cr)
0
C\l
0
izz:
C\j
�cy)
C)
o
0
N#
C\l
C\l
Y
0
CD
h
C\l
1
00
co
0
co
0
0
0
0
C>
CD
0
O
C)
0
c
CL CL 0
FL
FL
.9
U)
N
CZ
c
c
.2
'0
>
Laa0-
0 0)0-
co •.0
Cfj 0
CIJ
ca
C.)
0
w
m
ca
0 0 C
CO a)
u)
Co c
- 0
:3
U)
Cl)
> 2 E
C —
X a) 0
E
x 0
E >
C N
a) CL
.0
=3
2)
co
c w
as
E —
-0 c
— :3 C a
CC
CL U)
- 1 6-- U:3),
U)
If
cr-
FL
U) CL
CL U) <
cq 0
0 1
CY)
0
C\1
00
(0
C\j
co
rr
0—
C� 0
0
1
09
1
0
—
0
0
9
0
6
99
C\j C\j
(n N
0
C)
C)
1
co
0 0
U) W
0
00
9
C)
U)
0
C\l
I
C)
C\j
00
I I
0) 0)
U) 0 0 C\l
U)
(j)
U)
CV
U)
CL CL
o o 0�
U)
Q Kt
U)
--j
0
0)
0
c
0)
0) C9
0
0 O (D
in E
cu
�c
0
E
w
2 0o
o
0
0
a)
(a 0
UL —
0
-
p
E
0
CC C\J
:E
Cam)
0
Uo
m L:L
(D
ca
0 N
ca
0
E
Co
M
ca
m
D
im CL
E2
Co
N
co
C: U)
U)
0
C)
cc
cr
cr
CC
E O
E
a) a)
-Ne
a) m
a)
07
ca O
0) Ca
Caa)
x 0
0 (n
0 " C0
ca CO
0 a)
0
2 U)
2 CL
2i
, 2,21
z 0 S .
, 0 CL CL
0 i;l
0 CL
c
N
`cs
�
W
E
>
o
E
o
>
V
4
C6
6
O
Cc
O
O
Cn
,L
,;
H
>
ca
F
u
—
(/
c
ca
c
ca
c
cad
Fz
a)
Cc
Q
ca
h
v_
a
c
a
ems,
o
a
m
(�
ca
ri
\a
a
Co
0
ca
U)
0
a)
U)
jay
Ln
0
l�0
0IN
0
'
N
to
cn
cn
z)
cn
a
"0
°y
c
N
c
N
c
N
c
N
o
c
N N
ca
w
o
c
c
c
E
E
E
E
r
c
E
O
:.
to
N
E
N
E
c
E ca
�
0
� y
yu.�
�u{...
µcam�:
c
y0.. Co
u�
�
c
c�
ru
u
b }
cz
c
c
E
C
4-
T
U)
T
a)
r
r
N
!,
,.
CC
cc
cc
m
cc
m
E—
rr
Cc
it
i—
r
(
0
CY)
CQ
CO
C4
C'�
(�
C'9
CO
C9
Cr)
lu!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
iii 7.
r
r
Co
O
i`•
N
r
r
C10
N
d'
N
h.
r
Co
r
r
Z6
N
W
Co
O
CC)
a
0
O
O
h
O
h
a
�
r
C7
h
\
(�
O
O
a
O
d
c
as
.y
tf�
cA
c
�tS
p�CO\ 0-
'c
(n
e4
ti)
t1�
m
��, c
�p
a)
ca
N
ca
c
N _ c
ro
cu
a)
UJ tca
N
co
U
IZ
co
u
O
.X
N 0
E
to
O
to
U
.;Z
$
>
E
U)
c
—
c
`c
c w N c.
c�a D 'o [C — >
E
U)
U)
c
c N
a) c
0) N (� 'CJ
Z7
to c
a) c
CL. U)
J
U- IL
U) c.,
m
U) 0-
m
< cc
U) J < CL. CL. U)
m
U) CL.
U) CL
z`
N
d
0)
CYi
�` rr
ai
CV
ai
d
a
co
d
a
.}M
N
d
cY)
N
c9
a
co
co
N
N
O
O
CV
O
O
U)
U)
U)
J
U)
co
4{ L� M,
cn
cn
v�
cq
cn
ciS
~
N _
�}y
(]
E
00
E
��
E
Q
E
(]
E
o
�7 V^
J
ac .-
7 c
N
0
as
O
Ci
O
U
4 ?
U�
O
0coUO:E�U)m
C)
to
c
> C
a) CLCOQ.
C[)
UI
N
N
N
N:
" N
N "C)
N y
E
NEC
N
N
C?
N
0
N
0 01
N
0 �
N i
o ca
N i
o —
U
N YN 2
I o ._ �
N
N�> Z)
o c (Z
c N
u)
Y a) T3
.n o ca
U
CO
u
N- •—
za
a)
I
co
d
0
N
C
co
o
L
}
(
0
c
ill
C()
o
E
o
(D
zt=
0
co
o
a)
(ll
�i
O
N
r
O NYC
c
o
ca c =3
CO xs
cn
>
c
o ° w
J
0
C:
4
c
CC
♦c♦AA
.0
(( C CL
k
CC 'c
.�
/�Y 'E �}.
1.1.. a) : Q
a ry
0
izzk
S(
o
cn
(�
U) (� �-
.�..
=
CO
co
..
O
CL
ry�x,/��
U
.Q
O
_
O
� o
'O • " E—
Cra
v
.�
CI
a) M
i.
O
(D
'�.� E _ )
,�
) !R
�
E
-� o
y,.. �
4
v>
U)
M 1,.
O
CO
CO 05
0 0 G C
r.
ep
� (n
kr
O
k"
0
O
O
a)
=3
ax
U) 0
O
0
N
en
n
In
`'
in
~
0
�!?
O a)
o
O
'o
C= �
a)
'D 'Cl
a)
i7 t�
N
E
N
E
C
O
}�
a)
O
ca
0.1-
`
E
.U) O
_
,O-.
,Cw
` co
to��E��
MF
"
�'
It!
I�jby
[L .�
C
E
3
U
E a)
E •0
C a)
a)
eta
o
U v)
U)
e
to
(�v
en
O
U
ro
CC
o a)
U 2
O o
U ra '
cn
o
Cl)
mod;
i
n
N
Q.
us
u1
�
cc~
CC
cc
{�'-
cc
ti
cc
w
COO
O
O
4
Q
O
0
0
O
f
r
V
N
CD
C3
(D
0
+—
p
aC
O
o
0
0
0
h
Cy
W
Cr
o
(n
ca
m
0
m
0
(D
0
co
0
h
0
rz
o
u)
a
o
co
c
�'Q
!t. "
lL
O
O
cn
0
v)
U)
co
co
$ Q
CL
.
t f
as
W
,>
to
a)
G
�-
06
W,
ea
�
a=3
ti
a
CL
ra
o
o
o a�CL
Ln E
e j m
}
U)
O
C
C
M
era
cn
C
CJ3
_
aS
X
s
x
J
ga (A
a) E CL
�
O
�
=o
v
� �
�
ca �
c
c
'� � D
� �
E
J CL U)
m
h
m
co
li CL
co
Ua CL
Q
<C
CL w CL
CL
yNe
z
N
CC
O
C?
9
i
<
r
co
4}
0
N
N
O
GT
N
N
0
O
0
CO
C?
r
a
U)
a)
J
tLI
va
',
,Q
(n
U)U)
(n
(n
(n
N
co
CY)
ao
(n
a)
c
N
C
a)
C
a)
G
UP)
U)
a)
a)
C
N
co
CA cifa) c
CA i�
N
CL
>+ O
ca
{li
W
co
`
O
f
O
EQ
LO
5 v
C
C
C
® (!)
Q
E
O (0
E
O to
E
O
Cia
CL tt5
Ua
CL
a).
C
N
(/) .�a- G
a) 4)
V) y-' C
a) E .W
(J)
N
p)
Qt
(ll
a) O
F-CL;f-CLhCLD�U)
`.>"��'�CLUCLU
iK'h
I
C7
0
C)
N
co
•
I
C
C
ccf
<6
o
m
0
N
j
j ('j
O
N
O
N M
ID N
„
J
4
cr
3 # iii ':
Cl)0
N` N
.
I
p
co
ri
�i
O
O
O`
N N
O
O
OD
O
Cl)
'
N
O
t
N O
W
J
c c
c^
x>
E N ucz
co
a
w
c
'm c
0)-
x
E
E o m. o
2c1
rn
rnco
ALI
c>
E .a
x
c
c
W
yRy.
'F..'
E2't°
n`
N
C
N
a>
N
u
N
E
m c�ro�
c
n a
0
of
a
of
o
o
o
�Cco
t.Na0
�
®
o
b
91
oaCC
�
¢I,
cc
cc
= N N
�2
,
11t
�
N
w
O. }
0
O
N
N
N
a
M
m co
U
(!�
In
X.
C O
c
y. Q
a
C
f
N
U-
ca m G US
a m
C' c
O U
(U
d S!
N
"J N
E2
�
~
l6 CCU,
m 1'..
m O•.�..
p C
N
u"�} N
o
C�1
m O
M
_N
ul
0.
U m m
0 0 a U O a
U UI G�
ii
U¢
w U
m�
m C)
0
N
O
N
U
i i
'`r
U
A
T
t.
N
h'A
£b
Q 6
CLcc
cc cc
t$
co
i1 E1
�
ur i I
I
i
I
ci
OG
m
{ EL I .>
V! I Nib
co
a
LEIa
� I
uI
co
a
N
4 0
`W
:Q
cocli
O C*J;, pl
wo
CL
co
BC
U D� N
U
��
®
U t I O
U
d
N r �� �29
N m
'CO
ro
N t']
.5" U N �. O n.
ca
Zi
>
-jt�z
�x
�
�, O rtOm cnav�sO!3 a
4.O
`�yysr
3 �
t
ai
CES
1
a
L
O
tU
o
I
U
oLU
n
c
O
Q y:
CD
c�
U� o
Co
c
L
a)
as
�C
i
ca
O
U
0_
0
j
! ca C
C
V
a)
Cn
t1 .
�
(
F—
O
^Q.
Qi
O O
L
LL
0
CL
O
NO
�C
O
0
�
�
�' �
Cw
Y .0
co
C
0
C
�
N
ca
ci
tLS
CL
O
[�
U
fll 1 (i
_I p
i
O
L-
C>
q{
cn
-0
c'n
.0
i
u
m ° N
`
L
cU
U
_®s
<n
r
cn
U)
aLi
v
o�
ac%
ai
L
Q
o
0
--�--
p
`"q Lv
Gi/0^
,
C
00