HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-21-86 THOMAS R. ISON TELEPHONE 656 -2322
MAYOR • COMMISSIONER
CITY OF OCOEE Ocoee
150 S. LAKESHORE DRIVE o
COMMISSIONERS OCOEE, FLORIDA 32761 0( �� _
a
O
RALPH RODGERS
JOHN BATEMAN 0 .
VARD J. HAGER ORANGE COUNTY
May 09, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: Merit System Board Members
FROM: Deputy Clerk Amesbury
SUBJECT: Merit System Board Meeting to consider Merit increases.
Attached please find a new agenda for the rescheduled Merit
System Board meeting. Chairman Bond urges full attendance
on Wednesday, May 21 at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Center.
As a point of interest, Acting City Manager Preston will be
attending. Chairman Bond would like all Board Members to
be thinking about nominations for an alternate to replace
David Lowery who is now a full member upon resignation of
Newy Breland.
SA /smb
"CENTER OF GOOD LIVING — THE PRIDE OF WEST ORANGE"
MINUTES OF THE MERIT SYSTEM BOARD MEETING HELD 5 -21 -86
PRESENT: Vice - Chairman Mary Ellen Frame, Members Marvin
Sanders; .Jim Swickerath; and David Lowery, City Manager
Preston, and Deputy Clerk Louloudis.
ABSENT: Chairman Pat Bond.
CALL TO ORDER
Vice - Chairman Frame called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.,
and Deputy Clerk Louloudia called the roll for the record.
APPROVALS
Mr. Swickerath corrected page 3, line 34, the word "contined"
to change the spelling to be "continued ". Upon a motion by
Mr. Lowery, and a second by Mr. Swickerath, the minutes were
approved unanimously.
MERIT SYSTEM RAISE RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. Preston stated the Board had $18,100.00 to be
distributed. Mr. Preston basically used the same format
which Mr. Griffin, former City Manager, used last year,in his
memo dated 5 -7 -86. Deputy Clerk Louloudis explained the memo
dated 5- 15 -86, which Chairman Bond requested. The Incentive
Raises are given to employees who have completed at least 80
certificated classroom hours. The Promotion raises are given
to employees who are promoted within the department. Mr.
Swickerath asked if they could give out more than 518,100.00.
Mr. Preston said it would not be a problem if they went over
one or two hundred dollars, but no more. Vice - Chairman Frame
stated last year they stayed within the number of allocations
per department. She pointed out that the Board did not
have to follow the suggested formula of allocating raises by
department. The final decision on employees to recieve
raises is up to the Merit Board and not necessarily by
department. Mr. Swickerath expressed opposition to this
method of allocating by department and asked if they could
give out two 2 1/2% raises versus one 5% raise. Mr. Preston
stated they would have to stay with the 5%, in accordance
with the Merit System Plan. Mr. Lowery stated all that
deserve a merit increase according to their rating should
receive a raise. Mr. Swickerath suggested going through the
review forms by department and, then, putting the forms of
those employees deserving a raise in one pile, and those
employees they are considering in another pile to discuss.
The Board members agreed to this idea and proceeded. Mr.
Lowery stated some reviews were very similiar and it was
difficult to say which employee is better. Mr. Swickerath
reminded him of the portion where the supervisor rates the
employee as 1 through 10 in his department. Looking at City
Hall, Mr. Swickerath pointed out that two employees were
rated number 1 in the office, and recommended these two
1
MERIT SYSTEM BOARD
MAY 21, 1986
PAGE 2
individuals for increases. These employees are Jean Grafton
and Tammie Louloudia. The Board was unanimous in thia
decision. Mr. Lowery stated he was against the 5% step
increases. Mr. Swickerath requested that the supervisors be
present net year to assist the Board with the reviews.
The Board then proceeded with the Police Department. Deputy
Clerk Louloudis pointed out that the immediate supervisors
rate the employee in the Police Department, therefore the
grading portion 1 -10 is not accurate. After much discussion,
Brian Clinger, James Cockcroft, William Gailit, Paul Vance,
JcAnn Drawdy, Jayelynn Hall, Jim Chandler, Charles Seaver,
Michael McMahon, William Walker, and John Boyd were
considered for raises. After further discussion Jayelynn
Hall, JoAnn Drawdy, and Jim Chandler were dropped since they
had been employed the least amount of time for the 11
employees originally discussed and there were too many
employees suggested for raises in thia department to stay
within the allocated funds according to Mr. Preston.
The Board then proceeded with the Fire Department. They
placed the following in the pile of reviews which are
recommended for increases: Frank Carlsson, George Ledford,
Larry Bras, and Wayne Vaughn. The following personnel were
placed in the pile which they would discuss further: James
Creech, Rob Rivenbark, and Rick Holmes.
The Water Department was discussed next. The forms of David
Gosnell and Michael Keller were placed with those recommended
for increases, and the forms of Mark Brownold and Jackie Bell
were placed with the others for further discussion. Vice -
Chairman Frame pointed out that a review was missing on
Jackie Bell. He should have been reviewed on 4 -1 -86, and
this evaluation was not present. Deputy Clerk Louloudia
asked to go to City Hall to look for the evaluation in his
personnel file in case it was overlooked. Deputy Clerk
Louloudia went to City Hall to search for the evaluation, but
was unable to locate it. She stated the form, according to
her records, waa sent out but never returned. The form could
have been lost.
James Mobley was recommended for an increase in the
Recreation Department by a unanimous decision of the Board
members.
Ray Jernigan was recommended for an increase in the Shop
Department by a unanimous decision of the Board members.
The Sanitation Department was discussed next. The Board felt
Leonard Doty, Manning Spivey, and Doug Duncan should be
recommended for increases. They decided to place Robert
2
MERIT SYSTEM BOARD
MAY 21, 1986
PAGE 3
Howell's evaluation along with the others to discuss further.
The Board recommended John Stone and Keith Brooks from the
Street Department for merit increases.
The Board then discussed the group of Supervisors and
recommended Ron Strosnider, Ivan Poston, Russ Wagner, William
Brandt, Jim Beech, and James Coschignano. The memo from City
Manager Preston included James Coschignano, along with a few
others, in the Supervisors category, although the Board
decided to address James Coschignano along with the regular
Fire Department personnel.
The Board called for a break at 9 :30 p.m. in order to give
City Manager Preston enough time to figure out how much they
were over budget. The meeting was called back to order at
9 :45 p.m.. Mr. Preston stated they were over 511,295.00,
which means the Board must begin cutting employees already
recommended for raises. The Board unanimously agreed to drop
the group of evaluations they had compiled for further
discussion due to the amount of money they were already over -
budget. Mr. Swickerath stated he did not believe that each
department must receive increases. The Board then decided
to review each evaluation recommended for an increase. The
Board unanimously decided to recommend Jean Grafton and
Tammie Louloudis for increases.
In the Police Department, the Board agreed to drop Charles
Seaver as his first evaluation form was only satisfactory,
not above average. Mr. Lowery stated William Walker, John
Boyd, and Brian Clinger had the top evaluations. Also Mr.
Swickerath was in favor of Brian Clinger as he was
recommended for Officer of the Year. Deputy Clerk Louloudis
pointed out that other employees may have been presented with
awards or honors the Board is not aware of. Mr. Lowery moved
to strike Brian Clinger from the recommendation group,
seconded by Vice Chairman Frame and the vote was a tie with
Mr. Lowery and Vice- Chairman Frame voting yeh, and Mr.
Sanders and Mr. Swickerath voting ney. The Board had further
discussion on this matter since the vote was tied. The Board
then unanimously agreed that Brian Clinger, John Boyd, and
William Walker would be recommended for increases.
The Board unanimously decided to drop Frank Carlsson and only
recommend Larry Bras, Wayne Vaughn, and George Ledford in the
Fire Department.
The Board did not change any of the persons recommended for
increases in the Water, Recreation, Shop, Sanitation and
Street Department. Including the six persons recommended in
the Supervisors category, the Board was 55,500.00 over budget
klibre
3
MERIT SYSTEM BOARD
MAY 21, 1986
PAGE 4
k we at this point. Mr. Swickerath recommended that of the six
persons, first of all, that James Coschignano ba considered
with the employees in the Fire Department, and secondly, that
Ron Strosnider, William Brandt, and Russ Wagner be considered
for the increase. Vice- Chairman Frame had a problem with the
supervisors category because all of them are rated
outstanding. Mr. Swickerath stated the Board is bound by the
amount of money they can give out, and the three supervisors
he recommended have the highest scores of the supervisors
rated. Mr. Swickerath then moved to include Ron Strosnider,
Russ Wagner, and William Brandt along with the other
personnel recommended for increases, Mr. Sanders seconded,
and the vote carried unaimously. Vice - Chairman Frame
questioned James Coschignano's evaluation, since he was
included with the Fire Department. The board unanimously
decided to recommend James Coschignano along with the others
for an increase.
DISTRIBUTION OF PROPOSED EMPLOYEE'S HANDBOOK
Deputy Clerk Louloudis informed the Board that Mr. Griffin
wrote this proposed Handbook, although it was not reviewed by
either herself or Ivan Poston, Finance Director. Mr. Lowery
moved to table the Handbook until it is reviewed by the
staff, Vice - Chairman Frame seconded, and the vote carried
unanimously.
NOMINATION OF ALTERNATE BOARD MEMBER
Mr. Swickerath moved to nominate Lester Dabbs as the
alternate, Mr. Sanders seconded, and the vote carried
unanimously. Mr. Dabbs is a school principal.
DISCUSSION BY BOARD MEMBERS
Mr. Swickerath suggested the Board call a workshop to discuss
a better way for the increases to be given and a new format
for the evaluations. Mr. Swickerath liked the idea of the
cash bonuses versus a five percent increase. Mr. Swickerath
also stated he was never officially notified of the
cancellation of the last scheduled Merit System meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
•
Mr. Lowery moved to adJourn the meeting at 11:05 p.m.
ATTEST:
DEPUTY CLERK LOULOUDIS CHAIRMAN BOND
4