HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-21-88 CHARTER REVISION COMMITTEE MEETING HELD APRIL 21, 1988
„ The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman
Beatty and he asked for a moment of silent prayer and led in
the pledge of allegiance to the flag.
PRESENT: Chairman Beatty, Board Members Mitchell, Pounds,
and Switzer (arrived at 7:38 p.m.), Attorneys Rosenthal and
Mlsna, and City Clerk Catron.
ABSENT: Board Member Hendrix was absent due to illness.
APPROVALS
Rev. Jim Mitchell moved to approve the minutes of the April
7, 1988 Meeting, Ed Pounds seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
REVIEW OF ARTICLE III OF THE CHARTER
Proposed Revisions and Commentary to Article III
Attorney Mlsna proceeded to review Article III and the
changes that had been incorporated as recommended by the
Board as follows:
Section 1 - The deletion was made that the "mayor only
voted in case of a tie ", provision was made for a vice -mayor
and added that the commissioner would represent the district
tier in which they reside.
Section 2 - This section remains basically the same
except for the addition of the word "city ".
Section 3 - The provision that a candidate for office
had to be a bonafide resident was added. Mayor was added so
it would read "mayor and commissioner ".
Section 4 - Clarification was added as far as a member
of the Commission being employed by or have a substantial
interest in any firm, corp., etc. There was discussion by
the board due to the fact that our current Mayor was employed
by Southern Bell and the attorneys were to look into this
and bring back some other language. The provision that no
former member of the Commission could hold any compensated
appointive city office or employment by the city for one year
after expiration of the member's term was added. The last
sentence of Section 4 (a) was deleted as the State Statute
covered it under the "Resign to Run" Law. Section 4 (b) was
modified to include the provisions for a strong City Manager.
Section 4 (c) was modified to clear up the reference to
influencing votes.
Section 5 - This section was reserved and would be
',,,. deleted.
1
Gage 2
Charter Revision Committee
April 21, 1998
igaw
Section 6 - No changes were made.
Section 7 - The word "elected" and "that the mayor
would vote in case of a tie" were deleted and the provision
added that "all members of the commission" would vote. There
was some discussion on the requirement for a roll call vote
on all resolutions and ordinances and it was decided to leave
it as written since the Mayor would be a voting member.
Section 8 - The word "city" was inserted.
Section 9 - This section was just clarified and the
provision for the vice -mayor added.
Section 10 - (a) - The language was just cleaned up on
this section. (b) Several of their recommendations had been
included and some minor word changes were made. (c) The
provision was made to allow the vice -mayor to serve as mayor
if a vacancy occurred in the office of mayor and that the
Governor would appoint members of the city commission if
they were all removed at the same time. Attorney Rosenthal
would check to see if that provision was included in the
State Statutes.
%iv Section 11 - No change except added "city ".
Section 12 and 13 - These were deleted as they were
governed by State Statute.
Section 14 - The model charter was used for this
section. The requirement for filing within a certain time
was deleted and the provision added that the city clerk could
seek assistance from the supervisor of elections. Under 4
(a), the time for filing the notice of intention to amend the
petition was lengthened to 5 days. Under 6 (a), the time was
changed from 60 days to 45 days and 30 days to 45 days.
Under 6 (b), the time was changed from 120 days to 90 days.
Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 - These sections were included
in Section 14; therefore, these would be deleted.
Section 19 - The provision was added that the mayor
would deliver an annual state of the city message in January.
Sections 20 and 21 - These were deleted.
RECESS: 8:46 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER: 8:55 p.m.
2
Page 3
Charter Revision Committee
April 21, 1988
err
DISCUSSION ON SINE MEMBER DISTRICTS
The items discussed regarding single member districting were:
who established boundaries; what guidelines to use for
establishing the boundaries; drawing the boundaries; adoption
of the districts; effective date; changing boundaries of the
districts, and who would establish the new boundaries. The
general consensus of the Charter Committee was to provide for
a districting commission that would consist of individuals
appointed by the city commission. The members would have to
be qualified voters who were not otherwise employed by the
city and staff assistance and technical data would be
provided by the Planning Department. They agreed not to
leave the actual districting in the Charter, but to provide
the commission with the vehicle (districting commission) to
accomplish the single member districts. They wanted to
provide for an orderly transition and to make it effective so
it would not affect the current commissioners. They also
agreed that new boundaries should be established at least
every ten years. Single member districts would be based on
population and the next census was scheduled for 1990.
Attorney Rosenthal stated that the data would probably not be
available until 1992 and the committee agreed to make it
effective with the 1992 Election with a report in 1993.
N ew Attorney Rosenthal was to look into terms of appointment for
the districting committee and report back at the next
meeting. There was some discussion on making the single
member districting a separate issue on the ballot in case the
citizens were opposed to the single member districts but not
the other revisions to the Charter.
R. P. Mohnacky, 1820 Prairie Lake Blvd., Ocoee, stated that
he was not in favor of single member districts and wanted to
keep the two year terms.
RESIGN TO RUN
As stated earlier, the Charter was more restrictive than
State Statute; so that sentence in Article II, Section 4 (a)
was deleted.
MINIMUM AGE REQUIREMENTS
The committee wanted this left out of the Charter.
The committee stopped at Item IV of the Memorandum of 4 -6 -88.
COMMENTS
The dates set for future meetings were as follows: 5/5, 5/12
3
Page 4
Charter Review Commission
April 21, 1988
and 5/26. This would allow several of the members to be
able to attend some of the meetings since they were to be out
of town during part of May.
Harold Switzer moved to adjourn, Rev. Jim Mitchell seconded
and the motion carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m..
CHAIRMAN BEATTY
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
4