Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-10-2013 Agenda PacketMayor S. Scott Vandergrift City Manager Robert Frank PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY) September 10, 2013 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum ILCONSENT AGENDA AGENDA Commissioners John Grogan, District 1 Rosemary Wilsen, District 2 Rusty Johnson, District 3 Joel F. Keller, District 4 A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting held August 13, 2013 III. OLD BUSINESS IV. NEW BUSINESS 7:00 PM A. Strickland LLC Public Hearing City Planner Rumer 1. Annexation & Rezoning 2. Special Exception B. Barkeritaville Public Hearing City Planner Rumer 1. Annexation & Rezoning to PUD 2. Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment C. Land Development Code Amendment Public Hearing City Planner Rumer 1. Article IV, Applications & Article V, Table 5-1, Permitted Use Regulations (To Be Continued) V. MISCELLANEOUS A. Project Status Report B. September Calendar VI. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meetings take place on the second Tuesday of every month at 7:00 pm in the Ocoee Commission Chambers in City Hall unless otherwise advertised. Any person who desires to appeal any decision at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. More than one Commissioner may participate or hear discussions regarding a matter which will come before the Commission for action. Also in accordance with Florida Statue 286.26: Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Office of the City Clerk, 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, FL 34761 (407) 905-3105, 48 hours in advance of the meeting. City of Ocoee • 150 North Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761 phone: (407) 905-3100 • fax: (407) 905-3167 • www.ocoee.org CALL TO ORDER Chairman Campbell called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Following a moment of silent meditation and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, a quorum was declared present. PRESENT: Chairman Campbell, Vice -Chairman McKey, Members Dillard, Dunn, Keethler, Marcotte, and West. Also present were City Planner Rumer, Assistant City Attorney Drage, Commissioner Johnson and Recording Clerk Turner ABSENT: Member(s): de la Portilla (A/U) and Sills (A/E) CONSENT AGENDA Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting held on Tuesday, March 12, 2013. Member Keethler: seconded by Vice -Chairman McKey, moved to accept the minutes of the March 12, 2013, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS - none NEW BUSINESS Weston Bay Subdivision City Planner Rumer gave a brief overview of the proposed project. The subject subdivision is zoned R-IAA (single-family dwelling) and is located on the north side of Ocoee Crown Point Parkway, The Westyn Bay Subdivision encompasses +/- 376 acres for phases 1-3, and +/- 40 acres for phases 4 and 5. The final site plan for phases 1-3 was approved by the City Commission on May 7, 2002, under the name West Groves. The approved subdivision plan provides a condition of approval that is consistent with the Development Agreement for West Groves dated June 5, 2001. City Planner Rumer explained that the Westyn Bay Community Association, Inc. (Association) is requesting the following: a. Proposed Deletion of Condition #22 (Easement) The easement provides pedestrian access through and over the private internal roads of Westyn Bay from the neighboring subdivision called The Vineyards. The easement restricts access to the time in which public schools are open for use by students. The easement does not permit access to any facilities within the Westyn Bay Subdivision. This condition was created to provide a safe route for school children and parents to access Ocoee Crown Point Parkway. At the time, Ocoee Apopka Road did not contain a sidewalk on the western side of the road; however, upon the development of The Vineyards Subdivision, a sidewalk was installed. He continued by stating that he does not have any objections to this request. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 b. Proposed Deletion of Condition #37 (Street Trees) Condition #37 is a reiteration of Ocoee Land Development Code (LDC), Article 6, Section 6-10. A street tree shall be provided in front of each single-family lot (two trees on corner lots, with one on each street), prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the house constructed on the lot. This condition requires that the developer plant within five feet of the right-of-way of each street within the development, one shade tree for every fifty linear feet of right-of-way. The Association is requesting the option for removal of the street trees. He continued by saying that he objects to the removal of Condition #37; however, is open to working with the Association. DISCUSSION Vice -Chairman McKey asked where the utilities are located within the subdivision. City Planner Rumor explained that they are located in the right-of-way, which is also where the trees are located. Vice -Chairman McKey stated that he understands the position of the City and Association, and asked if there is middle ground. City Planner Rumor stated that this condition should not be removed from the Land Development Code (LDC), but maybe modified, and he is agreeable to a middle ground. Member Keethler stated that as a homeowner and officer of the Association, this item poses a conflict of interest; therefore, he will abstain from voting (completed Form 8B). He continued by saying that the language in the LDC is very specific as to where the trees needed to be planted, and that is why they are there. The Public Hearing was opened. Jim Gustino, attorney for the Westyn Bay Community Association, Inc., attended on behalf of the applicant. He explained that the Association would like to delete Conditions #22 and #37. Mr. Gustino showed a PowerPoint presentation regarding Condition #22 (Exhibit A). He explained that this condition was a stipulation at a time when there was not a safe travel path for school children; however, with the development of The Vineyards, that has changed. There have been instances of vandalism, often times when the gate was locked. The gate allows access to unauthorized individuals. He continued by saying that the Association proposes to remove the gate and fence, and erect a wall that matches aesthetically. Mr. Gustino showed a PowerPoint presentation regarding Condition #37 (Exhibit B). He continued his presentation by explaining that the Association does not want to remove any of the common area trees; instead, they are requesting the removal of the street trees. He continued by saying that there are approximately 600 oak trees located between the 2 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 sidewalk and street, and some of these trees are causing steps to be formed in the sidewalks. These steps are a tripping hazard, exposing the Association to substantial liability. He explained that the trees are too large for the small space, and the soil in Westyn Bay is hard clay which causes shallow roots. He continued by saying that the trees could be moved to the other side of the sidewalk, but this will not cure the problem. The Association recommends the deletion of Condition #37 and asked that the board endorse the recommendation. Member Keethler explained that the Association is willing to offer homeowners different options. Some of the options include: 1) homeowners can keep the trees, but will have to assume the liability and responsibility of maintenance, 2) the homeowners can place the street trees elsewhere on their property, 3) any additional trees can be made available to the City for a cost. Member Dillard asked who absorbs the cost of the tree removal. Mr. Gustino stated the Association, unless the City chooses to take the trees. Vice -Chairman MaKey asked if the homeowners that choose to keep the trees will absorb the maintenance and liability costs. Mr. Gustino answered in the affirmative. Board discussion ensued regarding details of removing the trees. Susan (Inaudible- no speaker form provided), Westyn Bay resident approached the podium to speak on behalf of Westyn Bay. Member Dunn asked if there is a tally on how much has been spent to -date to repair the sidewalks. Mr. Gustino stated less than $10,000. Member Marcotte asked if the trees are planted within the swale. City Planner Rumer stated no. Member Marcotte stated there should be a mitigation plan, but the property owner should not have to absorb liability if they choose to keep the tree. City Planner Rumer explained that this property was an orange grove, and is not violating the replanting schedule. Mr. Gustino suggested phasing the removal of trees over a period of time. Rodney Stogsdill, Vice -President of the Association, approached the podium to speak on behalf of Westyn Bay. Mr. Stogsdill explained that moving all the trees to the inside of the lots would be challenging as much of those areas is already landscaped. Also, the corner lots are required to have a clear line of visibility around the corners, and planting the trees in that area would obstruct visibility. 3 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 The Public Hearing was closed. City Planner Rumer stated that the City cautions the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve or deny a variance based on the evidence so it does not set a precedent. He continued by saying that the soil in Westyn Bay is not a draining soil; therefore, the subdivision has shown some hardship. He stated that if the board does recommend approval, to state that the approval is based on hardship due to the soil condition. Vice -Chairman McKey asked if there are utilities that would preclude planting the trees within five feet from the inside of the sidewalk. City Planner Rumer answered that the utilities would be in the easement, or the right-of-way. Member Keethler stated that the trees were the expense of the developer, and to require the Association or homeowners to plant new trees is a financial burden. The soil is not amenable to the type of trees planted. Vice -Chairman McKev, seconded by Member West, moved the Planning and Zoning' Commission recommend to the Ocoee City Commission approval of the deletion of Condition #22 for the Westyn Bay Subdivision. Motion carried (6-0), with Member Keethler abstaining from voting. Member Dillard asked if the wall replacing the gate will be presented to Staff for approval. City Planner Rumer answered in the affirmative. Vice -Chairman McKev, seconded bV Member Marcotte, moved the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the Ocoee City Commission to agree with Staff objecting to the removal of Condition #37 with an additional condition that _Staff work with the Westyn Bay Community Association, Inc. to try and find some other mechanism other than blanketly removing Condition #37 to meet some tree reauirements. Motion carried (6-0). with Member Keethler abstainina from votina. Arbours at Crown Point City Planner Rumer gave a brief overview of the proposed project. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. is requesting rezoning from 1-1 (Light Industrial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) on 28.1 acres of land, and is requesting approval of the associated Arbours at Crown Point PUD Land Use plan, and Development Agreement. The subject property is located on the north side of West Road and west of State Road 429. It is approximately 28.1 acres in size, and is currently vacant except for an abandoned agricultural structure. The subject property is located adjacent to the West Orange Trail on the east with a 73 foot power line easement located along the eastern property line. Pedestrian access to the West Orange Trail is being provided on the 4 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 northern property line with a vehicular crossing located on the eastern property line subject to Orange County approval. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from 1-1 (Light Industrial) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of developing a mixed use community that combines 192 multi -family apartments with future light industrial uses. Access is proposed via an existing entrance off West Road. An internal road dedicated to the public will be provided in the PUD Land Use Plan. The rezoning from 1-1 (Light Industrial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) allowing high density residential in a Light Industrial Future Land Use designation is permitted via the City of Ocoee Comprehensive Plan, The Arbours at Crown Point PUD Land Use Plan proposes 192 multi -family units on 17.5 acres and 10.5 acres of land with uses consistent with 1-1 (Light Industrial) zoning district. The residential density of the project will achieve 11 dwelling units per acre. The PUD Land Use plan provides for a full access road through the property to provide access to the vacant properties on the east side. The proposed apartments will be gated with private roads accessed from the new internal public road. The developer has proposed on -site amenities that will be constructed during various phases of development. The main on -site amenity that will be constructed is a clubhouse and community pool. This is proposed to be constructed at the entrance of the development concurrent with the first phase of construction. In addition to the clubhouse, other amenities such as open space and connection to the West Orange Trail will be provided. A traffic Study was provided and approved by City Staff and the City's transportation planning consultant. The traffic study indicated no transportation concurrency issues. This means that the trips generated from the 192 multi -family units and the 106,000 sq. ft. of non-residential use will not make any of the road sections within a one -mile radius fail the adopted level of service. The traffic study did indicate operational issues with the turning movements at Fullers Cross Road and Ocoee Apopka Road. The project will mitigate the turning movement issue by paying a proportionate share payment for a northbound to westbound left turn and a southbound to eastbound left turn on Ocoee Apopka Road. A finding of school capacity was provided by Orange County Public Schools on May 1, 2013, with a determination that there is not sufficient capacity to support the development of 192 multi -family total residential units. The School Capacity Determination found that the project fails in capacity for elementary and middle school aged students. The applicant has worked out an agreement with Orange County Public Schools. The agreement will be presented for a first hearing with the Orange County School Board on August 13, 2013, and second hearing and adoption August 27, 2013. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 The site is located within the Wekiva Study Area. The site contains class "A" soils and must maintain 35% open space within the areas with the class "A" soils. Other development criteria within the Comprehensive Plan will be met. DISCUSSION Vice -Chairman McKey asked if the apartment buildings will be three-story units. City Planner Rumor answered in the affirmative. Member Marcotte asked what happens if the mitigation for the schools does not go through. City Planner Rumor stated that per the interlocal agreement with Orange County Public Schools, the project will not be presented to the City Commission for approval. Member Keethler asked how much of a plan should a PUD have. City Planner Rumor stated that it can be a bubble plan or up to 80% of an engineered plan. Discussion ensued regarding the uses for Light Industrial and Planned Unit Developments. City Planner Rumor explained that Arbours at Crown Point is a mixed -use development and is consistent with two other projects approved by the City Commission. Discussion ensued regarding mixed -use development plans and the functional relationship between mixed - use concepts, and the LDC and Comprehensive Plan. Member West stated that this development will bring in high -end tenants as it is a very desirable area. Assistant City Attorney Drage asked if this item poses a conflict of interest as he owns some of the property. Member West answered in the affirmative and stated he will abstain from voting (completed Form 88). The Public Hearing was opened. Allison Turnbull, attorney for Arbour Valley Development, LLC., attended on behalf of the applicant. She stated that this project meets all the LDC requirements for approval. Mr. Gustino, attorney for Westyn Bay Community Association, Inc., stated the homeowners are concerned because of the radical departure from the area. He stated that the community is concerned because high -density areas often bring crime. He continued by saying that the schools are over capacity, and accommodating new students would necessitate the use of portables. Member West stated that the multi -family area on Maguire Load has not produced more crime. He continued by saying that most developments would cause capacity issues; therefore, it is necessary to mitigate. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 Ms. Turnbull, stated that this area is a unique site and the proposed development would be a good fit for that area. Numerous studies have rebutted the opinion that multi -family developments produce more crime. Chairman Campbell stated that he personally feels this project is a good fit for this property. Board discussion ensued regarding the proximity of the development to State Road 429, and the noise levels produced. Member West explained that there will be buffers to reduce noise levels. Member Keethler asked about the buffers to be installed for the development. City Planner Rumer explained that the road, a 60-foot right-of-way, 25-feet of landscaping, and a 6-foot wall will buffer the development. Additionally, the apartment buildings will be set back from the road. He continued by saying that these buffers meet the criteria in the Comprehensive Plan and LDC. Assistant City Attorney Drage informed the board that there are outstanding issues that need to be resolved before being considered by the City Commission; therefore, the motion will need to address the fact that recommendation of approval is conditioned upon the traffic study results, conditions of approval, and the development agreement. The Public Hearing was closed. Vice -Chairman McKeV, seconded by Member Dillard, moved the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the Ocoee CitV Commission approval of the PUD Land Use Plan/Rezoning for Arbours at Crown Point PUD subject to the satisfaction of the outstanding staff comments dated July 2013, from Scott A. Cookson, City Attorney's Office. Motion carried (5-1), with Member Keethler opposing and Member West abstaining from vote. Member Keethler asked Assistant City Attorney Drage if there is a provision in the Code for conditional approvals. Assistant City Attorney Drage stated the approval is based on the condition that the outstanding issues have been resolved prior to consideration by the City Commission, and this is permissible. Garcia - 424 3rd Street Annexation and Initial Zoning City Planner Rumer gave a brief overview of the proposed annexation and initial zoning. The subject property is located on the west side of V Street and approximately 170 feet north of the intersection of 3`d Street and East Silver Star Road. The subject parcel has one existing single-family residence. The applicant is annexing into the City limits as a condition to receive City potable water connection. He explained that per Florida Statutes, the City has the authority to annex contiguous property just as long as it does not create Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 and enclave, and this property is considered contiguous since it is bordered by property located within the City limits on the northwestern point. The Public Hearing was opened. The Public Hearing was closed. Member Dillard, seconded by Member West, moved the Plannin_q and Zoning Commission recommend to the Ocoee City Commission approval of the Annexation Initial Zoning Classification of "R-1A". Motion carried unanimously Eva Medina — 538 ,Ist Street Annexation and Initial Zoning City Planner Rumer gave a brief overview of the proposed annexation and initial zoning. The subject property is located on the west side of 1st Street and approximately 120 feet south of the intersection of Center Street and 16t Street. The subject parcel has one existing single-family residence. The applicant has requested annexation into the City limits for potable water connection. The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City limits, urban services can be provided, and the annexation meets state and local regulations. Because the property is part of an enclave in the City, it already benefits from Ocoee Fire Rescue services. The subject property is located within the Ocoee -Orange County Joint Planning Area and it is adjacent to the City by a corner. Orange County has been notified of the petition, and is not contesting the annexation. DISCUSSION Member Marcotte asked who maintains the right-of-ways for these types of areas. City Planner Rumer stated the city of Ocoee has entered into a Road Transfer Agreement with Orange County. This agreement sets up a provision where if the city of Ocoee fronts 51 % of the road, the road is controlled by the city of Ocoee. However, those specific roads are maintained by Orange County. The Public Hearing was opened. Member Keethler asked at what point these annexations becomes an additional burden to the City for police and fire services. City Planner Rumer stated there is concurrency for solid waste, parks and recreation, schools and transportation, water and sewer, but not for police and fire services. Chairman Campbell asked if the properties will have a tax liability to the City once they are annexed. Commissioner Johnson stated those areas currently benefit from many City services, and annexing the properties will allow the City to receive taxes. The Public Hearing was closed. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 13, 2013 Member Keethler; seconded by Member Dillard, moved the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the Ocoee Citv Commission approval of the Annexation of the +/ .37 acre parcel of land known as the Medina Property (533 Ist Street) with an Initial Zoninq Classification of "R-IA". Motion carried unanimousiV. West 50 Commercial Subdivision Cancelled per Staff Recommendation MISCELLANEOUS Project Status Report City Planner Rumer presented the board with a project status update. Some of upcoming projects are: 2 dog kennels ® Wendy's restaurant on West Colonial Drive ® Letter of intent will be mailed out for the Coke property regarding residential aspect ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Attest: Diana Turner, Recording Clerk Bradley Campbell, Chairman WrINPIMT Westyn Bay Request to Amend its Preliminary/Final Subdivision Plan Condition #22 8/22/2013 Westyn Bay Request to Amend its Preliminary/Final Subdivision Plan Subdivision Plan • Condition 22 — Establishes an easement allowing students and parents access through Westyn Bay traveling to and from schools • Westyn Bay Community Association requests this condition be deleted from the Subdivision Plan for Westyn Bay Situation << " I 1 8/22/2013 Situation • Background: Conceived at a time when there was no sidewalk along Ocoee Apopka Road for students to walk to school • Access restricted to students and their accompanying parents/supervisors — No practical way to enforce • Access limited to 90 minutes before until 90 minutes after school, when in session — Impractical to open and lock gate outside of those times — When attempted, panels next to gate were kicked out No access to common areas or facilities — Impossible to police What we will do • We will remove the gate and associated PVC fencing and erect a wall with a motif similar to the other walls in Westyn Bay • We will change the combination to the pedestrian gates at the entrances to the subdivision • We will (likely) remove the sidewalk on the Westyn Bay side of the gate Result Unfettered, uncontrollable access through our private gated community which we spend significant sums of money to restrict to residents and guests only • The quickest and easiest way for unauthorized individuals to gain access to our subdivision Unauthorized use of and vandalism to our facilities (while not entirely attributable to the gate, it is the single largest gap in our ability to control access) What we will gain The sanctity of our private property, for which we pay dearly • The freedom from the long term expense to maintain the gate, the fence, and the sidewalk, and the liability exposure of non-residents/guests transiting our streets and sidewalks • Less pedestrian traffic through the subdivision • Significantly reduced opportunity for unauthorized access to the subdivision • Proportional reduction in vandalism and unauthorized use of facilities 8/22/2013 Counterarguments Some students will have a longer distance to walk to school Rebuttal: This is no longer a safety issue —it is merely a shortcut • Many students living within Westyn Bay will walk just as far to school as Vineyards students • Students normally do not have the privilege of crossing private property as a shortcut to school The easement is very restricted —only students during school hours with no access to facilities Rebuttal: Completely impractical to enforce This is a wonderful way to foster closer relationships between neighbors and foster a community spirit Rebuttal: • Reality: that hasn't happened in 8+years • Other developments (e.g., Arden Park) haven't had to provide access despite similar geography with respect to school locations (Note: Arden Park will allow its residents across clarcona-Ocoee Pkwy to transit through the larger section) Conclusion Removing Condition 22 from the Subdivision Plan will restore and uphold the private property rights of Westyn Bay residents, eliminate the largest single means for unauthorized access to the community, and eliminate the costs and liabilities associated with providing this access We respectfully request your support of our request Counterarguments (cont) We bought a house in the Vineyards based on having this access; this ruins it for us and decreases our property value — Rebuttal: the costs of the streets, sidewalks, and gates in Westyn Bay are completely borne by its residents; you are not entitled to any benefit from what the residents of Westyn Bay have paid and continue to pay for their community, including increasing your property value; you had (and still have) the opportunity to purchase a home in Westyn Bay, and otherwise you have safe sidewalk transit to the school sites 3 TI • Wesfyn Bay Request to Modify Its Development Agreement Condition #37 8/22/2013 Westyn Bay Request to Modify Its Development Agreement What is the motivation? • It is NOT about the wholesale removal of trees It IS about the Homeowner's Association ridding itself of substantial legal and financial liability Development Agreement Condition #37: A street tree shall be provided in front of each single-family lot (2 street trees on corner Ims, with one on each street), prior to the issuance of o certificate of o'roponcy for the house constructed on the lot Gach sweet tree shall he a minimum of 2" DAIi and 10' tall at the lime of planting. Westyn Bay Community Association requests this condition be deleted from the Development Agreement for Westyn Bay. Situation Trees WERE planted to comply with the requirement tl- oak/Laurel oak trees (encouraged by city staff) (approx-50/50 per Valley crest) -- Planted in red is as(2-6feetwide) between sidewalk a ud street ("in front of the of") - Approx.60otrees,I/- - Now s-gyears old; 90-95iare less than8"Doll Result - )hough stlllimrature, trees are pushing up sidewalksat an alarmingrate - Normally a long the joints Resulting "step" foirns a tripping hazard, exposing the Association to substantial legal liability Current coping mechanism - Grind the "steps" down; cost up to$300 each per occurrence - Temporarymeasure;sid,w,lkwill continueto rise, replacement required see ntual ly - Tripping hazard exists until ground down and, arguably, afterward as well 8/22/2013 Current Pictures of Tree Root "Steps" L Grinding-• UNSIGHTLY itk NF ii i J w Why is this happening? Per the Arbor Day Foundation. Wrong Type of Tree - Grows 40'-80', with an 80' spread myf W—) Trunk diameter up to 4 feet; flares out at base lifting sidewalks and curbing If planted in tree lawns less than 8 feet wide Soil Conditions - Thin layer of topsoil over clay, poorly drained; presents a hardship Per wide body of research, it always happens -- HOA In Hunter's Creek $200K in the last five years to repair oak tree damage to sidewalks v,n/ia/nnli M 8/22/2013 Result: Shallow Roots,Unstable Trees (Tree blown over by rain -associated wind in VJestyn Bay, May 2013) is s # ( a' As t.;tJY'i. What happens to a Street Tree? (from Arbor Day Foundation) !I I 3 8/22/2013 I, d A F 1 TBW . Roots are deflected horizontally and down by most of the barriers on the market a In compacted soils and soils with it high water table, roots grow under the barrier and up the other side . In well drained soil, roots may remain at deeper depths longer Research on Street Trees University of Florida — Surprisingly b :ico,; in I Ura rr7 under i i I Ik i `r.r-tc�l —illillllrWI so they tend to congregate there" t'Dr Ed Gilman, University of Florida tree guru, i(- ,i tI, i I u, 1 tot ) in. hr� In of unat' r yelthin ii tun . th _ ti t nlc t i, f r sl 1,�]i I nort b an o. _d. — "There are horror stories of municipalities doing sidewalk repairs by using the "cut the roots out" technique and sires I Icr;ln I o: r and um iincnrny,-int,ill (.�i;,, — "When the water table is close to the soil surface or when the soil is compacted tap roots do not develop kilp Iii (I,) i : t r li It, Ill 11f _,l in cr n IIM3 l ui l r il.i ill �i)tl 11 Illl Will i itt;tt tan; y J li Ill, i ...Even cutting small (less than one half inch) roots under or outside the edge of the canopy for long stretches can cut off water supply to the tree. This can cause the bee to dcchne er d ; t, n Il,r t "u:cr: "ots" Place trees on other ., f walk I Damane can be reduced by 1 — " planting on the side of the I sidewalk away from the curb r •' ■ This }daces the root flare in v open soil instead of - between the sidewalk and curb a Roots do not have to grow under the sidewalk to reach the open soil space in the lawn M 8/22/2013 Research on Street Trees Hillsborough County Florida: - "There are three issues nationally and locally: Sidewalks are being destroyed by 'Street bees"' Sidewalks must meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) criteria_ 'Street Trees are damaged by maintenance Repair costs exceed funds. Sidewalk repairs in Hillsborough County will cost $30 Million by the year 202C." - "In our reconiniendations, there are three parts to stop the uplifting of sidewalks: • ben feet ofsepaiationFomthe rice tothesidewalk • Root Barrier..-12 to 24 inches deep Crushed Base. For sidewalks less than 10 feetf om the tree, 'crushed base' is needed under the sidewalk, Arid the root harrier` Research on Street -frees Advanced Tree Care, Inc. — "..the most commonly planted Swale tree in in,my parts of Florida is the(4uercusvirgininna),which..simplyl I_ i t ,;.,i U ° r I. designated by the designers.... ( r n s tr r t.. ;I I r as the trees begin to mature and their root systems expand and try tc — "The '.i i anywhere between the slab next In thetrunk to as far away [as] ... j S I t r, a t Once the slab lifts over',;. inch, there is a rhnl. li:,'u l iy i, o a trip and fall hazard" c l l �t fl,I Resca chat the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories has demonstrated that cutting large lateral roots within the root plate, which is a distance from the trunk of three times the trunk diameter, r =., And those ordering cutting of major lateral roots should he aware of the tvf. t r 'ir I.Ltr I,, 1- . Research on Street Trees Michigan State University: "b—c[chcrs In England compared how often tree roots caused darraga to buildings relative to the specie frequency in the landscape - - .In general, fast growing scories should not be plant. d r%ear sewer Iln_s orsdL. alks." - A _°�tudy In street trees in Cincinnati found that likelihood of finding a tree Tl ere Is Mary Edwards, Valley Crest Arborist (asked about root pruning and barriers) "I am primarily concerned about if we attempt to root Pri-1110 them to prote_t tl e sidewalk, etc. We know that these trees currently have a l i, -? - e We also know that this location b ,s centhe sidewalk and the roadway contains the majority of the anchotage roots or critical root zone of the trees. ii My fear ¢ that be au,_ the area Is so condensed and e ale limited on how rnanv r'A, we can prune that Eliminating the Cause The most effective solutions are preventive and out of reach for the I OA because the trees and sidewalks are already there: — Appropriate (smaller) species, other side of and farther away from sidewalk, gravel under sidewalk, channels under sidewalks, elevated sidewalks, wider medians Other supposed solutions are either ineffective, dangerous, or too expensive: root "pruning", root barriers Bottorn line: with already existing live/laurel oak trees in 4-6 foot medians, there are no effective, affordable means to prevent sidewalk damage 5 8/22/2013 What will we do? Because of language in our covenants, eliminating Condition 37 will allow its to offer each resident the following alternatives: 1. Keep the street tree by assuming fmmm ial and legal liability for the sidewalk 2. Move the tree at their own expense to another location on their property 3. Have the HOA remove the tree In any case, the HOA will be relieved of the considerable legal and financial liability associated with street trees We will NOT eliminate healthy trees along Westyn Bay Boulevard, and we will maintain the sidewalks accordingly (far less exposure than the street trees) Vineyards PEA Counterarguments Granting the request amounts to a waiver ofthe Ocoee Land Development Code without a justifiahie hardship — Rebuttal_ The code oriIy requires the developer to plant st—t trees That, has Been done. Them is no further requ,rement in the rude. and, hence no mqui[erne it to waive it. Ever, if there was, there Is a sic icent hardship mndinon due to the compact clay soil, and considerable financti ial and legal liability hardship for the Associaon due to this requirement. Granting this request would give Westyn Bay Special favored status over similar developments in the area — Rebuttal: Three of the four contemporaneous developr—rin in the area have virtually no street pees; the fourth has scattered trees, so Westyn Bay is subject to discriminatory enforcement (Pictures follow) There will not he enough trees remaining in the subdivision - fieoettal: Every lot has at least three trees (usually more). by the definition of tree in tl,e Land Devaloprnent Code All of the trees will he taken out — Rebuttal: we anticipaba a substantial nurnhe of residents will choose to retain their street trees me 8/22/2013 Kensington Manor km .ate t OMI w a Mccormick Woods Conclusion • It is the fiduciary responsibility of the Association and its directors to identify and eliminate financial and legal liability risks • The street trees represent the single largest exposure of the Association for both risks due to the sheer numbers of trees (600+/-) • The subdivision will retain its beautiful appearance • Therefore, we respectfully ask that you endorse our request 7 FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS AaI VANE —FIRST NAME —MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COWMITTEE -MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON 0 Q� p f' �', 'NI-�� H I SERVE IS A Q COUNTY Y C'[TY COUNTY �/ O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON WHIC VOTE OCCURRED J� ✓ �.j / MY A)SITION IS: Q ELECTIVE AfrOINTIVE 'WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. I Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.: 143, FLORIDA STATUTES j A person holding elective or appointive coun ry, municipal,. or .other 1pc�l •public office `tbfUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure' 'I which inures to his or her special'pttivate'gain or foss. Eaclr elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from •knowingiy voting on a measure which inures to the special gain oe'loss of a principal:(ocher,than'a government agency) by whom he or she is retained including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special,tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are riot pro-. hibited from voting iri'that capacity. • i For purposes of this law, a `relative" includes only the officgr's father, mother, sorb, -daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father- in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A`"business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock 'exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting, and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. # # # # # # # # # # APPOINTED OFFICERS: You must abstain from voting and disclose the conflict in the situations described above and in the manner described for elected offi- cers. In order to participate in these matters, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO A17ME MPT TO INFLUENCE THE -DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING. • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file, it.wit un,l 'days,afier the vote occurs with the persoh respdfisth'1e tor'recording the minu'tl4of the'nieeting who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be Provided immedi tely to the. other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after Lhe form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST hereby disclose that on 413 (a) easure came or will come before my agency which (check one) IAnured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative inured to the special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: lilt: "%0V%cR rso,d D f�,te5��-ats,�•/�'�-at��, s�'��'✓.�sr�.J 449"v Ado 3>00014ppma yr Foe vlrCsrr.✓'a''Y c&,,gL.Ter ; z A� a ,ec6nxA'- er LJ9s �y,0 $9y .440 /ALJG / , a d, 3 Date Filed by which NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLO- SURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 88 - REV. 1i95 PAGE 2 FORM 813 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS i.AVIN HE—F[ T NAJ1E RIDDLE N,4ME -NAME OF OARD, COUNCIL, COMMISITT SION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMEE HAILG ADD V� 1 �'V THE B�SFRVE RD, COU�fCIL h1M[SS[ON[, A[fCHp(iI R COMMITTEE ON (� WHICIS A UNIT OF: CITY CO TY CITY p COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON WHICH v E OC URRED �3 MY POSITION IS: Q ELECTIVE X APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.: 143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or ocher local public office MUST .-ABSTAIN from voting on a measure .vhich inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basi hibited from voting in that capacity, s are not pro - For purposes of this law, a `relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, facher- in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). x x x x x ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting, and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. * x * x x * * x x APPOLNTED OFFICERS: You must abstain from voting and disclose the conflict in the situations described above and in the manner described for elected offi- cers. In order to participate in these matters, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO EKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO Al"LMM 'T TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING. • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST JeS hereby disclose that on 19 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: V x1l' by which Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLO- SURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 8B - REV. 1/95 PAGE 2 ANNEXATION, ■ •< STAFF REPORT DATE: September 10, 2013 ko, TO: Planning & Zoning Commission JLocal Planning Agency) FROM: Michael Romer, City Planne�_`_) SUBJECT: Strickland LLC (301 W Silver Star Rd) Annexation and Initial Zoning Project No(s): AX-07-13-40 & RZ-13-07-06 Should the Planning & Zoning Commission (LPA) recommend approval of the Annexation and the Initial Zoning (C-2) for the Strickland LLC, (301 W Silver Star Rd) Property? r.- 11 Lo no- WO-09I.QuIlme fill AINUM1,11 CURRENT PROPOSED Jurisdiction/Future Land Orange County / Commercial City of Ocoee /Commercial Use -Joint Planning Area Land Use Classification Jurisdiction/Zoning Orange County / "R-1K City of Ocoee / "C-2" Classification "Single-Famil Dwelling" "Communitv Commercial" E}8,</ Nleehi; Dale `iepteniber 10, 2013 Project: Strickland LLC 11¢oj€ c kl nh17 '(s): ,AX-01-13-110 & RZ-13-07-06 The current future land use and zoning classifications of the surrounding properties: DIRECTION: CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CURRENT ZONING North Commercial C-2 (Community Commercial) East Medium Density RT-1 South N/A N/A West Commercial C-2 (Community Commercial) CONSISTENCY WITH STATE & LOCAL REGULATIONS: Annexation: With respect to State annexation criteria, Chapter 171.044 of the Florida Statutes grants municipalities the authority to annex contiguous, compact, non -circuitous territory so long as it does not create an enclave. The subject property is considered contiguous to the City of Ocoee since it bordered by property located within the City limits on the north and western boundary. Joint Planning Area Agreement: The subject property is located within the Ocoee -Orange County Joint Planning Area (JPA) and is being considered for annexation as outlined in the JPA Agreement. The applicant is requesting rezoning of the property to C-2 (Community Commercial). Orange County has been notified of this petition in accordance with Section 171.044(6) FS and Subsection 13-A of the City of Ocoee -Orange County Joint Planning Area Agreement. Rezoning: The applicant has requested a City of Ocoee zoning designation of C-2 (Community Commercial), which is consistent with the zoning of the properties to the north and west. According to the Land Development Code, the C-2 zoning designation is intended for areas shown on the Future Land Use Map as "Commercial". The C-2 zoning designation is consistent with the adopted future land use designation of Commercial, as shown on the City of Ocoee & Orange County Joint Planning Area future land use map. Comprehensive Plan: The annexation is consistent with the Future Land Use Element Policy 2.5 that states in part, "The City shall consider requests for voluntary annexation into the City when those lands are logical extensions of the existing City limits, when services can be properly provided, and when proposed uses are compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan the JPA Agreement, and the City's Annexation Policy... [Emphasis added]. The rezoning is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 that states in part, "The City may assign an initial zoning, after annexation, which is consistent with both the Future Land Use Map and the JPA Agreement..." 118,/ Nieeiik q Date Sepeo her 10, 2013 Projpdc Strickland LLC Project Ni€ rth(.>r{s;: AX-07.13 40 & RZ 13-07-06 Annexation Feasibility & Public Facilities Analysis Report (See attached): Because the property is part of an enclave in the City it already benefits from Ocoee Fire Rescue services via a joint "First Responder" Agreement with Orange County. Summary: The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City limits, urban services can be provided, and the annexation meets state and local regulations. With regards to the notification form Orange County, city staff is comfortable with the annexation based on past annexations of similar circumstances. The land use and initial zoning are also consistent and compatible with surrounding properties. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) RECOMMENDATION: On September 4, 2013, the DRC met to determine if the proposed annexation and initial zoning was consistent with the City's regulations and policies. When the discussion was finished, the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the annexation and initial zoning for the Strickland LLC, property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis and the subsequent DRC recommendation, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend approval of the Annexation of the +/-.50 acre parcel of land known as the Strickland LLC Property (301 W Silver Star Rd) with an Initial Zoning classification of "C-2". Attachments: Annexation Feasibility Analysis Location Map Surrounding Future Land Use Map Surrounding Zoning Map Aerial Map FM- CITY OF OCOEE ANNEXATION FEASIBILITYANALYSIS CASE NUMBER: AX-07-13-40 & RZ-13-07-06 APPLICANT NAME: Strickland LLC PROJECT NAME: 301 W SILVER STAR ROAD ANNEXATION AND REZONING This form is used to evaluate annexation requests to determine the feasibility of providing urban services to individual properties. Each department has filled in the appropriate section and the findings are summarized below. I. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Michael Rumer A. Applicant/Owner 1. Owner (if different from Applicant): Carl Strickland B. Property Location 1. General Location: North side of W Silver Star Road and approximately 380 feet east of the intersection of Ocoee Apopka Road and W Silver Star Road. 2. Parcel Identification Numbers: 18-22-28-0000-00-062 3. Street Addresses: 301 W Silver Star Road 4. Size of Parcels: +/- .50 of an acre C. Use Characteristics 1. Existin Use: Single -Family Dwelling 2. Proposed Use: Used Car Sales 3. Density / Intensity: N/A 4. Projected Population: N/A D. Zoning and Land Use 1. Orange County Future Land Use: Commercial 2. Orange County Zoning: R-1A 3. Existing Ocoee Future Land Use: Commercial 4. Proposed Ocoee Zoning: C-2 E. Consistency 1. Joint Planning Area Yes 2. Comprehensive Plan: Yes FIRE DEPARTMENT Chief Pete McNeil 1. Estimated Response Time: 4 Minutes 2. Distance to Property: Approx. 2 miles 3. Fire Flow Requirements: N/A POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief Charlie Brown 1. Police Patrol Zone / Grid / Area: Zone 1 / Grid 105 2. Estimated Response Time: 1 minute for emergencies 3. Distance to Property: Distance from Police Station is Approx. 2 miles. Page 1 of 3 C Applicant Name: Carl Strickland Project Name: Strickland, LLC Street Annexation and Rezoning Case #: AX-07-13-40 & RZ-13-07-06 4. Average Travel Time 4 minute normal drive time ECONOMIC VALUE Michael Rumer 1. Property Appraiser Taxable Value: $38,496 2. Property Appraiser Just Value $38,496 3. Estimated City Ad Valorem Taxes: $200 4. Anticipated Licenses & Permits: N/A 5. Potential Impact Fees: N/A 6. Total Project Revenues: N/A V. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1. Within the 100-near Flood Plain: NO (FEMA 2 Michael Rumer VI. UTILITIES David Wheeler, P.E. A. Potable Water 1. In Ocoee Service Area: Yes 2. City Capable of Serving Area: Yes 3. Extension Needed: Yes 4. Location and Size of Nearest Water Main: 8" water main on the eastern adjacent property line. C Sanitary Sewer 1. In Ocoee Service Area: Yes 2. City Capable of Serving Area: Yes 3. Extension Needed: Yes 4. Location and Size of Nearest Force Main: 12" force main 5. Annexation Agreement Needed: No Other 1. Utility Easement Needed: Yes 2. Private Lift Station Needed: No 3. Well Protection Area Needed: No Page 2 of 3 EM Applicant Name: Carl Strickland Project Name: Strickland, LLC Street Annexation and Rezoning Case M AX-07-13-40 & RZ-13-07-06 TRANSPORTATION Michael Rumer 1. Paved Access: Yes 2. ROW Dedication: Yes 3. Traffic Study: No 4. Traffic Analysis Zone: 568 C . PRELIMINARY CONCURRENCY EVALUATION Michael Rumer At this time, adequate transportation capacity exists. A. Transportation: At this time, adequate park/recreation capacity exists. B. Parks / Recreation: At this time, adequate water/sewer capacity exists. C. Water / Sewer: N/A D. Stormwater: At this time, adequate solid waste capacity exists. E. Solid Waste: No impact fees will be assessed. F. Impact Fees: IX. SITE SPECIFIC ISSUES All Departments The subject parcel has one existing Single -Family Residence. No development proposal is planned at this time. The Applicant has requested annexation into the City limits mainly for potable water connection. X. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE REGULATIONS: Michael Rumer This property is contiguous with the City Limits and will reduce the area of an enclave; therefore this annexation is consistent with CH. 171.043 (1) & (2), Florida Statutes. Page 3 of 3 301 W. Silver Star Road Surrounding Future Land Use Map Ocoee Community Devebpment Dep3NnBn1 1 inch = 333.333333 feet 10050 0 100 200 300 Feet Printed: September 2013 QSubject Property Unincorporated Territory ® and Other Municipalties Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Professional Offices and Services Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Conservation/Floodplains Recreation and Open Space Public Facilities/Institutional Lakes and Water Bodies e �Fa Upic�nl (:oN Lt�� � oEE Ocoee Community Developmem Oe'diment 1 inch = 263 495422 feet Bo 45 o so 166 270 Feet Printed September 2013 aSubject Property Unincorporated Territory ®and Other Municipalbes Zoning Classification: General Agricultural (A-1) AM Suburban (A-2) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices & Services (P-S) Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) Community Commercial (C-2) General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (1-1) General Industrial (1-2) Commercial (PUD) Low Density (PUD) M Medium Density (PUD) M High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) Unclassified Lakes and Water Bodies 301 W. Silver Star Road Surrounding Zoning Map If J\hlyor �,_Ilwot.l Vondevp-rifi STAFF REPORT TO: The Planning & Zoning Commi,s, FROM: Michael Rumer, City Mann RE: Strickland LLC Special Exception Project # 2-13-SE-020 John Gro,,�131, Di-d ricl I Akwl V, klollcr, Dis"n'Ict t Should the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of a Special Exception to allow automobile sales (new and used) in a C-2 zoning district located at 301 W Silver Star Road? BACKGROUND: General Location: The property is located on the north side of W Silver Star Road, east of the intersection of Ocoee Apopka Road and W Silver Star Road. Parcel Identification Number: 18-22-28-0000-00-062 Physical Address: 301 W. Silver Star Road Property Size: Land area for the entire parcel is approximately 0.50 acres. The property was previously used as a single-family residence. The Future Land 41;se classification for this entire property is "Commercial" and the current zoning classification is "C- 2" Community Commercial, The applicant is proposing a used car lot. The development will take form in two phases. The first phase will utilize an existing single-family home that will be converted to an office. A small scale site plan will be used to develop a driveway, parking, landscape buffers, and stormwater retention. Phase two will include the demolition of the existing building with the construction of a new building located on the northern end of the property. P&Z Meeting [date: September 10, 2013 Project: Strickland LLC Project NUMber(s): 02-13-SE-20 The table below references the future land uses, zoning classifications and existing land uses of the surrounding parcels: Direction Future Land Use Zoning Classification Existing Land Use North Commercial C-2 (Community Commercial Single-family East Medium Density Residential RT-1 Pioneer Key Mobile Home Park out ROW I N/A West Silver Star Road West Commercial C-2 (Community Commercial Vacant Parcel DISCUSSION: According to "Table 5-1: Permitted Use Regulations" contained in the Ocoee Land Development Code, Automobile Sales (New and Used) uses are a Special Exception in the following zoning classifications: C-2: Community Commercial, and permitted in the C-3: General Commercial and 1-1 Light Industrial. The Land Development Code defines Special Exception as a use that would not be appropriate without restrictions throughout the zoning division or district. However, if controlled as to number, area, location or relation to the neighborhood, would promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals, order, comfort, convenience, appearance, prosperity or general welfare, such uses would be appropriate. (Emphasis added). In accordance with Section 4-8.B. (2) of the Land Development Code, the proposed use must be considered in relation to the compatibility with the surrounding land uses. As previously mentioned, the adjoining land uses are commercial and medium density. Also Strickland LLC, is not proposing a collision or body shop as an ancillary use. Based on this, the use is anticipated to be compatible with the surrounding uses in the proposed location. Additionally, the proposed use is not anticipated to: • Violate the health, safety, welfare, and/or convenience of those working or owning land in the vicinity of the proposed use or structure • Impair pedestrian or vehicular movement in adjoining streets so as to violate adopted level of service standards • Result in noise, odor, glare, vibration, or other similar characteristic which is detectable at the property line and which exceeds the level which will result from permitted uses • Prevent an adjoining landowner from the legal use of his property pursuant to the Land Development Code • Violate a requirement of limitation of any applicable state or federal law or regulation • Exceed the applicable density or bulk regulations except as specifically authorized, nor shall the use or structure result in overcrowding of land or buildings 2 P&Z Meeting mate: September 10, 2013 Project: Strickland LLC Project NUITIber(s): 02-13-SE-20 • Create a fire hazard A waiver to the minimum lot size of one acre is requested. The parcel is currently less than one acre. The City has requested the dedication of five (5) feet of right-of-way as a justification for the waiver request. The right-of-way dedication is requested to facilitate the future widening of Silver Star Road. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on September 4, 2013, and reviewed the Special Exception application and Site Plan. Staff discussed remaining comments. When the discussion was finished, the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of a Special Exception to allow the automobile sales (new and used) in a C-2 zoning district located at 301 W Silver Star Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis and the DRC recommendation, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of a Special Exception to allow the automobile sales (new and used) in a C-2 zoning district located at 301 W Silver Star Road. Attachments: Location Map FLU Map Zoning Map Aerial Map Elevation Special Exception Site Plan 3 Surrounding Future Land Use Map Subjectp Unincorporated Low Density Residential Space=Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial Light Industrial Heavy industrial Recreation and Open Public Facilities/institutional Lakes and Water Bodies m Subject Property Unincorporated Territory and Other Municipalties Zoning Classification: General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban (A-2) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1 ) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1 ) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family ®welling (R-2) Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Horne Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices &Services (P-S) Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) ems: Community Commercial (C-2) , General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (1-1) General Industrial (1-2) m Commercial (PUD) l Low Density (PUD) Medium Density (PUD) High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) Unclassified Lakes and Water Bodies Stricklands LLC 301 West Silver Star Road, Ocoee, FL 34761 ParceVTangible Number: 18-22-28-0000-00062 kLAR9E DEVGN ASSOCIATES, INC. i6R E. LANT 5L !WINTER GARDEN, FL34787 P 4 R 7-656-8879 : F 407-656-45V . ARKERITAVILLE ANNEXATION, • REZONING • PUT & SMALL SCALE COMP PLAN M TO: The Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Michael Rumor; City Planner DATE: September 10, 2013 RE: Barkeritaville Annexation and Rezoning to PUD and PUD Land Use Plan Project# AX-08-13-41 & RZ-1 3-08-07 ISSUE: Should the Planning and Zoning Commission (LPA) recommend approval of a request for the annexation and rezoning to PUD on 14.31 acres of land for a proposed dog daycare and veterinary facility, and recommend approval of the associated Barkeritaville PUD Land Use plan? The Barkeritaville PUD property is located on the east side of Tomyn Boulevard, approximately 1,230 feet north of the intersection of Roberson Road and Windermere/ Tomyn Boulevard. The subject site is approximately 7.32 acres in size and is zoned A-1 (Agriculture). The property is currently vacant and contains one (1) garage building. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from Agriculture (A-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of developing a dog daycare and veterinary facility, Access is proposed via an existing entrance off Tomyn Boulevard. The table below references the future land uses, zoning classifications and existing land uses of the surrounding parcels: Low Density Res PUD Residenfial DISCUSSION: The properties JPA Future Land Use designation was changed from Low Density Residential to Commercial in 2013. The associated annexation and rezoning to PUD will comply with the Commercial Land Use Designation. The Barkeritaville PUD Land Use Plan with an 8,000 sq. ft. retail/restaurant thoroughly explaining this cutting edge people and dogs. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: &Z tfleeting Date: September 10, 2013 Project: Barkeritaville PLJD Project Nfrnnbpr(s): AX-0€5-13-41 & RZ-13-08-07 proposes 22,000 sq. ft, of veterinary and dog daycare use. The applicant will provides a presentation more use. The developer has proposed on -site amenities for A traffic Study was provided and approved by City Staff and the City's consulting transportation planning consultant. The traffic study indicated no transportation concurrency issues. The traffic study did indicate operational issues with the turning movements at Roberson Road and Windermere/Tomyn Boulevard. SCHOOL CONCURRENCY: Not Applicable WEKIVA STUDY AREA The site is located within the Wekiva Study Area. The site does not contain any of the conditions of the study area. UTILITIES The project is located within the City of Ocoee utility service area. The project is required to connect to City of Ocoee Water and Sewer service. PROPOSED WAIVERS/ REQUESTS: No waivers requested DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on September 4, 2013, and reviewed the Proposed Annexation and PUD Rezoning and PUD Land Use Plan. No additional concerns were addressed, and the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PUD Land Use Plan/Rezoning for Barkeritaville PUD subject to addressing all final comments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend approval of the annexation of the 14.31 +/- acres of land known as the Barkeritaville, rezoning to PUD and the associated PUD Land Use plan; subject to the execution of the annexation/development agreement and subject to all outstanding comments being resolved prior to the City Commission meeting. 2 pezMeeuns Date: mentemue,m. 201$ Project: Bam*htav|uPuo Attachments: Location Map FLU Map Zoning Map Aerial Map BodmrdaviUoPUDRendering Bu/korhaviUoPUD Land Use Plan Annexation Feasibility Outstanding Comments Surrounding Zoning Map Ocoee Community Development Department I inch= 666,666667 feet 230115 0 230 460 690 Feet 23EEEE::�� Printed: September 2013 Subject Property Unincorporated Territory and Other M unicipalties Zoning Classification: General Agricultural (A-1) Suburban (A-2) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AAA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1AA) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1A) Single -Family Dwelling (R-1) One- & Two -Family Dwelling (R-2) Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) Mobile Home Subdivision (RT-1) Professional Offices & Services (P-S) Neighborhood Shopping (C-1) Community Commercial (-2)C General Commercial (C-3) Restricted Manufacturing & Warehousing (1-1) =,General Industrial (1-2) K' Commercial (PUD) Low Density (PUD) Medium Density (PUD) High Density (PUD) Public Use (PUD) Unclassified Lakes and Water Bodies C FEM CITY OF • ANNEXATION ANALYSIS CASE NUMBER: AX-08-13-41 & RZ-13-08-07 APPLICANT NAME: Ken Simmons PROJECT NAME: BARKERITAVILLE ANNEXATION AND REZONING This form is used to evaluate annexation requests to determine the feasibility of providing urban services to individual properties. Each department has filled in the appropriate section and the findings are summarized below. I. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Michael Rumer A. Applicant/Owner 1. Owner (if different from Applicant): Guilda Nolen B. Property Location 1. General Location: East side of Tomyn Boulevard, approximately 1,230 feet north of the intersection of Roberson Road and Windermere/ Tom n Boulevard. 2. Parcel Identification Numbers: 31-22-28-0000-00-004 3. Street Addresses: 763 Windermere Road 4. Size of Parcels: +/- 14.31 acre C. Use Characteristics 1. Existing Use: Agriculture 2. Proposed Use: PUD Commercial 3. Density / Intensity: N/A 4. Projected Population: N/A D. Zoning and Land Use 14 1. Orange County Future Land Use: Commercial 2. Orange County Zoning: A-1 3. Existing Ocoee Future Land Use: Commercial 4. Proposed Ocoee Zoning: PUD Consistency 1. Joint Planning Area EKes 2. Comprehensive Plan: I Yes FIRE DEPARTMENT Chief Pete McNeil 1. Estimated Response Time: 2 minutes 2. Distance to Property: Station 39 (Maguire Rd) is 1.5 miles 3. Fire Flow Requirements: 2,000 gpm POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief Charlie Brown 1. Police Patrol Zone / Grid / Area: Zone 3 / Grid 20 2. Estimated Response Time: 1.5 3. Distance to Property: Distance from Police Station is Approx. 2.5 miles. Page 1 of 3 Applicant Name: Ken Simmons Project Name: Barkeritaville Annexation and Rezoning Case #: AX-08-13-41 & RZ-13-08-07 4. Average Travel Time 2 minute normal drive time IV. ECONOMIC VALUE 1. Pronerty Anpraiser Taxable Value: $327,662 ►j TO-- HOM 2. Property Appraiser Just Value $327,662 3. Estimated City Ad Valorem Taxes: N/A 4. Anticipated Licenses & Permits: N/A 5. Potential Impact Fees: N/A 6. Total Project Revenues: N/A V. BUILDING DEPARTMENT Michael Rumer 1. Within the 100-veer Flood Plain: YES (FEMA 2009) VI. UTILITIES David Wheeler, P.E. A. Potable Water 1. In Ocoee Service Area: Yes 2. City Capable of Serving Area: Yes 3. Extension Needed: Yes 4. Location and Size of Nearest Water Main: 8" water main % mile north of property. C Sanitary Sewer 1. In Ocoee Service Area: Yes 2. City Capable of Serving Area: Yes 3. Extension Needed: Yes 4. Location and Size of Nearest Force Main: 8" force main 5. Annexation Agreement Needed: Yes Other 1. Utility Easement Needed: Yes 2. Private Lift Station Needed: No 3. Well Protection Area Needed: No Page 2 of 3 VII. Applicant Name: Ken Simmons Project Name: Barkeritaville Annexation and Rezoning Case M AX-08-13-41 & RZ-13-08-07 TRANSPORTATION Michael Rumer 1. Paved Access: Yes 2. ROW Dedication: No 3. Traffic Study: No 4. Traffic Analysis Zone: 568 . PRELIMINARY CONCURRENCY EVALUATION Michael Rumer At this time, adequate transportation capacity exists. A. Transportation: At this time, adequate park/recreation capacity exists. B. Parks / Recreation: At this time, adequate water/sewer capacity exists. C. Water / Sewer: N/A D. Stormwater: At this time, adequate solid waste capacity exists. E. Solid Waste: No impact fees will be assessed. F. Impact Fees: IX. SITE SPECIFIC ISSUES All Departments The subject parcel has one existing as an agricultural use. A PUD and PUD Land Use Plan is being proposed at this time. The Applicant has requested annexation into the City limits mainly for potable water and sewer connection. X. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE REGULATIONS: Michael Rumer This property is contiguous with the City Limits and will reduce the area of an enclave; therefore this annexation is consistent with CH. 171.043 (1) & (2), Florida Statutes. Page 3 of 3 P it Jean Abi-Aoun, P.E. Florida Engineering Group 5127 S, Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32809 BARKERITAVILLE ANNEXATION & REZONING TO PUD, SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AX-08-13-41, RZ-13-08-07 & CPA-2013-002 2 nd REVIEW Thank you for your submittal for the above -mentioned project. We have attached staff comments that are in response to your submittal. At your convenience, please call me at (407) 905-3100 extension 1021 to schedule a Technical Staff Review Committee Meeting (TSRC). During this meeting, the appropriate staff members will go over any of their comments to facilitate the re -submittal. In your written response, we ask that you indicate how each comment was addressed, If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you! Sincerely, Sherry Seaver Sherry Seaver, Development Review Coordinator Planning Division Attachment Cc: Mike Rumer, City Planner Antonio Fabre, Principal Planner Engineering Department Project File MICHAEL RUMER, CITY PLANNER (407) 905-3100 Extension 1018 No comments at this time. DAVID WHEELER, CITY ENGINEER (407) 905-3100 Extension 1504 The following are the results of your submittal for the above referenced project that was received on August 28, 2013. 1. On sheet C-1, the plan shows that part of the stormwater retention pond is located within the 100 Flood Plain. The City Code and Comp Plan do not allow development within the Flood Plain. The City does not allow development in the flood plain. However, minimal encroachments are allowed with compensating storage. The plan does not show where that proposed compensating storage area is to be located for the minimal encroachment into the flood plain. FAR is not a determining factor in the possible encroachment into the flood plain. 2. On sheet C-1, the Flood Zone note references that the 100 year flood elevation is 117.5, based upon a simplified method. Provide documentation for this method in determining the elevation — the FEMA FIRM panel does not list a specific elevation for this waterway. The City will obtain a copy of the Lake Roberts Drainage Study to review in total. 3. On the boundary survey, there is a description for four parcels but the sketch shows parcels 1 & 3 as being the same parcel. Please explain. Acknowledged, but the data is not very clear. 4. On sheet C-2, a fire flow calculation is shown that takes a 50% reduction sprinklers. At a projected fire flow of 2250 gpm, the City does not apply the percentage reduction. 5. At this stage in the review process, staff does not delve too deeply into the detailed design aspects of the project. However, staff will make comments on issues that need to be addressed when detailed design is accomplished. With the projected fire flow requirements, be advised that a 12 inch water main would be required for a single feed point of connection. The pipeline on Patriots Point Drive in the Brookestone development is only 6 inches in diameter. Therefore, the water main would need to be run farther along Tomyn Boulevard to connect to the 16 inch main that crosses the Expressway or Barkaritaville should work in concert with the All Sports Memory Care development to provide a looped connection that could provide sufficient pressure and flow and not exceed velocity limits. 6. Based upon the projected water and sanitary sewer flows provided on sheet C-2, the project could generate 22 ERUs of capacity demand on the City's water and sewer systems. Based upon those projected flows and ERUs and the current water capital charge of $1,804/ERU and wastewater capital charge of $5,350/ERU the development would generate $157,388 in capital fees to the City. SCOTT COOKSON CITY ATTORNEY (407) 581-5800 The following comments are general in nature and are based upon the City Attorney's review of the documents submitted. Repeat Comment: Please provide an attorney's title opinion or title certification addressed or certified to the City of Ocoee (the "Title Report") showing the record title holder of all of the property. Based on the applications submitted, we would expect to see the record title holder of the property to be Geilda I. Nolin Trust (Parcel 1) and Fiedler Erwin W. Tr. (Parcel 2). Please note that the Title Report must also show all mortgages not satisfied or released of record nor otherwise terminated by law. The Title Report must be less than six months old and certified or addressed to the City of Ocoee. Please ensure that the legal description referenced on the Title Report is identical to the legal description on the Survey and PSP/LUP. In addition, please include copies of all documents referenced in the Title Report. 2. Please ensure that the legal description on the LUP, the Survey and the Title Report are the same. 3. Repeat Comment: Please provide the Title Report to the surveyor and have the surveyor show all encumbrances referenced in the Title Report on the Survey that are capable of being shown on the Survey. 4. Repeat Comment: Please provide an owner's affidavit executed by the Fiedler Erwin W. Trust and designate the owner's authorized agent. In addition, the Annexation and Initial Zoning Hold Harmless Agreement will need to be re -executed by the owner of the property. all am all DEVELOPMENT t I STAFF REPORT IATE: September 10, 2013 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission (Local Planning Agency) FROM: Michael Rumer, City Planne SUBJECT: Barkeritaville Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Project of )a CPA-2013-002 Should the Planning & Zoning Commission (LPA) recommend approval of a Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment ("Low Density Residential" to "Commercial") for the Barkeritaville property? The Barkeritaville property is located on the east side of Tomyn Boulevard, approximately 1,230 feet north of the intersection of Roberson Road and Windermere/ Tomyn Boulevard. The subject site is approximately 7.32 acres in size and is zoned A-1 (AgriGUlture). The property is currently vacant and contains one (1) garage building. The table below references the Jurisdiction, Future Land Use, Existing Land Uses and Zoning of the surrounding properties. DIRECTION: CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CURRENT ZONING North Orange County Low Density Residential A-1 (Agriculture) East N/A. SR 429 Toll Road N/A. SR 429 Toll Road South Orange County Low Density Residential A-1 (Agriculture) West City of Ocoee Low Density Residential PLID (Residential) ! &,Z Meeting Cate: September 10, 2013 Project: Barkerittaville SSLUA Project Number(s): CPA-2013-002 • • �Tqq jq The applicant/owner is requesting a Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment which consists of classifying the subject parcel of land from "Low Density Residential' to "Commercial." The subject property is being rezoned to PUD Commerical to provide for a veterinary and pet boarding facility. This Small Scale Amendment will amend the Land Use of the 7.32 acres. SITE ANALYSIS: Floodplain Impacts: Based on FIRM map number 12095CO220F, the site does lie within the 100 year floodplain. Wetland Impact: Based on the PUD Land Use Plan, associated analysis, and City of Ocoee wetland map, there are jurisdictional wetlands. Compliance with the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan regarding development within and around the area is required. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife: A threatened and endangered wildlife study is not required for a small scale land use amendment. Utilities: The site is located within the City of Ocoee utility service area and is proposing to connect to public utilities for water and sewer. There is an existing 8" water main on Tomyn Boulevard within % mile and an 8" forcemain on Roberson Road. Approval of the proposed water and sewer utility connection plan is required prior to the approval of the final subdivision/site plan. Transportation / Traffic: The proposed PUD accesses Tomyn Boulevard. Tomyn Boulevard has a measured Level -of - Service "C". Schools: No school impacts are proposed since the proposed use is Commercial. Public Safety: The nearest Fire Department, Station Number 39 located on Maguire Road, is approximately 1.5 miles from the subject property. The estimated response time is 2-4 minutes. The Police Station is located 2.5 miles from the subject property. The estimated response time is 2-4 minutes. 13W, Meeting State: Septeinber 10, 2013 Project: Barkrnittavitie SSLUA Project Numher(s): CPA-2013-002 Drainage: The subject site is located within the Apopka Drainage Basin and therefore must meet the requirements of Section 11.7 (a) SJRWMD Management and Storage of Surface Water Handbook and Wekiva Study Area BMP's. Design of the drainage system will be evaluated in more detail prior to final engineering approval. Recreation and Open Space: No impacts on recreation facilities are proposed. The applicant will be required to provide twenty (20) percent open space. APPLICABLE POLICIES: Special Districts: The site is located within the Wekiva Study Area and does not contain any of the protected features. Comprehensive Plan: The following policies are applicable with the proposed project: Future Land Use Policy 1.3: Future Land Use Policy 1.7: Future Land Use Policy 1.10 Future Land Use Policy 2.5: Future Land Use Policy 7.1: Transportation Policy 1.4.1: Conservation Policy 1.2: Conservation Policy 2.3: Conservation Policy 3.1: Conservation Policy 3.3: Conservation Policy 4.1: Buffering Natural Environment Density and Intensity Voluntary Annexation Compatibility of Adjacent Land Uses Operational Movements Industrial Air Quality Standards 100-year Floodplain 100-year Floodplain 100-year Floodplain Wetlands DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on September 4, 2013, and reviewed the applicant's request. The applicant was notified that all concerns in regards to the review of the project had been satisfied. No additional concerns were addressed, and the DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Small -Scale Comprehensive Plan amendment for approximately 7.32 acres from a designation of Low Density Residential to Commercial. p&X Moeinyoato:September m.zoo Project: aameriuov|mmn|ua Project mumuor(a):cn^'zu|snoe Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Cornnnioeion, acting as the Local Planning Aoanoy, namornrnend approval of the SnnaU-Qms|a Comprehensive Plan Amendment ("Low Density Residential" to "Commercial") for the Barkeritaville property. Location Map 21853 TARTAN ■ 1 ■ ET LEES•URG, FLORIDA • PARCELl i i i i i 1 1 21853 TARTAN • 1 STREET LEES•URG, FLORIDA • PARCEL ID 1 1 1 1 i t i l/ LA KE WORTH, FLORIDA 33463 DEVELOPER: DR. KENNETH J.'SIMMONS APPLICANT: DR. KENNETH J, SIMMONS 4975 LAKE WORTH, ROAD LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA 33463 PHONE: 561-7221"5243 ARCHITECT: TERCILLA COURTEMANCHE ARCHITECTS RENE ■ 1 2047 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 100 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33411 PHONE: 561-478,4457 • ■ 1 1 1 ■ ■ • PUD OCOEEY FLORIDA PARCEL I.D. No. 31-22-28-0000-00-003 31-22-28-0000-00-00 SITE VICINITY MAP UTILITY COMPANIES WATER: / i 1 i t CITY.OFOCOEE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SEWER: (407) 905-3100 CITY OF OCOEE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REUSE: (407) 905-3100 CITY OF OCOEE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ELECTRIC: (800) 700-8744 DUKE ENERGY TELEPHONE: (770) 918-5424 AT&T TELEPHONE: (407) 814-5344 CEN I TURYLINK CABLE: (407) •509 BRIGHT CABLE: • • 24 COMPAST GAS: (407) 656-2734 LAKE APOPKA NATURAL GAS DISTRICT n NOT TO SCALE A portion of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: CONIQVIENCE at the West 1/4 corner of Section 31, Township 22 South, Range 28 East, Orange County, Florida; thence run North 00°19'13" West, along the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, for a distance of 1317.53 feet to the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence departing said West line, run North 89014'11" East, along the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, for a distance of 388.08 feet to a point on the Easterly limited access right of way line of State Road 429 to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence departing said North line, run North 31 °29'02" East, along said Easterly limited access right of way line, for a distance of 87.82 feet to the point of curvature of a curve, concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 1492.39 feet, a chord bearing of North 25°58'25" East and a chord distance of 286.63 feet; thence run No along the are of said curve, and said Easterly limited access right of way line, through a central angle of 11101'16" for an are distance of 287.07 feet to a point on the North line of the South 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence departing said curve, and said Easterly limited access right of way line, run North 89°08'47" East, along said North line, for a distance of 764.66 feet to a point on the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence departing said North line, run South 00°12'40" East, along the said East line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, and the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, for a distance of 495.83 feet to a point on the South line of the North 5 (five) acres of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence departing said East line, run South 89'14'11" West, along said South line, for a distance of 662.52 feet to a point on the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence departing said South line, run South 00°15'56" East, along said East line, for a distance of 496.49 feet to a point on the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence departing said East line, run South 89°24'59" West, along said South line, for a distance of 367.03 feet to a point on the East line of the West 295 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31; thence run North 00°19'13" West along the said East line, for a distance of 510.34 feet to a point on the aforesaid Easterly limited access right of way line of State Road 429; thence departing said East line, run North 31°29'02" East, along said Easterly limited access right of way line, for a distance of 176.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 14.31 acres, more or less. PLAN INDEX j C-1 COVER SHEET C-2 BARKERITAVILLE PUD 2 FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP i Engineerin�g the Future 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, Fl. 32809 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 CERTIFICATE No. EB-000 www.feg-inc.us "° " a`"" 13-034_COVER SHEEf.DWG / % north line of northwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 of section 31-22-28 s r�3 R�Ch,T-.0 / orlando/orange county expressway authority state road 429 limited access right of way wi th varies R50' 12. I / ' 1 PROP. MONL!Pzfi5�1 ' �N - _ S88'52'37"W 1327.97' - 123.92x.-12'r14, - 12 12x3.73 123.9 124 34 f / GRAPHIC SCALE 60' 0 30' 60' 120' I\ 1"=60' 11�/ ' ( northeast corner of the northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of section a / x 121.54 31-22-28 7 ' ryg wf 19 / ,d �`' �3202 east limme Worthwest �1+/4q E ••;/ / x 124s 14.33 � '� � ��li, L/--`f��est 1/V f� E tic i 31- �2 - / F not platted 124.3 / / owner: orlando/orange county expressway authority D R C ®N S E R V AT N 1; ..06 / I/ / J // site benchmark 2 �11' Y d24.2 i24.77i iron rod # cap lb m6723 YI / / elevation 118.92' r-f ZONING 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER & 55' x1VFUTURE BUILDING SETBACK - - - - A _ 1 I EXPANSION TYP. � rj LADING SP ' � - - - - _ / 4 � 1326.00 - , x116.8 - 764.66 124.83 n89'08'47�e -r (��3 122.C' 1.J,-/ x1'Lo.91 x120.68 / ' " x+118.1C► jf223.866 / 124.4 124.8-Y / BjI:E RACK 124 x x125 2 124.2 12 123J6 / 1 ' .98 rL� h 1 4.2 124.6� / 23.45 ' 12x 9f� ti�. 121 12 122.96 / 12X.21 123.58 122.75 123. x ' ' z / 1� 81 1 N-50 122 29 1 �L y -I- x 123.67 ft34' ^, k 1.3 1 32.0' 123.0 122.49 - EXISTING PAVING BACK OF CURB 12 .9 TO BACK OF CURB �. 12�•(1 / /ry/ rytV +�ryxjPZ31 L/� +, 21.1 122.6 Y a' ,Ory_5? 9 4 12 112..23 /�� // �� �� PROPOSED 122. 1 .67/ / �� r f RESTAURANT� R10 9, x14/_ x121.81 120.1 , x119. x1 P 119. ,2 122. 1 12z.1 s / N a 12X.10 .29 3 / DUMPSTER / / / ✓ 122.01 / x 18.89 119.91 x 119.63 < 119. i6 i / x 118.74 ���' / 1x 17.9�••'• / sitr�l� benchmark {f1 i •'• 721.44 iro / / / elevbt on 119.881b �6723 / 'I-� = i •-••.•••••••• / 122.71 22Z7 / i / \ i .► / 1[/2,9.30121.21 �/ ; / .•• •STORM�IUQrTt12 \ / 122.7 111Z.342�,�0 120.71 / / V� ` '3 / / p•••'-• w1AI�AGEMENT �1.70 �� o o / ' FACILITY /1`x 120.37 / / i 121.2 / l" / 0 0 ;/ ; / 34,334 I /� i / L 5.80 / phone -6 _ i �- 118.0 /0 0 tower j / L••� r�.T� -• ����i`9L(� 120.6'g x 1 .38 \ 3xc 117.82 0 (� 17J5 - -Q_ - - _ � (A : _ X 14.8 wf 29 - - - - - OZ l,�y-� ,. �- N. wf 34 35 wf 36 01 PARCEL # 31-22-28-0000-00-004 �,f37 / UPLAND PARCEL # UPLAND WETLAND TOTAL FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND AREA (AC.) AREA (AC.) - . - _ -AREA (C-) . -BUFF-E-R- -- -� - - - AREA (AC.) 31-22-28-0000-00-003 5.61 4.52 10.13 5.14 0.32 31-22-28-0600- 00-004 1 1.74 1 2.44 1 4.18 1 3.02 'L 0.24 1S LS eu PARK / \ PARK #2 / I o I / POOL N %8 C wf 21 �' x121.p9 xt'0.51 xY20.02 ` �\ .` "C11•6110 Ali bD 25' WETLAND BUFFER ' wf 27 WETLAND LINE r' �Q pR0 (BY OTHERS) II tract a 3 cresent lake y0isp lab/ \ I 1 co plat book 36, Page 46 R6 q� AFT / \ ® i. I WALKING TRAIL p owner: wesmere maint. assoc. RfjI S a t, Q x12 0 .06 x1 8.72 I fi 1 x ..'/ %�116.08 8 s \ 1\ POOL ,; � �, (DV = FUTURE PARCEL # 31-22-28-0000-00-003 1 I LAND USE R6' PARK ;; , I�wf23 All,CONSERVATION NTA ; M�� 6' \ \ �!/ I /% v+etland flagged by others //� ZONING O 19. + x 119� 6 1/ 1/7.02 1 2�' ; // rllll PROPOSED , P U D RESIDENTIAL I � G r ! 15 RETAININ /'BARK #5 / DRAINAGE E H TY east Tine of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 of 7 / , / ��� If 24 section 31-22-28 R7. /� / , / ) �tract d v� x/ 7.27 Ali cresent lake - ?.5 plat book 36, page 46 <' �� •. d owner: wesmere maint. assoc. 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN �wf 25 25' FLOODPLAIN BUFFER Oil / f 7 R36' /_ / _ - - --s89°14'11 "w- 662.52' - - x Y wf 26 --11�77� J►� ix wir"nce / south line of north 5 acres of d 12'�L5' the southwest 1/4 of the LI�NG// northwest 1/4 of section 31-22-28 SPA sil, /'/ ••'••',I'' / / /u FUTURE 116/32 1/t 16 wf 27 LAND U S E LDR CONSERVATION // ( not platted 1 / ZONING owner: vivek welfare and educational foundation, inc. 28 `^wfSEWER SERVICE / R1 ®AA 0 li 1. A 4 INCH FORCE MAIN WILL BE EXTENDED FROMI THE BROOKSTONE SUBDIVISION ENTRANCE CD = (PATRIOTS POINT DRIVE) ON WINDERMERE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET, NORTH OF THE l� (A PROJECT SITE TO PROVIDE THE OFFSITE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM. 0) 25' WETLAND BUFFER M a. SEWER DISCHARGE VETERINARY HOSPITAL / PET LODGE: east line rt the northwest 4,c on of the southwest 1/4 50 EMPLOYEES X 5 GPD / EMPLOYEE = 250 GPD of the northwest 1 4, section 31-22-28 a' RETAIL / RESTAURANT: 200 SEATS X 0.1 ERU X 270 GPD / ERU + 1 ERU (RETAIL) X 270 GPD = 670 GPD TOTAL = 5,920 GPD WATER SERVICE / 1 I, 1 / not platted wf 38 owner: lynn marie kruger east line of the west ' of the northwest 1/4 of the of the southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of section 31-22-28 r=763.94' di(, ' 1=424.05' chord bearing n 15'34'56" e delta 31'48'15" ' f r, 1 found iron rod &cap south line of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 Ib ,'6987 `i of the northwest 1/4, section 31-22-28 - - - - s_89°24'59"w - 367.03' I � � I point of commencement sl+, t3'2 Q'e, overall parcel NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED IN THIS BLOCK 08-26-2013 10 REVISED PER CITY OF OCOEE COMMENTS. DATE REVISIONS 71A iiW 4T PUD *COEE, FLORIDA ruiuKt AND USE CONSERVATION COUNTY) ZONING I (COUNTY) ve table chord chord bearing delta 286.63' n25°58'25"e 11'01'16" n25°58'24"e d 11'01'17" d 1. AN 8 INCH LINE WILL BE EXTENDED FROM THE 8ROOKSTONE SUBDIVISION ENTRANCE (PATRIOTS POINT DRIVE) ON WINDERMERE ROAD. APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET NORTH OF THE PROJECT SITE TO PROVIDE THE OFFSITE POTABLE AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. a. WATER DEMAND VETERINARY HOSPITAL / PET LODGE: 50 EMPLOYEES X 5 GPD / EMPLOYEE = 250 GPD RETAIL / RESTAURANT: 200 SEATS (RESTAURANT) X 0.1 ERU / SEAT XI300 GPD / ERU + 1 ERU (RETAIL) X 300 GPD = 6,550 GPD TOTAL = 6,800 GPD NOTE: A WELL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR IRRIGknON PURPOSES. b. FIRE FLOW W o VETERINARY HOSPITAL / PET LODGED TYPE II CONSTRUCTION PER NFPA (APPENDIX Hy-.�-,250 GPM (FIRE SPRINKLED) FOR A 22,857 S.F. BUILDING. USE 50% CREDIT: 1,125 GPM ^ FLORIDA FEG ENGINEERING GROUP Engineering the Future 5127 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32809 Phone: 407-895-0324 Fax: 407-895-0325 www.feg-inc.us SITE DATA PROPERTY LOCATION: 763 WINDERMERE ROAD, WINTER GARDEN, FL 34787 EXISTING PROPERTY ZONING: A-1 (COUNTY) PROPOSED PROPERTY ZONING: PUD EXISTING USE: VACANT FARMLAND FUTURE LAND USE: COMM PROPOSED USE: VETERINARY FACILITY, PET RESORT, RESTAURANT & NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.31 ± ACRES WETLAND AREA: 6.96± ACRES UNIMPACTED FLOODPLAIN AREA: (0.70 UNIMPACTED FLOODPLAIN AREA + 6.96 WETLAND AREA) 7.66± ACRES NET DEVELOPABLE AREA: 6.65± ACRES VETERINARY FACILITY BUILDING (PHASE 1): 22,857 S.F. RETAIL / RESTAURANT BUILDING (PHASE 2): 8,000 S.F. PROPOSED GROSS FLOOR AREA: 30,857 S.F. MAXIMUM ALLOWED GROSS FLOOR AREA: 3.0 PROPOSED TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA: 0.11 BUILDING SETBACKS (REQUIRED) BUILDING SETBACKS VETERINARY FACILITY FRONT IWEST) (WINDERMERE ROAD) 35' FRONT IWEST) (WINDERMERE ROAD)>35' REAR EAST)(WETLAND) 25' REAR EAST)(WETLAND) >25' SIDE NORTH 10' SIDE NORTH) >10' SIDE SOUTH (WETLAND) 25' SIDE SOUTH) >20' MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT HABITABLE SPACE 45'-0" NON -HABITABLE SPACE 49'-5" LANDSCAPE BUFFERS (REQUIRED) FRONT IWEST) (WINDERMERE ROAD)25'** REAR EAST)(WETLAND) NONE SIDE NORTH 10' * SIDE SOUTH (WETLAND) NONE * REQUEST A WAIVER FROM SECTION 5-18 "MEDIUM" BUFFER (25') REQUIREMENT BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL (ADJACENT TO EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY SITE) WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THE SITE CONSISTS OF WETLANDS. ** REQUEST A WAIVER FROM THE (25') BUFFER REQUIREMENT DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF THE WETLAND AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS CREATING A HARDSHIP IN DEVELOPING THE SITE. 923100141 '1 Was . VETERINARY FACILITY (PHASE 1) 1 SPACE / 200 SF 115 SPACES RETAIL / RESTAURANT (8,000 SF PHASE II) 1 SPACE / 200 SF 40 SPACES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 155 SPACES SPACES REQUIRED TO BE RESERVED FOR HANDICAP 6 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED VETERINARY FACILITY (PHASE 1) 117 SPACES RETAIL / RESTAURANT (PHASE 11) 49 SPACES HANDICAP PARKING 7 SPACES TOTAL PARKING P 0 ID D 173 SPACES ITE AREA CALCULATIONS PHASE I VETERINARY FACILITY & PET RESORT BUILDING 22,857 ±S.F. PAVING / PET POOL 63,968 ±S.F. SIDEWALK 4,543 ±S.F. IMPERVIOUS AREA 91,368 ±S.F. 2.10 ±AC. 38.60 % PERVIOUS AREA 145,598 ±S.F. 3.34 ±AC. 61 40 % TOTAL SITE AREA 236,966 ±S.F. 5.44 ±AC. 100.00 % PHASE II RETAIL / RESTAURANT BUILDING 8,000 ±S.F. PAVING 25,547 ±S.F. SIDEWALK / PATIO 4,586 ±S.F. IMPERVIOUS AREA 38,133 ±S.F. 0.88 ±AC. 72.73 % PERVIOUS AREA 14,574 ±S.F. 0.33 ±AC. 27.27 % TOTAL SITE AREA 52,707 ±S.F. 1.21 ±AC. 100.00 % TOTAL PHASES I & IMPERVIOUS AREA 129,501 ±S.F. 2.98 ±AC. 44.66 % PERVIOUS AREA 160,173 ±S.F. 3.67 ±AC. 55 34 % TOTAL SITE AREA 289,674 ±S.F. 6.65 ±AC. 100.00 % MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWED (N D OPABLE 70 IMPERVIOUS COVER PROPOSED 44.66 % MINIMUM OPEN SPACE (NET DEVELOPABLE) 1.3 ±AC. 20 % PERVIOUS AREA COVER PROPOSED 3.68 ±AC. 55.34 % FLOOD ZONE FLOOD ZONE A PER FEMA F.I.R.M. PANEL 12095CO22OF DATE: 09/25 09. BASED ON THE SIMPLIFIED METHOD APPROACH THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION IS ESTIMATED AT ELEVATION 117.5' NAVD 1988. S 0 I LS ) ZO ,SOILS ,)WETLAND SAND, STATEMENT FINE ,�q SA��N''D--,,� SANIBEL MUCK. THERET RE JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS THE PROJECT SITE. THE WETLANDS WILL BE PRESERVED IN A CONSERVATION EASEMENT. THERET AREND ST JURIISDICTIONA WETLA DSVWITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. THE WETLANDS WILL BE PRESERVED IN A CONSERVATION EASEMENT. DESIGNED BCHECKED BY rA DR13 JAA PROJECT NO. 13-034 SCALE 1"=60' DATE AUGUST 2, 2013 SHEET NO. APPROVED BY C-2 JAA SHEET 2 OF 2 FLORIDA ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. I CERTIFICATE No. EB-0006595 JEAN M. ABI-AOUN, P.E. LICENSE NO.45128 13-034 PLANS.dwg •M 11"s M a ff.i MTII • All Sports Memory Care LS-2013-002 !Site Plan I Arbours at Crown Point RZ-13-04-02 PUD Rezoning 8/23/2013IAF '2nd Comments due 09/06/13 Comments sent 07/08/13; DRC Meeting 08/07/13; Scheduled for P&Z on 08/13/13 and City Commission on 08/20/13 & 06/07/13 MR 2nd 09/17/13 Subdivision Arden Park North Phase 2 LS-2013-003 Plan 07/10/13 1AX-08-13-41, RZ-13-1 08-07 & CPA-2013-',Annex, Rez & Barkeritaville 002 CPA 08/28/13 Brynmar Phase 2 LS-2005-001 Plat Review 07/12/13 Brynmar Phase 2 Citrus Medical AF 1 1st ,Comments sent 08/01/13 2nd Comments sent 09/04/13 3rd Approved and Recorded 07/19/13 Comments due 08/29/13 - Tenatively LS-2005-001 Waivers 08/19/13 AF 1st scheduled for City Commission on 09/17/13 LS-99-014 FSP Revision 01/17/13 AF 1st Comments sent 01/30/13 Preliminary Subdivision Plan & Vested City Commission approved 12106111; Vested MR AF Eagle Creek of Ocoee LS-2009-002 Rights 06/30/11 AF 4th Rights Appeal has been settled July 2013. Small Scale Franklin Street Office SS-2013-004 Site Plan 07/11/13 MR 1st Comments sent 08/14/13 Preliminary / On hold pending receipt of the Joinder & F/X Warehouse Complex LS-2007-023 Final Site Plan 05/11/09 BH 4th Consent Forms AX-04-13-38 & RZ- Annexation & Scheduled for P&Z on 08/13113; City Garcia - 424 3rd Street 13-04-04 Rezoning 04/15/13 MR 1st Commission on 09/17/13 & 10/01/13 AX-07-13-39, RZ-13-J Annex, Rez 07-05 & 1-13-SE- Special Heaven Bound Church 019 Exception 07/24/13 AF 1st Comments sent 08/15/13 Special Iglesia Cristiana Sendero De Luz 1-12SE-018 Exception 09/06/12 MR 1st Comments sent 9/25112 Marshall Farms Business Center LS-2009-003 Final Site Plan 12/10/09 AF 2nd Staff Comments sent out 1 /11 /10 AX-04-13-37 & RZ- i Annexation & Scheduled for P&Z on 08113/13; City Medina - 538 1st Street 13-04-03 i Rezoning 04/05/13 MR 1st Commission on 09/17/13 & 10/01/13 Oaks Commerce Center SS-2007-005 Final Site Plan 09/19/11 AF 6th Staff comments sent out 09/28/11 Current Project Report Sept 2013/Review 9/6/2013 1 of 2 ' Small Scale Ocoee Elementary School Site Plan 09/05/13 MR 3rd Comments due 09/20/13 Small Scale Ocoee Health Care Center Addition SS-2013-002 Site Plan 04/24/13 AF 1st ;Comments sent 05/09/13 II Small Scale Paws & Play SS-2013-003 Site Plan 08/15/13 AF 2nd Comments sent 08/29/13 AX-05-010-21 Initial Zoning of j Roberson Road AX & RZ RZ-10-05-04 PUD 05/24/10 j AF 1st Staff comments sent out 6/17/10 Small Scale Site Shoppes at the Village SS-2008-005 Plan 04/23/10 AF 3rd Staff comments sent out 5/24/10 Silver Bend Subdivision :Appeal 12/14/12 MR 1st Appeal being negotiated. Spring Lake Elementary School Site Plan 12/20/12 MR 1st Construction to begin August 2013 AX-07-13-40, RZ-13-Annex, Rez & 07-06 & 2-13-SE- Special Scheduled for P & Z on 09/10/13 & City Strickland LLC 020 Exception 07/29/13 MR 1st Commission on 09/17/13 & 10/01/13 Small Scale Wendy's Restaurant SS-2013-001 Site Plan 06/21/13 AF 3rd Approved 08/07/13 Wendy's Restaurant Plat Review 07/17/13 AF 1st Comments sent 08/13/13 Development Agreement West 50 Commercial LS-2006-005 Amendment 07/15/13 AF 2nd Approved by City Commission 08/20/13 FSP Revision &'', Dev Agreement Scheduled for P&Z on 08113113; City Westyn Bay LS-2000-002 Amendment 05/20/13 MR 1st Commission on 09/17/13 AX-07-10-26 Annexation & Staff Comments sent out 08/03/11; pending Whisper Winds Landscaping RZ-10-11-12 Rezoning 07/13/11 AF 4th submittal of deposit Current Project Report Sept 2013/Review 9/6/2013 2 of 2 Un 1 %n ra a Sri �5�t 2 3 4 6 7 Labor Day CANCELLED ire r ssesswime 1 Cary Hill Closed City Cormnission Hcar—ing 6:00 :1 / Comm./Corgi,, Chambers 1 £am bens HRDB 7: > `Frt aslz t'callcriic> en ter 9 10 11 2 13 14 cl 3 aid Public g 6., f G" 1 1: 0 a-nl. i 30 Chambers @ Bill Breeze 09/17 Agenda penes dace to 09117 Staff Report shoe to 09117 Agenda Published City Clerk. city Manage' 15 16 17 18 19 24 21 Atcvle Parks & Rec. Advisory City Conunission jDark Board 6: i P 7: 51a / Comm. . Rec. Administrative Chambers office VHB (as needed) c r c Friday 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 City Commission Final West Orange Airport Budget I ub'XIC 11e< 14: Code Enforcernent Authority 10:00 / 6 p.11. cOM111. : 0 p / Cormm. Co 'ssion Chambers Chambers Chambers A utuam Begins 29 30 10/01 agenda Items dace to City Clerk