Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-10-2005 Agenda Packetonter of Goor? r . Mayor S. Scott Vandergrift Citv Manager Robert Frank PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY) AGENDA Tuesday, May 10, 2005 CALL TO ORDER A. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum II. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held April 12, 2005 Ill. OLD BUSINESS None IV. NEW BUSINESS I& In A. Ashton Park 1. Substantial Amendment to Ocoee Commons PUD Land Use Plan 2. Amendment to the Final Subdivision Plan for Ashton Park MISCELLANEOUS A. Project Status Report B. May Calendar ADJOURNMENT Commissioners Danny Howell, District 1 Scott Anderson, District 2 Rusty Johnson, District 3 Nancy J. Parker, District 4 7:00 PM (PUBLIC HEARING) NOTE: Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meetings take place on the second Tuesday of every month at 7:00 pm in the Ocoee Commission Chambers in City Hall unless otherwise advertised. Any person who desires to appeal any decision at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. More than one Commissioner may participate or hear discussions regarding a matter which will come before the Commission for action. Also in accordance with Florida Statue 286.26: Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Office of the City Clerk, 150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, FL 34761 (407) 905-3105, 48 hours in advance of the meeting. O:\P & Z\Agendas\2005\May10 2005 P & Z Agenda.doc City of Ocoee • 150 N Lakeshore Drive • Ocoee, Florida 34761 phone: (407) 905-3100 • fax: (407) 656-8504 • www.ci.ocoee.fl.us ITEM NUMBER II. A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting held on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTING AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2005 CALL TO ORDER Acting Chairman McKey called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Following a moment of silent meditation and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, a quorum was declared present. PRESENT: Vice -Chairman McKey, Members Campbell, Keller, Morris, Riffe, Rhodus, Sills, and West. Also present were Community Development Director Wagner, City Attorney Storey, Planning Manager Armstrong, Principal Planner James, Senior Planner Grimms, and Administrative Assistant III Aycock. ABSENT: Chairman Golden who was excused. GUEST: Dennis Foltz, Director of Planning and Coordinating for Orange County Public Schools. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held on Tuesday, March 8, 2005. Member Keller, seconded by Member Campbell, moved to accept the Consent Aqenda as presented. Motion carried 8-0. NEW BUSINESS ELECTION OF OFFICERS Acting Chairman McKey asked for nominations for Chairman. Member West, seconded by Member Keller. moved to nominate Member Jim Golden as Chairman of the Planninq and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 8-0. Acting Chairman McKey asked for nominations for Vice -Chairman. Member Keller. seconded by Member West. moved to nominate Member Rob McKey as Vice - Chairman of the Planninq and Zoninq Commission. Motion carried 8-0. WESMERE PROPERTIES PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN Planning Manager Armstrong presented the staff report for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP) for the Wesmere Properties. The Wesmere Property is located on the east side of Wesmere and Brookestone subdivisions, north of Cross Creek subdivision, and south of the Florida Turnpike. The subject property is comprised of multiple tracts, totaling 100.23 acres, and is currently zoned Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) and General Commercial (C-3). Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 The land use of the property is High Density Residential and Commercial. The proposed project is to be developed with three (3) lots and nine (9) tracts. Lot 1 is proposed to be commercial at the northeast intersection of Tomyn Boulevard and Maguire Road, which will be extended across; Lot 2 is to the east of that and is the master retention pond, which is ±16.99 acres; Lot 3, to the south, is the proposed Village of Wesmere townhomes, which is for about 369 townhomes. A traffic study was submitted for this development, along with the Village of Wesmere townhomes, because most of the lots, other than Lot 1, are vested from concurrency; therefore, only operational improvements were identified. Improvements identified were a northbound right turn lane on Maguire Road at Tomyn Boulevard, as well as intersection improvements on Maguire Road and Tomyn Boulevard including mast arm installations and a turn lane. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on March 15, 2005, and reviewed the PSP. Several issues were presented to the applicant. The DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PSP, subject to the developer making changes on the plans based on written comments raised at DRC. The applicant has revised the plans incorporating all of staff's comments that were presented at the DRC meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Wesmere Property, as date stamped received by the city on April 1, 2005. The Public Hearing was opened Bob Jenson, President of Wesmere HOA, stated his concerns regarding the traffic study submitted for the Wesmere Property. Acting Chairman McKey asked for clarification of Mr. Jenson's dialogue and wanted to know why Wesmere Properties and the Villages of Wesmere were divided. Planning Manager Armstrong said that the project before the board at this time was the overall subdivision plan, which is dividing the lot into the overall tracts and lots. The next item before the board is the individual development of Lot 3, which is the subdivision of the townhomes. There is currently no traffic signal at Wesmere Parkway and the traffic study submitted only pertained to the intersection of Tomyn Boulevard and Maguire Road. She recently spoke with the traffic consultants and they felt a traffic study was not warranted at this time for the Wesmere subdivision. Member Riffe asked why the Wesmere subdivision and Maguire Road area was not included in the recent traffic study. Community Development Director Wagner stated that the City's traffic consultant does perform annual traffic counts and knows how much traffic is on Maguire Road currently. He said that the traffic study performed for this project was site specific at where the traffic generated by this development would specifically be, which was the intersection of Maguire Road and Tomyn Boulevard. Community Development Director 2 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 Wagner agreed with Mr. Jenson's comments that the Wesmere subdivision creates a lot of heavy traffic at peak hours and said the board would be able to require another traffic study of this specific section of Maguire Road as a condition of the Final Site Plan, whereas this is only the PSP. Mr. Wagner added that further traffic improvements would be done when the commercial sites come in. Member Campbell asked if the intersection in front of Wesmere subdivision on Maguire Road and that of Tomyn Boulevard are too close together. Denver Marlow, Madden Engineering, representing the overall property owner, asked the board to make the new traffic study a condition of the following stage, not the PSP they are referring to currently. Community Developer Director Wagner pointed out that the townhomes are causing most of the impact at this point. There are no entitlements for the commercial parcels and they have been restricted to any further development and are required to come back for the PSP and further traffic analysis on Lot 1. He said that tonight's main focus was on the townhome project. The Public Hearing was closed. Member West, seconded by Member Keller, moved to recommend approval of the Preliminary Site Plan for Wesmere Properties, Proiect LS-2004-020. Motion carried 8-0. Villaaes of Wesmere — Preliminary Subdivision Plan Planning Manager Armstrong presented the staff report for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP) for the Villages of Wesmere. This property is located on Lot 3 of the Wesmere Property on the east side of Maguire Road, north of Cross Creek subdivision and south of the Tomyn Boulevard extension. The subject property comprises 369 fee -simple townhome lots, totaling 49.48 acres. The property is zoned Multiple -Family Dwelling (R-3) and is designated as High Density Residential. Access into the property will be from Maguire Road across from Wesmere Parkway, as well as the north side of the property at the Tomyn Boulevard extension. It will be a gated community and has proposed to have decorative metal swing gates. The traffic study performed for the Wesmere Properties holds true for this property as well. Recreational amenities proposed for the development include the following: multi -purpose field, volleyball, tennis, basketball court, swimming pool, tot -lot, and a clubhouse. Visitor parking is proposed through out the project, as well as a one -car garage for each unit and a parking stall within the driveway. Sidewalks are provided through out the development as well as along Tomyn Boulevard outside of the project. The Cross Creek subdivision backs up to this project on the southern boundary and a six (6) foot high tan vinyl fence is proposed to be installed by the developer. In addition, a 15' preserved tree buffer is proposed between the fence and the townhome units in accordance with the Land Development code, Article 5, Section 5-18 (a). The remainder of the perimeter of the property is enclosed with a 6' high masonry brick wall with portions containing decorative metal railings. Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 An easement is provided to be dedicated to the City for the existing access road to the City's south water plant, located adjacent to the southeast corner of the property. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on March 15, 2005 and reviewed the Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP). Staff discussed with the applicant outstanding comments from the Fire Marshal, Renaissance Planning Group (RPG) and the Planning Division, which were identified in written form to the committee and the applicant. The DRC voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PSP, subject to the developer making changes on the plans based on written comments raised at DRC and the traffic impact analysis being completed and approved by the city and RPG prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the PSP for Wesmere Property, as date stamped received by the City on April 1, 2005. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Orange County School Planner Foltz inquired if the road that runs along the south side of the property that goes to the water treatment plant has a crash gate or anything that enables it to be an emergency entrance/exit. Community Development Director Wagner said that they have had meetings with the School Board regarding this subject and said the School Board was originally looking for access through the development for school buses. He said the roadway was left into the water treatment plant as a separate roadway and the City would try to work out something with the School Board when they came in with their site plan at a later date. For the final analysis of this subject project, the School Board only asks for a pedestrian connection, which they have. He further added that the School Board has an acquisition agreement with the Developer and any concerns should be discussed with the Developer. Planning Manager Armstrong showed the board pictures of the appearance of the proposed homes. Orange County School Planner Foltz asked what the time frame would be on the completion of this development. Jonathon White stated the developing would begin once final engineering is complete and the project should be complete in approximately six (6) months. Acting Chairman McKey asked what the impact of this development would be on the population of children in the area. Orange County School Planner Foltz estimated that, with about 365 three -bedroom units, approximately 180 total children would come into the area and half of those would be elementary school children. Member Keller inquired if the proposed sidewalk on the southern side of the property, to be used as the passageway for the children to school, could be widened from 4' to 6'. Planning Manager Armstrong said that was something that could be looked at. Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 The Public Hearing was opened. Jon Walls, Miller -Legg Consultants, said the initial plan for the development was to have tile roofing. However, the applicant asks for a waiver of the the roof request because of the current demand in the industry for the clay tile. He assured the board that if they could acquire the tile they would use that for the roofs; however, if they were unable to acquire the tile, then they would use high-grade architectural shingles. Discussion ensued and it was decided that this issue should be decided upon at the Final Subdivision Plan. The Public Hearing was closed. Member Keller asked what the reason was for not putting a gate in the proposed recreation area, rather than to the water treatment plant. Community Development Director Wagner said that this was discussed between the developer and the Orange County School Board and the School Board said they did not need this access gate because there was no site plan for the school yet. Member Keller, seconded by Member Campbell, moved to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for the Wesmere Properties, Proiect LS-2004-010, as date stamped received by the Citv on April 1, 2005. subiect to the additional conditions that the sidewalk on the south side of Street I, between Street J and G. be widened to 6 feet and that a traffic signal warrant analysis be conducted for the intersection of Maguire Road and Wesmere Parkwav prior to the approval of the Final Subdivision Plan. Motion carried 8-0. PLANTATION GROVES, PHASE 3, LOT 2 — LARGE SCALE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Planning Manager Armstrong presented the staff report for the Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) for Plantation Grove, Phase 3, Lot 2. The Plantation Grove subdivision is located on the northeast corner of Maguire Road and Moore Road, with Phase 3, Lot 2 being located directly south of the Publix Shopping Center, east of the Hess gas station. The subject property comprises a single lot totaling 7.94 acres, is zoned commercial Planned Unit Development (PUD) and designated as Commercial. The site plan is indicative that the property will be developed into four (4) phases. Phase 1 is proposed to include a 21,520 square foot General Business building with approximately 13 tenant spaces; Phase 2 is proposed to include a 3,820 square foot AmSouth Bank, with five (5) drive-thru lanes; Phase 3 is proposed to include a 6,000 square foot high -quality restaurant; and Phase 4 is proposed to include a 8,000 square foot building, which will function as either a restaurant, retail or daycare use. The out parcels will not be sold fee -simple, but will be leased. Access into the subject site will be provided from Moore Road, with a single lane entering the project and two lanes exiting the project (left turn lane and right turn lane). Additionally, there will be an access provided through the subject property to Maguire Road to the west and to the Publix shopping center to the north. The Developer is requesting three (3) waivers: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 1. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Art. VI, Sec. 6-14, C, (1), (b), ii, which requires that smaller commercial structures and out parcels situated along primary and secondary roadways will not dominate the street frontage and shall be restricted to no more than 50% of the linear roadway frontage within a planned commercial development or subdivision. The justification indicates that no out parcels will ever be created from the lease site boundaries per the Conditions of Approval. 2. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Art. VI, Sec. 6-14, C, (1) (b), iv, which requires that no more than two (2) out parcels within the same planned development shall abut each other along primary or secondary street frontages, although any number of out parcels may front on internal streets within a commercial subdivision. The justification indicates that no out parcels will ever be created from the lease site boundaries per the Conditions of Approval. 3. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Art. V, Section 5-18, (b), which requires a 'medium buffer' comprising a 25' landscape buffer between commercial residential. The justification indicates that they will utilize a 6' high wall in conjunction with landscaping, in addition to a large storm water pond. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on March 15, 2005, and reviewed the Large Scale Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP). Staff discussed with the applicant the outstanding comments from Foley and Lardner and the Planning Division, which were identified in written form to the committee and the applicant. The DRC unanimously to recommend approval of the Large Scale PSP, subject to the developer making changes on the plans based on written comments raised at DRC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Large Scale Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Plantation Grove, Phase 3, Lot 2, as date stamped received by the City on April 1, 2005. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Acting Chairman McKey asked for clarification of the first waiver. Planning Manager Armstrong stated that the out parcels would not be sold; only leased. There are already out parcels existing that are already developed and they felt they should ask for the waiver to be consistent. Dennis Foltz asked if this project was an extension of the Publix shopping center, and if so, is the canopy going to extend that structure further south to make it look like one building. Planning Manager Armstrong said their proposed design would be consistent with that of the existing Plantation Grove Shopping Center. The public hearing was opened. As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed. 6 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 Member Camabell, seconded by Member West, moved to recommend approval of the Plantation Grove, Phase 3, Lot 2, Large Scale Preliminary Site Plan, Protect LS-2004-012, as date stamped approved by the Citv on April 1, 2005. Motion carried 8-0. INGRAM TRAILS — PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN Senior Planner Grimms presented the staff report for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP) for Ingram Trails, which includes approximately 20.482 acres. The subject property is located on the southwest side of Ingram Road near the intersection of Ingram Road and Clarcona- Ocoee Road. The West Orange Trail runs along the south and west boundaries of the subject property. The proposed subdivision will be developed in one phase and consist of 55 single-family residential lots with a typical lot size of 9,000 square feet and a minimum living area of 1,400 square feet. Sidewalks for the approximately 36 students and others will be provided along both sides of all internal streets. A 6' sidewalk will also be installed along the subdivision where it fronts on Ingram Road. This subdivision will not be gated. There will be a 6' brick wall with appropriate landscaping on both sides of the entrance with the wall extending northward along Ingram Road to the north boundary of the subdivision and southward along Ingram Road to the southeast tip of the property boundary near the Clarcona-Ocoee Road/Ingram Road intersection. Both retention ponds will be dry and not required to be fenced since they will be 5:1 slope. A park will be provided at the north end of the subdivision and will include a tot lot and a 250 square foot permanent outdoor meeting space in the form of a gazebo. Ingram Trails subdivision will have one access point from Ingram Road with a left turn lane into the subdivision. Ingram Road contains a 60' wide right-of-way from Clarcona-Ocoee Road northward to McCormick Road. The developer is not dedicating any additional land on the west side of Ingram Road for future widening; however, the developer will construct the following improvement: Ingram Road shall be improved to a paved 24' wide curb and gutter roadway section as shown on the PSP. Paving of Ingram Road from the northern tip of the property to the southern tip of the property was a situation in this project's Annexation Agreement. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the Ingram Trails Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP) on March 15, 2005. The DRC discussed some minor comments from the Planning Division and the developer has made the recommended changes and has submitted a revised set of plans. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the PSP for Ingram Trails Subdivision, as date stamped received by the City on April 6, 2005. Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Acting Chairman McKey inquired if there was an aluminum fencemith brick columns along the retention pond. Senior Planner Grimms said that Staff has requested a fence on the northeast and south side of the retention pond at the Clarcona-Ocoee Road/Ingram Road intersection and the developer has agreed to that. Orange County Schools Planner Foltz mentioned that the Orange County School Board would be building a middle school on the north side of Cemetery Road and asked if there could be an outlet from the proposed subdivision for students to access the West Orange Trail. Discussion ensued regarding the access gate and its benefit to the community. Tom Daly, Daly Design Group, answered regarding access to the West Orange Trail by saying that it would be a possibility. However, the access gate would have to remain locked at all times because of security purposes of the gated community in subject. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding an access gate and connection of sidewalk to the West Orange Trail. The Public Hearing was closed. Member West, seconded by Member Keller, moved to aDDrove the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Inaram Trails Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Proiect LS-2004-019, as date stamped approved by the Citv on April 6, 2005. Motion carried 8-0. ABC FINE WINES AND SPIRITS, STORE NO. 52 — ANNEXATION AND REZONING Senior Planner James presented the Staff Report for the Annexation and Rezoning for ABC Fine Wines and Spirits, Store No. 52. The property is located 575 feet west of the intersection of Bluford Avenue and Colonial Drive/State Road 50 on the north side of Colonial Drive. The subject property is made up of two parcels, consisting of approximately 2.4 acres, which are adjacent to the current ABC Liquor Store. The properties are vacant and the proposed land use is the expansion of the current ABC Liquor Store. The area surrounding the subject property is all commercial, currently zoned as Community Commercial (C-2) and General Commercial (C-3). The applicant is requesting an initial zoning classification of C-2, which is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the JPA Land Use Map. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on March 29, 2005, and reviewed the Annexation and Rezoning for ABC Fine Wines and Spirits, Store No. 52. Based on the above analysis and subsequent discussions, the DRC recommended the annexation of the ABC Fine Wines and Spirits to the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to the execution of the proposed Annexation Agreement. The proposed annexation agreement addresses traffic access as follows: • Dedication of 25 foot of right-of-way along the property abutting Bluford Avenue; • Joint access and cross access with the Floors Direct property to the west; • Conditional cross access with the Seven -Eleven (7-11) property to the east; • Alignment of the Bluford Avenue access with the Villages of Lake Bennett property to the east; and Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 The construction of a north bound left turn lane on Bluford Avenue of sufficient length to allow for storage of vehicles turning into the ABC site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the annexation and initial zoning of C-2: Community Commercial for ABC Fine Wines and Spirits, subject to the execution of the proposed Annexation Agreement. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Member Riffe asked if the store -front would be on Bluford Avenue or Colonial Drive/State Road 50. Senior Planner James said that it would still be facing Colonial Drive/State Road 50; however, the store is only proposing to expand the store and create a cross access. Member Riffe asked why a left turn from Bluford Avenue was necessary. Discussion ensued and Community Development Director Wagner stated Colonial Drive/State Road 50 is proposed to expand and there will not be a turn lane from Colonial Drive/State Road 50 anymore. Once that happens the access from Bluford Avenue would be very necessary. The Public Hearing was opened. Ralph Mockney, Owner of Seven -Eleven (7-11), asked if the current left turn lane from Bluford Avenue into Seven -Eleven (7-11) would still remain. Community Development Director Wagner said the left turn lane would be 700 feet north of the intersection with a dual left turn lane heading south. A median separator would be all of the way across; Therefore, a left turn access would not be available into the Seven -Eleven (7-11) once such improvements are made. Ralph Mockney declared this would create a hardship for the business coming into his store. Community Development Director Wagner suggested that he speak to and work out a deal with ABC Liquor Store in order to gain access into Seven -Eleven (7-11) through their proposed entrance drive. John Kelly, ABC Fine Wine and Spirits, 1505 E. Colonial Drive, said once the Villages of Lake Bennet were built all of the local businesses would benefit from the cross access intersection on Bluford Avenue. He further stated that he would entertain talking to Mr. Mockney regarding working out access for the Seven -Eleven (7-11) Store. The Public Hearing was closed. Member Campbell, seconded by Member Keller. moved to recommend approval of the Annexation and Zoninq for ABC Fine Wines and Spirits. Store No. 52, Proiect Number AX-04- 05-18, subiect to the execution of the proposed Annexation Agreement. Motion carried 8-0. MCCORMICK WOODS. PHASE 3 — ANNEXATION. JOINT PLANNING AGREEMENT LAND USE AMENDMENT. SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. AND REZONING. Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 City Attorney Storey announced a disclosure that Foley & Lardner LLP represents the property owner for McCormick Woods project; therefore, he would be unable to advise the City on any matters relating to that project. Senior Planner James presented the Staff Report for McCormick Woods, Phase 3. The subject property is located west of the existing McCormick Woods subdivision and east of the Western Beltway/SR 429. He explained that Phases 1 and 2 have caused Phase 3 to be landlocked; therefore, the entrance to Phase 3 would have to be through the existing McCormick Woods subdivision to the east. The property size is approximately 9.86 acres. Upon the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which will take the property from Institutional to Low Density Residential with the FLUM and the JPA Map, the annexation would be consistent with the surrounding zoning of R-1-A: Single Family Dwelling. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the McCormick Woods, Phase 3, on March 29, 2005. The DRC recommended approval of the annexation, subject to the agreement concerning the roadway access to this landlocked parcel. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis and the DRC recommendation, Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following actions, subject to the verification that the applicant provided an access easement signed by the legal entity that owns McCormick Woods Phases 1 and 2 permitting access through the private streets in Phases 1 and 2. • Annexation of the parcel into the City of Ocoee; • Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing the future land use classification from "Public Facilities/Institutional' to "Low Density Residential'; • Rezoning the parcel, from Orange County "Public Facilities/Institutional' to City of Ocoee "R-1-A: Single Family Dwelling"; and • Joint Planning Agreement Amendment changing the Joint Planning Area Land Use Map classification from "Institutional" to "Low Density Residential'. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Member Campbell inquired if the subject parcel would be part of the Crown Point PUD, since the recreational facilities had been mentioned. Senior Planner James said that the recreational facilities were only mentioned because the citizens would be able to use those facilities. Member Campbell asked if when the Preliminary Site Plan came in for this development if their own recreational facilities would have to be included or not. Senior Planner James said there would be no waiver on that in the future. The Public Hearing was opened. As there were no comments, the Public Hearing was closed. Member West, seconded by Member Keller, moved to recommend approval of McCormick Woods, Phase 3, for (1) the annexation of the Darcel into the Citv of Ocoee: (2) the Small Scale 10 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 12, 2005 comprehensive Dian amendment, changing the future land use classification from Public Facilities/Institutional to Low Density Residential: (3) the rezoning of the parcel from Orange Countv Public Facilities/Institutional to Sinale Familv Dwelling: and (4) the JPA Amendment chanqinq the Joint Planning Area Land Use MaD from Institutional to Low Densitv Residential. all subiect to the aDDlicant Drovidinq an access easement assigned by the legal entitv owning McCormick Woods, Phases 1 and 2. Dermittina access throuah the private streets through Phases 1 and 2. Motion carried 8-0. MISCELLANEOUS Community Development Director Wagner informed the Planning and Zoning Commission that the recommendation they made to the City Commission on the Villages of Lake Bennet was taken. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Attest: APPROVED: Holly Aycock, Administrative Assistant I I I Rob McKey, Acting Chairman ITEM NUMBER IV. A PUBLIC HEARING Ashton Park Substantial Amendment to Ocoee Commons PUD Land Use Plan Amendment to the Final Subdivision Plan for Ashton Park Mayor S. Scott Vandergrift Citv Manager Robert Frank STAFF REPORT TO: The Planning and Zoning Commission Commissioners Danny Howell, District. 1 Scott Anderson, District 2 Rusty Johnson, District 3 Nancy J. Parker, District 4 FROM: J. Antonio Fabre, Senior Planner )0 THROUGH: Russ Wagner, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: May 5, 2005 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Ocoee Commons PUD & Ashton Park FSP Project # AP-02-02-01 & AP-02-03-0 1 AA Commission District # 2 — Scott Anderson ISSUE: Should the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Amendment to the Ocoee Commons PUD and Ashton Park FSP? BACKGROUND: The Ocoee Commons PUD, which encompasses +/-74 acres, was originally approved by the City Commission on March 18, 2003. The Ocoee Common PUD, which includes "Ashton Park" the single-family dwelling subdivision approved by the City Commission on April 6, 2004, is located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of State Road 50 and Blackwood Avenue. The Applicant is requesting amendments to certain Conditions of Approval for the existing Ocoee Commons PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan. The amendments are comprised of changes to certain residential lots (rear building setback, maximum impervious area and maximum building coverage) in the Ashton Park subdivision. In addition, a redefinition of the conservation tract for the Ocoee Commons PUD will also be incorporated in order to ensure a City dedicated "nature trail' system will be incorporated in the future. The Ocoee Commons PUD property has a mix of future land use designations: a Commercial designation over the portion of the property located south of Shoal Creek, a Conservation designation over the Shoal Creek wetland area, and a Low Density Residential designation over the portion of the property located north of Shoal Creek. The Planning and Zoning Commission May 10, 2005 Page 2 of 3 The northern portion of the Ocoee Commons property is bounded on the east by the Hammocks subdivision (R-1AA zoning), on the north by the Highlands subdivision (R-1AA zoning) as well as some other single-family homes (R-1AA zoning), and on the west by the Shoal Creek subdivision (R-1AA zoning). South of Shoal Creek, the property is bounded on the east by a large wetland area that is part of the Shoal Creek system (C-2 zoning) and it is bounded on the west by a large vacant parcel (R-3 zoning) and the Lake Bennett Center (C-2 zoning). DISCUSSION: As indicated above, this amendment will essentially change certain Condition of Approval in the previously approved Ocoee Commons PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan. This amendment to the PUD Land Use Plan can be better explained in two parts. First, the Applicant is requesting to change the previously approved rear building setback from 30 feet to 25 feet in the single-family portion of the PUD (Ashton Park). Certain residential lots (8-12, 52-58 and 63-67) will remain with the previously approved 30 feet rear building setback. Due to the requested shorter setbacks, the applicant is also proposing additional privacy fence along the lots that abut neighboring residential lots impacted by the proposed setback. It should also be noted that lot 1-7 was already approved for a rear building setback of 25 feet. Furthermore, it is requested that the maximum impervious area increase from 50% to 55% on the residential lots. Certain residential lots (8-12, 29, 36, 40, 42, 45, 63-67 and 70-73) will remain with the previously approved maximum impervious surface area of 50%. Finally, it is also requested that the maximum building coverage increase from 35% to 45% for all single- family residential lots. Ultimately, the approval of the requested actions will allow the homebuilder greater flexibility in the options, size, and configuration of homes that they can offer to potential buyers. Second, a greater redefinition of the conservation tract that has been dedicated to the City will be incorporated in order to reflect the City dedicated "nature trail" system. Specifically, the developer is delineating the division of the "Conservation Area" (Tract N), into two (2) smaller tracts. The Conservation Area, which consists of approximately 9.77 acres of land, will separate a smaller tract approximately 1.23 acres of land into a "Passive Recreation" tract (Tract N1). This ensures that the wetland mitigation for St. Johns River Water Management District (SJWMD) is consolidated solely on the Conservation Area. The Passive Recreation tract (Tract N1) has been dedicated for passive recreation and for a future nature trail system. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The proposed Ocoee Commons PUD Amendment and the Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan Amendment were both reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on April 29, 2005. According to the City's Land Development Code, alterations to an approved PUD Land Use Plan shall be classified as either substantial or nonsubstantial by the DRC. The Committee determined that the proposed amendment was considered a substantial amendment due to the criteria established in the City's Land Development Code. Accordingly, the proposed substantial amendment will be presented at a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and public hearings before the City Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission May 10, 2005 Page 3 of 3 There was only one outstanding issue to be addressed from the Planning Division that was identified in the staff memorandum. Additionally, staff suggested that the developer provide new drawings that graphically enhance and illustrate the requested actions for requisite presentations. When the discussion was finished, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed Amendment to the Ocoee Commons PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan. The plans for both the Ocoee Commons PUD Amendment and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan Amendment have now been revised to address all the concerns that were discussed at the DRC meeting. For your review and consideration, the packet contains the effected sheets (only) in a bubble, strikethrough and underline format. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the recommendation of the DRC, Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Amendment to the Ocoee Commons PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan both date stamped received by the City on May 4, 2005. Attachments: Public Hearing Notice Ocoee Common PUD Location Map Ocoee Common PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan as date stamped received by the City on May 4, 2005. Amendments to the Ocoee Common PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdivision Plan LU MC� — -Uj i Y I-- Ica w -� MAINE SED�LI O w O nAll �I I1 �111 l I I I 1 o o Yrj U Q m SR 50 (W. COLONIAL DR) Copy of Public Hearing Advertisement Date Published #IS indw Advertisement Cm OF OCOM M0710E OF FMIX 11EAWM8 . ON THE- -- Amendment to the Ocoee Common PUD/Ashton Park final Subdivision Plan AP-02.02-01 AP-02-WJAA The Planning"and Zoning Commis- sion will review and may make a decision concerning the proposed Amendmend fa the Ocoee Camtnals PUD and AsMon Park Final, Subdi- vision Plan based uppoon its confor. mance with the reau#rements of the Ocoee Land Development Code and the recommendation of the Devel. opment Review Committee; The complete case file, lncluding a complete legal description by metes and bounds, may be Inspected at the Ocoee Community Development Department,150 North Lakeshore Drive, Ocoee, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except le- gal haildo". The Planning and Zoning Commis - 'soon may continue the public hear- ings to other dates and times, as it deems necessary. Any Interested Party shall be advised that the dates, Times, and places of any com tinuaHwi of these or continued pub- lic hearings shall be announced dur- ing the hearings and that no further notices regarding these matters wlII a pubi3stred. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard with respect to the proposed amendment to the Ocoee Commons PUD and Ashton Park Final Subdi. vision Plan. Any Person wishing to appeal any decision'made during the Public hearings will need a re- cord of the proceedings and for this purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the Proceedings j Is made which includes the testimo- ny and evidence upon which the ap- peat is based. Persons with disabill- i ties needing assistance to Participate In any of the proceed- Inss should contact the City Clerk's Office 48 hours ln,advonce of the meetinOW1407i 905=31a5; Beth EIkenberry, City Clerk l` giSb1.w61 +l2810a 1. STATEMENT ......._..... ., ��.. 11 . I I 111.����,...�....�.'....... OF INTENT: ,��... ........... I ...''Ill. I __._ . _...,... ., THE APPLICANT REQUESTS FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE OCOEE COMMONS PUD AND FOR TRACTS A AND B, THE SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION AREA KNOWN AS ASHTON PARK. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SET FORTII BY THE CITY AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION AT THEIR DECEMBER 16, 2003 MEETING. SUBDIVISIONl INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE UTILITIES, PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND PRIVATE CROSS -ACCESS DRIVES, STATE ROAD 50 DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS, TURN LANES, AND A TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, AND A "MASTER" STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS WILL SERVE THE VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT . TRACTS WITHIN THE PUD. THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS A ANTI . B, ASHTON PARK SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION CONCURRENTLY WITH PUD IMPROVEMENTS. 2. SITE AREAS: A. PUD DEVELOPMENT AREA 74.29 ACRES 3. LAND USE: A. PROPOSED LAND USE: TRACT LAND ZONING AREA % OF FUTURE DESIGNATION USE EOUIVALENT (ACRES) SITE OWNER PHASE A SINGLE-FAMILY Rl-AA 13.104 17.6% DEVELOPER 1 RESIDENTIAL . B SINGLE-FAMILY Rl-AA 8.784 11.8% DEVELOPER 1 RESIDENTIAL C MULTI -FAMILY R-3 14.438 19.4% DEVELOPER 3 RESIDENTIAL . DI COMMERCIAL C-2 3.796 5.1% DEVELOPER 2 D2 COMMERCIAL C-2 ' 1.534 2.1% DEVELOPER 2 E OFFICE/COMMERCIAL C-2 1.632 2.2% DEVELOPER 3 F COMMON AREA- PUD 0.238 0.3% HOMEOWNERS RECREATION AREA ASSOCIATION i GI COMMON AREA -NORTHEAST PUD 2.324 3.1% HOMEOWNERS STORMWATER RETENTION ASSOCIATION I G2 COMMON AREA -SOUTHEAST PUD 2.260 3.0% PROPERTY OWNERS STORMWATER RETENTION ASSOCIATION 1 Hi COMMON AREA -NORTHWEST PUD. 1.136 1.5% PROPERTY OWNERS STORMWATER RETENTION ASSOCIATION I H2 COMMON AREA- PUD 0 0.431 0.6 /o PROPERTY OWNERS COMMERCIAL TRACTS ASSOCIATION I COMMON OPEN SPACE I COMMON AREA -SOUTHWEST PUD 0.435 0.6% PROPERTY OWNERS STORMWATER RETENTION ASSOCIATION 1 J COMMON AREA -SINGLE PUD 0.065 0.1% HOMEOWNERS FAMILY SUBDIVISION - ASSOCIATION 1 ENTRY FEATURE K FUTURE CITY ROAD PUD- 0.805 1.1% CITY OF OCOEE N/A RIGHT-OF-WAY LI MONTGOMERY AVE-CITY PUD 1.324 1.8% CITY OF OCOEE 1 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY L2 MONTGOMERY AVE.-CITY PUD 1.389 1.9% CITY OF OCOEE 1 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY L3 MONTGOMERY AVE.-CITY PUD 0.657 0.9% CITY OF OCOEE 1 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY L4 CITY SERVICES PUD 0.186 0.3% CITY OF OCOEE 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY L5 CITY SERVICES PUD 0.208 0.3% CITY OF OCOEE 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY M BLACKWOOD AVE.-CITY PUD 0.880 1.2% CITY OF OCOEE 1 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY N CONSERVATION AREA PUD 9:574 8.542 13.2% 11.5% CITY OF OCOEE 1 Ni PASSIVE RECREATION PUD 1.232 1.7% CITY OF OCOEE I ` O CONSERVATION AREA PUD 2.050 2.8% CITY OF OCOEE 1 P COMMON AREA -SOUTH - PUD 1.983 2.7% COMMERCIAL ', , STORMWATER RETENTION ASSOCIATION 1 Q COMMERCIAL C-2 4.859 6.5% DEVELOPER 2 TOTALS 74.292 100.0% B. OCOEE COMMONS PUD W ILL BE A MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT CONTAINING SINGLE-FAMILY, MULTI -FAMILY, AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED WITHIN AN AREA HAVING A COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RESULTS DEMONSTRATE THAT THE OVERALL IMPACT OFTHE PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL IS LESS THAN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IF IT WERE DEVELOPED AS E LAND • LTI-FAM ILY RESIDENTIAL IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE COMMERCIAL USES. EVENTHO UGH i\IU • USE DESIGNATION, THE INTENT OFTHE OCOEE STATE ROAD 50 ACTIVITY CENTER SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS BEING MET WITH THIS PUD PLAN BY ENCOURAGING MIXED/MULTIPLE USES ALLOWING A PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND REDUCING THE PROJECT'S TRAFFIC IMPACT ON ADJACENT STREETS. PROVISIONS OF THE PUD PLAN WILL REQUIRE BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CROSS -ACCESS BETWEEN MULTI -USE PUD TRACTS THEMSELVES AS WELL AS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ADJACENTTO THE PUD. EXTENSIVE PLANNING EFFORTS AND COOPERATION BY THE APPLICANT WILL ASSURE THE CITY'S FUTURE ROADWAY PLANS WILL BE MET THROUGH THE DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF CITY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. 4. DETAILED LAND USE BREAKDOWN: . A. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACT: EQUIVALENT CITY ZONING R-IAA, SINGLE FAMILY GROSS AREA 21.88 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS 75 LOTS NET DENSITY 3.4 LOTS/ACRES MINIMUM LOT SIZE 9,000 SF MINIMUM LIVING FLOOR AREA 1,800 SF SETBACKS: FRONT 25 FEET SIDE 7.5 FEET REAR 30.25 FEET REAR - TRACT "A", LOTS 8-12 AND TRACT "B". LOTS 52-58 AND 63-67 2.5 30 FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH (AT BUILDING SETBACK): 75 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET PROJECTED SCHOOL AGE POPULATION (0.50 STUDENTS/LOT) 38 STUDENTS MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA 50% 55% LOT MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA TRACT "A", LOTS 8-12, TRACT "B". LOTS 29. 36, 40. 42, 45. 63-67, AND 70-73 50% LC;f MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 35% 45% LOT B. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA: EQUIVALENT CITY ZONING R-3, MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING GROSS AREA 14.44 ACRES MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS 175 UNITS DENSITY 11 UNITS/ACRES (INCLUDING TRACT "C" +TRACT "G2"AREAS) TYPE OF DWELLINGS TOWNHOUSES OR CONDOMINIUMS OWNERSHIP FEE SIMPLE EACH UNIT MINIMUM LIVING FLOOR AREA 1,200 SF SETBACKS: FRONT (3-STORY) 35 FEET SIDE 10 FEET REAR (3-STORY) 40 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 3 STORIES, 35 FEET PROJECTED SCHOOL AGE POPULATION (0.25 STUDENTS/UNIT) 45 STUDENTS MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA 70% LOT MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 40% LOT C. COMMERCIAL AREA: _ EQUIVALENT CITY ZONING C-2, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT GROSS AREA 11.90 ACRES GROSS FLOOR AREA (1sT FLOOR BUILDING AREA) 110,000 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - 1ST FLOOR ONLY 21.2% GROSS FLOOR AREA (BUILDING AREA ALL FLOORS) 131,500 SF SETBACKS: FRONT - STATE ROAD 50 50 FEET FRONT -LOCAL STREET 35 FEET SIDE 10 FEET REAR 20 FEET REAR ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL 50 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 45 FEET MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA . 80% LOT 5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: A. SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING 2.0 SPACES/UNIT U-) o_ N B. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2.25 SPACES/UNIT e.n C. OFFICE: 0= PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (EXCLUDING DOCTORS) 1 SPACE/250 SF �OFFICE BUILDING 1 SPACE/300 SF MEDICAL OFFICE i SPACE/200 SF D. COMMERCIAL RETAIL: FOOD STORE, SUPER MARKET AND DRUG STORE 1 SPACE/200 SF : CONVENIENCE STORE 1 SPACE/100 SF . NONSTORAGE AREA RESTAURANT 1 SPACE/4 FIXED SEATS PLUS 1 SPACE/75 SF PATRON USE FLOOR AREA NOT CONTAINING FIXED SEATING DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT 10 PARKING SPACES PLUS 1 SPACE/10 SF OF FLOOR SPACE (NOT DINING) FUNERAL HOME i SPACE/4 SEATS IN CHAPEL, PLUS 1 SPACE/COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SERVICE STATION 3 SPACES/SERVICE BAY OTHER COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS 1 SPACE/200 SF FIRST FLOOR AREA PLUS i SPACE/300 SF OF EACH FLOOR ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR E. OFF-STREET LOADING SHALL BE REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS: - OVER 10,000 SF BUT UNDER 25,000 1 LOADING SPACE - OVER 25,000 SF BUT UNDER 60,000 2 LOADING SPACES : - OVER 60,000 SF BUT UNDER 120,000 3 LOADING SPACES . 6. 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE: PER FIRM PANEL NO. 120179 0220 E, A PORTION OF THE SITE, 11.67 ACRES, LIES WITHIN ZONE "AE", A 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA. THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE LIES WITHIN ZONE "X", AREA OF MINIMAL FLOODING. 7. WETLANDS: A. SITE CONTAINS TWO (2) AREAS, TOTALING 6.45 ACRES, WHICH ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE BASED ON FIELD INSPECTION AND FLAGGING BY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING GROUP AND FIELD LOCATED BY ACCURIGHT SURVEYS. THE MAJORITY OF THIS AREA, 5.40 ACRES, WILL REMAIN UNDISTURBED WITHIN A PLATTED CONSERVATION TRACT. B. THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPOSES A WETLAND ENCROACHMENT, 1.10 ACRES, NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION ROADWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHIN JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND LIMITS REQUIRES ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT/ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS PERMIT APPROVAL. C. A WETLAND IMPACT MITIGATION PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN THAT FIRST SHOWS WETLANDS IMPACT,TO BE APPROVED BYTHE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF OCOEE PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN. 8. SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS: PER THE ORANGE COUNTY SCS SOILS SURVEY, SITE SOILS ARE CLASSIFIED AS FOLLOWS: , 4 = CANDLER FINE SANDS, 0-12% SLOPES, HYDROLOGIC GROUP A - 6 = CANDLER-APOPKA FINE SANDS, 5-12% SLOPES, HYDROLOGIC GROUP A 34 = POMELLO FINE SANDS, 0-5% SLOPES, HYDROLOGIC GROUP C 41 = SAMSULA-HONTOON-BASINGER ASSOCIATION, LESS THAN 1% SLOPES, HYDRO B/D 46 = TA VARES FINE SANDS, 0-5% SLOPES, HYDROLOGIC GROUP A 47 = TAVARES-MILLHOPPER FINE SANDS, 0-5% SLOPES, HYDROLOGIC GROUP A 9. UTILITIES: A. WATER SERVICE: - CITY OF OCOEE ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (ADF)- 75 SF DWELLINGS @ 350 GPD 26,250 GPD 175 MF DWELLINGS @ 300 GPD 52,500 GPD 131,500 SF RETAIL @ 0.1 GPD/SF 13.150 GPD TOTAL ESTIMATED ADF 91,900 GPD MINIMUM FIRE FLOWS SHALL BE PROVIDED- . SINGLE-FAMILY 500 GPM @ 20 PSI MULTI -FAMILY 1,000 GPM MINIMUM @ 20 PSI COMMERCIAL 1,000 GPM MINIMUM @ 20 PSI B. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE: CITY OF OCOEE ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (ADF)- 75 SF DWELLINGS @ 300 GPD 22,500 GPD 175 MF DWELLINGS @ 250 GPD 43,750 GPD 131,500 SF RETAIL @ 0.1 GPD/SF 13,150 GPD TOTAL ESTIMATED ADF 79,400 GPD C. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: PRIVATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF OCOEE AND ST. JOHNS RIVER RATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT REGULATIONS WITHIN COMMON AREA RETENTION TRACTS. THE TRACTS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. THE DRAINAGE CO LLECTION SYSTEM WITHIN PLATTED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE UPON FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS BYTHE CITY. THE STORMWATER RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RETA:N THE PRE -POST VOLUME DIFFERENCE BASED ON THE 25 YEAR-96 HOUR DESIGN STORM. 10. PROJECTED TRAFFIC GENERATION: PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADT) FOR THE PUD UPON BUILDOUT HAS BEEN ESTIMATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 5TH EDITION AS FOLLOWS: 75 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES (210) 775 TRIP ENDS 175 MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS (220) 1,098 TRIP ENDS 131,500 SF COMMERCIAL 11.360 TRIP ENDS TOTAL PROJECTED ADT 13,233 TRIP ENDS ii. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THIS PLAN, DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF OCOEE CODE. 12. THE CITY OF OCOEE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 163 MORATORIA ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THE CITY HAS NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO EXEMPT ANY PRIVATE ENTITY, OR ITSELF, FROM THE APPLICATION OF SUCH STATE LEGISLATION AND NOTHING HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS SUCH AN EXEMPTION. 13. THERE SHALL BE NO ACCESS FRONITHE PROJECT TO ANY PUBLIC ROADS EXCEPT AT THE APPROVED LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 14. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PARTS OF THE PUD WITHIN A MASTER STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. THEREFORE, OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE/COMMERCIAL PARCELS MAY BE REDUCED TO 20% IF ALL OTHER BUFFER AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET, AND A MAXIMUM 70% IMPERVIOUS AREA (BUILDABLE AREA, NOT COUNTING CONSERVATION AREAS) IS MAINTAINED WITHIN ALL THE COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE/COMMERCIAL PARCELS COMBINED. 15. A PERPETUAL, NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS OVER ALL INTERNAL ROADWAYS AND PAVED AREAS SHALL BE GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF OCOEE AND OTHER .APPLICABLE AUTHORITIES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE, AND OTHER EMERGENCY SERVICES. . 16. ALL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, ASSOCIATION DOCUMENTS, AND DEEDS CONVEYING PROPERTY TO A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLAT APPROVAL AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF RECORDING OF ANY SUCH INSTRUMENT. 17. ANY DAMAGE CAUSED TO ANY PUBLIC ROAD AS A RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE PROJECT, SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT STANDARDS AT THE DEVELOPER'S SOLE COST AND EXPENSE. 18. A MASTER ASSOCIATION OR ONE OR MORE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATIONS OR PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATIONS WILL BE CREATED FOR MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES OFTHE CITY IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF RECORDING OF ANY SUCH INSTRUMENT. 19. A COPY OF THE MASTER SUBDIVISION PLAN SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY PROSPECTIVE BUYERS IN ALL RESIDENTIAL SALES OFFICES. . 20. APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE WILL BE PROVIDED ON NON -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS AS NOTIFICATION TO FUTURE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS PURCHASERS OFTHE INTENDED USE OFTHE PARCELS. SIGNAGE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF32 SQUARE FEET AND PLACED IN LOCATIONS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE. 21. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES (INCLUDING BUILDINGS, BILLBOARDS, POWER LINES, EXISTING AERIAL AND UTILITY FACILITIES) WILL BE REMOVED AND/OR TERMINATED PRIOR TO OR DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT . REPLACING THOSE USES. 22. ALL ROADS WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 23. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT APPROPRIATE CURB CUTS TO ENABLE CONSTRUCTION OFRAMPSATALL RIGHTS-OF- � WAY INTERSECTIONS (AND OTHER AREAS AS REASONABLY REQUIRED) IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE ACCESS TO SIDEWALKS AND STREETS FOR PERSONS WHO ARE IN WHEELCHAIRS AND OTHER PERSONS WHO ARE PHYSICALLY ; i CHALLENGED. SIDEWALKS ABUTTING EACH PLATTED LOT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME A HOUSE IS r CONSTRUCTED ON THE LOT. WHEN SIDEWALKS ARE CONSTRUCTED ON CORNER LOTS AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS, THE i SIDEWALKS WILL BE EXTENDED TOTHE CURB ANDTHE APPROPRIATE RAMPS WILL THEN BE CONSTRUCTED. SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO COMMON AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION OF ADJACENT ' COMMON AREAS. I 1 24. THE DEVELOPMENT OFTH IS PROJECT WILL INCORPORATE THE STORNINVATER. NEEDS OF ALL PUBLIC ROADS WITHIN THE PROJECT, INCLUDING ALL OF THE ROAD TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN TRACT!'K". 25. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE NO. 2001-19, 26. EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT SHALL STAND ON ITS OWN WITH RESPECT TO PUBLIC SERVICES (SE\VER, WATER, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, ACCESS AND OTHER RELATED SERVICES). i 27. TO THE EXTENT ANY LIFT STATIONS ARE REQUIRED ON THE PROPERTYTHEY WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE CITY AT THE TIME OF PLATTING. ALL SUCH LIFT STATIONS SHALL BE FENCED WITH BLACK, VINYL CHAIN -LINK FENCE, WITH POSTS AND RAILS PAINTED BLACK, AND SHALL BE SET BACK NO LESS THAN 25' FROM ANY STREET. SUCH LIFT STATIONS SHALL ALSO BE SCREENED WITH HEDGE -TYPE SHRUBBERY, SUCH AS VIBURNUM OR LIGUSTRUM. 28. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE NO. 95-17, WHICH REQUIRES PEDESTAL -MOUNTED UTILITY BOXES TO BE PLACED BACK OFF THE STREET, NO MORE THAN 5' FORWARD OFTHE FRONT BUILDING SETBACK LINE, ON ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS WHICH ARE LESS THAN 70' IN WIDTH, WHERE THE LOTS ABUT THE STREET RIGHT-OF- WAY. i ! 29. ALL ACCESS RIGHTS TO TRACT "L" FOR ALL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ADJACENT THERETO SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. 30. STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER, AT THE DEVELOPER'S SOLE COST AND EXPENSE, PRIOR TO A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION BEING ISSUED, AND THE COST OF OPERATIONS WILL BE ASSUMED BYTHE DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO.95-17. 31. PURSUANTTO ORDINANCE NO, 2001-18 ALL SUBDIVISION SIGNAGE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGALLY ASSIGNED NAME OFTHE SUBDIVISION. ANYSUBSEQUENT CHANGETOTHE NAME OFTHE SUBDIVISION MUST BE APPROVED BYTHE CITY COMMISSION. 1 32. ALL BUILDING SETBACKS FROM ALL RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE 15 FEET FROM TOP OF BANK IN MULTI -FAMILY 1 PARCELS AND 30 FEET FROM TOP OF BANK IN SINGLE-FAMILY PARCELS. j 33. ALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL BE SET BACK 50 FEET FROM ALL RESIDENTIAL PARCELS, 35 FEET FROM BLACKWOOD AVENUE, AND 50 FEET FROM STATE ROAD 50. 1 ! 34. THE ROAD NETWORK WITHIN TRACT "A" AND TRACT "B" (THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS) WILL NOT ! CONNECT TO CROOKED CREEK DRIVE TO THE WEST OR BLUE SPRUCE DRIVE TO THE EAST. 35. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO THE CITY TRACT "L" (MONTGOMERY AVENUE TRACT) AT THE I EARLIEROF 18 MONTHS FROMTHE EFFECTIVEDATE OFTHE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT OR 8 MONTHS AFTERAPPROVAL OF THE FIRST FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR THE PROJECT OR WITH THE FIRST PLAT TO BE SUBMITTED FOR THE PROJECT, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. 36. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE AND CONVEYTO THE CITY TRACT "K" (60' FUTURE ROADWAY TRACT) WITHIN SIXTY i (60) DAYS OFA REQUEST FORTHE SAME BYTHE CITY BY IN NO EVENT PRIOR TO ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE I OF THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT. NOTWITHSTANDING THE CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ! SHALLTHE CITY BE UNDERANY OBLIGATION TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN TRACT "K" IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. I 37. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO THE CITY TRACT "M" (BLACKWOOD AVENUE TRACT) AT THE i EARLIEROF 18 MONTHS FROMTHE EFFECTIVEDATE OFTHE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT OR 8 MONTHS AFTERAPPROVAL OF THE FIRST FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR THE PROJECT OR WITH THE FIRST PLAT TO BE SUBMITTED FOR THE I PROJECT, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. 38. WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE WRITTEN REQUEST FOR ANY CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY SET FORTH HEREIN TO THE CITY, THE DEVELOPERSHALL PROVIDETHE CITY WITH A METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION FORTHE PROPERTYTO BE CONVEYED, SAID DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH BEING CERTIFIED TO THE CITY AND SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY. THE PROPERTY SHALL BE DEDICATED AND CONVEYED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE CITY BY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND . ENCUMBRANCES EXCEPT FORTHOSE MATTERS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THE FORM OFTHE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY. THE DEVELOPER SHALL, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE DEDICATION AND CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY, PROVIDE TO THE CITY A CURRENT ATTORNEY'S OPINION OF TITLE OR A CURRENT TITLE COMMITMENT TO BE FOLLOWED BY A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, EVIDENCING THAT FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY IS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES EXCEPT FOR THOSE MATTERS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THE COSTS AND EXPENSES RELATED TO THE CONVEYANCE AND DEDICATION OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE COST OF TITLE WORK, SHALL BE BORNE SOLELY BY THE DEVELOPER. REAL PROPERTY TAXES ON THE PROPERTYSHALL BE PRORATED AS OFTHE DAY BEFORE THE CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OFTHE CONVEYANCE OFTHE SAME, AND THE PRORATED AMOUNT OF SUCH REAL PROPERTYTAXES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE PAID AND ESCROWED BY THE DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 196.295, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT IF THE CONVEYANCE OCCURS BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1 AND DECEMBER 31, THEN THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR. NEITHER THE DEVELOPER, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, NOR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ANY ROAD IMPACT FEE CREDITS OR OTHER COMPENSATION OF ANY KIND FOR, ON ACCOUNT OF, OR WITH RESPECT TO THE REQUIRED CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY. 39. IN THE EVENT THE CITY CONSTRUCTS, OR CAUSES TO BE CONSTRUCTED, ANY PORTION OF TRACT "M" (BLACKWOOD AVENUE TRACT), TRACT "K" (60' FUTURE ROADWAY TRACT) OR TRACT "L" (MONTGOMERY AVENUE TRACT) PRIOR TO THE RETENTION AREAS BEING CONSTRUCTED, THE DEVELOPER AGREES TO GRANT TO THE CITY A TEMPORARY STORMWATER EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AS NECESSARY OVER A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE PORTION OFTHE PROPERTY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED AND PERMANENT RETENTION AREAS ARE CONSTRUCTED TO HANDLE THE STORMWATER FROM THE ROADS. 40. EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN A C-2 ZONING WILL APPLY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL TRACTS, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR R-3 ZONING WILL APPLY FOR ALL MULTI -FAMILY s RESIDENTIAL TRACTS, AND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RI -AA ZONING WILL APPLY FOR ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS. 41. THE USES PERMITTED IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY PORTION OF THE PUD WILL BE THE SAME AS THOSE USES PERMITTED IN AN R-IAA ZONING DISTRICT. AS A CONDITION OF THIS PUD, ANY USES THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED AS A SPECIAL i EXCEPTION IN AN R-IAA DISTRICT WILL REQUIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL IN THIS PUD. f 42. TRACTS "D1", "D2", "E", AND "Q" SHALL BE DEVELOPED WITH THE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO AREAS WITHIN A C-2 ! ZONING DISTRICT, ACCORDING TO ORDINANCE NO. 99-23, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PUD. AS A CONDITION OF THIS PUD, ANY USES THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED ASA SPECIAL EXCEPTION INA C-2 DISTRICT WILL REQUIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL IN THIS PUD. HOWEVER,EVEN THOUGH THE FOLLOWING USES WOULD NORMALLY BE PERMITTED IN A C-2 ZONING DISTRICT, THESE USES SHALL NOT : BE PERMITTED ON THESE FOUR TRACTS: AUTOMOBILE SALES (NEW OR USED), AUTOMOBILE REPAIR OR SERVICE STATIONS, PAWN SHOPS, OR A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS SALES. 1 43. ALL COMMERCIAL LOTS WILL BE A MINIMUM OF ONE ACRE IN SIZE. 44. ALL MANAGEMENT PONDS WILL BE UNFENCED W (� N WITH MAXIMUM 5:1 SIDE SLOPES INTO THE POND. BACK ! SLOPES TO THE NATURAL GRADE ON THE OUTSIDE OF PONDS MAY HAVE SLOPES UP TO 3:1 WITH GRASS SOD INSTALLED t FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION. 2:1 BACK SLOPES WITHIN TRACT "NI" ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THE SLOPES ARE STABILIZED WITH THE INSTALLATION OF TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GRASS SOD. i 45. ALL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ABUTTING MONTGOMERY AVENUE SHALL HAVE A 6-FOOT PVC FENCE WITH BRICK COLUMNS INSTALLED IN A 6-FOOT EASEMENT ALONG THAT ROAD. IN ADDITION. 6-FOOT PVC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG i THE REAR LOT LINES OF THE FOLLOWING LOTS: TRACT "A". LOTS 1-7. 13-17 AND 23-28. TRACT "B LOTS 46-50 AND 59-62. : 46. SHADE TREES (MINIMUM 2.5" DBH WHEN PLANTED) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT AN AVERAGE OF50-FOOT IN i ER!'ALS ALONG BOTH SIDES OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE FROM THE NORTHERN EDGE OFTHE SINGLE-FAMILYSUB61VISION ALL THE WAY TO BLACKWOOD AVENUE. TREES ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IBY THE LOT OWNER. ADJACENT TO TRACT "C", THE MULTI -FAMILY TRACT DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL THE TREES AT THE TIME THAT f PARCEL DEVELOPS. THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL TREES IN ALL REMAINING AREAS AT THE TIME OF ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION. 47. SHADE TREES (MININIUM 2.5" DBH WHEN PLANTED) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT AN AVERAGE OF 50-FOOT INTERVALS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NEW ROAD SHOWN ALONG THE NORTHEASTERN EDGE OF THE MULTIFAMILY AREA FROM MONTGOMERY AVENUE TO THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE PUD. THE MULTI -FAMILY TRACT DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL THE TREES AT THE TIME THAT PARCEL DEVELOPS. 48. ALL BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS SHALL EXCEED THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION BY A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. 49. ALL ON -SITE UTILITIES AS WELL AS THOSE LOCATED WITHIN INTERNAL AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS EXCLUDING CROOKED CREEK DRIVE, BLUE SPRUCE DRIVE, GENEVA STREET, AND MONTGOMERY AVENUE NORTH OF THE PUD'S i NORTH BOUNDARY SHALL BE PLACED BELOW GROUND. 50. ALL TRACTS WHICH ARE TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL BE CONVEYED ; TO THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BY WARRANTY DEED AT -THE TIME OF PLATTING. 1 51, THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO THE CITY TRACTS "O" AND "N" (CONSERVATION AREAS) AND "N1" I (PASSIVE RECREATION AREA) W ITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF A REQUEST FOR THE SAME BYTHE CITY BUT IN NO E V ENT PRIOR TO THE FIRST PLAT TO BE SUBMITTED FORTHE PROPERTY AND IN NO EVENT LATER THAN TRACT '18 L" BEING DEDICATED OR CONVEYED TO THE CITY. TRACTS "N" AND "O" SHALL CONTAIN ALL W ETLAND AREAS AND ALL THER AREAS BELOW THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION, AS WELL AS THE 25-FOOT UPLAND BUFFER AREA ADJOINNING THE SAME. NO BACKFILLING OR OTHER GRADING FOR LOTS, RETENTION PONDS, OR ROADS IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE 25' BUFFER. THE ONLY CONSTRUCTION PERMITTEDWITHINTHE BUFFERBYTHE DEVELOPER WITHIN TRACT"Nl" IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL SWALE TO COLLECT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM SLOPES. AND GRADING OF A 15.5' WIDE "LEVEL AREA" TO PREPARE AN AREA SUITABLE FOR THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF A NATURE WALK BY THE CITY OF OCOEE. THE 15.5' WIDE AREA SHALL BE GRADED WITH A CROSS SLOPE NOT TO.EXCEED 3.5%. COMPACTED. AND STABILIZED WITH GRASS SOD. 52. THE DEVELOPER IS TO PROTECT AND PREVENT ANY DISTURBANCE, SILTATION, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CONSERVATION AREA INSIDE THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION. THE ENTIRE CONSERVATION AREA, EXCEPT FOR THE APPROVED CROSSING POINT, COMPENSATING STORAGE AREAS, AND MITIGATION AREAS SHALL BE FENCED OFF DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SILT FENCES INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE ANY POSSIBILITY OF DISTURBANCE IN THE .AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 53. ALL OFFICE/COMMERCIAL AND COMMERCIAL LOT USES SHALL CONFORM TO THE MASTER ARCHITECTURAL, SIGNAGE, LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE PACKAGE PLANS, WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN THE FIRST COMMERCIAL LOT IS DEVELOPED AND WHICH WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY. 54. THE DEVELOPER WILL INCLUDE LANGUAGE WITHIN THE "DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, AND RESTRICTIONS" REQUIRING A BLANKET EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR CROSS -ACCESS BETWEEN TRACT "DI", "D2", "Q", AND THE PROPERTY LYING EAST OF TRACT "Q" KNOWN AS THE WEST ORANGE PROFESSIONAL CENTER.. j 55. RECREATION AMENITIES, MEETING THE CITY'S LDC REQUIREMENTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN BOTH THE SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI -FAMILY AREAS. 56. NOTWITHSTANDING THE CONVEYANCE OF ANY TRACT TO THE CITY, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE IMPROVEMENTS CONTEMPLATED FOR SAID TRACT ARE COMMENCED, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORTHE MAINTENANCE OF THE TRACT. 57. THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN TRACT"J" SHOULD THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FAIL TO DO SO AND RECEIVE REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR THE COSTS AND EXPENSES OF SUCH MAINTENANCE. 58. NOTWITHSTANDING THE CONVEYANCE OF THE STORMWATER RETENTION PONDS TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION (THE "ASSOCIATION") OR ANY PROVISION TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED IN THESE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER SHALL REMAIN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PROJECT'S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SWMS), INCLUDING ALL STORMWATER RETENTION PONDS, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS: (I) THE ENTIRE SWMS FORTHE PROJECTIS CONSTRUCTED AND APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION ISSUED BY BOTH THE CITY COIV O S AND THE SJRWMD, (ii) THE STORMWATER RETENTION PONDS INTENDED TO BE CONVEYED TO THE ASSOCIATION HAVE I IN FACT BEEN CONVEYED TO THE ASSOCIATION, (iii) THE ASSOCIATION IS DESIGNATED AS THE MAINTENANCE ENTITY ` ON THE RECORDS OF THE SJRWMD AND ALL TRANSFER RECORDS REQUIRED BY SJRWMD HAVE (BEEN EXECUTED AND IACCEPTED BY SJRWMD, (iv)THE CITY HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITH A COPY OFTHE DEVELOPER'S PROPOSED MAINTENANCE , PLAN WITH RESPECT TO THE SWMS, AND (v) THE CITY HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE ASSOCIATION ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OFTHE DEVELOPER'S PROPOSED MAINTENANCE PLAN WITH RESPECTTO THE SWMS AND THAT THE ASSOCIATION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SWMS. 59. ALL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING : PROVISIONS: A. PROVISION ALLOWING THE CITY TO LEVY,COLLECT, ENFORCE ASSESSMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS IF ASSOCIATIONS FAILS TO DO SO OR FAILS TO MAINTAIN ASSESSMENTS AT A LEVEL ALLOWING FOR ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE. B. PROVISION GRANTING THE CITY THE RIGHT, BUT NOT THE OBLIGATION, TO MAINTAIN/REPAIR THE SWMS AND OBTAIN REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE ASSOCIATION, OR FROM THE DEVELOPER IF (1) TURNOVER OF CONTROL TO THE MEMBERS HAS NOT OCCURRED, OR (ii) IF THE DEVELOPER IS STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ( THE SWMS. 11 C. PROVISION PROVIDING THAT THE SWMS WILL BETRANSFERREDTOARESPONSIBLE OPERATION/MAINTENANCE ENTITY ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY IN THE EVENT OF DISSOLUTION AND THAT IF DISSOLUTION OCCURS WITHOUT SUCH AFPROVALTHENTHECITYMAYCONTINUETOLEVYANDCOLLECTASSESSMENTSANDIMPOSELIENSWITH _-- a--_z; , RESPECT THERETO NOTWITHSTANDING THE DISSOLUTION OF THE ASSOCIATION. D. PROVISION THAT THE ASSOCIATION SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE IN GOOD STANDING WITH THE FLORIDA SECRETARY 0. Y.0 OF STATE. . Q,w Q=p fl , E. PROVISION THAT AT THE TIME OF TURNOVER OF CONTROL OF THE ASSOCIATION TO THE MEMBERS, THE H � .<, w=4 F.•.r. " " DECLARANT SHALL DELIVER TO THE NEW BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE SWMS W c iU ,%7. r, . ACCOMi'ANIEDBYANENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION THAT THE SWMS ISFUNCTIONING TNACCORDANCE tiVITHALL > ,, (.�': )r � J"Q� -:;, , , `` : �- ", --- APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS. TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY SUCH ENGINEER'S REPORT INDICATES ANY ,, O: g;� t: `• CORRECTIVE ACTION IS REQUIRED THE DECLARANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO DILIGENTLY UNDERTAKE SUCH �-� � � � �`_- CORRECTIVE ACTION AT THE DECLARANT'S EXPENSE AND TO POST A CASH BOND WITH THE ASSOCIATION FOR Z O Z Wy <t � ?, THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF SUCH CORRECTIVE ACTION. (n -, & ` Cl._7 F. PROVISION THAT NO PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL BE W. (9" . 5 0 "C)jZ � f'- l/?. �"'"' W U r•, F-�3 I .. > --_?: �-- SUBJECT' TO ASSESSMENTS LEVIEll W THE ASSOCIATION. � ¢11W`, -' c. r�r '_` G. PROVISION THAT ANY AMENDMENT TO ANY PROVISION AFFECTING THE CITY REQUIRES THE CONSENT OF THE �'j, Z-4 U T j w Q� �-Ll' C 1. �__p,_ CITY IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED WITH THE AMENDMENT. 01�- w '� � !' ' IZ W .. CL H. THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS OF THE ASSOCIATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE w w W �r9 FORGOING PROVISIONS. V) V) V) (n C:D >5>5 CO bi w W W C -:t - 60. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, A 5' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL BE PLATTED ALONG ALL SIDE LOT LINES,AND w w a� Of A10' UTILITY, DRAINAGEANDSIDEWALK EASEMENT ADJACENT -TO THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.SIDEWALKSWILL ONLY I`I }l "6 r Gx � h: BE PLACED IN THIS EASEMENT IF NECESSARY TO RUN THEM AROUND EXISTING PROTECTED TREES TO BE PRESERVED. 0 11 �' OOOp Y t. G, 1. - �-,� r7 e: I 1 61. THE 6' FENCE AND THE 5' EASEMENT AREAS WITHIN TRACTS "A" AND "B" ALONG MONTGOMERY AVENUE SHALL BE ���� . M INTAINEDBYTHEPROPERTYASSOCIATION,EXCEPTTHATALLGRASSANDLANDSCAPINGONTHEHOUSESIDEOFTHE r" M N r0 FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS. THE LAND BURDENED BY THE EASEMENT SHALL BE 0000 OWNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS. 62. EACH FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE OSHA YELLOW IN COLOR AND BLUE REFLECTIVE MARKER SHALL BE AFFIXED TO THE STREET IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE CLOSEST TO EACH HYDRANT. M NO PERSON SHALL UNDERTAKE LAND CLEARING OR THE REMOVAL OF ANY PROTECTED TREE WITHOUT FIRST W Z",63. OBTAINING A PERMIT FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE REMOVAL OF PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE AND NO AUTHORIZATION SHALL BE GRANTED TO REMOVE A TREE IF THE V N HAS DEVELOPERI'�I HA. FAILED TO TAKE REASONABLE MEASURES TO PRESERVE SPECIMEN AND HISTORIC TREES. r 4� 64. EXISTING TRESS 8" OR LARGER (OTHER THAN CITRUS TREES OR "TRASH" TREES) LOCATED ALONG PROPOSED �y . - ^i RIGHT -OF -WAY LOCATIONS OF E UFFER WALLS OR ROAD LINES WILL BE PRESERVED IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. THE BUFFER WALLS ROADS r AND WILL BE DESIGNED AROUND THOSE TREES TO INCORPORATE THEM INTO REQUIRED LANDSCAPE O BUFFERS AND AS STREET TREES. Li. r R 65. THE FINAL GRADING PLAN WILL PRESERVE EXISTING GRADES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS CONTAINING PROTECTED TREES AS QQ!! W `Q{.! �' 01) �^ NUCH MUCH AS POSSIBLE. ,� Q4 N a 66. IN ORDERTO ENSURETHATAS MANY EXISTING TREES AS POSSIBLE WILLBE PRESERVED,ALL ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYSAND RETENTION AREAS WILL BE FLAGGED FOR REVIEW BY THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY TREE REMOVAL. NO CLEARING `�, Iy fD4 'zI f1 -� "�{ PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED FOR SITE WORK OR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL .ALL TREES TO BE 0- Q PRESERVED HAVE BEEN CLEARLY MARKED WITH TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS. W Tr, `� 1 O - ` , 67. REMOVAL OF EXISTING PROTECTED TREES WILL BE LIMITED TO CLEARING RIGHT-OF-WAY AND RETENTION AREAS AS C w DETAILED IN EACH FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN. ALL EXISTING PROTECTED TREES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS WILL BE N, �� EVALUATED AT THE TIME A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED FOR THAT LOT TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT EACH TREE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. E- 1 � J � � lei 68. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TOWAIVE ANY PROVISIONOFTHELAND DEVELOPTVIENTCODEEXCEPTTOTHE EXTENT EXPRESSLY SET FORTH ON A WAIVER OR EXPLICITLY n TABLE SET OUT ON THE PLAN. 69. PRIOR TO RECEIVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT "L", THE DEVELOPER MUST FIRST OBTAIN FROM ORANGE COUNTY A DOCUMENT IN RECORDABLEFORM AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY WHICH ALLOWS FORTRACT "L" TO CROSS ORANGE COUNTY'SEASEMENT ASAPUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY RECORDED INOFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK3153,PAGE 1 co�I 2103, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. �J [� 70. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: < :; 1--, > 24 0 CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC LANES ON BLACKWOOD AVENUE FROM STATE ROAD 50 TO MONTGOMERY .AVENUE. O O o `� 0 ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STATE ROAD 50/BLACKWOOD AVENUE INTERSECTION RESULTING IN A TOTAL OF TWO NORTH BOUND LANES AND FOUR SOUTH BOUND LANES ON BLACKWOOD AVENUE NORTH OF ry STATE ROAD SO,TOINCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ANORTHBOUND SHARED RIGHTTURN/THROUGHLANE,ANORTH :Z� BOUND THROUGH LANE, A CONCRETE MEDIAN SEPARATOR, A SOUTH BOUND LEFT TURN LANE, A SOUTH BOUND . SHARED LEFT TURN/THROUGH LANE, A SOUTH BOUND THROUGH LANE, AND A SOUTH BOUND RIGHT TURN LANE / ALL PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE EXISTING CORRESPONDING LANES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 50. 1- Q 0 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ON THE EAST SIDE OF BLACKWOOD AVENUE NORTH OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE SUFFICIENT TO ACCONINIODATE A FOUR LANE DIVIDED ROADWAY AND ALL THE NECESSARY INTERSECTION I)\IPROV NtENTiS. o .q 0 UPGRADING THE EXISTING SIGNALIZATION AT THE STATE ROAD 50/BLACKWOOD AVENUE INTERSECTION TO n ^ INCLUDE LEFT TURN ARRO\'1' SIGNALS FOR THE EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE ON STATE ROAD 50 AND THE , �j SOUTHP.OUND LEFT TURN LANES ON BLACKWOOD AVENUE. - "q 0 DEDICATION OFTRACT'K'ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FORTHE CONSTRUCTIONOFA FUTURETWO LANE COLLECTOR (%�Q4 c ROAD. Q) Z 0 OTHER ON -SITE INTERSECTION, TURN LANE, RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION, AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT q IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN. O C) 71. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PHASING BY TRACT - [- 4�4-1 DEVELOPMENT TRACT . ROADWAY TRACT/NAME ROAD IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION "A" "B" "Ll", Q O OR TRACT MONTGOMERY AVENUE NORTH EDGE OF TRACTS "N" AND "O" TO NORTH TERMINUS o 'C TRACT L2 L3 L4 ,AND LS z �� MONTGOMERY AVENUE WEST EDGE OF TRACT "L3" TO SOUTH EDGE OFTRACT "Ll" u E----,"D1 AND D2" TRACT "M", BL.4CKVYOOD AVENUE ALL BLACKWOOD AVENUE NORTH OF STATE ROAD 50 PLUS INTERSECTION U TRAFFIC CONTROL WORK O V "E" TRACT %3", MONTGOMERY AVENUE WEST EDGE OF TRACT "L2" TO THE EAST EDGE OF BLACKWOOD AVENUE, TRACT"M" "Q" TRACT "M" BLACKWOOD AVENUE NORTH EDGE OF TRACT "L3" TO (1) & TRACT "L3", MONTGOMERY .AVENUE SOUTH EDGE OF TRACT "M" � � C � O V �� � 72. "IF TRACT "C" IS DEVELOPED AS A PRIVATE GATED COMMUNITY, IT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE ORANGE V � COUNTY ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS WITH RESPECT TO GATED COMMUNITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO " a) 0 ARTICLE V III, CHAPTER34 OFTHE ORANGE COUNTY CODE, AS WELL AS ANY AMENDMENTS TO THAT ARTICLE THAT MAY I 1 E BE ENACTED THERETO, ALL REFERENCES IN SAID COUNTY CODE CHAPTER TO THE "COUNTY" SHALL BE DEEMED TO IL REFER TO THE "CITY" FOR PURPOSES OFTHIS REQUIREMENT. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, IN THE EVENT THE d Z D CITY ADOPTS AN,ORDINANCE REGARDING GATED COMMUNITIES PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE PLAT FOR ANY PORTION c: c: Q O OF TRACT "C", THEN TRACT "C" SHALL COMPLY WITH ANY SUCH ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE CITY." •00_I 4- a) W L U 73. DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT "C" SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF OCOEE MULTI -FAMILY c- .N W N L DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT "C" WITH ONE EXCEPTION. THE O O ry co ALLOWABLE DENSITY WILL BE 11.0 UNITS/ACRE. THE ACREAGE USED TO CALCULATE TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLING > - D F--- V) � < UNITS ALLOWED WILL INCLUDE TRACT "C" AND TRACT "G2" THE RETENTION AREA THAT SERVES TRACT "C" AND THE � c- Q c FUTURE CITY ROADWAY, TRACT "K". W f--• n 'N Q. z 74. ALL REFERENCES TO TRACT "L" SHALL REFER COLLECTIVELY TO TRACTS "Ll" "L2" "L3" "L4" AND " L5 ALL REFERENCES TO TRACT "D", SHALL "DI" "D2". 0 Q 0 . . REFER COLLECTIVELY TO TRACTS AND c 0 l ALL REFERENCES TO TRACT "G", SHALL REFER COLLECTIVELY TO TRACTS "Gl" AND "G2"• "H", .= c� .. LE E ALL REFERENCES TO TRACT SHALL REFER COLLECTIVELY TO TRACTS "HI" AND "H2". Q) -t 0) LJ u I I 75. WITHIN TRACT "A", THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF LOTS I THRU 7 SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE FRONT SIDE. THE ACCESS • T"'I c: U 00 -F N RIGHTS FOR LOTS I THRU 7 TO GENEVA STREET SHALL BE DEDICATED TOTHE CITY.THE ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOTS 1 AND O , 28 TO CALIFORNIA AVENUE SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. WITHIN TRACT "B", THE ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOT 58 TO Lc N C O 0 0 CO BLUE SPRUCE DRTVE SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. -0) N (/-) 76. A 10' UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE STATE ROAD 50 FRONTAGE OF THE OCOEE COMMONS PUD PROPERTYBYTHEDEVELOPER. += W Q �t tn� O llq- THE DEVELOPER AGREES TO RECORD SEPARATE ELECTRIC POWEREASEMENTS WITHIN C�- Z) 0 N V THE PUD AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE THE ABANDONMENT AND REMOVAL OF EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES c Z X' ALONG THAT FRONTAGE. THE NEW POWER EASEMENTS WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE SERVICE PROVIDER, PROGRESS O m 0 0 ENERGY, INC., A1Vl) WILL BE DESIGNED TO CONTAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE TO PUD TRACTS AND THE WEST (� N ORANGE PROFESSIONAL CENTER. THE WEST ORANGE PROFESSIONAL CENTER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYMENT O J M t*� OF THEIR PRO-RATA SHARE OF COSTS CHARGED BY PROGRESS ENERGY, INC. TO UPGRADE ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM 1= , • CL I\ OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. . 1"-..N �0) 0 co 77. THE DEVELOPER AGREES TO CONSTRUCT A RIGHT IN - RIGHT OUT DRIVEWAY AND RIGHTTURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS U� C _0 � c0 - AT STATE ROAD 50 CONCURRENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT "Q". DEVELOPER ALSO AGREES TO CONSTRUCT C O N O A RIGHT IN ONLY DRIVEWAYAND RIGHTTURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS CONCURRENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF EITHER c' m TRACT "D1", "D2", OR TRACT "Q". DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCESS POINTS AS � � EL 0 " DELINEATED ON THE PUD LAND USE PLAN SUBJECT TO FDOT APPROVAL AND ALL WORK WITHINTHE STATE ROAD 50 ` i, , - ,N. C, "_ RIGHT-OF-W.4Y SHALL COMPLY V1'iTH FDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ; "' p LEGEND: - STRIKETHROUGHS DENOTE DELETION. DOUBLE UNDERLINE DENOTES CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. ,-II)�C���Ti�j I)'. I M AY 4 2005 � //. ENGINEER . �. . RONAL"D. HENSOh;;ll,~`rPE; "FL.,. R ' tJ6!'- 36 11 IDESIGN; - DR.ST,;,; .CHECK RMH' .,- DIG., I PROJECT NO, 01054-COND-APPR DATE OCTOBER, 2001 SCALE NONE SHEET 2 OF 19 18. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE NO. 95-17,WHICII REQUIRES PEDESTAL -MOUNTED UTILITY BOXES TO BE PLACED BACK OFF THE STREET, NO MORE THAN 5' FORWARD OF THE FRONT BUILDING SETBACK LINE, ON ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS WHICH ARE LESS THAN 70' 1N WIDTH, WHERE THE LOTS ABUT THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. 19. ALL ACCESS RIGHTS TO TRACT "L" FOR ALL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ADJACENT THERETO SHALL BE DEDICATED TO ��D) W a (0 _ D ---_.. __...._ THE CITY. Q a "� T._�.,�, !^ - - 20. STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER, AT THE DEVELOPER'S SOLE COST AND EXPENSE, PRIOR D ❑ \-`, I�"+ :: Z TO A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION BEING ISSUED, AND THE COST OF OPERATIONS WILL BE ASSUMED BY THE s L !z.,L : VA C ti `+' b v DEVELOPER 1N ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE N0.95-17. _ 21. PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2001-18 ALL SUBDIVISION SIGNAGE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGALLY ASSIGNED NAME OF THE SUBDIVISION. ANY SUBSEQUENT CHANGE TO THE NAME OF THE SUBDIVISION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. JJ(� 1' 54 (� in 22. ALL BUILDING SETBACKS FROM ALL RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE 30 FEET FROM TOP OF BANK IN SINGLE-FAMILY •; (k PARCELS. TION 23. THE ROAD NETWORK WITHIN TRACT „A„ AND TRACT „B" (THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS) WILL NOT - CONNECT TO CROOKED CREEK DRIVE TO THE WEST OR BLUE SPRUCE DRIVE TO THE EAST. ikZ :l 1. 24. EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RI -AA ZONING WILL APPLY FOR ALL • R `�' SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS. 25. ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PONDS WILL BE UNFENCED WITH MAXIMUM 5:1 SIDE SLOPES INTO THE POND. BACK SLOPES TO THE NATURAL GRADE ON THE OUTSIDE OF PONDS MAY HAVE SLOPES UP TO 3:1 WITH GRASS SOD_ INSTALLED FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION. 2:1 BACK SLOPES WITHIN TRACT "NI" ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THE , SLOPES ARE STABILIZED WITH THE INSTALLATION OF TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GRASS SOD. 26. ALL SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ABUTTING MONTGOMERY AVENUE SHALL HAVE A 6-FOOT PVC FENCE WITH BRICK COLUMNS INSTALLED IN A 5-FOOT EASEMENT ALONG THAT ROAD. IN ADDITION, 6-FOOT PVC FENCE SHALL. BE INSTALLED ALONG THE REAR LOT LINES OF TH E -FOLLOWING LOTS: TRACT "A". LOTS 1-7.13-17 AND 23-28. TRACT "B". LOTS 46-50 AND 59-62. 27. SHADE TREES (MINIMUM 2.5" DBH WHEN PLANTED) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT AN AVERAGE OF 50-FOOT INTERVALS ALONG BOTH SIDES OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE FROM THE NORTHERN EDGE OFTHE SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION ALLTHE WAYTO BLACKWOOD AVENUE. TREES ADJACENT TO SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS SHALL BE INSTALLED BYTHE LOTOWNER. ADJACENT TO TRACT "C", THE MULTI-FAM ILY TRACT DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL THE TREES AT THE TIME THAT PARCEL DEVELOPS. THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL TREES IN ALL REMAINING AREAS AT THE TIME OF ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION. 28. ALL BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS SHALL EXCEED THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION BY A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. 29. ALLTRACTS WHICH ARETO BEOWNEDAND MAINTAINED BYTHE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SHALL BE CONVEYED TO THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BY WARRANTY DEED AT THE TIME OF PLATTING, 30. RECREATION AMENITIES, MEETING THE CITY'S LDC REQUIREMENTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY AREA. ., 31. ALL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY SHALL INCLUDE THE TRJkCTS A. & BFOLLOWING PROVISIONS: A. PROVISION ALLOWING THE CITY TO LEVY, COLLECT, ENFORCE ASSESSMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS IF ASSOCIATIONS FAILS TO DO SO OR FAILS TO MAINTAIN ASSESSMENTS AT A LEVEL ALLOWING FOR ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE. B. PROVISION GRANTING THE CITY THE RIGHT, BUT NOT THE OBLIGATION, TO MAINTAIN/REPAIR THE SWMS AND OBTAIN REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE ASSOCIATION, OR FROM THE DEVELOPER IF (1) TURNOVER OF CONTROL TO THE MEMBERS HAS NOT OCCURRED, OR (U) IF THE DEVELOPER IS STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR hIAlNTENANCE OFTHE SWMS. EE MM N 0 C. PROVISION PROVIDING THAT THE SWMS WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO A RESPONSIBLE co CO 0 S p DOPERATION/MAINTENANCE ENTITY ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY IN THE EVENT OF DISSOLUTION AND THAT I F DISSO LOTION OCCURS WITHOUT SUCH APPROVAL THEN THE CITY MAY CONTINUE TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS AND IMPOSE LIENS WITH RESPECTTHERETO NOTWITHSTANDINGTHE DISSOLUTION OFTHE ASSOCIATION. D. PROVISION THAT THE ASSOCIATION SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE IN GOOD STANDING WITH THE FLORIDA H(013 0 ® a SECRETARY OFSTATE. 0 E. PROVISION THAT AT THE TIME OFTURNOVER OF CONTROL OF THE ASSOCIATION TO THE E M MBERS, THE DECLARANT SHALL DELIVER TO THE NEW BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE SWMS ACCOMPANIED BY AN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION THATTHE SWMS IS FUNCTIONING IN ACCORDANCE W ITH ALL APPROV ED PLANS AND PERMITS. TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY SUCH ENGINEER'S REPORT INDICATES ANY CORRECTIVE ACTION IS REQUIRED THE DECLARANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO DILIGENTLY UNDERTAKE SUCH CORRECTIVE ACTION AT THE DECLARANT'S EXPENSE AND TO POST A CASH BOND WITH THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF SUCH CORRECTIV9 ACTION. F. PROVISION THAT NO PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY THE ASSOCIATION. -- G. PROVISION THAT ANY AMENDMENT TO ANY PROVISION AFFECTING THE CITY REQUIRES THE CONSENT OF CITY OF OCOEE FLORIDA THE CITYIN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED WITH THE AMENDMENT. H. THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS OFTHE ASSOCIATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH.THE FORGOING PROVISIONS. 32. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, A S' UTILITYAND DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL BE PLATTED ALONG ALL SIDE LOT LINES, ' • •• AND A 10' UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. SIDEWALKS WILL ONLY BE PLACED IN THIS EASEMENT IF NECESSARY TO RUN THEM AROUND EXISTING PROTECTED TREES TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION UTILITIES VICINITY MAP CONDITIONS OF APPROVALBE PRESERVED. 33. THE 6' FENCE AND THE 5' EASEMENT AREAS WITHINTRACTS "A" AND "B" ALONG MONTGOMERY AVENU9SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY ASSOCIATION, EXCEPT THAT ALL GRASS AND LANDSCAPING ON THE HOUSE SIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BELOW IS THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE ENTIRE OCOEE COMMONS I. STATEMENT •' ^� OFTHE FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS. THE LAND BURDENED BY THE EASEMENT SHALL BE OWNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE OCOEE COMMONS PUD .AND FOR TRACTS 34. EACH FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE OSHA YELLOW IN COLOR AND BLUE REFLECTIVE MARKER SHALL BE AFFIXED TO PUD PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY WHICH IS PART D THESE ASHTON PARK LNG PLANS IS CONTAINED WATER & SEWER CITY OF OCOEE A .AND B, THE SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION AREA KNOWN AS ASHTON PARK. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO THE STREET IN THE CENTER OF THE LANE CLOSEST TO EACH HYDRANT. CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THECONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL WITHIN THE OCOEE COMMONS PUD PROPERTY AND COMPRISES JUST THE SINGLE-FAMILY PORTIONS 0 150 NORTH LAKESHORE DRIVE SET FORTH BY THE CITY AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION AT THEIR DECEMBER 16, 2003 MEETING. 35. NO PERSON SHALL UNDERTAKE LAND CLEARING OR THE REMOVAL OF ANY PROTECTED TREE WITHOUT FIRST THE OCOEE COMMONS PUD PROPERTY (TRACTS A BC B). SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE UTILITIES, PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND PRIVATE CROSS- OBTAINING A PERMIT FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE REMOVAL OF PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE COMMENCE ATrTHE rS©UTHEA'ST. CORNER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 22 SOUTH, RANGE 28 'EAST; OCOEE, FLORIDA 34761 ACCESS DRIVES, STATE ROAD 50 DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS, TURN LANES, AND A TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION, AI IN IAi IZED TO TH E hIAXID1 UM EXTENT POSSIBLE AND NO AUTHORIZATION SHALL BE GRANTED TO REMOVE A TREE AND A"MASTER" STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS WILL SERVE THE IFTHE DEVELOPER HAS FAILED TOTAKE REASONABLE MEASURES TO PRESERVE SPECIMEN AND HISTORIC TREES. (407) 905-3100 > VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT TRACTS WITHIN THE PUD. THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO CONSTFi'C"'T SUBDIVISION RUN THENCE N89'28'55"W A DISTANCE OF LY RIG FEET; RUN THENCE N COLONIAL 10 E A ORLANDO STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS A AND B, ASHTON PARK SINGLE-FAMILYSUBDIVISION CONCUS..?ENTLI' \\'1TH PUD 36. EXISTING TRESS 8" OR LARGER (OTHER THAN CITRUS TREES OR "TRASH" TREES) LOCATED ALONG PROPOSED DISTANCE OF 69.51 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLONIAL DRIVE Q WHITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS' LOCATIONS OF BUFFER WALLS OR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES WILL BE PRESERVED IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. THE BUFFER \VALLS AND ROADS IN ILL BE DESICNCD..ROUND THOSE TREES TO INCORPORATE THEM INTO REQUIRED - (STATE ROAD 50), SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 89'23'3'•" w CONTACT: MR. DAVID WHEELER ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 331.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST THIS CORNER OF LAKE,!BENNET,:CENTRE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGES 126 AND 127; PUBLIC �: 2. THERE REQUIREMENTS TSOFT THE FOCOPLAN,DEVELOPAfENTOFTHISPROPERTI'SHALLBECONSISTENT\VITH LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND AS STREET TREES. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF OCOEE CODE, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N00'21'46"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID • BELLSOUTH Q LAKE RENNET CENTRE A DISTANCE OF 1281.33 FEET; THENCE N 88'48'49" W A DISTANCE'OF TELEPHONE. 500 N. ORANGE AVENUE, STE 360 3. THE CITY OFOCOEE ISSUBJECT TOTHETERMIS, PROVISIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OFFLORIDA SYATUTESCH.APTER 37. THEFINALGRADINGPLANWILLPRESERVEEXISTINGGRADESONINDIVIDUALLOTSCONTAININGPROTECTEDTREES �L Z 163 MORATORIA ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCE:,. THE CITY HAS NO AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 8.45 FEET To THE CENTERLINE OF CALIFORNIA AVENUE; THENCE N 00'38'39" E ALONG SAID ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 z O LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO EXEMPT ANY PRIVATE ENTITY, OR ITSELF, FROM THE APPLICATiuN OF SUCH STATE CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 1127.25 FEET, THENCE S 88'11'34" E A DISTANCE OF 30.01 FEET � 0 LEGISLATION AND NOTHING HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS SUCH AN EXEMPTION. 38. INOR RETENTER TO ION RE AS WILL BE FLAGGED FTREE VIEW AS Y THE ITV ANPRESERVED,TENGINEER PRIOR O ANY WAYS AND RETENTION AREAS IYILL BE FLAGGED FOR REVIEW BY THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY TREE TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 17, TOWN OF OCOEE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK A, 407) 237-3080 O ~ 4. THERE SHALL BE NO ACCESS FROM THE PROJECT TO ANY PUBLIC ROADS EXCEPT AT THE APPROVED LOCATIONS REMOVAL. NO CLEARING PERMITSWILLBE ISSUED FORSITEWORKOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION UNTILALLTREES CONTACT: MR. NICK FARI S O SHOWN ON THE PLAN. TO BE PRESERVED HAVE BEEN CLEARLY MARKED WITH TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS. PAGES 100 THROUGH 101, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; N00'38'39"E ALONG 39. REMOVALOFEXISTINCPROTECTEDTREESWILLBELIAfITEDTOCLEARINGRIGHT-OF-WAYANDRETENTIONAREAS SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GENEVA STREET; SITE �/ � �O 5. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PARTS OFTHE PUD WITHIN A MASTER STORM WATER REMOVAS ILOFEXIED IN SINGPRCH PROTECTED TREE WILLB LLEXISTINGPRO RINGRECTED THT-O&REES AYANINDIVIDUETENTIAL WILL BE ELECTRIC: PROGRESS ENERGY U N MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. EVALUATED AT THE TIMEABUILDINGPERMITISISSUEDFORTHATLOTTODETERMINEWHETHERORNOTEACH THENCE S88'21'09"E ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 667.17 FEET; THENCE THENCE N00'33'04"E A DISTANCE OF 30.01 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GENEVA STREET; THENCE t:•. TREE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. 425 E CROWN POINT ROAD ;;,'_ „_ _ 6. A PERPETUAL, NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS OVER ALL INTERNAL ROADWAYS AND PAVED AREAS SHALL S 88*21 *09" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 637.11 FEET; THENCE S00'27'27' W ALONG THE = - BE GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF OCOEE AND OTHER APPLICABLE AUTHORITIES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, OF 1989.29 FEET 'THENCE WINTER GARDEN FLORIDA 34787 G MAINE STREET " " EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20 A DISTANCE;':!• ti?";1i:;' Q FIRE, AND OTHER EMERGENCY SERVICES. 40. NOTHINGHEREINSHALLBECONSTRUEDTOWAIVEANYPROVISIONOFTHELANDDEVELOPMENTCODEEXCEPTTO ' -r't=�='- v THE EXTENT EXPRESSLY SET FORTH ON A WAIVER TABLE OR EXPLICITLY SET OUT ON THE PLAN. N 89'09'40" W A DISTANCE OF 332.18 FEET; THENCE S00'26'01"W A DISTANCE OF 596.59 FEET TO THE 407 905-3303 O .f� V 7. ALL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND 41. WITHIN TRACT "A", THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF LOTS 1 THRU 7 SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE FRONT SIDE. THE - /' RESTRICTIONS, ASSOCIATION DOCUMENTS, AND DEEDS CONVEYING PROPERTYTO A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION ACCESS RIGHTS FOR LOTS t THRU 7 TO GENEVA STREET SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. THE ACCESS RIGHTS THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLONIAL DRIVE (STATE ROAD 50); THENCE N 89'23'37" W ALONG CONTACT: MR. JEFF ZAHARIS Q \ OR PROPERTY OWNER'SASSOCIATION,SHALLBEAPPROVEDBYTHECITYPRIORTOPLATAPPROVALANDSHALL ACCESSLOTS GHTSFORLOTSI THRU TO GEE VASTREDEDiC SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 663.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. y COAIPLI'\VITHALL ORDINANCES OFTHE CITI'1NEFFECT ATTHETIME OFRECORDING OFANI'SICIIINSTRUh1ENT•FOR ATEDTOTHECITY. WITHIN TRACT"B",THEACCESS AA .. RIGHTS FOR LOT 58 TO BLUE SPRUCE DRIVE SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. CONTAINS 3, 236,147 SQUARE FEET OR 74.2917 ACRES MORE OR LESS. GAS• LAKE APOPKA NATURAL GAS `/ . - 8. ANY DAMAGE CAUSED TO ANY PUBLIC ROAD AS A RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE • V.C� PROJECT, SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED BYTHE DEVELOPERTOTHE APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT STANDARDS AT , 1320 S. VINELAND ROAD \ THE DEVELOPER'S SOLE COST AND EXPENSE. PERMITS WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA 34777 COLONIAL DRIVE STATE ROAD 50 9. A MASTER ASSOCIATION OR ONE OR MORE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATIONS OR PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATIONS INDEX OF SHEETS,• WILL BE CREATED FOR MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES, UNLESS 407 656-2734 OTHERWISE NOTED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY 1N EFFECT AT THE TIME OF RECORDING OF ANY SUCH INSTRUMENT. CONTACT: MR. RICK GULLETT O 10. A COPY OF THE MASTER SUBDIVISION PLAN SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW By PROSPECTIVE BUYERS IN ALL GARDEN RTER RESIDENTIAL SALES OFFICES. CITY OF OCOEE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN & PLAT APPROVAL CABLE: BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORK g oAo 11. APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE WILL BE PROVIDED ON NON -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS AS NOTIFICATION TO 1 COVER SHEET 844 MAGUIRE ROAD O t1J V'� FUTURE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS PURCHASERS OF THE INTENDED USE OFTHE PARCELS. SIGNAGEWILLBEAMINIMUM �I, OF 32 SQUARE FEET AND PLACED IN LOCATIONS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF OCOEE. OCOEE, FLORIDA 34761 Z ` pRESp 12. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES (INCLUDING BUILDINGS, BILLBOARDS, POWER LINES, EXISTING AERIAL AND UTILITY EXISTING CONDITIONS & CLEARING PLAN St. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (407) 532-8509 ` v� O FACILITIES) WILL BE REMOVED AND/ORTERMINATED PRIORTO OR DURING CONSTRUCTION OFTHE DEVELOPMENT Q DES ?,0 REPLACING THOSE USES. 3 MASTER SUBDIVISION PLAN (STANDARD GENERAL ERP) CONTACT: MR. MARVIN USRY m Q �PS�S�P�E 13. ALL ROADS WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT APPROPRIATE CURB CUTS TO ENABLE CONSTRUCTION OF RAMPS AT ALL 4-7 PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS RIGHTS -OF -WAY INTERSECTIONS (AND OTHER AREAS AS REASONABLY REQUIRED) IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRO ACCESS SIDEWALKS AND STREETS FOR PERSONS WHO ARE WHEELCHAIRS AND OTHER PERSONS WHO ARE 8 LOT &BLOCK GRADING PLAN PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED. SIDEWALKS ABUTTING EACH PLATTED LOT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TIME A HOUSE IS CONSTRUCTED ON THE LOT. WHEN SIDEWALKS .ARE CONSTRUCTED ON CORNER LOTS AT CERTAIN _ LOCATIONS, THE SIDEWALKS WILL BE EXTENDED TO THE CURB AND THE APPROPRIATE R:\AIPS WILL THEN BE (WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMITS) CONSTRUCTED. SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO COM MON AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THEY IM E OF PERMANENT g STANDARDFN�M1 SS CONSTRUCTION OF ADJACENT COMMON AREAS. DETAILS i �� ...... - _.�___-•--•»----- [ i f I5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE NO.2001-19. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 10 WATER &SEWER DETAILI = 16. EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT SHALL STAND ON ITS OWN WITH RESPECT TO PUBLIC SERVI'f.FS (SEINER, WATER, I •y I I•. 4 2005 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, ACCESS AND OTHER RELATED SERVICES). I h.• (NPDES PERMIT) 17. TO THE EXTENT ANY LIFT STATIONS ARE REQUIRED ON THE PROPERTY THEY WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE CITY AT 11-12 SPECIFICATIONS THE TIME OF PLATTING. ALL SUCH LIFTSTATIONS SHALL BE FENCED WITH BLACK, VINYL CHAIN -LINK FENCE, WITH STS AND RAILS PAINTED BLACK, AND SHALL BE SET BACK NO LESS THAN 25' FROM ANY STREET. STATIONS ION SHALL ALSO BE SCREENED WITH HEDGE -TYPE SHRUBBERY, UCH AS VIBURNUM OR LIGUSTRU M'1 LIFT 13 TRACT F IMPROVEMENTS OCOEE I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SURVEYOR OWNER:BY*• DEVELOPER/APPLICANT. PREPARED HORTUS OASIS BECHTOL ENGINEERING ACCURIGHT SURVEYS OF OCOEE COMMONS, LLC OSTLER-FAGAN INC. & TESTING, INC. OF ORLANDO, INC. )CS1 n Service Gfou""), nc, ROBINSON STREET 236 PASADENA PLACE 1152 SOLANA AVENUE Site Planning • Consulting Engineering •Environmental Permitting 1425 BERKSHI RE AVENUE 605 W. NEW YORK AVE. SUITE A 2012 E. Florida Board of Professional Engineers Certificate of Authorization Number: 4220 WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789 DELAND, FL. 32720-5243 ORLANDO, FL..32803 ORLANDO, FL 32803 WINTER PARKS FL 32789 362A SOUTH GRANT STREET (407) 622-4886 (386) 734-8444 (407) 894-6314 (407) 841-3266 (407) 629-9449 LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750 FAX: (407) 622-4887 FAX: (386) 734-8541 FAX: (407) 897-3777 FAX: (407) 649-9421 FAX: 407 629-6274 (407) 331 "-377 78E-MAILtb®bechtol.com(407)FAX:264;E-MAIL: spategasChortusoasis.com E-MAIL: y.icE-MAILdesign serveg h.Iink.net CONTACT: STEPH EN PATEGAS, ASLA CONTACT TH OM AS BECH TOL, P.E. CONTACT: FRANK RAYM ON A PLS CONTACT: MR. BILL FAGAN CONTACT: MR. BILL P. - - y �Q �� � � � � ON TACT • RON AL NSRP , lI111" .. PE D' ;. 44 ? 4,� 1, `� J �� REGISTR FLORID" ATIGN',,NO 34836 f) OCOEE - - J LEGEND • CONSTRUCTED BY HOMEBUILDER AS EACH LOT DEVELOPS. m _ TO BE CON T ' r ~ o NOTE: 4 CONCRETE SIDEWALK R/W %5 MIN. R 1W 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY BB BOTTOM OF BANK � a X �� +� BC -BACK OF CURB -� n Yr TYPICAL LOT SETBACK/IMPERVIOUS DESIGNATIONS _ _ BM -BENCHMARK g tr 2 6 4 1' r r BPC - BURIED POWER CABLE t w o 1 GM 4 6 2' 24' PROPOSED W :•� t CONC�GRASS 1 MINIMUM TYPE S-1 �GRASSr'ONC. O O 30' REAR SETBACK FOR CALL -CALCULATED -I Q w a ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SOD S/W ? �`'.' Z ® #(50%) LOT WITH 30' REAR SETBACK, 50% MAX. IMPERVIOUS RATIO O---LOTS 8-12, 52-58, & C&M - CALCULATED & MEASUREL_ 00 X ° k 1 - CENTRAL ANGLE to w O o O 0 S/W SOD _ 63-67. 25 REAR SET- CBW -CONCRETE BLOCK WALL �' Z -� �' 7.5' MIAMI CURB, TYP. o �` -**(50%) LOT WITH 25' REAR SETBACK, 50% MAX. IMPERVIOUS RATIO r I Y w I i CHW - CONCRETE HEAD WALL N Z- c V, Q �- '•m (r° �.�, BACK ALL OTHER LOTS ' CF CONCRETE FLUME x v a ,Mq 2% 1 2q 2% G1 �% 1 4• j �° ;� V W ' CLF - CHAIN LINK FENCE i w w Al r? _ ( MAX. IMPERVIOUS RATIO :, M w � w + %1Ak Ya `1 rn 55 LOT WITH 25 REAR SETBACK 55% MP r + I, '� v (° ..� f :l { I - CENTERLINE ty v_ op 6" LIMEROCK BASE, COMPACTED TO 98� --i NOTE: ALL TRACT A & B LOTS MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE RATIO 6 w `'� Z a_CnONcn o " ZONING: N G: R 1- A A i I I CM - CONCRETE MONUMENT � F 0 Z o 0 o g N w O 36 MIN. MAX. DENSITY PER AASHTO T-180 Z 0 _ SHALL BE 45%. 5' UTILITY & DRAIN CMP -CORRUGATED METAL PIPE Z- _ wMM O o r Z C a to `� v CO CLEAN OUT O Z r 0_-_j 0 o COVER USE: 0 W `' D b - " STABILIZED SUBGRADE, COMPACTED TO 95% LAND I' z EASEMENT, SIDES & CONC CONCRETE z w O - <LL p > 12 PROPOSED WATER MAIN MAX. DENSITY PER AASHTO T-180, TOP 6" FBV 50 z ^t i REAR, 10' FRONT j �pVD _CONCRETE PAD > 8 o a o aw a a PROP DENISTY RES. ,, CW - CONCRETE WALKWAY V O N ^ 0° w o PROPOSED SANITARY GRAVITY MAIN ` o f Z O N I N G: R 1- A A, LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY RES. . N Ln o It z Y ! ;; ' I , I I DE -DRAINAGE EASEMENT r±; , r- �- 7.5 SIDE D&M - DEED/DESC & MEASURED - a '� z R to o Q y DESC - DESCRIPTION v U a o- Q I +�► ROAD SECTION ` =I HIGHLANDS OF t1C0EE, PB 29, PCB S4 ( SETBACK _ DUMPSTER w'r w a ►�'- Q �w LOCAL STREET TYPICAL i-~f "''F` `' - V r, o C� , r J-{�I, ._ 's !'f, ; r. , • tr.. DIN - DRIVEWAY w a Q a o < B c� sn NTS f, r I _ _ a `' `-'' Vk)TED GEl JEVA ST. --4' R f I V PER t51 i t`3z�... ; . = i V E� a ''' ai a o ELECTRIC METER o w o o +- O PARCEL 07092 ;� PARCEL 07095 ,'_; :: ` %; ~ G;- GSA NOT C)PEN_ ' ii. _ ESMT - EASEMENT BOX vwi 5 w 5 5 5 > Ill J ,� Ir�'01�NIA 7D9 PARCEL 070� 1 _ rn , = II I _ 5 w o w w w tow 0 o _ oRa . �s�� PG 2 TRACT B L� __i wIXoxx �;n�Sma ,� PARCEL _ = c,(_:�=c�i (-,' _ �,,,i ! E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT � N L�' 8 ; y) ,:: i =; �� ' RETENTION AREA } !I '' f' ( `-� FFE -FINISHED FLOOR ELEV. Q II , 1 - „ j UFIRE j% ,�'• �j'� v I: ,r. =j~ f -6' PRIVACY FEN 'E TO BE IN TALLED=6 OUTH t ® }y i o Q L - FLOW LINE -It o0O 0 0 ,��, A / L r_ TB i • ' ; _ . Lo _ . FND - FOUND \� N col \ N OF NORTH BOUNDARY TYPiC . L 243.08` 121.12 �- - 121.4 - 121.4-' r -`, TS 4 -50 7 \ - _., { , i1r f= -G- -GAS LINE `r`��\\\ N o li W GAS METER �N M to tD N M � EiVE17A S-77LJ LJ lJ ca GHANDICAP UY WIRE ANCHOR00 _ i_ S g O C% ? ""! HCR - HANDICAP RAMP p1RrROq_p , - _.._._.__...___\__._.__..___._____-- _..._._.__._.. .-_---_..-..-___.�..- -_._._ -_ ._... _._._.._-.._ _.._..___.-__-__--___._..___..-- ---1._..-- ..__--.........._._.._._. _._._.. E r 3 „ - INV - INVERT ELEVATION 1 6 7. D&M,i -� TYPICAL - M APPR03,IMATE - i- -, I f� IP IRON PIPE co ! ° O__ 9 _T ^__�D6N ACCESS �j 7.17 % % > -7 > f , , \ /t ]'1 V / I ry Q / . 4 , , IR -IRON ROD d' �` 7 // U 150.7' ' LOT DETAIL Cl - ARC LENGTH � �• Dlfe.�; _ D&M - 78. 5 78. 5 78. 5 85 LP -LIGHT POLE O s I r f f� _ ... �..... ....� !h I-(� U'- - -.F_ _l_. _ _ o NTS �'J [� ' U U 7 6.7 g q. , 5 8 q- , � • � � � n � T �y/� -" %� � { t� LSA -LANDSCAPED AREA � �C 8 4.5 " 8 4.5 " 9 2.5 \ O > rn �11F I- �m(� r 1 MEAS -MEASURED I � MITERED END SECTION _ (�)iCO m n ^ r' _ , -P Ut �J C7 O® MANHOLE +.� ^I 00 s n -ri 1 F 7 F* 7 F* 7 F Csl u I rn ITT N ` '� M ^ v' -P (A C7 O Q - MONITORING WELL Q_%Fz > ITl -, DTI W U1 VI ( �J1 .% N&D -NAIL &DISK O `D Z v� E '� ( > Qo �8 (AO V1 C3 OHE - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC W r��CIO o ' L� P = � rn rn� `,1 N -�C� 1 is -' D try ( V, I I 41>t ^ 12 8-8 J ��j OL - ON LINE 0 V � c� ,J L j I L� �1 S J `f a I rn cn O { .� 4 (A G71 c71 Gil (71 fr+ Z J �i v N m 1 -a ORB OPLAT L RECORDS BOOK W D > N Gil Gil �JI GR -Z O N •�4 r;� 1� PC POINT- 3 0 . D Dec M TURE m r- ( 3 s �' 0 Q� 65 N PEP - PER ENGIINEERINGAPLANS ``+ O Fq > �. • %' t" V -�-�•� 49. �� ^ PI - POINT OF INTERSECTION W I N 1 --� 6 •� cn C� J �� rn z �, - cn-i z �, cs 77. 70.9' - C� � e ' J7 O _ -i -� - COMMENCEMENT 'J O t � � u y � , I I I I I i I '--•-•-�t / -- •� �s � (0 CJl � POC POINT OF .��� � {s t, . •�, POB POINT OF BEGINNING rO '• i ® " -'- � T }��_ _ - ,, PP -POWER POLE v � E tr p Ftr ; r r =- Z -- - ._-- � ' � � � ` -PARKING SPACES i - t _ t I T'1 - TANGENCY _• ( ____� � /�'� _ 1 � _ _ _ � � PT POINT OF TAN EN J / _ - L - J D PVC - PLASTIC PIPE / 1 1 R - CURVE RADIUS Cam+ O •L , 4 ---D4"i f�---.,,..._... � - SZ� / 5.2' f ( RCP -REINFORCED CONC. PIPE 4111111 .. t r n ... , r ,q�, Q� 6 J 2 / %J �^ rJ�,� SAN - SANITARY LINE S 37.6 7 (� "y 173 �' J / . 6 69.6 ' ' CS 0) cil V ' SN -SIGN 1 C3� UA t>t ��) C 00.00 _SPOT ELEVATION -Q (n -SD- STORM/DRAIN LINE A J _ STORM ' N� �-9 rr ►^00 l ®� C� C� Ul f ` , Gd O S[- H - STORM INLETLE Cul J J ^ ^ 5.1 �� Z - TOP OF BANK N w ' ^ J cn 00 Gil oO- TO h; I /^ L� 0 O Gn 00 (JI ( ( 0192 (� TP -TRAFFIC POLE 1 ( o 0 0 o c9 ��. l L____ v t 5 Z O ^ -* - -- TRAFFIC SIGN =r3 P`v"' G� _ - - L J ___! l� TR - CABLE RISER R ^�I Q t� i�; �I�` (.1J � � 1 'L `, ' C� NB -TAB FiC SIGNAL BOX No I 1�-- 48.2 �f� cn r I- TYP TYPICAL 112' 1 0 0' , Z 4 t '", 1 0 2, v j C l ��` (+ j UE - UTILITY EASEMENT 86.3 0 ft t ^ rn (� 1 �� UNTL - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE (~Q4 V / 38 Lf -W- - WATER LINE Q_ icn ^ �? 86' 78.5 _'_'U C,Z N o 'cs t 6' - WOOD FENCE O Gil �.I 7 8.5 5 5.3 t �p o \ 12 0 (-t j ^ > i W F - WATER METER D m C L71 CSJ LQ� O� D ►� -WATER VALVE Z 0 Ull F F- d. a.3 �, o 0 ljj (A cn v.j r CIS =_ N d v <' = t c'! C� cn -P cs► c�, N �Z�,� i v� t c��, �/�� G I� Cyr' U' _ --'<< f:: �� o T z n p J N �f ff cn fcyl cil ff to til cr t 7 q ^ �' r,-� °) - o 10 o ul '� 25 cp 1 ;0 59.4' 80.5' Q) �i n f71 Z� �, 9 to � - E �. �y c9 , �[ � �' ITT of � � � �'\� --, �� � \ OZ � t71 ; � � � � l O _r uj cp `e `I C� i- z (Tl 0 - ^ -� �\ \ ��• 0 � N c I r� 1 /� ro 6 6.7 75 78.5) 3 6.5 c� cs` O cA o cyl--•T- " >r �' ,7 F . t } _ n � O O �i . �� t (1� �, �cp � i r1N + Z N J N N o� VV F' J 0 Q N (� �\ 1'� '�. V co c U� D� W N t�i� �� �' �'` -� �? g to 00 � OR o I 25 �1 O � �_ c 00 1 � 6 , 00 ., z WATER SYMBOL LEGEND DD Vm O `�- 70 ' 75• ' ^-Q LU C� �j ~ C� WATER LINE V 3( 3Q FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY c1 I rn v O .6 3 5 6 o O cfl 11 A ,��� s x_ ' `._ __ ' -_I � �' >� I o 0,2. 83 c� �, •�'' W t L U) --I ° i\J cD 0? 5 • g = - gg BLOWOFF t t F- �Qu ' _ f ' N %, � 0 t� J t , Q z _a VALVE AND C I VALVE BOX j Q IN ��(F�cn �^► O' / �`�\! Gil C.O Q = z L i O REDUCER ,� o z O v (�1 V ' ` a �+ DOUBLE WATER SERVICE W/ METERS T 1r,9 N O i- L0 0) ^ c71 T 0 (n C W METER E U N U C17� CT\ �lll` - ^ v J SINGLE WATER SERVICE / cj) \� -P to / t ,' J 1�\ �.' � Q c .0, Lu cy Z I C �' �' S '' coil O \ cil_ O � o � c'7 t • ' .5�7 -� 1 _ may/ J` i ,� C fi & P`.\ (� Lt-t} REUSE MAIN > v 30 UI / 5 // - (- `` NC `- 1 DOUBLE REUSE SERVICE W/ METERS T4W_ . c � FENC SEMI � • o ° Lu Q i- Q •�, N �� / J J ,Cb �/ Q �j' EFL j �y -0° SINGLE REUSE SERVICE W/ METER T O z r o _ \ N S '� �� ' 7 0 r SANITARY SYMBOL LEGEND c O Cn �J /� --��� j � SAN SEWER LINE 4JL w ci co ' N . O 2Q+ .O� ` : • r p Z � �"� DOUBLE SERVICE LATERAL v U = S' 1 N �_ SINGLE SERVICE LATERAL ., rrl 7,' / • \�/ /� Z4� NCY7 SANITARY MANHOLE W C O O 10 W f\ 3 V.Z-v V �C1 O 0•9Ob �1 CLEANOUT a� c 3 t� / t w C J O S� SEWER MAIN IN CONIC ENCASEMENT ^ N °? o �o o aD aD v .[ Z • s - --- - 0 �z x �.,` I 1 �..•3 - LIFT STATION �, In O ^ �\ , ' % Gn . `v (, i p i�3 ;':, �y FORCE MAIN O t o DRY RETENTION AREA A2 _ oco ul -' A POSED 20' UTILiITY PFDES- r0 �5`Z 0 1 PRO S EASEMENT TYP.T / CROSS -ACCESS ;s 0 c + 0 0 00 V V TRI A�! CE20S - I�' o cn pNO 0 I G?�t +-- - CIO N O I� \ '� J EMEND, _ O ENGINEER n o FEPS l O O, 5 �, 5 PE E 0.�0 L o 50 to .�MAY 4 2005 Rl Q \ \ \ Y _ « RONALD HE OP! •II PE, FL. `REG. NO.34836 r c, '{( DESIGN DRAFT i CHECK O _< \ Zoe -- �0' Z 1 - ._._- 0 ! - - o �- CX7 - 4 I 1 ��0.\0\ �`_ � _t RMH DaG I cJ 1\3oZC\ - I o - - f� PROJECT N0. 00 �_Tj, c-) 01054T n O \ 1p2.0 01.0 - 0'Zp ti p'ZO l C .3` I y�,_, ,-s T ov 0 N 1i DAT N EOCTOBER, 2001 C7 N !, EXIST. D&T?AGE_-_ESM v� '�- �� _ o O O = a \ D QQ QP Q ° Y - -ORB 3 i53, PG 2103 - �'l C C\ SCALE 1 6 0 ' O z Q M r \� » >"`�_ �'��� N r , (� Z SHEET rn ZD (il t� j pPROX 1 -