Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-09-2016 Minutes Mayor Commissioners Rusty Johnson John Grogan, District 1 Rosemary Wilsen, District 2 City Manager Richard Firstner, District 3 Robert Frank Joel F. Keller, District 4 ocoee florida PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTING AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES August 9, 2016 I. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 pm A. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum Present: Chairman McKey, Vice Chairman Marcotte, Member Dillard, Member Evans, Member Keethler, Member Richemond, Member Sills, Member West. Also present were City Planner Rumer, Assistant City Attorney Crosby-Collier and Recording Clerk Heard. Absent: N/A II. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting held July 12, 2016. Motion for Approval of Consent Agenda: Moved by Member Keethler, Seconded by Member Sills; Motion carried unanimously 8-0. 7:02 pm III. OLD BUSINESS - None 1 Page Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 IV. NEW BUSINESS A. The Park at 429 Planned Unit Development (PUD) (East Crown Industrial PUD) Annexation and Initial Zoning to PUD/Land Use Plan Project No(s): AX-04-16-58 & RZ-16-04-03 City Planner Rumer 7:03 pm City Planner Rumer presented a summary of the subject property, which is vacant/undeveloped and located on the North side of Palm Drive, on the west side of SR 429 (Western Expressway) and the east side of East Crown Point Road. This site consists of three parcels with three different parcel identification numbers, but the longest parcel lies half within the city and the other half within Orange County. The northern section lies within Orange County, is eligible for voluntary annexation, and is considered contiguous to the City of Ocoee since it is bordered by property located within the City limits on the eastern boundaries. It is located within the Ocoee-Orange County Joint Planning Area (JPA). The annexation and rezoning is consistent with the Future Land Use Element Policy. The applicants propose to develop the 45.85 acres as a light industrial/flex office PUD with six office buildings at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.037. The permitted uses will be limited to those uses permitted within the I-1 (Light Manufacturing and Warehousing) except automotive sales (new and used), boat sales and service, mobile homes and travel trailer sales, monument sales, motor vehicle wholesale and lumber yards. Access from the site will be via two (2) access points on Palm Drive and three (3) access points on East Crown Point Road, which has a 35 mile-per-hour speed limit. The proposed plan is limiting the trucks to two entrances; the eastern entrance on Palm Drive and the northern entrance on East Crown Point Road. A left-turn lane is proposed on Palm Drive turning left onto East Crown Point Road, and a left-turn lane is proposed at the middle entrance on East Crown Point Road. The PUD provides for dedication of ten (10) feet of additional right-of-way on Palm Drive and East Crown Point Road. East Crown Point Road is part Orange County, part City of Winter Garden and part City of Ocoee; and therefore, Winter Garden and Ocoee are working on a signal at the intersection of East Crown Point Road and Palm Drive as part of the 429 overlay. A future segment of the West Orange Trail Connector will run along Palm Drive. Buffers are being provided on East Crown Point Road of 25 feet and 35 feet along State Road 429. A master stormwater system is proposed for all three parcels combined, and on-site parking will be available. 7:15 pm Member West declared that he will not be voting on this project, because he owns part of the land. (Form 88 on file in the Clerk's Department.) 2IPage Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 City Planner Rumer advised the Board that the 429 Moratorium and a pre-annexation agreement is regulating this land and assisting it in moving forward. He continued describing the proposed building, and emphasized that the City has the capacity to serve the proposed structures with water/sewer along with future sites along State Road 429, because of the upcoming installation of a 50" forcemain through downtown to Plant Street. The property will be provided Police, Fire, Utilities, and Solid Waste from the City. The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City limits, urban services can be provided, and the annexation meets state and local regulations. The land use and initial zoning are also consistent and compatible with surrounding properties. Development Review Committee (DRC) Recommendation: On August 2, 2016, the DRC met to determine if the proposed annexation and initial zoning was consistent with the City's regulations and policies. When the discussion was finished, the DRC voted to recommend approval of the annexation and initial zoning to PUD/Land Use Plan for The Park at 429 PUD. Staff Recommendation: Based on the above analysis and the subsequent DRC recommendation, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Annexation and zoning to PUD (Planned Unit Development and associated Land Use Plan subject to the resolution of outstanding staff comments. Discussion: 7:20 pm Vice Chairman Marcotte mentioned that City Planner Rumer indicated a traffic signal is not warranted at the intersection and asked if a traffic study was performed. City Planner Rumer indicated a traffic study was performed. Discussion ensued regarding traffic and specifically proposed turn lanes. Vice Chairman Marcotte asked about tree mitigation and expressed there are a lot of trees within the north section. City Planner Rumer explained what is contained in the northern section of the site and discussed tree requirements within the site plan process. Member Sills advised City Planner Rumer that there are no plans within the five-year plan to upgrade Palm Drive to assist children walking to school. He is concerned with trucks driving along Palm Drive. City Planner Rumer agreed that currently there is not a plan in the five-year Capital Improvement Plan with Palm Drive. However, he advises the Board the City is currently studying Palm Drive with regards to the State Road 429 overlay and the Downtown Master Plan, which Palm Drive is recognized now as very significant. Member Keethler mentioned this project will increase the amount of truck traffic on Palm Drive as well as East Crown Point Road. City Planner Rumer indicated that is anticipated in which an entrance will be created on Palm Drive. 3IPage Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 Chairman McKey asked why the traffic study is not included in the packet. He is concerned about the traffic on East Crown Point Road and Palm Drive. He further inquired if the applicant is required to pay for part of the 50" forcemain proposed to be installed. City Planner Rumer answered in the affirmative. Member Richemond also expressed his concerns about the traffic study and the number of trucks utilizing the roads in this area; and further, asked if the traffic study is available for the Board to see. City Planner Rumer said the traffic study is available for them to see. Member Keethler asked if there is urgency to this project that entails the Board to have to consider it before criterions are established. City Planner Rumer indicated this plan will have less stringent criterion compared to other segments within the 429 overlay; and further, conveyed that the applicant can speak about moving the project forward. Member Keethler commented about the adjacent apartment complex in that it is not compatible with this proposed project. City Planner Rumer advised that the apartment complex was built when nothing was around but orange groves. He further discussed certain studies that were performed in this industrial area such as the 2006 Northwest Sector Study, which shows this property as industrial; the Tri-Cities Study, the 429 Master Plan. He explained how State Road 429 is now a regional thoroughfare and of great significance to this area, because the Wekiva Parkway Extension is almost complete. Further discussion entailed the proposed project area and the 429 corridor. He conveyed this project is proposed as an expensive Class A Industrial/Flex, Monday through Friday shipping/office place. Chairman McKey asked what "outstanding staff comments" refer to under "Staff Recommendation" in the Staff Report. City Planner Rumer explained the outstanding staff comments were the truck entrance and the turn lanes, which were already addressed. Member Keethler again asked about the adjacent apartments. City Planner Rumer explained the 25 foot landscape buffer and proposed six (6) foot wall, which he further explained is appropriate for this type of zoning. Matt Sullivan, Applicant, TSG Development, gave a brief overview of why they picked this particular site and stated the goal with this proposed project is for the businesses to have quick access onto East Crown Point Road and then onto State Road 429. Chairman McKey indicated he anticipates total gridlock in the area of East Crown Point Road and Palm Drive and inquired if the applicant will be making any additional improvements to that area to alleviate traffic congestion. Mr. Sullivan answered they do not foresee making any additional improvements. Member Dillard asked what he anticipates their normal operating hours will be. Mr. Sullivan said that typically it will be an industrial user. He further discussed the buildings, bays and tenants in more detail. He indicated this type of structure does not exist in this area, but there is a tremendous demand for it. 41Page Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 Member Evans inquired further on the anticipated times the businesses may be open. Mr. Sullivan answered he believes most of the businesses will be operating in the daytime hours. He said most of the business will typically be loading in the early morning, shipping out during the day and back in the afternoon. Chairman McKey said he foresees this as being a 24/7 operation for some of the businesses. Member Keethler asked for clarification on the buffer between this proposed project and the adjacent apartments. Mr. Sullivan said they are required to install a six-foot wall, a 25 foot landscaping buffer requirement along with 50 foot setback. He indicated the six-foot wall will be a precast panel wall. The public hearinq was opened. 7:51 pm Chris Martinez, President of Chapin Station HOA, 1838 Lindzlu Street, gave a brief background of his profession, which is developing industrial sites. He stressed this project will not be a mom-and-pop establishment, and there may be businesses that run 24-hour operations. He further stated that the roads in the vicinity need to be modified in order to accommodate the trucks and more traffic in general. He implores the Board to use common sense and advised them that the speed limit is not 35 miles per hour, but 45 miles per hour. The public hearing was closed. Comments from the Board: Chairman McKey asked if there will be any restrictions imposed on Palm Drive. City Planner Rumer stated that they are designating a truck-only entrance on Palm Drive. Member Keethler indicated that the notion that the trucks are not going to drive through town is ridiculous, because if you watch the Sysco trucks, they do not use the State Road 429 toll road. Instead, the trucks get on State Road 50; take a left onto Maguire, which becomes Ocoee Apopka and clog up traffic all the way up to the Sysco plant where there is not a left-hand turn lane and inevitably block traffic to turn left. He suggests it is naive to think that the trucks will not be driving down every single route they can find. He further states he has no issues with the annexation, but he believes the PUD plan needs work regarding the traffic and the apartments. 8:02 pm Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Annexation, Case #AX-04-16-58, for the parcel of land known as The Park at 429 Planned Unit Development (PUD) (East Crown Industrial PUD), subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting; Moved by Member Sills, Seconded by Member Dillard; Motion passed (7-0) with Member West abstaining. 5IPage Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 8:05 pm Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Zoning to PUD/Land Use Plan, Case #RZ-16-04-03, for the parcel of land known as The Park at 429 Planned Unit Development (PUD) (East Crown Industrial PUD) subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting; Moved by Member Sills, Seconded by Vice Chairman Marcotte for Discussion. Vice Chairman Marcotte indicated to City Planner Rumer that he feels he does not have enough information about the traffic in the area, but he believes it will be prudent to know how many lanes in each direction are on East Crown Point Road and Palm Drive. He believes there should be right-turn lanes installed for a proposed complex of this size. He further commented that trucks turning in will back up traffic. He wishes to amend the motion and add language to the effect that more traffic details or a condition should be recommended to the City Commission. Amended Motion: For a revised site plan for traffic movement illustrations and proof of the traffic study, which this Board did not have access to. Member Sills accepted the amended motion. Chairman McKey indicated he is in favor of the amended motion; and further, stated it looks like it could be a traffic problem. Member Keethler stated that the amendment does not sway his concerns about the traffic. He advised he is not in support of this plan and will vote against it; and further, he stated it is premature and needs a better plan. 8:09 pm Vote: Motion passed (6-1) to recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Zoning to PUD/Land Use Plan, Case #RZ-16-04-03, for the parcel of land known as The Park at 429 Planned Unit Development (PUD) (East Crown Industrial PUD); and further, recommends a revised site plan for traffic movement illustrations and proof of the traffic study, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting. Yes: Chairman McKey, Vice Chairman Marcotte, Members Dillard, Evans Richemond, Sills. No: Member Keethler. Abstain: Member West. 61Page Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 8:11 pm B. Oak Trail Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD) Substantial Amendment to the PUD Land Use Plan (LUP) Project# RZ-16-07-04 City Planner Rumer City Planner Rumer began by explaining what constitutes a substantial amendment and advised the Board the last PUD approval for this LUP was on April 19, 2016. Since that date the contracted homebuilder walked away from the project. Consequently, the applicant has brought forth a new revised plan being sought by Lennar Homes. He presented a summary of the old plan that was approved on April 19, 2016, which provided for 126 lots, a pool lot, residential lot sizes of 50 feet by 120 feet (101 units) and 40 feet by 110 feet rear-loaded lots (25 units). This project provided 11.19 acres of open space and was proposed to be developed in two phases. This PUD Land Use Plan is located on the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Clarke Road and Clarcona-Ocoee Road. The subject property is approximately 38.62 acres in size, is currently undeveloped and is partially covered with trees mostly on the south side and along the eastern boundary of the property of which approximately three (3) acres are designated as wetlands. The remainder of the site is open field. The newly-proposed PUD Land Use Plan is proposing 134 lots with the same lot sizes, but with a different 40 foot product, more 40 foot lots, and more open space. The residential lots sizes are 50 feet by 120 feet (35 units), 40 feet by 120 feet front-loaded lots (83 units), and 40 feet by 110 feet front-loaded lots (16 units). The open space is increased from 11.19 acres to 12.22 acres within the development and is proposed to be developed in one phase. Since the rear-loaded lots were changed to front-loaded lots, staff agreed to bring this in front of the Board as a substantial amendment. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) met on August 2, 2016, and reviewed the Proposed Amendment to the PUD Land Use Plan for Oak Trail Reserve PUD. There were technical issues to be addressed from staff based on changed lot lines. The DRC voted to , unanimously recommend a Substantial Amendment be brought forward, subject to the resolution of the remaining staff comments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the proposed Substantial Amendment to the PUD Land Use Plan for Oak Trail Reserve PUD, subject to reviewing the Lennar Homes amenities and hardscape proposal and affirmation on proposed home products. Discussion: 8:23 pm , Chairman McKey asked if there are any waivers or outstanding comments. City Planner Rumer responded in the negative, because this is only a change in housing type and lot yield; and further, he advised the Board this will come back for final revisions with the Final Subdivision Plan. 7IPage Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 Vice Chairman Marcotte advised the Board that he is not in favor of the smaller lot communities. He mentioned in Winter Garden along the West Orange Trail he has noticed bigger homes on larger lots and questions why this City is not proposing larger lot developments. Member Keethler interjected to advise the Board that 70 percent of the last nine developments that have been approved are 50 feet or less. He expressed he researched the market and determined there are two circumstances which appeals to these type of developments: One, a tight market, which is what we currently have where people are just looking to buy; and two, DINKS, dual income; no kids, which he states are attracted to these developments versus an apartment or townhome. He further commented that he believes it is the Board's responsibility to try to accumulate a larger diversity of housing within the city. Member West interjected and explained that obviously there is a current market for these types of developments; and further, are they to express to developers they cannot build these communities, because they are looking at the years ahead? Member Keethler responded he believes they have a responsibility to provide some balance. Vice Chairman Marcotte indicated he believes planning is beyond today and it should be 30 years out. Chairman McKey commented they cannot predict what the future is going to be 8:30 pm Richard Wohlfarth, Applicant, Engineer with IBI Group, Inc., explained what developments he has been involved with in the surrounding vicinity. He discussed the past planned projects on this site and stated the land has great vertical and horizontal movement, but relayed the costs are high, because of the Clarke Road extension and hooking up water and sewer lines. He discussed the various models of the Lennar homes explaining they will range in size from two bedrooms/two baths to five bedrooms/four-and- a-half baths and conveyed they are not ticky-tacky type homes. He expressed this community is designed for families with children; and further, said they have added a big park right next to the West Orange Trail. He described the community further saying there will be connections to the West Orange Trail and indicated it will be fully surrounded by a panel wall system and railing with columns alongside the trail. He commented that research has shown that current buyers are not looking for large lots, but they are looking for amenities and less maintenance. 8:37 pm Mark McDonald, Director of Forward Planning, Lennar Orlando, described the type of homes in which they are proposing to build and mentioned they are attempting to push the garages back, which will provide a better streetscape. He explained the history of Lennar and about the company in general. He indicated the homes are between 1,600 to 3,800 square feet with a very broad range of floor plans. The prices will range between $240,000 up to approximately $350,000. He further explained the Lennar's "Everything's Included" philosophy, which includes high quality/value, affordability and the price-is-the- price process for simplified buying. 8IPage Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 y3 Member Sills asked if all floor plans in the handout will be available to homebuyers. Mr. McDonald indicated all five plans under the 40-foot plans will be available, and they most likely will not offer all seven homesite plans under the 50-foot plans, because there are only 35 lots within this category. Member Sills further inquired if the potential buyers pick the lot and then pick the home. Mr. McDonald indicated that a lot of builders sell the lot with the home and conveyed it is becoming less frequent to build to suit, because it is more expensive. Chairman McKey expressed that he is satisfied that there seems to be extra parking for 50 vehicles and inquired if there will be RV parking. Mr. McDonald indicated this community will have an HOA, which will maintain the streets and all the common areas, gates and fences; and further, there will be standard rules which will not allow overnight parking or storage of boats or RVs. Chairman McKey suggested it would be nice if the two corner lots were moved in a little to facilitate maneuvering around the corner and provide parking. He further inquired about the mail location. Mr. McDonald indicated there will be a mail kiosk with parking. Mr. McDonald spoke further about the amenities of this proposed gated community. He indicated because of the smaller scale of this community it makes more sense to have a splash pad instead of a pool, which he concludes will lower the long-term maintenance costs. The following are some of the proposed amenities that he discussed; an open playfield, a shaded event pavilion alongside the park with parking and access to the trail. Member Evans asked if they will be installing bike racks. Mr. McDonald explained once they design the landscape, irrigation and hardscape plans, the bike racks, benches and picnic tables will be designed into the plan. The public hearing was opened. Aleida Verdasco, 1711 Sparkling Water Circle, addressed the Board and indicated she resides right down the street from this proposed project and said she is excited about this new development. She spoke about the 40 foot lots indicating they are great for starter homes, and she is in favor of the lower-maintenance home. She explained she has worked in conjunction with Lennar and indicated they do a lot of research with their projects. Her concern with a project of this small size is where the construction entrance will be and how it will affect Clarke Road. She spoke about the design of the homes, which she feels is nice, but wishes they had more of an urban feel. She spoke about her community pool and how busy it is with kids during the summertime and it gives them somewhere to go and something to do and feels a pool is much more beneficial than a 'f splash pad, and she asked them to reconsider the pool. She commented that the trail is a great asset, but suggests the fence alongside the trail should also have an urban feel, because the City of Ocoee is moving towards a new look, and she would like them to help the City move forward. . 9IPage Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 Richard Wohlfarth responded about the construction entrance. He explained the extension of Clarke Road will be built, and they can inquire with the City to see if they can keep Hobson Road open so the trucks can enter through the back of the site. Mark McDonald responded to Ms. Verdasco's comments. He explains that even though the lot sizes are small, there is adequate room to install a small pool if the homeowner wishes to do so. He discussed community pools and the code required to build them. He explained the size of pool required for this small community would feel very small; and further, he clarified the feel of a big community pool only comes with the larger communities. He further responded they are open to suggestions; and further, if the City deems a pool is a requirement, then they would comply, but the financials would have to be reconfigured. The public hearing was closed. 9:10 pm Motion: Move that the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommend to the Ocoee City Commission Approval of the Oak Trail Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD) Substantial Amendment to the PUD/ Land Use Plan, Project No. RZ-16-07-04, subject to resolution of the remaining staff comments before the City Commission meeting; Moved by Member West, Seconded by Member Sills; Motion passed 7-1. Yes: Chairman McKey, Vice Chairman Marcotte, Members Dillard, Evans, Richemond, Sills, West. No: Member Keethler. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. Project Status Report- City Planner Rumer advised the Board the City is finalizing 3' documents for a Final Public Workshop on the Downtown Development Plan, which they anticipate bringing to the City Commission during the Budget Workshop being held on August 15, 2016. He announced that Zaxby's broke ground in front of the Good Homes Plaza last week. The preconstruction conference was held for Mattamy Homes, the first 150 lots as well. He announced the Dunkin' Donuts on West Road received their final Certificate of Occupancy. He confirmed the charter school will receive a TCO to open tomorrow, August 10, 2016. Chairman McKey inquired about the site at the corner of Maguire and SR 50 where the Perkins used to be. City Planner Rumer indicated the site plan for the commercial parcels is finalized. He indicated a Popeyes is building on the site, and plans have been received from Jimmy John's and perhaps an Aspen Dental. Member Keethler asked about that location, but in the southwest corner. City Planner Rumer discussed the driveway, which the property owners were constructing; and further, he anticipates a site plan soon. He explained it will be a multi-use urban building of about 18,000 square feet. 101Page Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9, 2016 Member Richemond asked if there are any updates regarding the gas station on Ocoee Apopka next to Dunkin' Donuts. City Planner Rumer indicated that the parcel has sold, but he is not aware of what is intended to go there. Member Richemond asked about the parcels before McDonald's. City Planner Rumer indicated that the parcel next to McDonald's does have a limitation on fast food. He advised the Board that Zaxby's is looking for a second location within Ocoee. He advised them further that Taco Bell is looking at the parcel at Fountains West on the east side heading into Publix. B. August Calendar VI. ADJOURNMENT - 9:19 pm ATTEST: APPROVED: A /�///��t ��i /_' _ K.thy -ard, Recording Clerk Rob McKey, Chairm. 2f 11 Page FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAMIRST NANIF—MIDDLE NAMEy� ���� NAME OF B ARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITY,OR COMMITTEE MAILING AD ESS � 'moi– nP' THE BOARD,COUNCIL,C MISSION,AUTHORITY COMMITTEE ON P, t36)6/ �y � WHICHISERVE ISAUNIT OF: CITY V l�� (/ v CO CITY 0 COUNTY 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY C ` �N q p� N E OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: DATE ON WHICH VOT O C, RR r /V / MY POSITION IS: l� b 0 ELECTIVE A APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority,or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary,or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained);to the special private gain or loss of a relative;or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies(CRAB)under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law.A"business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner,joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder(where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who should incorporate the form in the minutes. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form(before making any attempt to influence the decision)with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2) CE FORM 8B-EFF.11/2013 PAGE 1 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f),F.A.C. • APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who must incorporate the form in the minutes.A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. ry� LDISCLOSURR-E-OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, ,©/'1 1-1 MAI 1(f C.. , hereby disclose that on A 9' ,20 / (a)A easure came or will come before my agency which(check one or more) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ; inured to the special gain or loss of , by whom I am retained;or inured to the special gain or loss of ,which is the parent subsidiary,or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b)The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: " 111-1 (ffrt430 /64-1-447 A/A-44-e41-12.4 .r- { If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer, who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. ' 11,11NUIA L-7)14& Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$10,000. CE FORM 8B-EFF.11/2013 PAGE 2 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f),F.A.C.