Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-22-1996 Minutes MINUTES OF THE CITY OF OCOEE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING HELD ON October 22, 1996 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Carlsson called the regular meeting of the Ocoee Code Enforcement Board to order at 7:35 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of City Hall and led in the pledge of allegiance. Member Linebarier led in prayer. The roll was called and a quorum declared present. PRESENT: Chairman Carlsson, Vice Chairman Linebarier, Members Holmes, Lenko, and Alternate Member Skiles. Also present were Attorney Feeney, Senior Plans Examiner Washington, Code Enforcement Officers Conyers and Simon, Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and Clerk/Stenographer Lewis. ABSENT: Members Chestney and Shagner (both absences were excused). Also absent was Alternate Member Godek (unexcused). APPROVALS This item consisted of the Minutes of the September 24, 1996 Code Enforcement Board meeting. Member Santo said that she should be included among the Members who were present at the meeting. Vice Chairman Linebarier, seconded by Member Santo, moved to approve the Minutes of the September 24, 1996 Code Enforcement Board meeting as corrected. Motion carried 6-0. COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS None Vice Chairman Linebarier, seconded by Member Lenko, moved, at the request of the City, to hear a'enda items V. Other Business, (A) Case No. 96-54, Base O.erations Mana'ement Services Inc., (B)Case No. 96-81, Deborah J. Higgins, (C) Case No. 96-53, Gorgonio Ramirez, to follow Case No. 96-54, Alicia F. Roberts, and add item (D) Case No. 96-58, Sarah E. Richards Estate c/o Charles Green (a request for re-hearin' by Thomas A. Donahoe). Motion carried 6-0. Vice Chairman Linebarier, seconded by Member Santo, due to Non-Proof of Service and at the re•uest of the Cit moved to table Case No. 96-90 Jeffre A. & Mar.aret Bratcher Case No. 96-97, Khewatte Persaud Mid-State Apartments, and Case No. 96-98, Sherman K. Flynn to the next meeting. Motion carried 6-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS OF NEW CASES PURSUANT TO NOTICES OF HEARING - The following cases as written in these minutes will use abbreviations to describe the violation(s) and the dates of inspection(s) at the beginning of each case. Code representation: NOCV - Notice of Code Violation; NOH - Notice of Hearing; SOV- Statement of Violation(s); and POS - Proof of Service. L Code Enforcement Board Meeting (60, October 22, 1996 96-54, ALICIA F. ROBERTS 7/10/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:7/15/96 7/15/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:7/23/96 7/15/96 SOV 7/16/96 POS - Mail Cert #P150-535-658 7/23/96 Order of Continuance:8/27/96 7/26/96 NOH 7/26/96 POS - Mail Certified#P150-535-679 8/29/96 Compliance Order:10/22/96 or $100 9/17/96 Affidavit of Non-Compliance At the request of Chairman Carlsson, Code Enforcement Officer Simon was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon. Code Enforcement Officer Simon said that Case No. 96-54 referred to the property at 815 Apricot Drive. Officer Simon said that the respondent had been given a Compliance Order from the August meeting, and had been given until October 22, 1996 for the violation of City Code, Chapter 51-21; Permit Required: "It shall be a violation of this Article for any person to do any building construction, repair work, alteration or remodeling of any building within the scope of this Article without first obtaining a permit therefore from the Building Department. " Officer Simon said that Ms. Roberts had now come into compliance by pulling a permit on October 21, 1996. In response to Vice Chairman Linebarier, Ms. Simon said that the respondent was aware that the existing shed must be moved as required in the permit. Member Holmes, seconded by Alternate Member Skiles, moved to find Alicia F. Roberts, Case No. 96-54, 815 Apricot Drive, in non-compliance of Chapter 51-21, Permit Required, as of July 15, 1996 but in compliance of October 21, 1996, and that no fine be imposed at this time. Motion carried 6-0. Alicia Roberts, 815 Apricot Drive, was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and asked about (1160, a deadline for moving the shed. Chairman Carlsson advised the respondent to contact the City for that information. 96-53, BASE OPERATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 6/19/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:7/02/96 7/08/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:7/23/96 7/08/96 SOV 7/08/96 POS - Mail Cert#P150-535-655 7/23/96 Compliance Order:7/30/96 or $50 per day 8/21/96 Affidavit of Non-Compliance 8/27/96 Order Imposing Fine & Lien:8/27/96 10/14/96 Request for Re-hearing:10/22/96 Chairman Carlsson informed the Board that a letter requesting a re-hearing had been in their meeting packet. Ben Griffin, who gave no address, was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and said that the City had notified him of this hearing because of a nuisance regarding a piece of his property. He said he learned of the meeting upon his return from being out of the state, and he requested a re-hearing. The City had informed him of this meeting. Mr. Griffin expressed his objections about stacked oak wood being considered a nuisance on his property at 20 E. McKey Street and testified that last week the wood had been hauled away. Vice Chairman Linebarier read the original violation that stated tires, propane tank, miscellaneous trash, etc. had also been on the property. Discussion ensued about the violation and the amount of time from the original NOCV and the .w 2 Code Enforcement Board Meeting October 22, 1996 present time. Chairman Carlsson said that Mr. Griffin must contact the City to request a re- inspection before the Board could hear the case again. Member Holmes, seconded by Member Lenko, moved to table Case No. 96-53, Base Operations Management Services Inc., 20 E. McKey Street, to the next meeting, pending coin.fiance. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Griffin suggested that the City change the inspection form to an affidavit rather than "just a form." In response to Vice Chairman Linebarier's request to look into making the minimum standards code inspection request an affidavit, Attorney Feeney said that the forms should come from the City Attorney. Officer Simon said that the City was looking into changing many of their forms. 96-81, DEBORAH J. HIGGINS 9/11/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/13/96 9/16/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:9/24/96 9/16/96 SOV 9/16/96 POS - Certified#P882-518-606 9/24/96 Violation Order: 9/24/96 Compliance Order:10/1/96 or $250 per day Chapter 51-21, 108-19, 108-22 Code Enforcement Officer Simon testified that Case No. 96-81 referred to the property at 332 Little Springhill Drive. Officer Simon said that the case had been brought before the Board at the last meeting, and that some of the violations had been brought into compliance. The Board had issued a Compliance Order for the Land Development Code: Article II 22-4 (97)Dwelling', Single-family: "A private residential building used or intended to be used as a home or residence in which the use and management of all sleeping quarters and appliances for sanitation, cooking, heating, ventilation, and lighting are designed primarily for the use of one(1)family unit, and with partitioning so that any substantial interior portion of the dwelling may be reached without resort to exterior access, and so that the building has one (1) kitchen and one (1) electrical meter." LDC: Article V 5-1 E (1) General except as hereinafter provided: "A: No building, structure or land shall hereafter be used or occupied, and no building or structure or part thereof shall hereafter be erected, constructed, reconstructed, moved or structurally altered, unless in conformity with all of the regulations herein specified for the district in which it is located." The observation had been that the owner was renting a multi-family residential unit in an R-1 zoned area that was zoned for single-family residence only. The property owner was given until October 1, 1996 to notify the City that they had come into compliance with the violations. Officer Simon said that the respondent had requested an inspection, and on October 2, 1996, she and Electrical Inspector Hendix inspected the property and found outstanding electrical violations as well as the violations from the Land Development Code. Upon another request by Ms. Higgins for a re-inspection, Ms. Simon said that she had explained what qualified as a kitchen facility. Also, that Ms. Higgins had denied entrance, unless under protest, to her on October 22, 1996 for a re-inspection as Ms. Higgins would only permit Mr. Hendrix to enter the premises. Ms. Simon would not, under protest, enter the property, and said that she could not verify if the property had been brought into compliance. Discussion ensued about minimum requirements for a kitchen. Deborah J. Higgins, 323 Hormigas Street, was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and said that she had refused to let Code Enforcement Officer Simon in to inspect the property. She also said that she had been willing to let the electrical inspector in but he had been ordered to leave fi 3 Code Enforcement Board Meeting (aly October 22, 1996 by Officer Simon. Expressing her willingness to be cooperative, Ms. Higgins said that the City had been vague about what was or wasn't a kitchen, and presented photographs taken that day, labeled as Exhibit A, B1, and B2, briefing the Board as they reviewed each exhibit. Ms. Higgins said for the record that Officer Simon had identified Exhibit A as the room in question. At the request of Member Lenko, Officer Simon read the criteria of a kitchen. Lengthy discussion ensued again, and Member Lenko, seconded by Member Santo, moved to Issue an Order Imposing Fine and Lien in Case No. 96-81, Deborah J. Higgins, effective October 2, 1996. Motion carried 5-1. Member Skiles voted "nay." Ms. Higgins said for the record that she had never received any inspection notice of any failure. In response to Ms. Higgins's inquiry of a verbatim transcript of the meeting and in giving notice that she planned to appeal the case, Attorney Feeney said that a copy of the tape which was the record that the City maintained, and a copy of the minutes when they were printed, would be available to Ms. Higgins. Respondents must bring their own court reporter if they desired a verbatim transcript of the meeting. 96-88, GORGONIO RAMIREZ 9/5/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/16/96 9/17/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:9/24/96 9/17/96 SOV 9/17/96 POS - Certified#P150-535-599 9/24/96 Compliance Order:10/1/96 or $100 per day Low 10/17/96 Affidavit of Compliance As the respondent spoke no English, Isabel Aguayo, Building Clerk, were sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and testified that to the best of her ability she would translate and interpret for the City. Discussion ensued about the date that the respondent had actually come into compliance, and whether Mr. Ramirez had been working as a subcontractor or operating a business from the property. Code Enforcement Officer Simon stated that the respondent had removed the dry-wall equipment and materials from the property and it had been the evidence used in saying that he was operating a dry-wall company. She said that Mr. Ramirez and his neighbor who had translated for him, had come to the City, stating that the respondent worked dry-wall but it was for a dry-wall company (and not himself). The City was satisfied that Mr. Ramirez was not an independent contractor out of that location. Moises Rangel, 610 Starke Lake Circle, a neighbor, was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and said that the respondent was not aware that he was being fined $100 a day. It was also why Mr. Ramirez had not complied with the order. Gorgonio Ramirez, 604 Starke Lake Circle, was sworn in by Isabel Aguayo, a notary public, and said via translation of Ms. Aguayo that he had no Federal identification number and did not consider himself a subcontractor. He also confirmed that he had received the Compliance Order that had been mailed by the City on September 24. Officer Simon stated that the respondent had been informed with Ms. Aguaryo as an interpreter, that the area needed to be cleaned up, and that he needed to come to the City about an application for an occupational license before tibr 4 Code Enforcement Board Meeting October 22, 1996 3:00 p.m. on ? Ms. Aguayo and Mr. Rangel had a difference about their interpretation or translations, and Ms. Aguayo assured the Board that the respondent had known about the time period given to apply for the license. Vice Chairman Linebarier, seconded by Member Skiles, moved that Gorgonio Ramirez, Case No. 96-88, be found in violation of Chapter 119-2 as of September 24, 1996 but in compliance as of October 17, 1996, and that the fine imposed for $100 per day, effective October 1, 1996 be rescinded. Motion carried 5-1. Member Lenko voted "nay." Attorney Feeney and Chairman Carlsson cautioned the respondent about repeat violation for the trash as well as the license. RECESS - 9:05 P.M. - 9:14 P.M. 96-58, SARAH E. RICHARDS ESTATE C/O CHARLES GREEN (Letter from Thomas A. Donohoe requesting a re-hearing) 6/10/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:7/15/96 7/16/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:7/23/96 7/16/96 SOV 7/16/96 POS - Mail Cert#P150-535-674 7/23/96 Compliance Order:7/30/96 or 8/21/96 Affidavit of Non-Compliance $100 per day 8/27/96 Order Imposing Fine & Lien Case No. 96-58 referred to the property at 1207 Flewelling Avenue. Thomas A. Donohoe, P. O. Box 2531, Winter Park 32790, was sworn in by Deputy Clerk Cronnon, and said that he had come before the Board in September. He testified that he had purchased the property toray only to learn that it had been cited with violations. During the last hearing he had no proof of ownership, and had then requested a re-hearing. Everything had since been brought into compliance. Officer Simon explained that a copy of the Orange County Tax Record listing Mr. Donohoe as the current owner had been included in the meeting packet. Discussion ensued about whether all the violations had been corrected, and a re-inspection of the property on October 22, 1996, revealed it had come into compliance. Member Lenko, seconded by Vice Chairman Linebarier, moved that the fine on the property in Case No. 96-58, Sarah E. Richards Estate c/o Charles Green be reduced to zero and the lien be removed as of October 22, 1996. Motion carried 5-0. Chairman Carlsson expressed his objections as there were outstanding fees involved with the case, and voted "nay." 96-85, ELIZABETH S. SALTERS (Repeat Violation) 8/9/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/16/96 9/17/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:9/24/96 9/17/96 SOV 9/17/96 POS - Certified#P150-535-598 9/24/96 Order of Continuance:10/22/96 10/17/96 Hand Delivery Chairman Carlsson said for the record that no one was present to represent the case. Deputy Clerk Cronnon announced that the Notice of Hearing for this Board meeting had been hand delivered. Code Enforcement Officer Simon testified that Case No. 96-85 referred to the property located at 801 Sullivan Avenue. Officer Simon said that on September 3, 1996, after receiving complaints of violations at the address, she had investigated and found a Jeep without a current license tag and an inoperable white vehicle on jacks. On September 9, 1996, an NOCV was sent to the property owner as identified by Orange County Tax Records, Elizabeth 5 Code Enforcement Board Meeting October 22, 1996 S. Salters, for violation of Chapter 165-3 Prohibited acts (a): "No person shall abandon or keep any junk vehicle on any public property or any private property within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee. Officer Simon said that since this was a repeat violation no compliance date was given. On September 16, 1996 a re-inspection revealed that the property remained in non-compliance. On September 17, 1996, an SOV and NOH to the September Board meeting were sent via restricted delivery. The case was continued to this meeting due to Non-Proof of Service. Ms. Simon said that she had spoken with the residents on the phone after the September meeting, and she had advised her that she would be removing the Jeep from the property. The Jeep had been moved from the driveway to the backyard, and the white vehicle had been removed from the property. The property was still in violation because the Jeep was still being stored on the property, and there was no proof that a tag had been issued on it. After hearing no further communication from the property owner that the Jeep had been removed, Ms. Simon did a re-inspection. The Jeep remained on the property. An NOH to this Board meeting was hand delivered on October 17, 1996 by the Ocoee Police Department. To date no re-inspection has been requested for compliance, no tag information has been obtained from the property owner showing that a tag has been obtained, and a re-inspection on today's date produced a status of non-compliance. The Jeep remained on the property. In response to Chairman Carlsson's inquiry about the NOH listing the case as a first violation rather than as a repeat offender, Attorney Feeney said that the City should continue and re- notice or handle it as a first time violation. Officer Simon preferred to re-serve as it was a repeat violation, that it was the same vehicle that they continued to return to the property. Chairman Carlsson said at the request of the City, Case No. 96-85, Elizabeth S. Salters, would be tabled until the November meeting. 96-86, RANDALL L. & MARISEL CHEEVER 8/19/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/16/96 9/17/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:9/24/96 9/17/96 SOV 9/17/96 POS - Certified#P150-535-601 9/24/96 Order of Continuance: Meeting Date 10/22/96 Chairman Carlsson said for the record that no one was present to represent the case. Code Enforcement Officer Simon testified that Case No. 96-86 referred to the property located at 505 Catwood Drive. Officer Simon said that the City had not received Proof of Service on this case but the property had been brought into compliance. Officer Simon said that the City was dismissing Case No. 96-86, Randall L. & Marisel Cheever. 96-87, VICKIE L. BUSCHE 7/30/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/16/96 9/16/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:9/24/96 9/16/96 SOV 9/16/96 POS - Certified#P150-535-600 9/24/96 Order of Continuance:10/22/96 10/16/96 Notice of Hearing:Meeting Date 10/22/96 10/17/96 Hand Delivery Chairman Carlsson said for the record that no one was present to represent the case. Code Enforcement Officer Simon testified that Case No. 96-87 referred to the property located at 6 Code Enforcement Board Meeting (iry October 22, 1996 905 Spring Creek Drive. Officer Simon said that on July 15, 1996, she had observed two hauling trailers (1) a "hot dog" type vendor setup, and 2) a boat hauling trailer) parked in the front building line. On July 30, 1996, an NOCV was sent to the property owner as identified by Orange County Tax Records, Vickie L. Busche, for violation of Article VI 6-4(H)5-b: "Not more than one camping or travel trailer or hauling trailer per family living on the premises shall be permitted, and said trailer shall not exceed twenty-four(24)feet in length or eight (8)feet in width;and further provided that said trailer shall not be parked or stored for more than forty-eight (48) hours unless it is located behind the front yard building line. A camping or travel trailer, or camper vehicle, shall not be occupied either temporarily or permanently while it is parked or stored in any residential district, except when it is located in an authorized mobile home park." The respondent was given until August 13, 1996 to come into compliance. The property owner expressed by phone that she wanted to bring the property into compliance, and requested and received an extension until September 15. On September 16, 1996, a re-inspection of the property produced a status of non-compliance. On September 17, 1996, an SOV and NOH were sent to Ms. Busche for the September Board meeting. The case was continued to this meeting due to Non-Proof of Service. On October 18, 1996, an NOH to this meeting was hand delivered to the property owner by the Ocoee Police Department. Ms. Busche contacted the City on October 21, 1996 and requested a re-inspection which was made on October 22 that revealed the property had been brought into compliance. Member Lenko, seconded by Alternate Member Skiles, moved to find Vickie L. Busche, Case No. 96-87 in non-compliance of Article VI 6-4 (H) 5-b as of August 13, 1996 but in compliance as of October 22, 1996, and that no fine be imposed. Motion carried 6-0. 96-92, VALERIE N. GENTRY 7/9/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:8/20/96 9/13/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:9/24/96 9/13/96 SOV 9/13/96 POS - Certified#P150-535-611 Chairman Carlsson said for the record that no one was present to represent the case. Code Enforcement Officer Simon testified that Case No. 96-92 referred to the property located at 1104 Maureen Avenue. Officer Simon said that on July 7, 1996, she had observed numerous violations existing at the address. On July 9, 1996, an NOCV was sent to the property owner as identified by Orange County Tax Records, Valerie N. Gentry, for violation of Chapter 165-3 Prohibited acts (a): "No person shall abandon or keep any junk vehicle on any public property or any private property within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee. Also, Article VI 6-4 (H) 5-b: "Not more than one camping or travel trailer or hauling trailer per family living on the premises shall be permitted, and said trailer shall not exceed twenty-four (24)feet in length or eight (8)feet in width; and further provided that said trailer shall not be parked or stored for more than forty-eight (48)hours unless it is located behind the front yard building line. A camping or travel trailer, or camper vehicle, shall not be occupied either temporarily or permanently while it is parked or stored in any residential district, except when it is located in an authorized mobile home park." Also, Chapter 115-3: Creation Prohibited: "No person shall allow to be dumped, placed, accumulated or otherwise located on lands or premises owned by such person within the city any nuisance and menace to public health, safety and welfare, etc..." The observation for this violation had been that of a Chevrolet truck for sale with an expired tag, and a covered car with grass growing around it at the side of the house, a trailer in the front yard with no tag, and miscellaneous trash and debris in the yard. The respondent was given until July 19, 1996 to come into compliance. On August 20, 1996 a re- 7 Code Enforcement Board Meeting October 22, 1996 inspection revealed that the property remained in non-compliance. On September 13, 1996, the property owner was sent via restricted delivery an SOV and NOH to the September meeting. The case had been brought before the Board during the September meeting and testimony was given at that time. A Violation Order was issued noting Article VI 6-4 (H) 5-6 was in compliance, and a Compliance Order was issued for Chapter 115-3 Creation Prohibited for the miscellaneous trash and debris in the yard. Prior to the September meeting, the respondent had complied with the junk vehicle violation. The property owner was given on the Compliance Order until October 1, 1996 to come into compliance with Chapter 115-3. The property owner had not requested an inspection. A re-inspection on October 22, 1996 revealed the property had been brought into compliance. Discussion ensued about whether the property was in compliance as of October 2, 1996, and Officer Simon said that it was the responsibility of the respondent to request a re-inspection. Member Lenko, seconded by Member Holmes, moved to Enter an Order Imposing Fine and Lien in Case No. 96-92, Valerie N. Gentry, referencing Chapter 115-3, effective October 2, 1996 and ending on October 22, 1996 when the property had come into compliance. Motion carried 5-1. Alternate Member Skiles voted "nay." 96-99, PAMELA A. ERICKSON 10/11/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/27/96 10/11/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:10/22/96 10/11/96 SOV 10/15/96 POS - Mail Cert#P882-518-823 Chairman Carlsson said for the record that no one was present to represent the case. Code Enforcement Officer Simon said that Case No. 96-99 referred to the property at 742 Licaria Drive. Officer Simon said that after receiving a complaint that a fence had been erected at the address without a permit, she inspected the property on September 3, 1996 and found a 6' ft. privacy fence. Verification with the Building Department revealed no permit existed on this property. On September 9, 1996, an NOCV was sent to the property owner as identified by Orange County Tax Records, Pamela A. Erickson, for violation of City Code, Chapter 51-21; Permit Required: "It shall be a violation of this Article for any person to do any building construction, repair work, alteration or remodeling of any building within the scope of this Article without first obtaining a permit therefore from the Building Department." The property owner was given until September 23, 1996 to bring the property into compliance. On September 23, 1996, a re-inspection revealed that the property remained in non-compliance. On October 11, 1996, an SOV and NOH to this meeting were sent to the property owner. City records reflect that no permits have been issued as of October 22, 1996 on this property. The respondent contacted the Building Department on October 21, 1996 but pulled no permit. Member Holmes, seconded by Member Lenko, moved to find Pamela A. Erickson, Case No. 96-99, 742 Licaria Drive, in non-compliance of Chapter 51-21, Permit Required, as of October 22, 1996, and be given until October 29, 1996 to come into compliance or be fined $100 a day thereafter. Motion carried 6-0. Attorney Feeney corrected for the record a clerical error on page 2 of the SOV in that the re-inspection date should read September 23, 1996, rather than September 15, 1996. Also, the address should be corrected to read 742 Licaria Drive, rather than 724 Licaria Drive. itaw 8 Code Enforcement Board Meeting (tary October 22, 1996 96-103, BRIAN WESTPHAL 08/09/96 NOCV - Re-inspection Date:9/23/96 10/14/96 NOH - Board Meeting Date:10/22/96 10/14/96 SOV 10/14/96 POS - Certified#P882-518-812 Chairman Carlsson said for the record that no one was present to represent the case. Code Enforcement Officer Simon testified that Case No. 96-103 referred to the property located at 1109 Doreen Avenue. Officer Simon said that after receiving a complaint about a junk vehicle, she performed an inspection of the property on August 6, 1996, and determined there was a violation. She had observed an inoperable white van displaying no tag that was parked in the driveway. On August 9, 1996, an NOCV was sent to the property owner as identified by Orange County Tax Records, Brian Westphal, for violation of Chapter 165-3 Prohibited acts(a): "No person shall abandon or keep any junk vehicle on any public property or any private property within the corporate limits of the City of Ocoee." The property owner was given until August 30, 1996 to come into compliance. Officer Simon said that she had received mail from the property owner who was renting the property to a tenant, a copy of the registration for the vehicle which was valid. The property owner had also contacted Ms. Simon who said that the tenant was working on the vehicle to make it operable. A re-inspection on September 23, 1996 found the van, without a tag, on jacks in the driveway. On October 14, 1996, an SOV and NOH to this meeting were sent restricted delivery to the property owner. On October 17, 1996, the respondent contacted her and she met Mr. Westphal at the property for a Minimum Housing inspection as well. On October 21, 1996, the property was re-inspected which revealed it had been brought into compliance. Member Lenko, seconded by Vice Chairman Linebarier, moved to find Brian West.hal Case No. 96-103 in non-compliance of Chaster 165-3 as of Au. st 30 1996 but in compliance as of October 21, 1996, and that no fine be assessed. Motion carried 6-0. OTHER BUSINESS AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD AT THIS POINT WERE CONSIDERED EARLIER IN THE MEETING. In response to Vice Chairman Linebarier, Deputy Clerk Cronnon said that copies of the Orders Imposing Fine and Liens in Case No. 96-66, Ocoee Food Mart and Case No. 96-67, RMN, Inc., and Case No. 96-74, Michael A. and Donna R. Keller, would be provided at the next meeting. COMMENTS City Manager: Absent Code Enforcement Officer Simon announced that the December meeting would fall on Christmas Eve, and Chairman Carlsson said that the Board will discuss that during the November meeting. Code Enforcement Officer Conyers: None Police Department: None Deputy Clerk Cronnon: None 9 Code Enforcement Board Meeting tklaw October 22, 1996 BOARD MEMBERS Member Holmes inquired about security for the monthly meetings, and Chairman Carlsson said that he would speak with Building and Zoning Official Flippen concerning the matter. He also wished everyone a "happy Halloween." Member Lenko: None Vice Chairman Linebarier: None Alternate Member Skiles: None Member Santo announced that she was scheduled for Jury Duty during the date of next month's meeting. Attorney Feeney said that he would soon be into the busy season where he would be out of town for Committee meetings in November through January, and the legislative session in March and April. He planned to be present as often as possible but Mr. O'Quinn was a sharp business lawyer and litigator. He said that Mr. O'Quinn was rapidly learning municipal business and was familiar with the procedures and rules. Chairman Carlsson: None ADJOURNMENT At 10:15 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED: Attest: E" Ale 11171 ��( ¢ l QilicAom- ./rteLH��i, Athena Cronnon, Deputy Clerk F Carlsson, Chairman J ie Lewis, Cler Stenographer a:\wp60\ce102296.M(#3)jfl L 10