HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem V (A) - Second Reading of Ordinance 91-19, Relating to Fire Impact Fees AGENDA 7-02-91
ItemVA 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 11 , 1991
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR ND BOARD OF CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Montye Beamer, T '
Director of Administrative Services
RE: Fire Impact Fee Update
ISSUE
Should the Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners approve
the attached Ordinance which adjusts the Fire Impact Fees .
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The Fire Impact Fee Ordinance (89-47 ) was adopted on December 5,
1989 . In accordance with its annual review requirement , the
attached update and accompanying ordinance revisions are being
submitted.
Data on collection and disbursements are included as part of the
updated study. In summary $304, 498 . 20 were collected since the
adoption; this includes adjustments for $1, 483 . 97 in refunds . No
credits were given. Distributed by District this is as follows :
District 1 $ 50 , 590 . 03
District 2 2 , 257 . 80
District 3 73 , 961 . 24
District 4 177 , 689 . 13
An additional $6, 966. 28 has been earned in interest . The only
expenditure has been $1 , 484 .00 for legal services . Since these
effect all four districts, the interest and expenditure will be
appropriated by activity level among the districts .
Developments with major impact include:
(1) District 1 - Good Homes Plaza
(2) District 3 - Oak Forest Apartments
(3) District 4 - Sawmill , Parkside, Waterside
It should also be noted that a . 96 acre site for Fire Station #3
has been acquired through impact fee negotiations. The site is
located on the west side of Maguire Road and one-half mile south of
the Florida Turnpike.
As the update suggests, no change in fire control benefit districts
has been recommended. The standard response time of five minutes
is being met within the two districts where stations exist .
Changes do, however, occur in the study for:
--variation in service demand for residential and non-
residential .
--current cost of equipment and construction
--additional equipment to meet growth requirement .
Changes in the ordinance include:
--adjustment of fee schedule
--appeal process
--time limit for holding unexpended or unencumbered funds .
--procedure for vested rights determination.
Most fees will increase:
Current Proposed Increase
Rate Rate
District 1 Residential $.06 $.053 (12)
Non-Residential . 17 . 315 85
District 2 Residential $.08 $.092 15
Non-Residential . 19 .097 (49)
District 3 Residential $. 18 $ . 225 25
Non-Residential . 28 . 390 39
District 4 Residential $ . 25 $. 328 31
Non-Residential . 35 . 333 (5)
By District these changes for a 2 ,000 square foot residential and
for a 2 ,000 square foot non-residential are as follows :
Current Proposed
Fee Fee
($) ($)
District 1 Residential 120 106
Non-Residential 340 630
District 2 Residential 160 184
Non-Residential 380 194
District 3 Residential 360 450
Non-Residential 560 780
District 4 Residential 500 656
Non-Residential 700 666
RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends that the Fire Impact Study Update and
accompanying Fee Schedule be accepted and the Ordinance be approved
by the Mayor and City Commissioners .
ki C7,
ORDINANCE NO. 91- 19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA,
REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 89-47 WHICH
ESTABLISHED A FIRE IMPACT FEE; ENACTING A NEW
FIRE IMPACT FEE; ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE;
PROVIDING FOR TIME OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING
DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR AN ANNUAL REVIEW;
PROVIDING FOR CREDITS; PROVIDING FOR
EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR VESTED RIGHTS
DETERMINATION; PROVIDING FOR A TRUST FUND;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
OCOEE, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Short Title and Authority
(A) This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as
the "Fire Impact Fee Ordinance".
(B) The City Commission of the City of Ocoee has the
authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VII of the
Constitution of the State of Florida and Chapter 166, Florida
Statutes.
Section 2. The present Ordinance Number 89-47 of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Ocoee, Florida is hereby repealed
in its entirety.
Section 3. A new Article I of Chapter 30 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Ocoee, Florida, is hereby created and
reads as follows:
Section 30-1. Intent and Purpose
(A) This Article is intended to implement and be
consistent with the City of Ocoee's Comprehensive Plan.
(B) The purpose of this Article is to ensure that new
development pays a fair share of the anticipated costs of equipment
and facilities necessary to provide fire protection for new
development.
(C) This Article is based upon a study by the Ocoee Fire
Department and Planning Department of the anticipated growth in the
City of Ocoee and a projection of the equipment and facilities
necessary to serve the anticipated growth.
1
(D) The intent of the City Commission is to periodically
revise this Article to adjust the fee schedule to reflect changes
in growth patterns in the City of Ocoee and equipment and
facilities necessary to provide fire protection for new
development.
Section 30-2. Fee Imposed; Time of Payment
Any person who, after the effective date of this Article,
seeks to develop land by applying for the issuance of a building
permit for any residential or non-residential dwelling or dwelling
unit, as defined in Section 30-4 herein, shall be required to pay
a Fire Impact Fee prior to the issuance of the building permit or
any other development permit for the construction of any structure
to be used for a residential or non-residential dwelling.
Section 30-3. District Boundaries Fee Schedule
(A) The City of Ocoee shall be divided into four
districts as more particularly set forth in Exhibit "A", the Fire
District boundary map attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
(B) The following Fire Impact Fees are hereby assessed
by the City and shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of
a building permit or any other building permit for the construction
of any structure to be used for a residential or non-residential
dwelling in each district.
District/Dwelling Impact Fee per Square Foot
District 1/Residential $ .053
Non-Residential .315
District 2/Residential $ .092
Non-Residential .097
District 3/Residential $ .225
Non-Residential .390
District 4/Residential $ .328
Non-Residential .333
(C) The fees imposed for residential and non-residential
construction are a result of the City's fee calculation study which
was designed to insure that the impact fees imposed are rationally
related to the benefit received by the applicant.
(D) In the event that an applicant believes the impact
of the construction will be less than that set forth above, the
applicant may, at his option, submit evidence to the City
Commission in support of an alternative assessment. Based upon
convincing and competent evidence, the City Commission may adjust
the impact fee as appropriate for the particular property.
Section 30-4. Definitions For the purposes of this
Ordinance, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
(A) "Residential Dwelling" shall mean each single family
dwelling in each unit of a condominium, duplex, triplex, mobile
home, modular housing, manufactured home, apartment or multiple
dwelling structure designated as a separate dwelling for one or
more persons, whether temporarily or permanently utilized or
2
designed or intended to be utilized for human habitation.
(B) "Non-residential Dwelling" shall mean any structure
which fully encloses space for the occupancy by persons or their
activities other than residential dwellings including but not
limited to professional buildings, commercial buildings, public
assembly buildings or institutional buildings.
Section 30-5. Annual Review of Fire Impact Fee
The City Manager shall report annually to the City
Commission indicating the amount of fees collected under this
Article and the amount of fees distributed. The City Commission
shall review the report of the City Manager and continue or adjust
the Fire Impact Fee as appropriate.
Section 30-6. Credits
(A) An applicant shall be entitled to a credit against
the Fire Impact Fee assessed pursuant to this Article in an amount
equal to the cost of improvements which create excess capacity for
the general public, or contributions to the City of land , money,
facilities, equipment, or services by the Applicant or his
predecessor in interest as a condition of any Development Agreement
entered into with the City. Such credit shall be based on the
following criteria:
(1) The actual cost, or estimated cost
based on recent bid sheet
information of the City of Ocoee or
Orange County, of off-site related
improvements. Improvements eligible
for a credit are those improvements
proposed that will benefit not only
the dwellings on-site, but also the
general public. Improvements not
eligible for a credit are those
facilities that are privately owned
or that serve only the dwellings
within the development.
(2) The actual cost, or estimated cost
of improvements based on recent bid
sheet information of the City of
Ocoee or Orange County with respect
to that portion of on-site
improvements which create excess
capacity for the general public
(3) The contribution of land, money,
facilities, equipment or services by
the Applicant for improvements to
the City's Fire Department which
create excess capacity for the
general public. Services must
relate directly to the provision of
land, facilities, or equipment. The
credit for land contributed will be
based on a pro rata share of the
appraised land value of the parent
parcel as determined by an M.A.I .
appraiser selected and paid for by
the Applicant and approved by the
Development Review Committee, or
based on such other method as may be
mutually agreed upon by the
Applicant and the Development Review
3
Committee. In the event the
Development Review Committee
disagrees with the appraised value,
the City may select and pay for
another appraiser and the credit
shall be an amount equal to the
average of the two appraisals.
(4) Unless otherwise provided in a
Development Agreement between the
City and the Applicant or his
predecessor in interest, no credit
for contributions or donations made
prior to the effective date of this
Article shall be granted unless the
cost of the improvements were paid
for or the contributions were made
within the two years prior to the
Effective Date of this Article.
(5) No credit shall exceed the amount of
the Fire Impact Fee assessed under
Section 30-3 above.
(6) No credit shall be allowed for the over-
sizing of water lines, widening of roads
or other improvements with only an
indirect benefit for fire protection.
(B) The amount of the credit shall be determined by the
Development Review Committee, provided, however, that the
determination may be appealed to the City Commission, whose
decision shall be final and binding on the Applicant.
(C) Any credit issued pursuant to this Section may be
transferred by the Applicant to any successor in interest in the
property.
Section 30-7. Exemptions
The following shall be exempt from payment of the Fire Impact
Fee:
(A) Those residential or non-residential dwellings which
have been issued a building permit or certificate of occupancy
prior to the effective date of this Article.
(B) Additions to or expansions of single family
dwellings.
Section 30-8. Vested Rights
(A) Any owner which was the subject of development order
of the City prior to December 5, 1989, may petition the City for a
vested rights determination which would exempt the owner from the
provisions of this Article. Such petition shall be evaluated by
the City Attorney and determination made based on the following
criteria:
(1) The existence of a valid, unexpired
governmental act of the City on the
specific development for which a
determination is sought;
(2) Expenditures or obligations made or
incurred in reliance upon the authorizing
governmental act that are reasonably
4
equivalent to the fees required by this
Article;
(3) Other factors that demonstrate it is
inequitable to deny the owner the
opportunity to complete the previously
approved development under the conditions
of approval by requiring the owner to
comply with the requirements of this
Article. For the purpose of this
paragraph, the following factor shall be
considered in determining whether it is
inequitable to deny the owner the
opportunity to complete the previously
approved development:
(a) Whether the injury suffered by
the owner outweighs the public
cost of allowing the
development to go forward
without payment of the Fire
Impact Fee.
(B) The City Attorney shall make a written determination
as to whether the owner has a vested right and, if so, whether such
vested right would exempt the owner from the provisions of this
Article.
(C) Any owner aggrieved by a decision of the City
Attorney pursuant to this Section may appeal said decision to the
City Commissioners within 30 days of the date of the written
decision by filing said appeal with the City Clerk.
Section 30-9. Establishment of Trust Fund
The Fire Impact Fees collected by the City pursuant to
this Article shall be kept separate from other revenues of the
City. Funds withdrawn from this account must be used solely in
accordance with the provisions of this Article. The disbursal of
funds shall require the approval of the City Commission.
Section 30-10. Use of Fire Impact Fees
(A) The funds collected by reason of establishment of
the Fire Impact Fee in accordance with this Article shall be used
solely for the purpose of acquisition of facilities and equipment
determined to be needed to provide fire protection for new
development within the City.
(B) All funds shall be used exclusively within the area
from which they were collected and in a manner consistent with the
principles set forth in Florida Statutes and case law and otherwise
consistent with all requirements of the constitution of the United
States and the State of Florida. Said funds shall not be used to
maintain or repair existing fire facilities or equipment or to
acquire facilities or equipment to serve existing development.
(C) Any funds on deposit not immediately necessary for
expenditure shall he invested in an interest bearing account. All
income derived shall be deposited in the appropriate Fire Impact
Fee Trust Fund.
(D) Any funds not expended or encumbered six years from
the date Fire Impact Fee was paid shall , upon application of the
fee payer and proof of payment, be returned with interest at the
rate of six percent annum.
5
Section 30-11. Penalty
Violation of this Article shall constitute a misdemeanor
enforceable in accordance with Section 1.8 of the City Code or by
an injunction or other legal or equitable relief in the Circuit
Court against any person violating this Article or both civil
injunctive and criminal relief.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion hereto.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become
effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1991.
Advertised June 20 , 1991
Read First Time June is , 1991
Read Second Time and Adopted
, 1991
Approved:
ATTEST: CITY OF OCOEE, FLORIDA
By:
Jean Grafton, City Clerk Lester A. Dabbs, Jr. Mayor
FOR USE AND RELIANCE ONLY BY
THE CITY OF OCOEE, APPROVED
AS TO THE FORM AND LEGALITY:
THIS DAY OF , 1991 APPROVED BY THE OCOEE
CITY COMMISSION AT A
Foley & Lardner, MEETING HELD ON
1991.
By: UNDER AGENDA ITEM NO.
City Attorney
6
•
EMI I R LT A
. FIRE CONTROL BENEFIT DISTRICTS
City of Ocoee II _ 1991 UPDATE .
Orange County, rlorlda 1
(2741•
�, O •TIIArfle ZONES I0 ?21 I �
I Q'
222 I n 000ee non� ..16
♦♦I o Cl.n conn— r..•
♦ Q f
41 Qt{
• ., o a, ...r• - I F; /1",3 01
.1 i 1 I ,
d
ec
e I,•' _ - : �_ I_O. STATION TWO_ �i'C ••I I
/ 1' ~
1= 4 / , ',1
1
O _ _ _ __ ' STATION roun� a.
•-•A' t►R 6
a /
O
1 = a
o • i
•
•
n : _ I" . le Al- . • ,7 SILVEn STAn nom:,
a
r
♦. to j { l'.7*'
a� i { .7 : : it I�.,.
I� ' a Ir l P;r aYQ .:ibt'� t{ t
0 i ,I I'i ill1E{ STATION ONF I26i :17 S� LI.�I�t! I / 261
3 A_� I I ,,.�, , 111 t,4 aUr t... �I'
I- i ,+ � yjii itt rr; r'r-•k t iter I/,t'I st•,l t
251 ( Ail ul1- , rtl?,1 , ' 6 •1.r1 • o
•,1••',.‘,-„.. • .t,. r .: . 1�fi t a
• ',,,f ...:''.'4!0'11 • .•irrw•r--wr"46.4Mif+11,4M 't�t•w • O ..•..•.•....r
,' .• 1 `,'• tr r 1 itlop 1''t` 1"."..0.10 r. • {I ty�it
lrt'1 ,t}Itf±�C^i�, m
K ' . k�;,fPYP )•' +I!1 1 .• 1 1 .�✓J �"iti ��"t '�� l •,' N
�'+▪ 'y;••,b•...4.6.,
:•:••:': •'•. r.' .{ 2 6 6.E ' :' i I if•
1 •
z 262
254 *- . • .'it••�. 1: , :Iv..13111s�Z ctaslk o
•.i.•:43,:i►►••.4,4:44e°�.:.e r i t 1,1 G,s ralf,}lsl s
•
t. 1S 5 O o wwww"'E
1•
1 ! . J1074414 •11)4*:•:•ii• iii$:,:,:,,i❖i❖ib•1O
G•i,ii0.�� ❖ 4, i44.4a4.•❖. ..Oi %"."V. g
w. , AAA. . ii ,
....— •�i^iA;i4ie��sr' o t,. .W. _56
`�-.
•0••O•••••••••••••O• • y
444+,..4.0:40:44* Pii••••i• •gid,••: ———. t .►�... —r..•
•4.04••• • i • • •••,....►••• '
•,.,.,•tib, Tpx,,••,y a 2571
i
i iii•••i• tt iii•�4�••` i••••i••• ••
••••,i •••••••••••...• •• ,V • •
II
•••,•,i:•,• •••••••,. d• x,-, • . 4
I N ••••144••
10,040 i STATION TIInEE:�:
I In
11C.•
•
FIGURE 5
CITY OF OCOEE
1991 FIRE IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE
JUNE 1991
PREPARED BY: OCOEE FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND DIRECTOR OF
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1991 FIRE IMPACT STUDY UPDATE
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
Section 1 Introduction and Background 3
Section 2 Methodology -- 10
Impact Fee Computation
Section 3 Appendices 24
1
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
1. Figure 1: Map of City and Highway Improvement 4
2. Figure 2: Calls for Service 5
3. Figure 3: Data Summary of Fire Impact Fees 7
4. Figure 4: Square Footage by Districts 8
5. Figure 5: Map of Fire Impact Fee Benefit Districts 11
6. Figure 6: Projected Growth Increments 13
7. Figure 7: Dwelling Unit Building Activity 15
8. Figure 8: Projected Growth Increments 16
9. Figure 9: Fire Impact Fee Tables 17
10. Figure 10: Fire Impact Calculations 23
2
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION
The Mayor and Board of City Commissioners adopted the City of
Ocoee's first fire impact ordinance in December 1989, Ordinance No.
89-47. It was declared that Ocoee's future growth should pay for
itself to the greatest extent possible. The present study will
carry forward that policy by updating the data and equipment costs,
and, in general , portraying the experience gained through 16 months
of fire impact fee system management.
The City of Ocoee has continued to experience population and
economic growth similar to that witnessed in the Orlando
Metropolitan area. Large fiscal impacts are resulting from this
growth and because of newly completed or announced infrastructure
improvements, (FIGURE 1) , i.e. - the East-West Beltway and Clark
Road, its future economic trends look very favorable.
The City of Ocoee has experienced 6% average annual population
increases since 1980 when its population numbered 7,803 residents.
According to the recent U.S. Census, Ocoee had 12,778 full-time
residents on April , 1990. The comprehensive plan states that the
City will have 22,000 residents by the year 2000.
A method for detailing how Ocoee's growth impacts the Fire
Department reviews "Calls for Service" (C.F.S. ) . In 1984, 1115
C.F.S. were received; this increased to 1,773 C.F.S. in 1990, a 59%
seven year increase, or an average 8.4% annual increase. The 1991
C.F.S. for the first 4 months of 1991 are up over 1990 rates for
the same time period by 6% (FIGURE 2) . These numbers closely
parallel the City's population increases and are very similar to
the Police Department's C.F.S. trends. If these trends continue,
then an estimated 3,300 annual C.F.S. will be received by the Fire
Department by 2001, a doubling from 1984 to 2001.
The City of Ocoee annexed 45 parcels of land from 1987-1989
totalling 1,195 acres. In 1990 an additional 548 acres were
annexed. The majority of the newly annexed land is well suited for
future development; a significant portion, moreover, has already
been developed. It is likely, furthermore, that at least 2,000
additional acres of land will be annexed into the City by the end
of the present 10 year capital budgeting period. Based upon this
aggressive annexation activity, an equally aggressive capital
equipment acquisition program is in order to achieve the stated
emergency protection levels of service.
It should be noted that the City of Ocoee Fire Department logs
indicate that the average response time in 1990 for districts 1 and
2 were 3.3 minutes and 2.6 minutes respectively. Emergency runs to
the town of Windermere averaged six minutes, except during peak
hour traffic; however, response times then ran as high as 12
minutes.
3
FIGURE 1 - .. •
City of Ocoee r'
274
Orange County, Florida M C C O R M I C ROAD•
TRAFFIC ZONES ' ,...'+
Q MAP OF HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS
.• .. . R o,' 16
a •
• 222 1990---2000 It-i,ncoHA'ocoE �..... •
0
a
' Q ''� 1991 UP TE
. °, .. -. 1°9/I err// .
C,
♦ • irr:■ 11111:1111111:11!:::!, a
♦ r iiii■■■■ ■ rErne■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■ ,
i �innonnu:�i�� ■■■nine■gg kiiiisenii: `A
4. :..s..6='E: ......881 ....:'::E o
11! /11W.Wlm 11K 1:11 : 1 :111111 , Q■1111■■ ■■ ■■ aa
.......L
0-i07l0,111::::.1r1 I:e■C::: i� ■1.rrr■�i■ ■r1 r
2 5 0 0 71 /r.■kill:ern:■■r:=il ■ii■:e::3i :r :::ee■11rr■=r' w
:: / .:::■.P:::::S::Oel •ren:::1:e ::■:=:':ellennnw • z
,M.WI c.m..a Q .■r ,Unnri ■e■■.en ■r �':e: nolo'� mann ■:■1■:re■ i' •
M Am i'11::1::0:::::roman nir:/ 1: : :::_:::1::::::::8 i >
■r l!eer■re mnneerrreer l■ ■e1■:eereereerrrr ee
•r' innnnlnerrne■ -1 ,r. r- r.ennnumon /I,/ i I
_ AOC . : - , y .
i 111111:14911111113,11111111. .1e111arenir-.rr
I
IA:111111:11:1111:1 In! ■■ ■■:�i :�� p monism1: : :: :1.1...11:d = iirrrrcrre4O ■err ■■■ ■.1: : : °"3Si . leer.=...U IMMO OM I Aim ■err.■ ■rrl��rs.11■ •
Ira err■CC . MON MIMI' ■ r ■■ ■er ■renown ■/rr■
• 1 le.1r.'111111 M•:811:8 8 -.1;..1.1■ r... I!/
1. .1111.. MOM
"7 .
Iv-)
`1 .•......:�' r" xi l ,� SILVER STAR ROAD
. it y ,{ y
•fi'?.--;'
f ii• 1I{ 9}• • s�s91•k i a,2 6 L i iii 1' Q1 Of
2 61
Y a �( 1 W t ,9s t , 1 IIG4 1/,, ,}l it . ,
L,
,,5'7 ! ji Y EN tr 3 i ,t , "'11�'�i. P g �;'1f 1 ', ;., i %, ,
' ' '9 Ia • • ` �leFa ' a O
251 >• j F 3 ,.r...,.y�.• �.r lr /.i Q p..ra . o .....,.A
41.stieltV cc
3 +d i 4 01 i!'.:,::..-,!.111i },4 1' i I ii`i}�c V 1 }'s ` 1
ow i{DV.bf w..w W ''«�«moi•`« i�«�«�`f► �'• •,•;; i 1 I; !l't
',k• .' :,t W
to ••«*A•M. ❖.• O•ete ..- r 1 2 6 6 t E i i 1 1; .. 2 6 3 2 6 2
•• •••••••••t a i<
254 e•-•-•.i;;•~4••••••ft�,•-•to 4 • • -.. ..111,,i,
t...4(;,,..
'1. 55 AOtt
aro „O_,.. a:Il.Ir.kt tt �.. S.R. 5 0 r 0 ..+...m,....
/;••• y«,«•«❖«•� ....«•.;«•«•••«OJd:« �v «« ••«••••• o
.:44,4,...........,...........,,, •••• • ♦..........,....„.................„,„4,.�„.,i!.!•!•!•: c7
-,.-'•.••,•�i••••O««•••.... • A • .
ti••}l,►.tij•;r itIll i•�ibtic ” ••:•••••❖❖••••••�/ 5j 8
. '..t 4.(' t�w•.tt..Ta►.�i!i. ❖•. ❖•«•��� EAST—WEST BELTWAY
g',
•:::::i..*:44."4,.•
; «.�d6h1V••••••••••• • / �+.�. nap wime ft,
•
I1 1�•••••• 4:11:�••«1«1«•«•••• • ••:;• :
Mil WI NM II aillIP OM MO 0
••
« . �s. 1...........s....4.04,04
•.•••• •.•QQ ►. 7i ••►
1�! � «• •p• i .•� ..4
►i•••• ai••• „. 4, .
i , 4.
.r:::., � n►•«««« .... F❖ .e o
s ..
y «�« ❖.❖.i• i♦ •« � .
•
•
‘.i °:::•.:4164.t.:::•::4;4.4'4.74)ottlitittt.3.14
•
•
4 .
FIGURE 2
CITY OF OCOEE FIRE DEPARTMENT
CALLS FOR SERVICE
JANUARY 1991 TO APRIL 1991
MONTH 1990 1991 PERCENTAGE
1990-91
-- ------------------ ---------------
JANUARY 153 157 +03%
FEBRUARY 138 124 -10%
t MARCH 129 156 +21%
I APRIL 157 177 +13%
[TOTALS 577 614 +06%
SOURCE: FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL BREAKDOWN OF RUN REPORTS
5
The Fire Impact Fee Ordinance has generated $304,498.20 from
December 1989 to March 1991 as summarized in FIGURE 3 (complete
data in APPENDICES 1 AND 2) . Four-hundred and ninety-seven (497)
residential dwelling units were permitted for a total 1,420,982
square feet and $254,766. 66 collected while 20 non-residential
structures were permitted for a total 247,884 square feet and
$49,731.54 collected. The residential square footage exceeded its
predicted output by 334,106 square feet; however, the non-
residential production was 22% of that predicted, as depicted in
FIGURE 4. For the present update, the residential and non-
residential growth predictions will not be revised but will be re-
evaluated in the 1992 update. It was felt that the slowed non-
residential development was due to economic condition which were
not the fault of the City; population demands will likely bring
non-residential in line with current projections.
In addition to these collections, a .96 acre site for Fire
Station #3 has been acquired through impact fee negotiations. It
is located on the west side of Maguire Road and one-half mile south
of Florida's Turnpike. This will be the site for the District 3
Fire Station.
6
FIGURE__3
DATA SUMMARY OF FIRE_IMPACT FEES
COLLECTED DECEMBER 1989 TO MARCH 1991
1. During the 16 month study time frame 524 structures paid in
fire impact fees, 497 residential dwellings and 27 non-
residential structures.
2. Residential collections by District:
NUMBER OF
DISTRICT RES. DWELLINGS PERCENTAGE TOTAL DOLLARS
1 139 28% $21,047.15
2 12 2.4% $2,257.80
3 25 5.0% $53,772.58
4 321 64.6% $177,689.13
Totals 497 100.0% $254,766.66
3. Important Residential Trends:
A. Average Impact Fee per DU = $512.61
B. Average size of DU = 2,859 s.f.
C. Most active Month = May 1990, 43 DU's, $58,018.35
collected (major contribution Oak Forest Apts. ) ; May 1990
represented 22.8% of 16 month total .
D. Least active Month = February 1990, 16 DU's, $6,300.35
collected.
E. Average Month's Collection - 31 DU's and $15,922.92
collected.
4. Non-residential collections by District:
NUMBER OF
DISTRICT NON-RES. DWELLINGS PERCENTAGE TOTAL DOLLARS
1 7 25.9% $29,542.88
2 0 0 0
3 13 74.1% $20,188.66
4 0 0 0
Totals 20 100.0% $49,731.54
5. Important Non-residential Trends:
A. Average Impact fee per non-residential structure =
$2,486.58
B. Average size of non-residential structures = 12,394 s.f.
C. Most active Month = November 1990, 3 structures for total
of $5,499.80.
D. Least active Month: = May and December 1990
E. Average Month's Collection = 1.25 structures and
$3,108.22.
7
FIGURE 4
ACTUAL VS. PREDICTED
RESIDENTIAL & NON-RESIDENTIAL
SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTALS, BY DISTRICT
DECEMBER 1989 TO MARCH 1991
(COMPARISON BASED ON_PROJECTED 1990-2000 RATES)_
TYPE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL OVER/UNDER
DISTRICT STRUCTURE PREDICTED ACTUAL S.F. PREDICTION
1 Residential 230,090 370,794 140,704
2 Residential 267,330 38,725 (228,605)
3 Residential 127,414 298,737 171,323
4 Residential 462,042 712,726 250,684
Totals Residential 1,086,876 1,420,982 334,106
TYPE NON-RES. NON-RES. OVER/UNDER
DISTRICT STRUCTURE__----PREDICTED ACTUAL S.F. PREDICTION
1 Non-Residential 445,325 173,840 (271,485)
2 Non-Residential 77,246 0 (77,246)
3 Non-Residential 540,719 74,044 (466,675)
4 Non-Residential 54,072 0 (54,072)
•
Totals Non-Residential 1,117,362 247,884 (869,478)
8
The following basic tenets continue to be operative in terms
of impact fee collections management:
1. Impact fees must be of direct demonstratable benefit to
the payers.
2. The capital equipment purchased must be directly
attributable to the fiscal impacts generated by the
identified population and commercial growth increments
over a prescribed time period.
3. Existing capital equipment deficiencies may not be
corrected utilizing impact fee funds.
4. Impact fee collections are cyclical in nature because
they follow the national economic and interest rate
trends that affect the building industry and buying
public. This cyclical characteristic has made itself
very evident in the City's first 16 months of impact fee
collections.
5. Collected impact fees must be timely spent in order to
provide the adopted standards of service.
9
SECTION 2. METHODOLOGY
IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION
The 1991 Fire Impact Fee Study update has utilized the 5-step,
December, 1989, methodology. Clarification language has been
added, mathematical computation reformulated and capital costs
updated.
Four fire impact fee benefit districts were established to
better service Ocoee's emergency protection needs (FIGURE 5) . The
size of the area served by each fire benefit district was
calculated by utilizing the Insurance Service Organization (I.S.O. )
emergency response standards for a maximum six-minute emergency
response by land area. The emergency response radii distance was
calculated by multiplying the average urban travelling speed of
18.4 miles per hour or .3072 miles per minute times the City of
Ocoee's adopted 5-minute level of service standard equalling 1.5
mile emergency response radii.
Secondly, the size and shape of the fire impact fee benefit
districts were based upon the 1.5 mile emergency response radii.
However, they had to represent a "best fit" combination of factors
which included geographic barriers, manmade features and budgetary
considerations.
In a third consideration, an attempt was made to set-up the
respective district boundaries in relation to a commonality of
service needs and equipment. For example, a major commercial
concentration will be found in District 3, hence the "specialized
pieces" of firefighting equipment. District 4, on the other hand,
is developing mainly as a new residential sector. Districts 1 and
2 are primarily established residential areas with much less non-
residential growth predicted. A detailed description of projected
equipment needs by district for the prescribed ten-year capital
improvement budgetary period will be presented in FIGURES-9A
through 9D.
In order to clarify how the impact fee computations were made,
the terminology "LEVEL 1" and "LEVEL 2" emergency responses are now
added. The basic tenet is that nearly all residential fires and
most non-residential fires may be combatted using the same
equipment. All residential and non-residential structures are,
therefore, assessed the "LEVEL 1" per square foot impact fee.
"LEVEL 2 Responses" are these which generate the need for
specialized pieces of equipment, i .e. an 85 foot aerial truck and
hazmat equipment. The capital costs necessitated by a "LEVEL 2
RESPONSE" are segregated in the capital budget and added to the
impact fee assessment of a "LEVEL 1 RESPONSE".
10
•
FIRE CONTROL BENEFIT DISTRICTS I
■ ry
City o1 Ocoee UPDATE
I.
274x1
Orange County, riorlde / i99i
�'i
Tllnrrlc ZONES le- 0?O I
?� .1 I X00
- 222 L ' .I .. c 0 s nom' 16
Q I '7/ !f
,+�,` w I... P
Ei-,1
*� Q4.. u° I 3 01
III
r ��1° r ' a
Orr
I
T. a •#
250 O m
' _ _
1
tt ot '
STA IA011 TWO s-►4��
I- .-� 1 1
z ' STATION r-oun x
O 11 #.. a
a °
f a
i 1•
1
i 0 ' ''• 1_____ /
1-
y , - -_ Arra. s,I.VEn STAn norm
eAl w Ai c ,�'j ,to r+ Y.r•�
0y 11, , : r,, l 14 t rq„ 4$41 .(1 +.1 t � 2 61
11 I STATION Orlrl1 =t k•„ 4J
10• 1 Al.� 1 a r P. , , Ivo :'Ir" r::0,,,...1,..v.),10/(4...1
3`f),o-e''
tri) ti �a '1. •t ' t,' (I'11•0,11 ••1t •' S ••Irt Ilii a
ii•{ Ate f 1 J ..rw• I. 1, 'ww..r . o ......w.....1
.",1,1t ■
O l tt,, 't'.;It ;I I I I { 1,I M f iU� '' r fl .1. t IC �'
AI,,a 4ty y'} l ,to '1. 1 f e 4r , I 1$L',F rn
1,143••♦••••••♦• i't' 5r '. 26 60.,(,:1',,...10A:.
f' j Illi R6t 1.0 • = 2 6 2
t ♦• rti 4 •�♦ _ til II�f: {rr1N 11�j.,y'�1,111�1 0
25/1 _ <•�.�•�P`•�. 7/•♦64~ : 1 j1r h''�.Y 1';d�•��tfditl4tl �1�;r j- Z
r.7..2—'5
ww i� + r�l S.n. GO •y. 4.444.444:4:4•13.4.°4
yiw ♦ ♦ V• ...............1—,
■w�!"� 6 ♦it• b �r. 7 • • •'• • Z►•i'� I ' _,ri 0
.14$444:::::::4•4$0 ...........I w_
I. iitiffitat: •'i► r 257
•
I •.••'moi•••••:•:44.6:40.0 , , • • !
.,' ve......•- STATION TIInEry
!wive
N. I
•
•
o
FIGURE 5
71
Mathematically expressed, the residential and non-residential
impact fee computations are as follows:
LEVEL 1 Residential and non-residential
equipment costs, by district.
Impact Fee =
Total predicted residential and non-
residential square footage over
budget period, by district.
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 impact fee plus non-
residential specialized equipment
costs, by district.
Impact Fee =
(Non-residential) Total predicted non-residential
square footage over budget period,
by district.
A five-step Methodology was employed to provide the basic cost
and growth factors described above:
1. STEP 1: Project square footage of residential growth
increment from 1990-95-2000, by Fire Benefit
District.
2. STEP 2: Project square footage of non-residential
growth increment from 1990-95-2000, by Fire
Benefit District.
3. STEP 3: Identify the capital equipment needs necessary
to meet the five-minute emergency response
level of service standard.
4. STEP 4: Compute the capital equipment cost, by Fire
Benefit District and prepare budget and
acquisition schedule by year.
5. STEP 5: Compute the residential and non-residential
impact fees, by district for 1991-92.
STEP 1__ Project square footage of residential growth
increment from 1990-95-2000, by Fire Benefit District.
FIGURE 6 summarizes the projected residential square footage
growth increment for the City of Ocoee from 1990 to 1995 and 1995
to 2000. As indicated in the Background sections the U.S. census
stated the City's resident population was 12,778 in 1990. The
residential square footage projections used in the earlier study
and this update, represent estimates by Orlando Regional Traffic
Zones; these take into consideration the 6-7% annual population
increase over 1990 and an allowance for seasonal residents and
visitors calculated to be approximately 800 full-time equivalent
residents. The corresponding dwelling growth is projected to
increase from 5,835 in 1990 to 8,821 by 2000 for a net increase of
12
FIGURE 6
PROJECTED 1990-2000 GROWTH INCREMENTS
IN
RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL
SQUARE FOOT TOTALS BY DISTRICT'
DISTRICT 1
Residential 1,730,000 Sq. Ft.
Non-Residential 3,348,312 Sq. Ft.
Total 5,078,312 Sq. Ft.
DISTRICT 2
Residential 2,010,000 Sq. Ft.
Non-Residential 580,800 Sq. Ft.
Total 2,590,800 Sq. Ft.
DISTRICT 3
Residential 958,000 Sq. Ft.
Non-Residential 4,065,560 Sq. Ft.
Total 5,023,560 Sq. Ft.
DJfiTRk CTi
Residential 3,474,000 Sq. Ft.
Non-Residential 406,560 Sq. Ft.
Total 3,880,560 Sq. Ft.
'Typical residential square footage total is computed at 2,000
sq. ft. per unit
13
2,986 dwellings at an expected long-term average dwelling size of
2,000 square feet (s.f. ) . The City building permit data for
January, 1990 to January, 1991 (FIGURE 7) indicates that the
average single family home was 2,360 s.f. while the average multi-
family dwelling was 1,520 s. f . Development activity continues to
be greater in the single-family sector; as land costs increase
because of demand, multi-family or increased densities will most
likely occur.
STEP 2: Project square footage of non-residential growth
increment from1990-95-200J by Fire Benefit District.
FIGURES 8 depicts the projected non-residential (commercial ,
industrial , and institutional) square footage that will be added to
the City of Ocoee by the year 2000.
With the 50% projected commercial build-out and the 75%
industrial build-out, approximately S 200,000 square foot non-
residential floor space will be added by the year 2000. The
principal assumptions to be observed are listed in Footnote 2,
FIGURE 8.
STEP 3: Identify the capital equipment needs necessary to
meet the five-minute emergency response level of service standard.
STEP 4: Compute the capital cost, by Fire Benefit District
and prepare budget and acquisition schedule_
FIGURES 9A to 9D depict the data called for in Steps 3 and 4
of the Methodology, i.e. , the 10-year capital improvement budgets
for each of the four Fire Impact Benefit Districts.
In summary, the total 10-year program will require the
collection of $4,300,691: District 1--$1,0822,698; District 2--
$220,553; District 3--$1,724,180; and District 4--$1,273,260. .
The footnotes accompanying FIGURES 9A-9D illustrate the
respective Inter-District and LEVEL 1 vs. LEVEL 2 equipment cost
sharing prorations.
STEP 5: Compute the residential and non-residential fees, by
district for 1991-92.
14
FIGURE 7
CITY OF OCOEE
DWELLING UNIT BUILDING ACTIVITY
JANUARY 1990 TO JANUARY 1991
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-
NUMBER RESIDENTIAL NUMBER RESIDENTIAL
MONTH OF UNITS Q. FT. OF UNITS SQ. FT.
January 19 48,484 2 3,040
February 16 38,116
March 47 106,492
April 32 82,836 2 3,040
May 35 81,128
June 45 111,007
July 26 65,393
August 35 77,798 2 3,040
September 27 58,214
October 40 95,282
November 42 96,730
December 21 49,125
January 32 73,700 2 3,404
Total Sq. Ft. 984,305 15,200
Average Sq. Ft. 2,360 1,520
15
FIGURE 8
PROJECTED NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT'
IN THE CITY OF OCOEE, 1990-20002
TRAFFIC AVAILABLE ACREAGE TOTAL3 COMM. DIV. COMMERCIALS IND. DEV. SCENARIO4 IBD. SQ. FT.4
ZONES 1990-2000 ACRES SCENARIO SQ. FT. FLOOR AREA DEVELOPED FLOOR AREA
RATIO 1:3 RATIO 1:2.5
IN CITY IN J.P.A. 2510EV 501DEV 2510EV 501DEV 501 ACRES 15% ACRES 501DEV 151DEV
DISTRICT 1
263,265
266,268
Commercial 260 110 370 93 185 1,343,100 2,686,200 25 38 435,600 662,112
Industrial 50 0 50
DISTRICT 2
269,210
211
Commercial 20 60 80 20 40 290,100 580,800 0 0
Industrial 0 0 0 0 0
DISTRICT 3
256,267
251,655
Commercial 310 215 525 131 267 1,902,100 3,804,200 10 15 171,240 261,360
Industrial 0 20 20
DISTRICT 4
273,212
264
Commercial 40 15 55 14 28 203,290 406,550 0 0
Industrial 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL COMMERCIAL/ 1,030 258 515 3,746,200 7,492,300 609,800 923,500
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 10
TOTAL ION-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTION EQUALS 8,200,00 SO. FT.
FOOTNOTES:
1. The year 2000 commercial and industrial acreage estimated by the Ocoee Planning Department and counted by Ocoee Fire
Department, For professional offices and services; neighborhood, community and general shopping districts; restricted
manufacturing and warehouse districts; and, general industrial districts.
2. Projections and land use utilization acreage estimates are dependent upon the completion of the following projects by 1995:
Clark Road; the Beltway;the Northwest Beltway with ramps at Maguire Road., S.R. 438 and fuller Cross Rd.; and the five-year
Capital Improvement program for Wastewater and Potable water as outlined by P.E.C. consultants in August 1989.
3. Commercial and Industrial acreages per traffic tones are not necessarily site specific but instead represent probable
development scenarios based upon projected and available infrastructure and land development intensity capabilities.
4. Commercial and industrial development scenario percentages represent low and high estimates based upon development trends
in the City of Ocoee during the last ten years and other rapidly developing Florida jurisdictions with comparable
development pressures and projected infrastructure improvements.
5. Floor area ratios for commercial and industrial development courtesy of Planning Design Criteria by Joseph Cechiara, and
Lee Koppelman, Van Nostrand, Reinhold., 1970, pages 231-231.
16
tO V)
o m to
1A 0
o H `° to
z U o 0, d
tO
0 tOtO tO
n 01 tO
00
Cl tO to
N N H
f
0 to tO
Fy O tD
O a,O r---
Cl
W 01 0 a, t0 v;)r1 N r1
ko
MD t0
40
IX COrn 0 0
0 Cl Cl
m CO Cltil 01 CO Cl to 0
i
E ,m el
op) p to
0 m
v, toma
0
CO
a,a, 0M COI0 `
0 0
Ill01
N N 0V'
O H H 'd'N n CO
•
-V4 ►� N
• 0 0 V' �. 0 0 N 0
I 0 O O N n d
In
a, M O
Cl n ' 'du) VCl O
dIn n d
,-I,.. CO H N
Q 0 El 0 0 0 0N
N N d'
O
En 01 01
en o
CO
I, H H Cl CO H N CO01 N
tll
H
OH 0 O 0 00 0 VD
0
^n ') V' 0 0 0 00 d' Cl
H �y a,a, 0 N L) ' I) H
�r�...' yoaJ •--1 H N CO
•--1
H f"; 0 V' 0 0 rn
If)
N CO 0 00, 0
00 1) 0 'O' H
H H O,a, d; N 1c1 U) N
H H r1
Q H H V'
A .-1.-1
H 0 T N N
0
0 Cl M N
a�1 01 �, ,O t0
a,a, N M
V-' 00 01 0 CO I I ul I 0 I 1 I d' N
V' O O O O 'a' 0 O O 0 O d' co
,...I to Cl If) ul 1 1 I O I I I 01 H
...
N In M M H N N M H H 00
M
10 CO
N H N
N. i
CO
M 40
01 I H I I CO CO I a, 0 I 0 N I n
cp O 0 0 0 O 0 0 co to 0 n
[t] N p I W W I W O I O n I r1
I V7 r-1 tO Cl Cl N H U) N n
n1 IllN ,
H H4
CO
N
��yl p 00 00 00 N-r' 0 O M1, O 01 O O co0to V4' a0, Qi
W o y t N O II) 0 Cl) ,) CO U) ,O CO 0 1 0 n a, CO 11
f0•1 �gp1 •8 to to M oo n a, m N N o a) H in 0.1 IrA co 01
I pp�IN Cl N a, f), N H 0
C?
0 In a, O I 0 0 CO t04 w W
0o m
0 0 0 0 0 0 ill
0 0 n Cl M
t0 CO W V' Cl Cl N 0 Cl N H ',1' Oj
[� Cl03 H ul 01
M Cl H (N H W
a I„I N H N
m m' Ul
H
v ..i ..i
O [+a O _ r1 �+ N •
rn 0
NI 0 N I I40
I N z ix
0 0 0 I E 4 U)
F ��/47 Ed 0 N 8
r-1 I 1 t'� N H
1
0 EA
HE-I H V W
17
g O
0
co g._, ..
o H H
.
O H 0 0
�;
N N H 01
H
0 O
O
01 0 0 N
00)0 01 0)
H N H
O 0
O
14 03 01 N N
¶ 1) 0)
0 0
.....• 0 0
h.CO N
HH01 of O1
H H H
0 0
�o 0 o 0 vr
0
01 01
01 o
O tn
N N
•-01-1H N d' H p �Q
nasi [pV`�C�1 H e1' V' 0 H 01 CT 0
t', 7'1 01 0) NC... M b
N N N H N H
H H H N
0 N co 00
may+ Irrl 01 01
N
1 N 001 n M
CV N Hr-1 la
10
H
1
OH d. d' co
i•-•(([ 0 C
N N
N 01 01
N E .H-1.--I
.N-1 N H
V
1-1
d+ �WWj tD d' H H
N M N H
Q O in al H N N N
H
H H
H O
{�Fss7y71]
0 O 0
H N N O N
01 0) N 1D a)
H H
Da O O 0 0 O O O O n
CJ El 0., N
pq
N.
M la i ,_.W. ...._
11.4 �(I N 0 VI
el
0 0 10 000 01
1
pO �OOH
Mn
4• NNH8i1 H f1
}
N O N M
H H 0 0 N 0 0 H 01 10 0 i
W 00 oa f1� 0) 0 ao 0 0 0 0 N o
N 8 CO U) H 0 VD 0 H N U) 00 01
1 �1 pp 01 , to H N
HWo-W7 u? 4n
O O N O O H 00) N 0 N
rii el
V' 1r1 0 CO o O 0 O N O M1-
rA7 [� H U1 H p l0 O r-1 N Ajy
f8(j H N W
WI CCWQWQ�r,, � to
I
N 1
t N0 „
1
a
H f„ R .H7
H
'. '6 1 8 N M i
18
in oto
7..,, U) ro 0
.-1
(31
N U) H N
tO 0 0 tO
U) 0 0 v)
O H r) t� N N
ON N U) .--1 r1 01
fs•
1..0 0 0 to
? 010 ) 0NN N
Ll ON 0 N U) Oi N
WQ .-1 N U) r-1H 01
tO
14 CO 01 el O (M') 0 0 0
01 01
01 01 01 rl rl (N
M tr H rA el
i �• vc-OOi M O O Ul
0
• yy1 rl.--I M U) H H 0)
0 d• 0 0 0 CO 0 N
_A V,h. O0
M W 0 0 O N
1.1300 V).i 01 01
0)0) 01 CO tel 0 0 d• 01 1•
.--1.-1 M U) H (N 10 (N N
• (N
• .7.:..
Cl [�] U)10 OM 0 CO OO O (N CO CO 0
• O)01 01 t0 d• 'Cr O 'C U) 0) 'I'
.--1.-I M H M N M
r1
•• FA VN---III O O 0 in el V) (N M to
N M n N O
• [p� OM1 V' 0 0 0 0 O O N M t0
M 0101 Cl 0 U) 0 O U) 0 V• U) O)
(y fy C9 r-1.-1 LO N N ..4. -4• N (N M
U • tO
aH0
[� " 0 0 d' M CO O
U� r N M 0 0 0) )O 0) CO
I-I Cr.O) .
a al O) U) O "d• M to co
E .-I.-1 N N U)
H
n V• 1� N
n 01 O011 O t0 U)
.• 01 01 d' N (N
H.-1 H
0 I I I C I 0 II U) I 0 1 I 1 0 01
0 O 0 0 N O 0 0 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 CO .
N O I d •
I I '1.0 1 U) 1CO 1 M I 0 I I I t0
01
qq�11'' as r1 V• H H t0M 0 H O�
,s. .--I M H t0
N
VI In '
H 0 0 0 0 1 0 I 01 01 I (` O 0 N 0 1 ^N
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cn 01 0 M 0 0 01 N 0 ..d•
I 1 M HO O O to 1 to 1 t0 t0 1 t0 O O 01 U) I U)
'y S(1 i CO U)� VCO ` N N H 0 t0 •d• 01 01 M U) 0 t0 H 0
�] [-� d' ( ' 01 l 01
el
H
VN 0)
0 0 0 0 O 0 0 01 0) U) N 0 0 N 0 0 0
H .-1 0 0 O O r-1 0 O 01 01 U) M 0 0 Cl N t0 00
W0•8 0 0 0 U) .-1 U) CO t0 1.13 M tO O 0 01 U) M .-1 I
N •
O U) O t0 CO d'. CO 01 01 U) M to O l0 r1 01 'c1• 0011
I 0O1 .�Q�jyj tO r".. V' M CO 01 01 H M (N 01 N H N
rl �aW7 f-1 U) N N .-1 V?
O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0) 01 CT, as u) M 0 0 01 0 0 0) Ift
O O 0 U) V• U) U) t0 t0 M t0 0 0 01 U) M N
1.0
O 11) O t0 to d' O 01 T to M t(1 O t0 r1 O) .--i
QQ t0 N d' M V• Ch r1 r-1 M N 01 (N H 0
rl H N U) N M H .-1 CO
[A '
N - E+
H CN1 el CO n
rri00) (V CO M
I I Ii)
.--1 OO � \j N N Ny H N a I
O
H [-i (1$�-! u) o „ N 8
O qrA 0 '61 P, 2. K 0 2
4
19
T. N
0
0
OH r-
0
0 O
0 0 0)
[r. N N H
00
0)O N N
0)0 0) 0)
.-1 N H H
0 0 0
COON 00 0 0
Cr)01
01 01 an 01 •cr
H H M
0 0 0 CO m
0 0 0 N N
NCO M O 1� I- r-
01 Ch
(•ti 01 01 01 V) 01 CO N
jyLyV�pJ� H.-1 M H H H O1
CO
r7M 0
00 0 N01 cr
H
H O r-1.-1 M r1 HH H Ch
••
n 0 0 O V) V) O C) V) CO
Vt0
01 01
01 01 OOO 0M N N
M M 0 N � 10o
H ON
01 U1 0
NC H 0
. H M H M
yy� 60 0
N 01 01 03
O 0
C•1
H H Ill H
HH 0 0 0 V) V)
0)0) 0 /11
0 r�-1
01 01 01 to
Ey H H M .-1 MCO
Tr SO
H H
0 00 J 00 O N 0 0 Ir)
N tsi
0H 00
Csi cc) 0 0 0 N 0 0 Ul
r1 01
Ca E-. .-1.-1 V) ON VO' co V' N tCn
0
H
Ch 01
0 0
in
0 0 1` n
0)0) 0 0
0 0 •
M CO
H H V) N I--
11 1 I I 1 I I I I I I t0 I t0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 M
M 1
1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I ON I 01
N
0 41
4/1
0 0 0 0 0 r1 .-1 O O N r-1 I 01 V'
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 0 H N0 0 N
1 r.._. O O O V) O V) V V' O O O) t0 I co co
co
I:1 i 4: O O N 0) H 1-- [\ 0 N N H N 01 VP ID (NH
H
Ca
O 0 0 0 0 0 .'-1 H 0 O N H t0 0) 0
H .-1 O O O O O 0 O1 0) 0 0 H N co O t0
Iia 00 Ty '. I 0 0 0 V) 0 U) V' d' 0 0 01 t0 01 CO N 1
N •' 'i 00 0 0 I.0 .-i CO N N V) co V' t0 H N M Obi
VI Hi ��jH�1�G V' O V' N 01 H 0H H N t - H N
HW pf1
0 0 0 0 0 0 H H 0 0 N H t0 01 0 1-I
0 0 0 0 0 O 0) O) O O .--1 N M 0 t0 h+
0 O 0 V) O V) V' V' 0 0 01 t0 ON 03
COr-I
[� O O lD CO I-- c-- 11') COM .--I N V' t0 f•)
9 ,..4 'V O V' co alH 0 N H t- NN
bW1,❑�+ N CO 4H
3
.Ni v .�.i l0
CO H
I
'J+ 4 o 1n N '[[yt�] a SI 0 1
r1 0 p I I. NI �` ry' Cn �VA� j
M 1 Pi [Uc7 H a
H .� • ' 8
,-, N i N
1-1 q tni-I x)1 6" K ,g. 8 2 1
20
FOOTNOTES TO FIGURES 9A-9D
1. Total cost of LEVEL 2 aerial truck equipment is $630,000 will be shared
between District 1 and 3:
District 1 = 45.16% of total 2 district projected sq. ft.
x $630,000
$284,508
District 3 = 54.84% of total 2 district projected sq. ft.
x $630,000
= $345,474
2. Total cost of LEVEL 1 2-chief's vehicles equipment is $32,000 will be
shared between Districts 1-4:
District 1 = 30.65% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $9,808
District 2 = 15.63% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $5,002
District 3 = 30.31% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $9,699
District 4 = 23.41% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $7,491
3. Ibid #2, 2-battalion vehicles.
4. Fire Department's share of communication system is $320,000; will be
spread across city's multi-department usage; will be shared between
Districts 1-4:
District 1 = 30.65% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $98,080
District 2 = 15.63% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $50,016
District 3 = 30.31% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $96,992
District 4 = 23.41% of projected sq. ft. x $32,000 = $74,912
5. Total cost of LEVEL 1 CAD System equipment is $71,000 will be shared
between Districts 1-4:
District 1 = 30.65% of projected sq. ft. x $71,000 = $21,762
District 2 = 15.63% of projected sq. ft. x $71,000 = $11,097
District 3 = 30.35% of projected sq. ft. x $71,000 = $21,520
District 4 = 23.41% of projected sq. ft. x $71,000 = $16,621
6. Total cost of LEVEL 2 Commercial portable air system equipment is
$40,000 will be shared between districts 1-4:
District 1 = 39.86% of projected sq. ft. x $40,000 = $15,944
District 2 = 6.90% of projected sq. ft. x $40,000 = $ 2,760
District 3 = 48.40% of projected sq. ft. x $40,000 = $19,360
District 4 = 4.84% of projected sq. ft. x $40,000 = $ 1,936
7. Total cost of LEVEL 2 1 -training officer vehicle is $12,000 will be
shared between Districts 1-4:
District 1 = 30.65% of projected sq. ft. x $12,000 = $ 2,809
District 2 = 15.63% of projected sq. ft. x $12,000 = $ 1,876
District 3 = 30.31% of projected sq. ft. x $12,000 = $ 3,637
District 4 = 23.41% of projected sq. ft. x $12,000 = $2,809
8. Total cost of LEVEL 2 2-commercial safety inspector vehicles is $28,000
will be shared between Districts 1 and 3:
District 1 = 45.16% of Projected sq. ft. x $28,000 = $12,645
District 3 = 54.84% of Projected sq. ft. x $28,000 = $15,355
21
FIGURE 10 depicts the proposed 1991-92 RESIDENTIAL and NON-RESIDENTIAL
impact fees, per square foot of floor area for each of the Fire Benefit
Districts and which are summarized below:
EMERGENCY RESPONSE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FIRE BENEFIT DISTRICT RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT
ONE $.053 $.315
TWO .092 .097
THREE .225 .390
FOUR .328 .333
22
FIGURE 10
1991-92 FIRE IMPACT TEE CALCULATIONS
BE DISTRICT AND B!
ENERCENCT RESPONSE LEVEL, 1991-2001 CAPITAL COSTS
SQ. PT. 1991 1989-91
RESPONSE' EQUIPMENT i GROWTH - SQ. FT. SQ. FT.
DISTRICT LEVEL COST IRCRERENT IMPACT FEE IMPACT FEE
1. ONE 1
RBS. 1,730,000
NON-RES. 3,348,312
TOTAL L-1 $ 271,111 5,078,312 - 0.053 8.08
ONE 2
LEVEL 1 .053
"SPECIAL" 3,348,312 1 .262
TOTAL L-2 $ 818,181 - $.315 s.f. 0.21
2. TWO 1
RES. 2,010,000
NOR-RES. _580,800
TOTAL L-1 $ 231,493 2,590,800 - $.092 s.f. $.12
TWO 2
LEVEL 1 .092
"SPECIAL" 580,000 + .005
TOTAL L-2 $ 2,1600.091 s.f. 0.27
3. THREE 1
RES. 958,000
RON-RES. 4,0i ,560
TOTAL L-1 $1,130,541 5,023,560 - $.225 s.f. $.19
THREE 2
LEVEL I .225
"SPECIAL" 4,065,560 I .165
TOTAL L-2 $ 610,689 - $.390 s.f. $.34
4. POUR 1
RES. 3,414,000
KOR_RES. 406,560
TOTAL L-1 $1,271,324 3,880,560 : 0.328 S.f. 0.32
POOR 2
LEVEL 1 .328
"SPECIAL" 406,560 4 .005
TOTAL L-2 $ 1,936 - 0.333 s.f. 0.34
1The"Level 1 Emergency Response" Impact Pee is calculated by dividing the total residential equipment cost and non-residential non-
specialized equipment cost by the total projected 1990-2000 square footage growth increase. The "Level 2 Emergency Response" Impact
Pee is calculated by dividing the total non-residential specialized equipment cost by the total projected 1991-2001 square footage
growth increment plus the respective "Level 1 Response" Impact Pee.
23
APPENDICES
24
APPENDIX 1
RESIDENTIAL
FIRE IMPACT FEES COLLECTED
MONTI/TRAR DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 TOTAL
UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT
I $ I $ I $ I $ I $
DECEMBER, 1989 6 $ 785.94 3 $ 411.84 4 $2309.76 4 $2058.50 17 $5626.04
JANUARY, 1990 9 1821.12 1 167.92 0 0 8 4311.31 18 6300.35
FEBRUARY, 1990 5 881.88 1 200.40 0 0 10 5228.25 16 6310.53
MARCH, 1990 8 1520.46 0 0 0 0 22 11224.75 30 12145.21
APRIL, 1990 11 1955.16 0 0 4 2233.80 28 15121.75 43 19316.71
MAY, 1990 13 2241.36 1 266.08 2 40852.16 27 14658.75 43 58018.35
JUNE, 1990 16 2714.52 0 0 5 2894.22 20 11941.50 41 17556.24
JULY, 1990 8 1206.24 2 570.04 0 0 18 9664.50 28 11440.18
AUGUST, 1990 11 1543.50 0 0 0 0 23 12273.15 34 13817.25
SEPTEMBRR,1990 9 538.97 1 242.80 2 981.48 20 11206.50 32 12975.75
OCTOBER, 1990 7 1165.14 0 0 2 985.14 27 16233.00 36 18383.88
NOVEMBER, 1990 7 1000.44 1 238.88 0 0 34 19267.50 42 20506.82
DECEMBER, 1990 4 411.42 0 0 5 2512.46 13 1120.25 22 10050.13
JANUARY, 1991 7 989.94 1 99.84 2 997.56 25 14692.75 35 16780.09
FEBRUARY, 1991 5 635.04 0 0 0 0 23 12648.32 28 13283.36
MARCH, 1991 13 1629,42 0 0 0 0 19 10025.75 32 11655,17
TOTALS 139 21047.15 11 2257.80 26 53172.58 321 177689.13 497 254166.66
Sq Fttt 370,794 38,125 298,731 112,726 1,420,982
rr Average Sq Ft 2,859 Sq Pt.
25
APPENDIX 2
NON-RESIDENTIAL _.
FIRE IMPACT FEES COLLECTED
MOITB/TRAR DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 TOTAL
UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT
1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $
DECEMBER, 1989 1 $ 228.48 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 1 $ 228,48
JANUARY, 1990 1 306.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 306.00
FEBRUARY, 1990 0 0 0 0 1 1312.00 0 0 1 1372.00
MARCH, 1990 0 0 0 0 2 1111.60 0 0 2 4471.60
APRIL, 1990 1 489.60 0 0 1 1400.00 0 0 2 1889.60
NAY, 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JUNE, 1990 1 25088.60 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25088.60
JULY, 1990 0 0 0 0 1 1540.00 0 0 1 1540.00
AUGUST, 1990 1 513.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 513.00
SEPTENBER,1990 0 0 0 0 1 896.00 0 0 1 896.00
OCTOBER, 1990 0 0 0 0 1 1716.32 0 0 1 1176.32
NOVEMBER, 1990 1 2401.20 0 0 2 3092.60 0 0 3 5499.80
DECEMBER, 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JANUARY, 1991 1 510.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 510.00
FEBRUARY, 1991 0 0 0 0 1 1512.29 0 0 1 1512.29
MARCH, 1991 0 0 0 0 3 4127.85 0 0 3 4127.85
TOTALS 7 29542.88 0 0 13 20188.66 0 0 20 49131.54
Sq Ft" 113,840 0 11,011 0 247,884
**Average Sq Ft 12,394 Sq. Ft.
26