Loading...
Item VII (A) Discussion/ Action re: Mr. & Mrs. Sullivan re: Decision by Don Flippen in reference to a Sidewalk to a Boat Dock at their Residence Agenda 8-04-98 Item VII A "CENTER OF GOOD LIVING-PRIDE OF WEST ORANGE" MAYOR•COMMISSIONER S.SCOTT VANDERGRIFT Ocoee o� CITY OF O C O E E DCOMMISSIONERS ANNY HOWELL t► • - 150 N.LAKESHORE DRIVE SCOTT ANDERSON v Q OCOEE,FLORIDA 34761-2258 SCOTT A.GLASS O NANCY J.PARKER w (407)656-2322 ,� CITY MANAGER E'P Op Gov`> ELLIS SHAPIRO STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND BOARD OF CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: D.W. FLIPPEN, BUILDING AND ZONING OFFICIAL 1�. DATE: JULY 30, 1998 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITHIN PLATTED CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ISSUE Should the Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners consider amending our current City Code and Conservation and Drainage Easement Agreements to permit the construction of concrete structures within platted conservation easements? BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Mr. Charles Sullivan applied for a City Building Permit to construct a concrete sidewalk on his property located at 879 Chauncey Court, Lot 22 in the Admiral Pointe Subdivision. Approximately 30 feet of the proposed sidewalk was to be located within a platted conservation easement. According to the Recorded Conservation and Drainage Easement Agreement for the Admiral Pointe Subdivision, the purpose of the conservation easement is to preserve the property in its natural condition in perpetuity and allow for natural drainage and stormwater to run off over and upon the property. The construction of structures on or above the ground with the exception of docks for single family residences are prohibited. It has been our interpretation of the Conservation Easement Agreements to only permit wooden sidewalks to be constructed within the easements to gain access to a permitted wooden dock. Staff Report - D.W. Flippen July 30, 1998 Page 2 Due to the location of the 30 feet of sidewalk being within a platted conservation easement, the City Planning Director denied the issuance of the permit. It was explained to Mr. Sullivan that he could construct an elevated wooden walkway within the platted conservation easement. Mr. Sullivan does not agree with the Planning Director's denial of his permit and has requested to appear before the Board of City Commissioners to request a change in the City Code and Conservation and Drainage Agreements that would permit the construction of concrete structures within platted conservation easements. RECOMMENDATION I would respectfully recommend to the Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners that the City Code or the Conservation and Drainage Easement Agreements not be changed to permit the construction of concrete structures within platted conservation easements due to the following reasons: 1) Conservation easements should remain in their natural state with minimum structures. Elevated wooden walkways to docks provide the least disturbance to the easement. 2) Elevated wooden walkways do not restrict the natural flow of run-off water. 3) Concrete walkway could retain surface water which could cause mold and may become slippery. 4) The use of chemicals to control mold or discoloration to concrete walkway would effect the natural state of the conservation easement. FROM : CHARLES SULLI()RN PHONE NO. : 487 654 4242 Jul. 28 1998 09:40AM P2 ADMIRAL POINTE 879 Chauncey Court Ooocc,Florida 34761-4308 Phone 407 654-4242 ------ Fax 407 654-424 July 28, 1998 Ellis Shapiro City Manager 150 N. Lakeshore Drive Ocoee,Florida 34761 Dear Mr. Shapiro; We are in receipt of your letter, dated July 14, 1998 advising us to bring the matter of our intentions to build a concrete sidewalk between our home and our boat dock before the City Commissioners. Our request for a building permit to have this work professionally accomplished was approved only up to the Conservation Easement extending across our back yard. The remainder, approximately 30 feet, must be done in wood according to the Planning Director. Such a measure would defeat the purpose of our request. It was,and still is, our intention to provide a solid concrete walking surface set flush with the existing terrain to provide the members of our family with a sure footed means of accessing the dock. We think that the current land development code, as it applies to homeowners, is too restrictive because it deprives homeowners of reasonable use of their land. No one in the Planning Department said anything about any such restrictions when we asked for and received a building permit to have the dock built. Several questions we would like to put before the City Commissioners are; (I) Why give a homeowner a building permit to build a dock and then deny him reasonable access to it? (II) Is it any more sensible to build an elevated wooden sidewalk than a solid concrete walk set into the earth so as to follow the contour of the berm? (III) Based on current policies, will the city be able to handle all such requests from other homeowners, in the very near future, on a fair an equal basis? We are asking to meet with the City Commissioners on August 4, 1998 to discuss the possibility of changing the current policies that affect the private use and enjoyment by a homeowner of his own land. .-i Sincerely, ��