Loading...
VI (D2) Hess Station Exception - Case No. 1-3SE-98CITY OF OCOEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Ocoee, Florida June 22, 1999 2:42 p.m. HESS STATION NUMBER 09050 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION CASE NUMBER 1-3SE-99 VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS, INC. 8612 Summerville Place Orlando. Florida 32819 (4071354-3355 z APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY: ELLIS SHAPIRO, City Manager PAUL ROSENTHAL, City Attorney RUSS WAGNER, City Planner DAVID WHEELER, Assistant City Engineer RON STROSNIDER, Fire Chief RICHARD FIRSTNER, Fire Department TONY WILSON, Police Department ROBERT LEWIS, Senior Planner BRAD FRIEL, Transportation TONY WIERZBICKI, Engineering Department JIM WASHINGTON, Engineering Department BOB SMITH, Public Works Director CAROLYN ALEXANDER, Planning Department APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER: ROBERT FERDINAND, Owner TOM DALY, Daly Design Group SCOTT CLARK, Graham, Clark, Jones, et al. WILLIAM REED COOK, Amerada Hess Corporation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Let's talk about the Hess Station, and this is a special exception. (To the reporter) It's a different case, Louan. Special Exception 1-35E-99. Okay. (To Mr. Wagner) Russ? MR. WAGNER: The same situation. The Applicant -- even though we haven't fully resolved all the issues on this case, they've asked for the project to move forward. We've prepared a list of items based on the code and pertaining to special exceptions that we feel are -- still need to be part of the plans, and there are some additional comments from the City Attorney and, I believe, the Building Department again. And we're recommending denial. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. Applicant? MR. CLARK: Okay. I guess we can go note by note. MR. SHAPIRO: That's the way we did the last time. Might as well get down to where we are. MR. CLARK: Note number one says that the plans are too detailed. I believe this is the first time I've ever been accused by the City of this. So I guess we can take a pen and you tell us what details you would like us 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 to remove. MR. WAGNER: For the record, we did. One of our initial staff comments was telling you that we did not want plans having to do with engineering details at this stage. MR. SHAPIRO: That is true. I even remember that. And the reason for that, I would think, is because we don't want any kind of a detrimental reliance that what you're showing the City Commission as a special exception is automatically and engineeringly [sic] approved. And I think they did suggest to you that we should be sticking to the issues regarding a special exception and not do the engineering. MR. CLARK: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: And that's the reason for it. It's not to be funny; it's to basically try and simplify the -- the process of what they approve and what they don't approve so that there aren't lines on there that somehow could be said, well, you -- on such -and -such a date you made a motion that included those drawings. MR. DALY: So that we can still provide as much information, can we make it condition of approval to -- that the City Commission can add stating that this is only for special exception and does not have any review of engineering plans? MR. ROSENTHAL: I think the problem with that is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I when you leave the plan as is, with that note, that really then requires that the staff comment -- MR. SHAPIRO: On each and every line. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- to the City Commission with respect to any line -- MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- which is for informational only that they disagree with. MR. SHAPIRO: They have to tell you which are and which aren't. And so it doesn't do you any better -- MR. DALY: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: -- good or less good. This is something that from the very beginning has been discussed that we were worried about. You know, I mean, we -- I mean, I think you'd have to go through and literally show you what we want and don't want. But -- but we're just concerned about it going -- MR. DALY: Our original -- our original pre - application meeting with staff we were told that typically developers come in on these things and do about 50 to 60 percent of the engineering and leave out a few sheets. We have no problem. We will create -- if this what the City wants, for the public hearing, we will create a sheet that will be the special exception application. There will be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 subsequent sheets from the Hess Corporation that will have signage details, et cetera -- MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: -- if that's acceptable. MR. SHAPIRO: Is that what you're after? MR. LEWIS: A comment last time that was indicating that you need a simplified title sheet, a general site layout sheet with the proposed signage drawings, a general landscape plan, and some elevation drawings will be sufficient for special exception review. MR. WAGNER: You can put that on one sheet or two sheets. MR. COOK: May I ask a question? One of the issues that has come up is turning radiuses and on this sheet it shows radiuses on there. Now, that's an engineering -related item, as well as the truck turning template that's shown on this. But it is an issue in here. Is that something that's going to be allowed to be submitted in? MR. SHAPIRO: Well, you're going to -- anything that was mentioned in here, if it's an issue that's mentioned -- is this mentioned under the special exception? MR. COOK: Yes. MR. SHAPIRO: If it's mentioned under the special exception, based upon the comments of the staff, then it 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7 becomes an issue. MR. COOK: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: Because if they do not mention it, then it's an issue you need to bring up. But the point of it all is that -- I know what you're trying to say, you're trying to show that that particular issue is part of the site plan -- MR. COOK: Uh-huh. MR. SHAPIRO: -- or site -- part of this, and you got the issue brought up verbally. MR. COOK: Uh-huh. MR. SHAPIRO: If you want to -- if you -- I would assume -- I'm not going to tell you that would be your job, but you can put together whatever you believe is documentation to put your point across regarding any difference of opinion. MR. ROSENTHAL: Yeah. I would point out in that regard, as you go through the balance of the staff reports, there are comments where they are requesting that specific issues be addressed. (To Mr. Wagner) And to the extent something, I guess, like the turning radii is specifically addressed, Russ, you would expect that to be addressed in the special exception and not part of the erasure or deletion? MR. WAGNER: We've -- we've had other 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 M applications that have had that on it. We don't -- I mean, that's not a requirement of the code. If they want to put that on for information to show how that works, I don't have any problem with it. It doesn't mean that we necessarily still agree with their turning radii just because that's how they show the truck movements. So it's informational only. It really isn't a requirement one way or another. MR. ROSENTHAL: Okay. But then you would advise the City Commission if you disagreed with something like that shown for -- even if it's shown for informational purposes? MR. WAGNER: Well, the issue in that case, all it's showing is how they get to their tanks and how they get in and out of the site, and we aren't -- I mean, there's -- there's truck radii and truck radii and turning movements and there's a lot of different ways to get in and out of site. And it's -- MR. SHAPIRO: Is this a site plan issue -- MR. WAGNER: And it is not -- MR. SHAPIRO: -- or a special exception issue? MR. WAGNER: Neither. MR. SHAPIRO: I don't understand. MR. WAGNER: It's their problem. MR. ROSENTHAL: Do you -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 N MR. WAGNER: It's an operational problem for them to get in and out of their site to get to their tanks. MR. ROSENTHAL: Do you object to whether or not that's left on the plan? MR. WAGNER: I don't care. MR. ROSENTHAL: Okay. MR. DALY: It was requested that we put it on, so we'll do it. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Well, it sounds lie it was requested in one case and "I don't care" on the other case. I don't know which is which. Okay. MR. DALY: In either case, if we can a date certain when we're done with this for our resubmittal for the reduced information on the package, if we can get that from the Planning Department or from the City Manager's office so we can -- MR. SHAPIRO: No. You'll get if from the Planning Department. I don't intend to -- I couldn't read one of these if it was -- my life depended on it. MR. DALY: What I'm going to ask for at the end is that you give us a date certain that we submit -- MR. SHAPIRO: If we ever get to an end. MR. DALY: Yes. MR. SHAPIRO: Let's go ahead and get going and we'll get to that. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 10 MR. DALY: Sorry. MR. CLARK: Number two, the first Sentence says that we didn't include some signage details that were previously submitted. MR. DALY: Yeah. The previous submittal that we made to the City showed the elevation to the sign, the building and canopy, et cetera. Our response to that, to the City's comments on that recommending changes was that we do not feel that we are required to do those changes and, therefore, did not resubmit another sheet and informed through -- in our written comments that the previously submitted plans were the plans that were done with. But I can resubmit those plans again. It's simply that we're not changing it. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, I think that's the crux of the argument when you get to the Commission, other than -- other than -- MR. CLARK: Then I'll address the second part. MR. SHAPIRO: -- some of the lines. MR. CLARK: The second part is a request that the signage conform to the signage on the Mobil site. We've consistently said that we don't agree with that and we still don't agree with that. I don't know what else to say about it. MR. SHAPIRO: I don't think there is anything 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 11 else to say about it. MR. WAGNER: Well, just for the record, though, I think we ought to point out -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, there is something to say about it. Okay. MR. WAGNER: -- that in the code one of the -- as far as a review of application -- MR. LEWIS: This is under the special exception regulations. MR. WAGNER: Special exception regulations. The City Commission may attach appropriate conditions. Such conditions may limit the use or the size of uses or structure or characteristics of the operation of the use or may require buffers, landscaping, or other improvements not normally required. And then it goes on to say that proposed uses and structures would be compatible with the uses, structures and activities on adjacent nearby lands. So most of our comments have to do with that criteria and we've -- we've repeatedly said that as a policy for special exceptions the City Commission has adopted certain standards affecting signage and landscaping and architecture and so forth, color. And also we've repeatedly said that this plan needs to be consistent with the overall PUD which is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 12 certainly consistent with this note that it is consistent with adjacent nearby lands. So all of our comments have to do with consistency and integrated development. MR. CLARK: Let me intercede conceptually because I don't know that everyone's had the benefit of hearing this. But we -- we have not ever conceded that the City was entitled to review this as a special exception because of the vested rights certificate that we have. We, nevertheless, have kind of walked through this process thinking that perhaps what has happened with it would not happen. so while -- while we have made a number of concessions that we're not talking about today because they're no longer issues, there are some things of which we cannot concede and signage is one of those issues. MR. WAGNER: Well, we're following the first and second development agreement that you have with the City. And one section of that says, "The developer shall comply with all applicable federal, stated and local ordinances, laws, rules and regulations in effect at the time of the development of the property and as expressly set forth in this agreement. The developer shall comply with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of Ocoee as they may from time to time be amended." So, i mean, I think under a very, very strict application that would mean the current -- even the most 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 13 up-to-date regulations. I believe -- I don't think there's any doubt in our mind that this project has always had to follow current development regulations. And I don't -- I don't understand any basis for an exemption because the vesting certificate also says that you'll follow -- well, I mean, this is a part of the vesting certificate. MR. CLARK: Well, I -- we have a response that we'll lay out. I'm not going to -- to do it at this time. MR. WAGNER: Well, I'm saying from the City's standpoint, I think it's pretty -- pretty clear. MR. ROSENTHAL: Yeah. For the benefit of the DRC, we've reviewed this and concur with staff that a gas station on this site requires a special exception based upon the existing approvals. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, I'd like to move on because if you're not interested in giving it to us -- MR. CLARK: Right. MR. SHAPIRO: -- to make a vote on this thing, then I'm not too interested on wasting my time on much of the rest of this. MR. CLARK: Well, I -- MR. SHAPIRO: I mean, because I -- because I want to make a decision and have my vote based upon what I hear. And if -- and if you're waiting to go to the big guys, that's fine; then why are you wasting our time? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 MR. DALY: Well, I think Scott was simply giving for informational purposes -- not for informational but making a statement regarding the special exception process. I'd still like to go through this if you don't mind? MR. SHAPIRO: Well, I mean, you know, if we're saving the -- if we're saving our -- our arguments for others -- MR. CLARK: I made a statement I hadn't really come intending to make but I thought it needed to be made in response to what -- what Russ said. MR. SHAPIRO: And I didn't intend to make the one I just made, but I made it. MR. CLARK: So, you know, there is a presentation that I can and will make, but I really didn't come with the exhibits and handouts to do that. So I'm not -- MR. ROSENTHAL: Tom, you're withdrawing the application MR. DALY: No. MR. CLARK: I'm not trying to be flippant. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. CLARK: I'm just -- because of that and our time frame -- MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. CLARK: -- I didn't come to do that. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 MR. SHAPIRO: Go on. MR. DALY: Item number two also requires that our signage be compatible with the nearby Mobil station's square footage and height. We have reviewed the original application for the Mobil. Their original application was for a 15 -foot -tall sign that was 98 square feet. At the request of the Planning Department, they reduced the height of their signage to -- or excuse me -- it was 25 foot originally. They reduced it down to 15 feet which was the new code. There was no comment in the record that stated that the square footage had to be reduced. The square footage was reduced at the initiation of the Mobil station. They decided that they wanted to reduce their freestanding sign to 61 square feet and leave all the signs on the buildings the same size. With this project, we have decided to reduce and eliminate some of the signage on our building and canopy and yet leave our sign as proposed. We believe we meet the code. We believe that the Mobil, by reducing it to 61 square feet, it was a voluntary decision on their part and not a request by the City. And so we don't feel any precedent has been set with regards to the square footage of that. We believe Mobil just made that decision. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 MR. WAGNER: Well, but that's's like, you know, if you come in and submit something and ten things are right and five things are in dispute, we're obviously not going to comment about the things that we agree with. So -- MR. DALY: The only thing -- MR. WAGNER: -- in this case, we agreed with the reduction in the Mobil signage and it was part and parcel of a whole package of signage that we agreed to, and we felt that it was proportionate to what they needed. And -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, let me ask a question: Did they, in fact, voluntarily reduce their sign and put it elsewhere? MR. WAGNER: It was a part -- I don't remember exactly other than I remember it was a part of their overall signage. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. But did they voluntarily reduce the sign, and does particular -- if they voluntarily reduced their sign because they wanted their design to be different, then this holds some merit. MR. WAGNER: Well, part of their reduction had to do with the height requirement which we did specifically ask them for. And I cannot remember specifically, Ellis. There was a lot of -- MR. SHAPIRO: But you put -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 MR. WAGNER: -- conversation -- MR. SHAPIRO: -- down a comment that specifically demanded that this developer do exactly the same thing. MR. WAGNER: Correct. MR. SHAPIRO: So I am asking you to specifically remind yourself as to whether it was voluntary or involuntary. MR. WAGNER: Well, I would then tend to say it was probably involuntary. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Thank you. MR. ROSENTHAL: Okay. (To Mr. Wagner) Russ? DR. FERDINAND: Could I make a comment at this point? MR. ROSENTHAL: Excuse me one second. Russ, was that part of the special exception approval plan? MR. WAGNER: Yes. MR. ROSENTHAL: Okay. As opposed to some subsequent development approval? MR. LEWIS: The approved special exception plan for Mobil showed a sign 15 feet tall and 61 square feet. MR. DALY: Right. And for the -- for the record, everything that I read in the staff's comments was only relative to the height and not the square footage with the exception of what is allowed for the total project square 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 M footage. MR. WAGNER: You know, if I had to write down everything that I agreed to with a developer -- MR. SHAPIRO: No. I don't think you -- I don't think you have that responsibility, and I don't think -- but there is an issue -- there may be an issue here if it's -- if it's voluntary versus required and then you point to a group and say that because they voluntarily reduced it, you have to, I don't know whether or not you got any law on your side. MR. WAGNER: The current City requirement would be 36 square feet. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. And you feel that they have the responsibility to meet the current requirement? MR. WAGNER: Well, I think if you had a strict -- strict application of their vesting certificate and their development agreement, that they would have to conform to 36 square feet. MR. SHAPIRO: But what have you done in regard to review of this? You've used -- you used the Mobil sign as the requirement -- MR. WAGNER: Yes. In other words, we're already -- MR. SHAPIRO: -- even though that -- MR. WAGNER: -- giving them a break, in my view, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 to make it consistent with the rest of the PUD. They're already getting almost -- almost, what, 60, 70 percent more. MR. SHAPIRO: But if -- but if the Mobil -- if the Mobil folks would have not voluntarily reduced the sign, would have you -- would you have then used this and said, "We'd like you to follow the Mobil," or would you -- or would you have gone to the requirements of the current law? MR. WAGNER: Well, I personally think we can go with the requirements of the existing law, but that's not what our attorney has recommended. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. DR. FERDINAND: Just a point of information. You know, we were told that we should review all the special exception processes that occurred. We did that; we spent a lot of time doing that. Unfortunately, there was nothing consistent about it. In other words, in one case a station had two signs of a certain height and certain dimensions. In another case, they had one sign. In one case there was more signage on the buildings and a little bit -- nothing on the -- you know, very little on this -- on the freestanding sign and then reversed. So there's no -- you know, I keep hearing this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 word "integrated," "consistent," whatever; there was no integrated or consistent rule as to what's to be done there. MR. CLARK: These are -- DR. FERDINAND: And -- MR. CLARK: I'm sorry. Go ahead. DR. FERDINAND: what makes it flustrating [sic] is, we read your code, we meet your code, in most instances we exceed your code, trying to anyway. And I think if there's a desire by the Planning Department or any other department in this City that they want some something additionally, then they got change the code. So when you come in as a developer or potential owner and builder and so forth, let's see what the playing field looks like before we start. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. All right. The only thing I'll say to that, though, is -- is this: Just as much as I question the issue of voluntary versus involuntary, there -- there is just much merit to the law in regard to -- I mean, if we get down to what's going to be legally discussed as to whether or not -- what code you have to follow and that to some degree if they have then voluntarily allowed you to follow a lesser code, you know, there's just as much of a mitigation to that, which may have been what they have done to be kind to others as well, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 as far as the integration. As these -- nothing in a snapshot and while you certainly should be looking at this stuff, the snapshot of the picture changes based upon the code's changes and the will of the City Commission as far as their policies. There is no question in my mind that over the course of the last five or ten years this City Commission -- right, wrong or indifferent -- has demanded a different product and has demanded that staff give them a different product through the developers -- DR. FERDINAND: Uh-huh. MR. SHAPIRO: -- right, wrong or indifferent. Whether or not -- and so I don't know that you know why -- well, I think we did that to sort of look and see what was going on. I think that dependent upon what year or what time, what effort, what laws were passed, where it was, how it related to the rest of another facility, had -- had something to do with it. And that's true and they're right under law under special exceptions to view a property with the consideration of health, safety and welfare. And so, I mean, I don't know that you're every going to be completely consistent based upon the fact that the picture does change and the area changes. MR. WAGNER: And as clarification, if the issue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 22 is following our current code, this plan is not anywhere concurrent. MR. SHAPIRO: Did you have any other comments you wanted to make on this particular issue? MR. DALY: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: Again, this comment is relative to some information that was submitted on previous submittals. We understand that the Planning Department desires a different roofing material. And, in lieu of Scott (indicating Mr. Clark) saying it, I think we believe that that's outside of the scope of the special exception process, getting the different materials. And so we're going to stick with our plan that we have. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Number four. MR. DALY: Temporary bollards at the Moore Road entrance. MR. SHAPIRO: What is a bollard? MR. DALY: It's a pipe that sticks up. MR. SHAPIRO: Is it a widget or something? What the hell is it that? MR. DALY: It's a pipe that sticks up that controls -- MR. WHEELER: It's full of concrete so you don't have -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 MR. DALY: All right. We believe -- MR. SHAPIRO: Oh, so that if you hit it, you smash the crap out of your car. MR. DALY: Right. This is being requested at our entrance on Moore Road. We believe it's a safety issue and we just don't think that it's a good situation to have out there. MR. WAGNER: Well, we're doing exactly the same thing at SunTrust Bank, so it must be a safety issue there, too. MR. DALY: In the public right-of-way? MR. WAGNER: It's a safety -- yes, sir. It's a safety issue the other way around. We don't need left - turning movements within a hundred feet of a main signalized intersection. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. We got a difference of opinion on that. Let's go on. MR. COOK: May I ask a question back on three? I didn't -- what did we resolve on that one? MR. SHAPIRO: We resolved that we're going to disagree. MR. COOK: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: Number five? MR. ROSENTHAL: And the same answer for number four; we resolved to disagree. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 MR. SHAPIRO: Right. It's just disagreed. And I think, you know, everybody's got the same position on those. I mean, they -- that's why we're trying to get through this DRC and I'd like to try and do that today. MR. DALY: Yes, sir. MR. SHAPIRO: So let's go on. MR. DALY: Number five, unsafe traffic patterns. We disagree. We don't understand the staff's concerns. (To Mr. Wagner) Is it -- is it turning radiuses, Russ, that is relative to this number five or -- or location? MR. WAGNER: You're creating a whole new entrance into the shopping center that never was planned for. MR. DALY: All right. MR. WHEELER: You're speaking to this entrance down here? MR. LEWIS: No. MR. WAGNER: And it's too close to the intersection. MR. WHEELER: This one. MR. WAGNER: What used to be simply an indirect driveway access to what was two out -parcels -- they shared access driveway, they shared no connection to the inner roadway -- has now become a direct access close to the intersection from Maguire Road into the shopping center. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 MR. DALY: so you believe that the out -parcels never anticipated having access to the shopping center? MR. WAGNER: Indirectly perhaps, but it's never been shown in the planning. MR. DALY: Well, we -- we disagree with that. (To Mr. Clark) Scott, did you have anything else on it? MR. WAGNER: And we're not disagreeing that you should have internal access but we're saying it ought to be indirect. MR. LEWIS: More specifically, we suggested that we felt the northern entrance to the shopping center site is unsafe; the southern entrance is fine. MR. DALY: And by what standards did you determine that? MR. WAGNER: Because it creates an indirect route through the -- in other words, it doesn't encourage people to cut through the service station to get to the shopping center. MR. CLARK: And I guess the other issue relates to the -- to the traffic pattern of the trucks. so I think if you -- if you eliminate some things that you think creates that, then it creates a different safety hazard relating to the trucks. MR. COOK: You mean the way it's configured now? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MR. CLARK: Uh-huh. MR. COOK: The configuration of this is so -- we always unload from the passenger side. And this sets up where the unloading is on this side and people coming through here are not going to have a problem with tangling up in hoses that are discharging volatile material. So -- and it also keeps our driver out of the traffic path. So that's the way -- that's the reason why it's configured as it is. MR. DALY: And we have to access the site for -- for the trucks from the north and the reasoning for that is because that's where our full access is. When we come in for this first phase for Hess, we have to come in the existing shopping center because that is where our full access point's going to be. We have no -- trucks aren't coming up from Windermere; they'll be coming in from 50, and so we need to have that circulation to get our trucks in and around. MR. LEWIS: And it's our opinion that entrance to the south can still provide that. It's different route to the site but it still provides for it. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: Well, obviously we disagree. We feel that the Hess Corporation has more experience in these matters than the City Planning Department. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 MR. SHAPIRO: Ditto to what was said in the earlier statement -- MR. DALY: Absolutely. MR. SHAPIRO: -- by Mr. Clark. Let's go on. MR. DALY: Number seven. (To Mr. Clark) Scott, do you want to -- MR. CLARK: I think it's a repeat of the issue -- MR. SHAPIRO: Ditto. MR. CLARK: -- we discussed -- MR. DALY: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. MR. CLARK: -- already. I asked for the code reference, and I think that the City Attorney's office was going to provide that to me. MR. SHAPIRO: It's not by the -- Current radii -- MR. SHAPIRO: Certainly with Hess gas stations. MR. DALY: Absolutely. MR. WAGNER: I will agree to that. MR. DALY: Current radii shown at the two cross height (ph). This again is a radius concern. We believe that, again, it's private property. We don't want to have to come back and rebuild our curbs; we feel we meet the code. MR. SHAPIRO: Ditto to what was said in the earlier statement -- MR. DALY: Absolutely. MR. SHAPIRO: -- by Mr. Clark. Let's go on. MR. DALY: Number seven. (To Mr. Clark) Scott, do you want to -- MR. CLARK: I think it's a repeat of the issue -- MR. SHAPIRO: Ditto. MR. CLARK: -- we discussed -- MR. DALY: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. MR. CLARK: -- already. I asked for the code reference, and I think that the City Attorney's office was going to provide that to me. MR. SHAPIRO: It's not by the -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. ROSENTHAL: I think the Planning Department would -- im MR. SHAPIRO: The Planning Department will provide the cite. MR. CLARK: Okay. MR. DALY: Number eight, sign location. I guess, again, we'll request the locational requirements in the code for the -- for the sign. It's our understanding that there's a ten -foot setback from public right-of-way and we need that. But apparently there's some other -- other criteria that we're not aware of. MR. SHAPIRO: Is there? MR. WAGNER: I can't remember the last sign we approved that was in a retention pond. And, yes, we have moved signs on other locations to move them back from the corner, and make them relate more to the building. MR. DALY: Is there -- MR. WAGNER: Common. MR. DALY: Is there criteria that we can review? MR. WAGNER: It's just under the special exceptions as far as compatibility of the site. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: This is relative to some additional landscaping. We have reviewed the Mobil plans and we have reviewed the Mobil site, and we believe we're consistent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 with what's out there. So I think that's another one that we're just going to have to move forward on. Number ten, it requests a four -foot landscape strip in front of the building. Again, we have reviewed all the special exception cases over the past five years in the City and have found nowhere where this requirement has been part of the process; whether it's a shopping center not under the special exception or a gas station, we have never seen a four -foot strip of landscaping in front of the building. And so -- MR. WAGNER: Well, this is strictly going by the code. As -- as we are able to request additional design features on the site, we're also able through the special exception process to provide waivers under certain circumstances. In this particular case, this is strictly an application of the current -- not even the current code but the code as it existed when you applied. In other words, unless you ask for a formal waiver of that, we would list that as a requirement because it isn't -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, are you saying that you don't care or are you saying -- what are you saying? MR. WAGNER: No. I'm saying that we would normally require it. We require it on every other building. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 30 MR. SHAPIRO: All right. DR. FERDINAND: But there's no inconsistency. MR. SHAPIRO: If -- if --- yeah. Well, I guess I'm trying -- I guess if I was sitting out there I'd say, "Well, then why do you even suggest the waiver if you're going to demand it?" MR. WAGNER: I'm saying in the other -- I don't -- in the other cases there were some kind of mitigating circumstances. MR. SHAPIRO: In other words, they may have got a waiver to do something else like -- like the possibility of the Mobil sign. It may change; you don't know. Okay. I'm only screwing you on that part. Okay. Go ahead. MR. DALY: The required landscaping along Moore Road, it needs to show shade trees spaced 30 feet apart. Again, we went out to the Mobil station and saw what was in the ground today and attempted to -- to match the plant material spacing, et cetera. And, so, since the consistency with the shopping center's been the flavor of the comments that we've received over the past ten months -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, but -- but the -- I think one of the arguments here, you know, that won't cut bait is that, I think, what -- you know, when you go ahead and go 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 31 to the City Commission and Planning and Zoning Hoard, it's difficult -- I guess you're saying we're having it both ways and you are, too, because on one hand those things that you want to do you're saying are not required to be consistent, and those things you don't want to do you're saying were consistent. So -- MR. DALY: I'm not saying -- I'm not -- I'm not saying we don't want to do it, I just want direction. I think -- MR. SHAPIRO: So -- so what you're really saying is, as a general rule, that if everybody was consistent on everything, some of this stuff would come back; is that what you're saying? MR. DALY: Some of this stuff would come back. I don't understand what -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, what I'm saying to you -- what I'm saying is, on one hand, what you're saying is that we're trying to be consistent, then -- then you would be -- and there are things that you don't want to do because we're saying we want to be consistent. There are things that you are not willing to do because you are consistent with others. So, therefore, there's a mixture of 20 items or 12 items, six of which everyone agrees we -- six that you're saying we don't want to be consistent and six that 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 32 says we are consistent, therefore we shouldn't have to. MR. CLARK: That's turning it around. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, it's both ways. MR. CLARK: No. The rationale that -- MR. SHAPIRO: I made it clear. MR. CLARK: -- that we've hear over and over again -- MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. MR. CLARK: -- where there were issues where there was no code and it's discretionary -- MR. SHAPIRO: And the consistency. MR. CLARK: -- and somebody said, "Well, gee, wouldn't it be great if you do this with your Mobil station." So when we get -- when we get to points that aren't, you know, on the Mobil station or elsewhere, they say, "Well, go ahead and do it anyway," then we ask ourselves a question of, okay, what's -- then what's the rationale for that or is that just something so that when the next guy comes along, you can point to the Hess station and say, 'See, we made them do it.'" MR. SHAPIRO: But -- yeah. But it appears to me they'll probably -- there's a urinary specialist that's required here and because that if certain things went away, other things would, too, is what I'm hearing between us here. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 33 MR. CLARK: Should we bring that person to the -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, I think that person may be there and I certainly hope the fan is not pointing in any direction. Go on with your comments. MR. DALY: I am -- MR. ROSENTHAL: I guess -- I guess, you know, the suggestion is -- and I don't hear the Applicant proposing that -- is I don't you see you coming forward saying, "We're going to have a plan, you know, consistent with the overall plan and the Mobil station in all cases." I think if you were saying that and the staff was trying to impose something more stringent on you that that may well be persuasive if you had agreed to that position. But if you start from the position that we don't have to be consistent with the Mobil station, then following up on what the City Manager says, you can't have the benefit of picking -- picking and choosing. MR. CLARK: So unfortunately the comments are punishment for our disagreeing with the other -- MR. ROSENTHAL: No, no. I think they reflect -- MR. SHAPIRO: No. I don't think it's punishment. MR. ROSENTHAL: I think they reflect the planning -- MR. SHAPIRO: Punishment is all of us sitting 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 34 around this table right now. MR. DALY: Misery loves company. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. You know, that's punishment. MR. ROSENTHAL: No. I think -- MR. CLARK: We will -- will stipulate agreement to that. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: Relative to the landscaping, we have submitted a plan that -- that met the minimum City standards, we have revised the plan to what we felt matched the Mobil station and we get an additional comment that talks about tree spacing relative to the special exception process. I think the plan that we have presented meets the design criteria established in the center. I can go back and change it to what the minimum code is. You know, we want to do a nice job. But I'm just trying to figure out, you know, how to get beyond this issue because landscaping is not an issue with us, okay. But I need some direction from the City staff, is the plan that we submitted consistent with the Mobil station? MR. WAGNER: No. MR. DALY: Can you give us reasons or direction how to make it consistent with the Mobil station? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 35 MR. WAGNER: Add more plant materials. I mean, I -- MR. DALY: I mean, how can -- MR. WAGNER: I mean, I can't sit here and list every tree that you're supposed to plan but it's the -- I would say that you probably have 60 to 70 percent of the number of plant materials and the size and type of plant materials that they had. So you're deficient in -- MR. DALY: The volume? MR. WAGNER: -- volume and quality of plant materials. DR. FERDINAND: Well, then that's clear what we need then. You're not saying you want them over here; just get them -- MR. WAGNER: Well, there are certain -- DR. FERDINAND: -- up and get them -- MR. WAGNER: -- certain things -- DR. FERDINAND: -- sized. MR. WAGNER: -- that are required and there are certain things that -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, as an ex -guy that owned a landscaping business, I mean, you pretty well could look at another piece of land and without being asked -- staff asking if they're using that as the criteria to determine what you need to do to make it equal. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 36 I mean, the -- I mean, you -- you know the difference; you've been around the block enough times -- MR. DALY: Sure. MR. SHAPIRO: -- to know the difference between a five gallon plant and a -- MR. DALY: Yeah. And an eight gallon plant. MR. SHAPIRO: -- eight plant (sic], so -- MR. DALY: We don't want to debate the issue. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, I don't know that there's a debate. DR. FERDINAND: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: I think if you -- if -- I mean -- I mean, I think, to be truthful with you, this is one of the ones that the person that specializes needs to be -- and I think this is one you really ought to be able to deal with. DR. FERDINAND: Yes. MR. SHAPIRO: But -- and my guess is the less of these that you have -- DR. FERDINAND: Have to deal with. MR. SHAPIRO: -- to deal with, the better off you're going to be. MR. DALY: I agree. MR. SHAPIRO: Let's go on. MR. CLARK: Is that 11 and 12 basically? DR. FERDINAND: Yes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. MR. DALY: Yes. MR. CLARK: Okay. Thirteen. I'm not sure what 13 is. 37 MR. DALY: Oh, that's -- there are -- there are standard conditions relative to -- DR. FERDINAND: Which we didn't have any problem with. MR. DALY: -- expiration dates. I was simply waiting until we got all of this resolved so I could stick them on the plan. MR. CLARK: That's a reference to number one in Martha's -- MR. DALY: Yes. MR. CLARK: I don't think -- MR. DALY: And we have reviewed those comments -- MR. CLARK: -- we have issues with this. MR. DALY: -- and we don't have any -- MR. SHAPIRO: Have any problem. Hey, guess what? MR. DALY: I just wanted to make sure that was it. MR. SHAPIRO: That's the first thing in five pages; delete number 13. MR. DALY: All right. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 W. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. Now we're rolling. I can feel that ball just going down that hill. All right. Number 14. MR. DALY: This -- this -- the hill has flattened out again. MR. SHAPIRO: Oh, no. Oh, God, small hill, ant hill. MR. CLARK: It's actually inclined some. MR. DALY: It's gone -- it's gone back up. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: There's a pothole in the road. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: (To Mr. Clark) Scott, do you want to address this? MR. CLARK: (No response) MR. SHAPIRO: No, he says. MR. ROSENTHAL: I -- let me -- let me address it. Item number -- on item number 14 there were a number of areas in previous staff comments with respect to the special exception which upon review it was determined do not need to be specifically addressed as part of the special exception but they are -- they are site plan issues. paper. MR. CLARK: You're saying that you ran out of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 39 MR. ROSENTHAL: No. No. It is that they are site plan issues but we didn't want the Applicant to misconstrue the fact that the City wasn't -- MR. SHAPIRO: Wasn't concerned about it. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- commenting on these as meaning that we had therefore agreed with your earlier comments. So at my request, I asked the Planning Department to put this in here letting you know that we're dropping these issues with respect -- MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- to the special exception, but that we did believe that these were site plan issues so that there wouldn't be any mistaken impression or mis- communication. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. I think it was in order to -- so that we wouldn't have another contest later on, that these are site -- we just wanted you to be aware that we haven't -- we still have the same problems but they're not issues regarding the special exception. That's all it meant. MR. CLARK: I understand. MR. SHAPIRO: I mean, you can comment it or not comment it; all we're doing is just giving you a piece of information. MR. CLARK: Yes, sir. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 40 MR. SHAPIRO: Okay? MR. DALY: (To Mr. Clark) Do you have any problem with putting this on the plan? MR. SHAPIRO: Have any problem with -- MR. DALY: Well, no, I'm asking Scott. MR. SHAPIRO: Oh, well, I mean -- MR. DALY: Yeah. MR. CLARK: Well, putting it on the plan kind of guarantees that we'll get to do this again. MR. DALY: We'll just take this as informational and see if we put it on the plan or put it in writing. We understand and if you want to put it as a condition -- MR. ROSENTHAL: Yeah. If you want to -- MR. DALY: -- you know, somewhere on the record -- MR. ROSENTHAL: -- label it informational note on the plan -- MR. SHAPIRO: I don't mind that either. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- as opposed to note, that's fine. MR. SHAPIRO: Informational note's fine as far as we're concerned. MR. DALY: All right. MR. SHAPIRO: It's not attempt -- intending to trap you; it's intending to advise you. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 41 MR. ROSENTHAL: And in fairness to Hess, I mean, we didn't know that Hess would necessarily be here. we don't want someone to pick up the plan and have a mis- communication in looking at the plan. MR. SHAPIRO: It's only a trap if you -- if it's -- if it's -- MR. DALY: Got you. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. You know what I'm saying. [There was an interruption in the proceedings.] MR. SHAPIRO: All right. Let's go on to -- MR. DALY: The next -- MR. SHAPIRO: -- Martha Formella -- MR. CLARK: Or Julian's. MR. SHAPIRO: -- or Julian. MR. CLARK: Martha's we covered, I think. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. So we go to Julian. MR. DALY: So we got -- with Julian's, the parking space ratios, I have not had a chance to review that back with the code. MR. CLARK: Is it the same as the previous one on that? this. MR. DALY: No. This is a new -- new comment on MR. SHAPIRO: I thought it was a site plan issue. MR. WAGNER: Well, we have met on this. I don't 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 42 remember who was in the meeting; I believe it was Don and myself and -- MR. SHAPIRO: And it was deleted. MR. WAGNER: -- and it was supposed to be deleted but - - MR. DALY: All right. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. MR. WAGNER: -- it never was. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. So that's deleted. You already talked about the second one as being something you get. MR. DALY: Yes. Number three is the location of the -- the underground tanks. We really from a functional standpoint to service and fill them -- MR. WAGNER: We -- I believe we also -- MR. SHAPIRO: We deleted that. We're not going to -- MR. WAGNER: -- deleted it. We're not going to tell you where to put your tank. MR. SHAPIRO: Right. MR. WASHINGTON: Item four was the only one that we left in and that was informational. MR. DALY: Yeah. Well, no, that's -- MR. SHAPIRO: All right. Do you have any problem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 with that? MR. DALY: No. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. MR. COOK: Wait a minute Martha's -- previous? 43 Before we go, back on MR. SHAPIRO: Martha's. MR. COOK: -- was all this stuff addressed in the MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. MR. COOK: Okay. I just have one question on the second page. MR. SHAPIRO: And all of it was opposed. No. Go ahead. MR. COOK: No. It was all -- it was not agreed to on any of that, okay, because on the back page, "The Applicant shall make good faith effort to obtain certificate of occupancy for the use authorized by the special exception within six months." Well, sometimes it takes us when we go through the -- the review, we've changed buildings a number of times on this thing. But just to get our plans in shape, I need nine months. MR. ROSENTHAL: This is from issuance of the building permit. MR. SHAPIRO: Permit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 44 construction -- MR. SHAPIRO: That's when we're concerned. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- and left it there. MR. COOK: No. We won't do that. It may take us a little while to get started and then -- MR. ROSENTHAL: That's when -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, that's cool. We don't -- MR. COOK: -- once we're under construction, you know, MR. COOK: Oh. MR. ROSENTHAL: That's MR. SHAPIRO: It's not from the -- MR. COOK: It takes six months for us to get -- MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. It's from the permit so you're fine. MR. COOK: All right. But -- MR. SHAPIRO: By then you may have changed your -- chances are you will not change your building after you get the permit. MR. COOK: Absolutely. I agree. MR. SHAPIRO: So you're in great shape. MR. ROSENTHAL: That's designed so if you started a building and then stopped -- MR. SHAPIRO: Stopped it. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- in the middle of construction -- MR. SHAPIRO: That's when we're concerned. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- and left it there. MR. COOK: No. We won't do that. It may take us a little while to get started and then -- MR. ROSENTHAL: That's when -- MR. SHAPIRO: Well, that's cool. We don't -- MR. COOK: -- once we're under construction, you know, it's one year. MR. ROSENTHAL: That's one year. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 45 MR. SHAPIRO: You have one year from that time. We're not concerned about that. All we're concerned here is with the old -- remember the old -- if you ever been in Florida for a while, the old condominium, "Let's get the hell out of the country; South America ain't buying anymore." That occurred in the 80's -- MR. DALY: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: -- where they were just all over the place. That's why that law was put in everybody's books. MR. COOK: So our next step is to go to the Planning Commission? MR. SHAPIRO: All right. No. Hold on a second. We need a motion. MR. COOK: Oh. MR. WAGNER: Recommend denial. MR. SHAPIRO: Is there a second? MR. ROSENTHAL: Based upon the reasons -- MR. SHAPIRO: Reasons -- MR. WAGNER: Based upon all the inconsistencies. MR. SHAPIRO: And the one we deleted. Okay. Anybody got a second? MR. FRIEL: I'll second. MR. WHEELER: I got a question. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. I don't believe you can 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 vote. MR. WAGNER: Yes, he can. MR. SHAPIRO: Oh, that's right member. Uri You're a voting All right. So it's been moved and seconded. You got a question? MR. WHEELER: Yeah. Can you explain to me again -- for I don't know how many times this is -- the requirements of the special exception and what the plan is? They are asking for a special exception to place a gas station on this corner; is that correct? MR. WAGNER: With a preliminary plan. It's part of the special exception as a preliminary plan. MR. WHEELER: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: And there are certain things that the law allows, I believe, the City Commission to know about or -- or determine as part of the special exception and that's what he was talking about in regard to when we said, "Here's a note; we can't -- we're not making you do that now -- MR. WHEELER: Uh-huh. MR. SHAPIRO: -- but on site plan we may make you do this and we don't want you to be surprised." MR. ROSENTHAL: Right. And at my request the staff has gone back through -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 47 MR. SHAPIRO: And it's delete. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- all of their, I guess, requests in areas of disagreement and identified specific -- MR. SHAPIRO: Specifics. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- sections of the special exception provisions of the code which they believe are not met based on the Applicant's -- MR. SHAPIRO: Which may make the argument a little more -- MR. ROSENTHAL: -- declining to -- MR. SHAPIRO: -- germane -- MR. ROSENTHAL: -- to -- to include -- MR. SHAPIRO: -- when it gets done. MR. ROSENTHAL: Huh? MR. SHAPIRO: It may be a little -- MR. ROSENTHAL: -- or incorporates a comment. MR. SHAPIRO; Okay. You get what we're saying or do you have any other questions? MR. WHEELER: No. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. It's been moved and seconded. All in favor say "aye." (voice response) MR. SHAPIRO: All opposed? (No audible response) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 48 MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. MR. DALY: All right. (There was an interruption in the proceedings.] MR. SHAPIRO: All right. Here's the situation. Probably you need to continue on with this plan because I don't think you can wait. And I think that we can verbalize the things that have been agreed upon and not been agreed upon. (To the reporter) The issue I've got, Louan, is how long will it take to get the minutes of this thing, even though it's a huge meeting, because I'm going to recommend that this transcript go to everybody, I mean at least on this P & Z Board and this Commission, just because I think it has to be done this way. How long do you think it will take? THE REPORTER: Well, Ellen left a note saying that it would -- it had to be here by the 6th of July. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. THE REPORTER: Is that sufficient? MR. SHAPIRO: When did you -- yeah. All right. So if on the basis of having the verbatim transcript of this, anybody that has no life and wants to read for a few hundred months might be able to understand what we came to in regard to having this plan in front of us, particularly if they have an I. Q. over 230. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 49 So I think that -- I think that makes it a little safer in regard to being able to go on with this plan. MR. ROSENTHAL: So the plan as considered by DRC without revisions will move forward to the Planning and Zoning Commission with the DRC comments and recommendations. MR. SHAPIRO: Comments and the verbatim transcript. MR. CLARK: We will proceed, in any event -- MR. SHAPIRO: To change it. MR. CLARK: -- to make the revisions so that those will be available so as we discuss that, there will be something to look at where we can say we -- MR. SHAPIRO: Plus, you may have some reduction. MR. ROSENTHAL: That's what I think the Planning Department is objecting to because -- MR. CLARK: Well -- MR. ROSENTHAL: -- that will be a set of plans that they will not have had an opportunity to review. And I -- what I hear you saying -- MR. SHAPIRO: We're trying to get you to the Commission as quickly as possible. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- if you're going to review it -- MR. CLARK: Well, I'm not going to submit 0 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 those. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- you want it to come back to DEC. in MR. CLARK: I'm not going to submit those; I'm going to have them available for discussion purposes at the public hearings. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, that's not -- that's a cold cock on us. MR. CLARK: Well -- MR. SHAPIRO: The problem is, is that -- I mean, then probably -- MR. ROSENTHAL: Well, they can present whatever exhibits -- MR. SHAPIRO: They want. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- at the P & Z they want to present. I mean -- MR. SHAPIRO: But it's a real -- it's -- it's going to make -- MR. ROSENTHAL: That wouldn't be the plan being approved. MR. SHAPIRO: It's going to -- MR. WAGNER: Well, I'm intending to review any further plans leading up to Planning and Zoning. I got six other cases out here -- MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 51 MR. WAGNER: -- and I just don't have the time. Plus, this is the record; this is what you submitted; this is what we're responding to. And, again, I don't understand how we can change these since it's -- and also it's a denial. So, I mean, it would be one thing if it was an approval subject to making these changes, but it's a denial based on all these reasons. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, but you can verbalize some of this stuff that you might -- MR. WAGNER: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: -- want to agree to, not that you got on the plan -- on the verbatim transcript. MR. CLARK: We'll decide how we need to handle that. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. Well, could you, just as a matter of course, advise us so that we understand how you're going to handle that? MR. ROSENTHAL: Yeah. I -- what I -- MR. SHAPIRO: Or are you going to go to this meeting and say, "Ladies and gentlemen of the Planning and Zoning Board, here's our real plan"? MR. ROSENTHAL: Yeah. What I would -- what I would ask or suggest is that if you plan to do any kind of memo or report which says, "As to these issues, we've 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 52 agreed," okay, so that they're not issues which need to be discussed at the P & Z -- MR. SHAPIRO: which hopefully you will do. MR. ROSENTHAL: -- it would be -- it would be helpful to get that in advance so neither of us have to spend our prep time focusing on that. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah. MR. DALY: Yeah. MR. SHAPIRO: Well, let's try and keep it to whatever the minimum of this thing is. MR. DALY: P & Z date? MR. LEWIS: July 13th. MR. DALY: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: July 13th at 7:30. MR. DALY: I'm sorry. I thought you were saying 7:00. MR. WAGNER: City Commission, July -- MR. SHAPIRO: Any comments -- any other comments from the Applicant? MR. DALY: City Commission July what? MR. SHAPIRO: Thirteenth -- no, twenty -- July 20th. MR. CLARK: sixth and the 20th? MR. WAGNER: No. Thirteenth and the 20th. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Any other comments? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 All right. That will take care of it. [The proceedings were concluded at 3:32 p.m.] 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 54 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER STATE OF FLORIDA: COUNTY OF ORANGE: I, Louan Roe, Court Reporter, certify that I reported the foregoing proceedings at the time and place aforesaid, and that pages numbered 3 through 53, inclusive, constitute a true, complete and accurate transcript of said proceedings. I further certify that I have no personal, professional or financial interest in the outcome of this action. DATED this 6th day of July 1999. E%IIIBIT "A" Hess Gas Station - Special Exception Case No. 1-3SE-98 [Discussion regarding special exception. Motion to deny for reasons set forth in staff report failed 4-4.1 Paul Rosenthal: You could move it to the City Commission without a recommendation. I think you need to take some action to send it to the City Commission, either with a recommendation of denial or a recommendation of approval, either with conditions or with no recommendation. I guess we haven't heard a recommendation for approval, but presumably, you know, I would presume, however anybody votes. But, I suggest that if you think you're essentially tied four-four that you then move it to the City Commission with, advising them that the P & Z is split four-four, to the extent those who may be inclined to vote in favor of the project, that particular action doesn't give any advice to the City Commission. If there is advice that you want to send, in terms of conditions of approval, you know, you can certainly do that even if that fails four-four, because then the City Commission would have that motion. Harold Switzer: So we could entertain another motion from the commission for another approach? PR: For another approach? HS: The chair will entertain a motion from the commission on what kind of a message we want to send to the City Commission. Do I hear a motion'? PR: And Mr. Chairman, I guess if you want, I don't know what, if there was a consensus or if there were four viewpoints on the side. I can tell you what I think you, I've heard you talk about, and think you want to make a motion for approval. And, but I'm not clear on whether the sign location as proposed by the developer is acceptable. That was one area where I didn't hear debates or discussion. Pat Bond: Well, it's almost like I don't think anyone has a problem with the sign. Does anyone have a problem with the sign? Various members: I don't. I don't have. No problem with the sign. Darlene Rhodus (? Female voice): I didn't, and I don't think that... HS: Is there a motion? PR: Welt then... t DR(?): Motion? I guess we could make a motion O PR: Well then, a motion to approve which you could consider would be to approve the application of Hess for a special exception approval subject to, and I have a couple of editorial comments as I guess they go, subject to the following conditions: 1. The handout by Mr. Daly labeled "Recornmended Conditions of Approval" with the changing of the reference to final site plan be with the change of condition number one to say "The Final Site Plan shall comply with the preliminary site plan for special exception dated 6-9-99, as revised by the Planning and Zoning Commission", and then incorporating items 2 through 7; 2. That it also be subject to all matters agreed to by the developer at the Development Review Committee; 3. Also subject to barrel tile roof, since Mr. Daly's handout did not expressly say barrel the roof; 4. I would recommend that it be subject to item number 14 of the DRC staff report dated December 21, 1999 [sic - actually June 21, 19991, that's the item which dealt with the issues that were site plan issues; 5. Subject to the moving of the Maguire, of the entrance to the Hess station on Maguire Road south, in a southerly direction, but north of the canopy, as far, I guess south as practical; 6. That the special exception and site plan be consistent with the final subdivision plan for Plantation Grove Commercial Phase 2 and 3; 7. I would go ahead and say "and expressly approve the Hess proposed Hess sign location as presented on the preliminary site plan for special exception" and; finally, and I'll say this only cause they're not highlighted on Mr. Daly's memo, there were items number 9, 11 and 12 of the DRC report dated December 21[sic - actually June 21, 1999], that dealt with the landscaping issues, which were not highlighted as being objected to so that those also be incorporated since I don't believe those were approved at the DRC. That would be one possible motion. PB: Oh, gee, would you repeat that please? Kim Christoefl: I would like to make that motion. Robert McKey: I'll second it. KC: Thank you. HS: I'm sorry, I didn't hear what you said. KC: We're taking that motion. HS: Oh. 7 LL: And it's been seconded. HS: Okay, did you get that? Marisa Dawson: Who seconded that? Was it Lou? HS: Rob McKey. MD: Okay, thanks. [Unintelligible remark by unknown member] We'll let the court reporter handle that for you. You're welcome. PR: And if somebody wants to vote for that and there's anything in it that you don't agree with, then you can move to amend it to take something out if that's what you want to do. HS: Anyone have any comments on the motion as proposed? Dan Matthys (?): Is that wording agreed upon by staff and applicant? Any compromise at all on this? HS: Call to vote. All those in favor of the motion signify by saying "aye". All members; aye. HS: Those opposed? No response. HS: You can't change your mind now. PB: I thought you were adjourning us. HS: We're not adjourned yet. The vote was unanimous for approval. Meeting is adjourned. I i FOLEY & LARDNER MEMORANDUM EXHIBIT 'B' CLIENT -MATTER NUMBER 0203]]-0492 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners of the City of Ocoee FROM: Martha H. Formella, Esq., Assistant City Attorney DATE: July 16, 1999 RE: Hess Special Exception (Project No. 1-3SE-99) (located within Plantation Grove PUD) The Special Exception application, including a Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception, ("Application") was considered by the Development Review Committee ("DRC") on June 22, 1999. The memorandum from the Planning Department to the DRC dated June 21, 1999 outlined all of the outstanding Staff comments including memoranda from the Building Department and City Attorney's Office as attachments (collectively "DRC Report"). During the DRC meeting, various issues were verbally resolved as reflected in the DRC transcript. However, based on the remaining unresolved issues, the DRC unanimously voted to recommend denial of the Application. On July 13, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC") unanimously voted to recommend approval of the Application subject to certain verbal and written representations by the Developer at the PZC meeting, revisions the Developer and the Staff agreed upon at the DRC meeting, and revisions the PZC required. If the City Commission desires to uphold the PZC recommendation, it would be appropriate to move to approve the Application subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Site Plan shall comply with the Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception dated June 9, 1999 as revised pursuant to City Commission action. 2. This Special Exception, including the Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception, and the Final Site Plan shall be consistent with the Final Subdivision Plan for Plantation Grove Shopping Center Phases 2 and 3. 3. Identification signage shall be voluntarily reduced to 61 s.f. 4. Roof material for the principle structure shall be compatible with the roof material used on the existing Shopping Center (barrel tile). 006.1468]].1 5. At the request of the City, temporary bollards shall be placed in the Moore Road entrance. The Developer and Owner assume no liability for the placement of vertical obstructions in the public right-of-way. 6. Landscape quantities, material, and placement shall be consistent with the approved Mobil Station located within the Plantation Grove Shopping Center. The following Conditions of Approval shall be added to the Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception: This Special Exception shall expire twelve (12) months from the date of approval by the City Commission unless a building permit is obtained prior to such date, such permit being for the construction of the proposed use authorized by the Special Exception. Further, upon issuance of the building permit, the Applicant (or its agent) shall diligently proceed in good faith to complete construction in accordance with the terms hereof. Failure of the Applicant (or its agent) to proceed as aforesaid shall provide a basis for revocation of the Special Exception by the City Commission. Approval of this Special Exception does not authorize commencement of development. Prior to issuance of a building permit, it will be necessary to obtain site plan approval pursuant to the provisions of Article IV of the Ocoee Land Development Code. Further, compliance with all other applicable provisions of the Ocoee Land Development Code shall be required. The Applicant shall make a good faith effort to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the use authorized by the Special Exception within six (6) months of issuance of the building permit. Should the use authorized by this Special Exception be terminated or substantially modified or expanded in a manner inconsistent with the conditions of approval for the Special Exception, then said Special Exception may be revoked by the City Commission at its sole discretion. The Special Exception for a Convenience Store with Gas Sales shall be applicable only to the proposed Hess facility shown on the Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception and is not transferable to any other operator prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This Special Exception does not address or constitute an approval with respect to the following matters: a) width of the driveway entrance from Maguire Road; b) proposed dumpster location and access; c) screening of equipment; and d) a sidewalk joining the site to the sidewalk along Maguire 006.146877.1 -2- Road. These issues will be addressed with the site plan review and must comply with Land Development Code requirements in effect at that time. The Shopping Center identification sign shall be located within the median at the southern entrance to the Shopping Center, subject to obtaining permission from the fee owner. The Developer and the City will use their best efforts to obtain such permission. If permission cannot be obtained prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy on Lots 1 or 2, then the project identification sign shall be located on Lot 1 as shown hereon. 8. The Maguire Road driveway entrance shall be moved as far south as practical (but remaining north of the canopy). 9. The location of the Hess identification sign shall be as shown on the Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception, as revised pursuant to City Commission action. 10. The radius at the intersection of the entrance road off of Maguire Road and the entrance road along the eastern property boundary shall be 35 feet. The Developer shall install additional landscaping to soften the visual impact. 11. The radii where the cross access driveways connect to the entrance road along the eastern property boundary shall be 35 feet. The Developer shall install additional landscaping to soften the visual impact. 12. The landscaping within the vehicle use area shall be at least 10% of the total paved area. 13. The landscaping along Maguire Road shall include at least one shade tree per 30 linear feet. 14. The landscaping along the entrance road on the eastern property boundary shall include at least one shade tree per 50 linear feet. 15. The Developer shall provide a clearance letter from Orange County Engineering Department as to the proposed improvements made over the 54" Conserv II wastewater line with particular attention directed toward the proposed 16' deep stormwater retention ponds and driveway crossings. 16. The Developer shall submit a revised Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception incorporating all Conditions of Approval which is consistent with the City Commission action. (The plan set shall include the title Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception). The Special Exception shall become effective upon confirmation by the Planning Director and City Attorney that the revised Preliminary Site Plan for Special Exception is consistent with the City Commission action. 006.146877.1 _3_ The verbatim language of the PZC motion included references to other documents including the DRC transcript, DRC Report, and an exhibit presented by the Developer. To assist the City Commission and clarify the record, the above motion sets forth the conditions of the PZC recommendation as we understand them without any references to other documents. There are several clarifications in the above motion of which the City Commission should be aware. Although City Staff and the Developer disagreed about the size of several radii, the PZC discussion focused on the radius described in Condition 10 above when the PZC determined that 35 feet was appropriate. The above motion identities 35 feet for all radii (see Conditions 10 and 11 above). The following table regarding the radii is provided for your information: Location northern driveway connecting to entrance road along eastern boundary southern driveway connecting to entrance road along eastern boundary intersection of entrance road off Maguire Road and entrance road along eastern property boundary Staff Developer's Plan 15 feet 50 feet 15 feet 35 feet 25 feet 50 feet (Developer specifically agreed to 35 feet at PZC hearing) In light of the changes to the record plan which would be needed if the City Commission upholds the PZC recommendation, we recommend Condition 16 (which was not specifically included in the PZC motion). cc: Paul E. Rosenthal, Esq., City Attorney Russell B. Wagner, AICP, Planning Director 006.146x77.1 �- LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION A INSTALL 1/2" TYPE "K" COPPER AIR LINE TO COMP. IM BLDG. AIR INSTALL AIR HEAD/TOWER, AND YARD LIGHT RB (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) ON 4'-6" W x 6'-0" L. 4'-0" (PREPARED BY A.S.M. DATED .............) DEEP, 3000 P.S.I. CONCRETE BASE. SEE DETAIL, PROVIDE C3 1/2" TYPE "K" COPPER AIR LINE TO COMPRESSOR RC LOCATED IN BUILDING. AD CAR WASH ACCESS DEVICE B STAINLESS STEEL INVERTED "U" BUMPER RD POSTS; SEE DETAIL. B.C. BOTTOM OF CURB. B.M. BENCH MARK. B.0.1. BOTTOM OF ISLAND BP BITUMINOUS PAVING. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. B.O.W. BOTTOM OF WALL. B4O.T. BOTTOM OF TANKS. CC 4000 P.S.I. CONCRETE CURBING (MIN. 6" ABOVE FINISHED C 1 1 GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) MEETING RYL REQUIREMENTS OF ALL AUTHORITIES. PROVIDE —S— EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20'-0" MAXIMUM. SEE DETAILS SB AND SPECIFICATION FOR AIR ENTRAINMENT, PREPARED BY T. DALY DESIGN REINFORCEMENT, ETC. CF 12" HIGH, 12 GAUGE STAINLESS STEEL CURB FASCIA. C.O. CLEANOUT CL 320 W. SUPER METAL HALIDE SEMI—RECESSED CANOPY LIGHT METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, DATED.......} ; (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR) CM CONCRETE MAT CR CURB RAMP MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ALL SW AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. D DIESEL FUEL. DPC DEPRESSED CONCRETE CURBING MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. D2 PROVIDE 2" DIA. P.V.C. DRAIN FROM "PEDIGRID" MATS SPR TO STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. D3 PROVIDE 3" DIA. P.V.C. DRAIN FROM BUILDING ROOF DRAIN5 TO STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. D3C PROVIDE (2) 3" P.V.C. STORM DRAINS FROM STORAGE SSN BUILDING ROOF DRAINS THRU CURB FACE AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. D4 PROVIDE 4" DIA. P.V.C. STORM DRAINS FROM CANOPY GUTTER FITTINGS AND/OR BUILDING ROOF TO STORM —T— WATER SYSTEM AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. D4C PROVIDE 4" DIA. P.V.C. STORM DRAINS FROM CANOPY TN GUTTER FITTINGS THRU CURB FACE OF ISLANDS D5 PROVIDE 5" DIAMETER P.V.C. STORM DRAINS AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. D6 PROVIDE 6" DIAMETER P.V.C. STORM DRAINS AS TBE INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. D8 PROVIDE8" DIAMETER P.V.C. STORM DRAIN AS TF INDICATED ON SITE PLAN- E PROVIDE NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE T.O.W. FROM UTILITY POLE DESIGNATED BY LOCAL UTILITY TRN COMPANY TO BUILDING (S). SEE ELEC. DRAWING & SPECIFICATIONS. EC EDGE OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT. EJ FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT, PROVIDE SEALER TP AND BACKER ROD AT ALL 6" THICK AND 8" THICK TRP CONCRETE MATS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT, FA ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL ALUMINUM PANEL FENCE (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS). SEE DETAIL. _--LIN. FT.; HEIGHT 6'-0" FC FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETE LOUVER FENCE PAINT WHITE — SEE DETAIL). LIN. FT. __— HEIGHT 6'-0". FRG FURNISH AND INSTALL GALVANIZED STEEL HIGHWAY V GUARDRAIL FENCE. PAINT WHITE LIN. FT. _ HEIGHT 2'— 0". —G— EXISTING NATURAL GAS LINE. OB GRADE BREAK GL WHITE RIVER GRAVEL MIN. 4" DEEP. GM GAS METER BY UTILITY COMPANY GN NEW NAT. GAS LINE FROM EXG. GAS MAIN TO GAS METER 2GT INSTALL ONE 20,000 GALLON REGULAR, AND ONE 10,000 W-3/4" GALLON PREMIUM W-1 " UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS GASOLINE STORAGE TANKS (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) W1-1/2 SEE TANK INSTALLATION DWGS. 3GT INSTALL ONE 20:000 GALLON REGULAR, AND TWO 10,000 GALLON ( (1) PREMIUM AND (1) DIESEL) UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS GASOLINE WM STORAGE TANKS (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) SEE TANK INSTALLATION DWGS. 4GT INSTALL FOUR 10,000 GALLON ( (1) PREMIUM, (2) REGULAR, AND (1) DIESEL) UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS GASOLINE QHEIGHTS STORAGE TANKS (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) SEE TANK INSTALLATION DWGS. 5GT INSTALL FIVE UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS GASOLINE 100.0 STORAGE TANKS (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) — — — AS FOLLOWS: FOUR 10,000 GALLONS ( (2) REGULAR --- (1) PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE & (1) DIESEL) ONE 8,000 GALLON, (KEROSENE) NEW PAVEMENT AND EXISTING PAVEMENT. SEE TANK INSTALLATION DRAWINGS H LAWN HYDRANT FROST PROOF) *HESS* CANOPY FACADE SIGNS "HESS EXPRESS" WALL SIGN. .HP HIGH POINT. ID INSTALL NEW FIXED IDENTIFICATION SIGN (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) ON NEW CONCRETE FOUNDATION. OVERALL HEIGHT ------- SEE DRAWING. K KEROSENE L LANDSCAPED AREA. LP LOW POINT. MTE MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE — SEE DETAIL P_ PIPE NUMBER P PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE. PL PLUS UNLEADED GASOLINE P. L. PROgRTY LINE PS STEEL POST: 4" DIA.; CONC. FILLED; SET 3'-0" ABOVE GRADE, SET IN CONCRETE. 4PS INSTALL NEW 4 PRODUCT PRICE SIGN (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) ON NEW CONCRETE FOUNDATION OVERALL HEIGHT: 8' — 3". 25 S.F. SEE DRAWING. SPS INSTALL NEW 5 PRODUCT PRICE SIGN (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) ON NEW CONCRETE FOUNDATION OVERALL HEIGHT: 8' — 3". 29.75 S.F.).SEE DRAWING. RC5 5"' THICK 4000 P.S.I. CONCRETE REINFORCED WITH 1 LAYER OF 66—W2.OxW2.0 WELDED WIRE MESH SET 2-1/2" BELOW TOP. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR; AIR ENTRAINMENT, ETC. RC6 6" THICK 4000 P.S.I. CONCRETE MAT REINFORCED WITH 1 LAYER OF 66—W2.9xW2.9 WELDED WIRE MESH SET 2-1/2" BELOW TOP. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR AIR ENTRAINMENT, ETC. C8 8 THICK 4000 P.S.I. CONCRETE MAT REINFOKCED WITH 1 LAYER OF 66—W4.OxW4.0 WELDED WIRE MESH SET 2-1/2" BELOW TOP OF SLAB. SEE TANK INSTALLATION DWGS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR AIR ENTRAINMENT, ETC. LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION R REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE. RB REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE AND (PREPARED BY A.S.M. DATED .............) ASSOCIATED WALKS, WING WALLS, PLANTERS, C3 UTILITIES, ETC. RC REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE AND/OR TIMBER CURBS. RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE, 15" DIAMETER C5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RD REMOVE EXISTING DISPENSERS, PUMP ISLAND, PIPING, POND LAYOUT CONCRETE MAT, ETC. RF REMOVE EXISTING FENCE. RT REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND GASOLINE &_ OIL DETAILS STORAGE TANKS, PIPING, CONCRETE MAT, ETC. RGP RAMP AND GUTTER PAVING: REPAIR, REPAVE, REPLACE ANY WORK DISTURBED BY THE INSTALLATION DETAILS OF NEW WORK TO CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF ALL C 1 1 AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. RYL REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT & BASE. —S— EXISTING STORM SEWER. SB 24" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STOP BAR WITH DOUBLE 6" YELLOW PREPARED BY T. DALY DESIGN THERMOPLASTIC CENTERLINE STRIPES, 20' LONG, IF SHOWN SD SEEDED AREA: TOPSOIL, LIME, FERTILIZER, IDENTIFICATION SIGN (PREPARED BY SEED AND MULCH. SP SHOULDER PAVING: TO CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, DATED.......} ; AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. —SS— EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. ST_ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NUMBER SW CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MIN. 4" THICK) TO CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR AIR ENTRAINMENT, ETC. SOD SODDED AREA: TOPSOIL, LIME, FERTILIZER AND SOD. SPR UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER SYSTEM. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. SPT PROVIDE ' COMPLETE INDIVIDUAL SANITARY DISPOSAL SYSTEM' (SEPTIC TANK AND DISPOSAL FIELD) TO CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. SSN PROVIDE 4" P.V.C. SANITARY SEWER LINE FROM NEW BUILDING (S) TO EXISTING MAIN. (SCHEDULE 40) SSP PROVIDE- 4" P.V.C. SANITARY SEWER LINE FROM NEW BUILDINGS TO SEPTIC SYSTEM. (SCHEDULE 40) —T— EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE. TB TEL. BOOTHS PER TEL. CO. REQUIREMENTS. SEE DETAIL. TN PROVIDE NEW UNDERGROUND GALV. INTERMED. GRADE STEEL TEL. CDT. FROM UTILITY POLE DESIGNATED BY TELEPHONE COMPANY AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. SEE ELECT. DWGS. & SPECIFICATIONS. TBE 2' x 6" PRESSURE TREATED BOARD EDGE. TC TOP OF -CURB. TF TOE FOOTING T.0.1. TOP OF ISLAND T.O.W. TOP OF 'WALL. TRN TRANSFORMER PAD: 6'-0" X 6'—O" X 6" THICK, 4000 P.S.I. CONCRETE MAT REINFORCED WITH 66—W2.9 x. W2.9 WELDED WIRE MESH SET 2-1/2" BELOW TOP WITH TRANSFORMER TP TRASH 'PAD: 8'-0" x 10'-0" x 6" THICK, 4000 P.S.I. CONCRETE TRP TRASH '=&; RECYCABLES PAD: 8' — 0" x 20' — 0" x 6" THICK 4000 IS:S,I. CONCRETE MAT REINFORCED WITH 66—W2,9XW2.9 WELDED WIRE MESH SET 2-1/2" BELOW TOP. PROVIDE '(6) 4" DIA. STD. STEEL PIPE COL. BUMPERS FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE. SEE SPECIFICATION FOR AIR ENTRAINMENT, ETC., SEE - DETAIL. TW TOP OF WALKWAY V NEW VENTS (MINIMUM 12' — 0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE). SEE TANK INSTALLATION DRAWING. VA COIN OPERATED VACUUM (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR) ON 4'-0" X 4'-0" X 6" REINF. CONCRETE PAD (USE ONLY WITH CAR WASH BUILDING) VTE VINYL ;TRASH ENCLOSURE — SEE DETAIL —W— EXISTING; WATER LINE. W-3/4" PROVIDE=; 3/4" PVC WATER LINE TO BUILDING. W-1 " PROVIDE 1" PVC WATER SERVICE AND TAP FROM AVAILABLE MAIN. W1-1/2 PROVIDE 1-1/2- PVC WATER SERVICE. WL PROVIDE AN INDIVIDUAL WATER SYSTEM (WELL, PUMP AND PRESSURE TANK) TO CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. WM PROVIDE.' NEW WATER METER OF SAME SIZE AS WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING. YL INSTALL , NEW YARDLIGHT & POLE (FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS) ON NEW CONCRETE BASE. SEE DETAILS FOR POLE HEIGHTS & LAMP WATTAGE. QHEIGHTS OF CURB OR ISLAND IN INCHES ABOVE PAVEMENT. pQQi EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS. 100.0 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS. — — — EXISTING CONTOURS. --- PROPOSED CONTOURS. SAWCUT IN EXISTING PAVEMENT AT JUNCTION OF NEW PAVEMENT AND EXISTING PAVEMENT. EXISTING TO BE REMOVED. SITE DATA THIS SITE PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION CONTAINED IN A SURVEY PREPARED BY: DATED: r�'s li Ttl h. LOT NO. N/A BLOCK NO. N/A LOT AREA = 2.18 AC. BUILDING AREA = 3668 SF OWNER/ APPLICANT: AMERADA HESS CORPORATION 1 HESS PLAZA WOODBRIDGE, NJ (908) 750-6000 ARCHITECT: METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, PA 60 POMPTON AVENUE VERONA, NJ (973) 857-1010 UTILITIES: WATER AND SEWER: CITY OF OCOEE TELEPHONE: US SPRINT ELECTRICAL FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION EFFLUENT TRANSMISSION MAIN Water Concery 11 Woodard & Curran, Inc. (407) 656-2332 Phil Cross 1 SITE DATA CURRENT ZONING — P.U.D. COMMERCIAL REQUIRED PARKING — 18 SPACES (1 SPACE/200 SF G.F A.) PROVIDED PARKING — 21 SPACES TOTAL LAND AREA — 2.18 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.13 ACRES PROVIDED OPEN SPACE — 1.05 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREA — 3668 SF. G.F.A. APPROVED BUILDING AREA — 6,000 S.F. G.F.A. REQUIRED SETBACKS MAGUIRE RD. 40' MOORE RD. 35' NORTH BOUNDARY 10' EAST BOUNDARY 10' MAX. BLDG. HT. — 35' SIGNAGE CALCULATIONS MAGUIRE RD. FRONTAGE 70.33 SF X 2 = 140.66 SF MOORE RD. FRONTAGE 52.50 SF X 1 = 52.50 SF TOTAL ALLOWABLE — 192.91 SF TOTAL PROPOSED 192.91 SF NOTES: THIS PROJECT IS VESTED FROM CONCURRENCY PER VESTED RIGHTS CERTIFICATE CV -95-01 AND THE APPROVED AMENDMENTS. ON AND OFF SITE STORMWATER PONDS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER OF THIS PARCEL UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A MASTER ASSOCIATION IS CREATED FOR THE OVERALL PHASE Hi SHOPPING CENTER. INDEX OF DRAWINGS s C 1 TITLE SHEET C2 SURVEY CAME (PREPARED BY A.S.M. DATED .............) C3 GENERAL NOTES AS NOTED C4 SITE PLAN I C5 GRADING PLAN 1 C6 POND LAYOUT 1 C7 POND OUTFALL ' C8 DETAILS Q 2: "=5- C9 DETAILS C10 DETAILS l C 1 1 DETAILS f L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN PREPARED BY T. 3 DALY DESIGN ' L-2 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE AND DETAILS PREPARED BY T. DALY DESIGN L-3 IRRIGATION PLAN PREPARED BY T. DALY DESIGN I 3 ID -1 IDENTIFICATION SIGN (PREPARED BY 3 METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, DATED......) CE -1 CANOPY ELEVATIONS (PREPARED BY METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, DATED.......} ; A—! PRELIMINARY BUILDING FLOOR PLAN (PREPARED BY METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, DATED........) A-2 PRELIMINARY BUILDING ELEVATIONS (PREPARED BY METSKY—ZUCKERMAN, DATED.......} i l i i i APPROVALS CHAIRPERSON DATE SECRETARY DATE ENGINEER DATE �.vp. TITLE SKEET o u o CAME cc MAGUIRE ROAD AS NOTED KS �'� 11-17-98 � � CC OGOEE, FLORIDA C,__ 0 ORLANDO. Q 2: "=5- mTml ®LT ..................................................... ..._............................. ..........................._.................... .................._..._......�. ..... _..... ..__....._.._....�. .......... _............ ............._........_. J c� �� t� GTCEng• r O KENNETH SCHWARTZ � C0 LIC. 39014 Lu �0CD � LL � N 1. All construction is to conform with City of Ocoee standards and specifications, unless otherwise ~waived by the City Engineer. 2. The Engineer certifies that all roadways were designed to the applicable standards, as set forth by City of Ocoee and the latest edition of the Florida Department of Transportation Manual of Uniform Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance for Streets and Highways. 3. The Contractor shall coordinate all work within existing road right-of-ways with City of Ocoee. 4. It will be the responsibility of the Contractor to get the necessary Right -of -Way Permit(s) and provide for the safety and control of local traffic during construction. 5. The Contractor shall be extremely cautious when working near trees that are to be saved, and the Effluent Transmission Main whether shown in the plans or designated in the field. 6. The Contractor shall be responsible for locating and verifying (horizontally and vertically) all existing utilities before construction, and Poor notifying the various utility companies to arrange for any relocation, temporary disruption of service, or clarification of activity regarding said utility. The contractor shall exercise caution when crossing an underground utility, whether shown in these plans or field located. All utilities which interfere with the proposed construction except the Effluent Transmission Main shall be relocated by the respective utility companies and the Contractor shall cooperate with them during relocation operations. Any delay or inconvenience of the various utilities shall be incidental to the contract and no extra compensation will be allowed. 7. The locations of all existing utilities, facilities, and any other features shown on these plans have been determined from the best available information and are provided for the convenience of the Contractor. The Engineer does not guarantee the accuracy or the completeness of the location information provided_ Any inaccuracy or omission in such information shall not relieve the Contractor of his responsibility to protect such existing features from damage or unscheduled interruption of service. Should a discrepancy arise between these plans and actual field conditions which would appreciably affect the execution of these plans, the Contractor will halt construction and notify the Engineer immediately. 8_ The Contractor shall be responsible for meeting all inspection criteria and schedules, and for signing for said inspections. 9. Water and wastewater service shall be provided by City of Ocoee. The water distribution system and wastewater collection system shall be installed by the Contractor and shall conform with the City of Ocoee Standards and Specifications_ 10. The electrical distribution system is to be designed and installed by the electrical power utility. The Contractor will coordinate scheduling with the electrical power utility to ensure proper construction phasing, and to allow the utility to install street crossings and other required sleeves. Contractor shall also coordinate with Woodard and Curran, inc. 11. Completely sod detention ponds to normal water level. 12. The Contractor shall not excavate, remove, or otherwise disturb any material, structure, or part of a structure which is located outside the lines, g or grades radia sections established for grading project, except where such excavation or removal is provided for in the contract, plans or specifications_ 13. All work and all materials furnished shall conform with the lines, grades, grading sections, cross sections, dimensions, material requirement, and testing requirements specified in the contract, pians or specifications. 14. Prior to commencing work, the Contractor shall furnish, erect, and maintain all barricades, warning signs, and markings for hazards and the control of traffic, in conformity with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways or as directed by the City of Ocoee Traffic Engineer, to effectively prevent accidents in all places where the work causes obstruction to traffic or constitutes in any way a hazard to the public. 15. All ductile iron pipe and fittings shall have an interior protective seat coat (30 mil thick) of coal tar epoxy in accordance with ANSI/AWWA A21.51/C151. 16. Compact all utility trenches within the top two (2) feet of the roadways to 98% of the Modified Proctor Maximum Density, and to 95% within other areas. 17. After the roadway has been constructed to subgrade, it shall be proof -rolled to assureithat proper compaction has been attained. The proof -rolling and compaction operations shall be inspected and tested by a Florida licensed Softs Engineer to assure that the specified compaction is maintained and all deleterious materials have been removed. 18. In areas which require fill material, the Contractor will strip or otherwise remove all vegetation such as brush, heavy sods, heavy growth of grass, decayed vegetable matter, rubbish, and any other deleterious material before the embankment is started. immediately prior to the placing of fill materials, the enure area being filled shall be scarified in a direction approximately parallel to the axis of fill. The Geotechnical Engineer shall approve the area prior to the placement of flit. 19_ Telephone system will be designed and installed by telephone utility. The Contractor will coordinate scheduling with the telephone utility to ensure proper construction phasing, and to allow the utility to install street crossings and other required sleeves. Contractor shall coordinate with Woodard and Curran, Inc. 20. Install valve boxes with all valves. Valve boxes under pavement shall have traffic -bearing covers. 21. The Contractor shall be responsible for the maintenance of all landscape buffers, retention and detention facilities until the work has been accepted by the Owner. All disturbed areas shall be returned to their original condition. 22. The Contractor shall comply with all legal load restrictions in the hauling of materials in public roads beyond the limits of the work. A special permit will not relieve the Contractor of liability for the damage that may result from the moving of material and equipment. 23. The Contractor shall familiarize himself with the policies and guidelines estabiished by City of Ocoee, Florida and Water Conserv II for the preservation of all public and private property. The Contractor shall be responsible for all damage or iniury to property of any character during the execution of the work, resulting from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in his manner or method of executing the work, or at anytime due to defective work or materials. 24. Gravity sanitary sewer to be PVC S.D.R, 35, or coal -tar epoxy DIP Class 50. 25. NOT USED 26. Fire protection shall be provided according to Orange County Regulations. 27_ The Contractor shall ensure that proper soil densities are achieved for placement of all headwall/endwall footings, retaining wall footings, and in general, any footing support described on these plans. It will also be the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure that sufficient geotechnical testing has been performed prior to construction. 28. The F.D.O.T. Roadway and Traffic Design Standards (booklet dated January 1994) is to be used for drainage structures and pavement markings_ 29. Water and Sewer Crossings.- a. rossings:a. NORMAL CONDITIONS: Water mains shall be laid to provide a minimum separation of 18 inches between the bottom of the water main and the top of the sewer pipe - UNUSUAL CONDITIONS: When construction conditions prevent a vertical separation of 18 inches, the sewer pipe shall be constructed of ductile iron pipe with mechanical joint. b. Water mains shall be above the sewer wherever they cross. Adequate structural support for both the water main and sewers shall be provided to prevent excessive deflection of joints and settling. Sewers shall be constructed of PVC or ductile iron pipe with mechanical joints. The PVC or ductile iron pipe shall be a minimum of 18 feet in length, and centered at the point of crossing so that the joints are equidistant and far as possible from the water main. c. The lateral separation between force mains, sanitary and storm sewers, and water mains shall not be less than 10 feet_ If this separation cannot be maintained, then either of the two pipes shall be constructed of ductile iron pipe with pressure -tight joint. NO ENCASEMENT of the sanitary sewer or water will be allowed. d. Reuse water mains shall maintain a five (5) foot (center to center) separation, or three (3) feet edge to edge, from potable water mains. f. Where ductile iron pipe is required for water mains, it shall conform to ANSI/AWWA A21.51. A minimum thickness of Class 50 per ANSYAWWA shall be supplied. g. All water main fittings, valves, restraints, couplings, pipe, and in general those materials required for installing the water supply system, shall comply with minimum material standards, ratings and classifications established by the Orange County and AWWA Standards and Specifications_ PVC water mains four (4) inches diameter or greater shall be AWWA C-900 (DR18) minimum. All water mains shall bear the NSF logo for approval for drinking water. h. All water mains shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with the latest version of AWWA M23 standard. All water mains shalt be disinfected in accordance with the latest version of AWWA-0651. 30. Mitered end sections are included in all stormwater pipe lengths. 31. All Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) shall be minimum Class Ill. 32. It is the Contractor's responsibility to obtain a copy of the Geotechnical Engineer's report for this project from GTC Engineering Corporation and meet the Geotechnical Engineer's requirements for soil preparation on the site. The Contractor's Geotechnical Engineer shall certify all site, utility, and roadway compaction as well as underdrain and pavement construction to GTC Engineering Corporation. Geotechnical recommendations are not the responsibility of GTC Engineering Corporation. GTC Engineering Corporation has relied on the geotechnical report in the preparation of the plans. Any conflict between information within the report and these plans shall be reported to the Engineer and/or Owner. GTC Engineering Corporation assumes no responsibility for the correctness, completeness. or accuracy of the geotechnical information. 33. During construction, no direct discharge of water will be allowed to downstream receiving waters. The Contractor is responsible for water quality and shall route discharges in such a manner to adequately remove silt before runoff from the site. 09 W Z O 34. For sign details, refer to the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices," published by the U_ S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration - 1978 (ANSI D6.1- 1983). All signs to be single mounted according to F.D.O.T. Index No_ 11862 (70 mph wind loading) and F.D.O.T. Index No. 17302. 35. Blue reflective pavement markers shall be placed in the center of the driving lane in front of all Fire Hydrants. 36. Erosion Control Notes a. Provide effective temporary and permanent erosion control following the requirements in Section 104 of the State of Florida Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, 1992 Edition (FDOT Section 104). b. Control features, methods and conditions included in this contract include the following as indicated by X in blank: (1) X Coordinate construction of temporary erosion control features with permanent erosion control features. (2) Control operation which result in water pollution (FDOT Section 104-3). (3) X Provide schedule for clearing and grubbing, earthwork operations and construction of permanent erosion control features and proposed use of temporary erosion control features (FDOT Section 104-5). (4) _ Limitation of exposure of erodible earth without temporary or permanent erosion control features is square feet (FDOT Section 104-6.1). (5) X Temporary grassing (FDOT Section 104-6.4.2). (6) X Temporary sod (FDOT Section 104-6.4.3). (7) X_ Temporary mulching (FDOT Section 104-6.4.4). (8) - Sandbagging (FDOT Section 104-6.4.5). (9) _ Slope drains (FDOT Section 104-6.4.6). (10) -Sediment basins (FDOT Section 1046.4.7). (11)_ Artificial coverings (FDOT Section 104-6.4.8)- (12) -Berms (FDOT Section 104-6.4.9). (13) X Baled hay or straw (FDOT Section 104-6.4.10). (14) Temporary silt fences and staked silt barriers (FDOT Section 104-6.4.11). (15) X Floating silt barriers (FDOT Section 104-6.4.12). (16) X Remove temporary erosion control features (FDOT Section 104-6.5). (17) X Maintain permanent and temporary erosion control features (FDOT Section 104.7). (18) X This contract design has been approved by the OWNER and regulatory agencies having an interest in erosion control abatement, The design in its final form meets or exceeds minimum standards. All temporary erosion control features required during construction shail be constructed by the Contractor, and the cost thereof included in the Contract Sum as a regular obligation incidental to the work. c. The Contractor is to submit an erosion control plan to the City of Ocoee Engineer for approval prior to the preconstruction meeting for this project. e. The Contractor is responsible for maintaining all erosion protection, especially along the wetland boundary during the entire construction process, including repairs, etc., to prevent any siltation from entering these areas, as well as any unsuitable discharges offsite or into the existing wetland. 37. Any fuel storage areas shall have owner's prior approval and appropriate measures shall be taken to ensure protection of groundwater and soil resources. 38. The Contractor shall field verify horizontal and vertical information for all connection points to existing utility systems, as well as the location and depth of all clusters of fittings and valves, before submittal of shop drawings. 39. Any discrepancy between the dimensions and measurements shown on the plans and the actual field conditions shall immediately be brought to the Engineer's attention. Failure to do so shall make the Contractor completely liable for whatever errors and/or problems that may subsequently arise. 40. It will be the responsibility of the Contractor(s) to ensure that all required permits are obtained and are in hand at the job site prior to the commencement of construction. Contractor shall abide by all conditions contained therein. Permits included (but not necessarily limited to) are: a_ Water Management District, Management and Storage of Surface Waters. b. FOEP water distribution and FDEP sewer collection. C. Local right-of-way use. d. Local underground utilities. 41. The Contractor shall stake all improvements using the plat and the GTC plans. Cofitractor shall confirm with American Surveying And Mapping, Inc. (Phone 407-539-2274) that the plat is current prior fo construction. It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to completely stake and check all improvements to ensure adequate positioning, both horizontal and vertical, including minimum building setbacks, before the installation of any improvement. 42. The Contractor shall be responsible for protecting all existing survey monumentation. Disturbed monumentation shall be restored by a Florida -licensed land surveyor selected by the Owner at the Contractor's expense. 43. The Contractor -is responsible for grading all pavement areas to drain positively. Intersections shall be transitioned to provide smooth driving surfaces while maintaining positive drainage. Should areas of poor drainage be observed, the Contractor shall notify the Engineer prior to paving so that recommendations for correction may be made. 44. The quantities and lengths of materials shown on plans should be verified by the Contractor. Any discrepancy between callouts and actual shown in plan view is to be brought to the Engineer's attention by the Contractor prior to bidding. it is the Engineer's intention to build what is shown on the construction plans. 45. A pre -construction meeting shall include Woodard & Curran, Inc_ NOTE -THIS DRAWING PROVIDED FOR iNFORI•.I TION s UI-1POSES ONLY GTC ENGiIVEEI I ,1!3 CORPORA-fiON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ITS USE. GTC ngineering Corporation 98S0urhSemoran Blvd Orlando, Ff. 32807 407-380-0402 FIELD: - - CADD 8Y: KS CHECKED BY: CLC _ - - DESIGNED BY: KS 11-8-96 CLC" Revised Note 11 DATE BY DESCRIPTION SCALE: NONE 37. Any fuel storage areas shall have owner's prior approval and appropriate measures shall be taken to ensure protection of groundwater and soil resources. 38. The Contractor shall field verify horizontal and vertical information for all connection points to existing utility systems, as well as the location and depth of all clusters of fittings and valves, before submittal of shop drawings. 39. Any discrepancy between the dimensions and measurements shown on the plans and the actual field conditions shall immediately be brought to the Engineer's attention. Failure to do so shall make the Contractor completely liable for whatever errors and/or problems that may subsequently arise. 40. It will be the responsibility of the Contractor(s) to ensure that all required permits are obtained and are in hand at the job site prior to the commencement of construction. Contractor shall abide by all conditions contained therein. Permits included (but not necessarily limited to) are: a_ Water Management District, Management and Storage of Surface Waters. b. FOEP water distribution and FDEP sewer collection. C. Local right-of-way use. d. Local underground utilities. 41. The Contractor shall stake all improvements using the plat and the GTC plans. Cofitractor shall confirm with American Surveying And Mapping, Inc. (Phone 407-539-2274) that the plat is current prior fo construction. It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to completely stake and check all improvements to ensure adequate positioning, both horizontal and vertical, including minimum building setbacks, before the installation of any improvement. 42. The Contractor shall be responsible for protecting all existing survey monumentation. Disturbed monumentation shall be restored by a Florida -licensed land surveyor selected by the Owner at the Contractor's expense. 43. The Contractor -is responsible for grading all pavement areas to drain positively. Intersections shall be transitioned to provide smooth driving surfaces while maintaining positive drainage. Should areas of poor drainage be observed, the Contractor shall notify the Engineer prior to paving so that recommendations for correction may be made. 44. The quantities and lengths of materials shown on plans should be verified by the Contractor. Any discrepancy between callouts and actual shown in plan view is to be brought to the Engineer's attention by the Contractor prior to bidding. it is the Engineer's intention to build what is shown on the construction plans. 45. A pre -construction meeting shall include Woodard & Curran, Inc_ NOTE -THIS DRAWING PROVIDED FOR iNFORI•.I TION s UI-1POSES ONLY GTC ENGiIVEEI I ,1!3 CORPORA-fiON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ITS USE. GTC ngineering Corporation 98S0urhSemoran Blvd Orlando, Ff. 32807 407-380-0402 Z o z W JJ A BASED ON 1NIFORMATION PROVIDED BY BOUNDARY DAT DESCRIPTION FIELD: ASM >: Uj zcry CADD BY: K8 20 10 29 .40 80 CHECKED BY. CLC LIT Z, 0 5 0 DESIGNED BY: CLOKS C/) SCALE: 1. = W UNAFHIU �UAU; >: Uj zcry 20 10 29 .40 80 LIT Z, 0 5 0 C/) MEE= Cf) 0 m IN -FEET o,n 0 C2- rr u - I inch = 20,.. ft. rc: 0 >_ U 000" FF I Ll u TC Enoneen*ng Corporadon' 1 T E I rom L A N !: '0 %*"'131 CD U) 98 Smu* $4=w= B104 OdmAs�M 32807 Amerada Hess Station Plantation Grove LW Uj DATE I JOB NUMBER HE S-1 SHEET C4 df W", I P WU!04E4�- PIPE --TYPE--sttpe- STRUCTURE, NUMBER STRUCTUREWERT G RATE I N TYPE ELEV. ELEV. PIPE ST1 FDOT D INLET 130.15 126.40 P I P2 RCP8 RCP ST2 IDO T P-4 INLET i 29.75 "l, 6.00 (t 0.20% ST3, MES 1,25.4-0- Y-4 ....... 'QJ 0% -P3j _P4- iST4WES 12255 P5 ST& I MES 122.45 rf; MES 122.55 r-ST7'- s T 12*2,45 MES 122:55, I P WU!04E4�- PIPE --TYPE--sttpe- PIPE PIPE PIPE P I P2 RCP8 RCP 2 8'�F- 0.20% -0 Y-4 ....... 'QJ 0% -P3j _P4- P- 1.1-.- 2 -D"08 . 4 91'4 76 - P5 RCP 10-2- 24 0,10%- .P6 ERCP, 80 9"x30"* 0.25% P7 RCP 60' .1 24" 0.08% P8 P9 DJP CMP 80 -145' 18" 18" 0.18% 5,56% CD \--MAGUIRE ROAD BASELINE`GRAPHIC SCALE > Lij viaguire moau LJJZo=) 20 .0 10 20 40 '80 ... . ...... co < Emma LU ....... ... ............ . ..... 00 (D 0 ...... IN "FEE T . .......... LL' I inch PIPE NUMBER STRUCTURE . STRUCTURE GRATE INVERT ''Num 6ER'TYPE ELEV. ELEV. PIPE LENGTH PIPE SIZE 1 MAX Pi RCP NWL 127.0 AS NOTEID ST3 MES 125.40 RCP 28 ST4'MES 122.55 0.36% P3 "ST5, MES: 122.45 102' 24 - P4 RCP 2.7 24- 0.08% MES' 122.55 RCP 102 24" 0.10% P6 BOTTOM 119.0 19";36`1 0.257. P7 RCP 60 24 "EXIST 54'Y . RECLAIMED FORCE 10' is, 10, 12' 25' 1 Pq I CM F- 12' 10) 1 5.56% 1 mAiII- (SEE NOTE, SHEET� C7) SECTION Q Q NOT TO SCALE 130.0 130.0 125.0 125.0 5:1 NWL 127.0 5.1 BOTTOM 119,0 15' 10' 12' VARIES, SEE PLAN 12' 10' + SECTION D -D NOT TO SCALE Go ff NOTES: 1. POND,. CONTOURS ARE PARALLEL TO MOORE RD, BASELINE. S 2. RADII ON PONDS IS 5' UP TO ELEV. 127 AND 15' AT ELEV. 3(8 30, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. '� ` 9q. 3. PONDS ARE TO BE SODDED TO ELEV. 127.0. f i CONCRE 4. TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE THE SAME FOR EACH POND. CENTER OF POND RA AI DRNA UfhE STRUCTURE TABLE. PIPE TABLE PIPE NUMBER STRUCTURE . STRUCTURE GRATE INVERT ''Num 6ER'TYPE ELEV. ELEV. PIPE LENGTH PIPE SIZE FDOT Q INLET130.15126,40 Pi RCP 29.75 126.0 -,,$T2 FDO.T P-.4 INLET 1 0 18::� 125.50 24 18" AS NOTEID ST3 MES 125.40 RCP 28 ST4'MES 122.55 0.36% P3 "ST5, MES: 122.45 102' 24 SIT6-:` MES 122.55 P4 RCP STT, MES 122.45 24- 0.08% MES' 122.55 RCP PIPE NUMBER PIPE TYPE PIPE LENGTH PIPE SIZE PIPE SLOPE Pi RCP 202'- 18" AS NOTEID P2 RCP 28 24 0.36% P3 RCP 102' 24 0.10% P4 RCP 119' 24- 0.08% RCP 102 24" 0.10% P6 ERCP- 86' 19";36`1 0.257. P7 RCP 60 24 0.08% P8 DIP 80' 18 0.18%0.18% 1 Pq I CM F- --r-�l 145 8 " 1 5.56% 1 15' 15' ©il 6' cn z 9 d00 -5T9.,,`i'! MIES, 127.45 *-CLASS 5, 1' COVER, 0 MES 127.25 CADD BY. KS CHECKED BY: STI'll MES = 122,45 DESIGNED BY: CLUKS ST. 12MES127.55 AS NOTEID 13 127.45 'ST 7WS� �$T 770�RT-RQL -STRUCTURE 127.00 ST 15 77 MES 1 6.8 SUIWEY AND BOUNDARY DATA RASED,ON INFORMAMON PROVIDED BY 0 LID -ST116-MES 1127.50 AMERICAN SURVEY & MAPPING, INC. (PHONE 407426-1/979) T., LASH PAD, 1 125:00 S � 7 S W = � HWAPTZ, GIC ENGINEERING CORP. 6/8/99 1151 AM HESIPONDS.clwg. ..... . ... .. ... 6' cn z 9 d00 DATE I BY DESCRIPTION FIELD: ASM CADD BY. KS CHECKED BY: CLC DESIGNED BY: CLUKS SCALE: AS NOTEID 0 LID D 0 + Go ff if 3(8 ! h �; '� ` 9q. -30, 1 f i CONCRE CENTER OF POND RA AI DRNA UfhE STA. 6+86.08 99-50' LT. fit t;j POND 413 8 4, U') it it. co it i 00 it IU �T7 .5G LT, � R=20'III R=22� it *i C) 1" + it R=20' t % I it 5+15. 8 ST6 t�uj it t CENTER OF POND i s 7�Q STA. 4+32.72 i it 99.50' LT, - 5.0, Plantation Grove Shopping Center i + .;l Opus South P.B. 33 Pgs. 21- I z Zoning PUD j tat P D 4fil --I DATE I BY DESCRIPTION FIELD: ASM CADD BY. KS CHECKED BY: CLC DESIGNED BY: CLUKS SCALE: AS NOTEID y„.....�.,, STIJCTOR TALE. PIPE TABl�E [C5If?E _ y , PSP?1PE NUWER: TYPE F r TROT , E : STRUCTURE GRATE tNvr~RT P1 RLP;; ' 2 ' ,ETYPE' . t=LEV. ELEV: P2 ' , 28. 2V',0.36% 1 ,FDOT ,D ".'INLET' 130.15 126140 f� 1.02 24 :: �ST2 . FDOT P 4 ,INLET ... 7129.75 ” 126:00 8 i > _111 9 .:, .. 24 125.50 24 P5 RCP 102 24 j� _ ST3 e ES. 12:40 P ERC . 80'- 1 q. "x3_07 0.25% , .122.55 ROP 0 24 t v1ES 122.45 S 122.55 f 0.18% r�0 yi 5 18 T t S 7 U1 E S 2� .4 [C5If?E _ y , PSP?1PE NUWER: TYPE LENGTH PIPE SIZE ` PIPE SSPE P1 RLP;; ' 2 ' .18 0.20% P2 RCP 28. 2V',0.36% 10+16.8 P3'. RCP 1.02 24 :: 0.10% P4 RCP _111 9 .:, .. 24 0.08% P5 RCP 102 24 0.10% P6 P ERC . 80'- 1 q. "x3_07 0.25% , P 7 ROP 0 24 0,08 % PB _D F 80. 18 0.18% r�0 CMP 5 18 5.56% NAME STA.T 0 S �. . A7 9+ 1 .0 3 1 1 . 2 B Q 10+54.0 131.6 �C 11+50.8 65.0 J 10+16.8 65.0 0 9+81.2 95.3 ` M NA E STK 0 S. L.T. Ks 8+24.3 139.0 DESIGNED BY: 8+74.6 139,0 AS NOTED 8+89.6 91.0 J 8+54.2 65.0 65.0 FIELD: ASM CADD BY: Ks CHECKED BY: CLC DESIGNED BY: CLMS alt,: AS NOTED FIELD: ASM CADD BY: Ks CHECKED BY: CLC DESIGNED BY: CLMS SCALE: AS NOTED 00098 trTC Engineering E -iii FL 32807 JL i 51d Beveled Or Rocu d Corners — —f 4 y I V a> I ! I ! 3 \' ! /X Concrete Sldb. 3` Or 5 ° Thick, 0 N Reinforced With WWF 6X6-WI.4xWI.4 �— S' I- TOP VIEW -SINGLE PIPE Concrete � Pipe77, Connecter ! Satldle �� Not Less Than D No Pipe Jo nt Permitted �4 Bm Un'. Appra✓ed By The Eny;neer , E F ffte To Be included Under Unit Price For Mitered End Sect SECTION 131.50 VARIES VARIES 131.00 2" TYPE S-1 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PER SECTION 331 FDOT TOP BANK s 2� 2� V TOP BANK STANDARD SPECIFICATONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUC7I 2% 5.1 130.0 'jP��E �RT�S 130.0 4" ABC -3 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PRE SECTION 280 FDOT 5:1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTI ;MEET N.G. MEET N.G. 5ti12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE (LBR 20 MIN, -98% AASHTO, T-180) t 24,SECTION Ba -B I I I=!! 1= ASPHALT PAVING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A - NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE PPRR GRADE PREP. GRADE PRDP. GRADE 18' RCP STM, SWR. �_i Sod�. Beveled Or Round Corners z in i !• ! I 3� ! tD 4- I � im ! /\ — b Concrete Slab. 3° Or 5x° Thick, [. r �S� Reinforced With WWF 6x6-W1.4xWL4 TOP VIEW -MULTIPLE PIPE yes Side Ditch Grode �a[ 2 CROSS DRAIN NOTE: See shell 6 for details and nates. MITERED END SECTION 5' Sod SINGLE AND MULTIPLE RWUND CONCRETE PIPE *Slope: 49 Miter: ToC Pipe For Pipes 18" And Smaller. 2d Far Pipes 24' And Larger, 2d Miter: To f Pipe For Pipes IT And Smelter. Id For Pipes 24' And Larger. 1 of 6 272 (�- Inlet Type 4 Symmetrical About € 7 -o -A Inlet Type 2 Symmetrical Atrvt f 1 as A t'.� a 06 Bars 0 s° � 116 Bars r / /'• 2' Dia. Cover See Slab Reinforcing2 Dia. CoverF 0 Detail This Sheet, -}-`h See Slab ReinforcingP� / \ / + b f liver 's,sr�a� \ -\ e b f Inlet Detail This Sheet. ,r / ,Y B / y 6'6' 6' Q s rt6 Bars I /f L Back Of Qtrb S° ID Concrete 9' 5' b Concrete io Support Post ° Face Of Qrrb 6 Bars ® L -1-A 5- D Concrete stwort Post Support Post t0'-01 3'-0° 61•0' 3'-0' INLETS TYPES I AND 3, 13 -0 g 0 A e �A L—AL—A PLAN UNLET TYPE 2 SYMMETRICAL ABOUT f) PLAN (INLET TYPE 4 SYMMETRICAL ABOUT f) m6 Bars 0 s' ` �4 a6 Bars ai a 4� To Be Paid Limits Of Inlet Construction To Be Paid To Be Paid Limits Of Inlet Construction To Be Paid k For AS C. & G. For As C. & G. For As C. & G. For AS C. & G.y F.L. Of Gutter F.L. Of Gutter b z.i 1 1 1 ': `a' t t t Back Of Curb '06 Bars "8 8or5 3'-0' 6'-0' 3'-4T 3'-0' Face Of Curb ( 5' 0 Cavprere Support Post 6Lttar &tatter Gutter Gutter 06 Bars O 9' A Fro»s. Trans. w - Trans. Trans. INLETS TYPES 2 AND 4 - SECTION BB (INLET TYPE 2 SYMMETRICA ABOUT €) SECTION 86 (INLET TYPE 4 SY METRICAL ABOUT €) SLAB REINFORCING 1' 4 I,•6. w GENERAL NOTES e b I. The r;nished grade end slope of the Inlet fops are to ' , confam with the finished pass slope and grade of the proposed sidewalk mrd/or border. See Note � D' b Concrete '` to 2. When inlets are fi be consjntcred mr a curve, refer to the No. 4 Support Post See Note 4 5' D Concrete ' plm>s ro determine rhe rodrus and, where necessary, modify 1 No. 4 _ support Post _ - the inlet details accordingly. Bend steel when necessary. 6' Concrete Or _ I i 3. All steel in r'nlet top shall rave 14' minimum cover unless 8° Brick- 6' Compete Or 1 /'•9' aclrherwise Shown, precast concrete, roes shall be either cosi-;n•ptoCt �� -� -- -�°'t+ S Brick. 6' 4'-0" 6° 4. The rear wall portion of infer ages Types 1, 2. 3 & 4 may be constructed with brick. Dowels to fop slob required. DIMENSIONAL SECTION DIMENSIONAL SECTION 6. For Supplemental details see Index No, 201. 5. Dvy round concrete support post will be acceptable. INLETS TYPES /AND 2 INLETS TYPES 3 AND 4 _T 6-'7j' 01',06 Tap Bars 7, These inlets are to be used with Curb mrd Rater Types E and F. Local, outside of pedestnola crossvalk where practical. r• ta¢' 7' 3j"6 Bottom Bars 8, For sturcture bottoms see Index No. M. e7 Bottom Bets 21¢'For 3'-6' Structure Bottom 9. Kurt (TYe Inlet to bepoid f Linder the contract unit price for inlets 6 ears Unless 'v6 Bars Unless 3°' 18J'For 4'-0' Structure Bottom 06 Bars 0 Othertsise Shown a6 Bars O ��3 "Otherwise Shown 9' Ctrs. 6° T 9' I ?' 9' Ctrs. 9° 6' 7� 7 j_ (3 96 Bars A Sr Ctrs 9 w 06 Bars O 9' Ctrs. t 'r6 ears O 9° Ctrs. 2 06 Bars � � ¢6 Bars t �w r 1 y+4 Bars 'r7 Bars I °4 Bars 07 Bars O 8° Ctrs.F O 8' Grrs. Both Ways Both Ways r -b' 4 Bars O B' Ctrs. e4 Bars A 8' Ctrs, 04 Bars O 6' Ctrs. r 3'•6' Diameter I 4 •0° Demeter CURB INLET TOPS t TYPES 1, 2, 3, & 4 REINFORCING SECTION REINFORCING SECTION DIMENSION &REINFORCING HALF SECTION TYPES A & E CURB (HALF SECTION AA) 3'-6" DIA. STRUCTURE BOTTOM (SECTION AA) 4'-0" DIA. STRUCTURE BOTTOM (SECTION AA) (TYPE E GUTTER SHOWN) TRANSVERSE SECTIONS FOR INLETS TYPES 1, 2, 3 & 4 i of I 210 ®:.-jzC5 — i=— Cf) QIP See General Note No. 3. i cD0r Wrlti,WWiZtR! nrr..�wr•�r%��€� �>��c�.�c��:� r ��■�-�:�����■��rr���r+��.�t�r��r:�a■��.s���� �i�����;.'� r '� �J��__� � ,� • 11 t�L�1r1 : „ -�y� �a'r.����:��F=��%�`�_�_��r��'�� �F`��i �rl�i►<r�!(''�+��i�l���ELX1.3����3i�.Ir��&���'t��2i�3:�i7CF��:.r����� («r Q rA l.__ LL 1 > FIELD: NIA �El•�LSS'i�ft�!!3•i�itSa'.���-a'1'it.•dl>•t4`dlai'a'11�����II't#���R2!��ii��i`i� - _. —� CADD BY: SCS eP ® ng ® on DETAILO ��� co 1 N NOME �i L -Li U CHECKED BY: CLQ t < W51&Wtd:ZJ�Il:l����r��l�c�6+�tTS��� 98 32809 �i��Jr����L%�%•..'��' +� .moi ������J���������`,'��3�1�� ice•' MrAm :ri'&�i�l�;E3'e��3'f��X+l`�0���Fwqgfn �o 51d Beveled Or Rocu d Corners — —f 4 y I V a> I ! I ! 3 \' ! /X Concrete Sldb. 3` Or 5 ° Thick, 0 N Reinforced With WWF 6X6-WI.4xWI.4 �— S' I- TOP VIEW -SINGLE PIPE Concrete � Pipe77, Connecter ! Satldle �� Not Less Than D No Pipe Jo nt Permitted �4 Bm Un'. Appra✓ed By The Eny;neer , E F ffte To Be included Under Unit Price For Mitered End Sect SECTION 131.50 VARIES VARIES 131.00 2" TYPE S-1 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PER SECTION 331 FDOT TOP BANK s 2� 2� V TOP BANK STANDARD SPECIFICATONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUC7I 2% 5.1 130.0 'jP��E �RT�S 130.0 4" ABC -3 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PRE SECTION 280 FDOT 5:1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTI ;MEET N.G. MEET N.G. 5ti12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE (LBR 20 MIN, -98% AASHTO, T-180) t 24,SECTION Ba -B I I I=!! 1= ASPHALT PAVING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A - NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE PPRR GRADE PREP. GRADE PRDP. GRADE 18' RCP STM, SWR. �_i Sod�. Beveled Or Round Corners z in i !• ! I 3� ! tD 4- I � im ! /\ — b Concrete Slab. 3° Or 5x° Thick, [. r �S� Reinforced With WWF 6x6-W1.4xWL4 TOP VIEW -MULTIPLE PIPE yes Side Ditch Grode �a[ 2 CROSS DRAIN NOTE: See shell 6 for details and nates. MITERED END SECTION 5' Sod SINGLE AND MULTIPLE RWUND CONCRETE PIPE *Slope: 49 Miter: ToC Pipe For Pipes 18" And Smaller. 2d Far Pipes 24' And Larger, 2d Miter: To f Pipe For Pipes IT And Smelter. Id For Pipes 24' And Larger. 1 of 6 272 (�- Inlet Type 4 Symmetrical About € 7 -o -A Inlet Type 2 Symmetrical Atrvt f 1 as A t'.� a 06 Bars 0 s° � 116 Bars r / /'• 2' Dia. Cover See Slab Reinforcing2 Dia. CoverF 0 Detail This Sheet, -}-`h See Slab ReinforcingP� / \ / + b f liver 's,sr�a� \ -\ e b f Inlet Detail This Sheet. ,r / ,Y B / y 6'6' 6' Q s rt6 Bars I /f L Back Of Qtrb S° ID Concrete 9' 5' b Concrete io Support Post ° Face Of Qrrb 6 Bars ® L -1-A 5- D Concrete stwort Post Support Post t0'-01 3'-0° 61•0' 3'-0' INLETS TYPES I AND 3, 13 -0 g 0 A e �A L—AL—A PLAN UNLET TYPE 2 SYMMETRICAL ABOUT f) PLAN (INLET TYPE 4 SYMMETRICAL ABOUT f) m6 Bars 0 s' ` �4 a6 Bars ai a 4� To Be Paid Limits Of Inlet Construction To Be Paid To Be Paid Limits Of Inlet Construction To Be Paid k For AS C. & G. For As C. & G. For As C. & G. For AS C. & G.y F.L. Of Gutter F.L. Of Gutter b z.i 1 1 1 ': `a' t t t Back Of Curb '06 Bars "8 8or5 3'-0' 6'-0' 3'-4T 3'-0' Face Of Curb ( 5' 0 Cavprere Support Post 6Lttar &tatter Gutter Gutter 06 Bars O 9' A Fro»s. Trans. w - Trans. Trans. INLETS TYPES 2 AND 4 - SECTION BB (INLET TYPE 2 SYMMETRICA ABOUT €) SECTION 86 (INLET TYPE 4 SY METRICAL ABOUT €) SLAB REINFORCING 1' 4 I,•6. w GENERAL NOTES e b I. The r;nished grade end slope of the Inlet fops are to ' , confam with the finished pass slope and grade of the proposed sidewalk mrd/or border. See Note � D' b Concrete '` to 2. When inlets are fi be consjntcred mr a curve, refer to the No. 4 Support Post See Note 4 5' D Concrete ' plm>s ro determine rhe rodrus and, where necessary, modify 1 No. 4 _ support Post _ - the inlet details accordingly. Bend steel when necessary. 6' Concrete Or _ I i 3. All steel in r'nlet top shall rave 14' minimum cover unless 8° Brick- 6' Compete Or 1 /'•9' aclrherwise Shown, precast concrete, roes shall be either cosi-;n•ptoCt �� -� -- -�°'t+ S Brick. 6' 4'-0" 6° 4. The rear wall portion of infer ages Types 1, 2. 3 & 4 may be constructed with brick. Dowels to fop slob required. DIMENSIONAL SECTION DIMENSIONAL SECTION 6. For Supplemental details see Index No, 201. 5. Dvy round concrete support post will be acceptable. INLETS TYPES /AND 2 INLETS TYPES 3 AND 4 _T 6-'7j' 01',06 Tap Bars 7, These inlets are to be used with Curb mrd Rater Types E and F. Local, outside of pedestnola crossvalk where practical. r• ta¢' 7' 3j"6 Bottom Bars 8, For sturcture bottoms see Index No. M. e7 Bottom Bets 21¢'For 3'-6' Structure Bottom 9. Kurt (TYe Inlet to bepoid f Linder the contract unit price for inlets 6 ears Unless 'v6 Bars Unless 3°' 18J'For 4'-0' Structure Bottom 06 Bars 0 Othertsise Shown a6 Bars O ��3 "Otherwise Shown 9' Ctrs. 6° T 9' I ?' 9' Ctrs. 9° 6' 7� 7 j_ (3 96 Bars A Sr Ctrs 9 w 06 Bars O 9' Ctrs. t 'r6 ears O 9° Ctrs. 2 06 Bars � � ¢6 Bars t �w r 1 y+4 Bars 'r7 Bars I °4 Bars 07 Bars O 8° Ctrs.F O 8' Grrs. Both Ways Both Ways r -b' 4 Bars O B' Ctrs. e4 Bars A 8' Ctrs, 04 Bars O 6' Ctrs. r 3'•6' Diameter I 4 •0° Demeter CURB INLET TOPS t TYPES 1, 2, 3, & 4 REINFORCING SECTION REINFORCING SECTION DIMENSION &REINFORCING HALF SECTION TYPES A & E CURB (HALF SECTION AA) 3'-6" DIA. STRUCTURE BOTTOM (SECTION AA) 4'-0" DIA. STRUCTURE BOTTOM (SECTION AA) (TYPE E GUTTER SHOWN) TRANSVERSE SECTIONS FOR INLETS TYPES 1, 2, 3 & 4 i of I 210 ®:.-jzC5 — i=— Cf) QIP See General Note No. 3. �� cD0r !'�.3il�J��i�J��I%�F-7L�������3��3���:���.I�/�i�+ T•'�IXE'���rr7������I���?+� �I.•i�F_����i��tlFJ��F'�='ir�lCt��"Li�3i�+•"�!��.t��x.�=raZ����!�'��.��t������ («r Q rA l.__ LL 1 > FIELD: NIA �El•�LSS'i�ft�!!3•i�itSa'.���-a'1'it.•dl>•t4`dlai'a'11�����II't#���R2!��ii��i`i� - _. —� CADD BY: SCS eP ® ng ® on DETAILO ��� co 1 N �i L -Li U CHECKED BY: CLQ t < 98 32809 � Station Plantation Grove �o DESIGNED BY: MISC. 07-380-OMFL 1? 77'w Lu NONE 010.40 ♦ r r r _ 0 Cancrele slabshoU be deepened to form bridge across crown of p1pe. See secflon wow. rr r.: I fiE7i[♦iia • ������Ili��C��ME®��3�4��� r 0 O C- 51d Beveled Or Rocu d Corners — —f 4 y I V a> I ! I ! 3 \' ! /X Concrete Sldb. 3` Or 5 ° Thick, 0 N Reinforced With WWF 6X6-WI.4xWI.4 �— S' I- TOP VIEW -SINGLE PIPE Concrete � Pipe77, Connecter ! Satldle �� Not Less Than D No Pipe Jo nt Permitted �4 Bm Un'. Appra✓ed By The Eny;neer , E F ffte To Be included Under Unit Price For Mitered End Sect SECTION 131.50 VARIES VARIES 131.00 2" TYPE S-1 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PER SECTION 331 FDOT TOP BANK s 2� 2� V TOP BANK STANDARD SPECIFICATONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUC7I 2% 5.1 130.0 'jP��E �RT�S 130.0 4" ABC -3 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PRE SECTION 280 FDOT 5:1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTI ;MEET N.G. MEET N.G. 5ti12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE (LBR 20 MIN, -98% AASHTO, T-180) t 24,SECTION Ba -B I I I=!! 1= ASPHALT PAVING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A - NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE PPRR GRADE PREP. GRADE PRDP. GRADE 18' RCP STM, SWR. �_i Sod�. Beveled Or Round Corners z in i !• ! I 3� ! tD 4- I � im ! /\ — b Concrete Slab. 3° Or 5x° Thick, [. r �S� Reinforced With WWF 6x6-W1.4xWL4 TOP VIEW -MULTIPLE PIPE yes Side Ditch Grode �a[ 2 CROSS DRAIN NOTE: See shell 6 for details and nates. MITERED END SECTION 5' Sod SINGLE AND MULTIPLE RWUND CONCRETE PIPE *Slope: 49 Miter: ToC Pipe For Pipes 18" And Smaller. 2d Far Pipes 24' And Larger, 2d Miter: To f Pipe For Pipes IT And Smelter. Id For Pipes 24' And Larger. 1 of 6 272 (�- Inlet Type 4 Symmetrical About € 7 -o -A Inlet Type 2 Symmetrical Atrvt f 1 as A t'.� a 06 Bars 0 s° � 116 Bars r / /'• 2' Dia. Cover See Slab Reinforcing2 Dia. CoverF 0 Detail This Sheet, -}-`h See Slab ReinforcingP� / \ / + b f liver 's,sr�a� \ -\ e b f Inlet Detail This Sheet. ,r / ,Y B / y 6'6' 6' Q s rt6 Bars I /f L Back Of Qtrb S° ID Concrete 9' 5' b Concrete io Support Post ° Face Of Qrrb 6 Bars ® L -1-A 5- D Concrete stwort Post Support Post t0'-01 3'-0° 61•0' 3'-0' INLETS TYPES I AND 3, 13 -0 g 0 A e �A L—AL—A PLAN UNLET TYPE 2 SYMMETRICAL ABOUT f) PLAN (INLET TYPE 4 SYMMETRICAL ABOUT f) m6 Bars 0 s' ` �4 a6 Bars ai a 4� To Be Paid Limits Of Inlet Construction To Be Paid To Be Paid Limits Of Inlet Construction To Be Paid k For AS C. & G. For As C. & G. For As C. & G. For AS C. & G.y F.L. Of Gutter F.L. Of Gutter b z.i 1 1 1 ': `a' t t t Back Of Curb '06 Bars "8 8or5 3'-0' 6'-0' 3'-4T 3'-0' Face Of Curb ( 5' 0 Cavprere Support Post 6Lttar &tatter Gutter Gutter 06 Bars O 9' A Fro»s. Trans. w - Trans. Trans. INLETS TYPES 2 AND 4 - SECTION BB (INLET TYPE 2 SYMMETRICA ABOUT €) SECTION 86 (INLET TYPE 4 SY METRICAL ABOUT €) SLAB REINFORCING 1' 4 I,•6. w GENERAL NOTES e b I. The r;nished grade end slope of the Inlet fops are to ' , confam with the finished pass slope and grade of the proposed sidewalk mrd/or border. See Note � D' b Concrete '` to 2. When inlets are fi be consjntcred mr a curve, refer to the No. 4 Support Post See Note 4 5' D Concrete ' plm>s ro determine rhe rodrus and, where necessary, modify 1 No. 4 _ support Post _ - the inlet details accordingly. Bend steel when necessary. 6' Concrete Or _ I i 3. All steel in r'nlet top shall rave 14' minimum cover unless 8° Brick- 6' Compete Or 1 /'•9' aclrherwise Shown, precast concrete, roes shall be either cosi-;n•ptoCt �� -� -- -�°'t+ S Brick. 6' 4'-0" 6° 4. The rear wall portion of infer ages Types 1, 2. 3 & 4 may be constructed with brick. Dowels to fop slob required. DIMENSIONAL SECTION DIMENSIONAL SECTION 6. For Supplemental details see Index No, 201. 5. Dvy round concrete support post will be acceptable. INLETS TYPES /AND 2 INLETS TYPES 3 AND 4 _T 6-'7j' 01',06 Tap Bars 7, These inlets are to be used with Curb mrd Rater Types E and F. Local, outside of pedestnola crossvalk where practical. r• ta¢' 7' 3j"6 Bottom Bars 8, For sturcture bottoms see Index No. M. e7 Bottom Bets 21¢'For 3'-6' Structure Bottom 9. Kurt (TYe Inlet to bepoid f Linder the contract unit price for inlets 6 ears Unless 'v6 Bars Unless 3°' 18J'For 4'-0' Structure Bottom 06 Bars 0 Othertsise Shown a6 Bars O ��3 "Otherwise Shown 9' Ctrs. 6° T 9' I ?' 9' Ctrs. 9° 6' 7� 7 j_ (3 96 Bars A Sr Ctrs 9 w 06 Bars O 9' Ctrs. t 'r6 ears O 9° Ctrs. 2 06 Bars � � ¢6 Bars t �w r 1 y+4 Bars 'r7 Bars I °4 Bars 07 Bars O 8° Ctrs.F O 8' Grrs. Both Ways Both Ways r -b' 4 Bars O B' Ctrs. e4 Bars A 8' Ctrs, 04 Bars O 6' Ctrs. r 3'•6' Diameter I 4 •0° Demeter CURB INLET TOPS t TYPES 1, 2, 3, & 4 REINFORCING SECTION REINFORCING SECTION DIMENSION &REINFORCING HALF SECTION TYPES A & E CURB (HALF SECTION AA) 3'-6" DIA. STRUCTURE BOTTOM (SECTION AA) 4'-0" DIA. STRUCTURE BOTTOM (SECTION AA) (TYPE E GUTTER SHOWN) TRANSVERSE SECTIONS FOR INLETS TYPES 1, 2, 3 & 4 i of I 210 ®:.-jzC5 i=— Cf) QIP cD0r («r Q rA l.__ LL 1 > FIELD: NIA Ocoee Fbildsm - _. —� CADD BY: SCS eP ® ng ® on DETAILO ��� co 1 N �i L -Li U CHECKED BY: CLQ t < 98 32809 � Station Plantation Grove �o DESIGNED BY: MISC. 07-380-OMFL 1? 77'w Lu NONE SCALE: DATE 4- JOB NUMBER HES-4 SHEET CSi< of 0 O C- U_ , j V-0 5/8 , 6 0 T.O.W. z PRECAST CONCRETE COPING #5 BARS @ 16" O.0 GROUTED INTO CELLS OF BLOCK NOMINAL 12" SPLIT FACE CMU, FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY WELD NOMINAL 3 1/2" CAP TO NOMINAL 4" CONTRACTOR, USE ABOVE GRADE. 1 011 SCHED. 40 STANDARD STEEL PIPE. GRIND WELDS SMOOTH. HORIZONTAL WALL REINFORCEMENT @ 16" O.0 VERTICALLY (TYPICAL) 4'-0" LENGTH OF 4" SCHED. 40 STANDARD STEEL PIPE BOLLARD FILLED WITH 3000 PSI CONCRETE AND PAINTED SILVER GRAY. GROUT TOP 3" OF SLEEVE. RECESS -1-1/4" FOR ASPHALT IMPREGNATED SEALANT AND BACKER ROD. EXPANSION JOINT 4 #5 DOWELS @ 16" O.C. FINISHED GRADE 6" THICK AIR ENTRAINED 4000 PSI CONCRETE SLAB CMU USED BELOW GRADE REINFORCED WITH 66 -2,9X2.9 WWM SET 2 1/2" BELOW FURNISHED AND INSTALLED TOP OF SLAB. BY CONTACTOR, < • 4 cD 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVE WITH CAR. Z Uj C,4 1A 5� 1" STYROFOAM FILL GAPS UNDER AND AROUND STEEL PIPE WITH •:711 V 0 MASON SAND. 3- 4 4 --m—COMPACTED BACKFILL - 0 INS TALL CONCRETE FOOTING AND PVC SLEEVE PRIOR TO ui v) CD POURING 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. 0 va ........... Q. ........... .......... . (4) #5 CONT. W1 #5 @ 16" O.C. t I f I 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING 7' UNDISTURBED EARTH OR APPROVED CONTROLLED FILL MINIMUM 1500 3' CLL. PSF BEARING CAPACITY. 1'- 2" 1'-6" S R. '71f 3'-0" CONTINUOUS WALL FOOTING[ 113ECTION THROUGH BOLLARD AT 1"SONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE A SCALE: 3/4" 1'-0" -KEN SCH4MRTZ, GTC ENGINEERING CORP. 1/22/99 10136 AM HESIDET2.ciwg 17 7 1 A SLIDE BOLT 5/8 WAL —0 LUNU ZtILLL L)MUr MUU INZ>LKILU INTO 3/4" PVC SLEEVE (TYPICAL) 23'-0" 3'-0" 5'-04„5'-04„ 5'-041 3'-0" 0. T.O.w. w n - f -)i F 0 uj CL F @ A 4 44 4' N 0 4X EJ O 4- 4 4 ALIGN SEAL -OFF WITH 4aloll 4 4 #5 BARS 0 16" O.0 GROUTED INTO CELLS OF HANDHOLE IN POLE EXPLOSION PROOF SEALING FITTING 4. .<4 0 C) 0 BLOCK 0 SPLIT FACE CMU, FURNISHED AND 4 4 —HANDHOLE WITH COVER 3000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. USE o 4. CONCRETE -FILLED IS 4"X4"X.25" STEEL TUBE GATE 4 .04 ABOVE GRADE. ALIGN TOP OF BASE FLUSH W/ POST WITH WELDED CAP, PAINTED WHITE (TYPICAL). PLANTING AREA 20'—O�f 4 6" 2,500 P.S.I. HORIZONTAL WALL 41 CONCRETE FOOTING D 'NT @ 16" REINFORCEME O.C. rA 'C' BY CONTRACTOR m VERTICALLY (TYPICAL) IV/// ANCHOR BOLTS BY TELEPHONE FILL POCKET SURROUNDING GATE UTILITY COMPANY POST AFTER SLAB IS POURED. 4 1 0 � 4" 17 2 #5 DOWELS @ 16" Q.C. )3/4" TELEPHONE CONDUIT A, 1/2" ASPHALT IMPREGNATED Q0 24" MIN. BELOW FIN. GRADE EXPANSION JOINT 0 FINISHED GRADE in 0 C) 0 CONTRACTOR 1111117INSTALL m0 .. 1 6" THICK AIR ENTRAINED 4000 PSI CONCRETE SLAB (4)3/4l' ELECTRICAL CONDUIT f o BELOW FROST LINE, 2'-0" MINIMUM 16' -6 - REINFORCED WITH 66 -2.9X2-9 WWM SET 2 1/2" BELOW UNDER PAVED AREAS, BY CONTRACTOR (")NOTE. TOP OF SLAB. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE UNDISTURBED SOIL MIN, AND LOCATION OF TEL. & ELECT. BEARING 2,000 LBS./SQUARE Al CONDUITS W/ TEL. UTILITY CO. FOOT) TELEPHONE BOOTH DETAIL AA. 1.p. L0 4 4, LLj LL 0 0 0 rO F— aCOMPACTED BACKFILL m l y.a !171171177 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING UNDISTURBED EARTH OR APPROVED CONTROLLED FILL MINIMUM 1500 " I. 3CR. PSF BEARING CAPACITY, Y—O" CONTINUOUS WALL FOOTING AmeTinN THRIOUGH GATIN -POST AT -KEN SCH4MRTZ, GTC ENGINEERING CORP. 1/22/99 10136 AM HESIDET2.ciwg 17 7 1 A SLIDE BOLT 5/8 WAL —0 LUNU ZtILLL L)MUr MUU INZ>LKILU INTO 3/4" PVC SLEEVE (TYPICAL) 23'-0" 3'-0" 5'-04„5'-04„ 5'-041 3'-0" 0. w n - f -)i F 0 uj CL F @ A 4 44 4' N 0 4X EJ O 4- 4 4 ALIGN SEAL -OFF WITH 4aloll 4 4 HANDHOLE IN POLE EXPLOSION PROOF SEALING FITTING 4. .<4 0 C) 0 0 CONTRACTOR 4 4 —HANDHOLE WITH COVER 4 4 4 o ii • 4 .04 ALIGN TOP OF BASE FLUSH W/ ADJACENT CONCRETE CURB PLANTING AREA 20'—O�f 4 6" EXPANSION JOINT (TYPICAL) SPLITFACE CMU WALL B" AIR ENTRAINED 4000 PSI CONCRETE SLAB REINFORCED WITH 66-42.9XW2.9 W.W.M. SET 2 1/2" BELOW TOP OF SLAB. ink 4" SCHED. 40 STANDARD STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED SILVER CRAY.. —TS 6"X4"X.25" STEEL TUBING WITH WELDED CAP AND FILLED WITH 3000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE. '--LtNE OF FOUNDATION BELOW. 5/8"OX2'-6" LONG STEEL DROP ROD INSERTED INTO 3/4"0 PVC SLEEVE (TYPICAL) 8 o BRACE PER NATIONAL FENCE SYSTEMS INC. SPECIFICATIONS NATIONAL FENCE SYSTEMS INC,, "THE IMPERIAL" WHITE VINYL GATE CANOPY LrHT-\ (TLP. OF 24) i) i ( + NATIONAL FENCE SYSTEMS INC., 0 'THE IMPERIAL" WHITE VINYL GATE � i VINYL GATE AT MASONRY TRASH & RECYCLING ENCLOSURE SCALE: 1/4 =1'-O GENERAL NOTES: 1. FOR PAINTING REQUIREMENTS SEE MASTER SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL MATERIALS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3, WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY SPECIFICATION D1.0., LATEST EDITION, AND WLEDER SHALL BE CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID CODE, 4. ALL STEEL FABRICATION AND ERECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT A.I.S.C. SPECIFICATIONS. 5. ALL WELDS AND SHARP EDGES SHALL BE GROUND SMOOTH. RADIUS ALL PROTRUDING CORNERS, 6. ALL SQUARE AND RECTANGULAR TUBING ASTM -36. 7. ALL FOUNDATION CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSEIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS AND A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE OF 3/4". 8. FOR ACTUAL TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION SEE SITE PLAN AND INSTALL AS DIRECTED BY AMERADA HESS REPRESENTATIVE. - ------------ - - - --- CL COLumm COLUMN C,COLUMN it CANOPY AREA NOT TO SCALE PROVIDED BY AMERADA HESS CORPORATION .... ............. . .. .... FIELD: WA vs CADD BY: KS z 0 in CHECKED BY: CIX uj DESIGNED BY: MISC. DATE BY DESCRIPTION SCALE: NONE, TELEPHONE BOOTH AND PEDESTAL BY TEL. UTILITY CO. (MOUNTING HEIGHT ABOVE PAVEMENT PER A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS) 0. w n - f -)i F 0 uj CL F @ C F Ld N 0 0 EJ \0 ALIGN SEAL -OFF WITH HANDHOLE IN POLE EXPLOSION PROOF SEALING FITTING 0 0 C) 0 0 CONTRACTOR —HANDHOLE WITH COVER SMOOTH FORMED/ RUBBED o ii ABOVE GRADE 1"CHAMFER ALIGN TOP OF BASE FLUSH W/ ADJACENT CONCRETE CURB PLANTING AREA 2,500 P.S.I. 41 CONCRETE FOOTING D 'C' BY CONTRACTOR m IV/// ANCHOR BOLTS BY TELEPHONE COMPACT ED BACKFILL UTILITY COMPANY 0 � )3/4" TELEPHONE CONDUIT 24" MIN. BELOW FIN. GRADE 0 0 0 0 C) 0 CONTRACTOR 1111117INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS 6" (4)3/4l' ELECTRICAL CONDUIT f o BELOW FROST LINE, 2'-0" MINIMUM 16' -6 - CL COLumm COLUMN C,COLUMN it CANOPY AREA NOT TO SCALE PROVIDED BY AMERADA HESS CORPORATION .... ............. . .. .... FIELD: WA vs CADD BY: KS z 0 in CHECKED BY: CIX uj DESIGNED BY: MISC. DATE BY DESCRIPTION SCALE: NONE, TELEPHONE BOOTH AND PEDESTAL BY TEL. UTILITY CO. (MOUNTING HEIGHT ABOVE PAVEMENT PER A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS) 0. w n - f -)i F 0 uj CL F @ C F Ld 0 0 EJ ALIGN SEAL -OFF WITH HANDHOLE IN POLE EXPLOSION PROOF SEALING FITTING P P p WITH GROUNDING JUMPER BY CONTRACTOR —HANDHOLE WITH COVER SMOOTH FORMED/ RUBBED ii ABOVE GRADE 1"CHAMFER ALIGN TOP OF BASE FLUSH W/ ADJACENT CONCRETE CURB PLANTING AREA 2,500 P.S.I. 41 CONCRETE FOOTING D BY CONTRACTOR m IV/// ANCHOR BOLTS BY TELEPHONE COMPACT ED BACKFILL UTILITY COMPANY 0 � )3/4" TELEPHONE CONDUIT 24" MIN. BELOW FIN. GRADE 'UNDER PAVED AREAS, BY- CONTRACTOR 1111117INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS 6" (4)3/4l' ELECTRICAL CONDUIT f BELOW FROST LINE, 2'-0" MINIMUM 24" MIN. BELOW FIN. GRADE DEPTH UNDER PAVED AREAS, BY CONTRACTOR (")NOTE. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE UNDISTURBED SOIL MIN, AND LOCATION OF TEL. & ELECT. BEARING 2,000 LBS./SQUARE CONDUITS W/ TEL. UTILITY CO. FOOT) TELEPHONE BOOTH DETAIL In UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK AREA I NOT TO SCALE PROVIDED BY AMERADA HESS CORPORATION - - ------- - - 0 QF_ NOTE: ALL DETAILS ON THIS SHEET WERE PROVIDED BY AMERADA HESS CORPOPATION 0 Ir u_ Ocoee FftoMddaI,CD 0. w n - f -)i F 0 uj CL F @ C F Ld 0 0 EJ P P p In UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK AREA I NOT TO SCALE PROVIDED BY AMERADA HESS CORPORATION - - ------- - - 0 QF_ NOTE: ALL DETAILS ON THIS SHEET WERE PROVIDED BY AMERADA HESS CORPOPATION 0 Ir u_ Ocoee FftoMddaI,CD , t I SELF CONTAINED AIR 1 1/2" CONC. OR ASPHALTTURF A R' (USE TO ' MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER ON SITE) ] FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS, 4" TOP SOIL I4 - aj m INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR .• a : : , ': 3 1/2" O.D. SCHEDULE 40 < t f t STAINLESS STEEL INVERTED UNDIST. EARTH p z`''' "U" BUMPER FILLED W/CONC.; 0 FILL SET BUMPER 1'-0"CLEAR OF t i o' I o ' p A' ' Q 6" BELOW FROST LiNE, 2'-0" ISLAND FASCIA DOUBLE WALL p ° V MINIMUM DEPTH FRP PRODUCT CONCRETE PUMP ISLAND PIPING W/STAINLESS STEEL FACIA j o • D r7 SINGLE WALL SEAL GAP AROUND STEEL VAPOR RECOVERY BUMPER W/SEALANT/BAC KER ROD PIPING . . ...... ' ,....................................... ........... ... ...:� . REINF. CONC. PAVEMENT SURFACE BASE BID: t ? PEA GRAVEL LANDSCAPE A I ALT. BI A AREA c° I STONE OF GRAVEL A 3 CRUSHINGS D A. D A p' D D 1/8" - 1 /2" DIA. 1 / — GROUT TOP 3" OF SLEEVE i 1 6" 4„ 3" 6„ t e RECESS 1" FOR SEALANT I 1 N.T.S. ------ .... --..._._...._....._......._.----.....__.................................._........................_........................_.............._........_............ �.. _._.........._........_ ........... ...:. D ° D' DA6. FILL GAPS UNDER AND AROUND STEEL TUBE W/MASON SAND `- 5" SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVE INSTALL CONC. FTG & PVC SLEEVE PRIOR TO POURING 6" REINF.CONC. SLAB TYPE BUM r SCALE: 3/4" = 1 '-D" , t I SELF CONTAINED AIR 1 CONC. OR ASPHALTTURF A R' (USE TO ' MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER ON SITE) , t SELF CONTAINED AIR 1 CONC. OR ASPHALTTURF A R' f PAVEMENT SURFACE COMPRESSOR/METER WITH PEDESTAL ] FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS, 4" TOP SOIL I4 - aj m INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR 3 3 < t f t UNDIST. EARTH p OR CONTROLLED 0 FILL INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS t i o ' p A' ' Q 6" BELOW FROST LiNE, 2'-0" DOUBLE WALL p ° V MINIMUM DEPTH FRP PRODUCT D D PIPING j o • D r7 SINGLE WALL VAPOR RECOVERY PIPING n BASE BID: t ? PEA GRAVEL LANDSCAPE A I ALT. BI A AREA c° I STONE OF GRAVEL A 3 CRUSHINGS D A. D A p' D D 1/8" - 1 /2" DIA. 1 / i 1 6" 4„ 3" 6„ t e i i I 1 N.T.S. ------ .... --..._._...._....._......._.----.....__.................................._........................_........................_.............._........_............ �.. _._.........._........_ ........... ...:. PAVED UNPAVED AREAS r AREAS PAVEMENT SURFACE COURSE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE PAVED AREAS: T TYPE 5, CLASS "A", 3/4" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING 1 -0 MATERIAL PLACED IN LAYERS OF 8" LOOSE DEPTH AND COMPACTED BY APPROVED MEANS (95-100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY) �z TOP SOIL UNPAVEDED AREAS: GENERAL BACKFILL 1'-0" COMPACT IN 6" LIFTS (APPROVED BY ENGINEER) THiRD STAGE RCP STORM SEWER V / / SECOND TYPE 5, CLASS "A", STAGE 3/4" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING MATERIAL FIRST 0 STAGE i 9m NOTES: 1. THE FIRST STAGE IS TO PLACE A COMPACTED LAYER, �95-100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY) OF TYPE 5, CLASS A', 3/4" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING MATERIAL FOR THE PIPE TO LAY ON. THE FIRST STAGE CAN BE COMPACTED iN ONE LIFT. 2. THE SECOND STAGE IS TO PLACE A COMPACTED LAYER, (95-100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY) OF TYPE 5, CLASS "A", 3/4" CRUSHED STONE THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE. BEDDING OF THE SECOND STAGE SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS OF 8" LOOSE DEPTH AND COMPACTED BY APPROVED MEANS. 3. THE THIRD STAGE IS TO PLACE A LAYER OF TYPE 5, CLASS "A", 3/4" CRUSHED STONE TO THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT ABOVE THE PIPE. THE THIRD STAGE SHALL BE HAND PLACED AND TAMPED. r: s rs rr' ;i 6" 1 R 2"-, SURFACE OF---�, PAVEMENT i� CONTINUOUS #5 BAR (TYPICAL) TOOLED JOINT TO ALIGN WITH ADJACENT CURB 4" CONCRETE SLAB/SIDEWALK REINFORCED WITH 6X6 -2.9X2.9 W.W.M. SET 2" FROM THE TOP. 6" POROUS FILL TOE FOOTING DETAIL N Z 0 w rz DATE I BY .......... .... .._........................._.......... ............... .........................---------�_.............._.......------- ...................... _....._......._....._..._..............._..............._..... ..„. _........ f i : t 1/2” R 1/2" R j i 4000 PSI AIR ENTRAINED CONC. +``'n ~ CURB REINF. W/ #4 BARS TOP fn 3 I AND BOTTOM (BY CONTRACTOR) - w b I ' ` •' PAVEMENT SURFACE � +- o U7 a 1 7OZ ! >x , •.. Q W i (p S Q Ljw ! t OLu �Q t•— 4 V)p >� i w J� f J •n -� { z e t I a ii f # r1T - SUB -BASE (BY CONTRACTOR) i i NOT TRANSVERSE JOINTS SHALL BE 1/2" FULL DEPTH ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBER EXP. JOINT RECESSED 1/4" IN FROM THE FRONT FACE AND TOP OF THE CURB 20'-0" MAXIMUM. i i r I I SCALE: 1 1/'?—" = V-0" I i 1'-0"� jRESERVED1 GREEN BORDER PARKING ° GREEN LETTERING Lo R7-8 BLUE BACKGROUND I WITH WHITE SYMBOL WHITE BACKGROUND ` I._..._.__...._._.. WHITE BACKGROUND f in ACCESSIB --- BLUE LETTERING I _...' BLUE BORDER E - PENALTY WHITE BACKGROUND Oj R7 -8P s,a WITH BLACK LETTERING a,,P M"D/oR (REFLECTIVE f TOW -AWAY Z I PENALTY PANEL WHEN REQUIRED BY LOCAL i 10 GOVERNING ATHORiTY, E i O i I � I S 2.50 GALV. U -POST t EMBEDDED 3'-0" E BELOW GRADE +i NOTE: USE THiS SiGN WHEN THERE IS NO SUPERSEDING LOCAL I SIGNAGE REQUIREMENT. E > SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 4000 PSI AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE CURB. DISPENSER ISLAND:` 4000 PSI AIR ENTRAINED 3'-0" 3'-0" 31-0" CONCRETE IN STAINLESS STEEL CURB FORM WiTH 6" MIN. REVEAL. 6" THiCK 4000 PSI' AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE MAT REINFORCED WITH 1 LAYER OF 6/6; W2.9XW2.9 WELDED WIRE MESH SET 2-1/2" BELOW TOP OF MAT; �\ SLOPE 0 1% TOWARD UNCURBED SIDE. � \ DISPENSER: "GILBARCO" DUAL ADVANTAGE SERIES (1) HOSE PER SIDE. EXPANSION JOINT 5'-0" LONG X :4"0 SCHED. 40 STAINLESS 1'-7" STEEL TUBE WiTH WELDED S.S. END CAP AND FiLLED WITH CONCRETE. INSTALL 2'-0" BELOW GRADE IN A 6"0 SCHED, 40 PVC SLEEVE. EMBED SLEEVE IN 3000 PSI 3'-2„ CONCRETE. 7'-9" KEROSNENE DISPENSE'R 100"' LAND D" ETAIL SCALE: 1/4" =`; V-0" FIELD: WA CADD BY: ICS CHECKED BY. CLC DESIGNED BY: WSC. DESCRIPTION SCALE: NONE 0 t N SELF CONTAINED AIR COMPRESSOR/METER WiTH PEDESTAL E FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR ' EXPLOSION PROOF SEALING FITTING WITH GROUNDING JUMPER BY CONTRACTOR I" CHAMFER PLANTING AREA y fld e dd a (4) 1/2" X 2$" ANCHOR B y °.. °Q 32" LAYOUT 28" + 4" HOOK) 26" EMBEDMENT (FURNISHED <°' a/ < a = AND iNTALLED BY CONTRACTOR) �? y y d 3/8" RiGID CONDUIT 24" MiN. BELOW FIN. GRADE UNDER 4„ PAVED AREAS, BY CONTRACTOR UNDISTURBED SOiL (MIN. BEARING 2,000 LBS./SQUARE FOOT) zAgineering Corporadon . , �, r &knAsii,,3207 Ameradar' @ Plantation Grove SELF CONTAINED AIR 1 A R' D COMPRESSOR/METER WITH PEDESTAL n FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS, I4 - aj m INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR D D p INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS o ' p A' ' Q 6" BELOW FROST LiNE, 2'-0" p ° V MINIMUM DEPTH D D o • D LANDSCAPE A A AREA A D A. D A p' D D D �.. D ° D' DA6. SELF CONTAINED AIR COMPRESSOR/METER WiTH PEDESTAL E FURNISHED BY AMERADA HESS, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR ' EXPLOSION PROOF SEALING FITTING WITH GROUNDING JUMPER BY CONTRACTOR I" CHAMFER PLANTING AREA y fld e dd a (4) 1/2" X 2$" ANCHOR B y °.. °Q 32" LAYOUT 28" + 4" HOOK) 26" EMBEDMENT (FURNISHED <°' a/ < a = AND iNTALLED BY CONTRACTOR) �? y y d 3/8" RiGID CONDUIT 24" MiN. BELOW FIN. GRADE UNDER 4„ PAVED AREAS, BY CONTRACTOR UNDISTURBED SOiL (MIN. BEARING 2,000 LBS./SQUARE FOOT) zAgineering Corporadon . , �, r &knAsii,,3207 Ameradar' @ Plantation Grove y PIPE 90 45 22-112 11-1/4 TEE 8 DESIGN SIZE BEN) BW BEN U -ND PLUG PRESS (INCKS) (SO FT) (SO FT) (SO F7) (SO FT) (SO F7) (PS r, 4 1.3 01 05 A3 _ 6 2-1 LS 0.8 05 2.7 )50 8 4.6 25 1.3 0.7 AREA FOR 10 68 3.7 1.9 19 S.B 150 12 9.7 53 2.7 IA UNDISTURBED PLUG • ANCH E1) IN CONE. PAD 94 BARS ALL 3' DTA. BRONZE SOIL (TYP.) AAdJIG TABU'7 kWAREAS 70 K CR4'U(T� Im BASIS Cr IBS. PER SD. Fl. S03i. REVRW BEARBL v TD BE CC04'LETED BY ENGMtEER. 2DC0 (Lw Ase° ME WE S TRENCH WIDTH VARIES CONC_ PAD STAMP SIZE OF VALV AS RED D. FINISHED GRADE W/ SIZE OF PIPE � ENED 4�AS SERVICE (3' WINJ DIRECTION & NO. a Y MAX. FINISHED GR (SEE NOTE 9). EDGE OF j TRENCH VALVE BOX PVC WATER RAIN (TYP.) AND COVER OR FORCE M41N } (TYP.) CSONCRE E MIN ANCHORS a CROSS W/PLUG CROSS W/ MIN. �I' MAX. METALLIC LOCATING VIRE S� U W v TWO PLUGS - ceat FILL WOOD FORM BOARDS BEHIND FINISHED GRADE BELL SHALL NOT INTERFERE 9' ASPHALT SURFACE r, , / ./1$2 . WITH JOINT (TYP. NOTES: T2' (TYPJ SELECT CONCRETE THRUST (MIN.) PRECAST POST FICOMMON BLOCK (TYP.) elC VALVE BOX WITH 3' DIAMETER 2. AND SHALL BE BURIED DIRECTLY ABOVE THE CENTERLINEOF THE PIPE RTHTURID °it - AND COVER BRONZE DISC SET IN (TYPJ LOCATING WIRE SHALL TERMINATE AT THE TOP OF EACH VALVE BOX (SEE NOTE 3) I AND BE CAPABLE OF EXTENDING 12' ABOVE TOP OF BED( IN SUCH A IMPROVED CONDITION ABOVE. NOTES - EDGE OF TRENCH USE DUCT TAPE AS NECESSARY TO HOLD WIRE DIRECTLY ON THE I. PIPE BEDDING: SELECT COWWON FILL COMPACTED TO 95Y. OF THE (TYP.) TOP OF THE PIPE. MAXIMUM DENSITY AS PER AASHTO T-180. LARGER, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY FOR CRITICAL OFFSITE VALVES. 2. TRENCH BACKFILL- COMMON FILL COMPACTED TO 957. Of THE . 2.VALVE COLLAR DIMENSIONS MAY BE REDUCED TO 18' X 18' X 6' WHEN THE HAXIAM DENSITY AS PER AASHTO T-180. BRONZE IDENTIFICATION DISC ]S NOT REQUIRED. 3L PIPE BEDDING UTILIZING SELECT COMMON FILL OR BEDDING ROCK W PVC PIPE LOCATING WIRE DETAIL CFM 107) ACCORDANCE WITH TYPE A BEDDING AND TRENCHING DETAIL MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. OFFSET (AS REQ'D) SET TOP" IIF VALVE B HYDRANT 4. ('): 15' MAX. FOR PIPE DIAMETER LESS THAN 24', AND 24' MAX. BENDS EDGE OF CROSSCUT -\ IIPERAT]NG FOR PIPE DIAMETER 24' AND LARGER. 5; WATER SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN THE TRENCH DURING CONSTRUCTION UNDISTURBED IN UNPAVED AREAS FINISHED GRADE (SEE DETAILS) lx ALL PIPE TO BE INSTALLED WITH BELL FACING UPSTREAM TO THE SOIL (TYPJ 24' SQUARE OR IURECTI[@N IF THE FLOW. ROUNN�D AN➢ V THICK PUMP[ 7. REFER TO SECTION 325 OF THE MANUAL FOR SHEETING AND BRACING AD CSON RETE FACIN IN EXCAVATIONS. 8 FINAL RESTORATION M IMPROVED AREAS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH TRENCH WIDTH � NOTE 2 ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF GOVERNING AGENCIES. SURFACE ADJUSTABLE CAST IRON G RESTORATION WITHIN ORANGE COUNTY RIGHT-iF-WAY SHALL COMPLY WITH to BOX SHALL REST ON RESILIENT SEAT RUCK NOT REOUIREWNTS Or RIFilii-OF-WAY UTILIZATION REGULATIONS AND ROAD /,REDDNGI M. J. GATE VALV ALVE OR PIPE CBAOMCKFILLWATER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS. THRUST r TYPE B BEDDING AND TRENCHING DETAIL.' NOTE 3 !RAIN OPERATING NUT (FIG.,�, THRUST BLOCK 12' FITTIN MIN. AREA (SQ. FTJ 6' BEDDING ROCK 6' BEDDING RACK CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK TYPICAL SECTION SCHEDULE FOR THRUST BLOCK AREAS a PIPE 90 45 22-112 11-1/4 TEE 8 DESIGN SIZE BEN) BW BEN U -ND PLUG PRESS (INCKS) (SO FT) (SO FT) (SO F7) (SO FT) (SO F7) (PS r, 4 1.3 01 05 A3 !3 150 6 2-1 LS 0.8 05 2.7 )50 8 4.6 25 1.3 0.7 9b 1% 10 68 3.7 1.9 19 S.B 150 12 9.7 53 2.7 IA 9.7 I50 ANCH E1) IN CONE. PAD 94 BARS ALL 3' DTA. BRONZE AAdJIG TABU'7 kWAREAS 70 K CR4'U(T� Im BASIS Cr IBS. PER SD. Fl. S03i. REVRW BEARBL v TD BE CC04'LETED BY ENGMtEER. 2DC0 (Lw Ase° ME WE S WOOD BLOCKING (TYP.) AREA FOR PLUG AREA FOR TEE AREA FOR PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS SHALL BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. WHERE TRENCH WALL HAS BEEN DISTURBED, EXCAVATE ALL LOOSE MATERIAL AND EXTEND TO UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. 2. EXTEND THRUST BLOCK FULL LENGTH OF FITTINGS. JOINTS SHALL NOT BE COVERED BY THRUST BLOCKS. FITTINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY POLYETHYLENE FILM (8 MIL.) PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK. 3. ROUGH BLOCKING FORMS SHALL BE USED ALONG SIDES OF THRUST BLOCKS, AS REQUIRED. 11 4, THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE USED IN COMBINATION, AS REQUIRED, TO SUITE THE SPECIFIC FITTING ARRANGEMENT, 5, ALTERNATE DESIGNED RESTRAINING SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE STANDARD THRUST BLOCKING IS NOT SUITABLE AND/OR SOIL RESISTANCE BEARING IS LESS THAN 1500 PSF, & ALL WOOD BLOCKING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED WITH PRESERVATIVE, THRUST BLOCK DETAIL (FIG. 103) -VALVE COLLAR (SEE DETAIL) R J HYDRANT ANCHORING TEE RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX (SEE DETAIL) NOTES, NOTES! I. FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITHOUT A WEEP HOLE, 1. PVC EXTENSIONS SHALL NOT BE USED ON VALVE BOX INSTALLATION. OR KITH A PERMANENTLY PLUGGED WEEP HOLE. 2, THE ACTUATING NUT FOR DEEPER VALVES SHALL BE EXTENDED TO 2. THE DEVELOPER MAY INSTALL THE SHEAR PAD RECESSED UP TO COKE UP TO 4 FOOT DEPTH BELOW FINISHEII GRADE: 4 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE AND SOD THE RECESSED SECTION. 3.CL£ARANCE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF BOLTS AND TOP OF SHEAR PAD SMALL BE A 6' MINIMUM7. (A Z 0 LA W Cc DATE B) GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION ABOVE THE WATER CONSERVii EFFLUENT TRANSMI-SSION MAIN APRIL 1999 Guidelines are based on criteria set forth in documents dated January 16, 1991 by McCree, Inc. (approved .by Orange County) and February 7, 1991 by Mr. Gabe Delneky, Chief Engineer, Orange County Utilities. The Effluent Transmission Main (ETM) shall be staked at 25 -foot intervals to clearly identify its location and elevation. Minimum cover of 3 feet shall be maintained prior to pouring concrete. All construction equipment will cross over the ETM at designated locations that will be MINIMUM LENGTH (FT) TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING(S). x 25 feet wide with 6 feet of cover dirt minimum. PIPE SIZE A concrete slab reinforced with #4 rebors at 18 -inch O.C. each way in the slab and 6x6 10/10 W•W.F., shall be provided over the entire length of the ETM where there wilt be 4` 6° 81 10` 12° 16' 20' 24° 34' 36' the minimum cover of three feet. The concrete'slab shall be 6 -inches thick and 10 feet 90° BEND 18 30 38 45 91 wide (5 feet on each side of the ETM). This will provide a continuous 10 -foot wide 450 BEND 7 12 16 19 38 protection barrier over the ETM from R/W line to R/W line. 22-1/2 ° BEND 4 6 7 9 18 The rebar shall be placed on 3 -inch continuous high chairs with sand plates. 11-1/4 °BEND 2 3 4 4 9 Sawed joints shall be provided at the spacing proposed. PLUG LIR BRANC 116 OF TEE Expansion' joints shall be p j provided at the spacing proposed with #4 smooth dowels at 18 - inch O.C. with one greased side. NOTES: Concrete shall be 3,000 s1 It shrill be manufactured and { g 1. FITTINGS SHALL BE RESTRAINED JOINTS UNLESS OTHERWISE P paced following FDOT INDICATED. standards. Slump tests shall be performed for concrete over the ETM. In addition, the 2. <INSTALL FULL LENGTH JOINTS WITH TOTAL LENGTH EQUAL TO curing times shall be followed in accordance to FDOT standards prior to any traffic OR GREATER THAN SHOWN IN THE TABLE, occurring above the slab. 3. WHERE TWO OR MORE FIT T INGS ARE TOGETHER, USE FITTING VHICH YIELDS GREATEST LENGTH OF RESTRAINED PIPE. Woodard &' Curran inspectors sholl inspect the alignment of the rebar mat, grading and 4. IN LINE VALVES AND THROUGH RUN OF TEES OUTSIDE LIMITS rebar spacing installation prior to concrete placement. Woodard & Curran inspectors OF RESTRAINED JOINTS FROM OTHER FITTINGS NEED NOT BE shah be r p y P RESTRAINED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. present for the placement of an concrete above the ETM and shall monitor the 5. LENGTHS SHOWN IN THE TABLE HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN curing of the slab, ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE OUTLINED IN 'THRUST A schedule Should be submitted to- Woodard & Curran with a description of the sequence RESTRAINT DESIGN FOR DUCTILE IRON PIPE' AS PUBLISHED of work to be performed and a proposed schedule, Woodard & Curran inspectors shall be BY DIPRA, WITH THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS: given at least two days notice prior to any work being performed around the ETM, WORKING PRESSURE: 150_ P.S.I. SOIL DESIGNATION: _r0711 __Nfi _ _ No construction vehicles shall be allowed to drive over the ETM cover until the concrete LAYING CONDITIONS: IVU-_ M-- - mat has cured. 6. FOR PIPE ENCASED IN POLYETHYLENE, USE VALUES GIVEN IN Signs should be placed at each property fine over the ETM, and the finished concrete PARENTHESES 0R INCREASE THE GIVEN VALUE BY A FACTOR should be stamped to provide additional markings signifyingthe location of the ETM. OF 1.5. P P 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ENGINEER. The heaviest construction equipment allowed to cross the ETM shall be a concrete truck, with a total loading weight of 32 tons or 6 tons per wheel. RESTRAINED PIPE TABLE. All excavation above the ETM will be accomplished without setting equipment on the main. (FIG. 104) Storm sewer catch basins and piping shall remain 10 -feet clear of the ETM. The heaviest loading after construction is completed shall be a semi -trailer weighing 25 tons or 3 tons per wheel All temporary facilities shall be operated and maintained by the Contractor. Temporary equipment and facilities shall be operated 24 hours a day if required to maintain the integrity of the existing disposal system, New or modified facilities and equipment that have been tested and accepted will be operated and maintained by the contracted operators. The contractor shrill notify Woodard & Curran prior to the start of modifications to any existing facility. If a freeze forecast is received prior to or during construction, construction will stop immediately until the warning has been lifted. It is essential that reclaimed water disposal operations at the existing facilities are not interrupted during construction of the new facilities, or diminished in quality by construction procedures or methods. Existing regulatory water quality requirements must not be violated due to construction activity, and Rapid Infiltration Basin (RIB) sites must be operated within permit requirements during construction. The relocation of appurtenances must be done according to the project specifications - Any modification or relocation of appurtenances must be coordinated with the City of Orlando, Orange County and Woodard & Curran prior to doing so. The Contractor shall. be responsible for any fines or repairs that occur as a result of damage to the ETM during construction. If the Contractor receives notification that there is an upset in the distribution system, construction will need to cease surrounding the ETM due to the need for emergency disposal into the RIBs, The contractor shall schedule the construction of the new drives and demolition of existing drives and/or construct temporary drives as necessary to provide access to existing facilities. Access shall be provided at all times. Temporary drives shall be sufficiently stabilized to permit passage of fully loaded semi- trailer trucks without the assistance from other vehicles or construction equipment. The Contractor shall maintain temporary drives. ©p tior)a l Post Positions - Clay roads shall be restored to as good or better conditions than existed prior to 2oD� commencing construction. Restoration shall consist of placing 8 -inches of stabilized clay Prince le Post Positron on top of compacted subgrade (95 per cent of the maximum density as determined by p L C Canted ZV toward i'low > AASHTO T-180); mixing to a depth of 12 -inches; and compacting the resulting mixture to 95 per cent of the maximum density (AASHTO T-180). Stabilized clay shall be a sand -clay having a plasticity of less than 10 and a liquid limit of less than 40, free of muck, trash, foreign matter and having no particle greater than 3 14 inches in any �- Filter Fabric dimension. The relocation and/or abandonment of any current roadways must be permitted through Silt Flory the county prior to construction. `j Procedures set forth herein are included as a guide only. The Contractor may use - procedures other than those set forth herein with prior approval from the City of Orlando, T T c Orange County and Woodard & Curran. Type III S i� T e n C e 990409 Gen. Guidelines. doc (FDOT Index No. 102) L a=) � co ®LU 0" Lr CJ'J 0 CC n0 CL LL - 0 E- °=, C1 FIELD: NIA _ ocoft < Co 01PCC 0 CADD BY: KS GTCEngneenng oragion DETAIL%*5 @ ® ® 1- D] _I S2 < " CHECKED BY: CIC 0 DESIGNED BY: DISC. 4�^30�'LLI Station it (D c LIJ DESCRIPTION SCALE: EID U DATE 1 JOB NUMBER HES-'1 SHEET C14 of ®©_ C!3 L_ fI13 24' x 24' x 6' THICK CONC. PAD - TYP. EACH VALVE B 3' DIA BRONZE DISC ANCH E1) IN CONE. PAD 94 BARS ALL 3' DTA. BRONZE STAMP AS RECYD AROUND DISC ANCIURED.IN CSEE NOTE 1) METALLIC LOCATING VI, CONC_ PAD STAMP SIZE OF VALV AS RED D. FINISHED GRADE TYPE OF VALV SERVICE DIRECTION & NO. a Y MAX. OF TURNS Tfl )i N 10 VALVE BOX PVC WATER RAIN AND COVER OR FORCE M41N } (TYP.) CSONCRE E MIN ANCHORS 4 MIN. �I' MAX. METALLIC LOCATING VIRE UNIMPROVED CONDITION - TOP FLUSH - FINISHED GRADE 9' ASPHALT SURFACE r, , / ./1$2 . NOTES: 4' x 4' x 16' LONG 1. PVC PIPE SHALL REQUIRE INSULATED METALLIC LOCATING VIP,E (MIN.) PRECAST POST (14 GAUGE COPPER) CAPABLE OF DETECTHIN BY A CABLE LOCATOR VALVE BOX WITH 3' DIAMETER 2. AND SHALL BE BURIED DIRECTLY ABOVE THE CENTERLINEOF THE PIPE AND COVER BRONZE DISC SET IN (TYPJ LOCATING WIRE SHALL TERMINATE AT THE TOP OF EACH VALVE BOX GROUT AS SHOVN I AND BE CAPABLE OF EXTENDING 12' ABOVE TOP OF BED( IN SUCH A IMPROVED CONDITION ABOVE. MANNER SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH VALVE OPERATION USE DUCT TAPE AS NECESSARY TO HOLD WIRE DIRECTLY ON THE NOTES: TOP OF THE PIPE. L BRONZE IDENNTIFICATION DISC SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL VALVES 16' AND LARGER, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY FOR CRITICAL OFFSITE VALVES. 2.VALVE COLLAR DIMENSIONS MAY BE REDUCED TO 18' X 18' X 6' WHEN THE BRONZE IDENTIFICATION DISC ]S NOT REQUIRED. VALVE COLLAR DETAIL PVC PIPE LOCATING WIRE DETAIL CFM 107) ff16 1t4D SET TOP" IIF VALVE B HYDRANT TO FINISHED GRADE IIPERAT]NG CONCRETE COLLAR NUT IN UNPAVED AREAS FINISHED GRADE (SEE DETAILS) HOSE NOZZLE AS RE 24' SQUARE OR ROUNN�D AN➢ V THICK PUMP[ AD CSON RETE FACIN SEI ARP EE NOTE 2 ADJUSTABLE CAST IRON 2 - #4 AT 9' ? O.C. ALL VALVE BOX SEE NOTE 2 AROUND BOX SHALL REST ON RESILIENT SEAT RUCK NOT /,REDDNGI M. J. GATE VALV ALVE OR PIPE CBAOMCKFILLWATER CENTEREDLONESEE NOTE 3 !RAIN OPERATING NUT 12' 6' BEDDING ROCK 6' BEDDING RACK M J ANCHORING COUPLING WOOD BLOCKING (TYP.) AREA FOR PLUG AREA FOR TEE AREA FOR PLUG NOTES: 1. THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS SHALL BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. WHERE TRENCH WALL HAS BEEN DISTURBED, EXCAVATE ALL LOOSE MATERIAL AND EXTEND TO UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. 2. EXTEND THRUST BLOCK FULL LENGTH OF FITTINGS. JOINTS SHALL NOT BE COVERED BY THRUST BLOCKS. FITTINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY POLYETHYLENE FILM (8 MIL.) PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK. 3. ROUGH BLOCKING FORMS SHALL BE USED ALONG SIDES OF THRUST BLOCKS, AS REQUIRED. 11 4, THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE USED IN COMBINATION, AS REQUIRED, TO SUITE THE SPECIFIC FITTING ARRANGEMENT, 5, ALTERNATE DESIGNED RESTRAINING SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE STANDARD THRUST BLOCKING IS NOT SUITABLE AND/OR SOIL RESISTANCE BEARING IS LESS THAN 1500 PSF, & ALL WOOD BLOCKING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED WITH PRESERVATIVE, THRUST BLOCK DETAIL (FIG. 103) -VALVE COLLAR (SEE DETAIL) R J HYDRANT ANCHORING TEE RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX (SEE DETAIL) NOTES, NOTES! I. FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITHOUT A WEEP HOLE, 1. PVC EXTENSIONS SHALL NOT BE USED ON VALVE BOX INSTALLATION. OR KITH A PERMANENTLY PLUGGED WEEP HOLE. 2, THE ACTUATING NUT FOR DEEPER VALVES SHALL BE EXTENDED TO 2. THE DEVELOPER MAY INSTALL THE SHEAR PAD RECESSED UP TO COKE UP TO 4 FOOT DEPTH BELOW FINISHEII GRADE: 4 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE AND SOD THE RECESSED SECTION. 3.CL£ARANCE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF BOLTS AND TOP OF SHEAR PAD SMALL BE A 6' MINIMUM7. (A Z 0 LA W Cc DATE B) GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION ABOVE THE WATER CONSERVii EFFLUENT TRANSMI-SSION MAIN APRIL 1999 Guidelines are based on criteria set forth in documents dated January 16, 1991 by McCree, Inc. (approved .by Orange County) and February 7, 1991 by Mr. Gabe Delneky, Chief Engineer, Orange County Utilities. The Effluent Transmission Main (ETM) shall be staked at 25 -foot intervals to clearly identify its location and elevation. Minimum cover of 3 feet shall be maintained prior to pouring concrete. All construction equipment will cross over the ETM at designated locations that will be MINIMUM LENGTH (FT) TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING(S). x 25 feet wide with 6 feet of cover dirt minimum. PIPE SIZE A concrete slab reinforced with #4 rebors at 18 -inch O.C. each way in the slab and 6x6 10/10 W•W.F., shall be provided over the entire length of the ETM where there wilt be 4` 6° 81 10` 12° 16' 20' 24° 34' 36' the minimum cover of three feet. The concrete'slab shall be 6 -inches thick and 10 feet 90° BEND 18 30 38 45 91 wide (5 feet on each side of the ETM). This will provide a continuous 10 -foot wide 450 BEND 7 12 16 19 38 protection barrier over the ETM from R/W line to R/W line. 22-1/2 ° BEND 4 6 7 9 18 The rebar shall be placed on 3 -inch continuous high chairs with sand plates. 11-1/4 °BEND 2 3 4 4 9 Sawed joints shall be provided at the spacing proposed. PLUG LIR BRANC 116 OF TEE Expansion' joints shall be p j provided at the spacing proposed with #4 smooth dowels at 18 - inch O.C. with one greased side. NOTES: Concrete shall be 3,000 s1 It shrill be manufactured and { g 1. FITTINGS SHALL BE RESTRAINED JOINTS UNLESS OTHERWISE P paced following FDOT INDICATED. standards. Slump tests shall be performed for concrete over the ETM. In addition, the 2. <INSTALL FULL LENGTH JOINTS WITH TOTAL LENGTH EQUAL TO curing times shall be followed in accordance to FDOT standards prior to any traffic OR GREATER THAN SHOWN IN THE TABLE, occurring above the slab. 3. WHERE TWO OR MORE FIT T INGS ARE TOGETHER, USE FITTING VHICH YIELDS GREATEST LENGTH OF RESTRAINED PIPE. Woodard &' Curran inspectors sholl inspect the alignment of the rebar mat, grading and 4. IN LINE VALVES AND THROUGH RUN OF TEES OUTSIDE LIMITS rebar spacing installation prior to concrete placement. Woodard & Curran inspectors OF RESTRAINED JOINTS FROM OTHER FITTINGS NEED NOT BE shah be r p y P RESTRAINED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. present for the placement of an concrete above the ETM and shall monitor the 5. LENGTHS SHOWN IN THE TABLE HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN curing of the slab, ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE OUTLINED IN 'THRUST A schedule Should be submitted to- Woodard & Curran with a description of the sequence RESTRAINT DESIGN FOR DUCTILE IRON PIPE' AS PUBLISHED of work to be performed and a proposed schedule, Woodard & Curran inspectors shall be BY DIPRA, WITH THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS: given at least two days notice prior to any work being performed around the ETM, WORKING PRESSURE: 150_ P.S.I. SOIL DESIGNATION: _r0711 __Nfi _ _ No construction vehicles shall be allowed to drive over the ETM cover until the concrete LAYING CONDITIONS: IVU-_ M-- - mat has cured. 6. FOR PIPE ENCASED IN POLYETHYLENE, USE VALUES GIVEN IN Signs should be placed at each property fine over the ETM, and the finished concrete PARENTHESES 0R INCREASE THE GIVEN VALUE BY A FACTOR should be stamped to provide additional markings signifyingthe location of the ETM. OF 1.5. P P 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ENGINEER. The heaviest construction equipment allowed to cross the ETM shall be a concrete truck, with a total loading weight of 32 tons or 6 tons per wheel. RESTRAINED PIPE TABLE. All excavation above the ETM will be accomplished without setting equipment on the main. (FIG. 104) Storm sewer catch basins and piping shall remain 10 -feet clear of the ETM. The heaviest loading after construction is completed shall be a semi -trailer weighing 25 tons or 3 tons per wheel All temporary facilities shall be operated and maintained by the Contractor. Temporary equipment and facilities shall be operated 24 hours a day if required to maintain the integrity of the existing disposal system, New or modified facilities and equipment that have been tested and accepted will be operated and maintained by the contracted operators. The contractor shrill notify Woodard & Curran prior to the start of modifications to any existing facility. If a freeze forecast is received prior to or during construction, construction will stop immediately until the warning has been lifted. It is essential that reclaimed water disposal operations at the existing facilities are not interrupted during construction of the new facilities, or diminished in quality by construction procedures or methods. Existing regulatory water quality requirements must not be violated due to construction activity, and Rapid Infiltration Basin (RIB) sites must be operated within permit requirements during construction. The relocation of appurtenances must be done according to the project specifications - Any modification or relocation of appurtenances must be coordinated with the City of Orlando, Orange County and Woodard & Curran prior to doing so. The Contractor shall. be responsible for any fines or repairs that occur as a result of damage to the ETM during construction. If the Contractor receives notification that there is an upset in the distribution system, construction will need to cease surrounding the ETM due to the need for emergency disposal into the RIBs, The contractor shall schedule the construction of the new drives and demolition of existing drives and/or construct temporary drives as necessary to provide access to existing facilities. Access shall be provided at all times. Temporary drives shall be sufficiently stabilized to permit passage of fully loaded semi- trailer trucks without the assistance from other vehicles or construction equipment. The Contractor shall maintain temporary drives. ©p tior)a l Post Positions - Clay roads shall be restored to as good or better conditions than existed prior to 2oD� commencing construction. Restoration shall consist of placing 8 -inches of stabilized clay Prince le Post Positron on top of compacted subgrade (95 per cent of the maximum density as determined by p L C Canted ZV toward i'low > AASHTO T-180); mixing to a depth of 12 -inches; and compacting the resulting mixture to 95 per cent of the maximum density (AASHTO T-180). Stabilized clay shall be a sand -clay having a plasticity of less than 10 and a liquid limit of less than 40, free of muck, trash, foreign matter and having no particle greater than 3 14 inches in any �- Filter Fabric dimension. The relocation and/or abandonment of any current roadways must be permitted through Silt Flory the county prior to construction. `j Procedures set forth herein are included as a guide only. The Contractor may use - procedures other than those set forth herein with prior approval from the City of Orlando, T T c Orange County and Woodard & Curran. Type III S i� T e n C e 990409 Gen. Guidelines. doc (FDOT Index No. 102) L a=) � co ®LU 0" Lr CJ'J 0 CC n0 CL LL - 0 E- °=, C1 FIELD: NIA _ ocoft < Co 01PCC 0 CADD BY: KS GTCEngneenng oragion DETAIL%*5 @ ® ® 1- D] _I S2 < " CHECKED BY: CIC 0 DESIGNED BY: DISC. 4�^30�'LLI Station it (D c LIJ DESCRIPTION SCALE: EID U DATE 1 JOB NUMBER HES-'1 SHEET C14 of ®©_ C!3 L_ fI13 i O mm M rte': •r A�.: IFREEZE '' 33 i I ir1 9S - Trow LJ Q ,i .-� „,t ? a Lt„••t T'. l�rr t+' •+' ��� 4 '�T I j 701_0" "' I I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -� LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG A FLOOR', PLAN -2P 13 i REV. I DATE BY DESCRPTM CHECK I APP'D. 0i oiurnN owrw rwaQr Ma RM MMVAL �w�oV�u �wwevK ArwrovK AMERADA HESS CORPORATION I HESS PLAZA, WOODBRIDGE, N.J. MMS TM i wim m w nra Na mvr. PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN AH-37W-BiaTP ft" ormw w a►n DAT-_ 1/4"=1-0" JG 12/10/98 t0°"TM" #09059 OCOEE, FLORIDA' HESS EXPRESS #09059 owwN. ra ,�y �► MAGUIRE ROAD 8, MOORE ROAD DATW-- OCOEE FLORIDA A -1 P a METSKY - ZUCKERMAN MONROE METSKY 5 #2770+ i''i� Sb"r ��✓ DAT— ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS DAVID ZUCKERMA #7801 60 POMPTON AVE VERONA, NEW JERSEY ------------ ,22%xzaSS Ly'� - j. i O mm M rte': •r A�.: IFREEZE '' 33 i I ir1 9S - Trow LJ Q ,i .-� „,t ? a Lt„••t T'. l�rr t+' •+' ��� 4 '�T I j 701_0" "' I I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -� LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG A FLOOR', PLAN -2P 13 i REV. I DATE BY DESCRPTM CHECK I APP'D. 0i oiurnN owrw rwaQr Ma RM MMVAL �w�oV�u �wwevK ArwrovK AMERADA HESS CORPORATION I HESS PLAZA, WOODBRIDGE, N.J. MMS TM i wim m w nra Na mvr. PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN AH-37W-BiaTP ft" ormw w a►n DAT-_ 1/4"=1-0" JG 12/10/98 t0°"TM" #09059 OCOEE, FLORIDA' HESS EXPRESS #09059 owwN. ra ,�y �► MAGUIRE ROAD 8, MOORE ROAD DATW-- OCOEE FLORIDA A -1 P a METSKY - ZUCKERMAN MONROE METSKY 5 #2770+ i''i� Sb"r ��✓ DAT— ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS DAVID ZUCKERMA #7801 60 POMPTON AVE VERONA, NEW JERSEY ------------ ,22%xzaSS Ly'� - . ' � PLAN FOR --- � /���AL CX�EN�xJNS 8: L�CATK]NJ ������������ �REEN WETAL C8P|N� �REEN �[TAL R08FN� SYSTEW CREEN �ETAL ' '|NQ �H�E ACRYLC ^STUCC0^ . �� /�R�C ��C�^ ~~' ACCENT STR|P ` VVH�E ACRYLC �REEN ACRYL|C�^STUCCO^ ' ACCENT STR|P ����*���| ______ � � /' o -u � � �� ° ' . FACE OF CULU�N C0VER BEYOND 3PUT F�CE WASONRY UN�S� COL0R VVH�E� �UHTAR TD ' RO8F�T8P E�UU��ENT (B[H|ND __-~-----PRBlN0HED �ETAL R80F ��RE[N �H�E W�TAL COPUV� - �H�E STUCC0� - �R[EN ��TAL ROOFN� 3YSTE� ~ |NTERNALLY |LLUW|NATED S|�N �-~.____- . . . 2 -Ur x 8-O^ A6O ��. F[\ �RE[N w�TAL FL�SHU«� ' � ' � �HOI ACRYLK� ^STUCCO^ � ^- �RAY ACRYL� "STUCCO. ' ~~ �CCENT 3TRP� � . � ' � �HnE ACRYLK� ^STUCCO^ ._'_-~___- ' _-_-----�REEN ACRYL� ^STU�C0^ � A��ENT 3TR� -------ALU�|NUW FRA�|N� SYSTE�� C0L0R� PERWAN0D|C 8R0NZE � -------' K[ TlL[ PAT7ERN _______SPL� F�CE WA�ONRY� UNR3� COLUR �HOE, �ORTAR COLOR TU �ATCH C.�]U. -------^EWERCENCY PUWP SHUTOFF" S|�N (TYP�AL OF 2\ ^E�ERCENCY PU�P SHUT0FF^ S��CH ' m �� � � � . / � � �- � �i N�� � �REEN WETAL C8P|N� �REEN �[TAL R08FN� SYSTEW CREEN �ETAL ' '|NQ �H�E ACRYLC ^STUCC0^ . �� /�R�C ��C�^ ~~' ACCENT STR|P ` VVH�E ACRYLC �REEN ACRYL|C�^STUCCO^ ' ACCENT STR|P ����*���| ______ � � /' o -u � � �� ° ' . FACE OF CULU�N C0VER BEYOND 3PUT F�CE WASONRY UN�S� COL0R VVH�E� �UHTAR TD ' RO8F�T8P E�UU��ENT (B[H|ND __-~-----PRBlN0HED �ETAL R80F ��RE[N �H�E W�TAL COPUV� - �H�E STUCC0� - �R[EN ��TAL ROOFN� 3YSTE� ~ |NTERNALLY |LLUW|NATED S|�N �-~.____- . . . 2 -Ur x 8-O^ A6O ��. F[\ �RE[N w�TAL FL�SHU«� ' � ' � �HOI ACRYLK� ^STUCCO^ � ^- �RAY ACRYL� "STUCCO. ' ~~ �CCENT 3TRP� � . � ' � �HnE ACRYLK� ^STUCCO^ ._'_-~___- ' _-_-----�REEN ACRYL� ^STU�C0^ � A��ENT 3TR� -------ALU�|NUW FRA�|N� SYSTE�� C0L0R� PERWAN0D|C 8R0NZE � -------' K[ TlL[ PAT7ERN _______SPL� F�CE WA�ONRY� UNR3� COLUR �HOE, �ORTAR COLOR TU �ATCH C.�]U. -------^EWERCENCY PUWP SHUTOFF" S|�N (TYP�AL OF 2\ ^E�ERCENCY PU�P SHUT0FF^ S��CH ' m ' �� � � ________________ _ �����NN00�� n���w���« N N 0 i ' �� � � � � � � \ � E�TERK]R DOOR LK�HT CJ. CABK4[T `--GAS WETER \ � /OPTONAL\ � BWER�ENCY FLOODLK�HT `----ELEC. WETER ^- ' -' � 0���_0�� �� ��� 0 ����0�� �w� \ HOLLO� WETAL DDOR PA0� �H�E m��m wn�~ m � � � PRERN|SHED �ETAL R0OF SCREEN VVH�E �ETAL COP|N� �H�[ A0�. �C� �T0� �HOI STUCC0 3^X4^ ALU�. LEADER (T/P OF 41 S�A ���AU LEADER �0OT (TYP|CA|\ �HD� WE�� EJLL C.k�.U. RNNTVVH�E �� � ry WEST ELEVATION 2—SIDED BLENDING DISPENSER, GASOLINE + DIESEL* EAST ELEVATION *NOTE: SEE SITE PLAN FOR ACTUAL ARRANGEMENT AND CONFIGURATION OF ISLANDS AND DISPENSERS G G s. ry WEST ELEVATION 2—SIDED BLENDING DISPENSER, GASOLINE + DIESEL* EAST ELEVATION *NOTE: SEE SITE PLAN FOR ACTUAL ARRANGEMENT AND CONFIGURATION OF ISLANDS AND DISPENSERS G G 9 x 0 m z in 0 Fn R x 0 in N 0 N. CONC. COLUMN ENCASEMENT, BY CONTR. LEVELING NUTS, BY CONTR.— 8,-74 CL V SIGN B( HE A01 ,lib_ GROUT, /—,--ANCHOR BOLTS,. of ._.._ • i _ i ; _ JL II" II !• is •;• I I a • . , • I1 II . - v •' YY� .�••ylly Y 4'-0" 2'-2" : /N FRONT ELEVATION/SECTION 4'-0" ."HESS" PANEL (FURNISHED BY SIGN FABRICATOR, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR); .080 WHITE FINISHED ALUM. CASING #901-101 W/ HIN3ED . FACE; MIN. 3/16" THICK PLEX. FACE PAINTED ON SECOND SURFACE; WHITE BACKGROUND #406; GREEN COPY AND STRIPE #AS -4352. SIGN SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING MIN. 37 PSF LOAD.' STEEL COLUMN TS 12%6%3/8" FURNISHED BY SIGN FABRICATOR, INSTALLED 11 BY CONTRACTOR. PAINT SILVER GRAY "PRICE" PANEL (FURNISHEID BY SIGN FABRICATOR, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR); .080 WHITE FINISHED ALUM. CASING #901-101 W/ HINGED FACE; MIN. 3/16" THICK PLEX. FACE PAINTED ON SECOND SURFACE; GREEN BACKGROUND #AS -4352; WHITE COPY AND STRIPE. #406; WHITE CHANGEABLE NUMERALS W/ GREEN BACKGROUND IN CLEAR "Z" TRACK. SIGN SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING MIN. 37 PSF LOAD. "CO -BRAND" PANEL (FURNISHED BY SIGN FABRICATOR, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR); .080 WHITE FINISHED ALUM. CASING #901-101 W/ HINGED FACE; MIN. 3/16" THICK PLEX. FACE PAINTED ON SECOND SURFACE; CO -BRAND STANDARD COLORS. SIGN SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING MIN. 37 PSF LOAD. EXPLOSION -PROOF SEALING FITTING, BY CONTRACTOR CONC. FOOTING, BY CONTRACTOR o (3,000 PSI CONC. MIN.) 2 0 z a o = 0 of O COMPACTED BACKFILL, BY CONTRACTOR 3/4" RIGID CONDUIT AND WIRING TO SIGN, BY CONTRACTOR #7 BARS ® 12" O.C. TYP. EACH WAY, TOP & BOTTOM, BY CONTRACTOR UNDISTURBED EARTH OR APPROVED CONTROLLED FILL MIN. 6" BELOW FROST LINE, VERIFY MIN. 2,000 PSF BEARING CAPACITY, BY CONTRACTOR NOTE: REINFORCEMENT TO CONFORM TO ASTM A 615 GRADE 60 NOTE: SIGN MANUFACTURER SHALL FABRICATE METAL SIGN BOX 11" DEEP (TYPICAL) Ir=,`31'j "HESS" PANEL STEEL COLUMN TS 12%6%3/8" FURNISHED BY SIGN FABRICATOR, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. PAINT SILVER GRAY "PRICE" PANEL SIGN ILLUMINATED W/ F96 T12/D/HO FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND POWERED BY 120 V BALLAST (TYPICAL) 6"x8" HANDHOLE COVER PLATE, BY SIGN FABRICATOR "CO—BRAND" PANEL FINISH GRADE 2'-2" - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —_j SIDE ELEVATION. ■ CODE COMPLIANCE CODE BOCA 1996 SBC 1997 REFERENCE STANDARD ASCE 7-95 ASCE 7-95 WIND SPEED 130 MPH 130 MPH (4) 2"0 HOLES FOR 1 .1 /2"0 A307 ANCHOR BOLTS AT EACH COLUMN, CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL (4) 1 1/2"0 ANCHOR BOLTS, 44" LONG WITH 36" EMBEDMENT. PROVIDE 5"x5%3/8" THICK PLATE AT BOTTOM .OF EACH BOLT. SECURE WITH (2) NUTS OR 1/4" FILLET WELD ALL AROUND BASE. GROUND LUG 1 /2"-13x 1 /2" LG., BY SIGN FABRICATOR 3/4" RIGID CONDUIT FOR WIRING TO SIGN, BY CONTRACTOR CUT OUT 12 1/4" x 6 1/4", BY SIGN FABRICATOR 1 1/4 " THICK BASE PLATE, BY SIGN FABRICATOR STEEL COLUMN: TS 12"x6"x3/8 FURNISHED BY SIGN FABRICATOR, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. PAINT SILVER GRAY BASE PLATE SCALE: 1"=l'—O" 1 REV. DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHECK APP'D. °amN° NW= Eft Alr�DYAL ruin A~& A AMERADA HESS CORPORATION I HESS PLAZA, WOODBRIDGE, N.J. FINAL TITLE t Arc W. APPROVAL 15'-0" HIGH IDENTIFICATION SIGN 09059 W/ 4 PRODUCT PRICE PANEL W." DOW w "m DATE: WIND SPEED: 130 MPH (PER ASCE 7-95) AS NOTED JG 12/10/98. HESS STATION #09059 Locam OCOEE, FL:; MAGUIRE ROAD a MOORE ROAD DATE• OCOEE, FLORIDA ID � c METSKY - ZUCKERMAN MONRDEMET$Ky.r { #2770 r 5 u $ t € DATE: ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS DAVID ZUCKERMA r1 60 POMPTON AVE VERONA, NEW JERSEY #7801 L ` N CN I dC' HS ( LM rn 80 QV O �M vs 0 � LL 60 , QV aCa CL . // / / / /l,/ ::, / MEit I Q N V — D �J.O Z 7r \ , DO _... ...,.... C/) \ , , O M w : W : LL1 4 x 1 � sign \ V0 a� D Z sm'ti for i J s J pr Djqct c CO denEificotion;" , 1 • ..., \ ;f/ i r QCDI 00 : , I I ... RIA LI ( O ' O RIA l' + ,. 25 22 3 I PROP. ' TJM QV PROJECT VS Proposed 15' Landscape Buffer & SIGN 1 60A Utilitv Easement to be Dedicated by Plat WWOT slzE ILn /4, ` e i ro N N O SECTION GALLONAGE 00 LM �7 n L / I f; vALVE NG srzE ' ' 1 1 %f / r - (ji N 0 {� SEC710N GALLONAGE J .. /. 1 1/2" 50 _ :5 U O 0 2„ f .✓ I Y ' LL 1' ST2 EL L „ De*) , L ..__.: ..._., , / / / I Ed �. Qi /,,/.:......%%/ ......, , ......�/� _. /oi._.../// ////i._._/......✓/...../%////...-_//J////i/i .. /, ...../f.......�i////..... .//J//...... , /,, i ...../�// ...%moi �-� r f C / ¢ N m a s 0-......... �/� � I - 7NO CD f J .0° • \ -s ,,-"' J .) 1 r ,/�' SECn GALLONAGE : 5 /o v/ , , 5 1 4 \ QI a ' ,, , W v o tli 3 , .... . . ..... i C 1 f , , , \ v / I 5 J Q \�� w) 11 2 I '. .�/!�" 1 fi% SECTION GALLONAGE 2" O - F �� .' YALYE NO SIZE 0 •ry.'�i' a Vii .. . I / / >r % swnoN GALL GNAGE YALVE NIU12 i,JPro I ....posed 15 Landscape Buffer &LO, CD Utility Easement to be nedicntPd by Pintdh SECTION WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR BUBBLER HEAD NOT TO SCALE POP—UP SPRAY HEAD o 0 ON SWING JOINT ON SWING JOINT CID NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Q 1- CO O • 0 O It ' 0) co t` ca N c (lY CU , Z I U 0 , . 7 L 1 - i U U'). SYMBOL ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATIONS Q CV Ueneral Notes Q � U � Toro 570Z -6P -5F .38 GPM @ 30 PSI • n h Ian shall be installed in a separate sleeve b the � -7 � • 1. All Piping and control wires under paving as indicated o the Toro ro 5 7 0 Z 6 P 5 T . 2 9 - P 9 P 9 P P Y Q GPM @ 30 PS( - �> , installation �! final location of sleeving is determined the contractor will Idents in the field and coordinate Irrigation contractor. Once g identify_ • m , 'Toro 570Z-6P-5Ha) with the general contractor. .19 GPM @ 30 PSI 70 "Z L:.. 2. PIP Y a layout and sizes shown on this plan are Intended to indicate minimum design concepts. Toro 5702- 6P 5Q .09 GPM @ 30 PSI The irrigation contractor m modif zone configuration provided approval is granted by the owner 9 Y Y 9 � •2 and that all landscape areas recieve 100% coverage. I r to those shown on the drawings. PI es sizes not shown on the tans are resumed to be 1/2". _ _ 3. Pipe sizes shall conformP P P40 T �� Toro 5702 6P 10F 1.49 GPM @ 30 PSI The smallest pipe size permitted is 1/2". - co - PP _ p - 4. Final location of automatic by controller shall be approved b the owner. Toro 570Z-6PQ 1 .04 GPM @ 3 0 PSI b others. The irrigation — I ower source at the controller location shall beprovided - Toro 5702 6P 10H - 71 GPM @ , 5.120 vac electrical p Y 9 . 30 PSI contractor shall make final connection from the electrical source. Toro 570Z -6P -10Q 40 GPM heads and valves for optimum coverage and @ 30 PS I 6: The irrigation contractor shall flush and adjust all sprinklerp g �j,• m lish this the contractor may substitute minimum overspray onto walks streets etc.. In order to accomplish p y P Y P necessare variable arc nozzles in place of the specified fixed arc nozzles where ry. paved areas or outside of roe Imes n Is dia rammafic all piping, valves etc. shown within570Z-6P-12F 7. This design g P P 9, P property dY • Toro 2.19 'GPM @ 30 PSI or limits or work Is for design clarification only. and shall be Installed In planting areas where ever possible. LID Cl) oro — — 570Z 6P 12TQ 8. It is the resonsiblil of the irrigation contractor to familiarize himself with all grade differences, location of walls, retaining walls � Q 1.55 GPM @ 30 P S ( tY 9 II items damaged b his work. He shall coordinate with structures and utilities. The irrigation contractor shall repair or replace a m g y .Toro 570Z -6P -12H s sleeves and laterals through walls under roadways paving. 1.09 GPM @ 30 Psi other contractors for the location and installation of pipe I g y p g � pressure of 50 psi and a maximum flow demand of 50 m. The contractor 9. The spinkler system Is based upon a minimum operating press p gp . C9 oro 570Z -6P -12Q .50 GPM .@ 30 PSI shall verify water pressures prior to construction, report any difference between the water pressure indicated on the plans and the actual pressure reading at the point of connection to the owner. suction d 10. Do not willfullyInstall the sprinkler system as shown on the drawings when It obviousin the field that unknown ub tr s, grade differences P Y gg P or differences in the area dimensions exist that may not have been considered in the enginnenng. Such obstructions or differences should be Toro 570Z -615F 3.60 GPM @ 30 P S ( not performed, the contractor shall assume full res onsibli for an revisions. brought to the owner's attention. In the event this notification is o p p ty y Toro 570Z 6P 15T 2.60 GPM . . � Q @ 30 'PSI control wires and white for common wires No cross connection between controllers 11. Control wire shall be 14 1 of direct burial, colored red for con I , •x and connectors and sealant. shall be allowed. Wire splices shall be made only at valve boxes, using dri s a g lice p To r 0 570Z -6P -15H 1.65 GPM @ 30 PSI Cn installed as er manufactures recommendations / specifications. 12. All sprinkler equipment not otherwise detailed or specified shallbep p P Toro 5702 -6P - 15Q .85 GPM @ 30 PSICu To ro — 570 . Z 6 P 4CST 1 . 44 GPM @ 30 PSI 01111 Toro 5 0CD 7 Z 6P 4EST 1.44 GPM @ 30 PSI CD cu Rainbird 150— ED P ELECTRIC REMOTE—CONTROLL VALVE _ SCALE nts PROJECT N0, i • 9812 LSHEET 4 of p 4 • t , k , FINISHED GRADE AMTEK VALVE BOX �l 1/2" PVC RISER - a a a a (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) ELECTRIC VALVE CONTROL WIRE GATE VALVE FINISHED GRADE (USE WATERTIGHT POP-UP SPRAY HEAD CONNECTORS ON ! 0) ' ALL WIRES) 1 PVC THREADED COUPLER F_ 90' ELL -PVC SCHEDULE 40 " 1/2 STREET ELL 1/2" STREET ELL N 1/2" SCHED. 80 NIPPLE o w 1/2" SCHED. 80 NIPPLE •- OR RAINBIRD FLEXPIPE Z Z I TO SPRINKLERS OR RAINBIRD FLEXPIPE OR TORO FUNNY PIPE OR TORO FUNNY PIPE iv (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) w SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE CK LENGTH AS REQUIRED) - MAIN LINE FITTING p U 1/2" STREET ELL 1 2" STREET ELL D / PVC TEE N i PVC TEE MAIN SUPPLY LINE t.,c ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE - PVC LATERAL LINE --/PVC LATERAL LINE WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR BUBBLER HEAD NOT TO SCALE POP—UP SPRAY HEAD o 0 ON SWING JOINT ON SWING JOINT CID NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Q 1- CO O • 0 O It ' 0) co t` ca N c (lY CU , Z I U 0 , . 7 L 1 - i U U'). SYMBOL ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATIONS Q CV Ueneral Notes Q � U � Toro 570Z -6P -5F .38 GPM @ 30 PSI • n h Ian shall be installed in a separate sleeve b the � -7 � • 1. All Piping and control wires under paving as indicated o the Toro ro 5 7 0 Z 6 P 5 T . 2 9 - P 9 P 9 P P Y Q GPM @ 30 PS( - �> , installation �! final location of sleeving is determined the contractor will Idents in the field and coordinate Irrigation contractor. Once g identify_ • m , 'Toro 570Z-6P-5Ha) with the general contractor. .19 GPM @ 30 PSI 70 "Z L:.. 2. PIP Y a layout and sizes shown on this plan are Intended to indicate minimum design concepts. Toro 5702- 6P 5Q .09 GPM @ 30 PSI The irrigation contractor m modif zone configuration provided approval is granted by the owner 9 Y Y 9 � •2 and that all landscape areas recieve 100% coverage. I r to those shown on the drawings. PI es sizes not shown on the tans are resumed to be 1/2". _ _ 3. Pipe sizes shall conformP P P40 T �� Toro 5702 6P 10F 1.49 GPM @ 30 PSI The smallest pipe size permitted is 1/2". - co - PP _ p - 4. Final location of automatic by controller shall be approved b the owner. Toro 570Z-6PQ 1 .04 GPM @ 3 0 PSI b others. The irrigation — I ower source at the controller location shall beprovided - Toro 5702 6P 10H - 71 GPM @ , 5.120 vac electrical p Y 9 . 30 PSI contractor shall make final connection from the electrical source. Toro 570Z -6P -10Q 40 GPM heads and valves for optimum coverage and @ 30 PS I 6: The irrigation contractor shall flush and adjust all sprinklerp g �j,• m lish this the contractor may substitute minimum overspray onto walks streets etc.. In order to accomplish p y P Y P necessare variable arc nozzles in place of the specified fixed arc nozzles where ry. paved areas or outside of roe Imes n Is dia rammafic all piping, valves etc. shown within570Z-6P-12F 7. This design g P P 9, P property dY • Toro 2.19 'GPM @ 30 PSI or limits or work Is for design clarification only. and shall be Installed In planting areas where ever possible. LID Cl) oro — — 570Z 6P 12TQ 8. It is the resonsiblil of the irrigation contractor to familiarize himself with all grade differences, location of walls, retaining walls � Q 1.55 GPM @ 30 P S ( tY 9 II items damaged b his work. He shall coordinate with structures and utilities. The irrigation contractor shall repair or replace a m g y .Toro 570Z -6P -12H s sleeves and laterals through walls under roadways paving. 1.09 GPM @ 30 Psi other contractors for the location and installation of pipe I g y p g � pressure of 50 psi and a maximum flow demand of 50 m. The contractor 9. The spinkler system Is based upon a minimum operating press p gp . C9 oro 570Z -6P -12Q .50 GPM .@ 30 PSI shall verify water pressures prior to construction, report any difference between the water pressure indicated on the plans and the actual pressure reading at the point of connection to the owner. suction d 10. Do not willfullyInstall the sprinkler system as shown on the drawings when It obviousin the field that unknown ub tr s, grade differences P Y gg P or differences in the area dimensions exist that may not have been considered in the enginnenng. Such obstructions or differences should be Toro 570Z -615F 3.60 GPM @ 30 P S ( not performed, the contractor shall assume full res onsibli for an revisions. brought to the owner's attention. In the event this notification is o p p ty y Toro 570Z 6P 15T 2.60 GPM . . � Q @ 30 'PSI control wires and white for common wires No cross connection between controllers 11. Control wire shall be 14 1 of direct burial, colored red for con I , •x and connectors and sealant. shall be allowed. Wire splices shall be made only at valve boxes, using dri s a g lice p To r 0 570Z -6P -15H 1.65 GPM @ 30 PSI Cn installed as er manufactures recommendations / specifications. 12. All sprinkler equipment not otherwise detailed or specified shallbep p P Toro 5702 -6P - 15Q .85 GPM @ 30 PSICu To ro — 570 . Z 6 P 4CST 1 . 44 GPM @ 30 PSI 01111 Toro 5 0CD 7 Z 6P 4EST 1.44 GPM @ 30 PSI CD cu Rainbird 150— ED P ELECTRIC REMOTE—CONTROLL VALVE _ SCALE nts PROJECT N0, i • 9812 LSHEET 4 of p 4 • t , k , �l - a a a a a 0) 1 F_ N w •- Z Z w w CK p U p t.,c WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR BUBBLER HEAD NOT TO SCALE POP—UP SPRAY HEAD o 0 ON SWING JOINT ON SWING JOINT CID NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Q 1- CO O • 0 O It ' 0) co t` ca N c (lY CU , Z I U 0 , . 7 L 1 - i U U'). SYMBOL ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATIONS Q CV Ueneral Notes Q � U � Toro 570Z -6P -5F .38 GPM @ 30 PSI • n h Ian shall be installed in a separate sleeve b the � -7 � • 1. All Piping and control wires under paving as indicated o the Toro ro 5 7 0 Z 6 P 5 T . 2 9 - P 9 P 9 P P Y Q GPM @ 30 PS( - �> , installation �! final location of sleeving is determined the contractor will Idents in the field and coordinate Irrigation contractor. Once g identify_ • m , 'Toro 570Z-6P-5Ha) with the general contractor. .19 GPM @ 30 PSI 70 "Z L:.. 2. PIP Y a layout and sizes shown on this plan are Intended to indicate minimum design concepts. Toro 5702- 6P 5Q .09 GPM @ 30 PSI The irrigation contractor m modif zone configuration provided approval is granted by the owner 9 Y Y 9 � •2 and that all landscape areas recieve 100% coverage. I r to those shown on the drawings. PI es sizes not shown on the tans are resumed to be 1/2". _ _ 3. Pipe sizes shall conformP P P40 T �� Toro 5702 6P 10F 1.49 GPM @ 30 PSI The smallest pipe size permitted is 1/2". - co - PP _ p - 4. Final location of automatic by controller shall be approved b the owner. Toro 570Z-6PQ 1 .04 GPM @ 3 0 PSI b others. The irrigation — I ower source at the controller location shall beprovided - Toro 5702 6P 10H - 71 GPM @ , 5.120 vac electrical p Y 9 . 30 PSI contractor shall make final connection from the electrical source. Toro 570Z -6P -10Q 40 GPM heads and valves for optimum coverage and @ 30 PS I 6: The irrigation contractor shall flush and adjust all sprinklerp g �j,• m lish this the contractor may substitute minimum overspray onto walks streets etc.. In order to accomplish p y P Y P necessare variable arc nozzles in place of the specified fixed arc nozzles where ry. paved areas or outside of roe Imes n Is dia rammafic all piping, valves etc. shown within570Z-6P-12F 7. This design g P P 9, P property dY • Toro 2.19 'GPM @ 30 PSI or limits or work Is for design clarification only. and shall be Installed In planting areas where ever possible. LID Cl) oro — — 570Z 6P 12TQ 8. It is the resonsiblil of the irrigation contractor to familiarize himself with all grade differences, location of walls, retaining walls � Q 1.55 GPM @ 30 P S ( tY 9 II items damaged b his work. He shall coordinate with structures and utilities. The irrigation contractor shall repair or replace a m g y .Toro 570Z -6P -12H s sleeves and laterals through walls under roadways paving. 1.09 GPM @ 30 Psi other contractors for the location and installation of pipe I g y p g � pressure of 50 psi and a maximum flow demand of 50 m. The contractor 9. The spinkler system Is based upon a minimum operating press p gp . C9 oro 570Z -6P -12Q .50 GPM .@ 30 PSI shall verify water pressures prior to construction, report any difference between the water pressure indicated on the plans and the actual pressure reading at the point of connection to the owner. suction d 10. Do not willfullyInstall the sprinkler system as shown on the drawings when It obviousin the field that unknown ub tr s, grade differences P Y gg P or differences in the area dimensions exist that may not have been considered in the enginnenng. Such obstructions or differences should be Toro 570Z -615F 3.60 GPM @ 30 P S ( not performed, the contractor shall assume full res onsibli for an revisions. brought to the owner's attention. In the event this notification is o p p ty y Toro 570Z 6P 15T 2.60 GPM . . � Q @ 30 'PSI control wires and white for common wires No cross connection between controllers 11. Control wire shall be 14 1 of direct burial, colored red for con I , •x and connectors and sealant. shall be allowed. Wire splices shall be made only at valve boxes, using dri s a g lice p To r 0 570Z -6P -15H 1.65 GPM @ 30 PSI Cn installed as er manufactures recommendations / specifications. 12. All sprinkler equipment not otherwise detailed or specified shallbep p P Toro 5702 -6P - 15Q .85 GPM @ 30 PSICu To ro — 570 . Z 6 P 4CST 1 . 44 GPM @ 30 PSI 01111 Toro 5 0CD 7 Z 6P 4EST 1.44 GPM @ 30 PSI CD cu Rainbird 150— ED P ELECTRIC REMOTE—CONTROLL VALVE _ SCALE nts PROJECT N0, i • 9812 LSHEET 4 of p 4 • t , k ,