P & Z - 05/08/2001 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Bond called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. A moment of silent meditation
was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. A quorum was declared present.
PRESENT: Chairman Bond, Vice Chairman Landefeld, Members Christoefl, Golden,
Matthys, McKey, Miller (arrived 7:32 p.m.), Rhodus and West. Also
present were Planning Director Wagner, Principal Planner Lewis, Senior
Planner McGinnis, City Attorney Rosenthal, Chief Assistant City
Attorney Cookson, and Deputy City Clerk Green.
ABSENT: None.
CONSENT AGENDA
The consent agenda consisted of approval of Item A:
A. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting held on
Tuesday, April 10, 2001.
i • i .'r : 1 • • - en. - .y Member Rhodus. move to accept the
Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried 8 -0. (Member Miller had not yet arrived.)
NEW BUSINESS
Members West and Golden disclosed conflicts of interest on the Avanti Rezoning and
Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP). Their Memoranda of Voting Conflicts are
attached.
Member West said he had a conflict of interest because most of the subject property is
owned by his father. He said he would not be voting or commenting.
Member Golden said he is employed by the engineer of record, Hartman and Associates,
and had been briefed on the project. He said he would abstain from voting on both
matters, but he did wish to participate in the meeting.
Chairman Bond asked if those who had conflicts of interest could participate in
discussion and City Attorney Rosenthal confirmed that they could.
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
AVANTI/WEST GROVES REZONING - CASE NO. RZ - 00 -04 -01 PUBLIC HEARING
Senior Planner McGinnis presented the Staff Report for the proposed rezoning of the
subject property (a portion of the West Groves) which is located north of the Coke
Property, west of Ocoee - Apopka Road. The Avanti /West Groves PSP comprises
approximately 383.1 acres, a majority of which is zoned R -1AA, and the remainder
zoned R -3, Multiple- Family Dwelling District, and C -2, Community Commercial
District. She explained the requested rezoning was to reconfigure the R -3 and C -2
parcels to accommodate the realignment of Clarcona -Ocoee Road (a.k.a. West Road) in
order to align with the new entrance. She said the rezoning will not result in an increase
in the C -2 or R -3 acreage and is therefore a de minimis change. Ms. McGinnis said Staff
finds the proposed rezoning consistent with Ocoee's: (1) Comprehensive Plan; (2) Future
Land Use Map; (3) Land Development Code; (4) Joint Planning Area Agreement with
Orange County; and (5) surrounding land uses and zoning classifications. She concluded
with Staff's recommendation for approval of the requested rezoning to reconfigure the
R1 -AA, C -2, and R -3 parcels as shown in Exhibit "A" to the staff report.
The public hearing was opened. As no one wished to speak, the public hearing was
closed.
Member Matthys asked why the rezoning was not done under the PUD process. Ms.
McGinnis said as a de minimis rezoning with no change in acreage, it could be
accomplished more quickly this way, rather than as a PUD rezoning.
Responding to a question by Member McKey, Ms. McGinnis said the reasons for the
reconfiguration as proposed would become clear as the PSP was considered.
As had been recommended by Staff, Vice Chairman Landefeld, seconded by M ember
Rhodus move s that Plannin' an. Zonin ■ ommi ion r- • mmend .. r s val of the
Avanti /W-st r•v-s R-zonin• a e •. RZ- 01 -14 -01 to r- •nfi• r- the R1 -AA C -2
and ' -3 • ar -1 as hewn in Exhibi "A" e f the staff r- . ort. Motion arri - s 7 -0 with
Members West and Golden abstaining_
AVANTI/WEST GROVES PUBLIC HEARING
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN, PROJECT No. LS- 2000 -002
Principal Planner Lewis presented the Staff Report for the proposed Preliminary
Subdivision Plan for the 383.1 acre Avanti /West Groves site. The property is located on
the eastern shore of Lake Apopka, west of Ocoee - Apopka Road, just north of the
Western Beltway. Its southern edge abuts the northern boundary of the tract commonly
2
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
known as the "Coke Property." The Master Plan for the site provides for a private gated
residential community with a total of 512 single family lots to be constructed in five
phases. The developer of the single family portion does not plan to develop the two
additional parcels which will be set aside for commercial and multifamily development in
the southeastern portion of the site. The site includes 58 acres of wetlands which lie
primarily along the shore of Lake Apopka and the southern and northeastern boundaries
of the property. Most of the subject property has R -1 -AA zoning (336.4 acres), except
for the southeastern portion of the site which has a combination of C -2 (23.0 acres) and
R -3 zoning (23.7 acres). A rezoning application has been submitted concurrently with
the PSP in order to make minor changes to the boundaries of the areas zoned C -2 and R -3
to conform with the boundaries shown on the subdivision plan.
The PSP provides for road access via an extension of West Road on the west side of
Ocoee Apopka Road. The single family area will be accessed from the main entrance via
the West Road Extension, a secondary entrance near the north end of the site from Ocoee
Apopka Road, and pedestrian access connecting to adjacent property to the east.
There will be a six foot wall with appropriate landscaping along the boundary of the
subdivision adjacent to the West Road Extension. The R -1 -AA zoning requires a
minimum lot width of 75 feet and minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, but the
developer intends to provide a mixture of lot sizes within the subdivisions, with larger
lots at the north end of the site.
Recreation amenities include an 8 foot sidewalk along one side of the spine road and
along the shore of Lake Apopka, a 6+ acre Community Park with a
clubhouse /community room, ballfields and other active recreation.
Mr. Lewis then addressed five unique issues for the project as noted below.
Wetlands
More than 50 of the 58 acres of wetlands on the property will be preserved, untouched by
the proposed development and dedicated to the City. They are proposing to utilize some
of the wetlands in their stormwater management and to do it in such a way that it will
enhance the wetlands. The Land Development Code does not allow development within
wetlands. The only exceptions have generally been for construction of essential road
improvements. This exception would apply to natural wetlands impacted by construction
of the northern entrance road. He said Staff will consider the proposal if the St. Johns
River Water Management District confirms that the Developer will be enhancing the
wetlands. Even then it is an important policy issue for the City Commission and will
require a waiver from Code requirements. The Conditions of Approval in the PSP
3
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
address this issue, indicating that if the City's concerns are not satisfied, the subdivision
will have to be redesigned to avoid these wetland impacts.
Northern Entrance
The subdivision plan provides for a fully operational secondary access at the north end of
the subdivision with an extension of West Groves Boulevard eastward to Ocoee Apopka
Road, to be constructed with the later phases of the development. The Plan shows two
potential routes across the wetland area. Another issue related to the construction of the
northern entrance road is timing - when it will be built and who will build it. The
northern entrance shown on the plans is now two lanes, but Staff strongly believes that it
should be three lanes, with a by -pass lane for residents to get around in case a visitor is
having trouble getting through the gate, and to provide for a turn- around in case someone
cannot get through the gate.
100 -Year Flood Plain
Some of the proposed development in the final phase of the subdivision (several lots and
portions of a road) encroaches upon the current 100 year flood plain as shown on the
FEMA map. The Project Engineer believes that the flood plain as currently shown on the
FEMA map is not shown correctly. The Developer will submit an application to have the
FEMA map changed. If it is not changed, the PSP will have to be revised prior to
submittal of the FSP for the final phase.
West Road Extension
The Conditions of Approval provide that the Developer will dedicate all of the 120' road
right -of -way for the West Road Extension. The Developer of the Avanti /West Groves
subdivision and the developers of the parcels zoned C -2 and R -3 will be responsible for
constructing the road and utilities, in phases, between Ocoee Apopka Road and the main
entrance to the single family subdivision. The southern portion will be developed when
the Coke property is developed.
Ocoee Apopka Road Improvements
Most of the improvements will be done by either the County when it realigns the eastern
side of Ocoee Apopka Road or by the City to make sure that the intersection
improvements and traffic signals are all in place to serve this subdivision, the commercial
property adjacent to it, and also the Coke Property to the south.
Mr. Lewis said three proposed waivers from normal Code requirements have been
requested and are supported by Staff:
4
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
1. The first waiver is related to the maximum block length of 1,000 feet, which is being
requested because there is a loop road within one of the villages that is up to 1,650
feet long.
2. The second waiver is related to the maximum building coverage on a lot (35 %). The
Developer is requesting a maximum of 40% lot coverage with a larger minimum
living area requirement.
3. The third waiver is related to the limitation on development within wetlands. Staff
supports this waiver only if the SJRWMD confirms they are enhancing the wetlands,
not just using the wetlands.
On April 16, 2001, the DRC considered the project and voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the PSP including the proposed waivers, subject to making
certain revisions on the plans and to the Conditions of Approvals. Most of the DRC
requirements have now been satisfactorily addressed in these plans and the document
titled Additional Conditions of Approval Related to Development Agreement Provisions
to be Added to Conditions of Approval (5/02/01).
Mr. Lewis concluded with the Staff recommendation for approval subject to the
proposed waivers noted above and to four conditions included in the motion at
conclusion of consideration of this item. The recommended conditions will bring the
plans into compliance with all of the requirements recommended by the DRC.
The public hearing was opened.
Howard Lefkowitz, the developer, representing Avanti Investment Group, presented
their project assisted by William Musser, the engineer, of Hartman & Associates, Inc.
Mr. Lefkowitz said he was an independent developer who works in conjunction with
Avanti and that he has been developing in the greater Orlando area since 1976.
Mr. Lefkowitz said the project had been two years in work and design. He said only
35% of the 512 lots will be 75' wide, 50% of lots will be no less than 85' x 120', and
15% of the lots that remain are in excess of 90' x 120'. He said nine of those are almost
half -acre lots in order to provide major tree preservation.
He said the project is intended to be a private community totally controlled and operated
by a single homeowners' association (HOA). It will be structured with mechanisms to
accommodate obligations concerning parking, protection of wetlands, maintenance of
drainage systems, walls and landscaping. The HOA documents will be reviewed by staff
to confirm the necessary items to manage the association are in place and also the
5
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
obligations under which they have agreed to abide are also appropriately documented. In
addition to fund raising and fund management, the HOA will have an architectural
review board. He said he will be chairman of the association until everything is built.
He said the community is designed as a series of villages, but will have one HOA. All
512 lot owners will have use and entitlement and obligation for support of all of the
common areas including the amenity packages. Each community will have its own entry
walls, name, and identity. He said the design provided a 50' buffer all along the lake and
the wetlands which will be for public meeting use, enjoyment and access.
Mr. Lefkowitz said amenities will include a pool and bathhouse, a community meeting
room of no less than 1,000 square feet available for use of all 512 lot owners, soccer and
softball fields, basketball court, sand volleyball court, tot lot, tennis court, pedestrian
covered pier into the lake. He said a premier but more subtle amenity is the
bicycle /paving /jogging recreational trail which will be approximately two miles long
running through the community.
Mr. Lefkowitz said they have emphasized the environmental aspects, incorporating
some of FOLA's (Friends of Lake Apopka) recommendations. He noted the 50' setback
from the wetlands and the lake. He said the HOA documents will require use of lake
friendly fertilization and pest control application in all lots that may develop runoff
toward wetlands or the lake.
Mr. Lefkowitz pointed out several benefits they believe the City would derive from their
proj ect:
• Donation of all of their wetlands to the SJRWMD or the City.
• Boat access to Lake Apopka from their property adjacent to Coke Property to be
developed by the City.
• Formal access into Coke Property.
• Drainage systems to accommodate stormwater for property dedicated to the City.
• Two extra paved lanes from the entry to the residential property to CR 437.
• Utility line extension at a cost of $1.4M (shared with Orange County) to enable
service to the Coke Property and beyond.
• Donation to City the parcel known as the finger as a public right -of -way for natural
access and collector for adjacent developments.
• Pedestrian access from future adjacent properties through their privately owned
streets and sidewalk systems to accommodate potential access needs to schools when
they are created on the Coke Property.
Mr. Lefkowitz said the West Groves project has been two years and two months into
City review. They will execute a developer's agreement and related conditions of
6
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
approval that reflect over 50 individual development commitments above and beyond
typical land development. He said they are very proud of the project they designed and
believe that West Groves presents the best possible community presentation that the City
of Ocoee has yet experienced.
Dr. Jay Exxum, of Glatting Jackson, lead environmentalist for the project, explained
their restoration and management strategy for the site. He said their plan includes
removing noxious vegetation along the fringes of the wetlands where they are proposing
stormwater ponds, and restoring the native canopy and understory vegetation in the 50'
buffer. He said over 50 of the 58 acres of wetlands will be preserved and set in
conservation easement.
Dr. Exxum said having the wetland nuisance vegetation removal included in the
SJRWMD permit would require that they monitor, maintain, and meet certain standards
for at least five years and to meet certain criteria established in the permit in perpetuity.
Chairman Bond gave the gavel to Vice Chairman Landefeld as she left the dais at 8:35
p.m. She retrieved the gavel when she returned at 8:40 p.m.
As no members of the public wished to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Member McKey asked if the homeowners association documents would be evaluated by
the City's attorney, and City Attorney Rosenthal said they review the association
documents for all subdivisions.
Member McKey asked about the wall, and Mr. Lefkowitz said they plan a Palm Beach
type stucco wall with full landscaping. Mr. McKey said in his experience masonry walls
with stucco have not been satisfactory over a long period of time. He asked that Staff
reconsider that recommendation.
Member Christoefl suggested the wall near the R -3 parcel should be put in now rather
than later. Mr. Lefkowitz said an orange grove will provide a very nice buffer until
something occurs on the property. Attorney Rosenthal said development of the multi-
family will require a large scale site plan which would come before Planning and Zoning
Commission, and they could not get their certificates of completion without constructing
the wall.
Member Christoefl said she thought all amenities should be in place before the first
house is sold.
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
Member Christoefl also expressed concern about completion dates and City Attorney
Rosenthal explained how they would be addressed in the Development Agreement.
Member Christoefl asked if there were any reason there could not have been a boat
access added to the subdivision. Mr. Lefkowitz said they decided they would have no
private property ownership and they did not want to impact the lake from that standpoint.
He said plans for a major recreation facility on the Coke Property seemed to negate the
need for them to deal with it. She commended them for including soccer fields.
Member Christoefl asked if any lighting was planned on the 50' buffer. Mr. Lefkowitz
said they felt it would be inappropriate because the community is insulated from outside
traffic. He said if it should become a problem, the homeowners' association could
address it.
Member Matthys asked if the wall between the R -3 and the single family would be the
responsibility of the R -3 developer. Mr. Lefkowitz said yes, the property would
probably be sold to a professional multi - family developer, and, at this time, it is the intent
to sell the commercial property as well.
Mr. Matthys commended the applicant and the staff for a great job. He said he thought
the project was beautiful, very innovative, and very esthetically pleasing.
Member Golden asked about the development proposed in the 100 year flood plain.
Bill Musser, of Hartman & Associates, responded they are confident the flood plain
delineation on the FEMA map will change when FEMA has better topographical
information. He said the map change process may require six months to one year.
Member Golden asked Dr. Exxum about maintenance of the wetlands when they are
restored. Dr. Exxum said they are hoping that after five years it will be a fairly stable
system. He said their responsibility to keep nuisance plants to less than 10% in the
wetland creation areas will go on until the SJRWMD concludes that it is stable. Until
SJRWMD believes that it is stable, they will have to remove exotics, ensure the survival
of the planted natives and ensure the function of the stormwater system as well.
Chairman Bond said she thinks the overall project is very appealing. She said she
would have liked to have seen a boat dock and marina slips. She expressed appreciation
for larger lots, but said she does not like the idea of increasing building size on the lot
from 35% to 40% of lot. Mr. Lefkowitz said they are not asking to increase lot
coverage.
8
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
Chairman Bond asked at what point in time the elementary, middle and high schools are
going to be addressed. Planning Director Wagner said they are now hiring an
engineering consultant to do the master plan for the Coke Property. The School Board
has immediate plans to design and construct the high school which they hope to have
open within two years. The elementary school is totally dependent on filling it with
students. Attorney Rosenthal said in this instance, because of the City and School
Board joint effort on the Coke Property, we do have a site for an elementary school
adjacent to this property.
Chairman Bond asked about water and sewer service for the property. Mr. Lefkowitz
said they have executed a separate agreement with Orange County utilizing their plants
on McCormick Road. The developer will install lines adequate to cover their needs plus
upgrade sizes specified by the County. Mr. Wagner said this area has always been in
the Orange County service area.
Chairman Bond asked about a fire facility in the area. Mr. Wagner said they have
discussed a joint fire and police department training facility. She asked if the basic
police and fire stations will come on line simultaneously with the first selling of the
individual lots. Mr. Wagner said probably not, but that a temporary arrangement could
be made if response should become a concern.
Chairman Bond commended Mr. Lefkowitz for a very good presentation.
Vice Chairman Landefeld asked how many trees can be saved. Mr. Lefkowitz said the
only tree stand other than orange grove is in the area committed to 20,000 square foot
lots, and preservation of trees on that property is addressed in the Conditions of
Approval.
Mr. Landefeld asked if there would be fences around the tot lot. Mr. Lefkowitz said
there will not be fences around the tot lot, but there will be fences around the pool with
lock access. He said they position the tot lot so that a mother can sit under cover in an
open building and have visibility toward the tot lot and the pool.
Mr. Landefeld asked if there would be fences around retention ponds and if the ponds
will be adequate to accommodate rains from hurricanes. Mr. Musser said, as to fences,
only the wet detention pond will be of concern and he explained that it will have the
recovery zone as required by the state. Mr. Musser said they must comply with a 100
year 24 hour storm (or 11 inches of rainfall). Mr. Musser said they have rainfall records
back to almost the 1890's and they know the lake elevations achieved in Hurricane
Donna and Tropical Storm Gordon which were close to 100 year storm events. He said
their ponds and berms will be up above the peak stages of the lake.
9
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
Mr. Landefeld asked if they were coordinated with restoration of Lake Apopka. Mr.
Musser said they will mandate that the HOA use no phosphates in their fertilizer and
their stormwater systems will be a two pond system to provide water quality treatment
and then a final polishing.
Member Rhodus recalled problems with water moccasins in the area in the past, and
expressed concern that they might be a problem near the boardwalk and retention ponds.
Dr. Exxum said water moccasins are often confused with a harmless water snake which
is more prevalent than cottonmouths. He said cottonmouths are very much aquatic
animals and might be in the ponds, but are unlikely to go as far up slope as the board
walk.
Member Miller said she thought it would be a great project. She said her concern was
the impact on transportation in the area, especially on 437, and asked if it would be
looked at in connection with a traffic study. Mr. Wagner said a complete traffic study
had been done as part of this project. He said there is available capacity on that road
today, and that the road is projected for four lanes in the future.
Member West had no comments.
Member McKey asked if there would be a fence or wall between the board walk and the
adjacent residential properties. Mr. Lefkowitz said it was not contemplated, but that
would not inhibit the landowner from installing one if they wish.
Member McKey asked if there would be gated access to the West Orange Trail. Mr.
Lefkowitz said none was planned and Mr. McKey said he thought Staff should look at it
again.
As had been recommended by Staff, Vice Chairman Landefeld, seconded by
Chairman Bond, moved that Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of
the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for the Avanti /West Groves subdivision, Project LS-
2100 -112 in ludin. th- .r... ed waiv -rs as date stam.ed receive .. th- it on Ma
2 2001, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the attached document titled Additional Conditions of Approval Related to
Develo. • t A.r•e - t Prov• '• s to be As • •d to ondi isns o As •rov• /2/01
shall be included on Sheet 3d of the Plan set under that title.
2. That the design of West Groves Boulevard at the northern entrance gate on the
eastern • . • e of Phas - 4 and hall be re is- d to • ra. hi all sho w three lanes tw.
10
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
lan - s in an e .n- lan- . t with an as - • .ate v - hi le turnaro.nd to or 'yid- for a full
operational secondary access to the entire subdivision.
3. That all he remainin' iss es i.entifi- in th- m-m. from ott ..kson Assistant
i Att.rne • .t - . Ma 3 2101 hall . - ati f. eril a.dre s- I a soon as
possible following City Commission approval of the PSP.
4. That a D- v-1 .m-nt A'r- -m-nt in ..ora in. all .f th- .ro.o - Conditions of
Approval and Additional Conditions of Approval as attached and amended b the
Ci Attorne be executed b the develo , er and said Conditions of An royal be
incorporated within the Preliminary Subdivision Plan.
Motion carried 7 -0 with Members West and Golden abstaining.
Mr. Lefkowitz said they were proud of what they had presented. He said it was a mutual
effort and that a great deal of the good parts of the project was the result of Mr. Wagner's
input.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
OTHER BUSINESS
None.
COMMENTS
Member Rhodus asked what was happening with the Washington Mutual Bank project.
Mr. Wagner explained their process which prioritizes projects based on date of receipt
and on construction status. He said they are very well aware of the Washington Mutual
Bank project and that her interest was noted.
Planning Director Wagner announced that the June 12, 2001, Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. to consider one or two regular items of
business (if needed). A Joint Work Session with City Commission will follow at 7:30
p.m. to hear three developers give informal presentations for their projects to receive
initial reaction/direction from the boards. He said it would be a public meeting and
notices would be sent to neighboring residents. He said the boards would not make any
decision, as the purpose was to elicit information and comments and reaction from the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Commission. The projects to be
considered are the Dill property on Clarcona -Ocoee Road (300 to 400 acres), a
commercial project proposed by Gordon Nutt for property at Moore and Maguire, and an
11
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting
May 8, 2001
industrial area on Lakewood Avenue. While there will be no formal staff reports, Staff
will provide background information so members will know what the issues are on each
of these projects from the City's perspective.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Attest: APPROVED:
Ma Green, Deputy City Clerk P. t Bond, C airman dig 0
12
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST v e l et NAME DI/ NAME Pi! // ry O &,eg C /' �S , AUTHORITY, 20/0 4/0 TOE "1`
MAILI DDRESI •' THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
N 1 3 �/ D, /0 y WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
IKCITY
CITY � �� �,/ � � / ((,! OUNTY U COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
i � /,� f �j NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
�(VFj
DATE ON iCH VOTE O RRED s D , �/ MY POSITION IS:
/ �� -� / / /- 0 U ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
M 1 ) N___14 _ —, hereby disclose that on _ Q, 20 P_L_:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
___ inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
i1 inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, FAktY____— ,
inured to the special gain or loss of , by
whom I am retained; or
-_ inured to the special gain or loss of , which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
vA-077 ReaLomim (C45e No, d�, -oo —o0
7 • 42/14124 4Le_ 14)42, pasos
e t4 m i.e.,1t 4A44 ;fre
5" li /oP1 - - - -- - --
------- /4),147— -
D Filed Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST AME -FI ST NAME - MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCI O MISSION, AyTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
y es- --rho i4 M� H - .' c 2c fie- i9 -rvNi� ��awi C' Mm
MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
P o . le 1 S �/ l WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
CITY �+ V CQ�INTY )(CITY Li COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
C/ 0 G C � C NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
DATE ON WH VOTE OCCU�E�D 0 v'
MA` TE I O C : MY POSITION IS:
❑ ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
r /
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, V/ o / _ L1p/"U — �'1LI< / -, hereby disclose that on _ - -- /r , -- - -, 20 0 l _:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
___ inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, - -_ —_ —_ — _-- _- -__ —__ __— _;
A inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ____
___ inured to the special gain or loss of - -_ , by
whom I am retained; or
___ inured to the special gain or loss of - -_ _ - - -_, which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
*✓ ' / W e , G-, -Dv e-
,� ,�� �•�c, Na y. r s K 6 d 1 11/ " Ste "/ ` P1�-rw
P 03 C.t NO e 5- A 00 OD IN,
." ' A .0 44 441 . 4AI-7
r44/' ot4 co-al a-6 A44-47Lig „ ,
4e.&
/ipt Doi
•
Date Filed Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST N9ME - NAME-MIDDLE NAME NAME OFBOARD COUNCIL, M
C MI SION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
MAILING A S THE (` BOARD, COUN, COM
C MISSIO OR COMMITTEE ON
( � (� WHICH I SERVE IS A
CITY y � COUNTY WHICH
❑ COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
NAME OF POLITICAL 0
���
UBDIVISION:
C ■
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS:
8 ) 20) I ❑ ELECTIVE X
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, (Tv , hereby disclose that on , 20
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
___ inured to my special private gain or loss;
___ inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ,t �,.
inured to the special gain or loss of 'C 4'Y e, t (`�1� f C- ' S ' , by
whom I am retained; or
___ inured to the special gain or loss of _ _. ____, which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency
v
gency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
!
6436-e_ _ ((( 12 oo - o `f - o (
cy2h
- 74aZ
-- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - - --
Date Filed Si. • . ure
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME-FIRST -MIDD� A� � NP,p�E OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMIS �, w AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
` l J �y v` f
• • 1 Y C�4�Y�Vw -ry 4
MAILING ADDRES r p� ` THE BOARD, COUNT COMMISSION, AUTHORI OR COMMITTEE ON • Q � -1.-- E a" � / 5+9 V `- �V'-Cf xi WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT ❑ COUNTY ❑ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY, COUNTY J7`f(` C
Ote-eAr-- NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: CO
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED a MY POSITION IS:
�'�[.v o , 'top � ❑ ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE
U
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA. STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting: and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
AJ _
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
�
l mil S . 6-v hereby disclose that on 20 0
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
___ inured to my special private gain or loss;
___ inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
___ inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
_—_ inured to the special gain or loss of_ k , by
whom I am retained; or
___ inured to the special gain or loss of , which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest iin�the measure is as follows:
y S c ' '1 ( �i ( e
mom. 5 cl k- v t s
z3
2-ao AP'
Date Filed Si:. - . e
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2