Item VI (A)(1 & 2) Architect Selection - Municipal Complex (1) 15 Minute Presentations by Each Firm (2) Ranking of Firms and Authorization to Proceed with Negotiations with Top-Ranked Firm AGENDA 6-16-92
"CENTER OF GOOD LIVING-PRIDE OF WEST ORANGE" Item VI A 1 & 2
Ocoee ---------
�: r:jiI: L CITY OF OCOEE RUSTY JOHNSON
0.a 150 N.LAKESHORE DRIVE PAUL W.FOSTER
Co O O OCOEE FLORIDA 34761
(407)656-2322 VERN COMBS
SAM WOODSON
f�,`. OF 0000 ,` CITY MANAGER
ELLIS SHAPIRO
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners
FROM: Montye E. Beamer, Director of Administrative Services--?1, -;Per-
DATE:
ervices ,
DATE: June 4, 1992
SUBJECT: ARCHITECT SELECTION - MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
On May 29 , 1992 , the City Commission received the list of seven who
submitted proposals for the Architectural Services for the
Municipal Complex. Attached as Exhibit 1 is the detailed
evaluation on each proposer. The evaluation was based upon the RFP
criteria .
The four short-listed proposals were also made available on May 29 ,
1992; their ranking was as follows:
( 1 ) C. T . Hsu & Associates
( 2 ) William Zettel & Associates
( 3 ) Stottler, Stagg & Associates
( 4) The Scott Companies
These top four firms were given copies of the Ocoee space needs
assessment study. Each firm made arrangements to review the
conceptual design before their oral presentations to the Architect
Selection Committee on April 24, 1992 . Areas requested to be
covered during presentations included:
( 1 ) Suggestions for best approach to renovation/new construction;
( 2 ) Response to Space Needs Assessment (adequacy of future space ) ;
( 3 ) Reaction to the conceptual design - how does it fit their
review of the City' s needs assessment and their concept of the
site?
On Wednesday April 29 , 1992 , the Committee discussed these written
proposals and oral presentations according to the criteria listed
in Exhibit 2 . This analysis included the firm' s apparent knowledge
of the space needs and site opportunities . Site visits were
at
arranged for the Committee to review structures designed by these
Architects .
On June 5 , 1992 , the Committee ranked the four based upon written
proposals, oral presentations, reference investigation (Exhibit 3 )
and site visits . The rankings are as follows :
( 1 ) C. T. Hsu & Associates
( 2 ) William Zettel & Associates
( 3 ) Stottler, Stagg & Associates
( 4 ) The Scott Companies
Additionally, these firms were made aware of a presentation to the
Commission on June 16 , 1992 .
Action Requested
The Review Committee respectfully requests that the Mayor and Board
of City Commissioners ( 1 ) hear the firms ' presentations, (2 ) rank
the firms , if possible, or set a date-certain for Commission
ranking, and ( 3 ) when appropriate, authorize the Architect
Selection Committee to proceed with negotiations with the
top-ranked firm.
MEB: f dg
meb. 43
SUMMARY: CH-MS Architects
EXHIBIT 1 Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a ) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? ( 0-10 ) 35
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to ,the City? (0-9 ) 2,7
4 . Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall ( 0-10 ) 33
Police Station ( 0-10 )
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? ( 0-6 ) 22.
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer ' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? ( 0-10 ) 36
b) Is the recent, current, and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8 ) 2.5
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) 28
CH-MS Architects
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal :
a) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? (0-8 ) _
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
( i.e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) (0-8 ) 5
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) a0
8 . Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 ) J�
TOTAL: 100 .248
FORM/1
SUMMARY: C.T. Hsu & Associates
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? (0-10 ) 44
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to -the City? (0-9 ) 37
4. Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall (0-10 ) 31
Police Station (0-10 ) 38
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? ( 0-6 ) .25
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer ' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? (0-10 ) 1+6
b) Is the recent, current, and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8 ) 34
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) 4a.
C.T. Hsu & Assoc.
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal:
a) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? ( 0-8 ) 33
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
(i. e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) (0-8 ) 2.q
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement ,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) 43
8. Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 )
TOTAL: 100 1407
FORM/i
SUMMARY: The Scott Companies
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? ( 0-10 ) 37
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to the City? ( 0-9 ) 31
4. Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall (0-10 ) .27
Police Station (0-10 ) a.5
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? (0-6 ) 19
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? ( 0-10 ) 3
b) Is the recent , current , and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8) e2.6
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) 37
SUMMARY: Schenkel & Shultz
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? ( 0-10 ) 2,9
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to .the City? (0-9 ) .26
4. Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall (0-10 ) 2 7
Police Station (0-10 ) 2.14
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? ( 0-6 ) .20
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? (0-10 ) 32
b) Is the recent, current, and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8 ) 2,7
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) 39
Schenkel & Shultz
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
a 6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal :
a) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? ( 0-8 )
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
(i.e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) ( 0_8) 6
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) 35
8 . Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 )
TOTAL: 100 264?
FORM/1
SUMMARY: Nick Jones & Associates
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? ( 0-10 ) 31
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to .the City? ( 0-9 ) o7
4. Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall (0-10 ) 31+
Police Station (0-10 ) _
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? ( 0-6 ) Iq
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? (0-10 ) 2c2..
b) Is the recent, current , and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8 ) 15
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) II
Nick Jones & Assoc.
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal :
a ) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? ( 0-8 ) 23
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
(i. e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) ( 0-8)
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) 30
8 . Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 )
TOTAL: 100 264
FORM/1
The Scott Co.
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal :
a) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? (0-8 ) a.6
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
(i .e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) ( 0-8) a.$
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) 37
8 . Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 ) 5
TOTAL: 100 332,
FORM/1
SUMMARY: Stottler Stagg & Associates
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? ( 0-10 )
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to the City? ( 0-9 ) 28
4 . Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall (0-10 ) 35
Police Station (0-10 )
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? ( 0-6 )
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? (0-10 ) 35
b) Is the recent, current, and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8 ) 33
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) 37
Stottler Stagg & Assoc.
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal:
a) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? (0-0 )
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
(i . e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) ( 0-8 ) a,q
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) 39
8. Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 ) 3
TOTAL: 100 347
FORM/1
SUMMARY: William Zettel Assoc.
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
3 . Ability to provide the type and
quality of services that will best
meet the needs of the City:
a) Does the proposal exhibit a
clear understanding of the
extent of work and coordination
involved in this project? ( 0-10 ) 144
b) Is the proposal specific and
tailored to ,the City? ( 0-9 ) 40
4. Quality and extent of experience with
municipal government projects :
a) Are the professional personnel
assigned to work with or
consult with the City on this
project experienced in municipal
projects?
City Hall ( 0-10 ) 38
Police Station (0-10 ) .37
b) Are the project references
commensurate with Ocoee ' s
project? (0-6 ) 25
5 . Willingness and ability to complete
the project within the time and budget
constraints, considering the proposer' s
current and projected workload:
a) Has the proposer provided concrete
information indicating willingness
to meet time and budget require-
ments for completion of services? (0-10 ) 3 7
b) Is the recent, current , and
projected work under contract
spelled out with provisions
to add this project? ( 0-8 ) 20
c ) Did the previous major projects
completed within the last five
years stay within the original
budget? ( 0-10 ) 38
Wm. Zettel Assoc.
Possible
Criteria
Points Score
6 . Degree of imagination, creativity,
and innovation reflected in proposal :
a) Does the proposal use Starke Lake
as a focal point? (0-8 ) 34-
b) Does the proposal include integration
of current architectural design?
(i .e. , incorporation of existing
buildings with renovations into
new design) (0-8 ) 37
7 . Fiscal stability of firm:
a) Based on the financial statement,
does the firm appear stable? (0-10 ) 35
8 . Minority Business Enterprise participation
on proposed project team:
a) Does the firm propose Minority
Business Enterprise participation
on the project team? (0-1 )
TOTAL: 100 386
FORM/1
N 2 M 1-3
n
o c wx 0 r L x H1-1
Z 5i H tt tB r H a +J
tei 0 H Lei 0
cn H fp 0 w r Rem
Re H cA O H co >
to 2 C
w to H 2 u 0
O N H Sp O
O tsi 0
c >
cn
cn
O >
O xi
0
X
H
O H
0:3' M
IA 01 ati a 01 01 a bd 0
4:• m w .P Oti Oa tel H
cA a
x �
ar
, z
tit)
MI tsi ►Hcct's'
0, 01 alk c1 c1 a, 4.c. • H
O N I" to ,401 0
2 •
O ijg
z rows
H
r o
f-► • Z
rnZci)
cn - a
x Z
-1 01 01 0) -4 CO 0) H H H
01 41. NS w Co) tO 0
tO H
N) hi
r
tsi0
xi O
C71 01 0' 01 �.1 �.7 7 t+i 2
w v1 01 0 0 14, cr1 z r
tt Lai
>4
ai
t -4 aa, w a
tt..) 1-4
d
tV N N w w w ,t► H
01 01 01 w bP 0) 0 O
FP 0) t0 N ...7 01 ..1 H
r
EXHIBIT 2
CITY HALL AND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES REQUIREMENTS
Net square footage requirement ( includes existing)
CITY HALL 12 ,200 ( 1993 )
13 ,000 (1998 )
POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 ,000 ( 1993 )
10 ,000 ( 1998 )
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
SITE PLAN:
• New facility should encourage visibility of and proper entry
into site. This goal is hindered as long as the existing
police station remains, thus blocking public view into
complex.
• The use of landscaping and courtyards to link various
elements, and to take advantage of the natural slope of the
site.
• Possible swap of the police department with the present city
hall .
• Facility should not be in the existing park area.
• Separation of public traffic from Public Safety (Emergency)
vehicles .
• Move entrance to complex to the south between Fire Department
and Withers-Maguire House.
• "Campus" arrangement - perimeter parking with walkways to all
buildings .
• Heavily landscaped "courtyard" .
•
• Heavily landscaped parking - tree cover.
• Description of treatment of existing ditch.
• Treatment of stormwater retention. Not purely conceptual.
BUILDING:
• Exterior should reflect a blending of styles within the site.
• The new facility should anticipate a future renovation of the
existing community center.
• An outside porch element similar to the one at the Withers-
Maguire House would be useful . This area can be used as an
overflow area for heavily attended Commission meetings .
• Buildings should be a departure from the rectangular form of
the present buildings.
• Orientation of facility towards Starke Lake.
• Exterior of building should blend with existing styles on
site, but a literal replication of the Withers-Maguire House
could not work as a practical and suitable design.
• Description of phasing of new construction and renovation.
• Possible drop for utility payment .
INTERIOR DESIGN:
• Public areas should be warm, inviting and calm.
• Theater style fixed seating would benefit the Commission
Chambers .
• Commissioners bench should be designed so that seated
officials are at eye level with the back half of the audience.
Does not want to see the Commission looking down on the
audience.
• Sound system in and around Commission chambers should work to
the benefit of hard-of-hearing citizens.
• Visibility for media cameras is important in the Commission
Chambers.
• The Commissioners bench should be flat surfaced, without a top
edge . This gives the public a better view of the seated
officials .
• Public spaces should have the priority of the lake view -
would like to see the Commission Chambers oriented such that
the view can be appreciated by the citizens in the chambers .
• The new facility needs to be comfortable, and adequately
suited to the working needs of the city employees .
• If design allows, (2 ) smaller Commissioners ' workrooms needed
instead of ( 1 ) larger room. Adequate storage space is needed
for this area.
• The project budget takes highest priority.
/CHPD1
c r• E r tri O_ > C) Z :G
o 0 r 0 go 0 O' Pi 0
2 c+ rt- C) cn a r• n) p) m
5 (D tr 1-- (D J4 I- ¢1 I- H
(D h Z (D r• c+ H. H
O 0 w a o c+ c+ H. c+ to
c+ C) rt. r• M 'C C .< CI
cn c+ 0 O H. H
H. H)0a E c+ c+ O •.
O 1••b 0 0 `4 rh
0 N r cn P) E
I-,•.>a C r
"dO r x
o ,ra E E 0 r• m
I✓ r• r• w 0
c+ 1--t � 0- H. 1-, A°
o• 0 o c+ a A
po utt r• r• v)
1✓ 0 m
m tt C
n
H
-- ----- -- -- a
A E (D r 0 E (n c+ 0 ro a 0 H
o as k O (D c+ 0 • y a '1 tzi
C r' -tr c+ x 1 P (D (D 0 go bd cn
(D I✓ (D (n (D 0 • rt r• O >
0 E r• O Z r• (D O `4 r• N
(D c+ O (D h-, 0 Q. c+ 0 M
/i O 0
c+ (D O rl O (D C 0 Z
• - c V ?' aa a et- 0 Z
M P+ go 134 r. ri- t0
E1 (n0 (n m � �.
O 0 (D oa G c+
n 5 a (D t?• - tri
m 0 • u) I 1m1
c+ tri
c+ 11 Pz7
til
0"0 11 0 0 v• N b 0 0
(D 1'1 (D • O 5 r• 1 — ti tri
O f 1-3 x a- CD c+ (D
0' 7'd • y 0- & c+
0 1-, o va H. c+ 2 (D tzl x
rM0 (D p • p '-< b
�
a09ww 0 o
O w r• 0 a7 IA n 0
CD < < °C 0 0 P, O
(n 0 (D (D I a 0 y z
y 11 c+ as a
E O '4 , (D C cr
CD CD'd 0w '10 CD c. c...••
H.
• "d r E I-,
0
tt
0 b 'b t'1 d E G-)b t'7 FC : (n go O E 0C D M
b 1i t--, x O (D (D h ?! (D t 0 0 0 1-y F.. I—I
It O go C) 1-- 1- c+ O n Cl) O 1- a 1- 11 0 C CO
11 1•hp (D r• I� (n O' (D G c+ r• N''g0H
O (D (n 1-- c+ N N "i P1 la a' h-+ c H
r
po in • 1-, E co CD 0 O M E 1- O
D C) r• 1-- ' '1 O w
O C ( • 9 (D E c+ r
O 1.1 • m
0' r 0 r c+ O (n 0 0 (n a•• c+ 0
0 c+ PO 0" 0 c+ `C H. O•' ii �i
10 0 W P1 : IC)
1-, C Cl)Po ap C ch l E c+ O O P
i-3 0 (D W 0 I • - < r• m • I-- 0
O I-• 11 N O I- Pt '7a 0-
t7 r• °C I- 1--, C c* p- (D t21 O
b
O 1 O fi ti
_ ___________ _____,—
P>
0 r E r• till O' a n 10 gJ
O O r• O A) Z v' ~i Z cl
D � m J � A) �
(D 1 G (D H. cr H. H
O P) Ell a O c+ c+ r• c+ tzl
c+ n fir• HD 'e,' C -C a
co cs- Po O r H
r• h,')C E c+ c+ 0 ••
O 1••h 0 0 "C +h
O ,yq 1
cD (D cu go E H
a• c+ 0 Co 5:1, 11 r
r. A .0 H
O 134 O r• X
N r• r• r•
r• PO rh c+ c+ () N
c+ i••� 7' 1-.• 1--, H
r• 0 r• co
n O O er a .3
DD 'Al, r• r• tri
rJ C O C'
CD iits
A°
E E 0 E V x z < • r• to
CD N 0 0 N Do O (D cD r• c+ C/l
i••r r, rh u] (n II n Cb O
h•. NcrrO b '< r >. n
E Do E 0 11 0 0 ''c, A) l-h H
I-.• n H. h 0- o
c+ crcr4D r F-' 0 t-1 M tzi
7 O O' O m cD a o (D o Cn
r" � aa 2 CDM z
r+ n
O E P3 O �• fi Z C7
O 0 r• Z c+
h O I-' 0- r•Ict til
m • 0
(D a O �
a m
0 z
c+ E A) c+ E h Cn I-. E b H ,-C O r• 0
O" 0 Ict 0• go P3 r• fi cD 1 i-t) (D • £ c+ tx1
CD 1 Do fD u) er O 1 0 w x
`C N-- r• C 0-' n (D Cr rt- • c+ 0
O x (D (D N 7 (D 0 x
Da• N• a O h y it
art. z C as 1
rt. i r• O
aoo �o P
uq O n
m n ' c+ O 2 y
DD Z
c+ u) (1)•
mE c+
Po 7 1
'l N (D
RetCD
go m
m r
Cx
' r• N N go (D .< CI 1
O a 'C r• E Po (D ua
rhVD 0 O b
1-1-
1
r (n 1-h 11- c+
I-43 1-1.
PO t En
00. b b N cD > 0r•
110 0 0 n al 1..ir'
I- O ‘:-.. O c+ cfr
r• cr y
O 0 & (D 4n• G
En
0- :f n O t.4A r'
1•-+ I•- er a O in
C E Cl- Q- o o o
E (D r• • O
o fi O cr
hay+ m 1-1e* -
I E 0t
O
r• O
0' a
_ __ _ --�
CD r• E r• ti O n x1
i -....-.. . --__ _ _____
O • r• AJ y C7
9 cr c+ 0CL r• CD Sb x
CD 0' I— CD J4 N ¢1 N H
CD n CD r• c+ r•
O A) En CLO
n cr c+ c+ r• c+ 1-3
lzJ
c+ r -b .0 C 'C n
0) c+ 0 0
I-.•
`3
I-1. l4 E c+ c+ 0 .•
O H-b O O C 1-h
0 a) c+ 0 0 0
CL c+ 0 A) an .3
r•r `C .3
0 04 0•
E E
ur• tt
1✓ r• r• r• 0 X
r• c+ cr c* C)
c+ F..,, 0- r• F••, CA
r• O w P) G I-3
0 0 0 c+ CL a
A'- 04
I ' C 0 0
CD Q4
A°
-- -- n a
J4 0 0 fri CD CD O CD CD CD F•'! CD A' b C) c+ Cr)
P 0 C o 't7 P ti h 1-i Cn 0 En u) b 1-n -`" 13:1 0
r• NF-' �. CD CI) W CD • - . 1i C n
O CL CL CD 0 0 >r 0 CD ^ 0 r• ° (7) H
0 O. 0 0 0 m a' C) C "d O '"'' x a
b Si c+ r• En N- 0 CD Z c1• y y 0
0 CD 0 0 < c+ -- go r•
., 0 O Cr)
CTE c+ E 11 c+ c+ cc+ CL
AD CD 0' 0 0 0 A) 0' CD r• CT Z
c+ 0
• 1•- 0 A) 1-, '1 c+ 0 d
gi
Al CD 0 r• 0 t'i
O CD C CD "xi
Cl) Cn B tri
CD '" x1
tl7
C)- - Z
b 0' E H CD P) 1-3 ''C b 1 0
1 P r• 0' C I—' 0' CD 11 c+ tri
. O CL c+ CD CD 0 CD Cl) CD
7 • 7 •• 0 "C c+ 0 0
V 0 � Cl c N °
EE , tri
1-1 £ 0" 0 0E01 0 CI
e< 0A) '1 CD CD CD '14 CD Z
O c+ I-, 9 0 0
Cr I—, CD 1—' CD 0 tv si
CD E a a 'b 7'
CD E 1-,- c+ P
m 'CCD c+ 0 11Z
04 I—, 0 c+ r•
O 1-1 J4 — 0
r• CD 5
O c+ r.
b CLE E --- --.0 O — x
l C 0 CD 0 CD CD C r'
O 1 h 0 1 Cn En CD 'JQ
u. r• 1 ca. 1-, .0 (•r CCT 0"
(D 0 C r• CL co r• n 1✓
O '4 CL E 0 Cr 1'• P
c+ AJ 0 0 CD CL 'I 0 0
c+ CT •- w N r. A) 14 CL
0" 0 c+ CD 1-� 0 i (I)
r• 0 A `< 170
En c+ 7' 0 0
O• CD r• r• 0
C) 0 C) c+
0" c+ .0
0 I
0 r• E r• Cr1 ^O' a 0 0 x7
O 0 r• 0 go 0 CT' 1-1 0 a
2 c+ c+ 0 (n ar• (D DD x
3 (D 0+ I-' (D UC N 0 N H
() n 0 cD H. c+ H. H
O A, W a0 (-t- c+ H. rt" C21
(+ C) cf H. 1-h 'C C 'ti' a
Cl) c+ ill> 0 H. 1-3
r• h-h OC E rr c-F O
0 H 0 0 '-1 I-h
03 (D r (n P E x
O c+ r. c+ 0 0 txi
a H.ADC 'Si, Cr)
Oam E E 0 r O
1— r. H. w 0 H
I'• PO c+ c+ c+ 0 H
c+ 1--' 0" 0' r• N
O 0 0 fi( 1 O
O UC r• r• X
0 Z
c I-1
— ---- --- CD C] tri
aadx E c.n '-C 'v 1 r'
r• (D ti r• 1 r-h 0 0 () 01
c+ +h C) h 0 b Cl) (D ,• CO
0 r• 7 cD 0 0 x' (D c+
O H. C) (D m 1 rt• 0 0
ti I-n>b r• c+ cr H. E � 'c
oC c+ (D o -- 0 w 0 0
0
0 - 00Cn (n 0
- 0 cr. c+ , a 0 z
0 E a0 < c+. • o d
+ (D
1 o cO
N- a m
O. 11 C11
— til
a Z
go E E d trl E E ►c C -- a
UC (D 0 1 >4 H. 0 cD (D 1.xj c+ tx1
il 1-' 0 0 C) c+ y (n y r -•. ar• H' I-' 1-h (D x• '-< y a
O• a cscDi 1~ (D Q. E Al °, n
�' as1-. p (Dc + 0 cn r
E C) 0 c+ n co Or a go o cn
O 0 0 - 'c +i H. rt- 0
1 9 Po (T'c 0 H. DQ
B 1-' 0 O
(D - aE cr 0 0
+ a 0 H
ccA
O✓ A, a (D
Cl) c+
C/)
41 E C z '-c z
! OC 0 r• 0 cD H. 0 H.
H. 1-, ¢ b COD o r'- a
I 0 ago 1 1 (D H.
0 1-i c+
E 0 0 0
or• crbo
ti C) CD r. ri 0
(D N r•
C N 0
E C-.• 0 UC
c+ VW in
0 C)
c+
1 a •i
t